Amendment to the International Traffic in Arms Regulations: Dual Nationals and Third-Country Nationals Employed by End-Users, 48625-48627 [2010-19833]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 154 / Wednesday, August 11, 2010 / Proposed Rules
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
the following new AD:
The Boeing Company: Docket No. FAA–
2010–0796; Directorate Identifier 2010–
NM–007–AD.
Comments Due Date
(a) We must receive comments by
September 27, 2010.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to The Boeing
Company Model 767–300 series airplanes,
certificated in any category, as identified in
Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin
767–53–0207, dated December 17, 2009.
Subject
(d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of
America Code 53: Fuselage.
Unsafe Condition
(e) This AD results from reports of cracking
found in the section 46 fuselage lower skin
around the periphery of the very high
frequency (VHF) antenna baseplate at station
1197 + 99. The Federal Aviation
Administration is issuing this AD to detect
and correct fatigue cracks in the fuselage skin
and internal backup structure, which could
result in rapid decompression of the airplane.
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
Compliance
(f) You are responsible for having the
actions required by this AD performed within
the compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.
Inspections
(g) Inspect for cracks in the fuselage skin
and backup structure at the lower VHF
antenna cutout at station 1197 + 99, between
stringers 39L and 39R, by doing an external
detailed inspection, with the antenna
removed, of the fuselage structure at the
lower aft VHF antenna cutout, and an
internal detailed inspection of the backup
structure. Do the inspections in accordance
with the Accomplishment Instructions of
Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin
767–53–0207, dated December 17, 2009 (‘‘the
service bulletin’’). Do the inspections at the
applicable time specified in paragraph 1.E.,
‘‘Compliance,’’ of the service bulletin, except,
where the service bulletin specifies a
compliance after the date on the service
bulletin, this AD requires compliance within
the specified time after the effective date of
this AD.
(1) If no crack is found, repeat the external
detailed inspection, without removing the
antenna, at intervals not to exceed 3,000
flight cycles.
(2) If any crack is found in the fuselage,
repair before further flight, in accordance
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:23 Aug 10, 2010
Jkt 220001
with the service bulletin. Accomplishment of
this repair terminates the repetitive external
detailed inspections of the fuselage skin
required by this AD.
(3) If any crack is found in the backup
structure, before further flight, repair or
replace the cracked part(s), in accordance
with the service bulletin.
Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
(h)(1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft
Certification Office (ACO), FAA, has the
authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if
requested using the procedures found in 14
CFR 39.19. Send information to ATTN:
Berhane Alazar, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe Branch, ANM–120S, FAA, Seattle
Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), 1601 Lind
Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98057–
3356; telephone 425–917–6577; fax 425–917–
6590. Information may be e-mailed to 9ANM-Seattle-ACO-AMOC-Requests@faa.gov.
(2) To request a different method of
compliance or a different compliance time
for this AD, follow the procedures in 14 CFR
39.19. Before using any approved AMOC on
any airplane to which the AMOC applies,
notify your principal maintenance inspector
(PMI) or principal avionics inspector (PAI),
as appropriate, or lacking a principal
inspector, your local Flight Standards District
Office. The AMOC approval letter must
specifically refer to this AD.
(3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable
level of safety may be used for any repair
required by this AD if it is approved by the
Boeing Commercial Airplanes Organization
Designation Authorization (ODA) that has
been authorized by the Manager, Seattle
ACO, to make those findings. For a repair
method to be approved, the repair must meet
the certification basis of the airplane, and the
approval must specifically refer to this AD.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on August
4, 2010.
Stephen P. Boyd,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2010–19832 Filed 8–10–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
22 CFR Parts 124 and 126
[Public Notice: 7116]
RIN 1400–AC68
Amendment to the International Traffic
in Arms Regulations: Dual Nationals
and Third-Country Nationals Employed
by End-Users
Department of State.
Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Department of State is
proposing to amend the International
Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR) to
update the policies regarding end-user
employment of dual nationals and thirdcountry nationals.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
48625
Comment Due Date: The
Department of State will accept
comments on this proposed rule until
September 10, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Interested parties may
submit comments within 30 days of the
date of the publication by any of the
following methods:
• E-mail:
DDTCResponseTeam@state.gov with an
appropriate subject line.
• Mail: PM/DDTC, SA–1, 12th Floor,
Directorate of Defense Trade Controls,
Office of Defense Trade Controls Policy,
ATTN: Regulatory Change—Nationals,
Bureau of Political Military Affairs, U.S.
