Aviation Rulemaking Advisory Committee; Transport Airplane and Engine Issues-New Task, 52807-52809 [2010-21333]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 166 / Friday, August 27, 2010 / Notices
Special Note: A description of the project
management approach that will guide
advancement of the project must be included
for project applications proposing ITS or
other technology based truck parking
solutions. The FHWA encourages in the
project management approach a minimum of
a communications plan, a risk management
plan and a work breakdown structure.
Æ How many truck parking spaces
will be used per day per dollar
expended.
Æ Total cost of project, including all
non-Federal funds that will be
contributed to the project.
4. Scope of proposal. (20 percent)
Examples should include:
Æ Evidence of a wide range of input
from affected parties, including State
and local governments, community
groups, private providers of commercial
motor vehicle parking, and motorist and
trucking organizations.
Æ For projects that are ITS-based, the
project management plan presented in
the application should demonstrate the
project will successfully be delivered.
Æ Whether the principles outlined in
the proposal can be applied to other
locations/projects and possibly serve as
a model for other locations.
V. Application Review Information
B. Review Standards
Grant applications that contain the
elements detailed in this notice will be
scored competitively according to the
soundness of their methodology and
subject to the criteria listed below. Subfactors listed under each factor are of
equal importance unless otherwise
noted.
1. All applications for grants should
be submitted to the e-mail address or
mailing address provided in this Notice
by the date specified in this notice.
2. Applicants should ensure that the
project proposal is compatible with or
documented on their planning
documents (TIP and STIP). They should
also validate, to the extent they can, any
analytic data.
3. Each application will be reviewed
for conformance with the provisions in
this notice.
4. Applications lacking any of the
mandatory elements or arriving after the
deadline for submission will not be
considered. To assure full
consideration, proposals should not
exceed 20 pages in length.
5. Applicants may be contacted for
additional information or clarification.
6. Applications complying with the
requirements outlined in this notice will
be evaluated competitively by a review
panel, and will be scored as described
in the scoring criteria.
7. If the FHWA determines that the
project is technically or financially
unfeasible, FHWA will notify the
applicant, in writing.
8. The FHWA reserves the right to
partially fund or request modification of
projects.
9. All information described in the
submitter’s proposal elements should be
quantifiable and sourced.
.pdf file format. Please reference in the
proposal if the maps are available.
9. Describe a measurement plan to
determine whether or not the project
achieved its intended results. The
measurement plan should continue for
3 years beyond the completion date of
the project. After the 3-year period, a
final report quantifying the results of the
project should be submitted to the
FHWA.
10. Proposals should not exceed 20
pages in length.
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
A. Scoring Criteria
1. Demonstration of severe shortage
(number of spaces, access to existing
spaces or information/knowledge of
space availability) of commercial motor
vehicle parking capacity/utilization in
the corridor. (Multi-State highway
corridors are the focus of these projects.
Consider the business requirements of
getting the goods to market, while also
considering the government regulations
associated with hours of service.) (20
percent)
Examples used to demonstrate severe
shortage may include:
Æ ADTT in proposal area.
Æ Average daily shortfall of truck
parking in proposal area.
Æ Ratio of ADTT to average daily
shortfall of truck parking in proposal
area.
Æ Proximity to NHS.
2. The extent to which the proposed
solution resolves the described shortage.
(35 percent)
Examples should include:
Æ Number of truck parking spaces per
day that will be used as a result of the
proposed solution.
Æ The effect on highway safety,
economic competitiveness and
sustainability, traffic congestion, and/or
air quality.
3. Cost effectiveness of proposal. (25
percent)
Examples should include:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:33 Aug 26, 2010
Jkt 220001
VI. Award Administration Information
The Secretary recognizes that each
funded project is unique, and therefore
may attach conditions to project award
documents. The FHWA will send an
award letter with a grant agreement that
contains all the terms and conditions for
the grant. These successful applicants
PO 00000
Frm 00099
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
52807
must execute and return the grant
agreement, accompanied by any
additional items required by the grant
agreement.
