Dried Prunes Produced in California; Increased Assessment Rate, 51956-51958 [2010-20981]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
51956
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
Vol. 75, No. 163
Tuesday, August 24, 2010
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains notices to the public of the proposed
issuance of rules and regulations. The
purpose of these notices is to give interested
persons an opportunity to participate in the
rule making prior to the adoption of the final
rules.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 993
[Doc. No. AMS–FV–10–0057; FV10–993–1
PR]
Dried Prunes Produced in California;
Increased Assessment Rate
Agricultural Marketing Service,
USDA.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
This rule would increase the
assessment rate established for the
Prune Marketing Committee
(Committee) for the 2010–11 and
subsequent crop years from $0.16 to
$0.27 per ton of salable dried prunes
handled. The Committee locally
administers the marketing order which
regulates the handling of dried prunes
grown in California. Assessments upon
dried prune handlers are used by the
Committee to fund reasonable and
necessary expenses of the program. The
crop year begins August 1 and ends July
31. The assessment rate would remain
in effect indefinitely unless modified,
suspended, or terminated.
DATES: Comments must be received by
September 23, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are
invited to submit written comments
concerning this rule. Comments must be
sent to the Docket Clerk, Marketing
Order Administration Branch, Fruit and
Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, 1400
Independence Avenue, SW., STOP
0237, Washington, DC 20250–0237; Fax:
(202) 720–8938; or Internet: https://
www.regulations.gov. Comments should
reference the document number and the
date and page number of this issue of
the Federal Register and will be
available for public inspection in the
Office of the Docket Clerk during regular
business hours, or can be viewed at:
https://www.regulations.gov. All
comments submitted in response to this
rule will be included in the record and
will be made available to the public.
wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with PROPOSALS_PART 1
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:48 Aug 23, 2010
Jkt 220001
Please be advised that the identity of the
individuals or entities submitting the
comments will be made public on the
Internet at the address provided above.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Andrea Ricci, Marketing Specialist, or
Kurt Kimmel, Regional Manager,
California Marketing Field Office, Fruit
and Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA;
Telephone: (559) 487–5901, Fax: (559)
487–5906, or E-mail:
Andrea.Ricci@ams.usda.gov or
Kurt.Kimmel@ams.usda.gov.
Small businesses may request
information on complying with this
regulation by contacting Antoinette
Carter, Marketing Order Administration
Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs,
AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence
Avenue, SW., STOP 0237, Washington,
DC 20250–0237; Telephone: (202) 720–
2491, Fax: (202)720–8938, or E-mail:
ntoinete.Carter@ams.usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This rule
is issued under Marketing Agreement
No. 110 and Order No. 993, both as
amended (7 CFR part 993), regulating
the handling of dried prunes grown in
California, hereinafter referred to as the
‘‘order.’’ The order is effective under the
Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act
of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601–674),
hereinafter referred to as the ‘‘Act.’’
The Department of Agriculture
(USDA) is issuing this rule in
conformance with Executive Order
12866.
This rule has been reviewed under
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform. Under the marketing order now
in effect, California dried prune
handlers are subject to assessments.
Funds to administer the order are
derived from such assessments. It is
intended that the assessment rate as
proposed herein would be applicable to
all assessable dried prunes beginning on
August 1, 2010, and continue until
amended, suspended, or terminated.
The Act provides that administrative
proceedings must be exhausted before
parties may file suit in court. Under
section 608c(15)(A) of the Act, any
handler subject to an order may file
with USDA a petition stating that the
order, any provision of the order, or any
obligation imposed in connection with
the order is not in accordance with law
and request a modification of the order
or to be exempted therefrom. Such
handler is afforded the opportunity for
a hearing on the petition. After the
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
hearing, USDA would rule on the
petition. The Act provides that the
district court of the United States in any
district in which the handler is an
inhabitant, or has his or her principal
place of business, has jurisdiction to
review USDA’s ruling on the petition,
provided an action is filed not later than
20 days after the date of the entry of the
ruling.