Department of State, Washington, DC
20522–0112.
• Persons with access to the Internet
may also view this notice by searching
for its RIN on the U.S. Government
regulations Web site at https://
regulations.gov/index.cfm.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Director Charles B. Shotwell, Office of
Defense Trade Controls Policy,
Department of State, Telephone (202)
663–1282 or Fax (202) 261–8199; E-mail
DDTCResponseTeam@state.gov. ATTN:
Regulatory Change, Nationals.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is
part of the President’s Export Control
Reform effort. The Department of State
is amending Parts 124 and 126 of the
ITAR to reflect new policy regarding
end-user employment of dual-nationals
and third-country nationals.
As a result of the President’s Task
Force on Export Control Reform, the
previous policy regarding the treatment
of dual nationals and foreign nationals
was reconsidered. The current
requirement for the provision of
additional information within a license
to cover dual national and third-country
national foreign employees has created
a tremendous administrative burden on
approved end-users and has evolved
into a human rights issue, which has
become a focus of contention between
the U.S. and allies and friends without
a commensurate gain in national
security. Based on available intelligence
and law enforcement information, and
given the current licensing requirements
regarding access by dual or third
country national employees, most
diversions of U.S. Munitions List
(USML) items appears to occur outside
the scope of approved licenses, not
within foreign companies or
organizations providing access to
properly screened dual national or third
country national employees. This
amendment will place the affirmative
responsibility upon the foreign
company, government, or international
organization, with the understanding
DATES:
E:\FR\FM\11AUP1.SGM
11AUP1
48626
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 154 / Wednesday, August 11, 2010 / Proposed Rules
that by accepting the USML defense
article, they must comply with the
provisions of U.S. laws and regulations
to prevent the possible diversion of U.S.
defense articles and technology. This
change, by no means, reduces the due
diligence requirements of the applicant
to ensure, to the best of their ability, that
the end-use and end-user are consistent
with the approved authorization. The
Department views due diligence as a
requirement for security clearances or
other effective screening procedures as
a condition for access to ITARcontrolled defense articles and
technology.
Regulatory Analysis and Notices
Administrative Procedure Act
This amendment involves a foreign
affairs function of the United States and,
therefore, is not subject to the
procedures contained in 5 U.S.C. 553
and 554.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
Since this amendment is not subject
to the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 553(b), it
does not require analysis under the
Regulatory Flexibility Act.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
This amendment does not involve a
mandate that will result in the
expenditure by State, local, and tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $100 million or more
in any year and it will not significantly
or uniquely affect small governments.
Therefore, no actions were deemed
necessary under the provisions of the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996
This amendment has been found not
to be a major rule within the meaning
of the Small Business Regulatory
Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996.
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
Executive Orders 12372 and 13132
This amendment will not have
substantial direct effects on the States,
on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government. Therefore, in
accordance with Executive Order 13132,
it is determined that this amendment
does not have sufficient federalism
implications to require consultations or
warrant the preparation of a federalism
summary impact statement. The
regulations implementing Executive
Order 12372 regarding
intergovernmental consultation on
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:23 Aug 10, 2010
Jkt 220001
Federal programs and activities do not
apply to this amendment.
Executive Order 12866
This amendment is exempt from
review under Executive Order 12866,
but has been reviewed internally by the
Department of State to ensure
consistency with the purposes thereof.
Executive Order 12988
The Department of State has reviewed
the proposed amendment in light of
sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
Order 12988 to eliminate ambiguity,
minimize litigation, establish clear legal
standards, and reduce burden.
Executive Order 13175
The Department of State has
determined that this rulemaking will
not have tribal implications, will not
impose substantial direct compliance
costs on Indian tribal governments, and
will not pre-empt tribal law.
Accordingly, the requirement of Section
5 of Executive Order 13175 does not
apply to this rulemaking.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This rule does not impose any new
reporting or recordkeeping requirements
subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act,
44 U.S.C. Chapter 35.
List of Subjects in 22 CFR Parts 124 and
Part 126
Arms and munitions, Exports.
