Walnuts Grown in California; Changes to the Quality Regulations for Shelled Walnuts, 51926-51929 [2010-21010]
Download as PDF
wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with RULES_PART 1
51926
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 163 / Tuesday, August 24, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
use of the Internet and other
information technologies to provide
increased opportunities for citizen
access to Government information and
services, and for other purposes.
A proposed rule regarding this action
was published in the Federal Register
on June 30, 2010 (FR 75 37740). Copies
of the proposed rule were also made
available to all apricot handlers by
Committee staff. The proposal was also
made available through the Internet by
USDA and the Office of the Federal
Register. A 15-day comment period
ending July 15, 2010, was provided for
interested persons to respond to the
proposal. No comments were received.
A small business guide on complying
with fruit, vegetable, and specialty crop
marketing agreements and orders may
be viewed at: https://www.ams.usda.gov/
AMSv1.0/ams.fetchTemplate
Data.do?template=TemplateN&
page=MarketingOrdersSmallBusiness
Guide. Any questions about the
compliance guide should be sent to
Antoinette Carter at the previously
mentioned address in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section.
After consideration of all relevant
material presented, including the
information and recommendation
submitted by the Committee and other
available information, it is hereby found
that this rule, as hereinafter set forth,
will tend to effectuate the declared
policy of the Act.
Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553, it is also
found and determined that good cause
exists for not postponing the effective
date of this rule until 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register
because: (1) The 2010–11 fiscal period
began on April 1, 2010, and the order
requires that the assessment rate for
each fiscal period apply to all assessable
apricots handled during such fiscal
period; (2) Washington apricots are
currently being harvested and shipped
to market; (3) the Committee needs to
have sufficient funds to pay its
expenses, which are incurred on a
continuous basis; (4) handlers are aware
of this action, which was recommended
by the Committee at a public meeting
and is similar to other assessment rate
actions issued in past years; and (5) a
15-day comment period was provided in
the proposed rule.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 922
Apricots, Marketing agreements,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, 7 CFR part 922 is amended as
follows:
■
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:10 Aug 23, 2010
Jkt 220001
PART 922—APRICOTS GROWN IN
DESIGNATED COUNTIES IN
WASHINGTON
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR
part 922 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601–674.
2. Section 922.235 is revised to read
as follows:
■
§ 922.235
Assessment rate.
On and after April 1, 2010, an
assessment rate of $1.50 per ton is
established for the Washington Apricot
Marketing Committee.
Dated: August 17, 2010.
Rayne Pegg,
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing
Service.
[FR Doc. 2010–21037 Filed 8–23–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 984
[Doc. No. AMS–FV–09–0036; FV09–984–4
FR]
Walnuts Grown in California; Changes
to the Quality Regulations for Shelled
Walnuts
Agricultural Marketing Service,
USDA.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
This rule revises the quality
regulations for shelled walnuts under
the Federal marketing order for
California walnuts (order). The order
regulates the handling of walnuts grown
in California and is administered locally
by the California Walnut Board (Board).
This rule requires inspection and
certification of shelled walnut products
after manufacturing instead of before
manufacturing. It also establishes a
process to specify that manufactured
products smaller than eight sixtyfourths of an inch in diameter are
derived from walnut pieces that have
been inspected and certified to U.S.
Commercial grade standards. These
changes will result in more efficient and
cost-effective handler operations, and
will certify the final Size And Grade Of
All Manufactured Walnut Pieces.
DATES: Effective Date: August 25, 2010.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeff
Smutny, Marketing Specialist, or Kurt J.
Kimmel, Regional Manager, California
Marketing Field Office, Marketing Order
Administration Branch, Fruit and
Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA;
Telephone: (559) 487–5901, Fax: (559)
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
487–5906, or E-mail:
Jeffrey.Smutny@ams.usda.gov or
Kurt.Kimmel@ams.usda.gov.
Small businesses may request
information on complying with this
regulation by contacting Antoinette
Carter, Marketing Order Administration
Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs,
AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence
Avenue, SW., STOP 0237, Washington,
DC 20250–0237; Telephone: (202) 720–
2491, Fax: (202) 720–8938, or E-mail:
Antoinette.Carter@ams.usda.gov.
This final
rule is issued under Marketing Order
No. 984, as amended (7 CFR part 984),
regulating the handling of walnuts
grown in California, hereinafter referred
to as the ‘‘order.’’ The order is effective
under the Agricultural Marketing
Agreement Act of 1937, as amended (7
U.S.C. 601–674), hereinafter referred to
as the ‘‘Act.’’
The Department of Agriculture
(USDA) is issuing this rule in
conformance with Executive Order
12866. This final rule has been reviewed
under Executive Order 12988, Civil
Justice Reform. This rule is not intended
to have retroactive effect.
The Act provides that administrative
proceedings must be exhausted before
parties may file suit in court. Under
section 608c(15)(A) of the Act, any
handler subject to an order may file
with USDA a petition stating that the
order, any provision of the order, or any
obligation imposed in connection with
the order is not in accordance with law
and request a modification of the order
or to be exempted therefrom. A handler
is afforded the opportunity for a hearing
on the petition. After the hearing, USDA
would rule on the petition. The Act
provides that the district court of the
United States in any district in which
the handler is an inhabitant, or has his
or her principal place of business, has
jurisdiction to review USDA’s ruling on
the petition, provided an action is filed
not later than 20 days after the date of
the entry of the ruling.
