Endangered and Threatened Species; Recovery Plans, 47538-47540 [2010-19475]
Download as PDF
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with NOTICES
47538
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 151 / Friday, August 6, 2010 / Notices
Baker Street, NW, Atlanta, Georgia
30313, has applied for an amendment to
Scientific Research Permit No. 14352.
DATES: Written, telefaxed, or e-mail
comments must be received on or before
September 7, 2010.
ADDRESSES: The application and related
documents are available for review
upon written request or by appointment
in the following office(s):
Permits, Conservation and Education
Division, Office of Protected Resources,
NMFS, 1315 East-West Highway, Room
13705, Silver Spring, MD 20910; phone
(301) 713–2289; fax (301) 713–0376; and
Southeast Region, NMFS, 263 13th
Avenue South, Saint Petersburg, Florida
33701; phone (727) 824–5312; fax (727)
824–5309.
Written comments on this application
should be submitted to the Chief,
Permits, Conservation and Education
Division, at the address listed above.
Comments may also be submitted by
facsimile to (301) 713–0376, or by email
to NMFS.Pr1Comments@noaa.gov.
Please include the File No. in the
subject line of the email comment.
Those individuals requesting a public
hearing should submit a written request
to the Chief, Permits, Conservation and
Education Division at the address listed
above. The request should set forth the
specific reasons why a hearing on this
application would be appropriate.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Carrie Hubard or Kristy Beard, (301)
713–2289.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
subject amendment to Permit No. 14352
is requested under the authority of the
Marine Mammal Protection Act of 1972,
as amended (16 U.S.C. 1361 et seq.) and
the regulations governing the taking and
importing of marine mammals (50 CFR
part 216).
Permit No. 14352, issued on October
15, 2009, authorizes the permit holder
to capture and release bottlenose
dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) for health
assessment purposes in the Indian River
Lagoon (IRL), Florida. Captured
dolphins receive a complete clinical
workup including: measurements,
weight, photographs, sample collection,
freeze brand, and ultrasound. The
holder is requesting the permit be
amended to include a second study area
in the vicinity of Charleston, South
Carolina. Fifty bottlenose dolphins
would be captured, sampled, and
released annually. Females with calves
less than one year old would not be
captured. Captured dolphins would
receive the same clinical workup as is
authorized in the IRL. All captured
animals would receive a roto tag. Up to
ten animals per year would also receive
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:35 Aug 05, 2010
Jkt 220001
a VHF tag. An experienced veterinarian
would be on site during captures and
the dolphins’ vital signs would be
closely monitored. Processing would
take about forty minutes. Individual
dolphins would only be sampled once
per year. Samples would be analyzed to
examine a variety of health topics such
as: infectious diseases, immune status,
contaminant exposure, antibiotic
resistance, and genetics. An additional
400 dolphins per year may be harassed
during pre- and post-capture surveys.
The objectives of the new study area are
the same as the IRL project and having
two study areas will allow comparisons
between dolphin populations. The
amended permit would be valid until
October 31, 2014.
In compliance with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42
U.S.C. 4321 et seq.), an initial
determination has been made that the
activity proposed is categorically
excluded from the requirement to
prepare an environmental assessment or
environmental impact statement.
Concurrent with the publication of
this notice in the Federal Register,
NMFS is forwarding copies of this
application to the Marine Mammal
Commission and its Committee of
Scientific Advisors.
Dated: August 2, 2010.
P. Michael Payne,
Chief, Permits, Conservation and Education
Division, Office of Protected Resources,
National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2010–19469 Filed 8–5–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–S
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
RIN 0648–XX85
Endangered and Threatened Species;
Recovery Plans
National Marine Fisheries
Service, National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration,
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of Availability; recovery
plan for the fin whale.
AGENCY:
The National Marine
Fisheries Service (NMFS) announces the
adoption of an Endangered Species Act
(ESA) Recovery Plan for the Fin whale
(Balaenoptera physalus). The Recovery
Plan contains revisions and additions in
consideration of public comments
received on the proposed draft Recovery
Plan for the fin whale.
