Telecommunications Relay Services and Speech-to-Speech Services for Individuals With Hearing and Speech Disabilities, 49491-49493 [2010-20047]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 156 / Friday, August 13, 2010 / Notices
(1) State, tribal or other Federal
certification data upon which the EPA
certification is based.
(2) Data provided by the requesting
applicator at the time of its request for
EPA certification.
(3) Data generated by EPA in the
processing of the EPA certification.
SYSTEM EXEMPTED FROM CERTAIN PROVISIONS
OF THE PRIVACY ACT:
None.
[FR Doc. 2010–20081 Filed 8–12–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
[CG Docket No. 03–123; FCC 10–115]
Telecommunications Relay Services
and Speech-to-Speech Services for
Individuals With Hearing and Speech
Disabilities
Federal Communications
Commission.
ACTION: Notice; approval of new rates.
AGENCY:
In this document, the
Commission adopts per-minute
compensation rates for the July 1, 2010
through June 30, 2011 Interstate
Telecommunications Relay Services
(TRS) Fund (Fund) year. This action is
necessary because the rates for the
previous Fund year expired on June 30,
2010. The intended effect of this action
is to establish reimbursement rates for
TRS providers and an appropriate
funding requirement for the 2010–2011
Fund year.
DATES: The new rates became effective
July 1, 2010.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Diane Mason, Consumer and
Governmental Affairs Bureau, Disability
Rights Office at (202) 418–7126 (voice),
(202) 418–7828 (TTY), or e-mail at
Diane.Mason@fcc.gov.
SUMMARY:
This is a
summary of the Commission’s
Telecommunications Relay Services and
Speech-to-Speech Services for
Individuals with Hearing and Speech
Disabilities, Order, document FCC 10–
115, adopted June 18, 2010, and
released June 28, 2010 in CG Docket
number 03–123 (Order). On April 30,
2010, the Fund administrator, the
National Exchange Carrier Association,
Inc. (NECA), filed its annual Interstate
Telecommunications Relay Services
Fund Payment Formula and Fund Size
Estimate for the period of July 1, 2010
through June 30, 2011. That same day,
the Commission’s Consumer and
Governmental Affairs Bureau (Bureau)
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:35 Aug 12, 2010
Jkt 220001
released a public notice requesting
comment on NECA’s filing. See
National Exchange Carrier Association
Submits the Payment Formula and
Fund Size Estimate for the Interstate
Telecommunications Relay Services
Fund for the July 2010 Through June
2011 Fund Year, CG Docket No. 03–123,
public notice, document DA 10–761,
published at 75 FR 26701, May 12, 2010
(2010 TRS Rate PN). Over 22,000
comments, reply comments, and ex
partes were filed in response to the 2010
TRS Rate PN.
The full text of document FCC 10–115
and copies of any subsequently filed
documents in this matter will be
available for public inspection and
copying during regular business hours
at the FCC Reference Information
Center, Portals II, 445 12th Street, SW.,
Room CY–A257, Washington, DC 20554.
Document FCC 10–115 and copies of
subsequently filed documents in this
matter may also be purchased from the
Commission’s duplicating contractor,
BCPI, Inc., Portals II, 445 12th Street,
SW., Room CY–B402, Washington, DC
20554. Customers may contact BCPI,
Inc. via its Web site https://
www.bcpiweb.com or by calling 1–800–
378–3160. To request materials in
accessible formats for people with
disabilities (Braille, large print,
electronic files, audio format), send an
e-mail to fcc504@fcc.gov or call the
Consumer and Governmental Affairs
Bureau at (202) 418–0530 (voice) or
(202) 418–0432 (TTY). Document FCC
10–115 can also be downloaded in
Word or Portable Document Format
(PDF) at: https://www.fcc.gov/cgb/dro/
trs.html#orders.
Synopsis
The Compensation Rates for VRS for the
2010–2011 Fund Year
1. The Commission adopts interim,
one-year rates of $6.2390 for Tier I,
$6.2335 for Tier II, and $5.0668 for Tier
III for VRS by averaging NECA’s
proposed per-minute rates calculated as
a measure of actual, historical provider
costs, and the current rates, which were
based on providers’ projected costs.
Projected costs for VRS for a given Fund
year have consistently proven to be
higher than actual costs for that Fund
year, and there is currently no ‘‘true-up’’
mechanism for reconciling, after the
Fund year, the rates at which providers
are reimbursed from the Fund and their
actual costs for the Fund year. By
NECA’s calculation, the rates based on
actual, historical costs would be $5.7754
for Tier I, $6.0318 for Tier II, and
$3.8963 for Tier III for the 2010–2011
Fund year, all of which include
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
49491
allowances of 1.6% for cash working
capital, 3.2% for growth in expenses,
and $0.0083 per minute for ongoing
E911 and ten-digit numbering costs.
