Cooperative Agreements and Superfund State Contracts for Superfund Response Actions, 49414-49417 [2010-20086]
Download as PDF
49414
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 156 / Friday, August 13, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
■
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
(ii) Enforcement Date. This rule will
be enforced from 9:00 p.m. to 11 p.m.
on August 14, 2010.
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
(5) Gloucester Schooner Festival
Fireworks, Gloucester, MA
(i) All waters of Gloucester Harbor,
from surface to bottom, within a 500yard radius of the launch site on the
beach at location of 42° 36′18″ N,
070°40′32″ W.
(ii) Enforcement Date. This rule will
be enforced from 7:00 p.m. to 11 p.m.
on September 4, 2010.
(b) Regulations.
(1) In accordance with the general
regulations in Section 165.23 of this
part, entering into, and transiting
through, mooring or anchoring within
these regulated areas is prohibited
unless authorized by the Captain of the
Port Boston, or his designated on-scene
representative.
(2) These safety zones are closed to all
vessel traffic, except as may be
permitted by the Captain of the Port
Boston or his designated on-scene
representative. The Captain of the Port
or his designated on-scene
representative may be contacted via
VHF Channel 16 or by telephone at
(617) 223–5750.
(3) The ‘‘on-scene representative’’ of
the Captain of the Port Boston is any
Coast Guard commissioned, warrant, or
petty officer who has been designated
by the Captain of the Port Boston to act
on his behalf. The on-scene
representative of the Captain of the Port
Boston will be aboard either a Coast
Guard or Coast Guard Auxiliary vessel.
(4) Vessel operators given permission
to enter or operate in the safety zones
must comply with all directions given to
them by the Captain of the Port or his
on-scene representative.
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195;
33 CFR 1.05–1(g), 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
Pub. L. 107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department
of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
2. Add § 165.T01–0685 to read as
follows:
■
§ 165.T01–0685 Safety Zones; Fireworks
Within the Captain of the Port Sector
Boston Zone.
(a) General. Temporary safety zones
are established for fireworks events
described in paragraphs (a)(1) through
(a)(5):
(1) Surfside Fireworks, Salisbury Beach,
MA
(i) All waters of the Atlantic Ocean
near Salisbury Beach, MA from surface
to bottom, within a 200-yard radius of
the fireworks barge located at 42°50′36″
N, 070°48′24″ W.
(ii) Enforcement Date. This rule is
effective from 9:30 p.m. on July 24, 2010
to 11:59 p.m. on September 4, 2010.
This rule will be enforced every
Saturday evening from 9:30 p.m.
through 10:30 p.m. during the effective
period.
(2) Yankee Homecoming Fireworks,
Newburyport, MA
(i) All waters of the Merrimack River,
from surface to bottom, within a 400yard radius of the fireworks launch site
located at position 42°48′58″ N,
070°52′41″ W.
(ii) Enforcement Date. This rule will
be enforced from 9 p.m. to 10 p.m. on
July 31, 2010.
(3) Beverly Homecoming Fireworks,
Beverly, MA
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES
(4) Town of Revere Fireworks, Revere,
MA
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:00 Aug 12, 2010
Jkt 220001
[FR Doc. 2010–19977 Filed 8–12–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
(i) All waters of Beverly Harbor from
surface to bottom, within a 200-yard
radius of the fireworks barge located at
position 42°32′37″ N, 070°52′09″ W.
(ii) Enforcement Date. This rule will
be enforced from 9:00 p.m. to 11:00 p.m.
on August 8, 2010.
(i) All waters of Broad Sound, from
surface to bottom, within a 300-yard
radius of the fireworks launch site
located at Revere Beach at position
42°24′30″ N, 070°59′26″ W.
Dated: August 2, 2010.
John N. Healey,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port Boston.
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 35
[FRL–9189–1]
RIN 2050–AG58
Cooperative Agreements and
Superfund State Contracts for
Superfund Response Actions
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Frm 00064
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
This rule amends the
regulation by allowing interim progress
reports to be due in 60 days, instead of
the current 30-day requirement,
following the close of the quarterly and
semi-annual reporting periods. In
addition, this amendment allows the
recipient of a Superfund State Contract
(SSC) to request that EPA apply any
overpayment of cost share to another
site. The revisions affect States, Indian
Tribes, intertribal consortia, and
political subdivisions. The revisions
will improve the administration and
effectiveness of Superfund Cooperative
Agreements and Superfund State
Contracts.
