Agency Information Collection Request. 60-Day Public Comment Request, 52345-52346 [2010-21070]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 164 / Wednesday, August 25, 2010 / Notices
It also appears that for some of these
same shipments, Sinicway acted as a
common carrier in relation to its
NVOCC customers and issued its own
NVOCC bill of lading. The electronic
tariff published by Sinicway appears to
indicate that only Cargo NOS rates were
in effect since July 17, 2009. However,
as indicated by Sinicway’s invoices, the
rate assessed by Sinicway to its NVOCC
customers appears to differ substantially
from its published Cargo NOS rates.
Accordingly, it appears that Sinicway
provided service that was not in
accordance with its published tariff, in
violation of 10(b)(2) of the Shipping Act.
Now therefore, it is ordered, That
pursuant to sections 10, 11, and 13 of
the Shipping Act, 46 U.S.C. 41102,
41104, and 41107–41109, an
investigation is instituted to determine:
(1) Whether Sinicway International
Logistics Ltd. violated section 10(a)(1) of
the Shipping Act by obtaining
transportation at less than the rates and
charges otherwise applicable by an
unjust or unfair device or means;
(2) Whether Sinicway International
Logistics Ltd. violated section 10(b)(2)
of the Shipping Act by providing service
other than at the rates, charges, and
classifications set forth in its published
NVOCC tariff or applicable NSA;
(3) Whether, in the event violations of
sections 10(a)(1), and 10(b)(2) of the
Shipping Act are found, civil penalties
should be assessed against Sinicway
International Logistics Ltd. and, if so,
the amount of penalties to be assessed;
(4) Whether, in the event violations of
section 10(b)(2) of the Shipping Act are
found, the tariff(s) of Sinicway
International Logistics Ltd. should be
suspended; and
(5) Whether, in the event violations
are found, an appropriate cease and
desist order should be issued.
It is further ordered, that a public
hearing be held in this proceeding and
that this matter be assigned for hearing
before an Administrative Law Judge of
the Commission’s Office of
Administrative Law Judges at a date and
place to be hereafter determined by the
Administrative Law Judge in
compliance with Rule 61 of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure, 46 CFR 502.61. The hearing
shall include oral testimony and crossexamination in the discretion of the
presiding Administrative Law Judge
only after consideration has been given
by the parties and the presiding
Administrative Law Judge to the use of
alternative forms of dispute resolution,
and upon a proper showing that there
are genuine issues of material fact that
cannot be resolved on the basis of sworn
statements, affidavits, depositions, or
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:09 Aug 24, 2010
Jkt 220001
other documents or that the nature of
the matters in issue is such that an oral
hearing and cross-examination are
necessary for the development of an
adequate record;
It is further ordered, that Sinicway
International Logistics Ltd. is designated
Respondent in this proceeding;
It is further ordered, that the
Commission’s Bureau of Enforcement is
designated a party to this proceeding;
It is further ordered, that notice of this
Order be published in the Federal
Register, and a copy be served on
parties of record;
It is further ordered, that other
persons having an interest in
participating in this proceeding may file
petitions for leave to intervene in
accordance with Rule 72 of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure, 46 CFR 502.72;
It is further ordered, that all further
notices, orders, and/or decisions issued
by or on behalf of the Commission in
this proceeding, including notice of the
time and place of hearing or prehearing
conference, shall be served on parties of
record;
It is further ordered, that all
documents submitted by any party of
record in this proceeding shall be
directed to the Secretary, Federal
Maritime Commission, Washington, DC
20573, in accordance with Rule 118 of
the Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure, 46 CFR 502.118, and shall be
served on parties of record; and
It is further ordered, that in
accordance with Rule 61 of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure, the initial decision of the
Administrative Law Judge shall be
issued by August 22, 2011 and the final
decision of the Commission shall be
issued by December 20, 2011.
By the Commission.
Karen V. Gregory,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010–21172 Filed 8–24–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
[Document Identifier: OS–0990–New]
Agency Information Collection
Request. 60-Day Public Comment
Request
Office of the Secretary, Office
of the National Coordinator for Health
Information Technology (ONC), HHS
In compliance with the requirement
of section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, the
Office of the Secretary (OS), Department
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Frm 00044
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
52345
of Health and Human Services, is
publishing the following summary of a
proposed information collection request
for public comment. Interested persons
are invited to send comments regarding
this burden estimate or any other aspect
of this collection of information,
including any of the following subjects:
(1) The necessity and utility of the
proposed information collection for the
proper performance of the agency’s
functions; (2) the accuracy of the
estimated burden; (3) ways to enhance
the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and (4) the
use of automated collection techniques
or other forms of information
technology to minimize the information
collection burden. To obtain copies of
the supporting statement and any
related forms for the proposed
paperwork collections referenced above,
e-mail your request, including your
address, phone number, OMB number,
and OS document identifier, to
Sherette.funncoleman@hhs.gov, or call
the Reports Clearance Office on (202)
690–6162. Written comments and
recommendations for the proposed
information collections must be directed
to the OS Paperwork Clearance Officer
at the above e-mail address within 60
days.
