Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model A300 B4-600, B4-600R, and F4-600R Series Airplanes, and Model C4-605R Variant F airplanes (Collectively Called A300-600 series airplanes); and A310 Series Airplanes, 49370-49375 [2010-19327]
Download as PDF
49370
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 156 / Friday, August 13, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
TABLE 1—ON-WING BORESCOPE INSPECTION—FURTHER ACTION AND REPETITIVE INSPECTION INTERVALS
Condition measured spline crest in accordance
with section 3.A of Rolls-Royce alert NMSB
RB.211–72–AG329, Revision 1, dated January
13, 2010, is:
(i) Less than 0.5 mm with no material remaining
(ii) Less than 0.5 mm with some material remaining.
(iii) Equal to or more than 0.5 mm but less than
1 mm.
(iv) Equal to or more than 1 mm but less than
1.5 mm.
(v) Equal to or more than 1.5 mm but less than
2 mm.
(vi) Equal to or more than 2 mm but less than
2.4 mm.
(vii) Equal to or more than 2.4 mm ....................
Note 1: The nominal unworn dimension of
the spline crest is 2.65 mm.
In-Shop Replacement and Inspection
(4) At the next shop visit after the effective
date of this AD perform the following:
(i) Replace any IP shaft coupling that was
previously borescope inspected in
accordance with paragraph (e)(1) of this AD
and put on a reduced re-inspection interval
in accordance with paragraphs (e)(3)(i)
through (e)(3)(vii) of this AD.
(ii) Inspect all other IP shaft coupling
splines using paragraphs 3.B.(2) or 3.B.(3) of
RR RB211 Trent 900 Series Propulsion
Systems Alert NMSB RB.211–72–AG329,
Revision 1, dated January 13, 2010.
Definitions
(5) For the purposes of this AD, a shop visit
is the induction of an engine into the shop
for maintenance involving the separation of
pairs of major mating engine flanges, except
that the separation of engine flanges solely
for the purposes of transportation without
subsequent engine maintenance does not
constitute an engine shop visit.
Compliance time/repetitive interval (not to exceed) flight cycles since last inspection
Action
Remove the engine ..........................................
Remove the engine ..........................................
Before next flight.
Within 10 flight cycles.
Repeat inspection ............................................
Within 50 flight cycles.
Repeat inspection ............................................
Within 100 flight cycles.
Repeat inspection ............................................
Within 200 flight cycles.
Repeat inspection ............................................
Within 300 flight cycles.
Repeat inspection ............................................
Within 400 flight cycles.
do the actions required by this AD, unless the
AD specifies otherwise.
(1) The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference of
this service information under 5 U.S.C.
552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
(2) For service information identified in
this AD, contact Rolls-Royce plc, P.O. Box
31, Derby, DE24 8BJ, United Kingdom;
telephone 044 1332 242424; fax 044 1332
249936.
(3) You may review copies at the FAA,
New England Region, 12 New England
Executive Park, Burlington, MA; or at the
National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For information on
the availability of this material at NARA, call
(202) 741–6030, or go to: https://www.
archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibrlocations.html.
Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts, on
July 26, 2010.
Peter A. White,
Assistant Manager, Engine and Propeller
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2010–18730 Filed 8–12–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
Other FAA AD Provisions
(g) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs): The Manager, Engine Certification
Office, FAA, has the authority to approve
AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the
procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES
FAA AD Differences
(f) None.
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Material Incorporated by Reference
(j) You must use Rolls-Royce RB211 Trent
900 Series Propulsion Systems Alert NonModification Service Bulletin RB.211–72–
AG329 Revision 1, dated January 13, 2010 to
15:00 Aug 12, 2010
Surface defects were visually detected on
the rudder of an [Airbus] A319 and an A321
in-service aeroplane. Investigation has
determined that the defects reported on both
rudders corresponded to areas that had been
reworked in production. The investigation
confirmed that the defects were the result of
de-bonding between the skin and honeycomb
core. Such reworks were also performed on
some rudders fitted on A310 and A300–600
aeroplanes.
An extended de-bonding, if not detected
and corrected, may degrade the structural
integrity of the rudder. The loss of the rudder
leads to degradation of the handling qualities
and reduces the controllability of the
aeroplane.
*
Related Information
(h) Refer to MCAI EASA Airworthiness
Directive 2010–0008, dated January 15, 2010,
for related information.
(i) Contact Ian Dargin, Aerospace Engineer,
Engine Certification Office, FAA, Engine and
Propeller Directorate, 12 New England
Executive Park, Burlington, MA 01803; email: ian.dargin@faa.gov; telephone (781)
238–7178; fax (781) 238–7199, for more
information about this AD.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
We are adopting a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above. This AD results
from mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI)
originated by an aviation authority of
another country to identify and correct
an unsafe condition on an aviation
product. The MCAI describes the unsafe
condition as:
SUMMARY:
Jkt 220001
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2010–0281; Directorate
Identifier 2009–NM–184–AD; Amendment
39–16390; AD 2010–16–13]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model
A300 B4–600, B4–600R, and F4–600R
Series Airplanes, and Model C4–605R
Variant F airplanes (Collectively Called
A300–600 series airplanes); and A310
Series Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
*
*
*
*
We are issuing this AD to require
actions to correct the unsafe condition
on these products.
DATES: This AD becomes effective
September 17, 2010. The Director of the
Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference of certain
publications listed in this AD as of
September 17, 2010.
ADDRESSES: You may examine the AD
docket on the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov or in person at the
U.S. Department of Transportation,
Docket Operations, M–30, West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dan
Rodina, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM–116,
Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
E:\FR\FM\13AUR1.SGM
13AUR1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 156 / Friday, August 13, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington 98057–3356; telephone
(425) 227–2125; fax (425) 227–1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Request for Clarification Regarding the
Requirement To Contact Airbus for
New Instructions for Rudders Installed
on Other Airplanes
Discussion
We issued a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to include an AD that would
apply to the specified products. That
NPRM was published in the Federal
Register on April 2, 2010 (75 FR 16685).
That NPRM proposed to correct an
unsafe condition for the specified
products. The MCAI states:
American Airlines requests
clarification concerning the requirement
to contact Airbus for new instructions if
rudders are installed on other airplanes.
American Airlines states that the NPRM
identifies rudders by rudder serial
number only and does not require
verification of airplane serial number;
however, Airbus All Operators Telexes
(AOT) A310–55A2048 and A300–
55A6047, both Revision 02, both dated
October 12, 2009, request contacting
Airbus for additional instructions for an
affected rudder if the data in Table 1 of
the referenced Technical Disposition
TD/K4/S1/27583/2009, Issue E, does not
match the airplane. American Airlines
states that since the rudder is a
removable structural component, it may
be moved to a new airplane. American
Airlines states that since inspections are
required only on the rudder, they agree
with the NPRM to not include the
airplane serial numbers in Table 1 of the
NPRM as there is no value in obtaining
new instructions simply because the
rudder has been installed on a different
airplane.