This rule would increase the
assessment rate established for the
Committee for the 2010–11 and
subsequent crop years from $0.16 to
$0.27 per ton of salable dried prunes
handled.
The California dried prune marketing
order provides authority for the
Committee, with the approval of USDA,
to formulate an annual budget of
expenses and collect assessments from
handlers to administer the program. The
members of the Committee are
producers and handlers of California
dried prunes. They are familiar with the
Committee’s needs and with the costs
for goods and services in their local area
and are thus in a position to formulate
an appropriate budget and assessment
rate. The assessment rate is formulated
and discussed in a public meeting.
Thus, all directly affected persons have
an opportunity to participate and
provide input.
For the 2009–10 and subsequent crop
years, the Committee recommended,
and USDA approved, an assessment rate
that would continue in effect from crop
year to crop year unless modified,
suspended, or terminated by USDA
upon recommendation and information
submitted by the Committee or other
information available to USDA.
The Committee met on June 24, 2010,
and unanimously recommended 2010–
11 expenditures of $58,353 and an
assessment rate of $0.27 per ton of
salable dried prunes. In comparison, last
year’s budgeted expenditures, as
amended in March of 2010, were
$57,756. The assessment rate of $0.27 is
$0.11 higher than the rate currently in
effect.
The Committee recommended the
higher assessment rate based on a
production estimate of 150,000 tons of
salable dried prunes for this year, which
is substantially less than the 165,488
tons produced last year. At the proposed
assessment rate the assessment income
for the 2010–11 crop year would be
$40,500. The Committee’s proposed
E:\FR\FM\24AUP1.SGM
24AUP1
wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with PROPOSALS_PART 1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 163 / Tuesday, August 24, 2010 / Proposed Rules
budget of expenses of $58,353 includes
a twenty percent increase in personnel
expenses, and a nine percent decrease
in operating expenses. Combined
personnel and operational expenses are
about eleven percent higher than last
year, or about $42,511. The Committee
also included $15,842 for contingencies,
which is substantially less than the
$19,526 included for last year’s budget.
Most of the Committee’s expenses
reflect its portion of the joint
administration costs of the Committee
and the California Dried Plum Board
(CDPB). Based on the Committee’s
reduced activities in recent years, it is
funding only five percent of the shared
expenses of the two programs. This
funding level is similar to that of last
year. The Committee believes that extra
assessment income carried in from the
2009 crop year, plus interest income
and 2009 assessment income, would be
adequate to cover its estimated expenses
of $58,353.
The major expenditures
recommended by the Committee for the
2010–11 year include $31,781 for
salaries and benefits, $10,730 for
operating expenses, and $15,842 for
contingencies. Budgeted expenses for
these items in 2009–10 were $26,450,
$11,780, and $19,526, respectively.
The assessment rate recommended by
the Committee was derived by
considering the handler assessment
revenue needed to meet anticipated
expenses, the estimated salable tons of
California dried prunes, excess funds
carried forward into the 2010–11 crop
year, and estimated interest income. As
mentioned earlier, dried prune
production for the year is estimated at
150,000 salable tons, which should
provide $40,500 in assessment income.
Income derived from handler
assessments, plus interest income, and
excess funds from the 2009–10 crop
year would be adequate to cover
budgeted expenses. The Committee is
authorized under § 993.81(c) of the
order to use excess assessment funds
from the 2009–10 crop year (currently
estimated at $17,847) for up to 5 months
beyond the end of the crop year to meet
the 2010–11 crop year expenses. At the
end of the 5 months, the Committee
either refunds or credits excess funds to
handlers.
The proposed assessment rate would
continue in effect indefinitely unless
modified, suspended, or terminated by
USDA upon recommendation and
information submitted by the
Committee or other available
information.
Although this assessment rate would
be in effect for an indefinite period, the
Committee would continue to meet
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:48 Aug 23, 2010
Jkt 220001
prior to or during each crop year to
recommend a budget of expenses and
consider recommendations for
modification of the assessment rate. The
dates and times of Committee meetings
are available from the Committee or
USDA. Committee meetings are open to
the public and interested persons may
express their views at these meetings.
USDA would evaluate Committee
recommendations and other available
information to determine whether
modification of the assessment rate is
needed. Further rulemaking would be
undertaken as necessary. The
Committee’s 2010–11 budget and those
for subsequent crop year would be
reviewed and, as appropriate, approved
by USDA.
Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Pursuant to requirements set forth in
the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5
U.S.C. 601–612), the Agricultural
Marketing Service (AMS) has
considered the economic impact of this
rule on small entities. Accordingly,
AMS has prepared this initial regulatory
flexibility analysis.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit
regulatory actions to the scale of
business subject to such actions in order
that small businesses will not be unduly
or disproportionately burdened.
Marketing orders issued pursuant to the
Act, and the rules issued thereunder, are
unique in that they are brought about
through group action of essentially
small entities acting on their own
behalf.
There are approximately 900
producers of dried prunes in the
California area and approximately 21
handlers subject to regulation under the
marketing order. Small agricultural
producers are defined by the Small
Business Administration (13 CFR
121.201) as those having annual receipts
less than $750,000, and small
agricultural service firms are defined as
those whose annual receipts are less
than $7,000,000.
Committee data indicates that about
64 percent of the handlers ship under
$7,000,000 worth of dried prunes.
Dividing the average prune crop value
for 2009 reported by the National
Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS) of
$188,400,000 by the number of
producers (900) yields an average
annual producer revenue estimate of
about $209,333. Based on the foregoing,
the majority of handlers and dried
prune producers may be classified as
small entities.
This rule would increase the
assessment rate established for the
Committee and collected from handlers
for the 2010–11 and subsequent crop
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
51957
year from $0.16 to $0.27 per ton of
salable dried prunes. The Committee
unanimously recommended 2010–11
expenditures of $58,353 and an
assessment rate of $0.27 per ton of
salable dried prunes. The proposed
assessment rate of $0.27 is $0.11 higher
than the 2009–10 rate. The quantity of
assessable dried prunes for the 2010–11
year is estimated at 150,000 tons. Thus,
the $0.27 rate should provide $40,500 in
assessment income. The Committee
believes that extra assessment income
carried in for the 2009 crop year, plus
interest income and 2010 assessment
income, would be adequate to cover its
estimated expenses of $58,353.
The major expenditures
recommended by the Committee for the
2010–11 year include $31,781 for
salaries and benefits, $10,730 for
operating expenses, and $15,842 for
contingencies. Budgeted expenses for
these items in 2009–10 were $26,450,
$11,780, and $19,526, respectively.
The Committee recommended the
higher assessment rate based on a
production estimate of 150,000 tons of
salable dried prunes for this year, which
is substantially less than the 165,488
tons produced last year. At the proposed
assessment rate the assessment income
for the 2010–11 crop year would be
$40,500. The Committee’s proposed
budget of expenses of $58,353 includes
a twenty percent increase in personnel
expenses, and a nine percent decrease
in operating expenses. Combined
personnel and operational expenses are
about eleven percent higher than last
year, or about $42,511. The Committee
also included $15,842 for contingencies,
which is substantially less than the
$19,526 included for last year’s budget.
Most of the Committee’s expenses
reflect its portion of the joint
administration costs of the Committee
and the California Dried Plum Board
(CDPB). Based on the Committee’s
reduced activities in recent years, it is
funding only five percent of the shared
expenses of the two programs. This
funding level is similar to that of last
year. The Committee believes that extra
assessment income from the 2009 crop
year, plus interest income and 2010
assessment income, would be adequate
to cover its estimated expenses of
$58,353.
