Office of Research and Development; Ambient Air Monitoring Reference and Equivalent Methods: Designation of Two New Equivalent Methods, 51039-51040 [2010-20476]
Download as PDF
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 159 / Wednesday, August 18, 2010 / Notices
has been submitted to the Agency and
this program is expected to end on
December 31, 2010. Contact: Marcel
Howard.
Washington
Department of Agriculture
Specific exemption: EPA authorized the
use of linuron on lentils to control
mayweed chamomile or dog fennel
(Anthemis cotula) and prickly lettuce
(Lactuca serriola L.); December 30, 2009
to June 20, 2010. Contact: Andrea
Conrath.
EPA authorized the use of
sulfentrazone on strawberry to control
broadleaf weeds; March 24, 2010 to
February 28, 2011. Contact: Andrea
Conrath.
EPA authorized the use of
spirotetramat on dry bulb onions to
control thrips; May 5, 2010 to
September 15, 2010. Contact: Keri
Grinstead.
EPA authorized the use of abamectin
on dry bulb onions to control thrips;
June 14, 2010 to September 15, 2010.
Contact: Keri Grinstead.
Wisconsin
Department of Agriculture, Trade, and
Consumer Protection
Crisis: On May 21, 2010, for the use of
zoxamide on ginseng to control
phytophthora blight. This program
ended on June 5, 2010. Contact: Stacey
Groce.
Specific exemption: EPA authorized the
use of anthraquinone on field and sweet
corn seed to repel sand hill cranes;
February 26, 2010 to February 26, 2011.
Contact: Marcel Howard.
EPA authorized the use of
fenpyroximate in beehives to control
varroa mites; March 9, 2010 to October
1, 2010. Contact: Stacey Groce.
EPA authorized the use of abamectin
on dry bulb onions to control thrips;
March 12, 2010 to September 15, 2010.
Contact: Keri Grinstead.
EPA authorized the use of
spirotetramat on dry bulb onions to
control thrips; May 5, 2010 to
September 15, 2010. Contact: Keri
Grinstead.
EPA authorized the use of
sulfentrazone on strawberry to control
broadleaf weeds; June 20, 2010 to
December 15, 2010. Contact: Andrea
Conrath.
Wyoming
Department of Agriculture
Crisis: On May 28, 2010, for the use of
diflubenzuron on alfalfa to control
grasshoppers and Mormon crickets. A
specific exemption request has been
submitted to the Agency and this
program is expected to end on October
31, 2010. Contact: Andrea Conrath.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:40 Aug 17, 2010
Jkt 220001
B. Federal Departments and Agencies
Agriculture Department
Animal and Plant Health Inspection
Service (APHIS)
Crisis: On May 4, 2010, for the use of
methyl bromide on imported avocados,
bananas, opuntia, plantains, bulb
vegetables, edible cacti, Brassica leafy
vegetables, cucurbit vegetables, leafy
vegetables, leaves of root and tuber
vegetables, root and tuber vegetables,
edible podded legume vegetables, figs,
fresh herbs and spices, ivy gourd, Kaffir
lime leaves, kiwi fruit, longan, lychee
fruit, fresh and dried mint, okra,
pomegranate, pointed gourd, rambutan,
seeds in the family Malvacceae, small
fruits and berries, and stone fruit to
control various plant pests not currently
established in the United States. APHIS
has submitted a quarantine exemption
to the Agency and this program is
expected to end on May 4, 2011.
Contact: Libby Pemberton.
On June 5, 2010, for the use of
diazinon on containment areas and
equipment to control exotic fruit flies. A
quarantine exemption request has been
submitted to the Agency and this
program is expected to end on June 15,
2011. Contact: Stacey Groce.
Quarantine: EPA authorized the use of
ethylene oxide to sterilize the interior
surfaces of enclosed animal isolator
units; March 11, 2010, to March 11,
2013. Contact: Princess Campbell.
List of Subjects
Environmental protection, Pesticides
and pests.