Authority: Section 1305, Pub. L. 109–59,
119 Stat. 1214, Aug. 10, 2005; Section 411,
Pub. L. 111–147, 124 Stat. 78.
Issued on: August 17, 2010.
Victor M. Mendez,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2010–21323 Filed 8–26–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–22–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
Aviation Rulemaking Advisory
Committee; Transport Airplane and
Engine Issues—New Task
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of new task assignment
for the Aviation Rulemaking Advisory
Committee (ARAC).
AGENCY:
The FAA assigned the
Aviation Rulemaking Advisory
Committee a new task to review and
submit recommendations in response to
the Federal Aviation Administration’s
approach to update, reorganize and
improve the level of safety of
requirements for flammability of
materials. This notice is to inform the
public of this ARAC activity.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeff
Gardlin, Airframe/Cabin Safety Branch,
ANM–115, Transport Airplane
Directorate, Federal Aviation
Administration, 1601 Lind Avenue,
SW., Renton, Washington 98057,
telephone (425) 227–2194, facsimile
(425) 227–1149; e-mail jeff.gardlin@faa.
gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
Background
The FAA established the Aviation
Rulemaking Advisory Committee to
provide advice and recommendations to
the FAA Administrator on the FAA’s
rulemaking activities with respect to
aviation-related issues. This includes
obtaining advice and recommendations
on flammability requirements for
interior materials on transport category
airplanes. The committee will address
the task under ARAC’s Transport
Airplane and Engine Issues and has
established a new Materials
Flammability Working Group to support
this task.
The flammability requirements for
interior materials on transport category
airplanes have evolved significantly
over the years, and have become more
E:\FR\FM\27AUN1.SGM
27AUN1
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
52808
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 166 / Friday, August 27, 2010 / Notices
threat-based. That is, a realistic test
method based on the type of fire hazard
most critical for the components in
question. Historically, these
requirements were based on a mix of
threat, usage (e.g., sidewall), and
material type (e.g., elastomeric
materials). This has led to multiple
requirements applying to the same
component; conflicting requirements for
the same component depending on what
material it is made from; and ambiguous
requirements for components not
explicitly listed in § 25.853 or Appendix
F, part I. This last aspect results in the
requirements of § 25.853 or Appendix F,
part I, being obsolete whenever
materials change or incomplete because
components that have been developed
since the regulation and Appendix F
were issued are not specifically
identified.
The FAA has drafted an approach that
would simplify compliance
demonstrations, and upgrade the level
of safety for flammability throughout the
airplane. The objective of the proposed
approach is to completely revisit the
flammability requirements and take
advantage of the wealth of data available
from FAA research and advances in
material fire safety to provide a simpler
regulation that provides a higher level of
safety for transport category airplanes.
This initiative originated in response
to a request by aviation industry
organizations who participate in the
International Aircraft Materials Fire Test
Working Group. The working group is
sponsored by the FAA’s William J.
Hughes Technical Center and is not
affiliated with the ARAC.
The proposed approach would clearly
delineate threat-based requirements,
primarily based on a component’s
function and location in the airplane.
Appendix F to part 25 could be
organized based on these threats, and
the current part I, in particular, could be
greatly simplified. In addition, this
approach could include new
requirements pertaining to inaccessible
areas of the airplane, where in-flight fire
is the greatest risk, by expanding the
requirements to include air ducts and
electrical wiring systems, as well as
other high volume materials. This could
include § 25.855 for materials in cargo
compartments. The approach would
also generalize the requirements for heat
release and smoke emissions to include
all exposed large surface areas in the
passenger cabin. This would eliminate
the need for special conditions that are
currently required for seats with nontraditional, large, non-metallic panels.
Because this task could result in a
significant change to the type
certification requirements, the FAA is
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:33 Aug 26, 2010
Jkt 220001
very interested in obtaining
international harmonization. Therefore,
the FAA specifically invites the
participation of other regulatory
authorities in developing the responses
to the below task.
The Task
The ARAC is asked to consider the
merits of the FAA’s proposed approach
for a threat-based structure for part 25,
Appendix F, and make
recommendations for improvement,
classification of the various parts of
Appendix F, and advisory material
necessary for implementation.
