Determination of Regulatory Review Period for Purposes of Patent Extension; PRISTIQ, 53314-53315 [2010-21586]
Download as PDF
53314
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 168 / Tuesday, August 31, 2010 / Notices
TABLE 1.—PROPOSED DESIGN (4 X 5 + 2)
Efficacy Level
Information Type
Smallest Effect
Smaller Effect
Mid-Size Effect
Larger Effect
Largest Effect
Absolute Frequency
81% vs. 82%
61% vs. 82%
41% vs. 82%
21% vs. 82%
1% vs. 82%
Absolute Frequency +
Qualitative Label
Fewer
81% vs. 82%
Fewer
61% vs. 82%
Fewer
41% vs. 82%
Fewer
21% vs. 82%
Fewer
1% vs. 82%
Absolute Difference +
Qualitative Label
Fewer (1%)
Fewer (21%)
Fewer (41%)
Fewer (61%)
Fewer (81%)
Absolute Frequency +
Absolute Difference +
Qualitative Label
Fewer (1%)
81% vs. 82%
Fewer (21%)
61% vs. 82%
Fewer (41%)
41% vs. 82%
Fewer (61%)
21% vs. 82%
Fewer (81%)
1% vs. 82%
Note. Two other cells will be tested: (1) No information and (2) Qualitative label only (fewer). This design (22 cells) will also be used to test risk
information (for a total of 44 cells). The specific numbers in the table are placeholders only. Qualitative label example: ‘‘fewer people taking drug
X had disease/symptom Y.’’
The test product will be for the
treatment of high prevalence medical
condition and modeled on an actual
drug used to treat that condition.
Participants will be consumers who
have been diagnosed with the medical
condition of interest. They will be
randomly assigned to read one ad
version. After reading the ad,
participants will answer a series of
questions about the drug. We will test
how the information type affects
perceived efficacy, perceived risk,
behavioral intention, and accurate
understanding of the benefit and risk
information.
Interviews are expected to last no
more than 20 minutes. A total of 11,750
participants will be involved in the
study. This will be a one-time (rather
than annual) collection of information.
FDA estimates the burden of this
collection of information as follows:
TABLE 2.—ESTIMATED ANNUAL REPORTING BURDEN1
No. of
Respondents
Activity
Pretest
Annual Frequency
per Response
Total Annual
Responses
Hours per
Response
750
1
750
20 minutes
250
11,000
Main Study
1
11,000
20 minutes
3,667
Total
3,917
1 There
are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of information.
Dated: August 25, 2010.
Leslie Kux,
Acting Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2010–21629 Filed 8–30–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160–01–S
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA–2009–E–0084]
Determination of Regulatory Review
Period for Purposes of Patent
Extension; PRISTIQ
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
HHS.
ACTION:
Total Hours
Notice.
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) has determined
the regulatory review period for
PRISTIQ and is publishing this notice of
that determination as required by law.
FDA has made the determination
because of the submission of
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:33 Aug 30, 2010
Jkt 220001
applications to the Director of Patents
and Trademarks, Department of
Commerce, for the extension of patents
which claim that human drug product.
ADDRESSES: Submit electronic
comments to https://
www.regulations.gov. Submit written
petitions along with three copies and
written comments to the Division of
Dockets Management (HFA–305), Food
and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers
Lane, rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Beverly Friedman, Office of Regulatory
Policy, Food and Drug Administration,
10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 51,
rm. 6222, Silver Spring, MD 20993–
0002, 301–796–3602.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Drug
Price Competition and Patent Term
Restoration Act of 1984 (Public Law 98–
417) and the Generic Animal Drug and
Patent Term Restoration Act (Public
Law 100–670) generally provide that a
patent may be extended for a period of
up to 5 years so long as the patented
item (human drug product, animal drug
PO 00000
Frm 00044
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
product, medical device, food additive,
or color additive) was subject to
regulatory review by FDA before the
item was marketed. Under these acts, a
product’s regulatory review period
forms the basis for determining the
amount of extension an applicant may
receive.
