New Postal Product, 52786-52788 [2010-21329]

Download as PDF 52786 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 166 / Friday, August 27, 2010 / Notices Day Event/activity 10 .................. Deadline for submitting requests for access to Sensitive Unclassified Non-Safeguards Information (SUNSI) with information: supporting the standing of a potential party identified by name and address; describing the need for the information in order for the potential party to participate meaningfully in an adjudicatory proceeding. Deadline for submitting petition for intervention containing: (i) Demonstration of standing; (ii) all contentions whose formulation does not require access to SUNSI (+25 Answers to petition for intervention; +7 requestor/petitioner reply). Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff informs the requestor of the staff’s determination whether the request for access provides a reasonable basis to believe standing can be established and shows need for SUNSI. (NRC staff also informs any party to the proceeding whose interest independent of the proceeding would be harmed by the release of the information.) If NRC staff makes the finding of need for SUNSI and likelihood of standing, NRC staff begins document processing (preparation of redactions or review of redacted documents). If NRC staff finds no ‘‘need’’ or no likelihood of standing, the deadline for requestor/petitioner to file a motion seeking a ruling to reverse the NRC staff’s denial of access; NRC staff files copy of access determination with the presiding officer (or Chief Administrative Judge or other designated officer, as appropriate). If NRC staff finds ‘‘need’’ for SUNSI, the deadline for any party to the proceeding whose interest independent of the proceeding would be harmed by the release of the information to file a motion seeking a ruling to reverse the NRC staff’s grant of access. Deadline for NRC staff reply to motions to reverse NRC staff determination(s). (Receipt +30) If NRC staff finds standing and need for SUNSI, deadline for NRC staff to complete information processing and file motion for Protective Order and draft Non-Disclosure Affidavit. Deadline for applicant/licensee to file Non-Disclosure Agreement for SUNSI. If access granted: Issuance of presiding officer or other designated officer decision on motion for protective order for access to sensitive information (including schedule for providing access and submission of contentions) or decision reversing a final adverse determination by the NRC staff. Deadline for filing executed Non-Disclosure Affidavits. Access provided to SUNSI consistent with decision issuing the protective order. Deadline for submission of contentions whose development depends upon access to SUNSI. However, if more than 25 days remain between the petitioner’s receipt of (or access to) the information and the deadline for filing all other contentions (as established in the notice of hearing or opportunity for hearing), the petitioner may file its SUNSI contentions by that later deadline. (Contention receipt +25) Answers to contentions whose development depends upon access to SUNSI. (Answer receipt +7) Petitioner/Intervenor reply to answers. Decision on contention admission. 60 .................. 20 .................. 25 .................. 30 .................. 40 .................. A .................... A + 3 ............. A + 28 ........... A + 53 ........... A + 60 ........... >A + 60 ......... [FR Doc. 2010–21345 Filed 8–26–10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7590–01–P NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [Docket No. 50–482; NRC–2010–0286] WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with NOTICES Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation; Notice of Withdrawal of Application for Amendment to Renewed Facility Operating License The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC, the Commission) has granted the request of Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation (the licensee) to withdraw its application dated November 20, 2009, as supplemented by letter dated April 6, 2010, for a proposed amendment to Renewed Facility Operating License No. NPF–42 for the Wolf Creek Generating Station, located in Coffey County, Kansas. The proposed amendment would have revised the facility technical specifications (TSs) pertaining to TS 3.8.1, ‘‘AC [Alternating Current] Sources—Operating,’’ by adding a note to the Required Actions B.3.1 and B.3.2 to indicate that the TS 3.8.1 Required Actions B.3.1 and B.3.2 are satisfied if the diesel generator (DG) became inoperable due to an inoperable support system, an independently testable VerDate Mar<15>2010 15:33 Aug 26, 2010 Jkt 220001 component, or preplanned preventive maintenance or testing. The licensee also proposed to revise the Completion Times for Required Actions B.3.1 and B.3.2 to specify a Completion Time based on the discovery of an issue or failure