Planning and Establishment of State-Level Exchanges; Request for Comments Regarding Exchange-Related Provisions in Title I of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, 45584-45590 [2010-18924]
Download as PDF
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS3
45584
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 148 / Tuesday, August 3, 2010 / Proposed Rules
claimed to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise
protected through https://
www.regulations.gov, or e-mail. The
Federal https://www.regulations.gov Web
site is an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system,
which means EPA will not know your
identity or contact information unless
you provide it in the body of your
comment. If you send an e-mail
comment directly to EPA without going
through https://www.regulations.gov,
your e-mail address will be
automatically captured and included as
part of the comment that is placed in the
public docket and made available on the
Internet. If you submit an electronic
comment, EPA recommends that you
include your name and other contact
information in the body of your
comment and with any disk or CD–ROM
you submit. If EPA cannot read your
comment due to technical difficulties,
and cannot contact you for clarification,
EPA may not be able to consider your
comment. Electronic files should avoid
the use of special characters or any form
of encryption, and be free of any defects
or viruses. (For additional information
about EPA’s public docket, visit the EPA
Docket Center homepage at https://
www.epa.gov/dockets/).
Docket: All documents in the docket
are listed in the https://
www.regulations.gov index. Although
listed in the index, some information is
not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other
material, such as copyrighted material,
will be publicly available only in hard
copy. Publicly available docket
materials are available either
electronically in https://
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy.
You can view and copy the records
related to this codification effort in the
EPA Region 2 Library by appointment
only. To make an appointment please
call (212) 637–3185.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Michael Infurna, Division of
Environmental Planning and Protection,
EPA Region 2, 290 Broadway, 22nd
floor, New York, NY 10007; telephone
number (212) 637–4177; fax number:
(212) 637–4377; e-mail address:
infurna.michael@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the
‘‘Rules and Regulations’’ section of this
Federal Register, the EPA is codifying
and incorporating by reference the
State’s hazardous waste program as a
direct final rule. EPA did not make a
proposal prior to the direct final rule
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:05 Aug 02, 2010
Jkt 220001
because we believe these actions are not
controversial and do not expect
comments that oppose them. We have
explained the reasons for this
codification and incorporation by
reference in the preamble to the direct
final rule. Unless we get written
comments which oppose this
incorporation by reference during the
comment period, the direct final rule
will become effective on the date
indicated, and we will not take further
action on this proposal. If we get
comments that oppose these actions, we
will withdraw the direct final rule and
it will not take effect. We will then
respond to public comments in a later
final rule based on this proposal. You
may not have another opportunity for
comment. If you want to comment on
this action, you must do so at this time.
For additional information, please see
the direct final rule published in the
‘‘Rules and Regulations’’ section of this
Federal Register.
Dated: April 27, 2010.
Judith A. Enck,
Regional Administrator, Region 2.
[FR Doc. 2010–18928 Filed 8–2–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
45 CFR Part 170
Planning and Establishment of StateLevel Exchanges; Request for
Comments Regarding ExchangeRelated Provisions in Title I of the
Patient Protection and Affordable Care
Act
Office of Consumer Information
and Insurance Oversight, Department of
Health and Human Services.
ACTION: Request for comments.
AGENCY:
This document is a request for
comments regarding the Exchangerelated provisions of the Patient
Protection and Affordable Care Act (the
Affordable Care Act), enacted on March
23, 2010. The Department of Health and
Human Services (HHS) invites public
comments in advance of future
rulemaking and grant solicitations.
DATES: Submit written or electronic
comments by October 4, 2010.
ADDRESSES: In commenting, please refer
to file code OCIIO–9989–NC. Because of
staff and resource limitations, we cannot
accept comments by facsimile (FAX)
transmission.
You may submit comments in one of
four ways (please choose only one of the
ways listed):
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
• Electronically. You may submit
electronic comments on this regulation
to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow
the instructions under the ‘‘More Search
Options’’ tab.
• By regular mail. You may mail
written comments to the following
address ONLY: Centers for Medicare &
Medicaid Services, Department of
Health and Human Services, Attention:
OCIIO–9989–NC, P.O. Box 8010,
Baltimore, MD 21244–8010.
Please allow sufficient time for mailed
comments to be received before the
close of the comment period.
• By express or overnight mail. You
may send written comments to the
following address ONLY: Centers for
Medicare & Medicaid Services,
Department of Health and Human
Services, Attention: OCIIO–9989–NC,
Mail Stop C4–26–05, 7500 Security
Boulevard, Baltimore, MD 21244–1850.
• By hand or courier. If you prefer,
you may deliver (by hand or courier)
your written comments before the close
of the comment period to either of the
following addresses:
a. For delivery in Washington, DC—
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
Services, Department of Health and
Human Services, Room 445–G, Hubert
H. Humphrey Building, 200
Independence Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC 20201.
(Because access to the interior of the
Hubert H. Humphrey Building is not
readily available to persons without
Federal government identification,
commenters are encouraged to leave
their comments in the CMS drop slots
located in the main lobby of the
building. A stamp-in clock is available
for persons wishing to retain a proof of
filing by stamping in and retaining an
extra copy of the comments being filed.)
b. For delivery in Baltimore, MD—
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
Services, Department of Health and
Human Services, 7500 Security
Boulevard, Baltimore, MD 21244–1850.
If you intend to deliver your
comments to the Baltimore address,
please call telephone number (410) 786–
9994 in advance to schedule your
arrival with one of our staff members.
Comments mailed to the addresses
indicated as appropriate for hand or
courier delivery may be delayed and
received after the comment period.