DATES: This rule is effective October 12,
2010.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPA–HQ–SFUND–2010–0085. All
documents in the docket are listed on
the https://www.regulations.gov Web
site. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available,
e.g., confidential business information
(CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the Internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
available either electronically through
https://www.regulations.gov or in hard
copy at the CERCLA Docket, EPA/DC,
EPA West, Room 3334, 1301
Constitution Ave., NW., Washington,
DC. The Public Reading Room is open
from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday
through Friday, excluding legal
holidays. The telephone number for the
Public Reading Room is (202) 566–1744,
and the telephone number for the
CERCLA docket is (202) 566–0276.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Angelo Carasea, Assessment and
Remediation Division, Office of
Superfund Remediation and Technology
Innovation, (5204P), Environmental
Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania
Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460;
telephone number: (703) 603–8828; fax
number: (703) 603–9112; e-mail address:
carasea.angelo@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
I. Statutory Authority
II. Applicability
III. Background
IV. Description of Key Changes
V. Section-by-Section Analysis
VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Statutory Authority
This rule is issued under section
104(a)–(j) of the Comprehensive
Environmental Response,
E:\FR\FM\13AUR1.SGM
13AUR1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 156 / Friday, August 13, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980
(42 U.S.C. 9601 et seq.) as amended
(hereinafter CERCLA).
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES
II. Applicability
The final regulation requirements
shall apply to all new Cooperative
Agreements and Superfund State
Contracts, funded under CERCLA,
which EPA signs on or after the effective
date of this regulation. EPA may agree
to amend existing Cooperative
Agreements or Superfund State
Contracts to make the final regulation
requirements applicable to work
performed on and after the date EPA
signs the amendment.
III. Background
CERCLA launched the nation’s first
centralized and substantial commitment
to clean up hazardous substance sites.
CERCLA, or Superfund, provided
federal authority and resources to
respond directly to releases (or
threatened releases) of hazardous
substances, pollutants, or contaminants
that could endanger human health or
the environment. The law also
authorized enforcement action and cost
recovery from those responsible for a
release of a hazardous substance.
CERCLA authorizes two types of
Superfund response agreements for
State, Tribal (including intertribal
consortium) and political subdivision
participation in CERCLA
implementation: Cooperative
Agreements and Superfund State
Contracts. These agreements ensure
State and Tribal involvement, consistent
with section 121 of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C.
9621 (hereinafter section 121), and
section 126 of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. 9626
(hereinafter section 126), and are used
to obtain State assurances required
under section 104 of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C.
9604, (hereinafter section 104) before
EPA begins a remedial action.
EPA uses Cooperative Agreements to
transfer funds to a State, political
subdivision, or Indian Tribe that
assumes responsibility as the lead or
support agency for Superfund
responses. Core Program Cooperative
Agreements are used to fund non-sitespecific activities that support a State or
Indian Tribe’s involvement in CERCLA
responses.
A Superfund State Contract is used to
document a State’s CERCLA section 104
assurances when either EPA or a
political subdivision has the lead role in
the implementation of a remedial
action.
The role of States, Indian Tribes, and
political subdivisions (also described as
recipients) in Superfund has evolved
substantially since 1990 when the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:00 Aug 12, 2010
Jkt 220001
original 40 CFR part 35 subpart O
regulation was promulgated. The
recipients’ cleanup programs have
matured and become more
sophisticated. In addition, EPA has
actively sought to fulfill CERCLA’s
mandate in sections 121 and 126 to
provide States and Indian Tribes a
‘‘substantial and meaningful
involvement’’ in Superfund by
providing Core Program funding for the
development of State and Tribal
infrastructure.
On May 2, 2007, EPA promulgated a
final regulation, which amended 40 CFR
part 35 subpart O, to reduce the burden
on recipients to receive and administer
Cooperative Agreements and Superfund
State Contracts. This rule amends 40
CFR part 35 subpart O to further reduce
the recipients’ burden by allowing
interim progress reports to be due in 60
days, instead of 30 days, following the
close of the quarterly and semi-annual
reporting periods. Also, this rule
amends 40 CFR part 35 subpart O so
that under a Superfund State Contract,
a recipient may request the
overpayment of cost share from one site
be applied to meet the cost share
requirement of another site.
IV. Description of Key Changes
EPA made limited revisions to certain
sections of the regulation. The following
is a brief description of the key changes.
A. Progress Reports
This rule revises 40 CFR part 35
subpart O by amending the current
reporting requirements that require the
interim progress report to be due within
30 days after the reporting period. In the
revised regulation, interim progress
reports are now due within 60 days after
the reporting period. This change
codifies a recommendation under EPA
initiative, ‘‘Burden Reduction Initiative’’
(See https://www.epa.gov/
burdenreduction/index.htm for
information about EPA’s Burden
Reduction Initiative.)
B. Financial Reports
This revision corrects a citation error
to CFR 31.41(b)(3) for quarterly and
semiannual financial reports
requirement. The correct citation is CFR
31.41(b)(4), which requires quarterly
and semiannual financial reports due 30
days after the reporting period.
C. Overpayment
In the revised regulation, a State may
also direct EPA to use the excess cash
cost share funds (overmatch) at one site
to meet the cost share obligations at
another State site. This change was
made to provide greater flexibility to a
PO 00000
Frm 00065
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
49415
State on how it wants to address the
overmatch of cost share under a
Superfund State Contract.
V. Section-by-Section Analysis
Section 35.6650
Progress Reports
Paragraph (a) is revised to read,
‘‘Reporting frequency. The recipient
must submit progress reports as
specified in the Cooperative Agreement.
Progress reports will be required no
more frequently than quarterly, and will
be required at least annually.
Notwithstanding 40 CFR 31.41(b)(1), the
reports shall be due within 60 days after
the reporting period. The final progress
report shall be due 90 days after
expiration or termination of the
Cooperative Agreement.’’ The reporting
period for quarterly and semiannual
progress reports was changed from 30 to
60 days.
Section 35.6670
Financial Reports
Paragraph (b)(2)(i) is revised to read,
‘‘If a Financial Status Report is required
annually, the report is due 90 days after
the end of the Federal fiscal year or as
specified in the Cooperative Agreement.
If quarterly or semiannual Financial
Status Reports are required, reports are
due in accordance with 40 CFR
31.41(b)(4).’’ The reference citation to 40
CFR 31.41(b)(3) was changed to 40 CFR
31.41(b)(4), and the redundant
statement, ‘‘due 30 days after the
reporting period,’’ was deleted. 40 CFR
31.41(b)(4) requires quarterly and
semiannual reports to be due 30 days
after the reporting period.
Section 35.6805
Contents of an SSC
Paragraph (k) is revised to read,
‘‘Reconciliation provision, which states
that the SSC remains in effect until the
financial settlement of project costs and
final reconciliation of response costs
(including all change orders, claims,
overmatch of cost share,
reimbursements, etc.) ensures that both
EPA and the State have satisfied the cost
share requirement contained in section
104 of CERCLA, as amended. The
recipient may direct EPA to return the
overmatch or to use the excess cost
share payment at one site to meet the
cost share obligation at another site in
accordance with § 35.6285(d).
Reimbursements for any overpayment
will be made to the payer identified in
the SSC.’’ The revised regulation permits
the recipient also to request the
overmatch be applied to the cost share
requirements of another site. Under the
current regulation, EPA must return the
overpayment to the recipient. On May 2,
2007, EPA promulgated a final
regulation, amending § 35.6285(d),
E:\FR\FM\13AUR1.SGM
13AUR1
49416
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 156 / Friday, August 13, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
‘‘Excess cash cost share contribution/
overmatch,’’ which permitted a state to
request the overmatch be applied to the
cost share requirements of another site
when using a remedial cooperative
agreement. This change makes the
overmatch requirements the same for an
SSC as for a remedial cooperative
agreement.
VI. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory
Planning and Reviews
Under Executive Order (EO) 12866
(58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993), this
action is a ‘‘significant regulatory
action.’’ Accordingly, EPA submitted
this action to the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) for review under EO
12866 and any changes made in
response to OMB recommendations
have been documented in the docket for
this action.
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES
B. Paperwork Reduction Act
This action does not impose any new
information collection burden, because
it makes only minimal changes in the
current 40 CFR part 35 subpart O
requirements. However, the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) has
previously approved the information
collection requirements contained in the
existing regulations in 40 CFR part 35
under the provisions of the Paperwork
Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.
and has assigned OMB control number
2050–0179. The OMB control numbers
for EPA’s regulations in 40 CFR are
listed in 40 CFR part 9.
C. Regulatory Flexibility Act
Today’s final rule is not subject to the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA), which
generally requires an agency to prepare
a regulatory flexibility analysis for any
rule that will have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. The RFA
applies only to rules subject to notice
and comment rulemaking requirements
under the Administrative Procedure Act
(APA) or any other statute. This rule is
not subject to notice and comment
requirements under the APA or any
other statute because this rule pertains
to grants which the APA expressly
exempts from notice and comment
rulemaking requirements under 5 U.S.C.
553(a)(2). Moreover, CERCLA also does
not require EPA to issue a notice of
proposed rulemaking prior to issuing
this rule.
D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
This action contains no Federal
mandates under the provisions of Title
II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:00 Aug 12, 2010
Jkt 220001
Act of 1995 (UMRA), 2 U.S.C. 1531–
1538 for State, local, or tribal
governments or the private sector.
UMRA excludes from the definition of
‘‘Federal intergovernmental mandate’’
duties that arise from participation in a
voluntary Federal program. Therefore,
this action is not subject to the
requirements of sections 202 or 205 of
UMRA.
This action is also not subject to the
requirements of section 203 of UMRA
because it contains no regulatory
requirements that might significantly or
uniquely affect small governments.
Participation by small governments in
this program is voluntary and is funded
by EPA.
E. Executive Order 13132: Federalism
This final rule does not have
federalism implications. This action
will not have substantial direct effects
on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various level of government, as
specified in Executive Order 13132.
This final rule makes minor changes to
the regulation, under which the 40 CFR
part 35 subpart O program has been
operating since May 2007. Apart from
the minor changes, this rule adds new
provisions that increase State flexibility,
so it does not have federalism
implications as that phrase is defined
for purposes of Executive Order 13132.
Further, because this is a rule that
primarily conditions the use of Federal
assistance, it does not impose
substantial direct compliance costs on
States. Thus Executive Order 13132
does not apply to this final rule.
F. Executive Order 13175: Consultation
and Coordination With Indian Tribal
Governments
This action does not have tribal
implications, as specified in Executive
Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9,
2000). It does not have substantial direct
effects on Tribal governments, on the
relationship between the Federal
government and Indian Tribes, or the
distribution of power between and
responsibilities between the Federal
government and Indian tribes. Thus,
Executive Order 13175 does not apply
to this action.
G. Executive Order 13045: Protection of
Children From Environmental Health
and Safety Risks
EPA interprets Executive Order 13045
(62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997) as
applying only to those regulatory
actions that concern health or safety
risks, such that the analysis required
PO 00000
Frm 00066
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
under section 5–501 of the Executive
Order has the potential to influence the
regulation. This action is not subject to
Executive Order 13045 because it does
not establish an environmental standard
intended to mitigate health or safety
risks.
H. Executive Order 13211 (Energy
Effects)
This action is not a ‘‘significant energy
action’’ as defined in Executive Order
13211 (66 FR 28355 (May 22, 2001)),
because it is not likely to have a
significant adverse effect on the supply,
distribution, or use of energy. Further,
we have concluded that this rule is not
likely to have any adverse energy
effects.
I. National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (‘‘NTTAA’’), Public Law
104–113, 12(d) (15 U.S.C. 272 note)
directs EPA to use voluntary consensus
standards in its regulatory activities
unless to do so would be inconsistent
with applicable law or otherwise
impractical. Voluntary consensus
standards are technical standards (e.g.,
materials specifications, test methods,
sampling procedures, and business
practices) that are developed or adopted
by voluntary consensus standards
bodies. NTTAA directs EPA to provide
Congress, through OMB, explanations
when the Agency decides not to use
available and applicable voluntary
consensus standards.
This action does not involved
technical standards. Therefore, EPA did
not consider the use of any voluntary
consensus standards.
J. Executive Order 12898: Federal
Actions To Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and
Low-Income Populations
Executive Order (EO) 12898 (59 FR
7629 (Feb. 16, 1994)) establishes Federal
executive policy on environmental
justice. Its main provision directs
Federal agencies, to the greatest extent
practicable and permitted by law, to
make environmental justice part of their
mission by identifying and addressing,
as appropriate, disproportionately high
and adverse human health or
environmental effects of their programs,
policies, and activities on minority
populations and low-income
populations in the United States.
EPA has determined that this final
rule will not have disproportionately
high and adverse human health and
environmental effects on minority or
low-income populations because it does
E:\FR\FM\13AUR1.SGM
13AUR1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 156 / Friday, August 13, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
not affect the level of protection
provided to human health or the
environment. This rule amends 40 CFR
part 35 subpart O by allowing interim
progress reports to be due in 60 days,
instead of the current 30-day
requirement. In addition, this
amendment allows the recipient of a
Superfund State Contract to request that
EPA apply any overpayment of cost
share to another site. The regulation 40
CFR part 35 subpart O codified: (1)
Recipient requirements for
administering Cooperative Agreements
awarded pursuant to section 104(d)(1) of
CERCLA; and (2) requirements for
administering Superfund State
Contracts for non-State-lead remedial
responses undertaken pursuant to
section 104 of CERCLA.
K. Congressional Review Act
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. EPA will submit a
report containing this rule and other
required information to the U.S. Senate,
the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United
States prior to publication of the rule in
the Federal Register. A major rule
cannot take effect until 60 days after it
is published in the Federal Register.
While this action is not a ‘‘major rule’’
as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2), the final
rule becomes effective 60 days after
publication in the Federal Register on
October 12, 2010.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 35
Administrative practices and
procedures, Environmental protection,
Grant programs—environmental
protection, Reporting and
recordkeeping.
Dated: August 9, 2010.
Lisa P. Jackson,
Administrator.
For the reasons set out in the
preamble, 40 CFR part 35 is amended as
follows:
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES
■
PART 35—STATE AND LOCAL
ASSISTANCE
1. The authority citation for 40 CFR
part 35, subpart O continues to read as
follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 9601 et seq.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:00 Aug 12, 2010
Jkt 220001
Subpart O—Cooperative Agreements
and Superfund State Contracts for
Superfund Response Actions
2. Amend § 35.6650 by revising
paragraph (a) to read as follows:
■
§ 35.6650
Progress reports.
(a) Reporting frequency. The recipient
must submit progress reports as
specified in the Cooperative Agreement.
Progress reports will be required no
more frequently than quarterly, and will
be required at least annually.
Notwithstanding 40 CFR 31.41(b)(1), the
reports shall be due within 60 days after
the reporting period. The final progress
report shall be due 90 days after
expiration or termination of the
Cooperative Agreement.
*
*
*
*
*
3. Amend § 35.6670 by revising
paragraph (b)(2)(i) to read as follows:
■
§ 35.6670
Financial reports.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(2) * * *
(i) If a Financial Status Report is
required annually, the report is due 90
days after the end of the Federal fiscal
year or as specified in the Cooperative
Agreement. If quarterly or semiannual
Financial Status Reports are required,
reports are due in accordance with 40
CFR 31.41(b)(4);
*
*
*
*
*
4. Amend § 35.6805 by revising
paragraph (k) to read as follows:
■
§ 35.6805
Contents of an SSC.
*
*
*
*
*
(k) Reconciliation provision, which
states that the SSC remains in effect
until the financial settlement of project
costs and final reconciliation of
response costs (including all change
orders, claims, overmatch of cost share,
reimbursements, etc.) ensures that both
EPA and the State have satisfied the cost
share requirement contained in section
104 of CERCLA, as amended. The
recipient may direct EPA to return the
overmatch or to use the excess cost
share payment at one site to meet the
cost share obligation at another site in
accordance with § 35.6285(d).
Reimbursements for any overmatch will
be made to the recipient identified in
the SSC.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2010–20086 Filed 8–12–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
PO 00000
Frm 00067
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
49417
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Federal Emergency Management
Agency
44 CFR Part 64
[Docket ID FEMA–2010–0003; Internal
Agency Docket No. FEMA–8141]
Suspension of Community Eligibility
Federal Emergency
Management Agency, DHS.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
This rule identifies
communities, where the sale of flood
insurance has been authorized under
the National Flood Insurance Program
(NFIP), that are scheduled for
suspension on the effective dates listed
within this rule because of
noncompliance with the floodplain
management requirements of the
program. If the Federal Emergency
Management Agency (FEMA) receives
documentation that the community has
adopted the required floodplain
management measures prior to the
effective suspension date given in this
rule, the suspension will not occur and
a notice of this will be provided by
publication in the Federal Register on a
subsequent date.
DATES: Effective Dates: The effective
date of each community’s scheduled
suspension is the third date (‘‘Susp.’’)
listed in the third column of the
following tables.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you want to determine whether a
particular community was suspended
on the suspension date or for further
information, contact David Stearrett,
Mitigation Directorate, Federal
Emergency Management Agency, 500 C
Street, SW., Washington, DC 20472,
(202) 646–2953.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The NFIP
enables property owners to purchase
flood insurance which is generally not
otherwise available. In return,
communities agree to adopt and
administer local floodplain management
aimed at protecting lives and new
construction from future flooding.
Section 1315 of the National Flood
Insurance Act of 1968, as amended, 42
U.S.C. 4022, prohibits flood insurance
coverage as authorized under the NFIP,
42 U.S.C. 4001 et seq., unless an
appropriate public body adopts
adequate floodplain management
measures with effective enforcement
measures. The communities listed in
this document no longer meet that
statutory requirement for compliance
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\13AUR1.SGM
13AUR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 156 (Friday, August 13, 2010)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 49414-49417]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-20086]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 35
[FRL-9189-1]
RIN 2050-AG58
Cooperative Agreements and Superfund State Contracts for
Superfund Response Actions
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This rule amends the regulation by allowing interim progress
reports to be due in 60 days, instead of the current 30-day
requirement, following the close of the quarterly and semi-annual
reporting periods. In addition, this amendment allows the recipient of
a Superfund State Contract (SSC) to request that EPA apply any
overpayment of cost share to another site. The revisions affect States,
Indian Tribes, intertribal consortia, and political subdivisions. The
revisions will improve the administration and effectiveness of
Superfund Cooperative Agreements and Superfund State Contracts.
DATES: This rule is effective October 12, 2010.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPA-HQ-SFUND-2010-0085. All documents in the docket are listed on
the https://www.regulations.gov Web site. Although listed in the index,
some information is not publicly available, e.g., confidential business
information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted
by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted material, is
not placed on the Internet and will be publicly available only in hard
copy form. Publicly available docket materials are available either
electronically through https://www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at
the CERCLA Docket, EPA/DC, EPA West, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave.,
NW., Washington, DC. The Public Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to
4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The
telephone number for the Public Reading Room is (202) 566-1744, and the
telephone number for the CERCLA docket is (202) 566-0276.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Angelo Carasea, Assessment and
Remediation Division, Office of Superfund Remediation and Technology
Innovation, (5204P), Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania
Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460; telephone number: (703) 603-8828; fax
number: (703) 603-9112; e-mail address: carasea.angelo@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Statutory Authority
II. Applicability
III. Background
IV. Description of Key Changes
V. Section-by-Section Analysis
VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Statutory Authority
This rule is issued under section 104(a)-(j) of the Comprehensive
Environmental Response,
[[Page 49415]]
Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (42 U.S.C. 9601 et seq.) as
amended (hereinafter CERCLA).
II. Applicability
The final regulation requirements shall apply to all new
Cooperative Agreements and Superfund State Contracts, funded under
CERCLA, which EPA signs on or after the effective date of this
regulation. EPA may agree to amend existing Cooperative Agreements or
Superfund State Contracts to make the final regulation requirements
applicable to work performed on and after the date EPA signs the
amendment.
III. Background
CERCLA launched the nation's first centralized and substantial
commitment to clean up hazardous substance sites. CERCLA, or Superfund,
provided federal authority and resources to respond directly to
releases (or threatened releases) of hazardous substances, pollutants,
or contaminants that could endanger human health or the environment.
The law also authorized enforcement action and cost recovery from those
responsible for a release of a hazardous substance.
CERCLA authorizes two types of Superfund response agreements for
State, Tribal (including intertribal consortium) and political
subdivision participation in CERCLA implementation: Cooperative
Agreements and Superfund State Contracts. These agreements ensure State
and Tribal involvement, consistent with section 121 of CERCLA, 42
U.S.C. 9621 (hereinafter section 121), and section 126 of CERCLA, 42
U.S.C. 9626 (hereinafter section 126), and are used to obtain State
assurances required under section 104 of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. 9604,
(hereinafter section 104) before EPA begins a remedial action.
EPA uses Cooperative Agreements to transfer funds to a State,
political subdivision, or Indian Tribe that assumes responsibility as
the lead or support agency for Superfund responses. Core Program
Cooperative Agreements are used to fund non-site-specific activities
that support a State or Indian Tribe's involvement in CERCLA responses.
A Superfund State Contract is used to document a State's CERCLA
section 104 assurances when either EPA or a political subdivision has
the lead role in the implementation of a remedial action.
The role of States, Indian Tribes, and political subdivisions (also
described as recipients) in Superfund has evolved substantially since
1990 when the original 40 CFR part 35 subpart O regulation was
promulgated. The recipients' cleanup programs have matured and become
more sophisticated. In addition, EPA has actively sought to fulfill
CERCLA's mandate in sections 121 and 126 to provide States and Indian
Tribes a ``substantial and meaningful involvement'' in Superfund by
providing Core Program funding for the development of State and Tribal
infrastructure.
On May 2, 2007, EPA promulgated a final regulation, which amended
40 CFR part 35 subpart O, to reduce the burden on recipients to receive
and administer Cooperative Agreements and Superfund State Contracts.
This rule amends 40 CFR part 35 subpart O to further reduce the
recipients' burden by allowing interim progress reports to be due in 60
days, instead of 30 days, following the close of the quarterly and
semi-annual reporting periods. Also, this rule amends 40 CFR part 35
subpart O so that under a Superfund State Contract, a recipient may
request the overpayment of cost share from one site be applied to meet
the cost share requirement of another site.
IV. Description of Key Changes
EPA made limited revisions to certain sections of the regulation.
The following is a brief description of the key changes.
A. Progress Reports
This rule revises 40 CFR part 35 subpart O by amending the current
reporting requirements that require the interim progress report to be
due within 30 days after the reporting period. In the revised
regulation, interim progress reports are now due within 60 days after
the reporting period. This change codifies a recommendation under EPA
initiative, ``Burden Reduction Initiative'' (See https://www.epa.gov/burdenreduction/index.htm for information about EPA's Burden Reduction
Initiative.)
B. Financial Reports
This revision corrects a citation error to CFR 31.41(b)(3) for
quarterly and semiannual financial reports requirement. The correct
citation is CFR 31.41(b)(4), which requires quarterly and semiannual
financial reports due 30 days after the reporting period.
C. Overpayment
In the revised regulation, a State may also direct EPA to use the
excess cash cost share funds (overmatch) at one site to meet the cost
share obligations at another State site. This change was made to
provide greater flexibility to a State on how it wants to address the
overmatch of cost share under a Superfund State Contract.
