Safety Zone; Potomac River, St. Mary's River, St. Inigoes, MD, 51945-51947 [2010-20919]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 163 / Tuesday, August 24, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
1. The authority citation for part 147
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 14 U.S.C. 85; 43 U.S.C. 1333;
and Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 0170.1.
2. Section 147.T08–849 temporarily
added at 75 FR 32273, June 8, 2010,
effective from June 8, 2010 to August 26,
2010, will continue in effect through
November 26, 2010.
■
Dated: August 16, 2010.
M.E. Landry,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander,
Eighth Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 2010–20921 Filed 8–23–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG–2010–0719]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone; Potomac River, St. Mary’s
River, St. Inigoes, MD
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard is
establishing a temporary safety zone
upon specified waters of the St. Mary’s
River, a tributary of the Potomac River.
This action is necessary to provide for
the safety of life on navigable waters
during military pyrotechnic flare
exercises launched from a U.S. Navy
helicopter located near St. Inigoes,
Maryland. This safety zone is intended
to protect the maritime public in a
portion of the St. Mary’s River.
DATES: This rule is effective from
August 24, 2010 through August 27,
2010. This rule may be enforced with
actual notice starting on August 16,
2010.
SUMMARY:
Documents indicated in this
preamble as being available in the
docket are part of docket USCG–2010–
0719 and are available online by going
to https://www.regulations.gov, inserting
USCG–2010–0719 in the ‘‘Keyword’’
box, and then clicking ‘‘Search.’’ They
are also available for inspection or
copying at the Docket Management
Facility (M–30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground
Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590,
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with RULES_PART 1
ADDRESSES:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:10 Aug 23, 2010
Jkt 220001
If
you have questions on this temporary
rule, call or e-mail Mr. Ronald L. Houck,
Sector Baltimore Waterways
Management Division, Coast Guard;
telephone 410–576–2674, e-mail
Ronald.L.Houck@uscg.mil. If you have
questions on viewing the docket, call
Renee V. Wright, Program Manager,
Docket Operations, telephone 202–366–
9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
PART 147—SAFETY ZONES
Regulatory Information
The Coast Guard is issuing this
temporary final rule without prior
notice and opportunity to comment
pursuant to authority under section 4(a)
of the Administrative Procedure Act
(APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This provision
authorizes an agency to issue a rule
without prior notice and opportunity to
comment when the agency for good
cause finds that those procedures are
‘‘impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary
to the public interest.’’ Under 5 U.S.C.
553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that
good cause exists for not publishing a
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
with respect to this rule because it is
contrary to public interest to delay the
effective date of this rule. Delaying the
effective date by first publishing an
NPRM would be contrary to the safety
zone’s intended objectives because
immediate action is needed to protect
persons and vessels against the hazards
associated with a military pyrotechnic
flare exercise over navigable waters.
Such hazards include premature
detonations, dangerous projectiles and
falling or burning debris.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast
Guard finds that good cause exists for
making this rule effective less than 30
days after publication in the Federal
Register. Due to the need for immediate
action, the restriction of vessel traffic is
necessary to protect life, property and
the environment; therefore, a 30-day
notice is impracticable. Delaying the
effective date would be contrary to the
safety zone’s intended objectives of
protecting persons and vessels involved
in the event, and enhancing public and
maritime safety.
Basis and Purpose
Military pyrotechnic flare exercises
are necessary to provide testing and
demonstration of countermeasures
designed for military aircraft
survivability and protection. These
exercises are sometimes held at
locations above or near the navigable
waters of the United States. The
potential hazards associated with
pyrotechnic flares are a safety concern
during such exercises. The purpose of
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
51945
this rule is to promote public and
maritime safety during a military
pyrotechnic flare exercise, and to
protect mariners transiting the area from
the potential hazards associated with a
pyrotechnic flare exercise, such as the
accidental discharge of flares, dangerous
projectiles, and falling hot embers or
other debris. This rule is needed to
ensure safety on the waterway during
the scheduled event.
Discussion of Rule
The Naval Air Warfare Center Aircraft
Division, at U.S. Naval Air Station
Patuxent River, Maryland, will conduct
a pyrotechnic flare exercise from an
airborne CH–53D Sea Stallion helicopter
hovering at a minimum of 1,000 feet
above the surface of the St. Mary’s
River, near St. Inigoes, Maryland. The
activity is scheduled for a two hour
period on a single day during the week
of August 16, 2010, and if necessary due
to inclement weather or availability of
aircraft, for a two hour period on a
single day during the week of August
23, 2010. Due to many limiting factors,
including when such flights are
identified by the Navy during weekly
requests, the Coast Guard can only be
provided a 96-hour notification of
approved flare-dispensing missions.
