Pilot Program for Waiver of Patent Owner's Statement in Ex Parte Reexamination Proceedings, 47269-47270 [2010-19337]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 150 / Thursday, August 5, 2010 / Notices
47269
LIST OF PETITIONS RECEIVED BY EDA FOR CERTIFICATION OF ELIGIBILITY TO APPLY FOR TRADE ADJUSTMENT
7/17/2010 THROUGH 7/29/2010
Date
accepted
for filing
Firm
Address
Imperia Corp .............................
343 Manley Street, West MA
02379.
1 Pine Street Ext., Nashua NH
03060.
1400 E. Lackawanna Street,
Olyphant PA 18448.
4116 First Avenue, Brooklyn
NY 11232.
597 Main Street, Great MA
01230.
7159 Country Road 200, Joplin
MO 64801.
184 Woonasquatucket Ave,
North RI 02911.
65 Tripps Lane, East RI 02915
W.H. Bagshaw Company, Inc ..
Cinram Manufacturing, LLC ......
Fixture Hardware Manufacturing Corporation.
McTeigue & McClelland, Inc .....
MSW, Inc ..................................
Philip Machine Company, Inc ...
Fulford Manufacturing Company, Inc.
Gulf Crown Seafood Company,
Inc.
Hatch & Kirk, Inc .......................
306 Jon Floyd Rd, Delcambre
LA 70528.
5111 Leary Ave NW, Seattle
WA 98107.
101
Perinton
Parkway,
Delcambre LA 70528.
Parlec, Inc .................................
Any party having a substantial
interest in these proceedings may
request a public hearing on the matter.
A written request for a hearing must
be submitted to the Trade Adjustment
Assistance for Firms Division, Room
D100, Economic Development
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, Washington, DC 20230, no
later than ten (10) calendar days
following publication of this notice.
Please follow the procedures set forth
in Section 315.9 of EDA’s final rule (71
FR 56704) for procedures for requesting
a public hearing. The Catalog of Federal
Domestic Assistance official program
number and title of the program under
which these petitions are submitted is
11.313, Trade Adjustment Assistance.
Dated: July 30, 2010.
Miriam J. Kearse,
Eligibility Certifier.
[FR Doc. 2010–19209 Filed 8–4–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–24–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
Patent and Trademark Office
[Docket No.: PTO–P–2010–0056]
Pilot Program for Waiver of Patent
Owner’s Statement in Ex Parte
Reexamination Proceedings
United States Patent and
Trademark Office, Commerce.
AGENCY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:52 Aug 04, 2010
Jkt 220001
ACTION:
7/27/2010
7/27/2010
7/28/2010
7/28/2010
7/28/2010
7/28/2010
7/28/2010
7/29/2010
7/29/2010
7/29/2010
7/29/2010
Products
Imperial Corp. manufactures custom, cabinetry out of melamine and plywood.
WH Bagshaw manufacturers pins, pin assemblies and wire
products for a wide range of industrial applications.
Cinram is one of the largest optical disc replicators in the
world.
Firm manufactures a full line of steel display hardware.
MC2 designs and manufactures, hand made, precious jewelry
using gold, platinum, diamonds and precious stones.
MSW, Inc., designs and manufactures booths, counters, and
table tops made of plastics, woods, and laminate materials.
Philip Machine Company, Inc. manufactures metal findings
using steel, brass, and stainless steel.
Fulford Manufacturing Company, Inc. manufactures hardware,
plumbing fixtures and fittings, metal stampings, and costume jewelry using materials that include stainless steel,
brass and aluminum.
Processes shrimp for human consumption.
Hatch & Kirk, Inc., is a supplier of heavy duty diesel engine
parts.
Parlec, Inc., manufactures machine tool accessories.
Notice.
