TRICARE; Changes Included in the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010; Expansion of Survivor Eligibility Under the TRICARE Dental Program, 50950-50952 [2010-20392]
Download as PDF
50950
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 159 / Wednesday, August 18, 2010 / Proposed Rules
COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING
COMMISSION
17 CFR Parts 1, 20, and 151
RIN 3038–AC85
Federal Speculative Position Limits for
Referenced Energy Contracts and
Associated Regulations
Commodity Futures Trading
Commission.
ACTION: Proposed rules; withdrawal.
AGENCY:
On January 26, 2010, the
Commodity Futures Trading
Commission (‘‘CFTC’’ or ‘‘Commission’’)
proposed to implement position limits
for futures and option contracts based
on a limited set of exempt
commodities,1 namely certain energy
commodities (‘‘Federal Speculative
Position Limits for Referenced Energy
Contracts and Associated Regulations,’’
for ease of reference, herein referred to
as the ‘‘Energy Proposal’’).2 In accord
with the significant amendments
introduced to the Commodity Exchange
Act of 1936 (‘‘Act’’ or ‘‘CEA’’) by the
recent enactment of the Dodd-Frank
Wall Street Reform and Consumer
Protection Act (‘‘Dodd-Frank Act’’),3 the
Commission is withdrawing its Energy
Proposal as it plans to issue a notice of
rulemaking proposing position limits for
regulated exempt commodity contracts,
including energy commodity contracts,
as directed by the Act.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Bruce Fekrat, Special Counsel, Office of
the Director, Division of Market
Oversight, Commodity Futures Trading
Commission, Three Lafayette Centre,
1155 21st Street, NW., Washington, DC
20581, telephone (202) 418–5578,
facsimile number (202) 418–5527,
e-mail bfekrat@cftc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On
January 26, 2010, the Commission
issued the Energy Proposal to establish
CFTC-set position limits for four
enumerated contracts—the New York
Mercantile (‘‘NYMEX’’) Henry Hub
natural gas contract, the NYMEX Light
Sweet crude oil contract, the NYMEX
New York Harbor No. 2 heating oil
contract, and the NYMEX New York
Harbor gasoline blendstock (RBOB)
contract—as well as for, with limited
exceptions, any other contract that was
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
1 Section 1a(14) of the Commodity Exchange Act,
7 U.S.C. 1a(14). An exempt commodity is defined
as a commodity that is neither an excluded
commodity, as that term is defined by CEA Section
1a(13), nor an agricultural commodity. Generally
the definition encompasses energy commodities
and metals.
2 75 FR 4133 (January 26, 2010).
3 Public Law 111–203.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:11 Aug 17, 2010
Jkt 220001
exclusively or partially based on the
above referenced contracts’
commodities and delivery points. The
Energy Proposal included, inter alia,
provisions relating to exemptions for
bona fide hedging transactions and
certain swap dealer positions
maintained to manage the risk of an
unbalanced swaps book.
At that time, section 4a(a) of the Act
authorized the Commission to establish
position limits for contracts traded on or
subject to the rules of a designated
contract market or significant price
discovery contracts traded on exempt
commercial markets. The purpose of
such limits, as stated in prior section
4a(a), was to eliminate or prevent
excessive speculation causing sudden or
unreasonable fluctuations or
unwarranted changes in the price of a
commodity. Section 4a(a) of the CEA, as
amended by the Dodd-Frank Act, directs
the Commission to set position limits
for all regulated exempt and agricultural
commodity derivatives. More
specifically, amended section 4a(a)(2)(B)
of the Act requires the Commission to
establish limits for exempt and
agricultural commodity derivatives
within 180 and 270 days, respectively,
of the Dodd-Frank Act’s enactment date.
In addition, amended section 4a(a) of
the Act explicitly requires the
implementation of aggregate position
limits across certain derivatives
positions established on designated
contract markets, swap execution
facilities, or foreign boards of trade, or
through bilateral trading. Thus, the
CFTC intends to publish a notice of
rulemaking proposing Commission-set
position limits and exemptions
therefrom for such derivatives pursuant
to section 4a(a) and other related
provisions of the CEA, as amended by
the Dodd-Frank Act. In doing so, the
Commission intends to take account of
the Energy Proposal and build on the
substantive issues raised by the
commenters thereon.