The Coast Guard is establishing a
temporary safety zone on certain waters
of the St. Mary’s River, near its
confluence with the Potomac River,
within a one nautical mile radius of an
airborne CH–53D Sea Stallion helicopter
in approximate position latitude
38°06′49″ N., longitude 76°26′35″ W.,
located approximately 2,300 yards westnorthwest of Sage Point, Maryland
(NAD 1983). The temporary safety zone
will be enforced for a two hour period
on a single day during the week of
August 16, 2010, and if necessary due
to inclement or availability of aircraft,
for a two hour period on a single day
during the week of August 23, 2010. The
effect of this temporary safety zone will
be to restrict navigation in the regulated
area during the pyrotechnic flare
exercise. No person or vessel may enter
or remain in the safety zone. Vessels
will be allowed to transit the waters of
the St. Mary’s River outside the safety
zone. Notification of the temporary
safety zone will be provided to the
public via marine information
broadcasts.
Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after
considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on 13 of these statutes or
executive orders.
E:\FR\FM\24AUR1.SGM
24AUR1
51946
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 163 / Tuesday, August 24, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant
regulatory action under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs
and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that
Order. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under that
Order. Although this safety zone will
restrict vessel traffic, there is little
vessel traffic associated with
commercial fishing, and recreational
boating in the area. In addition, the
effect of this rule will not be significant
because the safety zone is of limited
duration and size. For the above
reasons, the Coast Guard does not
anticipate any significant economic
impact.
wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with RULES_PART 1
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered
whether this rule would have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises
small businesses, not-for-profit
organizations that are independently
owned and operated and are not
dominant in their fields, and
governmental jurisdictions with
populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5
U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
This rule will affect the following
entities, some of which may be small
entities: The owners or operators of
vessels intending to operate, transit, or
anchor in a portion of the St. Mary’s
River, near its confluence with the
Potomac River, located near St. Inigoes,
Maryland, for a two hour period on a
single day during the week of August
16, 2010, and if necessary due to
inclement weather or availability of
aircraft, for a two hour period on a
single day during the week of August
23, 2010. This safety zone will not have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities for
the following reasons. The safety zone is
of limited size and duration. In
addition, before the effective periods,
the Coast Guard will issue maritime
advisories widely available to users of
the waterway to allow mariners to make
alternative plans for transiting the
affected area.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we offer to assist small entities in
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:10 Aug 23, 2010
Jkt 220001
understanding the rule so that they can
better evaluate its effects on them and
participate in the rulemaking process.
Small businesses may send comments
on the actions of Federal employees
who enforce, or otherwise determine
compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
and the Regional Small Business
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
Ombudsman evaluates these actions
annually and rates each agency’s
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
employees of the Coast Guard, call 1–
888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247). The
Coast Guard will not retaliate against
small entities that question or complain
about this rule or any policy or action
of the Coast Guard.
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection
of information under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–
3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on State or local governments and
would either preempt State law or
impose a substantial direct cost of
compliance on them. We have analyzed
this rule under that Order and have
determined that it does not have
implications for federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this rule
will not result in such an expenditure,
we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not cause a taking of
private property or otherwise have
taking implications under Executive
Order 12630, Governmental Actions and
Interference with Constitutionally
Protected Property Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards
in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to
minimize litigation, eliminate
ambiguity, and reduce burden.
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13045, Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not
an economically significant rule and
does not create an environmental risk to
health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under that order because
it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. The Administrator of the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs
has not designated it as a significant
energy action. Therefore, it does not
require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use
voluntary consensus standards in their
regulatory activities unless the agency
provides Congress, through the Office of
Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
E:\FR\FM\24AUR1.SGM
24AUR1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 163 / Tuesday, August 24, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
Management Directive 023–01 and
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
which guide the Coast Guard in
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have concluded this action is one of a
category of actions that do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. This rule is categorically
excluded, under figure 2–1, paragraph
(34)(g), of the Instruction. This rule
involves establishing a temporary safety
zone. An environmental analysis
checklist and a categorical exclusion
determination are available in the
docket where indicated under
ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
■ For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
Pub. L. 107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department
of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
2. Add § 165.T05–0719 to read as
follows:
■
wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with RULES_PART 1
§ 165.T05–0719 Safety Zone; Potomac
River, St. Mary’s River, St. Inigoes, MD.
(a) Regulated Area. The following area
is a safety zone: All waters in the St.