Proposed Project: Evaluation of the IT
Professionals in Health Care—OMB No.
0990—NEW—Office of the National
Coordinator for Health Information
Technology (ONC).
Abstract: The Office of the National
Coordinator for Health Information
Technology (ONC) Office of the Chief
Scientist is soliciting comments on a
series of data collection efforts for the
Evaluation of the IT Professionals in
Health Care. The Workforce Program,
created under Section 3016 of the
HITECH Act, was intended to provide
‘‘assistance to institutions of higher
education (or consortia thereof) to
establish or expand health informatics
education programs, including
certification, undergraduate, and
masters degree programs, for both health
care and information technology
students.’’ The evaluation of the
Workforce Program is a new information
collection activity which will explore
program challenges, provide critical
formative feedback to the Workforce
grantee institutions on their activities,
and determine whether the Workforce
Program overall was successful in
helping to build a skilled workforce
equipped to meet the heightened
demands of the current environment.
The data collection efforts include: A
Web-based baseline survey of
community college students; course
evaluation forms; focus groups with
E:\FR\FM\25AUN1.SGM
25AUN1
52346
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 164 / Wednesday, August 25, 2010 / Notices
students, faculty members, and
competency exam takers; and a Web-
based survey of community college
faculty.
ESTIMATED ANNUALIZED BURDEN TABLE
Type of respondent
Web-based student baseline survey
Average burden hours per
response
1,350
1
20/60
450
256
1
1.5
384
50
32
1
1
1.5
1.5
75
48
Web-based faculty survey ................
300
1
10/60
50
........................
........................
........................
1,007
Students enrolled in workforce program
Students enrolled in workforce program
Instructors from workforce program
Competency exam takers not enrolled in workforce program
Instructors from workforce program
Total ...........................................
...........................................................
Focus groups with students ..............
Focus groups with faculty .................
Focus groups with exam takers ........
Seleda Perryman,
Office of the Secretary, Paperwork Reduction
Act Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 2010–21070 Filed 8–24–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4150–45–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Office of the Secretary
Findings of Scientific Misconduct
Office of the Secretary, HHS.
Notice.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
Notice is hereby given that
the Office of Research Integrity (ORI)
and the Assistant Secretary for Health
have taken final action in the following
case:
Elizabeth Goodwin, PhD, University of
Wisconsin-Madison: Based on the report
of an investigation conducted by the
University of Wisconsin-Madison (UWM) and additional analysis conducted
by ORI in its oversight review, the U.S.
Public Health Service (PHS) found that
Elizabeth Goodwin, PhD, former
associate professor of genetics and
medical genetics, UW-M, engaged in
scientific misconduct while her research
was supported by National Institute of
General Medical Sciences (NIGMS),
National Institutes of Health (NIH),
grants R01 GM051836 and R01
GM073183.
PHS found that the Respondent
engaged in misconduct in science by
falsifying and fabricating data that she
included in grant applications 2 R01
GM051836–13 and 1 R01 GM073183–
01.
PHS found that in grant application
2 R01 GM051836–13, Respondent
knowingly and intentionally:
SUMMARY:
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
Number of
responses per
respondent
Number of
respondents
Forms
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:09 Aug 24, 2010
Jkt 220001
• Falsified Figures 5A and 5B by
reusing figures from two of her earlier
published papers and falsely labeling
them to claim results that had not been
achieved in her laboratory.
• Falsified Figure 7B by reusing a
figure from one of her published papers
and both relabeling it to claim she had
detected the STAR–2 protein rather than
the TRA-l protein actually detected and
modifying the image in the application
to disguise its origin.
• Falsified Figure 8C by using a figure
produced by one of her students and
relabeled it to show that RNAi treatment
of C. elegans led to increased expression
of the TRA–2 protein when this result
had not been obtained by the student.
• Falsified the table on Page 20 of the
application showing phenotypic
frequencies of worms expressing star-2
(ok483) mutants by significantly
overstating the level of aberrant
phenotypes and fabricating certain
categories of phenotypes not seen by the
student conducting the research.
PHS finds that in grant application
1 R01 GM073183–01, Dr. Goodwin
knowingly and intentionally:
• Falsified Figure 5 because she used
the same two lanes in both Figure 5 and
Figure 7, although they were flipped
horizontally in one of the figures to
disguise their reuse. In Figure 7, the
lanes illustrated an effect on laf-1 during
developmental stages of C. elegans, and
in Figure 5, the same lanes purportedly
illustrated an effect on laf-1 noncoding
RNA. A witness testified that the result
in Figure 5 had not been observed,
while that in Figure 7 had, indicating
that the claims for Figure 5 were
falsified.