The United States Patent and
Trademark Office (USPTO) recognizes
the need to reduce the pendency of
reexamination proceedings and improve
the efficiency of the reexamination
process. The USPTO is considering a
number of short and long-range
initiatives that can be implemented in
three phases. In phase I, the USPTO will
implement streamlined procedures, as
well as optional programs in which
patent owners and third party requesters
may elect to participate in order to gain
the benefit of shorter pendency. In
phases II and III, the USPTO will
consider the data gathered from phase I
and the feedback from the patent
owners and other stakeholders, and
implement process changes that are
likely to improve efficiency. Such
changes may include internal
procedural changes, rule making that
includes opportunities for the public to
comment, and/or administrative
proposals for statutory changes to
enhance the efficiency of the USPTO in
conducting reexamination proceedings.
As part of phase I to reduce pendency
and improve efficiency in ex parte
reexamination proceedings, the USPTO
is implementing, in this notice, a pilot
program in which patent owners may
waive the right to file a patent owner’s
statement upon a request made by the
USPTO. This will enable USPTO in
suitable cases to issue the first Office
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
action on the merits together with or
soon after the reexamination order, and
thereby reduce the pendency of the
proceeding by about three to five
months.
Effective Date: The changes set
forth in this notice will take effect on
August 5, 2010.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Robert A. Clarke, Kenneth M. Schor or
Joni Y. Chang, Office of Patent Legal
Administration, Office of the Associate
Commissioner for Patent Examination
Policy, by telephone at 571–272–7735,
571–272–7710 or 571–272–7720, or by
mail addressed to: Mail Stop Comments
Patents, Commissioner for Patents, P.O.
Box 1450, Alexandria, VA 22313–1450.
Inquiries regarding the current
reexamination practice may be directed
to the Office of Patent Legal
Administration, by telephone at (571)
272–7703, or by electronic mail at
PatentPractice@uspto.gov.
DATES:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background: The USPTO recognizes
the need to reduce the pendency of
reexamination proceedings and improve
the efficiency of the reexamination
process. As of March 31, 2010, the
average time to reach notice of intent to
issue reexamination certificate (NIRC)
for ex parte reexamination proceedings
was about twenty-five months. Many of
our stakeholders have expressed the
desire to have a proceeding in which
patent owners can resolve patent
E:\FR\FM\05AUN1.SGM
05AUN1
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
47270
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 150 / Thursday, August 5, 2010 / Notices
validity issues in a shorter time frame.
The USPTO is considering a number of
short and long-range initiatives that can
be implemented in three phases to
reduce pendency and improve
efficiency in reexamination
proceedings. In phase I, the USPTO will
implement streamlined procedures and
optional programs in which patent
owners and third party requesters may
elect to participate in order to gain the
benefit of shorter pendency. For
example, the USPTO recently
implemented the streamlined procedure
for appeal brief review in ex parte
reexamination proceedings. See
Streamlined Procedure for Appeal Brief
Review in Ex Parte Reexamination
Proceedings, 75 FR 29321 (May 25,
2010). In the instant notice, the USPTO
is implementing a pilot program in
which patent owners may waive the
right to file a patent owner’s statement
in response to a request from the
USPTO. The USPTO will also publish
notices to implement additional
optional procedures and seek public
comments on other procedural changes
in the near future. In phases II and III,
the USPTO will consider the data
gathered from phase I and the feedback
from the patent owners and other
stakeholders, and implement process
changes through internal procedural
changes, rule making that includes
opportunities for the public to
comment, and/or administrative
proposals for statutory changes to
enhance reexamination proceedings.
The USPTO welcomes feedback on
improving its processes. Suggestions
may be directed to the Office of Patent
Legal Administration at (571) 272–7701
for the general examination process, or
(571) 272–7703 for the reexamination or
reissue process.
II. Overview of the Pilot Program: As
part of phase I to reduce pendency and
improve efficiency in ex parte
reexamination proceedings, the USPTO
will implement a pilot program in
which the USPTO will contact the
patent owner and request the optional
waiver of the right to file a patent
owner’s statement after the proceeding
has been granted a filing date and before
the examiner begins his or her review.
This will enable the USPTO in suitable
cases to issue the first Office action on
the merits (including an NIRC) together
with or soon after the order for
reexamination, and thereby reduce the
pendency of the proceeding by about
three to five months.
Under the current procedure, a patent
owner may file a statement under 35
U.S.C. 304 within two months from the
issuance of an ex parte reexamination
order in a reexamination proceeding,
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:52 Aug 04, 2010
Jkt 220001
and a third party requester may file a
reply (under 35 U.S.C. 304) to the patent
owner’s statement within two months
from the date of service of the patent
owner’s statement. Last year,
approximately ten percent of patent
owners filed a patent owner’s statement
under 35 U.S.C. 304 after the USPTO
had ordered an ex parte reexamination
of a patent. When ex parte
reexamination is ordered, the examiner
generally starts to prepare the first
Office action on the merits after the
receipt of the patent owner’s statement
and the third party requester’s reply, or
after the expiration of the time period
for filing the statement and reply. As of
March 31, 2010, the average time to
order an ex parte reexamination from
the filing of an ex parte reexamination
request was about two months and the
average time to issue a first Office action
on the merits from the filing of an ex
parte reexamination request was
between seven to eight months.
If the patent owner waives the right to
file a patent owner’s statement in
response to a request from the USPTO,
the examiner will be able to act on the
first Office action on the merits
immediately after determining that
reexamination will be ordered, and in a
suitable case issue the reexamination
order and the first Office action on the
merits (including an NIRC) at the same
time. This will eliminate the delay of
waiting for a patent owner’s statement
and the third-party requester’s reply and
will permit the examiner to utilize his
or her time more efficiently by drafting
the order and the first Office action on
the merits (including an NIRC) together.
Moreover, by performing the threshold
analysis of determining and preparing
an action on the merits concurrently
when a request raises a substantial new
question of patentability (SNQ), the
overall efficiency of the USPTO in
performing the reexamination process
should be increased. The Central
Reexamination Unit (CRU) has
experience in performing the threshold
SNQ analysis and concurrently
preparing an Office action on the merits,
and the reexamination order and Office
action are typically mailed together in
inter partes reexamination proceedings.
See 37 CFR 1.935.
III. Waiver Procedure under the Pilot
Program: Under the pilot program for
waiving the patent owner’s statement
announced in this notice, the CRU will
contact, via telephone, the patent owner
to request the optional waiver of the
patent owner’s statement after the
proceeding has been granted a filing
date and before the examiner begins his
or her review. The telephone
communication will be limited to the
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
CRU requesting the waiver of the patent
owner’s statement and agreement (or
non-agreement) to the waiver by the
patent owner. Discussion of the merits
of the proceedings, e.g., the patentability
of claims in patents, will not be
permitted. The CRU will make the
agreement or non-agreement of record in
the reexamination file in an interview
summary and a copy will be mailed to
the patent owner and any third party
requester. The patent owner is not
required to complete a written statement
of the telephone communication under
37 CFR 1.560(b) or otherwise, and such
a statement should not be filed as it will
slow the process. If the patent owner
agrees to the waiver of the right to file
a patent owner’s statement, the
examiner will typically issue the
reexamination order and the first Office
action on the merits on the same day as
the order, or within a few days
thereafter.
The Office intends to make available
to the public statistics on the number of
patent owners that agree to waive the
statement and the impact on pendency
due to waiving the statement right. This
data is expected to form a portion of the
data used in the decision making
processes in phases II and III.
Dated: July 16, 2010.
David J. Kappos,
Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual
Property and Director of the United States
Patent and Trademark Office.
[FR Doc. 2010–19337 Filed 8–4–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–16–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
(A–570–855)
Certain Non–Frozen Apple Juice
Concentrate from the People’s
Republic of China: Notice of
Preliminary Results of the New Shipper
Review
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(‘‘Department’’) is conducting a new
shipper review (‘‘NSR’’) of the
antidumping duty order, covering the
period of review (‘‘POR’’) of June 1,
2009, through January 20, 2010. If these
preliminary results are adopted in our
final results of review, we will instruct
U.S. Customs and Border Protection
(‘‘CBP’’) to assess antidumping duties on
entries of subject merchandise during
the POR for which the importer–specific
assessment rates are above de minimis.
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\05AUN1.SGM
05AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 150 (Thursday, August 5, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 47269-47270]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-19337]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Patent and Trademark Office
[Docket No.: PTO-P-2010-0056]
Pilot Program for Waiver of Patent Owner's Statement in Ex Parte
Reexamination Proceedings
AGENCY: United States Patent and Trademark Office, Commerce.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)
recognizes the need to reduce the pendency of reexamination proceedings
and improve the efficiency of the reexamination process. The USPTO is
considering a number of short and long-range initiatives that can be
implemented in three phases. In phase I, the USPTO will implement
streamlined procedures, as well as optional programs in which patent
owners and third party requesters may elect to participate in order to
gain the benefit of shorter pendency. In phases II and III, the USPTO
will consider the data gathered from phase I and the feedback from the
patent owners and other stakeholders, and implement process changes
that are likely to improve efficiency. Such changes may include
internal procedural changes, rule making that includes opportunities
for the public to comment, and/or administrative proposals for
statutory changes to enhance the efficiency of the USPTO in conducting
reexamination proceedings. As part of phase I to reduce pendency and
improve efficiency in ex parte reexamination proceedings, the USPTO is
implementing, in this notice, a pilot program in which patent owners
may waive the right to file a patent owner's statement upon a request
made by the USPTO. This will enable USPTO in suitable cases to issue
the first Office action on the merits together with or soon after the
reexamination order, and thereby reduce the pendency of the proceeding
by about three to five months.
DATES: Effective Date: The changes set forth in this notice will take
effect on August 5, 2010.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert A. Clarke, Kenneth M. Schor or
Joni Y. Chang, Office of Patent Legal Administration, Office of the
Associate Commissioner for Patent Examination Policy, by telephone at
571-272-7735, 571-272-7710 or 571-272-7720, or by mail addressed to:
Mail Stop Comments Patents, Commissioner for Patents, P.O. Box 1450,
Alexandria, VA 22313-1450.
Inquiries regarding the current reexamination practice may be
directed to the Office of Patent Legal Administration, by telephone at
(571) 272-7703, or by electronic mail at PatentPractice@uspto.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background: The USPTO recognizes the need to reduce the pendency
of reexamination proceedings and improve the efficiency of the
reexamination process. As of March 31, 2010, the average time to reach
notice of intent to issue reexamination certificate (NIRC) for ex parte
reexamination proceedings was about twenty-five months. Many of our
stakeholders have expressed the desire to have a proceeding in which
patent owners can resolve patent
[[Page 47270]]
validity issues in a shorter time frame. The USPTO is considering a
number of short and long-range initiatives that can be implemented in
three phases to reduce pendency and improve efficiency in reexamination
proceedings. In phase I, the USPTO will implement streamlined
procedures and optional programs in which patent owners and third party
requesters may elect to participate in order to gain the benefit of
shorter pendency. For example, the USPTO recently implemented the
streamlined procedure for appeal brief review in ex parte reexamination
proceedings. See Streamlined Procedure for Appeal Brief Review in Ex
Parte Reexamination Proceedings, 75 FR 29321 (May 25, 2010). In the
instant notice, the USPTO is implementing a pilot program in which
patent owners may waive the right to file a patent owner's statement in
response to a request from the USPTO. The USPTO will also publish
notices to implement additional optional procedures and seek public
comments on other procedural changes in the near future. In phases II
and III, the USPTO will consider the data gathered from phase I and the
feedback from the patent owners and other stakeholders, and implement
process changes through internal procedural changes, rule making that
includes opportunities for the public to comment, and/or administrative
proposals for statutory changes to enhance reexamination proceedings.
The USPTO welcomes feedback on improving its processes. Suggestions may
be directed to the Office of Patent Legal Administration at (571) 272-
7701 for the general examination process, or (571) 272-7703 for the
reexamination or reissue process.
II. Overview of the Pilot Program: As part of phase I to reduce
pendency and improve efficiency in ex parte reexamination proceedings,
the USPTO will implement a pilot program in which the USPTO will
contact the patent owner and request the optional waiver of the right
to file a patent owner's statement after the proceeding has been
granted a filing date and before the examiner begins his or her review.
This will enable the USPTO in suitable cases to issue the first Office
action on the merits (including an NIRC) together with or soon after
the order for reexamination, and thereby reduce the pendency of the
proceeding by about three to five months.
Under the current procedure, a patent owner may file a statement
under 35 U.S.C. 304 within two months from the issuance of an ex parte
reexamination order in a reexamination proceeding, and a third party
requester may file a reply (under 35 U.S.C. 304) to the patent owner's
statement within two months from the date of service of the patent
owner's statement. Last year, approximately ten percent of patent
owners filed a patent owner's statement under 35 U.S.C. 304 after the
USPTO had ordered an ex parte reexamination of a patent. When ex parte
reexamination is ordered, the examiner generally starts to prepare the
first Office action on the merits after the receipt of the patent
owner's statement and the third party requester's reply, or after the
expiration of the time period for filing the statement and reply. As of
March 31, 2010, the average time to order an ex parte reexamination
from the filing of an ex parte reexamination request was about two
months and the average time to issue a first Office action on the
merits from the filing of an ex parte reexamination request was between
seven to eight months.
If the patent owner waives the right to file a patent owner's
statement in response to a request from the USPTO, the examiner will be
able to act on the first Office action on the merits immediately after
determining that reexamination will be ordered, and in a suitable case
issue the reexamination order and the first Office action on the merits
(including an NIRC) at the same time. This will eliminate the delay of
waiting for a patent owner's statement and the third-party requester's
reply and will permit the examiner to utilize his or her time more
efficiently by drafting the order and the first Office action on the
merits (including an NIRC) together. Moreover, by performing the
threshold analysis of determining and preparing an action on the merits
concurrently when a request raises a substantial new question of
patentability (SNQ), the overall efficiency of the USPTO in performing
the reexamination process should be increased. The Central
Reexamination Unit (CRU) has experience in performing the threshold SNQ
analysis and concurrently preparing an Office action on the merits, and
the reexamination order and Office action are typically mailed together
in inter partes reexamination proceedings. See 37 CFR 1.935.
III. Waiver Procedure under the Pilot Program: Under the pilot
program for waiving the patent owner's statement announced in this
notice, the CRU will contact, via telephone, the patent owner to
request the optional waiver of the patent owner's statement after the
proceeding has been granted a filing date and before the examiner
begins his or her review. The telephone communication will be limited
to the CRU requesting the waiver of the patent owner's statement and
agreement (or non-agreement) to the waiver by the patent owner.
Discussion of the merits of the proceedings, e.g., the patentability of
claims in patents, will not be permitted. The CRU will make the
agreement or non-agreement of record in the reexamination file in an
interview summary and a copy will be mailed to the patent owner and any
third party requester. The patent owner is not required to complete a
written statement of the telephone communication under 37 CFR 1.560(b)
or otherwise, and such a statement should not be filed as it will slow
the process. If the patent owner agrees to the waiver of the right to
file a patent owner's statement, the examiner will typically issue the
reexamination order and the first Office action on the merits on the
same day as the order, or within a few days thereafter.
The Office intends to make available to the public statistics on
the number of patent owners that agree to waive the statement and the
impact on pendency due to waiving the statement right. This data is
expected to form a portion of the data used in the decision making
processes in phases II and III.
Dated: July 16, 2010.
David J. Kappos,
Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of
the United States Patent and Trademark Office.
[FR Doc. 2010-19337 Filed 8-4-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-16-P