Pipeline Safety: Periodic Updates of Regulatory References to Technical Standards and Miscellaneous Edits, 48593-48608 [2010-19643]
Download as PDF
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 154 / Wednesday, August 11, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
rate(s) of pay for the employee(s), plus
16 percent).
(b) Electronic searches. Fees shall
reflect the direct cost of conducting the
search. This will include the cost of
operating the central processing unit for
that portion of operating time that is
directly attributable to searching for and
printing records responsive to the FOIA
request and operator/programmer salary
attributable to the search.
(c) Record reviews. Time devoted to
reviewing records shall be charged on
the same basis as under paragraph (a) of
this section, but shall only be applicable
to the review of records located in
response to commercial use requests.
(d) Duplication. Fees for copying
paper records or for printing electronic
records shall be assessed at a rate of $.15
per page. For other types of copies such
as disks or audio visual tapes, CEQ shall
charge the direct cost of producing the
document(s). If total costs are expected
to exceed $25, the FOIA Officer shall
provide the requester with an estimate
in writing and, in return, obtain from
the requester a commitment to pay the
estimated fee. This does not apply if the
requester has indicated in advance a
willingness to pay fees as high as those
anticipated. If a requester wishes to
limit costs, the FOIA Officer shall
provide the requester an opportunity to
reformulate the request in order to
reduce costs. If the requester
reformulates a request, it shall be
considered a new request and the 20day period described in § 1515.6(a) shall
be deemed to begin when the FOIA
Officer receives the request.
(e)(1) Advance payments required.
The FOIA Officer may require a
requester to make an advance deposit of
up to the amount of the entire
anticipated fee before the FOIA Officer
begins to process the request if:
(i) The FOIA Officer estimates that the
fee will exceed $250; or
(ii) The requester has previously
failed to pay a fee in a timely fashion.
(2) When the FOIA Officer requires a
requester to make an advance payment,
the 20-day period described in
§ 1515.6(a) shall begin when the FOIA
Officer receives the payment.
(f) No assessment of fee. CEQ shall
not charge a fee to any requester if:
(1) The cost of collecting the fee
would be equal to or greater than the fee
itself; or
(2) After the effective date of these
regulations CEQ fails to comply with a
time limit under the Freedom of
Information Act for responding to the
request for records where no unusual or
exceptional circumstances apply.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:53 Aug 10, 2010
Jkt 220001
§ 1515.13 Fees for categories of
requesters.
CEQ shall assess fees for certain
categories of requesters as follows:
(a) Commercial use requesters. In
responding to commercial use requests,
CEQ shall assess fees that recover the
full direct costs of searching for,
reviewing, and duplicating records.
(b) Educational and non-commercial
scientific institutions. CEQ shall provide
records to requesters in this category for
the cost of duplication alone, excluding
charges for the first 100 pages. To
qualify for inclusion in this fee category,
a requester must show that the request
is authorized by and is made under the
auspices of a qualifying institution and
that the records are sought to further
scholarly research, not an individual
goal.
(c) Representatives of the news media.
CEQ shall provide records to requesters
in this category for the cost of
duplication alone, excluding charges for
the first 100 pages.
(d) All other requesters. CEQ shall
charge requesters who do not fall within
paragraphs (a) through (c) of this section
fees that recover the full direct cost of
searching for and duplicating records,
excluding charges for the first 100 pages
of reproduction and the first two hours
of search time.
§ 1515.14
Other charges.
CEQ may apply other charges,
including the following:
(a) Special charges. CEQ shall recover
the full cost of providing special
services, such as sending records by
express mail, to the extent that CEQ
elects to provide them in that manner.
(b) Interest charges. CEQ may begin
assessing interest charges on an unpaid
bill starting on the 31st day following
the day on which the FOIA Officer sent
the billing. Interest shall be charged at
the rate prescribed in 31 U.S.C. 3717
and will accrue from the date of billing.
(c) Aggregating requests. When the
FOIA Officer reasonably believes that a
requester or a group of requesters acting
in concert is attempting to divide a
request into a series of requests for the
purpose of avoiding fees, the FOIA
Officer shall aggregate those requests
and charge accordingly.
§ 1515.15
Payment and waiver.
(a) Remittances. Payment shall be
made in the form of check or money
order made payable to the Treasury of
the United States. At the time the FOIA
Officer notifies a requester of the
applicable fees, the Officer shall inform
the requester of where to send the
payment.
PO 00000
Frm 00045
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
48593
(b) Waiver of fees. CEQ may waive all
or part of any fee provided for in
§§ 1515.12 and 1515.13 when the FOIA
Officer deems that disclosure of the
information is in the general public’s
interest because it is likely to contribute
significantly to public understanding of
the operations or activities of the
government and is not primarily in the
commercial interest of the requester. In
determining whether a fee should be
waived, the FOIA Officer may consider
whether:
(1) The subject matter specifically
concerns identifiable operations or
activities of the government;
(2) The information is already in the
public domain;
(3) Disclosure of the information
would contribute to the understanding
of the public-at-large as opposed to a
narrow segment of the population;
(4) Disclosure of the information
would significantly enhance the
public’s understanding of the subject
matter;
(5) Disclosure of the information
would further a commercial interest of
the requester; and
(6) The public’s interest is greater
than any commercial interest of the
requester.
§ 1515.16
Other rights and services.
Nothing in this subpart will be
construed to entitle any person, as of
right, to any service or to the disclosure
of any record to which such person is
not entitled under the FOIA.
§§ 1515.17–1515.19
[Reserved]
Dated: August 5, 2010.
Nancy H. Sutley,
Chair, Council on Environmental Quality.
[FR Doc. 2010–19841 Filed 8–10–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3125–W0–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials
Safety Administration
49 CFR Parts 192, 193, and 195
[Docket No. PHMSA–2008–0301; Amdt. Nos.
192–114; 193–22; 195–94)
RIN 2137–AE41
Pipeline Safety: Periodic Updates of
Regulatory References to Technical
Standards and Miscellaneous Edits
Pipeline and Hazardous
Materials Safety Administration
(PHMSA), Department of Transportation
(DOT).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\11AUR1.SGM
11AUR1
48594
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 154 / Wednesday, August 11, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
PHMSA is amending the
Federal pipeline safety regulations to
incorporate by reference all or parts of
40 new editions of voluntary consensus
technical standards. This action allows
pipeline operators to use current
technologies, improved materials, and
updated industry and management
practices. Additionally, PHMSA is
clarifying certain regulatory provisions
and making several editorial
corrections. These amendments do not
require pipeline operators to take on any
significant new pipeline safety
initiatives.
DATES: The effective date of this final
rule is October 1, 2010.
Incorporation by reference. The
incorporation by reference of the
publications listed in these amendments
has been approved by the Director of the
Federal Register as of October 1, 2010.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
For technical information: Mike Israni
by phone at (202) 366–4571, or by email at mike.israni@dot.gov.
For regulatory information: Cheryl
Whetsel by phone at (202) 366–4431 or
by e-mail at cheryl.whetsel@dot.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
I. Background
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act of 1995 (Pub. L.
104–113) directs Federal agencies to use
technical standards and design
specifications developed by voluntary
consensus standard bodies instead of
government-developed technical
standards, when practicable. The Office
of Management and Budget (OMB)
Circular A–119: ‘‘Federal Participation
in the Development and Use of
Voluntary Consensus Standards,’’ sets
the policies on Federal use of voluntary
consensus standards. As defined in
OMB Circular A–119, voluntary
consensus standards are technical
standards developed or adopted by
organizations, both domestic and
international. These organizations use
agreed upon procedures to update and
revise their published standards every
three to five years to reflect modern
technology and best technical practices.
PHMSA’s Office of Pipeline Safety
employees participate in more than 25
national voluntary consensus standards
committees. PHMSA reviews, and may
adopt, standards that are applicable to
pipeline design, construction,
maintenance, inspection, and repair.
Prior to adopting any standard, PHMSA
reviews each new edition to determine
whether it should be incorporated in
whole or in part into the pipeline safety
regulations. When PHMSA believes
some aspect of a standard does not meet
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:53 Aug 10, 2010
Jkt 220001
this directive, it will not incorporate the
new edition. PHMSA has the ultimate
responsibility to ensure the best
interests of public safety are served.
There are more than 60 standards and
specifications incorporated by reference
in 49 CFR part 192, Transportation of
Natural and Other Gas by Pipeline:
Minimum Federal Safety Standards; 49
CFR part 193, Liquefied Natural Gas
Facilities: Federal Safety Standards; and
49 CFR part 195, Transportation of
Hazardous Liquids by Pipeline.
Previous updates to incorporate
industry standards by reference were
published May 24, 1996, (61 FR 26121),
June 6, 1996, (61 FR 2877), February 17,
1998, (63 FR 7721), June 14, 2004, (69
FR 32886), June 9, 2006, (71 FR 33402),
February 1, 2007, (72 FR 4657), and
April 14, 2009, (74 FR 17099).
II. Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
On July 22, 2009, PHMSA published
a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
(NPRM) to incorporate by reference
new, updated, or reaffirmed editions of
voluntary consensus standards into the
Federal pipeline safety regulations.
PHMSA proposed to incorporate by
reference all or parts of 40 technical
standards and make editorial
corrections to certain regulations.
PHMSA did not propose to incorporate
four new editions of ASTM
International (ASTM) standards (ASTM
D638, D2513, D2517, and F1055).
Therefore, the gas pipeline safety
regulations continue to reference
standards found in ASTM D638 (2003
edition), ASTM D 2513 (1987 edition),
ASTM D2513 (1999 edition), ASTM
2517 (2000 edition) and ASTM F1055
(1998 edition). In addition, PHMSA did
not propose to incorporate the 2008
editions of the National Fire Protection
Association (NFPA) NFPA 58:
‘‘Liquefied Petroleum Gas Code’’ (LP-Gas
Code) and NFPA 59: ‘‘Utility Liquefied
Petroleum Gas Plant Code (Utility LPGas Plant Code). Therefore, PHMSA will
continue to reference the 2004 editions
of NFPA 58 and 59 in part 192 of the
Federal pipeline safety regulations.
III. Summary of Comments
PHMSA received a total of 19
comments in response to the NPRM.
Several comments were from trade and
standards associations including: The
American Gas Association (AGA); the
Interstate Natural Gas Association of
America (INGAA); the National Propane
Gas Association (NPGA); the American
Petroleum Institute (API); the Oklahoma
Independent Petroleum Association
(OIPA); the Southern California Gas
Association (SCGA); the National Fire
Protection Association (NFPA) and the
PO 00000
Frm 00046
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Gas Piping Technology Committee
(GPTC). One state agency, the Iowa
Utilities Board, filed a comment as well
as the National Association of Pipeline
Safety Representatives (NAPSR), an
organization of state agency pipeline
safety managers responsible for the
administration of their state’s pipeline
safety programs. Five operators,
Southern California Gas Company and
San Diego Gas & Electric, Baltimore Gas
and Electric Company, CenterPoint
Energy Resources Corporation, and
Distrigas of Massachusetts LLC
submitted comments. Three private
citizens also submitted comments.
PHMSA also met with representatives
from NFPA during the comment period.
A summary of this September 8, 2009,
meeting is available in the docket
(PHMSA–2008–0301).
The majority of the comments
received were in opposition to a
proposed change to § 192.11(c) altering
the primacy of the NFPA 58 and 59
standards over part 192. The comments
are summarized and discussed under
each issue area below:
Comment Topic 1: Primacy of Part 192
over NFPA 58 and 59
Under the current version of
§ 192.11(c), if a conflict arises between
NFPA 58 and 59 and part 192, NFPA 58
and 59 would prevail. However, since
this primacy was established in 1996,
some operators have been
misinterpreting the meaning of
‘‘conflict.’’ Operators are complying with
the NFPA standards when the
requirements of these NFPA standards
and part 192 are in direct conflict;
however, the misinterpretation arises
when NFPA is silent or nonspecific on
a subject covered in part 192. In these
situations, some operators have
misinterpreted § 192.11(c) to mean they
do not need to comply with these
additional requirements listed in part
192.
The NPRM had proposed to reverse
this primacy so that part 192 would
prevail if the two conflict. In the NPRM,
PHMSA explained that NFPA 58 was
originally developed as a design and
installation code and, as such, did not
cover ongoing corrosion control issues
or operations and maintenance (O&M)
activities. Recently, NFPA 58 adopted
several O&M requirements; however,
they are significantly less stringent than
the requirements found in part 192.
PHMSA believes that NFPA 58
currently fails to sufficiently address
damage prevention, odorization,
distribution valve maintenance, leak
surveys, emergency plans, failure
investigation, and public awareness.
Because NFPA 58 and 59 currently
E:\FR\FM\11AUR1.SGM
11AUR1
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 154 / Wednesday, August 11, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
prevail, when there is a conflict in one
of these areas with part 192, operators
would be allowed to comply with a less
stringent requirement. Additionally,
propane gas does not safely dissipate
when it leaks and as a result can
represent a greater potential hazard to
the public than natural gas. Therefore, it
would be inappropriate to impose
weaker standards on propane
distribution facilities than on natural
gas distribution facilities. Without a
change to § 192.11(c), PHMSA believes
that the NFPA’s O&M requirements
would actually decrease safety in areas
where they conflict with part 192
requirements.
Nine commenters objected to this
proposed change. Commenters
requested an explanation of the
misinterpretations referred to in the
NPRM and suggested that the proposed
change is substantive and therefore
inappropriate for this type of
rulemaking. Commenters maintained
that petroleum gas systems are often
installed by plumbers who may not be
aware of part 192 requirements but are
familiar with NFPA 58.
Commenters also stated that the
NFPA 58 and NFPA 59 consensus
standards were developed by industry,
manufacturers, listing agencies, state
and Federal regulators, and insurance
professionals and that these standards
are specific to the installation and
utilization of liquefied petroleum gas
(LPG). Commenters stated there are
extensive differences between propaneair plants and pipeline transportation
facilities and the physical properties of
LPG are not compatible with the current
regulations for natural gas systems.
One commenter supported the change
noting that the O&M requirements are
clearer in part 192 than NFPA 58 and,
therefore, the primacy of part 192 over
NFPA 58 and 59 would be beneficial.
According to the NFPA, the proposed
change would create conflicts between
NFPA 58 or 59 and part 192. The
proposed change would affect
inspection of pressure vessel relief
valves, process piping design standards,
welding standards and the use of
threaded connections, polyethylene (PE)
pipe in LPG systems above 30 psig, gray
cast iron, and regulator configuration for
smaller LPG systems. NFPA
recommended that the reference to
NFPA 58 and NFPA 59 in § 192.11 be
revised to clarify that these NFPA
standards are applicable to propane
storage systems only and not to
underground gas distribution systems.
NFPA also recommended that § 192.11
specify which operating requirements of
part 192 are applicable to propane
storage systems, including operations,
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:53 Aug 10, 2010
Jkt 220001
maintenance, qualification of pipeline
personnel, and public awareness
planning. NFPA suggested that the
conflicts between its NFPA 58 and 59
standards and part 192 can be resolved
through the NFPA standards updating
process.
NPGA asserted that NFPA is better
suited than PHMSA to develop
petroleum gas regulations.
PHMSA response: Petroleum gas
transportation requirements need to
achieve the same level of safety as
natural gas transportation requirements.
PHMSA continues to have concerns
regarding the level of safety required in
NFPA 58 and 59 standards in certain
subject areas. The newer editions of
NFPA 58 have expanded the scope of
covered facilities and have more
conflicting requirements than the
currently incorporated editions. PHMSA
believes that the NFPA 58 and 59
committees should analyze the
following topics in consideration of
public safety: Internal valves on tank
penetrations transporting propane, relief
valves, equipment separation and
location distances, facility cathodic
protection, and requirements for
‘‘retroactive’’ application of the
standards.
PHMSA will address the subject of
NFPA 58 and 59 primacy under a
separate rulemaking. In the interim,
compliance with part 192 requirements
has not changed. When a requirement
exists in part 192 that does not exist in
NFPA 58 or 59, operators are required
to comply with it. A conflict only exists
when an operator cannot comply with a
requirement in NFPA 58 and 59 because
it conflicts with a requirement in part
192. When a conflict exists, NFPA 58 or
59 continue to prevail.
Comment Topic 2: GPTC petition to
amend § 192.557(c).
PHMSA proposed to amend
§ 192.557(c) in response to a petition by
the GPTC to clarify that a previous
pressure test would allow for a pipeline
to operate at the higher maximum
allowable operating pressure (MAOP).
Several commenters stated that this
explanation misstated the purpose of
the change. Many commenters objected
that this is a substantive change and
therefore inappropriate for this type of
rulemaking.
The Iowa Utilities Board (IUB) and
the NAPSR stated that the amendment
will not accomplish the purpose of the
GPTC petition. The proposed change
occurs in a section of the code that
addresses pressure increments
(§ 192.557(c)). The requirements of
§ 192.553(d) (‘‘Limitation on increase in
maximum allowable operating
PO 00000
Frm 00047
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
48595
pressure’’), would not be counteracted.
To accomplish the purpose of the GPTC
petition, additional code sections would
need to be amended.
Sempra Energy and GPTC stated that
they support the proposed change to
§ 192.557(c) but the language of the
NPRM misstates the GPTC intent which
is to clarify that a pressure test is not
required to validate the new MAOP.
PHMSA response: PHMSA has
removed the proposed change to
§ 192.557(c) from the final rule. PHMSA
agrees that the proposed change may
cause confusion with the requirements
of § 192.553(d) which were amended
after the GPTC petition was submitted.
PHMSA may consider a revised GPTC
petition in a separate rulemaking action.
Comment Topic 3: NFPA 58 and NFPA
59
Three commenters expressed concern
regarding the proposal to not adopt the
2008 edition of NFPA 58. These
commenters surmised that PHMSA’s
decision to not adopt the 2008 edition
stemmed from concerns with Section
14.4 Small LP–Gas Systems and
recommended that PHMSA adopt the
2008 edition of NFPA 58 excluding
Section 14.4.
There were also objections to
PHMSA’s proposal to not adopt the
latest edition of NFPA 59. These
commenters believe the 2008 edition is
superior to the 2004 edition. They stated
that the 2008 edition included
reorganization of the document to
conform to the NFPA Manual of Style.
This edition eliminated confusing
language, reorganized the standard to
logically group requirements, and
expanded use of excerpts from NFPA 58
instead of referencing NFPA 58. The
commenters stated that many
stakeholders have worked extensively to
develop the 2008 edition of the NFPA
59 consensus standard. They noted that
the AGA Supplemental Gas Committee
task force performed a great deal of
work to review the NFPA standard and
that NFPA ultimately adopted 62 of the
72 proposals the AGA task force
submitted to the technical committee.
The commenters asserted that safety
measures are not decreased in the areas
of damage prevention, odorization,
distribution valve maintenance,
operation and maintenance, and
emergency and public awareness
planning by moving from the 2004
edition to the 2008 edition.
NFPA encouraged PHMSA to work
with the NFPA 59 committee in a
manner similar to its work with the
NFPA 58 committee to address relevant
issues through the normal course of
scheduled revisions or, for unforeseen
E:\FR\FM\11AUR1.SGM
11AUR1
48596
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 154 / Wednesday, August 11, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with RULES
issues, through the Tentative Interim
Amendment process.
PHMSA response: PHMSA
appreciates the work of the NFPA 58
and 59 committees and their
responsiveness to PHMSA’s concerns.
However, PHMSA is not changing the
editions currently incorporated by
reference (2004 editions of NFPA 58 and
59). The 2008 edition of NFPA 58
included changes in the requirements
for small LPG operators which are in
conflict with part 192 requirements.
Further, the 2008 edition of NFPA 59
references NFPA 58. If we were to adopt
the 2008 edition of NFPA 59, the
referenced sections of NFPA 58 would
also be incorporated by reference unless
we were to prescribe otherwise.
Therefore, PHMSA has decided not to
adopt either of the new editions.
PHMSA looks forward to working with
the committees to improve public safety
and resolve issues which may lead to
the adoption of the newest editions in
the next Periodic Updates of Regulatory
References to Technical Standards.
Comment Topic 4: NFPA 59A
The NFPA maintained that
incorporating both the 2001 and 2006
editions of NFPA 59A by reference
would create confusion for operators.
NFPA recommends that to address
PHMSA’s concern with Section 5.3 of
the 2006 edition, PHMSA should adopt
the 2006 edition and reference the 2001
edition solely for the requirements
applicable to those specific subjects.