The Committee reviewed and
unanimously recommended 2010–11
expenditures of $58,353, which
includes an increase in personnel
expenses and a decrease in operational
expenses. Prior to arriving at its budget
of $58,353, the Committee considered
information from various sources,
including the Committee’s Executive
Subcommittee to include the
E:\FR\FM\24AUP1.SGM
24AUP1
wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with PROPOSALS_PART 1
51958
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 163 / Tuesday, August 24, 2010 / Proposed Rules
administrative expenses shared between
the Committee and the CDPB in recent
years. The assessment rate of $0.27 per
ton of salable dried prunes was derived
by considering the handler assessment
revenue needed to meet anticipated
expenses, the estimated salable tons of
California dried prunes, excess funds
carried forward into the 2010–11 crop
year, and estimated interest income. An
alternative to this action would to be to
continue with the $0.16 per ton
assessment rate. However, an
assessment rate of $0.27 per ton of
salable dried prunes, along with excess
funds from the 2009–10 crop year, is
needed to provide enough income to
fund the Committee’s operations.
A review of historical and preliminary
information pertaining to the upcoming
crop year indicates that the grower price
for the 2008–09 crop year was $1,500
per ton, that the grower price for the
2009–10 crop year was $1,200 per ton,
and that the grower price for the 2010–
11 crop year could range between
$1,000 and $1,100 per ton of salable
dried prunes. Based on an estimated
150,000 salable tons of dried prunes,
assessment revenue as a percentage of
producer prices during the 2010–2011
crop year is expected to range between
.027 and .025 percent.
This action would increase the
assessment obligation imposed on
handlers. While assessments impose
some additional costs on handlers, the
costs are minimal and uniform on all
handlers. Some of the additional costs
may be passed on to producers.
However, these costs would be offset by
the benefits derived by the operation of
the marketing order. In addition, the
Committee’s meeting was widely
publicized throughout the California
dried prune industry and all interested
persons were invited to attend the
meeting and participate in Committee
deliberations on all issues. Like all
Committee meetings, the June 24, 2010,
meeting was a public meeting and all
entities, both large and small, were able
to express views on this issue. Finally,
interested persons are invited to submit
comments on this proposed rule,
including the regulatory and
informational impacts of this action on
small businesses.
This proposed rule would impose no
additional reporting or recordkeeping
requirements on either small or large
California prune handlers. As with all
Federal marketing order programs,
reports and forms are periodically
reviewed to reduce information
requirements and duplication by
industry and public sector agencies.
AMS is committed to complying with
the E-Government Act, to promote the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:48 Aug 23, 2010
Jkt 220001
use of the Internet and other
information technologies to provide
increased opportunities for citizen
access to government information and
services, and for other purposes.
USDA has not identified any relevant
Federal rules that duplicate, overlap, or
conflict with this rule.
A small business guide on complying
with fruit, vegetable, and specialty crop
marketing agreements and orders may
be viewed at: https://www.ams.usda.gov/
MarketingOrdersSmallBusinessGuide.
Any questions about the compliance
guide should be sent to Antoinette
Carter at the previously-mentioned
address in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section.
A 30-day comment period is provided
to allow interested persons to respond
to this proposed rule. Thirty days is
deemed appropriate because: (1) The
2010–11 crop begins on August 1, 2010,
and the marketing order requires that
the rate of assessment for each crop year
apply to all assessable dried prunes
handled during such crop year; (2) the
Committee needs to have sufficient
funds to pay its expenses which are
incurred on a continuous basis; and (3)
handlers are aware of this action which
was unanimously recommended by the
Committee at a public meeting and is
similar to other assessment rate actions
issued in past years.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 993
Marketing agreements, Plum, Prunes,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, 7 CFR part 993 is proposed to
be amended as follows:
PART 993—DRIED PRUNES
PRODUCED IN CALIFORNIA
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR
part 993 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601–674.
2. Section 993.347 is revised to read
as follows:
§ 993.347
Assessment rate.
On and after August 1, 2010, an
assessment rate of $0.27 per ton of
salable dried prunes is established for
California dried prunes.
Dated: August 17, 2010.
Rayne Pegg,
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing
Service.
[FR Doc. 2010–20981 Filed 8–23–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
10 CFR Part 26
[Docket No. PRM–26–4; NRC–2010–0269]
California Association of Marriage and
Family Therapists; Notice of Receipt of
Petition for Rulemaking
Nuclear Regulatory
Commission.
ACTION: Petition for rulemaking; notice
of receipt.
