Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans: Kentucky; Approval Section 110(a)(1) Maintenance Plan for the 1997 8-Hour Ozone Standard for the Paducah Area, 52467-52470 [2010-21107]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 165 / Thursday, August 26, 2010 / Rules and Regulations require a Statement of Energy Effects under Executive Order 13211. Technical Standards The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15 U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress, through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus standards bodies. This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, the Coast Guard did not consider the use of voluntary consensus standards. § 165.T01–0502 Safety Zones; Swim Events within the Sector New York Captain of the Port Zone. (a) Location. The following swim events include safety zones as described herein: (1) Swim Across America 2010 LIS Swim, Glen Cove, NY to Larchmont, NY. (i) All waters of Long Island Sound, from surface to bottom, within 100-yard radius around the swimmers swimming from Morgan Park Beach, Glen Cove, NY to Larchmont Shore Club, Larchmont, NY. (ii) Effective Date. This rule will be effective from 5:30 a.m. through 10:30 p.m. on July 24, 2010 and August 14, 2010. (2) Newburgh to Beacon Swim, Newburgh, NY to Beacon, NY. (i) All waters of the Hudson River from surface to bottom, within a 100yard radius around the swimmers swimming from the waterfront at Newburgh, NY to the waterfront at Beacon, NY. (ii) Effective Date. This rule will be effective from 11:30 a.m. to 1:30 p.m. on July 31, 2010. (3) Brooklyn Bridge Swim, Brooklyn, NY. (i) All waters of the East River from surface to bottom, within a 100-yard radius around the swimmers swimming in the waters of the East River from Brooklyn Bridge Park to East River Park, Brooklyn. (ii) Effective Date. This rule will be effective from 11:45 a.m. to 1:30 p.m. on September 11, 2010. (4) Hudson River Swim for Life, Nyack, NY to Sleepy Hollow, NY. (i) All waters of the Hudson River from surface to bottom, within a 100yard radius around the swimmers swimming from Nyack, NY to Kingsland Point Park, Sleepy Hollow, NY. (ii) Effective Date. This rule will be effective from 9 a.m. to 12:30 p.m. on September 12, 2010. (5) Toughman Half Iron Triathlon, Hudson River, Croton Point Park, NY. (i) All waters of the Hudson River from surface to bottom, within a 100yard radius around the swimmers swimming in the vicinity of Haverstraw Bay, Croton Point Park, Westchester County, NY. (ii) Effective Date. This rule will be effective from 6 a.m. to 10 a.m. on September 12, 2010. (b) Definitions. The following definition applies to this section: Designated representative means any commissioned, warrant and petty officers of the Coast Guard on board Coast Guard, Coast Guard Auxiliary, and local, State, and Federal law Environment We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security Management Directive 023–01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and have concluded this action is one of a category of actions which do not individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment. This rule is categorically excluded under figure 2–1, paragraph (34)(g), of the Instruction as this rule involves establishing safety zones. An environmental analysis checklist and a categorical exclusion determination are available in the docket where indicated under ADDRESSES. List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165 Harbors, Marine safety navigation (water), Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, and Waterways. ■ For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33 CFR part 165 as follows: mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS 1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows: ■ Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; Pub. L. 107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1. 2. Add a new temporary safety zones § 165.T01–0502 to read as follows: ■ VerDate Mar<15>2010 20:57 Aug 25, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00039 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 52467 enforcement vessels that have been authorized to act on behalf of the Captain of the Port New York. (c) Regulations. In accordance with the general regulations in § 165.23 of this part, entry into, transit through or anchoring within the safety zones is prohibited unless authorized by the Captain of the Port New York or a designated representative. Persons desiring to transit within any of the safety zones established in this section may contact the Captain of the Port at telephone number 718–354–4398 or via on-scene patrol personnel on VHF channel 16 to seek authorization. If permission is granted, all persons and vessels must comply with the instructions of the Captain of the Port New York or the designated representative. (d) Enforcement period. This section will be enforced from 3:30 a.m. to 11:59 p.m. on various dates from July 24 to September 12, 2010. Dated: July 22, 2010. G.P. Hitchen, Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Acting, Captain of the Port New York. [FR Doc. 2010–21311 Filed 8–25–10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 9110–04–P ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 52 [EPA–R04–OAR–2007–1186–201021; FRL– 9193–4] Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans: Kentucky; Approval Section 110(a)(1) Maintenance Plan for the 1997 8-Hour Ozone Standard for the Paducah Area Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Final rule. AGENCY: EPA is taking final action to approve a revision to the Kentucky State Implementation Plan (SIP) concerning the maintenance plan addressing the 1997 8-hour ozone standards for the Paducah 1997 8-hour ozone attainment area, which comprises Marshall County and a portion of Livingston County (hereafter referred to as the ‘‘Paducah Area’’). This maintenance plan was submitted to EPA on May 27, 2008, by the Commonwealth of Kentucky, and ensures the continued attainment of the 1997 8-hour ozone national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) through