V. Section-by-Section Analysis
Section 35.6650 Progress Reports
Paragraph (a) is revised to read, ``Reporting frequency. The
recipient must submit progress reports as specified in the Cooperative
Agreement. Progress reports will be required no more frequently than
quarterly, and will be required at least annually. Notwithstanding 40
CFR 31.41(b)(1), the reports shall be due within 60 days after the
reporting period. The final progress report shall be due 90 days after
expiration or termination of the Cooperative Agreement.'' The reporting
period for quarterly and semiannual progress reports was changed from
30 to 60 days.
Section 35.6670 Financial Reports
Paragraph (b)(2)(i) is revised to read, ``If a Financial Status
Report is required annually, the report is due 90 days after the end of
the Federal fiscal year or as specified in the Cooperative Agreement.
If quarterly or semiannual Financial Status Reports are required,
reports are due in accordance with 40 CFR 31.41(b)(4).'' The reference
citation to 40 CFR 31.41(b)(3) was changed to 40 CFR 31.41(b)(4), and
the redundant statement, ``due 30 days after the reporting period,''
was deleted. 40 CFR 31.41(b)(4) requires quarterly and semiannual
reports to be due 30 days after the reporting period.
Section 35.6805 Contents of an SSC
Paragraph (k) is revised to read, ``Reconciliation provision, which
states that the SSC remains in effect until the financial settlement of
project costs and final reconciliation of response costs (including all
change orders, claims, overmatch of cost share, reimbursements, etc.)
ensures that both EPA and the State have satisfied the cost share
requirement contained in section 104 of CERCLA, as amended. The
recipient may direct EPA to return the overmatch or to use the excess
cost share payment at one site to meet the cost share obligation at
another site in accordance with Sec. 35.6285(d). Reimbursements for
any overpayment will be made to the payer identified in the SSC.'' The
revised regulation permits the recipient also to request the overmatch
be applied to the cost share requirements of another site. Under the
current regulation, EPA must return the overpayment to the recipient.
On May 2, 2007, EPA promulgated a final regulation, amending Sec.
35.6285(d),
[[Page 49416]]
``Excess cash cost share contribution/overmatch,'' which permitted a
state to request the overmatch be applied to the cost share
requirements of another site when using a remedial cooperative
agreement. This change makes the overmatch requirements the same for an
SSC as for a remedial cooperative agreement.
VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory Planning and Reviews
Under Executive Order (EO) 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993),
this action is a ``significant regulatory action.'' Accordingly, EPA
submitted this action to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for
review under EO 12866 and any changes made in response to OMB
recommendations have been documented in the docket for this action.
B. Paperwork Reduction Act
This action does not impose any new information collection burden,
because it makes only minimal changes in the current 40 CFR part 35
subpart O requirements. However, the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) has previously approved the information collection requirements
contained in the existing regulations in 40 CFR part 35 under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq. and
has assigned OMB control number 2050-0179. The OMB control numbers for
EPA's regulations in 40 CFR are listed in 40 CFR part 9.
C. Regulatory Flexibility Act
Today's final rule is not subject to the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(RFA), which generally requires an agency to prepare a regulatory
flexibility analysis for any rule that will have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities. The RFA applies only
to rules subject to notice and comment rulemaking requirements under
the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) or any other statute. This rule
is not subject to notice and comment requirements under the APA or any
other statute because this rule pertains to grants which the APA
expressly exempts from notice and comment rulemaking requirements under
5 U.S.C. 553(a)(2). Moreover, CERCLA also does not require EPA to issue
a notice of proposed rulemaking prior to issuing this rule.
D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
This action contains no Federal mandates under the provisions of
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA), 2 U.S.C.
1531-1538 for State, local, or tribal governments or the private
sector. UMRA excludes from the definition of ``Federal
intergovernmental mandate'' duties that arise from participation in a
voluntary Federal program. Therefore, this action is not subject to the
requirements of sections 202 or 205 of UMRA.
This action is also not subject to the requirements of section 203
of UMRA because it contains no regulatory requirements that might
significantly or uniquely affect small governments. Participation by
small governments in this program is voluntary and is funded by EPA.
E. Executive Order 13132: Federalism
This final rule does not have federalism implications. This action
will not have substantial direct effects on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various level of
government, as specified in Executive Order 13132. This final rule
makes minor changes to the regulation, under which the 40 CFR part 35
subpart O program has been operating since May 2007. Apart from the
minor changes, this rule adds new provisions that increase State
flexibility, so it does not have federalism implications as that phrase
is defined for purposes of Executive Order 13132. Further, because this
is a rule that primarily conditions the use of Federal assistance, it
does not impose substantial direct compliance costs on States. Thus
Executive Order 13132 does not apply to this final rule.
F. Executive Order 13175: Consultation and Coordination With Indian
Tribal Governments
This action does not have tribal implications, as specified in
Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000). It does not have
substantial direct effects on Tribal governments, on the relationship
between the Federal government and Indian Tribes, or the distribution
of power between and responsibilities between the Federal government
and Indian tribes. Thus, Executive Order 13175 does not apply to this
action.
