Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Model 747-100, 747-100B, 747-100B SUD, 747-200B, 747-200C, 747-200F, 747-300, 747-400, 747-400D, 747-400F, 747SR, and 747SP Series Airplanes, 47208-47210 [2010-18619]
Download as PDF
47208
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 150 / Thursday, August 5, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
On June
29, 2010, the FAA issued AD 2010–14–
19, Amendment 39–16364 (75 FR
39814, July 13, 2010), for certain Airbus
Model A330–200 and –300 series
airplanes, and Model A340–200, –300,
–500 and –600 series airplanes. The AD
requires replacing or modifying the
Halon dual-filter assemblies of the flow
metering fire extinguishing system in
the forward and bulk cargo
compartments, as applicable.
As published, Note 3 of the AD
specifies in error Airbus Service
Bulletin A340–26–4038. The correct
service bulletin is Airbus Service
Bulletin A340–26–4030.
No other part of the regulatory
information has been changed;
therefore, the final rule is not
republished in the Federal Register.
The effective date of this AD remains
August 17, 2010.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
§ 39.13
[Corrected]
In the Federal Register of July 13,
2010, on page 39817, in the second and
third columns, Note 3 of AD 2010–14–
19 is corrected to read as follows:
*
*
*
*
*
■
Note 3: The Halon dual-filter assembly P/
N QA06753 is embodied in production
through Airbus modification 40041. The
Halon dual-filter assembly P/N QA06753–01
is only embodied in service through Airbus
Service Bulletin A330–26–3030 or Airbus
Service Bulletin A340–26–4030. The Halon
dual-filter assembly P/N QA06753–02 is
embodied in production through
modification 47197 or 47883 or 50108
(BCRC) and 51065 or 51329 (LDCC) or in
service through Airbus Service Bulletin
A330–26–3030 or Airbus Service Bulletin
A340–26–4030.
*
*
*
*
*
Issued in Renton, Washington, on July 27,
2010.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2010–19151 Filed 8–4–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2010–0045; Directorate
Identifier 2009–NM–085–AD; Amendment
39–16382; AD 2010–16–05]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing
Company Model 747–100, 747–100B,
747–100B SUD, 747–200B, 747–200C,
747–200F, 747–300, 747–400, 747–
400D, 747–400F, 747SR, and 747SP
Series Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
We are adopting a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for certain
Model 747 airplanes. This AD requires
inspecting to verify the part number of
the low-pressure flex-hoses of the crew
oxygen system installed under the
oxygen mask stowage boxes in the flight
deck, and replacing the flex-hose with a
new non-conductive low-pressure flexhose if necessary. This AD results from
reports of low-pressure flex-hoses of the
crew oxygen system that burned
through due to inadvertent electrical
current from a short circuit in the audio
select panel. We are issuing this AD to
prevent inadvertent electrical current,
which can cause the low-pressure flexhoses of the crew oxygen system to melt
or burn, causing oxygen system leakage
and smoke or fire.
DATES: This AD is effective September 9,
2010.
The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
of a certain publication listed in the AD
as of September 9, 2010.
ADDRESSES: For service information
identified in this AD, contact Boeing
Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data
& Services Management, P.O. Box 3707,
MC 2H–65, Seattle, Washington 98124–
2207; telephone 206–544–5000,
extension 1; fax 206–766–5680; e-mail
me.boecom@boeing.com; Internet
https://www.myboeingfleet.com.
SUMMARY:
wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with RULES_PART 1
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the
Docket Management Facility between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD
docket contains this AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and
other information. The address for the
Docket Office (telephone 800–647–5527)
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:16 Aug 04, 2010
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
is the Document Management Facility,
U.S. Department of Transportation,
Docket Operations, M–30, West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Susan L. Monroe, Aerospace Engineer,
Cabin Safety and Environmental
Systems Branch, ANM–150S, FAA,
Seattle Aircraft Certification Office,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington 98057–3356; telephone
(425) 917–6457; fax (425) 917–6590.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
We issued a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to include an airworthiness
directive (AD) that would apply to
certain Model 747 airplanes. That
NPRM was published in the Federal
Register on January 22, 2010 (75 FR
3658). That NPRM proposed to require
inspecting to verify the part number of
the low-pressure flex-hoses of the crew
oxygen system installed under the
oxygen mask stowage boxes in the flight
deck, and replacing the flex-hose with a
new non-conductive low-pressure flexhose if necessary.
