Determination of Nonattainment and Reclassification of the Dallas/Fort Worth 1997 8-hour Ozone Nonattainment Area; TX, 47746-47751 [2010-19574]
Download as PDF
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS
47746
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 152 / Monday, August 9, 2010 / Proposed Rules
In the event we become subject to either a
voluntary or involuntary petition for relief
under the U.S. Bankruptcy Code, we
acknowledge that you will have no obligation
to release the Funds held in the Account(s),
except upon instruction of the Trustee in
Bankruptcy or pursuant to the Order of the
respective U.S. Bankruptcy Court.
Notwithstanding anything in the foregoing to
the contrary, nothing contained herein shall
be construed as limiting your right to assert
any right of set off against or lien on assets
other than assets maintained in the
Account(s) nor to impose such charges
against us or any proprietary account
maintained by us with you. Further, it is
understood that amounts represented by
checks, drafts or other items shall not be
considered to be part of the Account(s) until
finally collected. Accordingly, checks, drafts
and other items credited to the Account(s)
and subsequently dishonored or otherwise
returned to you, or reversed, for any reason
and any claims relating thereto, including but
not limited to claims of alteration or forgery,
may be charged back to the Account(s), and
we shall be responsible to you as a general
endorser of all such items whether or not
actually so endorsed.
You may conclusively presume that any
withdrawal from the Account(s) and the
balances maintained therein are in
conformity with the Act and CFTC
regulations without any further inquiry, and
you shall not in any manner not expressly
agreed to herein be responsible for ensuring
compliance by us with the provisions of the
Act and CFTC regulations.
You may, and are hereby authorized to,
obey the order, judgment, decree or levy of
any court of competent jurisdiction or any
governmental agency with jurisdiction,
which order, judgment, decree or levy relates
in whole or in part to the Account(s). In any
event, you shall not be liable by reason of any
such action or omission to act, to us or to any
other person, firm, association or corporation
even if thereafter any such order, decree,
judgment or levy shall be reversed, modified,
set aside or vacated.
This letter agreement constitutes the entire
understanding of the parties with respect to
its subject matter and supersedes and
replaces all prior writings, including any
applicable agreement between the parties in
connection with the Account(s), with respect
thereto.
This letter agreement shall be governed by
and construed in accordance with the laws
of [Insert governing law] without regard to
the principles of choice of law.
Please acknowledge that you agree to abide
by the requirements and conditions set forth
above by signing and returning the enclosed
copy of this letter.
[Name of Futures Commission Merchant]
By:
Name:
Title:
ACKNOWLEDGED AND AGREED:
[Name of Depository]
By:
Name:
Title:
DATE:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:21 Aug 06, 2010
Jkt 220001
PART 140—ORGANIZATION,
FUNCTIONS, AND PROCEDURES OF
THE COMMISSION
7. The authority citation for part 140
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 2 and 12a.
7. In § 140.91, redesignate paragraphs
(a)(7) and (a)(8) as paragraphs (a)(8) and
(a)(11) respectively; add new paragraphs
(a)(7), (a)(9), and (a)(10); and revise
newly designated paragraph (a)(11) to
read as follows:
§ 140.91 Delegation of authority to the
Director of the Division of Clearing and
Intermediary Oversight.
(a) * * *
(7) All functions reserved to the
Commission in § 1.20 of this chapter.
*
*
*
*
*
(9) All functions reserved to the
Commission in § 1.26 of this chapter.
(10) All functions reserved to the
Commission in § 30.7 of this chapter.
(11) All functions reserved to the
Commission in § 41.41 of this chapter.
Any action taken pursuant to the
delegation of authority under this
paragraph (a)(11) shall be made with the
concurrence of the General Counsel or,
in his or her absence, a Deputy General
Counsel.
*
*
*
*
*
Issued in Washington, DC, on August 3,
2010, by the Commission.
David A. Stawick,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2010–19553 Filed 8–6–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 81
[EPA–R06–OAR–2010–0412; FRL–9186–1]
Determination of Nonattainment and
Reclassification of the Dallas/Fort
Worth 1997 8-hour Ozone
Nonattainment Area; TX
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
EPA is proposing to
determine that the Dallas/Fort Worth
(DFW) moderate 8-hour ozone
nonattainment area did not attain the
1997 8-hour ozone national ambient air
quality standard (NAAQS or standard)
by June 15, 2010, the attainment
deadline set forth in the Clean Air Act
(CAA or Act) and Code of Federal
Regulations (CFR) for moderate
nonattainment areas. This proposal is
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
based on EPA’s review of complete,
quality assured and certified ambient air
quality monitoring data for the 2007–
2009 monitoring period that are
available in the EPA Air Quality System
(AQS) database. If EPA finalizes this
determination, the DFW area will be
reclassified by operation of law as a
serious 8-hour ozone nonattainment
area for the 1997 8-hour standard. The
serious area attainment date for the
DFW area would be as expeditiously as
practicable, but not later than June 15,
2013. Once reclassified, Texas must
submit State Implementation Plan (SIP)
revisions for the DFW area that meet the
1997 8-hour ozone nonattainment
requirements for serious areas as
required by the Act. In this action, EPA
is also proposing that Texas submit the
required SIP revisions for the serious
area attainment demonstration,
reasonable further progress (RFP),
reasonably available control technology
(RACT), contingency measures, and for
all other serious area measures required
under CAA section 182(c) to EPA no
later than one year after the effective
date of the final rulemaking for this
reclassification; except that we propose
that Texas submit the required SIP
revision for the Stage II vapor recovery
to EPA no later than two years after the
effective date of the final rulemaking for
this reclassification, pursuant to section
182(b)(3)(A) of the Act.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before September 8, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R06–
OAR–2010–0412, by one of the
following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line
instructions for submitting comments.
• EPA Region 6 ‘‘Contact Us’’ Web
site: https://epa.gov/region6/
r6coment.htm. Please click on ‘‘6PD’’
(Multimedia) and select ‘‘Air’’ before
submitting comments.
• E-mail: Mr. Guy Donaldson at
donaldson.guy@epa.gov. Please also
send a copy by e-mail to the person
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section below.
• Fax: Mr. Guy Donaldson, Chief, Air
Planning Section (6PD–L), at fax
number 214–665–6762.
• Mail: Mr. Guy Donaldson, Chief,
Air Planning Section (6PD–L),
Environmental Protection Agency, 1445
Ross Avenue, Suite 1200, Dallas, Texas
75202–2733.
• Hand or Courier Delivery: Mr. Guy
Donaldson, Chief, Air Planning Section
(6PD–L), Environmental Protection
Agency, 1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 1200,
Dallas, Texas 75202–2733. Such
E:\FR\FM\09AUP1.SGM
09AUP1
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 152 / Monday, August 9, 2010 / Proposed Rules
deliveries are accepted only between the
hours of 8 a.m. and 4 p.m. weekdays
except for legal holidays. Special
arrangements should be made for
deliveries of boxed information.
Instructions: Direct your comments to
Docket ID No. EPA–R06–OAR–2010–
0412, EPA’s policy is that all comments
received will be included in the public
docket without change and may be
made available online at https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided, unless
the comment includes information
claimed to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Do not submit through https://
www.regulations.gov or e-mail,
information that you consider to be CBI
or otherwise protected. The https://
www.regulations.gov Web site is an
‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which
means EPA will not know your identity
or contact information unless you
provide it in the body of your comment.
If you send an e-mail comment directly
to EPA without going through https://
www.regulations.gov, your e-mail
address will be automatically captured
and included as part of the comment
that is placed in the public docket and
made available on the Internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, EPA
recommends that you include your
name and other contact information in
the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA
cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact
you for clarification, EPA may not be
able to consider your comment.
Electronic files should avoid the use of
special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or
viruses. For additional information
about EPA’s public docket visit the EPA
Docket Center homepage at https://
www.epa.gov/epahome/dockets.htm.
Docket: All documents in the docket
are listed in the https://
www.regulations.gov index. Although
listed in the index, some information is
not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other
material, such as copyrighted material,
will be publicly available only in hard
copy. Publicly available docket
materials are available either
electronically in https://
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at
the Air Planning Section (6PD–L),
Environmental Protection Agency, 1445
Ross Avenue, Suite 700, Dallas, Texas
75202–2733. The file will be made
available by appointment for public
inspection in the Region 6 FOIA Review
Room between the hours of 8:30 a.m.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:21 Aug 06, 2010
Jkt 220001
and 4:30 p.m. weekdays except for legal
holidays. Contact the person listed in
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
paragraph below or Mr. Bill Deese at
214–665–7253 to make an appointment.