For information on viewing public
comments, see the beginning of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Donna Laverdiere, Office of Consumer
Information and Insurance Oversight,
Department of Health and Human
Services, at (301) 492–4100.
E:\FR\FM\03AUP1.SGM
03AUP1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 148 / Tuesday, August 3, 2010 / Proposed Rules
Customer Service Information:
Individuals interested in obtaining
information about the Patient Protection
and Affordable Care Act may visit the
Department of Health and Human
Services’ Web site (https://
www.HealthCare.gov).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Inspection of Public Comments. All
comments received before the close of
the comment period are available for
viewing by the public, including any
personally identifiable or confidential
business information that is included in
a comment. We post all electronic
comments received before the close of
the comment period on the following
public Web site as soon as possible after
they have been received: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the search
instructions on that Web site to view
public comments.
Comments received timely will be
available for public inspection as they
are received, generally beginning
approximately 3 weeks after publication
of a document, at Room 445–G,
Department of Health and Human
Services, Hubert H. Humphrey Building,
200 Independence Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC 20201, Monday
through Friday of each week from 8:30
a.m. to 4 p.m. To schedule an
appointment to view public comments,
call 1–800–743–3951.
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS3
I. Background
A. General
Title I of the Patient Protection and
Affordable Care Act (Affordable Care
Act, or the Act), Public Law 111–148,
enacted on March 23, 2010, expands
access to health insurance through the
establishment of American Health
Benefits Exchanges (‘‘Exchanges’’).
Sections 1311(b) and 1321 (b) of the
Affordable Care Act provide that each
State may elect to establish an Exchange
that would (consistent with definitions
relating to the individual and group
markets and employer size established
in Section 1304 of the Act): (1) Facilitate
the purchase of qualified health plans
(QHPs); (2) provide for the
establishment of a Small Business
Health Options Program (‘‘SHOP
Exchange’’) designed to assist qualified
employers in facilitating the enrollment
of their employees in QHPs offered in
the SHOP Exchange; and (3) meet other
requirements specified in the Act.
Additionally, section 1321(c)(1) requires
the Secretary to establish and operate an
Exchange within States that do not elect
to establish an Exchange, or if the
Secretary determines, on or before
January 1, 2013, that the State will not
have an Exchange operable by January
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:05 Aug 02, 2010
Jkt 220001
1, 2014 or has not taken the actions
necessary to meet required Exchange
standards as defined by regulation or to
implement other requirements in
Subtitles A and C of the Affordable Care
Act (relating to insurance market
reforms). For purposes of the remainder
of this notice, the term ‘‘Exchange’’ will
refer to State-operated Exchanges and
the Exchange operated by the Federal
government on behalf of States that do
not elect to establish an Exchange.
B. Requirements for Establishing and
Operating Exchanges
Section 1311(d) of the Affordable Care
Act specifies certain requirements for
Exchanges, and section 1311(e) specifies
the requirements for a plan to be
certified by the Exchange as a QHP.
Additionally, Section 1321 of the
Affordable Care Act discusses State
flexibility in the operation and
enforcement of Exchanges and related
requirements. The Secretary will issue
regulations setting standards for meeting
the requirements under Title I of the Act
with respect to the establishment and
operations of the Exchanges. Each State
electing to establish and operate an
Exchange must have in effect Federal
standards or a State law or regulation
that implements the Federal standards
within the State. Also, section 1311(k)
specifies that Exchanges may not
establish rules that conflict with or
prevent the application of regulations
promulgated by the Secretary under
Subtitle D of the Affordable Care Act.
Section 1321(c) of the Act provides
the authority for the Secretary to
establish and operate an Exchange on
behalf of a State that does not elect to
establish an Exchange or that the
Secretary determines will not have an
Exchange operable by January 1, 2014;
or has not taken the necessary actions to
implement the requirements in 1321(a)
or other market reforms specified in
Subtitles A and C of Title I of the
Affordable Care Act.
1. General Requirements for Exchanges
Section 1311(d)(1) requires that an
Exchange must be a governmental
agency or nonprofit entity established
by a State. Section 1311(d)(2) requires
Exchanges to make QHPs available to
eligible individuals and employers.
Section 1311(d)(6) requires Exchanges
to consult with various stakeholders
relevant to carrying out their
responsibilities.
Section 1311(d)(4) identifies the
minimum functions that an Exchange
must perform. These functions include,
but are not limited to: Implementing
procedures for certification,
recertification, and decertification of
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
45585
QHPs; providing for the operation of a
toll-free telephone hotline to respond to
requests for assistance; maintaining an
Internet website containing
standardized comparative information
on QHPs; assigning ratings to each QHP
offered through the Exchange on the
basis of relative quality and price, in
accordance with criteria as defined by
the Secretary; utilizing a standardized
format for presenting health benefits
options in the Exchange; consistent with
requirements in Section 1413 of the Act,
informing individuals of eligibility
requirements for the Medicaid and CHIP
programs or any applicable State or
local public program, and enrolling
individuals in those programs if the
Exchange determines they are eligible
through screening of the application by
the Exchange; establishing and making
available by electronic means a
calculator to determine the actual cost
of coverage after application of any
premium tax credit and cost-sharing
reduction; granting certifications to
individuals relating to hardship or other
exemptions; and establishing a
Navigator program consistent with the
requirements in Section 1311(i).
2. Requirements Relating to Plan Ratings
and Internet Portals
Section 1311(c)(3) requires the
Secretary to develop a rating system that
would rate QHPs offered through an
Exchange on the basis of the relative
quality and price. Additionally, Section
1311(c)(4) requires the Secretary to
develop an enrollee satisfaction system
that would evaluate the level of
satisfaction with QHPs that had more
than 500 enrollees during the previous
year that are offered through an
Exchange. The Act requires Exchanges
to include quality and enrollee
satisfaction ratings in the information
provided to individuals and employers
through their Internet portals.