ADDRESSES: Additional information
about the Recovery Plans may be
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
obtained by writing to Monica
DeAngelis, National Marine Fisheries
Service, Southwest Regional Office,
Protected Resources Division, 501 W.
Ocean Blvd., Suite 4200, Long Beach,
CA 90802 or send an electronic message
to Monica.DeAngelis@noaa.gov.
Electronic copies of the Recovery Plan
and a summary of NMFS’ response to
public comments on the Recovery Plan
are available online at the NMFS Office
of Protected Resources website:
www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/species/
mammals/cetaceans/finwhale.htm.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Monica DeAngelis (562) 980–3232, email Monica.DeAngelis@noaa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Recovery plans describe actions
considered necessary for the
conservation and recovery of species
listed under the Endangered Species Act
of 1973 (ESA), as amended (16 U.S.C.
1531 et seq.). The ESA requires that
recovery plans incorporate (1) objective,
measurable criteria that, when met,
would result in a determination that the
species is no longer threatened or
endangered; (2) site-specific
management actions necessary to
achieve the plan’s goals; and (3)
estimates of the time required and costs
to implement recovery actions. The ESA
requires the development of recovery
plans for listed species unless such a
plan would not promote the recovery of
a particular species. NMFS’ goal is to
restore endangered fin whale
(Balaenoptera physalus) populations to
the point where they are again secure,
self-sustaining members of their
ecosystems and no longer need the
protections of the ESA.
The fin whale was listed as an
endangered species under the ESA on
December 2, 1970 (35 FR 18319). Fin
whales have a global distribution and
can be found in the Atlantic and Pacific
Oceans and the Southern Hemisphere.
Although most populations were
depleted by modern whaling in the midtwentieth century, there are still tens of
thousands of fin whales worldwide.
Currently, the population structure of
fin whales has not been adequately
defined. Most models have assigned
arbitrary boundaries, often based on
patterns of historic whaling activity and
catch reports, rather than on biological
evidence. Populations are often divided
on an ocean basin level. Since the
Southern Ocean often refers only to
waters surrounding Antarctica and fin
whales occur not only in those waters
but also in temperate waters, we refer to
the geographic area for the fin whale
E:\FR\FM\06AUN1.SGM
06AUN1
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 151 / Friday, August 6, 2010 / Notices
subspecies (Balaena physalus quoyi) as
the Southern Hemisphere. Therefore,
the Recovery Plan is organized, for
convenience, by ocean basin and
discussed in three sections: those fin
whales in the North Atlantic Ocean,
those in the North Pacific Ocean and its
adjoining seas and gulfs, and those in
the Southern Hemisphere, referring
particularly to areas near Antarctica.
There is a need for an improved
understanding of the genetic differences
among and between populations, in
order to determine distinct population
units. Although there is new
information, existing knowledge of
population structure remains poor. New
information is currently insufficient to
identify units that are both discrete and
significant to the survival of the species.
NMFS released the draft Recovery
Plan and requested comments from the
public on July 6, 2006 (71 FR 38385). A
summary of comments and NMFS
responses to comments are available
electronically (see ADDRESSES).
Concurrent with the public comment
period, NMFS requested comments from
three independent peer-reviewers. The
peer-review comment period was
extended for another 60 days after the
public comment period was closed to
allow peer-reviewers more time.
The final Recovery Plan contains: (1)
a comprehensive review of fin whale
ecology, (2) a threats assessment, (3)
biological and recovery criteria for
downlisting and delisting, (4) actions
necessary for the recovery of the
species, (5) an implementation
schedule, and (6) estimates of time and
cost to recovery.