This final rule revises the quality
regulations for shelled walnuts to
require inspection and certification after
chopping or dicing them into smaller
pieces (manufacturing) instead of before
manufacturing, and to establish a
process for specifying that
manufactured products smaller than
eight sixty-fourths of an inch in
diameter are derived from walnut pieces
that have been inspected and certified to
U.S. Commercial grade standards. This
will result in more efficient and costeffective handler operations and will
certify the final size and grade of all
manufactured walnut pieces. This rule
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
E:\FR\FM\24AUR1.SGM
24AUR1
wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with RULES_PART 1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 163 / Tuesday, August 24, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
was unanimously recommended by the
Board at a meeting on September 12,
2008.
Section 984.50(d) of the order
provides authority for the Board to
recommend to the Secretary additional
grade, size, or other quality regulations
for California walnuts. Section 984.52 of
the order provides that handlers shall
not change the form of shelled walnuts
unless such walnuts have been certified
as merchantable or meet quality
regulations established under
§ 984.50(d).
Currently, all shelled walnuts are
inspected and certified before
manufacturing by the American Council
for Food Safety & Quality (also known
as DFA of California and hereinafter
referred to as ‘‘DFA’’) to ensure the
walnuts meet marketing order
requirements for U.S. Commercial
grade. Following inspection, walnut
pieces may be further manufactured by
chopping them into smaller pieces, or
‘‘end products.’’ Pieces smaller than
eight sixty-fourths of an inch that are
accumulated during the manufacturing
process are considered a byproduct of
this process and are called ‘‘meal.’’
Walnut meal is sold into the market for
industrial use, such as in commercial
bakery products.
Upon passing inspection, an
inspection certificate is issued for the
lot of shelled walnuts, and the
certificate number follows the walnuts
from that lot through the entire
manufacturing process. The original
inspection certificate number is noted
on the certificates that accompany both
the end products and the meal derived
from the original lot of shelled walnuts.
Providing information about the original
lot of walnuts from which the end
products and meal were derived assures
customers that those products were
derived from walnuts that meet quality
standards under the order.
The inspection certificate specifies
the size of the shelled walnut pieces
before manufacturing. The size may be
stated as ‘‘large pieces’’ or ‘‘halves and
pieces,’’ and that information is also
noted on the certificates that accompany
the end products and the meal, although
it does not accurately describe the size
of the manufactured end product pieces
or meal. If a customer requires
certification of the size of a finished end
product, the handler must obtain a
second inspection for that product,
which may add expense to the process.
Currently, meal may be co-mingled
into one output bin as it is accumulated
from the manufacturing of several
different lots of shelled walnuts. When
this occurs, the certificate number from
each original lot of shelled walnuts is
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:10 Aug 23, 2010
Jkt 220001
transferred to the meal certificate. As a
result, the certificate for one output bin
of meal may include multiple certificate
numbers.
Transferring the inspection certificate
number from an original lot of shelled
walnuts to various manufactured end
products and meal is cumbersome and
creates a potential for errors under the
current system. Currently, all of a
certified lot of shelled walnuts must be
manufactured at one time to ensure the
certificate number of that lot is properly
transferred to the resulting end products
and meal. If, at a future date, the end
products from the original
manufacturing run are remanufactured
in order to be cut to a smaller size, the
certificate numbers must be transferred
from the first manufactured product to
the second manufactured product. This
additional process of transferring
certificate numbers to and from multiple
end products is cumbersome and further
increases the potential for error.
The Board’s Grades and Standards
Committee formed a work group in May
2008 to investigate alternatives to the
current inspection and certification
process of manufactured shelled
walnuts. The work group recommended
changing the existing process to allow
handlers to manufacture shelled
walnuts into smaller end products
without prior inspection. Instead,
handlers will be required to have all end
products inspected. The manufactured
pieces equal to or larger than eight sixtyfourths of an inch in diameter will be
inspected and certified to existing U.S.
Commercial grade requirements
specified in the United States Standards
for Shelled Walnuts (Juglans regia).
Each end product that passes inspection
will be issued an inspection certificate,
which will include the actual size of the
end product.
The U.S. Commercial grade
requirements do not include standards
for walnut meal. Therefore, the meal
accumulated during the manufacturing
process will not be inspected. Meal
collected from multiple manufacturing
runs will no longer be co-mingled in
one output bin but will remain
segregated.
A document also referred to as a
‘‘meal certificate’’ will be issued for the
walnut meal accumulated during each
manufacturing run. Because the meal
most closely resembles the color,
freshness, and other characteristics of
the smallest end product produced
during manufacturing, the meal can be
affiliated with that end product. If the
end product passes inspection and is
certified, the certificate number
assigned to that end product will be
referenced on the meal certificate. If that
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
51927
end product fails inspection, the meal
created during the same manufacturing
process will be rejected and disposed of
pursuant to the requirements of
§ 984.64. However, the end product that
failed inspection can be reconditioned,
re-sampled, and presented again for
inspection and certification.
