Certifications and Exemptions Under the International Regulations for Preventing Collisions at Sea, 1972, 47210-47211 [2010-19206]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
47210
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 150 / Thursday, August 5, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
39.19. Before using any approved AMOC on
any airplane to which the AMOC applies,
notify your principal maintenance inspector
(PMI) or principal avionics inspector (PAI),
as appropriate, or lacking a principal
inspector, your local Flight Standards District
Office. The AMOC approval letter must
specifically reference this AD. Material
Incorporated by Reference.
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Material Incorporated by Reference
AGENCY:
(j) You must use Boeing Service Bulletin
747–35A2101, Revision 1, dated May 15,
2003 to do the actions required by this AD,
unless the AD specifies otherwise.
(1) The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference of
this service information under 5 U.S.C.
552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
(2) For service information identified in
this AD, contact Boeing Commercial
Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services
Management, P. O. Box 3707, MC 2H–65,
Seattle, Washington 98124–2207; telephone
206–544–5000, extension 1; fax 206–766–
5680; e-mail me.boecom@boeing.com;
Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com.
(3) You may review copies of the service
information at the FAA, Transport Airplane
Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton,
Washington. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA, call
425–227–1221.
(4) You may also review copies of the
service information that is incorporated by
reference at the National Archives and
Records Administration (NARA). For
information on the availability of this
material at NARA, call 202–741–6030, or go
to: https://www.archives.gov/federal_register/
code_of_federal_regulations/
ibr_locations.html.
ACTION:
Issued in Renton, Washington, on July 16,
2010.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2010–18619 Filed 8–4–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
Department of the Navy
32 CFR Part 706
Certifications and Exemptions Under
the International Regulations for
Preventing Collisions at Sea, 1972
Department of the Navy, DoD.
Final rule.
The Department of the Navy
is amending its certifications and
exemptions under the International
Regulations for Preventing Collisions at
Sea, 1972 (72 COLREGS), to reflect that
the Deputy Assistant Judge Advocate
General (Admiralty and Maritime Law)
has determined that USS RUSSELL
(DDG 59) is a vessel of the Navy which,
due to its special construction and
purpose, cannot fully comply with
certain provisions of the 72 COLREGS
without interfering with its special
function as a naval ship. The intended
effect of this rule is to warn mariners in
waters where 72 COLREGS apply.
DATES: This rule is effective August 5,
2010 and is applicable beginning July
23, 2010.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Lieutenant Commander Ted Cook,
JAGC, U.S. Navy, Admiralty Attorney,
(Admiralty and Maritime Law), Office of
the Judge Advocate General, Department
of the Navy, 1322 Patterson Ave., SE.,
Suite 3000, Washington Navy Yard, DC
20374–5066, telephone number: 202–
685–5040.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant
to the authority granted in 33 U.S.C.
1605, the Department of the Navy
amends 32 CFR part 706.
This amendment provides notice that
the Deputy Assistant Judge Advocate
General (Admiralty and Maritime Law),
under authority delegated by the
Secretary of the Navy, has certified that
USS RUSSELL (DDG 59) is a vessel of
the Navy which, due to its special
construction and purpose, cannot fully
SUMMARY:
comply with the following specific
provisions of 72 COLREGS without
interfering with its special function as a
naval ship: Annex I, paragraph 3(a),
pertaining to the horizontal distance
between the forward and after masthead
lights; and, Rule 21(a) pertaining to the
forward masthead light arc of visibility.
The Deputy Assistant Judge Advocate
General (Admiralty and Maritime Law)
has also certified that the lights
involved are located in closest possible
compliance with the applicable 72
COLREGS requirements.
Moreover, it has been determined, in
accordance with 32 CFR parts 296 and
701, that publication of this amendment
for public comment prior to adoption is
impracticable, unnecessary, and
contrary to public interest since it is
based on technical findings that the
placement of lights on this vessel in a
manner differently from that prescribed
herein will adversely affect the vessel’s
ability to perform its military functions.
List of Subjects in 32 CFR Part 706
Marine safety, Navigation (water), and
Vessels.
■ For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, amend part 706 of title 32 of
the Code of Federal Regulations as
follows:
PART 706—CERTIFICATIONS AND
EXEMPTIONS UNDER THE
INTERNATIONAL REGULATIONS FOR
PREVENTING COLLISIONS AT SEA,
1972
1. The authority citation for part 706
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1605.