However, in light of concerns expressed
by providers and users, and to ensure
sufficient, quality service for users
while the Commission considers broad
reform, the Commission declines to
reduce the VRS rates to that level at this
time.
2. Interim VRS Rates for the 2010–
2011 Fund Year. The Commission finds
that adopting a multi-year rate structure
would be premature at this time. The
Commission believes that establishing
multi-year VRS rates at this time may
hamper the Commission’s efforts to
implement in a timely manner reforms
that the Commission may determine are
needed as a result of the 2010 VRS NOI
proceeding. See Structure and Practices
of the Video Relay Service Program, CG
Docket No. 10–51, Notice of Inquiry,
FCC 10–111, published at 75 FR 41863,
July 19, 2010 (2010 VRS NOI).
3. Rates Based on Actual vs. Projected
Costs for VRS. The Commission finds
that NECA’s use of providers’ actual,
historical costs in proposing VRS rates
provides a valuable point of reference
for setting VRS rates. Specifically, a
comparative analysis by NECA of
providers’ projected and actual cost and
demand over the past several years
reveals that there is a substantial
disparity between providers’ reported
projected costs and demand, and what
turns out to be their actual costs and
demand. In particular, based on the data
received from providers, NECA
indicates that VRS providers’ weighted
average actual per-minute costs as
submitted to NECA were $4.4603 in
2006, $3.9604 in 2007, $4.1180 in 2008,
and $4.1596 in 2009. By contrast, the
compensation rates were in the
following ranges for each of those years:
$6.644 in 2006, $6.444 to $6.77 in 2007,
$6.30 to $6.7632 in 2008, and $6.2373
to $6.7362 in 2009. In addition, in the
past, the Commission has not provided
a process for reconciling providers’
actual costs to their compensation from
the Fund, and the Commission declines
to do so here.
4. With the benefit of four years’ data
showing that providers’ projections
consistently overstate their costs, the
Commission concludes that it can no
longer justify basing VRS compensation
rates only on projected costs.
Furthermore, NECA, which has been the
Fund administrator since the inception
of the Fund, used weighted averages in
proposing tiered rates based on actual
costs. To the extent that one provider
commands a substantial share of the
VRS market, the Commission finds that
E:\FR\FM\13AUN1.SGM
13AUN1
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES
49492
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 156 / Friday, August 13, 2010 / Notices
NECA’s use of weighted averages is
appropriate, and properly balances, on
one side, the greater relative costs
incurred by smaller providers with, on
the other, not penalizing providers
operating at lower costs for their greater
efficiency. The Commission therefore
concludes that NECA’s methodology,
and use of actual cost information
submitted by the providers and certified
under penalty of perjury to be true and
correct, were reasonable.
5. The Commission has an obligation
to protect the integrity of the Fund and
to deter and detect waste. It has
therefore sought to find a reasonable
balance between the past rates based on
projections that consistently overstate
true costs and overcompensate VRS
providers, and the NECA-proposed rates
based on actual costs that would
represent a significant and sudden cut
to providers’ compensation. The
Commission concludes that adjusting
NECA’s proposed rates based on actual
costs for a one-year, interim period
strikes the correct balance. The
Commission also notes that the rates
adopted in the Order fall within the
range of rates proposed by providers for
each of the tiers. As such, the
Commision expects that the interim
rates adopted will permit service
providers to continue offering service in
accordance with the Commission’s rules
to consumers, while the Commission
considers the 2010 VRS NOI. In the
interim, the Commission is obliged to
adopt a set of rates that compensates
VRS providers for reasonable costs
caused by their provision of VRS ‘‘in the
most efficient manner’’ possible, and is
otherwise consistent with the
Communications Act of 1934, as
amended (Act) and the Commission’s
rules.
6. Sorenson argues that ‘‘any decision
to create a new methodology—based on
historical costs or any other approach
that deviates from the incentive-based
(or projected-‘cost’) approach adopted in
2007—would amount to a rule change
that could be adopted only pursuant to
a new rulemaking proceeding.’’ Even if
Sorenson is correct that, by adopting
these interim VRS rates, the
Commission is somehow changing a
‘‘rule,’’ the Commission has provided
ample notice and opportunity for public
comment regarding this action. For
example, the Commission has twice
expressly sought comment recently in
this proceeding on the use of actual cost
data as a basis for determining rates.