This approach would recognize and
capture the other improvements in the
2006 edition.
NFPA further stated that the 2001
edition of NFPA 59A incorporates by
reference 70 other technical standards of
which all but three have been
superseded or removed. Some of the
standards were discontinued and are no
longer for sale. During the generation of
an updated edition, the technical
committee does not consider the
interrelation of a provision in one
edition with related provisions in a
prior edition. Each edition stands on its
own. Since 2006, when PHMSA
incorporated NFPA 59A by reference in
the pipeline safety regulations, PHMSA
has incorporated different editions of
the standards that are cross-referenced
within NFPA 59A. This rulemaking
does not address this conflict.
PHMSA response: PHMSA wishes to
remind all who commented on
proposed changes to NFPA 59A and
part 193 that the process for changing a
regulation is significantly different than
developing a consensus standard
process. PHMSA must assess the impact
of new editions of NFPA 59A on the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:53 Aug 10, 2010
Jkt 220001
public and the environment. When
revised safety standards are clearly an
improvement to the public, the
environment, and pipeline safety, the
adoption of a standard may be more
easily justified.
After NFPA 59A’s 2006 edition was
published, PHMSA noted that revisions
to NFPA 59A lacked sufficient
justification. In some instances, the
historical basis for adopting a safety
standard could not be explained. In
these cases, PHMSA observed NFPA’s
committee work and concluded it
would be premature to adopt revisions
that were incomplete or could not be
appropriately justified. For these
reasons, PHMSA has infrequently
adopted new provisions within NFPA
59A and has not changed its decision to
not adopt the new edition in response
to these comments.
PHMSA is supportive of NFPA’s
efforts on standards and safety research
and believes its work is beneficial to the
public. We encourage NFPA and its
members to continuously improve its
NFPA 59A standard and ensure that
new revisions are complete, properly
justified, and adequately explained to
the public.
Comment Topic 5: ASTM D2513–87 and
ASTM D2513–99
PHMSA proposed not to incorporate
by reference ASTM D2513: Standard
Specification for Thermoplastic Gas
Pressure Pipe, Tubing and Fittings
(2007) edition at this time but will
continue to reference the 1987 & 1999
editions. Southwest Gas and AGA
commented that the 2007 edition of
ASTM D2513 incorporates changes
which occurred since 1999 including
advances in manufacturing and
installation of polyethylene (PE) pipe,
recognition of applicability of more
recent ASTM standards for fittings, and
provisions for updated storage
requirements. If the 2007 edition is not
incorporated, both commenters
recommended that PHMSA provide a
Stay of Enforcement from Section
A.1.5.7 in the 1999 edition of ASTM
D2513 to recognize the safe, longer
storage time of PE pipe. AGA noted that
gas utility operators and their state
regulators have already sought waivers
to take advantage of the new standard.
If they are not granted the waiver, they
may have to dispose of a significant
amount of polyethylene (PE) pipe that
was purchased in response to the
shortages that operators experienced in
the aftermath of hurricane Katrina.
Southwest Gas recommended deleting
the reference in § 192.7 to the 1987
edition of ASTM D2513 for
§ 192.63(a)(1). A 1993 amendment to
PO 00000
Frm 00048
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
§ 192.63 stated that the reference was
retained due to temperature marking of
fittings. The 1999 edition of ASTM
D2513 restored the temperature marking
requirements for fittings.
PHMSA response: PHMSA has made
no change in the response to these
comments. PHMSA appreciates the
work of the ASTM Committee F–17 and
D20.10. There are important issues that
are being finalized including the subject
of NAPSR Resolution SR–2–01, marking
of materials. The resolution of these
issues will impact ASTM D638, D2513–
87, D2513–99, D2517, and F1055
standards. These issues include but are
not limited to the review of:
• Revisions of material categories.
• PENT test duration for PA–11 and
PA–12 materials.
• Development process for new
materials.
• Review of existing standards for regrind, quality assurance, and quality
control due to recent failures.
• Cyclic fatigue and long-term cyclic
fatigue testing of plastic mechanical
appurtenances.
• Need for new or modified
regulations or standards due to the
impact of new materials.
• Impact of findings from Standard
Dimension Ratio and side wall fusion
Research and Development programs.
PHMSA will address Southwest Gas
and AGA’s request for a Stay of
Enforcement separately from this
rulemaking. The special permit process
offers operators an existing mechanism
to request an extension from the current
storage requirements for polyethylene
(PE) pipe.
PHMSA has considered these
comments but has not changed its
decision to not adopt the more recent
edition of ASTM D2513.
Comment Topic 6: LNGFIRE3
Technology & Management Systems
commented on the proposal to replace
GRI–89/0176 ‘‘LNGFIRE: A Thermal
Radiation Model for LNG Fires’’ (June
29, 1990) with GTI -04/0032 LNGFIRE3:
A Thermal Radiation Model for LNG
Fires (2004). The commenter
recommended that in consideration of
fire research conducted in the past three
years, PHMSA should reevaluate
performance criteria for fire models and
consider alternate models that have
been scientifically assessed, verified,
and validated to the Administrator’s
approval.
PHMSA response: The Gas
Technology Institute (GTI) (formerly the
Gas Research Institute) changed the title
of this material. The contents of the
software and the report have not
changed. PHMSA’s purpose for this
E:\FR\FM\11AUR1.SGM
11AUR1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 154 / Wednesday, August 11, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
amendment is solely to reference the
new title. The commenter’s statements
regarding performance criteria are
beyond the scope of this rulemaking.
PHMSA is updating the title of this
standard in the regulation to reflect the
title currently used by GTI.
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with RULES
Comment Topic 7: Web accessibility of
standards.
The Oklahoma Independent
Petroleum Association stated that the
costs to smaller oil and gas operators to
purchase the updated standards and to
identify and assess all regulatory
compliance requirements are
burdensome. They requested that
PHMSA place the applicable reference
documents on its web site for easy
access.
PHMSA response: PHMSA regrets that
we are prohibited from posting the
technical standards to our web site as
most standards have copyright
protection. All incorporated materials
are available for inspection in the Office
of Pipeline Safety, Pipeline and
Hazardous Materials Safety
Administration, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC, 20590–
0001, 202–366–4595, or at the National
Archives and Records Administration
(NARA), 202–741–6030, or go to
https://www.archives.gov/
federal_register/
code_of_federal_regulations/
ibr_locations.html.
The incorporated materials are
available from the respective
organizations listed in § 192.7 (c)(1).
IV. Advisory Committee
On December 9, 2009, PHMSA
discussed the proposed rule with the
Technical Pipeline Safety Standards
Committee (TPSSC) and the Technical
Hazardous Liquid Pipeline Safety
Standards Committee (THLPSSC). These
are statutorily-mandated advisory
committees that advise PHMSA about
the technical feasibility, reasonableness
and cost-effectiveness of its proposed
regulations. At the meeting, PHMSA
discussed the comments received in
response to the NPRM. NFPA
emphasized that small operators have
difficulty determining which
requirements of part 192 or NFPA 59A
apply to them. The committee urged
PHMSA to take action to work out the
issues presented by NFPA, ASME,
GPTC, and/or State Industry Regulatory
Review Committee (SIRRC), a
committee comprised of state and
federal pipeline safety regulators, AGA
and APGA formed to coordinate issues
pertaining to part 192.
With the exception of NFPA’s
abstention, the committees voted
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:53 Aug 10, 2010
Jkt 220001
unanimously that the NPRM was
technically feasible, reasonable,
practicable, and cost effective. Since the
NPRM included proposed changes to
the NFPA standards, the NFPA
abstained from voting in accordance
with its bylaws. A transcript of the
meeting is available in the docket for
this rulemaking.
V. Summary of Final Rule
This final rule accepts the following
updated editions of technical standards
in parts 192, 193, 195. PHMSA is also
amending titles, dates, and references as
applicable. Before describing each
newly incorporated standard, PHMSA is
providing additional information
regarding the partial incorporation of
NFPA 59A and the full incorporation of
several API standards.
PHMSA will incorporate only those
sections of NFPA 59A, ‘‘Standard for the
Production, Storage, and Handling of
Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG)’’ (2006
edition) relating to ultrasonic inspection
and seismic design requirements.
PHMSA believes the NFPA 59A
committee needs to reconcile
differences relating to dispersion
analyses for vapor releases from process
and safety equipment; containers with
liquid penetrations at grade; design spill
cases for full and double containment
containers; standards for impoundment
sizing for snow accumulation, severe
weather, emergency depressurization,
and fuel bunkering. Therefore, except
for specified sections in the 2006
edition mentioned above, PHMSA will
continue to reference NFPA 59A (2001
edition).
ANSI/API Specification 5L and API
Standard 1104
In a Direct Final Rule (74 FR 17099)
published on April 14, 2009, PHMSA
incorporated by reference the 2007
editions of ANSI/API Specification 5L,
‘‘Specification for Line Pipe’’ and API
Standard 1104, ‘‘Welding of Pipelines
and Related Facilities.’’ However, it did
not eliminate the use of the previously
referenced editions of these standards.
In this final rule, PHMSA eliminates the
use of the previous editions of these
standards, API Specification 5L (43rd
edition and errata, 2004) and API
Standard 1104 (19th edition, 1999,
including errata October 31, 2001).
API Recommended Practice 5L1/ISO
3183 & API Recommended Practice 5LW
PHMSA is incorporating by reference
API Recommended Practice 5L1/ISO
3183 ‘‘Specification for Line Pipe’’ (6th
edition, 2002) into the newly-created
§ 195.207. This standard provides a
standard for hazardous liquid operators
PO 00000
Frm 00049
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
48597
for the transportation of certain API
Specification 5L steel line pipe by
railroad.
PHMSA is also incorporating API
Recommended Practice 5LW (API RP
5LW), ‘‘Transportation of Line Pipe on
Barges and Marine Vessels’’ (2nd
edition, 1996) into Parts 192 and 195.
This standard is referenced in
§ 192.65(a) and in the newly-created
§ 195.207(a). API RP 5LW provides a
standard for transportation of certain
API Specification 5L steel line pipe by
ship or barge on both inland and marine
waterways.
American Petroleum Institute (API)
• ANSI/API Specification 5L/ISO
3183, ‘‘Specification for Line Pipe’’ (44th
edition, 2007), includes errata (January
2009) and addendum (February 2009).
Replaces incorporated by reference
(IBR): API Specification 5L,
‘‘Specification for Line Pipe’’ (43rd
edition and errata, 2004);
Referenced in 49 CFR 192.55(e);
192.112; 192.113; Item I, Appendix B to
Part 192; 195.106(b)(1)(i); 195.106(e),
195.207(a).
• API Recommended Practice 5L1
‘‘Recommended Practice for Railroad
Transportation of Line Pipe,’’ (6th
Edition, 2002)
IBR for the first time in 49 CFR newlycreated 195.207;
Referenced in 49 CFR 192.65(a)(1);
195.207.
• API Recommended Practice 5LW,
‘‘Transportation of Line Pipe on Barges
and Marine Vessels’’ (2nd edition, 1996,
effective March 1, 1997).
IBR for the first time;
Referenced in 49 CFR 192.65(b);
195.207(b).
• API Specification 6D/ISO 14313,
‘‘Specification for Pipeline Valves’’ (23rd
edition (April 2008, effective October 1,
2008) and errata 3 (includes 1 & 2,
February 2009).
Replaces IBR: API Specification 6D
‘‘Pipeline Valves’’ (22nd edition,
January 2002);
Referenced in 49 CFR 192.145(a);
195.116(d).
• API Specification 12F,
‘‘Specification for Shop Welded Tanks
for Storage of Production Liquids (11th
edition, November 1, 1994, reaffirmed
2000, errata, February 2007).
Replaces IBR: 11th edition, 1994
(reaffirmed, 2000);
Referenced in 49 CFR 195.132(b)(1);
195.205(b)(2); 195.264(b)(1);
195.264(e)(1); 195.307(a); 195.565;
195.579(d).
• API Standard 510, ‘‘Pressure Vessel
Inspection Code: In-Service Inspection,
E:\FR\FM\11AUR1.SGM
11AUR1
48598
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 154 / Wednesday, August 11, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with RULES
Rating, Repair, and Alteration’’ (9th
edition, June 2006).
Replaces IBR: 8th edition, 1997
including Addenda 1 through 4;
Referenced in 49 CFR 195.205(b)(3);
195.432(c).
• API Standard 620, ‘‘Design and
Construction of Large, Welded, LowPressure Storage Tanks,’’ (11th edition
February 2008, addendum 1, March
2009).
Replaces IBR: 10th edition, 2002
including addendum 1;
Reference added in 49 CFR 193.2101(b),
193. 2321(b)(2).
Referenced in 49 CFR 195.132(b)(2);
195.205(b)(2); 195.264(b)(1);
195.264(e)(3); 195.307(b);
• API Standard 650, ‘‘Welded Steel
Tanks for Oil Storage’’ (11th edition,
June 2007, addendum 1, November
2008).
Replaces IBR: 10th edition, 1998
including Addenda 1–3;
Referenced in 49 CFR 195.132(b)(3);
195.205(b)(1); 195.264(b)(1);
195.264(e)(2); 195.307; 195.307(d);
195.565; 195.579(d).
• ANSI/API Recommended Practice
651, ‘‘Cathodic Protection of
Aboveground Petroleum Storage Tanks’’
(3rd edition, January 2007).
Replaces IBR: 2nd edition, December
1997;
Referenced in 49 CFR 195.565;
195.579(d).
• ANSI/API Recommended Practice
652, ‘‘Linings of Aboveground
Petroleum Storage Tank Bottoms’’ (3rd
edition, October 2005).
Replaces IBR: 2nd edition, December
1997;
Referenced in 49 CFR 195.579(d).
• API Standard 653, ‘‘Tank
Inspection, Repair, Alteration, and
Reconstruction’’ (3rd edition, December
2001, includes addendum 1 (September
2003), addendum 2 (November 2005),
addendum 3 (February 2008), and errata
(April 2008).
Replaces IBR: 3rd edition, 2001
including addendum 1, 2003;
Referenced in 49 CFR 195.205(b)(1);
195.432(b).
• API Standard 1104, ‘‘Welding of
Pipelines and Related Facilities’’ (20th
edition November 2005, errata/
addendum (July 2007) and errata 2
(2008)).
Replaces IBR: 19th edition, 1999,
including errata October 31, 2001;
Referenced in 49 CFR 192.225;
192.227(a); 192.229(c)(1); 192.241(c);
Item II, Appendix B; 195.222(a);
195.228(b); 195.214(a).
• API Recommended Practice 1130,
‘‘Computational Pipeline Monitoring for
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:53 Aug 10, 2010
Jkt 220001
Liquids Pipeline Segment’’ (3rd edition,
September 2007).
Replaces IBR: 2nd edition, 2002;
Referenced in 49 CFR 195.134; 195.444.
• API Standard 2000, ‘‘Venting
Atmospheric and Low-Pressure Storage
Tanks Nonrefrigerated and Refrigerated’’
(5th edition, April 1998, errata,
November 15, 1999).
Replaces IBR: 5th edition, April 1998;
Referenced in 49 CFR 195.264(e)(2);
195.264(e)(3).
• API Recommended Practice 2003,
‘‘Protection Against Ignitions Arising
Out of Static, Lightning, and Stray
Currents’’ (7th edition, January 2008).
Replaces IBR: 6th edition, 1998;
Referenced in 49 CFR 195.405(a).
• API Publication 2026, ‘‘Safe Access/
Egress Involving Floating Roofs of
Storage Tanks in Petroleum Service’’
(2nd edition, April 1998, reaffirmed,
June 2006).
Replaces IBR: 2nd edition, 1998;
Referenced in 49 CFR 195.405(b).
• API Recommended Practice 2350,
‘‘Overfill Protection for Storage Tanks in
Petroleum Facilities’’ (3rd edition,
January 2005).
Replaces IBR: 2nd edition, 1996;
Referenced in 49 CFR 195.428(c).
American Society of Civil Engineers
(ASCE):
• ASCE/SEI 7–05, ‘‘Minimum Design
Loads for Buildings and Other
Structures’’ (2005 edition, includes
supplement number 1 and errata)
Replaces IBR: 2002 edition;
Referenced in 49 CFR 193.2067(b)(1).
American Society for Testing and
Materials (ASTM):
• ASTM A53/A53M–07 (2007),
‘‘Standard Specification for Pipe, Steel,
Black and Hot-Dipped, Zinc-Coated,
Welded and Seamless’’ (September 1,
2007).
Replaces IBR: 2004 edition;
Referenced in 49 CFR 192.113; Item I,
Appendix B to Part 192; 195.106(e).
• ASTM A106/A106M–08 (2008),
‘‘Standard Specification for Seamless
Carbon Steel Pipe for High-Temperature
Service’’ (July 15, 2008).
Replaces IBR: 2004 edition;
Referenced in 49 CFR 192.113; Item I,
Appendix B to Part 192; 195.106(e).
• ASTM A372/A372M–03
(reapproved 2008), ‘‘Standard
Specification for Carbon and Alloy Steel
Forgings for Thin-Walled Pressure
Vessels’’ (March 1, 2008).
Replaces IBR: 2003 edition;
Referenced in 49 CFR 192.177(b)(1).
• ASTM A381–96 (Reapproved 2005),
‘‘Standard Specification for Metal-ArcWelded Steel Pipe for Use with High-
PO 00000
Frm 00050
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Pressure Transmission Systems’’
(October 1, 2005).
Replaces IBR: 1996 edition; reapproved
2001;
Referenced in 49 CFR 192.113, Item I,
Appendix B to Part 192; 195.106(e).
• ASTM A671–06, ‘‘Standard
Specification for Electric-FusionWelded Steel Pipe for Atmospheric and
Lower Temperatures’’ (May 1, 2006).
Replaces IBR: 2004 edition;
Referenced in 49 CFR 192.113, Item I,
Appendix B to Part 192; 195.106(e).
• ASTM A672–08, ‘‘Standard
Specification for Electric-FusionWelded Steel Pipe for High-Pressure
Service at Moderate Temperatures’’
(May 1, 2008).
Replaces IBR: 1996 edition; reapproved
2001;
Referenced in 49 CFR 192.113, Item I,
Appendix B to Part 192; 195.106(e).
• ASTM A691–98 (reapproved 2007),
‘‘Standard Specification for Carbon and
Alloy Steel Pipe, Electric-FusionWelded for High-Pressure Service at
High Temperatures’’ (November 1,
2007).
Replaces IBR: 1998 edition, reapproved
2002;
Referenced in 49 CFR 192.113, Item I,
Appendix B to Part 192; 195.106(e).
ASME International (ASME)
• ANSI/ASME B16.1 –2005, ‘‘Gray
Iron Pipe Flanges and Flanged Fittings:
(Classes 25, 125, and 250)’’ (August 31,
2006).
Replaces IBR: ASME B16.1–1998 ‘‘Cast
Iron Pipe Flanges and Flanged
Fittings’’ 1998 edition;
Referenced in 49 CFR 192.147(c).
• ANSI/ASME B16.9 –2007, ‘‘FactoryMade Wrought Butt Welding Fittings’’
(December 7, 2007).
Replaces IBR: 2003 edition (February
2004);
Referenced in 49 CFR 195.118(a).
• ANSI/ASME B31.4 –2006, ‘‘Pipeline
Transportation Systems for Liquid
Hydrocarbons and Other Liquids’’
(October 20, 2006).
Replaces IBR: 2002 edition (October
2002);
Referenced in 49 CFR 195.452(h)(4)(i).
• ANSI/ASME B31.8 –2007, ‘‘Gas
Transmission and Distribution Piping
Systems’’ (November 30, 2007).
Replaces IBR: 2003 edition (February
2004);
Referenced in 49 CFR 192.619(a)(1)(i);
195.5(a)(1)(i); 195.406(a)(1)(i).
• 2007 ASME Boiler & Pressure
Vessel Code, Section I: Rules for
Construction of Power Boilers (2007
edition, July 1, 2007).
E:\FR\FM\11AUR1.SGM
11AUR1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 154 / Wednesday, August 11, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
Replaces IBR: 2004 edition, including
addenda through July 1, 2005;
Referenced in 49 CFR 192.153(b).
• 2007 ASME Boiler & Pressure
Vessel Code, Section VIII, Division 1:
Rules for Construction of Pressure
Vessels (2007 edition, July 1, 2007).
Replaces IBR: 2004 edition, including
addenda through July 1, 2005;
Referenced in 49 CFR 192.153 (a);
192.153(b); 192.165(b)(3); 193.2321;
195.307(e).