We agree that clarification is needed
to explain the requirement described
previously. In the NPRM, we referred to
the Airbus AOTs for accomplishment of
the inspections. We have added notes to
paragraphs (g) and (h) of this AD to state
that verification of the airplane serial
numbers is not required.
Surface defects were visually detected on
the rudder of an [Airbus] A319 and an A321
in-service aeroplane. Investigation has
determined that the defects reported on both
rudders corresponded to areas that had been
reworked in production. The investigation
confirmed that the defects were the result of
de-bonding between the skin and honeycomb
core. Such reworks were also performed on
some rudders fitted on A310 and A300–600
aeroplanes.
An extended de-bonding, if not detected
and corrected, may degrade the structural
integrity of the rudder. The loss of the rudder
leads to degradation of the handling qualities
and reduces the controllability of the
aeroplane.
To address this unsafe condition [this
EASA AD] requires inspections of specific
areas and, depending on findings, the
application of corrective actions for those
rudders where production reworks have been
identified.
This * * * [EASA] AD * * * [also]
requires for the vacuum loss hole restoration:
—A local ultrasonic inspection for reinforced
area instead of the local thermographic
inspection, which is maintained for nonreinforced areas, and
—additional work performance for rudders
on which this thermographic inspection
has been performed in the reinforced area.
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES
The inspections include vacuum loss
inspections and elasticity laminate
checker inspections for defects
including de-bonding between the skin
and honeycomb core of the rudder, and
ultrasonic inspections for rudders on
which temporary restoration with resin
or permanent vacuum loss hole
restoration has been performed. The
corrective action is contacting the
manufacturer for repair instructions and
doing the repair. We are considering
similar rulemaking action on Model
A319 and A321 airplanes. You may
obtain further information by examining
the MCAI in the AD docket.
Comments
We gave the public the opportunity to
participate in developing this AD. We
considered the comments received.
FedEx comments that the proposed
compliance times fit within their
planned scheduled maintenance check.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:00 Aug 12, 2010
Jkt 220001
Request To Change Compliance Time
American Airlines requests that the
compliance time for the initial
inspections (specified in the NPRM as
‘‘within 8 months of the effective date of
the AD’’) be revised to represent 8
months in-service time. American
Airlines’ fleet of Model A300–600 series
airplanes has been retired from active
service and is in long-term storage.
American Airlines states that previous
investigations of the Model A300–600/
A310 series airplanes rudders suggest
that disbonding damage grows under
vacuum air-ground cycling and that a
previous study on a Model A310
airplane had shown no reduction in
stiffness due to age. American Airlines
suggests that it is unlikely that
additional disbonding or degradation
will occur on the affected rudders in
storage, therefore requests that the
compliance time represent 8 months inservice time. American Airlines states
that this will allow for more efficient
planning and will relieve the burden of
obtaining special flight permits to move
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
49371
re-activated airplanes to facilities where
the inspections are to be performed.
We agree to revise the proposed
compliance time for the reason stated by
the commenter. We have added a
compliance time of within 840 flight
hours after the effective date of this AD
to paragraphs (g)(1), (g)(2), (g)(4), (g)(6),
(h)(1), (h)(2), (h)(4), and (h)(6) of this
AD. We have determined that 840 flight
hours represents approximately 8
months given average utilization.
Request To Include Costs of Special
Equipment
American Airlines requests that the
cost of the elasticity laminate checker
and the vacuum loss inspection
equipment be included in the proposed
cost estimate. American Airlines
considers the equipment for both
inspections to be special tooling and the
inspection methods to be of limited
application.
We agree that the cost of this special
equipment should be included in the
cost estimate specified in this AD. The
Cost Estimate section of the final rule
has been changed accordingly.
Request To Remove Reporting
Requirement for Negative Responses
American Airlines requests that the
reporting requirement for a negative
response be removed from the NPRM.
American Airlines states that Airbus All
Operators Telexes A310–55A2048 and
A300–55A6047, both Revision 02, both
dated October 12, 2009, request
reporting both positive and negative
findings. American Airlines states that
reporting negative findings has no effect
on airplane safety and merely adds
administrative burden to the operator,
which could create compliance issues
due to delays in the processing of
paperwork.
We agree that negative responses need
not be reported. We have removed the
requirement to report if no defects are
found from this AD (paragraphs (g)(11)
and (h)(11) of the NPRM specified
reporting if no defects are found).
Change to Cost of Compliance
We have revised the Costs of
Compliance section of this AD. The
work-hour estimate has been changed
from 4 work-hours to 12 work-hours to
match the work-hours specified in the
service information, which increases the
costs accordingly.
Conclusion
We reviewed the available data,
including the comments received, and
determined that air safety and the
public interest require adopting the AD
with the changes described previously.
E:\FR\FM\13AUR1.SGM
13AUR1
49372
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 156 / Friday, August 13, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
We determined that these changes will
not increase the economic burden on
any operator or increase the scope of the
AD.
Differences Between This AD and the
MCAI or Service Information
We have reviewed the MCAI and
related service information and, in
general, agree with their substance. But
we might have found it necessary to use
different words from those in the MCAI
to ensure the AD is clear for U.S.
operators and is enforceable. In making
these changes, we do not intend to differ
substantively from the information
provided in the MCAI and related
service information.
We might also have required different
actions in this AD from those in the
MCAI in order to follow our FAA
policies. Any such differences are
highlighted in a NOTE within the AD.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this AD will affect
194 products of U.S. registry. We also
estimate that it will take about 12 workhours per product to comply with the
basic requirements of this AD. The
average labor rate is $85 per work-hour.
Tooling costs for each operator will cost
about $24,602. There are three affected
US operators. Based on these figures, we
estimate the cost of this AD to the U.S.
operators to be $197,880, or $1,020 per
product, plus the tooling costs of
$24,602 for each operator.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. ‘‘Subtitle VII:
Aviation Programs,’’ describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in ‘‘Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701:
General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this AD will not
have federalism implications under
Executive Order 13132. This AD will
not have a substantial direct effect on
the States, on the relationship between
the national government and the States,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify this AD:
1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866;
2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation
of the estimated costs to comply with
this AD and placed it in the AD docket.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the
Docket Operations office between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains the NPRM, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and
other information. The street address for
the Docket Operations office (telephone
(800) 647–5527) is in the ADDRESSES
section. Comments will be available in
the AD docket shortly after receipt.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as
follows:
■
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
the following new AD:
■
2010–16–13 Airbus: Amendment 39–16390.
Docket No. FAA–2010–0281; Directorate
Identifier 2009–NM–184–AD.
Effective Date
(a) This airworthiness directive (AD)
becomes effective September 17, 2010.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to Airbus Model A300
B4–601, B4–603, B4–620, B4–622, B4–605R,
B4–622R, F4–605R, F4–622R, and C4–605R
Variant F airplanes; and Model A310–203,
–204, –221, –222, –304, –322, –324, and –325
airplanes; certificated in any category;
equipped with carbon fiber reinforced plastic
rudders having part numbers and serial
numbers listed in Table 1 of this AD.
TABLE 1—RUDDER INFORMATION
Affected
rudder
Serial No.
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES
Rudder part No.