Dated: August 10, 2010.
Lois Rossi,
Director, Registration Division, Office of
Pesticide Programs.
[FR Doc. 2010–20445 Filed 8–17–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–S
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[FRL–9190–5]
Office of Research and Development;
Ambient Air Monitoring Reference and
Equivalent Methods: Designation of
Two New Equivalent Methods
Environmental Protection
Agency.
ACTION: Notice of the designation of two
new equivalent methods for monitoring
ambient air quality.
AGENCY:
Notice is hereby given that
the Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA) has designated, in accordance
with 40 CFR Part 53, two new
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00057
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
51039
equivalent methods for measuring
concentrations of PM10 and sulfur
dioxide (SO2) in the ambient air.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Surender Kaushik, Human Exposure
and Atmospheric Sciences Division
(MD–D205–03), National Exposure
Research Laboratory, U.S. EPA,
Research Triangle Park, North Carolina
27711. Phone: (919) 541–5691, e-mail:
Kaushik.Surender@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In
accordance with regulations at 40 CFR
Part 53, the EPA evaluates various
methods for monitoring the
concentrations of those ambient air
pollutants for which EPA has
established National Ambient Air
Quality Standards (NAAQSs) as set
forth in 40 CFR Part 50. Monitoring
methods that are determined to meet
specific requirements for adequacy are
designated by the EPA as either
reference methods or equivalent
methods (as applicable), thereby
permitting their use under 40 CFR Part
58 by States and other agencies for
determining compliance with the
NAAQSs.
The EPA hereby announces the
designation of two new equivalent
methods for measuring concentrations
of PM10 and SO2 in the ambient air.
These designations are made under the
provisions of 40 CFR Part 53, as
amended on November 12, 2008 (73 FR
67057–67059).
The new PM10 equivalent method is
an automated monitoring method
utilizing a measurement principle based
on sample collection by filtration and
analysis by beta-ray attenuation. The
newly designated equivalent method is
identified as follows:
EQPM–0810–193, ‘‘OPSIS Model SM200
Monitor,’’ beta gauge semi-continuous
ambient particulate monitor operated for 24
hours at a flow rate of 16.67 LPM between
5° and 40 °C using 47 mm PTFE membrane
filter media, in the mass measurement range
of 0 to 60 mg, configured with a BGI Model
SSI25 PM10 inlet meeting criteria specified in
40 CFR 50 Appendix L, with a roof mounting
kit, and with or without an inlet tube heater
(as recommended based on site RH
conditions), according to the SM200 User’s
Guide.
The new SO2 equivalent method is an
automated method (analyzer) that
utilizes a measurement principle based
on ultraviolet fluorescence. The newly
designated equivalent method is
identified as follows:
EQSA–0810–194, ‘‘SERES model SF 2000 G
Sulfur Dioxide Analyzer,’’ UV fluorescence
method using a wavelength source
approaching 215 nm and a selective
membrane for aromatic hydrocarbon
removal, operated with a full scale
E:\FR\FM\18AUN1.SGM
18AUN1
51040
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 159 / Wednesday, August 18, 2010 / Notices
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with NOTICES
measurement range of 0–0.5 ppm at any
ambient temperature in the range of 20 °C to
30 °C, with tabletop or rack mounts,
microprocessor controlled menu-driven user
interface, onboard diagnostics and system
test functions, analog output signals of 4–20
mA or user selectable voltage ranges up to 10
V, printer port, modem port and 32 pin data/
control/alarm port, user selectable manual
and automatic zero/span and calibrate
modes; with or without a permeation tube
system (optional equipment) for internal
calibration; operated in accordance with the
SF 2000 G User and Maintenance Manual.
The applications for equivalent
method determinations for these
candidate methods were received by the
EPA on June 22, 2007 and June 23,
2010, respectively. The OPSIS monitor
is commercially available from the
applicant, OPSIS Inc., 150 N. Michigan
Ave., Suite 1950, Chicago, IL 60601. The
SERES analyzer is available from the
applicant, SERES, 360 Rue Louis de
Broglie, La Duranne—BP 20087, 13793
Aix en Provence, Cedex 3, France.
