Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Model 767-300 Series Airplanes, 50854-50856 [2010-19707]
Download as PDF
50854
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 159 / Wednesday, August 18, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on August
9, 2010.
John R. Colomy,
Acting Manager, Small Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
to require F&R testing for airplanes
weighing 6,000 pounds or less is needed
where the level of sophistication is
beyond evaluating failures by
inspection.
incorporating the same novel or unusual
design feature, the special conditions
would apply to that model as well.
Type Certification Basis
Under the provisions of 14 CFR 21.17,
Cirrus Design Corporation must show
that the SF50 meets the applicable
provisions of part 23, as amended by
Amendments 23–1 through 23–59
thereto.
If the Administrator finds that the
applicable airworthiness regulations
(i.e., 14 CFR part 23) do not contain
adequate or appropriate safety standards
for the SF50 because of a novel or
unusual design feature, special
conditions are prescribed under the
provisions of § 21.16.
In addition to the applicable
airworthiness regulations and special
conditions, the SF50 must comply with
the fuel vent and exhaust emission
requirements of 14 CFR part 34 and the
noise certification requirements of 14
CFR part 36; and the FAA must issue a
finding of regulatory adequacy under
section 611 of Public Law 92–574, the
‘‘Noise Control Act of 1972.’’
The FAA issues special conditions, as
defined in § 11.19, under § 11.38 and
they become part of the type
certification basis under § 21.17(a)(2).
Special conditions are initially
applicable to the model for which they
are issued. Should the type certificate
for that model be amended later to
include any other model that
incorporates the same novel or unusual
design feature, the special conditions
would also apply to the other model
under § 21.101.
This action affects only certain novel
or unusual design features on model
SF50 airplanes. It is not a rule of general
applicability and affects only the
applicant who applied to the FAA for
approval of these features on the
airplane.
[FR Doc. 2010–20416 Filed 8–17–10; 8:45 am]
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 23
14 CFR Part 39
Aircraft, Aviation safety, Signs and
symbols.
[Docket No. FAA–2010–0762; Directorate
Identifier 2010–NM–011–AD; Amendment
39–16393; AD 2010–17–03]
Novel or Unusual Design Features
The SF50 will incorporate the
following novel or unusual design
features: Complex design and
performance features consistent with
technologically advanced aircraft over
6,000 pounds.
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES
Discussion of Comments
Notice of proposed special conditions
No. 23–10–02–SC for the Cirrus Design
Corporation model SF50 airplanes was
published in the Federal Register on
May 28, 2010, 75 FR 29962. No
comments were received, and the
special conditions are adopted as
proposed.
Applicability
As discussed above, these special
conditions are applicable to the SF50.
Should Cirrus Design Corporation apply
at a later date for a change to the type
certificate to include another model
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:12 Aug 17, 2010
Jkt 220001
Conclusion
Citation
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113 and
44701; 14 CFR 21.16 and 21.17; and 14 CFR
11.38 and 11.19.
The Special Conditions
Accordingly, pursuant to the
authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the following special
conditions are issued as part of the type
certification basis for Cirrus Design
Corporation model SF50 airplanes.
1. Function and Reliability Testing.
Flight tests: In place of 14 CFR
21.35(b)(2), the following applies:
(b) Upon showing compliance with
§ 21.35, paragraph (a), the applicant
must make all flight tests that the
Administrator finds necessary—
(2) For aircraft to be certificated under
this subchapter to determine whether
there is reasonable assurance that the
aircraft, its components, and its
equipment are reliable and function
properly.
Additionally the provisions of § 21.35,
paragraphs (c) and (f) then apply:
(c) Each applicant must, if practicable,
make the tests described in paragraph
(b)(2) of this section upon the aircraft
that was used to show compliance
with—
(1) Paragraph (b)(1) of this section;
and
(2) ll.
