Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans and Operating Permits Program; State of Nebraska, 48582-48585 [2010-19566]

Download as PDF 48582 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 154 / Wednesday, August 11, 2010 / Rules and Regulations Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by October 12, 2010. Filing a petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or action. Parties with objections to this direct final rule are encouraged to file a comment in response to the parallel notice of proposed rulemaking for this action published in the proposed rules section of today’s Federal Register, rather than file an immediate petition for judicial review of this direct final rule, so that EPA can withdraw this direct final rule and address the comment in the proposed rulemaking. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).) PART 52—[AMENDED] List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 Subpart AA—Missouri Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide, Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Lead, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile organic compounds. Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. 2. In § 52.1320(c) the table is amended by: ■ a. Removing the entry under Chapter 5 for 10–5.290; and ■ b. Revising the entry under Chapter 6 for 10–6.400. The revision reads as follows: ■ Dated: July 21, 2010. William Rice, Acting Regional Administrator, Region 7. ■ 1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows: ■ § 52.1320 * 40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows: Identification of plan. * * (c) * * * * * EPA-APPROVED MISSOURI REGULATIONS Missouri citation State effective date Title EPA approval date Explanation Missouri Department of Natural Resources * * * * * * * Chapter 6—Air Quality Standards, Definitions, Sampling and Reference Methods and Air Pollution Control Regulations for the Entire State of Missouri * * 10–6.400 ................... * * * * * * [FR Doc. 2010–19569 Filed 8–10–10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560–50–P ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Parts 52 and 70 [EPA–R07–OAR–2009–0913; FRL–9186–5] Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Direct final rule. srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with RULES AGENCY: EPA is taking direct final action to approve revisions to the State Implementation Plan (SIP) and Operating Permits Program to revise the state definition of volatile organic compounds; clarify language and incorporate rules related to construction SUMMARY: 16:53 Aug 10, 2010 Jkt 220001 * 5/30/09 * * permits to incorporate application fees and include a mechanism to use construction permits to accomplish other permitting needs; and clarify language related to open fires and explicitly include an exemption for fires used for religious activities. Approval of these revisions will ensure consistency between the state and Federallyapproved rules. This direct final rule will be effective October 12, 2010, without further notice, unless EPA receives adverse comment by September 10, 2010. If adverse comment is received, EPA will publish a timely withdrawal of the direct final rule in the Federal Register informing the public that the rule will not take effect. Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R07– OAR–2009–0913, by one of the following methods: ADDRESSES: PO 00000 Frm 00034 Fmt 4700 * Sfmt 4700 * 8/11/10 [insert FR page number where the document begins]. DATES: Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans and Operating Permits Program; State of Nebraska VerDate Mar<15>2010 * Restriction of Emission of Particulate Matter from Industrial Processes. * * * * * 1. www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line instructions for submitting comments. 2. E-mail: wolfersberger.chris@epa.gov. 3. Mail or Hand Delivery: Chrissy Wolfersberger, Environmental Protection Agency, Air Planning and Development Branch, 901 North 5th Street, Kansas City, Kansas 66101. Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID No. EPA–R07–OAR–2009– 0913. EPA’s policy is that all comments received will be included in the public docket without change and may be made available online at www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided, unless the comment includes information claimed to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit through www.regulations.gov or e-mail information that you consider to be CBI or otherwise protected. The E:\FR\FM\11AUR1.SGM 11AUR1 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 154 / Wednesday, August 11, 2010 / Rules and Regulations srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with RULES www.regulations.gov Web site is an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which means EPA will not know your identity or contact information unless you provide it in the body of your comment. If you send an e-mail comment directly to EPA without going through www.regulations.gov, your e-mail address will be automatically captured and included as part of the comment that is placed in the public docket and made available on the Internet. If you submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you include your name and other contact information in the body of your comment and with any disk or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid the use of special characters, any form of encryption, and be