Navigation and Navigable Waters; Technical, Organizational, and Conforming Amendments, Sector Puget Sound, WA, 47211-47212 [2010-19326]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 150 / Thursday, August 5, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
*
*
*
*
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
*
Approved: July 23, 2010.
M. Robb Hyde,
Commander, JAGC, U.S. Navy, Deputy
Assistant Judge Advocate General (Admiralty
and Maritime Law).
Dated: July 28, 2010.
D.J. Werner,
Lieutenant Commander, Office of the Judge
Advocate General, U.S. Navy, Federal
Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 2010–19206 Filed 8–4–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3810–FF–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Parts 3 and 165
[Docket No. USCG–2010–0351]
RIN 1625–ZA25
Small Entities
Regulatory Information
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered
whether this rule would have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises
small businesses, not-for-profit
organizations that are independently
owned and operated and are not
dominant in their fields, and
governmental jurisdictions with
populations of less than 50,000.
We estimate this rule will not impose
any additional costs and should have
little or no impact on small entities
because the provisions of this rule are
technical and non-substantive, and will
have no substantive effect on the public
and will impose no additional costs.
Therefore, the Coast Guard certifies
under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this final rule
will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
We did not publish a notice of
proposed rulemaking (NPRM) for this
rule. Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(3)(A), the
Coast Guard finds this rule is exempt
from notice and comment rulemaking
requirements because these changes
involve rules of agency organization,
procedure, or practice. In addition, the
Coast Guard finds notice and comment
procedure are unnecessary under 5
U.S.C. 553(b)(3)(B) as this rule consists
only of corrections and editorial,
organizational, and conforming
amendments and these changes will
have no substantive effect on the public.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast
Guard finds that, for the same reasons,
good cause exists for making this rule
effective upon publication in the
Federal Register.
Basis and Purpose
Navigation and Navigable Waters;
Technical, Organizational, and
Conforming Amendments, Sector
Puget Sound, WA
This rule makes technical and
editorial corrections to Title 33 parts 3
and 165 in the Code of Federal
Regulations. This rule does not create
any substantive requirements.
Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
Discussion of Rule
This rule makes nonsubstantive changes throughout our
regulations. The purpose of this rule is
to make conforming amendments and
technical corrections to reflect the
renaming of Sector Seattle to Sector
Puget Sound as part of the Coast Guard
reorganization.
DATES: This final rule is effective August
5, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Comments and material
received from the public, as well as
documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, are part
of docket USCG–2010–0351 and are
available for inspection or copying at
the Docket Management Facility (M–30),
U.S. Department of Transportation,
West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. You may also
find this docket on the Internet by going
to https://www.regulations.gov, inserting
USCG–2010–0351 in the ‘‘Keyword’’
box, and then clicking ‘‘Search.’’
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this rule, call or
e-mail Lt. Matthew Jones, Coast Guard;
telephone 206–220–7110, e-mail
Matthew.m.jones@uscg.mil. If you have
questions on viewing the docket, call
Renee V. Wright, Program Manager,
Docket Operations, telephone 202–366–
9826.
wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with RULES_PART 1
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:16 Aug 04, 2010
47211
Jkt 220001
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection
of information under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–
3520).
This rule revises 33 CFR parts 3 and
165 to reflect changes in Coast Guard
internal organizational structure. Sector
Seattle has been disestablished and
Sector Puget Sound has been
established in its place. This rule revises
33 CFR Parts 3 and 165 to reflect the
Sector name change in current
regulations. This rule is a technical
revision reflecting changes in agency
procedure and organization, and does
not indicate new authorities.
Federalism
Regulatory Analyses
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
We developed this rule after
considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on 13 of these statutes or
executive orders.
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or Tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this rule
will not result in such an expenditure,
we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant
regulatory action under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs
and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that
Order. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under that
Order. Because this rule involves nonsubstantive changes and internal agency
practices and procedures, it will not
impose any additional costs on the
public.
PO 00000
Frm 00041
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on State or local governments and
would either preempt State law or
impose a substantial direct cost of
compliance on them. We have analyzed
this rule under that Order and have
determined that it does not have
implications for federalism.
