Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request, 53376-53377 [2010-21669]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
53376
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 168 / Tuesday, August 31, 2010 / Notices
In addressing the specific content
requirements of 543.6, Chrysler
provided information on the reliability
and durability of the device. Chrysler
conducted tests based on its own
specified standards and stated its belief
that the device meets the stringent
performance standards prescribed.
Specifically, Chrysler stated that its
device must demonstrate a minimum of
95 percent reliability with 90 percent
confidence. In addition to the design
and production validation test criteria,
Chrysler stated that the SKIS device also
undergoes a daily short term durability
test and 100 percent of its systems
undergo a series of three functional tests
for durability prior to being shipped
from the supplier to the vehicle
assembly plant for installation in its
vehicles.
Chrysler also stated that each ignition
key used in the SKIS device has an
integral transponder chip included on
the circuit board beneath the cover of
the integral Remote Keyless Entry (RKE)
transmitter. Chrysler further stated that
in addition to having to be cut to match
the mechanical coding of the ignition
lock cylinder and programmed for
operation of the RKE system, each new
Sentry Key has a unique transponder
identification code that is permanently
programmed into it by the
manufacturer, and must be programmed
into the SKREEM to be recognized by
the SKIS device as a valid key. Chrysler
stated that once a transponder key has
been programmed to a particular
vehicle, it cannot be used on any other
vehicle.
Chrysler stated that while there is no
theft data available for the Fiat 500
because it is a new vehicle line
introduction, the theft rate experience of
the Jeep Grand Cherokee which has
been installed with the SKIS
immobilizer device since MY 1999
indicates that it is projected to have a
theft rate lower than the median theft
rate. Chrysler stated that NHTSA’s theft
rate data for the Jeep Grand Cherokee
indicates that the inclusion of a
standard immobilizer system has
resulted in a 52.3 percent net average
reduction in vehicle thefts for the Jeep
Grand Cherokee vehicle line. The
average theft rate for the Jeep Grand
Cherokee vehicle for four model years
prior to installation of an immobilizer
device as standard equipment (1995–
1998) was 5.3574, which is significantly
higher than the 1990/1991 median theft
rate of 3.5826. However, the average
theft rate for the six model years after
installation of the standard immobilizer
device (1999–2005) was 2.5492, which
is significantly lower than the median.
The Jeep Grand Cherokee vehicle line
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:33 Aug 30, 2010
Jkt 220001
was granted an exemption from the
parts-marking requirements beginning
with MY 2004. Chrysler stated that it
expects Fiat 500 vehicles equipped with
standard ignition immobilizer systems
to mirror the results achieved by the
Jeep Cherokee vehicles when ignition
immobilizer devices were included as
standard equipment.
Based on the supporting evidence
submitted by Chrysler on the Jeep Grand
Cherokee, the agency believes that the
antitheft device for the Fiat 500 vehicle
line is likely to be as effective in
reducing and deterring motor vehicle
theft as compliance with the partsmarking requirements of the Theft
Prevention Standard (49 CFR 541). The
agency concludes that the device will
provide four of the five types of
performance listed in § 543.6(a)(3):
Promoting activation; preventing defeat
or circumvention of the device by
unauthorized persons; preventing
operation of the vehicle by
unauthorized entrants; and ensuring the
reliability and durability of the device.
Pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 33106 and 49
CFR 543.7 (b), the agency grants a
petition for exemption from the partsmarking requirements of Part 541, either
in whole or in part, if it determines that,
based upon supporting evidence, the
standard equipment antitheft device is
likely to be as effective in reducing and
deterring motor vehicle theft as
compliance with the parts-marking
requirements of Part 541. The agency
finds that Chrysler has provided
adequate reasons for its belief that the
antitheft device for the Fiat 500 vehicle
line is likely to be as effective in
reducing and deterring motor vehicle
theft as compliance with the partsmarking requirements of the Theft
Prevention Standard (49 CFR Part 541).
This conclusion is based on the
information Chrysler provided about its
device.
For the foregoing reasons, the agency
hereby grants in full Chrysler’s petition
for an exemption for the MY 2012 Fiat
500 vehicle line from the parts-marking
requirements of 49 CFR Part 541. The
agency notes that 49 CFR Part 541,
Appendix A–1, identifies those lines
that are exempted from the Theft
Prevention Standard for a given model
year. 49 CFR Part 543.7(f) contains
publication requirements with respect
to the disposition of all Part 543
petitions. Advanced listing, including
the release of future product
nameplates, the beginning model year
for which the petition is granted and a
general description of the antitheft
device is necessary in order to notify
law enforcement agencies of new
vehicle lines exempted from the parts-
PO 00000
Frm 00106
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
marking requirements of the Theft
Prevention Standard.
If Chrysler decides not to use the
exemption for this vehicle line, it must
formally notify the agency. If such a
decision is made, the vehicle line must
be fully marked as required by 49 CFR
Parts 541.5 and 541.6 (marking of major
component parts and replacement
parts).