For the reasons set out in the
preamble, the Department of State,
proposes to amend 22 CFR parts 124
and 126 as follows:
PART 124—AGREEMENTS, OFFSHORE PROCUREMENT AND OTHER
DEFENSE SERVICES
1. The authority citation for part 124
continues to read as follows:
Authority: Sec. 2, 38, and 71, Pub. L. 90–
629, 90 Stat. 744 (22 U.S.C. 2752, 2778,
2797); E.O. 11958, 42 FR 4311; 3 CFR 1977
Comp. p. 79; 22 U.S.C. 2651a; 22 U.S.C. 2776;
Pub. L. 105–261
2. In § 124.8, paragraph (5) is revised
to read as follows:
§ 124.8 Clauses required both in
manufacturing license agreements and
technical assistance agreements.
*
*
*
*
*
(5) The technical data or defense
service exported from the United States
in furtherance of this agreement and any
defense article which may be produced
or manufactured from such technical
data or defense service may not be
transferred to a foreign person except
pursuant to § 126.18 or as specifically
authorized in this agreement unless the
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
prior written approval of the
Department of State has been obtained.
*
*
*
*
*
§ 126.16
[Removed]
3. Section 124.16 is removed.
PART 126—LICENSE FOR THE
EXPORT OF DEFENSE ARTICLES
4. The authority citation for part 126
continues to read as follows:
Authority: Secs. 2, 38, 40, 42, and 71, Pub.
L. 90–629, 90 Stat. 744 (22 U.S.C. 2752, 2778,
2780, 2791, and 2797); E.O. 11958, 42 FR
4311; 3 CFR, 1977 Comp., p.79; 22 U.S.C.
2651a; 22 U.S.C. 287c; E.O. 12918; 59 FR
28205, 3 CFR, 1994 Comp. p. 899; Sec. 1225,
Pub. L. 108–375.
§§ 126.16 and 126.17
[Reserved]
5. Sections 126.16 and 126.17 are
reserved.
6. Section 126.18 is added to read as
follows:
§ 126.18 Exemptions Regarding Intracompany Transfers to Employees who are
Dual Nationals or Third-Country Nationals.
(a) Subject to the requirements of
paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section, no
approval is needed from the Directorate
of Defense Trade Controls (DDTC) for
the transfer of defense articles,
including technical data, within a
foreign business entity, foreign
governmental entity, or international
organization that is an approved enduser or consignee for those defense
articles (including technical data),
including the transfer to dual nationals
or third country nationals who are bona
fide, regular employees, directly
employed by the foreign business entity,
foreign governmental entity, or
international organization. The transfer
of defense articles pursuant to this
section must take place completely
within the physical territories of the
country where the end-user is located or
the consignee operates, and be within
the scope of an approved export license,
other export authorization, or license
exemption.
(b) The provisions of § 127.1(b) are
applicable to any transfer under this
section. As a prerequisite to receiving
any defense article, any foreign business
entity, foreign governmental entity, or
international organization, as a ‘‘foreign
person’’ within the meaning of § 120.16,
that receives a defense article, including
technical data, is responsible for
implementing effective procedures to
prevent diversion to destinations,
entities, or for purposes other than those
authorized by the applicable export
license or other authorization (e.g.,
written approval or exemption) and
E:\FR\FM\11AUP1.SGM
11AUP1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 154 / Wednesday, August 11, 2010 / Proposed Rules
must comply with U.S. laws and
regulations (including the ITAR).
(c) (1)Pursuant to paragraph (b) of this
section, the end-users or consignees can
meet the above conditions, prior to
access to defense articles, by requiring:
(i) A security clearance approved by
the host nation government for its
employees, or
(ii) The end-user or consignee have in
place a process to screen its employees
and to have executed a Non-Disclosure
Agreement that provides assurances that
the employee will not transfer any
information to persons or entities unless
specifically authorized by the consignee
or end-user.
(2) The end-user or consignee must
screen its employees for substantive
contacts with restricted or prohibited
countries listed in § 126.1. Substantive
contacts include, but are not limited to,
recent or regular travel to such
countries, recent or continuing contact
with agents and nationals of such
countries, continued allegiance to such
countries, or acts otherwise indicating a
risk of diversion. Though nationality
does not, in and of itself, prohibit access
to defense articles or defense services,
an employee that has substantive
contacts with persons from countries
listed in § 126.1(a) shall be presumed to
raise a risk of diversion, unless DDTC
determines otherwise. End-users and
consignees must maintain a technology
security/clearance plan that details its
procedures for screening employees for
such substantive contacts and maintain
records of such screening. The
technology security/clearance plan and
screening records will be available to
DDTC or its agents upon request.
Dated: July 8, 2010.