of the DG. The Commission had previously issued a Notice of Consideration of Issuance of Amendment published in the Federal Register on January 26, 2010 (75 FR 4121). However, by letter dated August 10, 2010, the licensee withdrew the proposed change. For further details with respect to this action, see the application for amendment dated November 20, 2009 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML093310430), as supplemented by letter dated April 6, 2010 (ADAMS Accession No. ML101031093), and the licensee’s letter dated August 10, 2010 (ADAMS Accession No. ML102300387), which withdrew the application for license amendment. Documents may be examined, and/or copied for a fee, at the NRC’s Public Document Room (PDR), located at One White Flint North, Public File Area O1 F21, 11555 Rockville Pike (first floor), Rockville, Maryland. Publicly available records will be accessible electronically from the ADAMS Public Electronic Reading Room on the Internet at the NRC Web PO 00000 Frm 00078 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 site, https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/ adams.html. Persons who do not have access to ADAMS or who encounter problems in accessing the documents located in ADAMS should contact the NRC PDR Reference staff by telephone at 1–800–397–4209, or 301–415–4737 or by e-mail to pdr.resource@nrc.gov. Dated at Rockville, Maryland this 20th day of August 2010. For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Balwant K. Singal, Senior Project Manager, Plant Licensing Branch IV, Division of perating Reactor Licensing, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation. [FR Doc. 2010–21344 Filed 8–26–10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7590–01–P POSTAL REGULATORY COMMISSION [Docket Nos. MC2010–35, R2010–5, R2010– 6; Order No. 518] New Postal Product Postal Regulatory Commission. Notice. AGENCY: ACTION: The Commission is noticing a recently-filed Postal Service request to add Inbound Market Dominant MultiService Agreements with Foreign Postal Operators 1 to the market dominant product list. This notice addresses SUMMARY: E:\FR\FM\27AUN1.SGM 27AUN1 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 166 / Friday, August 27, 2010 / Notices procedural steps associated with the filing. DATES: Comments are due: August 31, 2010. Submit comments electronically via the Commission’s Filing Online system at https:// www.prc.gov. Commenters who cannot submit their views electronically should contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION section by telephone for advice on alternatives to electronic filing. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Stephen L. Sharfman, General Counsel, stephen.sharfman@prc.gov or 202–789– 6820. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: ADDRESSES: Table of Contents I. Introduction II. Notice of Filing III. Ordering Paragraphs WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with NOTICES I. Introduction On August 13, 2010, the Postal Service filed a request pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3622(c)(10) and 3642, and 39 CFR 3010.40 et seq. and 3020.30 et seq. to add Inbound Market Dominant Multi–Service Agreements with Foreign Postal Operators 1 (Multi–Service Agreements 1) to the market dominant product list.1 This Request has been assigned Docket No. MC2010–35. The Postal Service contemporaneously gave notice, pursuant to 39 CFR 3010.40 et seq. and 39 CFR 3015.5, that the Governors have authorized Type 2 rate adjustments for negotiated service agreements in accordance with 39 CFR 3010.40 et seq. that will result generally in more remunerative rates than the default rates set by the Universal Postal Union (UPU) Acts for inbound Letter Post items. Id. Additionally, the Postal Service filed two functionally equivalent Multi– Service Agreements 1 described as follows: 1.The Strategic Bilateral Agreement Between United States Postal Service and Koninklijke TNT Post BV and TNT Post Pakketservice Benelux BV, collectively ‘‘TNT Post’’ (TNT Agreement); and 2.China Post Group—United States Postal Service Letter Post Bilateral Agreement (CPG Agreement). The Postal Service requests that the two Multi–Service Agreements 1 be 1 Request of United States Postal Service to Add Inbound Market Dominant Multi–Service Agreements with Foreign Postal Operators to the Market Dominant Product List, Notice of Type 2 Rate Adjustments, and Notice of Filing Two Functionally Equivalent Agreements (Under Seal), August 13, 2010 (Request). VerDate Mar<15>2010 15:33 Aug 26, 2010 Jkt 220001 listed along with any subsequent functionally equivalent agreements as part of a single product grouping on the market dominant product list. Id. at 2. The TNT Agreement and CPG Agreement have been assigned Docket Nos. R2010–5 and R2010–6, respectively. In support of its Request, the Postal Service filed four attachments as follows: 1. Attachment 1—proposed Mail Classification Schedule (MCS) language for Inbound Market Dominant MultiService Agreements with Foreign Postal Operators; 2. Attachment 2—Statement of Supporting Justification required by 39 CFR 3020.32; 3. Attachments 3A and 3B—redacted copies of each agreement; and 4. Attachment 4—an application for non–public treatment of materials to maintain redacted portions of the agreements and supporting documents under seal. Related agreements. Parties to the TNT Agreement are the Postal Service and subsidiaries of the postal operator for the Netherlands. The instant agreement covers inbound Letter Post in the form of letters, flats, small packets, bags, containers, and International Registered Mail service for Letter Post. Id. at 4. It also includes a placeholder for additional ancillary services at rates yet to be determined. Id. The CPG Agreement with the postal operator of the People’s Republic of China includes the same inbound Letter Post items, plus delivery confirmation scanning with Letter Post small packets. Id. The scheduled effective date for both agreements is October 1, 2010. Id. at 3. The Postal Service states its filings comply with 39 CFR 3010.40 et seq. for the implementation of the negotiated service agreements. The Request identifies various performance attributes associated with the agreements, e.g., electronic settlement and payment processes. Id. at 5–6. Under 39 CFR 3010.43, the Postal Service is required to submit a data collection plan. In response, the Postal Service indicated that it intends to report information on these agreements through its Annual Compliance Report. While indicating its willingness to provide information on mail flows within the annual compliance review process, the Postal Service proposes that no special data collection plan be established for these agreements. With respect to performance measurement, it requests that the Commission exempt these agreements from separate reporting requirements under 39 CFR 3055.3. Id. at 8–9. PO 00000 Frm 00079 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 52787 Functional equivalency. The Request advances reasons why the agreements are functionally equivalent to one another and contain the same attributes and methodology. Id. at 12–13. The Postal Service asserts that both agreements fit within the proposed MCS language, are with foreign postal operators, conform to a common description, and include similar terms and conditions. The Postal Service identifies specific terms that distinguish the agreements from one another, all of which are highlighted in the Request. Id. at 12–14. These include electronic settlement, termination, dispute resolution, and other differences. The Postal Service contends that the agreements nonetheless are functionally equivalent to each other and ‘‘[t]he Postal Service does not consider that the specified differences affect either the fundamental service the Postal Service is offering or the fundamental structure of the contracts.’’ Id. XI.In its Request, the Postal Service maintains that certain portions of the agreements and related financial information should remain under seal. Id., Attachment 4. In the Statement of Supporting Justification, Lea Emerson, Executive Director, International Postal Affairs, reviews the factors of section 3622(c) and concludes, inter alia, that the revenues generated will cover the attributable costs of the services offered under the agreements and that the rates are preferable to default rates set by the UPU. Id., Attachment 4, at 2–3. The Request also addresses the requirements of 39 U.S.C. 3622 and 39 CFR 3020.30 et seq. Id. at 10–11; Attachment 4 at 5– 9. The Postal Service asserts its filings demonstrate compliance with the statute. It requests that Inbound Market Dominant Multi–Service Agreements With Foreign Postal Operators 1 be added to the market dominant product list. Id. at 11–15. II. Notice of Filing The Commission establishes Docket Nos. MC2010–35, R2010–5 and R2010– 6 for consideration of the Request pertaining to the proposed Inbound Market Dominant Multi-Service Agreements with Foreign Postal Operators 1, and the related rates and classifications, respectively. In keeping with practice, these dockets are addressed on a consolidated basis for purposes of this Order; however, future filings should be made in the specific docket in which issues being addressed pertain. Interested persons may submit comments on whether the Postal E:\FR\FM\27AUN1.SGM 27AUN1 52788 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 166 / Friday, August 27, 2010 / Notices Service’s filings in the captioned dockets are consistent with the policies of 39 U.S.C. 3622, 3642, or 39 CFR part 3010.40, and 39 CFR 3020 subpart B. Comments are due no later than August 31, 2010. The public portions of these filings can be accessed via the Commission’s website (https:// www.prc.gov). The Commission appoints Paul L. Harrington to serve as Public Representative in these dockets. III. Ordering Paragraphs It is ordered: 1. The Commission establishes Docket Nos. MC2010–35, R2010–5 and R2010– 6 for consideration of the issues raised in this docket. 