These changes will improve the
manufacturing process by eliminating
the need for multiple inspections for the
same product, and will improve handler
efficiencies by eliminating duplicative
inventory tracking. Consumers will be
better served since each finished end
product will be certified to U.S.
Commercial grade requirements, and
accurate size information for each end
product will be provided on the
individual inspection certificates.
Handlers can continue to assure
customers that walnut meal is derived
from walnuts that have been inspected
and certified. Accordingly, a new
§ 984.450(c) containing these
regulations will be added to the order’s
administrative rules and regulations.
This rule also revises the first
sentence in § 984.450(a) regarding the
minimum kernel content requirements
of inshell walnuts for reserve
disposition credit. The sentence
incorrectly references requirements for
inshell walnuts pursuant to § 984.59(a).
The correct reference is § 984.50(a). The
sentence is revised accordingly.
Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Pursuant to requirements set forth in
the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5
U.S.C. 601–612), the Agricultural
Marketing Service (AMS) has
considered the economic impact of this
action on small entities. Accordingly,
AMS has prepared this final regulatory
flexibility analysis.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit
regulatory actions to the scale of
business subject to such actions in order
that small businesses will not be unduly
or disproportionately burdened.
Marketing orders issued pursuant to the
Act, and the rules issued thereunder, are
unique in that they are brought about
through group action of essentially
small entities acting on their own
behalf.
There are currently 58 handlers of
California walnuts subject to regulation
under the marketing order, and there are
approximately 4,500 growers in the
production area. Small agricultural
service firms are defined by the Small
Business Administration (SBA) (13 CFR
121.201) as those having annual receipts
of less than $7,000,000, and small
agricultural producers are defined as
those having annual receipts of less than
$750,000.
E:\FR\FM\24AUR1.SGM
24AUR1
wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with RULES_PART 1
51928
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 163 / Tuesday, August 24, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
USDA’s National Agricultural
Statistics Service (NASS) reports that
California walnuts were harvested from
a total of 223,000 bearing acres during
2008–09. The average yield for the
2008–09 crop was 1.96 tons per acre,
which is higher than the 1.56 tons per
acre average for the previous five years.
NASS reported the value of the 2008–
09 crop at $1,210 per ton, which is
lower than the previous five-year
average of $1,598 per ton.
At the time of the 2007 Census of
Agriculture, which is the most recent
information available, approximately
89 percent of California’s walnut farms
were smaller than 100 acres. Fifty-four
percent were between 1 and 15 acres. A
100-acre farm with an average yield of
1.96 tons per acre would have been
expected to produce about 196 tons of
walnuts during 2008–09. At $1,210 per
ton, that farm’s production would have
had an approximate value of $237,000.
Assuming that the majority of
California’s walnut farms are still
smaller than 100 acres, it could be
concluded that the majority of the
growers had receipts of less than
$237,000 in 2008–09. This is well below
the SBA threshold of $750,000; thus, the
majority of California’s walnut growers
would be considered small growers
according to SBA’s definition.
According to information supplied by
the industry, approximately one-half of
California’s walnut handlers shipped
merchantable walnuts valued under
$7,000,000 during the 2008–09
marketing year and would therefore be
considered to be small handlers
according to the SBA definition. The
firm that currently inspects and certifies
shelled walnuts before manufacturing
would likely be considered a large
agricultural business firm.
This final rule amends § 984.450 of
the order’s administrative rules and
regulations by adding a new paragraph
(c) that requires inspection and
certification of shelled walnuts after
manufacturing instead of before
manufacturing, and establishes a
process for specifying that walnut meal
is derived from manufactured walnut
pieces that have been inspected and
certified to U.S. Commercial grade
standards. This results in more efficient
and cost-effective handler operations,
and certifies the final size and grade of
all manufactured walnut pieces.
Authority for these changes is provided
in §§ 984.50(d) and 984.52 of the order.
Regarding the impact of the action on
affected entities, this final rule should
not impose any additional costs. It
should reduce costs to handlers by
streamlining and improving the
production process. Handlers will no
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:10 Aug 23, 2010
Jkt 220001
longer need to track lots of shelled
walnuts through the manufacturing
process in order to tie those original lots
to the manufactured end products and
meal. Handlers will be able to more
easily manage inventory and production
since they will no longer be required to
manufacture an entire lot of shelled
walnuts at one time in order to transfer
the certificate number of the original lot
to each end product and the meal. Since
handlers will no longer be required to
transfer certificate numbers from an
entire lot of shelled walnuts to multiple
manufactured end products, a portion of
a lot could be held for manufacturing or
remanufacturing at a later date.
The potential for errors will be
reduced under the proposed system
because fewer certificate numbers will
be transferred. Each end product will
have its own certificate number, and the
certificate number of the smallest end
product will be referenced on the meal
certificate for the meal that was
accumulated during the same
manufacturing process.
Handler costs will also be reduced
when customers require manufactured
product to be certified to U.S.
Commercial grade requirements since
this will be automatically provided
under the proposed regulations. Under
the current system, if a customer
requires this type of certification after
manufacturing, handlers may pay
additional fees if an inspector makes a
special trip to perform a second
inspection. If a DFA inspector is already
onsite at a handler’s facility, there is no
additional charge for a second
inspection. DFA charges $28.00 per
hour with a four-hour minimum charge
for a special visit to the handler’s site,
for a minimum total charge of $112 per
visit.
While discussing this change, the
Board considered lab testing the meal as
an alternative to transferring the
inspection certificate number of the
smallest manufactured end product to
the meal. There is no U.S. Commercial
grade standard for meal, so it is not
currently possible to inspect and certify
it as meeting a standard. Quality
standards for meal would need to be
developed in order to pursue this
alternative. In addition, lab testing the
meal could increase handler costs. This
alternative would also cause a delay in
shipping in order to allow time for lab
testing, and this could adversely impact
marketing efforts. As a result, lab testing
of meal was not considered a viable
alternative.
This final rule will not impose any
additional reporting or recordkeeping
requirements on either small or large
walnut handlers. As with all Federal
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
marketing order programs, reports and
forms are periodically reviewed to
reduce information requirements and
duplication by industry and public
sector agencies.
AMS is committed to complying with
the E-Government Act, to promote the
use of the Internet and other
information technologies to provide
increased opportunities for citizen
access to Government information and
services, and for other purposes.
USDA has not identified any relevant
Federal rules that duplicate, overlap or
conflict with this proposed rule.
In addition, the Board’s meeting on
September 12, 2008, when this action
was considered, was widely publicized
throughout the walnut industry. This
issue was also deliberated at a Grades
and Standards Committee meeting on
May 20, 2008; a Board meeting on May
28, 2008; and a Grades and Standards
Committee work group meeting on
September 2, 2008. Like all Board
meetings, these meetings were public
meetings, and all interested persons
were invited to attend the meetings and
participate in deliberations on all issues.
A proposed rule concerning this action
was published in the Federal Register
on June 21, 2010 (75 FR 34950). Copies
of the rule were mailed or sent via
facsimile to all Board members and
walnut handlers. Finally, the rule was
made available through the Internet by
USDA and the Office of the Federal
Register. A 15-day comment period
ending July 6, 2010, was provided to
allow interested persons to respond to
the proposal.
Two comments were received during
the comment period in response to the
proposal. Both comments were made in
support of the proposal.
Accordingly, no changes will be made
to the rule as proposed, based on the
comments received.
A small business guide on complying
with fruit, vegetable, and specialty crop
marketing agreements and orders may
be viewed at: https://www.ams.usda.gov/
AMSv1.0/ams.fetchTemplate
Data.do?template=TemplateN&page=
MarketingOrdersSmallBusinessGuide.
Any questions about the compliance
guide should be sent to Antoinette
Carter at the previously mentioned
address in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section.
After consideration of all relevant
matters presented, including the
information and recommendation
submitted by the Board and other
available information, it is hereby found
that this rule, as hereinafter set forth,
will tend to effectuate the declared
policy of the Act.
E:\FR\FM\24AUR1.SGM
24AUR1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 163 / Tuesday, August 24, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
It is further found that good cause
exists for not postponing the effective
date of this rule until 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register
(5 U.S.C. 553) because this rule should
be in place for the upcoming marketing
year, which begins September 1, 2010.
Further, handlers are aware of this rule,
which was recommended at a public
meeting. Also, 15 days were provided
for comments to the proposed rule.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 984
Marketing agreements, Nuts,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Walnuts.
■ For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, 7 CFR part 984 is amended as
follows:
PART 984—WALNUTS GROWN IN
CALIFORNIA
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR
part 984 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601–674.
§ 984.450
[Amended]
2. Section 984.450 is amended by
revising the first sentence in paragraph
(a) and adding a new paragraph (c) to
read as follows:
■
wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with RULES_PART 1
§ 984.450
(a) Minimum kernel content
requirements for inshell walnuts for
reserve disposition credit. For purposes
of §§ 984.54 and 984.56, no lot of inshell
walnuts may be held, exported, or
disposed of for use by governmental
agencies or charitable institutions
unless it meets the minimum
requirements for merchantable inshell
walnuts effective pursuant to
§ 984.50(a). * * *
*
*
*
*
*
(c) Inspection and certification of
shelled walnuts that are manufactured
into products. For purposes of
§§ 984.50(d) and 984.52(c), shelled
walnuts may be cut or diced without
prior inspection and certification:
Provided, That the end product, except
for walnut meal, is inspected and
certified. For purposes of this section,
end product shall be defined as walnut
pieces equal to or larger than eight sixtyfourths of an inch in diameter. Walnut
meal shall be defined as walnut pieces
smaller than eight sixty-fourths of an
inch in diameter.
(1) End product. End product must be
sized, inspected and certified, and the
size must be noted on the inspection
certificate. The end product quality
must be equal to or better than the
minimum requirements of U.S.
Commercial grade as defined in the
15:10 Aug 23, 2010
Jkt 220001
Dated: August 17, 2010.
Rayne Pegg,
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing
Service.
[FR Doc. 2010–21010 Filed 8–23–10; 8:45 am]
Grade and size regulations.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
United States Standards for Shelled
Walnuts (Juglans regia).
(2) Walnut meal. Walnut meal that is
accumulated during the cutting or
dicing of shelled walnuts to create end
product must be presented with the
smallest end product from that
manufacturing run that is inspected and
certified. If the end product meets the
applicable U.S. Commercial grade
requirements, the walnut meal
accumulated during the manufacture of
that end product shall be identified and
referenced on a separate meal certificate
as ‘‘meal derived from walnut pieces
that meet U.S. Commercial grade
requirements.’’ The certificate number of
the smallest end product will be
referenced on the meal certificate.