In light of the broadened scope and
new requirements of the CEA, as
amended by the Dodd-Frank Act, and
amended section 4a(a) of the Act in
particular, the Commission has
determined to withdraw the pending
Energy Proposal as it plans to issue a
notice of rulemaking proposing position
limits and exemptions therefrom for
regulated exempt commodity
derivatives, including energy
derivatives, as directed by the DoddFrank Act.
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Issued by the Commission this August 12,
2010, in Washington, DC.
David Stawick,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2010–20428 Filed 8–17–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6351–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Office of the Secretary
32 CFR Part 199
[Docket ID: DoD–2010–HA–0071]
RIN 0720–AB40
TRICARE; Changes Included in the
National Defense Authorization Act for
Fiscal Year 2010; Expansion of
Survivor Eligibility Under the TRICARE
Dental Program
Office of the Secretary, DoD.
Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Department is publishing
this proposed rule to implement section
704 of the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010
(NDAA for FY10). Specifically, that
legislation expands the survivor
eligibility under the TRICARE Dental
Program (TDP). The legislation entitles
a child or unmarried person placed in
legal custody of a member or former
member continuation of eligibility for
the TDP. The period of continued
eligibility for these dependents shall be
the longer of the following periods
beginning on the date of the member’s
death: Three years; the period ending on
the date on which such dependent
attains 21 years of age; or in the case of
such dependent who, at 21 years of age,
is enrolled in a full-time course of study
in a secondary school or in a full-time
course of study in an institution of
higher education approved by the
administering Secretary and was, at the
time of the member’s death, in fact
dependent on the member for over onehalf of such dependent’s support, the
period ending on the earlier of the
following dates: The date on which such
dependent ceases to pursue such a
course of study, as determined by the
administering Secretary; or the date on
which such dependent attains 23 years
of age. This proposed rule does not
expand the TDP eligibility of other
eligible survivors.
Survivors, who meet the new
eligibility requirements, will regain TDP
eligibility as of the publishing of the
final rule in the Federal Register.
Retroactive payment of premiums or
claims paid for dental treatment during
the time of loss of TDP eligibility will
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\18AUP1.SGM
18AUP1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 159 / Wednesday, August 18, 2010 / Proposed Rules
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS
not be reimbursed to surviving
dependents.
DATES: Written comments received at
the address indicated below by October
18, 2010 will be accepted.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by docket number and/or
Regulatory Information Number (RIN)
number and title, by any of the
following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Mail: Federal Docket Management
System Office, 1160 Defense Pentagon,
Room 3C843, Washington, DC 20301–
1160.
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the agency name and
docket number or RIN for this Federal
Register document. The general policy
for comments and other submissions
from members of the public is to make
these submissions available for public
viewing on the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov as they are
received without change, including any
personal identifiers or contact
information.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
CAPT Robert H. Mitton, Office of the
Assistant Secretary of Defense (Health
Affairs), TRICARE Management
Activity, telephone (703) 681–0039.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
This proposed rule expands the
survivor eligibility under the TRICARE
Dental Program (TDP). The legislation
entitles a child or unmarried person
placed in legal custody of a member or
former member, as defined in 10 U.S.C.
1072(2), subparagraph (D) or (I),
continuation of eligibility for the TDP.
The period of continued eligibility for
these dependents shall be the longer of
the following periods beginning on the
date of the member’s death: (1) Three
years; (2) the period ending on the date
on which such dependent attains 21
years of age; or (3) in the case of such
dependent who, at 21 years of age, is
enrolled in a full-time course of study
in a secondary school or in a full-time
course of study in an institution of
higher education approved by the
administering Secretary and was, at the
time of the member’s death, in fact
dependent on the member for over onehalf of such dependent’s support, the
period ending on the earlier of the
following dates: (a) The date on which
such dependent ceases to pursue such a
course of study, as determined by the
administering Secretary; or (b) the date
on which such dependent attains 23
years of age.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:11 Aug 17, 2010
Jkt 220001
This proposed rule does not expand
the TDP eligibility of other eligible
survivors. Currently, all eligible
survivors are entitled to continued TDP
enrollment for up to three years from
the date of the member’s death. The
proposed rule will maintain the
government’s payment of both the
government and dependent’s portion of
the premium share during the period of
continuous enrollment.