the year 2020. On July 15, 2009, the Commonwealth of Kentucky submitted supplemental information with updated SUMMARY: E:\FR\FM\26AUR1.SGM 26AUR1 52468 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 165 / Thursday, August 26, 2010 / Rules and Regulations emissions tables for this Area to reflect actual emissions. This plan meets the statutory and regulatory requirements, and is consistent with EPA’s guidance. EPA is taking final action to approve the revisions to the Kentucky SIP, pursuant to the Clean Air Act (CAA). EPA is also in the process of establishing a new 8hour ozone NAAQS, and expects to finalize the reconsidered NAAQS by August 2010. Today’s action, however, relates only to the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS. Requirements for the Paducah Area under the 2010 NAAQS will be addressed in the future. I. Background This rule will be effective September 27, 2010. EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket Identification No. EPA–R04–OAR– 2007–1186. All documents in the electronic docket are listed in the https:// www.regulations.gov Web site. Although listed in the index, some information is not publicly available, i.e., Confidential Business Information or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted material, is not placed on the Internet and will be publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket materials are available either electronically in https:// www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at the Regulatory Development Section, Air Planning Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics Management Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street, SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960. EPA requests that, if at all possible, you contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to schedule your inspection. The Regional Office’s official hours of business are Monday through Friday, 8:30 to 4:30, excluding federal holidays. In accordance with the CAA, the Paducah Area, consisting of Marshall County and a portion of Livingston County in Kentucky, was designated as marginal nonattainment for the 1-hour ozone NAAQS effective November 6, 1991 (56 FR 56694) because the Area did not meet the 1-hour ozone NAAQS. On November 13, 1992, the Commonwealth of Kentucky submitted a request to redesignate the Paducah Area to attainment for the 1-hour ozone NAAQS. At the same time as the redesignation request, Kentucky submitted the required ozone monitoring data and maintenance plan to ensure that the Paducah Area would remain in attainment for the 1-hour ozone NAAQS for a period of 10 years, consistent with the CAA section 175A(a). The maintenance plan submitted by Kentucky followed EPA guidance for limited maintenance areas, which applied to 1-hour ozone NAAQS areas with design values less than 85 percent of the applicable standard (0.12 parts per million). On February 7, 1995, EPA approved Kentucky’s request to redesignate the Paducah Area (60 FR 7124) to attainment for the 1-hour ozone NAAQS. II. EPA Guidance and CAA Requirements DATES: ADDRESSES: Zuri Farngalo, Regulatory Development Section, Air Planning Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics Management Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street, SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960. Mr. Farngalo may be reached by phone at (404) 562–9152 or by electronic mail address farngalo.zuri@epa.gov. mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Table of Contents I. Background II. EPA Guidance and CAA Requirements III. Today’s Action IV. Final Action V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews VerDate Mar<15>2010 20:57 Aug 25, 2010 Jkt 220001 On April 30, 2004, EPA designated areas for the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS (69 FR 23858), and published the final Phase I Implementation Rule for the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS (69 FR 23951) (Phase I Rule). The Paducah Area was designated attainment for the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS, effective June 15, 2004. The Paducah attainment area consequently was required to submit a 10-year maintenance plan under section 110(a)(1) of the CAA and the Phase I Rule, 40 CFR 51.905(a)(4). On May 20, 2005, EPA issued guidance providing information as to how a state might fulfill the maintenance plan obligation established by the CAA and the Phase I Rule (Memorandum from Lydia N. Wegman to Air Division Directors, Maintenance Plan Guidance Document for Certain 8-hour Ozone Areas Under Section 110(a)(1) of Clean Air Act, May 20, 2005—hereafter referred to as ‘‘Wegman Memorandum’’). On December 22, 2006, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit issued an opinion that vacated portions of EPA’s Phase I Rule. See South Coast Air Quality Management District. v. EPA, 472 F.3d 882 (DC Cir. 2006). The Court vacated those portions of the Phase I Rule that provided for regulation of the 1997 PO 00000 Frm 00040 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 8-hour ozone nonattainment areas designated under Subpart 1 (of part D of the CAA), in lieu of Subpart 2 among other portions. The Court’s decision did not alter any 8-hour ozone attainment area requirements under the Phase I Rule for CAA section 110(a)(1) maintenance plans. EPA has determined that Kentucky’s May 27, 2008, proposed SIP revision satisfies the section 110(a)(1) CAA requirements for a plan that provides for implementation, maintenance, and enforcement of the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS in the Paducah attainment area. III. Today’s Action EPA is taking final action to approve the SIP revisions concerning the 110(a)(1) maintenance plan addressing the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS for the Paducah Area. This maintenance plan was submitted to EPA on May 27, 2008, by the Commonwealth of Kentucky to ensure the continued attainment of the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS through the year 2020. This approval action is based on EPA’s analyses of whether this request complies with