free of any defects or viruses. Docket: All documents in the docket are listed in the www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index, some information is not publicly available, i.e., CBI or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted material, is not placed on the Internet and will be publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket materials are available either electronically in www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at the Environmental Protection Agency, Air Planning and Development Branch, 901 North 5th Street, Kansas City, Kansas 66101. The Regional Office’s official hours of business are Monday through Friday, 8 to 4:30 excluding Federal holidays. The interested persons wanting to examine these documents should make an appointment with the office at least 24 hours in advance. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Chrissy Wolfersberger at (913) 551– 7864, or by e-mail at wolfersberger.chris@epa.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ refer to EPA. This section provides additional information by addressing the following questions: What is being addressed in this document? What action is EPA taking? What does Federal approval of a state regulation mean to me? What is being addressed in this document? EPA is approving revisions to the Nebraska SIP and Operating Permits Program which revise the state definition of volatile organic VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:53 Aug 10, 2010 Jkt 220001 compounds; incorporate rules related to construction permit application fees and include a mechanism to use construction permits to accomplish other permitting needs; and clarify language related to open fires. Changes to Chapter 1 revise the definition of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) to adopt changes that EPA made on November 29, 2004. In the first action (69 FR 69298), EPA added four chemicals to the list of excluded compounds at 40 CFR 51.100(s)(1), on the basis that these compounds make a negligible contribution to tropospheric ozone formation. These are: 1,1,1,2,2,3,3heptafluoro-3-methoxy-propane;3ethoxy-1,1,1,2,3,4,4,5,5,6,6,6dodecafluoro-2-(trifluoromethyl) hexane; 1,1,1,2,3,3,3heptafluoropropane; and Methyl formate. In the second action (69 FR 69304), EPA modified the definition of VOC at 40 CFR 51.100(s)(5) to exclude t-butyl acetate as a VOC for purposes of VOC emission limitations or VOC content requirements. While EPA determined that t-butyl acetate has a negligible contribution to tropospheric ozone formation, and need not be considered in determining source compliance with restrictions on VOC emissions, it also concluded that the compound should still be subject to all recordkeeping, emissions reporting, modeling, and inventory VOC requirements. The EPA final rule was effective December 29, 2004. The Nebraska regulation does not retain the recordkeeping, emissions reporting, modeling, and inventory VOC requirements. EPA has communicated with the state regarding this issue, and expects that Nebraska will revise its rule to retain the recordkeeping, emissions reporting, modeling, and inventory VOC requirements specified in the federal rule for sources using t-butyl acetate. Pending the state’s revision of the rule, EPA is not approving the current submittal as it relates to t-butyl acetate. EPA is, however, approving the revision as it relates to the other compounds discussed above. Changes to Chapter 17, construction permits, clarify various terms in the regulation, add cross-references, and delete redundant language. Additionally, Chapter 17, 003.01 adopts into Title 129 the construction permit application fee structure adopted by the Nebraska Legislature in 2004 at Neb. Rev. Stat. § 81–1505.06. EPA had determined that these primarily administrative changes are consistent with Federal requirements. PO 00000 Frm 00035 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 48583 Changes to Chapter 17, 015 delineates the construction permit process to be used as a vehicle to accomplish other permitting needs when a construction permit is not actually required, including to establish enforceable limits to avoid otherwise applicable regulatory provisions, or to modify existing construction permits to incorporate modifications that cannot be processed otherwise. While EPA is approving this regulatory change as part of this SIP submission as consistent with EPA requirements, it should be noted that if this provision is used to establish requirements relating to another regulatory program required to be included in the SIP, such as a best available retrofit technology requirement to address Regional Haze, Nebraska would need to submit such requirements to EPA for SIP approval, in order to meet the requirements of the particular regulatory program. Therefore, EPA approval of this regulation does not imply approval of permit requirements which may be issued under the regulation. Changes to Chapter 30 clarify language related to open fires, exemptions, and permits. Additionally, Chapter 30, 002.01 expands allowable exceptions to the Nebraska Department of Environmental Quality open fire ban to include fires set solely for religious activities. According to the state’s documentation, this change was intended to end confusion about the allowability of fires used in Native American sweat lodge ceremonies in those areas where the state has jurisdiction. EPA believes that fires set solely for