AGENCY:
The Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC) has received and
requests public comment on a petition
for rulemaking dated March 24, 2010,
and supplemented on July 12, 2010,
filed by the California Association of
Marriage and Family Therapists
(CAMFT) (petitioner). The petition was
docketed by the NRC and has been
assigned Docket No. PRM–26–4. The
petitioner requests that the NRC amend
its regulations to add marriage and
family therapists (MFT) as substance
abuse experts (SAEs).
DATES: Submit comments by November
8, 2010. Comments received after this
date will be considered if it is practical
to do so, but the NRC is able to assure
consideration only for comments
received on or before this date.
ADDRESSES: Please include Docket ID
NRC–2010–0269 in the subject line of
your comments. For instructions on
submitting comments and accessing
documents related to this action, see
‘‘Submitting Comments and Accessing
Information’’ in the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION section of this document.
You may submit comments by any one
of the following methods.
Federal Rulemaking Web Site: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov and search
for documents filed under Docket ID
NRC–2010–0269. Address questions
about NRC dockets to Carol Gallagher,
telephone 301–492–3668; e-mail
Carol.Gallagher@nrc.gov.
Mail comments to: Secretary, U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission,
Washington, DC 20555–0001, ATTN:
Rulemakings and Adjudications Staff.
E-mail comments to:
Rulemaking.Comments@nrc.gov. If you
do not receive a reply e-mail confirming
that we have received your comments,
contact us directly at 301–415–1966.
Hand Deliver comments to: 11555
Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland
20852 between 7:30 a.m. and 4:15 p.m.
during Federal workdays (Telephone
301–415–1966).
Fax comments to: Secretary, U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission at 301–
415–1101.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\24AUP1.SGM
24AUP1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 163 (Tuesday, August 24, 2010)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 51956-51958]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-20981]
========================================================================
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 163 / Tuesday, August 24, 2010 /
Proposed Rules
[[Page 51956]]
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 993
[Doc. No. AMS-FV-10-0057; FV10-993-1 PR]
Dried Prunes Produced in California; Increased Assessment Rate
AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This rule would increase the assessment rate established for
the Prune Marketing Committee (Committee) for the 2010-11 and
subsequent crop years from $0.16 to $0.27 per ton of salable dried
prunes handled. The Committee locally administers the marketing order
which regulates the handling of dried prunes grown in California.
Assessments upon dried prune handlers are used by the Committee to fund
reasonable and necessary expenses of the program. The crop year begins
August 1 and ends July 31. The assessment rate would remain in effect
indefinitely unless modified, suspended, or terminated.
DATES: Comments must be received by September 23, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit written comments
concerning this rule. Comments must be sent to the Docket Clerk,
Marketing Order Administration Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs,
AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW., STOP 0237, Washington, DC
20250-0237; Fax: (202) 720-8938; or Internet: https://www.regulations.gov. Comments should reference the document number and
the date and page number of this issue of the Federal Register and will
be available for public inspection in the Office of the Docket Clerk
during regular business hours, or can be viewed at: https://www.regulations.gov. All comments submitted in response to this rule
will be included in the record and will be made available to the
public. Please be advised that the identity of the individuals or
entities submitting the comments will be made public on the Internet at
the address provided above.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Andrea Ricci, Marketing Specialist, or
Kurt Kimmel, Regional Manager, California Marketing Field Office, Fruit
and Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA; Telephone: (559) 487-5901, Fax:
(559) 487-5906, or E-mail: Andrea.Ricci@ams.usda.gov or
Kurt.Kimmel@ams.usda.gov.
Small businesses may request information on complying with this
regulation by contacting Antoinette Carter, Marketing Order
Administration Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, 1400
Independence Avenue, SW., STOP 0237, Washington, DC 20250-0237;
Telephone: (202) 720-2491, Fax: (202)720-8938, or E-mail:
ntoinete.Carter@ams.usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This rule is issued under Marketing
Agreement No. 110 and Order No. 993, both as amended (7 CFR part 993),
regulating the handling of dried prunes grown in California,
hereinafter referred to as the ``order.'' The order is effective under
the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C.