Section 1311(c)(5) directs the
Secretary to make a model template
available to Exchanges for an Internet
portal that may be used to direct eligible
individuals and employers to QHPs;
assist individuals and employers in
determining eligibility for participation
in Exchanges, premium tax credits, or
cost-sharing reductions; and present
standardized information (including
plan ratings) to assist consumers in
making health insurance choices. The
Affordable Care Act also directs the
Secretary to continue operating,
maintaining and updating the Federal
Internet portal developed under Section
1103(a) and to assist States in
developing and maintaining their own
portals.
E:\FR\FM\03AUP1.SGM
03AUP1
45586
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 148 / Tuesday, August 3, 2010 / Proposed Rules
3. Requirements Relating to Navigator
Programs
5. Establishment of Exchanges in the
Territories
Section 1311(i) provides that an
Exchange shall establish a Navigator
program under which it awards grants
to eligible entities that meet the law’s
criteria, including demonstrating to the
Exchange that they have existing
relationships or could establish
relationships with employers and
employees, consumers, or self-employed
individuals likely to be eligible to enroll
in a qualified health plan. The duties of
entities that serve as Navigators under
such a grant include: Conducting public
education activities to raise awareness
of the availability of QHPs; distributing
fair and impartial information
concerning enrollment in QHPs and the
availability of premium tax credits and
cost-sharing reductions; facilitating
enrollment in QHPs; providing referrals
to any applicable office of health
insurance consumer assistance, health
insurance ombudsman, or other State
agency to address enrollee complaints
and questions about their health plans
and coverage determination; and
providing information in a manner that
is culturally and linguistically
appropriate to the needs of the
population being served by the
Exchange. The Affordable Care Act
directs the Secretary, in collaboration
with States, to develop standards to
ensure that information made available
by Navigators is fair, accurate and
impartial.
Section 1323 of the Affordable Care
Act provides an opportunity for U.S.
Territories to elect to establish
Exchanges and appropriates a fixed
amount of funds to reduce the cost of
coverage provided through an Exchange
in the Territories. The Act stipulates
that Territories’ elections related to
establishing Exchanges must be
consistent with Section 1321, relating to
standards for establishing and operating
Exchanges, and received not later than
October 1, 2013.
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS3
4. Other Requirements Relating to
Exchanges
Section 1311(c)(6) requires Exchanges
to provide for an initial open enrollment
period (as determined by the Secretary
no later than July 1, 2012), annual open
enrollment periods (as determined by
the Secretary), and special enrollment
periods.
Section 1311(d)(5)(A) specifies that
States must ensure that their Exchanges
are self-sustaining on or after January 1,
2015, including allowing Exchanges to
charge assessments or user fees to
participating health insurance issuers,
or otherwise generate funding to
support their operations. Section
1311(d)(5)(B) prohibits wasteful use of
funds by Exchanges. Additionally,
Section 1313 requires Exchanges to keep
an accurate accounting of all activities,
receipts, and expenditures, and
annually submit to the Secretary a
report concerning such accounting.
Section 1313(a) also specifies that the
Secretary has certain enforcement
authority if an Exchange or a State has
engaged in serious misconduct related
to compliance with Title I of the Act.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:05 Aug 02, 2010
Jkt 220001
II. Solicitation of Comments
Section 1321(a)(2) of the Affordable
Care Act requires the Secretary to
consult with stakeholders to ensure
balanced representation among
interested parties. HHS is inviting
public comment to aid in the
development of standards for
establishment and operation of the
Exchanges, to address other Exchangerelated provisions in Title I of the
Affordable Care Act, and to inform for
the awarding of grants to the States to
assist them in planning and developing
Exchanges. The Department is
interested in comments from all
interested parties. To assist interested
parties in responding, this request for
comments describes specific areas in
which the Department is particularly
interested.
Commenters should use the questions
below to provide the Department with
relevant information for the
development of regulations regarding
the Exchange-related provisions in Title
I of the Affordable Care Act. However,
it is not necessary for commenters to
address every question below and
commenters may also address
additional issues under the Exchangerelated provisions in Title I of the
Affordable Care Act. Individuals,
groups, and organizations interested in
providing comments may do so at their
discretion by following the above
mentioned instructions.
Specific areas in which HHS is
particularly interested include the
following:
A. State Exchange Planning and
Establishment Grants
Section 1311(a) directs the Secretary
to make planning and establishment
grant awards to States for activities
related to establishing an Exchange. For
each fiscal year, the Secretary must
determine the total amount that will be
made available to each State. Grants
awarded under this Section may be
renewed if a State is making sufficient
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
progress toward establishing an
Exchange, implementing other
insurance market reforms, and meeting
other benchmarks. The Secretary must
make the initial grant awards under this
Section no later than one year after
enactment, and no grants shall be
awarded after January 1, 2015.
1. What factors are States likely to
consider in determining whether they
will elect to offer an Exchange by
January 1, 2014? To what extent are
States currently planning to develop
their own Exchanges by 2014 (e.g.,
become electing States) versus choosing
to opt-in to an Exchange operated by the
Federal government for their State?
When will this decision be made? Can
planning grants assist in identifying and
assessing relevant factors and making
this decision?
2. To what extent have States already
begun to plan for establishment of
Exchanges? What kinds of activities are
currently underway (e.g., legislative,
regulatory, etc.)? What internal and/or
external entities are involved, or will
likely be involved in this planning
process?
a. What kinds of governance
structures, rules or processes have
States established or are they likely to
establish related to operating Exchanges
(e.g., legal structure (such as placement
in State agency or nonprofit
organization), governance structure,
requirements relating to governing
board composition, etc.)?
b. To what extent have States begun
developing business plans or budgets
relating to Exchange implementation?
3. What are some of the major factors
that States are likely to consider in
determining how to structure their
Exchanges (e.g., separate or combined
individual Exchanges and SHOP
Exchanges; regional or interstate
Exchanges; subsidiary Exchanges, State
agency versus nonprofit entity)? What
are the pros and cons of these various
options?
4. What kinds of factors are likely to
affect States’ resource needs related to
establishing Exchanges?
a. What is the estimated range of costs
that States are likely to incur during the
upcoming year (e.g., calendar 2010
through calendar 2011) for each of the
major categories of Exchange activities?
Which of these expenses are fixed costs,
and which costs are variable?
b. To what extent do States have
existing resources that could be
leveraged as a starting point for
Exchange operations (e.g., existing
information technology (IT) systems,
toll-free hotlines, Web sites, business
processes, etc.)?
E:\FR\FM\03AUP1.SGM
03AUP1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 148 / Tuesday, August 3, 2010 / Proposed Rules
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS3
c. For what kinds of activities are
States likely to seek funding using the
Exchange establishment and planning
grants?
5. What kinds of questions are States
likely to receive during the initial
planning and start-up phase of
establishing Exchanges? How can HHS
provide technical assistance, and in
what forms, in helping States to answer
these questions?
B. Implementation Timeframes and
Considerations
Section 1321(b) requires each State
that elects to establish an Exchange
meeting the Secretary’s requirements to
have an Exchange operational by
January 1, 2014. Section 1321(c) directs
the Secretary to establish and operate an
Exchange within each State that: (1)
Does not elect to establish an Exchange;
or (2) the Secretary determines will not
have an Exchange operational by
January 1, 2014, or has not taken the
actions the Secretary determines
necessary to implement the
requirements in Section 1321(a) or the
other insurance market reform
requirements in Subtitles A and C of
Title I of the Act.
Additionally, the Affordable Care Act
includes several statutory deadlines for
the Secretary related to establishment of
Exchanges, including:
• Issuing regulations and/or guidance
relating to requirements for Exchanges,
requirements for QHPs, and risk
adjustment as soon as practicable;
• Awarding State planning grants no
later than one year after enactment
(March 23, 2011);
• Determining the dates of the initial
open enrollment period by July 1, 2012;
• No later than January 1, 2013,
determining States’ readiness to have
Exchanges operational and implement
required insurance market reforms by
January 1, 2014;
• No later than July 1, 2013, issuing
regulations for health choice compacts
and the CO–OP program, and awarding
CO–OP program grants; and
• Having in place additional
insurance market reforms and providing
cost-sharing reductions beginning on
January 1, 2014.
In order to carry out the Federal
implementation activities to ensure
Exchanges are fully operational on
January 1, 2014, the Department is
seeking comments from stakeholders
relating to implementation timeframes.
1. What are the key implementation
tasks that need to be accomplished to
meet Exchange formation deadlines and
what is the timing for such tasks? What
kinds of business functions will need to
be operational before January 1, 2014,
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:05 Aug 02, 2010
Jkt 220001
and how soon will they need to be
operational?
2. What kinds of guidance or
information would be helpful to States,
plans, employers, consumers, and other
groups or sectors as they begin the
planning process?
3. What potential criteria could be
considered in determining whether an
electing State is making sufficient
progress in establishing an Exchange
and implementing the insurance market
reforms in Subtitles A and C of Title I
of the Affordable Care Act? What are
important milestones for States to show
they are making steady and sufficient
progress to implement reforms by the
statutory deadlines?
4. What other terms or provisions
require additional clarification to
facilitate implementation and
compliance? What specific clarifications
would be helpful?
C. State Exchange Operations
Section 1311(b) requires an Exchange
to be established in each State not later
than January 1, 2014 that: Facilitates the
purchase of QHPs; provides for the
establishment of a SHOP Exchange that
assists small employers in facilitating
the enrollment of their employees in
QHPs offered in the small group market
in the State; and meets additional
requirements for Exchanges outlined in
Section 1311(d). The Act requires the
Secretary to publish regulations relating
to the requirements for operating State
Exchanges as soon as practicable, and
provides various types of flexibility for
States.
A number of additional programs
established by the Act are closely
related to the establishment of health
insurance Exchanges, such as the
Navigator program in Section 1311(i)
and other consumer assistance
programs. In addition, the insurance
reforms, consumer protection
provisions, and premium rating
requirements will apply to plans both
inside and outside the Exchanges.
1. What are some of the major
considerations for States in planning for
and establishing Exchanges?
2. For which aspects of Exchange
operations or Exchange standards would
uniformity be preferable? For which
aspects of Exchange operations or
Exchange standards is State flexibility
likely to be particularly important?
3. What kinds of systems are States
likely to need to enable important
Exchange operational functions (e.g.,
eligibility determination, plan
qualification, data reporting, payment
flows, etc.), to ensure adequate
accounting and tracking of spending,
provide transparency to Exchange
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
45587
functions, and facilitate financial
audits? What are the relative costs and
considerations associated with building
Exchange operational, financial, and/or
IT systems off of existing systems,
versus building new stand-alone
Exchange IT systems?
4. What are the tradeoffs for States to
utilize a Federal IT solution for
operating their Exchanges, as compared
to building their own unique systems to
conform to the current State
environment? For what kinds of
functions would it make more sense for
States to build their own systems, or
modify existing systems?
