Supplemental Standards of Ethical Conduct for Employees of the Department of Agriculture; Additional Rules for Department's Rural Development Employees, 51369-51373 [2010-20722]

Agencies

• Office of the Secretary
• DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 161 (Friday, August 20, 2010)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 51369-51373]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-20722]



========================================================================
Rules and Regulations
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents 
having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed 
to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published 
under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.

The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents. 
Prices of new books are listed in the first FEDERAL REGISTER issue of each 
week.

========================================================================


Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 161 / Friday, August 20, 2010 / Rules 
and Regulations

[[Page 51369]]



DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Office of the Secretary

5 CFR Part 8301

RIN 3209-AA15


Supplemental Standards of Ethical Conduct for Employees of the 
Department of Agriculture; Additional Rules for Department's Rural 
Development Employees

AGENCY: Office of the Secretary, U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA).

ACTION: Interim rule with request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Agriculture (USDA), with the concurrence of 
the Office of Government Ethics (OGE), is issuing an interim rule 
amending the regulations for Department employees that supplement the 
Standards of Ethical Conduct for Employees of the Executive Branch 
(Standards), as issued by OGE. The interim rule adds additional rules 
in a new section applicable to employees of the Rural Development (RD) 
mission area. This section sets forth certain restrictions on financial 
interests applicable to RD employees and separate, more-extensive prior 
approval requirements for RD employees.

DATES: Effective Date: These interim regulations are effective August 
20, 2010. Comments are invited and should be received by September 20, 
2010.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments to the Office of Ethics, U.S. 
Department of Agriculture, on this interim regulation by any of the 
following methods:
     E-mail: daeo.ethics@usda.gov [include reference to RD 
Supplemental Regulation in the subject line of the message].
     Fax: 202-690-2642.
     Postal Mail/Hand Delivery/Courier: Office of Ethics, U.S. 
Department of Agriculture, Room 347-W, Stop 0122, 1400 Independence 
Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20250, telephone (202) 720-2251. Attention: 
Michael M. Edwards, Deputy Director.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael M. Edwards, (202) 720-2251.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

    On October 2, 2000, with the concurrence and co-signature of OGE, 
The USDA published a final rule establishing supplemental standards of 
ethical conduct for employees of USDA (65 FR 58635-40, October 2, 
2000). The final rule was issued to supplement the Standards of Ethical 
Conduct for Employees of the Executive Branch (Standards) that were 
published by OGE on August 7, 1992, and became effective on February 3, 
1993. The Standards, as corrected and amended, are codified at 5 CFR 
part 2635. The final rule was issued pursuant to 5 CFR 2635.105, which 
authorizes agencies, with the concurrence of OGE, to publish agency-
specific supplemental regulations that are necessary to implement their 
respective ethics programs. The Department, with OGE concurrence, 
determined that the supplemental rules for codification in chapter 73 
of 5 CFR, consisting of part 8301, are necessary to the success of its 
ethics program, and has likewise determined that these additional rules 
are necessary to the success of its ethics program for RD.

II. Grace Period

    While these regulations are effective upon publication, pursuant to 
5 CFR 2635.403(d), whenever an agency directs divestiture of a 
financial interest under paragraphs (a) or (b) of 5 CFR 2635.403, the 
employee shall be given a reasonable time, not to exceed ninety (90) 
calendar days from the date on which divestiture is first directed, in 
which to comply with the agency's direction.
    Divestiture is directed upon publication of this rule. Accordingly, 
employees who are required to divest financial interests pursuant to 
publication of this rule shall accomplish required divestiture as 
follows: Divestiture of financial interests described under Sec.  
8301.107(c) of this rule shall be accomplished within ninety (90) 
calendar days from the effective date of this rule; termination of 
outside employment prohibited under Sec.  8301.107(f) of this rule 
shall be accomplished within thirty (30) calendar days from the 
effective date of this rule. However, during the 90 and 30 day periods, 
as long as the employee retains or continues to hold any financial 
interest that must be divested or employment that must be terminated 
pursuant to this rule, the employee shall remain subject to any 
restrictions imposed under 5 CFR part 2635, subpart D, as well as 18 
U.S.C. 208 and 5 CFR part 2640. Moreover, employees who, subsequent to 
the effective date of this rule, either: (1) Unknowingly or through 
processes such as inheritance acquire, receive, or otherwise obtain 
financial interests; or (2) engage in outside employment that becomes 
conflicting through a subsequent official reassignment or change in 
official duties, shall also have respective 90 and 30 calendar day 
periods in which to divest such interest, or terminate prohibited 
outside employment. These periods will be measured from the date on 
which the employee learns, or reasonably should have learned, that he 
or she has acquired a prohibited financial interest or that outside 
employment in which he or she currently is engaged is prohibited by 
this rule.