religious purposes are similar in terms of size, frequency, and emissions to fires set for recreational purposes, which are already exempted from the open fire ban. Therefore, this change is considered a clarification, and it is not expected to result in additional emissions increases or a SIP relaxation. Changes to Chapter 30, 002.08 alter the wording to state that burning materials not authorized under a burn permit may result in withdrawal of the permit. The existing wording stating that burning unauthorized materials ‘‘will result in immediate withdrawal of the permit’’ is inconsistent with normal state enforcement procedures, which allow for case-by-case discretion. EPA notes that, in any event, burning of material not authorized under the permit would not be exempt from the open burning ban in the rule, and would, therefore, be a violation of the rule. Therefore, the change regarding withdrawal of permits does not affect the enforceability of the rule. EPA is E:\FR\FM\11AUR1.SGM 11AUR1 48584 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 154 / Wednesday, August 11, 2010 / Rules and Regulations approving the rule revision on this basis. What action is EPA taking? With the exception of the exemption of t-butyl acetate as discussed above, we are taking final action to approve revisions to the Nebraska SIP and Operating Permits Program. Approval of this revision will ensure consistency between the state and the Federallyapproved rules. EPA has determined that these changes will not relax the SIP or adversely impact air emissions and will not substantively change the operating permits program. We are processing this action as a direct final action because the revisions make noncontroversial changes to the existing rules. Therefore, we do not anticipate any adverse comments. Please note that if EPA receives adverse comment on part of this rule and if that part can be severed from the remainder of the rule, EPA may adopt as final those parts of the rule that are not the subject of an adverse comment. What does Federal approval of a state regulation mean to me? Enforcement of the state regulation before and after it is incorporated into the Federally-approved SIP is primarily a state responsibility. However, after the regulation is Federally approved, we are authorized to take enforcement action against violators. Citizens are also offered legal recourse to address violations as described in section 304 of the CAA. srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with RULES Statutory and Executive Order Reviews Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA’s role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law. For that reason, this action: • Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993); • does not impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:53 Aug 10, 2010 Jkt 220001 • is certified as not having a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.); • does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4); • Does not have Federalism implications as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999); • Is not an economically significant regulatory action based on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); • Is not a significant regulatory action subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001); • Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent with the CAA; and • Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). In addition, this rule does not have tribal implications as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000), because the SIP is not approved to apply in Indian country located in the state, and EPA notes that it will not impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law. The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule, to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal Register. This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States PO 00000 Frm 00036 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 Court of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by October 12, 2010. Filing a petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or action. Parties with objections to this direct final rule are encouraged to file a comment in response to the parallel notice of proposed rulemaking for this action published in the proposed rules section of today’s Federal Register, rather than file an immediate petition for judicial review of this direct final rule, so that EPA can withdraw this direct final rule and address the comment in the proposed rulemaking. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).) List of Subjects 40 CFR Part 52 Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide, Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Volatile organic compounds. 40 CFR Part 70 Administrative practice and procedure, Air pollution control, Intergovernmental relations, Operating permits, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements. Dated: July 21, 2010. William Rice, Acting Regional Administrator, Region 7. Chapter I, Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended as follows: ■ PART 52—[AMENDED] 1. The authority citation for Part 52 continues to read as follows: ■ Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. Subpart CC—Nebraska 2. In § 52.1420(c) the table is amended by revising the entries for 129–1, 129– 17, and 129–30 to read as follows: ■ § 52.1420 * Identification of plan. * * (c) * * * E:\FR\FM\11AUR1.SGM 11AUR1 * * 48585 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 154 / Wednesday, August 11, 2010 / Rules and Regulations EPA-APPROVED NEBRASKA REGULATIONS Nebraska citation State effective date Title EPA approval date Explanation STATE OF NEBRASKA Department of Environmental Quality Title 129—Nebraska Air Quality Regulations 129–1 .............................. Definitions ...................... 9/25/05 8/11/10 [insert FR page number where the document begins]. * 129–17 ............................ * * Construction Permits— When Required. * * * 8/11/10 [insert FR page number where the document begins]. * 9/25/05 * 129–30 ............................ * * Open Fires, Prohibited; Exceptions. * * * 8/11/10 [insert FR page number where the document begins]. * 9/25/05 * * * * * * * * 3. The authority citation for Part 70 continues to read as follows: ■ Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. Appendix A—[Amended] 4. Appendix A to Part 70 is amended by adding paragraph (j) under the heading ‘‘Nebraska; City of Omaha; Lincoln-Lancaster County Health Department’’ to read as follows: ■ Appendix A to Part 70—Approval Status of State and Local Operating Permits Programs * * * * Nebraska; City of Omaha; Lincoln-Lancaster County Health Department * * * * * (j) The Nebraska Department of Environmental Quality approved a revision to NDEQ Title 129, Chapter 1 on June 2, 2005, which became effective September 25, 2005. This revision was submitted on May 27, 2009. We are approving this program revision effective October 12, 2010. * * * * * [FR Doc. 2010–19566 Filed 8–10–10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560–50–P srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with RULES COUNCIL ON ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY 40 CFR Part 1515 RIN 0331–ZA01 Revision of Freedom of Information Act Regulations AGENCY: Council on Environmental Quality. VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:53 Aug 10, 2010 Jkt 220001 * * Final Rule. * determine if a FOIA request may be modified to allow for a more timely SUMMARY: This document amends the response, or to arrange an alternative Council on Environmental Quality’s time frame for a response; informing the (CEQ) regulations governing the requester of the volume of requested disclosure of information pursuant to material withheld and the extent of the requests made under the Freedom of deletions in records released in Information Act (FOIA). These revisions response to a FOIA request; increase in also reflect the principles established by time for appeal from 45 to 60 days from President Obama’s Presidential the date of denial of a request; extension Memoranda on ‘‘Transparency and Open of the time limit to respond to a request Government’’ and ‘‘Freedom of in ‘‘unusual circumstances,’’ and Information Act’’ issued on January 21, aggregation of clearly related requests by 2009 and Attorney General Holder’s a single requester or group of requesters. Memorandum on ‘‘The Freedom of Further, CEQ’s fee structure is revised to Information Act (FOIA)’’ issued on include a method for computing fees March 19, 2009. Additionally, the based upon the classification of the regulations have been updated to reflect requester and the base pay of the CEQ’s policy and practices and reaffirm employee making the search, an its commitment to providing the fullest increase of copying costs from $0.10 to possible disclosure of records to the $0.15 per page, and a provision for public. The regulations provide for an waiving fees. Additional administrative online FOIA Requester Service Center changes include reorganizing, and Reading Room; electronic FOIA renumbering, and renaming of the FOIA requests; access to records published or subsections and updating addresses and released under FOIA in electronic telephone numbers. format, provided the record is readily DATES: This final rule is effective reproducible in that form or format; designation of a Chief FOIA Officer and September 10, 2010. FOIA Public Liaison; referral of requests FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elizabeth Moss, FOIA Coordinator, 722 to appropriate Federal agencies or Jackson Place, NW., Washington, DC consultation with another agency, if 20503 or (202) 456–6550. appropriate; review of requests in order SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On of receipt; multi-tacking of FOIA November 13, 2009, the Council on requests based on the amount of time Environmental Quality published a and work involved in processing proposed rule that revised its existing requests; revision of CEQ’s initial determination period from 10 days to 20 regulations under the FOIA and added new provisions implementing the days, beginning on the date CEQ receives a written request; assignment of ‘‘Openness Promotes Effectiveness in our National Government Act of 2007’’ individualized tracking numbers for certain requests; tolling of the time limit (OPEN Government Act of 2007), Public Law 110–175, 121 Stat. 2524 (Dec. 31, for CEQ to act on a request; expedited 2007) and the ‘‘Electronic Freedom of processing of FOIA requests upon showing a showing of compelling need; Information Act Amendments of 1996’’ (Electronic FOIA Amendments), Public CEQ consultations with a requester to ACTION: PART 70—[AMENDED] * * Requirements for t-butyl acetate are still in effect. PO 00000 Frm 00037 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\11AUR1.SGM 11AUR1

Agencies

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 154 (Wednesday, August 11, 2010)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 48582-48585]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-19566]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Parts 52 and 70

[EPA-R07-OAR-2009-0913; FRL-9186-5]

Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans and Operating
Permits Program; State of Nebraska

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Direct final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA is taking direct final action to approve revisions to the
State Implementation Plan (SIP) and Operating Permits Program to revise
the state definition of volatile organic compounds; clarify language
and incorporate rules related to construction permits to incorporate
application fees and include a mechanism to use construction permits to
accomplish other permitting needs; and clarify language related to open
fires and explicitly include an exemption for fires used for religious
activities. Approval of these revisions will ensure consistency between
the state and Federally-approved rules.

DATES: This direct final rule will be effective October 12, 2010,
without further notice, unless EPA receives adverse comment by
September 10, 2010. If adverse comment is received, EPA will publish a
timely withdrawal of the direct final rule in the Federal Register
informing the public that the rule will not take effect.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R07-
OAR-2009-0913, by one of the following methods:
1. www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line instructions for
submitting comments.
2. E-mail: wolfersberger.chris@epa.gov.
3. Mail or Hand Delivery: Chrissy Wolfersberger, Environmental
Protection Agency, Air Planning and Development Branch, 901 North 5th
Street, Kansas City, Kansas 66101.
Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID No. EPA-R07-OAR-
2009-0913. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included
in the public docket without change and may be made available online at
www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided,
unless the comment includes information claimed to be Confidential
Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Do not submit through www.regulations.gov or e-
mail information that you consider to be CBI or otherwise protected.
The

[[Page 48583]]

www.regulations.gov Web site is an ``anonymous access'' system, which
means EPA will not know your identity or contact information unless you
provide it in the body of your comment. If you send an e-mail comment
directly to EPA without going through www.regulations.gov, your e-mail
address will be automatically captured and included as part of the
comment that is placed in the public docket and made available on the
Internet. If you submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you
include your name and other contact information in the body of your
comment and with any disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your
comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you for
clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic
files should avoid the use of special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or viruses.
Docket: All documents in the docket are listed in the
www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available, i.e., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such
as copyrighted material, is not placed on the Internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket
materials are available either electronically in www.regulations.gov or
in hard copy at the Environmental Protection Agency, Air Planning and
Development Branch, 901 North 5th Street, Kansas City, Kansas 66101.
The Regional Office's official hours of business are Monday through
Friday, 8 to 4:30 excluding Federal holidays. The interested persons
wanting to examine these documents should make an appointment with the
office at least 24 hours in advance.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Chrissy Wolfersberger at (913) 551-
7864, or by e-mail at wolfersberger.chris@epa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document ``we,'' ``us,'' or
``our'' refer to EPA. This section provides additional information by
addressing the following questions:

What is being addressed in this document?
What action is EPA taking?
What does Federal approval of a state regulation mean to me?

What is being addressed in this document?