This proposed rule will amend the
Code of Federal Regulations to allow the
TDP to conform to the new statutory
authority. Public comments are invited.
All comments will be carefully
considered. A discussion of the major
issues received by public comments will
be included with the issuance of the
final rule.
II. Regulatory Procedures
Executive Order 12866 and Regulatory
Flexibility Act
Executive Order 12866 requires that a
comprehensive regulatory impact
analysis be performed on any
economically significant regulatory
action, defined as one that would result
in an annual effect of $100 million or
more on the national economy or which
would have other substantial impacts.
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
requires that each Federal agency
prepare, and make available for public
comment, a regulatory flexibility
analysis when the agency issues a
regulation which would have a
significant impact on a substantial
number of small entities. This rule is
not an economically significant
regulatory action and will not have a
significant impact on a substantial
number of small entities for purposes of
the RFA, thus this proposed rule is not
subject to any of these requirements.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
This rule does not contain a Federal
mandate that may result in the
expenditure by State, local, and tribal
governments, in aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $100 million or more
in any one year.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This rule will not impose additional
information collection requirements on
the public under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–
3511).
Federalism
We have examined the impact(s) of
the proposed rule under Executive
Order 13132 and it does not have
policies that have federalism
implications that would have
substantial direct effects on the States,
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
50951
on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government, therefore,
consultation with State and local
officials is not required.
List of Subjects in 32 CFR Part 199
Claims, Dental health, Health care,
Health insurance, Individuals with
disabilities, Military personnel.
Accordingly, 32 CFR part 199 is
proposed to be amended as follows:
PART 199—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 199
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 10 U.S.C. chapter
55.
2. Section 199.13 is amended by
revising paragraph (c)(3)(ii)(E)(2) to read
as follows:
§ 199.13
TRICARE dental program.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(3) * * *
(ii) * * *
(E) * * *
(2) Continuation of eligibility. Eligible
dependents of active duty members
while on active duty for a period of
more than 30 days and eligible
dependents of members of the Ready
Reserve (i.e., Selected Reserve or
Individual Ready Reserve, as specified
in 10 U.S.C. 10143 and 10144(b)
respectively), shall be eligible for
continued enrollment in the TDP, if, on
the date of the death of the member, the
dependent is enrolled in the TDP, or is
not enrolled by reason of
discontinuance of a former enrollment
under paragraphs (c)(3)(ii)(E)(4)(ii) and
(c)(3)(ii)(E)(4)(iii) of this section, or is
not enrolled because the dependent was
under the minimum age for enrollment
at the time of the member’s death, or is
not qualified for enrollment because the
dependent is a spouse who is a member
of the armed forces on active duty for
a period of more than 30 days but
subsequently separates or is discharged
from active duty. This continued
enrollment is not contingent on the
Selected Reserve or Individual Ready
Reserve member’s own enrollment in
the TDP. During the period of
continuous enrollment, the government
will pay both the government and the
beneficiary’s portion of the premium
share. This continued enrollment shall
be up to (3) three years from the date of
the member’s death, except that, in the
case of a dependent of the deceased who
is described in 10 U.S.C. section 1072(2)
by subparagraph (D) or (I), the period of
E:\FR\FM\18AUP1.SGM
18AUP1
50952
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 159 / Wednesday, August 18, 2010 / Proposed Rules
continued enrollment shall be the
longer of the following periods
beginning on the date of the member’s
death:
(i) Three years.
(ii) The period ending on the date on
which such dependent attains 21 years
of age.
(iii) In the case of such dependent
who, at 21 years of age, is enrolled in
a full-time course of study in a
secondary school or in a full-time
course of study in an institution of
higher education approved by the
administering Secretary and was, at the
time of the member’s death, in fact
dependent on the member for over onehalf of such dependent’s support, the
period ending on the earlier of the
following dates: The date on which such
dependent ceases to pursue such a
course of study, as determined by the
administering Secretary; or the date on
which such dependent attains 23 years
of age.
*
*
*
*
*
You may submit comments
identified by docket number USCG–
2010–0705 using any one of the
following methods:
(1) Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov.
(2) Fax: 202–493–2251.
(3) Mail: Docket Management Facility
(M–30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground
Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590–
0001.
(4) Hand delivery: Same as mail
address above between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays. The telephone number
is 202–366–9329.
To avoid duplication, please use only
one of these four methods. See the
‘‘Public Participation and Request for
Comments’’ portion of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
below for instructions on submitting
comments.
ADDRESSES:
Coast Guard
If
you have questions on this proposed
rule, call or e-mail Lieutenant
Commander Marcella Granquist,
Waterways Management Division, U.S.
Coast Guard Sector Honolulu, telephone
808–842–2600, e-mail
Marcella.A.Granquist@uscg.mil. If you
have questions on viewing or submitting
material to the docket, call Renee V.
Wright, Program Manager, Docket
Operations, telephone 202–366–9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
33 CFR Part 165
Public Participation and Request for
Comments
Dated: August 10, 2010.
Patricia L. Toppings,
OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer,
Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 2010–20392 Filed 8–17–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001–06–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
[Docket No. USCG–2010–0705]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone; Blue Angels at Kaneohe
Bay Air Show, Oahu, HI
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard proposes
two temporary safety zones while the
U.S. Navy Blue Angels Squadron
conducts aerobatic performances over
Kaneohe Bay, Oahu, Hawaii. These
safety zones are necessary to protect
watercraft and the general public from
hazards associated with the U.S. Navy
Blue Angels aircraft low flying, high
powered jet aerobatics over open waters.
Vessels desiring to transit through the
zones can request permission by
contacting the Honolulu Captain of the
Port at telephone number 808–842–
2600.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
We encourage you to participate in
this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related materials. All
comments received will be posted
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov and will include
any personal information you have
provided.
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
Submitting Comments
Comments and related material
must be received by the Coast Guard on
or before September 2, 2010.
If you submit a comment, please
include the docket number for this
rulemaking (USCG–2010–0705),
indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment
applies, and provide a reason for each
suggestion or recommendation. You
may submit your comments and
material online (via https://
www.regulations.gov) or by fax, mail, or
hand delivery, but please use only one
of these means. If you submit a
comment online via https://
www.regulations.gov, it will be
considered received by the Coast Guard
when you successfully transmit the
comment. If you fax, hand deliver, or
DATES:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:11 Aug 17, 2010
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
mail your comment, it will be
considered as having been received by
the Coast Guard when it is received at
the Docket Management Facility. We
recommend that you include your name
and a mailing address, an e-mail
address, or a telephone number in the
body of your document so that we can
contact you if we have questions
regarding your submission.
To submit your comment online, go to
https://www.regulations.gov, click on the
‘‘submit a comment’’ box, which will
then become highlighted in blue. In the
‘‘Document Type’’ drop down menu
select ‘‘Proposed Rule’’ and insert
‘‘USCG–2010–0705’’ in the ‘‘Keyword’’
box. Click ‘‘Search’’ then click on the
balloon shape in the ‘‘Actions’’ column.
If you submit your comments by mail or
hand delivery, submit them in an
unbound format, no larger than 81⁄2 by
11 inches, suitable for copying and
electronic filing. If you submit
comments by mail and would like to
know that they reached the Facility,
please enclose a stamped, self-addressed
postcard or envelope. We will consider
all comments and material received
during the comment period and may
change the rule based on your
comments.
Viewing Comments and Documents
To view comments, as well as
documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to
https://www.regulations.gov, click on the
‘‘read comments’’ box, which will then
become highlighted in blue. In the
‘‘Keyword’’ box insert ‘‘USCG–2010–
0705’’ and click ‘‘Search.’’ Click the
‘‘Open Docket Folder’’ in the ‘‘Actions’’
column. You may also visit the Docket
Management Facility in Room W12–140
on the ground floor of the Department
of Transportation West Building, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington,
DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. We have an agreement with
the Department of Transportation to use
the Docket Management Facility.