If possible, please make the
appointment at least two working days
in advance of your visit. There will be
a fee of 15 cents per page to make
photocopies of documents. On the day
of the visit, please check in at the EPA
Region 6 reception area at 1445 Ross
Avenue, Suite 700, Dallas, Texas.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Carrie Paige, Air Planning Section,
(6PD–L), Environmental Protection
Agency, Region 6, 1445 Ross Avenue,
Suite 700, Dallas, Texas 75202–2733,
telephone (214) 665–6521; fax number
214–665–6762; e-mail address
paige.carrie@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. What is the background for this proposed
action?
A. What are the national ambient air
quality standards?
B. What is ozone and what is the 1997 8hour ozone standard?
C. What is a SIP and how does it relate to
the 1997 8-hour ozone standard?
D. What is the DFW nonattainment area,
and what is its current 1997 8-hour
ozone nonattainment classification?
E. What are the CAA provisions regarding
determinations of nonattainment and
reclassifications?
II. What is EPA’s evaluation of the DFW
area’s 1997 8-hour ozone data?
III. What actions is EPA proposing?
A. Determination of Nonattainment,
Reclassification of the DFW
Nonattainment Area and New
Attainment Date
B. Proposed Date for Submitting a Revised
SIP for the DFW Area
IV. Proposed Action
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. What is the Background for this
proposed action?
A. What are the national ambient air
quality standards?
Section 109 of the Act requires EPA
to establish a NAAQS for pollutants that
‘‘may reasonably be anticipated to
endanger public health and welfare’’ and
to develop a primary and secondary
standard for each NAAQS. The primary
standard is designed to protect human
health with an adequate margin of safety
and the secondary standard is designed
to protect public welfare and the
environment. EPA has set NAAQS for
six common air pollutants, referred to as
criteria pollutants: carbon monoxide,
lead, nitrogen dioxide, ozone,
particulate matter, and sulfur dioxide.
These standards present state and local
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
47747
governments with the minimum air
quality levels they must meet to comply
with the Act. Also, these standards
provide information to residents of the
United States about the air quality in
their communities.
B. What is ozone and what is the 1997
8-hour ozone standard?
Ozone is a gas composed of three
oxygen atoms. It is not usually emitted
directly into the air, but at ground level
is created by a chemical reaction
between volatile organic compounds
(VOCs) and oxides of nitrogen (NOX) in
the presence of sunlight. On July 18,
1997, EPA promulgated an 8-hour ozone
standard of 0.08 parts per million
(ppm), which is more protective than
the previous 1-hour ozone standard (62
FR 38855) that was established by EPA
in 1979. We revoked the 1-hour ozone
standard effective June 15, 2005. See 40
CFR 50.9(b) and 69 FR 23858 (April 30,
2004). Under EPA regulations at 40 CFR
part 50, the 1997 8-hour ozone standard
is attained when the 3-year average of
the annual fourth highest daily
maximum 8-hour average ambient air
quality ozone concentration is less than
or equal to 0.08 ppm (i.e., 0.084 ppm
when rounding is considered). See 69
FR 23857 (April 30, 2004).1 Ambient air
quality monitoring data for the 3-year
period must meet a data completeness
requirement. The ambient air quality
monitoring data completeness
requirement is met when the average
percentage of days with valid ambient
monitoring data is greater than 90
percent, and no single year has less than
75 percent data completeness as
determined in Appendix I of part 50.
Specifically, section 2.3 of 40 CFR part
50, Appendix I, ‘‘Comparisons with the
Primary and Secondary Ozone
Standards’’ states: ‘‘The primary and
secondary ozone ambient air quality
standards are met at an ambient air
quality monitoring site when the 3-year
average of the annual fourth-highest
daily maximum 8-hour average ozone
concentration is less than or equal to
0.08 ppm. The number of significant
figures in the level of the standard
dictates the rounding convention for
comparing the computed 3-year average
annual fourth-highest daily maximum 8hour average ozone concentration with
the level of the standard. The third
decimal place of the computed value is
rounded, with values equal to or greater
than 5 rounding up. Thus, a computed
3-year average ozone concentration of
1 For ease of communication, many reports of
ozone concentrations are given in parts per billion
(ppb); ppb = ppm × 1000. Thus, 0.084 ppm becomes
84 ppb.
E:\FR\FM\09AUP1.SGM
09AUP1
47748
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 152 / Monday, August 9, 2010 / Proposed Rules
0.085 ppm is the smallest value that is
greater than 0.08 ppm.’’ 2
C. What is a SIP and how does it relate
to the 1997 8-hour ozone standard?
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS
Section 110 of the Act requires states
to develop air pollution regulations and
control strategies to ensure that state air
quality meets the NAAQS established
by EPA. Each state must submit these
regulations and control strategies to EPA
for approval and incorporation into the
Federally-enforceable SIP. Each
Federally-approved SIP protects air
quality primarily by addressing air
pollution at its point of origin. The SIPs
may contain state regulations or other
enforceable documents and supporting
information such as emission
inventories, monitoring networks, and
modeling demonstrations.
EPA published a first phase rule
governing implementation of the 1997
8-hour ozone standard (Phase 1 Rule) on
April 30, 2004 (69 FR 23951). The Phase
1 Rule addressed, among other matters,
classifications for Part D subpart 2 areas
under the 1997 8-hour standard. The
Phase 1 rule was challenged and certain
portions of it were vacated by the DC
Circuit in South Coast Air Quality
Management Dist. v. EPA, 472 F.3d 882
(DC Cir. 2006), clarified on rehearing,
489 F.3d 1245 (DC Cir. 2007), cert.
denied, 128 S.Ct. 1065 (2008). The
provisions of the Phase 1 rule that are
directly relevant to this proposed rule—
classifications for subpart 2 and the
related 8-hour ozone standard
attainment deadlines—are not among
those that were successfully challenged,
and they remain effective.
EPA also published a rule governing
implementation of the 1997 8-hour
ozone standard (Phase 2 Rule) on
November 29, 2005 (70 FR 71612), as
revised on June 8, 2007 (72 FR 31727).
The Phase 2 rule addresses SIP
obligations for the 1997 8-hour ozone
NAAQS, including the SIP elements
associated with RACT, reasonably
available control measures (RACM),
RFP, modeling and attainment
demonstrations, new source review
(NSR), vehicle inspection and
maintenance programs (I/M), and
2 EPA notes that today’s proposed action deals
with the classifications and SIP obligations
associated with the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS. On
March 27, 2008 (73 FR 16436), EPA promulgated a
revised 8-hour ozone standard of 0.075 ppm. On
January 6, 2010, EPA proposed to set the level of
the primary 8-hour ozone standard within the range
of 0.060 to 0.070 ppm, rather than at 0.075 ppm.
EPA anticipates that in 2010 it will have completed
reconsideration of the standard and thereafter will
proceed with designations. EPA’s actions with
respect to this new standard do not affect EPA’s
action here.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:21 Aug 06, 2010
Jkt 220001
contingency measures for failure to meet
RFP and the attainment date.
For ozone nonattainment areas,
requirements for SIPs are contained in
part D, subparts 1 and 2 of the Act.
Under subpart 2, the applicable control
requirements become increasingly more
stringent according to an area’s
classification as marginal, moderate,
serious, severe or extreme.
D. What is the DFW nonattainment area,
and what is its current 1997 8-hour
ozone nonattainment classification?
The current DFW nonattainment area
includes nine counties: Collin, Dallas,
Denton, Tarrant (the core counties) and
Ellis, Johnson, Kaufman, Parker, and
Rockwall (the remaining counties).
Under the 1-hour ozone standard, the
DFW nonattainment area was classified
as a ‘‘serious’’ nonattainment area and
included only the four core counties.
See 63 FR 8128 (February 18, 1998). The
remaining counties maintained their
initial designation of unclassifiable/
attainment for the 1-hour ozone
standard. See 56 FR 56694 (November 6,
1991).3 On October 16, 2008, we
determined that the DFW 1-hour ozone
nonattainment area was attaining the 1hour ozone standard based upon
complete, quality-assured and certified
ambient air monitoring data that
showed the area had monitored
attainment of the 1-hour ozone NAAQS
for the 2004–2006 monitoring period (73
FR 61357). That determination allowed
certain SIP planning measures to be
suspended for so long as the area
continues to monitor attainment of the
1-hour ozone standard. Today’s
proposed rulemaking addresses the
area’s attainment and reclassification
only with respect to the 1997 8-hour
ozone standard.
With regard to the 8-hour standard, on
April 30, 2004, EPA published the 8hour ozone designations in conjunction
with its Phase I implementation rule (69
FR 23858 and 69 FR 23951,
respectively). For areas subject to
subpart 2 of the Act, such as the DFW
nonattainment area, the maximum
period for attainment runs from the
effective date of designations and
classifications for the 1997 8-hour ozone
NAAQS and corresponds to the same
length of time provided in Table 1 of
section 181(a) of the Act: Marginal—3
years; Moderate—6 years; Serious—9
years, Severe—15 or 17 years; and
Extreme—20 years.