(f) The flight tests prescribed in
paragraph (b)(2) of this section must
include—
(1) For aircraft incorporating turbine
engines of a type not previously used in
a type certificated aircraft, at least 300
hours of operation with a full
complement of engines that conform to
a type certificate; and
(2) For all other aircraft, at least 150
hours of operation.
Frm 00010
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
RIN 2120–AA64
The authority citation for these
special conditions is as follows:
PO 00000
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing
Company Model 767–300 Series
Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule; request for
comments.
AGENCY:
We are adopting a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for certain
Model 767–300 series airplanes. This
AD requires replacing a wire bundle
clamp and installing a
tetrafluoroethylene (TFE 2X) sleeve.
This AD results from fuel system
reviews conducted by the manufacturer.
We are issuing this AD to prevent
chafing of a wiring bundle, which could
result in a high-energy short and,
consequently, a possible ignition source
in the center auxiliary fuel tank.
DATES: This AD is effective September 2,
2010.
The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
of a certain publication listed in the AD
as of September 2, 2010.
We must receive comments on this
AD by October 4, 2010.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by
any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
For service information identified in
this AD, contact Boeing Commercial
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\18AUR1.SGM
18AUR1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 159 / Wednesday, August 18, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services
Management, P.O. Box 3707, MC 2H–65,
Seattle, Washington 98124–2207;
telephone 206–544–5000; extension 1,
fax 206–766–5680; e-mail
me.boecom@boeing.com; Internet
https://www.myboeingfleet.com.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the
Docket Management Facility between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD
docket contains this AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and
other information. The street address for
the Docket Office (telephone 800–647–
5527) is in the ADDRESSES section.
Comments will be available in the AD
docket shortly after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Margaret Langsted, Aerospace Engineer,
Propulsion Branch, ANM–140S, FAA,
Seattle Aircraft Certification Office,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington 98057–3356; telephone
(425) 917–6500; fax (425) 917–6590.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES
Discussion
The FAA has examined the
underlying safety issues involved in fuel
tank explosions on several large
transport airplanes, including the
adequacy of existing regulations, the
service history of airplanes subject to
those regulations, and existing
maintenance practices for fuel tank
systems. As a result of those findings,
we issued a regulation titled ‘‘Transport
Airplane Fuel Tank System Design
Review, Flammability Reduction and
Maintenance and Inspection
Requirements’’ (66 FR 23086, May 7,
2001). In addition to new airworthiness
standards for transport airplanes and
new maintenance requirements, this
rule included Special Federal Aviation
Regulation No. 88 (‘‘SFAR 88,’’
Amendment 21–78, and subsequent
Amendments 21–82 and 21–83).
Among other actions, SFAR 88
requires certain type design (i.e., type
certificate (TC) and supplemental type
certificate (STC)) holders to substantiate
that their fuel tank systems can prevent
ignition sources in the fuel tanks. This
requirement applies to type design
holders for large turbine-powered
transport airplanes and for subsequent
modifications to those airplanes. It
requires them to perform design reviews
and to develop design changes and
maintenance procedures if their designs
do not meet the new fuel tank safety
standards. As explained in the preamble
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:12 Aug 17, 2010
Jkt 220001
to the rule, we intended to adopt
airworthiness directives to mandate any
changes found necessary to address
unsafe conditions identified as a result
of these reviews.
In evaluating these design reviews, we
have established four criteria intended
to define the unsafe conditions
associated with fuel tank systems that
require corrective actions. The
percentage of operating time during
which fuel tanks are exposed to
flammable conditions is one of these
criteria. The other three criteria address
the failure types under evaluation:
single failures, single failures in
combination with a latent condition(s),
and in-service failure experience. For all
four criteria, the evaluations included
consideration of previous actions taken
that may mitigate the need for further
action.
We have determined that the actions
identified in this AD are necessary to
reduce the potential of ignition sources
inside fuel tanks, which, in combination
with flammable fuel vapors, could result
in fuel tank explosions and consequent
loss of the airplane.