Ellen O. Tauscher,
Under Secretary, Arms Control and
International Security, Department of State.
to approve revisions to the Maryland
State Implementation Plan (SIP). The
revisions amended Maryland’s
transportation conformity regulations
and general conformity regulations.
EPA’s approval did not include
Maryland’s regulation regarding conflict
resolution associated with conformity
determinations (COMAR 26.11.26.06).
EPA has determined that it cannot
proceed with approval of these SIP
revisions until and unless it also
approves Maryland’s regulation
regarding conflict resolution associated
with conformity determinations.
Therefore, EPA is withdrawing its
proposed rule to approve Maryland’s
conformity regulations. This withdrawal
action is being taken under section 110
of the Clean Air Act.
DATES: The proposed rule published
June 18, 2010 (75 FR 34669) is
withdrawn as of August 11, 2010.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established docket
number EPA–R03–OAR–2008–0871 for
this action. The index to the docket is
available electronically at https://
www.regulations.gov and in hard copy
at Air Protection Division, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency,
Region III, 1650 Arch Street,
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Martin Kotsch, (215) 814–3335, or by email at kotsch.martin@epa.gov.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen
dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Volatile organic
compounds.
[FR Doc. 2010–19833 Filed 8–10–10; 8:45 am]
Dated: August 2, 2010.
W. C. Early,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region III.
BILLING CODE 4710–25–P
[FR Doc. 2010–19804 Filed 8–10–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
[EPA–R03–OAR–2008–0871; FRL–9188–4]
40 CFR Part 52
Approval and Promulgation of Air
Quality Implementation Plans;
Maryland; Transportation Conformity
Regulations; Withdrawal of Proposed
Rule
[EPA R03–OAR–2009–0606; FRL–9186–7]
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Withdrawal of proposed rule.
AGENCY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:23 Aug 10, 2010
Jkt 220001
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
On June 18, 2010 (75 FR
34669), EPA published a proposed rule
SUMMARY:
Approval and Promulgation of Air
Quality Implementation Plans;
Delaware; Administrative and NonSubstantive Changes to Existing
Delaware SIP Regulations
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
48627
EPA proposes to approve the
State Implementation Plan (SIP)
revision submitted by the State of
Delaware consisting of administrative
and non-substantive changes to the
Delaware air pollution control
regulations which EPA has previously
approved as part of the Delaware State
Implementation Plan (SIP). In the Final
Rules section of this Federal Register,
EPA is approving the State’s SIP
submittal as a direct final rule without
prior proposal because the Agency
views this as a noncontroversial
submittal and anticipates no adverse
comments. A detailed rationale for the
approval is set forth in the direct final
rule. If no adverse comments are
received in response to this action, no
further activity is contemplated. If EPA
receives adverse comments, the direct
final rule will be withdrawn and all
public comments received will be
addressed in a subsequent final rule
based on this proposed rule. EPA will
not institute a second comment period.
Any parties interested in commenting
on this action should do so at this time.
DATES: Comments must be received in
writing by September 10, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID Number EPA–
R03–OAR–2009–0606 by one of the
following methods:
A. https://www.regulations.gov. Follow
the on-line instructions for submitting
comments.
B. E-mail: frankford.harold@epa.gov.
C. Mail: EPA–R03–OAR–2009–0606,
Harold A. Frankford, Air Protection
Division, Mailcode 3AP00, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency,
Region III, 1650 Arch Street,
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103.
D. Hand Delivery: At the previouslylisted EPA Region III address. Such
deliveries are only accepted during the
Docket’s normal hours of operation, and
special arrangements should be made
for deliveries of boxed information.
Instructions: Direct your comments to
Docket ID No. EPA–R03–OAR–2009–
0606. EPA’s policy is that all comments
received will be included in the public
docket without change, and may be
made available online at https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided, unless
the comment includes information
claimed to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise
protected through https://
www.regulations.gov or e-mail. The
https://www.regulations.gov Web site is
an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\11AUP1.SGM
11AUP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 154 (Wednesday, August 11, 2010)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 48625-48627]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-19833]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
22 CFR Parts 124 and 126
[Public Notice: 7116]
RIN 1400-AC68
Amendment to the International Traffic in Arms Regulations: Dual
Nationals and Third-Country Nationals Employed by End-Users
AGENCY: Department of State.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of State is proposing to amend the
International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR) to update the policies
regarding end-user employment of dual nationals and third-country
nationals.
