Airworthiness Directives; Aircraft Industries a.s. (Type Certificate G24EU Previously Held by LETECKÉ ZÁVODY a.s. and LET Aeronautical Works) Model L-13 Blanik Gliders, 52250-52253 [2010-20877]

Download as PDF 52250 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 164 / Wednesday, August 25, 2010 / Rules and Regulations Issue No. Page title/description Page number(s) List of Effective Pages ............................................................................. Table of Contents ..................................................................................... Section 1—Introduction ............................................................................ Section 2—Airworthiness Limitation Items (ALI) ...................................... 1–LEP ............................................. 1–TOC ............................................ 1—7 ................................................ 1—61 .............................................. 9 9 9 09 Date shown on page(s) November November November November 2006. 2006. 2006. 2006. Airbus A318/A319/A320/A321 ALI AI/SE– M4/95A.0252/96, Issue 10 contains the following effective pages: Page title/description Page number(s) List of Effective Pages: ALI Title Page ..................................................................... Record of Revisions ........................................................... Table of Contents ............................................................... Section 1—Introduction ...................................................... Section 2—Damage Tolerant Airworthiness Limitations List. Appendix A—Summary of Changes .................................. Appendix B—Abbreviations ................................................ Appendix C—Terms and Definitions .................................. Appendix D—Reporting Form ............................................ Appendix E—Modifications List .......................................... Issue No. None shown ........................ 1–ROR through 4-ROR ....... 1–TOC ................................. 1–INTRO through 8–INTRO 1—85 ................................... 10 ........................................ None shown* ....................... None shown* ....................... None shown* ....................... None shown* ....................... October October October October October 2009. 2009. 2009. 2009. 2009. 1–APXA through 9-APXA ... 1–APXB through 2-APXB ... 1–APXC ............................... 1–APXD ............................... 1–APXE through 2-APXE ... None None None None None October October October October October 2009. 2009. 2009. 2009. 2009. shown* shown* shown* shown* shown* ....................... ....................... ....................... ....................... ....................... Date shown on page(s) (*Only the title page of this document contains the issue level of the document.) (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by reference of this service information under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. (2) For service information identified in this AD, contact Airbus, Airworthiness Office—EAS, 1 Rond Point Maurice Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Cedex, France; telephone +33 5 61 93 36 96; fax +33 5 61 93 44 51; e-mail: account.airworth-eas@airbus.com; Internet https://www.airbus.com. (3) You may review copies of the service information at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington. For information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call 425–227–1221. (4) You may also review copies of the service information that is incorporated by reference at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202–741–6030, or go to: https://www.archives.gov/federal_register/ code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_ locations.html. Issued in Renton, Washington, on August 13, 2010. Ali Bahrami, Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service. mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES [FR Doc. 2010–21023 Filed 8–24–10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910–13–P VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:51 Aug 24, 2010 Jkt 220001 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Aviation Administration 14 CFR Part 39 [Docket No. FAA–2010–0839; Directorate Identifier 2010–CE–042–AD; Amendment 39–16418; AD 2010–18–05] RIN 2120–AA64 Airworthiness Directives; Aircraft Industries a.s. (Type Certificate G24EU ´ ´ Previously Held by LETECKE ZAVODY a.s. and LET Aeronautical Works) Model L–13 Blanik Gliders Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT. ACTION: Final rule; request for comments. AGENCY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the products listed above that will supersede an existing AD. This AD results from mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) issued by the aviation authority of another country to identify and correct an unsafe condition on an aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe condition as: SUMMARY: A fatal accident occurred to a L–13 ´ BLANIK sailplane, in which the main spar of the right wing failed near the root due to positive load. The right wing detached from the aircraft and the pilots lost control of the sailplane. The preliminary investigation has revealed that the fracture may have been due to fatigue. PO 00000 Frm 00038 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 The AD 2010–0119–E required immediate inspection of the main spar at the root of the wing to detect fatigue cracking and the accomplishment of the relevant corrective actions as necessary. In addition, the AD 2010–0119–E imposed operational limitations. AD 2010–0122–E retained the requirements of AD 2010–0119–E, which is superseded, and extended the applicability to ´ L–13 A BLANIK sailplanes. This AD requires actions that are intended to address the unsafe condition described in the MCAI. DATES: This AD becomes effective August 30, 2010. We must receive comments on this AD by October 12, 2010. ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods: • Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments. • Fax: (202) 493–2251. • Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M– 30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590. • Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M– 30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. Examining the AD Docket You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https:// www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Management Facility between 9 E:\FR\FM\25AUR1.SGM 25AUR1 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 164 / Wednesday, August 25, 2010 / Rules and Regulations a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains this AD, the regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street address for the Docket Office (telephone (800) 647– 5527) is in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly after receipt. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Greg Davison, Aerospace Engineer, Small Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust, Room 301, Kansas City, Missouri 64106, telephone: (816) 329–4130, fax: (816) 329–4090. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Discussion mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES On June 28, 2010, we issued AD 2010–14–15, Amendment 39–16360 (75 FR 39795), dated July 13, 2010. That AD required actions intended to address an unsafe condition on the products listed above. Since we issued AD 2010–14–15, we have received preliminary information from the European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), which is the Technical Agent for the Member States of the European Community, that identified fatigue as the failure mode in the fatal accident. The examination of the fractures in the wing flange straps found eight areas of fatigue cracking that originated from the surface of the bores used to rivet the flange straps to the hinge. The fatigue cracks had propagated to the surface of the flange straps and were not visible for inspection. In addition, we received several public comments indicating that the use of a 10X magnifier is not appropriate to assess the specified inspection areas and portions of the operational data requested by the current AD are not required for U.S. operators. EASA has issued Emergency AD No. 2010–0160–E, dated July 30, 2010 (referred to after this as ‘‘the MCAI’’), to correct an unsafe condition for the specified products. The MCAI states: A fatal accident occurred to a L–13 ´ BLANIK sailplane, in which the main spar of the right wing failed near the root due to positive load. The right wing detached from the aircraft and the pilots lost control of the sailplane. The preliminary investigation has revealed that the fracture may have been due to fatigue. The AD 2010–0119–E required immediate inspection of the main spar at the root of the wing to detect fatigue cracking and the accomplishment of the relevant corrective actions as necessary. In addition, the AD 2010–0119–E imposed operational limitations. AD 2010–0122–E retained the requirements of AD 2010–0119–E, which is VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:51 Aug 24, 2010 Jkt 220001 superseded, and extended the applicability to ´ L–13 A BLANIK sailplanes. The requirements of AD 2010–0122–E were considered as interim action to immediately address the unsafe condition. Since issuance of AD 2010–0122–E, based on further information provided by the Austrian Accident Investigation Board, EASA has reassessed the inspection method as described in Aircraft Industries a.s. Mandatory Bulletin No. L13/109a. EASA now concludes that the inspection method might not be sufficient for detecting the crack which means that the unsafe condition might still be present even if the sailplane has passed the inspection required by AD 2010–0122–E. Furthermore, the Type Certificate Holder indicates that it is extremely important to remain within the flight limitations specified in the Aircraft Industries a.s. Mandatory Bulletin No. L13/ 109a. For this reason, this AD further requires a record checking for determining if the sailplane has been operated within the flight limitations. For all the reasons stated above, as a precautionary measure, this AD is prohibiting operations when a sailplane does not pass the requirements of this AD. For those sailplanes, EASA is currently working with the Type Certificate Holder. When, as a result of the on-going investigation, a solution is later identified, further mandatory action is likely to follow. You may obtain further information by examining the MCAI in the AD docket. FAA’s Determination and Requirements of the AD This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another country, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant to our bilateral agreement with this State of Design Authority, they have notified us of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI and service information referenced above. We are issuing this AD because we evaluated all information provided by the State of Design Authority and determined the unsafe condition exists and is likely to exist or develop on other products of the same type design. Differences Between This AD and the MCAI or Service Information We have reviewed the MCAI and related service information and, in general, agree with their substance. But we might have found it necessary to use different words from those in the MCAI to ensure the AD is clear for U.S. operators and is enforceable. In making these changes, we do not intend to differ substantively from the information provided in the MCAI and related service information. We might have also required different actions in this AD from those in the MCAI in order to follow FAA policies. Any such differences are described in a separate paragraph of the AD. These PO 00000 Frm 00039 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 52251 requirements take precedence over those copied from the MCAI. FAA’s Determination of the Effective Date An unsafe condition exists that requires the immediate adoption of this AD. The FAA has found that the risk to the flying public justifies waiving notice and comment prior to adoption of this rule because a fatal accident occurred in an L–13 Blanik glider. The main spar of the right wing of the accident glider failed near the root due to positive load. The right wing detached from the aircraft and the pilots lost control. The preliminary investigation has revealed that the fracture may have been due to fatigue. Therefore, we determined that notice and opportunity for public comment before issuing this AD are impracticable and that good cause exists for making this amendment effective in fewer than 30 days. Comments Invited This AD is a final rule that involves requirements affecting flight safety, and we did not precede it by notice and opportunity for public comment. We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or arguments about this AD. Send your comments to an address listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ‘‘Docket No. FAA–2010–0839; Directorate Identifier 2010–CE–042–AD’’ at the beginning of your comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory, economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this AD. We will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend this AD because of those comments. We will post all comments we receive, without change, to https:// www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we receive about this AD. Authority for This Rulemaking Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA’s authority to issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. ‘‘Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,’’ describes in more detail the scope of the Agency’s authority. We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in ‘‘Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General requirements.’’ Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing regulations for practices, methods, and procedures E:\FR\FM\25AUR1.SGM 25AUR1 52252 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 164 / Wednesday, August 25, 2010 / Rules and Regulations the Administrator finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this rulemaking action. Regulatory Findings List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39 Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Safety. Adoption of the Amendment Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows: ■ PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES 1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows: ■ Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701. [Amended] 2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by removing Amendment 39–16360 (75 FR 39795), dated July 13, 2010, and adding the following new AD: mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES ■ 2010–18–05 Aircraft Industries a.s. (Type Certificate G24EU Previously Held by ´ ´ Letecke Zavody a.s. and LET Aeronautical Works): Amendment 39– 16418; Docket No. FAA–2010–0839; Directorate Identifier 2010–CE–042–AD. Effective Date (a) This airworthiness directive (AD) becomes effective August 30, 2010. Affected ADs (b) This AD supersedes AD 2010–14–15; Amendment 39–16360. VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:51 Aug 24, 2010 FAA AD Differences (c) This AD applies to Aircraft Industries a.s. L–13 Blanik gliders, all serial numbers, certificated in any category. Note: This AD differs from the MCAI and/ or service information as follows: The MCAI requires the owner/operator to submit data regarding certain operations including aerobatic operations, to the European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) and Aircraft Industries, a.s. so they can determine whether further flight is permitted. The FAA does not require such data to be collected for operations in the United States. The FAA is relying on an inspection and/or modification program approved specifically for this AD to detect and correct cracks before further flight. Until such a program is approved, owners/ operators may apply for an alternative method of compliance (AMOC) following 14 CFR 39.19 described in paragraph (f)(1) of this AD. The FAA will work with EASA and Aircraft Industries a.s. to determine if an acceptable level of safety is achieved with the AMOC proposal. Subject (d) Air Transport Association of America (ATA) Code 57: Wings. Reason We determined that this AD will not have federalism implications under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government. For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD: (1) Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under Executive Order 12866; (2) Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and (3) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to comply with this AD and placed it in the AD docket. § 39.13 Applicability Jkt 220001 (e) The mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) states: A fatal accident occurred to a L–13 ´ BLANIK sailplane, in which the main spar of the right wing failed near the root due to positive load. The right wing detached from the aircraft and the pilots lost control of the sailplane. The preliminary investigation has revealed that the fracture may have been due to fatigue. The AD 2010–0119–E required immediate inspection of the main spar at the root of the wing to detect fatigue cracking and the accomplishment of the relevant corrective actions as necessary. In addition, the AD 2010–0119–E imposed operational limitations. AD 2010–0122–E retained the requirements of AD 2010–0119–E, which is superseded, and extended the applicability to ´ L–13 A BLANIK sailplanes. The requirements of AD 2010–0122–E were considered as interim action to immediately address the unsafe condition. Since issuance of AD 2010–0122–E, based on further information provided by the Austrian Accident Investigation Board, EASA has reassessed the inspection method as described in Aircraft Industries a.s. Mandatory Bulletin No. L13/109a. EASA now concludes that the inspection method might not be sufficient for detecting the crack which means that the unsafe condition might still be present even if the sailplane has passed the inspection required by AD 2010–0122–E. Furthermore, the Type Certificate Holder indicates that it is extremely important to remain within the flight limitations specified in the Aircraft Industries a.s. Mandatory Bulletin No. L13/ 109a. For this reason, this AD further requires a record checking for determining if the sailplane has been operated within the flight limitations. For all the reasons stated above, as a precautionary measure, this AD is prohibiting operations when a sailplane does not pass the requirements of this AD. For those sailplanes, EASA is currently working with the Type Certificate Holder. When, as a result of the on-going investigation, a solution is later identified, further mandatory action is likely to follow. Actions and Compliance (f) To address this problem, before further flight after August 30, 2010 (the effective date of this AD), incorporate an FAA-approved inspection and/or modification program developed specifically for this AD. Corrective action is considered FAA-approved if it is approved by the State of Design Authority (or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product is airworthy before it is returned to service. PO 00000 Frm 00040 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 Other FAA AD Provisions (f) The following provisions also apply to this AD: (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager, Standards Office, FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. Send information to Attn: Greg Davison, Aerospace Engineer, FAA, Small Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust, Room 301, Kansas City, Missouri 64106; telephone: (816) 329–4130; fax: (816) 329– 4090. Before using any approved AMOC on any airplane to which the AMOC applies, notify your appropriate principal inspector (PI) in the FAA Flight Standards District Office (FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local FSDO. (2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority (or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product is airworthy before it is returned to service. (3) Reporting Requirements: For any reporting requirement in this AD, under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has approved the information collection requirements and has assigned OMB Control Number 2120–0056. Special Flight Permit (g) Under 14 CFR part 39.23, we are limiting the special flight permits for this AD by prohibiting aerobatic maneuvers. Related Information (h) Refer to MCAI EASA Emergency AD No. 2010–0160–E, dated July 30, 2010, for related information. For future service information that may be developed to address the unsafe condition specified in this AD, contact Aircraft Industries, a.s., Na ´ Zahonech 1177, 686 04 Kunovice, Czech Republic; telephone: +420 572 817 660; fax: +420 572 816 112; Internet: https:// www.let.cz/; e-mail: ots@let.cz. E:\FR\FM\25AUR1.SGM 25AUR1 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 164 / Wednesday, August 25, 2010 / Rules and Regulations Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on August 17, 2010. John Colomy, Acting Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service. 30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. [FR Doc. 2010–20877 Filed 8–24–10; 8:45 am] Examining the AD Docket BILLING CODE 4910–13–P DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Aviation Administration 14 CFR Part 39 [Docket No. FAA–2010–0847; Directorate Identifier 2010–CE–046–AD; Amendment 39–16419; AD 2010–18–06] RIN 2120–AA64 Airworthiness Directives; GA 8 Airvan (Pty) Ltd Models GA8 and GA8–TC320 Airplanes Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT. ACTION: Final rule; request for comments. AGENCY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the products listed above that will supersede an existing AD. This AD results from mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) issued by the aviation authority of another country to identify and correct an unsafe condition on an aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe condition as: SUMMARY: mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES Inspections have revealed cases of excessive wear in the forward slide of the cargo door. Excessive wear in the door slide may result in the door becoming detached from the aircraft in flight, with potentially catastrophic results. This AD requires actions that are intended to address the unsafe condition described in the MCAI. DATES: This AD becomes effective August 30, 2010. On August 30, 2010, the Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in this AD. We must receive comments on this AD by October 12, 2010. ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods: • Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments. • Fax: (202) 493–2251. • Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M– 30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590. • Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M– VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:51 Aug 24, 2010 Jkt 220001 You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https:// www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Management Facility between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains this AD, the regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street address for the Docket Office (telephone (800) 647– 5527) is in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly after receipt. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Doug Rudolph, Aerospace Engineer, FAA, Small Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust, Room 301, Kansas City, Missouri 64106; telephone: (816) 329– 4059; fax: (816) 329–4090. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Discussion On October 18, 2005, we issued AD 2005–22–02, Amendment 39–14346 (70 FR 61547; October 25, 2005). That AD required actions intended to address an unsafe condition on the products listed above. Since we issued AD 2005–22–02, there has been another report of an inflight cargo door separation. Consequently, GA 8 Airvan (Pty) Ltd has revised the service information by improving the inspection method and making a minor design change to the door slide. The Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA), which is the aviation authority for Australia, has issued AD/GA8/3, Amdt 2, dated August 11, 2010 (referred to after this as ‘‘the MCAI’’), to correct an unsafe condition for the specified products. The MCAI states: Inspections have revealed cases of excessive wear in the forward slide of the cargo door. Excessive wear in the door slide may result in the door becoming detached from the aircraft in flight, with potentially catastrophic results. Following a recent in-flight door separation, this amendment is issued to update the service bulletin to remove any ambiguities that could have existed in the previous revision to the referenced service bulletin. It also provides an improved inspection method and a minor design change to the cargo door slide (inclusion of slide backing plate, castellated nut and spilt [sic] pin). You may obtain further information by examining the MCAI in the AD docket. PO 00000 Frm 00041 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 52253 Relevant Service Information GippsAero Pty. Ltd. has issued Mandatory Service Bulletin SB–GA8– 2005–23, Issue 3, dated August 5, 2010. The actions described in this service information are intended to correct the unsafe condition identified in the MCAI. FAA’s Determination and Requirements of the AD This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another country, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant to our bilateral agreement with this State of Design Authority, they have notified us of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI and service information referenced above. We are issuing this AD because we evaluated all information provided by the State of Design Authority and determined the unsafe condition exists and is likely to exist or develop on other products of the same type design. Differences Between This AD and the MCAI or Service Information We have reviewed the MCAI and related service information and, in general, agree with their substance. But we might have found it necessary to use different words from those in the MCAI to ensure the AD is clear for U.S. operators and is enforceable. In making these changes, we do not intend to differ substantively from the information provided in the MCAI and related service information. We might have also required different actions in this AD from those in the MCAI in order to follow FAA policies. Any such differences are described in a separate paragraph of the AD. These requirements take precedence over those copied from the MCAI. FAA’s Determination of the Effective Date An unsafe condition exists that requires the immediate adoption of this AD. The FAA has found that the risk to the flying public justifies waiving notice and comment prior to adoption of this rule because an in-flight separation of the door could potentially strike the horizontal stabilizer structure, which could lead to failure of the tailplane assembly. Therefore, we determined that notice and opportunity for public comment before issuing this AD are impracticable and that good cause exists for making this amendment effective in fewer than 30 days. Comments Invited This AD is a final rule that involves requirements affecting flight safety, and E:\FR\FM\25AUR1.SGM 25AUR1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 164 (Wednesday, August 25, 2010)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 52250-52253]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-20877]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2010-0839; Directorate Identifier 2010-CE-042-AD; 
Amendment 39-16418; AD 2010-18-05]
RIN 2120-AA64