We received a report that, during a
review of production records, it was
found that three airplanes did not
receive a tetrafluoroethylene (TFE 2X)
sleeve and a clamp as part of an inproduction version of the actions
required by AD 2009–18–02,
Amendment 39–15998 (74 FR 43621,
August 27, 2009). The TFE 2X sleeve
and the clamp are designed to prevent
chafing of a wiring bundle located along
a fuel tank boundary structure and to
provide additional electrical isolation
from the fuel tank. Chafing of that
wiring bundle and insufficient electrical
isolation, when combined, could result
in a high-energy short and,
consequently, a potential ignition
source in the center auxiliary fuel tank.
Related Rulemaking
AD 2009–18–02 (which applies to
certain Model 767–200, –300, –300F,
and –400ER series airplanes identified
in Boeing Service Bulletins 767–
57A0100, Revision 1, dated June 19,
2008, and 767–57A0102, Revision 1,
dated November 27, 2007), requires
sealing certain fasteners and stiffeners
in the fuel tank, changing certain wire
bundle clamp configurations on the fuel
tank walls, inspecting certain fasteners
in the fuel tanks and to determine the
method of attachment of the vortex
generators, and corrective action if
necessary.
Relevant Service Information
We reviewed Boeing Alert Service
Bulletin 767–57A0122, dated October
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
50855
22, 2009. The service bulletin describes
procedures for installing a
tetrafluoroethylene (TFE 2X) sleeve and
a wire bundle clamp.
FAA’s Determination and Requirements
of This AD
No airplanes affected by this AD are
on the U.S. Register. We are issuing this
AD because the unsafe condition
described previously is likely to exist or
develop on other products of the same
type design that could be registered in
the United States in the future. This AD
requires the actions described in the
service bulletin.
Since no airplanes are affected by this
AD, notice and opportunity for public
comment before issuing this AD are
unnecessary.
Comments Invited
This AD is a final rule that involves
requirements affecting flight safety, and
we did not provide you with notice and
an opportunity to provide your
comments before it becomes effective.
However, we invite you to send any
written data, views, or arguments about
this AD. Send your comments to an
address listed under the ADDRESSES
section. Include ‘‘Docket No. FAA–
2010–0762; Directorate Identifier 2010–
NM–011–AD’’ at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite
comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy
aspects of this AD. We will consider all
comments received by the closing date
and may amend this AD because of
those comments.
We will post all comments we
receive, without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact we receive
about this AD.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. ‘‘Subtitle VII:
Aviation Programs,’’ describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in ‘‘Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701:
General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
E:\FR\FM\18AUR1.SGM
18AUR1
50856
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 159 / Wednesday, August 18, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
Regulatory Findings
This AD will not have federalism
implications under Executive Order
13132. This AD will not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on
the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify that this AD:
(1) Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866,
(2) Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979), and
(3) Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
You can find our regulatory
evaluation and the estimated costs of
compliance in the AD docket.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as
follows:
■
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
the following new AD:
■
2010–17–03 The Boeing Company:
Amendment 39–16393. Docket No.
FAA–2010–0762; Directorate Identifier
2010–NM–011–AD.
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES
Effective Date
(a) This airworthiness directive (AD) is
effective September 2, 2010.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to The Boeing
Company Model 767–300 series airplanes,
certificated in any category; as identified in
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 767–57A0122,
dated October 22, 2009.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:12 Aug 17, 2010
Jkt 220001
Subject
(d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of
America Code 57: Wings.
Unsafe Condition
(e) This AD results from fuel system
reviews conducted by the manufacturer. The
Federal Aviation Administration is issuing
this AD to chafing of the wiring bundle,
which could result in a high-energy short
and, consequently, a possible ignition source
in the center auxiliary fuel tank.
Compliance
(f) You are responsible for having the
actions required by this AD performed within
the compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.