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not cause a taking of
private property or otherwise have
taking implications under Executive
Order 12630, Governmental Actions and
Interference with Constitutionally
Protected Property Rights.
E:\FR\FM\05AUR1.SGM
05AUR1
47212
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 150 / Thursday, August 5, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards
in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to
minimize litigation, eliminate
ambiguity, and reduce burden.
This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
Environment
This rule does not have Tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
Tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian Tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian Tribes.
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023–01 and
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
which guide the Coast Guard in
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have concluded that this action is one
of a category of actions that do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. This rule is categorically
excluded under section 2.B.2, figure 2–
1, paragraph (34) (a) of the Instruction.
This rule involves regulations which are
editorial and/or procedural, such as
those updating addresses or establishing
application procedures. An
environmental analysis checklist and a
categorical exclusion determination are
available in the docket where indicated
under ADDRESSES.
Energy Effects
33 CFR Part 3
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13045, Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not
an economically significant rule and
does not create an environmental risk to
health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
Technical Standards
wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with RULES_PART 1
3. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapter 701; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR
1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5; Pub. L.
107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of
Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
List of Subjects
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under that order because
it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. The Administrator of the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs
has not designated it as a significant
energy action. Therefore, it does not
require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use
voluntary consensus standards in their
regulatory activities unless the agency
provides Congress, through the Office of
Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:16 Aug 04, 2010
Jkt 220001
Dated: July 30, 2010.
Steve Venckus,
Chief, Office of Regulations and
Administrative Law, United States Coast
Guard.
[FR Doc. 2010–19326 Filed 8–3–10; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 100
Special Local Regulation for Marine
Events; Elizabeth River, Portsmouth,
VA
Harbors, Marine Safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and record keeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR parts 3 and 165 as follows:
■
PART 3—COAST GUARD AREAS,
DISTRICTS, SECTORS, MARINE
INSPECTION ZONES, AND CAPTAIN
OF THE PORT ZONES
1. The authority citation for part 3
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 14 U.S.C. 92, Pub. L. 107–296,
116 Stat. 2135; Department of Homeland
Security Delegation No. 0170.1, para. 2(23).
2. In § 3.65–10, revise the introductory
text to read as follows:
■
§ 3.65–10 Sector Puget Sound Marine
Inspection Zone and Captain of the Port
Zone.
Sector Puget Sound’s office is located
in Seattle, WA. The boundaries of
Sector Puget Sound’s Marine Inspection
and Captain of the Port Zones.
*
*
*
*
*
Fmt 4700
4. In § 165.1327(a), remove the phrase
‘‘Sector Seattle’’ and add, in its place, the
phrase ‘‘Sector Puget Sound’’.
■
RIN 1625–AA08
33 CFR Part 165
Frm 00042
[Amended]
[Docket No. USCG–2010–0713]
Organization and functions
(government agencies).
PO 00000
§ 165.1327
Sfmt 4700
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard is
establishing a special local regulation
during the USCG City of Portsmouth
Celebration Rowing Regatta on the
Elizabeth River. The event consists of a
series of crew rowing races to be held
on the waters of the Elizabeth River,
near Portsmouth, Virginia. This special
local regulation will restrict vessel
traffic and is necessary to provide for
the safety of life on navigable waters
during the event.
DATES: This rule is effective from 5 p.m.
to 7 p.m. on August 6, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Documents indicated in this
preamble as being available in the
docket, are part of docket USCG–2010–
0713 and are available online by going
to https://www.regulations.gov, inserting
USCG–2010–0713 in the ‘‘Keyword’’
box, and then clicking ‘‘Search.’’ This
material is also available for inspection
or copying at the Docket Management
Facility (M–30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground
Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590,
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\05AUR1.SGM
05AUR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 150 (Thursday, August 5, 2010)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 47211-47212]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-19326]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Parts 3 and 165
[Docket No. USCG-2010-0351]
RIN 1625-ZA25
Navigation and Navigable Waters; Technical, Organizational, and
Conforming Amendments, Sector Puget Sound, WA
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This rule makes non-substantive changes throughout our
regulations. The purpose of this rule is to make conforming amendments
and technical corrections to reflect the renaming of Sector Seattle to
Sector Puget Sound as part of the Coast Guard reorganization.