The DFW area, consisting of all nine
counties, was designated nonattainment
for the 1997 8-hour ozone standard and
classified as ‘‘moderate’’ based on a
3 Designations
PO 00000
Frm 00023
for Texas begin at 56 FR 56835.
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
design value of 0.100 ppm, with an
attainment date of June 15, 2010 (69 FR
23858). The design value (DV) of an area
characterizes the severity of the air
quality concern and is represented by
the highest DV measured at any ozone
monitor in the area. The calculation for
the DV is the three-year average of the
annual fourth-highest daily maximum 8hour average ozone concentration
measured at a monitor. In response to
the designation, on May 30, 2007, the
State of Texas submitted an attainment
plan designed to attain the 1997 8-hour
ozone standard. The state submitted a
supplement to this plan on April 23,
2008. On July 14, 2008, we proposed to
conditionally approve the 1997 8-hour
ozone attainment demonstration SIP
revision for the DFW moderate 8-hour
ozone nonattainment area. See 73 FR
40203. We finalized this approval on
January 14, 2009. See 74 FR 1903. The
DFW area met all of the current
requirements for its moderate area
classification.
E. What are the CAA provisions
regarding determinations of
nonattainment and reclassifications?
Section 181(b)(2) of the Act prescribes
the process for making determinations
upon failure of an ozone nonattainment
area to meet the standard by its
attainment date, and for reclassification
of an ozone nonattainment area. Section
181(b)(2)(A) of the Act requires that EPA
determine, based on the area’s design
value (as of the attainment date),
whether or not the area attained the
ozone standard by that date. For
marginal, moderate, and serious areas, if
EPA finds that the nonattainment area
has failed to attain the ozone standard
by the applicable attainment date, the
area must be reclassified by operation of
law to the higher of (1) the next higher
classification for the area, or (2) the
classification applicable to the area’s
design value as determined at the time
of the required Federal Register notice.
Section 181(b)(2)(B) requires EPA to
publish in the Federal Register a notice
identifying any area that has failed to
attain by its attainment date and the
resulting reclassification.
II. What is EPA’s evaluation of the DFW
area’s 8–hour ozone data?
EPA is proposing to make its
determination of whether the DFW
attained the 8-hour ozone standard by
its attainment deadline based on
quality-assured, quality-controlled
ambient air monitoring data for the
years 2007–2009. These data, from sites
in the DFW area have been certified by
TCEQ, and are presented in Table 1.
These data show that the DFW area was
E:\FR\FM\09AUP1.SGM
09AUP1
47749
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 152 / Monday, August 9, 2010 / Proposed Rules
violating the 1997 8-hour ozone
standard at the time of its June 15, 2010
attainment deadline. As noted above,
the highest design value at any
regulatory monitor in the area is
considered the design value for the area
pursuant to section 181(b)(2) of the Act,
EPA is proposing to determine that the
DFW nonattainment area did not attain
the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS by the
June 15, 2010, deadline for moderate
nonattainment areas.
(40 CFR 58.1). The Keller and Eagle
Mountain Lake monitoring sites
recorded the highest 2007–2009 design
values, and thus at the time of its
attainment deadline, the area had a
design value of 0.086 ppm. Thus,
TABLE 1—DFW AREA FOURTH HIGHEST 8-HOUR OZONE CONCENTRATIONS AND DESIGN VALUES (PPM)*
4th Highest daily max
Design value
(2007–2009)
Site name and No.
2007
Fort Worth Northwest, 48–439–1002 ..............................................
Keller, 48–439–2003 ........................................................................
Frisco, 48–085–0005 .......................................................................
Midlothian OFW, 48–139–0016 .......................................................
Denton Airport South, 48–121–0034 ...............................................
Arlington Municipal Airport, 48–439–3011 ......................................
Dallas North No. 2, 48–113–0075 ...................................................
Rockwall Heath, 48–397–0001 ........................................................
Grapevine Fairway, 48–439–3009 ..................................................
Kaufman, 48–257–0005 ..................................................................
Granbury, 48–221–0001 ..................................................................
Eagle Mountain Lake, 48–439–0075 ...............................................
Parker County, 48–367–0081 ..........................................................
Cleburne Airport, 48–251–0003 ......................................................
Dallas Hinton St., 48–113–0069 ......................................................
Dallas Executive Airport, 48–113–0087 ..........................................
Greenville, 48–231–1006 .................................................................
Pilot Point, 48–121–1032 ................................................................
2008
0.081
0.084
0.080
0.076
0.089
0.075
0.079
0.074
0.089
0.074
0.081
0.084
0.088
0.087
0.076
0.080
0.069
0.075
2009
0.073
0.085
0.079
0.072
0.084
0.078
0.076
0.073
0.077
0.069
0.073
0.085
0.077
0.083
0.064
0.077
0.063
0.080
0.083
0.090
0.079
0.072
0.082
0.080
0.088
0.078
0.086
0.068
0.077
0.091
0.080
0.080
0.062
0.079
0.067
0.078
0.079
0.086
0.079
0.073
0.085
0.077
0.081
0.075
0.084
0.070
0.077
0.086
0.081
0.083
0.067
0.078
0.066
0.077
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS
* Design value calculations for the 8-hour ozone standard are based on a rolling three-year average of the annual 4th highest values (40 CFR
Part 50, Appendix I).
Under section 181(a)(5) of the Act,
and 40 CFR 51.907, an area can qualify
for up to 2 one-year extensions of its
attainment date if it meets the
conditions set forth in 40 CFR 51.907.
For the 1997 8-hour standard, if an
area’s fourth highest daily maximum 8hour average value in the attainment
year is 0.084 ppm or less (40 CFR
51.907), the area is eligible for the first
one-year extension to the attainment
date. The attainment year is the year
immediately preceding the attainment
date. The DFW area’s attainment year is
2009. In 2009, the area’s fourth-highest
daily 8-hour average from the monitor
with the highest average of the area’s
monitors was 0.091 ppm. 40 CFR
51.907(a), (c). Therefore, the DFW area
does not qualify for a 1-year extension
of its moderate area attainment
deadline.
Section 181(b)(2)(A) of the Act
provides that, should an area fail to
attain by the applicable date, the area is
reclassified by operation of law to the
next higher classification or the
classification applicable to the area’s
ozone design value at the time of the
required notice under Section
181(b)(2)(B), whichever is higher.
Section 181(b)(2)(B) requires EPA to
publish a notice in the Federal Register
identifying the reclassification status of
an area that has failed to attain the
standard by its attainment date. The
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:21 Aug 06, 2010
Jkt 220001
classification that would be applicable
to the DFW area’s ozone design value at
the time of today’s notice is ‘‘marginal’’
because the area’s 2009 calculated
design value, based on quality-assured
ozone monitoring data from 2007–2009,
is 0.086 ppm. By contrast, the next
higher classification for the DFW area is
‘‘serious.’’ Because ‘‘serious’’ is a higher
nonattainment classification than
‘‘marginal’’ under the statutory scheme
in the Act, upon the effective date of a
final rulemaking determining that the
DFW has failed to attain the 1997 8-hour
ozone standard by the applicable
attainment date of June 15, 2010, the
DFW area will be reclassified by
operation of law as ‘‘serious.’’
III. What actions is EPA proposing?
A. Determination of Nonattainment,
Reclassification of the DFW
Nonattainment Area and New
Attainment Date
Pursuant to section 181(b)(2) of the
Act, EPA is proposing to determine that
the DFW area did not attain the 1997 8hour ozone NAAQS by the June 15,
2010, attainment deadline prescribed
under the Act for moderate ozone
nonattainment areas. If EPA takes final
action on this determination as
proposed, the DFW area will be
reclassified by operation of law from
moderate to serious nonattainment.
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Serious areas are required to attain the
standard ‘‘as expeditiously as
practicable’’ but no later than 9 years
after designation, or June 15, 2013. The
‘‘as expeditiously as practicable’’
attainment date will be determined as
part of the action on the required SIP
submittal demonstrating attainment of
the 1997 8-hour ozone standard. EPA is
proposing a schedule by which Texas
will submit the SIP revisions necessary
pursuant to reclassification to serious
nonattainment of the 1997 8-hour ozone
standard.
