Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans: Kentucky; Approval Section 110(a)(1) Maintenance Plan for the 1997 8-Hour Ozone Standard for the Paducah Area, 52467-52470 [2010-21107]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 165 / Thursday, August 26, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (NTTAA)
(15 U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to
use voluntary consensus standards in
their regulatory activities unless the
agency provides Congress, through the
Office of Management and Budget, with
an explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, the Coast Guard
did not consider the use of voluntary
consensus standards.
§ 165.T01–0502 Safety Zones; Swim
Events within the Sector New York Captain
of the Port Zone.
(a) Location. The following swim
events include safety zones as described
herein:
(1) Swim Across America 2010 LIS
Swim, Glen Cove, NY to Larchmont,
NY.
(i) All waters of Long Island Sound,
from surface to bottom, within 100-yard
radius around the swimmers swimming
from Morgan Park Beach, Glen Cove, NY
to Larchmont Shore Club, Larchmont,
NY.
(ii) Effective Date. This rule will be
effective from 5:30 a.m. through
10:30 p.m. on July 24, 2010 and August
14, 2010.
(2) Newburgh to Beacon Swim,
Newburgh, NY to Beacon, NY.
(i) All waters of the Hudson River
from surface to bottom, within a 100yard radius around the swimmers
swimming from the waterfront at
Newburgh, NY to the waterfront at
Beacon, NY.
(ii) Effective Date. This rule will be
effective from 11:30 a.m. to 1:30 p.m. on
July 31, 2010.
(3) Brooklyn Bridge Swim, Brooklyn,
NY.
(i) All waters of the East River from
surface to bottom, within a 100-yard
radius around the swimmers swimming
in the waters of the East River from
Brooklyn Bridge Park to East River Park,
Brooklyn.
(ii) Effective Date. This rule will be
effective from 11:45 a.m. to 1:30 p.m. on
September 11, 2010.
(4) Hudson River Swim for Life,
Nyack, NY to Sleepy Hollow, NY.
(i) All waters of the Hudson River
from surface to bottom, within a 100yard radius around the swimmers
swimming from Nyack, NY to Kingsland
Point Park, Sleepy Hollow, NY.
(ii) Effective Date. This rule will be
effective from 9 a.m. to 12:30 p.m. on
September 12, 2010.
(5) Toughman Half Iron Triathlon,
Hudson River, Croton Point Park, NY.
(i) All waters of the Hudson River
from surface to bottom, within a 100yard radius around the swimmers
swimming in the vicinity of Haverstraw
Bay, Croton Point Park, Westchester
County, NY.
(ii) Effective Date. This rule will be
effective from 6 a.m. to 10 a.m. on
September 12, 2010.
(b) Definitions. The following
definition applies to this section:
Designated representative means any
commissioned, warrant and petty
officers of the Coast Guard on board
Coast Guard, Coast Guard Auxiliary,
and local, State, and Federal law
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023–01 and
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
which guide the Coast Guard in
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have concluded this action is one of a
category of actions which do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. This rule is categorically
excluded under figure 2–1, paragraph
(34)(g), of the Instruction as this rule
involves establishing safety zones. An
environmental analysis checklist and a
categorical exclusion determination are
available in the docket where indicated
under ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures, and
Waterways.
■ For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195;
Pub. L. 107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department
of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
2. Add a new temporary safety zones
§ 165.T01–0502 to read as follows:
■
VerDate Mar<15>2010
20:57 Aug 25, 2010
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00039
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
52467
enforcement vessels that have been
authorized to act on behalf of the
Captain of the Port New York.
(c) Regulations. In accordance with
the general regulations in § 165.23 of
this part, entry into, transit through or
anchoring within the safety zones is
prohibited unless authorized by the
Captain of the Port New York or a
designated representative. Persons
desiring to transit within any of the
safety zones established in this section
may contact the Captain of the Port at
telephone number 718–354–4398 or via
on-scene patrol personnel on VHF
channel 16 to seek authorization.