A regulatory review period consists of
two periods of time: A testing phase and
an approval phase. For human drug
products, the testing phase begins when
the exemption to permit the clinical
investigations of the drug becomes
effective and runs until the approval
phase begins. The approval phase starts
with the initial submission of an
application to market the human drug
product and continues until FDA grants
permission to market the drug product.
Although only a portion of a regulatory
review period may count toward the
actual amount of extension that the
Director of Patents and Trademarks may
award (for example, half the testing
phase must be subtracted as well as any
time that may have occurred before the
E:\FR\FM\31AUN1.SGM
31AUN1
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 168 / Tuesday, August 31, 2010 / Notices
patent was issued), FDA’s determination
of the length of a regulatory review
period for a human drug product will
include all of the testing phase and
approval phase as specified in 35 U.S.C.
156(g)(1)(B).
FDA recently approved for marketing
the human drug product PRISTIQ
(desvenlafaxine sucinate). PRISTIQ is
indicated for treatment of major
depressive disorder. Subsequent to this
approval, the Patent and Trademark
Office received a patent term restoration
application for PRISTIQ (U.S. Patent
Nos. 6,673,838 and 7,291,347) from
Wyeth, and the Patent and Trademark
Office requested FDA’s assistance in
determining this patent’s eligibility for
patent term restoration. In a letter dated
February 17, 2010, FDA advised the
Patent and Trademark Office that this
human drug product had undergone a
regulatory review period and that the
approval of PRISTIQ represented the
first permitted commercial marketing or
use of the product. Thereafter, the
Patent and Trademark Office requested
that FDA determine the product’s
regulatory review period.
FDA has determined that the
applicable regulatory review period for
PRISTIQ is 2,124 days. Of this time,
1,324 days occurred during the testing
phase of the regulatory review period,
while 800 days occurred during the
approval phase. These periods of time
were derived from the following dates:
1. The date an exemption under
section 505(i) of the Federal Food, Drug,
and Cosmetic Act (the act) (21 U.S.C.
355(i)) became effective: May 9, 2002.
FDA has verified the applicant’s claim
that the date the investigational new
drug application became effective was
on May 9, 2002.
2. The date the application was
initially submitted with respect to the
human drug product under section
505(b) of the act: December 22, 2005.
The applicant claims December 22,
2005, as the date the new drug
application (NDA) for PRISTIQ (NDA
21–966) was initially submitted.
However, FDA records indicate that the
application initially submitted for
PRISTIQ was NDA 21–992 and FDA has
confirmed that NDA 21–992 was
initially submitted on December 22,
2005.
3. The date the application was
approved: February 29, 2008. FDA has
verified the applicant’s claim that
PRISTIQ was approved on February 29,
2008. However FDA records indicate
that it was NDA 21–992 that was
approved.
This determination of the regulatory
review period establishes the maximum
potential length of a patent extension.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:33 Aug 30, 2010
Jkt 220001
However, the U.S. Patent and
Trademark Office applies several
statutory limitations in its calculations
of the actual period for patent extension.
In its applications for patent extension,
this applicant seeks 17 days of patent
term extension.
Anyone with knowledge that any of
the dates as published are incorrect may
submit to the Division of Dockets
Management (see ADDRESSES) either
electronic or written comments and ask
for a redetermination by November 1,
2010. Furthermore, any interested
person may petition FDA for a
determination regarding whether the
applicant for extension acted with due
diligence during the regulatory review
period by [insert date 180 days after
date of publication in the Federal
Register]. To meet its burden, the
petition must contain sufficient facts to
merit an FDA investigation. (See H.
Rept. 857, part 1, 98th Cong., 2d sess.,
pp. 41–42, 1984.) Petitions should be in
the format specified in 21 CFR 10.30.
Interested persons may submit to the
Division of Dockets Management (see
ADDRESSES) electronic or written
comments and written petitions. It is
only necessary to send one set of
comments. It is no longer necessary to
send three copies of mailed comments.