(3) Failed lots. If the end product fails
to meet applicable U.S. Commercial
grade requirements, the end product
may be reconditioned, re-sampled,
inspected again, and certified. However,
the walnut meal accumulated during the
manufacture of that end product shall
be rejected and disposed of pursuant to
the requirements of § 984.64.
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 1000
[Doc. No. AMS–DA–09–0062; AO–14–A73, et
al.; DA–03–10]
Milk in the Northeast and Other
Marketing Areas; Order Amending the
Orders
Agricultural Marketing Service,
USDA.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
This final rule maintains the
current fluid milk product definition’s
compositional standard of 6.5 percent
nonfat milk solids criterion and
incorporates an equivalent 2.25 percent
true milk protein criterion for
determining if a product meets the
compositional standard. This final rule
also determines how milk and milkderived ingredients should be priced
under all Federal milk marketing orders
when used in products meeting the
fluid milk product definition. It
provides exemptions for drinkable
yogurt products containing at least 20
percent yogurt (by weight), kefir, and
products intended to be meal
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
51929
replacements from the fluid milk
product definition. A referendum was
held and the required number of
producers approved the issuance of the
orders as amended.
DATES: Effective Date: January 1, 2011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Henry H. Schaefer, Economist, USDA/
AMS/Dairy Programs, Upper Midwest
Milk Market Administrators Office,
Suite 200, 1600 West 82nd Street,
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55431–1420,
(952) 831–5292, e-mail address:
hschaefer@fmma30.com; or William
Francis, Associate Deputy
Administrator, USDA/AMS/Dairy
Programs, Order Formulation and
Enforcement, Stop 0231—Room 2971–S,
1400 Independence Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC 20250–0231, (202) 720–
6274, e-mail address:
william.francis@ams.usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This final
rule amends the fluid milk product
definition in all Federal milk marketing
orders. This rulemaking action
maintains the current fluid milk product
definition’s compositional standard of
6.5 percent nonfat milk solids and
incorporates an equivalent 2.25 percent
true milk protein criterion for
determining if a product meets the
compositional standard. This final rule
also amends determining how milk and
milk-derived ingredients should be
priced under all Federal milk marketing
orders when used in products meeting
the fluid milk product definition. It
exempts drinkable yogurt products
containing at least 20 percent yogurt (by
weight), kefir, infant formulas, dietary
products (meal replacements) and other
products that may contain milk-derived
ingredients from the fluid milk product
definition.
This administrative action is governed
by the provisions of sections 556 and
557 of Title 5 of the United States Code
and, therefore, is excluded from the
requirements of Executive Order 12866.
This final rule herein has been
reviewed under Executive Order 12988,
Civil Justice Reform. The final rule is
not intended to have a retroactive effect.
The Agricultural Marketing
Agreement Act of 1937 (Act), as
amended (7 U.S.C. 601–674), provides
that administrative proceedings must be
exhausted before parties may file suit in
court. Under section 608c(15)(A) of the
Act, any handler subject to an order may
request modification or exemption from
such order by filing with the
Department a petition stating that the
order, any provision of the order, or any
obligation imposed in connection with
the order is not in accordance with the
law. A handler is afforded the
E:\FR\FM\24AUR1.SGM
24AUR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 163 (Tuesday, August 24, 2010)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 51926-51929]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-21010]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 984
[Doc. No. AMS-FV-09-0036; FV09-984-4 FR]
Walnuts Grown in California; Changes to the Quality Regulations
for Shelled Walnuts
AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This rule revises the quality regulations for shelled walnuts
under the Federal marketing order for California walnuts (order). The
order regulates the handling of walnuts grown in California and is
administered locally by the California Walnut Board (Board). This rule
requires inspection and certification of shelled walnut products after
manufacturing instead of before manufacturing. It also establishes a
process to specify that manufactured products smaller than eight sixty-
fourths of an inch in diameter are derived from walnut pieces that have
been inspected and certified to U.S. Commercial grade standards. These
changes will result in more efficient and cost-effective handler
operations, and will certify the final Size And Grade Of All
Manufactured Walnut Pieces.
DATES: Effective Date: August 25, 2010.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeff Smutny, Marketing Specialist, or
Kurt J. Kimmel, Regional Manager, California Marketing Field Office,
Marketing Order Administration Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs,
AMS, USDA; Telephone: (559) 487-5901, Fax: (559) 487-5906, or E-mail:
Jeffrey.Smutny@ams.usda.gov or Kurt.Kimmel@ams.usda.gov.
Small businesses may request information on complying with this
regulation by contacting Antoinette Carter, Marketing Order
Administration Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, 1400
Independence Avenue, SW., STOP 0237, Washington, DC 20250-0237;
Telephone: (202) 720-2491, Fax: (202) 720-8938, or E-mail:
Antoinette.Carter@ams.usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This final rule is issued under Marketing
Order No. 984, as amended (7 CFR part 984), regulating the handling of
walnuts grown in California, hereinafter referred to as the ``order.''
The order is effective under the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act
of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601-674), hereinafter referred to as the
``Act.''
