CSX Transportation, Inc.-Corporate Family Merger Exemption-Gainesville Midland Railroad Company, 47677-47678 [2010-19122]
Download as PDF
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 151 / Friday, August 6, 2010 / Notices
Street, NW., Washington, DC 20503,
Attention NHTSA Desk Officer.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Randolph Atkins, PhD, Office of
Behavioral Safety Research, National
Highway Traffic Safety Administration,
NTI–131, Room W46–500, 1200 New
Jersey Ave, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
Dr. Atkins’ phone number is 202–366–
5597 and his e-mail address is
randolph.atkins@dot.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Title: Investigate the Use and
Feasibility of Speed Warning Devices.
Type of Request: New information
collection request—debriefing session
follow-up with participants from an
earlier on-road instrumented vehicle
study.
Abstract: Speeding is one of the
primary factors leading to vehicle
crashes. In 2008, 31% of all fatal crashes
were speeding-related. The estimated
economic cost to society for speedingrelated crashes is $40.4 billion per year.
Driving at higher speeds reduces the
ability of drivers to avoid obstacles or
react to sudden changes in the roadway
environment and increases the severity
of crashes. Of particular concern are the
habitual speeders and aggressive drivers
for whom other countermeasures, such
as enforcement, licenses suspensions,
and fines, are not effective deterrents.
The data collected in this study will
provide NHTSA with important
information on a countermeasure with
the potential to address an especially
challenging segment of the driving
population that poses an inordinately
high safety risk to themselves and other
drivers who share the roads with them.
In this pilot study, NHTSA will be
conducting on-road instrumented
vehicle data collection with drivers who
have a history of speeding violations to
examine the impact of in-vehicle speed
warning devices on their driving speed
patterns and speeding behavior.
Participants will be asked to install a
speed warning device for eight weeks.
The device will provide data on travel
speeds of participants’ vehicles coupled
with GPS information that is linked to
a database with speed limits for various
sections of roads in the study area. After
completing their on-road phase of the
data collection, participating drivers
will be asked to participate in a short
debriefing interview while the invehicle warning device is removed from
their vehicle. The debriefing sessions
will focus on the drivers’ subjective
experience regarding the speed warning
device—how it affected their driving
behavior, any problems experienced
with the device, how they interacted
with the device, and their opinion of the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:35 Aug 05, 2010
Jkt 220001
device, as well as feedback on their
experience as a participant in the study.
This subjective data will be coupled
with the data from their actual driving
behavior to help NHTSA develop a
better understanding of speeding and
speeders and the potential acceptance
and effectiveness of using speed
warning devices as a countermeasure to
alter the speeding behavior of habitual
speeders. The debriefing sessions are
expected to provide data relevant to
implementation issues and concerns
associated with the device, as well as
the key advantages and disadvantages
associated with the use of this device as
a countermeasure.
Affected Public: NHTSA plans to
recruit 80 drivers from the Rockville,
MD area, with a driving history of at
least three speeding violations in the
previous five years, through the MVA.
The participants will be stratified; with
20 male and 20 female drivers age 18–
29 and 20 male and 20 female drivers
age 30 and above. Participation would
be voluntary and confidential.
Estimated Total Annual Burden: The
total estimated annual burden is 40
hours for the debriefing session (80 × 30
minutes per session) while the
monitoring device is being removed
from their vehicle. The participants
would not incur any reporting cost from
the information collection and will
receive a $150 honorarium for data
collection. The participants would not
incur any record keeping burden or
record keeping cost from the
information collection.
Comments are invited on the
following:
(i) Whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
agency, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
(ii) The accuracy of the agency’s
estimate of the burden of the proposed
information collection;
(iii) Ways to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information to
be collected; and
(iv) Ways to minimize the burden of
the collection of information on
respondents, including the use of
automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
A comment to OMB is most effective
if OMB receives it within 30 days of
publication.
Authority: 44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A).
Issued on: August 3, 2010.
Jeff Michael,
Associate Administrator, Research and
Program Development.