However, if you submit a written
petition, you must submit three copies
of the petition. Identify comments with
the docket number found in brackets in
the heading of this document.
Comments and petitions that have not
been made publicly available on
regulations.gov may be viewed in the
Division of Dockets Management
between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday
through Friday.
Dated: August 13, 2010.
Jane A. Axelrad,
Associate Director for Policy, Center for Drug
Evaluation and Research.
[FR Doc. 2010–21586 Filed 8–30–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160–01–S
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA–2010–E–0061]
Determination of Regulatory Review
Period for Purposes of Patent
Extension; ONGLYZA
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Notice.
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) has determined
the regulatory review period for
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00045
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
53315
ONGLYZA and is publishing this notice
of that determination as required by
law. FDA has made the determination
because of the submission of an
application to the Director of Patents
and Trademarks, Department of
Commerce, for the extension of a patent
which claims that human drug product.
ADDRESSES: Submit electronic
comments to https://
www.regulations.gov. Submit written
petitions along with three copies and
written comments to the Division of
Dockets Management (HFA–305), Food
and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers
Lane, rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Beverly Friedman, Office of Regulatory
Policy, Food and Drug Administration,
10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 51,
rm. 6222, Silver Spring, MD 20993–
0002, 301–796–3602.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Drug
Price Competition and Patent Term
Restoration Act of 1984 (Public Law 98–
417) and the Generic Animal Drug and
Patent Term Restoration Act (Public
Law 100–670) generally provide that a
patent may be extended for a period of
up to 5 years so long as the patented
item (human drug product, animal drug
product, medical device, food additive,
or color additive) was subject to
regulatory review by FDA before the
item was marketed. Under these acts, a
product’s regulatory review period
forms the basis for determining the
amount of extension an applicant may
receive.
A regulatory review period consists of
two periods of time: A testing phase and
an approval phase. For human drug
products, the testing phase begins when
the exemption to permit the clinical
investigations of the drug becomes
effective and runs until the approval
phase begins. The approval phase starts
with the initial submission of an
application to market the human drug
product and continues until FDA grants
permission to market the drug product.
Although only a portion of a regulatory
review period may count toward the
actual amount of extension that the
Director of Patents and Trademarks may
award (for example, half the testing
phase must be subtracted as well as any
time that may have occurred before the
patent was issued), FDA’s determination
of the length of a regulatory review
period for a human drug product will
include all of the testing phase and
approval phase as specified in 35 U.S.C.
156(g)(1)(B).
FDA recently approved for marketing
the human drug product ONGLYZA
(saxagliptin). ONGLYZA is indicated as
an adjunct to diet and exercise to
E:\FR\FM\31AUN1.SGM
31AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 168 (Tuesday, August 31, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 53314-53315]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-21586]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA-2009-E-0084]
Determination of Regulatory Review Period for Purposes of Patent
Extension; PRISTIQ
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has determined the
regulatory review period for PRISTIQ and is publishing this notice of
that determination as required by law. FDA has made the determination
because of the submission of applications to the Director of Patents
and Trademarks, Department of Commerce, for the extension of patents
which claim that human drug product.
ADDRESSES: Submit electronic comments to https://www.regulations.gov.
Submit written petitions along with three copies and written comments
to the Division of Dockets Management (HFA-305), Food and Drug
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Beverly Friedman, Office of Regulatory
Policy, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg.
51, rm. 6222, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002, 301-796-3602.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Drug Price Competition and Patent Term
Restoration Act of 1984 (Public Law 98-417) and the Generic Animal Drug
and Patent Term Restoration Act (Public Law 100-670) generally provide
that a patent may be extended for a period of up to 5 years so long as
the patented item (human drug product, animal drug product, medical
device, food additive, or color additive) was subject to regulatory
review by FDA before the item was marketed. Under these acts, a
product's regulatory review period forms the basis for determining the
amount of extension an applicant may receive.