The Department of Agriculture (USDA) is issuing this rule in
conformance with Executive Order 12866. This final rule has been
reviewed under Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform. This rule
is not intended to have retroactive effect.
The Act provides that administrative proceedings must be exhausted
before parties may file suit in court. Under section 608c(15)(A) of the
Act, any handler subject to an order may file with USDA a petition
stating that the order, any provision of the order, or any obligation
imposed in connection with the order is not in accordance with law and
request a modification of the order or to be exempted therefrom. A
handler is afforded the opportunity for a hearing on the petition.
After the hearing, USDA would rule on the petition. The Act provides
that the district court of the United States in any district in which
the handler is an inhabitant, or has his or her principal place of
business, has jurisdiction to review USDA's ruling on the petition,
provided an action is filed not later than 20 days after the date of
the entry of the ruling.
This final rule revises the quality regulations for shelled walnuts
to require inspection and certification after chopping or dicing them
into smaller pieces (manufacturing) instead of before manufacturing,
and to establish a process for specifying that manufactured products
smaller than eight sixty-fourths of an inch in diameter are derived
from walnut pieces that have been inspected and certified to U.S.
Commercial grade standards. This will result in more efficient and
cost-effective handler operations and will certify the final size and
grade of all manufactured walnut pieces. This rule
[[Page 51927]]
was unanimously recommended by the Board at a meeting on September 12,
2008.
Section 984.50(d) of the order provides authority for the Board to
recommend to the Secretary additional grade, size, or other quality
regulations for California walnuts. Section 984.52 of the order
provides that handlers shall not change the form of shelled walnuts
unless such walnuts have been certified as merchantable or meet quality
regulations established under Sec. 984.50(d).
Currently, all shelled walnuts are inspected and certified before
manufacturing by the American Council for Food Safety & Quality (also
known as DFA of California and hereinafter referred to as ``DFA'') to
ensure the walnuts meet marketing order requirements for U.S.
Commercial grade. Following inspection, walnut pieces may be further
manufactured by chopping them into smaller pieces, or ``end products.''
Pieces smaller than eight sixty-fourths of an inch that are accumulated
during the manufacturing process are considered a byproduct of this
process and are called ``meal.'' Walnut meal is sold into the market
for industrial use, such as in commercial bakery products.
Upon passing inspection, an inspection certificate is issued for
the lot of shelled walnuts, and the certificate number follows the
walnuts from that lot through the entire manufacturing process. The
original inspection certificate number is noted on the certificates
that accompany both the end products and the meal derived from the
original lot of shelled walnuts. Providing information about the
original lot of walnuts from which the end products and meal were
derived assures customers that those products were derived from walnuts
that meet quality standards under the order.
The inspection certificate specifies the size of the shelled walnut
pieces before manufacturing. The size may be stated as ``large pieces''
or ``halves and pieces,'' and that information is also noted on the
certificates that accompany the end products and the meal, although it
does not accurately describe the size of the manufactured end product
pieces or meal. If a customer requires certification of the size of a
finished end product, the handler must obtain a second inspection for
that product, which may add expense to the process.
Currently, meal may be co-mingled into one output bin as it is
accumulated from the manufacturing of several different lots of shelled
walnuts. When this occurs, the certificate number from each original
lot of shelled walnuts is transferred to the meal certificate. As a
result, the certificate for one output bin of meal may include multiple
certificate numbers.
Transferring the inspection certificate number from an original lot
of shelled walnuts to various manufactured end products and meal is
cumbersome and creates a potential for errors under the current system.
Currently, all of a certified lot of shelled walnuts must be
manufactured at one time to ensure the certificate number of that lot
is properly transferred to the resulting end products and meal. If, at
a future date, the end products from the original manufacturing run are
remanufactured in order to be cut to a smaller size, the certificate
numbers must be transferred from the first manufactured product to the
second manufactured product. This additional process of transferring
certificate numbers to and from multiple end products is cumbersome and
further increases the potential for error.
The Board's Grades and Standards Committee formed a work group in
May 2008 to investigate alternatives to the current inspection and
certification process of manufactured shelled walnuts. The work group
recommended changing the existing process to allow handlers to
manufacture shelled walnuts into smaller end products without prior
inspection. Instead, handlers will be required to have all end products
inspected. The manufactured pieces equal to or larger than eight sixty-
fourths of an inch in diameter will be inspected and certified to
existing U.S. Commercial grade requirements specified in the United
States Standards for Shelled Walnuts (Juglans regia). Each end product
that passes inspection will be issued an inspection certificate, which
will include the actual size of the end product.
The U.S. Commercial grade requirements do not include standards for
walnut meal. Therefore, the meal accumulated during the manufacturing
process will not be inspected. Meal collected from multiple
manufacturing runs will no longer be co-mingled in one output bin but
will remain segregated.
A document also referred to as a ``meal certificate'' will be
issued for the walnut meal accumulated during each manufacturing run.
Because the meal most closely resembles the color, freshness, and other
characteristics of the smallest end product produced during
manufacturing, the meal can be affiliated with that end product. If the
end product passes inspection and is certified, the certificate number
assigned to that end product will be referenced on the meal
certificate. If that end product fails inspection, the meal created
during the same manufacturing process will be rejected and disposed of
pursuant to the requirements of Sec. 984.64. However, the end product
that failed inspection can be reconditioned, re-sampled, and presented
again for inspection and certification.