Moreover, the Commission is taking the
additional precaution of establishing
VRS rates on an interim basis to address
a significant disparity between actual
costs and provider compensation while
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:35 Aug 12, 2010
Jkt 220001
the Commission undertakes to examine
VRS compensation more broadly in a
formal rulemaking proceeding. The
Commission notes that in the past, it has
been afforded substantial deference
when imposing regulations on an
interim basis, particularly where it is
acting in the public interest. The
Commission therefore finds Sorenson’s
arguments in this regard to be without
merit.
7. Further, provider criticisms of
NECA’s proposal relying on actual cost
data to set VRS rates—based on the
argument that costs allowed by NECA
do not include all of the true costs of
providing VRS—should, in theory,
apply equally to reliance on projected
cost data in VRS rate setting because the
categories of compensable costs are the
same whether actual or projected.
Therefore, they are not persuasive as a
challenge to reliance on actual cost data.
8. Tiered Rate Structure. The
Commission concludes that for the
2010–2011 Fund year, the interim rate
shall continue to be tiered based on the
demand thresholds established in
Telecommunications Relay Services and
Speech-to-Speech Services for
Individuals with Hearing and Speech
Disabilities, Report and Order and
Declaratory Ruling, CG Docket No. 03–
123, document FCC 07–186, published
at 73 FR 3254, Jan. 17, 2008. (2007 TRS
Rate Methodology Order): Tier I shall
include monthly minutes submitted in
the range of 0—50,000, Tier II shall
include monthly minutes from 50,001 to
500,000, and Tier III shall include
monthly minutes submitted above
500,000. The rationale for adopting the
tiers in the 2007 TRS Rate Methodology
Order remains applicable; that is,
providers with a relatively small
number of minutes generally have
higher costs. Further, the Commission
lacks sufficient record evidence to
depart from the existing tier structure in
favor of any particular alternative. The
Commission therefore declines to
change the tier structure at this time.
9. Consistency of this Action with the
ADA. The Commission concludes that
the adoption of the VRS rates herein is
consistent with its obligations under
Title IV of the Americans with
Disabilities Act, codified as section 225
of the Communications Act. In
complying with these statutory
requirements, the Commission often
must balance the interests of
contributors to the Fund, who are
ratepayers, with the interests of users of
TRS. Because the rates adopted in the
Order exceed the VRS providers’
average actual costs as reported by
them, the Commission concludes that
they are consistent with the
PO 00000
Frm 00039
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
requirements in section 225 of the Act,
and furthermore reflect a full awareness
of the Commission’s obligations under
section 225 and a commitment to
further the goals of functional
equivalency through strengthening and
sustaining VRS.
The Compensation Rate for TRS and
STS for the 2010–2011 Fund Year
10. The Commission adopts NECA’s
proposed per-minute base rate of
$2.0256 for traditional TRS and STS for
the 2010–2011 Fund year. The base rate
for TRS and STS is formulated by NECA
following the MARS analysis adopted in
the 2007 TRS Rate Methodology Order.
11. Although the base rate for STS is
the same as for TRS, in the 2007 TRS
Rate Methodology Order, the
Commission recognized that many
potential STS users were not being
made aware of this important service.
Therefore, for the 2007–2008 Fund year,
the Commission added an additional
amount of $1.131 per minute to the STS
compensation rate calculated under the
MARS plan to be used for outreach
purposes. The Bureau decided to retain
the outreach payment for the 2008–2009
and 2009–2010 Fund years. The
Commission will continue the
additional funding for STS as adopted
in the 2007 TRS Rate Methodology
Order for the 2010–2011 Fund year in
light of NECA’s and commenters’ belief
that continued additional support for
outreach is needed. However, the
Commission will monitor the impact of
this funding for the next cycle and
consider alternative approaches to STS
outreach in the future.
The Compensation Rates for Captioned
Telephone Service (CTS) and InternetProtocol (IP) CTS for the 2010–2011
Fund Year
12. The Commission adopts NECA’s
proposed per-minute compensation rate
of $1.6951 for CTS and IP CTS for the
2010–2011 Fund year. These rates are
also calculated using the MARS formula
adopted in the 2007 TRS Rate
Methodology Order.
The Compensation Rate for IP Relay for
the 2010–2011 Fund Year
13. The Commission adopts NECA’s
proposed per-minute compensation rate
of $1.2985 for IP Relay for the 2010–
2011 Fund year. This rate includes
$0.0503 per minute for ongoing ten-digit
numbering and E911 costs and $0.0204
per minute as a rate of return on capital
investment as explained in NECA’s
filing. Beginning July 1, 2010, all
numbering and E911 costs associated
with IP Relay, as well as VRS, will be
compensated on a per-minute basis. The
E:\FR\FM\13AUN1.SGM
13AUN1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 156 / Friday, August 13, 2010 / Notices
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Commission adopted a price cap
formula in the 2007 TRS Rate
Methodology Order for three years
which expires June 30, 2010. The
Commission finds it appropriate to
continue to use the price-cap
methodology used in setting the
previous rates for IP Relay, and to adopt
NECA’s proposed rate for the 2010–2011
Fund year based on IP Relay providers’
projected costs and demand.
