Notice of Availability for the Little Snake Proposed Resource Management Plan and Final Environmental Impact Statement, Colorado, 49514-49515 [2010-19917]
Download as PDF
49514
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 156 / Friday, August 13, 2010 / Notices
Authority
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
This notice is published in
accordance with section 1503.1 of the
CEQ Regulations (40 CFR parts 1500
through 1508) implementing the
procedural requirements of NEPA, as
amended (42 U.S.C. 4371 et seq.), and
the Department of the Interior Manual
(516 DM 1–6), and is in the exercise of
authority delegated to the Assistant
Secretary—Indian Affairs by 209 DM 8.
Bureau of Land Management
Dated: July 20, 2010.
Donald Laverdure,
Deputy Assistant Secretary—Indian Affairs.
[FR Doc. 2010–19906 Filed 8–12–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–W7–P
[CO–100–1610 DQ]
Notice of Availability for the Little
Snake Proposed Resource
Management Plan and Final
Environmental Impact Statement,
Colorado
Bureau of Land Management,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability.
AGENCY:
In accordance with the
National Environmental Policy Act of
1969 and the Federal Land Policy and
Management Act of 1976, the Bureau of
Land Management (BLM) has prepared
a Proposed Resource Management Plan
(RMP)/Final Environmental Impact
Statement (EIS) for the Little Snake
Field Office.
DATES: The BLM planning regulations
(43 CFR 1610.5–2) provide that any
person who meets the conditions as
described in the regulations may protest
SUMMARY:
the BLM’s Proposed RMP. A person
who meets the conditions and files a
protest must file the protest within 30
days of the date that the Environmental
Protection Agency publishes its Notice
in the Federal Register.
ADDRESSES: Copies of the Little Snake
Proposed RMP/Final EIS have been sent
to affected Federal, State, and local
government agencies and to interested
parties. Copies of the Proposed RMP/
Final EIS are also available for public
inspection at the following locations:
1. Bureau of Land Management,
Colorado State Office, 2850 Youngfield
Street, Lakewood, Colorado 80215.
2. Bureau of Land Management, Little
Snake Field Office, 455 Emerson Street,
Craig, Colorado 81625.
Interested persons may also review the
Proposed RMP/Final EIS at the
following Web site: https://www.blm.gov/
co/st/en/fo/lsfo/plans/rmp_revision.
html. Upon request, additional copies in
limited numbers of both paper and
digital formats are available.
All protests must be in writing and
mailed to the following addresses:
Regular mail:
Overnight mail:
BLM Director (210), Attention: Brenda Williams, P.O. Box 66538,
Washington, DC 20035.
BLM Director (210), Attention: Brenda Williams, 1620 L Street, NW.,
Suite 1075, Washington, DC 20036.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jeremy Casterson, RMP Project Manager,
455 Emerson Street, Craig, Colorado
81625, 970–826–5071,
Jeremy_Casterson@blm.gov.
The
planning area is located in Northwest
Colorado in Moffat, Routt, and Rio
Blanco counties. The plan will provide
a framework to guide subsequent
management decisions on
approximately 1.3 million acres of BLMadministered public lands and 1.1
million acres of BLM-administered
subsurface mineral estate. The Little
Snake Field Office area is currently
being managed under its 1989 RMP,
which has been amended for Oil and
Gas Leasing (1991), Black-Footed Ferret
Reintroduction (1996), Land Health
Standards (1997), and the Emerald
Mountain Land Exchange (2007).
The Draft RMP/EIS was made
available for public review for a 90-day
period beginning in February 2007.
After the careful review and
consideration of all public comments,
changes to Alternative C (the Preferred
Alternative as described in the Draft
RMP/EIS) have been made to clarify
management direction, incorporate as
appropriate management direction from
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:35 Aug 12, 2010
Jkt 220001
other alternatives analyzed, and update
the effects analysis.