If permission is granted, all persons
and vessels must comply with the
instructions of the Captain of the Port
New York or the designated
representative.
(d) Enforcement period. This section
will be enforced from 3:30 a.m. to 11:59
p.m. on various dates from July 24 to
September 12, 2010.
Dated: July 22, 2010.
G.P. Hitchen,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Acting, Captain
of the Port New York.
[FR Doc. 2010–21311 Filed 8–25–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R04–OAR–2007–1186–201021; FRL–
9193–4]
Approval and Promulgation of Air
Quality Implementation Plans:
Kentucky; Approval Section 110(a)(1)
Maintenance Plan for the 1997 8-Hour
Ozone Standard for the Paducah Area
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
EPA is taking final action to
approve a revision to the Kentucky State
Implementation Plan (SIP) concerning
the maintenance plan addressing the
1997 8-hour ozone standards for the
Paducah 1997 8-hour ozone attainment
area, which comprises Marshall County
and a portion of Livingston County
(hereafter referred to as the ‘‘Paducah
Area’’). This maintenance plan was
submitted to EPA on May 27, 2008, by
the Commonwealth of Kentucky, and
ensures the continued attainment of the
1997 8-hour ozone national ambient air
quality standards (NAAQS) through the
year 2020. On July 15, 2009, the
Commonwealth of Kentucky submitted
supplemental information with updated
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\26AUR1.SGM
26AUR1
52468
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 165 / Thursday, August 26, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
emissions tables for this Area to reflect
actual emissions. This plan meets the
statutory and regulatory requirements,
and is consistent with EPA’s guidance.
EPA is taking final action to approve the
revisions to the Kentucky SIP, pursuant
to the Clean Air Act (CAA). EPA is also
in the process of establishing a new 8hour ozone NAAQS, and expects to
finalize the reconsidered NAAQS by
August 2010. Today’s action, however,
relates only to the 1997 8-hour ozone
NAAQS. Requirements for the Paducah
Area under the 2010 NAAQS will be
addressed in the future.
I. Background
This rule will be effective
September 27, 2010.
EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket
Identification No. EPA–R04–OAR–
2007–1186. All documents in the
electronic docket are listed in the https://
www.regulations.gov Web site. Although
listed in the index, some information is
not publicly available, i.e., Confidential
Business Information or other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other
material, such as copyrighted material,
is not placed on the Internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy
form. Publicly available docket
materials are available either
electronically in https://
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at
the Regulatory Development Section,
Air Planning Branch, Air, Pesticides and
Toxics Management Division, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street, SW.,
Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960. EPA
requests that, if at all possible, you
contact the person listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to
schedule your inspection. The Regional
Office’s official hours of business are
Monday through Friday, 8:30 to 4:30,
excluding federal holidays.
In accordance with the CAA, the
Paducah Area, consisting of Marshall
County and a portion of Livingston
County in Kentucky, was designated as
marginal nonattainment for the 1-hour
ozone NAAQS effective November 6,
1991 (56 FR 56694) because the Area
did not meet the 1-hour ozone NAAQS.
On November 13, 1992, the
Commonwealth of Kentucky submitted
a request to redesignate the Paducah
Area to attainment for the 1-hour ozone
NAAQS. At the same time as the
redesignation request, Kentucky
submitted the required ozone
monitoring data and maintenance plan
to ensure that the Paducah Area would
remain in attainment for the 1-hour
ozone NAAQS for a period of 10 years,
consistent with the CAA section
175A(a). The maintenance plan
submitted by Kentucky followed EPA
guidance for limited maintenance areas,
which applied to 1-hour ozone NAAQS
areas with design values less than 85
percent of the applicable standard (0.12
parts per million). On February 7, 1995,
EPA approved Kentucky’s request to
redesignate the Paducah Area (60 FR
7124) to attainment for the 1-hour ozone
NAAQS.
II. EPA Guidance and CAA
Requirements
DATES:
ADDRESSES:
Zuri
Farngalo, Regulatory Development
Section, Air Planning Branch, Air,
Pesticides and Toxics Management
Division, U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street,
SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960. Mr.
Farngalo may be reached by phone at
(404) 562–9152 or by electronic mail
address farngalo.zuri@epa.gov.
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. Background
II. EPA Guidance and CAA Requirements
III. Today’s Action
IV. Final Action
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
VerDate Mar<15>2010
20:57 Aug 25, 2010
Jkt 220001
On April 30, 2004, EPA designated
areas for the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS
(69 FR 23858), and published the final
Phase I Implementation Rule for the
1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS (69 FR
23951) (Phase I Rule). The Paducah
Area was designated attainment for the
1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS, effective
June 15, 2004. The Paducah attainment
area consequently was required to
submit a 10-year maintenance plan
under section 110(a)(1) of the CAA and
the Phase I Rule, 40 CFR 51.905(a)(4).
On May 20, 2005, EPA issued guidance
providing information as to how a state
might fulfill the maintenance plan
obligation established by the CAA and
the Phase I Rule (Memorandum from
Lydia N. Wegman to Air Division
Directors, Maintenance Plan Guidance
Document for Certain 8-hour Ozone
Areas Under Section 110(a)(1) of Clean
Air Act, May 20, 2005—hereafter
referred to as ‘‘Wegman Memorandum’’).
On December 22, 2006, the United
States Court of Appeals for the District
of Columbia Circuit issued an opinion
that vacated portions of EPA’s Phase I
Rule. See South Coast Air Quality
Management District. v. EPA, 472 F.3d
882 (DC Cir. 2006). The Court vacated
those portions of the Phase I Rule that
provided for regulation of the 1997
PO 00000
Frm 00040
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
8-hour ozone nonattainment areas
designated under Subpart 1 (of part D of
the CAA), in lieu of Subpart 2 among
other portions. The Court’s decision did
not alter any 8-hour ozone attainment
area requirements under the Phase I
Rule for CAA section 110(a)(1)
maintenance plans. EPA has determined
that Kentucky’s May 27, 2008, proposed
SIP revision satisfies the section
110(a)(1) CAA requirements for a plan
that provides for implementation,
maintenance, and enforcement of the
1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS in the
Paducah attainment area.
III. Today’s Action
EPA is taking final action to approve
the SIP revisions concerning the
110(a)(1) maintenance plan addressing
the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS for the
Paducah Area. This maintenance plan
was submitted to EPA on May 27, 2008,
by the Commonwealth of Kentucky to
ensure the continued attainment of the
1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS through the
year 2020. This approval action is based
on EPA’s analyses of whether this
request complies with section 110 of the
CAA and section 51.905(a)(4). EPA’s
analyses for the Commonwealth of
Kentucky’s submittal are described in
detail in the proposed rule published
January 4, 2010 (75 FR 97).
The comment period for this
proposed action closed on February 3,
2010. EPA did not receive any
comments, adverse or otherwise, during
this public comment period. However,
EPA noticed an inadvertent omission of
the July 15, 2009, supplement that
Kentucky provided from the electronic
docket at https://www.regulations.gov.
Since EPA referenced this supplement
in the January 4, 2010, proposed
rulemaking, EPA reopened the public
comment period for this proposed
action for the limited purpose of
allowing the public the opportunity to
review and consider this supplemental
information in regards to EPA’s
proposed rulemaking (75 FR 8574).
EPA’s reopening of the comment period
ended on March 25, 2010. During this
additional comment period, EPA did
not receive any comments.
In support of this final action, the
Commonwealth of Kentucky provided
an analysis of emissions differences for
the highway mobile source emissions
using a Reid Vapor Pressure (RVP) level
of 9.0 pounds per square inch (psi),
which is the applicable standard during
the regulatory control period (i.e., May
1st through September 15th). See 40
CFR 80.27. In its original submission,
the Commonwealth of Kentucky had
modeled 8.6 psi based on historical
information that indicated that summer
E:\FR\FM\26AUR1.SGM
26AUR1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 165 / Thursday, August 26, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
time RVP supplied to the Paducah Area
averaged 8.6 psi. EPA considers the
original submittal to model a more
stringent RVP; however, in order to
ensure that Kentucky could demonstrate
attainment with a higher RVP, Kentucky
provided the supplemental information.
Subsequently, the Commonwealth of
Kentucky provided modeling at the 9.0
psi level. EPA reviewed this additional
information and noted that there was no
change in emissions for nitrogen oxides
(NOX) and a slight increase (less than a
tenth of a ton per day) in emissions of
52469
volatile organic compounds (VOC) with
RVP at the 9.0 psi level as compared to
the 8.6 psi level. The difference in total
highway emissions for each year
emissions was provided and is included
in the following table:
PADUCAH AREA HIGHWAY MOBILE SOURCE EMISSIONS
[Tons per day]
8.6 psi
VOC
2002
2005
2008
2011
2014
2017
2020
.............................................................................................
.............................................................................................
.............................................................................................
.............................................................................................
.............................................................................................
.............................................................................................
.............................................................................................
EPA has made the determination that,
even with the slight increase in VOC
emissions due to the difference of
modeling 9.0 psi versus 8.6 psi,
Kentucky has demonstrated continued
maintenance for the 1997 8-hour
NAAQS for the Paducah Area. Further,
EPA believes that Kentucky’s 110(a)(1)
submission for the Paducah Area meets
the CAA requirements in addition to
EPA policy and guidance.
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES
IV. Final Action
Pursuant to Section 110 of the CAA,
EPA is approving the maintenance plan
addressing the 1997 8-hour ozone
NAAQS for the Paducah Area, which
was submitted by Kentucky on May 27,
2008, and ensures continued attainment
of the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS
through the year 2020. EPA has
evaluated the Commonwealth’s
submittal and has determined that it
meets the applicable requirements of the
CAA and EPA regulations, and is
consistent with EPA policy. EPA’s
rationale is explained in the proposed
action.
On March 12, 2008, EPA issued a
revised ozone NAAQS. EPA
subsequently announced a
reconsideration of the 2008 NAAQS,
and proposed new 8-hour ozone
NAAQS in January 2010. A final 8-hour
ozone NAAQS is expected in August
2010. The current action, however, is
being taken to address requirements
under the 1997 ozone NAAQS.
Requirements for the Paducah Area
under the 2010 NAAQS will be
addressed in the future.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
20:57 Aug 25, 2010
Jkt 220001
9.0 psi
NOX
1.14
1.62
1.47
1.32
1.14
1.04
0.94
1.90
3.36
3.00
2.49
1.90
1.51
1.27
V. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is
required to approve a SIP submission
that complies with the provisions of the
Act and applicable Federal regulations.
42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions,
EPA’s role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of
the CAA. Accordingly, this action
merely approves state law as meeting
Federal requirements and does not
impose additional requirements beyond
those imposed by state law. For that
reason, this action:
• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ subject to review by the Office
of Management and Budget under
Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993);
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
PO 00000
Frm 00041
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
VOC
Difference between 8.6
psi & 9.0 psi
NOX
1.19
1.67
1.52
1.36
1.19
1.07
0.97
1.90
3.36
3.00
2.49
1.90
1.52
1.27
VOC
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.04
0.05
0.03
0.03
NOX
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the CAA; and
• Does not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this rule does not have
tribal implications as specified by
Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249,
November 9, 2000), because the SIP is
not approved to apply in Indian country
located in the state, and EPA notes that
it will not impose substantial direct
costs on tribal governments or preempt
tribal law.
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. EPA will submit a
report containing this action and other
required information to the U.S. Senate,
the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United
States prior to publication of the rule in
the Federal Register. A major rule
cannot take effect until 60 days after it
is published in the Federal Register.
This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as
defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
E:\FR\FM\26AUR1.SGM
26AUR1
52470
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 165 / Thursday, August 26, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA,
petitions for judicial review of this
action must be filed in the United States
Court of Appeals for the appropriate
circuit by October 25, 2010. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the
Administrator of this final rule does not
affect the finality of this action for the
purposes of judicial review nor does it
extend the time within which a petition
for judicial review may be filed, and
shall not postpone the effectiveness of
such rule or action. This action may not
be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section
307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Air pollution control, Environmental
protection, Incorporation by reference,
Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen
dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Volatile organic
compounds.
Dated: August 11, 2010.
A. Stanley Meiburg,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 4.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart S—Kentucky
2. Section 52.920(e), is amended by
adding a new entry for the ‘‘Paducah 8Hour Ozone Attainment/1–Hour Ozone
Maintenance Plan Section 110(a)(1)’’ at
the end of the table to read as follows:
■
§ 52.920
*
PART 52—[AMENDED]
Identification of plan.
*
*
(e) * * *
*
*
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
■
EPA-APPROVED KENTUCKY NON-REGULATORY PROVISIONS
Applicable geographic
or nonattainment area
Name of SIP provision
*
*
*
*
Paducah 8-Hour Ozone Attainment/1-Hour Ozone Marshall and Livingston
Maintenance Plan Section 110(a)(1).
Counties.
State submittal
date/effective date
EPA approval date
*
May 27, 2008 ...............
*
August 26, 2010 [insert
citation of publication].
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
8960. The Regional Office’s official
hours of business are Monday through
Friday, 8:30 to 4:30, excluding federal
holidays.
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
[FR Doc. 2010–21107 Filed 8–25–10; 8:45 am]
Ms.
Lynorae Benjamin, Regulatory
Development Section, Air Planning
Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics
Management Division, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street, SW.,
Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960. Ms.
Benjamin can be reached at 404–562–
9040, or via electronic mail at
benjamin.lynorae@epa.gov.
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R04–OAR–2007–0113–200709(c);
FRL–9193–5]
Approval and Promulgation of
Implementation Plans Georgia: State
Implementation Plan Revision;
Correction
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule; correcting
amendment.
AGENCY:
On February 9, 2010, EPA
published a direct final rule approving
revisions to the Georgia State
Implementation Plan submitted by the
Georgia Environmental Protection
Division on September 26, 2006, with a
clarifying revision submitted on
November 6, 2006. This action corrects
a typographical error in the regulatory
text in Table (c) of the aforementioned
Federal Register notice.
DATES: This action is effective August
26, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Copies of the
documentation used in the action being
corrected are available for inspection
during normal business hours at the
following location: U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth
Street, SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303–
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
20:57 Aug 25, 2010
Jkt 220001
This
action corrects a typographical error in
the regulatory language for an entry that
appears in Table (c) of Georgia’s
Identification of Plan section at 40 CFR
52.570. The direct final action which
approved the addition of new rule
391–3–1–.02(2)(rrr), ‘‘NOX Emissions
from Small Fuel-Burning Equipment,’’
was approved by EPA on February 9,
2010 (75 FR 6309). However, EPA
inadvertently listed new rule (rrr) as
being revised, rather than added as a
new entry, in Table (c). Therefore, EPA
is correcting this typographical error by
clarifying that rule 391–3–1–.02(2)(rrr)
is being added as a new entry to Table
(c)—EPA Approved Georgia
Regulations.
EPA has determined that today’s
action falls under the ‘‘good cause’’
exemption in section 553(b)(3)(B) of the
Administrative Procedure Act (APA)
which, upon finding ‘‘good cause,’’
authorizes agencies to dispense with
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
PO 00000
Frm 00042
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Explanation
*
public participation where public notice
and comment procedures are
impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary
to the public interest. Public notice and
comment for this action are unnecessary
because today’s action to clarify the
addition of new rule
391–3–1–.02(2)(rrr), in Table (c) of the
rulemaking, has no substantive impact
on EPA’s February 9, 2010, approval of
this regulation. In addition, EPA can
identify no particular reason why the
public would be interested in being
notified of the correction of this table
entry, or in having the opportunity to
comment on the correction prior to this
action being finalized, since this
correction action does not change the
meaning of EPA’s analysis or action to
approve the addition of rule
391–3–1–.–2(2)(rrr) to the Georgia SIP.
EPA also finds that there is good
cause under APA section 553(d)(3) for
this correction to become effective on
the date of publication of this action.
Section 553(d)(3) of the APA allows an
effective date less than 30 days after
publication ‘‘as otherwise provided by
the agency for good cause found and
published with the rule.’’ 5 U.S.C.
553(d)(3). The purpose of the 30-day
waiting period prescribed in APA
section 553(d)(3) is to give affected
parties a reasonable time to adjust their
behavior and prepare before the final
rule takes effect. Today’s rule, however,
does not create any new regulatory
requirements such that affected parties
would need time to prepare before the
rule takes effect. Rather, today’s rule
merely corrects a typographical error in
E:\FR\FM\26AUR1.SGM
26AUR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 165 (Thursday, August 26, 2010)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 52467-52470]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-21107]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R04-OAR-2007-1186-201021; FRL-9193-4]
Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans:
Kentucky; Approval Section 110(a)(1) Maintenance Plan for the 1997 8-
Hour Ozone Standard for the Paducah Area
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: EPA is taking final action to approve a revision to the
Kentucky State Implementation Plan (SIP) concerning the maintenance
plan addressing the 1997 8-hour ozone standards for the Paducah 1997 8-
hour ozone attainment area, which comprises Marshall County and a
portion of Livingston County (hereafter referred to as the ``Paducah
Area''). This maintenance plan was submitted to EPA on May 27, 2008, by
the Commonwealth of Kentucky, and ensures the continued attainment of
the 1997 8-hour ozone national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS)
through the year 2020. On July 15, 2009, the Commonwealth of Kentucky
submitted supplemental information with updated
[[Page 52468]]
emissions tables for this Area to reflect actual emissions. This plan
meets the statutory and regulatory requirements, and is consistent with
EPA's guidance. EPA is taking final action to approve the revisions to
the Kentucky SIP, pursuant to the Clean Air Act (CAA). EPA is also in
the process of establishing a new 8-hour ozone NAAQS, and expects to
finalize the reconsidered NAAQS by August 2010. Today's action,
however, relates only to the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS. Requirements for
the Paducah Area under the 2010 NAAQS will be addressed in the future.
DATES: This rule will be effective September 27, 2010.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket
Identification No. EPA-R04-OAR-2007-1186. All documents in the
electronic docket are listed in the https://www.regulations.gov Web
site. Although listed in the index, some information is not publicly
available, i.e., Confidential Business Information or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such
as copyrighted material, is not placed on the Internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket
materials are available either electronically in https://www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at the Regulatory Development
Section, Air Planning Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics Management
Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth
Street, SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960. EPA requests that, if at all
possible, you contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section to schedule your inspection. The Regional Office's
official hours of business are Monday through Friday, 8:30 to 4:30,
excluding federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Zuri Farngalo, Regulatory Development
Section, Air Planning Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics Management
Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth
Street, SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960. Mr. Farngalo may be reached
by phone at (404) 562-9152 or by electronic mail address
farngalo.zuri@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. Background
II. EPA Guidance and CAA Requirements
III. Today's Action
IV. Final Action
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Background
In accordance with the CAA, the Paducah Area, consisting of
Marshall County and a portion of Livingston County in Kentucky, was
designated as marginal nonattainment for the 1-hour ozone NAAQS
effective November 6, 1991 (56 FR 56694) because the Area did not meet
the 1-hour ozone NAAQS. On November 13, 1992, the Commonwealth of
Kentucky submitted a request to redesignate the Paducah Area to
attainment for the 1-hour ozone NAAQS. At the same time as the
redesignation request, Kentucky submitted the required ozone monitoring
data and maintenance plan to ensure that the Paducah Area would remain
in attainment for the 1-hour ozone NAAQS for a period of 10 years,
consistent with the CAA section 175A(a). The maintenance plan submitted
by Kentucky followed EPA guidance for limited maintenance areas, which
applied to 1-hour ozone NAAQS areas with design values less than 85
percent of the applicable standard (0.12 parts per million). On
February 7, 1995, EPA approved Kentucky's request to redesignate the
Paducah Area (60 FR 7124) to attainment for the 1-hour ozone NAAQS.
II. EPA Guidance and CAA Requirements
On April 30, 2004, EPA designated areas for the 1997 8-hour ozone
NAAQS (69 FR 23858), and published the final Phase I Implementation
Rule for the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS (69 FR 23951) (Phase I Rule). The
Paducah Area was designated attainment for the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS,
effective June 15, 2004. The Paducah attainment area consequently was
required to submit a 10-year maintenance plan under section 110(a)(1)
of the CAA and the Phase I Rule, 40 CFR 51.905(a)(4). On May 20, 2005,
EPA issued guidance providing information as to how a state might
fulfill the maintenance plan obligation established by the CAA and the
Phase I Rule (Memorandum from Lydia N. Wegman to Air Division
Directors, Maintenance Plan Guidance Document for Certain 8-hour Ozone
Areas Under Section 110(a)(1) of Clean Air Act, May 20, 2005--hereafter
referred to as ``Wegman Memorandum'').
On December 22, 2006, the United States Court of Appeals for the
District of Columbia Circuit issued an opinion that vacated portions of
EPA's Phase I Rule. See South Coast Air Quality Management District. v.
EPA, 472 F.3d 882 (DC Cir. 2006). The Court vacated those portions of
the Phase I Rule that provided for regulation of the 1997 8-hour ozone
nonattainment areas designated under Subpart 1 (of part D of the CAA),
in lieu of Subpart 2 among other portions. The Court's decision did not
alter any 8-hour ozone attainment area requirements under the Phase I
Rule for CAA section 110(a)(1) maintenance plans. EPA has determined
that Kentucky's May 27, 2008, proposed SIP revision satisfies the
section 110(a)(1) CAA requirements for a plan that provides for
implementation, maintenance, and enforcement of the 1997 8-hour ozone
NAAQS in the Paducah attainment area.
III. Today's Action
EPA is taking final action to approve the SIP revisions concerning
the 110(a)(1) maintenance plan addressing the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS
for the Paducah Area. This maintenance plan was submitted to EPA on May
27, 2008, by the Commonwealth of Kentucky to ensure the continued
attainment of the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS through the year 2020. This
approval action is based on EPA's analyses of whether this request
complies with section 110 of the CAA and section 51.905(a)(4). EPA's
analyses for the Commonwealth of Kentucky's submittal are described in
detail in the proposed rule published January 4, 2010 (75 FR 97).
The comment period for this proposed action closed on February 3,
2010. EPA did not receive any comments, adverse or otherwise, during
this public comment period. However, EPA noticed an inadvertent
omission of the July 15, 2009, supplement that Kentucky provided from
the electronic docket at https://www.regulations.gov. Since EPA
referenced this supplement in the January 4, 2010, proposed rulemaking,
EPA reopened the public comment period for this proposed action for the
limited purpose of allowing the public the opportunity to review and
consider this supplemental information in regards to EPA's proposed
rulemaking (75 FR 8574). EPA's reopening of the comment period ended on
March 25, 2010. During this additional comment period, EPA did not
receive any comments.
In support of this final action, the Commonwealth of Kentucky
provided an analysis of emissions differences for the highway mobile
source emissions using a Reid Vapor Pressure (RVP) level of 9.0 pounds
per square inch (psi), which is the applicable standard during the
regulatory control period (i.e., May 1st through September 15th). See
40 CFR 80.27. In its original submission, the Commonwealth of Kentucky
had modeled 8.6 psi based on historical information that indicated that
summer
[[Page 52469]]
time RVP supplied to the Paducah Area averaged 8.6 psi. EPA considers
the original submittal to model a more stringent RVP; however, in order
to ensure that Kentucky could demonstrate attainment with a higher RVP,
Kentucky provided the supplemental information. Subsequently, the
Commonwealth of Kentucky provided modeling at the 9.0 psi level. EPA
reviewed this additional information and noted that there was no change
in emissions for nitrogen oxides (NOX) and a slight increase
(less than a tenth of a ton per day) in emissions of volatile organic
compounds (VOC) with RVP at the 9.0 psi level as compared to the 8.6
psi level. The difference in total highway emissions for each year
emissions was provided and is included in the following table:
Paducah Area Highway Mobile Source Emissions
[Tons per day]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
8.6 psi 9.0 psi Difference between 8.6
------------------------------------------------ psi & 9.0 psi
-----------------------
VOC NOX VOC NOX VOC NOX
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2002.................................... 1.14 1.90 1.19 1.90 0.05 0.00
2005.................................... 1.62 3.36 1.67 3.36 0.05 0.00
2008.................................... 1.47 3.00 1.52 3.00 0.05 0.00
2011.................................... 1.32 2.49 1.36 2.49 0.04 0.00
2014.................................... 1.14 1.90 1.19 1.90 0.05 0.00
2017.................................... 1.04 1.51 1.07 1.52 0.03 0.01
2020.................................... 0.94 1.27 0.97 1.27 0.03 0.00
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
EPA has made the determination that, even with the slight increase
in VOC emissions due to the difference of modeling 9.0 psi versus 8.6
psi, Kentucky has demonstrated continued maintenance for the 1997 8-
hour NAAQS for the Paducah Area. Further, EPA believes that Kentucky's
110(a)(1) submission for the Paducah Area meets the CAA requirements in
addition to EPA policy and guidance.
IV. Final Action
Pursuant to Section 110 of the CAA, EPA is approving the
maintenance plan addressing the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS for the Paducah
Area, which was submitted by Kentucky on May 27, 2008, and ensures
continued attainment of the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS through the year
2020. EPA has evaluated the Commonwealth's submittal and has determined
that it meets the applicable requirements of the CAA and EPA
regulations, and is consistent with EPA policy. EPA's rationale is
explained in the proposed action.
On March 12, 2008, EPA issued a revised ozone NAAQS. EPA
subsequently announced a reconsideration of the 2008 NAAQS, and
proposed new 8-hour ozone NAAQS in January 2010. A final 8-hour ozone
NAAQS is expected in August 2010. The current action, however, is being
taken to address requirements under the 1997 ozone NAAQS. Requirements
for the Paducah Area under the 2010 NAAQS will be addressed in the
future.
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP
submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in
reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this
action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and
does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state
law. For that reason, this action:
Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993);
Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the CAA; and
Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this rule does not have tribal implications as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000),
because the SIP is not approved to apply in Indian country located in
the state, and EPA notes that it will not impose substantial direct
costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law.
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
[[Page 52470]]
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review
of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for
the appropriate circuit by October 25, 2010. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect
the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor
does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may
be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or
action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Air pollution control, Environmental protection, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone,
Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Volatile
organic compounds.
Dated: August 11, 2010.
A. Stanley Meiburg,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 4.
PART 52--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart S--Kentucky
0
2. Section 52.920(e), is amended by adding a new entry for the
``Paducah 8-Hour Ozone Attainment/1-Hour Ozone Maintenance Plan Section
110(a)(1)'' at the end of the table to read as follows:
Sec. 52.920 Identification of plan.
* * * * *
(e) * * *
EPA-Approved Kentucky Non-Regulatory Provisions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Applicable State submittal
Name of SIP provision geographic or date/effective EPA approval date Explanation
nonattainment area date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
Paducah 8-Hour Ozone Attainment/ Marshall and May 27, 2008...... August 26, 2010
1-Hour Ozone Maintenance Plan Livingston [insert citation
Section 110(a)(1). Counties. of publication].
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[FR Doc. 2010-21107 Filed 8-25-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P