Privacy Act
Anyone can search the electronic
form of comments received into any of
our dockets by the name of the
individual submitting the comment (or
signing the comment, if submitted on
behalf of an association, business, labor
union, etc.). You may review a Privacy
Act notice regarding our public dockets
in the January 17, 2008, issue of the
Federal Register (73 FR 3316).
Public Meeting
We do not now plan to hold a public
meeting. But you may submit a request
E:\FR\FM\18AUP1.SGM
18AUP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 159 (Wednesday, August 18, 2010)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 50950-50952]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-20392]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Office of the Secretary
32 CFR Part 199
[Docket ID: DoD-2010-HA-0071]
RIN 0720-AB40
TRICARE; Changes Included in the National Defense Authorization
Act for Fiscal Year 2010; Expansion of Survivor Eligibility Under the
TRICARE Dental Program
AGENCY: Office of the Secretary, DoD.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department is publishing this proposed rule to implement
section 704 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year
2010 (NDAA for FY10). Specifically, that legislation expands the
survivor eligibility under the TRICARE Dental Program (TDP). The
legislation entitles a child or unmarried person placed in legal
custody of a member or former member continuation of eligibility for
the TDP. The period of continued eligibility for these dependents shall
be the longer of the following periods beginning on the date of the
member's death: Three years; the period ending on the date on which
such dependent attains 21 years of age; or in the case of such
dependent who, at 21 years of age, is enrolled in a full-time course of
study in a secondary school or in a full-time course of study in an
institution of higher education approved by the administering Secretary
and was, at the time of the member's death, in fact dependent on the
member for over one-half of such dependent's support, the period ending
on the earlier of the following dates: The date on which such dependent
ceases to pursue such a course of study, as determined by the
administering Secretary; or the date on which such dependent attains 23
years of age. This proposed rule does not expand the TDP eligibility of
other eligible survivors.
Survivors, who meet the new eligibility requirements, will regain
TDP eligibility as of the publishing of the final rule in the Federal
Register. Retroactive payment of premiums or claims paid for dental
treatment during the time of loss of TDP eligibility will
[[Page 50951]]
not be reimbursed to surviving dependents.
DATES: Written comments received at the address indicated below by
October 18, 2010 will be accepted.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by docket number and/or
Regulatory Information Number (RIN) number and title, by any of the
following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Mail: Federal Docket Management System Office, 1160
Defense Pentagon, Room 3C843, Washington, DC 20301-1160.
Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency name
and docket number or RIN for this Federal Register document. The
general policy for comments and other submissions from members of the
public is to make these submissions available for public viewing on the
Internet at https://www.regulations.gov as they are received without
change, including any personal identifiers or contact information.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: CAPT Robert H. Mitton, Office of the
Assistant Secretary of Defense (Health Affairs), TRICARE Management
Activity, telephone (703) 681-0039.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
This proposed rule expands the survivor eligibility under the
TRICARE Dental Program (TDP). The legislation entitles a child or
unmarried person placed in legal custody of a member or former member,
as defined in 10 U.S.C. 1072(2), subparagraph (D) or (I), continuation
of eligibility for the TDP. The period of continued eligibility for
these dependents shall be the longer of the following periods beginning
on the date of the member's death: (1) Three years; (2) the period
ending on the date on which such dependent attains 21 years of age; or
(3) in the case of such dependent who, at 21 years of age, is enrolled
in a full-time course of study in a secondary school or in a full-time
course of study in an institution of higher education approved by the
administering Secretary and was, at the time of the member's death, in
fact dependent on the member for over one-half of such dependent's
support, the period ending on the earlier of the following dates: (a)
The date on which such dependent ceases to pursue such a course of
study, as determined by the administering Secretary; or (b) the date on
which such dependent attains 23 years of age.