Test analyzers representative of these
methods have been tested in accordance
with the applicable test procedures
specified in 40 CFR Part 53 (as amended
on November 12, 2008). After reviewing
the results of those tests and other
information submitted by the applicants
in the applications, EPA has
determined, in accordance with Part 53,
that these methods should be designated
as equivalent methods. The information
submitted by the applicants will be kept
on file, either at EPA’s National
Exposure Research Laboratory, Research
Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711 or
in an approved archive storage facility,
and will be available for inspection
(with advance notice) to the extent
consistent with 40 CFR Part 2 (EPA’s
regulations implementing the Freedom
of Information Act).
As designated equivalent methods,
these methods are acceptable for use by
states and other air monitoring agencies
under the requirements of 40 CFR Part
58, Ambient Air Quality Surveillance.
For such purposes, these methods must
be used in strict accordance with the
operation or instruction manual
associated with the method and subject
to any specifications and limitations
(e.g., configuration or operational
settings) specified in the applicable
designated method description (see the
identification of the methods above).
Use of these methods also should be
in general accordance with the guidance
and recommendations of applicable
sections of the ‘‘Quality Assurance
Handbook for Air Pollution
Measurement Systems, Volume I,’’ EPA/
600/R–94/038a and ‘‘Quality Assurance
Handbook for Air Pollution
Measurement Systems, Volume II,
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:40 Aug 17, 2010
Jkt 220001
Ambient Air Quality Monitoring
Program’’ EPA–454/B–08–003,
December, 2008. Vendor modifications
of designated equivalent methods used
for purposes of Part 58 are permitted
only with prior approval of the EPA, as
provided in Part 53. Provisions
concerning modification of such
methods by users are specified under
Section 2.8 (Modifications of Methods
by Users) of Appendix C to 40 CFR Part
58.
In general, a method designation
applies to any sampler or analyzer
which is identical to the sampler or
analyzer described in the application for
designation. In some cases, similar
samplers or analyzers manufactured
prior to the designation may be
upgraded or converted (e.g., by minor
modification or by substitution of the
approved operation or instruction
manual) so as to be identical to the
designated method and thus achieve
designated status. The manufacturer
should be consulted to determine the
feasibility of such upgrading or
conversion.
Part 53 requires that sellers of
designated reference or equivalent
method analyzers or samplers comply
with certain conditions. These
conditions are specified in 40 CFR 53.9.
Aside from occasional breakdowns or
malfunctions, consistent or repeated
noncompliance with any of these
conditions should be reported to:
Director, Human Exposure and
Atmospheric Sciences Division (MD–
E205–01), National Exposure Research
Laboratory, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Research Triangle
Park, North Carolina 27711.
Designation of these new equivalent
methods is intended to assist the States
in establishing and operating their air
quality surveillance systems under 40
CFR Part 58. Questions concerning the
commercial availability or technical
aspects of the methods should be
directed to the applicants.
Jewel F. Morris,
Acting Director, National Exposure Research
Laboratory.
[FR Doc. 2010–20476 Filed 8–17–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[EPA–HQ–OPP–2010–0576; FRL–8840–8]
Issuance of an Experimental Use
Permit by the State of Florida
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Frm 00058
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
The State of Florida has
granted an experimental use permit
(EUP) to the following pesticide
applicant, SpringStar, Inc. EPA
Company Number 66433, P.O. Box
2622, Woodinville, WA 98072. An EUP
permits use of a pesticide for
experimental or research purposes only
in accordance with the limitations in
the permit. EPA is publishing this
document, pursuant to 40 CFR
172.26(a)(3). Notice of receipt of this
permit does not imply a decision by the
Agency on the permit.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kevin Sweeney, Registration Division
(7505P), Office of Pesticide Programs,
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington,
DC 20460–0001; telephone number:
(703) 305–5063; e-mail address:
sweeney.kevin@epa.gov.
Florida state contact: Dennis F.
Howard, Chief, Bureau of Pesticides;
telephone number: (850) 487–0532;
e-mail address:
howardd@doacs.state.fl.us.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
I. General Information
A. Does this Action Apply to Me?
This action is directed to the public
in general. Although this action may be
of particular interest to those persons
who conduct or sponsor research on
pesticides, the Agency has not
attempted to describe all the specific
entities that may be affected by this
action. If you have any questions
regarding the information in this action,
consult the people listed under FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
B. How Can I Get Copies of this
Document and Other Related
Information?
EPA has established a docket for this
action under docket identification (ID)
number EPA–HQ–OPP–2010–0576.
Publicly available docket materials are
available either in the electronic docket
at https://www.regulations.gov, or, if only
available in hard copy, at the Office of
Pesticide Programs (OPP) Regulatory
Public Docket in Rm. S–4400, One
Potomac Yard (South Bldg.), 2777 S.
Crystal Dr., Arlington, VA. The hours of
operation of this Docket Facility are
from 8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday
through Friday, excluding legal
holidays. The Docket Facility telephone
number is (703) 305–5805.
II. State of Florida EUP
The State of Florida has issued the
following EUP:
EUP number FL10–EUP–01. Issuance.
Florida Department of Agriculture and
E:\FR\FM\18AUN1.SGM
18AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 159 (Wednesday, August 18, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 51039-51040]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-20476]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
[FRL-9190-5]
Office of Research and Development; Ambient Air Monitoring
Reference and Equivalent Methods: Designation of Two New Equivalent
Methods
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency.
ACTION: Notice of the designation of two new equivalent methods for
monitoring ambient air quality.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) has designated, in accordance with 40 CFR Part 53, two new
equivalent methods for measuring concentrations of PM10 and
sulfur dioxide (SO2) in the ambient air.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Surender Kaushik, Human Exposure and
Atmospheric Sciences Division (MD-D205-03), National Exposure Research
Laboratory, U.S. EPA, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711.
Phone: (919) 541-5691, e-mail: Kaushik.Surender@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In accordance with regulations at 40 CFR
Part 53, the EPA evaluates various methods for monitoring the
concentrations of those ambient air pollutants for which EPA has
established National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQSs) as set
forth in 40 CFR Part 50. Monitoring methods that are determined to meet
specific requirements for adequacy are designated by the EPA as either
reference methods or equivalent methods (as applicable), thereby
permitting their use under 40 CFR Part 58 by States and other agencies
for determining compliance with the NAAQSs.
The EPA hereby announces the designation of two new equivalent
methods for measuring concentrations of PM10 and
SO2 in the ambient air. These designations are made under
the provisions of 40 CFR Part 53, as amended on November 12, 2008 (73
FR 67057-67059).
The new PM10 equivalent method is an automated
monitoring method utilizing a measurement principle based on sample
collection by filtration and analysis by beta-ray attenuation. The
newly designated equivalent method is identified as follows:
EQPM-0810-193, ``OPSIS Model SM200 Monitor,'' beta gauge semi-
continuous ambient particulate monitor operated for 24 hours at a
flow rate of 16.67 LPM between 5[deg] and 40 [deg]C using 47 mm PTFE
membrane filter media, in the mass measurement range of 0 to 60 mg,
configured with a BGI Model SSI25 PM10 inlet meeting
criteria specified in 40 CFR 50 Appendix L, with a roof mounting
kit, and with or without an inlet tube heater (as recommended based
on site RH conditions), according to the SM200 User's Guide.