2. Comments by interested persons in these proceedings are due no later than August 31, 2010. 3. Pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 505, Paul L. Harrington is appointed to serve as officer of the Commission (Public Representative) to represent the interest of the general public in these proceedings. 4. The Secretary shall arrange for publication of this order in the Federal Register. By the Commission. Shoshana M. Grove, Secretary. [FR Doc. 2010–21329 Filed 8–26–10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7710–FW–S SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION [Disaster Declaration #12283 and #12284] U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of the President’s major disaster declaration on 08/17/2010, Private Non-Profit organizations that provide essential services of governmental nature may file disaster loan applications at the address listed above or other locally announced locations. The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected by the disaster: Primary Counties: Adair, Andrew, Atchison, Buchanan, Caldwell, Carroll, Cass, Chariton, Clark, Clinton, Daviess, Dekalb, Gentry, Grundy, Harrison, Holt, Howard, Jackson, Lafayette, Lewis, Livingston, Mercer, Nodaway, Putnam, Ray, Schuyler, Scotland, Sullivan, Worth. The Interest Rates are: Percent For Physical Damage: Non-Profit Organizations with Credit Available Elsewhere ....... Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere ....... For Economic Injury: Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere ....... U.S. Small Business Administration. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: 3.000 (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008) BILLING CODE 8025–01–P WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with NOTICES SUMMARY: VerDate Mar<15>2010 15:33 Aug 26, 2010 Jkt 220001 SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION [Disaster Declaration #12268 and #12269] Texas Disaster Number TX–00362 U.S. Small Business Administration. ACTION: Amendment 2. AGENCY: This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for Public Assistance Only for the State of Texas (FEMA–1931–DR), dated 08/03/2010. Incident: Hurricane Alex. Incident Period: 06/30/2010 through 08/14/2010. DATES: Effective Date: 08/14/2010. Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 10/04/2010. PO 00000 Frm 00080 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 BILLING CODE 8025–01–P SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 12283B and for economic injury is 12284B. SUMMARY: Lisa Lopez-Suarez, Acting Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance. 3.000 [FR Doc. 2010–21413 Filed 8–26–10; 8:45 am] This is a Notice of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for Public Assistance Only for the State of MISSOURI (FEMA–1934– DR), dated 08/17/2010. Incident: Severe Storms, Flooding, and Tornadoes. Incident Period: 06/12/2010 through 07/31/2010. DATES: Effective Date: 08/17/2010. Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 10/18/2010. Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: 05/17/2011. ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008) [FR Doc. 2010–21417 Filed 8–26–10; 8:45 am] 3.625 Lisa Lopez-Suarez, Acting Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance. Missouri Disaster #MO–00041 Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: 05/03/2011. ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of the President’s major disaster declaration for Private Non-Profit organizations in the State of TEXAS, dated 08/03/2010, is hereby amended to establish the incident period for this disaster as beginning 06/30/2010 and continuing through 08/14/2010. All other information in the original declaration remains unchanged. [Disaster Declaration #12290 and #12291] Illinois Disaster #IL–00025 U.S. Small Business Administration. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: This is a Notice of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for the State of Illinois (FEMA– 1935–DR), dated 08/19/2010. Incident: Severe Storms and Flooding. Incident Period: 07/22/2010 through 08/07/2010. DATES: Effective Date: 08/19/2010. Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 10/18/2010. Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: 05/19/2011. ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of the President’s major disaster declaration on 08/19/2010, applications for disaster loans may be filed at the address listed SUMMARY: E:\FR\FM\27AUN1.SGM 27AUN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 166 (Friday, August 27, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 52786-52788]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-21329]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL REGULATORY COMMISSION