5. What are the considerations for
States as they develop web portals for
the Exchanges?
6. What factors should Exchanges
consider in reviewing justifications for
premium increases from insurers
seeking certification as QHPs? How will
States leverage/coordinate the work
funded by the rate review grants to
inform the decisions about which plans
will be certified by QHPs?
7. To what extent are Territories likely
to elect to establish their own
Exchanges? What specific issues apply
to establishing Exchanges in the
Territories?
8. What specific planning steps
should the Exchanges undertake to
ensure that they are accessible and
available to individuals from diverse
cultural origins and those with low
literacy, disabilities, and limited English
proficiency?
9. What factors should the Secretary
consider in determining what
constitutes as wasteful spending (as
outlined in Section 1311 (d)(5)(B))?
D. Qualified Health Plans (QHPs)
Section 1311(d)(2)(A) requires
Exchanges to make QHPs available to
qualified individuals and employers,
and Section 1311(d)(4)(A) requires
Exchanges to implement procedures for
the certification, recertification, and
decertification of health plans as QHPs,
consistent with criteria developed by
the Secretary under section 1311(c).
This certification criteria include, at a
minimum: Meeting marketing
requirements; ensuring a sufficient
choice of providers and providing
information on the availability of
providers; including essential
community providers within health
insurance plan networks; receiving
appropriate accreditation; implementing
a quality improvement strategy;
utilizing a uniform enrollment form and
a standard format to present health
benefit plan options; and providing
quality information to enrollees and
prospective enrollees.
E:\FR\FM\03AUP1.SGM
03AUP1
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS3
45588
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 148 / Tuesday, August 3, 2010 / Proposed Rules
1. What are some of the major
considerations involved in certifying
QHPs under the Exchanges, and how do
those considerations differ in the
context of individual and SHOP State
Exchanges, subsidiary Exchanges,
regional or interstate Exchanges, or an
Exchange operated by the Federal
government on behalf of States that do
not elect to establish an Exchange?
2. What factors should be considered
in developing the Section 1311(c)
certification criteria? To what extent do
States currently have similar
requirements or standards for plans in
the individual and group markets?
a. What issues need to be considered
in establishing appropriate standards for
ensuring a sufficient choice of providers
and providing information on the
availability of providers?
b. What issues need to be considered
in establishing appropriate minimum
standards for marketing of QHPs and
enforcement of those standards? What
are appropriate Federal and State roles
in marketing oversight?
3. What factors are needed to facilitate
participation of a sufficient mix of QHPs
in the Exchanges to meet the needs of
consumers?
a. What timeframes and key
milestones will be most important in
assessing plans’ participation in
Exchanges?
b. What kinds of factors are likely to
encourage or discourage competition
among plans in the Exchanges based on
price, quality, value, and other factors?
4. What health plan standards and
bidding processes would help to
facilitate getting the best value for
consumers and taxpayers?
5. What factors are important in
establishing minimum requirements for
the actuarial value/level of coverage?
6. What factors, bidding requirements,
and review/selection practices are likely
to facilitate the participation of multiple
plans in Exchanges? To what extent
should the Exchanges accept all plans
that meet minimum standards or select
and negotiate with plans?
7. What are some important
considerations related to establishing
the program to offer loans or grants to
foster the promotion of qualified
nonprofit health plans under CO–OP
plans? How prevalent are these
organizations today? What is the likely
demand for these loans and grants?
What kinds of guidance are they likely
to need from HHS and what legislative
or regulatory changes are they likely to
need from States?
8. Are there any special factors that
are important for consideration in
establishing standards for the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:05 Aug 02, 2010
Jkt 220001
participation of multi-State plans in
Exchanges?
9. To what extent are States
considering setting up State Basic
Health Plans under Section 1331 of the
Act?
E. Quality
The Affordable Care Act requires the
Secretary to develop a health plan rating
system on the basis of quality and prices
that would be used by the Exchanges
and to establish quality improvement
criteria that health plans must meet in
order to be qualified plans for
Exchanges.
1. What factors are most important for
consideration in establishing standards
for a plan rating system?
a. How best can Exchanges help
consumers understand the quality and
cost implications of their plan choices?
b. Are the measures and standards
that are being used to establish ratings
for health plans in the Medicare
Advantage program appropriate for
rating QHPs in the Exchanges? Are there
other State Medicaid or commercial
models that could be considered?
c. How much flexibility is desirable
with respect to establishing Statespecific thresholds or quality
requirements above the minimum
Federal thresholds or quality
requirements?
2. What are some minimum standards
or other factors that could be considered
with respect to establishing quality
measurement and improvement
thresholds or quality requirements that
should be met by QHPs? What other
strategies, including payment structures,
could be used by plans to improve the
practices of plan providers?
F. An Exchange for Non-Electing States
Section 1321(c) requires that in the
case of States that do not elect to
establish Exchanges, or that the
Secretary determines will not have
Exchanges operational by January 1,
2014 or have not taken the necessary
actions to implement the requirements
in Section 1321(a) or other insurance
market reforms specified in Subtitles A
and C of Title I of the Act, the Secretary
shall establish (directly or through
agreement with a not-for-profit entity)
and operate an Exchange within the
State.
1. How can the Federal government
best work to implement an Exchange in
States that do not elect to establish or
are unable to establish their own
Exchanges?
2. Are there considerations for an
Exchange operated by the Federal
government on behalf of States that do
not elect to establish an Exchange that
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
would be different from the State-run
Exchanges?
G. Enrollment and Eligibility
Section 1411 of the Affordable Care
Act requires the Secretary to establish a
program for determining whether an
individual meets certain eligibility
requirements for Exchange
participation, premium tax credits and
cost-sharing reductions, and individual
responsibility exemptions. Additionally,
Sections 1412, 1413 and 2201 contain
additional requirements to assist
Exchanges by making advance
determinations regarding income
eligibility and cost-sharing reductions;
providing for residents of each State to
apply for enrollment in, receive a
determination of eligibility for
participation in, and continue
participation in applicable State health
subsidy programs; and simplifying and
coordinating enrollment in the
Exchanges, Medicaid and the Children’s
Health Insurance Program (CHIP).
1. What are the advantages and issues
associated with various options for
setting the duration of the open
enrollment period for Exchanges for the
first year and subsequent years? What
factors are important for developing
criteria for special enrollment periods?
2. What are some of the key
considerations associated with
conducting online enrollment?
3. How can eligibility and enrollment
be effectively coordinated between
Medicaid, CHIP, and Exchanges? How
could eligibility systems be designed or
adapted to accomplish this? What steps
can be taken to ease consumer
navigation between the programs and
ease administrative burden? What are
the key considerations related to States
using Exchange or Medicaid/CHIP
application information to determine
eligibility for all three programs?
4. What kinds of data linkages do
State Medicaid and CHIP agencies
currently have with other Federal and
State agencies and data sources? How
can the implementation of Exchanges
help to streamline these processes for
States, and how can these linkages be
leveraged to support Exchange
operations?
5. How do States or other stakeholders
envision facilitating the requirements of
Section 1411 related to verification with
Federal agencies of eligibility for
enrollment through an Exchange?
6. What are the verification and data
sharing functions that States are capable
of performing to facilitate the
determination of Exchange eligibility
and enrollment?
7. What considerations should be
taken into account in establishing
E:\FR\FM\03AUP1.SGM
03AUP1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 148 / Tuesday, August 3, 2010 / Proposed Rules
procedures for payment of the costsharing reductions to health plans?
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS3
H. Outreach
Section 1311(i) provides that
Exchanges shall establish grant
programs for Navigators, to conduct
public education activities, distribute
enrollment information, facilitate
enrollment, and provide referrals for
grievances, complaints, or questions.
1. What kinds of consumer
enrollment, outreach, and educational
activities are States and other entities
likely to conduct relating to Exchanges,
insurance market reforms, premium tax
credits and cost-sharing reductions,
available plan choices, etc., and what
Federal resources or technical assistance
are likely to be beneficial?
2. What resources are needed for
Navigator programs? To what extent do
States currently have programs in place
that can be adapted to serve as patient
Navigators?
3. What kinds of outreach strategies
are likely to be most successful in
enrolling individuals who are eligible
for tax credits and cost-sharing
reductions to purchase coverage through
an Exchange, and retaining these
individuals? How can these outreach
efforts be coordinated with efforts for
other public programs?
I. Rating Areas
Section 2701(a)(2) of the Public
Health Service Act, as added by Section
1201 of the Affordable Care Act requires
each State to establish one or more
rating areas within the State for
purposes of applying the requirements
of Title I of the Affordable Care Act
(including the Exchange provisions),
subject to review by the Secretary.
1. To what extent do States currently
utilize established premium rating
areas? What are the typical geographical
boundaries of these premium rating
areas (e.g., Statewide, regional, county,
etc.)? What are the pros and cons
associated with interstate, statewide,
and sub-State premium rating areas?
What insurance markets are typically
required to utilize these premium rating
areas?
2. To the extent that States utilize
premium rating areas, how are they
established? What kinds of criteria do
States and other entities typically
consider when determining the
adequacy of premium rating areas?
What other criteria could be considered?
J. Consumer Experience
1. What kinds of design features can
help consumers obtain coverage through
the Exchange? What information are
consumers likely to find useful from
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:05 Aug 02, 2010
Jkt 220001
Exchanges in making plan selections?
Which kinds of enrollment venues are
likely to be most helpful in facilitating
individual enrollment in Exchanges and
QHPs?
2. What kinds of information are
likely to be most useful to consumers as
they determine whether to enroll in an
Exchange and which plans to select
(within or outside of an Exchange)?
What are some best practices in
conveying information to consumers
relating to health insurance, plan
comparisons, and eligibility for
premium tax credits, or eligibility for
other public health insurance programs
(e.g., Medicaid)? What types of efforts
could be taken to reach individuals from
diverse cultural origins and those with
low literacy, disabilities, and limited
English proficiency?
3. What are best practices in
implementing consumer protections
standards?
4. Given that consumer complaints
can be an important source of
information in identifying compliance
issues, what are the pros and cons of
various options for collecting and
reporting Exchange-related complaints
(e.g., collecting complaints at the
Federal level, versus at the State or
Exchange level)?
K. Employer Participation
Section 1311(b)(1)(B) provides for the
establishment of Small Business Health
Options Programs, referred to as SHOP
Exchanges, which are designed to assist
qualified employers in the State who are
small employers in facilitating the
enrollment of their employees in QHPs
offered in the small group market in the
State. Section 1304(b) provides that for
plan years beginning before January 1,
2016, States have the option to define
‘‘small employers’’ as those with (1) 100
or fewer employees, or (2) 50 or fewer
employees. Section 1312(f)(2)(B)
specifies that beginning in 2017, States
may elect to include issuers of health
insurance coverage in the large group
market to offer QHPs through the
Exchange, and for large employers to
purchase coverage through the
Exchange.
In addition, employers that do not
offer affordable coverage to their
employees will also interact with the
Exchanges including where their
employees purchase coverage through
the Exchange.