Analysis of the Regulations

Section 8301.107 Additional Rules for Rural Development Employees

    USDA's RD has determined that certain additional rules are 
necessary in order to protect the integrity of its programs. Many RD 
programs are administered in a highly decentralized manner. Many RD 
employees reside in the same small communities as the RD loan 
applicants, borrowers, and program participants they serve. At the same 
time, many RD employees and/or their family members are RD program 
participants. Rural Development employees often are part of the very 
rural communities being serviced by their local RD offices. Given the 
opportunity and, in many cases, the need for regular, non-official 
interaction between RD employees and the persons and businesses in 
their communities serviced by RD, there is a need to establish for RD 
employees certain limitations regarding outside

[[Page 51370]]

employment and to prohibit RD employees from obtaining certain 
financial holdings. The restrictions contained in paragraphs (c) 
through (g) of Sec.  8301.107 primarily reinstate employee conduct 
rules that were in effect at the former Farmers Home Administration 
(FmHA) and Rural Electrification Administration, the predecessor 
agencies to RD, prior to the effective date of 5 CFR part 2635, as 
extended by OGE-issued grace periods to November 1, 1996, for certain 
existing USDA regulatory prohibited financial interests and prior 
approval for outside employment requirements.
    Paragraph (a) of Sec.  8301.107 provides that, other than where 
specified, the additional rules in the section apply solely to all RD 
employees, other than special Government employees as defined under 18 
U.S.C. 202, whether the employees are employed by RD, or one of the RD 
agencies, the Rural Housing Service (RHS), the Rural Business and 
Cooperative Service (RBS), or the Rural Utilities Service (RUS).
    Paragraph (b) defines the phrase ``RD program participant'' as any 
person (including any entity) who, either individually or collectively, 
(1) Currently has an outstanding loan, loan guaranty, or grant from RD, 
(2) currently receives any other form of RD financial assistance under 
a credit, payment, or other program administered by RD, or (3) has an 
application on file to become an RD borrower, RD grantee, or recipient 
of any other form of RD financial assistance available under any 
credit, payment, or other program administered by RD. However, the 
definition excludes voluntary membership by a person in a utility or 
public-type facility organization that is an RD program participant.
    The new interim rule contains five restrictions on RD employees 
holding or acquiring conflicting interests. Paragraph (c)(1) of Sec.  
8301.107 provides that no RD employee, or spouse or minor child of such 
an RD employee, shall knowingly own, receive, or acquire stock, or hold 
any other financial interest in a for-profit entity, or affiliate of a 
for-profit entity, that is an RD program participant, a business that 
does or seeks to do business with RD, or one that sells repeatedly to 
RD borrowers or contractors for payment from RD loan, grant, or loan 
guaranty funds, if that entity or affiliate is affected by decisions of 
the particular RD office in which the RD employee serves. The paragraph 
specifically references types of entities covered as including: 
Entities engaged in commercial real estate sale and lease, including 
brokers, sales agents, mortgage lenders, and other financial servers; 
title and abstract companies; house/building construction companies and 
subcontractors; building supply companies and lumberyards; insurance 
companies; and entities involved in land development.
    This provision is subject to two exceptions under paragraph (c)(2). 
The first exception permits investing in a publicly traded or publicly 
available mutual fund or other collective investment fund or in a 
widely held pension or similar fund provided that the fund does not 
invest more than 5 percent of its assets in securities of any one 
entity covered under paragraph (c)(1), or more than 25 percent of its 
assets in securities of any combination of entities covered under 
paragraph (c)(1).
    Under the second exception, the prohibitions contained in paragraph 