• Falsified Figure 8 by reusing
photographs prepared by a student that
identified the location of rRas-l
PO 00000
Frm 00045
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Total burden
hours
expression in adult worms and claiming
instead that the images illustrated the
location of laf-1 mRNA. The images had
been enlarged and cropped to disguise
their location.
Dr. Goodwin has entered into a
Voluntary Exclusion Agreement in
which she has voluntarily agreed, for a
period of three (3) years, beginning on
July 22, 2010:
(1) To exclude herself from any
contracting or subcontracting with any
agency of the U.S. Government and from
eligibility for, or involvement in,
nonprocurement programs of the U.S.
Government referred to as ‘‘covered
transactions’’ pursuant to the HHS
Implementation of OMB Guidelines to
Agencies on Governmentwide
Debarment and Suspension at 2 CFR
376, et seq.; and
(2) To exclude herself from serving in
any advisory capacity to PHS, including
but not limited to service on any PHS
advisory committee, board, and/or peer
review committee, or as a consultant.
This Agreement is entered into
pursuant to the terms of a plea
agreement by and between the
Respondent and the United States
Attorney for the Western District of
Wisconsin.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Director, Division of Investigative
Oversight, Office of Research Integrity,
1101 Wootton Parkway, Suite 750,
Rockville, MD 20852, (240) 453–8800.
John Dahlberg,
Director, Division of Investigative Oversight,
Office of Research Integrity.
[FR Doc. 2010–21048 Filed 8–24–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4150–31–P
E:\FR\FM\25AUN1.SGM
25AUN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 164 (Wednesday, August 25, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 52345-52346]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-21070]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
[Document Identifier: OS-0990-New]
Agency Information Collection Request. 60-Day Public Comment
Request
AGENCY: Office of the Secretary, Office of the National Coordinator for
Health Information Technology (ONC), HHS
In compliance with the requirement of section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, the Office of the Secretary (OS),
Department of Health and Human Services, is publishing the following
summary of a proposed information collection request for public
comment. Interested persons are invited to send comments regarding this
burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information,
including any of the following subjects: (1) The necessity and utility
of the proposed information collection for the proper performance of
the agency's functions; (2) the accuracy of the estimated burden; (3)
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to
be collected; and (4) the use of automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology to minimize the information
collection burden. To obtain copies of the supporting statement and any
related forms for the proposed paperwork collections referenced above,
e-mail your request, including your address, phone number, OMB number,
and OS document identifier, to Sherette.funncoleman@hhs.gov, or call
the Reports Clearance Office on (202) 690-6162. Written comments and
recommendations for the proposed information collections must be
directed to the OS Paperwork Clearance Officer at the above e-mail
address within 60 days.
Proposed Project: Evaluation of the IT Professionals in Health
Care--OMB No. 0990--NEW--Office of the National Coordinator for Health
Information Technology (ONC).
Abstract: The Office of the National Coordinator for Health
Information Technology (ONC) Office of the Chief Scientist is
soliciting comments on a series of data collection efforts for the
Evaluation of the IT Professionals in Health Care. The Workforce
Program, created under Section 3016 of the HITECH Act, was intended to
provide ``assistance to institutions of higher education (or consortia
thereof) to establish or expand health informatics education programs,
including certification, undergraduate, and masters degree programs,
for both health care and information technology students.'' The
evaluation of the Workforce Program is a new information collection
activity which will explore program challenges, provide critical
formative feedback to the Workforce grantee institutions on their
activities, and determine whether the Workforce Program overall was
successful in helping to build a skilled workforce equipped to meet the
heightened demands of the current environment. The data collection
efforts include: A Web-based baseline survey of community college
students; course evaluation forms; focus groups with
[[Page 52346]]
students, faculty members, and competency exam takers; and a Web-based
survey of community college faculty.
Estimated Annualized Burden Table
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number of Average burden
Forms Type of Number of responses per hours per Total burden
respondent respondents respondent response hours
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Web-based student baseline Students 1,350 1 20/60 450
survey. enrolled in
workforce
program
Focus groups with students.... Students 256 1 1.5 384
enrolled in
workforce
program
Focus groups with faculty..... Instructors from 50 1 1.5 75
workforce
program
Focus groups with exam takers. Competency exam 32 1 1.5 48
takers not
enrolled in
workforce
program
Web-based faculty survey...... Instructors from 300 1 10/60 50
workforce
program
---------------------------------------------------------------
Total..................... ................ .............. .............. .............. 1,007
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Seleda Perryman,
Office of the Secretary, Paperwork Reduction Act Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 2010-21070 Filed 8-24-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4150-45-P