[Docket Nos. MC2010-35, R2010-5, R2010-6; Order No. 518]


New Postal Product

AGENCY:  Postal Regulatory Commission.

ACTION:  Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY:  The Commission is noticing a recently-filed Postal Service 
request to add Inbound Market Dominant Multi-Service Agreements with 
Foreign Postal Operators 1 to the market dominant product list. This 
notice addresses

[[Page 52787]]

procedural steps associated with the filing.

DATES:  Comments are due: August 31, 2010.

ADDRESSES:  Submit comments electronically via the Commission's Filing 
Online system at https://www.prc.gov. Commenters who cannot submit their 
views electronically should contact the person identified in the FOR 
FURTHER INFORMATION section by telephone for advice on alternatives to 
electronic filing.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:  Stephen L. Sharfman, General Counsel, 
stephen.sharfman@prc.gov or 202-789-6820.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Table of Contents

I. Introduction
II. Notice of Filing
III. Ordering Paragraphs

I. Introduction

    On August 13, 2010, the Postal Service filed a request pursuant to 
39 U.S.C. 3622(c)(10) and 3642, and 39 CFR 3010.40 et seq. and 3020.30 
et seq. to add Inbound Market Dominant Multi-Service Agreements with 
Foreign Postal Operators 1 (Multi-Service Agreements 1) to the market 
dominant product list.\1\ This Request has been assigned Docket No. 
MC2010-35.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Request of United States Postal Service to Add Inbound 
Market Dominant Multi-Service Agreements with Foreign Postal 
Operators to the Market Dominant Product List, Notice of Type 2 Rate 
Adjustments, and Notice of Filing Two Functionally Equivalent 
Agreements (Under Seal), August 13, 2010 (Request).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Postal Service contemporaneously gave notice, pursuant to 39 
CFR 3010.40 et seq. and 39 CFR 3015.5, that the Governors have 
authorized Type 2 rate adjustments for negotiated service agreements in 
accordance with 39 CFR 3010.40 et seq. that will result generally in 
more remunerative rates than the default rates set by the Universal 
Postal Union (UPU) Acts for inbound Letter Post items. Id. 
Additionally, the Postal Service filed two functionally equivalent 
Multi-Service Agreements 1 described as follows:
    1.The Strategic Bilateral Agreement Between United States Postal 
Service and Koninklijke TNT Post BV and TNT Post Pakketservice Benelux 
BV, collectively ``TNT Post'' (TNT Agreement); and
    2.China Post Group--United States Postal Service Letter Post 
Bilateral Agreement (CPG Agreement).
    The Postal Service requests that the two Multi-Service Agreements 1 
be listed along with any subsequent functionally equivalent agreements 
as part of a single product grouping on the market dominant product 
list. Id. at 2. The TNT Agreement and CPG Agreement have been assigned 
Docket Nos. R2010-5 and R2010-6, respectively.
    In support of its Request, the Postal Service filed four 
attachments as follows:
    1. Attachment 1--proposed Mail Classification Schedule (MCS) 
language for Inbound Market Dominant Multi-Service Agreements with 
Foreign Postal Operators;
    2. Attachment 2--Statement of Supporting Justification required by 
39 CFR 3020.32;
    3. Attachments 3A and 3B--redacted copies of each agreement; and
    4. Attachment 4--an application for non-public treatment of 
materials to maintain redacted portions of the agreements and 
supporting documents under seal.
    Related agreements. Parties to the TNT Agreement are the Postal 
Service and subsidiaries of the postal operator for the Netherlands. 
The instant agreement covers inbound Letter Post in the form of 
letters, flats, small packets, bags, containers, and International 
Registered Mail service for Letter Post. Id. at 4. It also includes a 
placeholder for additional ancillary services at rates yet to be 
determined. Id.
    The CPG Agreement with the postal operator of the People's Republic 
of China includes the same inbound Letter Post items, plus delivery 
confirmation scanning with Letter Post small packets. Id. The scheduled 
effective date for both agreements is October 1, 2010. Id. at 3.
    The Postal Service states its filings comply with 39 CFR 3010.40 et 
seq. for the implementation of the negotiated service agreements. The 
Request identifies various performance attributes associated with the 
agreements, e.g., electronic settlement and payment processes. Id. at 
5-6.
    Under 39 CFR 3010.43, the Postal Service is required to submit a 
data collection plan. In response, the Postal Service indicated that it 
intends to report information on these agreements through its Annual 
Compliance Report. While indicating its willingness to provide 
information on mail flows within the annual compliance review process, 
the Postal Service proposes that no special data collection plan be 
established for these agreements. With respect to performance 
measurement, it requests that the Commission exempt these agreements 
from separate reporting requirements under 39 CFR 3055.3. Id. at 8-9.
    Functional equivalency. The Request advances reasons why the 
agreements are functionally equivalent to one another and contain the 
same attributes and methodology. Id. at 12-13. The Postal Service 
asserts that both agreements fit within the proposed MCS language, are 
with foreign postal operators, conform to a common description, and 
include similar terms and conditions.
    The Postal Service identifies specific terms that distinguish the 
agreements from one another, all of which are highlighted in the 
Request. Id. at 12-14. These include electronic settlement, 
termination, dispute resolution, and other differences. The Postal 
Service contends that the agreements nonetheless are functionally 
equivalent to each other and ``[t]he Postal Service does not consider 
that the specified differences affect either the fundamental service 
the Postal Service is offering or the fundamental structure of the 
contracts.'' Id. XI.In its Request, the Postal Service maintains that 
certain portions of the agreements and related financial information 
should remain under seal. Id., Attachment 4.
    In the Statement of Supporting Justification, Lea Emerson, 
Executive Director, International Postal Affairs, reviews the factors 
of section 3622(c) and concludes, inter alia, that the revenues 
generated will cover the attributable costs of the services offered 
under the agreements and that the rates are preferable to default rates 
set by the UPU. Id., Attachment 4, at 2-3. The Request also addresses 
the requirements of 39 U.S.C. 3622 and 39 CFR 3020.30 et seq. Id. at 
10-11; Attachment 4 at 5-9.
    The Postal Service asserts its filings demonstrate compliance with 
the statute. It requests that Inbound Market Dominant Multi-Service 
Agreements With Foreign Postal Operators 1 be added to the market 
dominant product list. Id. at 11-15.