Comments
We gave the public the opportunity to
participate in developing this AD. We
considered the comments received.
Support for the NPRM
Boeing concurs with the contents of
the NPRM, and the Air Line Pilots
Association, International (ALPA)
supports the intent of the NPRM.
Request To Shorten Compliance Time
ALPA requests that the 36-month
compliance time specified in the NPRM
be shortened given the potential
consequence of an oxygen-fed fire in the
vicinity of the flightcrew station.
We do not agree. In developing an
appropriate compliance time, we
considered the safety implications, parts
availability, and normal maintenance
schedules for timely accomplishment of
replacement of the fasteners. Further,
we arrived at the compliance time with
manufacturer concurrence. In
consideration of all of these factors, we
determined that the compliance time, as
proposed, represents an appropriate
interval in which the inspections can be
done in a timely manner within the
fleet, while still maintaining an
adequate level of safety. Operators are
always permitted to accomplish the
requirements of an AD at a time earlier
than the specified compliance time;
therefore, an operator may choose to do
E:\FR\FM\05AUR1.SGM
05AUR1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 150 / Thursday, August 5, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
the inspection before 36 months in
order to accomplish the requirements of
this AD. If additional data are presented
that would justify a shorter compliance
time, we may consider further
rulemaking on this issue. We have not
changed the AD in this regard.
Conclusion
We reviewed the relevant data,
considered the comments received, and
determined that air safety and the
public interest require adopting the AD
as proposed.
Explanation of Change to Costs of
Compliance
Since issuance of the NPRM, we have
increased the labor rate used in the
Costs of Compliance from $80 per workhour to $85 per work-hour. The Costs of
Compliance information, below, reflects
this increase in the specified hourly
labor rate.
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify that this AD:
(1) Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866,
(2) Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979), and
(3) Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
You can find our regulatory
evaluation and the estimated costs of
compliance in the AD Docket.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as
follows:
wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with RULES_PART 1
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this AD will affect
211 airplanes of U.S. registry. We also
estimate that it will take 1 work-hour
per product to comply with this AD.
The average labor rate is $85 per workhour. Based on these figures, we
estimate the cost of this proposed AD to
the U.S. operators to be $17,935, or $85
per product.
■
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. ‘‘Subtitle VII:
Aviation Programs,’’ describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in ‘‘Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701:
General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
§ 39.13
Regulatory Findings
This AD will not have federalism
implications under Executive Order
13132. This AD will not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on
the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:16 Aug 04, 2010
Jkt 220001
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
can cause the low-pressure flex-hoses of the
crew oxygen system to melt or burn, resulting
in oxygen system leakage and smoke or fire.
Compliance
(f) You are responsible for having the
actions required by this AD performed within
the compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.
Inspection
(g) Within 36 months after the effective
date of this AD, do an inspection to
determine whether any low-pressure flexhose of the crew oxygen system installed
under the oxygen mask stowage box in the
flight deck has a part number identified in
Table 1 of this AD. A review of airplane
maintenance records is acceptable in lieu of
this inspection if the part number of the lowpressure flex-hoses of the crew oxygen
system can be conclusively determined from
that review.
(1) For any hose having a part number
identified in Table 1 of this AD, before
further flight, replace the hose with a new or
serviceable part, in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing
Service Bulletin 747–35A2101, Revision 1,
dated May 15, 2003.
(2) For any hose not having a part number
identified in Table 1 of this AD, no further
action is required by this paragraph.
TABLE 1—APPLICABLE PART NUMBERS
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
■
Boeing specification part No.
Equivalent
hydraflow part
No.
60B50059–19 .......................
60B50059–20 .......................
60B50059–60 .......................
60B50059–62 .......................
60B50059–69 .......................
60B50059–70 .......................
60B50059–81 .......................
60B50059–94 .......................
60B50059–95 .......................
60B50059–101 .....................
60B50059–129 .....................
38001–19
38001–20
38001–60
38001–62
38001–69
38001–70
38001–81
38001–94
38001–95
38001–101
38001–129
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
the following new AD:
■
2010–16–05 The Boeing Company:
Amendment 39–16382. Docket No.
FAA–2010–0045; Directorate Identifier
2009–NM–085–AD.
Effective Date
(a) This airworthiness directive (AD) is
effective September 9, 2010.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to The Boeing
Company Model 747–100, 747–100B, 747–
100B SUD, 747–200B, 747–200C, 747–200F,
747–300, 747–400, 747–400D, 747–400F,
747SR, and 747SP series airplanes,
certificated in any category; line numbers 1
through 1229 inclusive.
Subject
(d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of
America Code 35: Oxygen.
Unsafe Condition
(e) This AD results from reports of lowpressure flex-hoses of the crew oxygen
system that burned through due to
inadvertent electrical current from a short
circuit in the audio select panel. The Federal
Aviation Administration is issuing this AD to
prevent inadvertent electrical current, which
PO 00000
Frm 00039
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
47209
Parts Installation
(h) As of the effective date of this AD, no
person may install on any airplane a crew
oxygen hose with a part number identified in
Table 1 of this AD.
Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
(i)(1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft
Certification Office (ACO), FAA, has the
authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if
requested using the procedures found in 14
CFR 39.19. Send information to Attn: Susan
L. Monroe, Aerospace Engineer, Cabin Safety
and Environmental Systems Branch, ANM–
150S, FAA, Seattle Aircraft Certification
Office, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton,
Washington 98057–3356; telephone (425)
917–6457; fax (425) 917–6590. Or, e-mail
information to 9-ANM-Seattle-ACO-AMOCRequests@faa.gov.
(2) To request a different method of
compliance or a different compliance time
for this AD, follow the procedures in 14 CFR
E:\FR\FM\05AUR1.SGM
05AUR1
47210
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 150 / Thursday, August 5, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
39.19. Before using any approved AMOC on
any airplane to which the AMOC applies,
notify your principal maintenance inspector
(PMI) or principal avionics inspector (PAI),
as appropriate, or lacking a principal
inspector, your local Flight Standards District
Office. The AMOC approval letter must
specifically reference this AD. Material
Incorporated by Reference.
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Material Incorporated by Reference
AGENCY:
(j) You must use Boeing Service Bulletin
747–35A2101, Revision 1, dated May 15,
2003 to do the actions required by this AD,
unless the AD specifies otherwise.
(1) The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference of
this service information under 5 U.S.C.
552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
(2) For service information identified in
this AD, contact Boeing Commercial
Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services
Management, P. O. Box 3707, MC 2H–65,
Seattle, Washington 98124–2207; telephone
206–544–5000, extension 1; fax 206–766–
5680; e-mail me.boecom@boeing.com;
Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com.
(3) You may review copies of the service
information at the FAA, Transport Airplane
Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton,
Washington. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA, call
425–227–1221.
(4) You may also review copies of the
service information that is incorporated by
reference at the National Archives and
Records Administration (NARA). For
information on the availability of this
material at NARA, call 202–741–6030, or go
to: https://www.archives.gov/federal_register/
code_of_federal_regulations/
ibr_locations.html.
ACTION:
Issued in Renton, Washington, on July 16,
2010.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2010–18619 Filed 8–4–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
Department of the Navy
32 CFR Part 706
Certifications and Exemptions Under
the International Regulations for
Preventing Collisions at Sea, 1972
Department of the Navy, DoD.
Final rule.
The Department of the Navy
is amending its certifications and
exemptions under the International
Regulations for Preventing Collisions at
Sea, 1972 (72 COLREGS), to reflect that
the Deputy Assistant Judge Advocate
General (Admiralty and Maritime Law)
has determined that USS RUSSELL
(DDG 59) is a vessel of the Navy which,
due to its special construction and
purpose, cannot fully comply with
certain provisions of the 72 COLREGS
without interfering with its special
function as a naval ship. The intended
effect of this rule is to warn mariners in
waters where 72 COLREGS apply.
DATES: This rule is effective August 5,
2010 and is applicable beginning July
23, 2010.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Lieutenant Commander Ted Cook,
JAGC, U.S. Navy, Admiralty Attorney,
(Admiralty and Maritime Law), Office of
the Judge Advocate General, Department
of the Navy, 1322 Patterson Ave., SE.,
Suite 3000, Washington Navy Yard, DC
20374–5066, telephone number: 202–
685–5040.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant
to the authority granted in 33 U.S.C.
1605, the Department of the Navy
amends 32 CFR part 706.
This amendment provides notice that
the Deputy Assistant Judge Advocate
General (Admiralty and Maritime Law),
under authority delegated by the
Secretary of the Navy, has certified that
USS RUSSELL (DDG 59) is a vessel of
the Navy which, due to its special
construction and purpose, cannot fully
SUMMARY:
comply with the following specific
provisions of 72 COLREGS without
interfering with its special function as a
naval ship: Annex I, paragraph 3(a),
pertaining to the horizontal distance
between the forward and after masthead
lights; and, Rule 21(a) pertaining to the
forward masthead light arc of visibility.
The Deputy Assistant Judge Advocate
General (Admiralty and Maritime Law)
has also certified that the lights
involved are located in closest possible
compliance with the applicable 72
COLREGS requirements.
Moreover, it has been determined, in
accordance with 32 CFR parts 296 and
701, that publication of this amendment
for public comment prior to adoption is
impracticable, unnecessary, and
contrary to public interest since it is
based on technical findings that the
placement of lights on this vessel in a
manner differently from that prescribed
herein will adversely affect the vessel’s
ability to perform its military functions.
List of Subjects in 32 CFR Part 706
Marine safety, Navigation (water), and
Vessels.
■ For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, amend part 706 of title 32 of
the Code of Federal Regulations as
follows:
PART 706—CERTIFICATIONS AND
EXEMPTIONS UNDER THE
INTERNATIONAL REGULATIONS FOR
PREVENTING COLLISIONS AT SEA,
1972
1. The authority citation for part 706
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1605.
2. Section 706.2 is amended in Table
Four, Paragraph 16 by revising, in alpha
numerical order, by vessel number, an
entry for USS RUSSELL (DDG 59):
■
§ 706.2 Certifications of the Secretary of
the Navy under Executive Order 11964 and
33 U.S.C. 1605.
*
*
*
*
*
TABLE FOUR—PARAGRAPH 16
Obstruction angle relative ship’s
headings
wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with RULES_PART 1
Vessel
Number
*
*
*
USS RUSSELL ............................................................
*
*
DDG 59 ........................................................................
*
VerDate Mar<15>2010
*
15:16 Aug 04, 2010
*
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
*
Frm 00040
Fmt 4700
*
103.66 thru 112.50.°
*
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\05AUR1.SGM
*
05AUR1
*
*
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 150 (Thursday, August 5, 2010)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 47208-47210]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-18619]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2010-0045; Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-085-AD;
Amendment 39-16382; AD 2010-16-05]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Model 747-100, 747-
100B, 747-100B SUD, 747-200B, 747-200C, 747-200F, 747-300, 747-400,
747-400D, 747-400F, 747SR, and 747SP Series Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain
Model 747 airplanes. This AD requires inspecting to verify the part
number of the low-pressure flex-hoses of the crew oxygen system
installed under the oxygen mask stowage boxes in the flight deck, and
replacing the flex-hose with a new non-conductive low-pressure flex-
hose if necessary. This AD results from reports of low-pressure flex-
hoses of the crew oxygen system that burned through due to inadvertent
electrical current from a short circuit in the audio select panel. We
are issuing this AD to prevent inadvertent electrical current, which
can cause the low-pressure flex-hoses of the crew oxygen system to melt
or burn, causing oxygen system leakage and smoke or fire.
DATES: This AD is effective September 9, 2010.
The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of a certain publication listed in the AD as of September 9,
2010.
ADDRESSES: For service information identified in this AD, contact
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services Management,
P.O. Box 3707, MC 2H-65, Seattle, Washington 98124-2207; telephone 206-
544-5000, extension 1; fax 206-766-5680; e-mail me.boecom@boeing.com;
Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Management Facility
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this AD, the regulatory evaluation,
any comments received, and other information. The address for the
Docket Office (telephone 800-647-5527) is the Document Management
Facility, U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30,
West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Susan L. Monroe, Aerospace Engineer,
Cabin Safety and Environmental Systems Branch, ANM-150S, FAA, Seattle
Aircraft Certification Office, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington 98057-3356; telephone (425) 917-6457; fax (425) 917-6590.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to include an airworthiness directive (AD) that would apply to
certain Model 747 airplanes. That NPRM was published in the Federal
Register on January 22, 2010 (75 FR 3658). That NPRM proposed to
require inspecting to verify the part number of the low-pressure flex-
hoses of the crew oxygen system installed under the oxygen mask stowage
boxes in the flight deck, and replacing the flex-hose with a new non-
conductive low-pressure flex-hose if necessary.
Comments
We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this AD. We considered the comments received.
Support for the NPRM
Boeing concurs with the contents of the NPRM, and the Air Line
Pilots Association, International (ALPA) supports the intent of the
NPRM.
Request To Shorten Compliance Time
ALPA requests that the 36-month compliance time specified in the
NPRM be shortened given the potential consequence of an oxygen-fed fire
in the vicinity of the flightcrew station.
We do not agree. In developing an appropriate compliance time, we
considered the safety implications, parts availability, and normal
maintenance schedules for timely accomplishment of replacement of the
fasteners. Further, we arrived at the compliance time with manufacturer
concurrence. In consideration of all of these factors, we determined
that the compliance time, as proposed, represents an appropriate
interval in which the inspections can be done in a timely manner within
the fleet, while still maintaining an adequate level of safety.
Operators are always permitted to accomplish the requirements of an AD
at a time earlier than the specified compliance time; therefore, an
operator may choose to do
[[Page 47209]]
the inspection before 36 months in order to accomplish the requirements
of this AD. If additional data are presented that would justify a
shorter compliance time, we may consider further rulemaking on this
issue. We have not changed the AD in this regard.
Conclusion
We reviewed the relevant data, considered the comments received,
and determined that air safety and the public interest require adopting
the AD as proposed.
Explanation of Change to Costs of Compliance
Since issuance of the NPRM, we have increased the labor rate used
in the Costs of Compliance from $80 per work-hour to $85 per work-hour.
The Costs of Compliance information, below, reflects this increase in
the specified hourly labor rate.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this AD will affect 211 airplanes of U.S.
registry. We also estimate that it will take 1 work-hour per product to
comply with this AD. The average labor rate is $85 per work-hour. Based
on these figures, we estimate the cost of this proposed AD to the U.S.
operators to be $17,935, or $85 per product.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
This AD will not have federalism implications under Executive Order
13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct effect on the States,
on the relationship between the national government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
(1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
(2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979), and
(3) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
You can find our regulatory evaluation and the estimated costs of
compliance in the AD Docket.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
0
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new AD:
2010-16-05 The Boeing Company: Amendment 39-16382. Docket No. FAA-
2010-0045; Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-085-AD.
Effective Date
(a) This airworthiness directive (AD) is effective September 9,
2010.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to The Boeing Company Model 747-100, 747-
100B, 747-100B SUD, 747-200B, 747-200C, 747-200F, 747-300, 747-400,
747-400D, 747-400F, 747SR, and 747SP series airplanes, certificated
in any category; line numbers 1 through 1229 inclusive.
Subject
(d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 35: Oxygen.
Unsafe Condition
(e) This AD results from reports of low-pressure flex-hoses of
the crew oxygen system that burned through due to inadvertent
electrical current from a short circuit in the audio select panel.
The Federal Aviation Administration is issuing this AD to prevent
inadvertent electrical current, which can cause the low-pressure
flex-hoses of the crew oxygen system to melt or burn, resulting in
oxygen system leakage and smoke or fire.
Compliance
(f) You are responsible for having the actions required by this
AD performed within the compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.
Inspection
(g) Within 36 months after the effective date of this AD, do an
inspection to determine whether any low-pressure flex-hose of the
crew oxygen system installed under the oxygen mask stowage box in
the flight deck has a part number identified in Table 1 of this AD.
A review of airplane maintenance records is acceptable in lieu of
this inspection if the part number of the low-pressure flex-hoses of
the crew oxygen system can be conclusively determined from that
review.
(1) For any hose having a part number identified in Table 1 of
this AD, before further flight, replace the hose with a new or
serviceable part, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions
of Boeing Service Bulletin 747-35A2101, Revision 1, dated May 15,
2003.
(2) For any hose not having a part number identified in Table 1
of this AD, no further action is required by this paragraph.
Table 1--Applicable Part Numbers
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Equivalent
Boeing specification part No. hydraflow part
No.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
60B50059-19............................................. 38001-19
60B50059-20............................................. 38001-20
60B50059-60............................................. 38001-60
60B50059-62............................................. 38001-62
60B50059-69............................................. 38001-69
60B50059-70............................................. 38001-70
60B50059-81............................................. 38001-81
60B50059-94............................................. 38001-94
60B50059-95............................................. 38001-95
60B50059-101............................................ 38001-101
60B50059-129............................................ 38001-129
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Parts Installation
(h) As of the effective date of this AD, no person may install
on any airplane a crew oxygen hose with a part number identified in
Table 1 of this AD.
Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)
(i)(1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office (ACO),
FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested
using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. Send information to
Attn: Susan L. Monroe, Aerospace Engineer, Cabin Safety and
Environmental Systems Branch, ANM-150S, FAA, Seattle Aircraft
Certification Office, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, Washington
98057-3356; telephone (425) 917-6457; fax (425) 917-6590. Or, e-mail
information to 9-ANM-Seattle-ACO-AMOC-Requests@faa.gov.
(2) To request a different method of compliance or a different
compliance time for this AD, follow the procedures in 14 CFR
[[Page 47210]]
39.19. Before using any approved AMOC on any airplane to which the
AMOC applies, notify your principal maintenance inspector (PMI) or
principal avionics inspector (PAI), as appropriate, or lacking a
principal inspector, your local Flight Standards District Office.
The AMOC approval letter must specifically reference this AD.
Material Incorporated by Reference.
Material Incorporated by Reference
(j) You must use Boeing Service Bulletin 747-35A2101, Revision
1, dated May 15, 2003 to do the actions required by this AD, unless
the AD specifies otherwise.
(1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference of this service information under 5
U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
(2) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services Management,
P. O. Box 3707, MC 2H-65, Seattle, Washington 98124-2207; telephone
206-544-5000, extension 1; fax 206-766-5680; e-mail
me.boecom@boeing.com; Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com.
(3) You may review copies of the service information at the FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton,
Washington. For information on the availability of this material at
the FAA, call 425-227-1221.
(4) You may also review copies of the service information that
is incorporated by reference at the National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this
material at NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: https://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on July 16, 2010.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2010-18619 Filed 8-4-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P