FAA will provide ARAC with the
proposed approach. The ARAC working
group is expected to produce a report
within 18 months from publication of
the tasking statement in the Federal
Register. The report should address the
following questions for the proposed
approach, including the rationale for the
responses.
1. Is the proposed threat-based
approach for § 25.853 and Appendix F,
parts II through VII organized correctly?
2. Is Appendix F, part I, necessary for
items covered in parts II through VII?
3. Are there regions of the airplane
not currently covered by flammability
requirements that should be?
4. Can the flammability requirements
be further simplified while maintaining
or improving the existing level of safety?
5. How should non-metallic structure
(e.g., airframe and seats) be addressed?
6. What advisory material is needed to
implement the new structure?
Schedule: Required Completion date
is 18 months after the FAA publishes
the task in the Federal Register.
ARAC Acceptance of Task
ARAC accepted the task and assigned
the task to the newly formed Materials
Flammability Working Group, Transport
Airplane and Engine Issues. The
working group serves as staff to ARAC
and assists in the analysis of assigned
tasks. ARAC must review and approve
the working group’s recommendations.
If ARAC accepts the working group’s
recommendations, it will forward them
to the FAA.
Working Group Activity
The Materials Flammability Working
Group must comply with the procedures
adopted by ARAC. As part of the
procedures, the working group must:
1. Recommend a work plan for
completion of the task, including the
rationale supporting such a plan for
consideration at the next meeting of the
ARAC on Transport Airplane and
Engine Issues held following
publication of this notice.
PO 00000
Frm 00100
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
2. Give a detailed conceptual
presentation of the proposed
recommendations prior to proceeding
with the work stated in item 3 below.
3. Draft the appropriate documents
and required analyses and/or any other
related materials or documents.
4. Provide a status report at each
meeting of the ARAC held to consider
Transport Airplane and Engine Issues.
Participation in the Working Group
The Materials Flammability Working
Group will be composed of technical
experts having an interest in the
assigned task. A working group member
need not be a member, or a
representative of a member, of the full
committee.
If you have expertise in the subject
matter and wish to become a member of
the working group, write to the person
listed under the caption FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT expressing that
desire. Describe your interest in the task
and state the expertise you would bring
to the working group. We must receive
all requests by September 16, 2010. The
assistant chair and the assistant
executive director will review the
requests and advise you whether or not
your request is approved.
If you are chosen for membership on
the working group, you must represent
your aviation community segment and
actively participate in the working
group by attending all meetings, and
providing written comments when
requested to do so. You must devote the
resources necessary to support the
working group in meeting any assigned
deadlines. You must keep your
management chain and those you
represent advised of working group
activities and decisions to ensure that
the proposed technical solutions don’t
conflict with your sponsoring
organization’s position when the subject
being considered is presented to ARAC
for approval. Once the working group
has begun deliberations, members will
not be added or substituted without the
approval of the assistant chair, the
assistant executive director and the
working group chair.
The Secretary of Transportation
determined that the formation and use
of the ARAC is necessary and in the
public interest in connection with the
performance of duties imposed on the
FAA by law.
Meetings of the ARAC are open to the
public. Meetings of the Materials
Flammability Working Group will not
be open to the public, except to the
extent individuals with an interest and
expertise are selected to participate. The
FAA will make no public
E:\FR\FM\27AUN1.SGM
27AUN1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 166 / Friday, August 27, 2010 / Notices
announcement of working group
meetings.
Issued in Washington, DC, on August 23,
2010.
Pamela Hamilton-Powell,
Executive Director, Aviation Rulemaking
Advisory Committee.
[FR Doc. 2010–21333 Filed 8–26–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Administration
[Docket No. FMCSA-2010–0202]
Qualification of Drivers; Exemption
Applications; Diabetes Mellitus
Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Administration (FMCSA).
ACTION: Notice of applications for
exemption from the diabetes mellitus
standard; request for comments.