601-674), hereinafter referred to as the ``Act.''
The Department of Agriculture (USDA) is issuing this rule in
conformance with Executive Order 12866.
This rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988, Civil
Justice Reform. Under the marketing order now in effect, California
dried prune handlers are subject to assessments. Funds to administer
the order are derived from such assessments. It is intended that the
assessment rate as proposed herein would be applicable to all
assessable dried prunes beginning on August 1, 2010, and continue until
amended, suspended, or terminated.
The Act provides that administrative proceedings must be exhausted
before parties may file suit in court. Under section 608c(15)(A) of the
Act, any handler subject to an order may file with USDA a petition
stating that the order, any provision of the order, or any obligation
imposed in connection with the order is not in accordance with law and
request a modification of the order or to be exempted therefrom. Such
handler is afforded the opportunity for a hearing on the petition.
After the hearing, USDA would rule on the petition. The Act provides
that the district court of the United States in any district in which
the handler is an inhabitant, or has his or her principal place of
business, has jurisdiction to review USDA's ruling on the petition,
provided an action is filed not later than 20 days after the date of
the entry of the ruling.
This rule would increase the assessment rate established for the
Committee for the 2010-11 and subsequent crop years from $0.16 to $0.27
per ton of salable dried prunes handled.
The California dried prune marketing order provides authority for
the Committee, with the approval of USDA, to formulate an annual budget
of expenses and collect assessments from handlers to administer the
program. The members of the Committee are producers and handlers of
California dried prunes. They are familiar with the Committee's needs
and with the costs for goods and services in their local area and are
thus in a position to formulate an appropriate budget and assessment
rate. The assessment rate is formulated and discussed in a public
meeting. Thus, all directly affected persons have an opportunity to
participate and provide input.
For the 2009-10 and subsequent crop years, the Committee
recommended, and USDA approved, an assessment rate that would continue
in effect from crop year to crop year unless modified, suspended, or
terminated by USDA upon recommendation and information submitted by the
Committee or other information available to USDA.
The Committee met on June 24, 2010, and unanimously recommended
2010-11 expenditures of $58,353 and an assessment rate of $0.27 per ton
of salable dried prunes. In comparison, last year's budgeted
expenditures, as amended in March of 2010, were $57,756. The assessment
rate of $0.27 is $0.11 higher than the rate currently in effect.
The Committee recommended the higher assessment rate based on a
production estimate of 150,000 tons of salable dried prunes for this
year, which is substantially less than the 165,488 tons produced last
year. At the proposed assessment rate the assessment income for the
2010-11 crop year would be $40,500. The Committee's proposed
[[Page 51957]]
budget of expenses of $58,353 includes a twenty percent increase in
personnel expenses, and a nine percent decrease in operating expenses.
Combined personnel and operational expenses are about eleven percent
higher than last year, or about $42,511. The Committee also included
$15,842 for contingencies, which is substantially less than the $19,526
included for last year's budget. Most of the Committee's expenses
reflect its portion of the joint administration costs of the Committee
and the California Dried Plum Board (CDPB). Based on the Committee's
reduced activities in recent years, it is funding only five percent of
the shared expenses of the two programs. This funding level is similar
to that of last year. The Committee believes that extra assessment
income carried in from the 2009 crop year, plus interest income and
2009 assessment income, would be adequate to cover its estimated
expenses of $58,353.
The major expenditures recommended by the Committee for the 2010-11
year include $31,781 for salaries and benefits, $10,730 for operating
expenses, and $15,842 for contingencies. Budgeted expenses for these
items in 2009-10 were $26,450, $11,780, and $19,526, respectively.
The assessment rate recommended by the Committee was derived by
considering the handler assessment revenue needed to meet anticipated
expenses, the estimated salable tons of California dried prunes, excess
funds carried forward into the 2010-11 crop year, and estimated
interest income. As mentioned earlier, dried prune production for the
year is estimated at 150,000 salable tons, which should provide $40,500
in assessment income. Income derived from handler assessments, plus
interest income, and excess funds from the 2009-10 crop year would be
adequate to cover budgeted expenses. The Committee is authorized under
Sec. 993.81(c) of the order to use excess assessment funds from the
2009-10 crop year (currently estimated at $17,847) for up to 5 months
beyond the end of the crop year to meet the 2010-11 crop year expenses.