The Recovery Plan presents a
recovery strategy to address the
potential threats based on the best
available science and presents guidance
for use by agencies and interested
parties to assist in the recovery of the fin
whale. The threats assessment ranked
threats as either having a/an Unknown,
Unknown but Potentially High, Low,
Medium, or High relative impact to the
recovery of fin whales. Ranking
assignments were determined by an
expert panel with contributions from
reviewers. Following are the threat
rankings relative to the recovery of the
fin whale:
• Anthropogenic noise from ship
noise, oil and gas exploration, and
military sonar and explosives, and
competition for resources were ranked
as having an unknown impact
• Ship strikes and loss of prey base
due to climate and ecosystem change or
shifts in habitat were ranked as
unknown but potentially high
• Fishery interactions (gillnet, trawl,
pot/trap, purse seine, and longline),
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:35 Aug 05, 2010
Jkt 220001
anthropogenic noise from coastal
development, disturbance from whale
watching and other vessels,
contaminants and pollutants, disease,
injury from marine debris, disturbance
due to research, and predation and
natural mortality were ranked as having
a low impact; and
• Direct harvest was ranked as
having a medium impact.
No threats were identified as having
a high impact relative to the recovery of
the fin whale.
The Recovery Plan identifies nine
measures that need to be taken to ensure
the recovery of fin whales in the North
Atlantic, North Pacific, and Southern
Hemisphere. Key elements of the
proposed recovery program for this
species are (1) coordinate state, Federal,
and international actions to implement
recovery efforts; (2) determine
population discreteness and stock
structure; (3) develop and apply
methods to estimate population size and
monitor trends in abundance; (4)
conduct risk analyses; (5) identify and
protect habitat important to fin whale
survival and recovery; (6) identify
causes and minimize human-caused
injury and mortality; (7) determine and
minimize any detrimental effects of
anthropogenic noise in the oceans; (8)
maximize efforts to acquire scientific
information from dead, stranded, and
entangled or entrapped fin whales; and
(9) develop a post-delisting monitoring
plan.
Criteria for the reclassification of the
fin whale are included in the final
Recovery Plan. In summary, the fin
whale may be reclassified from
endangered to threatened when all of
the following have been met: (1) given
current and projected threats and
environmental conditions, the overall
fin whale population in each ocean
basin in which it occurs (North Atlantic,
North Pacific, and Southern
Hemisphere) satisfies the risk analysis
standard for threatened status (has no
more than a 1 percent chance of
extinction in 100 years) and at least 500
mature, reproductive individuals
remain (consisting of at least 250 mature
females and at least 250 mature males).
Mature is defined as the number of
individuals known, estimated or
inferred to be capable of reproduction.
Any factors or circumstances that are
thought to substantially contribute to a
real risk of extinction that cannot be
incorporated into a Population Viability
Analysis will be carefully considered
before downlisting takes place; and (2)
none of the known threats to fin whales
(summarized in the five listing factors)
are known to limit the continued growth
of populations. Specifically, the factors
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
47539
in 4(a)(l) of the ESA are being or have
been addressed. The population will be
considered for delisting if all of the
following can be met: (1) given current
and projected threats and environmental
conditions, the overall fin whale
population in each ocean basin in
which it occurs (North Atlantic, North
Pacific, and Southern Hemisphere)
satisfies the risk analysis standard for
unlisted status (has less than a 10
percent probability of becoming
endangered (has more than a 1 percent
chance of extinction in 100 years) in 20
years). Any factors or circumstances that
are thought to substantially contribute
to a real risk of extinction that cannot
be incorporated into a Population
Viability Analysis will be carefully
considered before delisting takes place,
and (2) none of the known threats to fin
whales (summarized in the five listing
factors) are known to limit the
continued growth of populations.
Specifically, the factors in 4(a)(l) of the
ESA are being or have been addressed.
Time and cost for recovery actions are
contained in the Recovery Plan. The
recovery program for the fin whale will
cost $225.42 million dollars for the first
5 fiscal years and $245.98 million
dollars to full recovery, assuming
recovery date of 2020 for the North
Atlantic and North Pacific Ocean
regions and 2030 for the Southern
Hemisphere.