NHTSA notes that if Chrysler wishes
in the future to modify the device on
which this exemption is based, the
company may have to submit a petition
to modify the exemption. Part 543.7(d)
states that a Part 543 exemption applies
only to vehicles that belong to a line
exempted under this part and equipped
with the anti-theft device on which the
line’s exemption is based. Further,
§ 543.9(c)(2) provides for the submission
of petitions to modify an exemption to
permit the use of an antitheft device
similar to but differing from the one
specified in that exemption.
The agency wishes to minimize the
administrative burden that Part
543.9(c)(2) could place on exempted
vehicle manufacturers and itself. The
agency did not intend Part 543 to
require the submission of a modification
petition for every change to the
components or design of an antitheft
device. The significance of many such
changes could be de minimis. Therefore,
NHTSA suggests that if the
manufacturer contemplates making any
changes the effects of which might be
characterized as de minimis, it should
consult the agency before preparing and
submitting a petition to modify.
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 33106; delegation of
authority at 49 CFR 1.50.
Issued on: August 26, 2010.
Joseph S. Carra,
Acting Associate Administrator for
Rulemaking.
[FR Doc. 2010–21758 Filed 8–30–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–59–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Submission for OMB Review;
Comment Request
August 25, 2010.
The Department of the Treasury will
submit the following public information
collection requirement(s) to OMB for
review and clearance under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995,
Public Law 104–13 on or after the date
of publication of this notice. Copies of
the submission(s) may be obtained by
calling the Treasury Bureau Clearance
Officer listed. Comments regarding this
information collection should be
E:\FR\FM\31AUN1.SGM
31AUN1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 168 / Tuesday, August 31, 2010 / Notices
addressed to the OMB reviewer listed
and to the Treasury Department
Clearance Officer, Department of the
Treasury, Room 11000, 1750
Pennsylvania Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20220.
DATES: Written comments should be
received on or before September 30,
2010 to be assured of consideration.
Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade
Bureau (TTB)
OMB Number: 1513–0005.
Type of Review: Extension without
change of a currently approved
collection.
Title: Letterhead applications and
notices filed by brewers TTB REC 5130/
2.
Form: TTB F 5130.10.
Abstract: The Internal Revenue Code
requires brewers to file a notice of intent
to operate a brewery. TTB F 5130.10 is
similar to a permit and, when approved
by TTB, is a brewer’s authorization to
operate. Letterhead applications and
notices are necessary to identify
brewery activities so that TTB may
ensure that proposed operations do not
jeopardize Federal revenues.
Respondents: Private Sector:
Businesses or other for-profits.
Estimated Total Burden Hours: 10,593
hours.
Clearance Officer: Gerald Isenberg,
Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade
Bureau, Room 200 East, 1310 G Street,
NW., Washington, DC 20005; (202) 453–
2097
OMB Reviewer: Shagufta Ahmed,
Office of Management and Budget, New
Executive Office Building, Room 10235,
Washington, DC 20503; (202) 395–7873.
Celina M. Elphage,
Treasury PRA Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 2010–21669 Filed 8–30–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810–31–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Office of Foreign Assets Control
Designation of One Individual
Pursuant to Executive Order 13224
Office of Foreign Assets
Control, Treasury.
ACTION: Notice.
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
AGENCY:
The Treasury Department’s
Office of Foreign Assets Control
(‘‘OFAC’’) is publishing the names of one
newly-designated individual whose
property and interests in property are
blocked pursuant to Executive Order
13224 of September 23, 2001, ‘‘Blocking
Property and Prohibiting Transactions
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:33 Aug 30, 2010
Jkt 220001
With Persons Who Commit, Threaten To
Commit, or Support Terrorism.’’
DATES: The designation by the Director
of OFAC of the individual identified in
this notice, pursuant to Executive Order
13224, is effective on August 24, 2010.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Assistant Director, Compliance
Outreach & Implementation, Office of
Foreign Assets Control, Department of
the Treasury, Washington, DC 20220,
tel.: 202/622–2490.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Electronic and Facsimile Availability
This document and additional
information concerning OFAC are
available from OFAC’s Web site (https://
www.treas.gov/ofac) or via facsimile
through a 24-hour fax-on-demand
service, tel.: 202/622–0077.
Background
On September 23, 2001, the President
issued Executive Order 13224 (the
‘‘Order’’) pursuant to the International
Emergency Economic Powers Act, 50
U.S.C. 1701–1706, and the United
Nations Participation Act of 1945, 22
U.S.C. 287c. In the Order, the President
declared a national emergency to
address grave acts of terrorism and
threats of terrorism committed by
foreign terrorists, including the
September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks in
New York, Pennsylvania, and at the
Pentagon. The Order imposes economic
sanctions on persons who have
committed, pose a significant risk of
committing, or support acts of terrorism.
The President identified in the Annex to
the Order, as amended by Executive
Order 13268 of July 2, 2002, 13
individuals and 16 entities as subject to
the economic sanctions. The Order was
further amended by Executive Order
13284 of January 23, 2003, to reflect the
creation of the Department of Homeland
Security.