AGENCY:
FMCSA announces receipt of
applications from 39 individuals for
exemption from the prohibition against
persons with insulin-treated diabetes
mellitus (ITDM) operating commercial
motor vehicles (CMVs) in interstate
commerce. If granted, the exemptions
would enable these individuals with
ITDM to operate CMVs in interstate
commerce.
SUMMARY:
Comments must be received on
or before September 27, 2010.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
bearing the Federal Docket Management
System (FDMS) Docket No. FMCSA–
2010–0202 using any of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
on-line instructions for submitting
comments.
• Mail: Docket Management Facility;
U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200
New Jersey Avenue, SE., West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
Washington, DC 20590–0001.
• Hand Delivery: West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200
New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington,
DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal
Holidays.
• Fax: 1–202–493–2251.
Instructions: Each submission must
include the Agency name and the
docket numbers for this Notice. Note
that all comments received will be
posted without change to https://www.
regulations.gov, including any personal
information provided. Please see the
Privacy Act heading below for further
information.
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
DATES:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:33 Aug 26, 2010
Jkt 220001
Docket: For access to the docket to
read background documents or
comments, go to https://
www.regulations.gov at any time or
Room W12–140 on the ground level of
the West Building, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC, between
9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays. The
Federal Docket Management System is
available 24 hours each day, 365 days
each year. If you want acknowledgment
that we received your comments, please
include a self-addressed, stamped
envelope or postcard or print the
acknowledgement page that appears
after submitting comments on-line.
Privacy Act: Anyone may search the
electronic form of all comments
received into any of our dockets by the
name of the individual submitting the
comment (or of the person signing the
comment, if submitted on behalf of an
association, business, labor union, etc.).
You may review DOT’s Privacy Act
Statement for the FDMS published in
the Federal Register on January 17,
2008 (73 FR 3316), or you may visit
https://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2008/pdf/
E8–785.pdf.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr.
Mary D. Gunnels, Director, Medical
Programs, (202) 366–4001,
fmcsamedical@dot.gov, FMCSA,
Department of Transportation, 1200
New Jersey Avenue, SE., Room W64–
224, Washington, DC 20590–0001.
Office hours are from 8:30 a.m. to 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
Background
Under 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and 31315,
FMCSA may grant an exemption from
the Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Regulations for a 2-year period if it finds
‘‘such exemption would likely achieve a
level of safety that is equivalent to, or
greater than, the level that would be
achieved absent such exemption.’’ The
statute also allows the Agency to renew
exemptions at the end of the 2-year
period. The 39 individuals listed in this
notice have recently requested such an
exemption from the diabetes prohibition
in 49 CFR 391.41(b)(3), which applies to
drivers of CMV in interstate commerce.
Accordingly, the Agency will evaluate
the qualifications of each applicant to
determine whether granting the
exemption will achieve the required
level of safety mandated by the statutes.
Qualifications of Applicants
Angel Bergendale
Mr. Bergendale, age 30, has had ITDM
since 2010. His endocrinologist
examined him in 2010 and certified that
PO 00000
Frm 00101
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
52809
he has had no hypoglycemic reactions
resulting in loss of consciousness,
requiring the assistance of another
person, or resulting in impaired
cognitive function that occurred without
warning in the past 5 years; understands
diabetes management and monitoring;
has stable control of his diabetes using
insulin; and is able to drive a CMV
safely. Mr. Bergendale meets the
requirements of the vision standard at
49 CFR 391.41(b)(10). His optometrist
examined him in 2010 and certified that
he does not have diabetic retinopathy.
He holds a Class D operator’s license
from Massachusetts.
Charles K. Bond
Mr. Bond, 45, has had ITDM since
2009. His endocrinologist examined him
in 2010 and certified that he has had no
hypoglycemic reactions resulting in loss
of consciousness, requiring the
assistance of another person, or
resulting in impaired cognitive function
that occurred without warning in the
past 5 years; understands diabetes
management and monitoring; has stable
control of his diabetes using insulin;
and is able to drive a CMV safely. Mr.
Bond meets the requirements of the
vision standard at 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10).
His ophthalmologist examined him in
2010 and certified that he has stable
nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy.