Mary’s River, near its confluence with
the Potomac River, within a one
nautical mile radius of an airborne CH–
53D Sea Stallion helicopter in
approximate position latitude 38°06′’49″
N, longitude 76°26′35″ W, located
approximately 2,300 yards westnorthwest of Sage Point, Maryland
(NAD 1983).
(b) Regulations. The general safety
zone regulations found in § 165.23
apply to the safety zone created by this
temporary section, § 165.T05–0719.
(1) All vessels and persons are
prohibited from entering this zone,
except as authorized by the Coast Guard
Captain of the Port Baltimore.
(2) Persons or vessels requiring entry
into or passage within the zone must
request authorization from the Captain
of the Port Baltimore or his designated
representative by telephone at 410–576–
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:10 Aug 23, 2010
Jkt 220001
2693 or on VHF–FM marine band radio
channel 16.
(3) All Coast Guard assets enforcing
this safety zone can be contacted on
VHF–FM marine band radio channels
13 and 16.
(4) The operator of any vessel within
or in the immediate vicinity of this
safety zone shall:
(i) Stop the vessel immediately upon
being directed to do so by any
commissioned, warrant or petty officer
on board a vessel displaying a Coast
Guard Ensign, and
(ii) Proceed as directed by any
commissioned, warrant or petty officer
on board a vessel displaying a Coast
Guard Ensign.
(c) Definitions. Captain of the Port
Baltimore means the Commander, Coast
Guard Sector Baltimore or any Coast
Guard commissioned, warrant or petty
officer who has been authorized by the
Captain of the Port Baltimore to act on
his behalf.
Designated representative means any
Coast Guard commissioned, warrant, or
petty officer who has been authorized
by the Captain of the Port Baltimore to
assist in enforcing the safety zone
described in paragraph (a) of this
section.
(d) Enforcement. The U.S. Coast
Guard may be assisted by Federal, State
and local agencies in the patrol and
enforcement of the zone.
(e) Enforcement period. This section
will be enforced for a two-hour period
on a single day during the week of
August 16, 2010, and if necessary due
to inclement weather or availability of
aircraft, for a two-hour period on a
single day during the week of August
23, 2010.
Dated: August 5, 2010.
Mark P. O’Malley,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port Baltimore, Maryland.
[FR Doc. 2010–20919 Filed 8–23–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
POSTAL SERVICE
39 CFR Part 111
Mailing of Cigarettes and Smokeless
Tobacco Products to APO/FPO/DPO
Destination Addresses
Postal ServiceTM.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The Postal Service is revising
the Mailing Standards of the United
States Postal Service, Domestic Mail
Manual (DMM®) 503.9 and 601.11 to
permit the mailing of cigarettes and
smokeless tobacco to APO/FPO/DPO
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
51947
destination addresses via Express Mail®
Military Service or Priority Mail®
service with Delivery ConfirmationTM.
DATES: Effective Date: August 27, 2010.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mary Collins, 202–268–5440, Anthony
Alverno, 202–268–2997 or Jeff Burger,
202–268–7251.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On May 5,
2010, the Postal Service published a
proposed rule in the Federal Register
(75 FR 24534–24541) to implement the
Prevent All Cigarette Trafficking (PACT)
Act of 2009, Public Law 111–154. After
solicitation and consideration of the
comments received in response to the
proposed rule, the Postal Service
published a Federal Register final rule
on May 27, 2010 (75 FR 29662–29671)
to implement the PACT Act effective
June 29, 2010.
The final rule established eligibility
requirements under which shipments of
cigarettes and smokeless tobacco could
be sent via U.S. mail under the PACT
Act. One of the exceptions in the PACT
Act allows for gift shipments sent by
certain individuals. The Postal Service
implemented this requirement in the
final rule by providing that shipments
sent by individuals in non-commercial
transactions must be sent by Express
Mail with Hold for Pickup for domestic
shipments. With respect to shipments to
Air Force/Army Post Offices (APOs),
Fleet Post Offices (FPOs), or Diplomatic
Post Offices (DPOs) destination
addresses, the standards in DMM
section 601.11.6.2 provided that
shipments of cigarettes and smokeless
tobacco must be sent via Express Mail.
This is consistent with the PACT Act
requirement that shipments by certain
individuals must be sent using ‘‘the
systems of the Postal Service that
provide for the tracking and
confirmation of delivery.’’ 18 U.S.C.
1716E(b)(4)(ii)(IV). Express Mail service
offers both tracking and confirmation of
delivery and was accordingly required
for shipments to APO/FPO/DPO
destination addresses.