[FR Doc. 2010–19352 Filed 8–5–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–59–P
PO 00000
Frm 00155
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
47677
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Surface Transportation Board
[Docket No. FD 35375]
CSX Transportation, Inc.—Corporate
Family Merger Exemption—Gainesville
Midland Railroad Company
CSX Transportation, Inc. (CSXT) and
Gainesville Midland Railroad Company
(GMRR) have jointly filed a verified
notice of exemption under 49 CFR
1180.2(d)(3) for a corporate family
transaction. CSXT is a Class I rail carrier
that directly controls and operates
GMRR.1 GMRR is a wholly owned
subsidiary of CSXT. The transaction
involves the merger of GMRR with and
into CSXT with CSXT being the
surviving corporation.
The transaction is scheduled to be
consummated on or after August 20,
2010. The purpose of the transaction is
to simplify the corporate structure and
reduce overhead costs and duplication
by eliminating one corporation while
retaining the same assets to serve
customers. CSXT will obtain certain
other savings as a result of this
transaction.
This is a transaction within a
corporate family of the type specifically
exempted from prior review and
approval under 49 CFR 1180.2(d)(3).
The parties state that the transaction
will not result in adverse changes in
service levels, significant operational
changes, or any change in the
competitive balance with carriers
outside the corporate family.
Under 49 U.S.C. 10502(g), the Board
may not use its exemption authority to
relieve a rail carrier of its statutory
obligation to protect the interests of its
employees. As a condition to the use of
this exemption, any employees
adversely affected by this transaction
will be protected by the conditions set
forth in New York Dock Railways.—
Control—Brooklyn Eastern District
Terminal, 360 I.C.C. 60 (1979).
If the notice contains false or
misleading information, the exemption
is void ab initio. Petitions to revoke the
exemption under 49 U.S.C. 10502(d)
may be filed at any time. The filing of
a petition to revoke will not
automatically stay the transaction.
Petitions for stay must be filed no later
than August 13, 2010 (at least 7 days
before the exemption becomes
effective).
An original and 10 copies of all
pleadings, referring to FD No. 35375,
1 See CSX Corp.—Control—Chessie and Seaboard
C. L. I., 363 I.C.C. 521 (1980) and Seaboard Air-Line
R.R.—Control—Gainesville Midland R.R., FD 20296
(ICC decided Mar. 26, 1959), 307 I.C.C. 801, 803.
E:\FR\FM\06AUN1.SGM
06AUN1
47678
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 151 / Friday, August 6, 2010 / Notices
must be filed with the Surface
Transportation Board, 395 E Street,
NW., Washington, DC 20423–0001. In
addition, one copy of each pleading
must be served on Louis E. Gitomer,
Esq., Law Offices of Louis E. Gitomer,
600 Baltimore Avenue, Suite 301,
Towson, Md. 21204.
Board decisions and notices are
available on our Web site at https://
www.stb.dot.gov.
Decided: July 29, 2010.
By the Board, Rachel D. Campbell,
Director, Office of Proceedings.
Kulunie L. Cannon,
Clearance Clerk.
[FR Doc. 2010–19122 Filed 8–3–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Surface Transportation Board
[Docket No. FD 35382]
Northern Plains Railroad, Inc.—Lease
Exemption—Soo Line Railroad
Company
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with NOTICES
Under 49 CFR 1011.7(b)(10), the
Director of the Office of Proceedings
(Director) is delegated the authority to
determine whether to issue notices of
exemption for lease transactions under
49 U.S.C. 10902. However, the Board
reserves to itself the consideration and
disposition of all matters involving
issues of general transportation
importance. 49 CFR 1011.2(a)(6).
Accordingly, the Board revokes the
delegation to the Director with respect
to the issuance of this notice of
exemption. The Board determines that
this notice of lease and operation
exemption should be issued, and does
so here.