In accordance with the 2003 Peer
Review Policy as stated in Appendix R
of the Interim Endangered and
Threatened Species Recovery Planning
Guidance, NMFS solicited independent
peer-review on the draft Recovery Plan
concurrent with the public comment
period. Independent peer-reviews were
requested from three scientists and
managers with expertise in recovery
planning, statistical analyses, fisheries,
and marine mammals. Many of the
recommendations that were made by the
reviewers were addressed and provided
in detail in the final Recovery Plan. New
information, research results, and
references that have become available
since the draft Recovery Plan was
released were also incorporated into the
final Recovery Plan.
Conclusion
NMFS revised the final Recovery Plan
for the fin whale and evaluated all
comments received by the public as
well as independent peer-reviewers.
NMFS concludes that the Recovery Plan
meets the requirements of the ESA.
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.
E:\FR\FM\06AUN1.SGM
06AUN1
47540
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 151 / Friday, August 6, 2010 / Notices
Dated: August 2, 2010.
Angela Somma,
Chief, Endangered Species Division, Office
of Protected Resources, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2010–19475 Filed 8–5–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–S
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Minority Business Development
Agency
[Docket No.: 100730316–0318–02]
Extension of the Award Period for
Certain Minority Business Enterprise
Centers
Minority Business
Development Agency, Commerce.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
The Minority Business
Development Agency (MBDA) publishes
this notice of a funded extension of up
to nine months, on a non-competitive
SUMMARY:
basis, of the award periods for those
Minority Business Enterprise Centers
(MBECs) identified in this notice. This
action is necessary to allow for
continued program delivery by the
incumbent MBEC operators while
MBDA completes the development of a
new minority business development
grant program, solicits competitive
applications and processes new awards.
DATES: The extension and related
funding, if approved, will commence at
the end of the current award period and
will continue for a period not to exceed
nine months.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Efrain Gonzalez, Chief, Office of
Business Development, Minority
Business Development Agency, 1401
Constitution Avenue, NW., Room 5075,
Washington, DC 20230. Mr. Gonzalez
may be reached by telephone at (202)
482–1940 and by e-mail at
egonzalez@mbda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant
to Executive Order 11625, the MBEC
Program provides standardized business
assistance and development services
directly to eligible minority-owned
businesses. The MBEC Program is a key
component of MBDA’s overall business
development assistance program; it
promotes the growth and
competitiveness of minority business
enterprises, and further incorporates an
entrepreneurial approach to the delivery
of client services. This strategy expands
the reach and service delivery of the
MBEC Program by requiring project
operators to develop and build upon
strategic alliances with public and
private sector partners as a means of
serving eligible businesses within each
MBEC’s applicable geographical service
area.
MBDA amends its prior competitive
solicitations under the MBEC Program,
as referenced in the below table, to
provide funding extensions of up to
nine months, on a non-competitive
basis, to the award period for the
following MBEC projects:
Name of Project
Name of Operator
Geographical Service Area
Original Federal Register Notice
Alabama MBEC .......................
Mobile Area Chamber of Commerce, Inc.
Georgia Tech Research Corporation.
M. Gill & Associates, Inc .........
State of Alabama ....................
71 FR 42351, as amended by 71 FR 45773
and by 74 FR 58246.
71 FR 42351, as amended by 74 FR 58246.
Georgia MBEC .........................
Miami MBEC ............................
Mississippi MBEC ....................
North Carolina MBEC ..............
South Carolina MBEC ..............
Chicago MBEC ........................
Detroit MBEC ...........................
Indianapolis MBEC ..................
St. Louis MBEC .......................
Dallas MBEC ............................
El Paso MBEC .........................
New Mexico MBEC ..................
San Antonio MBEC ..................
Pennsylvania ............................
Puerto Rico MBEC ...................
Queens MBEC .........................