(c)(1) on owning or acquiring a financial interest do not prohibit an 
RD employee, spouse or minor child from owning ``Patronage Capital,'' 
as a member in a nonprofit entity, such as an electric, 
telecommunications, or water cooperative. Patronage Capital is defined 
as the amounts received for providing a service in excess of the 
amounts required for operating costs and expenses. Under this 
definition, Patronage Capital is the equivalent of net income in a 
commercial for-profit business entity. Cooperative principles require 
that Patronage Capital be returned to the members who furnished it. 
When these amounts are credited or allocated to the members, they are 
referred to as Patronage Capital Credits or Capital Credits. Generally, 
Capital Credits are retired or paid to members on a First In First Out 
(FIFO) basis. Because of the capital-intensive nature of the utility 
industry, Capital Credit retirements are paid on a rotational cycle 
determined by the Cooperative. These rotational cycles are usually 
between 15 and 30 years, meaning that Patronage Capital Credits may not 
be paid to the member for 15 to 30 years after it is earned. Credits 
are allocated based on the amount of electrical service provided to a 
consumer. As many RUS employees are residents of rural communities 
where utilities are provided through cooperatives, prohibiting such 
interests would impose an undue hardship on the employees, their 
spouses, and/or minor children. Moreover, RD has determined that these 
payments, which stem from simple membership, pose little risk of 
conflicting interests.
    Paragraph (d) of Sec.  8301.107 generally provides that no RD 
employee, or a spouse or minor child of an RD employee, shall knowingly 
purchase RD-related real estate properties. Application of this 
prohibition is subject to waiver under paragraph (g) of this section.
    Paragraph (e)(1) of this section prohibits an RD employee, or a 
spouse or minor child of an RD employee, from engaging in certain 
transactions with persons whom the RD employee, or spouse or minor 
child of the RD employee, knows or reasonably should know to be an RD 
program participant directly affected by decisions made by the 
employee's RD office, unless certain exceptions apply. The transactions 
covered by this general prohibition include sales of real property, 
leases of real or personal property, the sale or purchase of personal 
property, and obtaining personal services from RD program participants. 
As provided in paragraph (e)(2), the general prohibition does not apply 
to transactions involving goods available to the general public at 
posted prices that are customary and usual within the community (e.g., 
sale of a tractor through placing an advertisement in the local 
newspaper). As with paragraph (d), above, application of this general 
prohibition also is subject to waiver under paragraph (g) of this 
section.
    Paragraph (f) of Sec.  8301.107 contains a prohibition on RD 
employees providing outside consulting services to an RD program 
participant if the program participant is affected by decisions of the 
particular RD office in which the RD employee serves. It is the 
position of USDA that such service by an RD employee would often result 
not only in the employee being tempted to use his or her official 
position, or nonpublic RD information, to benefit himself or herself, 
but would almost always result in the perception among RD program 
participants of such misuse. In light of the potential risk to the 
faith of the public in the integrity of RD programs, this prohibition 
is not subject to waiver.
    Under 5 CFR 2635.403(a), RD may, by supplemental regulation, 
prohibit or restrict employees from holding financial interests that RD 
determines would cause a reasonable person to question the impartiality 
or objectivity with which RD programs are administered. The important 
local role that RD plays in rural communities as a lender and loan 
guarantor, and the resulting impact that it has upon the rural real 
estate industry, warrants supplemental safeguards against placing any 
RD employee in a position to secure, or appear to secure, private gain 
for himself or herself, or for any other person, by virtue of the 
public position he or she holds.