II. Notice of Filing

    The Commission establishes Docket Nos. MC2010-35, R2010-5 and 
R2010-6 for consideration of the Request pertaining to the proposed 
Inbound Market Dominant Multi-Service Agreements with Foreign Postal 
Operators 1, and the related rates and classifications, respectively. 
In keeping with practice, these dockets are addressed on a consolidated 
basis for purposes of this Order; however, future filings should be 
made in the specific docket in which issues being addressed pertain.
    Interested persons may submit comments on whether the Postal

[[Page 52788]]

Service's filings in the captioned dockets are consistent with the 
policies of 39 U.S.C. 3622, 3642, or
    39 CFR part 3010.40, and 39 CFR 3020 subpart B. Comments are due no 
later than August 31, 2010. The public portions of these filings can be 
accessed via the Commission's website (https://www.prc.gov).
    The Commission appoints Paul L. Harrington to serve as Public 
Representative in these dockets.

III. Ordering Paragraphs

    It is ordered:
    1. The Commission establishes Docket Nos. MC2010-35, R2010-5 and 
R2010-6 for consideration of the issues raised in this docket.
    2. Comments by interested persons in these proceedings are due no 
later than August 31, 2010.
    3. Pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 505, Paul L. Harrington is appointed to 
serve as officer of the Commission (Public Representative) to represent 
the interest of the general public in these proceedings.
    4. The Secretary shall arrange for publication of this order in the 
Federal Register.

    By the Commission.
Shoshana M. Grove,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-21329 Filed 8-26-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-FW-S
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.