Washington DC Metro MBEC ..
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with NOTICES
Williamsburg MBEC .................
Arizona MBEC .........................
Honolulu MBEC .......................
Inland Empire MBEC ...............
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:35 Aug 05, 2010
Arkansas Regional Minority
Business Council.
North Carolina Institute of Minority Economic Development.
DESA, Inc. ...............................
Chicago Community Ventures
Michigan Minority Business
Development Council.
State of Indiana .......................
St. Louis Minority Business
Development Council.
Grijalva & Allen, P.C ...............
El Paso Hispanic Chamber of
Commerce.
NEDA Business Consultants,
Inc.
University of Texas at San Antonio.
The Enterprise Center .............
Asociacion Productos de Puerto Rico.
Jamaica Business Resource
Center.
National Community Reinvestment Coalition, Inc.
ODA Community Development
Corporation.
Arizona Hispanic Chamber of
Commerce Foundation.
University of Hawaii ................
CHARO Community Development Corporation.
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00018
State of Georgia ......................
Miami/Ft. Lauderdale/Pompano Beach MSA.
State of Mississippi .................
State of North Carolina ...........
State of South Carolina ...........
State of Illinois .........................
State of Michigan ....................
State of Indiana .......................
State of Missouri .....................
72 FR 67277, as amended by 74 FR 58246.
71 FR 42351, as amended by 71 FR 45773
and 74 FR 58246.
71 FR 42351, as amended by 74 FR 58246.
71 FR 42351, as amended by 74 FR 58246.
71 FR 42351, as amended by 74 FR 58246.
71 FR 42351, as amended by 71 FR 58788
and by 74 FR 58246.
71 FR 42351, as amended by 74 FR 58246.
71 FR 42351, as amended by 74 FR 58246.
Dallas/Fort Worth/Arlington
MSA.
El Paso MSA ...........................
72 FR 71621, as amended by 74 FR 58246.
State of New Mexico ...............
71 FR 42351, as amended by 74 FR 58246.
San Antonio MSA ....................
71 FR 42351, as amended by 74 FR 58246.
State of Pennsylvania .............
Puerto Rico Islandwide ...........
71 FR 42351, as amended by 74 FR 58246.
71 FR 42351, as amended by 74 FR 58246.
New York Counties of:
Queens, Nassau & Suffolk.
Washington, DC/Arlington/Alexandria MSA.
New York Counties of: Kings &
Richmond.
State of Arizona ......................
71 FR 42351, as amended by 74 FR 58246.
Honolulu MSA .........................
California Counties of: Orange,
Riverside, Inland Empire,
San Diego & San
Bernardino.
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
71 FR 42351, as amended by 74 FR 58246.
71 FR 42351, as amended by 74 FR 58246.
71 FR 42351, as amended by 74 FR 58246.
71 FR 42351, as amended by 74 FR 58246.
72 FR 67277, as amended by 74 FR 58246.
71 FR 42351, as amended by 74 FR 58246.
E:\FR\FM\06AUN1.SGM
06AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 151 (Friday, August 6, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 47538-47540]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-19475]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
RIN 0648-XX85
Endangered and Threatened Species; Recovery Plans
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service, National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration, Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of Availability; recovery plan for the fin whale.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) announces the
adoption of an Endangered Species Act (ESA) Recovery Plan for the Fin
whale (Balaenoptera physalus). The Recovery Plan contains revisions and
additions in consideration of public comments received on the proposed
draft Recovery Plan for the fin whale.
ADDRESSES: Additional information about the Recovery Plans may be
obtained by writing to Monica DeAngelis, National Marine Fisheries
Service, Southwest Regional Office, Protected Resources Division, 501
W. Ocean Blvd., Suite 4200, Long Beach, CA 90802 or send an electronic
message to Monica.DeAngelis@noaa.gov.