Airworthiness Directives; Aircraft Industries a.s. (Type 
Certificate G24EU Previously Held by LETECK[Eacute] Z[Aacute]VODY a.s. 
and LET Aeronautical Works) Model L-13 Blanik Gliders

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule; request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the 
products listed above that will supersede an existing AD. This AD 
results from mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) 
issued by the aviation authority of another country to identify and 
correct an unsafe condition on an aviation product. The MCAI describes 
the unsafe condition as:

    A fatal accident occurred to a L-13 BLAN[Iacute]K sailplane, in 
which the main spar of the right wing failed near the root due to 
positive load. The right wing detached from the aircraft and the 
pilots lost control of the sailplane.
    The preliminary investigation has revealed that the fracture may 
have been due to fatigue.
    The AD 2010-0119-E required immediate inspection of the main 
spar at the root of the wing to detect fatigue cracking and the 
accomplishment of the relevant corrective actions as necessary. In 
addition, the AD 2010-0119-E imposed operational limitations. AD 
2010-0122-E retained the requirements of AD 2010-0119-E, which is 
superseded, and extended the applicability to L-13 A BLAN[Iacute]K 
sailplanes.

This AD requires actions that are intended to address the unsafe 
condition described in the MCAI.

DATES: This AD becomes effective August 30, 2010.
    We must receive comments on this AD by October 12, 2010.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax: (202) 493-2251.
     Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket 
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New 
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket 
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New 
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., 
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Management Facility 
between 9

[[Page 52251]]

a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD 
docket contains this AD, the regulatory evaluation, any comments 
received, and other information. The street address for the Docket 
Office (telephone (800) 647-5527) is in the ADDRESSES section. Comments 
will be available in the AD docket shortly after receipt.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Greg Davison, Aerospace Engineer, 
Small Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust, Room 301, Kansas City, Missouri 
64106, telephone: (816) 329-4130, fax: (816) 329-4090.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Discussion

    On June 28, 2010, we issued AD 2010-14-15, Amendment 39-16360 (75 
FR 39795), dated July 13, 2010. That AD required actions intended to 
address an unsafe condition on the products listed above.
    Since we issued AD 2010-14-15, we have received preliminary 
information from the European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), which is 
the Technical Agent for the Member States of the European Community, 
that identified fatigue as the failure mode in the fatal accident. The 
examination of the fractures in the wing flange straps found eight 
areas of fatigue cracking that originated from the surface of the bores 
used to rivet the flange straps to the hinge. The fatigue cracks had 
propagated to the surface of the flange straps and were not visible for 
inspection.
    In addition, we received several public comments indicating that 
the use of a 10X magnifier is not appropriate to assess the specified 
inspection areas and portions of the operational data requested by the 
current AD are not required for U.S. operators.
    EASA has issued Emergency AD No. 2010-0160-E, dated July 30, 2010 
(referred to after this as ``the MCAI''), to correct an unsafe 
condition for the specified products. The MCAI states:

    A fatal accident occurred to a L-13 BLAN[Iacute]K sailplane, in 
which the main spar of the right wing failed near the root due to 
positive load. The right wing detached from the aircraft and the 
pilots lost control of the sailplane.
    The preliminary investigation has revealed that the fracture may 
have been due to fatigue.
    The AD 2010-0119-E required immediate inspection of the main 
spar at the root of the wing to detect fatigue cracking and the 
accomplishment of the relevant corrective actions as necessary. In 
addition, the AD 2010-0119-E imposed operational limitations. AD 
2010-0122-E retained the requirements of AD 2010-0119-E, which is 
superseded, and extended the applicability to L-13 A BLAN[Iacute]K 
sailplanes.
    The requirements of AD 2010-0122-E were considered as interim 
action to immediately address the unsafe condition. Since issuance 
of AD 2010-0122-E, based on further information provided by the 
Austrian Accident Investigation Board, EASA has re-assessed the 
inspection method as described in Aircraft Industries a.s. Mandatory 
Bulletin No. L13/109a. EASA now concludes that the inspection method 
might not be sufficient for detecting the crack which means that the 
unsafe condition might still be present even if the sailplane has 
passed the inspection required by AD 2010-0122-E. Furthermore, the 
Type Certificate Holder indicates that it is extremely important to 
remain within the flight limitations specified in the Aircraft 
Industries a.s. Mandatory Bulletin No. L13/109a. For this reason, 
this AD further requires a record checking for determining if the 
sailplane has been operated within the flight limitations.
    For all the reasons stated above, as a precautionary measure, 
this AD is prohibiting operations when a sailplane does not pass the 
requirements of this AD. For those sailplanes, EASA is currently 
working with the Type Certificate Holder. When, as a result of the 
on-going investigation, a solution is later identified, further 
mandatory action is likely to follow.