Section 1 of the Order blocks, with
certain exceptions, all property and
interests in property that are in or
hereafter come within the United States
or the possession or control of United
States persons, of: (1) Foreign persons
listed in the Annex to the Order; (2)
foreign persons determined by the
Secretary of State, in consultation with
the Secretary of the Treasury, the
Secretary of the Department of
Homeland Security and the Attorney
General, to have committed, or to pose
a significant risk of committing, acts of
terrorism that threaten the security of
U.S. nationals or the national security,
foreign policy, or economy of the United
States; (3) persons determined by the
Director of OFAC, in consultation with
PO 00000
Frm 00107
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 9990
53377
the Departments of State, Homeland
Security and Justice, to be owned or
controlled by, or to act for or on behalf
of those persons listed in the Annex to
the Order or those persons determined
to be subject to subsection 1(b), 1(c), or
1(d)(i) of the Order; and (4) except as
provided in section 5 of the Order and
after such consultation, if any, with
foreign authorities as the Secretary of
State, in consultation with the Secretary
of the Treasury, the Secretary of the
Department of Homeland Security and
the Attorney General, deems
appropriate in the exercise of his
discretion, persons determined by the
Director of OFAC, in consultation with
the Departments of State, Homeland
Security and Justice, to assist in,
sponsor, or provide financial, material,
or technological support for, or financial
or other services to or in support of,
such acts of terrorism or those persons
listed in the Annex to the Order or
determined to be subject to the Order or
to be otherwise associated with those
persons listed in the Annex to the Order
or those persons determined to be
subject to subsection 1(b), 1(c), or 1(d)(i)
of the Order.
On August 24, 2010 the Director of
OFAC, in consultation with the
Departments of State, Homeland
Security, Justice and other relevant
agencies, designated, pursuant to one or
more of the criteria set forth in
subsections 1(b), 1(c) or 1(d) of the
Order, one individual whose property
and interests in property are blocked
pursuant to Executive Order 13224.
The designee is as follows:
1. ABU–AL–KHAYR, Muhammad
Abdallah Hasan (a.k.a. ABU–AL–
KHAYR, Muhammad Bin-’Abdullah
Bin-Hamd; a.k.a. ABUL–KHAIR,
Mohammed Abdullah Hassan; a.k.a.
AL–HALABI, Abdallah; a.k.a. AL–
HALABI, Abdullah; a.k.a. AL–HALABI,
Abu ’Abdallah; a.k.a. AL–JADDAWI,
Muhannad; a.k.a. AL–MADANI,
’Abdallah al-Halabi; a.k.a. AL–
MADANI, Abu Abdallah; a.k.a. AL–
MAKKI, Abdallah; a.k.a. EL HALABI,
Abdallah); DOB 19 Jun 1975; alt. DOB
18 Jun 1975; POB Al-Madinah alMunawwarah, (Medina) Saudi Arabia;
National ID No. 1006010555 (Saudi
Arabia); Passport A741097 (Saudi
Arabia) issued 14 Nov 1995 expires 19
Sep 2000 (individual) [SDGT].
Dated: August 24, 2010.
Barbara C. Hammerle,
Acting Director, Office of Foreign Assets
Control.
[FR Doc. 2010–21670 Filed 8–30–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810–AL–P
E:\FR\FM\31AUN1.SGM
31AUN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 168 (Tuesday, August 31, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 53376-53377]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-21669]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request
August 25, 2010.
The Department of the Treasury will submit the following public
information collection requirement(s) to OMB for review and clearance
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13 on or
after the date of publication of this notice. Copies of the
submission(s) may be obtained by calling the Treasury Bureau Clearance
Officer listed. Comments regarding this information collection should
be
[[Page 53377]]
addressed to the OMB reviewer listed and to the Treasury Department
Clearance Officer, Department of the Treasury, Room 11000, 1750
Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20220.
DATES: Written comments should be received on or before September 30,
2010 to be assured of consideration.
Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau (TTB)
OMB Number: 1513-0005.
Type of Review: Extension without change of a currently approved
collection.
Title: Letterhead applications and notices filed by brewers TTB REC
5130/2.
Form: TTB F 5130.10.
Abstract: The Internal Revenue Code requires brewers to file a
notice of intent to operate a brewery. TTB F 5130.10 is similar to a
permit and, when approved by TTB, is a brewer's authorization to
operate. Letterhead applications and notices are necessary to identify
brewery activities so that TTB may ensure that proposed operations do
not jeopardize Federal revenues.
Respondents: Private Sector: Businesses or other for-profits.
Estimated Total Burden Hours: 10,593 hours.
Clearance Officer: Gerald Isenberg, Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and
Trade Bureau, Room 200 East, 1310 G Street, NW., Washington, DC 20005;
(202) 453-2097
OMB Reviewer: Shagufta Ahmed, Office of Management and Budget, New
Executive Office Building, Room 10235, Washington, DC 20503; (202) 395-
7873.
Celina M. Elphage,
Treasury PRA Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 2010-21669 Filed 8-30-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-31-P