EPA is approving revisions to the Nebraska SIP and Operating
Permits Program which revise the state definition of volatile organic
compounds; incorporate rules related to construction permit application
fees and include a mechanism to use construction permits to accomplish
other permitting needs; and clarify language related to open fires.
Changes to Chapter 1 revise the definition of volatile organic
compounds (VOCs) to adopt changes that EPA made on November 29, 2004.
In the first action (69 FR 69298), EPA added four chemicals to the list
of excluded compounds at 40 CFR 51.100(s)(1), on the basis that these
compounds make a negligible contribution to tropospheric ozone
formation. These are: 1,1,1,2,2,3,3-heptafluoro-3-methoxy-propane;3-
ethoxy-1,1,1,2,3,4,4,5,5,6,6,6-dodecafluoro-2-(trifluoromethyl) hexane;
1,1,1,2,3,3,3-heptafluoropropane; and Methyl formate.
In the second action (69 FR 69304), EPA modified the definition of
VOC at 40 CFR 51.100(s)(5) to exclude t-butyl acetate as a VOC for
purposes of VOC emission limitations or VOC content requirements. While
EPA determined that t-butyl acetate has a negligible contribution to
tropospheric ozone formation, and need not be considered in determining
source compliance with restrictions on VOC emissions, it also concluded
that the compound should still be subject to all recordkeeping,
emissions reporting, modeling, and inventory VOC requirements. The EPA
final rule was effective December 29, 2004. The Nebraska regulation
does not retain the recordkeeping, emissions reporting, modeling, and
inventory VOC requirements.
EPA has communicated with the state regarding this issue, and
expects that Nebraska will revise its rule to retain the recordkeeping,
emissions reporting, modeling, and inventory VOC requirements specified
in the federal rule for sources using t-butyl acetate. Pending the
state's revision of the rule, EPA is not approving the current
submittal as it relates to t-butyl acetate. EPA is, however, approving
the revision as it relates to the other compounds discussed above.
Changes to Chapter 17, construction permits, clarify various terms
in the regulation, add cross-references, and delete redundant language.
Additionally, Chapter 17, 003.01 adopts into Title 129 the construction
permit application fee structure adopted by the Nebraska Legislature in
2004 at Neb. Rev. Stat. Sec. 81-1505.06. EPA had determined that these
primarily administrative changes are consistent with Federal
requirements.
Changes to Chapter 17, 015 delineates the construction permit
process to be used as a vehicle to accomplish other permitting needs
when a construction permit is not actually required, including to
establish enforceable limits to avoid otherwise applicable regulatory
provisions, or to modify existing construction permits to incorporate
modifications that cannot be processed otherwise. While EPA is
approving this regulatory change as part of this SIP submission as
consistent with EPA requirements, it should be noted that if this
provision is used to establish requirements relating to another
regulatory program required to be included in the SIP, such as a best
available retrofit technology requirement to address Regional Haze,
Nebraska would need to submit such requirements to EPA for SIP
approval, in order to meet the requirements of the particular
regulatory program. Therefore, EPA approval of this regulation does not
imply approval of permit requirements which may be issued under the
regulation.
Changes to Chapter 30 clarify language related to open fires,
exemptions, and permits. Additionally, Chapter 30, 002.01 expands
allowable exceptions to the Nebraska Department of Environmental
Quality open fire ban to include fires set solely for religious
activities. According to the state's documentation, this change was
intended to end confusion about the allowability of fires used in
Native American sweat lodge ceremonies in those areas where the state
has jurisdiction. EPA believes that fires set solely for religious
purposes are similar in terms of size, frequency, and emissions to
fires set for recreational purposes, which are already exempted from
the open fire ban. Therefore, this change is considered a
clarification, and it is not expected to result in additional emissions
increases or a SIP relaxation.
Changes to Chapter 30, 002.08 alter the wording to state that
burning materials not authorized under a burn permit may result in
withdrawal of the permit. The existing wording stating that burning
unauthorized materials ``will result in immediate withdrawal of the
permit'' is inconsistent with normal state enforcement procedures,
which allow for case-by-case discretion. EPA notes that, in any event,
burning of material not authorized under the permit would not be exempt
from the open burning ban in the rule, and would, therefore, be a
violation of the rule. Therefore, the change regarding withdrawal of
permits does not affect the enforceability of the rule. EPA is

[[Page 48584]]

approving the rule revision on this basis.