DATES: This final rule is effective August 5, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Comments and material received from the public, as well as
documents mentioned in this preamble as being available in the docket,
are part of docket USCG-2010-0351 and are available for inspection or
copying at the Docket Management Facility (M-30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. You may also find this
docket on the Internet by going to https://www.regulations.gov,
inserting USCG-2010-0351 in the ``Keyword'' box, and then clicking
``Search.''
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule,
call or e-mail Lt. Matthew Jones, Coast Guard; telephone 206-220-7110,
e-mail Matthew.m.jones@uscg.mil. If you have questions on viewing the
docket, call Renee V. Wright, Program Manager, Docket Operations,
telephone 202-366-9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulatory Information
We did not publish a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) for this
rule. Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(3)(A), the Coast Guard finds this rule is
exempt from notice and comment rulemaking requirements because these
changes involve rules of agency organization, procedure, or practice.
In addition, the Coast Guard finds notice and comment procedure are
unnecessary under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(3)(B) as this rule consists only of
corrections and editorial, organizational, and conforming amendments
and these changes will have no substantive effect on the public.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that, for the same
reasons, good cause exists for making this rule effective upon
publication in the Federal Register.
Basis and Purpose
This rule makes technical and editorial corrections to Title 33
parts 3 and 165 in the Code of Federal Regulations. This rule does not
create any substantive requirements.
Discussion of Rule
This rule revises 33 CFR parts 3 and 165 to reflect changes in
Coast Guard internal organizational structure. Sector Seattle has been
disestablished and Sector Puget Sound has been established in its
place. This rule revises 33 CFR Parts 3 and 165 to reflect the Sector
name change in current regulations. This rule is a technical revision
reflecting changes in agency procedure and organization, and does not
indicate new authorities.
Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on 13 of these statutes or executive orders.
Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant regulatory action under section 3(f)
of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs and benefits under section
6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and Budget has not
reviewed it under that Order. Because this rule involves non-
substantive changes and internal agency practices and procedures, it
will not impose any additional costs on the public.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered whether this rule would have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small entities''
comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are
independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields,
and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000.
We estimate this rule will not impose any additional costs and
should have little or no impact on small entities because the
provisions of this rule are technical and non-substantive, and will
have no substantive effect on the public and will impose no additional
costs. Therefore, the Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that
this final rule will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this rule under
that Order and have determined that it does not have implications for
federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or Tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not cause a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
[[Page 47212]]
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not an economically significant rule and does not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have Tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian Tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian Tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian Tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have concluded
that this action is one of a category of actions that do not
individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human
environment. This rule is categorically excluded under section 2.B.2,
figure 2-1, paragraph (34) (a) of the Instruction. This rule involves
regulations which are editorial and/or procedural, such as those
updating addresses or establishing application procedures. An
environmental analysis checklist and a categorical exclusion
determination are available in the docket where indicated under
ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects
33 CFR Part 3
Organization and functions (government agencies).
33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine Safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and record
keeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
0
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR parts 3 and 165 as follows:
PART 3--COAST GUARD AREAS, DISTRICTS, SECTORS, MARINE INSPECTION
ZONES, AND CAPTAIN OF THE PORT ZONES
0
1. The authority citation for part 3 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 14 U.S.C. 92, Pub. L. 107-296, 116 Stat. 2135;
Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1, para. 2(23).
0
2. In Sec. 3.65-10, revise the introductory text to read as follows:
Sec. 3.65-10 Sector Puget Sound Marine Inspection Zone and Captain of
the Port Zone.
Sector Puget Sound's office is located in Seattle, WA. The
boundaries of Sector Puget Sound's Marine Inspection and Captain of the
Port Zones.
* * * * *
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
3. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701; 50
U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; Pub. L.
107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1.
Sec. 165.1327 [Amended]
0
4. In Sec. 165.1327(a), remove the phrase ``Sector Seattle'' and add,
in its place, the phrase ``Sector Puget Sound''.
Dated: July 30, 2010.
Steve Venckus,
Chief, Office of Regulations and Administrative Law, United States
Coast Guard.
[FR Doc. 2010-19326 Filed 8-3-10; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE P