Navigation and Navigable Waters; Technical, Organizational, and Conforming Amendments, Sector Columbia River, WA, 48564-48566 [2010-19754]

Download as PDF 48564 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 154 / Wednesday, August 11, 2010 / Rules and Regulations Dated: August 3, 2010. Adam J. Szubin, Director, Office of Foreign Assets Control. from notice and comment rulemaking requirements because these changes involve rules of agency organization, procedure, or practice. In addition, the Coast Guard finds notice and comment procedure are unnecessary under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(3)(B) as this rule consists only of corrections and editorial, organizational, and conforming amendments and these changes will have no substantive effect on the public. Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that, for the same reasons, good cause exists for making this rule effective upon publication in the Federal Register. [FR Doc. 2010–19781 Filed 8–10–10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4810–AL–P DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY Coast Guard 33 CFR Parts 3 and 165 [Docket No. USCG–2010–0351] RIN 1625–ZA25 Navigation and Navigable Waters; Technical, Organizational, and Conforming Amendments, Sector Columbia River, WA Basis and Purpose Coast Guard, DHS. Final rule. AGENCY: ACTION: This rule makes nonsubstantive changes throughout our regulations. The purpose of this rule is to make conforming amendments and technical corrections to reflect the renaming of Sector Seattle to Sector Puget Sound as part of the Coast Guard reorganization. DATES: This final rule is effective 12:01 a.m. on August 16, 2010. ADDRESSES: Comments and material received from the public, as well as documents mentioned in this preamble as being available in the docket, are part of docket USCG–2010–0351 and are available for inspection or copying at the Docket Management Facility (M–30), U.S. Department of Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. You may also find this docket on the Internet by going to http://www.regulations.gov, inserting USCG–2010–0351 in the ‘‘Keyword’’ box, and then clicking ‘‘Search.’’ FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule, call or e-mail Lt. Matthew Jones, Coast Guard; telephone 206–220–7110, e-mail Matthew.m.jones@uscg.mil. If you have questions on viewing the docket, call Renee V. Wright, Program Manager, Docket Operations, telephone 202–366– 9826. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with RULES SUMMARY: Regulatory Information We did not publish a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) for this rule. Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(3)(A), the Coast Guard finds this rule is exempt VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:53 Aug 10, 2010 Jkt 220001 This rule makes technical and editorial corrections to Title 33 parts 3 and 165 in the Code of Federal Regulations. This internal agency reorganization establishes Sector Columbia River and is part of a process begun in 2004, intended to strengthen unity of command in Coast Guard port, waterway and coastal areas. Discussion of Rule This rule revises 33 CFR parts 3 and 165 to reflect changes in Coast Guard internal organizational structure. Sector Portland has been disestablished and Sector Columbia River has been established in its place. This rule revises 33 CFR parts 3 and 165 to reflect the Sector Columbia River and Captain of the Port Zone name change in current regulations. This rule is a technical revision reflecting changes in agency procedure and organization, and does not indicate new authorities nor create any substantive requirements. Small Entities Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered whether this rule would have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000. We estimate this rule will not impose any additional costs and should have little or no impact on small entities because the provisions of this rule are technical and non-substantive, and will have no substantive effect on the public and will impose no additional costs. Therefore, the Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this final rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. Collection of Information This rule calls for no new collection of information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501– 3520). Federalism A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132, Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and have determined that it does not have implications for federalism. Regulatory Analyses Unfunded Mandates Reform Act We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses based on 13 of these statutes or executive orders. The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may result in the expenditure by a State, local, or Tribal government, in the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in this preamble. Regulatory Planning and Review This rule is not a significant regulatory action under section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, and does not require an assessment of potential costs and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and Budget has not reviewed it under that Order. Because this rule involves nonsubstantive changes and internal agency practices and procedures, it will not impose any additional costs on the public. PO 00000 Frm 00016 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 Taking of Private Property This rule will not cause a taking of private property or otherwise have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property Rights. E:\FR\FM\11AUR1.SGM 11AUR1 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 154 / Wednesday, August 11, 2010 / Rules and Regulations Civil Justice Reform This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation, eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden. Protection of Children We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not an economically significant rule and does not create an environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may disproportionately affect children. Indian Tribal Governments This rule does not have Tribal implications under Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments, because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more Indian Tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and Indian Tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian Tribes. We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13211, Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ‘‘significant energy action’’ under that order because it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects under Executive Order 13211. srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with RULES 33 CFR Part 3 Organization and functions (government agencies). 