A554–71500–016–91
A554–71500–016–91
A554–71500–016–91
A554–71500–016–91
A554–71500–016–91
A554–71500–014–00
A554–71500–014–00
A554–71500–016–00
A554–71500–016–00
A554–71500–016–00
A554–71500–026–00
A554–71710–000–00
A554–71710–000–00
A554–71710–000–00
A554–71710–000–00
VerDate Mar<15>2010
...............................................................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................................................
15:00 Aug 12, 2010
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\13AUR1.SGM
13AUR1
HF–1017
HF–1020
HF–1059
HF–1061
HF–1064
HF–1087
HF–1119
HF–1189
HF–1203
HF–1266
TS–1405
TS–2001
TS–2004
TS–2007
TS–2009
Core density
24kg/m3
Yes.
No.
No.
No.
No.
Yes.
Yes.
Yes.
Yes.
Yes.
No.
No.
No.
No.
No.
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 156 / Friday, August 13, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
49373
TABLE 1—RUDDER INFORMATION—Continued
Affected
rudder
Serial No.
Rudder part No.
A554–71710–000–00
A554–71710–000–00
A554–71710–000–00
A554–71710–000–00
A554–71710–000–00
A554–71710–000–00
A554–71710–000–00
A554–71710–000–00
A554–71710–000–00
A554–71710–000–00
A554–71710–000–00
A554–71710–000–00
A554–71710–000–00
A554–71710–000–00
A554–71710–000–00
A554–71710–002–00
A554–71710–002–00
A554–71710–002–00
A554–71710–002–00
A554–71710–002–00
A554–71710–002–00
A554–71710–002–00
A554–71710–004–00
A554–71710–004–00
A554–71710–004–00
A554–71710–004–00
A554–71710–004–00
A554–71710–004–00
A554–71710–004–00
A554–71710–004–00
A554–71710–004–00
A554–71710–004–00
A554–71710–004–00
...............................................................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................................................
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES
Subject
(d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of
America Code 55: Stabilizers.
Reason
(e) The mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI) states:
Surface defects were visually detected on
the rudder of an [Airbus] A319 and an A321
in-service aeroplane. Investigation has
determined that the defects reported on both
rudders corresponded to areas that had been
reworked in production. The investigation
confirmed that the defects were the result of
de-bonding between the skin and honeycomb
core. Such reworks were also performed on
some rudders fitted on A310 and A300–600
aeroplanes.
An extended de-bonding, if not detected
and corrected, may degrade the structural
integrity of the rudder. The loss of the rudder
leads to degradation of the handling qualities
and reduces the controllability of the
aeroplane.
To address this unsafe condition [this
EASA AD] requires inspections of specific
areas and, depending on findings, the
application of corrective actions for those
rudders where production reworks have been
identified. This * * * [EASA] AD * * *
[also] requires for the vacuum loss hole
restoration:
—A local ultrasonic inspection for reinforced
area instead of the local thermographic
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:00 Aug 12, 2010
Jkt 220001
inspection, which is maintained for nonreinforced areas, and
—Additional work performance for rudders
on which this thermographic inspection
has been performed in the reinforced area.
The inspections include vacuum loss
inspections and elasticity laminate checker
inspections for defects including de-bonding
between the skin and honeycomb core of the
rudder, and ultrasonic inspections for
rudders on which temporary restoration with
resin or permanent vacuum loss hole
restoration has been performed. The
corrective action is contacting the
manufacturer for repair instructions and
doing the repair. We are considering similar
rulemaking action on Model A319 and A321
airplanes.
Compliance
(f) You are responsible for having the
actions required by this AD performed within
the compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.
Actions and Compliance
(g) For rudders with a honeycomb core
density of 24 kg/m3, as identified in Table 1
of this AD, do the actions required in
paragraphs (g)(1) through (g)(10) of this AD,
in accordance with Airbus All Operators
Telex (AOT) A310–55A2048 or A300–
55A6047, both Revision 02, both dated
October 12, 2009, as applicable.
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
TS–2011
TS–2012
TS–2013
TS–2014
TS–2016
TS–2017
TS–2018
TS–2020
TS–2021
TS–2022
TS–2024
TS–2025
TS–2026
TS–2028
TS–2029
TS–2031
TS–2032
TS–2035
TS–2040
TS–2041
TS–2044
TS–2046
TS–2050
TS–2056
TS–2058
TS–2060
TS–2062
TS–2065
TS–2066
TS–2074
TS–2075
TS–2076
TS–2079
Core density
24kg/m3
No.
No.
No.
No.
No.
No.
No.
No.
No.
No.
No.
No.
No.
No.
No.
No.
No.
No.
No.
No.
No.
No.
No.
No.
No.
No.
No.
No.
No.
No.
No.
No.
No.
Note 1: Verification of the airplane serial
numbers is not required.
(1) In the reinforced location: Within 8
months or 840 flight hours after the effective
date of this AD, whichever occurs later, do
a vacuum loss inspection to detect defects
including de-bonding.
(2) In the trailing edge location: Within 24
months or 840 flight hours after the effective
date of this AD, whichever occurs later, do
an elasticity laminate checker inspection to
detect defects including de-bonding.
(3) Repeat the inspection required by
paragraph (g)(2) of this AD two times at
intervals not to exceed 4,500 flight cycles,
but not fewer than 4,000 flight cycles from
the last inspection.
(4) In other locations (lower rib/upper
edge/leading edge/other locations): Within 8
months or 840 flight hours after the effective
date of this AD, whichever occurs later, do
an elasticity laminate checker inspection to
detect defects including de-bonding.
(5) Repeat the inspection required by
paragraph (g)(4) of this AD at intervals not to
exceed 8 months from the last inspection.
(6) Within 24 months or 840 flight hours
after the effective date of this AD, whichever
occurs later, do a vacuum loss inspection on
the other locations (lower rib/upper edge/
leading edge/other locations) to detect
defects including de-bonding.
(7) Accomplishment of the inspection
required by paragraph (g)(6) of this AD
E:\FR\FM\13AUR1.SGM
13AUR1
49374
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 156 / Friday, August 13, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
terminates the initial and repetitive
inspections required by paragraphs (g)(4) and
(g)(5) of this AD.
(8) If any defect is found during any
inspection required by paragraph (g)(1),
(g)(2), (g)(4), or (g)(6) of this AD, before
further flight, contact Airbus for repair
instructions and do the repair.
(9) If no defects are found during any
inspection required by paragraphs (g)(1) and
(g)(6) of this AD, before further flight, restore
the vacuum loss holes with temporary
restoration with self-adhesive patches,
temporary restoration with resin, or
permanent restoration with resin and surface
protection, and repeat the inspection
required by paragraph (g)(3) of this AD at
intervals not to exceed 4,500 flight cycles
until permanent restoration is completed.
(10) If any defect is found during any
inspection required by paragraphs (g)(1),
(g)(2), (g)(4), and (g)(6) of this AD, at the
applicable time specified in paragraph
(g)(10)(i) or (g)(10)(ii) of this AD: Report the
inspection results to Airbus SAS, SEER1/
SEER2/SEER3, Customer Services, 1 Rond
Point Maurice Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac
Cedex, France; fax +33 (0) 5 61 93 28 73; or
e-mail to
region1.StructureRepairSupport@airbus.com,
region2.StructureRepairSupport@airbus.com,
or
region3.StructureRepairSupport@airbus.com.