14. Unlike VRS, for IP Relay, the
Commission explicitly stated that at the
end of the first three-year cycle, it
would adopt IP Relay rates for another
three-year cycle. Therefore, NECA’s
proposed rate for the 2010–2011 Fund
year for IP Relay will serve as a base rate
for a new three-year cycle for IP Relay
that will expire June 30, 2013. As has
been done in the previous cycle based
on the 2007 TRS Rate Methodology
Order, this rate will be adjusted
annually by an inflation factor and an
efficiency factor, and will include any
appropriate exogenous costs submitted
by providers. The inflation factor is the
Gross Domestic Product minus the Price
Index (GDP¥PI), and the efficiency
factor is the inflation factor minus 0.5
percent to account for productivity
gains.
The Carrier Contribution Factor and
Funding Requirement
15. Because the Commission adopts
NECA’s proposed compensation rates
for the various forms of TRS, with the
adjustment of VRS rates to prevent a
steep and disruptive decrease in perminute compensation, and because the
Commission agrees that NECA’s
projected minutes of use for each
service are supported by the record and
thus reasonable, the remaining issue to
resolve is the treatment of NECA’s
March 30, 2010 Supplemental Filing
recommending a decrease in 2009–2010
funding requirements from $891 million
to $701.8 million, and a reduction in the
carrier contribution factor from 0.01137
to 0.00886. NECA made this
recommendation based on the finding
that actual VRS minutes for a sevenmonth period of July 2009 through
January 2010 consistently averaged 18%
below projections. The Commission
declines to reduce the 2009–2010 Fund
size as recommended, and instead
concludes that the most
administratively reasonable approach is
to apply NECA’s recommended Fund
adjustment to the funding requirement
for 2010–2011. Based on this, the
Commission adopts a total funding
requirement of $433,990,484.98 and
carrier contribution factor of 0.00585
which will result in a total Fund size of
$705,048,502.19.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:35 Aug 12, 2010
Jkt 220001
Paperwork Reduction Act
16. This document does not contain
new or modified information collection
requirements subject to the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104–
13. In addition, therefore, it does not
contain any new or modified
information collection burden for small
business concerns with fewer than 25
employees, pursuant to the Small
Business Paperwork Relief Act of 2002,
Public Law 107–198, see 44 U.S.C.
3506(c)(4).
Congressional Review Act
17. The Commission will send a copy
of this Order in a report to be sent to
Congress and the Government
Accountability Office pursuant to the
Congressional Review Act. See 5 U.S.C.
801(a)(1)(A).
Ordering Clauses
Pursuant to the authority contained in
section 225 of the Communications Act
of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 225, and
§ 64.604(c)(5)(iii) of the Commission’s
rules, 47 CFR 64.604(c)(5)(iii),
document 10–115 is adopted.
NECA shall compensate providers of
interstate traditional TRS for the July 1,
2010 through June 30, 2011 Fund year,
at the rate of $2.0256 per completed
interstate conversation minute.
NECA shall compensate providers of
interstate Speech-to-Speech service for
the July 1, 2010 through June 30, 2011
Fund year, at the rate of $3.1566 per
completed interstate conversation
minute.
NECA shall compensate providers of
interstate captioned telephone service
and intrastate and interstate IP
captioned telephone service for the July
1, 2010 through June 30, 2011 Fund
year, at the rate of $1.6951 per
completed conversation minute.
NECA shall compensate providers of
intrastate and interstate IP Relay service
for the July 1, 2010 through June 30,
2011 Fund year, at the rate of $1.2985
per completed conversation minute.
NECA shall compensate providers of
intrastate and interstate Video Relay
Service at the rates of $6.2390 for the
first 50,000 monthly minutes (Tier I),
$6.2335 for monthly minutes between
50,001 and 500,000 (Tier II), and
$5.0668 for minutes above 500,000 (Tier
III) per completed conversation minute
for the July 1, 2010 through June 30,
2011 Fund year.
The Interstate TRS carrier
contribution factor shall be 0.00585, and
the funding requirement shall be
$433,990,484.98, and the, for the July 1,
2010 through June 30, 2011 Fund year.
PO 00000
Frm 00040
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 9990
49493
Federal Communications Commission.