123°18′00″ W; thence east along this latitude to the eastern Idaho state line; thence southeast along the Idaho state line to the intersection of the IdahoWyoming boundary; thence south along the Idaho-Wyoming boundary to the intersection of the Idaho-Utah-Wyoming boundaries; thence west along the southern border of Idaho to Oregon and then west along the southern border of Oregon to the coast at latitude 41°59′54″ N, longitude 124°12′42″ W; thence west along the southern boundary of the Thirteenth Coast Guard District, which is described in § 3.65–10, to the outermost extent of the EEZ at latitude 41°38′35″ N, 128°51′26″ W; thence north along the outermost extent of the EEZ to latitude 47°32′00″ N; thence east to the point of origin. PART 165— REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS 3. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows: ■ Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5; Pub. L. 107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1. § 165.1308 [Amended] 4. In § 165.1308(c), remove the phrase ‘‘Captain of the Port, Portland, Oregon’’ and add, in its place, the phrase ‘‘Captain of the Port Columbia River’’. ■ 33 CFR Part 165 Harbors, Marine Safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and record keeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways. ■ For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33 CFR parts 3 and 165 as follows: § 165.1312 PART 3—COAST GUARD AREAS, DISTRICTS, SECTORS, MARINE INSPECTION ZONES, AND CAPTAIN OF THE PORT ZONES § 165.1315 [Amended] 5. In § 165.1312(b), remove the phrase ‘‘Coast Guard Captain of the Port, Portland, Oregon’’ and add, in its place, the phrase ‘‘Captain of the Port Columbia River’’. ■ [Amended] 1. The authority citation for part 3 continues to read as follows: Authority: 14 U.S.C. 92, Pub. L. 107–296, 116 Stat. 2135; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1, para. 2(23). 6. In § 165.1315, in the heading and paragraph (b), remove the phrase ‘‘Captain of the Port Portland’’ and add, in its place, the phrase ‘‘Captain of the Port Columbia River’’. § 165.1318 ■ Technical Standards The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15 U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress, through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus standards bodies. 16:53 Aug 10, 2010 Environment We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security Management Directive 023–01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and have concluded that this action is one of a category of actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment. This rule is categorically excluded under section 2.B.2, figure 2– 1, paragraph (34)(a) of the Instruction. This rule involves regulations which are editorial and/or procedural, such as those updating addresses or establishing application procedures. An environmental analysis checklist and a categorical exclusion determination are available in the docket where indicated under ADDRESSES. List of Subjects Energy Effects VerDate Mar<15>2010 This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not consider the use of voluntary consensus standards. 48565 Jkt 220001 ■ 2. Revise § 3.65–15 to read as follows: § 3.65–15 Sector Columbia River Marine Inspection Zone and Captain of the Port Zone. Sector Columbia River’s office is located in Astoria, OR. The boundaries of Sector Columbia River’s Marine Inspection and Captain of the Port Zones start at the Washington coast at latitude 47°32′00″ N, longitude 124°21′15″ W, proceeding along this latitude east to latitude 47°32′00″ N, longitude 123°18′00″ W; thence south to latitude 46°55′00″ N, longitude PO 00000 Frm 00017 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 ■ [Amended] 7. In § 165.1318: a. In the section heading, remove ‘‘Portland, OR Captain of the Port Zone’’ and add, in its place, ‘‘Captain of the Port Columbia River Zone’’. ■ b. In paragraphs (a), (d), (i) and (l) remove the phrase ‘‘Captain of the Port Portland’’ and add, in its place, the phrase ‘‘Captain of the Port Columbia River’’. ■ ■ § 165.1322 [Amended] 8. In § 165.1322, in the section heading remove ‘‘Oregon Captain of the Port Zone’’ and add, in its place ■ E:\FR\FM\11AUR1.SGM 11AUR1 48566 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 154 / Wednesday, August 11, 2010 / Rules and Regulations ‘‘Captain of the Port Columbia River Zone’’. § 165.1323 [Amended] 8. In § 165.1323, in the section heading remove ‘‘Portland, Oregon Captain of the Port Zone’’ and add, in its place ‘‘, Captain of the Port Columbia River Zone’’. ■ Dated: August 5, 2010. Sandra Selman, Acting Chief, Office of Regulations and Administrative Law, United States Coast Guard. [FR Doc. 2010–19754 Filed 8–10–10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 9110–04–P ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 52 [EPA–R03–OAR–2009–0606; FRL–9186–6] Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Delaware; Administrative and NonSubstantive Amendments to Existing Delaware SIP Regulations Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Direct final rule. AGENCY: EPA is taking direct final action to approve revisions to the Delaware State Implementation Plan (SIP). The revisions streamline, renumber and reformat the Delaware Regulations for the Control of Air Pollution which EPA has approved as part of the Delaware SIP. This SIP vision is administrative in nature; there are no substantive changes. EPA is approving these revisions to Delaware SIP regulations in accordance with the requirements of the Clean Air Act (CAA). DATES: This rule is effective on October 12, 2010 without further notice, unless EPA receives adverse written comment by September 10, 2010. If EPA receives such comments, it will publish a timely withdrawal of the direct final rule in the Federal Register and inform the public that the rule will not take effect. ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID Number EPA– R03–OAR–2009–0606 by one of the following methods: A. http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line instructions for submitting comments. B. E-mail: frankford.harold@epa.gov. C. Mail: EPA–R03–OAR–2009–0606, Harold A. Frankford, Air Protection Division, Mailcode 3AP00, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with RULES SUMMARY: VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:53 Aug 10, 2010 Jkt 220001 Region III, 1650 Arch Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103. D. Hand Delivery: At the previouslylisted EPA Region III address. Such deliveries are only accepted during the Docket’s normal hours of operation, and special arrangements should be made for deliveries of boxed information. Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID No. EPA–R03–OAR–2009– 0606. EPA’s policy is that all comments received will be included in the public docket without change, and may be made available online at http:// www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided, unless the comment includes information claimed to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you consider to be CBI or otherwise protected through http:// www.regulations.gov or e-mail. The http://www.regulations.gov Web site is an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which means EPA will not know your identity or contact information unless you provide it in the body of your comment. If you send an e-mail comment directly to EPA without going through http:// www.regulations.gov, your e-mail address will be automatically captured and included as part of the comment that is placed in the public docket and made available on the Internet. If you submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you include your name and other contact information in the body of your comment and with any disk or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid the use of special characters, any form of encryption, and be free of any defects or viruses. Docket: All documents in the electronic docket are listed in the http://www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index, some information is not publicly available, i.e., CBI or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted material, is not placed on the Internet and will be publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket materials are available either electronically in http:// www.regulations.gov or in hard copy during normal business hours at the Air Protection Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region III, 1650 Arch Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103. Copies of the State submittal are available at the Delaware Department of PO 00000 Frm 00018 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 Natural Resources and Environmental Control, 89 Kings Highway, P.O. Box 1401, Dover, Delaware 19903. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Harold A. Frankford, (215) 814–2108, or by e-mail at frankford.harold@epa.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. Background On June 15, 2009, the State of Delaware submitted a formal revision to its State Implementation Plan (SIP). The SIP revision consists of administrative and non-substantive amendments to 32 of the SIP approved Delaware air pollution control regulations. In its SIP revision submittal, Delaware explains that under Title 29, Chapter 101 of the Delaware Codes (29 Del. C., Ch 101), regulatory agencies in Delaware are required to develop and adopt regulations, and publish the regulations in Delaware Register of Regulations. The State Registrar’s Office under Division of Research of the General Assembly has developed guidelines and drafting manuals for Delaware regulations. Delaware issued the latest edition of drafting and style manual, entitled ‘‘Delaware Manual for Drafting Regulations’’ in March 2006 (‘‘the 2006 Manual’’). Since then, EPA has approved several Delaware SIP regulations in the manual-compliant format. However, a majority of the Delaware SIP regulations have not been updated. II. Summary of SIP Revision The purpose of this SIP revision is to revise all Delaware SIP regulations so that they are consistent with the format prescribed in the 2006 Manual. In addition, Delaware has made some nonsubstantive changes and corrections of errors exclusively for this SIP revision: • Administrative or editorial changes made under the administrative authority granted to Delaware Registrar’s Office by 29 Del. C., Ch 1134 and applicable to all Delaware regulations for consistency purposes. Therefore, all Delaware air regulations, both existing ones and future ones, shall follow this format. • Non-substantive changes made for clarification and consistency purposes and which do not alter or amend the intent or meaning of the subject regulation. • Editorial changes, including correction of errors due to typos or misprints when a regulation was developed or revised to its current version. A. SIP Regulations Revised in This SIP Revision The 32 regulations which Delaware has submitted administrative changes to EPA in this SIP revision are: E:\FR\FM\11AUR1.SGM 11AUR1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 154 (Wednesday, August 11, 2010)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 48564-48566]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-19754]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Parts 3 and 165