B. Proposed Date for Submitting a
Revised SIP for the DFW Area
EPA is also addressing here the
schedule by which Texas would be
required to submit a revised SIP. When
an area is reclassified, EPA has the
authority under section 182(i) of the Act
to adjust the Act’s submittal deadlines
for any new SIP revisions that are
required as a result of the
reclassification. Pursuant to 40 CFR
51.908(d), for each nonattainment area,
the State must provide for
implementation of all control measures
needed for attainment no later than the
beginning of the attainment year ozone
season. The attainment year ozone
season is the ozone season immediately
preceding a nonattainment area’s
attainment date, in this case 2012 (40
CFR 51.900(g)). The ozone season is the
E:\FR\FM\09AUP1.SGM
09AUP1
47750
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 152 / Monday, August 9, 2010 / Proposed Rules
ozone monitoring season as defined in
40 CFR Part 58, Appendix D, section
4.1, Table D–3 (October 17, 2006, 71 FR
61236). For the DFW area, March 1st is
the beginning of the ozone monitoring
season. Therefore, we propose that
Texas submit the required SIP revisions,
including the attainment demonstration,
RFP, RACT, contingency measures, and
other applicable serious area
requirements to EPA as expeditiously as
practicable, but not later than one year
after the effective date of the final
rulemaking for this reclassification. In
addition, all applicable controls shall be
implemented no later than March 1,
2012, the start of the ozone season for
the attainment year.
Pursuant to section 182(c) of the Act
and as further referenced below, the
requirements for serious ozone
nonattainment areas include, but are not
limited to: (1) Attainment and
reasonable further progress
demonstrations (CAA section 182(c)(2),
40 CFR 51.908 and 40 CFR 51.910); (2)
an enhanced monitoring program (CAA
section 182(c)(1) and 40 CFR 58.10); (3)
an enhanced vehicle inspection and
maintenance program (CAA section
182(c)(3) and 40 CFR 51.350); (4) clean
fuel vehicle programs (CAA section
182(c)(4)); (5) transportation control
(CAA section 182(c)(5)); (6) a 50 ton-peryear major source threshold (CAA
section182(c) and 40 CFR 51.165); (7)
more stringent new source review
requirements (CAA section 182(c)(6)
and 40 CFR 51.165); (8) special rules for
modification of sources (CAA sections
182(c)(7) and 182(c)(8), and 40 CFR
51.165); (9) contingency provisions
(CAA section 182(c)(9)); and (10)
increased offsets (CAA section
182(c)(10) and 40 CFR 51.165). See also
the requirements for serious ozone
nonattainment areas set forth in section
182(c) of the Act.
In addition, the requirements of
section 182(b)(3) relating to Stage II
gasoline vapor recovery shall apply,
provided EPA has not yet found that
onboard vapor recovery (ORVR) is in
widespread use in the motor vehicle
fleet and waived the section 182(b)(3)
requirement.4 Pursuant to section
182(b)(3)(B), we propose that Texas
submit the SIP revision relating to Stage
II vapor recovery to EPA no later than
two years after the effective date of the
final rulemaking for this reclassification,
since that corresponds to the period that
moderate and worse nonattainment
areas were first required to submit Stage
II SIPs following enactment of the 1990
CAA Amendments. Section 182(b)(3)
requires implementation of Stage II
controls within 6 months to two years
after the date of adoption by the state of
requirements for the installation and
operation of a system for gasoline vapor
recovery of emissions from the fueling
of motor vehicles, depending on the age
and throughput of the facility.5
The DFW 1-hour ozone
nonattainment area was reclassified as
serious for that standard on February 18,
1998 (63 FR 8128), so the 1-hour ozone
standard requirements applicable to the
area are those that apply to
nonattainment areas classified as
serious. Under the 1-hour ozone
standard, Collin, Dallas, Denton and
Tarrant counties were all classified as
serious. As such, many of the
requirements listed above are already
being implemented in those areas, as
specified in Table 2 below. However,
some of these requirements will be new
to the five remaining counties that were
not included in the 1-hour ozone
nonattainment area for DFW; these are
also provided in Table 2 below. EPA
also notes that there may be sources in
the five remaining counties that will be
newly subject to Title V and will have
one year from the effective date of the
final rulemaking for this reclassification
to provide TCEQ with a Title V permit
application.6 A list of the requirements
already in place and those yet to be
implemented in the DFW area is
provided in Table 2 below:
TABLE 2—STATUS OF REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PROPOSED DFW 1997 8-HOUR OZONE SERIOUS NONATTAINMENT AREA
Requirement
Status
Attainment Demonstration 182(c)(2)(A) .............
Due 1 year from the effective date of the final
rulemaking for this action.
Due 1 year from the effective date of the final
rulemaking for this action.
Due 1 year from the effective date of the final
rulemaking for this action.
Implemented in all 9 counties ..........................
Equivalency program due 1 year from the effective date of the final rulemaking for this
action7.
RFP Demonstration 182(c)(2)(B) .......................
Enhanced monitoring 182(c)(1) ..........................
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS
Enhanced I/M program .......................................
Clean-fuel vehicle programs 182(c)(4) ...............
4 Section 182(b)(3) imposes the Stage II
requirement on moderate and worse ozone
nonattainment areas, but pursuant to section
202(a)(6), section 182(b)(3) applied only in serious
and worse areas after EPA promulgated rules for
ORVR in 1994. Section 202(a)(6) additionally
allows EPA to revise or waive the section 182(b)(3)
requirement for all ozone nonattainment areas after
EPA determines that ORVR is in widespread use
throughout the motor vehicle fleet. If EPA finds that
ORVR is in widespread use and waives the section
182(b)(3) requirement in advance of the date by
which new serious areas would otherwise be
required to implement Stage II controls, such areas
would no longer be subject to the section 182(b)(3)
requirement. Further, for any areas that already
implement Stage II, to remove Stage II controls
following an EPA widespread use and waiver
decision, any EPA SIP approval would be subject
to the CAA section 110(l) requirement that the
revision does not interfere with any applicable
requirement of the CAA.
5 Pursuant to section 182(b)(3)(B), the compliance
date shall be (i) 6 months after the adoption date,
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:21 Aug 06, 2010
Jkt 220001
Action needed or date approved by EPA
in the case of gasoline dispensing facilities for
which construction commenced after the date of the
enactment of the Clean Air Act Amendments of
1990; (ii) one year after the adoption date, in the
case of gasoline dispensing facilities which
dispense at least 100,000 gallons of gasoline per
month, based on average monthly sales for the 2year period before the adoption date; or (iii) 2 years
after the adoption date, in the case of all other
gasoline dispensing facilities. Any gasoline
dispensing facility described under both clause (i)
and clause (ii) shall meet the requirements of clause
(i).
6 As stated earlier in this notice, in regards to
requirements for SIPs regarding review of new or
modified major stationary sources (‘‘new source
review’’), the reclassification proposed herein
would not lower the ‘‘major source’’ thresholds
required in the four core counties because the
statutory thresholds that applied by virtue of the
area’s classification under the 1-hour ozone
standard continue to apply as anti-backsliding
measures for the 1997 8-hour ozone standard (see
South Coast Air Quality Management Dist. v. EPA,
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Must be submitted to EPA for approval.
Must be submitted to EPA for approval.
Must be submitted to EPA for approval.
November 14, 2001 (66 FR 57261).
Must be submitted to EPA for approval.
472 F.3rd 882 (DC 2006) rehearing denied 489 F.3d
1245, clarifying that the vacatur was limited to the
issues on which the court granted the petitions for
review). In EPA’s Phase 1 rule, EPA made NSR
applicability thresholds dependent upon the status
and classification of an area under the 1997 8-hour
standard. The effect of the ruling in the South Coast
case is to restore NSR applicability thresholds
pursuant to the classifications previously in effect
for areas designated nonattainment for the 1-hour
standard. See EPA memorandum from Robert J.
Meyers, ‘‘New Source Review (NSR) Aspects of the
Decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the
District of Columbia Circuit on the Phase 1 Rule to
Implement the 8–Hour Ozone National Ambient Air
Quality Standards (NAAQS),’’ dated October 2,
2007. As provided in CAA sections 501 and 502(a)
and 40 CFR 70.2, 70.3(a), 71.2 and 71.3(a), the
thresholds at which a source is required to apply
for and operate a Title V operating permit are linked
to the NSR ‘‘major source’’ applicability threshold.
E:\FR\FM\09AUP1.SGM
09AUP1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 152 / Monday, August 9, 2010 / Proposed Rules
47751
TABLE 2—STATUS OF REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PROPOSED DFW 1997 8-HOUR OZONE SERIOUS NONATTAINMENT
AREA—Continued
Requirement
Status
Action needed or date approved by EPA
Transportation control 182(c)(5) .........................
Transportation controls in place under the
1997 8-hr ozone moderate nonattainment
area SIP.
Implemented in all 9 counties ..........................
Implemented in all 9 counties ..........................
Implemented in core counties ..........................
Implemented in core counties ..........................
Adopt transportation controls as needed in the
serious nonattainment area and submit to
EPA for approval.
July 17, 2008 (73 FR 40972).
December 3, 2008 (73 FR 73562).
Must be expanded to all 9 counties.
Must be expanded to all 9 counties.
Implemented in core counties ..........................
Must be expanded to all 9 counties.
Due 1 year from the effective date of the final
rulemaking for this action.
Implemented in core counties ..........................
Implemented in core counties ..........................
Must be submitted to EPA for approval.
50 tpy threshold for VOCs 182(c) ......................
50 tpy threshold for NOX ....................................
De minimis rule 182(c)(6) ...................................
Special rule for modifications of sources emitting less than 100 tons. 182(c)(7).
Special rule for modifications of sources emitting 100 tons or more. 182(c)(8).
Contingency provisions 182(c)(9) .......................
Offsets of 1.2 to 1 182(c)(10) .............................
Stage II vapor recovery ......................................
IV. Proposed Action
Pursuant to section 181(b)(2) of the
Act, EPA is proposing to determine,
based on certified, quality-assured
monitoring data for 2007–2009, that the
DFW area did not attain the 1997 8-hour
ozone standard by the applicable June
15, 2010 attainment deadline. If EPA
finalizes this determination, upon the
effective date of the final determination
DFW will be reclassified by operation of
law as a serious 1997 8-hour ozone
nonattainment area. Pursuant to section
182(i) of the Act, EPA is also proposing
the schedule for submittal of the SIP
revisions required for serious areas once
the DFW area is reclassified. We
propose that Texas submit the required
SIP revisions for the serious attainment
demonstration, RFP, RACT, contingency
measures, and for all other serious area
measures required under CAA section
182(c) to EPA no later than one year
after the effective date of the final
rulemaking for this reclassification;
except that we propose that Texas
submit the required SIP revision for the
Stage II vapor recovery to EPA no later
than two years after the effective date of
the final rulemaking for this
reclassification, pursuant to section
182(b)(3)(A) of the Act.
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS
V. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under section 181(b)(2) of the CAA, a
determination of nonattainment is a
factual determination based upon air
quality considerations and the resulting
reclassification must occur by operation
of law. A determination of
nonattainment and the resulting
7 In
2005, the Texas Legislature repealed the
Texas Clean Fuel Fleet substitute program. As a
result, Texas must submit an equivalency
demonstration. See 75 FR 27514, beginning on page
27524 (May 17, 2010).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:21 Aug 06, 2010
Jkt 220001
reclassification of a nonattainment area
by operation of law under section
181(b)(2) does not in and of itself create
any new requirements, but rather
applies the requirements contained in
the Clean Air Act. For these reasons,
this proposed action:
• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ subject to review by the Office
of Management and Budget under
Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993);
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act;
and
• Does not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Must be expanded to all 9 counties.
Submit evidence of widespread use or expand Stage II SIP to all 9 counties.4
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this rule does not have
tribal implications as specified by
Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249,
November 9, 2000), because the SIP is
not approved to apply in Indian country
located in the state, and EPA notes that
it will not impose substantial direct
costs on tribal governments or preempt
tribal law.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 81
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, National parks,
Wilderness areas.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: July 28, 2010.
Lawrence E. Starfield,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 6.
[FR Doc. 2010–19574 Filed 8–6–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Federal Emergency Management
Agency
44 CFR Part 67
[Docket ID FEMA–2008–0020; Internal
Agency Docket No. FEMA–B–1060]
Proposed Flood Elevation
Determinations
Federal Emergency
Management Agency, DHS.
ACTION: Proposed rule; correction.
AGENCY:
On July 2, 2009, FEMA
published in the Federal Register a
proposed rule that contained an
erroneous table. This notice provides
corrections to that table, to be used in
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\09AUP1.SGM
09AUP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 152 (Monday, August 9, 2010)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 47746-47751]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-19574]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 81
[EPA-R06-OAR-2010-0412; FRL-9186-1]
Determination of Nonattainment and Reclassification of the
Dallas/Fort Worth 1997 8-hour Ozone Nonattainment Area; TX
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to determine that the Dallas/Fort Worth (DFW)
moderate 8-hour ozone nonattainment area did not attain the 1997 8-hour
ozone national ambient air quality standard (NAAQS or standard) by June
15, 2010, the attainment deadline set forth in the Clean Air Act (CAA
or Act) and Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) for moderate
nonattainment areas. This proposal is based on EPA's review of
complete, quality assured and certified ambient air quality monitoring
data for the 2007-2009 monitoring period that are available in the EPA
Air Quality System (AQS) database. If EPA finalizes this determination,
the DFW area will be reclassified by operation of law as a serious 8-
hour ozone nonattainment area for the 1997 8-hour standard. The serious
area attainment date for the DFW area would be as expeditiously as
practicable, but not later than June 15, 2013. Once reclassified, Texas
must submit State Implementation Plan (SIP) revisions for the DFW area
that meet the 1997 8-hour ozone nonattainment requirements for serious
areas as required by the Act. In this action, EPA is also proposing
that Texas submit the required SIP revisions for the serious area
attainment demonstration, reasonable further progress (RFP), reasonably
available control technology (RACT), contingency measures, and for all
other serious area measures required under CAA section 182(c) to EPA no
later than one year after the effective date of the final rulemaking
for this reclassification; except that we propose that Texas submit the
required SIP revision for the Stage II vapor recovery to EPA no later
than two years after the effective date of the final rulemaking for
this reclassification, pursuant to section 182(b)(3)(A) of the Act.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before September 8, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R06-
OAR-2010-0412, by one of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the on-line instructions for submitting comments.
EPA Region 6 ``Contact Us'' Web site: https://epa.gov/region6/r6coment.htm. Please click on ``6PD'' (Multimedia) and select
``Air'' before submitting comments.
E-mail: Mr. Guy Donaldson at donaldson.guy@epa.gov. Please
also send a copy by e-mail to the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section below.
Fax: Mr. Guy Donaldson, Chief, Air Planning Section (6PD-
L), at fax number 214-665-6762.
Mail: Mr. Guy Donaldson, Chief, Air Planning Section (6PD-
L), Environmental Protection Agency, 1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 1200,
Dallas, Texas 75202-2733.
Hand or Courier Delivery: Mr. Guy Donaldson, Chief, Air
Planning Section (6PD-L), Environmental Protection Agency, 1445 Ross
Avenue, Suite 1200, Dallas, Texas 75202-2733. Such
[[Page 47747]]
deliveries are accepted only between the hours of 8 a.m. and 4 p.m.
weekdays except for legal holidays. Special arrangements should be made
for deliveries of boxed information.
Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID No. EPA-R06-OAR-
2010-0412, EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included
in the public docket without change and may be made available online at
https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information
provided, unless the comment includes information claimed to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit through https://www.regulations.gov or e-mail, information that you consider to be CBI
or otherwise protected. The https://www.regulations.gov Web site is an
``anonymous access'' system, which means EPA will not know your
identity or contact information unless you provide it in the body of
your comment. If you send an e-mail comment directly to EPA without
going through https://www.regulations.gov, your e-mail address will be
automatically captured and included as part of the comment that is
placed in the public docket and made available on the Internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you include your name
and other contact information in the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA
may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid
the use of special characters, any form of encryption, and be free of
any defects or viruses. For additional information about EPA's public
docket visit the EPA Docket Center homepage at https://www.epa.gov/epahome/dockets.htm.
Docket: All documents in the docket are listed in the https://www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such
as copyrighted material, will be publicly available only in hard copy.
Publicly available docket materials are available either electronically
in https://www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at the Air Planning
Section (6PD-L), Environmental Protection Agency, 1445 Ross Avenue,
Suite 700, Dallas, Texas 75202-2733. The file will be made available by
appointment for public inspection in the Region 6 FOIA Review Room
between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. weekdays except for legal
holidays. Contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT paragraph below or Mr. Bill Deese at 214-665-7253 to make an
appointment. If possible, please make the appointment at least two
working days in advance of your visit. There will be a fee of 15 cents
per page to make photocopies of documents. On the day of the visit,
please check in at the EPA Region 6 reception area at 1445 Ross Avenue,
Suite 700, Dallas, Texas.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Carrie Paige, Air Planning Section,
(6PD-L), Environmental Protection Agency, Region 6, 1445 Ross Avenue,
Suite 700, Dallas, Texas 75202-2733, telephone (214) 665-6521; fax
number 214-665-6762; e-mail address paige.carrie@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. What is the background for this proposed action?
A. What are the national ambient air quality standards?
B. What is ozone and what is the 1997 8-hour ozone standard?
C. What is a SIP and how does it relate to the 1997 8-hour ozone
standard?
D. What is the DFW nonattainment area, and what is its current
1997 8-hour ozone nonattainment classification?
E. What are the CAA provisions regarding determinations of
nonattainment and reclassifications?