Electronic copies of the Recovery Plan and a summary of NMFS'
response to public comments on the Recovery Plan are available online
at the NMFS Office of Protected Resources website: www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/species/mammals/cetaceans/finwhale.htm.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Monica DeAngelis (562) 980-3232, e-
mail Monica.DeAngelis@noaa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Recovery plans describe actions considered necessary for the
conservation and recovery of species listed under the Endangered
Species Act of 1973 (ESA), as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.). The ESA
requires that recovery plans incorporate (1) objective, measurable
criteria that, when met, would result in a determination that the
species is no longer threatened or endangered; (2) site-specific
management actions necessary to achieve the plan's goals; and (3)
estimates of the time required and costs to implement recovery actions.
The ESA requires the development of recovery plans for listed species
unless such a plan would not promote the recovery of a particular
species. NMFS' goal is to restore endangered fin whale (Balaenoptera
physalus) populations to the point where they are again secure, self-
sustaining members of their ecosystems and no longer need the
protections of the ESA.
The fin whale was listed as an endangered species under the ESA on
December 2, 1970 (35 FR 18319). Fin whales have a global distribution
and can be found in the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans and the Southern
Hemisphere. Although most populations were depleted by modern whaling
in the mid-twentieth century, there are still tens of thousands of fin
whales worldwide. Currently, the population structure of fin whales has
not been adequately defined. Most models have assigned arbitrary
boundaries, often based on patterns of historic whaling activity and
catch reports, rather than on biological evidence. Populations are
often divided on an ocean basin level. Since the Southern Ocean often
refers only to waters surrounding Antarctica and fin whales occur not
only in those waters but also in temperate waters, we refer to the
geographic area for the fin whale
[[Page 47539]]
subspecies (Balaena physalus quoyi) as the Southern Hemisphere.
Therefore, the Recovery Plan is organized, for convenience, by ocean
basin and discussed in three sections: those fin whales in the North
Atlantic Ocean, those in the North Pacific Ocean and its adjoining seas
and gulfs, and those in the Southern Hemisphere, referring particularly
to areas near Antarctica. There is a need for an improved understanding
of the genetic differences among and between populations, in order to
determine distinct population units. Although there is new information,
existing knowledge of population structure remains poor. New
information is currently insufficient to identify units that are both
discrete and significant to the survival of the species.
NMFS released the draft Recovery Plan and requested comments from
the public on July 6, 2006 (71 FR 38385). A summary of comments and
NMFS responses to comments are available electronically (see
ADDRESSES). Concurrent with the public comment period, NMFS requested
comments from three independent peer-reviewers. The peer-review comment
period was extended for another 60 days after the public comment period
was closed to allow peer-reviewers more time.
The final Recovery Plan contains: (1) a comprehensive review of fin
whale ecology, (2) a threats assessment, (3) biological and recovery
criteria for downlisting and delisting, (4) actions necessary for the
recovery of the species, (5) an implementation schedule, and (6)
estimates of time and cost to recovery.
The Recovery Plan presents a recovery strategy to address the
potential threats based on the best available science and presents
guidance for use by agencies and interested parties to assist in the
recovery of the fin whale. The threats assessment ranked threats as
either having a/an Unknown, Unknown but Potentially High, Low, Medium,
or High relative impact to the recovery of fin whales. Ranking
assignments were determined by an expert panel with contributions from
reviewers. Following are the threat rankings relative to the recovery
of the fin whale:
Anthropogenic noise from ship noise, oil and gas
exploration, and military sonar and explosives, and competition for
resources were ranked as having an unknown impact
Ship strikes and loss of prey base due to climate and
ecosystem change or shifts in habitat were ranked as unknown but
potentially high
Fishery interactions (gillnet, trawl, pot/trap, purse
seine, and longline), anthropogenic noise from coastal development,
disturbance from whale watching and other vessels, contaminants and
pollutants, disease, injury from marine debris, disturbance due to
research, and predation and natural mortality were ranked as having a
low impact; and
Direct harvest was ranked as having a medium impact.