• 2007 ASME Boiler & Pressure
Vessel Code, Section VIII, Division 2:
Alternative Rules, Rules for
Construction of Pressure Vessels (2007
edition, July 1, 2007).
Replaces IBR: 2004 edition, including
addenda through July 1, 2005;
Referenced in 49 CFR 192.153(b);
192.165(b)(3); 193.2321; 195.307(e).
• 2007 ASME Boiler & Pressure
Vessel Code, Section IX: Qualification
Standard for Welding and Brazing
Procedures, Welders, Brazers, and
Welding and Brazing Operators (2007
edition, July 1, 2007).
Replaces IBR: 2004 edition, including
addenda through July 1, 2005;
Referenced in 49 CFR 192.227(a); Item
II, Appendix B to Part 192; 195.222(a).
Gas Technology Institute (GTI)
• GTI–04/0032 LNGFIRE3: A
Thermal Radiation Model for LNG Fires
(March 2004).
Replaces IBR: GRI–89/0176 ‘‘LNGFIRE:
A Thermal Radiation Model for LNG
Fires’’ (June 29, 1990);
Referenced in 49 CFR 193.2057(a).
Manufacturers Standardization Society
of the Valve and Fittings Industry, Inc.
(MSS)
• MSS SP–44–2006, Standard
Practice, ‘‘Steel Pipeline Flanges’’ (2006
edition).
Replaces IBR: 1996 edition reaffirmed
2001;
Referenced in 49 CFR 192.147(a).
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with RULES
NACE International (NACE)
Replaces IBR: NACE Standard RP0502–
2002 ‘‘Pipeline External Corrosion
Direct Assessment Methodology;’’
Referenced in 49 CFR 192.923(b)(1);
192.925(b) Introductory text;
192.925(b)(1); 192.925(b)(1)(ii);
192.925(b)(2) Introductory text;
192.925(b)(3) Introductory text;
192.925(b)(3)(ii); 192.925(b)(iv);
192.925(b)(4) Introductory text;
192.925(b)(4)(ii); 192.931(d);
192.935(b)(1)(iv); 192.939(a)(2);
195.588.
National Fire Protection Association
(NFPA)
• NFPA 30, ‘‘Flammable and
Combustible Liquids Code’’ (2008
edition, approved August 15, 2007).
Replaces IBR: 2003 edition;
Referenced in 49 CFR 192.735(b);
195.264(b)(1).
• NFPA 59A, ‘‘Standard for the
Production, Storage, and Handling of
Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) (2006
edition, approved August 18, 2005).
Partially Replaces IBR: 2001 edition;
Referenced in 49 CFR 193.2101(b);
193.2321(b).
• NFPA 70 (2008), ‘‘National
Electrical Code’’ (NEC 2008) (Approved
August 15, 2007).
Replaces IBR: 2005 edition;
Referenced in 49 CFR 192.163(e);
192.189(c).
Plastics Pipe Institute, Inc. (PPI)
• PPI TR–3/2008 HDB/HDS/PDB/
SDB/MRS Policies (2008),’’Policies and
Procedures for Developing Hydrostatic
Design Basis (HDB), Pressure Design
Basis (PDB), Strength Design Basis
(SDB), and Minimum Required Strength
(MRS) Ratings for Thermoplastic Piping
Materials or Pipe’’ (May 2008).
Replaces IBR: 2004 edition;
Referenced in 49 CFR 192.121.
VI. Editorial Corrections and
Clarifications
Part 192
Section 192.3
• NACE SP0169–2007, Standard
Practice, ‘‘Control of External Corrosion
on Underground or Submerged Metallic
Piping Systems’’ (reaffirmed March 15,
2007).
Replaces IBR: NACE Standard RP0169–
2002, ‘‘Control of External Corrosion
on Underground or Submerged
Metallic Piping Systems;’’
Referenced in 49 CFR 195.571;
195.573(a)(2).
Section 192.3 defines terms used
throughout Part 192. PHMSA will move
the definitions, ‘‘active corrosion,’’
‘‘electrical survey’’ and ‘‘pipeline
environment’’ from § 192.465(e) to
§ 192.3. This revision provides a broader
applicability of these terms to part 192
because these terms are also found in
part 192, subparts I and O.
• NACE SP0502–2008, Standard
Practice ‘‘Pipeline External Corrosion
Direct Assessment Methodology’’
(reaffirmed March 20, 2008).
PHMSA corrects the notation to
ASTM D2513 to ASTM D2513–87 in
§ 192.63 (a)(1) to clarify the version
incorporated is the 1987 version and
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:53 Aug 10, 2010
Jkt 220001
Section 192.63
PO 00000
Frm 00051
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
48599
adds to the text ‘‘(incorporated by
reference, see § 192.7).’’
PHMSA also corrects the notation to
ASTM D2513 to ASTM D2513–99 in
§§ 192.123 (e)(2); 192.191(b); 192.281
(b)(2); 192.283 (a)(1)(i) and Item 1,
Appendix B to clarify the version
incorporated is the 1999 version and
adds to the text ‘‘(Incorporated by
reference, see § 192.7).’’
Section 192.145
PHMSA revises paragraphs (d) and (e)
to use the same language as ANSI/
ASME B31.8, paragraph 831.11(c) in
referring to shell components. The
revisions to paragraph (d) clarify the
elements of a ‘‘shell component.’’
PHMSA is also clarifying the
materials allowed in certain valve
components used in compressor stations
in response to the GPTC petition. In
paragraph (e), we clarify that cast iron,
malleable iron, or ductile iron may be
used in the valve ball or plug. These
materials may not be used in the
pressure holding shell components (e.g.,
body, bonnet, cover, or end flange).
Section 192.711
When the repair time conditions were
implemented for Pipeline Integrity
Management in High Consequence
Areas (HCA), this section was not
modified to clarify that the repair times
for pipelines covered by § 192.711
pertained only to non-integrity
management repairs. We are revising
this section to make that clearer.
Part 193
Section 193.2101
PHMSA revises § 193.2101 to
incorporate by reference sections from
the 2006 edition of NFPA 59A
pertaining to the seismic design of
stationary LNG storage tanks. Other
sections from the 2001 edition of NFPA
59A continue to be incorporated by
reference as designated in § 193.2013.
Although NFPA 59A (2006)
incorporates by reference the 1990
edition of API Standard 620 for seismic
design PHMSA is instead incorporating
by reference the most recent version of
API Standard 620 (11th edition,
addendum 1, 2009).
Section 193.2321
PHMSA clarifies the language in
§ 193.2321(a) to use the broader
terminology for nondestructive testing.
PHMSA revises § 193.2321(b) to
incorporate the requirements in the
2006 edition of NFPA 59A’s for the
ultrasonic examination of LNG tank
welds for storage tanks with an internal
design pressure at or below 15 psig.
E:\FR\FM\11AUR1.SGM
11AUR1
48600
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 154 / Wednesday, August 11, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
Part 195
Privacy Act Statement
Executive Order 13175
Section 195.264
Anyone may search the electronic
form of all comments received for any
of our dockets. The Privacy Notice for
comment submissions may be reviewed
at https://www.regulations.gov. You may
review DOT’s complete Privacy Act
Statement in the Federal Register
published April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477)
or you may visit https://
DocketsInfo.dot.gov.
Executive Order 12866—Regulatory
Planning and Review and DOT
Regulatory Policies and Procedures
PHMSA analyzed this final rule
according to Executive Order 13175
(‘‘Consultation and Coordination with
Indian Tribal Governments’’). The final
rule does not significantly or uniquely
affect the communities of the Indian
tribal governments or impose
substantial direct compliance costs;
thus, the funding and consultation
requirements of Executive Order 13175
do not apply.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
PHMSA adds to the text in
195.264(e)(2); 195.264(e)(3)
‘‘(Incorporated by reference, see
§ 195.3).’’
Section 195.307
PHMSA revises paragraph (c) to
reflect revised section numbering
regarding pneumatic testing from 5.3 to
5.2 of API Standard 650.
Section 195.401
When the repair time conditions were
implemented for Pipeline Integrity
Management in High Consequence
Areas (HCA), this section was not
modified to clarify the repair times for
pipelines covered by § 195.452
(pipelines that could affect an HCA).
The requirement to repair a condition
within a reasonable time period (unless
an immediate hazard) applies to
conditions on pipelines not covered by
§ 195.452. In this final rule, PHMSA
revises this section to make those
requirements clearer.
Section 195.432
PHMSA revises paragraph (b) to
eliminate the reference to Section 4 of
API Standard 653. All sections in API
Standard 653 relating to inspection of
in-service atmospheric and low-pressure
steel aboveground breakout tanks are
incorporated by reference.
Section 195.452
PHMSA revises paragraph (h)(4)(i) to
reflect new section numbering as
specified in the updated ANSI/ASME
B31.4. The referenced section is
changed from ‘‘451.7’’ to ‘‘451.6.2.2 (b)’’.
VII. Rulemaking Analyses and Notices
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with RULES
Statutory/Legal Authority for This
Rulemaking
16:53 Aug 10, 2010
Jkt 220001
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.), PHMSA must
consider whether rulemaking actions
would have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities. This final rule ensures that
pipeline operators are using the most
current editions of technical standards
incorporated by reference. The final rule
also improves the clarity of several
regulations. PHMSA believes that this
final rule impacts a substantial number
of small entities but that this impact
will be negligible. Based on the facts
available about the expected impact of
this rulemaking, I certify, under Section
605 of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 605) that this final rule will not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
This final rule does not impose
unfunded mandates under the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995. It does not result in costs of $100
million (adjusted for inflation currently
estimated to be $132 million) or more in
any one year to either State, local, or
tribal governments, in the aggregate, or
to the private sector, and is the least
burdensome alternative that achieves
the objective of the final rule.
Executive Order 13132
This final rule is published under the
authority of the Federal Pipeline Safety
Laws (49 U.S.C. 60101 et seq.). Section
60102 authorizes the Secretary of
Transportation to issue regulations
governing design, installation,
inspection, emergency plans and
procedures, testing, construction,
extension, operation, replacement, and
maintenance of pipeline facilities.
Section 60102(l) of the Federal Pipeline
Safety Laws states that the Secretary
shall, to the extent appropriate and
practicable, update incorporated
industry standards that have been
adopted as part of the Federal pipeline
safety regulations.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
The final rule is not a significant
regulatory action under Section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735)
and, therefore, was not subject to review
by the Office of Management and
Budget. This final rule is not significant
under the Regulatory Policies and
Procedures of the Department of
Transportation (44 FR 11034).
PHMSA is incorporating by reference
new editions of technical standards in
the Federal pipeline safety regulations.
The final rule is intended to enhance
transportation safety and reduce the
overall compliance burden on the
regulated industry.
Industry standards developed and
adopted by consensus generally are
accepted and followed by the industry;
thus, their incorporation by reference in
the Federal pipeline safety regulations
assures that the industry is not forced to
comply with a different set of standards
to accomplish the same safety goal.
Requiring regulatory compliance with
standards such as the ASME, ASTM and
API takes advantage of established,
well-defined and proven practices.
Because we are adopting industry
consensus standards we expect
compliance costs associated with these
regulatory changes to be minimal.
Paperwork Reduction Act
PHMSA has analyzed this final rule
under the principles and criteria in
Executive Order 13132 (‘‘Federalism’’).
The final rule does not have a
substantial direct effect on the States,
the relationship between the national
government and the States, or the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government. The final rule
does not impose substantial direct
compliance costs on State and local
governments. This final regulation does
not preempt state law for intrastate
pipelines. Therefore, the consultation
and funding requirements of Executive
Order 13132 do not apply.
This final rule does not impose any
new information collection
requirements.
PO 00000
Frm 00052
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
National Environmental Policy Act
PHMSA analyzed this final rule in
accordance with the National
Environmental Policy Act (42
U.S.C.4321–4375), the Council on
Environmental Quality regulations (40
CFR parts 1500–1508), and DOT Order
5610.1C, and has determined that this
action will not significantly affect the
quality of the human environment.
PHMSA examined alternatives in the
NPRM and did not receive any
comments on this preliminary analysis.
E:\FR\FM\11AUR1.SGM
11AUR1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 154 / Wednesday, August 11, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
Executive Order 13211
Transporting gas affects the nation’s
available energy supply. However, this
final rule is not a ‘‘significant’’ energy
action under Executive Order 13211. It
is not a significant regulatory action
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. Further, the Administrator of
the Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs has not designated this rule as a
significant energy action.
Regulation Identifier Number (RIN)
A regulation identifier number (RIN)
is assigned to each regulatory action
listed in the Unified Agenda of Federal
Regulations. The Regulatory Information
Service Center publishes the Unified
Agenda in April and October of each
year. The RIN number contained in the
heading of this document can be used
to cross-reference this action with the
Unified Agenda.
49 CFR Part 193
Incorporation by Reference, Liquefied
Natural gas, Pipeline safety.
49 CFR Part 195
Anhydrous ammonia, Carbon
Dioxide, Incorporation by Reference,
Petroleum Pipeline safety.
In consideration of the foregoing,
PHMSA is amending 49 CFR parts 192,
193, and 195 as follows:
■
PART 192—TRANSPORTATION OF
NATURAL AND OTHER GAS BY
PIPELINE: MINIMUM FEDERAL
SAFETY STANDARDS
1. The authority citation for Part 192
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 5103, 60102, 60104,
60108, 60109, 60110, 60113, 60116, 60118
and 60137; and 49 CFR 1.53.
List of Subjects
49 CFR Part 192
Incorporation by Reference, Natural
Gas, Pipeline safety.
2. In § 192.3, definitions for ‘‘Active
corrosion’’, ‘‘Electrical survey’’ and
‘‘pipeline environment’’ are added in
alphabetical order to read as follows:
§ 192.3
■
*
*
Definitions
*
*
*
Active corrosion means continuing
corrosion that, unless controlled, could
result in a condition that is detrimental
to public safety.
*
*
*
*
*
Electrical survey means a series of
closely spaced pipe-to-soil readings over
pipelines which are subsequently
analyzed to identify locations where a
corrosive current is leaving the pipeline.
*
*
*
*
*
Pipeline environment includes soil
resistivity (high or low), soil moisture
(wet or dry), soil contaminants that may
promote corrosive activity, and other
known conditions that could affect the
probability of active corrosion.
*
*
*
*
*
3. In § 192.7, paragraph (c)(2) is
revised to read as follows:
■
§ 192.7 What documents are incorporated
by reference partly or wholly in this part?
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(2) Documents incorporated by
reference.
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with RULES
Source and name of referenced material
49 CFR reference
A. Pipeline Research Council International (PRCI):
(1) AGA Pipeline Research Committee, Project PR–3–805, ‘‘A Modified Criterion for
Evaluating the Remaining Strength of Corroded Pipe,’’ (December 22, 1989). The
RSTRENG program may be used for calculating remaining strength.
B. American Petroleum Institute (API):
(1) ANSI/API Specification 5L/ISO 3183 ‘‘Specification for Line Pipe’’ (44th edition,
2007), includes errata (January 2009) and addendum (February 2009).
(2) API Recommended Practice 5L1 ‘‘Recommended Practice for Railroad Transportation of Line Pipe,’’ (6th Edition, July 2002).
(3) API Recommended Practice 5LW, ‘‘Transportation of Line Pipe on Barges and
Marine Vessels’’ (2nd edition, December 1996, effective March 1, 1997).
(4) ANSI/API Specification 6D, ‘‘Specification for Pipeline Valves’’ (23rd edition
(April 2008, effective October 1, 2008) and errata 3 (includes 1 and 2, February
2009)).
(5) API Recommended Practice 80, ‘‘Guidelines for the Definition of Onshore Gas
Gathering Lines,’’ (1st edition, April 2000).
(6) API Standard 1104, ‘‘Welding of Pipelines and Related Facilities’’ (20th edition,
October 2005, errata/addendum, (July 2007) and errata 2 (2008)).
(7) API Recommended Practice 1162, ‘‘Public Awareness Programs for Pipeline
Operators,’’ (1st edition, December 2003).
(8) API Recommended Practice 1165 ‘‘Recommended Practice 1165 ‘‘Recommended Practice for Pipeline SCADA Displays,’’ (API RP 1165) (First edition
(January 2007)).
C. American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM):
(1) ASTM A53/A53M–07, ‘‘Standard Specification for Pipe, Steel, Black and HotDipped, Zinc-Coated, Welded and Seamless’’ (September 1, 2007).
(2) ASTM A106/A106M–08, ‘‘Standard Specification for Seamless Carbon Steel
Pipe for High-Temperature Service’’ (July 15, 2008).
(3) ASTM A333/A333M–05 (2005) ‘‘Standard Specification for Seamless and Welded Steel Pipe for Low-Temperature Service’’.
(4) ASTM A372/A372M–03 (reapproved 2008), ‘‘Standard Specification for Carbon
and Alloy Steel Forgings for Thin-Walled Pressure Vessels’’ (March 1, 2008).
(5) ASTM A381–96 (reapproved 2005), ‘‘Standard Specification for Metal-Arc Welded Steel Pipe for Use With High-Pressure Transmission Systems’’ (October 1,
2005).
(6) ASTM A578/A578M–96 (re-approved 2001) ‘‘Standard Specification for StraightBeam Ultrasonic Examination of Plain and Clad Steel Plates for Special Applications.’’.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:53 Aug 10, 2010
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00053
48601
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
§§ 192.485(c);.192.933(a)(1); 192.933(d)(1)(i).
§§ 192.55(e); 192.112; 192.113; Item I, Appendix B to
Part 192.
§ 192.65(a)(1).
§ 192.65(b).
§ 192.145(a).
§§ 192.8(a); 192.8(a)(1); 192.8(a)(2); 192.8(a)(3);
192.8(a)(4).
§§ 192.225; 192.227(a); 192.229(c)(1); 192.241(c);
Item II, Appendix B.
§§ 192.616(a); 192.616(b); 192.616(c).
§ 192.631(c)(1).
§§ 192.113; Item I, Appendix B to Part 192.
§§ 192.113; Item I, Appendix B to Part 192.
§§ 192.113; Item I, Appendix B to Part 192.
§ 192.177(b)(1).
§§ 192.113; Item I, Appendix B to Part 192.
§§ 192.112(c)(2)(iii).
E:\FR\FM\11AUR1.SGM
11AUR1
48602
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 154 / Wednesday, August 11, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
Source and name of referenced material
49 CFR reference
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with RULES
(7) ASTM A671–06, ‘‘Standard Specification for Electric-Fusion-Welded Steel Pipe
for Atmospheric and Lower Temperatures’’ (May 1, 2006).
(8) ASTM A672–08, ‘‘Standard Specification for Electric-Fusion-Welded Steel Pipe
for High-Pressure Service at Moderate Temperatures’’ (May 1, 2008).
(9) ASTM A691–98 (reapproved 2007), ‘‘Standard Specification for Carbon and
Alloy Steel Pipe, Electric-Fusion-Welded for High-Pressure Service at High Temperatures’’ (November 1, 2007).
(10) ASTM D638–03 ‘‘Standard Test Method for Tensile Properties of Plastics.’’ ......
(11) ASTM D2513–87 ‘‘Standard Specification for Thermoplastic Gas Pressure
Pipe, Tubing, and Fittings.’’.
(12) ASTM D2513–99 ‘‘Standard Specification for Thermoplastic Gas Pressure
Pipe, Tubing, and Fittings.’’.
(13) ASTM D2517–00 ‘‘Standard Specification for Reinforced Epoxy Resin Gas
Pressure Pipe and Fittings.’’.
(14) ASTM F1055–1998, ‘‘Standard Specification for Electrofusion Type Polyethylene Fittings for Outside Diameter Controller Polyethylene Pipe and Tubing.’’.
D. ASME International (ASME):
(1) ASME/ANSI B16.1–2005, ‘‘Gray Iron Pipe Flanges and Flanged Fittings: (Classes 25, 125, and 250)’’ (August 31, 2006).
(2) ASME/ANSI B16.5–2003, ‘‘Pipe Flanges and Flanged Fittings.’’ (October 2004)
(3) ASME/ANSI B31G–1991 (Reaffirmed, 2004), ‘‘Manual for Determining the Remaining Strength of Corroded Pipelines.’’.
(4) ASME/ANSI B31.8–2007, ‘‘Gas Transmission and Distribution Piping Systems’’
(November 30, 2007).
(5) ASME/ANSI B31.8S–2004, ‘‘Supplement to B31.8 on Managing System Integrity
of Gas Pipelines.’’.
(6) 2007 ASME Boiler & Pressure Vessel Code, Section I, ‘‘Rules for Construction
of Power Boilers 2007’’ (2007 edition, July 1, 2007).
(7) 2007 ASME Boiler & Pressure Vessel Code, Section VIII, Division 1, ‘‘Rules for
Construction of Pressure Vessels 2’’ (2007 edition, July 1, 2007).
(8) 2007 ASME Boiler & Pressure Vessel Code, Section VIII, Division 2, ‘‘Alternative
Rules, Rules for Construction of Pressure Vessels’’ (2007 edition, July 1, 2007).
(9) 2007 ASME Boiler & Pressure Vessel Code, Section IX, ‘‘Welding and Brazing
Procedures, Welders, Brazers, and Welding and Brazing Operators’’ (2007 edition, July 1, 2007).
E. Manufacturers Standardization Society of the Valve and Fittings Industry, Inc. (MSS):
(1) MSS SP–44–2006, Standard Practice, ‘‘Steel Pipeline Flanges’’ (2006 edition) ...
(2) [Reserved].
F. National Fire Protection Association (NFPA):
(1) NFPA 30 (2008 edition, August 15, 2007), ‘‘Flammable and Combustible Liquids
Code’’ (2008 edition; approved August 15, 2007).
(2) NFPA 58 (2004), ‘‘Liquefied Petroleum Gas Code (LP-Gas Code).’’ .....................
(3) NFPA 59 (2004), ‘‘Utility LP-Gas Plant Code.’’ .......................................................
(4) NFPA 70 (2008), ‘‘National Electrical Code’’ (NEC 2008) (Approved August 15,
2007).
G. Plastics Pipe Institute, Inc. (PPI):
(1) PPI TR–3/2008 HDB/HDS/PDB/SDB/MRS Policies (2008), ‘‘Policies and Procedures for Developing Hydrostatic Design Basis (HDB), Pressure Design Basis
(PDB), Strength Design Basis (SDB), and Minimum Required Strength (MRS)
Ratings for Thermoplastic Piping Materials or Pipe’’ (May 2008).
H. NACE International (NACE):
(1) NACE Standard SP0502–2008, Standard Practice, ‘‘Pipeline External Corrosion
Direct Assessment Methodology’’ (reaffirmed March 20, 2008).
I. Gas Technology Institute (GTI):
(1) GRI 02/0057 (2002) ‘‘Internal Corrosion Direct Assessment of Gas Transmission
Pipelines Methodology.’’.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:53 Aug 10, 2010
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00054
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
§§ 192.113; Item I, Appendix B to Part 192.
§§ 192.113; Item I, Appendix B to Part 192.
§§ 192.113; Item I, Appendix B to Part 192.
§§ 192.283(a)(3); 192.283(b)(1).
§ 192.63(a)(1).
§§ 192.123(e)(2);
192.191(b);
192.281(b)(2);
192.283(a)(1)(i); Item 1, Appendix B to Part 192.
§§ 192.191(a); 192.281(d)(1); 192.283(a)(1)(ii); Item I,
Appendix B to Part 192.
§ 192.283(a)(1)(iii).
§ 192.147(c).
§§ 192.147(a); 192.279.
§§ 192.485(c); 192.933(a).
§ 192.619(a)(1)(i).
§§ 192.903(c); 192.907(b); 192.911 Introductory text;
192.911(i); 192.911(k); 192.911(l); 192.911(m);
192.913(a)
Introductory
text;
192.913(b)(1);
192.917(a)
Introductory
text;
192.917(b);
192.917(c);
192.917(e)(1);
192.917(e)(4);
192.921(a)(1);
192.923(b)(1);
192.923(b)(2);
192.923(b)(3);
192.925(b)
Introductory
text;
192.925(b)(1);
192.925(b)(2);
192.925(b)(3);
192.925(b)(4);
192.927(b);
192.927(c)(1)(i);
192.929(b)(1);
192.929(b)(2);
192.933(a);
192.933(d)(1);
192.933(d)(1)(i);
192.935(a);
192.935(b)(1)(iv); 192.937(c)(1); 192.939(a)(1)(i);
192.939(a)(1)(ii); 192.939(a)(3); 192.945(a).
§ 192.153(b).
§§ 192.153(a); 192.153(b); 192.153(d); 192.165(b)(3).
§§ 192.153(b); 192.165(b)(3).
§§ 192.227(a); Item II, Appendix B to Part 192.
§ 192.147(a).
§ 192.735(b).
§§ 192.11(a); 192.11(b); 192.11(c).
§§ 192.11(a); 192.11(b); 192.11(c).
§§ 192.163(e); 192.189(c).
§ 192.121.
§§ 192.923(b)(1);
192.925(b)
Introductory
text;
192.925(b)(1); 192.925(b)(1)(ii); 192.925(b)(2) Introductory text; 192.925(b)(3) Introductory text;
192.925(b)(3)(ii); 192.925(b)(3)(iv); 192.925(b)(4) Introductory
text;
192.925(b)(4)(ii);
192.931(d);
192.935(b)(1)(iv); 192.939(a)(2).
§ 192.927(c)(2).
E:\FR\FM\11AUR1.SGM
11AUR1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 154 / Wednesday, August 11, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
4. In § 192.63, paragraph (a)(1) is
revised to read as follows:
■
§ 192.63
Marking of materials.
(a) Except as provided in paragraph
(d) of this section, each valve, fitting,
length of pipe, and other component
must be marked—
(1) As prescribed in the specification
or standard to which it was
manufactured, except that thermoplastic
fittings must be marked in accordance
with ASTM D2513–87 (incorporated by
reference, see § 192.7);
*
*
*
*
*
■ 5. Section 192.65 is revised to read as
follows:
§ 192.65
Transportation of pipe.
(a) Railroad. In a pipeline to be
operated at a hoop stress of 20 percent
or more of SMYS, an operator may not
use pipe having an outer diameter to
wall thickness ratio of 70 to 1, or more,
that is transported by railroad unless:
(1) The transportation is performed in
accordance with API Recommended
Practice 5L1 (incorporated by reference,
see § 192.7).
(2) In the case of pipe transported
before November 12, 1970, the pipe is
tested in accordance with Subpart J of
this Part to at least 1.25 times the
maximum allowable operating pressure
if it is to be installed in a class 1
location and to at least 1.5 times the
maximum allowable operating pressure
if it is to be installed in a class 2, 3, or
4 location. Notwithstanding any shorter
time period permitted under Subpart J
of this Part, the test pressure must be
maintained for at least 8 hours.
(b) Ship or barge. In a pipeline to be
operated at a hoop stress of 20 percent
or more of SMYS, an operator may not
use pipe having an outer diameter to
wall thickness ratio of 70 to 1, or more,
that is transported by ship or barge on
both inland and marine waterways
unless the transportation is performed
in accordance with API Recommended
Practice 5LW (incorporated by
reference, see § 192.7).
§ 192.121
[Amended].
6. In § 192.121, under ‘‘S=’’, the words
‘‘PPI TR–3/2004’’ are removed and the
words ‘‘PPI TR–3/2008’’ are added in
their place.
■ 7. In § 192.123, paragraphs (e)
introductory text, (e)(1) and (2) are
revised to read as follows:
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with RULES
■
§ 192.123
pipe.
Design limitations for plastic
*
*
*
*
*
(e) The design pressure for
thermoplastic pipe produced after July
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:53 Aug 10, 2010
Jkt 220001
14, 2004 may exceed a gauge pressure
of 100 psig (689 kPa) provided that:
(1) The design pressure does not
exceed 125 psig (862 kPa);
(2) The material is a PE2406 or a
PE3408 as specified within ASTM
D2513–99 (incorporated by reference,
see § 192.7);
*
*
*
*
*
■ 8. In § 192.145, the first sentence in
paragraph (d) introductory text and
paragraph (e) are revised to read as
follows:
§ 192.145
Valves.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) No valve having shell (body,
bonnet, cover, and/or end flange)
components made of ductile iron may
be used at pressures exceeding 80
percent of the pressure ratings for
comparable steel valves at their listed
temperature. * * *
(e) No valve having shell (body,
bonnet, cover, and/or end flange)
components made of cast iron,
malleable iron, or ductile iron may be
used in the gas pipe components of
compressor stations.
■ 9. Section 192.191 is revised to read
as follows:
§ 192.191
fittings.
Design pressure of plastic
(a) Thermosetting fittings for plastic
pipe must conform to ASTM D 2517,
(incorporated by reference, see § 192.7).
(b) Thermoplastic fittings for plastic
pipe must conform to ASTM D 2513–99,
(incorporated by reference, see § 192.7).
■ 10. In § 192.281, paragraphs (a) and
(b) are revised to read as follows:
§ 192.281
Plastic pipe
(a) General. A plastic pipe joint that
is joined by solvent cement, adhesive, or
heat fusion may not be disturbed until
it has properly set. Plastic pipe may not
be joined by a threaded joint or miter
joint.
(b) Solvent cement joints. Each
solvent cement joint on plastic pipe
must comply with the following:
(1) The mating surfaces of the joint
must be clean, dry, and free of material
which might be detrimental to the joint.
(2) The solvent cement must conform
to ASTM D2513–99, (incorporated by
reference, see § 192.7).
(3) The joint may not be heated to
accelerate the setting of the cement.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 11. In § 192.283, paragraph (a) is
revised to read as follows:
§ 192.283 Plastic pipe: Qualifying joining
procedures.
(a) Heat fusion, solvent cement, and
adhesive joints. Before any written
PO 00000
Frm 00055
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
48603
procedure established under
§ 192.273(b) is used for making plastic
pipe joints by a heat fusion, solvent
cement, or adhesive method, the
procedure must be qualified by
subjecting specimen joints made
according to the procedure to the
following tests:
(1) The burst test requirements of—
(i) In the case of thermoplastic pipe,
paragraph 6.6 (sustained pressure test)
or paragraph 6.7 (Minimum Hydrostatic
Burst Test) or paragraph 8.9 (Sustained
Static pressure Test) of ASTM D2513–99
(incorporated by reference, see § 192.7);
(ii) In the case of thermosetting plastic
pipe, paragraph 8.5 (Minimum
Hydrostatic Burst Pressure) or paragraph
8.9 (Sustained Static Pressure Test) of
ASTM D2517 (incorporated by
reference, see § 192.7); or
(iii) In the case of electrofusion
fittings for polyethylene (PE) pipe and
tubing, paragraph 9.1 (Minimum
Hydraulic Burst Pressure Test),
paragraph 9.2 (Sustained Pressure Test),
paragraph 9.3 (Tensile Strength Test), or
paragraph 9.4 (Joint Integrity Tests) of
ASTM Designation F1055 (incorporated
by reference, see § 192.7).
(2) For procedures intended for lateral
pipe connections, subject a specimen
joint made from pipe sections joined at
right angles according to the procedure
to a force on the lateral pipe until failure
occurs in the specimen. If failure
initiates outside the joint area, the
procedure qualifies for use; and
(3) For procedures intended for nonlateral pipe connections, follow the
tensile test requirements of ASTM D638
(incorporated by reference, see § 192.7),
except that the test may be conducted at
ambient temperature and humidity If
the specimen elongates no less than 25
percent or failure initiates outside the
joint area, the procedure qualifies for
use.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 12. In § 192.465, paragraph (e) is
revised to read as follows:
§ 192.465 External corrosion control:
Monitoring
*
*
*
*
*
(e) After the initial evaluation
required by §§ 192.455(b) and (c) and
192.457(b), each operator must, not less
than every 3 years at intervals not
exceeding 39 months, reevaluate its
unprotected pipelines and cathodically
protect them in accordance with this
subpart in areas in which active
corrosion is found. The operator must
determine the areas of active corrosion
by electrical survey. However, on
distribution lines and where an
electrical survey is impractical on
transmission lines, areas of active
E:\FR\FM\11AUR1.SGM
11AUR1
48604
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 154 / Wednesday, August 11, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
corrosion may be determined by other
means that include review and analysis
of leak repair and inspection records,
corrosion monitoring records, exposed
pipe inspection records, and the
pipeline environment.
■ 13. Section 192.711 is revised to read
as follows:
§ 192.711 Transmission lines: General
requirements for repair procedures.
(a) Temporary repairs. Each operator
must take immediate temporary
measures to protect the public
whenever:
(1) A leak, imperfection, or damage
that impairs its serviceability is found in
a segment of steel transmission line
operating at or above 40 percent of the
SMYS; and
(2) It is not feasible to make a
permanent repair at the time of
discovery.
(b) Permanent repairs. An operator
must make permanent repairs on its
pipeline system according to the
following:
(1) Non integrity management repairs:
The operator must make permanent
repairs as soon as feasible.
(2) Integrity management repairs:
When an operator discovers a condition
on a pipeline covered under Subpart O–
Gas Transmission Pipeline Integrity
Management, the operator must
remediate the condition as prescribed
by § 192.933(d).
(c) Welded patch. Except as provided
in § 192.717(b)(3), no operator may use
a welded patch as a means of repair.
§§ 192.923, 192.925, 192.931, 192.935, and
192.939 [Amended]
14. In 49 CFR part 192 the words
‘‘NACE RP0502–2002’’ or ‘‘NACE RP
0502–2002’’ are removed and the words
‘‘NACE SP0502–2008’’ are added in their
place in the following places:
■ a. Section 192.923(b)(1);
■ b. Section 192.925(b) introductory
text, 192.925(b)(1), 192.925 (b)(1)(ii),
192.925 (b)(2) introductory text, 192.925
(b)(3) introductory text,
192.925(b)(3)(ii), 192.925(b)(iv),
■
192.925(b)(4) introductory text, and
192.925(b)(4)(ii);
■ c. Section 192.931(d);
■ d. Section 192.935(b)(1)(iv); and
■ e. Section 192.939(a)(2).
Appendix B to Part 192 [Amended]
15. In Appendix B to Part 192, in
section I, the phrase ‘‘ASTM D2513’’ is
revised to read ‘‘ASTM D2513–99’’
■
PART 193—LIQUEFIED NATURAL GAS
FACILITIES: FEDERAL SAFETY
STANDARDS
16. The authority citation for Part 193
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 5103, 60102, 60103,
60104, 60108, 60109, 60110, 60113, 60118;
and 49 CFR 1.53.
17. In § 193.2013, paragraph (c) is
revised to read as follows:
■
§ 193.2013
*
*
*
*
(c) Documents incorporated by
reference.
Source and name of referenced material
49 CFR Reference
A. American Gas Association (AGA):
(1) ‘‘Purging Principles and Practices’’ (3rd edition, 2001) ..........................................
B. American Petroleum Institute (API):
(1) API Standard 620 ‘‘Design and Construction of Large, Welded, Low-Pressure
Storage Tanks’’ (11th edition February 2008, addendum 1, March 2009).
C. American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE):
(1) ASCE/SEI 7–05 ‘‘Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures’’
(2005 edition, includes supplement No. 1 and Errata).
D. ASME International (ASME):
(1) 2007 ASME Boiler & Pressure Vessel Code, Section VIII, Division 1, ‘‘Rules for
Construction of Pressure Vessels’’ (2007 edition, July 1, 2007).
(2) 2007 ASME Boiler & Pressure Vessel Code, Section VIII, Division 2, ‘‘Alternative
Rules, Rules for Construction of Pressure Vessels’’ (2007 edition, July 1, 2007).
E. Gas Technology Institute (GTI) formerly the Gas Research Institute (GRI):
(1) GTI–04/0032 LNGFIRE3: A Thermal Radiation Model for LNG Fires (March
2004).
(2) GTI–04/0049 (April 2004) ‘‘LNG Vapor Dispersion Prediction with the DEGADIS
2.1: Dense Gas Dispersion Model For LNG Vapor Dispersion’’.
(3) GRI–96/0396.5 ‘‘Evaluation of Mitigation Methods for Accidental LNG Releases,
Volume 5: Using FEM3A for LNG Accident Consequence Analyses’’ (April 1997).
F. National Fire Protection Association (NFPA):
(1) NFPA 59A, (2001) ‘‘Standard for the Production, Storage, and Handling of Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG)’’.
(2) NFPA 59A, ‘‘Standard for the Production, Storage, and Handling of Liquefied
Natural Gas (LNG)’’ (2006 edition, Approved August 18, 2005).
18. In § 193.2057, paragraph (a) is
revised to read as follows:
■
§ 193.2057
Thermal radiation protection.
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with RULES
*
*
*
*
*
(a) The thermal radiation distances
must be calculated using Gas
Technology Institute’s (GTI) report or
computer model GTI–04/0032
LNGFIRE3: A Thermal Radiation Model
for LNG Fires (incorporated by
reference, see § 193.2013). The use of
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:53 Aug 10, 2010
Jkt 220001
§§ 193.2513; 193.2517; 193.2615.
§§ 193.2101(b); 193.2321(b)(2).
§ 193.2067(b)(1).
§ 193.2321(a).
§ 193.2321(a).
§ 193.2057(a).
§ 193.2059.
§ 193.2059.
§§ 193.2019;
193.2051;
193.2057;
193.2101(a); 193.2301; 193.2303;
193.2521; 193.2639; 193.2801.
§§ 193.2101(b); 193.2321(b).
other alternate models which take into
account the same physical factors and
have been validated by experimental
test data may be permitted subject to the
Administrator’s approval.
*
*
*
*
*
19. In § 193.2067, paragraph (b)(1) is
revised to read as follows:
■
§ 193.2067
*
Wind forces.
*
*
(b) * * *
PO 00000
Frm 00056
Incorporation by reference.
*
*
Fmt 4700
(1) For shop fabricated containers of
LNG or other hazardous fluids with a
capacity of not more than 70,000
gallons, applicable wind load data in
ASCE/SEI 7–05 (incorporated by
reference, see § 193.2013).
*
*
*
*
*
20. Section 193.2101 is revised to read
as follows:
■
*
Sfmt 4700
193.2059;
193.2401;
E:\FR\FM\11AUR1.SGM
11AUR1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 154 / Wednesday, August 11, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
§ 193.2101
Scope.
(a) Each LNG facility designed after
March 31, 2000 must comply with
requirements of this Part and of NFPA
59A (2001) (incorporated by reference,
see § 193.2013). If there is a conflict
between this Part and NFPA 59A, this
Part prevails. Unless otherwise
specified, all references to NFPA 59A in
this Part are to the 2001 edition.
(b) Stationary LNG storage tanks must
comply with Section 7.2.2 of NFPA 59A
(2006) (incorporated by reference, see
§ 193.2013) for seismic design of field
fabricated tanks. All other LNG storage
tanks must comply with API Standard
620 (incorporated by reference, see
§ 193.2013) for seismic design.
■ 21. Section 193.2321 is revised to read
as follows:
§ 193.2321
Nondestructive tests.
(a) The butt welds in metal shells of
storage tanks with internal design
pressure above 15 psig must be
nondestructively examined in
accordance with the ASME Boiler and
Pressure Vessel Code (Section VIII
Division 1) (incorporated by reference,
see § 193.2013), except that 100 percent
of welds that are both longitudinal (or
meridional) and circumferential (or
latitudinal) of hydraulic load bearing
shells with curved surfaces that are
subject to cryogenic temperatures must
be nondestructively examined in
accordance with the ASME Boiler and
Pressure Vessel Code (Section VIII
Division 1) (incorporated by reference,
see § 193.2013).
(b) For storage tanks with internal
design pressures at 15 psig or less,
ultrasonic examinations of welds on
metal containers must comply with the
following:
(1) Section 7.3.1.2 of NFPA 59A
(2006) (incorporated by reference, see
§ 193.2013);
(2) Appendices Q and C of API 620
Standard (incorporated by reference, see
§ 193.2013);
(c) Ultrasonic examination records
must be retained for the life of the
facility. If electronic records are kept,
they must be retained in a manner so
that they cannot be altered by any
means; and
(d) The ultrasonic equipment used in
the examination of welds must be
calibrated at a frequency no longer than
eight hours. Such calibrations must
verify the examination of welds against
a calibration standard. If the ultrasonic
equipment is found to be out of
calibration, all previous weld
inspections that are suspect must be
reexamined.
PART 195—TRANSPORTATION OF
HAZARDOUS LIQUIDS BY PIPELINE
22. The authority citation for Part 195
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 5103, 60102, 60104,
60108, 60109, 60116, 60118 and 60137; and
49 CFR 1.53.
23. In § 195.3, paragraph (c) is revised
to read as follows:
■
§ 195.3
Incorporation by reference.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) The full titles of publications
incorporated by reference wholly or
partially in this part are as follows.
Numbers in parentheses indicate
applicable editions:
Source and name of referenced material
49 CFR reference
A. Pipeline Research Council International, Inc. (PRCI):
(1) AGA Pipeline Research Committee, Project PR–3–805, ‘‘A Modified Criterion for Evaluating the Remaining Strength of Corroded Pipe,’’ (December 22, 1989). The RSTRENG
program may be used for calculating remaining strength.
B. American Petroleum Institute (API):
(1) ANSI/API Specification 5L/ISO 3183, ‘‘Specification for Line Pipe’’ (44th edition, October 2007, including errata (January 2009) and addendum (February 2009)).
(2) API Recommended Practice 5L1, ‘‘Recommended Practice for Railroad Transportation
of Line Pipe’’ (6th edition, July 2002).
(3) API Recommended Practice 5LW, ‘‘Transportation of Line Pipe on Barges and Marine
Vessels’’ (2nd edition, December 1996, effective March 1, 1997).
(4) ANSI/API Specification 6D, ‘‘Specification for Pipeline Valves’’ (23rd edition, April 2008,
effective October 1, 2008) and errata 3 (includes 1 & 2 (2009).
(5) API Specification 12F, ‘‘Specification for Shop Welded Tanks for Storage of Production
Liquids’’ (11th edition, November 1, 1994, reaffirmed 2000, errata, February 2007).
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with RULES
(6) API Standard 510, ‘‘Pressure Vessel Inspection Code: In-Service Inspection, Rating,
Repair, and Alteration’’ (9th edition, June 2006).
(7) API Standard 620, ‘‘Design and Construction of Large, Welded, Low-Pressure Storage
Tanks’’ (11th edition, February 2008, addendum 1 March 2009).
(8) API Standard 650, ‘‘Welded Steel Tanks for Oil Storage’’ (11th edition, June 2007, addendum 1, November 2008).
(9) ANSI/API Recommended Practice 651, ‘‘Cathodic Protection of Aboveground Petroleum Storage Tanks’’ (3rd edition, January 2007).
(10) ANSI/API Recommended Practice 652, ‘‘Linings of Aboveground Petroleum Storage
Tank Bottoms’’ (3rd edition, October 2005).
(11) API Standard 653, ‘‘Tank Inspection, Repair, Alteration, and Reconstruction’’ (3rd edition, December 2001, includes addendum 1 (September 2003), addendum 2 (November
2005), addendum 3 (February 2008), and errata (April 2008)).
(12) API Standard 1104, ‘‘Welding of Pipelines and Related Facilities’’ (20th edition, October 2005, errata/addendum (July 2007), and errata 2 December 2008)).
(13) API Recommended Practice 1130, ‘‘Computational Pipeline Monitoring for Liquids:
Pipeline Segment’’ (3rd edition, September 2007).
(14) API Recommended Practice 1162, ‘‘Public Awareness Programs for Pipeline Operators’’ (1st edition, December 2003).
(15) API Recommended Practice 1165, ‘‘Recommended Practice for Pipeline SCADA Displays,’’ (API RP 1165) First Edition (January 2007).
(16) API Standard 2000, ‘‘Venting Atmospheric and Low-Pressure Storage Tanks Nonrefrigerated and Refrigerated’’ (5th edition, April 1998, errata, November 15, 1999).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:53 Aug 10, 2010
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00057
Fmt 4700
48605
Sfmt 4700
§§ 195.452(h)(4)(i)(B);
195.587.
195.452(h)(4)(iii)(D);
§§ 195.106(b)(1)(i); 195.106(e).
§ 195.207(a).
§ 195.207(b).
§ 195.116(d).
§§ 195.132(b)(1); 195.205(b)(2); 195.264(b)(1);
195.264(e)(1);
195.307(a);
195.565;
195.579(d).
§§ 195.205(b)(3); 195.432(c).
§§ 195.132(b)(2); 195.205(b)(2); 195.264(b)(1);
195.264(e)(3); 195.307(b).
§§ 195.132(b)(3);
195.205(b)(1);
195.264(b)(1);195.264(e)(2);
195.307(c);
195.307(d); 195.565; 195.579(d).
§§ 195.565; 195.579(d).
§ 195.579(d).
§§ 195.205(b)(1); 195.432(b).
§§ 195.222(a); 195.228(b); 195.214(a).
§§ 195.134; 195.444.
§§ 195.440(a); 195.440(b); 195.440(c).
§ 195.446(c)(1).
§§ 195.264(e)(2); 195.264(e)(3).
E:\FR\FM\11AUR1.SGM
11AUR1
48606
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 154 / Wednesday, August 11, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
Source and name of referenced material
49 CFR reference
(17) API Recommended Practice 2003, ‘‘Protection Against Ignitions Arising Out of Static,
Lightning, and Stray Currents’’ (7th edition, January 2008).
(18) API Publication 2026, ‘‘Safe Access/Egress Involving Floating Roofs of Storage Tanks
in Petroleum Service’’ (2nd edition, April 1998, reaffirmed June 2006).
(19) API Recommended Practice 2350, ‘‘Overfill Protection for Storage Tanks In Petroleum
Facilities’’’ (3rd edition, January 2005).
(20) API 2510, ‘‘Design and Construction of LPG Installations’’ (8th edition, 2001) ..............
(21) API Recommended Practice 1168 ‘‘Pipeline Control Room Management,’’ (API
RP1168) First Edition (September 2008).
C. ASME International (ASME):
(1) ASME/ANSI B16.9–2007, ‘‘Factory-Made Wrought Buttwelding Fittings’’ (December 7,
2007).
(2) ASME/ANSI B31.4–2006, ‘‘Pipeline Transportation Systems for Liquid Hydrocarbons
and Other Liquids’’ (October 20, 2006).
(3) ASME/ANSI B31G–1991 (Reaffirmed; 2004), ‘‘Manual for Determining the Remaining
Strength of Corroded Pipelines.’’.
(4) ASME/ANSI B31.8–2007, ‘‘Gas Transmission and Distribution Piping Systems’’ (November 30, 2007).
(5) 2007 ASME Boiler & Pressure Vessel Code, Section VIII, Division 1 ‘‘Rules for Construction of Pressure Vessels’’ (2007 edition, July 1, 2007).
(6) 2007 ASME Boiler & Pressure Vessel Code, Section VIII, Division 2 ‘‘Alternate Rules,
Rules for Construction of Pressure Vessels’’ (2007 edition, July 1, 2007).
(7) 2007 ASME Boiler & Pressure Vessel Code, Section IX: ‘‘Qualification Standard for
Welding and Brazing Procedures, Welders, Brazers, and Welding and Brazing Operators,’’ (2007 edition, July 1, 2007).
D. Manufacturers Standardization Society of the Valve and Fittings Industry, Inc. (MSS):
(1) MSS SP–75–2004, ‘‘Specification for High Test Wrought Butt Welding Fittings.’’ ............
(2) [Reserved] ..........................................................................................................................
E. American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM):
(1) ASTM A53/A53M–07, ‘‘Standard Specification for Pipe, Steel, Black and Hot-Dipped,
Zinc-Coated Welded and Seamless’’ (September 1, 2007).
(2) ASTM A106/A106M–08, ‘‘Standard Specification for Seamless Carbon Steel Pipe for
High-Temperature Service’’ (July 15, 2008).
(3) ASTM A333/A 333M–05, ‘‘Standard Specification for Seamless and Welded Steel Pipe
for Low-Temperature Service.’’.
(4) ASTM A381–96 (Reapproved 2005), ‘‘Standard Specification for Metal-Arc-Welded
Steel Pipe for Use With High-Pressure Transmission Systems’’ (October 1, 2005).
(5) ASTM A671–06, ‘‘Standard Specification for Electric-Fusion-Welded Steel Pipe for Atmospheric and Lower Temperatures’’ (May 1, 2006).
(6) ASTM A672–08, ‘‘Standard Specification for Electric-Fusion-Welded Steel Pipe for
High-Pressure Service at Moderate Temperatures’’ (May 1, 2008).
(7) ASTM A691–98 (reapproved 2007), ‘‘Standard Specification for Carbon and Alloy Steel
Pipe Electric-Fusion-Welded for High-Pressure Service at High Temperatures.’’.
F. National Fire Protection Association (NFPA):
(1) NFPA 30, ‘‘Flammable and Combustible Liquids Code’’ (2008 edition, approved August
15, 2007).
(2) [Reserved]. .........................................................................................................................
G. NACE International (NACE):
(1) NACE SP0169–2007, Standard Practice, ‘‘Control of External Corrosion on Underground or Submerged Metallic Piping Systems’’ (reaffirmed March 15, 2007).
(2) NACE SP0502–2008, Standard Practice, ‘‘Pipeline External Corrosion Direct Assessment Methodology’’ (reaffirmed March 20, 2008).
*
§ 195.207
■
(a) Railroad. In a pipeline operated at
a hoop stress of 20 percent or more of
SMYS, an operator may not use pipe
having an outer diameter to wall
thickness ratio of 70 to 1, or more, that
is transported by railroad unless the
transportation is performed in
accordance with API Recommended
Practice 5L1 (incorporated by reference,
see § 195.3).
(b) Ship or barge. In a pipeline
operated at a hoop stress of 20 percent
or more of SMYS, an operator may not
use pipe having an outer diameter to
*
*
*
*
24. In § 195.116, paragraph (d) is
revised to read as follows:
§ 195.116
Valves.
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with RULES
*
*
*
*
*
(d) Each valve must be both
hydrostatically shell tested and
hydrostatically seat tested without
leakage to at least the requirements set
forth in Section 11 of API Standard 6D
(incorporated by reference, see § 195.3).
*
*
*
*
*
■ 25. Add § 195.207 to subpart D to read
as follows:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:53 Aug 10, 2010
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Transportation of pipe.
Frm 00058
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
§ 195.405(a).
§ 195.405(b).
§ 195.428(c).
§§ 195.132(b)(3); 195.205(b)(3); 195.264(b)(2);
195.264(e)(4);
195.307(e);
195.428(c);
195.432(c).
§ 195.446(c)(5), (f)(1).
§ 195.118(a).
§ 195.452(h)(4)(i).
§§ 195.452(h)(4)(i)(B); 195.452(h)(4)(iii)(D).
§ 195.5(a)(1)(i); 195.406(a)(1)(i).
§ 195.124; 195.307(e).
§ 195.307(e).
§ 195.222(a).
§ 195.118(a).
§ 195.106(e).
§ 195.106(e).
§ 195.106(e).
§ 195.106(e).
§ 195.106(e).
§ 195.106(e).
§ 195.106(e).
§ 195.264(b)(1).
§§ 195.571; 195.573(a)(2).
§ 195.588.
wall thickness ratio of 70 to 1, or more,
that is transported by ship or barge on
both inland and marine waterways,
unless the transportation is performed
in accordance with API Recommended
Practice 5LW (incorporated by
reference, see § 195.3).
26. In § 195.264, paragraph (e) is
revised to read as follows:
■
§ 195.264 Impoundment, protection
against entry, normal/emergency venting or
pressure/vacuum relief for aboveground
breakout tanks.
*
E:\FR\FM\11AUR1.SGM
*
*
11AUR1
*
*
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 154 / Wednesday, August 11, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
(e) For normal/emergency relief
venting and pressure/vacuum-relieving
devices installed on aboveground
breakout tanks after October 2, 2000,
compliance with paragraph (d) of this
section requires the following for the
tanks specified:
(1) Normal/emergency relief venting
installed on atmospheric pressure tanks
built to API Specification 12F
(incorporated by reference, see § 195.3)
must be in accordance with Section 4,
and Appendices B and C, of API
Specification 12F (incorporated by
reference, see § 195.3).
(2) Normal/emergency relief venting
installed on atmospheric pressure tanks
(such as those built to API Standard 650
or its predecessor Standard 12C) must
be in accordance with API Standard
2000 (incorporated by reference, see
§ 195.3).
(3) Pressure-relieving and emergency
vacuum-relieving devices installed on
low pressure tanks built to API Standard
620 (incorporated by reference, see
§ 195.3) must be in accordance with
section 9 of API Standard 620
(incorporated by reference, see § 195.3)
and its references to the normal and
emergency venting requirements in API
Standard 2000 (incorporated by
reference, see § 195.3).
(4) Pressure and vacuum-relieving
devices installed on high pressure tanks
built to API Standard 2510
(incorporated by reference, see § 195.3)
must be in accordance with sections 7
or 11 of API Standard 2510
(incorporated by reference, see § 195.3).
■ 27. In § 195.307, paragraphs (a) and (c)
are revised to read as follows:
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with RULES
§ 195.307 Pressure testing aboveground
breakout tanks.
(a) For aboveground breakout tanks
built into API Specification 12F and
first placed in service after October 2,
2000, pneumatic testing must be in
accordance with section 5.3 of API
Specification 12 F (incorporated by
reference, see § 195.3).
*
*
*
*
*
(c) For aboveground breakout tanks
built to API Standard 650 (incorporated
by reference, see § 195.3) and first
placed in service after October 2, 2000,
testing must be in accordance with
Section 5.2 of API Standard 650
(incorporated by reference, see § 195.3).
*
*
*
*
*
■ 28. In § 195.401, paragraph (b) is
revised to read as follows:
§ 195.401
General requirements.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) An operator must make repairs on
its pipeline system according to the
following requirements:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:53 Aug 10, 2010
Jkt 220001
(1) Non Integrity management repairs.
Whenever an operator discovers any
condition that could adversely affect the
safe operation of its pipeline system, it
must correct the condition within a
reasonable time. However, if the
condition is of such a nature that it
presents an immediate hazard to
persons or property, the operator may
not operate the affected part of the
system until it has corrected the unsafe
condition.
(2) Integrity management repairs.
When an operator discovers a condition
on a pipeline covered under § 195.452,
the operator must correct the condition
as prescribed in § 195.452(h).
*
*
*
*
*
29. In § 195.432, paragraph (b) is
revised to read as follows:
■
§ 195.432
tanks.
Inspection of in-service breakout
*
*
*
*
*
(b) Each operator must inspect the
physical integrity of in-service
atmospheric and low-pressure steel
aboveground breakout tanks according
to API Standard 653 (incorporated by
reference, see § 195.3). However, if
structural conditions prevent access to
the tank bottom, the bottom integrity
may be assessed according to a plan
included in the operations and
maintenance manual under
§ 195.402(c)(3).
*
*
*
*
*
48607
§ 195.571 What criteria must I use to
determine the adequacy of cathodic
protection?
Cathodic protection required by this
Subpart must comply with one or more
of the applicable criteria and other
considerations for cathodic protection
contained in paragraphs 6.2 and 6.3 of
NACE SP 0169 (incorporated by
reference, see § 195.3).
■ 32. In § 195.573, paragraph (a)(2) is
revised to read as follows:
§ 195.573 What must I do to monitor
external corrosion control?
(a) * * *
(2) Identify not more than 2 years after
cathodic protection is installed, the
circumstances in which a close-interval
survey or comparable technology is
practicable and necessary to accomplish
the objectives of paragraph 10.1.1.3 of
NACE SP 0169 (incorporated by
reference, see § 195.3).
*
*
*
*
*
■ 33. In § 195.588, paragraphs (b)(1),
(b)(2) introductory text, (b)(2)(iii), (b)(3)
introductory text, (b)(4) introductory
text, (b)(4)(ii), (b)(4)(iv), (b)(5)
introductory text, and (b)(5)(ii) are
revised to read as follows:
§ 195.588 What standards apply to direct
assessment?
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(1) General. You must follow the
requirements of NACE SP0502
(incorporated by reference, see § 195.3).
Also, you must develop and implement
■ 30. In § 195.452, paragraphs (h)(4)(i)
a External Corrosion Direct Assessment
introductory text is revised to read as
(ECDA) plan that includes procedures
follows:
addressing pre-assessment, indirect
§ 195.452 Pipeline integrity management in examination, direct examination, and
post-assessment.
high consequence areas.
(2) Pre-assessment. In addition to the
*
*
*
*
*
requirements in Section 3 of NACE
(h) * * *
SP0502 (incorporated by reference, see
§ 195.3), the ECDA plan procedures for
(4) * * *
pre-assessment must include—
(i) Immediate repair conditions. An
*
*
*
*
*
operator’s evaluation and remediation
(iii) If you utilize an indirect
schedule must provide for immediate
repair conditions. To maintain safety, an inspection method not described in
Appendix A of NACE SP0502
operator must temporarily reduce
(incorporated by reference, see § 195.3),
operating pressure or shut down the
you must demonstrate the applicability,
pipeline until the operator completes
validation basis, equipment used,
the repair of these conditions. An
application procedure, and utilization of
operator must calculate the temporary
data for the inspection method.
reduction in operating pressure using
(3) Indirect examination. In addition
the formula in Section 451.6.2.2 (b) of
to the requirements in Section 4 of
ANSI/ASME B31.4 (incorporated by
reference, see § 195.3). An operator must NACE SP0502 (incorporated by
reference, see § 195.3), the procedures
treat the following conditions as
for indirect examination of the ECDA
immediate repair conditions:
regions must include—
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
■ 31. Section 195.571 is revised to read
(4) Direct examination. In addition to
the requirements in Section 5 of NACE
as follows:
PO 00000
Frm 00059
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
*
E:\FR\FM\11AUR1.SGM
11AUR1
48608
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 154 / Wednesday, August 11, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
SP0502 (incorporated by reference, see
§ 195.3), the procedures for direct
examination of indications from the
indirect examination must include—
*
*
*
*
*
(ii) Criteria for deciding what action
should be taken if either:
(A) Corrosion defects are discovered
that exceed allowable limits (Section
5.5.2.2 of NACE SP0502 (incorporated
by reference, see § 195.3) provides
guidance for criteria); or
(B) Root cause analysis reveals
conditions for which ECDA is not
suitable (Section 5.6.2 of NACE SP0502
(incorporated by reference, see § 195.3)
provides guidance for criteria);
*
*
*
*
*
(iv) Criteria that describe how and on
what basis you will reclassify and reprioritize any of the provisions specified
in Section 5.9 of NACE SP0502
(incorporated by reference, see § 195.3).
(5) Post assessment and continuing
evaluation. In addition to the
requirements in Section 6 of NACE SP
0502 (incorporated by reference, see
§ 195.3), the procedures for post
assessment of the effectiveness of the
ECDA process must include—
*
*
*
*
*
(ii) Criteria for evaluating whether
conditions discovered by direct
examination of indications in each
ECDA region indicate a need for
reassessment of the pipeline segment at
an interval less than that specified in
Sections 6.2 and 6.3 of NACE SP0502
(see appendix D of NACE SP0502)
(incorporated by reference, see § 195.3).
34. In Appendix C to part 195,
paragraph I. A. introductory text is
revised to read as follows:
■
Appendix C to Part 195—Guidance for
Implementation of an Integrity
Management Program
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with RULES
*
*
*
*
*
I. * * *
A. The rule defines a High Consequence
Area as a high population area, an other
populated area, an unusually sensitive area,
or a commercially navigable waterway. The
Office of Pipeline Safety (OPS) will map
these areas on the National Pipeline Mapping
System (NPMS). An operator, member of the
public or other government agency may view
and download the data from the NPMS home
page https://www.npms.phmsa.gov/. OPS will
maintain the NPMS and update it
periodically. However, it is an operator’s
responsibility to ensure that it has identified
all high consequence areas that could be
affected by a pipeline segment. An operator
is also responsible for periodically evaluating
its pipeline segments to look for population
or environmental changes that may have
occurred around the pipeline and to keep its
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:53 Aug 10, 2010
Jkt 220001
program current with this information. (Refer
to § 195.452(d)(3).)
*
*
*
*
*
Issued in Washington, DC, on August 3,
2010, under authority delegated in 49 CFR
part 1.
Cynthia L. Quarterman,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2010–19643 Filed 8–10–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–60–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
49 CFR Part 594
[Docket No. NHTSA 2010–0035; Notice 2]
RIN 2127–AK70
Schedule of Fees Authorized by 49
U.S.C. 30141
National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration (NHTSA),
Department of Transportation.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
This document adopts fees for
Fiscal Year 2011 and until further
notice, as authorized by 49 U.S.C.
30141, relating to the registration of
importers and the importation of motor
vehicles not certified as conforming to
the Federal motor vehicle safety
standards (FMVSS). These fees are
needed to maintain the registered
importer (RI) program.
We are increasing the fees for the
registration of a new RI from $760 to
$795 and the annual fee for renewing an
existing registration from $651 to $670.
The fee to reimburse Customs for
conformance bond processing costs will
decrease from $10.23 to $9.93 per bond.
We are decreasing the fees for the
importation of a vehicle covered by an
import eligibility decision made on an
individual model and model year basis.
For vehicles determined eligible based
on their substantial similarity to a U.S.
certified vehicle, the fee will decrease
from $198 to $158. For vehicles
determined eligible based on their
capability of being modified to comply
with all applicable FMVSS, the fee will
also decrease from $198 to $158. The fee
for the inspection of a vehicle will
remain $827. The fee for processing a
conformity package will increase to $17
from $14. If the vehicle has been entered
electronically with Customs through the
Automated Broker Interface (ABI) and
the RI has an e-mail address, the fee for
processing the conformity package will
continue to be $6, provided the fee is
paid by credit card. However, if NHTSA
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00060
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
finds that the information in the entry
or the conformity package is incorrect,
the processing fee will be $57,
representing a $9 increase in the fee that
is currently charged when there are one
or more errors in the ABI entry or
omissions in the statement of
conformity.
DATES: The amendments established by
this final rule will become effective on
October 1, 2010. Petitions for
reconsideration must be received by
NHTSA not later than September 27,
2010.
ADDRESSES: Petitions for reconsideration
of this final rule should refer to the
docket and notice numbers identified
above and be submitted to:
Administrator, National Highway
Traffic Safety Administration, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., West Building,
Washington, DC 20590. It is requested,
but not required, that 10 copies of the
petition be submitted. The petition must
be received not later than 45 days after
publication of this final rule in the
Federal Register. Petitions filed after
that time will be considered petitions
filed by interested persons to initiate
rulemaking pursuant to 49 U.S.C.
Chapter 301.
The petition must contain a brief
statement of the complaint and an
explanation as to why compliance with
the final rule is not practicable, is
unreasonable, or is not in the public
interest. Unless otherwise specified in
the final rule, the statement and
explanation together may not exceed 15
pages in length, but necessary
attachments may be appended to the
submission without regard to the 15page limit. If it is requested that
additional facts be considered, the
petitioner must state the reason why
they were not presented to the
Administrator within the prescribed
time. The Administrator does not
consider repetitious petitions and
unless the Administrator otherwise
provides, the filing of a petition does
not stay the effectiveness of the final
rule.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Clint Lindsay, Office of Vehicle Safety
Compliance, NHTSA (202–366–5291).
For legal issues, you may call Nicholas
Englund, Office of Chief Counsel,
NHTSA (202–366–5263).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Introduction
This rule was preceded by a notice of
proposed rulemaking (NPRM) that
NHTSA published on May 7, 2010 (75
FR 25169).
The National Traffic and Motor
Vehicle Safety Act, as amended by the
E:\FR\FM\11AUR1.SGM
11AUR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 154 (Wednesday, August 11, 2010)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 48593-48608]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-19643]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration
49 CFR Parts 192, 193, and 195
[Docket No. PHMSA-2008-0301; Amdt. Nos. 192-114; 193-22; 195-94)
RIN 2137-AE41
Pipeline Safety: Periodic Updates of Regulatory References to
Technical Standards and Miscellaneous Edits
AGENCY: Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA),
Department of Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 48594]]
SUMMARY: PHMSA is amending the Federal pipeline safety regulations to
incorporate by reference all or parts of 40 new editions of voluntary
consensus technical standards. This action allows pipeline operators to
use current technologies, improved materials, and updated industry and
management practices. Additionally, PHMSA is clarifying certain
regulatory provisions and making several editorial corrections. These
amendments do not require pipeline operators to take on any significant
new pipeline safety initiatives.
DATES: The effective date of this final rule is October 1, 2010.
Incorporation by reference. The incorporation by reference of the
publications listed in these amendments has been approved by the
Director of the Federal Register as of October 1, 2010.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
For technical information: Mike Israni by phone at (202) 366-4571,
or by e-mail at mike.israni@dot.gov.
For regulatory information: Cheryl Whetsel by phone at (202) 366-
4431 or by e-mail at cheryl.whetsel@dot.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (Pub.
L. 104-113) directs Federal agencies to use technical standards and
design specifications developed by voluntary consensus standard bodies
instead of government-developed technical standards, when practicable.
The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circular A-119: ``Federal
Participation in the Development and Use of Voluntary Consensus
Standards,'' sets the policies on Federal use of voluntary consensus
standards. As defined in OMB Circular A-119, voluntary consensus
standards are technical standards developed or adopted by
organizations, both domestic and international. These organizations use
agreed upon procedures to update and revise their published standards
every three to five years to reflect modern technology and best
technical practices.
PHMSA's Office of Pipeline Safety employees participate in more
than 25 national voluntary consensus standards committees. PHMSA
reviews, and may adopt, standards that are applicable to pipeline
design, construction, maintenance, inspection, and repair. Prior to
adopting any standard, PHMSA reviews each new edition to determine
whether it should be incorporated in whole or in part into the pipeline
safety regulations. When PHMSA believes some aspect of a standard does
not meet this directive, it will not incorporate the new edition. PHMSA
has the ultimate responsibility to ensure the best interests of public
safety are served. There are more than 60 standards and specifications
incorporated by reference in 49 CFR part 192, Transportation of Natural
and Other Gas by Pipeline: Minimum Federal Safety Standards; 49 CFR
part 193, Liquefied Natural Gas Facilities: Federal Safety Standards;
and 49 CFR part 195, Transportation of Hazardous Liquids by Pipeline.
Previous updates to incorporate industry standards by reference
were published May 24, 1996, (61 FR 26121), June 6, 1996, (61 FR 2877),
February 17, 1998, (63 FR 7721), June 14, 2004, (69 FR 32886), June 9,
2006, (71 FR 33402), February 1, 2007, (72 FR 4657), and April 14,
2009, (74 FR 17099).
II. Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
On July 22, 2009, PHMSA published a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
(NPRM) to incorporate by reference new, updated, or reaffirmed editions
of voluntary consensus standards into the Federal pipeline safety
regulations. PHMSA proposed to incorporate by reference all or parts of
40 technical standards and make editorial corrections to certain
regulations. PHMSA did not propose to incorporate four new editions of
ASTM International (ASTM) standards (ASTM D638, D2513, D2517, and
F1055). Therefore, the gas pipeline safety regulations continue to
reference standards found in ASTM D638 (2003 edition), ASTM D 2513
(1987 edition), ASTM D2513 (1999 edition), ASTM 2517 (2000 edition) and
ASTM F1055 (1998 edition). In addition, PHMSA did not propose to
incorporate the 2008 editions of the National Fire Protection
Association (NFPA) NFPA 58: ``Liquefied Petroleum Gas Code'' (LP-Gas
Code) and NFPA 59: ``Utility Liquefied Petroleum Gas Plant Code
(Utility LP-Gas Plant Code). Therefore, PHMSA will continue to
reference the 2004 editions of NFPA 58 and 59 in part 192 of the
Federal pipeline safety regulations.
III. Summary of Comments
PHMSA received a total of 19 comments in response to the NPRM.
Several comments were from trade and standards associations including:
The American Gas Association (AGA); the Interstate Natural Gas
Association of America (INGAA); the National Propane Gas Association
(NPGA); the American Petroleum Institute (API); the Oklahoma
Independent Petroleum Association (OIPA); the Southern California Gas
Association (SCGA); the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) and
the Gas Piping Technology Committee (GPTC). One state agency, the Iowa
Utilities Board, filed a comment as well as the National Association of
Pipeline Safety Representatives (NAPSR), an organization of state
agency pipeline safety managers responsible for the administration of
their state's pipeline safety programs. Five operators, Southern
California Gas Company and San Diego Gas & Electric, Baltimore Gas and
Electric Company, CenterPoint Energy Resources Corporation, and
Distrigas of Massachusetts LLC submitted comments. Three private
citizens also submitted comments.
PHMSA also met with representatives from NFPA during the comment
period. A summary of this September 8, 2009, meeting is available in
the docket (PHMSA-2008-0301).
The majority of the comments received were in opposition to a
proposed change to Sec. 192.11(c) altering the primacy of the NFPA 58
and 59 standards over part 192. The comments are summarized and
discussed under each issue area below:
Comment Topic 1: Primacy of Part 192 over NFPA 58 and 59
Under the current version of Sec. 192.11(c), if a conflict arises
between NFPA 58 and 59 and part 192, NFPA 58 and 59 would prevail.
However, since this primacy was established in 1996, some operators
have been misinterpreting the meaning of ``conflict.'' Operators are
complying with the NFPA standards when the requirements of these NFPA
standards and part 192 are in direct conflict; however, the
misinterpretation arises when NFPA is silent or nonspecific on a
subject covered in part 192. In these situations, some operators have
misinterpreted Sec. 192.11(c) to mean they do not need to comply with
these additional requirements listed in part 192.
The NPRM had proposed to reverse this primacy so that part 192
would prevail if the two conflict. In the NPRM, PHMSA explained that
NFPA 58 was originally developed as a design and installation code and,
as such, did not cover ongoing corrosion control issues or operations
and maintenance (O&M) activities. Recently, NFPA 58 adopted several O&M
requirements; however, they are significantly less stringent than the
requirements found in part 192. PHMSA believes that NFPA 58 currently
fails to sufficiently address damage prevention, odorization,
distribution valve maintenance, leak surveys, emergency plans, failure
investigation, and public awareness. Because NFPA 58 and 59 currently
[[Page 48595]]
prevail, when there is a conflict in one of these areas with part 192,
operators would be allowed to comply with a less stringent requirement.
Additionally, propane gas does not safely dissipate when it leaks and
as a result can represent a greater potential hazard to the public than
natural gas. Therefore, it would be inappropriate to impose weaker
standards on propane distribution facilities than on natural gas
distribution facilities. Without a change to Sec. 192.11(c), PHMSA
believes that the NFPA's O&M requirements would actually decrease
safety in areas where they conflict with part 192 requirements.
Nine commenters objected to this proposed change. Commenters
requested an explanation of the misinterpretations referred to in the
NPRM and suggested that the proposed change is substantive and
therefore inappropriate for this type of rulemaking. Commenters
maintained that petroleum gas systems are often installed by plumbers
who may not be aware of part 192 requirements but are familiar with
NFPA 58.
Commenters also stated that the NFPA 58 and NFPA 59 consensus
standards were developed by industry, manufacturers, listing agencies,
state and Federal regulators, and insurance professionals and that
these standards are specific to the installation and utilization of
liquefied petroleum gas (LPG). Commenters stated there are extensive
differences between propane-air plants and pipeline transportation
facilities and the physical properties of LPG are not compatible with
the current regulations for natural gas systems.
One commenter supported the change noting that the O&M requirements
are clearer in part 192 than NFPA 58 and, therefore, the primacy of
part 192 over NFPA 58 and 59 would be beneficial.
According to the NFPA, the proposed change would create conflicts
between NFPA 58 or 59 and part 192. The proposed change would affect
inspection of pressure vessel relief valves, process piping design
standards, welding standards and the use of threaded connections,
polyethylene (PE) pipe in LPG systems above 30 psig, gray cast iron,
and regulator configuration for smaller LPG systems. NFPA recommended
that the reference to NFPA 58 and NFPA 59 in Sec. 192.11 be revised to
clarify that these NFPA standards are applicable to propane storage
systems only and not to underground gas distribution systems. NFPA also
recommended that Sec. 192.11 specify which operating requirements of
part 192 are applicable to propane storage systems, including
operations, maintenance, qualification of pipeline personnel, and
public awareness planning. NFPA suggested that the conflicts between
its NFPA 58 and 59 standards and part 192 can be resolved through the
NFPA standards updating process.
NPGA asserted that NFPA is better suited than PHMSA to develop
petroleum gas regulations.
PHMSA response: Petroleum gas transportation requirements need to
achieve the same level of safety as natural gas transportation
requirements. PHMSA continues to have concerns regarding the level of
safety required in NFPA 58 and 59 standards in certain subject areas.
The newer editions of NFPA 58 have expanded the scope of covered
facilities and have more conflicting requirements than the currently
incorporated editions. PHMSA believes that the NFPA 58 and 59
committees should analyze the following topics in consideration of
public safety: Internal valves on tank penetrations transporting
propane, relief valves, equipment separation and location distances,
facility cathodic protection, and requirements for ``retroactive''
application of the standards.
PHMSA will address the subject of NFPA 58 and 59 primacy under a
separate rulemaking. In the interim, compliance with part 192
requirements has not changed. When a requirement exists in part 192
that does not exist in NFPA 58 or 59, operators are required to comply
with it. A conflict only exists when an operator cannot comply with a
requirement in NFPA 58 and 59 because it conflicts with a requirement
in part 192. When a conflict exists, NFPA 58 or 59 continue to prevail.
Comment Topic 2: GPTC petition to amend Sec. 192.557(c).
PHMSA proposed to amend Sec. 192.557(c) in response to a petition
by the GPTC to clarify that a previous pressure test would allow for a
pipeline to operate at the higher maximum allowable operating pressure
(MAOP). Several commenters stated that this explanation misstated the
purpose of the change. Many commenters objected that this is a
substantive change and therefore inappropriate for this type of
rulemaking.
The Iowa Utilities Board (IUB) and the NAPSR stated that the
amendment will not accomplish the purpose of the GPTC petition. The
proposed change occurs in a section of the code that addresses pressure
increments (Sec. 192.557(c)). The requirements of Sec. 192.553(d)
(``Limitation on increase in maximum allowable operating pressure''),
would not be counteracted. To accomplish the purpose of the GPTC
petition, additional code sections would need to be amended.
Sempra Energy and GPTC stated that they support the proposed change
to Sec. 192.557(c) but the language of the NPRM misstates the GPTC
intent which is to clarify that a pressure test is not required to
validate the new MAOP.
PHMSA response: PHMSA has removed the proposed change to Sec.
192.557(c) from the final rule. PHMSA agrees that the proposed change
may cause confusion with the requirements of Sec. 192.553(d) which
were amended after the GPTC petition was submitted. PHMSA may consider
a revised GPTC petition in a separate rulemaking action.
Comment Topic 3: NFPA 58 and NFPA 59
Three commenters expressed concern regarding the proposal to not
adopt the 2008 edition of NFPA 58. These commenters surmised that
PHMSA's decision to not adopt the 2008 edition stemmed from concerns
with Section 14.4 Small LP-Gas Systems and recommended that PHMSA adopt
the 2008 edition of NFPA 58 excluding Section 14.4.
There were also objections to PHMSA's proposal to not adopt the
latest edition of NFPA 59. These commenters believe the 2008 edition is
superior to the 2004 edition. They stated that the 2008 edition
included reorganization of the document to conform to the NFPA Manual
of Style. This edition eliminated confusing language, reorganized the
standard to logically group requirements, and expanded use of excerpts
from NFPA 58 instead of referencing NFPA 58. The commenters stated that
many stakeholders have worked extensively to develop the 2008 edition
of the NFPA 59 consensus standard. They noted that the AGA Supplemental
Gas Committee task force performed a great deal of work to review the
NFPA standard and that NFPA ultimately adopted 62 of the 72 proposals
the AGA task force submitted to the technical committee. The commenters
asserted that safety measures are not decreased in the areas of damage
prevention, odorization, distribution valve maintenance, operation and
maintenance, and emergency and public awareness planning by moving from
the 2004 edition to the 2008 edition.
NFPA encouraged PHMSA to work with the NFPA 59 committee in a
manner similar to its work with the NFPA 58 committee to address
relevant issues through the normal course of scheduled revisions or,
for unforeseen
[[Page 48596]]
issues, through the Tentative Interim Amendment process.
PHMSA response: PHMSA appreciates the work of the NFPA 58 and 59
committees and their responsiveness to PHMSA's concerns. However, PHMSA
is not changing the editions currently incorporated by reference (2004
editions of NFPA 58 and 59). The 2008 edition of NFPA 58 included
changes in the requirements for small LPG operators which are in
conflict with part 192 requirements. Further, the 2008 edition of NFPA
59 references NFPA 58. If we were to adopt the 2008 edition of NFPA 59,
the referenced sections of NFPA 58 would also be incorporated by
reference unless we were to prescribe otherwise. Therefore, PHMSA has
decided not to adopt either of the new editions. PHMSA looks forward to
working with the committees to improve public safety and resolve issues
which may lead to the adoption of the newest editions in the next
Periodic Updates of Regulatory References to Technical Standards.
Comment Topic 4: NFPA 59A
The NFPA maintained that incorporating both the 2001 and 2006
editions of NFPA 59A by reference would create confusion for operators.
NFPA recommends that to address PHMSA's concern with Section 5.3 of the
2006 edition, PHMSA should adopt the 2006 edition and reference the
2001 edition solely for the requirements applicable to those specific
subjects. This approach would recognize and capture the other
improvements in the 2006 edition.
NFPA further stated that the 2001 edition of NFPA 59A incorporates
by reference 70 other technical standards of which all but three have
been superseded or removed. Some of the standards were discontinued and
are no longer for sale. During the generation of an updated edition,
the technical committee does not consider the interrelation of a
provision in one edition with related provisions in a prior edition.
Each edition stands on its own. Since 2006, when PHMSA incorporated
NFPA 59A by reference in the pipeline safety regulations, PHMSA has
incorporated different editions of the standards that are cross-
referenced within NFPA 59A. This rulemaking does not address this
conflict.
PHMSA response: PHMSA wishes to remind all who commented on
proposed changes to NFPA 59A and part 193 that the process for changing
a regulation is significantly different than developing a consensus
standard process. PHMSA must assess the impact of new editions of NFPA
59A on the public and the environment. When revised safety standards
are clearly an improvement to the public, the environment, and pipeline
safety, the adoption of a standard may be more easily justified.
After NFPA 59A's 2006 edition was published, PHMSA noted that
revisions to NFPA 59A lacked sufficient justification. In some
instances, the historical basis for adopting a safety standard could
not be explained. In these cases, PHMSA observed NFPA's committee work
and concluded it would be premature to adopt revisions that were
incomplete or could not be appropriately justified. For these reasons,
PHMSA has infrequently adopted new provisions within NFPA 59A and has
not changed its decision to not adopt the new edition in response to
these comments.
PHMSA is supportive of NFPA's efforts on standards and safety
research and believes its work is beneficial to the public. We
encourage NFPA and its members to continuously improve its NFPA 59A
standard and ensure that new revisions are complete, properly
justified, and adequately explained to the public.
Comment Topic 5: ASTM D2513-87 and ASTM D2513-99
PHMSA proposed not to incorporate by reference ASTM D2513: Standard
Specification for Thermoplastic Gas Pressure Pipe, Tubing and Fittings
(2007) edition at this time but will continue to reference the 1987 &
1999 editions. Southwest Gas and AGA commented that the 2007 edition of
ASTM D2513 incorporates changes which occurred since 1999 including
advances in manufacturing and installation of polyethylene (PE) pipe,
recognition of applicability of more recent ASTM standards for
fittings, and provisions for updated storage requirements. If the 2007
edition is not incorporated, both commenters recommended that PHMSA
provide a Stay of Enforcement from Section A.1.5.7 in the 1999 edition
of ASTM D2513 to recognize the safe, longer storage time of PE pipe.
AGA noted that gas utility operators and their state regulators have
already sought waivers to take advantage of the new standard. If they
are not granted the waiver, they may have to dispose of a significant
amount of polyethylene (PE) pipe that was purchased in response to the
shortages that operators experienced in the aftermath of hurricane
Katrina.
Southwest Gas recommended deleting the reference in Sec. 192.7 to
the 1987 edition of ASTM D2513 for Sec. 192.63(a)(1). A 1993 amendment
to Sec. 192.63 stated that the reference was retained due to
temperature marking of fittings. The 1999 edition of ASTM D2513
restored the temperature marking requirements for fittings.
PHMSA response: PHMSA has made no change in the response to these
comments. PHMSA appreciates the work of the ASTM Committee F-17 and
D20.10. There are important issues that are being finalized including
the subject of NAPSR Resolution SR-2-01, marking of materials. The
resolution of these issues will impact ASTM D638, D2513-87, D2513-99,
D2517, and F1055 standards. These issues include but are not limited to
the review of:
Revisions of material categories.
PENT test duration for PA-11 and PA-12 materials.
Development process for new materials.
Review of existing standards for re-grind, quality
assurance, and quality control due to recent failures.
Cyclic fatigue and long-term cyclic fatigue testing of
plastic mechanical appurtenances.
Need for new or modified regulations or standards due to
the impact of new materials.
Impact of findings from Standard Dimension Ratio and side
wall fusion Research and Development programs.
PHMSA will address Southwest Gas and AGA's request for a Stay of
Enforcement separately from this rulemaking. The special permit process
offers operators an existing mechanism to request an extension from the
current storage requirements for polyethylene (PE) pipe.
PHMSA has considered these comments but has not changed its
decision to not adopt the more recent edition of ASTM D2513.
Comment Topic 6: LNGFIRE3
Technology & Management Systems commented on the proposal to
replace GRI-89/0176 ``LNGFIRE: A Thermal Radiation Model for LNG
Fires'' (June 29, 1990) with GTI -04/0032 LNGFIRE3: A Thermal Radiation
Model for LNG Fires (2004). The commenter recommended that in
consideration of fire research conducted in the past three years, PHMSA
should reevaluate performance criteria for fire models and consider
alternate models that have been scientifically assessed, verified, and
validated to the Administrator's approval.
PHMSA response: The Gas Technology Institute (GTI) (formerly the
Gas Research Institute) changed the title of this material. The
contents of the software and the report have not changed. PHMSA's
purpose for this
[[Page 48597]]
amendment is solely to reference the new title. The commenter's
statements regarding performance criteria are beyond the scope of this
rulemaking. PHMSA is updating the title of this standard in the
regulation to reflect the title currently used by GTI.
Comment Topic 7: Web accessibility of standards.
The Oklahoma Independent Petroleum Association stated that the
costs to smaller oil and gas operators to purchase the updated
standards and to identify and assess all regulatory compliance
requirements are burdensome. They requested that PHMSA place the
applicable reference documents on its web site for easy access.
PHMSA response: PHMSA regrets that we are prohibited from posting
the technical standards to our web site as most standards have
copyright protection. All incorporated materials are available for
inspection in the Office of Pipeline Safety, Pipeline and Hazardous
Materials Safety Administration, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC, 20590-0001, 202-366-4595, or at the National Archives
and Records Administration (NARA), 202-741-6030, or go to https://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html.
The incorporated materials are available from the respective
organizations listed in Sec. 192.7 (c)(1).
IV. Advisory Committee
On December 9, 2009, PHMSA discussed the proposed rule with the
Technical Pipeline Safety Standards Committee (TPSSC) and the Technical
Hazardous Liquid Pipeline Safety Standards Committee (THLPSSC). These
are statutorily-mandated advisory committees that advise PHMSA about
the technical feasibility, reasonableness and cost-effectiveness of its
proposed regulations. At the meeting, PHMSA discussed the comments
received in response to the NPRM. NFPA emphasized that small operators
have difficulty determining which requirements of part 192 or NFPA 59A
apply to them. The committee urged PHMSA to take action to work out the
issues presented by NFPA, ASME, GPTC, and/or State Industry Regulatory
Review Committee (SIRRC), a committee comprised of state and federal
pipeline safety regulators, AGA and APGA formed to coordinate issues
pertaining to part 192.
With the exception of NFPA's abstention, the committees voted
unanimously that the NPRM was technically feasible, reasonable,
practicable, and cost effective. Since the NPRM included proposed
changes to the NFPA standards, the NFPA abstained from voting in
accordance with its bylaws. A transcript of the meeting is available in
the docket for this rulemaking.
V. Summary of Final Rule
This final rule accepts the following updated editions of technical
standards in parts 192, 193, 195. PHMSA is also amending titles, dates,
and references as applicable. Before describing each newly incorporated
standard, PHMSA is providing additional information regarding the
partial incorporation of NFPA 59A and the full incorporation of several
API standards.
PHMSA will incorporate only those sections of NFPA 59A, ``Standard
for the Production, Storage, and Handling of Liquefied Natural Gas
(LNG)'' (2006 edition) relating to ultrasonic inspection and seismic
design requirements. PHMSA believes the NFPA 59A committee needs to
reconcile differences relating to dispersion analyses for vapor
releases from process and safety equipment; containers with liquid
penetrations at grade; design spill cases for full and double
containment containers; standards for impoundment sizing for snow
accumulation, severe weather, emergency depressurization, and fuel
bunkering. Therefore, except for specified sections in the 2006 edition
mentioned above, PHMSA will continue to reference NFPA 59A (2001
edition).
ANSI/API Specification 5L and API Standard 1104
In a Direct Final Rule (74 FR 17099) published on April 14, 2009,
PHMSA incorporated by reference the 2007 editions of ANSI/API
Specification 5L, ``Specification for Line Pipe'' and API Standard
1104, ``Welding of Pipelines and Related Facilities.'' However, it did
not eliminate the use of the previously referenced editions of these
standards. In this final rule, PHMSA eliminates the use of the previous
editions of these standards, API Specification 5L (43rd edition and
errata, 2004) and API Standard 1104 (19th edition, 1999, including
errata October 31, 2001).
API Recommended Practice 5L1/ISO 3183 & API Recommended Practice 5LW
PHMSA is incorporating by reference API Recommended Practice 5L1/
ISO 3183 ``Specification for Line Pipe'' (6th edition, 2002) into the
newly-created Sec. 195.207. This standard provides a standard for
hazardous liquid operators for the transportation of certain API
Specification 5L steel line pipe by railroad.
PHMSA is also incorporating API Recommended Practice 5LW (API RP
5LW), ``Transportation of Line Pipe on Barges and Marine Vessels'' (2nd
edition, 1996) into Parts 192 and 195. This standard is referenced in
Sec. 192.65(a) and in the newly-created Sec. 195.207(a). API RP 5LW
provides a standard for transportation of certain API Specification 5L
steel line pipe by ship or barge on both inland and marine waterways.
American Petroleum Institute (API)
ANSI/API Specification 5L/ISO 3183, ``Specification for
Line Pipe'' (44th edition, 2007), includes errata (January 2009) and
addendum (February 2009).
Replaces incorporated by reference (IBR): API Specification 5L,
``Specification for Line Pipe'' (43rd edition and errata, 2004);
Referenced in 49 CFR 192.55(e); 192.112; 192.113; Item I, Appendix
B to Part 192; 195.106(b)(1)(i); 195.106(e), 195.207(a).
API Recommended Practice 5L1 ``Recommended Practice for
Railroad Transportation of Line Pipe,'' (6th Edition, 2002)
IBR for the first time in 49 CFR newly-created 195.207;
Referenced in 49 CFR 192.65(a)(1); 195.207.
API Recommended Practice 5LW, ``Transportation of Line
Pipe on Barges and Marine Vessels'' (2nd edition, 1996, effective March
1, 1997).
IBR for the first time;
Referenced in 49 CFR 192.65(b); 195.207(b).
API Specification 6D/ISO 14313, ``Specification for
Pipeline Valves'' (23rd edition (April 2008, effective October 1, 2008)
and errata 3 (includes 1 & 2, February 2009).
Replaces IBR: API Specification 6D ``Pipeline Valves'' (22nd edition,
January 2002);
Referenced in 49 CFR 192.145(a); 195.116(d).
API Specification 12F, ``Specification for Shop Welded
Tanks for Storage of Production Liquids (11th edition, November 1,
1994, reaffirmed 2000, errata, February 2007).
Replaces IBR: 11th edition, 1994 (reaffirmed, 2000);
Referenced in 49 CFR 195.132(b)(1); 195.205(b)(2); 195.264(b)(1);
195.264(e)(1); 195.307(a); 195.565; 195.579(d).
API Standard 510, ``Pressure Vessel Inspection Code: In-
Service Inspection,
[[Page 48598]]
Rating, Repair, and Alteration'' (9th edition, June 2006).
Replaces IBR: 8th edition, 1997 including Addenda 1 through 4;
Referenced in 49 CFR 195.205(b)(3); 195.432(c).
API Standard 620, ``Design and Construction of Large,
Welded, Low-Pressure Storage Tanks,'' (11th edition February 2008,
addendum 1, March 2009).
Replaces IBR: 10th edition, 2002 including addendum 1;
Reference added in 49 CFR 193.2101(b), 193. 2321(b)(2).
Referenced in 49 CFR 195.132(b)(2); 195.205(b)(2); 195.264(b)(1);
195.264(e)(3); 195.307(b);
API Standard 650, ``Welded Steel Tanks for Oil Storage''
(11th edition, June 2007, addendum 1, November 2008).
Replaces IBR: 10th edition, 1998 including Addenda 1-3;
Referenced in 49 CFR 195.132(b)(3); 195.205(b)(1); 195.264(b)(1);
195.264(e)(2); 195.307; 195.307(d); 195.565; 195.579(d).
ANSI/API Recommended Practice 651, ``Cathodic Protection
of Aboveground Petroleum Storage Tanks'' (3rd edition, January 2007).
Replaces IBR: 2nd edition, December 1997;
Referenced in 49 CFR 195.565; 195.579(d).
ANSI/API Recommended Practice 652, ``Linings of
Aboveground Petroleum Storage Tank Bottoms'' (3rd edition, October
2005).
Replaces IBR: 2nd edition, December 1997;
Referenced in 49 CFR 195.579(d).
API Standard 653, ``Tank Inspection, Repair, Alteration,
and Reconstruction'' (3rd edition, December 2001, includes addendum 1
(September 2003), addendum 2 (November 2005), addendum 3 (February
2008), and errata (April 2008).
Replaces IBR: 3rd edition, 2001 including addendum 1, 2003;
Referenced in 49 CFR 195.205(b)(1); 195.432(b).
API Standard 1104, ``Welding of Pipelines and Related
Facilities'' (20th edition November 2005, errata/addendum (July 2007)
and errata 2 (2008)).
Replaces IBR: 19th edition, 1999, including errata October 31, 2001;
Referenced in 49 CFR 192.225; 192.227(a); 192.229(c)(1); 192.241(c);
Item II, Appendix B; 195.222(a); 195.228(b); 195.214(a).
API Recommended Practice 1130, ``Computational Pipeline
Monitoring for Liquids Pipeline Segment'' (3rd edition, September
2007).
Replaces IBR: 2nd edition, 2002;
Referenced in 49 CFR 195.134; 195.444.
API Standard 2000, ``Venting Atmospheric and Low-Pressure
Storage Tanks Nonrefrigerated and Refrigerated'' (5th edition, April
1998, errata, November 15, 1999).
Replaces IBR: 5th edition, April 1998;
Referenced in 49 CFR 195.264(e)(2); 195.264(e)(3).
API Recommended Practice 2003, ``Protection Against
Ignitions Arising Out of Static, Lightning, and Stray Currents'' (7th
edition, January 2008).
Replaces IBR: 6th edition, 1998;
Referenced in 49 CFR 195.405(a).
API Publication 2026, ``Safe Access/Egress Involving
Floating Roofs of Storage Tanks in Petroleum Service'' (2nd edition,
April 1998, reaffirmed, June 2006).
Replaces IBR: 2nd edition, 1998;
Referenced in 49 CFR 195.405(b).
API Recommended Practice 2350, ``Overfill Protection for
Storage Tanks in Petroleum Facilities'' (3rd edition, January 2005).
Replaces IBR: 2nd edition, 1996;
Referenced in 49 CFR 195.428(c).
American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE):
ASCE/SEI 7-05, ``Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and
Other Structures'' (2005 edition, includes supplement number 1 and
errata)
Replaces IBR: 2002 edition;
Referenced in 49 CFR 193.2067(b)(1).
American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM):
ASTM A53/A53M-07 (2007), ``Standard Specification for
Pipe, Steel, Black and Hot-Dipped, Zinc-Coated, Welded and Seamless''
(September 1, 2007).
Replaces IBR: 2004 edition;
Referenced in 49 CFR 192.113; Item I, Appendix B to Part 192;
195.106(e).
ASTM A106/A106M-08 (2008), ``Standard Specification for
Seamless Carbon Steel Pipe for High-Temperature Service'' (July 15,
2008).
Replaces IBR: 2004 edition;
Referenced in 49 CFR 192.113; Item I, Appendix B to Part 192;
195.106(e).
ASTM A372/A372M-03 (reapproved 2008), ``Standard
Specification for Carbon and Alloy Steel Forgings for Thin-Walled
Pressure Vessels'' (March 1, 2008).
Replaces IBR: 2003 edition;
Referenced in 49 CFR 192.177(b)(1).
ASTM A381-96 (Reapproved 2005), ``Standard Specification
for Metal-Arc-Welded Steel Pipe for Use with High-Pressure Transmission
Systems'' (October 1, 2005).
Replaces IBR: 1996 edition; reapproved 2001;
Referenced in 49 CFR 192.113, Item I, Appendix B to Part 192;
195.106(e).
ASTM A671-06, ``Standard Specification for Electric-
Fusion-Welded Steel Pipe for Atmospheric and Lower Temperatures'' (May
1, 2006).
Replaces IBR: 2004 edition;
Referenced in 49 CFR 192.113, Item I, Appendix B to Part 192;
195.106(e).
ASTM A672-08, ``Standard Specification for Electric-
Fusion-Welded Steel Pipe for High-Pressure Service at Moderate
Temperatures'' (May 1, 2008).
Replaces IBR: 1996 edition; reapproved 2001;
Referenced in 49 CFR 192.113, Item I, Appendix B to Part 192;
195.106(e).
ASTM A691-98 (reapproved 2007), ``Standard Specification
for Carbon and Alloy Steel Pipe, Electric-Fusion-Welded for High-
Pressure Service at High Temperatures'' (November 1, 2007).
Replaces IBR: 1998 edition, reapproved 2002;
Referenced in 49 CFR 192.113, Item I, Appendix B to Part 192;
195.106(e).
ASME International (ASME)
ANSI/ASME B16.1 -2005, ``Gray Iron Pipe Flanges and
Flanged Fittings: (Classes 25, 125, and 250)'' (August 31, 2006).
Replaces IBR: ASME B16.1-1998 ``Cast Iron Pipe Flanges and Flanged
Fittings'' 1998 edition;
Referenced in 49 CFR 192.147(c).
ANSI/ASME B16.9 -2007, ``Factory-Made Wrought Butt Welding
Fittings'' (December 7, 2007).
Replaces IBR: 2003 edition (February 2004);
Referenced in 49 CFR 195.118(a).
ANSI/ASME B31.4 -2006, ``Pipeline Transportation Systems
for Liquid Hydrocarbons and Other Liquids'' (October 20, 2006).
Replaces IBR: 2002 edition (October 2002);
Referenced in 49 CFR 195.452(h)(4)(i).
ANSI/ASME B31.8 -2007, ``Gas Transmission and Distribution
Piping Systems'' (November 30, 2007).
Replaces IBR: 2003 edition (February 2004);
Referenced in 49 CFR 192.619(a)(1)(i); 195.5(a)(1)(i);
195.406(a)(1)(i).
2007 ASME Boiler & Pressure Vessel Code, Section I: Rules
for Construction of Power Boilers (2007 edition, July 1, 2007).
[[Page 48599]]
Replaces IBR: 2004 edition, including addenda through July 1, 2005;
Referenced in 49 CFR 192.153(b).
2007 ASME Boiler & Pressure Vessel Code, Section VIII,
Division 1: Rules for Construction of Pressure Vessels (2007 edition,
July 1, 2007).
Replaces IBR: 2004 edition, including addenda through July 1, 2005;
Referenced in 49 CFR 192.153 (a); 192.153(b); 192.165(b)(3); 193.2321;
195.307(e).
2007 ASME Boiler & Pressure Vessel Code, Section VIII,
Division 2: Alternative Rules, Rules for Construction of Pressure
Vessels (2007 edition, July 1, 2007).
Replaces IBR: 2004 edition, including addenda through July 1, 2005;
Referenced in 49 CFR 192.153(b); 192.165(b)(3); 193.2321; 195.307(e).
2007 ASME Boiler & Pressure Vessel Code, Section IX:
Qualification Standard for Welding and Brazing Procedures, Welders,
Brazers, and Welding and Brazing Operators (2007 edition, July 1,
2007).
Replaces IBR: 2004 edition, including addenda through July 1, 2005;
Referenced in 49 CFR 192.227(a); Item II, Appendix B to Part 192;
195.222(a).
Gas Technology Institute (GTI)
GTI-04/0032 LNGFIRE3: A Thermal Radiation Model for LNG
Fires (March 2004).
Replaces IBR: GRI-89/0176 ``LNGFIRE: A Thermal Radiation Model for LNG
Fires'' (June 29, 1990);
Referenced in 49 CFR 193.2057(a).
Manufacturers Standardization Society of the Valve and Fittings
Industry, Inc. (MSS)
MSS SP-44-2006, Standard Practice, ``Steel Pipeline
Flanges'' (2006 edition).
Replaces IBR: 1996 edition reaffirmed 2001;
Referenced in 49 CFR 192.147(a).
NACE International (NACE)
NACE SP0169-2007, Standard Practice, ``Control of External
Corrosion on Underground or Submerged Metallic Piping Systems''
(reaffirmed March 15, 2007).
Replaces IBR: NACE Standard RP0169-2002, ``Control of External
Corrosion on Underground or Submerged Metallic Piping Systems;''
Referenced in 49 CFR 195.571; 195.573(a)(2).
NACE SP0502-2008, Standard Practice ``Pipeline External
Corrosion Direct Assessment Methodology'' (reaffirmed March 20, 2008).
Replaces IBR: NACE Standard RP0502-2002 ``Pipeline External Corrosion
Direct Assessment Methodology;''
Referenced in 49 CFR 192.923(b)(1); 192.925(b) Introductory text;
192.925(b)(1); 192.925(b)(1)(ii); 192.925(b)(2) Introductory text;
192.925(b)(3) Introductory text; 192.925(b)(3)(ii); 192.925(b)(iv);
192.925(b)(4) Introductory text; 192.925(b)(4)(ii); 192.931(d);
192.935(b)(1)(iv); 192.939(a)(2); 195.588.
National Fire Protection Association (NFPA)
NFPA 30, ``Flammable and Combustible Liquids Code'' (2008
edition, approved August 15, 2007).
Replaces IBR: 2003 edition;
Referenced in 49 CFR 192.735(b); 195.264(b)(1).
NFPA 59A, ``Standard for the Production, Storage, and
Handling of Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) (2006 edition, approved August
18, 2005).
Partially Replaces IBR: 2001 edition;
Referenced in 49 CFR 193.2101(b); 193.2321(b).
NFPA 70 (2008), ``National Electrical Code'' (NEC 2008)
(Approved August 15, 2007).
Replaces IBR: 2005 edition;
Referenced in 49 CFR 192.163(e); 192.189(c).
Plastics Pipe Institute, Inc. (PPI)
PPI TR-3/2008 HDB/HDS/PDB/SDB/MRS Policies
(2008),''Policies and Procedures for Developing Hydrostatic Design
Basis (HDB), Pressure Design Basis (PDB), Strength Design Basis (SDB),
and Minimum Required Strength (MRS) Ratings for Thermoplastic Piping
Materials or Pipe'' (May 2008).
Replaces IBR: 2004 edition;
Referenced in 49 CFR 192.121.
VI. Editorial Corrections and Clarifications
Part 192
Section 192.3
Section 192.3 defines terms used throughout Part 192. PHMSA will
move the definitions, ``active corrosion,'' ``electrical survey'' and
``pipeline environment'' from Sec. 192.465(e) to Sec. 192.3. This
revision provides a broader applicability of these terms to part 192
because these terms are also found in part 192, subparts I and O.
Section 192.63
PHMSA corrects the notation to ASTM D2513 to ASTM D2513-87 in Sec.
192.63 (a)(1) to clarify the version incorporated is the 1987 version
and adds to the text ``(incorporated by reference, see Sec. 192.7).''
PHMSA also corrects the notation to ASTM D2513 to ASTM D2513-99 in
Sec. Sec. 192.123 (e)(2); 192.191(b); 192.281 (b)(2); 192.283
(a)(1)(i) and Item 1, Appendix B to clarify the version incorporated is
the 1999 version and adds to the text ``(Incorporated by reference, see
Sec. 192.7).''
Section 192.145
PHMSA revises paragraphs (d) and (e) to use the same language as
ANSI/ASME B31.8, paragraph 831.11(c) in referring to shell components.
The revisions to paragraph (d) clarify the elements of a ``shell
component.''
PHMSA is also clarifying the materials allowed in certain valve
components used in compressor stations in response to the GPTC
petition. In paragraph (e), we clarify that cast iron, malleable iron,
or ductile iron may be used in the valve ball or plug. These materials
may not be used in the pressure holding shell components (e.g., body,
bonnet, cover, or end flange).