You may obtain further information by examining the MCAI in the AD 
docket.

FAA's Determination and Requirements of the AD

    This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another 
country, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant 
to our bilateral agreement with this State of Design Authority, they 
have notified us of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI and 
service information referenced above. We are issuing this AD because we 
evaluated all information provided by the State of Design Authority and 
determined the unsafe condition exists and is likely to exist or 
develop on other products of the same type design.

Differences Between This AD and the MCAI or Service Information

    We have reviewed the MCAI and related service information and, in 
general, agree with their substance. But we might have found it 
necessary to use different words from those in the MCAI to ensure the 
AD is clear for U.S. operators and is enforceable. In making these 
changes, we do not intend to differ substantively from the information 
provided in the MCAI and related service information.
    We might have also required different actions in this AD from those 
in the MCAI in order to follow FAA policies. Any such differences are 
described in a separate paragraph of the AD. These requirements take 
precedence over those copied from the MCAI.

FAA's Determination of the Effective Date

    An unsafe condition exists that requires the immediate adoption of 
this AD. The FAA has found that the risk to the flying public justifies 
waiving notice and comment prior to adoption of this rule because a 
fatal accident occurred in an L-13 Blanik glider. The main spar of the 
right wing of the accident glider failed near the root due to positive 
load. The right wing detached from the aircraft and the pilots lost 
control. The preliminary investigation has revealed that the fracture 
may have been due to fatigue. Therefore, we determined that notice and 
opportunity for public comment before issuing this AD are impracticable 
and that good cause exists for making this amendment effective in fewer 
than 30 days.

Comments Invited

    This AD is a final rule that involves requirements affecting flight 
safety, and we did not precede it by notice and opportunity for public 
comment. We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or 
arguments about this AD. Send your comments to an address listed under 
the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2010-0839; Directorate 
Identifier 2010-CE-042-AD'' at the beginning of your comments. We 
specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory, economic, 
environmental, and energy aspects of this AD. We will consider all 
comments received by the closing date and may amend this AD because of 
those comments.
    We will post all comments we receive, without change, to https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We 
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we 
receive about this AD.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to 
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the 
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation 
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's 
authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in 
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General 
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with 
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing 
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures

[[Page 52252]]

the Administrator finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This 
regulation is within the scope of that authority because it addresses 
an unsafe condition that is likely to exist or develop on products 
identified in this rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this AD will not have federalism implications 
under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct 
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national 
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and 
responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive 
Order 12866;
    (2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and 
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
    (3) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or 
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria 
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to 
comply with this AD and placed it in the AD docket.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment

0
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator, 
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.


Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by removing Amendment 39-16360 (75 FR 
39795), dated July 13, 2010, and adding the following new AD:

2010-18-05 Aircraft Industries a.s. (Type Certificate G24EU 
Previously Held by Leteck[eacute] Z[aacute]vody a.s. and LET 
Aeronautical Works): Amendment 39-16418; Docket No. FAA-2010-0839; 
Directorate Identifier 2010-CE-042-AD.

Effective Date

    (a) This airworthiness directive (AD) becomes effective August 
30, 2010.

Affected ADs

    (b) This AD supersedes AD 2010-14-15; Amendment 39-16360.

Applicability

    (c) This AD applies to Aircraft Industries a.s. L-13 Blanik 
gliders, all serial numbers, certificated in any category.

Subject

    (d) Air Transport Association of America (ATA) Code 57: Wings.