2. Section 706.2 is amended in Table
Four, Paragraph 16 by revising, in alpha
numerical order, by vessel number, an
entry for USS RUSSELL (DDG 59):
■
§ 706.2 Certifications of the Secretary of
the Navy under Executive Order 11964 and
33 U.S.C. 1605.
*
*
*
*
*
TABLE FOUR—PARAGRAPH 16
Obstruction angle relative ship’s
headings
wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with RULES_PART 1
Vessel
Number
*
*
*
USS RUSSELL ............................................................
*
*
DDG 59 ........................................................................
*
VerDate Mar<15>2010
*
15:16 Aug 04, 2010
*
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
*
Frm 00040
Fmt 4700
*
103.66 thru 112.50.°
*
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\05AUR1.SGM
*
05AUR1
*
*
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 150 / Thursday, August 5, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
*
*
*
*
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
*
Approved: July 23, 2010.
M. Robb Hyde,
Commander, JAGC, U.S. Navy, Deputy
Assistant Judge Advocate General (Admiralty
and Maritime Law).
Dated: July 28, 2010.
D.J. Werner,
Lieutenant Commander, Office of the Judge
Advocate General, U.S. Navy, Federal
Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 2010–19206 Filed 8–4–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3810–FF–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Parts 3 and 165
[Docket No. USCG–2010–0351]
RIN 1625–ZA25
Small Entities
Regulatory Information
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered
whether this rule would have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises
small businesses, not-for-profit
organizations that are independently
owned and operated and are not
dominant in their fields, and
governmental jurisdictions with
populations of less than 50,000.
We estimate this rule will not impose
any additional costs and should have
little or no impact on small entities
because the provisions of this rule are
technical and non-substantive, and will
have no substantive effect on the public
and will impose no additional costs.
Therefore, the Coast Guard certifies
under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this final rule
will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
We did not publish a notice of
proposed rulemaking (NPRM) for this
rule. Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(3)(A), the
Coast Guard finds this rule is exempt
from notice and comment rulemaking
requirements because these changes
involve rules of agency organization,
procedure, or practice. In addition, the
Coast Guard finds notice and comment
procedure are unnecessary under 5
U.S.C. 553(b)(3)(B) as this rule consists
only of corrections and editorial,
organizational, and conforming
amendments and these changes will
have no substantive effect on the public.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast
Guard finds that, for the same reasons,
good cause exists for making this rule
effective upon publication in the
Federal Register.
Basis and Purpose
Navigation and Navigable Waters;
Technical, Organizational, and
Conforming Amendments, Sector
Puget Sound, WA
This rule makes technical and
editorial corrections to Title 33 parts 3
and 165 in the Code of Federal
Regulations. This rule does not create
any substantive requirements.
Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
Discussion of Rule
This rule makes nonsubstantive changes throughout our
regulations. The purpose of this rule is
to make conforming amendments and
technical corrections to reflect the
renaming of Sector Seattle to Sector
Puget Sound as part of the Coast Guard
reorganization.
DATES: This final rule is effective August
5, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Comments and material
received from the public, as well as
documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, are part
of docket USCG–2010–0351 and are
available for inspection or copying at
the Docket Management Facility (M–30),
U.S. Department of Transportation,
West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. You may also
find this docket on the Internet by going
to https://www.regulations.gov, inserting
USCG–2010–0351 in the ‘‘Keyword’’
box, and then clicking ‘‘Search.’’
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this rule, call or
e-mail Lt. Matthew Jones, Coast Guard;
telephone 206–220–7110, e-mail
Matthew.m.jones@uscg.mil. If you have
questions on viewing the docket, call
Renee V. Wright, Program Manager,
Docket Operations, telephone 202–366–
9826.
wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with RULES_PART 1
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:16 Aug 04, 2010
47211
Jkt 220001
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection
of information under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–
3520).
This rule revises 33 CFR parts 3 and
165 to reflect changes in Coast Guard
internal organizational structure. Sector
Seattle has been disestablished and
Sector Puget Sound has been
established in its place. This rule revises
33 CFR Parts 3 and 165 to reflect the
Sector name change in current
regulations. This rule is a technical
revision reflecting changes in agency
procedure and organization, and does
not indicate new authorities.
Federalism
Regulatory Analyses
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
We developed this rule after
considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on 13 of these statutes or
executive orders.