section 110 of the CAA and section 51.905(a)(4). EPA’s analyses for the Commonwealth of Kentucky’s submittal are described in detail in the proposed rule published January 4, 2010 (75 FR 97). The comment period for this proposed action closed on February 3, 2010. EPA did not receive any comments, adverse or otherwise, during this public comment period. However, EPA noticed an inadvertent omission of the July 15, 2009, supplement that Kentucky provided from the electronic docket at https://www.regulations.gov. Since EPA referenced this supplement in the January 4, 2010, proposed rulemaking, EPA reopened the public comment period for this proposed action for the limited purpose of allowing the public the opportunity to review and consider this supplemental information in regards to EPA’s proposed rulemaking (75 FR 8574). EPA’s reopening of the comment period ended on March 25, 2010. During this additional comment period, EPA did not receive any comments. In support of this final action, the Commonwealth of Kentucky provided an analysis of emissions differences for the highway mobile source emissions using a Reid Vapor Pressure (RVP) level of 9.0 pounds per square inch (psi), which is the applicable standard during the regulatory control period (i.e., May 1st through September 15th). See 40 CFR 80.27. In its original submission, the Commonwealth of Kentucky had modeled 8.6 psi based on historical information that indicated that summer E:\FR\FM\26AUR1.SGM 26AUR1 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 165 / Thursday, August 26, 2010 / Rules and Regulations time RVP supplied to the Paducah Area averaged 8.6 psi. EPA considers the original submittal to model a more stringent RVP; however, in order to ensure that Kentucky could demonstrate attainment with a higher RVP, Kentucky provided the supplemental information. Subsequently, the Commonwealth of Kentucky provided modeling at the 9.0 psi level. EPA reviewed this additional information and noted that there was no change in emissions for nitrogen oxides (NOX) and a slight increase (less than a tenth of a ton per day) in emissions of 52469 volatile organic compounds (VOC) with RVP at the 9.0 psi level as compared to the 8.6 psi level. The difference in total highway emissions for each year emissions was provided and is included in the following table: PADUCAH AREA HIGHWAY MOBILE SOURCE EMISSIONS [Tons per day] 8.6 psi VOC 2002 2005 2008 2011 2014 2017 2020 ............................................................................................. ............................................................................................. ............................................................................................. ............................................................................................. ............................................................................................. ............................................................................................. ............................................................................................. EPA has made the determination that, even with the slight increase in VOC emissions due to the difference of modeling 9.0 psi versus 8.6 psi, Kentucky has demonstrated continued maintenance for the 1997 8-hour NAAQS for the Paducah Area. Further, EPA believes that Kentucky’s 110(a)(1) submission for the Paducah Area meets the CAA requirements in addition to EPA policy and guidance. mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES IV. Final Action Pursuant to Section 110 of the CAA, EPA is approving the maintenance plan addressing the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS for the Paducah Area, which was submitted by Kentucky on May 27, 2008, and ensures continued attainment of the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS through the year 2020. EPA has evaluated the Commonwealth’s submittal and has determined that it meets the applicable requirements of the CAA and EPA regulations, and is consistent with EPA policy. EPA’s rationale is explained in the proposed action. On March 12, 2008, EPA issued a revised ozone NAAQS. EPA subsequently announced a reconsideration of the 2008 NAAQS, and proposed new 8-hour ozone NAAQS in January 2010. A final 8-hour ozone NAAQS is expected in August 2010. The current action, however, is being taken to address requirements under the 1997 ozone NAAQS. Requirements for the Paducah Area under the 2010 NAAQS will be addressed in the future. VerDate Mar<15>2010 20:57 Aug 25, 2010 Jkt 220001 9.0 psi NOX 1.14 1.62 1.47 1.32 1.14 1.04 0.94 1.90 3.36 3.00 2.49 1.90 1.51 1.27 V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA’s role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law. For that reason, this action: • Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993); • Does not impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); • Is certified as not having a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.); • Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4); • Does not have Federalism implications as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999); • Is not an economically significant regulatory action based on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); PO 00000 Frm 00041 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 VOC Difference between 8.6 psi & 9.0 psi NOX 1.19 1.67 1.52 1.36 1.19 1.07 0.97 1.90 3.36 3.00 2.49 1.90 1.52 1.27 VOC 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.04 0.05 0.03 0.03 NOX 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 • Is not a significant regulatory action subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001); • Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent with the CAA; and • Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). In addition, this rule does not have tribal implications as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000), because the SIP is not approved to apply in Indian country located in the state, and EPA notes that it will not impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law. The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule, to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal Register. This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). E:\FR\FM\26AUR1.SGM 26AUR1 52470 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 165 / Thursday, August 26, 2010 / Rules and Regulations Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by October 25, 2010. Filing a petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).) List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 Air pollution control, Environmental protection, Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Volatile organic compounds. Dated: August 11, 2010. A. Stanley Meiburg, Acting Regional Administrator, Region 4. Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. Subpart S—Kentucky 2. Section 52.920(e), is amended by adding a new entry for the ‘‘Paducah 8Hour Ozone Attainment/1–Hour Ozone Maintenance Plan Section 110(a)(1)’’ at the end of the table to read as follows: ■ § 52.920 * PART 52—[AMENDED] Identification of plan. * * (e) * * * * * 1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows: ■ EPA-APPROVED KENTUCKY NON-REGULATORY PROVISIONS Applicable geographic or nonattainment area Name of SIP provision * * * * Paducah 8-Hour Ozone Attainment/1-Hour Ozone Marshall and Livingston Maintenance Plan Section 110(a)(1). Counties. State submittal date/effective date EPA approval date * May 27, 2008 ............... * August 26, 2010 [insert citation of publication]. BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 8960. The Regional Office’s official hours of business are Monday through Friday, 8:30 to 4:30, excluding federal holidays. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: [FR Doc. 2010–21107 Filed 8–25–10; 8:45 am] Ms. Lynorae Benjamin, Regulatory Development Section, Air Planning Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics Management Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street, SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960. Ms. Benjamin can be reached at 404–562– 9040, or via electronic mail at benjamin.lynorae@epa.gov. 40 CFR Part 52 [EPA–R04–OAR–2007–0113–200709(c); FRL–9193–5] Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans Georgia: State Implementation Plan Revision; Correction Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Final rule; correcting amendment. AGENCY: On February 9, 2010, EPA published a direct final rule approving revisions to the Georgia State Implementation Plan submitted by the Georgia Environmental Protection Division on September 26, 2006, with a clarifying revision submitted on November 6, 2006. This action corrects a typographical error in the regulatory text in Table (c) of the aforementioned Federal Register notice. DATES: This action is effective August 26, 2010. ADDRESSES: Copies of the documentation used in the action being corrected are available for inspection during normal business hours at the following location: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street, SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303– mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES SUMMARY: VerDate Mar<15>2010 20:57 Aug 25, 2010 Jkt 220001 This action corrects a typographical error in the regulatory language for an entry that appears in Table (c) of Georgia’s Identification of Plan section at 40 CFR 52.570. The direct final action which approved the addition of new rule 391–3–1–.02(2)(rrr), ‘‘NOX Emissions from Small Fuel-Burning Equipment,’’ was approved by EPA on February 9, 2010 (75 FR 6309). However, EPA inadvertently listed new rule (rrr) as being revised, rather than added as a new entry, in Table (c). Therefore, EPA is correcting this typographical error by clarifying that rule 391–3–1–.02(2)(rrr) is being added as a new entry to Table (c)—EPA Approved Georgia Regulations. EPA has determined that today’s action falls under the ‘‘good cause’’ exemption in section 553(b)(3)(B) of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) which, upon finding ‘‘good cause,’’ authorizes agencies to dispense with SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: PO 00000 Frm 00042 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 Explanation * public participation where public notice and comment procedures are impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public interest. Public notice and comment for this action are unnecessary because today’s action to clarify the addition of new rule 391–3–1–.02(2)(rrr), in Table (c) of the rulemaking, has no substantive impact on EPA’s February 9, 2010, approval of this regulation. In addition, EPA can identify no particular reason why the public would be interested in being notified of the correction of this table entry, or in having the opportunity to comment on the correction prior to this action being finalized, since this correction action does not change the meaning of EPA’s analysis or action to approve the addition of rule 391–3–1–.–2(2)(rrr) to the Georgia SIP. EPA also finds that there is good cause under APA section 553(d)(3) for this correction to become effective on the date of publication of this action. Section 553(d)(3) of the APA allows an effective date less than 30 days after publication ‘‘as otherwise provided by the agency for good cause found and published with the rule.’’ 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3). The purpose of the 30-day waiting period prescribed in APA section 553(d)(3) is to give affected parties a reasonable time to adjust their behavior and prepare before the final rule takes effect. Today’s rule, however, does not create any new regulatory requirements such that affected parties would need time to prepare before the rule takes effect. Rather, today’s rule merely corrects a typographical error in E:\FR\FM\26AUR1.SGM 26AUR1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 165 (Thursday, August 26, 2010)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 52467-52470]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-21107]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R04-OAR-2007-1186-201021; FRL-9193-4]


Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans: 
Kentucky; Approval Section 110(a)(1) Maintenance Plan for the 1997 8-
Hour Ozone Standard for the Paducah Area

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA is taking final action to approve a revision to the 
Kentucky State Implementation Plan (SIP) concerning the maintenance 
plan addressing the 1997 8-hour ozone standards for the Paducah 1997 8-
hour ozone attainment area, which comprises Marshall County and a 
portion of Livingston County (hereafter referred to as the ``Paducah 
Area''). This maintenance plan was submitted to EPA on May 27, 2008, by 
the Commonwealth of Kentucky, and ensures the continued attainment of 
the 1997 8-hour ozone national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) 
through the year 2020. On July 15, 2009, the Commonwealth of Kentucky 
submitted supplemental information with updated

[[Page 52468]]

emissions tables for this Area to reflect actual emissions. This plan 
meets the statutory and regulatory requirements, and is consistent with 
EPA's guidance. EPA is taking final action to approve the revisions to 
the Kentucky SIP, pursuant to the Clean Air Act (CAA). EPA is also in 
the process of establishing a new 8-hour ozone NAAQS, and expects to 
finalize the reconsidered NAAQS by August 2010. Today's action, 
however, relates only to the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS. Requirements for 
the Paducah Area under the 2010 NAAQS will be addressed in the future.