[Docket No. USCG-2010-0351]
RIN 1625-ZA25


Navigation and Navigable Waters; Technical, Organizational, and 
Conforming Amendments, Sector Columbia River, WA

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This rule makes non-substantive changes throughout our 
regulations. The purpose of this rule is to make conforming amendments 
and technical corrections to reflect the renaming of Sector Seattle to 
Sector Puget Sound as part of the Coast Guard reorganization.

DATES: This final rule is effective 12:01 a.m. on August 16, 2010.

ADDRESSES: Comments and material received from the public, as well as 
documents mentioned in this preamble as being available in the docket, 
are part of docket USCG-2010-0351 and are available for inspection or 
copying at the Docket Management Facility (M-30), U.S. Department of 
Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New 
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., 
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. You may also find this 
docket on the Internet by going to http://www.regulations.gov, 
inserting USCG-2010-0351 in the ``Keyword'' box, and then clicking 
``Search.''

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule, 
call or e-mail Lt. Matthew Jones, Coast Guard; telephone 206-220-7110, 
e-mail Matthew.m.jones@uscg.mil. If you have questions on viewing the 
docket, call Renee V. Wright, Program Manager, Docket Operations, 
telephone 202-366-9826.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Regulatory Information

    We did not publish a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) for this 
rule. Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(3)(A), the Coast Guard finds this rule is 
exempt from notice and comment rulemaking requirements because these 
changes involve rules of agency organization, procedure, or practice. 
In addition, the Coast Guard finds notice and comment procedure are 
unnecessary under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(3)(B) as this rule consists only of 
corrections and editorial, organizational, and conforming amendments 
and these changes will have no substantive effect on the public.
    Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that, for the same 
reasons, good cause exists for making this rule effective upon 
publication in the Federal Register.

Basis and Purpose

    This rule makes technical and editorial corrections to Title 33 
parts 3 and 165 in the Code of Federal Regulations. This internal 
agency reorganization establishes Sector Columbia River and is part of 
a process begun in 2004, intended to strengthen unity of command in 
Coast Guard port, waterway and coastal areas.

Discussion of Rule

    This rule revises 33 CFR parts 3 and 165 to reflect changes in 
Coast Guard internal organizational structure. Sector Portland has been 
disestablished and Sector Columbia River has been established in its 
place. This rule revises 33 CFR parts 3 and 165 to reflect the Sector 
Columbia River and Captain of the Port Zone name change in current 
regulations. This rule is a technical revision reflecting changes in 
agency procedure and organization, and does not indicate new 
authorities nor create any substantive requirements.

Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and 
executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses 
based on 13 of these statutes or executive orders.

Regulatory Planning and Review

    This rule is not a significant regulatory action under section 3(f) 
of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, and does not 
require an assessment of potential costs and benefits under section 
6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and Budget has not 
reviewed it under that Order. Because this rule involves non-
substantive changes and internal agency practices and procedures, it 
will not impose any additional costs on the public.

Small Entities

    Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have 
considered whether this rule would have a significant economic impact 
on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small entities'' 
comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are 
independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields, 
and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000.
    We estimate this rule will not impose any additional costs and 
should have little or no impact on small entities because the 
provisions of this rule are technical and non-substantive, and will 
have no substantive effect on the public and will impose no additional 
costs. Therefore, the Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that 
this final rule will not have a significant economic impact on a 
substantial number of small entities.

Collection of Information

    This rule calls for no new collection of information under the 
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).

Federalism

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132, 
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local 
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial 
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this rule under 
that Order and have determined that it does not have implications for 
federalism.

Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538) 
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary 
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may 
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or Tribal government, in 
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for 
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in 
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere 
in this preamble.

Taking of Private Property

    This rule will not cause a taking of private property or otherwise 
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental 
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property 
Rights.

[[Page 48565]]

Civil Justice Reform

    This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) 
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation, 
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.

Protection of Children

    We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection 
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule 
is not an economically significant rule and does not create an 
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may 
disproportionately affect children.

Indian Tribal Governments

    This rule does not have Tribal implications under Executive Order 
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments, 
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more 
Indian Tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and 
Indian Tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities 
between the Federal Government and Indian Tribes.

Energy Effects

    We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13211, Actions 
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, 
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant 
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant 
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to 
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use 
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and 
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy 
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects 
under Executive Order 13211.