[[Page 51371]]

    The sensitive and diverse mission of RD involving the institutions 
it assists makes it appropriate to restrict ownership of certain 
financial interests dealing with rural real estate ownership and rural 
construction interests by an RD employee, or spouse and/or minor child 
of an RD employee. Such restrictions are necessary in order to (1) 
maintain public confidence in the impartiality and objectivity with 
which RD executes its mission, (2) eliminate public concern, 
particularly in the area serviced by the employee's RD office, that 
sensitive information provided to RD might be used for private gain, 
and (3) avoid a significant number of recusals which would hinder 
program operations.
    The prohibitions under paragraphs (c) and (d) apply whether the 
prohibited financial interest involved is obtained by the employee, 
spouse, or minor child directly or indirectly if the financial interest 
is obtained knowingly by the employee, spouse, or minor child. For 
example, an employee would violate paragraph (d) should he or she 
obtain otherwise prohibited RD property through an agreement with 
another person under which the other party poses as a front for the RD 
employee. Because application of the prohibitions in paragraphs (d) and 
(e) may result in undue financial hardship to various RD employees and 
RD program participants in certain instances, the prohibitions may be 
waived in accordance with the standards at paragraph (g) of Sec.  
8301.107. Under this paragraph, an RD employee may submit a written 
request to the RD State Director for the employee's State or the Deputy 
Administrator for Operations and Management. Either of these officials, 
as appropriate, may make a determination in advance after consulting 
with the USDA Office of Ethics that a transaction would satisfy the 
conditions, as explained below. Paragraph (g) also provides that a 
waiver may impose appropriate additional conditions, such as a written 
disqualification. This waiver provision reflects, in large part, a 
similar provision that existed in the former FmHA rules prior to the 
effective date of the Standards and which lapsed when the Standards 
became effective as a final rule.
    A waiver may be granted by the RD State Director or Deputy 
Administrator for Operations and Management based on his or her 
finding, after consultation with the USDA Office of Ethics, that: (1) 
The transaction is not inconsistent with the Standards at part 2635 of 
this title or this part; (2) the transaction is not otherwise 
prohibited by law, including 7 U.S.C. 1986 (prohibiting Department 
employees from benefiting, or receiving a fee, commission, gift, or 
other consideration, in connection with any transaction or business 
under the Consolidated Farm and Rural Development Act, 7 U.S.C. 1921 et 
seq.); and (3) under the particular circumstances, application of the 
prohibition to the transaction is not necessary to avoid the appearance 
of misuse of position or loss of impartiality, nor otherwise needed to 
ensure confidence in theimpartiality and objectivity with which agency 
programs are administered. In addition, the transaction must be found 
to be free of duress or favoritism and to not involve a contractual 
relationship or obligation exceeding 365 consecutive calendar days.
    Moreover, because farm leases and other transactions between RD 
employees and RD program participants are so common within rural 
communities, RD has determined that not providing RD employees (on 
their own behalf or on behalf of their spouses or minor children) the 
opportunity, through the waiver provision, to obtain an advance 
determination that the transaction would be consistent with ethics 
requirements would impose an undue financial hardship upon the RD 
employees (including their spouses and/or minor children) and the RD 
program participants. While the waiver request is submitted by the RD 
employee, the standards for granting such a waiver set forth in (g)(2) 
specifically require a showing that, in addition to satisfying the 
primary Government ethics conditions for the RD employee noted above, 
the transaction is in the best interests of the RD program participant 
and that denial of the requested waiver would likely cause significant 
hardship to the RD program participant. Such additional waiver 
provisions, based on a balancing of ethical considerations against the 
potential financial hardship to the RD program participant, provide 
flexibility and fairness while raising the level of decision-making 
visibility and accountability. Requiring requests for advance 
determinations to be submitted to the appropriate RD official permits 
the agency to have control over these interactions without imposing 
undue financial hardships. As a result, approved transactions will have 
visibility and accountability.
    Paragraph (h) of Sec.  8301.107 requires an RD employee, not 
otherwise required to do so under Sec.  8301.102, to obtain prior 
approval from RD before engaging in outside employment that: (1) 
Relates to the real estate industry in the area serviced by the 
particular RD office in which the RD employee serves, or (2) involves a 
person whom the RD employee knows, or reasonably should know, to be an 
RD program participant directly affected by decisions made by the 
particular RD office in which the RD employee serves.
    This requirement also reflects a similar requirement contained 
within the former FmHA rules and which lapsed on November 1, 1996. 
While outside interaction is vital to RD employees and to the community 
in which they live, the potential for outside employment opportunities 
leading to favoritism and a loss of impartiality, or an appearance 
thereof, is significant enough to justify agency concerns. Thus, USDA 
has determined that it is necessary to require approval before any of 
its RD employees may engage in any outside employment in such 
businesses where potential for actual or perceived favoritism or a loss 
of impartiality is significant. Specifically, the parties involved in 
real estate transactions are generally real estate agents, appraisers, 
brokerage agents, title attorneys, bank board members, etc. In the 
opinion of USDA, prior approval is necessary in order to maintain 
public confidence in the impartiality and objectivity with which RD 
executes its various functions; to eliminate public concern, 
particularly in the area serviced by the employee's RD office, that 
sensitive information provided to or by RD employees might be used for 
private gain; and to avoid a significant number of recusals that would 
hinder program operations.
    Mitigating against the impact of this restriction is the fact that 
this paragraph covers only RD employees, not their spouses or minor 
children. Moreover, there is a provision set forth in Sec.  
8301.102(e)(1) that will provide the flexibility to exempt from the 
prior approval requirement categories of outside employment that are 
deemed to pose little or no ethical risk to RD employees.

IV. Matters of Regulatory Procedure

Administrative Procedure Act

    Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553(a)(2), USDA is not required to provide a 
general notice of proposed rulemaking, opportunity for advance comment, 
and a 30-day delay in effectiveness as to this interim rule because it 
is a matter relating to Federal personnel. This rulemaking contains 
statements of policy, interpretive rules, and conduct regulations 
related to USDA personnel and, in significant part, reissues in revised 
form the prohibited financial interest and outside employment rules 
that existed in the former FmHA prior

[[Page 51372]]

to the effective date of 5 CFR part 2635. However, because this rule 
may be improved, comments may be submitted on or before September 20, 
2010. All comments will be analyzed and any appropriate changes to the 
rule will be incorporated in the subsequent publication of the final 
rule.
    While the rule is effective upon publication, pursuant to 5 CFR 
2635.403(d), whenever an agency directs divestiture of a financial 
interest under paragraphs (a) or (b) of 5 CFR 2635.403, the employee 
shall be given a reasonable time, normally not to exceed ninety (90) 
calendar days from the date on which divestiture is first directed, in 
which to comply with the agency's direction.
    The divestiture requirement is directed upon publication of this 
rule. Accordingly, employees who are required to divest financial 
interests pursuant to publication of this rule shall complete required 
divestiture of financial interests under paragraph (c) of Sec.  
8301.107 within 90 calendar days from the date of publication, except 
in cases of unusual hardship as determined by RD. Employees who are 
required to terminate conflicting outside employment under paragraph 
(f) of Sec.  8301.107 shall accomplish required termination within 
thirty (30) calendar days from the date of publication, except in cases 
of unusual hardship as determined by RD. During the 90- and 30[dash]day 
periods, as long as the employee retains or continues to hold any 
financial interest that must be divested or employment that must be 
terminated pursuant to this rule, the employee shall remain subject to 
any restrictions imposed under 5 CFR part 2635, subpart D, as well as 
18 U.S.C. 208 and 5 CFR part 2640.

Congressional Review

    The Department has found that this rulemaking is not a rule as 
defined in 5 U.S.C. 804, and, thus, does not require review by 
Congress. This rulemaking is related to Department personnel.

Executive Orders 12866 and 12988

    Since this rule relates to Department personnel, it is exempt from 
the provisions of Executive Orders 12866 and 12988.

Paperwork Reduction Act

    The Department has determined that the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 
U.S.C. chapter 35) does not apply to this regulation.

List of Subjects in 5 CFR Part 8301

    Conflict of interests, Executive Branch standards of conduct, 
Government employees.


0
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, the Department of 
Agriculture, with the concurrence of the Office of Government Ethics, 
is amending 5 CFR part 8301 as follows:

PART 8301--SUPPLEMENTAL STANDARDS OF ETHICAL CONDUCT FOR EMPLOYEES 
OF THE DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

0
1. The authority citation for part 8301 is revised to read as follows:

    Authority:  5 U.S.C. 301, 5 U.S.C. 7301; 5 U.S.C. App. (Ethics 
in Government Act of 1978); E.O. 12674, 54 FR 15159, 3 CFR, 1989 
Comp., p. 215, as modified by E.O. 12731, 55 FR 42547, 3 CFR, 1990 
Comp., p. 306; 5 CFR 2635.105, 2635.403(a), 2635.802(a), 2635.803.