II. What is EPA's evaluation of the DFW area's 1997 8-hour ozone
data?
III. What actions is EPA proposing?
A. Determination of Nonattainment, Reclassification of the DFW
Nonattainment Area and New Attainment Date
B. Proposed Date for Submitting a Revised SIP for the DFW Area
IV. Proposed Action
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. What is the Background for this proposed action?
A. What are the national ambient air quality standards?
Section 109 of the Act requires EPA to establish a NAAQS for
pollutants that ``may reasonably be anticipated to endanger public
health and welfare'' and to develop a primary and secondary standard
for each NAAQS. The primary standard is designed to protect human
health with an adequate margin of safety and the secondary standard is
designed to protect public welfare and the environment. EPA has set
NAAQS for six common air pollutants, referred to as criteria
pollutants: carbon monoxide, lead, nitrogen dioxide, ozone, particulate
matter, and sulfur dioxide. These standards present state and local
governments with the minimum air quality levels they must meet to
comply with the Act. Also, these standards provide information to
residents of the United States about the air quality in their
communities.
B. What is ozone and what is the 1997 8-hour ozone standard?
Ozone is a gas composed of three oxygen atoms. It is not usually
emitted directly into the air, but at ground level is created by a
chemical reaction between volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and oxides
of nitrogen (NOX) in the presence of sunlight. On July 18,
1997, EPA promulgated an 8-hour ozone standard of 0.08 parts per
million (ppm), which is more protective than the previous 1-hour ozone
standard (62 FR 38855) that was established by EPA in 1979. We revoked
the 1-hour ozone standard effective June 15, 2005. See 40 CFR 50.9(b)
and 69 FR 23858 (April 30, 2004). Under EPA regulations at 40 CFR part
50, the 1997 8-hour ozone standard is attained when the 3-year average
of the annual fourth highest daily maximum 8-hour average ambient air
quality ozone concentration is less than or equal to 0.08 ppm (i.e.,
0.084 ppm when rounding is considered). See 69 FR 23857 (April 30,
2004).\1\ Ambient air quality monitoring data for the 3-year period
must meet a data completeness requirement. The ambient air quality
monitoring data completeness requirement is met when the average
percentage of days with valid ambient monitoring data is greater than
90 percent, and no single year has less than 75 percent data
completeness as determined in Appendix I of part 50. Specifically,
section 2.3 of 40 CFR part 50, Appendix I, ``Comparisons with the
Primary and Secondary Ozone Standards'' states: ``The primary and
secondary ozone ambient air quality standards are met at an ambient air
quality monitoring site when the 3-year average of the annual fourth-
highest daily maximum 8-hour average ozone concentration is less than
or equal to 0.08 ppm. The number of significant figures in the level of
the standard dictates the rounding convention for comparing the
computed 3-year average annual fourth-highest daily maximum 8-hour
average ozone concentration with the level of the standard. The third
decimal place of the computed value is rounded, with values equal to or
greater than 5 rounding up. Thus, a computed 3-year average ozone
concentration of
[[Page 47748]]
0.085 ppm is the smallest value that is greater than 0.08 ppm.'' \2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ For ease of communication, many reports of ozone
concentrations are given in parts per billion (ppb); ppb = ppm x
1000. Thus, 0.084 ppm becomes 84 ppb.
\2\ EPA notes that today's proposed action deals with the
classifications and SIP obligations associated with the 1997 8-hour
ozone NAAQS. On March 27, 2008 (73 FR 16436), EPA promulgated a
revised 8-hour ozone standard of 0.075 ppm. On January 6, 2010, EPA
proposed to set the level of the primary 8-hour ozone standard
within the range of 0.060 to 0.070 ppm, rather than at 0.075 ppm.
EPA anticipates that in 2010 it will have completed reconsideration
of the standard and thereafter will proceed with designations. EPA's
actions with respect to this new standard do not affect EPA's action
here.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
C. What is a SIP and how does it relate to the 1997 8-hour ozone
standard?
Section 110 of the Act requires states to develop air pollution
regulations and control strategies to ensure that state air quality
meets the NAAQS established by EPA. Each state must submit these
regulations and control strategies to EPA for approval and
incorporation into the Federally-enforceable SIP. Each Federally-
approved SIP protects air quality primarily by addressing air pollution
at its point of origin. The SIPs may contain state regulations or other
enforceable documents and supporting information such as emission
inventories, monitoring networks, and modeling demonstrations.
EPA published a first phase rule governing implementation of the
1997 8-hour ozone standard (Phase 1 Rule) on April 30, 2004 (69 FR
23951). The Phase 1 Rule addressed, among other matters,
classifications for Part D subpart 2 areas under the 1997 8-hour
standard. The Phase 1 rule was challenged and certain portions of it
were vacated by the DC Circuit in South Coast Air Quality Management
Dist. v. EPA, 472 F.3d 882 (DC Cir. 2006), clarified on rehearing, 489
F.3d 1245 (DC Cir. 2007), cert. denied, 128 S.Ct. 1065 (2008). The
provisions of the Phase 1 rule that are directly relevant to this
proposed rule--classifications for subpart 2 and the related 8-hour
ozone standard attainment deadlines--are not among those that were
successfully challenged, and they remain effective.
EPA also published a rule governing implementation of the 1997 8-
hour ozone standard (Phase 2 Rule) on November 29, 2005 (70 FR 71612),
as revised on June 8, 2007 (72 FR 31727). The Phase 2 rule addresses
SIP obligations for the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS, including the SIP
elements associated with RACT, reasonably available control measures
(RACM), RFP, modeling and attainment demonstrations, new source review
(NSR), vehicle inspection and maintenance programs (I/M), and
contingency measures for failure to meet RFP and the attainment date.
For ozone nonattainment areas, requirements for SIPs are contained
in part D, subparts 1 and 2 of the Act. Under subpart 2, the applicable
control requirements become increasingly more stringent according to an
area's classification as marginal, moderate, serious, severe or
extreme.
D. What is the DFW nonattainment area, and what is its current 1997 8-
hour ozone nonattainment classification?
The current DFW nonattainment area includes nine counties: Collin,
Dallas, Denton, Tarrant (the core counties) and Ellis, Johnson,
Kaufman, Parker, and Rockwall (the remaining counties). Under the 1-
hour ozone standard, the DFW nonattainment area was classified as a
``serious'' nonattainment area and included only the four core
counties. See 63 FR 8128 (February 18, 1998). The remaining counties
maintained their initial designation of unclassifiable/attainment for
the 1-hour ozone standard. See 56 FR 56694 (November 6, 1991).\3\ On
October 16, 2008, we determined that the DFW 1-hour ozone nonattainment
area was attaining the 1-hour ozone standard based upon complete,
quality-assured and certified ambient air monitoring data that showed
the area had monitored attainment of the 1-hour ozone NAAQS for the
2004-2006 monitoring period (73 FR 61357). That determination allowed
certain SIP planning measures to be suspended for so long as the area
continues to monitor attainment of the 1-hour ozone standard. Today's
proposed rulemaking addresses the area's attainment and
reclassification only with respect to the 1997 8-hour ozone standard.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ Designations for Texas begin at 56 FR 56835.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
With regard to the 8-hour standard, on April 30, 2004, EPA
published the 8-hour ozone designations in conjunction with its Phase I
implementation rule (69 FR 23858 and 69 FR 23951, respectively). For
areas subject to subpart 2 of the Act, such as the DFW nonattainment
area, the maximum period for attainment runs from the effective date of
designations and classifications for the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS and
corresponds to the same length of time provided in Table 1 of section
181(a) of the Act: Marginal--3 years; Moderate--6 years; Serious--9
years, Severe--15 or 17 years; and Extreme--20 years.
The DFW area, consisting of all nine counties, was designated
nonattainment for the 1997 8-hour ozone standard and classified as
``moderate'' based on a design value of 0.100 ppm, with an attainment
date of June 15, 2010 (69 FR 23858). The design value (DV) of an area
characterizes the severity of the air quality concern and is
represented by the highest DV measured at any ozone monitor in the
area. The calculation for the DV is the three-year average of the
annual fourth-highest daily maximum 8-hour average ozone concentration
measured at a monitor. In response to the designation, on May 30, 2007,
the State of Texas submitted an attainment plan designed to attain the
1997 8-hour ozone standard. The state submitted a supplement to this
plan on April 23, 2008. On July 14, 2008, we proposed to conditionally
approve the 1997 8-hour ozone attainment demonstration SIP revision for
the DFW moderate 8-hour ozone nonattainment area. See 73 FR 40203. We
finalized this approval on January 14, 2009. See 74 FR 1903. The DFW
area met all of the current requirements for its moderate area
classification.
E. What are the CAA provisions regarding determinations of
nonattainment and reclassifications?
