Special Conditions: Bombardier Inc. Model CL-600-2E25 Series Airplane; Passenger Seats With Non-Traditional, Large, Non-Metallic Panels, 46840-46843 [2010-19072]
Download as PDF
46840
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 149 / Wednesday, August 4, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
jdjones on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with RULES
standards for flammability of seat
cushions will greatly inhibit
involvement of the seats.’’
In the late 1990s, when it became
clear that seat designs were evolving to
include large non-metallic panels with
surface areas that would impact
survivability during a cabin-fire event
compared to partitions or galleys, the
FAA issued Policy Memorandum 97–
112–39. This memo noted that largesurface-area panels must comply with
heat-release and smoke-emission
requirements, even if they were attached
to a seat. If the FAA had not issued such
policy, seat designs would have been
viewed as a loophole to the
airworthiness standards that would
result in an unacceptable decrease in
survivability during a cabin-fire event.
Applicability
As discussed above, these special
conditions are applicable to the ERJ
190–100. Should Embraer apply at a
later date for a change to the type
certificate to include another model
incorporating the same novel or unusual
design feature, the special conditions
would apply to that model as well.
As discussed above, these special
conditions are applicable to Embraer
ERJ 190–100 series airplanes. It is not
our intent, however, to require seats
with non-traditional, large, non-metallic
panels to meet § 25.853, which calls out
appendix F, parts IV and V, if they are
installed in cabins of airplanes that
otherwise are not required to meet these
standards. Because the heat-release and
smoke-emission testing requirements of
§ 25.853, per appendix F, parts IV and
V, are not part of the type-certification
basis of the Model ERJ 190–100, these
special conditions are only applicable if
the Model ERJ 190–100 series airplanes
are in 14 CFR part 121 operations.
Section 121.312 requires compliance
with the heat-release and smokeemission testing requirements of
§ 25.853, for certain airplanes,
irrespective of the type-certification
bases of those airplanes. For Model ERJ
190–100 series airplanes, these are the
airplanes that would be affected by
these special conditions. Should
Embraer apply at a later date for a
supplemental type certificate to modify
any other model included on Type
Certificate No. A57NM, to incorporate
the same novel or unusual design
feature, the special conditions would
apply to that model as well.
Conclusion
This action affects only certain novel
or unusual design features on one
model-series of airplanes. It is not a rule
of general applicability and affects only
VerDate Mar<15>2010
12:40 Aug 03, 2010
Jkt 220001
the applicant who applied to the FAA
for approval of these features on the
airplane.
Under standard practice, the effective
date of final special conditions would
be 30 days after the date of publication
in the Federal Register; however, as the
return-to-service date for the Embraer
ERJ 190–100 series airplane is
imminent, the FAA finds that good
cause exists to make these special
conditions effective upon issuance.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on June 29,
2010.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 25
14 CFR Part 25
Aircraft, Aviation safety, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements.
The authority citation for these
special conditions is as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701,
44702, 44704.
The Special Conditions
Accordingly, pursuant to the
authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the following special
conditions are issued as part of the typecertification basis for Embraer ERJ 190–
100 series airplanes.
1. Except as provided in paragraph 3
of these special conditions, compliance
with 14 CFR part 25, appendix F, parts
IV and V, heat release and smoke
emission, is required for seats that
incorporate non-traditional, large, nonmetallic panels that may be either a
single component or multiple
components in a concentrated area in
their design.
2. The applicant may designate up to
and including 1.5 square feet of nontraditional, non-metallic panel material
per seat place that does not have to
comply with special condition (1),
above. A triple-seat assembly may have
a total of 4.5 square feet excluded on
any portion of the assembly (e.g.,
outboard-seat place 1 square foot;
middle, 1 square foot; and inboard, 2.5
square feet).
3. Seats do not have to meet the test
requirements of 14 CFR part 25,
appendix F, parts IV and V, when
installed in compartments that are not
otherwise required to meet these
requirements. Examples include:
a. Airplanes with passenger capacities
of 19 or fewer,
b. Airplanes that do not have § 25.853,
Amendment 25–61 or later, in their
certification basis and do not need to
comply with the requirements of 14 CFR
121.312, and
c. Airplanes exempted from § 25.853,
Amendment 25–61 or later.
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
[FR Doc. 2010–19071 Filed 8–3–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
[Docket No. NM431; Special Conditions No.
25–409–SC]
Special Conditions: Bombardier Inc.
Model CL–600–2E25 Series Airplane;
Passenger Seats With Non-Traditional,
Large, Non-Metallic Panels
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final special conditions; request
for comments.
AGENCY:
These special conditions are
issued for the Bombardier Inc. Model
CL–600–2E25 Series Airplane. These
airplanes will have a novel or unusual
design feature associated with seats that
include non-traditional, large, nonmetallic panels that would affect
survivability during a post-crash fire
event. The applicable airworthiness
regulations do not contain adequate or
appropriate safety standards for this
design feature. These special conditions
contain the additional safety standards
that the Administrator considers
necessary to establish a level of safety
equivalent to that established by the
existing airworthiness standards.
DATES: The effective date of these
special conditions is July 27, 2010. We
must receive your comments by
September 20, 2010.
ADDRESSES: You must mail two copies
of your comments to: Federal Aviation
Administration, Transport Airplane
Directorate, Attn: Rules Docket (ANM–
113), Docket No. NM431, 1601 Lind
Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington
98057–3356. You may deliver two
copies to the Transport Airplane
Directorate at the above address. You
must mark your comments: Docket No.
NM431. You can inspect comments in
the Rules Docket weekdays, except
Federal holidays, between 7:30 a.m. and
4 p.m.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Alan Sinclair, FAA, Airframe/Cabin
Safety Branch, ANM–115, Transport
Airplane Directorate, Aircraft
Certification Service, 1601 Lind
Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington
98057–3356; telephone (425) 227–2195;
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\04AUR1.SGM
04AUR1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 149 / Wednesday, August 4, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
facsimile (425) 227–1232; e-mail
alan.sinclair@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA
has determined that notice of and
opportunity for prior public comment
on these special conditions is
impracticable and would significantly
delay issuance of the design approval
and thus delivery of the affected aircraft.
The substance of these special
conditions has previously been subject
to the public-comment process and
received no substantive comments. The
FAA therefore finds that good cause
exists for making these special
conditions effective upon issuance.
jdjones on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with RULES
Comments Invited
We invite interested people to take
part in this rulemaking by sending
written comments, data, or views. The
most helpful comments reference a
specific portion of the special
conditions, explain the reason for any
recommended change, and include
supporting data. We ask that you send
us two copies of written comments.
We will file in the docket all
comments we receive, as well as a
report summarizing each substantive
public contact with FAA personnel
about these special conditions. You can
inspect the docket before and after the
comment closing date. If you wish to
review the docket in person, go to the
address in the ADDRESSES section of this
preamble between 7:30 a.m. and 4 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays.
We will consider all comments we
receive by the closing date for
comments. We will consider comments
filed late if it is possible to do so
without incurring expense or delay. We
may change these special conditions
based on the comments we receive.
If you want us to let you know we
received your comments on these
special conditions, send us a selfaddressed, stamped postcard on which
the docket number appears. We will
stamp the date on the postcard and mail
it back to you.
Background
On February 28, 2007, Bombardier
Inc., 400 Cote Vertu West, Dorval,
Quebec, Canada, H4S 1Y9, applied for
an amended type certificate for the
Bombardier Model CL–600–2E25
airplane to be identified on Type
Certificate Data Sheet (TCDS) No.
A21EA. The Model CL–600–2E25 series
airplane will be a swept-wing, T-tail,
twin-engine, fuselage-mounted
turbofan-powered, single-aisle, mediumsized, transport-category airplane.
The applicable airplane regulations,
currently approved under Title 14, Code
VerDate Mar<15>2010
12:40 Aug 03, 2010
Jkt 220001
of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) part 25,
do not require seats to meet the morestringent flammability standards
required of large, non-metallic panels in
the cabin interior. At the time the
applicable rules were written, seats
were designed with a metal frame
covered by fabric, not with large, nonmetallic panels. Seats also met the thenrecently adopted standards for
flammability of seat cushions. With the
seat design being mostly fabric and
metal, the contribution to a fire in the
cabin had been minimized and was not
considered a threat. For these reasons,
seats did not need to be tested to heatrelease and smoke-emission
requirements.
Seat designs have now evolved to
occasionally include non-traditional,
large, non-metallic panels. Taken in
total, the surface area of these panels is
on the same order as the sidewall and
overhead stowage bin interior panels.
To provide the level of passenger
protection intended by the
airworthiness standards, these nontraditional, large, non-metallic panels in
the cabin must meet the standards of
part 25, Appendix F, parts IV and V,
heat-release and smoke-emission
requirements.
Type Certification Basis
Under provisions of 14 CFR 21.17,
Bombardier must show that the Model
CL–600–2E25 series airplane meets the
applicable provisions of part 25, as
amended by Amendments 25–1 through
25–119. If the Administrator finds that
the applicable airworthiness regulations
do not contain adequate or appropriate
safety standards for the Model CL–600–
2E25 airplane because of a novel or
unusual design feature, special
conditions are prescribed under
provisions of 14 CFR 21.16.
In addition to the applicable
airworthiness regulations and special
conditions, the Model CL–600–2E25
series airplanes must comply with the
fuel vent and exhaust emission
requirements of 14 CFR part 34 and the
noise certification requirements of 14
CFR part 36. In addition, the FAA must
issue a finding of regulatory adequacy
pursuant to section 611 of Public Law
92–574, the ‘‘Noise Control Act of 1972.’’
Special conditions, as defined in 14
CFR 11.19, are issued in accordance
with § 11.38 and become part of the type
certification basis in accordance with
§ 21.17(a)(2).
Special conditions are initially
applicable to the model for which they
are issued. Should the type certificate
for that model be amended later to
include any other model that
incorporates the same or similar novel
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
46841
or unusual design feature, the special
conditions would also apply to the other
model under the provisions of § 21.101.
Novel or Unusual Design Features
The Model CL–600–2E25 series
airplanes will incorporate the following
novel or unusual design feature: These
models offer interior arrangements that
include passenger seats that incorporate
non-traditional, large, non-metallic
panels in lieu of the traditional metal
frame covered by fabric. The
flammability properties of these panels
have been shown to significantly affect
the survivability of occupants of the
cabin in the event of fire. These seats are
considered a novel design for transportcategory airplanes that include
Amendment 25–61 and Amendment
25–66 in the certification basis, and
were not considered when those
airworthiness standards were
established.
The existing regulations do not
provide adequate or appropriate safety
standards for seat designs that
incorporate non-traditional, large, nonmetallic panels. To provide a level of
safety equivalent to that provided by the
balance of the cabin, additional
airworthiness standards, in the form of
special conditions, are necessary. These
special conditions supplement § 25.853.
The requirements contained in these
special conditions consist of applying
the identical test conditions, required of
all other large panels in the cabin, to
seats with non-traditional, large, nonmetallic panels.
Definition of ‘‘Non-Traditional, Large,
Non-Metallic Panel’’
A non-traditional, large, non-metallic
panel, in this case, is defined as a panel
with exposed-surface areas greater than
1.5 square feet installed per seat place.
The panel may consist of either a single
component or multiple components in a
concentrated area. Examples of parts of
the seat where these non-traditional
panels are installed include, but are not
limited to: seat backs, bottoms and leg/
foot rests, kick panels, back shells, and
credenzas and associated furniture.
Examples of traditional exempted parts
of the seat include: arm caps, armrest
close-outs such as end bays and armreststyled center consoles, food trays, and
video monitors and shrouds.
Clarification of ‘‘Exposed’’
‘‘Exposed’’ is considered to include
those panels directly exposed to the
passenger cabin in the traditional sense,
plus those panels enveloped such as by
a dress cover. Traditional fabrics or
leathers currently used on seats are
excluded from these special conditions.
E:\FR\FM\04AUR1.SGM
04AUR1
46842
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 149 / Wednesday, August 4, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
These materials must still comply with
§ 25.853(a) and § 25.853(c) if used as a
covering for a seat cushion, or
§ 25.853(a) if installed elsewhere on the
seat. Non-traditional, large, non-metallic
panels covered with traditional fabrics
or leathers will be tested without their
coverings or covering attachments.
jdjones on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with RULES
Discussion
In the early 1980s, the FAA
conducted extensive research on the
effects of post-crash flammability in the
passenger cabin. As a result of this
research and service experience, the
FAA adopted new standards for interior
surfaces associated with large-surfacearea parts. Specifically, the rules require
measurement of heat release and smoke
emission (part 25, Appendix F, parts IV
and V) for the affected parts. Heat
release has been shown to have a direct
correlation with post-crash fire-survival
time. Materials that comply with the
standards (i.e., § 25.853 entitled
‘‘Compartment interiors’’ as amended by
Amendment 25–61 and Amendment
25–66) extend survival time by
approximately 2 minutes over materials
that do not comply.
At the time these standards were
written, the potential application of the
requirements of heat release and smoke
emission to seats was explored. The seat
frame itself was not a concern because
it was primarily made of aluminum and
contained only small amounts of nonmetallic materials. The FAA determined
that the overall effect on survivability
was negligible, whether or not the food
trays met the heat-release and smoke
requirements. The requirements,
therefore, did not address seats. The
preambles to both the Notice of
Proposed Rule Making (NPRM), Notice
No. 85–10 (50 FR 15038, April 16,
1985), and the Final Rule at
Amendment 25–61 (51 FR 26206, July
21, 1986), specifically note that seats
were excluded ‘‘because the recentlyadopted standards for flammability of
seat cushions will greatly inhibit
involvement of the seats.’’
Subsequently, the Final Rule at
Amendment 25–83 (60 FR 6615, March
6, 1995) clarified the definition of
minimum panel size:
It is not possible to cite a specific size that
will apply in all installations; however, as a
general rule, components with exposedsurface areas of one square foot or less may
be considered small enough that they do not
have to meet the new standards. Components
with exposed-surface areas greater than two
square feet may be considered large enough
that they do have to meet the new standards.
Those with exposed-surface areas greater
than one square foot, but less than two square
feet, must be considered in conjunction with
the areas of the cabin in which they are
VerDate Mar<15>2010
12:40 Aug 03, 2010
Jkt 220001
installed before a determination could be
made.
In the late 1990s, the FAA issued
Policy Memorandum 97–112–39,
‘‘Guidance for Flammability Testing of
Seat/Console Installations,’’ October 17,
1997 (https://rgl.faa.gov). That memo
was issued when it became clear that
seat designs were evolving to include
large, non-metallic panels with surface
areas that would impact survivability
during a cabin-fire event, comparable to
partitions or galleys. The memo noted
that large-surface-area panels must
comply with heat-release and smokeemission requirements, even if they
were attached to a seat. If the FAA had
not issued such policy, seat designs
could have been viewed as a loophole
to the airworthiness standards that
would result in an unacceptable
decrease in survivability during a cabin
fire event.
In October 2004, the FAA examined
the appropriate flammability standards
for passenger seats installed on
transport-category airplanes that
incorporated non-traditional, large, nonmetallic panels in lieu of the traditional
metal covered by fabric. The FAA
reviewed this design and determined
that it represented the kind and quantity
of material that should be required to
pass the heat-release and smokeemissions requirements. The FAA has
determined that special conditions
would be issued to apply the standards
defined in § 25.853(d) to seats with
large, non-metallic panels in their
design.
Applicability
Because the heat-release and smokeemission testing requirements of
§ 25.853 are part of the type certification
basis for the Model CL–600–2E25 series
airplane, these special conditions are
applicable to the Model CL–600–2E25
series airplane. Should Bombardier
apply at a later date for a change to the
type certificate to include another
model incorporating the same novel or
unusual design feature, the special
conditions would apply to that model as
well.
Seats do not have to meet these
special conditions when installed in
compartments that are not otherwise
required to meet the test requirements of
part 25, Appendix F, parts IV and V.
This includes, for example, airplanes
that do not have § 25.853, Amendment
25–61 or later, in their certification basis
and those airplanes that do not need to
comply with the requirements of
§ 121.312.
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Conclusion
This action affects only certain novel
or unusual design features on
Bombardier Inc. Model CL–600–2E25
series airplanes. It is not a rule of
general applicability.
The substance of these special
conditions has been subjected to the
notice and comment period in several
prior instances and has been derived
without substantive change from those
previously issued. It is unlikely that
prior public comment would result in a
significant change from the substance
contained herein. Therefore, the FAA
has determined that prior public notice
and comment are unnecessary, and good
cause exists for adopting these special
conditions upon issuance. The FAA is
requesting comments to allow interested
persons to submit views that may not
have been submitted in response to the
prior opportunities for comment
described above.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 25
Aircraft, Aviation safety, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements.
The authority citation for these
special conditions is as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701,
44702, 44704.
The Special Conditions
Accordingly, pursuant to the
authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the following special
conditions are issued as part of the type
certification basis for Bombardier Inc.
Model CL–600–2E25 series airplane.
1. Except as provided in special
condition number 3, below, compliance
with heat-release and smoke-emission
testing requirements per § 25.853, and
Appendix F, parts IV and V, is required
for seats that incorporate nontraditional, large, non-metallic panels
that may be either a single component
or multiple components in a
concentrated area in their design.
2. The applicant may designate up to
and including 1.5 square feet of nontraditional, non-metallic panel material
per seat place that does not have to
comply with special condition number
1, above. A triple-seat assembly may
have a total of 4.5 square feet excluded
on any portion of the assembly (e.g.,
outboard seat place, 1 square foot;
middle, 1 square foot; and inboard, 2.5
square feet).
3. Seats do not have to meet the test
requirements of part 25, Appendix F,
parts IV and V, when installed in
compartments that are not otherwise
required to meet these requirements.
Examples include:
E:\FR\FM\04AUR1.SGM
04AUR1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 149 / Wednesday, August 4, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
[FR Doc. 2010–19072 Filed 8–3–10; 8:45 am]
already noted in form DS–4076,
information contained in the
description block (Block 5) (exclusive of
information legitimately identified as
proprietary in Block 15) will be used in
DDTC’s published Commodity
Jurisdiction determinations list, to be
available on the DDTC Web site. Also,
22 CFR 120.4(a) is amended to state that
the ‘‘Commodity Jurisdiction (CJ)
Determination Form’’ must be
electronically submitted to DDTC. For
twenty-nine (29) days after the effective
date of this final rule, a request for a
commodity jurisdiction determination
may be submitted electronically or via
a paper format. After thirty (30) days
from the effective date of this final rule,
electronic submission via the
‘‘Commodity Jurisdiction (CJ)
Determination Form’’ (Form DS–4076)
will be mandatory. Additionally,
§ 120.4(c) was amended to eliminate the
instruction to submit seven collated sets
of supporting documentation.
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
Regulatory Analysis and Notices
a. Airplanes with passenger capacities
of 19 or less,
b. Airplanes that do not have § 25.853,
Amendment 25–61 or later, in their
certification basis and do not need to
comply with the requirements of
§ 121.312, and
c. Airplanes exempted from § 25.853,
Amendment 25–61 or later.
4. Only airplanes associated with new
seat-certification programs approved
after the effective date of these special
conditions will be affected by the
requirements in these special
conditions. Previously certificated
interiors on the existing airplane fleet,
and follow-on deliveries of airplanes
with previously certificated interiors,
are not affected.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on July 27,
2010.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
Administrative Procedure Act
This amendment involves a foreign
affairs function of the United States and,
therefore, is not subject to the
procedures contained in 5 U.S.C. 553
and 554.
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
22 CFR Part 120
RIN 1400–AC63
[Public Notice: 7075]
Regulatory Flexibility Act
Amendment to the International Traffic
in Arms Regulations: Commodity
Jurisdiction
Department of State.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
jdjones on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with RULES
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
The Department of State is
amending the International Traffic in
Arms Regulations (ITAR) to address
electronic submission of a request for a
commodity jurisdiction determination
using ‘‘Commodity Jurisdiction (CJ)
Determination Form’’ (Form DS–4076).
DATES: Effective Date: This rule is
effective August 4, 2010.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Director Charles Shotwell, Office of
Defense Trade Controls Policy,
Department of State, Telephone (202)
663–2792 or Fax (202) 261–8199; E-mail
DDTCResponseTeam@state.gov. ATTN:
Regulatory Change, Part 120.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A new
form entitled ‘‘Commodity Jurisdiction
(CJ) Determination Form’’ (Form DS–
4076) has been added to the listing of
forms at 22 CFR 120.28(a)(8). This form
was made available via the Directorate
of Defense Trade Controls’ (DDTC) Web
site (https://www.pmddtc.state.gov) for
public use on a trial basis (as well as
comment) on September 30, 2009. As
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
12:40 Aug 03, 2010
Jkt 220001
Since this amendment involves a
foreign affairs function of the United
States, it does not require analysis under
the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
This amendment does not involve a
mandate that will result in the
expenditure by State, local, and Tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $100 million or more
in any year and it will not significantly
or uniquely affect small governments.
Therefore, no actions were deemed
necessary under the provisions of the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995.
Executive Order 13175
The Department has determined that
this rulemaking will not have Tribal
implications, will not impose
substantial direct compliance costs on
Indian Tribal governments, and will not
pre-empt Tribal law. Accordingly, the
requirements of Section 5 of Executive
Order 13175 do not apply to his
rulemaking.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996
This amendment has been found not
to be a major rule within the meaning
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
46843
of the Small Business Regulatory
Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996.
Executive Orders 12372 and 13132
This amendment will not have
substantial direct effects on the States,
on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government. Therefore, in
accordance with Executive Order 13132,
it is determined that this amendment
does not have sufficient federalism
implications to require consultations or
warrant the preparation of a federalism
summary impact statement. The
regulations implementing Executive
Order 12372 regarding
intergovernmental consultation on
Federal programs and activities do not
apply to this amendment.
Executive Order 12866
This amendment is exempt from
review under Executive Order 12866,
but has been reviewed internally by the
Department of State to ensure
consistency with the purposes thereof.
Executive Order 12988
The Department of State has reviewed
the proposed regulations in light of
sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
Order 12988 to eliminate ambiguity,
minimize litigation, establish clear legal
standards, and reduce burden.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This collection was approved under
OMB Control Number 1405–0163. This
rule does not impose any new reporting
or recordkeeping requirements subject
to the Paperwork Reduction Act, 44
U.S.C. Chapter 35.
List of Subjects in 22 CFR Part 120
Arms and munitions, Classified
information, Exports.
Accordingly, for the reasons set forth
above, Title 22, Chapter I, Subchapter
M, part 120 is amended as follows:
■
PART 120—PURPOSE AND
DEFINITIONS
1. The authority citation for part 120
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: Secs. 2, 38, and 71, Pub. L. 90–
629, 90 Stat. 744 (22 U.S.C. 2752, 2778,
2797); 22 U.S.C. 2794; E.O. 11958, 42 FR
4311; E.O. 13284, 68 FR 4075; 3 CFR, 1977
Comp. p. 79; 22 U.S.C. 2651a; Pub. L. 105–
261, 112 Stat. 1920.
2. Section 120.4 is amended by
revising paragraphs (a) and (c) to read as
follows:
■
E:\FR\FM\04AUR1.SGM
04AUR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 149 (Wednesday, August 4, 2010)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 46840-46843]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-19072]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 25
[Docket No. NM431; Special Conditions No. 25-409-SC]
Special Conditions: Bombardier Inc. Model CL-600-2E25 Series
Airplane; Passenger Seats With Non-Traditional, Large, Non-Metallic
Panels
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final special conditions; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: These special conditions are issued for the Bombardier Inc.
Model CL-600-2E25 Series Airplane. These airplanes will have a novel or
unusual design feature associated with seats that include non-
traditional, large, non-metallic panels that would affect survivability
during a post-crash fire event. The applicable airworthiness
regulations do not contain adequate or appropriate safety standards for
this design feature. These special conditions contain the additional
safety standards that the Administrator considers necessary to
establish a level of safety equivalent to that established by the
existing airworthiness standards.
DATES: The effective date of these special conditions is July 27, 2010.
We must receive your comments by September 20, 2010.
ADDRESSES: You must mail two copies of your comments to: Federal
Aviation Administration, Transport Airplane Directorate, Attn: Rules
Docket (ANM-113), Docket No. NM431, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington 98057-3356. You may deliver two copies to the Transport
Airplane Directorate at the above address. You must mark your comments:
Docket No. NM431. You can inspect comments in the Rules Docket
weekdays, except Federal holidays, between 7:30 a.m. and 4 p.m.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alan Sinclair, FAA, Airframe/Cabin
Safety Branch, ANM-115, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft
Certification Service, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98057-
3356; telephone (425) 227-2195;
[[Page 46841]]
facsimile (425) 227-1232; e-mail alan.sinclair@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA has determined that notice of and
opportunity for prior public comment on these special conditions is
impracticable and would significantly delay issuance of the design
approval and thus delivery of the affected aircraft. The substance of
these special conditions has previously been subject to the public-
comment process and received no substantive comments. The FAA therefore
finds that good cause exists for making these special conditions
effective upon issuance.
Comments Invited
We invite interested people to take part in this rulemaking by
sending written comments, data, or views. The most helpful comments
reference a specific portion of the special conditions, explain the
reason for any recommended change, and include supporting data. We ask
that you send us two copies of written comments.
We will file in the docket all comments we receive, as well as a
report summarizing each substantive public contact with FAA personnel
about these special conditions. You can inspect the docket before and
after the comment closing date. If you wish to review the docket in
person, go to the address in the ADDRESSES section of this preamble
between 7:30 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays.
We will consider all comments we receive by the closing date for
comments. We will consider comments filed late if it is possible to do
so without incurring expense or delay. We may change these special
conditions based on the comments we receive.
If you want us to let you know we received your comments on these
special conditions, send us a self-addressed, stamped postcard on which
the docket number appears. We will stamp the date on the postcard and
mail it back to you.
Background
On February 28, 2007, Bombardier Inc., 400 Cote Vertu West, Dorval,
Quebec, Canada, H4S 1Y9, applied for an amended type certificate for
the Bombardier Model CL-600-2E25 airplane to be identified on Type
Certificate Data Sheet (TCDS) No. A21EA. The Model CL-600-2E25 series
airplane will be a swept-wing, T-tail, twin-engine, fuselage-mounted
turbofan-powered, single-aisle, medium-sized, transport-category
airplane.
The applicable airplane regulations, currently approved under Title
14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) part 25, do not require seats
to meet the more-stringent flammability standards required of large,
non-metallic panels in the cabin interior. At the time the applicable
rules were written, seats were designed with a metal frame covered by
fabric, not with large, non-metallic panels. Seats also met the then-
recently adopted standards for flammability of seat cushions. With the
seat design being mostly fabric and metal, the contribution to a fire
in the cabin had been minimized and was not considered a threat. For
these reasons, seats did not need to be tested to heat-release and
smoke-emission requirements.
Seat designs have now evolved to occasionally include non-
traditional, large, non-metallic panels. Taken in total, the surface
area of these panels is on the same order as the sidewall and overhead
stowage bin interior panels. To provide the level of passenger
protection intended by the airworthiness standards, these non-
traditional, large, non-metallic panels in the cabin must meet the
standards of part 25, Appendix F, parts IV and V, heat-release and
smoke-emission requirements.
Type Certification Basis
Under provisions of 14 CFR 21.17, Bombardier must show that the
Model CL-600-2E25 series airplane meets the applicable provisions of
part 25, as amended by Amendments 25-1 through 25-119. If the
Administrator finds that the applicable airworthiness regulations do
not contain adequate or appropriate safety standards for the Model CL-
600-2E25 airplane because of a novel or unusual design feature, special
conditions are prescribed under provisions of 14 CFR 21.16.
In addition to the applicable airworthiness regulations and special
conditions, the Model CL-600-2E25 series airplanes must comply with the
fuel vent and exhaust emission requirements of 14 CFR part 34 and the
noise certification requirements of 14 CFR part 36. In addition, the
FAA must issue a finding of regulatory adequacy pursuant to section 611
of Public Law 92-574, the ``Noise Control Act of 1972.''
Special conditions, as defined in 14 CFR 11.19, are issued in
accordance with Sec. 11.38 and become part of the type certification
basis in accordance with Sec. 21.17(a)(2).
Special conditions are initially applicable to the model for which
they are issued. Should the type certificate for that model be amended
later to include any other model that incorporates the same or similar
novel or unusual design feature, the special conditions would also
apply to the other model under the provisions of Sec. 21.101.
Novel or Unusual Design Features
The Model CL-600-2E25 series airplanes will incorporate the
following novel or unusual design feature: These models offer interior
arrangements that include passenger seats that incorporate non-
traditional, large, non-metallic panels in lieu of the traditional
metal frame covered by fabric. The flammability properties of these
panels have been shown to significantly affect the survivability of
occupants of the cabin in the event of fire. These seats are considered
a novel design for transport-category airplanes that include Amendment
25-61 and Amendment 25-66 in the certification basis, and were not
considered when those airworthiness standards were established.
The existing regulations do not provide adequate or appropriate
safety standards for seat designs that incorporate non-traditional,
large, non-metallic panels. To provide a level of safety equivalent to
that provided by the balance of the cabin, additional airworthiness
standards, in the form of special conditions, are necessary. These
special conditions supplement Sec. 25.853. The requirements contained
in these special conditions consist of applying the identical test
conditions, required of all other large panels in the cabin, to seats
with non-traditional, large, non-metallic panels.
Definition of ``Non-Traditional, Large, Non-Metallic Panel''
A non-traditional, large, non-metallic panel, in this case, is
defined as a panel with exposed-surface areas greater than 1.5 square
feet installed per seat place. The panel may consist of either a single
component or multiple components in a concentrated area. Examples of
parts of the seat where these non-traditional panels are installed
include, but are not limited to: seat backs, bottoms and leg/foot
rests, kick panels, back shells, and credenzas and associated
furniture. Examples of traditional exempted parts of the seat include:
arm caps, armrest close-outs such as end bays and armrest-styled center
consoles, food trays, and video monitors and shrouds.
Clarification of ``Exposed''
``Exposed'' is considered to include those panels directly exposed
to the passenger cabin in the traditional sense, plus those panels
enveloped such as by a dress cover. Traditional fabrics or leathers
currently used on seats are excluded from these special conditions.
[[Page 46842]]
These materials must still comply with Sec. 25.853(a) and Sec.
25.853(c) if used as a covering for a seat cushion, or Sec. 25.853(a)
if installed elsewhere on the seat. Non-traditional, large, non-
metallic panels covered with traditional fabrics or leathers will be
tested without their coverings or covering attachments.
Discussion
In the early 1980s, the FAA conducted extensive research on the
effects of post-crash flammability in the passenger cabin. As a result
of this research and service experience, the FAA adopted new standards
for interior surfaces associated with large-surface-area parts.
Specifically, the rules require measurement of heat release and smoke
emission (part 25, Appendix F, parts IV and V) for the affected parts.
Heat release has been shown to have a direct correlation with post-
crash fire-survival time. Materials that comply with the standards
(i.e., Sec. 25.853 entitled ``Compartment interiors'' as amended by
Amendment 25-61 and Amendment 25-66) extend survival time by
approximately 2 minutes over materials that do not comply.
At the time these standards were written, the potential application
of the requirements of heat release and smoke emission to seats was
explored. The seat frame itself was not a concern because it was
primarily made of aluminum and contained only small amounts of non-
metallic materials. The FAA determined that the overall effect on
survivability was negligible, whether or not the food trays met the
heat-release and smoke requirements. The requirements, therefore, did
not address seats. The preambles to both the Notice of Proposed Rule
Making (NPRM), Notice No. 85-10 (50 FR 15038, April 16, 1985), and the
Final Rule at Amendment 25-61 (51 FR 26206, July 21, 1986),
specifically note that seats were excluded ``because the recently-
adopted standards for flammability of seat cushions will greatly
inhibit involvement of the seats.''
Subsequently, the Final Rule at Amendment 25-83 (60 FR 6615, March
6, 1995) clarified the definition of minimum panel size:
It is not possible to cite a specific size that will apply in
all installations; however, as a general rule, components with
exposed-surface areas of one square foot or less may be considered
small enough that they do not have to meet the new standards.
Components with exposed-surface areas greater than two square feet
may be considered large enough that they do have to meet the new
standards. Those with exposed-surface areas greater than one square
foot, but less than two square feet, must be considered in
conjunction with the areas of the cabin in which they are installed
before a determination could be made.
In the late 1990s, the FAA issued Policy Memorandum 97-112-39,
``Guidance for Flammability Testing of Seat/Console Installations,''
October 17, 1997 (https://rgl.faa.gov). That memo was issued when it
became clear that seat designs were evolving to include large, non-
metallic panels with surface areas that would impact survivability
during a cabin-fire event, comparable to partitions or galleys. The
memo noted that large-surface-area panels must comply with heat-release
and smoke-emission requirements, even if they were attached to a seat.
If the FAA had not issued such policy, seat designs could have been
viewed as a loophole to the airworthiness standards that would result
in an unacceptable decrease in survivability during a cabin fire event.
In October 2004, the FAA examined the appropriate flammability
standards for passenger seats installed on transport-category airplanes
that incorporated non-traditional, large, non-metallic panels in lieu
of the traditional metal covered by fabric. The FAA reviewed this
design and determined that it represented the kind and quantity of
material that should be required to pass the heat-release and smoke-
emissions requirements. The FAA has determined that special conditions
would be issued to apply the standards defined in Sec. 25.853(d) to
seats with large, non-metallic panels in their design.
Applicability
Because the heat-release and smoke-emission testing requirements of
Sec. 25.853 are part of the type certification basis for the Model CL-
600-2E25 series airplane, these special conditions are applicable to
the Model CL-600-2E25 series airplane. Should Bombardier apply at a
later date for a change to the type certificate to include another
model incorporating the same novel or unusual design feature, the
special conditions would apply to that model as well.
Seats do not have to meet these special conditions when installed
in compartments that are not otherwise required to meet the test
requirements of part 25, Appendix F, parts IV and V. This includes, for
example, airplanes that do not have Sec. 25.853, Amendment 25-61 or
later, in their certification basis and those airplanes that do not
need to comply with the requirements of Sec. 121.312.
Conclusion
This action affects only certain novel or unusual design features
on Bombardier Inc. Model CL-600-2E25 series airplanes. It is not a rule
of general applicability.
The substance of these special conditions has been subjected to the
notice and comment period in several prior instances and has been
derived without substantive change from those previously issued. It is
unlikely that prior public comment would result in a significant change
from the substance contained herein. Therefore, the FAA has determined
that prior public notice and comment are unnecessary, and good cause
exists for adopting these special conditions upon issuance. The FAA is
requesting comments to allow interested persons to submit views that
may not have been submitted in response to the prior opportunities for
comment described above.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 25
Aircraft, Aviation safety, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
0
The authority citation for these special conditions is as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701, 44702, 44704.
The Special Conditions
Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the following special conditions are issued as part of
the type certification basis for Bombardier Inc. Model CL-600-2E25
series airplane.
1. Except as provided in special condition number 3, below,
compliance with heat-release and smoke-emission testing requirements
per Sec. 25.853, and Appendix F, parts IV and V, is required for seats
that incorporate non-traditional, large, non-metallic panels that may
be either a single component or multiple components in a concentrated
area in their design.
2. The applicant may designate up to and including 1.5 square feet
of non-traditional, non-metallic panel material per seat place that
does not have to comply with special condition number 1, above. A
triple-seat assembly may have a total of 4.5 square feet excluded on
any portion of the assembly (e.g., outboard seat place, 1 square foot;
middle, 1 square foot; and inboard, 2.5 square feet).
3. Seats do not have to meet the test requirements of part 25,
Appendix F, parts IV and V, when installed in compartments that are not
otherwise required to meet these requirements. Examples include:
[[Page 46843]]
a. Airplanes with passenger capacities of 19 or less,
b. Airplanes that do not have Sec. 25.853, Amendment 25-61 or
later, in their certification basis and do not need to comply with the
requirements of Sec. 121.312, and
c. Airplanes exempted from Sec. 25.853, Amendment 25-61 or later.
4. Only airplanes associated with new seat-certification programs
approved after the effective date of these special conditions will be
affected by the requirements in these special conditions. Previously
certificated interiors on the existing airplane fleet, and follow-on
deliveries of airplanes with previously certificated interiors, are not
affected.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on July 27, 2010.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2010-19072 Filed 8-3-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P