Marlene H. Dortch,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010–20047 Filed 8–12–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712–01–P
FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
Change in Bank Control Notices;
Acquisition of Shares of Bank or Bank
Holding Companies
The notificants listed below have
applied under the Change in Bank
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and
§ 225.41 of the Board’s Regulation Y (12
CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank
holding company. The factors that are
considered in acting on the notices are
set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12
U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
The notices are available for
immediate inspection at the Federal
Reserve Bank indicated. The notices
also will be available for inspection at
the office of the Board of Governors.
Interested persons may express their
views in writing to the Reserve Bank
indicated for that notice or to the offices
of the Board of Governors. Comments
must be received not later than August
27, 2010.
A. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
(Glenda Wilson, Community Affairs
Officer) P.O. Box 442, St. Louis,
Missouri 63166–2034:
1. George J. Shackelford, Coila,
Mississippi; to acquire additional voting
shares of Peoples Commerce
Corporation, and thereby indirectly
acquire additional voting shares of
Peoples Bank and Trust Company, both
of North Carrollton, Mississippi.
B. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas (E.
Ann Worthy, Vice President) 2200
North Pearl Street, Dallas, Texas 75201–
2272:
1. John D. Mican, Bastrop, Texas;
Robert E. Berryhill, Smithville, Texas;
Tammy L. Goertz, Rosansky, Texas; and
Dianna L. Kana, Bastrop, Texas,
individually and collectively as co–
trustees of the Bastrop Bancshares, Inc.
Employee Stock Ownership Plan
(‘‘ESOP’’) and on behalf of ESOP; to
acquire voting shares of Bastrop
Bancshares, Inc., and thereby indirectly
acquire voting shares of The First
National Bank of Bastrop, both of
Bastrop, Texas.
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve
System, August 9, 2010.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2010–19948 Filed 8–12–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210–01–S
E:\FR\FM\13AUN1.SGM
13AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 156 (Friday, August 13, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 49491-49493]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-20047]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
[CG Docket No. 03-123; FCC 10-115]
Telecommunications Relay Services and Speech-to-Speech Services
for Individuals With Hearing and Speech Disabilities
AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.
ACTION: Notice; approval of new rates.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In this document, the Commission adopts per-minute
compensation rates for the July 1, 2010 through June 30, 2011
Interstate Telecommunications Relay Services (TRS) Fund (Fund) year.
This action is necessary because the rates for the previous Fund year
expired on June 30, 2010. The intended effect of this action is to
establish reimbursement rates for TRS providers and an appropriate
funding requirement for the 2010-2011 Fund year.
DATES: The new rates became effective July 1, 2010.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Diane Mason, Consumer and Governmental
Affairs Bureau, Disability Rights Office at (202) 418-7126 (voice),
(202) 418-7828 (TTY), or e-mail at Diane.Mason@fcc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a summary of the Commission's
Telecommunications Relay Services and Speech-to-Speech Services for
Individuals with Hearing and Speech Disabilities, Order, document FCC
10-115, adopted June 18, 2010, and released June 28, 2010 in CG Docket
number 03-123 (Order). On April 30, 2010, the Fund administrator, the
National Exchange Carrier Association, Inc. (NECA), filed its annual
Interstate Telecommunications Relay Services Fund Payment Formula and
Fund Size Estimate for the period of July 1, 2010 through June 30,
2011. That same day, the Commission's Consumer and Governmental Affairs
Bureau (Bureau) released a public notice requesting comment on NECA's
filing. See National Exchange Carrier Association Submits the Payment
Formula and Fund Size Estimate for the Interstate Telecommunications
Relay Services Fund for the July 2010 Through June 2011 Fund Year, CG
Docket No. 03-123, public notice, document DA 10-761, published at 75
FR 26701, May 12, 2010 (2010 TRS Rate PN). Over 22,000 comments, reply
comments, and ex partes were filed in response to the 2010 TRS Rate PN.
The full text of document FCC 10-115 and copies of any subsequently
filed documents in this matter will be available for public inspection
and copying during regular business hours at the FCC Reference
Information Center, Portals II, 445 12th Street, SW., Room CY-A257,
Washington, DC 20554. Document FCC 10-115 and copies of subsequently
filed documents in this matter may also be purchased from the
Commission's duplicating contractor, BCPI, Inc., Portals II, 445 12th
Street, SW., Room CY-B402, Washington, DC 20554. Customers may contact
BCPI, Inc. via its Web site https://www.bcpiweb.com or by calling 1-800-
378-3160. To request materials in accessible formats for people with
disabilities (Braille, large print, electronic files, audio format),
send an e-mail to fcc504@fcc.gov or call the Consumer and Governmental
Affairs Bureau at (202) 418-0530 (voice) or (202) 418-0432 (TTY).
Document FCC 10-115 can also be downloaded in Word or Portable Document
Format (PDF) at: https://www.fcc.gov/cgb/dro/trs.html#orders.
Synopsis
The Compensation Rates for VRS for the 2010-2011 Fund Year
1. The Commission adopts interim, one-year rates of $6.2390 for
Tier I, $6.2335 for Tier II, and $5.0668 for Tier III for VRS by
averaging NECA's proposed per-minute rates calculated as a measure of
actual, historical provider costs, and the current rates, which were
based on providers' projected costs. Projected costs for VRS for a
given Fund year have consistently proven to be higher than actual costs
for that Fund year, and there is currently no ``true-up'' mechanism for
reconciling, after the Fund year, the rates at which providers are
reimbursed from the Fund and their actual costs for the Fund year. By
NECA's calculation, the rates based on actual, historical costs would
be $5.7754 for Tier I, $6.0318 for Tier II, and $3.8963 for Tier III
for the 2010-2011 Fund year, all of which include allowances of 1.6%
for cash working capital, 3.2% for growth in expenses, and $0.0083 per
minute for ongoing E911 and ten-digit numbering costs. However, in
light of concerns expressed by providers and users, and to ensure
sufficient, quality service for users while the Commission considers
broad reform, the Commission declines to reduce the VRS rates to that
level at this time.
2. Interim VRS Rates for the 2010-2011 Fund Year. The Commission
finds that adopting a multi-year rate structure would be premature at
this time. The Commission believes that establishing multi-year VRS
rates at this time may hamper the Commission's efforts to implement in
a timely manner reforms that the Commission may determine are needed as
a result of the 2010 VRS NOI proceeding. See Structure and Practices of
the Video Relay Service Program, CG Docket No. 10-51, Notice of
Inquiry, FCC 10-111, published at 75 FR 41863, July 19, 2010 (2010 VRS
NOI).
3. Rates Based on Actual vs. Projected Costs for VRS. The
Commission finds that NECA's use of providers' actual, historical costs
in proposing VRS rates provides a valuable point of reference for
setting VRS rates. Specifically, a comparative analysis by NECA of
providers' projected and actual cost and demand over the past several
years reveals that there is a substantial disparity between providers'
reported projected costs and demand, and what turns out to be their
actual costs and demand. In particular, based on the data received from
providers, NECA indicates that VRS providers' weighted average actual
per-minute costs as submitted to NECA were $4.4603 in 2006, $3.9604 in
2007, $4.1180 in 2008, and $4.1596 in 2009. By contrast, the
compensation rates were in the following ranges for each of those
years: $6.644 in 2006, $6.444 to $6.77 in 2007, $6.30 to $6.7632 in
2008, and $6.2373 to $6.7362 in 2009. In addition, in the past, the
Commission has not provided a process for reconciling providers' actual
costs to their compensation from the Fund, and the Commission declines
to do so here.
4. With the benefit of four years' data showing that providers'
projections consistently overstate their costs, the Commission
concludes that it can no longer justify basing VRS compensation rates
only on projected costs. Furthermore, NECA, which has been the Fund
administrator since the inception of the Fund, used weighted averages
in proposing tiered rates based on actual costs. To the extent that one
provider commands a substantial share of the VRS market, the Commission
finds that
[[Page 49492]]
NECA's use of weighted averages is appropriate, and properly balances,
on one side, the greater relative costs incurred by smaller providers
with, on the other, not penalizing providers operating at lower costs
for their greater efficiency. The Commission therefore concludes that
NECA's methodology, and use of actual cost information submitted by the
providers and certified under penalty of perjury to be true and
correct, were reasonable.
5. The Commission has an obligation to protect the integrity of the
Fund and to deter and detect waste. It has therefore sought to find a
reasonable balance between the past rates based on projections that
consistently overstate true costs and overcompensate VRS providers, and
the NECA-proposed rates based on actual costs that would represent a
significant and sudden cut to providers' compensation. The Commission
concludes that adjusting NECA's proposed rates based on actual costs
for a one-year, interim period strikes the correct balance. The
Commission also notes that the rates adopted in the Order fall within
the range of rates proposed by providers for each of the tiers. As
such, the Commision expects that the interim rates adopted will permit
service providers to continue offering service in accordance with the
Commission's rules to consumers, while the Commission considers the
2010 VRS NOI. In the interim, the Commission is obliged to adopt a set
of rates that compensates VRS providers for reasonable costs caused by
their provision of VRS ``in the most efficient manner'' possible, and
is otherwise consistent with the Communications Act of 1934, as amended
(Act) and the Commission's rules.