Northern Plains Railroad, Inc. (NPR),
a Class III rail carrier, has filed a verified
notice of exemption under 49 CFR
1150.41 to renew its lease of
approximately 290.31 miles of rail line
of Soo Line Railroad Company, d/b/a
Canadian Pacific Railway (Soo), in
Minnesota and North Dakota (referred to
as the Wheat Lines). NPR has operated
the Wheat Lines pursuant to an existing
lease with Soo since 1997.1 According
1 NPR acquired authority to lease and operate
approximately 377.55 miles of Soo rail line. See
Northern Plains R.R.—Lease and Operation
Exemption—Certain Lines of Soo Line R.R., Docket
No. FD 33324 (STB served Jan. 9, 1997). In 2009,
NPR was authorized to discontinue service over
certain lines covered by that lease: between Bisbee,
N.D., and Kramer, N.D., and between Devils Lake,
N.D., and Harlow, N.D. See Northern Plains R.R.—
Discontinuance of Serv. Exemption—in Ramsey and
Benson Counties, N.D., Docket No. AB 1054X (STB
served Dec. 28, 2009) (NPR discontinuance on
Devils Lake-Harlow line); and Northern Plains
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:35 Aug 05, 2010
Jkt 220001
to NPR, NPR and Soo have entered into
a Lease Renewal Agreement and a
related Renewed Exchange and
Operating Agreement, both dated July
19, 2010 (Agreements), which provide
for NPR’s continued lease of and
provision of rail service on the Wheat
Lines.2 Pursuant to the Agreements,
NPR will renew its lease of the Wheat
Lines extending: (a) From milepost
309.69 at Thief River Falls, Minn., to
milepost 474.5 at Bisbee; (b) from
milepost 390.99 at Fordville, N.D., to
milepost 445.50 at Devils Lake; and (c)
from milepost 535.00 at Kramer, to
milepost 605.99 at Kenmare, N.D. NPR
states that, as part of the Agreements,
NPR will lease 5 miles of abandoned
Soo trackage at Kramer and 4.95 miles
of abandoned Soo trackage at Bisbee for
rail supply and other purposes.3 The
term of the lease renewal is 20 years. As
required at 49 CFR 1150.43(h), NPR has
disclosed that the Lease Renewal
Agreement contains a provision that
would limit NPR’s future interchange of
traffic with a third-party connecting
carrier at any location. NPR notes that
(other than with Soo) NPR has
interchanges with BNSF Railway
Company at Ardoch, N.D., Devils Lake,
and Warren, Minn.
NPR states that it expects to remain a
Class III rail carrier after consummation
of the proposed transaction, and
certifies that its projected annual
revenues for the Wheat Lines as a result
of the proposed transaction will not
result in the creation of a Class II or
Class I rail carrier. In accordance with
the Board’s requirements at 49 CFR
1150.42(e), NPR certified to the Board,
on June 18, 2010, that it had posted the
60-day notice of the transaction at the
R.R.—Discontinuance of Serv. Exemption—in
Bottineau, Rolette, and Towner Counties, N.D.,
Docket No. AB 1054 (Sub-No. 1X) (STB served Dec.
28, 2009) (NPR discontinuance on Bisbee-Kramer
line). NPR states that it will renew its lease with
Soo but that the lease will only cover approximately
290.31 miles now because Soo has abandoned the
lines (described above) over which service had been
discontinued. See Soo Line R.R.—Aban.
Exemption—in Ramsey and Benson Counties, N.D.,
Docket No. AB 57 (Sub-No. 54X) (STB served Oct.
22, 2004) (Soo abandonment of Devils Lake-Harlow
line) and Soo Line R.R.—Aban. Exemption—in
Bottineau, Rolette, and Towner Counties, N.D.,
Docket No. AB 57 (Sub-No. 56X) (STB served Sept.
5, 2008) (Soo abandonment of Bisbee-Kramer line).
NPR also notes a change to the Devils Lake
endpoint, from milepost 446.0+/¥ to milepost
445.50.
2 NPR’s Agreements were filed under seal
pursuant to 49 CFR 1150.43(h)(1)(ii). NPR states
that the Lease Renewal Agreement includes other
changes beyond the extension of the lease term. As
a result, the class exemption at 49 CFR 1180.2(d)(4)
covering lease renewals where only an extension of
time is involved is not available here.
3 NPR states that it does not seek any authority
here to operate these previously abandoned
segments.
PO 00000
Frm 00156
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
workplaces of current NPR employees
on the Wheat Lines on June 8 and 9,
2010, that it had posted the notice at the
workplaces of Soo employees whose
territory includes the Wheat Lines on
June 17, 2010, and that it had served the
notice on the national offices of the
labor unions for such Soo employees on
June 17, 2010. NPR stated that there are
no labor unions that represent
employees of NPR.
NPR states that it expects to
consummate the transaction on
September 1, 2010 (which is more than
60 days after NPR’s certification to the
Board that it had complied with the
labor notice requirements at 49 CFR
1150.42(e)).
If the verified notice contains false or
misleading information, the exemption
is void ab initio. Petitions to revoke the
exemption under 49 U.S.C. 10502(d)
may be filed at any time. The filing of
a petition to revoke will not
automatically stay the transaction.