The Little Snake Field Office has
worked extensively with interested and
affected publics and cooperating
agencies in the development of the
Proposed RMP/Final EIS. Cooperating
agencies include: Moffat County, the
Colorado Department of Natural
Resources, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service, the City of Steamboat Springs,
and the Juniper Water Conservancy
District.
During the public review of the Draft
RMP/EIS, the Environmental Protection
Agency, in consultation with the BLM,
identified areas where additional air
quality information would augment the
existing analysis in the Draft RMP/EIS.
As a result, on December 19, 2007, the
BLM published its Notice of Intent to
prepare additional air quality analysis
in the Federal Register. On October 10,
2008, the BLM published the Notice of
Availability (NOA) in the Federal
Register for Additional Air Quality
Impact Assessment to support the Little
Snake Draft RMP/EIS. On November 19,
2008, the BLM published a Notice of
Correction to the NOA for additional air
quality information in the Federal
Register. The additional air quality
analysis information was released to the
PO 00000
Frm 00061
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
public for review and comment. A
response to these comments and all
other public comments is included in
the Proposed RMP/Final EIS.
The Proposed RMP/Final EIS
addresses many issues important to the
area, including energy development,
special designations, transportation and
travel management, wildlife habitat and
socio-economic values. Four
alternatives were analyzed in the
Proposed RMP/Final EIS.
Alternative A, the No Action
Alternative, would maintain present
uses by continuing present management
direction and activities. Commodity
production and unrestricted offhighway vehicle (OHV) travel would be
allowed throughout a majority of the
planning area.
Alternative B would allow the greatest
extent of resource use within the
planning area, while maintaining the
basic protection needed to sustain
resources. Under this alternative,
constraints on commodity production
for the protection of sensitive resources
would be the least restrictive within the
limits defined by law, regulation, and
BLM policy. Fewer areas would be
limited or closed to OHV use than under
the No Action Alernative.
E:\FR\FM\13AUN1.SGM
13AUN1
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 156 / Friday, August 13, 2010 / Notices
Alternative C, the Proposed RMP,
would emphasize multiple resource use
in the planning area by protecting
sensitive resources, including high
priority sagebrush habitat, through
performance-based approaches.
Commodity production would be
balanced with providing protection for
wildlife habitat, vegetation, and natural
values. More areas would be limited or
closed to OHV use than under the No
Action Alternative.
Alternative D would allow the
greatest extent of resource protection
within the planning area, while still
allowing resource use. Commodity
production would be constrained to
protect natural resource values or to
accelerate improvement in their
condition. Under this alternative there
would be an increase in areas closed or
limited to OHV use than in Alternative
C, the Proposed RMP.
In the Proposed RMP (Alternative C),
Irish Canyon is designated as an Area of
Critical Environmental Concern (ACEC).
The ACEC objective would be to protect
sensitive plants, remnant plant
communities, cultural and geologic
values, and scenic quality. The area
would be closed to oil and gas leasing,
limited to designated routes for OHVs,
withdrawn from locatable mineral entry,
managed as Visual Resource
Management Class II, and designated as
a right-of-way exclusion area unless
associated with valid existing rights.
ACEC proposals that were determined
to meet the relevance and importance
criteria, but not designated as ACECs in
the Proposed RMP because they were
deemed not warranted for special
management attention include: Lookout
Mountain, Limestone Ridge, Cross
Mountain Canyon, White-tailed Prairie
Dog habitat, and 11 additional areas
proposed to protect sensitive plants and
plant communities (Cold Desert
Shrublands occurrences, Gibben’s
beardtongue occurrences, Bull Canyon,
G Gap, Little Juniper Canyon, the
Bassett Spring, No Name Spring, Pot
Creek, Whiskey Springs, Willow Spring,
and Deception Creek).