DATES: This rule will be effective September 27, 2010.

ADDRESSES: EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket 
Identification No. EPA-R04-OAR-2007-1186. All documents in the 
electronic docket are listed in the https://www.regulations.gov Web 
site. Although listed in the index, some information is not publicly 
available, i.e., Confidential Business Information or other information 
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such 
as copyrighted material, is not placed on the Internet and will be 
publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket 
materials are available either electronically in https://www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at the Regulatory Development 
Section, Air Planning Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics Management 
Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth 
Street, SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960. EPA requests that, if at all 
possible, you contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION 
CONTACT section to schedule your inspection. The Regional Office's 
official hours of business are Monday through Friday, 8:30 to 4:30, 
excluding federal holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Zuri Farngalo, Regulatory Development 
Section, Air Planning Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics Management 
Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth 
Street, SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960. Mr. Farngalo may be reached 
by phone at (404) 562-9152 or by electronic mail address 
farngalo.zuri@epa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Table of Contents

I. Background
II. EPA Guidance and CAA Requirements
III. Today's Action
IV. Final Action
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

I. Background

    In accordance with the CAA, the Paducah Area, consisting of 
Marshall County and a portion of Livingston County in Kentucky, was 
designated as marginal nonattainment for the 1-hour ozone NAAQS 
effective November 6, 1991 (56 FR 56694) because the Area did not meet 
the 1-hour ozone NAAQS. On November 13, 1992, the Commonwealth of 
Kentucky submitted a request to redesignate the Paducah Area to 
attainment for the 1-hour ozone NAAQS. At the same time as the 
redesignation request, Kentucky submitted the required ozone monitoring 
data and maintenance plan to ensure that the Paducah Area would remain 
in attainment for the 1-hour ozone NAAQS for a period of 10 years, 
consistent with the CAA section 175A(a). The maintenance plan submitted 
by Kentucky followed EPA guidance for limited maintenance areas, which 
applied to 1-hour ozone NAAQS areas with design values less than 85 
percent of the applicable standard (0.12 parts per million). On 
February 7, 1995, EPA approved Kentucky's request to redesignate the 
Paducah Area (60 FR 7124) to attainment for the 1-hour ozone NAAQS.