A regulatory review period consists of two periods of time: A
testing phase and an approval phase. For human drug products, the
testing phase begins when the exemption to permit the clinical
investigations of the drug becomes effective and runs until the
approval phase begins. The approval phase starts with the initial
submission of an application to market the human drug product and
continues until FDA grants permission to market the drug product.
Although only a portion of a regulatory review period may count toward
the actual amount of extension that the Director of Patents and
Trademarks may award (for example, half the testing phase must be
subtracted as well as any time that may have occurred before the
[[Page 53315]]
patent was issued), FDA's determination of the length of a regulatory
review period for a human drug product will include all of the testing
phase and approval phase as specified in 35 U.S.C. 156(g)(1)(B).
FDA recently approved for marketing the human drug product PRISTIQ
(desvenlafaxine sucinate). PRISTIQ is indicated for treatment of major
depressive disorder. Subsequent to this approval, the Patent and
Trademark Office received a patent term restoration application for
PRISTIQ (U.S. Patent Nos. 6,673,838 and 7,291,347) from Wyeth, and the
Patent and Trademark Office requested FDA's assistance in determining
this patent's eligibility for patent term restoration. In a letter
dated February 17, 2010, FDA advised the Patent and Trademark Office
that this human drug product had undergone a regulatory review period
and that the approval of PRISTIQ represented the first permitted
commercial marketing or use of the product. Thereafter, the Patent and
Trademark Office requested that FDA determine the product's regulatory
review period.
FDA has determined that the applicable regulatory review period for
PRISTIQ is 2,124 days. Of this time, 1,324 days occurred during the
testing phase of the regulatory review period, while 800 days occurred
during the approval phase. These periods of time were derived from the
following dates:
1. The date an exemption under section 505(i) of the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the act) (21 U.S.C. 355(i)) became effective:
May 9, 2002. FDA has verified the applicant's claim that the date the
investigational new drug application became effective was on May 9,
2002.
2. The date the application was initially submitted with respect to
the human drug product under section 505(b) of the act: December 22,
2005. The applicant claims December 22, 2005, as the date the new drug
application (NDA) for PRISTIQ (NDA 21-966) was initially submitted.
However, FDA records indicate that the application initially submitted
for PRISTIQ was NDA 21-992 and FDA has confirmed that NDA 21-992 was
initially submitted on December 22, 2005.
3. The date the application was approved: February 29, 2008. FDA
has verified the applicant's claim that PRISTIQ was approved on
February 29, 2008. However FDA records indicate that it was NDA 21-992
that was approved.
This determination of the regulatory review period establishes the
maximum potential length of a patent extension. However, the U.S.
Patent and Trademark Office applies several statutory limitations in
its calculations of the actual period for patent extension. In its
applications for patent extension, this applicant seeks 17 days of
patent term extension.
Anyone with knowledge that any of the dates as published are
incorrect may submit to the Division of Dockets Management (see
ADDRESSES) either electronic or written comments and ask for a
redetermination by November 1, 2010. Furthermore, any interested person
may petition FDA for a determination regarding whether the applicant
for extension acted with due diligence during the regulatory review
period by [insert date 180 days after date of publication in the
Federal Register]. To meet its burden, the petition must contain
sufficient facts to merit an FDA investigation. (See H. Rept. 857, part
1, 98th Cong., 2d sess., pp. 41-42, 1984.) Petitions should be in the
format specified in 21 CFR 10.30.
Interested persons may submit to the Division of Dockets Management
(see ADDRESSES) electronic or written comments and written petitions.
It is only necessary to send one set of comments. It is no longer
necessary to send three copies of mailed comments. However, if you
submit a written petition, you must submit three copies of the
petition. Identify comments with the docket number found in brackets in
the heading of this document. Comments and petitions that have not been
made publicly available on regulations.gov may be viewed in the
Division of Dockets Management between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday
through Friday.
Dated: August 13, 2010.
Jane A. Axelrad,
Associate Director for Policy, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research.
[FR Doc. 2010-21586 Filed 8-30-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-S