No comments were received in
response to the Postal Service’s
solicitation for comments on the
proposed rule in connection with
shipments to APO/FPO/DPO
addressees. Subsequent to the
publication of the final rule, however,
the Postal Service received inquiries
from customers concerning the
requirement to use Express Mail service
for shipments to APO/FPO/DPO
destination addresses in Iraq and
Afghanistan. In particular, customers
advised that Express Mail service is not
offered to APO/FPO/DPO destination
addresses in certain places where large
E:\FR\FM\24AUR1.SGM
24AUR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 163 (Tuesday, August 24, 2010)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 51945-51947]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-20919]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG-2010-0719]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zone; Potomac River, St. Mary's River, St. Inigoes, MD
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Temporary final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone upon
specified waters of the St. Mary's River, a tributary of the Potomac
River. This action is necessary to provide for the safety of life on
navigable waters during military pyrotechnic flare exercises launched
from a U.S. Navy helicopter located near St. Inigoes, Maryland. This
safety zone is intended to protect the maritime public in a portion of
the St. Mary's River.
DATES: This rule is effective from August 24, 2010 through August 27,
2010. This rule may be enforced with actual notice starting on August
16, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Documents indicated in this preamble as being available in
the docket are part of docket USCG-2010-0719 and are available online
by going to https://www.regulations.gov, inserting USCG-2010-0719 in the
``Keyword'' box, and then clicking ``Search.'' They are also available
for inspection or copying at the Docket Management Facility (M-30),
U.S. Department of Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this
temporary rule, call or e-mail Mr. Ronald L. Houck, Sector Baltimore
Waterways Management Division, Coast Guard; telephone 410-576-2674, e-
mail Ronald.L.Houck@uscg.mil. If you have questions on viewing the
docket, call Renee V. Wright, Program Manager, Docket Operations,
telephone 202-366-9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulatory Information
The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary final rule without prior
notice and opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under section
4(a) of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This
provision authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice and
opportunity to comment when the agency for good cause finds that those
procedures are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest.'' Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good
cause exists for not publishing a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
with respect to this rule because it is contrary to public interest to
delay the effective date of this rule. Delaying the effective date by
first publishing an NPRM would be contrary to the safety zone's
intended objectives because immediate action is needed to protect
persons and vessels against the hazards associated with a military
pyrotechnic flare exercise over navigable waters. Such hazards include
premature detonations, dangerous projectiles and falling or burning
debris.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good cause
exists for making this rule effective less than 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register. Due to the need for immediate
action, the restriction of vessel traffic is necessary to protect life,
property and the environment; therefore, a 30-day notice is
impracticable. Delaying the effective date would be contrary to the
safety zone's intended objectives of protecting persons and vessels
involved in the event, and enhancing public and maritime safety.
Basis and Purpose
Military pyrotechnic flare exercises are necessary to provide
testing and demonstration of countermeasures designed for military
aircraft survivability and protection. These exercises are sometimes
held at locations above or near the navigable waters of the United
States. The potential hazards associated with pyrotechnic flares are a
safety concern during such exercises. The purpose of this rule is to
promote public and maritime safety during a military pyrotechnic flare
exercise, and to protect mariners transiting the area from the
potential hazards associated with a pyrotechnic flare exercise, such as
the accidental discharge of flares, dangerous projectiles, and falling
hot embers or other debris. This rule is needed to ensure safety on the
waterway during the scheduled event.
Discussion of Rule
The Naval Air Warfare Center Aircraft Division, at U.S. Naval Air
Station Patuxent River, Maryland, will conduct a pyrotechnic flare
exercise from an airborne CH-53D Sea Stallion helicopter hovering at a
minimum of 1,000 feet above the surface of the St. Mary's River, near
St. Inigoes, Maryland. The activity is scheduled for a two hour period
on a single day during the week of August 16, 2010, and if necessary
due to inclement weather or availability of aircraft, for a two hour
period on a single day during the week of August 23, 2010. Due to many
limiting factors, including when such flights are identified by the
Navy during weekly requests, the Coast Guard can only be provided a 96-
hour notification of approved flare-dispensing missions.
The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone on certain
waters of the St. Mary's River, near its confluence with the Potomac
River, within a one nautical mile radius of an airborne CH-53D Sea
Stallion helicopter in approximate position latitude 38[deg]06'49'' N.,
longitude 76[deg]26'35'' W., located approximately 2,300 yards west-
northwest of Sage Point, Maryland (NAD 1983). The temporary safety zone
will be enforced for a two hour period on a single day during the week
of August 16, 2010, and if necessary due to inclement or availability
of aircraft, for a two hour period on a single day during the week of
August 23, 2010. The effect of this temporary safety zone will be to
restrict navigation in the regulated area during the pyrotechnic flare
exercise. No person or vessel may enter or remain in the safety zone.