0
2. A new section 8301.107 is added to read as follows:


Sec.  8301.107  Additional rules for RD employees.

    (a) Application. Except where otherwise noted below, this section 
applies to all of the Department's RD employees, other than special 
Government employees, as defined at 18 U.S.C. 202, including employees 
of the Rural Housing Service, Rural Business and Cooperative Service, 
and Rural Utilities Service.
    (b) Definition of RD program participant. For purposes of this 
section, the phrase ``RD program participant,'' includes any person 
(including any entity) who, either individually or collectively, 
currently has an outstanding loan, loan guaranty, or grant from RD, 
currently receives any other form of RD financial assistance under a 
credit, payment, or other program administered by RD, or has an 
application on file to become an RD borrower, RD grantee, or recipient 
of any other form of RD financial assistance available under any 
credit, payment or other program administered by RD. Voluntary 
membership by a person in a utility or public-type facility 
organization that is an RD program participant does not make the person 
an RD program participant.
    (c) Prohibited financial interests. (1) Except as provided for in 
paragraph (c)(2) of this section, an RD employee, or a spouse or minor 
child of an RD employee, shall not knowingly own, receive, or acquire 
stock, or hold any other financial interest in a for-profit entity, or 
affiliate of a for-profit entity, that is an RD program participant, a 
business that does or seeks to do business with RD, or one that sells 
repeatedly to RD borrowers or contractors for payment from RD loan, 
loan guaranty, or grant funds, if that entity or affiliate is affected 
by decisions of the particular RD office in which the RD employee 
serves. Types of entities covered by this section include, but are not 
limited to the following:
    (i) Entities engaged in commercial real estate sales and leasing, 
including brokers, sales agents, mortgage lenders, and other financial 
servers;
    (ii) Title and abstract companies;
    (iii) House/building construction companies and subcontractors;
    (iv) Building supply companies and lumberyards;
    (v) Insurance companies; and
    (vi) Entities involved in land development.
    (2) Exceptions. (i) Nothing in this section prohibits an RD 
employee, or a spouse or minor child of an RD employee, from owning any 
of the interests described in paragraph (c)(1) of this section where 
the interest is held through investment in a publicly traded or 
publicly available mutual fund or other collective investment fund or 
in a widely held pension or similar fund provided that the fund does 
not invest more than 5 percent of its assets in any one entity covered 
under paragraph (c)(1) of this section and does not invest more than 25 
percent of its assets in any combination of entities covered under 
paragraph (c)(1) of this section.
    (ii) Nothing in this section prohibits an RD employee, or a spouse 
or minor child of an RD employee, from owning Patronage Capital that 
the employee receives simply by reason of being a member of a nonprofit 
entity, such as an electric, telecommunications, or water cooperative. 
For purposes of this section, Patronage Capital is defined as amounts 
received for providing a service in excess of the amounts required for 
operating costs and expenses.
    (d) Prohibited real estate purchases. Except in cases where a 
waiver has been granted pursuant to paragraph (g) of this section, no 
RD employee, or spouse or minor child of an RD employee may personally, 
or through the participation of another person, knowingly purchase real 
estate or personal property: Mortgaged or pledged to the Government 
through RD; held in the RD inventory; for sale under forfeiture to RD; 
or from an RD program participant.
    (e) Prohibited transactions with RD program participants. (1) 
Except in cases where a transaction is subject to the exceptions set 
forth in paragraph (e)(2) of this section, or where a waiver has been 
granted pursuant to paragraph

[[Page 51373]]