Petitions for stay must be filed no later
than August 13, 2010 (at least 7 days
before the exemption becomes
effective).
An original and 10 copies of all
pleadings, referring to Docket No. FD
35382, must be filed with the Surface
Transportation Board, 395 E Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20423–0001. In
addition, a copy of each pleading must
be served on Thomas J. Litwiler,
Fletcher & Sippel LLC, 29 North Wacker
Drive, Suite 920, Chicago, IL 60606–
2832.
Board decisions and notices are
available on our Web site at https://
www.stb.dot.gov.
It is ordered:
1. The delegation of authority of the
Office of Proceedings, under 49 CFR
1011.7(b)(10), to determine whether to
issue a notice of exemption in this
proceeding is revoked.
2. This decision is effective on the
date of service.
Decided: August 3, 2010.
By the Board, Chairman Elliott, Vice
Chairman Mulvey, and Commissioner
Nottingham. Vice Chairman Mulvey
dissented with a separate expression.
VICE CHAIRMAN MULVEY, dissenting:
I disagree with the Board’s decision
today to allow this transaction to be
processed under the Board’s class
exemption procedures at 49 CFR
1150.41. I believe that transactions
which prohibit the lessee carrier from
interchanging with any rail carrier other
than the lessor carrier should be subject
to close scrutiny by the Board and that
such scrutiny cannot take place within
the expedited notice of exemption
process.
E:\FR\FM\06AUN1.SGM
06AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 151 (Friday, August 6, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 47677-47678]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-19122]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Surface Transportation Board
[Docket No. FD 35375]
CSX Transportation, Inc.--Corporate Family Merger Exemption--
Gainesville Midland Railroad Company
CSX Transportation, Inc. (CSXT) and Gainesville Midland Railroad
Company (GMRR) have jointly filed a verified notice of exemption under
49 CFR 1180.2(d)(3) for a corporate family transaction. CSXT is a Class
I rail carrier that directly controls and operates GMRR.\1\ GMRR is a
wholly owned subsidiary of CSXT. The transaction involves the merger of
GMRR with and into CSXT with CSXT being the surviving corporation.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See CSX Corp.--Control--Chessie and Seaboard C. L. I., 363
I.C.C. 521 (1980) and Seaboard Air-Line R.R.--Control--Gainesville
Midland R.R., FD 20296 (ICC decided Mar. 26, 1959), 307 I.C.C. 801,
803.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The transaction is scheduled to be consummated on or after August
20, 2010. The purpose of the transaction is to simplify the corporate
structure and reduce overhead costs and duplication by eliminating one
corporation while retaining the same assets to serve customers. CSXT
will obtain certain other savings as a result of this transaction.
This is a transaction within a corporate family of the type
specifically exempted from prior review and approval under 49 CFR
1180.2(d)(3). The parties state that the transaction will not result in
adverse changes in service levels, significant operational changes, or
any change in the competitive balance with carriers outside the
corporate family.
Under 49 U.S.C. 10502(g), the Board may not use its exemption
authority to relieve a rail carrier of its statutory obligation to
protect the interests of its employees. As a condition to the use of
this exemption, any employees adversely affected by this transaction
will be protected by the conditions set forth in New York Dock
Railways.--Control--Brooklyn Eastern District Terminal, 360 I.C.C. 60
(1979).
If the notice contains false or misleading information, the
exemption is void ab initio. Petitions to revoke the exemption under 49
U.S.C. 10502(d) may be filed at any time. The filing of a petition to
revoke will not automatically stay the transaction. Petitions for stay
must be filed no later than August 13, 2010 (at least 7 days before the
exemption becomes effective).
An original and 10 copies of all pleadings, referring to FD No.
35375,
[[Page 47678]]
must be filed with the Surface Transportation Board, 395 E Street, NW.,
Washington, DC 20423-0001. In addition, one copy of each pleading must
be served on Louis E. Gitomer, Esq., Law Offices of Louis E. Gitomer,
600 Baltimore Avenue, Suite 301, Towson, Md. 21204.
Board decisions and notices are available on our Web site at https://www.stb.dot.gov.
Decided: July 29, 2010.
By the Board, Rachel D. Campbell, Director, Office of
Proceedings.
Kulunie L. Cannon,
Clearance Clerk.
[FR Doc. 2010-19122 Filed 8-3-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915-01-P