No threats were identified as having a high impact relative to the
recovery of the fin whale.
The Recovery Plan identifies nine measures that need to be taken to
ensure the recovery of fin whales in the North Atlantic, North Pacific,
and Southern Hemisphere. Key elements of the proposed recovery program
for this species are (1) coordinate state, Federal, and international
actions to implement recovery efforts; (2) determine population
discreteness and stock structure; (3) develop and apply methods to
estimate population size and monitor trends in abundance; (4) conduct
risk analyses; (5) identify and protect habitat important to fin whale
survival and recovery; (6) identify causes and minimize human-caused
injury and mortality; (7) determine and minimize any detrimental
effects of anthropogenic noise in the oceans; (8) maximize efforts to
acquire scientific information from dead, stranded, and entangled or
entrapped fin whales; and (9) develop a post-delisting monitoring plan.
Criteria for the reclassification of the fin whale are included in
the final Recovery Plan. In summary, the fin whale may be reclassified
from endangered to threatened when all of the following have been met:
(1) given current and projected threats and environmental conditions,
the overall fin whale population in each ocean basin in which it occurs
(North Atlantic, North Pacific, and Southern Hemisphere) satisfies the
risk analysis standard for threatened status (has no more than a 1
percent chance of extinction in 100 years) and at least 500 mature,
reproductive individuals remain (consisting of at least 250 mature
females and at least 250 mature males). Mature is defined as the number
of individuals known, estimated or inferred to be capable of
reproduction. Any factors or circumstances that are thought to
substantially contribute to a real risk of extinction that cannot be
incorporated into a Population Viability Analysis will be carefully
considered before downlisting takes place; and (2) none of the known
threats to fin whales (summarized in the five listing factors) are
known to limit the continued growth of populations. Specifically, the
factors in 4(a)(l) of the ESA are being or have been addressed. The
population will be considered for delisting if all of the following can
be met: (1) given current and projected threats and environmental
conditions, the overall fin whale population in each ocean basin in
which it occurs (North Atlantic, North Pacific, and Southern
Hemisphere) satisfies the risk analysis standard for unlisted status
(has less than a 10 percent probability of becoming endangered (has
more than a 1 percent chance of extinction in 100 years) in 20 years).
Any factors or circumstances that are thought to substantially
contribute to a real risk of extinction that cannot be incorporated
into a Population Viability Analysis will be carefully considered
before delisting takes place, and (2) none of the known threats to fin
whales (summarized in the five listing factors) are known to limit the
continued growth of populations. Specifically, the factors in 4(a)(l)
of the ESA are being or have been addressed.
Time and cost for recovery actions are contained in the Recovery
Plan. The recovery program for the fin whale will cost $225.42 million
dollars for the first 5 fiscal years and $245.98 million dollars to
full recovery, assuming recovery date of 2020 for the North Atlantic
and North Pacific Ocean regions and 2030 for the Southern Hemisphere.
In accordance with the 2003 Peer Review Policy as stated in
Appendix R of the Interim Endangered and Threatened Species Recovery
Planning Guidance, NMFS solicited independent peer-review on the draft
Recovery Plan concurrent with the public comment period. Independent
peer-reviews were requested from three scientists and managers with
expertise in recovery planning, statistical analyses, fisheries, and
marine mammals. Many of the recommendations that were made by the
reviewers were addressed and provided in detail in the final Recovery
Plan. New information, research results, and references that have
become available since the draft Recovery Plan was released were also
incorporated into the final Recovery Plan.
Conclusion
NMFS revised the final Recovery Plan for the fin whale and
evaluated all comments received by the public as well as independent
peer-reviewers. NMFS concludes that the Recovery Plan meets the
requirements of the ESA.
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.
[[Page 47540]]
Dated: August 2, 2010.
Angela Somma,
Chief, Endangered Species Division, Office of Protected Resources,
National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2010-19475 Filed 8-5-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-S