These changes will improve the manufacturing process by eliminating
the need for multiple inspections for the same product, and will
improve handler efficiencies by eliminating duplicative inventory
tracking. Consumers will be better served since each finished end
product will be certified to U.S. Commercial grade requirements, and
accurate size information for each end product will be provided on the
individual inspection certificates. Handlers can continue to assure
customers that walnut meal is derived from walnuts that have been
inspected and certified. Accordingly, a new Sec. 984.450(c) containing
these regulations will be added to the order's administrative rules and
regulations.
This rule also revises the first sentence in Sec. 984.450(a)
regarding the minimum kernel content requirements of inshell walnuts
for reserve disposition credit. The sentence incorrectly references
requirements for inshell walnuts pursuant to Sec. 984.59(a). The
correct reference is Sec. 984.50(a). The sentence is revised
accordingly.
Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Pursuant to requirements set forth in the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601-612), the Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS)
has considered the economic impact of this action on small entities.
Accordingly, AMS has prepared this final regulatory flexibility
analysis.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit regulatory actions to the scale of
business subject to such actions in order that small businesses will
not be unduly or disproportionately burdened. Marketing orders issued
pursuant to the Act, and the rules issued thereunder, are unique in
that they are brought about through group action of essentially small
entities acting on their own behalf.
There are currently 58 handlers of California walnuts subject to
regulation under the marketing order, and there are approximately 4,500
growers in the production area. Small agricultural service firms are
defined by the Small Business Administration (SBA) (13 CFR 121.201) as
those having annual receipts of less than $7,000,000, and small
agricultural producers are defined as those having annual receipts of
less than $750,000.
[[Page 51928]]
USDA's National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS) reports that
California walnuts were harvested from a total of 223,000 bearing acres
during 2008-09. The average yield for the 2008-09 crop was 1.96 tons
per acre, which is higher than the 1.56 tons per acre average for the
previous five years. NASS reported the value of the 2008-09 crop at
$1,210 per ton, which is lower than the previous five-year average of
$1,598 per ton.
At the time of the 2007 Census of Agriculture, which is the most
recent information available, approximately 89 percent of California's
walnut farms were smaller than 100 acres. Fifty-four percent were
between 1 and 15 acres. A 100-acre farm with an average yield of 1.96
tons per acre would have been expected to produce about 196 tons of
walnuts during 2008-09. At $1,210 per ton, that farm's production would
have had an approximate value of $237,000. Assuming that the majority
of California's walnut farms are still smaller than 100 acres, it could
be concluded that the majority of the growers had receipts of less than
$237,000 in 2008-09. This is well below the SBA threshold of $750,000;
thus, the majority of California's walnut growers would be considered
small growers according to SBA's definition.
According to information supplied by the industry, approximately
one-half of California's walnut handlers shipped merchantable walnuts
valued under $7,000,000 during the 2008-09 marketing year and would
therefore be considered to be small handlers according to the SBA
definition. The firm that currently inspects and certifies shelled
walnuts before manufacturing would likely be considered a large
agricultural business firm.
This final rule amends Sec. 984.450 of the order's administrative
rules and regulations by adding a new paragraph (c) that requires
inspection and certification of shelled walnuts after manufacturing
instead of before manufacturing, and establishes a process for
specifying that walnut meal is derived from manufactured walnut pieces
that have been inspected and certified to U.S. Commercial grade
standards. This results in more efficient and cost-effective handler
operations, and certifies the final size and grade of all manufactured
walnut pieces. Authority for these changes is provided in Sec. Sec.
984.50(d) and 984.52 of the order.
Regarding the impact of the action on affected entities, this final
rule should not impose any additional costs. It should reduce costs to
handlers by streamlining and improving the production process. Handlers
will no longer need to track lots of shelled walnuts through the
manufacturing process in order to tie those original lots to the
manufactured end products and meal. Handlers will be able to more
easily manage inventory and production since they will no longer be
required to manufacture an entire lot of shelled walnuts at one time in
order to transfer the certificate number of the original lot to each
end product and the meal. Since handlers will no longer be required to
transfer certificate numbers from an entire lot of shelled walnuts to
multiple manufactured end products, a portion of a lot could be held
for manufacturing or remanufacturing at a later date.
The potential for errors will be reduced under the proposed system
because fewer certificate numbers will be transferred. Each end product
will have its own certificate number, and the certificate number of the
smallest end product will be referenced on the meal certificate for the
meal that was accumulated during the same manufacturing process.
Handler costs will also be reduced when customers require
manufactured product to be certified to U.S. Commercial grade
requirements since this will be automatically provided under the
proposed regulations. Under the current system, if a customer requires
this type of certification after manufacturing, handlers may pay
additional fees if an inspector makes a special trip to perform a
second inspection. If a DFA inspector is already onsite at a handler's
facility, there is no additional charge for a second inspection. DFA
charges $28.00 per hour with a four-hour minimum charge for a special
visit to the handler's site, for a minimum total charge of $112 per
visit.