At the end of the 5 months, the Committee either refunds or credits
excess funds to handlers.
The proposed assessment rate would continue in effect indefinitely
unless modified, suspended, or terminated by USDA upon recommendation
and information submitted by the Committee or other available
information.
Although this assessment rate would be in effect for an indefinite
period, the Committee would continue to meet prior to or during each
crop year to recommend a budget of expenses and consider
recommendations for modification of the assessment rate. The dates and
times of Committee meetings are available from the Committee or USDA.
Committee meetings are open to the public and interested persons may
express their views at these meetings. USDA would evaluate Committee
recommendations and other available information to determine whether
modification of the assessment rate is needed. Further rulemaking would
be undertaken as necessary. The Committee's 2010-11 budget and those
for subsequent crop year would be reviewed and, as appropriate,
approved by USDA.
Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Pursuant to requirements set forth in the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601-612), the Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS)
has considered the economic impact of this rule on small entities.
Accordingly, AMS has prepared this initial regulatory flexibility
analysis.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit regulatory actions to the scale of
business subject to such actions in order that small businesses will
not be unduly or disproportionately burdened. Marketing orders issued
pursuant to the Act, and the rules issued thereunder, are unique in
that they are brought about through group action of essentially small
entities acting on their own behalf.
There are approximately 900 producers of dried prunes in the
California area and approximately 21 handlers subject to regulation
under the marketing order. Small agricultural producers are defined by
the Small Business Administration (13 CFR 121.201) as those having
annual receipts less than $750,000, and small agricultural service
firms are defined as those whose annual receipts are less than
$7,000,000.
Committee data indicates that about 64 percent of the handlers ship
under $7,000,000 worth of dried prunes. Dividing the average prune crop
value for 2009 reported by the National Agricultural Statistics Service
(NASS) of $188,400,000 by the number of producers (900) yields an
average annual producer revenue estimate of about $209,333. Based on
the foregoing, the majority of handlers and dried prune producers may
be classified as small entities.
This rule would increase the assessment rate established for the
Committee and collected from handlers for the 2010-11 and subsequent
crop year from $0.16 to $0.27 per ton of salable dried prunes. The
Committee unanimously recommended 2010-11 expenditures of $58,353 and
an assessment rate of $0.27 per ton of salable dried prunes. The
proposed assessment rate of $0.27 is $0.11 higher than the 2009-10
rate. The quantity of assessable dried prunes for the 2010-11 year is
estimated at 150,000 tons. Thus, the $0.27 rate should provide $40,500
in assessment income. The Committee believes that extra assessment
income carried in for the 2009 crop year, plus interest income and 2010
assessment income, would be adequate to cover its estimated expenses of
$58,353.
The major expenditures recommended by the Committee for the 2010-11
year include $31,781 for salaries and benefits, $10,730 for operating
expenses, and $15,842 for contingencies. Budgeted expenses for these
items in 2009-10 were $26,450, $11,780, and $19,526, respectively.
The Committee recommended the higher assessment rate based on a
production estimate of 150,000 tons of salable dried prunes for this
year, which is substantially less than the 165,488 tons produced last
year. At the proposed assessment rate the assessment income for the
2010-11 crop year would be $40,500. The Committee's proposed budget of
expenses of $58,353 includes a twenty percent increase in personnel
expenses, and a nine percent decrease in operating expenses. Combined
personnel and operational expenses are about eleven percent higher than
last year, or about $42,511. The Committee also included $15,842 for
contingencies, which is substantially less than the $19,526 included
for last year's budget. Most of the Committee's expenses reflect its
portion of the joint administration costs of the Committee and the
California Dried Plum Board (CDPB). Based on the Committee's reduced
activities in recent years, it is funding only five percent of the
shared expenses of the two programs. This funding level is similar to
that of last year. The Committee believes that extra assessment income
from the 2009 crop year, plus interest income and 2010 assessment
income, would be adequate to cover its estimated expenses of $58,353.