Technical Standards

    The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15 
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards 
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress, 
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why 
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or 
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical 
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or 
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management 
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus 
standards bodies.
    This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not 
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.

Environment

    We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security 
Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which 
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental 
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have concluded 
that this action is one of a category of actions that do not 
individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human 
environment. This rule is categorically excluded under section 2.B.2, 
figure 2-1, paragraph (34)(a) of the Instruction. This rule involves 
regulations which are editorial and/or procedural, such as those 
updating addresses or establishing application procedures. An 
environmental analysis checklist and a categorical exclusion 
determination are available in the docket where indicated under 
ADDRESSES.

List of Subjects

33 CFR Part 3

    Organization and functions (government agencies).

33 CFR Part 165

    Harbors, Marine Safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and record 
keeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.

0
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33 
CFR parts 3 and 165 as follows:

PART 3--COAST GUARD AREAS, DISTRICTS, SECTORS, MARINE INSPECTION 
ZONES, AND CAPTAIN OF THE PORT ZONES

0
1. The authority citation for part 3 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 14 U.S.C. 92, Pub. L. 107-296, 116 Stat. 2135; 
Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1, para. 2(23).


0
2. Revise Sec.  3.65-15 to read as follows:


Sec.  3.65-15  Sector Columbia River Marine Inspection Zone and Captain 
of the Port Zone.

    Sector Columbia River's office is located in Astoria, OR. The 
boundaries of Sector Columbia River's Marine Inspection and Captain of 
the Port Zones start at the Washington coast at latitude 47[deg]32'00'' 
N, longitude 124[deg]21'15'' W, proceeding along this latitude east to 
latitude 47[deg]32'00'' N, longitude 123[deg]18'00'' W; thence south to 
latitude 46[deg]55'00'' N, longitude 123[deg]18'00'' W; thence east 
along this latitude to the eastern Idaho state line; thence southeast 
along the Idaho state line to the intersection of the Idaho-Wyoming 
boundary; thence south along the Idaho-Wyoming boundary to the 
intersection of the Idaho-Utah-Wyoming boundaries; thence west along 
the southern border of Idaho to Oregon and then west along the southern 
border of Oregon to the coast at latitude 41[deg]59'54'' N, longitude 
124[deg]12'42'' W; thence west along the southern boundary of the 
Thirteenth Coast Guard District, which is described in Sec.  3.65-10, 
to the outermost extent of the EEZ at latitude 41[deg]38'35'' N, 
128[deg]51'26'' W; thence north along the outermost extent of the EEZ 
to latitude 47[deg]32'00'' N; thence east to the point of origin.

PART 165-- REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS

0
3. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701; 50 
U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; Pub. L. 
107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security Delegation 
No. 0170.1.


Sec.  165.1308  [Amended]

0
4. In Sec.  165.1308(c), remove the phrase ``Captain of the Port, 
Portland, Oregon'' and add, in its place, the phrase ``Captain of the 
Port Columbia River''.


Sec.  165.1312  [Amended]

0
5. In Sec.  165.1312(b), remove the phrase ``Coast Guard Captain of the 
Port, Portland, Oregon'' and add, in its place, the phrase ``Captain of 
the Port Columbia River''.


Sec.  165.1315  [Amended]

0
6. In Sec.  165.1315, in the heading and paragraph (b), remove the 
phrase ``Captain of the Port Portland'' and add, in its place, the 
phrase ``Captain of the Port Columbia River''.


Sec.  165.1318  [Amended]

0
7. In Sec.  165.1318:
0
a. In the section heading, remove ``Portland, OR Captain of the Port 
Zone'' and add, in its place, ``Captain of the Port Columbia River 
Zone''.
0
b. In paragraphs (a), (d), (i) and (l) remove the phrase ``Captain of 
the Port Portland'' and add, in its place, the phrase ``Captain of the 
Port Columbia River''.


Sec.  165.1322  [Amended]

0
8. In Sec.  165.1322, in the section heading remove ``Oregon Captain of 
the Port Zone'' and add, in its place

[[Page 48566]]

``Captain of the Port Columbia River Zone''.


Sec.  165.1323  [Amended]

0
8. In Sec.  165.1323, in the section heading remove ``Portland, Oregon 
Captain of the Port Zone'' and add, in its place ``, Captain of the 
Port Columbia River Zone''.

    Dated: August 5, 2010.
Sandra Selman,
Acting Chief, Office of Regulations and Administrative Law, United 
States Coast Guard.
[FR Doc. 2010-19754 Filed 8-10-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P