While discussing this change, the Board considered lab testing the
meal as an alternative to transferring the inspection certificate
number of the smallest manufactured end product to the meal. There is
no U.S. Commercial grade standard for meal, so it is not currently
possible to inspect and certify it as meeting a standard. Quality
standards for meal would need to be developed in order to pursue this
alternative. In addition, lab testing the meal could increase handler
costs. This alternative would also cause a delay in shipping in order
to allow time for lab testing, and this could adversely impact
marketing efforts. As a result, lab testing of meal was not considered
a viable alternative.
This final rule will not impose any additional reporting or
recordkeeping requirements on either small or large walnut handlers. As
with all Federal marketing order programs, reports and forms are
periodically reviewed to reduce information requirements and
duplication by industry and public sector agencies.
AMS is committed to complying with the E-Government Act, to promote
the use of the Internet and other information technologies to provide
increased opportunities for citizen access to Government information
and services, and for other purposes.
USDA has not identified any relevant Federal rules that duplicate,
overlap or conflict with this proposed rule.
In addition, the Board's meeting on September 12, 2008, when this
action was considered, was widely publicized throughout the walnut
industry. This issue was also deliberated at a Grades and Standards
Committee meeting on May 20, 2008; a Board meeting on May 28, 2008; and
a Grades and Standards Committee work group meeting on September 2,
2008. Like all Board meetings, these meetings were public meetings, and
all interested persons were invited to attend the meetings and
participate in deliberations on all issues. A proposed rule concerning
this action was published in the Federal Register on June 21, 2010 (75
FR 34950). Copies of the rule were mailed or sent via facsimile to all
Board members and walnut handlers. Finally, the rule was made available
through the Internet by USDA and the Office of the Federal Register. A
15-day comment period ending July 6, 2010, was provided to allow
interested persons to respond to the proposal.
Two comments were received during the comment period in response to
the proposal. Both comments were made in support of the proposal.
Accordingly, no changes will be made to the rule as proposed, based
on the comments received.
A small business guide on complying with fruit, vegetable, and
specialty crop marketing agreements and orders may be viewed at: https://www.ams.usda.gov/AMSv1.0/ams.fetchTemplateData.do?template=TemplateN&page=MarketingOrdersSmallBusinessGuide. Any questions about the compliance guide should be sent to
Antoinette Carter at the previously mentioned address in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
After consideration of all relevant matters presented, including
the information and recommendation submitted by the Board and other
available information, it is hereby found that this rule, as
hereinafter set forth, will tend to effectuate the declared policy of
the Act.
[[Page 51929]]
It is further found that good cause exists for not postponing the
effective date of this rule until 30 days after publication in the
Federal Register (5 U.S.C. 553) because this rule should be in place
for the upcoming marketing year, which begins September 1, 2010.
Further, handlers are aware of this rule, which was recommended at a
public meeting. Also, 15 days were provided for comments to the
proposed rule.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 984
Marketing agreements, Nuts, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Walnuts.
0
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, 7 CFR part 984 is amended as
follows:
PART 984--WALNUTS GROWN IN CALIFORNIA
0
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR part 984 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601-674.
Sec. 984.450 [Amended]
0
2. Section 984.450 is amended by revising the first sentence in
paragraph (a) and adding a new paragraph (c) to read as follows:
Sec. 984.450 Grade and size regulations.
(a) Minimum kernel content requirements for inshell walnuts for
reserve disposition credit. For purposes of Sec. Sec. 984.54 and
984.56, no lot of inshell walnuts may be held, exported, or disposed of
for use by governmental agencies or charitable institutions unless it
meets the minimum requirements for merchantable inshell walnuts
effective pursuant to Sec. 984.50(a). * * *
* * * * *
(c) Inspection and certification of shelled walnuts that are
manufactured into products. For purposes of Sec. Sec. 984.50(d) and
984.52(c), shelled walnuts may be cut or diced without prior inspection
and certification: Provided, That the end product, except for walnut
meal, is inspected and certified. For purposes of this section, end
product shall be defined as walnut pieces equal to or larger than eight
sixty-fourths of an inch in diameter. Walnut meal shall be defined as
walnut pieces smaller than eight sixty-fourths of an inch in diameter.
(1) End product. End product must be sized, inspected and
certified, and the size must be noted on the inspection certificate.
The end product quality must be equal to or better than the minimum
requirements of U.S. Commercial grade as defined in the United States
Standards for Shelled Walnuts (Juglans regia).
(2) Walnut meal. Walnut meal that is accumulated during the cutting
or dicing of shelled walnuts to create end product must be presented
with the smallest end product from that manufacturing run that is
inspected and certified. If the end product meets the applicable U.S.
Commercial grade requirements, the walnut meal accumulated during the
manufacture of that end product shall be identified and referenced on a
separate meal certificate as ``meal derived from walnut pieces that
meet U.S. Commercial grade requirements.'' The certificate number of
the smallest end product will be referenced on the meal certificate.
(3) Failed lots. If the end product fails to meet applicable U.S.
Commercial grade requirements, the end product may be reconditioned,
re-sampled, inspected again, and certified. However, the walnut meal
accumulated during the manufacture of that end product shall be
rejected and disposed of pursuant to the requirements of Sec. 984.64.
Dated: August 17, 2010.
Rayne Pegg,
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service.
[FR Doc. 2010-21010 Filed 8-23-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-02-P