G. Executive Order 13045: Protection of Children From Environmental
Health and Safety Risks
EPA interprets Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997)
as applying only to those regulatory actions that concern health or
safety risks, such that the analysis required under section 5-501 of
the Executive Order has the potential to influence the regulation. This
action is not subject to Executive Order 13045 because it does not
establish an environmental standard intended to mitigate health or
safety risks.
H. Executive Order 13211 (Energy Effects)
This action is not a ``significant energy action'' as defined in
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355 (May 22, 2001)), because it is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect on the supply,
distribution, or use of energy. Further, we have concluded that this
rule is not likely to have any adverse energy effects.
I. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act
Section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (``NTTAA''), Public Law 104-113, 12(d) (15 U.S.C. 272 note)
directs EPA to use voluntary consensus standards in its regulatory
activities unless to do so would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., materials specifications, test methods, sampling
procedures, and business practices) that are developed or adopted by
voluntary consensus standards bodies. NTTAA directs EPA to provide
Congress, through OMB, explanations when the Agency decides not to use
available and applicable voluntary consensus standards.
This action does not involved technical standards. Therefore, EPA
did not consider the use of any voluntary consensus standards.
J. Executive Order 12898: Federal Actions To Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations
Executive Order (EO) 12898 (59 FR 7629 (Feb. 16, 1994)) establishes
Federal executive policy on environmental justice. Its main provision
directs Federal agencies, to the greatest extent practicable and
permitted by law, to make environmental justice part of their mission
by identifying and addressing, as appropriate, disproportionately high
and adverse human health or environmental effects of their programs,
policies, and activities on minority populations and low-income
populations in the United States.
EPA has determined that this final rule will not have
disproportionately high and adverse human health and environmental
effects on minority or low-income populations because it does
[[Page 49417]]
not affect the level of protection provided to human health or the
environment. This rule amends 40 CFR part 35 subpart O by allowing
interim progress reports to be due in 60 days, instead of the current
30-day requirement. In addition, this amendment allows the recipient of
a Superfund State Contract to request that EPA apply any overpayment of
cost share to another site. The regulation 40 CFR part 35 subpart O
codified: (1) Recipient requirements for administering Cooperative
Agreements awarded pursuant to section 104(d)(1) of CERCLA; and (2)
requirements for administering Superfund State Contracts for non-State-
lead remedial responses undertaken pursuant to section 104 of CERCLA.
K. Congressional Review Act
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other
required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. While this action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5
U.S.C. 804(2), the final rule becomes effective 60 days after
publication in the Federal Register on October 12, 2010.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 35
Administrative practices and procedures, Environmental protection,
Grant programs--environmental protection, Reporting and recordkeeping.
Dated: August 9, 2010.
Lisa P. Jackson,
Administrator.
0
For the reasons set out in the preamble, 40 CFR part 35 is amended as
follows:
PART 35--STATE AND LOCAL ASSISTANCE
0
1. The authority citation for 40 CFR part 35, subpart O continues to
read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 9601 et seq.
Subpart O--Cooperative Agreements and Superfund State Contracts for
Superfund Response Actions
0
2. Amend Sec. 35.6650 by revising paragraph (a) to read as follows:
Sec. 35.6650 Progress reports.
(a) Reporting frequency. The recipient must submit progress reports
as specified in the Cooperative Agreement. Progress reports will be
required no more frequently than quarterly, and will be required at
least annually. Notwithstanding 40 CFR 31.41(b)(1), the reports shall
be due within 60 days after the reporting period. The final progress
report shall be due 90 days after expiration or termination of the
Cooperative Agreement.
* * * * *
0
3. Amend Sec. 35.6670 by revising paragraph (b)(2)(i) to read as
follows:
Sec. 35.6670 Financial reports.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(2) * * *
(i) If a Financial Status Report is required annually, the report
is due 90 days after the end of the Federal fiscal year or as specified
in the Cooperative Agreement. If quarterly or semiannual Financial
Status Reports are required, reports are due in accordance with 40 CFR
31.41(b)(4);
* * * * *
0
4. Amend Sec. 35.6805 by revising paragraph (k) to read as follows:
Sec. 35.6805 Contents of an SSC.
* * * * *
(k) Reconciliation provision, which states that the SSC remains in
effect until the financial settlement of project costs and final
reconciliation of response costs (including all change orders, claims,
overmatch of cost share, reimbursements, etc.) ensures that both EPA
and the State have satisfied the cost share requirement contained in
section 104 of CERCLA, as amended. The recipient may direct EPA to
return the overmatch or to use the excess cost share payment at one
site to meet the cost share obligation at another site in accordance
with Sec. 35.6285(d). Reimbursements for any overmatch will be made to
the recipient identified in the SSC.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2010-20086 Filed 8-12-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P