The new SO2 equivalent method is an automated method
(analyzer) that utilizes a measurement principle based on ultraviolet
fluorescence. The newly designated equivalent method is identified as
follows:
EQSA-0810-194, ``SERES model SF 2000 G Sulfur Dioxide
Analyzer,'' UV fluorescence method using a wavelength source
approaching 215 nm and a selective membrane for aromatic hydrocarbon
removal, operated with a full scale
[[Page 51040]]
measurement range of 0-0.5 ppm at any ambient temperature in the
range of 20 [deg]C to 30 [deg]C, with tabletop or rack mounts,
microprocessor controlled menu-driven user interface, onboard
diagnostics and system test functions, analog output signals of 4-20
mA or user selectable voltage ranges up to 10 V, printer port, modem
port and 32 pin data/control/alarm port, user selectable manual and
automatic zero/span and calibrate modes; with or without a
permeation tube system (optional equipment) for internal
calibration; operated in accordance with the SF 2000 G User and
Maintenance Manual.
The applications for equivalent method determinations for these
candidate methods were received by the EPA on June 22, 2007 and June
23, 2010, respectively. The OPSIS monitor is commercially available
from the applicant, OPSIS Inc., 150 N. Michigan Ave., Suite 1950,
Chicago, IL 60601. The SERES analyzer is available from the applicant,
SERES, 360 Rue Louis de Broglie, La Duranne--BP 20087, 13793 Aix en
Provence, Cedex 3, France.
Test analyzers representative of these methods have been tested in
accordance with the applicable test procedures specified in 40 CFR Part
53 (as amended on November 12, 2008). After reviewing the results of
those tests and other information submitted by the applicants in the
applications, EPA has determined, in accordance with Part 53, that
these methods should be designated as equivalent methods. The
information submitted by the applicants will be kept on file, either at
EPA's National Exposure Research Laboratory, Research Triangle Park,
North Carolina 27711 or in an approved archive storage facility, and
will be available for inspection (with advance notice) to the extent
consistent with 40 CFR Part 2 (EPA's regulations implementing the
Freedom of Information Act).
As designated equivalent methods, these methods are acceptable for
use by states and other air monitoring agencies under the requirements
of 40 CFR Part 58, Ambient Air Quality Surveillance. For such purposes,
these methods must be used in strict accordance with the operation or
instruction manual associated with the method and subject to any
specifications and limitations (e.g., configuration or operational
settings) specified in the applicable designated method description
(see the identification of the methods above).
Use of these methods also should be in general accordance with the
guidance and recommendations of applicable sections of the ``Quality
Assurance Handbook for Air Pollution Measurement Systems, Volume I,''
EPA/600/R-94/038a and ``Quality Assurance Handbook for Air Pollution
Measurement Systems, Volume II, Ambient Air Quality Monitoring
Program'' EPA-454/B-08-003, December, 2008. Vendor modifications of
designated equivalent methods used for purposes of Part 58 are
permitted only with prior approval of the EPA, as provided in Part 53.
Provisions concerning modification of such methods by users are
specified under Section 2.8 (Modifications of Methods by Users) of
Appendix C to 40 CFR Part 58.
In general, a method designation applies to any sampler or analyzer
which is identical to the sampler or analyzer described in the
application for designation. In some cases, similar samplers or
analyzers manufactured prior to the designation may be upgraded or
converted (e.g., by minor modification or by substitution of the
approved operation or instruction manual) so as to be identical to the
designated method and thus achieve designated status. The manufacturer
should be consulted to determine the feasibility of such upgrading or
conversion.
Part 53 requires that sellers of designated reference or equivalent
method analyzers or samplers comply with certain conditions. These
conditions are specified in 40 CFR 53.9.
Aside from occasional breakdowns or malfunctions, consistent or
repeated noncompliance with any of these conditions should be reported
to: Director, Human Exposure and Atmospheric Sciences Division (MD-
E205-01), National Exposure Research Laboratory, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711.
Designation of these new equivalent methods is intended to assist
the States in establishing and operating their air quality surveillance
systems under 40 CFR Part 58. Questions concerning the commercial
availability or technical aspects of the methods should be directed to
the applicants.
Jewel F. Morris,
Acting Director, National Exposure Research Laboratory.
[FR Doc. 2010-20476 Filed 8-17-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P