II. EPA Guidance and CAA Requirements

    On April 30, 2004, EPA designated areas for the 1997 8-hour ozone 
NAAQS (69 FR 23858), and published the final Phase I Implementation 
Rule for the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS (69 FR 23951) (Phase I Rule). The 
Paducah Area was designated attainment for the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS, 
effective June 15, 2004. The Paducah attainment area consequently was 
required to submit a 10-year maintenance plan under section 110(a)(1) 
of the CAA and the Phase I Rule, 40 CFR 51.905(a)(4). On May 20, 2005, 
EPA issued guidance providing information as to how a state might 
fulfill the maintenance plan obligation established by the CAA and the 
Phase I Rule (Memorandum from Lydia N. Wegman to Air Division 
Directors, Maintenance Plan Guidance Document for Certain 8-hour Ozone 
Areas Under Section 110(a)(1) of Clean Air Act, May 20, 2005--hereafter 
referred to as ``Wegman Memorandum'').
    On December 22, 2006, the United States Court of Appeals for the 
District of Columbia Circuit issued an opinion that vacated portions of 
EPA's Phase I Rule. See South Coast Air Quality Management District. v. 
EPA, 472 F.3d 882 (DC Cir. 2006). The Court vacated those portions of 
the Phase I Rule that provided for regulation of the 1997 8-hour ozone 
nonattainment areas designated under Subpart 1 (of part D of the CAA), 
in lieu of Subpart 2 among other portions. The Court's decision did not 
alter any 8-hour ozone attainment area requirements under the Phase I 
Rule for CAA section 110(a)(1) maintenance plans. EPA has determined 
that Kentucky's May 27, 2008, proposed SIP revision satisfies the 
section 110(a)(1) CAA requirements for a plan that provides for 
implementation, maintenance, and enforcement of the 1997 8-hour ozone 
NAAQS in the Paducah attainment area.

III. Today's Action

    EPA is taking final action to approve the SIP revisions concerning 
the 110(a)(1) maintenance plan addressing the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS 
for the Paducah Area. This maintenance plan was submitted to EPA on May 
27, 2008, by the Commonwealth of Kentucky to ensure the continued 
attainment of the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS through the year 2020. This 
approval action is based on EPA's analyses of whether this request 
complies with section 110 of the CAA and section 51.905(a)(4). EPA's 
analyses for the Commonwealth of Kentucky's submittal are described in 
detail in the proposed rule published January 4, 2010 (75 FR 97).
    The comment period for this proposed action closed on February 3, 
2010. EPA did not receive any comments, adverse or otherwise, during 
this public comment period. However, EPA noticed an inadvertent 
omission of the July 15, 2009, supplement that Kentucky provided from 
the electronic docket at https://www.regulations.gov. Since EPA 
referenced this supplement in the January 4, 2010, proposed rulemaking, 
EPA reopened the public comment period for this proposed action for the 
limited purpose of allowing the public the opportunity to review and 
consider this supplemental information in regards to EPA's proposed 
rulemaking (75 FR 8574). EPA's reopening of the comment period ended on 
March 25, 2010. During this additional comment period, EPA did not 
receive any comments.
    In support of this final action, the Commonwealth of Kentucky 
provided an analysis of emissions differences for the highway mobile 
source emissions using a Reid Vapor Pressure (RVP) level of 9.0 pounds 
per square inch (psi), which is the applicable standard during the 
regulatory control period (i.e., May 1st through September 15th). See 
40 CFR 80.27. In its original submission, the Commonwealth of Kentucky 
had modeled 8.6 psi based on historical information that indicated that 
summer

[[Page 52469]]

time RVP supplied to the Paducah Area averaged 8.6 psi. EPA considers 
the original submittal to model a more stringent RVP; however, in order 
to ensure that Kentucky could demonstrate attainment with a higher RVP, 
Kentucky provided the supplemental information. Subsequently, the 
Commonwealth of Kentucky provided modeling at the 9.0 psi level. EPA 
reviewed this additional information and noted that there was no change 
in emissions for nitrogen oxides (NOX) and a slight increase 
(less than a tenth of a ton per day) in emissions of volatile organic 
compounds (VOC) with RVP at the 9.0 psi level as compared to the 8.6 
psi level. The difference in total highway emissions for each year 
emissions was provided and is included in the following table:

                                  Paducah Area Highway Mobile Source Emissions
                                                 [Tons per day]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                  8.6 psi                 9.0 psi         Difference between 8.6
                                         ------------------------------------------------      psi & 9.0 psi
                                                                                         -----------------------
                                              VOC         NOX         VOC         NOX         VOC         NOX
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2002....................................        1.14        1.90        1.19        1.90        0.05        0.00
2005....................................        1.62        3.36        1.67        3.36        0.05        0.00
2008....................................        1.47        3.00        1.52        3.00        0.05        0.00
2011....................................        1.32        2.49        1.36        2.49        0.04        0.00
2014....................................        1.14        1.90        1.19        1.90        0.05        0.00
2017....................................        1.04        1.51        1.07        1.52        0.03        0.01
2020....................................        0.94        1.27        0.97        1.27        0.03        0.00
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    EPA has made the determination that, even with the slight increase 
in VOC emissions due to the difference of modeling 9.0 psi versus 8.6 
psi, Kentucky has demonstrated continued maintenance for the 1997 8-
hour NAAQS for the Paducah Area. Further, EPA believes that Kentucky's 
110(a)(1) submission for the Paducah Area meets the CAA requirements in 
addition to EPA policy and guidance.

IV. Final Action

    Pursuant to Section 110 of the CAA, EPA is approving the 
maintenance plan addressing the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS for the Paducah 
Area, which was submitted by Kentucky on May 27, 2008, and ensures 
continued attainment of the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS through the year 
2020. EPA has evaluated the Commonwealth's submittal and has determined 
that it meets the applicable requirements of the CAA and EPA 
regulations, and is consistent with EPA policy. EPA's rationale is 
explained in the proposed action.
    On March 12, 2008, EPA issued a revised ozone NAAQS. EPA 
subsequently announced a reconsideration of the 2008 NAAQS, and 
proposed new 8-hour ozone NAAQS in January 2010. A final 8-hour ozone 
NAAQS is expected in August 2010. The current action, however, is being 
taken to address requirements under the 1997 ozone NAAQS. Requirements 
for the Paducah Area under the 2010 NAAQS will be addressed in the 
future.

V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP 
submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable 
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in 
reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, 
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this 
action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and 
does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state 
law. For that reason, this action:
     Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to 
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order 
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993);
     Does not impose an information collection burden under the 
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
     Is certified as not having a significant economic impact 
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory 
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
     Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or 
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded 
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
     Does not have Federalism implications as specified in 
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
     Is not an economically significant regulatory action based 
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 
19885, April 23, 1997);
     Is not a significant regulatory action subject to 
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
     Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the 
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent 
with the CAA; and
     Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to 
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental 
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under 
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
    In addition, this rule does not have tribal implications as 
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000), 
because the SIP is not approved to apply in Indian country located in 
the state, and EPA notes that it will not impose substantial direct 
costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law.
    The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the 
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally 
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating 
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule, 
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the 
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and 
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of 
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior 
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot 
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal 
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 
804(2).

[[Page 52470]]

    Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review 
of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for 
the appropriate circuit by October 25, 2010. Filing a petition for 
reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect 
the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor 
does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may 
be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or 
action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to 
enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Air pollution control, Environmental protection, Incorporation by 
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, 
Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Volatile 
organic compounds.

    Dated: August 11, 2010.
A. Stanley Meiburg,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 4.

PART 52--[AMENDED]

0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

Subpart S--Kentucky

0
2. Section 52.920(e), is amended by adding a new entry for the 
``Paducah 8-Hour Ozone Attainment/1-Hour Ozone Maintenance Plan Section 
110(a)(1)'' at the end of the table to read as follows:


Sec.  52.920  Identification of plan.

* * * * *
    (e) * * *

                                 EPA-Approved Kentucky Non-Regulatory Provisions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                     Applicable        State submittal
     Name of SIP provision          geographic or      date/effective     EPA approval date      Explanation
                                 nonattainment area         date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
                                                  * * * * * * *
Paducah 8-Hour Ozone Attainment/ Marshall and        May 27, 2008......  August 26, 2010
 1-Hour Ozone Maintenance Plan    Livingston                              [insert citation
 Section 110(a)(1).               Counties.                               of publication].
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[FR Doc. 2010-21107 Filed 8-25-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.