Instructions for filing a protest with
the Director of the BLM regarding the
Proposed RMP/Final EIS may be found
in the Dear Reader letter of the Little
Snake Proposed RMP/Final EIS and at
43 CFR 1610.5–2. E-mail and faxed
protests will not be considered as valid
protests unless the protesting party also
provides the original letter by either
regular or overnight mail postmarked by
the close of the protest period. Under
these conditions, the BLM will consider
the e-mail or faxed protest as an
advance copy and it will receive full
consideration. If you wish to provide
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:35 Aug 12, 2010
Jkt 220001
the BLM with such advance
notification, please direct faxed protests
to the attention of Brenda HudgensWilliams, BLM protest coordinator, at
(202) 912–7212, and e-mails to
Brenda_Hudgens-Williams@blm.gov.
All protests, including the follow-up
letter (if e-mailing or faxing) must be in
writing and mailed to the appropriate
address, as set forth in the ADDRESSES
section above.
Before including your phone number,
e-mail address, or other personal
identifying information in your protest,
you should be aware that your entire
protest—including your personal
identifying information—may be made
publicly available at any time. While
you can ask us in your protest to
withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
Helen M. Hankins,
State Director.
Authority: 40 CFR 1506.6, 43 CFR 1610.2
and 1610–1.
[FR Doc. 2010–19917 Filed 8–12–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–JB–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Land Management
[CACA–49575 L51010000 FX0000
LVRWB09B3220 LLCAD08000]
Notice of Availability of the Final
Environmental Impact Statement for
the Chevron Energy Solutions Lucerne
Valley Solar Project, California and the
Proposed Amendment to the California
Desert Conservation Area Plan
Bureau of Land Management,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of Availability.
AGENCY:
In accordance with the
National Environmental Policy Act of
1969, as amended, and the Federal Land
Policy and Management Act of 1976, as
amended, the Bureau of Land
Management (BLM) has prepared a
Proposed California Desert Conservation
Area Plan (CDCA Plan) Amendment/
Final Environmental Impact Statement
(EIS) for the Chevron Energy Solutions
Lucerne Valley Solar Project and by this
notice is announcing its availability.
DATES: The publication of the
Environmental Protection Agency’s
(EPA) Notice of Availability of this Final
EIS in the Federal Register initiates a
30-day public comment period. Submit
comments to Greg Thomsen by mail
22835 Calle San Juan de Los Lagos,
Moreno Valley, California 92553; or eSUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00062
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
49515
mail lucernesolar@blm.gov. In addition,
BLM planning regulations state that any
person who meets the conditions as
described in the regulations may protest
the BLM’s Proposed CDCA Plan
Amendment. A person who meets the
conditions and files a protest must do so
within 30 days of the date that the
Environmental Protection Agency
publishes its notice of availability in the
Federal Register.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons may also
review the Proposed CDCA Plan
Amendment/Final EIS at the following
Web site: https://www.blm.gov/ca/st/en/
prog/energy/fasttrack.html. All protests
must be in writing and mailed to one of
the following addresses:
Regular mail
Overnight mail
BLM Director (210),
Attention: Brenda
Williams, P.O. Box
66538, Washington,
DC 20035.
BLM Director (210),
Attention: Brenda
Williams, 1620 L
Street, NW., Suite
1075, Washington,
DC 20036.
Greg
Thomsen; telephone (951) 697–5237;
address 22835 Calle San Juan de Los
Lagos, Moreno Valley, California 92553;
e-mail lucernesolar@blm.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Chevron
Energy Solutions (CES) has requested a
516 acre right-of-way (ROW)
authorization from the BLM for the CES
Lucerne Valley Solar Project, consisting
of construction and operation of a 45
megawatt (MW) solar photovoltaic
project which would connect to an
existing Southern California Edison 33
kilovolt (kV) distribution system. The
proposed project would include a new
switchyard, a control and maintenance
building, and a parking area. Pursuant
to BLM’s CDCA Plan (1980, as
amended), sites associated with power
generation or transmission not
identified in the CDCA Plan will be
considered through the plan
amendment process. The Final EIS
considers five alternatives, including
the project as proposed by the applicant,
the no action alternative; a no project
alternative with a plan amendment that
classifies the lands as either ‘‘suitable’’
or ‘‘unsuitable’’ for solar energy
development; a smaller 30 MW facility
of 238 acres; and the preferred
alternative: a modified design of the
proposed project that addresses some of
the environmental concerns. Copies of
the proposed CDCA Plan Amendment/
Final EIS are available for public
inspection at 22835 Calle San Juan de
Los Lagos, Moreno Valley, California.