1. What Exchange design features are
likely to be most important for employer
participation, including the
participation of large employers in the
future? What are some relevant best
practices?
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
45589
2. What factors are important for
consideration in determining the
employer size limit (e.g., 50 versus 100)
for participation in a given State’s
Exchange?
3. What considerations are important
in facilitating coordination between
employers and Exchanges? What key
issues will require collaboration?
4. What other issues are there of
interest to employers with respect to
their participation in Exchanges?
L. Risk Adjustment, Reinsurance, and
Risk Corridors
Sections 1341, 1342, and 1343 of the
Act provide for the establishment of
transitional reinsurance programs, risk
corridors, and risk adjustment systems
for the individual and small group
markets within States.
1. To what extent do States and other
entities currently risk-adjust payments
for health insurance coverage in order to
counter adverse selection? In what
markets (e.g., Medicaid, CHIP,
government employee plans, etc.) are
these risk adjustment activities
currently performed? To the extent that
risk adjustment is or has been used,
what methods have been utilized, and
what are the pros and cons of such
methods?
2. To what extent do States currently
collect demographic and other
information, such as health status,
claims history, or medical conditions
under treatment on enrollees in the
individual and small group markets that
could be used for risk adjustment? What
kinds of resources and authorities
would States need in order to collect
information for risk adjustment of plans
offered inside and outside of the
Exchanges?
3. What issues are States likely to
consider in carrying out risk adjustment
for health plans inside and outside of
the Exchanges? What kinds of technical
assistance might be useful to States and
QHPs?
4. What are some of the major
administrative options for carrying out
risk adjustment? What kinds of entities
could potentially conduct risk
adjustment or collect and distribute
funds for risk adjustment? What are
some of the options relating to the
timing of payments, and what are the
pros and cons of these options?
5. To what extent do States currently
offer reinsurance in the health insurance
arena (e.g., Medicaid, State employee
plans, etc.) or in other arenas? How is
that reinsurance typically structured in
terms of contributions, coverage levels,
and eligibility? How much is typically
taken in and paid out? Is the
reinsurance fund capped in any way?
E:\FR\FM\03AUP1.SGM
03AUP1
45590
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 148 / Tuesday, August 3, 2010 / Proposed Rules
6. What kinds of non-profit entities
currently exist in the marketplace that
could potentially fulfill the role of an
‘‘applicable reinsurance entity’’ as
defined in the Act?
7. What methods are typically used to
determine which individuals are
deemed high-risk or high cost for the
purposes of reinsurance?
8. What challenges are States likely to
face in implementing the temporary
reinsurance program?
9. How do other programs (e.g.,
Medicaid) use risk corridors to share
profits and losses with health plans or
other entities? How are the corridors
defined and monitored under these
programs? What mechanisms are used
to collect and disburse payments?
10. Are there non-Federal instances in
which reinsurance and/or risk corridors
and/or risk adjustment were used
together? What kinds of special
considerations are important when
implementing multiple risk selection
mitigation strategies at once?
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS3
M. Comments Regarding Economic
Analysis, Paperwork Reduction Act, and
Regulatory Flexibility Act
Executive Order 12866 requires an
assessment of the anticipated costs and
benefits of a significant rulemaking
action and the alternatives considered,
using the guidance provided by the
Office of Management and Budget.
These costs and benefits are not limited
to the Federal government, but pertain
to the affected public as a whole. Under
Executive Order 12866, a determination
must be made whether implementation
of the Exchange-related provisions in
Title I of the Affordable Care Act will be
economically significant. A rule that has
an annual effect on the economy of $100
million or more is considered
economically significant.
In addition, the Regulatory Flexibility
Act may require the preparation of an
analysis of the economic impact on
small entities of proposed rules and
regulatory alternatives. An analysis
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
must generally include, among other
things, an estimate of the number of
small entities subject to the regulations
(for this purpose, plans, employers, and
in some contexts small governmental
entities), the expense of the reporting,
recordkeeping, and other compliance
requirements (including the expense of
using professional expertise), and a
description of any significant regulatory
alternatives considered that would
accomplish the stated objectives of the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:05 Aug 02, 2010
Jkt 220001
statute and minimize the impact on
small entities.
The Paperwork Reduction Act
requires an estimate of how many
‘‘respondents’’ will be required to
comply with any ‘‘collection of
information’’ requirements contained in
regulations and how much time and
cost will be incurred as a result. A
collection of information includes
recordkeeping, reporting to
governmental agencies, and third-party
disclosures.
Furthermore, Section 202 of the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
(UMRA) requires that agencies assess
anticipated costs and benefits and take
certain other actions before issuing a
final rule that includes any Federal
mandate that may result in expenditure
in any one year by State, local, or tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $135 million.
The Department is requesting
comments that may contribute to the
analyses that will be performed under
these requirements, both generally and
with respect to the following specific
areas:
1. What policies, procedures, or
practices of plans, employers and States
may be impacted by the Exchangerelated provisions in Title I of the
Affordable Care Act?
a. What direct or indirect costs and
benefits would result?
b. Which stakeholders will be affected
by such benefits and costs?
c. Are these impacts likely to vary by
insurance market, plan type, or
geographic area?
2. Are there unique effects for small
entities subject to the Exchange-related
provisions in Title I of the Affordable
Care Act?
3. Are there unique benefits and costs
affecting consumers? How will these
consumer benefits be affected by States’
Exchange design and flexibilities and
the magnitude and substance of
provisions mandated by the Act? Please
discuss tangible and intangible benefits.