6. Sorenson argues that ``any decision to create a new
methodology--based on historical costs or any other approach that
deviates from the incentive-based (or projected-`cost') approach
adopted in 2007--would amount to a rule change that could be adopted
only pursuant to a new rulemaking proceeding.'' Even if Sorenson is
correct that, by adopting these interim VRS rates, the Commission is
somehow changing a ``rule,'' the Commission has provided ample notice
and opportunity for public comment regarding this action. For example,
the Commission has twice expressly sought comment recently in this
proceeding on the use of actual cost data as a basis for determining
rates. Moreover, the Commission is taking the additional precaution of
establishing VRS rates on an interim basis to address a significant
disparity between actual costs and provider compensation while the
Commission undertakes to examine VRS compensation more broadly in a
formal rulemaking proceeding. The Commission notes that in the past, it
has been afforded substantial deference when imposing regulations on an
interim basis, particularly where it is acting in the public interest.
The Commission therefore finds Sorenson's arguments in this regard to
be without merit.
7. Further, provider criticisms of NECA's proposal relying on
actual cost data to set VRS rates--based on the argument that costs
allowed by NECA do not include all of the true costs of providing VRS--
should, in theory, apply equally to reliance on projected cost data in
VRS rate setting because the categories of compensable costs are the
same whether actual or projected. Therefore, they are not persuasive as
a challenge to reliance on actual cost data.
8. Tiered Rate Structure. The Commission concludes that for the
2010-2011 Fund year, the interim rate shall continue to be tiered based
on the demand thresholds established in Telecommunications Relay
Services and Speech-to-Speech Services for Individuals with Hearing and
Speech Disabilities, Report and Order and Declaratory Ruling, CG Docket
No. 03-123, document FCC 07-186, published at 73 FR 3254, Jan. 17,
2008. (2007 TRS Rate Methodology Order): Tier I shall include monthly
minutes submitted in the range of 0--50,000, Tier II shall include
monthly minutes from 50,001 to 500,000, and Tier III shall include
monthly minutes submitted above 500,000. The rationale for adopting the
tiers in the 2007 TRS Rate Methodology Order remains applicable; that
is, providers with a relatively small number of minutes generally have
higher costs. Further, the Commission lacks sufficient record evidence
to depart from the existing tier structure in favor of any particular
alternative. The Commission therefore declines to change the tier
structure at this time.
9. Consistency of this Action with the ADA. The Commission
concludes that the adoption of the VRS rates herein is consistent with
its obligations under Title IV of the Americans with Disabilities Act,
codified as section 225 of the Communications Act. In complying with
these statutory requirements, the Commission often must balance the
interests of contributors to the Fund, who are ratepayers, with the
interests of users of TRS. Because the rates adopted in the Order
exceed the VRS providers' average actual costs as reported by them, the
Commission concludes that they are consistent with the requirements in
section 225 of the Act, and furthermore reflect a full awareness of the
Commission's obligations under section 225 and a commitment to further
the goals of functional equivalency through strengthening and
sustaining VRS.
The Compensation Rate for TRS and STS for the 2010-2011 Fund Year
10. The Commission adopts NECA's proposed per-minute base rate of
$2.0256 for traditional TRS and STS for the 2010-2011 Fund year. The
base rate for TRS and STS is formulated by NECA following the MARS
analysis adopted in the 2007 TRS Rate Methodology Order.
11. Although the base rate for STS is the same as for TRS, in the
2007 TRS Rate Methodology Order, the Commission recognized that many
potential STS users were not being made aware of this important
service. Therefore, for the 2007-2008 Fund year, the Commission added
an additional amount of $1.131 per minute to the STS compensation rate
calculated under the MARS plan to be used for outreach purposes. The
Bureau decided to retain the outreach payment for the 2008-2009 and
2009-2010 Fund years. The Commission will continue the additional
funding for STS as adopted in the 2007 TRS Rate Methodology Order for
the 2010-2011 Fund year in light of NECA's and commenters' belief that
continued additional support for outreach is needed. However, the
Commission will monitor the impact of this funding for the next cycle
and consider alternative approaches to STS outreach in the future.
The Compensation Rates for Captioned Telephone Service (CTS) and
Internet-Protocol (IP) CTS for the 2010-2011 Fund Year
12. The Commission adopts NECA's proposed per-minute compensation
rate of $1.6951 for CTS and IP CTS for the 2010-2011 Fund year. These
rates are also calculated using the MARS formula adopted in the 2007
TRS Rate Methodology Order.