(i) Inspections done before the effective
date of this AD: Within 30 days after the
effective date of this AD.
(ii) Inspections done on or after the
effective date of this AD: Within 30 days after
accomplishment of the inspection.
(h) For rudders not having a honeycomb
core density of 24 kg/m3, as identified in
Table 1 of this AD, do the actions required
in paragraphs (h)(1) through (h)(10) of this
AD, in accordance with Airbus AOT A310–
55A2048 or AOT A300–55A6047, both
Revision 02, both dated October 12, 2009, as
applicable.
Note 2: Verification of the airplane serial
numbers is not required.
(1) In the reinforced location: Within 8
months after the rudder has accumulated
13,000 flight cycles since first installation, or
within 8 months after the effective date of
this AD, or within 840 flight hours after the
effective date of this AD; whichever occurs
latest, do a vacuum loss inspection to detect
defects including de-bonding.
(2) In the trailing edge location: Within 24
months after the rudder has accumulated
13,000 flight cycles since first installation, or
within 24 months after the effective date of
this AD, or within 840 flight hours after the
effective date of this AD, whichever occurs
latest, do an elasticity laminate checker
inspection to detect defects including debonding.
(3) Repeat the inspection required by
paragraph (h)(2) of this AD two times at
intervals not to exceed 4,500 flight cycles,
but not fewer than 4,000 flight cycles from
the last inspection.
(4) In other locations (lower rib/upper
edge/leading edge/other locations): Within 8
months after the rudder has accumulated
13,000 flight cycles since first installation, or
within 8 months after the effective date of
this AD, or within 840 flight hours after the
effective date of this AD, whichever occurs
latest; do an elasticity laminate checker
inspection to detect defects including debonding.
(5) Repeat the inspection required by
paragraph (h)(4) of this AD at intervals not
to exceed 8 months from the last inspection.
(6) Within 24 months after the rudder has
accumulated 13,000 flight cycles since first
installation, or within 24 months after the
effective date of this AD, or within 840 flight
hours after the effective date of this AD,
whichever occurs latest, do a vacuum loss
inspection on the other locations (lower rib/
upper edge/leading edge/other location) to
detect defects including de-bonding.
(7) Accomplishment of the inspection
required by paragraph (h)(6) of this AD
terminates the initial and repetitive
inspections required by paragraphs (h)(4) and
(h)(5) of this AD.
(8) If any defect is found during any
inspection required by paragraph (h)(1),
(h)(2), (h)(4), or (h)(6) of this AD, before
further flight, contact Airbus for repair
instructions and do the repair.
(9) If no defects are found during the
inspections required by paragraphs (h)(1) and
(h)(6) of this AD, before further flight, restore
the vacuum loss holes with the temporary
restoration with self adhesive patches,
temporary restoration with resin, or
permanent restoration with resin and surface
protection, and repeat the inspection
required by paragraph (h)(3) of this AD at
intervals not to exceed 4,500 flight cycles
until permanent restoration is completed.
(10) If any defect is found during any
inspection required by paragraphs (h)(1),
(h)(2), (h)(4), and (h)(6) of this AD, at the
applicable time specified in paragraph
(h)(10)(i) or (h)(10)(ii) of this AD: Report the
inspection results to Airbus SAS, SEER1/
SEER2/SEER3, Customer Services, 1 Rond
Point Maurice Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac
Cedex, France; fax +33 (0) 5 61 93 28 73; or
e-mail to
region1.StructureRepairSupport@airbus.com,
region2.StructureRepairSupport@airbus.com,
or
region3.StructureRepairSupport@airbus.com.
(i) Inspections done before the effective
date of this AD: Within 30 days after the
effective date of this AD.
(ii) Inspections done on or after the
effective date of this AD: Within 30 days after
accomplishment of the inspection.
(i) Actions done before the effective date of
this AD, in accordance with the service
information listed in Table 2 of this AD, are
acceptable for compliance with the
requirements of paragraphs (g) and (h) of this
AD for the areas inspected, for any rudder
listed in Table 1 of this AD.
(j) Additional areas requiring inspection for
all airplanes are defined in Airbus AOT
A310–55A2048 or AOT A300–55A6047, both
Revision 02, both dated October 12, 2009, as
applicable. For these additional areas, do the
actions required in paragraphs (g) and (h) of
this AD, as applicable, at the times specified
in those paragraphs. For all areas, do the
repetitive inspections required by paragraphs
(g) and (h) of this AD as applicable at the
times specified in those paragraphs.
TABLE 2—CREDIT SERVICE INFORMATION
Airbus AOT—
Revision—
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES
A300–55A6047
A300–55A6047
A310–55A2048
A310–55A2048
.......................................................................
.......................................................................
.......................................................................
.......................................................................
(k) For rudders on which temporary
restoration with resin or permanent vacuum
loss hole restoration has been done in
accordance with the applicable service
bulletin specified in Table 2 of this AD, as
required in paragraph (g)(9) or (h)(9) of this
AD, before the effective date of this AD:
Within 4,500 flight cycles from the
restoration date, do an ultrasonic inspection
for defects, including debonding of the
reinforced area, in accordance with Airbus
AOT A310–55A2048 or AOT A300–55A6047,
both Revision 02, both dated October 12,
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:00 Aug 12, 2010
Jkt 220001
Dated—
Original ...................................................................................
01 ...........................................................................................
Original ...................................................................................
01 ...........................................................................................
May 11, 2009.
July 8, 2009.
May 11, 2009.
July 8, 2009.
2009, as applicable. If any defect is found,
before further flight, contact Airbus for repair
instructions and do the repair.
(l) After the effective date of this AD, no
person may install any rudder listed in Table
1 of this AD on any airplane, unless the
rudder has been inspected and all applicable
corrective actions have been done in
accordance with paragraph (g) or (h) of this
AD.
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
FAA AD Differences
Note 3: This AD differs from the MCAI
and/or service information as follows: No
differences.
Other FAA AD Provisions
(m) The following provisions also apply to
this AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs): The Manager, International
Branch, ANM–116, FAA, has the authority to
approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested
E:\FR\FM\13AUR1.SGM
13AUR1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 156 / Friday, August 13, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
Send information to ATTN: Dan Rodina,
Aerospace Engineer, International Branch,
ANM–116, Transport Airplane Directorate,
FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington 98057–3356; telephone (425)
227–2125; fax (425) 227–1149. Before using
any approved AMOC on any airplane to
which the AMOC applies, notify your
principal maintenance inspector (PMI) or
principal avionics inspector (PAI), as
appropriate, or lacking a principal inspector,
your local Flight Standards District Office.
The AMOC approval letter must specifically
reference this AD.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any
requirement in this AD to obtain corrective
actions from a manufacturer or other source,
use these actions if they are FAA-approved.
Corrective actions are considered FAAapproved if they are approved by the State
of Design Authority (or their delegated
agent). You are required to assure the product
is airworthy before it is returned to service.
(3) Reporting Requirements: For any
reporting requirement in this AD, under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act
(44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) has
approved the information collection
requirements and has assigned OMB Control
Number 2120–0056.
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES
Related Information
(n) Refer to MCAI European Aviation
Safety Agency (EASA) Airworthiness
Directive 2010–0002, dated January 5, 2010;
Airbus AOT A310–55A2048, Revision 02,
dated October 12, 2009; and Airbus AOT
A300–55A6047, Revision 02, dated October
12, 2009; for related information.
Material Incorporated by Reference
(o) You must use Airbus All Operators
Telex A300–55A6047, Revision 02, dated
October 12, 2009; or Airbus All Operators
Telex A310–55A2048, Revision 02, dated
October 12, 2009; as applicable; to do the
actions required by this AD, unless the AD
specifies otherwise. (The document number,
revision level, and date appear only on page
1 of the AOTs; no other page of these
documents contains this information)
(1) The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference of
this service information under 5 U.S.C.
552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
(2) For service information identified in
this AD, contact Airbus SAS—EAW
(Airworthiness Office), 1 Rond Point Maurice
Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Cedex, France;
telephone +33 5 61 93 36 96; fax +33 5 61
93 44 51; e-mail: account.airwortheas@airbus.com; Internet: https://
www.airbus.com.
(3) You may review copies of the service
information at the FAA, Transport Airplane
Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA, call
425–227–1221.
(4) You may also review copies of the
service information that is incorporated by
reference at the National Archives and
Records Administration (NARA). For
information on the availability of this
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:00 Aug 12, 2010
Jkt 220001
material at NARA, call 202–741–6030, or go
to: https://www.archives.gov/federal_register/
code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.
html.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on July 28,
2010.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2010–19327 Filed 8–12–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2010–0704; Directorate
Identifier 2010–NM–037–AD; Amendment
39–16389; AD 2010–16–12]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing
Company Model 777–200LR and
–300ER Series Airplanes Equipped
with GE90–100 Series Engines
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule; request for
comments.
AGENCY:
We are adopting a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for certain
Model 777–200LR and –300ER series
airplanes equipped with GE90–100
series engines. This AD requires
replacing the insulation blanket
fasteners of the lower aft cowl of the
thrust reverser. This AD also requires
inspecting the oil scavenge tube on the
turbine rear frame of the engine for
damage, and replacement if necessary.
This AD results from a determination of
insufficient clearance and subsequent
interference between the oil scavenge
tube on the turbine rear frame of the
engine and the bolt on the aft cowl
insulation blanket of the thrust reverser.
We are issuing this AD to prevent
damage and possible puncture of the oil
scavenge tube and consequent oil loss,
which could result in an in-flight
shutdown of the engine.
DATES: This AD is effective August 30,
2010.
The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
of certain publications listed in the AD
as of August 30, 2010.
We must receive comments on this
AD by September 27, 2010.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by
any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
49375
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
For service information identified in
this AD, contact Boeing Commercial
Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services
Management, P.O. Box 3707, MC 2H–65,
Seattle, Washington 98124–2207;
telephone 206–544–5000, extension 1,
fax 206–766–5680; e-mail
me.boecom@boeing.com; Internet
https://www.myboeingfleet.com.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the
Docket Management Facility between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD
docket contains this AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and
other information. The street address for
the Docket Office (telephone 800–647–
5527) is in the ADDRESSES section.
Comments will be available in the AD
docket shortly after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Margaret Langsted, Aerospace Engineer,
Propulsion Branch, ANM–140S, FAA,
Seattle Aircraft Certification Office,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington 98057–3356; telephone
(425) 917–6500; fax (425) 917–6590.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
Boeing has determined that
insufficient clearance and subsequent
interference exists between the oil
scavenge tube on the turbine rear frame
of the engine and the bolt on the aft
cowl insulation blanket. This location
could encounter interference under
flight loads. Damage to the oil scavenge
tube was confirmed after flight on
undelivered airplanes. Several inservice airplanes had sustained damage
(dents, gouges, or chafing) because of
the interference condition. This
condition, if not corrected, could result
in possible puncture of the oil scavenge
tube and consequent oil loss, resulting
in an in-flight shutdown of the engine.
Relevant Service Information
We reviewed Boeing Alert Service
Bulletin 777–78A0070, dated November
20, 2008. This service bulletin describes
E:\FR\FM\13AUR1.SGM
13AUR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 156 (Friday, August 13, 2010)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 49370-49375]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-19327]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2010-0281; Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-184-AD;
Amendment 39-16390; AD 2010-16-13]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model A300 B4-600, B4-600R, and
F4-600R Series Airplanes, and Model C4-605R Variant F airplanes
(Collectively Called A300-600 series airplanes); and A310 Series
Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above. This AD results from mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI) originated by an aviation authority of
another country to identify and correct an unsafe condition on an
aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe condition as:
Surface defects were visually detected on the rudder of an
[Airbus] A319 and an A321 in-service aeroplane. Investigation has
determined that the defects reported on both rudders corresponded to
areas that had been reworked in production. The investigation
confirmed that the defects were the result of de-bonding between the
skin and honeycomb core. Such reworks were also performed on some
rudders fitted on A310 and A300-600 aeroplanes.
An extended de-bonding, if not detected and corrected, may
degrade the structural integrity of the rudder. The loss of the
rudder leads to degradation of the handling qualities and reduces
the controllability of the aeroplane.
* * * * *
We are issuing this AD to require actions to correct the unsafe
condition on these products.
DATES: This AD becomes effective September 17, 2010. The Director of
the Federal Register approved the incorporation by reference of certain
publications listed in this AD as of September 17, 2010.
ADDRESSES: You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov or in person at the U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dan Rodina, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
[[Page 49371]]
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98057-3356; telephone (425)
227-2125; fax (425) 227-1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to include an AD that would apply to the specified products.
That NPRM was published in the Federal Register on April 2, 2010 (75 FR
16685). That NPRM proposed to correct an unsafe condition for the
specified products. The MCAI states:
Surface defects were visually detected on the rudder of an
[Airbus] A319 and an A321 in-service aeroplane. Investigation has
determined that the defects reported on both rudders corresponded to
areas that had been reworked in production. The investigation
confirmed that the defects were the result of de-bonding between the
skin and honeycomb core. Such reworks were also performed on some
rudders fitted on A310 and A300-600 aeroplanes.
An extended de-bonding, if not detected and corrected, may
degrade the structural integrity of the rudder. The loss of the
rudder leads to degradation of the handling qualities and reduces
the controllability of the aeroplane.
To address this unsafe condition [this EASA AD] requires
inspections of specific areas and, depending on findings, the
application of corrective actions for those rudders where production
reworks have been identified.
This * * * [EASA] AD * * * [also] requires for the vacuum loss
hole restoration:
--A local ultrasonic inspection for reinforced area instead of the
local thermographic inspection, which is maintained for non-
reinforced areas, and
--additional work performance for rudders on which this
thermographic inspection has been performed in the reinforced area.
The inspections include vacuum loss inspections and elasticity laminate
checker inspections for defects including de-bonding between the skin
and honeycomb core of the rudder, and ultrasonic inspections for
rudders on which temporary restoration with resin or permanent vacuum
loss hole restoration has been performed. The corrective action is
contacting the manufacturer for repair instructions and doing the
repair. We are considering similar rulemaking action on Model A319 and
A321 airplanes. You may obtain further information by examining the
MCAI in the AD docket.
Comments
We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this AD. We considered the comments received. FedEx comments that the
proposed compliance times fit within their planned scheduled
maintenance check.
Request for Clarification Regarding the Requirement To Contact Airbus
for New Instructions for Rudders Installed on Other Airplanes
American Airlines requests clarification concerning the requirement
to contact Airbus for new instructions if rudders are installed on
other airplanes. American Airlines states that the NPRM identifies
rudders by rudder serial number only and does not require verification
of airplane serial number; however, Airbus All Operators Telexes (AOT)
A310-55A2048 and A300-55A6047, both Revision 02, both dated October 12,
2009, request contacting Airbus for additional instructions for an
affected rudder if the data in Table 1 of the referenced Technical
Disposition TD/K4/S1/27583/2009, Issue E, does not match the airplane.
American Airlines states that since the rudder is a removable
structural component, it may be moved to a new airplane. American
Airlines states that since inspections are required only on the rudder,
they agree with the NPRM to not include the airplane serial numbers in
Table 1 of the NPRM as there is no value in obtaining new instructions
simply because the rudder has been installed on a different airplane.
We agree that clarification is needed to explain the requirement
described previously. In the NPRM, we referred to the Airbus AOTs for
accomplishment of the inspections. We have added notes to paragraphs
(g) and (h) of this AD to state that verification of the airplane
serial numbers is not required.
Request To Change Compliance Time
American Airlines requests that the compliance time for the initial
inspections (specified in the NPRM as ``within 8 months of the
effective date of the AD'') be revised to represent 8 months in-service
time. American Airlines' fleet of Model A300-600 series airplanes has
been retired from active service and is in long-term storage. American
Airlines states that previous investigations of the Model A300-600/A310
series airplanes rudders suggest that disbonding damage grows under
vacuum air-ground cycling and that a previous study on a Model A310
airplane had shown no reduction in stiffness due to age. American
Airlines suggests that it is unlikely that additional disbonding or
degradation will occur on the affected rudders in storage, therefore
requests that the compliance time represent 8 months in-service time.
American Airlines states that this will allow for more efficient
planning and will relieve the burden of obtaining special flight
permits to move re-activated airplanes to facilities where the
inspections are to be performed.
We agree to revise the proposed compliance time for the reason
stated by the commenter. We have added a compliance time of within 840
flight hours after the effective date of this AD to paragraphs (g)(1),
(g)(2), (g)(4), (g)(6), (h)(1), (h)(2), (h)(4), and (h)(6) of this AD.
We have determined that 840 flight hours represents approximately 8
months given average utilization.
Request To Include Costs of Special Equipment
American Airlines requests that the cost of the elasticity laminate
checker and the vacuum loss inspection equipment be included in the
proposed cost estimate. American Airlines considers the equipment for
both inspections to be special tooling and the inspection methods to be
of limited application.
We agree that the cost of this special equipment should be included
in the cost estimate specified in this AD. The Cost Estimate section of
the final rule has been changed accordingly.
Request To Remove Reporting Requirement for Negative Responses
American Airlines requests that the reporting requirement for a
negative response be removed from the NPRM. American Airlines states
that Airbus All Operators Telexes A310-55A2048 and A300-55A6047, both
Revision 02, both dated October 12, 2009, request reporting both
positive and negative findings. American Airlines states that reporting
negative findings has no effect on airplane safety and merely adds
administrative burden to the operator, which could create compliance
issues due to delays in the processing of paperwork.
We agree that negative responses need not be reported. We have
removed the requirement to report if no defects are found from this AD
(paragraphs (g)(11) and (h)(11) of the NPRM specified reporting if no
defects are found).
Change to Cost of Compliance
We have revised the Costs of Compliance section of this AD. The
work-hour estimate has been changed from 4 work-hours to 12 work-hours
to match the work-hours specified in the service information, which
increases the costs accordingly.
Conclusion
We reviewed the available data, including the comments received,
and determined that air safety and the public interest require adopting
the AD with the changes described previously.
[[Page 49372]]
We determined that these changes will not increase the economic burden
on any operator or increase the scope of the AD.
Differences Between This AD and the MCAI or Service Information
We have reviewed the MCAI and related service information and, in
general, agree with their substance. But we might have found it
necessary to use different words from those in the MCAI to ensure the
AD is clear for U.S. operators and is enforceable. In making these
changes, we do not intend to differ substantively from the information
provided in the MCAI and related service information.
We might also have required different actions in this AD from those
in the MCAI in order to follow our FAA policies. Any such differences
are highlighted in a NOTE within the AD.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this AD will affect 194 products of U.S. registry.
We also estimate that it will take about 12 work-hours per product to
comply with the basic requirements of this AD. The average labor rate
is $85 per work-hour. Tooling costs for each operator will cost about
$24,602. There are three affected US operators. Based on these figures,
we estimate the cost of this AD to the U.S. operators to be $197,880,
or $1,020 per product, plus the tooling costs of $24,602 for each
operator.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this AD will not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify this AD:
1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this AD and placed it in the AD docket.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Operations office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains the NPRM, the regulatory evaluation,
any comments received, and other information. The street address for
the Docket Operations office (telephone (800) 647-5527) is in the
ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly
after receipt.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
0
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new AD:
2010-16-13 Airbus: Amendment 39-16390. Docket No. FAA-2010-0281;
Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-184-AD.
Effective Date
(a) This airworthiness directive (AD) becomes effective
September 17, 2010.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to Airbus Model A300 B4-601, B4-603, B4-620,
B4-622, B4-605R, B4-622R, F4-605R, F4-622R, and C4-605R Variant F
airplanes; and Model A310-203, -204, -221, -222, -304, -322, -324,
and -325 airplanes; certificated in any category; equipped with
carbon fiber reinforced plastic rudders having part numbers and
serial numbers listed in Table 1 of this AD.
Table 1--Rudder Information
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Affected
Rudder part No. rudder Serial Core density
No. 24kg/m\3\
------------------------------------------------------------------------
A554-71500-016-91....................... HF-1017 Yes.
A554-71500-016-91....................... HF-1020 No.
A554-71500-016-91....................... HF-1059 No.
A554-71500-016-91....................... HF-1061 No.
A554-71500-016-91....................... HF-1064 No.
A554-71500-014-00....................... HF-1087 Yes.
A554-71500-014-00....................... HF-1119 Yes.
A554-71500-016-00....................... HF-1189 Yes.
A554-71500-016-00....................... HF-1203 Yes.
A554-71500-016-00....................... HF-1266 Yes.
A554-71500-026-00....................... TS-1405 No.
A554-71710-000-00....................... TS-2001 No.
A554-71710-000-00....................... TS-2004 No.
A554-71710-000-00....................... TS-2007 No.
A554-71710-000-00....................... TS-2009 No.
[[Page 49373]]
A554-71710-000-00....................... TS-2011 No.
A554-71710-000-00....................... TS-2012 No.
A554-71710-000-00....................... TS-2013 No.
A554-71710-000-00....................... TS-2014 No.
A554-71710-000-00....................... TS-2016 No.
A554-71710-000-00....................... TS-2017 No.
A554-71710-000-00....................... TS-2018 No.
A554-71710-000-00....................... TS-2020 No.
A554-71710-000-00....................... TS-2021 No.
A554-71710-000-00....................... TS-2022 No.
A554-71710-000-00....................... TS-2024 No.
A554-71710-000-00....................... TS-2025 No.
A554-71710-000-00....................... TS-2026 No.
A554-71710-000-00....................... TS-2028 No.
A554-71710-000-00....................... TS-2029 No.
A554-71710-002-00....................... TS-2031 No.
A554-71710-002-00....................... TS-2032 No.
A554-71710-002-00....................... TS-2035 No.
A554-71710-002-00....................... TS-2040 No.
A554-71710-002-00....................... TS-2041 No.
A554-71710-002-00....................... TS-2044 No.
A554-71710-002-00....................... TS-2046 No.
A554-71710-004-00....................... TS-2050 No.
A554-71710-004-00....................... TS-2056 No.
A554-71710-004-00....................... TS-2058 No.
A554-71710-004-00....................... TS-2060 No.
A554-71710-004-00....................... TS-2062 No.
A554-71710-004-00....................... TS-2065 No.
A554-71710-004-00....................... TS-2066 No.
A554-71710-004-00....................... TS-2074 No.
A554-71710-004-00....................... TS-2075 No.
A554-71710-004-00....................... TS-2076 No.
A554-71710-004-00....................... TS-2079 No.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subject
(d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 55:
Stabilizers.
Reason
(e) The mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI)
states:
Surface defects were visually detected on the rudder of an
[Airbus] A319 and an A321 in-service aeroplane. Investigation has
determined that the defects reported on both rudders corresponded to
areas that had been reworked in production. The investigation
confirmed that the defects were the result of de-bonding between the
skin and honeycomb core. Such reworks were also performed on some
rudders fitted on A310 and A300-600 aeroplanes.
An extended de-bonding, if not detected and corrected, may
degrade the structural integrity of the rudder. The loss of the
rudder leads to degradation of the handling qualities and reduces
the controllability of the aeroplane.
To address this unsafe condition [this EASA AD] requires
inspections of specific areas and, depending on findings, the
application of corrective actions for those rudders where production
reworks have been identified. This * * * [EASA] AD * * * [also]
requires for the vacuum loss hole restoration:
--A local ultrasonic inspection for reinforced area instead of the
local thermographic inspection, which is maintained for non-
reinforced areas, and
--Additional work performance for rudders on which this
thermographic inspection has been performed in the reinforced area.
The inspections include vacuum loss inspections and elasticity
laminate checker inspections for defects including de-bonding
between the skin and honeycomb core of the rudder, and ultrasonic
inspections for rudders on which temporary restoration with resin or
permanent vacuum loss hole restoration has been performed. The
corrective action is contacting the manufacturer for repair
instructions and doing the repair. We are considering similar
rulemaking action on Model A319 and A321 airplanes.
Compliance
(f) You are responsible for having the actions required by this
AD performed within the compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.
Actions and Compliance
(g) For rudders with a honeycomb core density of 24 kg/m\3\, as
identified in Table 1 of this AD, do the actions required in
paragraphs (g)(1) through (g)(10) of this AD, in accordance with
Airbus All Operators Telex (AOT) A310-55A2048 or A300-55A6047, both
Revision 02, both dated October 12, 2009, as applicable.
Note 1: Verification of the airplane serial numbers is not
required.
(1) In the reinforced location: Within 8 months or 840 flight
hours after the effective date of this AD, whichever occurs later,
do a vacuum loss inspection to detect defects including de-bonding.
(2) In the trailing edge location: Within 24 months or 840
flight hours after the effective date of this AD, whichever occurs
later, do an elasticity laminate checker inspection to detect
defects including de-bonding.
(3) Repeat the inspection required by paragraph (g)(2) of this
AD two times at intervals not to exceed 4,500 flight cycles, but not
fewer than 4,000 flight cycles from the last inspection.
(4) In other locations (lower rib/upper edge/leading edge/other
locations): Within 8 months or 840 flight hours after the effective
date of this AD, whichever occurs later, do an elasticity laminate
checker inspection to detect defects including de-bonding.
(5) Repeat the inspection required by paragraph (g)(4) of this
AD at intervals not to exceed 8 months from the last inspection.
(6) Within 24 months or 840 flight hours after the effective
date of this AD, whichever occurs later, do a vacuum loss inspection
on the other locations (lower rib/upper edge/leading edge/other
locations) to detect defects including de-bonding.
(7) Accomplishment of the inspection required by paragraph
(g)(6) of this AD
[[Page 49374]]
terminates the initial and repetitive inspections required by
paragraphs (g)(4) and (g)(5) of this AD.
(8) If any defect is found during any inspection required by
paragraph (g)(1), (g)(2), (g)(4), or (g)(6) of this AD, before
further flight, contact Airbus for repair instructions and do the
repair.
(9) If no defects are found during any inspection required by
paragraphs (g)(1) and (g)(6) of this AD, before further flight,
restore the vacuum loss holes with temporary restoration with self-
adhesive patches, temporary restoration with resin, or permanent
restoration with resin and surface protection, and repeat the
inspection required by paragraph (g)(3) of this AD at intervals not
to exceed 4,500 flight cycles until permanent restoration is
completed.
(10) If any defect is found during any inspection required by
paragraphs (g)(1), (g)(2), (g)(4), and (g)(6) of this AD, at the
applicable time specified in paragraph (g)(10)(i) or (g)(10)(ii) of
this AD: Report the inspection results to Airbus SAS, SEER1/SEER2/
SEER3, Customer Services, 1 Rond Point Maurice Bellonte, 31707
Blagnac Cedex, France; fax +33 (0) 5 61 93 28 73; or e-mail to
region1.StructureRepairSupport@airbus.com,
region2.StructureRepairSupport@airbus.com, or
region3.StructureRepairSupport@airbus.com.
(i) Inspections done before the effective date of this AD:
Within 30 days after the effective date of this AD.
(ii) Inspections done on or after the effective date of this AD:
Within 30 days after accomplishment of the inspection.
(h) For rudders not having a honeycomb core density of 24 kg/
m\3\, as identified in Table 1 of this AD, do the actions required
in paragraphs (h)(1) through (h)(10) of this AD, in accordance with
Airbus AOT A310-55A2048 or AOT A300-55A6047, both Revision 02, both
dated October 12, 2009, as applicable.
Note 2: Verification of the airplane serial numbers is not
required.
(1) In the reinforced location: Within 8 months after the rudder
has accumulated 13,000 flight cycles since first installation, or
within 8 months after the effective date of this AD, or within 840
flight hours after the effective date of this AD; whichever occurs
latest, do a vacuum loss inspection to detect defects including de-
bonding.
(2) In the trailing edge location: Within 24 months after the
rudder has accumulated 13,000 flight cycles since first
installation, or within 24 months after the effective date of this
AD, or within 840 flight hours after the effective date of this AD,
whichever occurs latest, do an elasticity laminate checker
inspection to detect defects including de-bonding.
(3) Repeat the inspection required by paragraph (h)(2) of this
AD two times at intervals not to exceed 4,500 flight cycles, but not
fewer than 4,000 flight cycles from the last inspection.
(4) In other locations (lower rib/upper edge/leading edge/other
locations): Within 8 months after the rudder has accumulated 13,000
flight cycles since first installation, or within 8 months after the
effective date of this AD, or within 840 flight hours after the
effective date of this AD, whichever occurs latest; do an elasticity
laminate checker inspection to detect defects including de-bonding.
(5) Repeat the inspection required by paragraph (h)(4) of this
AD at intervals not to exceed 8 months from the last inspection.
(6) Within 24 months after the rudder has accumulated 13,000
flight cycles since first installation, or within 24 months after
the effective date of this AD, or within 840 flight hours after the
effective date of this AD, whichever occurs latest, do a vacuum loss
inspection on the other locations (lower rib/upper edge/leading
edge/other location) to detect defects including de-bonding.
(7) Accomplishment of the inspection required by paragraph
(h)(6) of this AD terminates the initial and repetitive inspections
required by paragraphs (h)(4) and (h)(5) of this AD.
(8) If any defect is found during any inspection required by
paragraph (h)(1), (h)(2), (h)(4), or (h)(6) of this AD, before
further flight, contact Airbus for repair instructions and do the
repair.
(9) If no defects are found during the inspections required by
paragraphs (h)(1) and (h)(6) of this AD, before further flight,
restore the vacuum loss holes with the temporary restoration with
self adhesive patches, temporary restoration with resin, or
permanent restoration with resin and surface protection, and repeat
the inspection required by paragraph (h)(3) of this AD at intervals
not to exceed 4,500 flight cycles until permanent restoration is
completed.
(10) If any defect is found during any inspection required by
paragraphs (h)(1), (h)(2), (h)(4), and (h)(6) of this AD, at the
applicable time specified in paragraph (h)(10)(i) or (h)(10)(ii) of
this AD: Report the inspection results to Airbus SAS, SEER1/SEER2/
SEER3, Customer Services, 1 Rond Point Maurice Bellonte, 31707
Blagnac Cedex, France; fax +33 (0) 5 61 93 28 73; or e-mail to
region1.StructureRepairSupport@airbus.com,
region2.StructureRepairSupport@airbus.com, or
region3.StructureRepairSupport@airbus.com.
(i) Inspections done before the effective date of this AD:
Within 30 days after the effective date of this AD.
(ii) Inspections done on or after the effective date of this AD:
Within 30 days after accomplishment of the inspection.
(i) Actions done before the effective date of this AD, in
accordance with the service information listed in Table 2 of this
AD, are acceptable for compliance with the requirements of
paragraphs (g) and (h) of this AD for the areas inspected, for any
rudder listed in Table 1 of this AD.
(j) Additional areas requiring inspection for all airplanes are
defined in Airbus AOT A310-55A2048 or AOT A300-55A6047, both
Revision 02, both dated October 12, 2009, as applicable. For these
additional areas, do the actions required in paragraphs (g) and (h)
of this AD, as applicable, at the times specified in those
paragraphs. For all areas, do the repetitive inspections required by
paragraphs (g) and (h) of this AD as applicable at the times
specified in those paragraphs.
Table 2--Credit Service Information
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Airbus AOT-- Revision-- Dated--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
A300-55A6047................. Original....... May 11, 2009.
A300-55A6047................. 01............. July 8, 2009.
A310-55A2048................. Original....... May 11, 2009.
A310-55A2048................. 01............. July 8, 2009.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(k) For rudders on which temporary restoration with resin or
permanent vacuum loss hole restoration has been done in accordance
with the applicable service bulletin specified in Table 2 of this
AD, as required in paragraph (g)(9) or (h)(9) of this AD, before the
effective date of this AD: Within 4,500 flight cycles from the
restoration date, do an ultrasonic inspection for defects, including
debonding of the reinforced area, in accordance with Airbus AOT
A310-55A2048 or AOT A300-55A6047, both Revision 02, both dated
October 12, 2009, as applicable. If any defect is found, before
further flight, contact Airbus for repair instructions and do the
repair.
(l) After the effective date of this AD, no person may install
any rudder listed in Table 1 of this AD on any airplane, unless the
rudder has been inspected and all applicable corrective actions have
been done in accordance with paragraph (g) or (h) of this AD.
FAA AD Differences
Note 3: This AD differs from the MCAI and/or service information
as follows: No differences.
Other FAA AD Provisions
(m) The following provisions also apply to this AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
International Branch, ANM-116, FAA, has the authority to approve
AMOCs for this AD, if requested
[[Page 49375]]
using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. Send information to
ATTN: Dan Rodina, Aerospace Engineer, International Branch, ANM-116,
Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington 98057-3356; telephone (425) 227-2125; fax (425) 227-1149.
Before using any approved AMOC on any airplane to which the AMOC
applies, notify your principal maintenance inspector (PMI) or
principal avionics inspector (PAI), as appropriate, or lacking a
principal inspector, your local Flight Standards District Office.
The AMOC approval letter must specifically reference this AD.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain
corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered
FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product
is airworthy before it is returned to service.
(3) Reporting Requirements: For any reporting requirement in
this AD, under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has
approved the information collection requirements and has assigned
OMB Control Number 2120-0056.
Related Information
(n) Refer to MCAI European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA)
Airworthiness Directive 2010-0002, dated January 5, 2010; Airbus AOT
A310-55A2048, Revision 02, dated October 12, 2009; and Airbus AOT
A300-55A6047, Revision 02, dated October 12, 2009; for related
information.
Material Incorporated by Reference
(o) You must use Airbus All Operators Telex A300-55A6047,
Revision 02, dated October 12, 2009; or Airbus All Operators Telex
A310-55A2048, Revision 02, dated October 12, 2009; as applicable; to
do the actions required by this AD, unless the AD specifies
otherwise. (The document number, revision level, and date appear
only on page 1 of the AOTs; no other page of these documents
contains this information)
(1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference of this service information under 5
U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
(2) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Airbus SAS--EAW (Airworthiness Office), 1 Rond Point Maurice
Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Cedex, France; telephone +33 5 61 93 36 96;
fax +33 5 61 93 44 51; e-mail: account.airworth-eas@airbus.com;
Internet: https://www.airbus.com.
(3) You may review copies of the service information at the FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington. For information on the availability of this material at
the FAA, call 425-227-1221.
(4) You may also review copies of the service information that
is incorporated by reference at the National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this
material at NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: https://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on July 28, 2010.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2010-19327 Filed 8-12-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P