What action is EPA taking?

With the exception of the exemption of t-butyl acetate as discussed
above, we are taking final action to approve revisions to the Nebraska
SIP and Operating Permits Program. Approval of this revision will
ensure consistency between the state and the Federally-approved rules.
EPA has determined that these changes will not relax the SIP or
adversely impact air emissions and will not substantively change the
operating permits program.
We are processing this action as a direct final action because the
revisions make noncontroversial changes to the existing rules.
Therefore, we do not anticipate any adverse comments. Please note that
if EPA receives adverse comment on part of this rule and if that part
can be severed from the remainder of the rule, EPA may adopt as final
those parts of the rule that are not the subject of an adverse comment.

What does Federal approval of a state regulation mean to me?

Enforcement of the state regulation before and after it is
incorporated into the Federally-approved SIP is primarily a state
responsibility. However, after the regulation is Federally approved, we
are authorized to take enforcement action against violators. Citizens
are also offered legal recourse to address violations as described in
section 304 of the CAA.

Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP
submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in
reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this
action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and
does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state
law. For that reason, this action:
Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993);
does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the CAA; and
Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this rule does not have tribal implications as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000),
because the SIP is not approved to apply in Indian country located in
the state, and EPA notes that it will not impose substantial direct
costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law.
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review
of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for
the appropriate circuit by October 12, 2010. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect
the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor
does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may
be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or
action. Parties with objections to this direct final rule are
encouraged to file a comment in response to the parallel notice of
proposed rulemaking for this action published in the proposed rules
section of today's Federal Register, rather than file an immediate
petition for judicial review of this direct final rule, so that EPA can
withdraw this direct final rule and address the comment in the proposed
rulemaking. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)

List of Subjects

40 CFR Part 52

Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen
dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Volatile organic compounds.

40 CFR Part 70

Administrative practice and procedure, Air pollution control,
Intergovernmental relations, Operating permits, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.

Dated: July 21, 2010.
William Rice,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 7.

0
Chapter I, Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended as
follows:

PART 52--[AMENDED]

0
1. The authority citation for Part 52 continues to read as follows:

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

Subpart CC--Nebraska

0
2. In Sec. 52.1420(c) the table is amended by revising the entries for
129-1, 129-17, and 129-30 to read as follows:

Sec. 52.1420 Identification of plan.

* * * * *
(c) * * *

[[Page 48585]]

EPA-Approved Nebraska Regulations
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
State
Nebraska citation Title effective EPA approval date Explanation
date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
STATE OF NEBRASKA
Department of Environmental Quality
Title 129--Nebraska Air Quality Regulations
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
129-1........................... Definitions........ 9/25/05 8/11/10 [insert FR page Requirements for t-
number where the butyl acetate are
document begins]. still in effect.

* * * * * * *
129-17.......................... Construction 9/25/05 8/11/10 [insert FR page ...................
Permits--When number where the
Required. document begins].

* * * * * * *
129-30.......................... Open Fires, 9/25/05 8/11/10 [insert FR page ...................
Prohibited; number where the
Exceptions. document begins].

* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

* * * * *

PART 70--[AMENDED]

0
3. The authority citation for Part 70 continues to read as follows:

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

Appendix A--[Amended]

0
4. Appendix A to Part 70 is amended by adding paragraph (j) under the
heading ``Nebraska; City of Omaha; Lincoln-Lancaster County Health
Department'' to read as follows:

Appendix A to Part 70--Approval Status of State and Local Operating
Permits Programs

* * * * *

Nebraska; City of Omaha; Lincoln-Lancaster County Health Department

* * * * *
(j) The Nebraska Department of Environmental Quality approved a
revision to NDEQ Title 129, Chapter 1 on June 2, 2005, which became
effective September 25, 2005. This revision was submitted on May 27,
2009. We are approving this program revision effective October 12,
2010.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2010-19566 Filed 8-10-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.