Section 181(b)(2) of the Act prescribes the process for making
determinations upon failure of an ozone nonattainment area to meet the
standard by its attainment date, and for reclassification of an ozone
nonattainment area. Section 181(b)(2)(A) of the Act requires that EPA
determine, based on the area's design value (as of the attainment
date), whether or not the area attained the ozone standard by that
date. For marginal, moderate, and serious areas, if EPA finds that the
nonattainment area has failed to attain the ozone standard by the
applicable attainment date, the area must be reclassified by operation
of law to the higher of (1) the next higher classification for the
area, or (2) the classification applicable to the area's design value
as determined at the time of the required Federal Register notice.
Section 181(b)(2)(B) requires EPA to publish in the Federal Register a
notice identifying any area that has failed to attain by its attainment
date and the resulting reclassification.
II. What is EPA's evaluation of the DFW area's 8-hour ozone data?
EPA is proposing to make its determination of whether the DFW
attained the 8-hour ozone standard by its attainment deadline based on
quality-assured, quality-controlled ambient air monitoring data for the
years 2007-2009. These data, from sites in the DFW area have been
certified by TCEQ, and are presented in Table 1. These data show that
the DFW area was
[[Page 47749]]
violating the 1997 8-hour ozone standard at the time of its June 15,
2010 attainment deadline. As noted above, the highest design value at
any regulatory monitor in the area is considered the design value for
the area (40 CFR 58.1). The Keller and Eagle Mountain Lake monitoring
sites recorded the highest 2007-2009 design values, and thus at the
time of its attainment deadline, the area had a design value of 0.086
ppm. Thus, pursuant to section 181(b)(2) of the Act, EPA is proposing
to determine that the DFW nonattainment area did not attain the 1997 8-
hour ozone NAAQS by the June 15, 2010, deadline for moderate
nonattainment areas.
Table 1--DFW Area Fourth Highest 8-Hour Ozone Concentrations and Design Values (ppm)*
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
4th Highest daily max
Site name and No. ------------------------------------------------------ Design value
2007 2008 2009 (2007-2009)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fort Worth Northwest, 48-439-1002....... 0.081 0.073 0.083 0.079
Keller, 48-439-2003..................... 0.084 0.085 0.090 0.086
Frisco, 48-085-0005..................... 0.080 0.079 0.079 0.079
Midlothian OFW, 48-139-0016............. 0.076 0.072 0.072 0.073
Denton Airport South, 48-121-0034....... 0.089 0.084 0.082 0.085
Arlington Municipal Airport, 48-439-3011 0.075 0.078 0.080 0.077
Dallas North No. 2, 48-113-0075......... 0.079 0.076 0.088 0.081
Rockwall Heath, 48-397-0001............. 0.074 0.073 0.078 0.075
Grapevine Fairway, 48-439-3009.......... 0.089 0.077 0.086 0.084
Kaufman, 48-257-0005.................... 0.074 0.069 0.068 0.070
Granbury, 48-221-0001................... 0.081 0.073 0.077 0.077
Eagle Mountain Lake, 48-439-0075........ 0.084 0.085 0.091 0.086
Parker County, 48-367-0081.............. 0.088 0.077 0.080 0.081
Cleburne Airport, 48-251-0003........... 0.087 0.083 0.080 0.083
Dallas Hinton St., 48-113-0069.......... 0.076 0.064 0.062 0.067
Dallas Executive Airport, 48-113-0087... 0.080 0.077 0.079 0.078
Greenville, 48-231-1006................. 0.069 0.063 0.067 0.066
Pilot Point, 48-121-1032................ 0.075 0.080 0.078 0.077
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* Design value calculations for the 8-hour ozone standard are based on a rolling three-year average of the
annual 4th highest values (40 CFR Part 50, Appendix I).
Under section 181(a)(5) of the Act, and 40 CFR 51.907, an area can
qualify for up to 2 one-year extensions of its attainment date if it
meets the conditions set forth in 40 CFR 51.907. For the 1997 8-hour
standard, if an area's fourth highest daily maximum 8-hour average
value in the attainment year is 0.084 ppm or less (40 CFR 51.907), the
area is eligible for the first one-year extension to the attainment
date. The attainment year is the year immediately preceding the
attainment date. The DFW area's attainment year is 2009. In 2009, the
area's fourth-highest daily 8-hour average from the monitor with the
highest average of the area's monitors was 0.091 ppm. 40 CFR 51.907(a),
(c). Therefore, the DFW area does not qualify for a 1-year extension of
its moderate area attainment deadline.
Section 181(b)(2)(A) of the Act provides that, should an area fail
to attain by the applicable date, the area is reclassified by operation
of law to the next higher classification or the classification
applicable to the area's ozone design value at the time of the required
notice under Section 181(b)(2)(B), whichever is higher. Section
181(b)(2)(B) requires EPA to publish a notice in the Federal Register
identifying the reclassification status of an area that has failed to
attain the standard by its attainment date. The classification that
would be applicable to the DFW area's ozone design value at the time of
today's notice is ``marginal'' because the area's 2009 calculated
design value, based on quality-assured ozone monitoring data from 2007-
2009, is 0.086 ppm. By contrast, the next higher classification for the
DFW area is ``serious.'' Because ``serious'' is a higher nonattainment
classification than ``marginal'' under the statutory scheme in the Act,
upon the effective date of a final rulemaking determining that the DFW
has failed to attain the 1997 8-hour ozone standard by the applicable
attainment date of June 15, 2010, the DFW area will be reclassified by
operation of law as ``serious.''
III. What actions is EPA proposing?
A. Determination of Nonattainment, Reclassification of the DFW
Nonattainment Area and New Attainment Date
Pursuant to section 181(b)(2) of the Act, EPA is proposing to
determine that the DFW area did not attain the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS
by the June 15, 2010, attainment deadline prescribed under the Act for
moderate ozone nonattainment areas. If EPA takes final action on this
determination as proposed, the DFW area will be reclassified by
operation of law from moderate to serious nonattainment. Serious areas
are required to attain the standard ``as expeditiously as practicable''
but no later than 9 years after designation, or June 15, 2013. The ``as
expeditiously as practicable'' attainment date will be determined as
part of the action on the required SIP submittal demonstrating
attainment of the 1997 8-hour ozone standard. EPA is proposing a
schedule by which Texas will submit the SIP revisions necessary
pursuant to reclassification to serious nonattainment of the 1997 8-
hour ozone standard.
B. Proposed Date for Submitting a Revised SIP for the DFW Area
EPA is also addressing here the schedule by which Texas would be
required to submit a revised SIP. When an area is reclassified, EPA has
the authority under section 182(i) of the Act to adjust the Act's
submittal deadlines for any new SIP revisions that are required as a
result of the reclassification. Pursuant to 40 CFR 51.908(d), for each
nonattainment area, the State must provide for implementation of all
control measures needed for attainment no later than the beginning of
the attainment year ozone season. The attainment year ozone season is
the ozone season immediately preceding a nonattainment area's
attainment date, in this case 2012 (40 CFR 51.900(g)). The ozone season
is the
[[Page 47750]]
ozone monitoring season as defined in 40 CFR Part 58, Appendix D,
section 4.1, Table D-3 (October 17, 2006, 71 FR 61236). For the DFW
area, March 1st is the beginning of the ozone monitoring season.
Therefore, we propose that Texas submit the required SIP revisions,
including the attainment demonstration, RFP, RACT, contingency
measures, and other applicable serious area requirements to EPA as
expeditiously as practicable, but not later than one year after the
effective date of the final rulemaking for this reclassification. In
addition, all applicable controls shall be implemented no later than
March 1, 2012, the start of the ozone season for the attainment year.
Pursuant to section 182(c) of the Act and as further referenced
below, the requirements for serious ozone nonattainment areas include,
but are not limited to: (1) Attainment and reasonable further progress
demonstrations (CAA section 182(c)(2), 40 CFR 51.908 and 40 CFR
51.910); (2) an enhanced monitoring program (CAA section 182(c)(1) and
40 CFR 58.10); (3) an enhanced vehicle inspection and maintenance
program (CAA section 182(c)(3) and 40 CFR 51.350); (4) clean fuel
vehicle programs (CAA section 182(c)(4)); (5) transportation control
(CAA section 182(c)(5)); (6) a 50 ton-per-year major source threshold
(CAA section182(c) and 40 CFR 51.165); (7) more stringent new source
review requirements (CAA section 182(c)(6) and 40 CFR 51.165); (8)
special rules for modification of sources (CAA sections 182(c)(7) and
182(c)(8), and 40 CFR 51.165); (9) contingency provisions (CAA section
182(c)(9)); and (10) increased offsets (CAA section 182(c)(10) and 40
CFR 51.165). See also the requirements for serious ozone nonattainment
areas set forth in section 182(c) of the Act.