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or Tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this rule
will not result in such an expenditure,
we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant
regulatory action under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs
and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that
Order. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under that
Order. Because this rule involves nonsubstantive changes and internal agency
practices and procedures, it will not
impose any additional costs on the
public.
PO 00000
Frm 00041
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on State or local governments and
would either preempt State law or
impose a substantial direct cost of
compliance on them. We have analyzed
this rule under that Order and have
determined that it does not have
implications for federalism.
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not cause a taking of
private property or otherwise have
taking implications under Executive
Order 12630, Governmental Actions and
Interference with Constitutionally
Protected Property Rights.
E:\FR\FM\05AUR1.SGM
05AUR1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 150 (Thursday, August 5, 2010)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 47210-47211]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-19206]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Navy
32 CFR Part 706
Certifications and Exemptions Under the International Regulations
for Preventing Collisions at Sea, 1972
AGENCY: Department of the Navy, DoD.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of the Navy is amending its certifications and
exemptions under the International Regulations for Preventing
Collisions at Sea, 1972 (72 COLREGS), to reflect that the Deputy
Assistant Judge Advocate General (Admiralty and Maritime Law) has
determined that USS RUSSELL (DDG 59) is a vessel of the Navy which, due
to its special construction and purpose, cannot fully comply with
certain provisions of the 72 COLREGS without interfering with its
special function as a naval ship. The intended effect of this rule is
to warn mariners in waters where 72 COLREGS apply.
DATES: This rule is effective August 5, 2010 and is applicable
beginning July 23, 2010.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lieutenant Commander Ted Cook, JAGC,
U.S. Navy, Admiralty Attorney, (Admiralty and Maritime Law), Office of
the Judge Advocate General, Department of the Navy, 1322 Patterson
Ave., SE., Suite 3000, Washington Navy Yard, DC 20374-5066, telephone
number: 202-685-5040.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to the authority granted in 33
U.S.C. 1605, the Department of the Navy amends 32 CFR part 706.
This amendment provides notice that the Deputy Assistant Judge
Advocate General (Admiralty and Maritime Law), under authority
delegated by the Secretary of the Navy, has certified that USS RUSSELL
(DDG 59) is a vessel of the Navy which, due to its special construction
and purpose, cannot fully comply with the following specific provisions
of 72 COLREGS without interfering with its special function as a naval
ship: Annex I, paragraph 3(a), pertaining to the horizontal distance
between the forward and after masthead lights; and, Rule 21(a)
pertaining to the forward masthead light arc of visibility. The Deputy
Assistant Judge Advocate General (Admiralty and Maritime Law) has also
certified that the lights involved are located in closest possible
compliance with the applicable 72 COLREGS requirements.
Moreover, it has been determined, in accordance with 32 CFR parts
296 and 701, that publication of this amendment for public comment
prior to adoption is impracticable, unnecessary, and contrary to public
interest since it is based on technical findings that the placement of
lights on this vessel in a manner differently from that prescribed
herein will adversely affect the vessel's ability to perform its
military functions.
List of Subjects in 32 CFR Part 706
Marine safety, Navigation (water), and Vessels.
0
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, amend part 706 of title 32
of the Code of Federal Regulations as follows:
PART 706--CERTIFICATIONS AND EXEMPTIONS UNDER THE INTERNATIONAL
REGULATIONS FOR PREVENTING COLLISIONS AT SEA, 1972
0
1. The authority citation for part 706 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1605.
0
2. Section 706.2 is amended in Table Four, Paragraph 16 by revising, in
alpha numerical order, by vessel number, an entry for USS RUSSELL (DDG
59):
Sec. 706.2 Certifications of the Secretary of the Navy under
Executive Order 11964 and 33 U.S.C. 1605.
* * * * *
Table Four--Paragraph 16
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Vessel Number Obstruction angle relative ship's headings
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
USS RUSSELL.......................... DDG 59................. 103.66 thru 112.50.[deg]
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 47211]]
* * * * *
Approved: July 23, 2010.
M. Robb Hyde,
Commander, JAGC, U.S. Navy, Deputy Assistant Judge Advocate General
(Admiralty and Maritime Law).
Dated: July 28, 2010.
D.J. Werner,
Lieutenant Commander, Office of the Judge Advocate General, U.S. Navy,
Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 2010-19206 Filed 8-4-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3810-FF-P