DATES: Comment Due Date: The Department of State will accept comments
on this proposed rule until September 10, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Interested parties may submit comments within 30 days of the
date of the publication by any of the following methods:
E-mail: DDTCResponseTeam@state.gov with an appropriate
subject line.
Mail: PM/DDTC, SA-1, 12th Floor, Directorate of Defense
Trade Controls, Office of Defense Trade Controls Policy, ATTN:
Regulatory Change--Nationals, Bureau of Political Military Affairs,
U.S. Department of State, Washington, DC 20522-0112.
Persons with access to the Internet may also view this
notice by searching for its RIN on the U.S. Government regulations Web
site at https://regulations.gov/index.cfm.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Director Charles B. Shotwell, Office
of Defense Trade Controls Policy, Department of State, Telephone (202)
663-1282 or Fax (202) 261-8199; E-mail DDTCResponseTeam@state.gov.
ATTN: Regulatory Change, Nationals.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is part of the President's Export
Control Reform effort. The Department of State is amending Parts 124
and 126 of the ITAR to reflect new policy regarding end-user employment
of dual-nationals and third-country nationals.
As a result of the President's Task Force on Export Control Reform,
the previous policy regarding the treatment of dual nationals and
foreign nationals was reconsidered. The current requirement for the
provision of additional information within a license to cover dual
national and third-country national foreign employees has created a
tremendous administrative burden on approved end-users and has evolved
into a human rights issue, which has become a focus of contention
between the U.S. and allies and friends without a commensurate gain in
national security. Based on available intelligence and law enforcement
information, and given the current licensing requirements regarding
access by dual or third country national employees, most diversions of
U.S. Munitions List (USML) items appears to occur outside the scope of
approved licenses, not within foreign companies or organizations
providing access to properly screened dual national or third country
national employees. This amendment will place the affirmative
responsibility upon the foreign company, government, or international
organization, with the understanding
[[Page 48626]]
that by accepting the USML defense article, they must comply with the
provisions of U.S. laws and regulations to prevent the possible
diversion of U.S. defense articles and technology. This change, by no
means, reduces the due diligence requirements of the applicant to
ensure, to the best of their ability, that the end-use and end-user are
consistent with the approved authorization. The Department views due
diligence as a requirement for security clearances or other effective
screening procedures as a condition for access to ITAR-controlled
defense articles and technology.
Regulatory Analysis and Notices
Administrative Procedure Act
This amendment involves a foreign affairs function of the United
States and, therefore, is not subject to the procedures contained in 5
U.S.C. 553 and 554.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
Since this amendment is not subject to the provisions of 5 U.S.C.
553(b), it does not require analysis under the Regulatory Flexibility
Act.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
This amendment does not involve a mandate that will result in the
expenditure by State, local, and tribal governments, in the aggregate,
or by the private sector, of $100 million or more in any year and it
will not significantly or uniquely affect small governments. Therefore,
no actions were deemed necessary under the provisions of the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996
This amendment has been found not to be a major rule within the
meaning of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of
1996.
Executive Orders 12372 and 13132
This amendment will not have substantial direct effects on the
States, on the relationship between the national government and the
States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. Therefore, in accordance with Executive
Order 13132, it is determined that this amendment does not have
sufficient federalism implications to require consultations or warrant
the preparation of a federalism summary impact statement. The
regulations implementing Executive Order 12372 regarding
intergovernmental consultation on Federal programs and activities do
not apply to this amendment.
Executive Order 12866
This amendment is exempt from review under Executive Order 12866,
but has been reviewed internally by the Department of State to ensure
consistency with the purposes thereof.
Executive Order 12988
The Department of State has reviewed the proposed amendment in
light of sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988 to
eliminate ambiguity, minimize litigation, establish clear legal
standards, and reduce burden.
Executive Order 13175
The Department of State has determined that this rulemaking will
not have tribal implications, will not impose substantial direct
compliance costs on Indian tribal governments, and will not pre-empt
tribal law. Accordingly, the requirement of Section 5 of Executive
Order 13175 does not apply to this rulemaking.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This rule does not impose any new reporting or recordkeeping
requirements subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C. Chapter
35.
List of Subjects in 22 CFR Parts 124 and Part 126
Arms and munitions, Exports.