(g) of this section, no RD employee or spouse or minor child of an RD 
employee, may knowingly: Purchase an interest in or sell real property 
to; lease real property to or from; sell to, lease to or from, or 
purchase personal property from; seek or accept credit from RD-financed 
cooperative associations; or employ for compensation a person whom the 
RD employee or spouse or minor child of the RD employee, knows or 
reasonably should know is an RD program participant directly affected 
by decisions of the particular RD office in which the RD employee 
serves.
    (2) Exceptions. Paragraph (e)(1) of this section does not apply to 
a sale, lease, or purchase of personal property, if it involves goods 
available to the general public at posted prices that are customary and 
usual within the community. (f) Prohibited outside employment. No RD 
employee may provide personal consulting services for any person or 
entity with an application on file with, grant from, or outstanding 
loan or loan guaranty with RD, if the application, grant, or 
outstanding loan or loan guaranty could be affected directly by 
decisions of the particular RD office in which the RD employee serves.
    (g) Waiver--(1) Approving officials. A written request for an 
exception to the prohibitions found in paragraphs (d) and (e) of this 
section may be submitted in advance of the transaction by the RD 
employee (whether on his or her own behalf, or on behalf of the 
employee's own spouse or minor child) to:
    (i) The RD State Director, for RD State-level employees; or
    (ii) The Deputy Administrator for Operations and Management, for RD 
State Directors and National Office employees.
    (2) Standards. The RD State Director or Deputy Administrator for 
Operations and Management may grant a written waiver from this 
prohibition based on a determination made with the concurrence of the 
USDA Office of Ethics that all three of the following conditions are 
satisfied:
    (i) The waiver is not inconsistent with part 2635 of this title, 
this part, or 7 U.S.C. 1986, nor otherwise prohibited by law, and that, 
under the particular circumstances, application of the prohibition is 
not necessary to avoid the appearance of misuse of position or loss of 
impartiality or otherwise to ensure confidence in the impartiality and 
objectivity with which agency programs are administered;
    (ii) The transaction:
    (A) Appears free of duress or favoritism;
    (B) Does not involve a contractual relationship or obligation that 
exceeds 365 consecutive calendar days; and
    (C) Is in the best interests of the RD program participant; and
    (iii) A denial of the request would likely cause significant 
hardship to the RD program participant.
    (3) Additional conditions. A waiver under this paragraph may impose 
appropriate conditions, such as requiring execution of a written 
disqualification. Approval of a waiver under this paragraph does not 
exempt the employee from complying with other applicable programmatic 
requirements under 7 CFR part 3550.9.
    (h) Additional prior approval requirement for outside employment. 
(1) Any RD employee wishing to engage in outside employment as defined 
in paragraph (b) of Sec.  8301.102 and who is not otherwise required to 
obtain approval therefor under that section, shall obtain prior written 
approval in accordance with the procedures set forth in paragraphs (c) 
and (d) of Sec.  8301.102 if the outside employment is covered under 
paragraph (h)(2) or paragraph (h)(3) of this section.
    (2) Outside employment is subject to the prior approval requirement 
of this paragraph if it involves any of the following activities, if 
conducted in the area serviced by the RD office in which the employee 
serves:
    (i) Sale, appraisal, or assessment of real estate;
    (ii) Performance of real estate brokerage services;
    (iii) Service as a title attorney or title insurance 
representative;
    (iv) Real estate development, including the construction of houses 
or other buildings;
    (v) Service as an officer or on the board of directors of a bank or 
savings and loan association;
    (vi) Service as an officer, member of the board of directors or 
trustees, or as an employee of an RD-financed entity;
    (vii) Service as an officer, employee, or member of a governing 
board of a State, county, municipal, or other local political 
jurisdiction having the power to tax or zone real estate;
    (viii) Membership in grazing associations, un-incorporated Economic 
Opportunity cooperatives, rental housing groups, and closely-held labor 
housing organizations;
    (ix) Insurance sales; or
    (x) Land speculation.
    (3) Outside employment is also subject to the prior approval 
requirements of this paragraph if it is with or for a person whom the 
RD employee knows, or reasonably should know, is both:
    (i) An RD program participant; and
    (ii) Directly affected by decisions made by the particular RD 
office in which the RD employee serves.

    Dated: August 8, 2010.
Thomas J. Vilsack,
Secretary.
    Approved: August 13, 2010.
Robert I. Cusick,
Director, Office of Government Ethics.
[FR Doc. 2010-20722 Filed 8-19-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-01-P