He holds a Class A Commercial Driver’s
License (CDL) from Pennsylvania.
Dennis J. Callanan
Mr. Callanan, 56, has had ITDM since
2008. His endocrinologist examined him
in 2010 and certified that he has had no
hypoglycemic reactions resulting in loss
of consciousness, requiring the
assistance of another person, or
resulting in impaired cognitive function
that occurred without warning in the
past 5 years; understands diabetes
management and monitoring; has stable
control of his diabetes using insulin;
and is able to drive a CMV safely. Mr.
Callanan meets the requirements of the
vision standard at 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10).
His ophthalmologist examined him in
2010 and certified that he does not have
diabetic retinopathy. He holds a Class D
operator’s license from Massachusetts.
Philip F. Carpenter
Mr. Carpenter, 50, has had ITDM
since 2009. His endocrinologist
examined him in 2010 and certified that
he has had no hypoglycemic reactions
resulting in loss of consciousness,
requiring the assistance of another
person, or resulting in impaired
cognitive function that occurred without
warning in the past 5 years; understands
diabetes management and monitoring;
E:\FR\FM\27AUN1.SGM
27AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 166 (Friday, August 27, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 52807-52809]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-21333]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
Aviation Rulemaking Advisory Committee; Transport Airplane and
Engine Issues--New Task
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of new task assignment for the Aviation Rulemaking
Advisory Committee (ARAC).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The FAA assigned the Aviation Rulemaking Advisory Committee a
new task to review and submit recommendations in response to the
Federal Aviation Administration's approach to update, reorganize and
improve the level of safety of requirements for flammability of
materials. This notice is to inform the public of this ARAC activity.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeff Gardlin, Airframe/Cabin Safety
Branch, ANM-115, Transport Airplane Directorate, Federal Aviation
Administration, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98057,
telephone (425) 227-2194, facsimile (425) 227-1149; e-mail
jeff.gardlin@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The FAA established the Aviation Rulemaking Advisory Committee to
provide advice and recommendations to the FAA Administrator on the
FAA's rulemaking activities with respect to aviation-related issues.
This includes obtaining advice and recommendations on flammability
requirements for interior materials on transport category airplanes.
The committee will address the task under ARAC's Transport Airplane and
Engine Issues and has established a new Materials Flammability Working
Group to support this task.
The flammability requirements for interior materials on transport
category airplanes have evolved significantly over the years, and have
become more
[[Page 52808]]
threat-based. That is, a realistic test method based on the type of
fire hazard most critical for the components in question. Historically,
these requirements were based on a mix of threat, usage (e.g.,
sidewall), and material type (e.g., elastomeric materials). This has
led to multiple requirements applying to the same component;
conflicting requirements for the same component depending on what
material it is made from; and ambiguous requirements for components not
explicitly listed in Sec. 25.853 or Appendix F, part I. This last
aspect results in the requirements of Sec. 25.853 or Appendix F, part
I, being obsolete whenever materials change or incomplete because
components that have been developed since the regulation and Appendix F
were issued are not specifically identified.
The FAA has drafted an approach that would simplify compliance
demonstrations, and upgrade the level of safety for flammability
throughout the airplane. The objective of the proposed approach is to
completely revisit the flammability requirements and take advantage of
the wealth of data available from FAA research and advances in material
fire safety to provide a simpler regulation that provides a higher
level of safety for transport category airplanes.
This initiative originated in response to a request by aviation
industry organizations who participate in the International Aircraft
Materials Fire Test Working Group. The working group is sponsored by
the FAA's William J. Hughes Technical Center and is not affiliated with
the ARAC.
The proposed approach would clearly delineate threat-based
requirements, primarily based on a component's function and location in
the airplane. Appendix F to part 25 could be organized based on these
threats, and the current part I, in particular, could be greatly
simplified. In addition, this approach could include new requirements
pertaining to inaccessible areas of the airplane, where in-flight fire
is the greatest risk, by expanding the requirements to include air
ducts and electrical wiring systems, as well as other high volume
materials. This could include Sec. 25.855 for materials in cargo
compartments. The approach would also generalize the requirements for
heat release and smoke emissions to include all exposed large surface
areas in the passenger cabin. This would eliminate the need for special
conditions that are currently required for seats with non-traditional,
large, non-metallic panels.