Reason

    (e) The mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) 
states:

    A fatal accident occurred to a L-13 BLAN[Iacute]K sailplane, in 
which the main spar of the right wing failed near the root due to 
positive load. The right wing detached from the aircraft and the 
pilots lost control of the sailplane.
    The preliminary investigation has revealed that the fracture may 
have been due to fatigue.
    The AD 2010-0119-E required immediate inspection of the main 
spar at the root of the wing to detect fatigue cracking and the 
accomplishment of the relevant corrective actions as necessary. In 
addition, the AD 2010-0119-E imposed operational limitations. AD 
2010-0122-E retained the requirements of AD 2010-0119-E, which is 
superseded, and extended the applicability to L-13 A BLAN[Iacute]K 
sailplanes.
    The requirements of AD 2010-0122-E were considered as interim 
action to immediately address the unsafe condition. Since issuance 
of AD 2010-0122-E, based on further information provided by the 
Austrian Accident Investigation Board, EASA has re-assessed the 
inspection method as described in Aircraft Industries a.s. Mandatory 
Bulletin No. L13/109a. EASA now concludes that the inspection method 
might not be sufficient for detecting the crack which means that the 
unsafe condition might still be present even if the sailplane has 
passed the inspection required by AD 2010-0122-E. Furthermore, the 
Type Certificate Holder indicates that it is extremely important to 
remain within the flight limitations specified in the Aircraft 
Industries a.s. Mandatory Bulletin No. L13/109a. For this reason, 
this AD further requires a record checking for determining if the 
sailplane has been operated within the flight limitations.
    For all the reasons stated above, as a precautionary measure, 
this AD is prohibiting operations when a sailplane does not pass the 
requirements of this AD. For those sailplanes, EASA is currently 
working with the Type Certificate Holder. When, as a result of the 
on-going investigation, a solution is later identified, further 
mandatory action is likely to follow.

Actions and Compliance

    (f) To address this problem, before further flight after August 
30, 2010 (the effective date of this AD), incorporate an FAA-
approved inspection and/or modification program developed 
specifically for this AD. Corrective action is considered FAA-
approved if it is approved by the State of Design Authority (or 
their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product is 
airworthy before it is returned to service.

FAA AD Differences

    Note: This AD differs from the MCAI and/or service information 
as follows: The MCAI requires the owner/operator to submit data 
regarding certain operations including aerobatic operations, to the 
European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) and Aircraft Industries, a.s. 
so they can determine whether further flight is permitted. The FAA 
does not require such data to be collected for operations in the 
United States. The FAA is relying on an inspection and/or 
modification program approved specifically for this AD to detect and 
correct cracks before further flight. Until such a program is 
approved, owners/operators may apply for an alternative method of 
compliance (AMOC) following 14 CFR 39.19 described in paragraph 
(f)(1) of this AD. The FAA will work with EASA and Aircraft 
Industries a.s. to determine if an acceptable level of safety is 
achieved with the AMOC proposal.

Other FAA AD Provisions

    (f) The following provisions also apply to this AD:
    (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager, 
Standards Office, FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this 
AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. Send 
information to Attn: Greg Davison, Aerospace Engineer, FAA, Small 
Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust, Room 301, Kansas City, Missouri 
64106; telephone: (816) 329-4130; fax: (816) 329-4090. Before using 
any approved AMOC on any airplane to which the AMOC applies, notify 
your appropriate principal inspector (PI) in the FAA Flight 
Standards District Office (FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local FSDO.
    (2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain 
corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these 
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered 
FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority 
(or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product 
is airworthy before it is returned to service.
    (3) Reporting Requirements: For any reporting requirement in 
this AD, under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has 
approved the information collection requirements and has assigned 
OMB Control Number 2120-0056.

Special Flight Permit

    (g) Under 14 CFR part 39.23, we are limiting the special flight 
permits for this AD by prohibiting aerobatic maneuvers.

Related Information

    (h) Refer to MCAI EASA Emergency AD No. 2010-0160-E, dated July 
30, 2010, for related information. For future service information 
that may be developed to address the unsafe condition specified in 
this AD, contact Aircraft Industries, a.s., Na Z[aacute]honech 1177, 
686 04 Kunovice, Czech Republic; telephone: +420 572 817 660; fax: 
+420 572 816 112; Internet: https://www.let.cz/; e-mail: ots@let.cz.


[[Page 52253]]


    Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on August 17, 2010.
John Colomy,
Acting Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification 
Service.
[FR Doc. 2010-20877 Filed 8-24-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.