For the reasons set out in the preamble, the Department of State,
proposes to amend 22 CFR parts 124 and 126 as follows:
PART 124--AGREEMENTS, OFF-SHORE PROCUREMENT AND OTHER DEFENSE
SERVICES
1. The authority citation for part 124 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: Sec. 2, 38, and 71, Pub. L. 90-629, 90 Stat. 744 (22
U.S.C. 2752, 2778, 2797); E.O. 11958, 42 FR 4311; 3 CFR 1977 Comp.
p. 79; 22 U.S.C. 2651a; 22 U.S.C. 2776; Pub. L. 105-261
2. In Sec. 124.8, paragraph (5) is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 124.8 Clauses required both in manufacturing license agreements
and technical assistance agreements.
* * * * *
(5) The technical data or defense service exported from the United
States in furtherance of this agreement and any defense article which
may be produced or manufactured from such technical data or defense
service may not be transferred to a foreign person except pursuant to
Sec. 126.18 or as specifically authorized in this agreement unless the
prior written approval of the Department of State has been obtained.
* * * * *
Sec. 126.16 [Removed]
3. Section 124.16 is removed.
PART 126--LICENSE FOR THE EXPORT OF DEFENSE ARTICLES
4. The authority citation for part 126 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: Secs. 2, 38, 40, 42, and 71, Pub. L. 90-629, 90 Stat.
744 (22 U.S.C. 2752, 2778, 2780, 2791, and 2797); E.O. 11958, 42 FR
4311; 3 CFR, 1977 Comp., p.79; 22 U.S.C. 2651a; 22 U.S.C. 287c; E.O.
12918; 59 FR 28205, 3 CFR, 1994 Comp. p. 899; Sec. 1225, Pub. L.
108-375.
Sec. Sec. 126.16 and 126.17 [Reserved]
5. Sections 126.16 and 126.17 are reserved.
6. Section 126.18 is added to read as follows:
Sec. 126.18 Exemptions Regarding Intra-company Transfers to Employees
who are Dual Nationals or Third-Country Nationals.
(a) Subject to the requirements of paragraphs (b) and (c) of this
section, no approval is needed from the Directorate of Defense Trade
Controls (DDTC) for the transfer of defense articles, including
technical data, within a foreign business entity, foreign governmental
entity, or international organization that is an approved end-user or
consignee for those defense articles (including technical data),
including the transfer to dual nationals or third country nationals who
are bona fide, regular employees, directly employed by the foreign
business entity, foreign governmental entity, or international
organization. The transfer of defense articles pursuant to this section
must take place completely within the physical territories of the
country where the end-user is located or the consignee operates, and be
within the scope of an approved export license, other export
authorization, or license exemption.
(b) The provisions of Sec. 127.1(b) are applicable to any transfer
under this section. As a prerequisite to receiving any defense article,
any foreign business entity, foreign governmental entity, or
international organization, as a ``foreign person'' within the meaning
of Sec. 120.16, that receives a defense article, including technical
data, is responsible for implementing effective procedures to prevent
diversion to destinations, entities, or for purposes other than those
authorized by the applicable export license or other authorization
(e.g., written approval or exemption) and
[[Page 48627]]
must comply with U.S. laws and regulations (including the ITAR).
(c) (1)Pursuant to paragraph (b) of this section, the end-users or
consignees can meet the above conditions, prior to access to defense
articles, by requiring:
(i) A security clearance approved by the host nation government for
its employees, or
(ii) The end-user or consignee have in place a process to screen
its employees and to have executed a Non-Disclosure Agreement that
provides assurances that the employee will not transfer any information
to persons or entities unless specifically authorized by the consignee
or end-user.
(2) The end-user or consignee must screen its employees for
substantive contacts with restricted or prohibited countries listed in
Sec. 126.1. Substantive contacts include, but are not limited to,
recent or regular travel to such countries, recent or continuing
contact with agents and nationals of such countries, continued
allegiance to such countries, or acts otherwise indicating a risk of
diversion. Though nationality does not, in and of itself, prohibit
access to defense articles or defense services, an employee that has
substantive contacts with persons from countries listed in Sec.
126.1(a) shall be presumed to raise a risk of diversion, unless DDTC
determines otherwise. End-users and consignees must maintain a
technology security/clearance plan that details its procedures for
screening employees for such substantive contacts and maintain records
of such screening. The technology security/clearance plan and screening
records will be available to DDTC or its agents upon request.
Dated: July 8, 2010.
Ellen O. Tauscher,
Under Secretary, Arms Control and International Security, Department of
State.
[FR Doc. 2010-19833 Filed 8-10-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-25-P