Section 192.711
When the repair time conditions were implemented for Pipeline
Integrity Management in High Consequence Areas (HCA), this section was
not modified to clarify that the repair times for pipelines covered by
Sec. 192.711 pertained only to non-integrity management repairs. We
are revising this section to make that clearer.
Part 193
Section 193.2101
PHMSA revises Sec. 193.2101 to incorporate by reference sections
from the 2006 edition of NFPA 59A pertaining to the seismic design of
stationary LNG storage tanks. Other sections from the 2001 edition of
NFPA 59A continue to be incorporated by reference as designated in
Sec. 193.2013. Although NFPA 59A (2006) incorporates by reference the
1990 edition of API Standard 620 for seismic design PHMSA is instead
incorporating by reference the most recent version of API Standard 620
(11th edition, addendum 1, 2009).
Section 193.2321
PHMSA clarifies the language in Sec. 193.2321(a) to use the
broader terminology for nondestructive testing. PHMSA revises Sec.
193.2321(b) to incorporate the requirements in the 2006 edition of NFPA
59A's for the ultrasonic examination of LNG tank welds for storage
tanks with an internal design pressure at or below 15 psig.
[[Page 48600]]
Part 195
Section 195.264
PHMSA adds to the text in 195.264(e)(2); 195.264(e)(3)
``(Incorporated by reference, see Sec. 195.3).''
Section 195.307
PHMSA revises paragraph (c) to reflect revised section numbering
regarding pneumatic testing from 5.3 to 5.2 of API Standard 650.
Section 195.401
When the repair time conditions were implemented for Pipeline
Integrity Management in High Consequence Areas (HCA), this section was
not modified to clarify the repair times for pipelines covered by Sec.
195.452 (pipelines that could affect an HCA). The requirement to repair
a condition within a reasonable time period (unless an immediate
hazard) applies to conditions on pipelines not covered by Sec.
195.452. In this final rule, PHMSA revises this section to make those
requirements clearer.
Section 195.432
PHMSA revises paragraph (b) to eliminate the reference to Section 4
of API Standard 653. All sections in API Standard 653 relating to
inspection of in-service atmospheric and low-pressure steel aboveground
breakout tanks are incorporated by reference.
Section 195.452
PHMSA revises paragraph (h)(4)(i) to reflect new section numbering
as specified in the updated ANSI/ASME B31.4. The referenced section is
changed from ``451.7'' to ``451.6.2.2 (b)''.
VII. Rulemaking Analyses and Notices
Statutory/Legal Authority for This Rulemaking
This final rule is published under the authority of the Federal
Pipeline Safety Laws (49 U.S.C. 60101 et seq.). Section 60102
authorizes the Secretary of Transportation to issue regulations
governing design, installation, inspection, emergency plans and
procedures, testing, construction, extension, operation, replacement,
and maintenance of pipeline facilities. Section 60102(l) of the Federal
Pipeline Safety Laws states that the Secretary shall, to the extent
appropriate and practicable, update incorporated industry standards
that have been adopted as part of the Federal pipeline safety
regulations.
Privacy Act Statement
Anyone may search the electronic form of all comments received for
any of our dockets. The Privacy Notice for comment submissions may be
reviewed at https://www.regulations.gov. You may review DOT's complete
Privacy Act Statement in the Federal Register published April 11, 2000
(65 FR 19477) or you may visit https://DocketsInfo.dot.gov.
Executive Order 12866--Regulatory Planning and Review and DOT
Regulatory Policies and Procedures
The final rule is not a significant regulatory action under Section
3(f) of Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735) and, therefore, was not
subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget. This final
rule is not significant under the Regulatory Policies and Procedures of
the Department of Transportation (44 FR 11034).
PHMSA is incorporating by reference new editions of technical
standards in the Federal pipeline safety regulations. The final rule is
intended to enhance transportation safety and reduce the overall
compliance burden on the regulated industry.
Industry standards developed and adopted by consensus generally are
accepted and followed by the industry; thus, their incorporation by
reference in the Federal pipeline safety regulations assures that the
industry is not forced to comply with a different set of standards to
accomplish the same safety goal. Requiring regulatory compliance with
standards such as the ASME, ASTM and API takes advantage of
established, well-defined and proven practices. Because we are adopting
industry consensus standards we expect compliance costs associated with
these regulatory changes to be minimal.
Executive Order 13132
PHMSA has analyzed this final rule under the principles and
criteria in Executive Order 13132 (``Federalism''). The final rule does
not have a substantial direct effect on the States, the relationship
between the national government and the States, or the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the various levels of government. The
final rule does not impose substantial direct compliance costs on State
and local governments. This final regulation does not preempt state law
for intrastate pipelines. Therefore, the consultation and funding
requirements of Executive Order 13132 do not apply.
Executive Order 13175
PHMSA analyzed this final rule according to Executive Order 13175
(``Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments''). The
final rule does not significantly or uniquely affect the communities of
the Indian tribal governments or impose substantial direct compliance
costs; thus, the funding and consultation requirements of Executive
Order 13175 do not apply.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.), PHMSA
must consider whether rulemaking actions would have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. This final
rule ensures that pipeline operators are using the most current
editions of technical standards incorporated by reference. The final
rule also improves the clarity of several regulations. PHMSA believes
that this final rule impacts a substantial number of small entities but
that this impact will be negligible. Based on the facts available about
the expected impact of this rulemaking, I certify, under Section 605 of
the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 605) that this final rule will
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
This final rule does not impose unfunded mandates under the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995. It does not result in costs of
$100 million (adjusted for inflation currently estimated to be $132
million) or more in any one year to either State, local, or tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or to the private sector, and is the
least burdensome alternative that achieves the objective of the final
rule.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This final rule does not impose any new information collection
requirements.
National Environmental Policy Act
PHMSA analyzed this final rule in accordance with the National
Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C.4321-4375), the Council on
Environmental Quality regulations (40 CFR parts 1500-1508), and DOT
Order 5610.1C, and has determined that this action will not
significantly affect the quality of the human environment. PHMSA
examined alternatives in the NPRM and did not receive any comments on
this preliminary analysis.
[[Page 48601]]
Executive Order 13211
Transporting gas affects the nation's available energy supply.
However, this final rule is not a ``significant'' energy action under
Executive Order 13211. It is not a significant regulatory action under
Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to have a significant adverse
effect on the supply, distribution, or use of energy. Further, the
Administrator of the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs has
not designated this rule as a significant energy action.
Regulation Identifier Number (RIN)
A regulation identifier number (RIN) is assigned to each regulatory
action listed in the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulations. The
Regulatory Information Service Center publishes the Unified Agenda in
April and October of each year. The RIN number contained in the heading
of this document can be used to cross-reference this action with the
Unified Agenda.
List of Subjects
49 CFR Part 192
Incorporation by Reference, Natural Gas, Pipeline safety.
49 CFR Part 193
Incorporation by Reference, Liquefied Natural gas, Pipeline safety.
49 CFR Part 195
Anhydrous ammonia, Carbon Dioxide, Incorporation by Reference,
Petroleum Pipeline safety.
0
In consideration of the foregoing, PHMSA is amending 49 CFR parts 192,
193, and 195 as follows:
PART 192--TRANSPORTATION OF NATURAL AND OTHER GAS BY PIPELINE:
MINIMUM FEDERAL SAFETY STANDARDS
0
1. The authority citation for Part 192 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 5103, 60102, 60104, 60108, 60109, 60110,
60113, 60116, 60118 and 60137; and 49 CFR 1.53.
0
2. In Sec. 192.3, definitions for ``Active corrosion'', ``Electrical
survey'' and ``pipeline environment'' are added in alphabetical order
to read as follows:
Sec. 192.3 Definitions
* * * * *
Active corrosion means continuing corrosion that, unless
controlled, could result in a condition that is detrimental to public
safety.
* * * * *
Electrical survey means a series of closely spaced pipe-to-soil
readings over pipelines which are subsequently analyzed to identify
locations where a corrosive current is leaving the pipeline.
* * * * *
Pipeline environment includes soil resistivity (high or low), soil
moisture (wet or dry), soil contaminants that may promote corrosive
activity, and other known conditions that could affect the probability
of active corrosion.
* * * * *
0
3. In Sec. 192.7, paragraph (c)(2) is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 192.7 What documents are incorporated by reference partly or
wholly in this part?
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(2) Documents incorporated by reference.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Source and name of referenced material 49 CFR reference
------------------------------------------------------------------------
A. Pipeline Research Council International
(PRCI):
(1) AGA Pipeline Research Committee, Sec. Sec.
Project PR-3-805, ``A Modified 192.485(c);.192.933(a)(1);
Criterion for Evaluating the Remaining 192.933(d)(1)(i).
Strength of Corroded Pipe,'' (December
22, 1989). The RSTRENG program may be
used for calculating remaining
strength.
B. American Petroleum Institute (API):
(1) ANSI/API Specification 5L/ISO 3183 Sec. Sec. 192.55(e);
``Specification for Line Pipe'' (44th 192.112; 192.113; Item I,
edition, 2007), includes errata Appendix B to Part 192.
(January 2009) and addendum (February
2009).
(2) API Recommended Practice 5L1 Sec. 192.65(a)(1).
``Recommended Practice for Railroad
Transportation of Line Pipe,'' (6th
Edition, July 2002).
(3) API Recommended Practice 5LW, Sec. 192.65(b).
``Transportation of Line Pipe on
Barges and Marine Vessels'' (2nd
edition, December 1996, effective
March 1, 1997).
(4) ANSI/API Specification 6D, Sec. 192.145(a).
``Specification for Pipeline Valves''
(23rd edition (April 2008, effective
October 1, 2008) and errata 3
(includes 1 and 2, February 2009)).
(5) API Recommended Practice 80, Sec. Sec. 192.8(a);
``Guidelines for the Definition of 192.8(a)(1); 192.8(a)(2);
Onshore Gas Gathering Lines,'' (1st 192.8(a)(3); 192.8(a)(4).
edition, April 2000).
(6) API Standard 1104, ``Welding of Sec. Sec. 192.225;
Pipelines and Related Facilities'' 192.227(a); 192.229(c)(1);
(20th edition, October 2005, errata/ 192.241(c); Item II,
addendum, (July 2007) and errata 2 Appendix B.
(2008)).
(7) API Recommended Practice 1162, Sec. Sec. 192.616(a);
``Public Awareness Programs for 192.616(b); 192.616(c).
Pipeline Operators,'' (1st edition,
December 2003).
(8) API Recommended Practice 1165 Sec. 192.631(c)(1).
``Recommended Practice 1165
``Recommended Practice for Pipeline
SCADA Displays,'' (API RP 1165) (First
edition (January 2007)).
C. American Society for Testing and
Materials (ASTM):
(1) ASTM A53/A53M-07, ``Standard Sec. Sec. 192.113; Item
Specification for Pipe, Steel, Black I, Appendix B to Part 192.
and Hot-Dipped, Zinc-Coated, Welded
and Seamless'' (September 1, 2007).
(2) ASTM A106/A106M-08, ``Standard Sec. Sec. 192.113; Item
Specification for Seamless Carbon I, Appendix B to Part 192.
Steel Pipe for High-Temperature
Service'' (July 15, 2008).
(3) ASTM A333/A333M-05 (2005) Sec. Sec. 192.113; Item
``Standard Specification for Seamless I, Appendix B to Part 192.
and Welded Steel Pipe for Low-
Temperature Service''.
(4) ASTM A372/A372M-03 (reapproved Sec. 192.177(b)(1).
2008), ``Standard Specification for
Carbon and Alloy Steel Forgings for
Thin-Walled Pressure Vessels'' (March
1, 2008).
(5) ASTM A381-96 (reapproved 2005), Sec. Sec. 192.113; Item
``Standard Specification for Metal-Arc I, Appendix B to Part 192.
Welded Steel Pipe for Use With High-
Pressure Transmission Systems''
(October 1, 2005).
(6) ASTM A578/A578M-96 (re-approved Sec. Sec.
2001) ``Standard Specification for 192.112(c)(2)(iii).
Straight-Beam Ultrasonic Examination
of Plain and Clad Steel Plates for
Special Applications.''.
[[Page 48602]]
(7) ASTM A671-06, ``Standard Sec. Sec. 192.113; Item
Specification for Electric-Fusion- I, Appendix B to Part 192.
Welded Steel Pipe for Atmospheric and
Lower Temperatures'' (May 1, 2006).
(8) ASTM A672-08, ``Standard Sec. Sec. 192.113; Item
Specification for Electric-Fusion- I, Appendix B to Part 192.
Welded Steel Pipe for High-Pressure
Service at Moderate Temperatures''
(May 1, 2008).
(9) ASTM A691-98 (reapproved 2007), Sec. Sec. 192.113; Item
``Standard Specification for Carbon I, Appendix B to Part 192.
and Alloy Steel Pipe, Electric-Fusion-
Welded for High-Pressure Service at
High Temperatures'' (November 1, 2007).
(10) ASTM D638-03 ``Standard Test Sec. Sec. 192.283(a)(3);
Method for Tensile Properties of 192.283(b)(1).
Plastics.''.
(11) ASTM D2513-87 ``Standard Sec. 192.63(a)(1).
Specification for Thermoplastic Gas
Pressure Pipe, Tubing, and Fittings.''.
(12) ASTM D2513-99 ``Standard Sec. Sec. 192.123(e)(2);
Specification for Thermoplastic Gas 192.191(b); 192.281(b)(2);
Pressure Pipe, Tubing, and Fittings.''. 192.283(a)(1)(i); Item 1,
Appendix B to Part 192.
(13) ASTM D2517-00 ``Standard Sec. Sec. 192.191(a);
Specification for Reinforced Epoxy 192.281(d)(1);
Resin Gas Pressure Pipe and 192.283(a)(1)(ii); Item I,
Fittings.''. Appendix B to Part 192.
(14) ASTM F1055-1998, ``Standard Sec. 192.283(a)(1)(iii).
Specification for Electrofusion Type
Polyethylene Fittings for Outside
Diameter Controller Polyethylene Pipe
and Tubing.''.
D. ASME International (ASME):
(1) ASME/ANSI B16.1-2005, ``Gray Iron Sec. 192.147(c).
Pipe Flanges and Flanged Fittings:
(Classes 25, 125, and 250)'' (August
31, 2006).
(2) ASME/ANSI B16.5-2003, ``Pipe Sec. Sec. 192.147(a);
Flanges and Flanged Fittings.'' 192.279.
(October 2004).
(3) ASME/ANSI B31G-1991 (Reaffirmed, Sec. Sec. 192.485(c);
2004), ``Manual for Determining the 192.933(a).
Remaining Strength of Corroded
Pipelines.''.
(4) ASME/ANSI B31.8-2007, ``Gas Sec. 192.619(a)(1)(i).
Transmission and Distribution Piping
Systems'' (November 30, 2007).
(5) ASME/ANSI B31.8S-2004, ``Supplement Sec. Sec. 192.903(c);
to B31.8 on Managing System Integrity 192.907(b); 192.911
of Gas Pipelines.''. Introductory text;
192.911(i); 192.911(k);
192.911(l); 192.911(m);
192.913(a) Introductory
text; 192.913(b)(1);
192.917(a) Introductory
text; 192.917(b);
192.917(c); 192.917(e)(1);
192.917(e)(4);
192.921(a)(1);
192.923(b)(1);
192.923(b)(2);
192.923(b)(3); 192.925(b)
Introductory text;
192.925(b)(1);
192.925(b)(2);
192.925(b)(3);
192.925(b)(4); 192.927(b);
192.927(c)(1)(i);
192.929(b)(1);
192.929(b)(2); 192.933(a);
192.933(d)(1);
192.933(d)(1)(i);
192.935(a);
192.935(b)(1)(iv);
192.937(c)(1);
192.939(a)(1)(i);
192.939(a)(1)(ii);
192.939(a)(3); 192.945(a).
(6) 2007 ASME Boiler & Pressure Vessel Sec. 192.153(b).
Code, Section I, ``Rules for
Construction of Power Boilers 2007''
(2007 edition, July 1, 2007).
(7) 2007 ASME Boiler & Pressure Vessel Sec. Sec. 192.153(a);
Code, Section VIII, Division 1, 192.153(b); 192.153(d);
``Rules for Construction of Pressure 192.165(b)(3).
Vessels 2'' (2007 edition, July 1,
2007).
(8) 2007 ASME Boiler & Pressure Vessel Sec. Sec. 192.153(b);
Code, Section VIII, Division 2, 192.165(b)(3).
``Alternative Rules, Rules for
Construction of Pressure Vessels''
(2007 edition, July 1, 2007).
(9) 2007 ASME Boiler & Pressure Vessel Sec. Sec. 192.227(a);
Code, Section IX, ``Welding and Item II, Appendix B to
Brazing Procedures, Welders, Brazers, Part 192.
and Welding and Brazing Operators''
(2007 edition, July 1, 2007).
E. Manufacturers Standardization Society of
the Valve and Fittings Industry, Inc.
(MSS):
(1) MSS SP-44-2006, Standard Practice, Sec. 192.147(a).
``Steel Pipeline Flanges'' (2006
edition).
(2) [Reserved].........................
F. National Fire Protection Association
(NFPA):
(1) NFPA 30 (2008 edition, August 15, Sec. 192.735(b).
2007), ``Flammable and Combustible
Liquids Code'' (2008 edition; approved
August 15, 2007).
(2) NFPA 58 (2004), ``Liquefied Sec. Sec. 192.11(a);
Petroleum Gas Code (LP[dash]Gas 192.11(b); 192.11(c).
Code).''.
(3) NFPA 59 (2004), ``Utility Sec. Sec. 192.11(a);
LP[dash]Gas Plant Code.''. 192.11(b); 192.11(c).
(4) NFPA 70 (2008), ``National Sec. Sec. 192.163(e);
Electrical Code'' (NEC 2008) (Approved 192.189(c).
August 15, 2007).
G. Plastics Pipe Institute, Inc. (PPI):
(1) PPI TR-3/2008 HDB/HDS/PDB/SDB/MRS Sec. 192.121.
Policies (2008), ``Policies and
Procedures for Developing Hydrostatic
Design Basis (HDB), Pressure Design
Basis (PDB), Strength Design Basis
(SDB), and Minimum Required Strength
(MRS) Ratings for Thermoplastic Piping
Materials or Pipe'' (May 2008).
H. NACE International (NACE):
(1) NACE Standard SP0502-2008, Standard Sec. Sec. 192.923(b)(1);
Practice, ``Pipeline External 192.925(b) Introductory
Corrosion Direct Assessment text; 192.925(b)(1);
Methodology'' (reaffirmed March 20, 192.925(b)(1)(ii);
2008). 192.925(b)(2) Introductory
text; 192.925(b)(3)
Introductory text;
192.925(b)(3)(ii);
192.925(b)(3)(iv);
192.925(b)(4) Introductory
text; 192.925(b)(4)(ii);
192.931(d);
192.935(b)(1)(iv);
192.939(a)(2).
I. Gas Technology Institute (GTI):
(1) GRI 02/0057 (2002) ``Internal Sec. 192.927(c)(2).
Corrosion Direct Assessment of Gas
Transmission Pipelines Methodology.''.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 48603]]
0
4. In Sec. 192.63, paragraph (a)(1) is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 192.63 Marking of materials.
(a) Except as provided in paragraph (d) of this section, each
valve, fitting, length of pipe, and other component must be marked--
(1) As prescribed in the specification or standard to which it was
manufactured, except that thermoplastic fittings must be marked in
accordance with ASTM D2513-87 (incorporated by reference, see Sec.
192.7);
* * * * *
0
5. Section 192.65 is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 192.65 Transportation of pipe.
(a) Railroad. In a pipeline to be operated at a hoop stress of 20
percent or more of SMYS, an operator may not use pipe having an outer
diameter to wall thickness ratio of 70 to 1, or more, that is
transported by railroad unless:
(1) The transportation is performed in accordance with API
Recommended Practice 5L1 (incorporated by reference, see Sec. 192.7).
(2) In the case of pipe transported before November 12, 1970, the
pipe is tested in accordance with Subpart J of this Part to at least
1.25 times the maximum allowable operating pressure if it is to be
installed in a class 1 location and to at least 1.5 times the maximum
allowable operating pressure if it is to be installed in a class 2, 3,
or 4 location. Notwithstanding any shorter time period permitted under
Subpart J of this Part, the test pressure must be maintained for at
least 8 hours.
(b) Ship or barge. In a pipeline to be operated at a hoop stress of