The Compensation Rate for IP Relay for the 2010-2011 Fund Year
13. The Commission adopts NECA's proposed per-minute compensation
rate of $1.2985 for IP Relay for the 2010-2011 Fund year. This rate
includes $0.0503 per minute for ongoing ten-digit numbering and E911
costs and $0.0204 per minute as a rate of return on capital investment
as explained in NECA's filing. Beginning July 1, 2010, all numbering
and E911 costs associated with IP Relay, as well as VRS, will be
compensated on a per-minute basis. The
[[Page 49493]]
Commission adopted a price cap formula in the 2007 TRS Rate Methodology
Order for three years which expires June 30, 2010. The Commission finds
it appropriate to continue to use the price-cap methodology used in
setting the previous rates for IP Relay, and to adopt NECA's proposed
rate for the 2010-2011 Fund year based on IP Relay providers' projected
costs and demand.
14. Unlike VRS, for IP Relay, the Commission explicitly stated that
at the end of the first three-year cycle, it would adopt IP Relay rates
for another three-year cycle. Therefore, NECA's proposed rate for the
2010-2011 Fund year for IP Relay will serve as a base rate for a new
three-year cycle for IP Relay that will expire June 30, 2013. As has
been done in the previous cycle based on the 2007 TRS Rate Methodology
Order, this rate will be adjusted annually by an inflation factor and
an efficiency factor, and will include any appropriate exogenous costs
submitted by providers. The inflation factor is the Gross Domestic
Product minus the Price Index (GDP-PI), and the efficiency factor is
the inflation factor minus 0.5 percent to account for productivity
gains.
The Carrier Contribution Factor and Funding Requirement
15. Because the Commission adopts NECA's proposed compensation
rates for the various forms of TRS, with the adjustment of VRS rates to
prevent a steep and disruptive decrease in per-minute compensation, and
because the Commission agrees that NECA's projected minutes of use for
each service are supported by the record and thus reasonable, the
remaining issue to resolve is the treatment of NECA's March 30, 2010
Supplemental Filing recommending a decrease in 2009-2010 funding
requirements from $891 million to $701.8 million, and a reduction in
the carrier contribution factor from 0.01137 to 0.00886. NECA made this
recommendation based on the finding that actual VRS minutes for a
seven-month period of July 2009 through January 2010 consistently
averaged 18% below projections. The Commission declines to reduce the
2009-2010 Fund size as recommended, and instead concludes that the most
administratively reasonable approach is to apply NECA's recommended
Fund adjustment to the funding requirement for 2010-2011. Based on
this, the Commission adopts a total funding requirement of
$433,990,484.98 and carrier contribution factor of 0.00585 which will
result in a total Fund size of $705,048,502.19.
Paperwork Reduction Act
16. This document does not contain new or modified information
collection requirements subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995,
Public Law 104-13. In addition, therefore, it does not contain any new
or modified information collection burden for small business concerns
with fewer than 25 employees, pursuant to the Small Business Paperwork
Relief Act of 2002, Public Law 107-198, see 44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(4).
Congressional Review Act
17. The Commission will send a copy of this Order in a report to be
sent to Congress and the Government Accountability Office pursuant to
the Congressional Review Act. See 5 U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(A).
Ordering Clauses
Pursuant to the authority contained in section 225 of the
Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 225, and Sec.
64.604(c)(5)(iii) of the Commission's rules, 47 CFR 64.604(c)(5)(iii),
document 10-115 is adopted.
NECA shall compensate providers of interstate traditional TRS for
the July 1, 2010 through June 30, 2011 Fund year, at the rate of
$2.0256 per completed interstate conversation minute.
NECA shall compensate providers of interstate Speech-to-Speech
service for the July 1, 2010 through June 30, 2011 Fund year, at the
rate of $3.1566 per completed interstate conversation minute.
NECA shall compensate providers of interstate captioned telephone
service and intrastate and interstate IP captioned telephone service
for the July 1, 2010 through June 30, 2011 Fund year, at the rate of
$1.6951 per completed conversation minute.
NECA shall compensate providers of intrastate and interstate IP
Relay service for the July 1, 2010 through June 30, 2011 Fund year, at
the rate of $1.2985 per completed conversation minute.
NECA shall compensate providers of intrastate and interstate Video
Relay Service at the rates of $6.2390 for the first 50,000 monthly
minutes (Tier I), $6.2335 for monthly minutes between 50,001 and
500,000 (Tier II), and $5.0668 for minutes above 500,000 (Tier III) per
completed conversation minute for the July 1, 2010 through June 30,
2011 Fund year.
The Interstate TRS carrier contribution factor shall be 0.00585,
and the funding requirement shall be $433,990,484.98, and the, for the
July 1, 2010 through June 30, 2011 Fund year.
Federal Communications Commission.
Marlene H. Dortch,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-20047 Filed 8-12-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P