Vessels will be allowed to transit the waters of the St. Mary's River
outside the safety zone. Notification of the temporary safety zone will
be provided to the public via marine information broadcasts.
Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on 13 of these statutes or executive orders.
[[Page 51946]]
Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant regulatory action under section 3(f)
of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs and benefits under section
6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and Budget has not
reviewed it under that Order. Although this safety zone will restrict
vessel traffic, there is little vessel traffic associated with
commercial fishing, and recreational boating in the area. In addition,
the effect of this rule will not be significant because the safety zone
is of limited duration and size. For the above reasons, the Coast Guard
does not anticipate any significant economic impact.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered whether this rule would have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small entities''
comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are
independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields,
and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities. This rule will affect the following entities, some of which
may be small entities: The owners or operators of vessels intending to
operate, transit, or anchor in a portion of the St. Mary's River, near
its confluence with the Potomac River, located near St. Inigoes,
Maryland, for a two hour period on a single day during the week of
August 16, 2010, and if necessary due to inclement weather or
availability of aircraft, for a two hour period on a single day during
the week of August 23, 2010. This safety zone will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities
for the following reasons. The safety zone is of limited size and
duration. In addition, before the effective periods, the Coast Guard
will issue maritime advisories widely available to users of the
waterway to allow mariners to make alternative plans for transiting the
affected area.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we offer to assist small
entities in understanding the rule so that they can better evaluate its
effects on them and participate in the rulemaking process.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this rule under
that Order and have determined that it does not have implications for
federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not cause a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not an economically significant rule and does not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
[[Page 51947]]
Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have concluded
this action is one of a category of actions that do not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment. This
rule is categorically excluded, under figure 2-1, paragraph (34)(g), of
the Instruction. This rule involves establishing a temporary safety
zone. An environmental analysis checklist and a categorical exclusion
determination are available in the docket where indicated under
ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
0
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701, 3306,
3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6, and 160.5;
Pub. L. 107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 0170.1.
0
2. Add Sec. 165.T05-0719 to read as follows:
Sec. 165.T05-0719 Safety Zone; Potomac River, St. Mary's River, St.
Inigoes, MD.
(a) Regulated Area. The following area is a safety zone: All waters
in the St. Mary's River, near its confluence with the Potomac River,
within a one nautical mile radius of an airborne CH-53D Sea Stallion
helicopter in approximate position latitude 38[deg]06''49'' N,
longitude 76[deg]26'35'' W, located approximately 2,300 yards west-
northwest of Sage Point, Maryland (NAD 1983).
(b) Regulations. The general safety zone regulations found in Sec.
165.23 apply to the safety zone created by this temporary section,
Sec. 165.T05-0719.
(1) All vessels and persons are prohibited from entering this zone,
except as authorized by the Coast Guard Captain of the Port Baltimore.
(2) Persons or vessels requiring entry into or passage within the
zone must request authorization from the Captain of the Port Baltimore
or his designated representative by telephone at 410-576-2693 or on
VHF-FM marine band radio channel 16.
(3) All Coast Guard assets enforcing this safety zone can be
contacted on VHF-FM marine band radio channels 13 and 16.
(4) The operator of any vessel within or in the immediate vicinity
of this safety zone shall:
(i) Stop the vessel immediately upon being directed to do so by any
commissioned, warrant or petty officer on board a vessel displaying a
Coast Guard Ensign, and
(ii) Proceed as directed by any commissioned, warrant or petty
officer on board a vessel displaying a Coast Guard Ensign.
(c) Definitions. Captain of the Port Baltimore means the Commander,
Coast Guard Sector Baltimore or any Coast Guard commissioned, warrant
or petty officer who has been authorized by the Captain of the Port
Baltimore to act on his behalf.
Designated representative means any Coast Guard commissioned,
warrant, or petty officer who has been authorized by the Captain of the
Port Baltimore to assist in enforcing the safety zone described in
paragraph (a) of this section.
(d) Enforcement. The U.S. Coast Guard may be assisted by Federal,
State and local agencies in the patrol and enforcement of the zone.
(e) Enforcement period. This section will be enforced for a two-
hour period on a single day during the week of August 16, 2010, and if
necessary due to inclement weather or availability of aircraft, for a
two-hour period on a single day during the week of August 23, 2010.
Dated: August 5, 2010.
Mark P. O'Malley,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Baltimore, Maryland.
[FR Doc. 2010-20919 Filed 8-23-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P