Because this task could result in a significant change to the type
certification requirements, the FAA is very interested in obtaining
international harmonization. Therefore, the FAA specifically invites
the participation of other regulatory authorities in developing the
responses to the below task.
The Task
The ARAC is asked to consider the merits of the FAA's proposed
approach for a threat-based structure for part 25, Appendix F, and make
recommendations for improvement, classification of the various parts of
Appendix F, and advisory material necessary for implementation.
FAA will provide ARAC with the proposed approach. The ARAC working
group is expected to produce a report within 18 months from publication
of the tasking statement in the Federal Register. The report should
address the following questions for the proposed approach, including
the rationale for the responses.
1. Is the proposed threat-based approach for Sec. 25.853 and
Appendix F, parts II through VII organized correctly?
2. Is Appendix F, part I, necessary for items covered in parts II
through VII?
3. Are there regions of the airplane not currently covered by
flammability requirements that should be?
4. Can the flammability requirements be further simplified while
maintaining or improving the existing level of safety?
5. How should non-metallic structure (e.g., airframe and seats) be
addressed?
6. What advisory material is needed to implement the new structure?
Schedule: Required Completion date is 18 months after the FAA
publishes the task in the Federal Register.
ARAC Acceptance of Task
ARAC accepted the task and assigned the task to the newly formed
Materials Flammability Working Group, Transport Airplane and Engine
Issues. The working group serves as staff to ARAC and assists in the
analysis of assigned tasks. ARAC must review and approve the working
group's recommendations. If ARAC accepts the working group's
recommendations, it will forward them to the FAA.
Working Group Activity
The Materials Flammability Working Group must comply with the
procedures adopted by ARAC. As part of the procedures, the working
group must:
1. Recommend a work plan for completion of the task, including the
rationale supporting such a plan for consideration at the next meeting
of the ARAC on Transport Airplane and Engine Issues held following
publication of this notice.
2. Give a detailed conceptual presentation of the proposed
recommendations prior to proceeding with the work stated in item 3
below.
3. Draft the appropriate documents and required analyses and/or any
other related materials or documents.
4. Provide a status report at each meeting of the ARAC held to
consider Transport Airplane and Engine Issues.
Participation in the Working Group
The Materials Flammability Working Group will be composed of
technical experts having an interest in the assigned task. A working
group member need not be a member, or a representative of a member, of
the full committee.
If you have expertise in the subject matter and wish to become a
member of the working group, write to the person listed under the
caption FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT expressing that desire.
Describe your interest in the task and state the expertise you would
bring to the working group. We must receive all requests by September
16, 2010. The assistant chair and the assistant executive director will
review the requests and advise you whether or not your request is
approved.
If you are chosen for membership on the working group, you must
represent your aviation community segment and actively participate in
the working group by attending all meetings, and providing written
comments when requested to do so. You must devote the resources
necessary to support the working group in meeting any assigned
deadlines. You must keep your management chain and those you represent
advised of working group activities and decisions to ensure that the
proposed technical solutions don't conflict with your sponsoring
organization's position when the subject being considered is presented
to ARAC for approval. Once the working group has begun deliberations,
members will not be added or substituted without the approval of the
assistant chair, the assistant executive director and the working group
chair.
The Secretary of Transportation determined that the formation and
use of the ARAC is necessary and in the public interest in connection
with the performance of duties imposed on the FAA by law.
Meetings of the ARAC are open to the public. Meetings of the
Materials Flammability Working Group will not be open to the public,
except to the extent individuals with an interest and expertise are
selected to participate. The FAA will make no public
[[Page 52809]]
announcement of working group meetings.
Issued in Washington, DC, on August 23, 2010.
Pamela Hamilton-Powell,
Executive Director, Aviation Rulemaking Advisory Committee.
[FR Doc. 2010-21333 Filed 8-26-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P