Installation
(g) Within 60 months after the effective
date of this AD, install a tetrafluoroethylene
(TFE 2X) sleeve and a wire bundle clamp, in
accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin
767–57A0122, dated October 22, 2009.
Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
(h)(1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft
Certification Office (ACO), FAA, has the
authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if
requested using the procedures found in 14
CFR 39.19. Send information to ATTN:
Margaret Langsted, Aerospace Engineer,
Propulsion Branch, ANM–140S, FAA, Seattle
Aircraft Certification Office, 1601 Lind
Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98057–
3356; telephone (425) 917–6500; fax (425)
917–6590. Information may be e-mailed to: 9ANM-Seattle-ACO-AMOC-Requests@faa.gov.
(2) To request a different method of
compliance or a different compliance time
for this AD, follow the procedures in 14 CFR
39.19. Before using any approved AMOC on
any airplane to which the AMOC applies,
notify your principal maintenance inspector
(PMI) or principal avionics inspector (PAI),
as appropriate, or lacking a principal
inspector, your local Flight Standards District
Office. The AMOC approval letter must
specifically reference this AD.
Material Incorporated by Reference
(i) You must use Boeing Alert Service
Bulletin 767–57A0122, dated October 22,
2009, to do the actions required by this AD,
unless the AD specifies otherwise.
(1) The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference of
this service information under 5 U.S.C.
552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
(2) For service information identified in
this AD, contact Boeing Commercial
Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services
Management, P.O. Box 3707, MC 2H–65,
Seattle, Washington 98124–2207; telephone
206–544–5000, extension 1; fax 206–766–
5680; e-mail me.boecom@boeing.com;
Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com.
(3) You may review copies of the service
information at the FAA, Transport Airplane
Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA, call
425–227–1221.
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
(4) You may also review copies of the
service information that is incorporated by
reference at the National Archives and
Records Administration (NARA). For
information on the availability of this
material at NARA, call 202–741–6030, or go
to: https://www.archives.gov/federal_register/
code_of_federal_regulations/
ibr_locations.html.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on July 30,
2010.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2010–19707 Filed 8–17–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2010–0763; Directorate
Identifier 2009–NM–253–AD] Amendment
39–16394; AD 2010–17–04]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model
A380–800 Series Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule; request for
comments.
AGENCY:
We are adopting a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above. This AD results
from mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI)
originated by an aviation authority of
another country to identify and correct
an unsafe condition on an aviation
product. The MCAI describes the unsafe
condition as:
SUMMARY:
A crack has been found on the Droop Nose
(DN) 1 master sidestay bracket on the inboard
leading edge of an Airbus A380 flight test
aeroplane.
In case of failure of the master bracket, the
sub-master bracket would be able to sustain
limit loads but not ultimate loads.
This condition, if not detected and
corrected, could lead to a DN failure which
would affect the structural integrity of that
wing area.
*
*
*
*
*
This AD requires actions that are
intended to address the unsafe
condition described in the MCAI.
DATES: This AD becomes effective
September 2, 2010.
The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
of a certain publication listed in the AD
as of September 2, 2010.
We must receive comments on this
AD by October 4, 2010.
E:\FR\FM\18AUR1.SGM
18AUR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 159 (Wednesday, August 18, 2010)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 50854-50856]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-19707]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2010-0762; Directorate Identifier 2010-NM-011-AD;
Amendment 39-16393; AD 2010-17-03]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Model 767-300 Series
Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain
Model 767-300 series airplanes. This AD requires replacing a wire
bundle clamp and installing a tetrafluoroethylene (TFE 2X) sleeve. This
AD results from fuel system reviews conducted by the manufacturer. We
are issuing this AD to prevent chafing of a wiring bundle, which could
result in a high-energy short and, consequently, a possible ignition
source in the center auxiliary fuel tank.
DATES: This AD is effective September 2, 2010.
The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of a certain publication listed in the AD as of September 2,
2010.
We must receive comments on this AD by October 4, 2010.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Fax: 202-493-2251.
Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
For service information identified in this AD, contact Boeing
Commercial
[[Page 50855]]
Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services Management, P.O. Box 3707, MC 2H-
65, Seattle, Washington 98124-2207; telephone 206-544-5000; extension
1, fax 206-766-5680; e-mail me.boecom@boeing.com; Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Management Facility
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this AD, the regulatory evaluation,
any comments received, and other information. The street address for
the Docket Office (telephone 800-647-5527) is in the ADDRESSES section.
Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Margaret Langsted, Aerospace Engineer,
Propulsion Branch, ANM-140S, FAA, Seattle Aircraft Certification
Office, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98057-3356; telephone
(425) 917-6500; fax (425) 917-6590.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
The FAA has examined the underlying safety issues involved in fuel
tank explosions on several large transport airplanes, including the
adequacy of existing regulations, the service history of airplanes
subject to those regulations, and existing maintenance practices for
fuel tank systems. As a result of those findings, we issued a
regulation titled ``Transport Airplane Fuel Tank System Design Review,
Flammability Reduction and Maintenance and Inspection Requirements''
(66 FR 23086, May 7, 2001). In addition to new airworthiness standards
for transport airplanes and new maintenance requirements, this rule
included Special Federal Aviation Regulation No. 88 (``SFAR 88,''
Amendment 21-78, and subsequent Amendments 21-82 and 21-83).
Among other actions, SFAR 88 requires certain type design (i.e.,
type certificate (TC) and supplemental type certificate (STC)) holders
to substantiate that their fuel tank systems can prevent ignition
sources in the fuel tanks. This requirement applies to type design
holders for large turbine-powered transport airplanes and for
subsequent modifications to those airplanes. It requires them to
perform design reviews and to develop design changes and maintenance
procedures if their designs do not meet the new fuel tank safety
standards. As explained in the preamble to the rule, we intended to
adopt airworthiness directives to mandate any changes found necessary
to address unsafe conditions identified as a result of these reviews.
In evaluating these design reviews, we have established four
criteria intended to define the unsafe conditions associated with fuel
tank systems that require corrective actions. The percentage of
operating time during which fuel tanks are exposed to flammable
conditions is one of these criteria. The other three criteria address
the failure types under evaluation: single failures, single failures in
combination with a latent condition(s), and in-service failure
experience. For all four criteria, the evaluations included
consideration of previous actions taken that may mitigate the need for
further action.
We have determined that the actions identified in this AD are
necessary to reduce the potential of ignition sources inside fuel
tanks, which, in combination with flammable fuel vapors, could result
in fuel tank explosions and consequent loss of the airplane.
We received a report that, during a review of production records,
it was found that three airplanes did not receive a tetrafluoroethylene
(TFE 2X) sleeve and a clamp as part of an in-production version of the
actions required by AD 2009-18-02, Amendment 39-15998 (74 FR 43621,
August 27, 2009). The TFE 2X sleeve and the clamp are designed to
prevent chafing of a wiring bundle located along a fuel tank boundary
structure and to provide additional electrical isolation from the fuel
tank. Chafing of that wiring bundle and insufficient electrical
isolation, when combined, could result in a high-energy short and,
consequently, a potential ignition source in the center auxiliary fuel
tank.
Related Rulemaking
AD 2009-18-02 (which applies to certain Model 767-200, -300, -300F,
and -400ER series airplanes identified in Boeing Service Bulletins 767-
57A0100, Revision 1, dated June 19, 2008, and 767-57A0102, Revision 1,
dated November 27, 2007), requires sealing certain fasteners and
stiffeners in the fuel tank, changing certain wire bundle clamp
configurations on the fuel tank walls, inspecting certain fasteners in
the fuel tanks and to determine the method of attachment of the vortex
generators, and corrective action if necessary.
Relevant Service Information
We reviewed Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 767-57A0122, dated
October 22, 2009. The service bulletin describes procedures for
installing a tetrafluoroethylene (TFE 2X) sleeve and a wire bundle
clamp.