This proposed rule does not expand the TDP eligibility of other
eligible survivors. Currently, all eligible survivors are entitled to
continued TDP enrollment for up to three years from the date of the
member's death. The proposed rule will maintain the government's
payment of both the government and dependent's portion of the premium
share during the period of continuous enrollment.
This proposed rule will amend the Code of Federal Regulations to
allow the TDP to conform to the new statutory authority. Public
comments are invited. All comments will be carefully considered. A
discussion of the major issues received by public comments will be
included with the issuance of the final rule.
II. Regulatory Procedures
Executive Order 12866 and Regulatory Flexibility Act
Executive Order 12866 requires that a comprehensive regulatory
impact analysis be performed on any economically significant regulatory
action, defined as one that would result in an annual effect of $100
million or more on the national economy or which would have other
substantial impacts. The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) requires that
each Federal agency prepare, and make available for public comment, a
regulatory flexibility analysis when the agency issues a regulation
which would have a significant impact on a substantial number of small
entities. This rule is not an economically significant regulatory
action and will not have a significant impact on a substantial number
of small entities for purposes of the RFA, thus this proposed rule is
not subject to any of these requirements.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
This rule does not contain a Federal mandate that may result in the
expenditure by State, local, and tribal governments, in aggregate, or
by the private sector, of $100 million or more in any one year.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This rule will not impose additional information collection
requirements on the public under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. 3501-3511).
Federalism
We have examined the impact(s) of the proposed rule under Executive
Order 13132 and it does not have policies that have federalism
implications that would have substantial direct effects on the States,
on the relationship between the national government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various
levels of government, therefore, consultation with State and local
officials is not required.
List of Subjects in 32 CFR Part 199
Claims, Dental health, Health care, Health insurance, Individuals
with disabilities, Military personnel.
Accordingly, 32 CFR part 199 is proposed to be amended as follows:
PART 199--[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 199 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 10 U.S.C. chapter 55.
2. Section 199.13 is amended by revising paragraph (c)(3)(ii)(E)(2)
to read as follows:
Sec. 199.13 TRICARE dental program.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(3) * * *
(ii) * * *
(E) * * *
(2) Continuation of eligibility. Eligible dependents of active duty
members while on active duty for a period of more than 30 days and
eligible dependents of members of the Ready Reserve (i.e., Selected
Reserve or Individual Ready Reserve, as specified in 10 U.S.C. 10143
and 10144(b) respectively), shall be eligible for continued enrollment
in the TDP, if, on the date of the death of the member, the dependent
is enrolled in the TDP, or is not enrolled by reason of discontinuance
of a former enrollment under paragraphs (c)(3)(ii)(E)(4)(ii) and
(c)(3)(ii)(E)(4)(iii) of this section, or is not enrolled because the
dependent was under the minimum age for enrollment at the time of the
member's death, or is not qualified for enrollment because the
dependent is a spouse who is a member of the armed forces on active
duty for a period of more than 30 days but subsequently separates or is
discharged from active duty. This continued enrollment is not
contingent on the Selected Reserve or Individual Ready Reserve member's
own enrollment in the TDP. During the period of continuous enrollment,
the government will pay both the government and the beneficiary's
portion of the premium share. This continued enrollment shall be up to
(3) three years from the date of the member's death, except that, in
the case of a dependent of the deceased who is described in 10 U.S.C.
section 1072(2) by subparagraph (D) or (I), the period of
[[Page 50952]]
continued enrollment shall be the longer of the following periods
beginning on the date of the member's death:
(i) Three years.
(ii) The period ending on the date on which such dependent attains
21 years of age.
(iii) In the case of such dependent who, at 21 years of age, is
enrolled in a full-time course of study in a secondary school or in a
full-time course of study in an institution of higher education
approved by the administering Secretary and was, at the time of the
member's death, in fact dependent on the member for over one-half of
such dependent's support, the period ending on the earlier of the
following dates: The date on which such dependent ceases to pursue such
a course of study, as determined by the administering Secretary; or the
date on which such dependent attains 23 years of age.
* * * * *
Dated: August 10, 2010.
Patricia L. Toppings,
OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 2010-20392 Filed 8-17-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P