The Committee reviewed and unanimously recommended 2010-11
expenditures of $58,353, which includes an increase in personnel
expenses and a decrease in operational expenses. Prior to arriving at
its budget of $58,353, the Committee considered information from
various sources, including the Committee's Executive Subcommittee to
include the
[[Page 51958]]
administrative expenses shared between the Committee and the CDPB in
recent years. The assessment rate of $0.27 per ton of salable dried
prunes was derived by considering the handler assessment revenue needed
to meet anticipated expenses, the estimated salable tons of California
dried prunes, excess funds carried forward into the 2010-11 crop year,
and estimated interest income. An alternative to this action would to
be to continue with the $0.16 per ton assessment rate. However, an
assessment rate of $0.27 per ton of salable dried prunes, along with
excess funds from the 2009-10 crop year, is needed to provide enough
income to fund the Committee's operations.
A review of historical and preliminary information pertaining to
the upcoming crop year indicates that the grower price for the 2008-09
crop year was $1,500 per ton, that the grower price for the 2009-10
crop year was $1,200 per ton, and that the grower price for the 2010-11
crop year could range between $1,000 and $1,100 per ton of salable
dried prunes. Based on an estimated 150,000 salable tons of dried
prunes, assessment revenue as a percentage of producer prices during
the 2010-2011 crop year is expected to range between .027 and .025
percent.
This action would increase the assessment obligation imposed on
handlers. While assessments impose some additional costs on handlers,
the costs are minimal and uniform on all handlers. Some of the
additional costs may be passed on to producers. However, these costs
would be offset by the benefits derived by the operation of the
marketing order. In addition, the Committee's meeting was widely
publicized throughout the California dried prune industry and all
interested persons were invited to attend the meeting and participate
in Committee deliberations on all issues. Like all Committee meetings,
the June 24, 2010, meeting was a public meeting and all entities, both
large and small, were able to express views on this issue. Finally,
interested persons are invited to submit comments on this proposed
rule, including the regulatory and informational impacts of this action
on small businesses.
This proposed rule would impose no additional reporting or
recordkeeping requirements on either small or large California prune
handlers. As with all Federal marketing order programs, reports and
forms are periodically reviewed to reduce information requirements and
duplication by industry and public sector agencies.
AMS is committed to complying with the E-Government Act, to promote
the use of the Internet and other information technologies to provide
increased opportunities for citizen access to government information
and services, and for other purposes.
USDA has not identified any relevant Federal rules that duplicate,
overlap, or conflict with this rule.
A small business guide on complying with fruit, vegetable, and
specialty crop marketing agreements and orders may be viewed at: https://www.ams.usda.gov/MarketingOrdersSmallBusinessGuide. Any questions
about the compliance guide should be sent to Antoinette Carter at the
previously-mentioned address in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.
A 30-day comment period is provided to allow interested persons to
respond to this proposed rule. Thirty days is deemed appropriate
because: (1) The 2010-11 crop begins on August 1, 2010, and the
marketing order requires that the rate of assessment for each crop year
apply to all assessable dried prunes handled during such crop year; (2)
the Committee needs to have sufficient funds to pay its expenses which
are incurred on a continuous basis; and (3) handlers are aware of this
action which was unanimously recommended by the Committee at a public
meeting and is similar to other assessment rate actions issued in past
years.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 993
Marketing agreements, Plum, Prunes, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, 7 CFR part 993 is
proposed to be amended as follows:
PART 993--DRIED PRUNES PRODUCED IN CALIFORNIA
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR part 993 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601-674.
2. Section 993.347 is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 993.347 Assessment rate.
On and after August 1, 2010, an assessment rate of $0.27 per ton of
salable dried prunes is established for California dried prunes.
Dated: August 17, 2010.
Rayne Pegg,
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service.
[FR Doc. 2010-20981 Filed 8-23-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-02-P