FAA's Determination and Requirements of This AD
No airplanes affected by this AD are on the U.S. Register. We are
issuing this AD because the unsafe condition described previously is
likely to exist or develop on other products of the same type design
that could be registered in the United States in the future. This AD
requires the actions described in the service bulletin.
Since no airplanes are affected by this AD, notice and opportunity
for public comment before issuing this AD are unnecessary.
Comments Invited
This AD is a final rule that involves requirements affecting flight
safety, and we did not provide you with notice and an opportunity to
provide your comments before it becomes effective. However, we invite
you to send any written data, views, or arguments about this AD. Send
your comments to an address listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include
``Docket No. FAA-2010-0762; Directorate Identifier 2010-NM-011-AD'' at
the beginning of your comments. We specifically invite comments on the
overall regulatory, economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this
AD. We will consider all comments received by the closing date and may
amend this AD because of those comments.
We will post all comments we receive, without change, to https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this AD.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority
[[Page 50856]]
because it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to exist or
develop on products identified in this rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
This AD will not have federalism implications under Executive Order
13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct effect on the States,
on the relationship between the national government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
(1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
(2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979), and
(3) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
You can find our regulatory evaluation and the estimated costs of
compliance in the AD docket.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
0
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new AD:
2010-17-03 The Boeing Company: Amendment 39-16393. Docket No. FAA-
2010-0762; Directorate Identifier 2010-NM-011-AD.
Effective Date
(a) This airworthiness directive (AD) is effective September 2,
2010.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to The Boeing Company Model 767-300 series
airplanes, certificated in any category; as identified in Boeing
Alert Service Bulletin 767-57A0122, dated October 22, 2009.
Subject
(d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 57: Wings.
Unsafe Condition
(e) This AD results from fuel system reviews conducted by the
manufacturer. The Federal Aviation Administration is issuing this AD
to chafing of the wiring bundle, which could result in a high-energy
short and, consequently, a possible ignition source in the center
auxiliary fuel tank.
Compliance
(f) You are responsible for having the actions required by this
AD performed within the compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.
Installation
(g) Within 60 months after the effective date of this AD,
install a tetrafluoroethylene (TFE 2X) sleeve and a wire bundle
clamp, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing
Alert Service Bulletin 767-57A0122, dated October 22, 2009.
Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)
(h)(1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office (ACO),
FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested
using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. Send information to
ATTN: Margaret Langsted, Aerospace Engineer, Propulsion Branch, ANM-
140S, FAA, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office, 1601 Lind Avenue,
SW., Renton, Washington 98057-3356; telephone (425) 917-6500; fax
(425) 917-6590. Information may be e-mailed to: 9-ANM-Seattle-ACO-AMOC-Requests@faa.gov.
(2) To request a different method of compliance or a different
compliance time for this AD, follow the procedures in 14 CFR 39.19.
Before using any approved AMOC on any airplane to which the AMOC
applies, notify your principal maintenance inspector (PMI) or
principal avionics inspector (PAI), as appropriate, or lacking a
principal inspector, your local Flight Standards District Office.
The AMOC approval letter must specifically reference this AD.
Material Incorporated by Reference
(i) You must use Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 767-57A0122,
dated October 22, 2009, to do the actions required by this AD,
unless the AD specifies otherwise.
(1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference of this service information under 5
U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
(2) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services Management,
P.O. Box 3707, MC 2H-65, Seattle, Washington 98124-2207; telephone
206-544-5000, extension 1; fax 206-766-5680; e-mail
me.boecom@boeing.com; Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com.
(3) You may review copies of the service information at the FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington. For information on the availability of this material at
the FAA, call 425-227-1221.
(4) You may also review copies of the service information that
is incorporated by reference at the National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this
material at NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: https://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on July 30, 2010.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2010-19707 Filed 8-17-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P