Comments on the Draft CDCA Plan
Amendment/Draft EIS received from the
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
E:\FR\FM\13AUN1.SGM
13AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 156 (Friday, August 13, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 49514-49515]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-19917]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Land Management
[CO-100-1610 DQ]
Notice of Availability for the Little Snake Proposed Resource
Management Plan and Final Environmental Impact Statement, Colorado
AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of
1969 and the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976, the Bureau
of Land Management (BLM) has prepared a Proposed Resource Management
Plan (RMP)/Final Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the Little
Snake Field Office.
DATES: The BLM planning regulations (43 CFR 1610.5-2) provide that any
person who meets the conditions as described in the regulations may
protest the BLM's Proposed RMP. A person who meets the conditions and
files a protest must file the protest within 30 days of the date that
the Environmental Protection Agency publishes its Notice in the Federal
Register.
ADDRESSES: Copies of the Little Snake Proposed RMP/Final EIS have been
sent to affected Federal, State, and local government agencies and to
interested parties. Copies of the Proposed RMP/Final EIS are also
available for public inspection at the following locations:
1. Bureau of Land Management, Colorado State Office, 2850
Youngfield Street, Lakewood, Colorado 80215.
2. Bureau of Land Management, Little Snake Field Office, 455
Emerson Street, Craig, Colorado 81625.
Interested persons may also review the Proposed RMP/Final EIS at the
following Web site: https://www.blm.gov/co/st/en/fo/lsfo/plans/rmp_revision.html. Upon request, additional copies in limited numbers of
both paper and digital formats are available.
All protests must be in writing and mailed to the following
addresses:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regular mail: Overnight mail:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
BLM Director (210), Attention: Brenda BLM Director (210), Attention:
Williams, P.O. Box 66538, Washington, Brenda Williams, 1620 L
DC 20035. Street, NW., Suite 1075,
Washington, DC 20036.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeremy Casterson, RMP Project Manager,
455 Emerson Street, Craig, Colorado 81625, 970-826-5071, Jeremy_Casterson@blm.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The planning area is located in Northwest
Colorado in Moffat, Routt, and Rio Blanco counties. The plan will
provide a framework to guide subsequent management decisions on
approximately 1.3 million acres of BLM-administered public lands and
1.1 million acres of BLM-administered subsurface mineral estate. The
Little Snake Field Office area is currently being managed under its
1989 RMP, which has been amended for Oil and Gas Leasing (1991), Black-
Footed Ferret Reintroduction (1996), Land Health Standards (1997), and
the Emerald Mountain Land Exchange (2007).
The Draft RMP/EIS was made available for public review for a 90-day
period beginning in February 2007. After the careful review and
consideration of all public comments, changes to Alternative C (the
Preferred Alternative as described in the Draft RMP/EIS) have been made
to clarify management direction, incorporate as appropriate management
direction from other alternatives analyzed, and update the effects
analysis.
The Little Snake Field Office has worked extensively with
interested and affected publics and cooperating agencies in the
development of the Proposed RMP/Final EIS. Cooperating agencies
include: Moffat County, the Colorado Department of Natural Resources,
the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, the City of Steamboat Springs, and
the Juniper Water Conservancy District.
During the public review of the Draft RMP/EIS, the Environmental
Protection Agency, in consultation with the BLM, identified areas where
additional air quality information would augment the existing analysis
in the Draft RMP/EIS. As a result, on December 19, 2007, the BLM
published its Notice of Intent to prepare additional air quality
analysis in the Federal Register. On October 10, 2008, the BLM
published the Notice of Availability (NOA) in the Federal Register for
Additional Air Quality Impact Assessment to support the Little Snake
Draft RMP/EIS. On November 19, 2008, the BLM published a Notice of
Correction to the NOA for additional air quality information in the
Federal Register. The additional air quality analysis information was
released to the public for review and comment. A response to these
comments and all other public comments is included in the Proposed RMP/
Final EIS.
The Proposed RMP/Final EIS addresses many issues important to the
area, including energy development, special designations,
transportation and travel management, wildlife habitat and socio-
economic values. Four alternatives were analyzed in the Proposed RMP/
Final EIS.
Alternative A, the No Action Alternative, would maintain present
uses by continuing present management direction and activities.
Commodity production and unrestricted off-highway vehicle (OHV) travel
would be allowed throughout a majority of the planning area.
Alternative B would allow the greatest extent of resource use
within the planning area, while maintaining the basic protection needed
to sustain resources. Under this alternative, constraints on commodity
production for the protection of sensitive resources would be the least
restrictive within the limits defined by law, regulation, and BLM
policy. Fewer areas would be limited or closed to OHV use than under
the No Action Alernative.
[[Page 49515]]
Alternative C, the Proposed RMP, would emphasize multiple resource
use in the planning area by protecting sensitive resources, including
high priority sagebrush habitat, through performance-based approaches.
Commodity production would be balanced with providing protection for
wildlife habitat, vegetation, and natural values. More areas would be
limited or closed to OHV use than under the No Action Alternative.
Alternative D would allow the greatest extent of resource
protection within the planning area, while still allowing resource use.
Commodity production would be constrained to protect natural resource
values or to accelerate improvement in their condition. Under this
alternative there would be an increase in areas closed or limited to
OHV use than in Alternative C, the Proposed RMP.
In the Proposed RMP (Alternative C), Irish Canyon is designated as
an Area of Critical Environmental Concern (ACEC). The ACEC objective
would be to protect sensitive plants, remnant plant communities,
cultural and geologic values, and scenic quality. The area would be
closed to oil and gas leasing, limited to designated routes for OHVs,
withdrawn from locatable mineral entry, managed as Visual Resource
Management Class II, and designated as a right-of-way exclusion area
unless associated with valid existing rights.
ACEC proposals that were determined to meet the relevance and
importance criteria, but not designated as ACECs in the Proposed RMP
because they were deemed not warranted for special management attention
include: Lookout Mountain, Limestone Ridge, Cross Mountain Canyon,
White-tailed Prairie Dog habitat, and 11 additional areas proposed to
protect sensitive plants and plant communities (Cold Desert Shrublands
occurrences, Gibben's beardtongue occurrences, Bull Canyon, G Gap,
Little Juniper Canyon, the Bassett Spring, No Name Spring, Pot Creek,
Whiskey Springs, Willow Spring, and Deception Creek).
Instructions for filing a protest with the Director of the BLM
regarding the Proposed RMP/Final EIS may be found in the Dear Reader
letter of the Little Snake Proposed RMP/Final EIS and at 43 CFR 1610.5-
2. E-mail and faxed protests will not be considered as valid protests
unless the protesting party also provides the original letter by either
regular or overnight mail postmarked by the close of the protest
period. Under these conditions, the BLM will consider the e-mail or
faxed protest as an advance copy and it will receive full
consideration. If you wish to provide the BLM with such advance
notification, please direct faxed protests to the attention of Brenda
Hudgens-Williams, BLM protest coordinator, at (202) 912-7212, and e-
mails to Brenda_Hudgens-Williams@blm.gov.
All protests, including the follow-up letter (if e-mailing or
faxing) must be in writing and mailed to the appropriate address, as
set forth in the ADDRESSES section above.
Before including your phone number, e-mail address, or other
personal identifying information in your protest, you should be aware
that your entire protest--including your personal identifying
information--may be made publicly available at any time. While you can
ask us in your protest to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be
able to do so.
Helen M. Hankins,
State Director.
Authority: 40 CFR 1506.6, 43 CFR 1610.2 and 1610-1.
[FR Doc. 2010-19917 Filed 8-12-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-JB-P