In addition, the requirements of section 182(b)(3) relating to
Stage II gasoline vapor recovery shall apply, provided EPA has not yet
found that onboard vapor recovery (ORVR) is in widespread use in the
motor vehicle fleet and waived the section 182(b)(3) requirement.\4\
Pursuant to section 182(b)(3)(B), we propose that Texas submit the SIP
revision relating to Stage II vapor recovery to EPA no later than two
years after the effective date of the final rulemaking for this
reclassification, since that corresponds to the period that moderate
and worse nonattainment areas were first required to submit Stage II
SIPs following enactment of the 1990 CAA Amendments. Section 182(b)(3)
requires implementation of Stage II controls within 6 months to two
years after the date of adoption by the state of requirements for the
installation and operation of a system for gasoline vapor recovery of
emissions from the fueling of motor vehicles, depending on the age and
throughput of the facility.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ Section 182(b)(3) imposes the Stage II requirement on
moderate and worse ozone nonattainment areas, but pursuant to
section 202(a)(6), section 182(b)(3) applied only in serious and
worse areas after EPA promulgated rules for ORVR in 1994. Section
202(a)(6) additionally allows EPA to revise or waive the section
182(b)(3) requirement for all ozone nonattainment areas after EPA
determines that ORVR is in widespread use throughout the motor
vehicle fleet. If EPA finds that ORVR is in widespread use and
waives the section 182(b)(3) requirement in advance of the date by
which new serious areas would otherwise be required to implement
Stage II controls, such areas would no longer be subject to the
section 182(b)(3) requirement. Further, for any areas that already
implement Stage II, to remove Stage II controls following an EPA
widespread use and waiver decision, any EPA SIP approval would be
subject to the CAA section 110(l) requirement that the revision does
not interfere with any applicable requirement of the CAA.
\5\ Pursuant to section 182(b)(3)(B), the compliance date shall
be (i) 6 months after the adoption date, in the case of gasoline
dispensing facilities for which construction commenced after the
date of the enactment of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990; (ii)
one year after the adoption date, in the case of gasoline dispensing
facilities which dispense at least 100,000 gallons of gasoline per
month, based on average monthly sales for the 2-year period before
the adoption date; or (iii) 2 years after the adoption date, in the
case of all other gasoline dispensing facilities. Any gasoline
dispensing facility described under both clause (i) and clause (ii)
shall meet the requirements of clause (i).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The DFW 1-hour ozone nonattainment area was reclassified as serious
for that standard on February 18, 1998 (63 FR 8128), so the 1-hour
ozone standard requirements applicable to the area are those that apply
to nonattainment areas classified as serious. Under the 1-hour ozone
standard, Collin, Dallas, Denton and Tarrant counties were all
classified as serious. As such, many of the requirements listed above
are already being implemented in those areas, as specified in Table 2
below. However, some of these requirements will be new to the five
remaining counties that were not included in the 1-hour ozone
nonattainment area for DFW; these are also provided in Table 2 below.
EPA also notes that there may be sources in the five remaining counties
that will be newly subject to Title V and will have one year from the
effective date of the final rulemaking for this reclassification to
provide TCEQ with a Title V permit application.\6\ A list of the
requirements already in place and those yet to be implemented in the
DFW area is provided in Table 2 below:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ As stated earlier in this notice, in regards to requirements
for SIPs regarding review of new or modified major stationary
sources (``new source review''), the reclassification proposed
herein would not lower the ``major source'' thresholds required in
the four core counties because the statutory thresholds that applied
by virtue of the area's classification under the 1-hour ozone
standard continue to apply as anti-backsliding measures for the 1997
8-hour ozone standard (see South Coast Air Quality Management Dist.
v. EPA, 472 F.3rd 882 (DC 2006) rehearing denied 489 F.3d 1245,
clarifying that the vacatur was limited to the issues on which the
court granted the petitions for review). In EPA's Phase 1 rule, EPA
made NSR applicability thresholds dependent upon the status and
classification of an area under the 1997 8-hour standard. The effect
of the ruling in the South Coast case is to restore NSR
applicability thresholds pursuant to the classifications previously
in effect for areas designated nonattainment for the 1-hour
standard. See EPA memorandum from Robert J. Meyers, ``New Source
Review (NSR) Aspects of the Decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals
for the District of Columbia Circuit on the Phase 1 Rule to
Implement the 8-Hour Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standards
(NAAQS),'' dated October 2, 2007. As provided in CAA sections 501
and 502(a) and 40 CFR 70.2, 70.3(a), 71.2 and 71.3(a), the
thresholds at which a source is required to apply for and operate a
Title V operating permit are linked to the NSR ``major source''
applicability threshold.
Table 2--Status of Requirements for the Proposed DFW 1997 8-Hour Ozone
Serious Nonattainment Area
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Action needed or
Requirement Status date approved by EPA
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Attainment Demonstration Due 1 year from the Must be submitted to
182(c)(2)(A). effective date of EPA for approval.
the final
rulemaking for this
action.
RFP Demonstration Due 1 year from the Must be submitted to
182(c)(2)(B). effective date of EPA for approval.
the final
rulemaking for this
action.
Enhanced monitoring Due 1 year from the Must be submitted to
182(c)(1). effective date of EPA for approval.
the final
rulemaking for this
action.
Enhanced I/M program........ Implemented in all 9 November 14, 2001
counties. (66 FR 57261).
Clean-fuel vehicle programs Equivalency program Must be submitted to
182(c)(4). due 1 year from the EPA for approval.
effective date of
the final
rulemaking for this
action\7\.
[[Page 47751]]
Transportation control Transportation Adopt transportation
182(c)(5). controls in place controls as needed
under the 1997 8-hr in the serious
ozone moderate nonattainment area
nonattainment area and submit to EPA
SIP. for approval.
50 tpy threshold for VOCs Implemented in all 9 July 17, 2008 (73 FR
182(c). counties. 40972).
50 tpy threshold for NOX.... Implemented in all 9 December 3, 2008 (73
counties. FR 73562).
De minimis rule 182(c)(6)... Implemented in core Must be expanded to
counties. all 9 counties.
Special rule for Implemented in core Must be expanded to
modifications of sources counties. all 9 counties.
emitting less than 100
tons. 182(c)(7).
Special rule for Implemented in core Must be expanded to
modifications of sources counties. all 9 counties.
emitting 100 tons or more.
182(c)(8).
Contingency provisions Due 1 year from the Must be submitted to
182(c)(9). effective date of EPA for approval.
the final
rulemaking for this
action.
Offsets of 1.2 to 1 Implemented in core Must be expanded to
182(c)(10). counties. all 9 counties.
Stage II vapor recovery..... Implemented in core Submit evidence of
counties. widespread use or
expand Stage II SIP
to all 9
counties.\4\
------------------------------------------------------------------------
IV. Proposed Action
Pursuant to section 181(b)(2) of the Act, EPA is proposing to
determine, based on certified, quality-assured monitoring data for
2007-2009, that the DFW area did not attain the 1997 8-hour ozone
standard by the applicable June 15, 2010 attainment deadline. If EPA
finalizes this determination, upon the effective date of the final
determination DFW will be reclassified by operation of law as a serious
1997 8-hour ozone nonattainment area. Pursuant to section 182(i) of the
Act, EPA is also proposing the schedule for submittal of the SIP
revisions required for serious areas once the DFW area is reclassified.
We propose that Texas submit the required SIP revisions for the serious
attainment demonstration, RFP, RACT, contingency measures, and for all
other serious area measures required under CAA section 182(c) to EPA no
later than one year after the effective date of the final rulemaking
for this reclassification; except that we propose that Texas submit the
required SIP revision for the Stage II vapor recovery to EPA no later
than two years after the effective date of the final rulemaking for
this reclassification, pursuant to section 182(b)(3)(A) of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ In 2005, the Texas Legislature repealed the Texas Clean Fuel
Fleet substitute program. As a result, Texas must submit an
equivalency demonstration. See 75 FR 27514, beginning on page 27524
(May 17, 2010).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under section 181(b)(2) of the CAA, a determination of
nonattainment is a factual determination based upon air quality
considerations and the resulting reclassification must occur by
operation of law. A determination of nonattainment and the resulting
reclassification of a nonattainment area by operation of law under
section 181(b)(2) does not in and of itself create any new
requirements, but rather applies the requirements contained in the
Clean Air Act. For these reasons, this proposed action:
Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993);
Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the Clean Air Act; and
Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this rule does not have tribal implications as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000),
because the SIP is not approved to apply in Indian country located in
the state, and EPA notes that it will not impose substantial direct
costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 81
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, National parks,
Wilderness areas.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: July 28, 2010.
Lawrence E. Starfield,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 6.
[FR Doc. 2010-19574 Filed 8-6-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P