4. Are there paperwork burdens
related to the Exchange-related
provisions in Title I of the Affordable
Care Act, and, if so, what estimated
hours and costs are associated with
those additional burdens?
N. Comments Regarding Exchange
Operations
The Exchange-related provisions in
Title I of the Affordable Care Act may
affect/will involve various stakeholders.
HHS wants to ensure receipt of all
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
comments pertaining to the operations
of the Exchanges.
1. What other considerations related
to the operations of Exchanges should
be addressed? If your questions related
to the operations of Exchanges have not
been asked, or you would like to add
additional comments, you may do so
here.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 27th day of
July 2010.
Jay Angoff,
Director, Office of Consumer Information and
Insurance Oversight, Department of Health
and Human Services.
[FR Doc. 2010–18924 Filed 7–29–10; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 4150–65–P
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
47 CFR Part 1
[WC Docket No. 07–245, GN Docket No. 09–
51; FCC 10–84]
Implementation of Section 224 of the
Act; A National Broadband Plan for
Our Future
Federal Communications
Commission.
ACTION: Proposed rule; correction.
AGENCY:
This document corrects a
proposed rule published in the Federal
Register on July 15, 2010, with respect
to attachments to poles by any
telecommunications carrier or cable
operator providing telecommunications
services. Specifically, this corrects how
the maximum just and reasonable rate
would be calculated under proposed
rule § 1.1409(e)(2).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Marvin Sacks, 202–418–2017.
SUMMARY:
Correction
In proposed rule FR Doc. 2010–17048,
beginning on page 41338 in the issue of
July 15, 2010, make the following
corrections in the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION section. On page 41361 in
the third column, under the proposed
formula in § 1.1409(e)(2)(ii), delete the
word ‘‘Maximum’’ before the word
‘‘Rate’’ and add the words ‘‘Maintenance
and Administrative’’ before the words
‘‘Carrying Charge Rate,’’ so the formula
reads as follows:
Federal Communications Commission.
Bulah P. Wheeler,
Deputy Manager.
E:\FR\FM\03AUP1.SGM
03AUP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 148 (Tuesday, August 3, 2010)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 45584-45590]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-18924]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
45 CFR Part 170
Planning and Establishment of State-Level Exchanges; Request for
Comments Regarding Exchange-Related Provisions in Title I of the
Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
AGENCY: Office of Consumer Information and Insurance Oversight,
Department of Health and Human Services.
ACTION: Request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document is a request for comments regarding the
Exchange-related provisions of the Patient Protection and Affordable
Care Act (the Affordable Care Act), enacted on March 23, 2010. The
Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) invites public comments
in advance of future rulemaking and grant solicitations.
DATES: Submit written or electronic comments by October 4, 2010.
ADDRESSES: In commenting, please refer to file code OCIIO-9989-NC.
Because of staff and resource limitations, we cannot accept comments by
facsimile (FAX) transmission.
You may submit comments in one of four ways (please choose only one
of the ways listed):
Electronically. You may submit electronic comments on this
regulation to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions under
the ``More Search Options'' tab.
By regular mail. You may mail written comments to the
following address ONLY: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services,
Department of Health and Human Services, Attention: OCIIO-9989-NC, P.O.
Box 8010, Baltimore, MD 21244-8010.
Please allow sufficient time for mailed comments to be received
before the close of the comment period.
By express or overnight mail. You may send written
comments to the following address ONLY: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
Services, Department of Health and Human Services, Attention: OCIIO-
9989-NC, Mail Stop C4-26-05, 7500 Security Boulevard, Baltimore, MD
21244-1850.
By hand or courier. If you prefer, you may deliver (by
hand or courier) your written comments before the close of the comment
period to either of the following addresses:
a. For delivery in Washington, DC--Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
Services, Department of Health and Human Services, Room 445-G, Hubert
H. Humphrey Building, 200 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC
20201.
(Because access to the interior of the Hubert H. Humphrey Building
is not readily available to persons without Federal government
identification, commenters are encouraged to leave their comments in
the CMS drop slots located in the main lobby of the building. A stamp-
in clock is available for persons wishing to retain a proof of filing
by stamping in and retaining an extra copy of the comments being
filed.)
b. For delivery in Baltimore, MD--Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
Services, Department of Health and Human Services, 7500 Security
Boulevard, Baltimore, MD 21244-1850.
If you intend to deliver your comments to the Baltimore address,
please call telephone number (410) 786-9994 in advance to schedule your
arrival with one of our staff members.
Comments mailed to the addresses indicated as appropriate for hand
or courier delivery may be delayed and received after the comment
period.
For information on viewing public comments, see the beginning of
the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Donna Laverdiere, Office of Consumer
Information and Insurance Oversight, Department of Health and Human
Services, at (301) 492-4100.
[[Page 45585]]
Customer Service Information: Individuals interested in obtaining
information about the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act may
visit the Department of Health and Human Services' Web site (https://www.HealthCare.gov).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Inspection of Public Comments. All comments received before the
close of the comment period are available for viewing by the public,
including any personally identifiable or confidential business
information that is included in a comment. We post all electronic
comments received before the close of the comment period on the
following public Web site as soon as possible after they have been
received: https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the search instructions on
that Web site to view public comments.
Comments received timely will be available for public inspection as
they are received, generally beginning approximately 3 weeks after
publication of a document, at Room 445-G, Department of Health and
Human Services, Hubert H. Humphrey Building, 200 Independence Avenue,
SW., Washington, DC 20201, Monday through Friday of each week from 8:30
a.m. to 4 p.m. To schedule an appointment to view public comments, call
1-800-743-3951.
I. Background
A. General
Title I of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
(Affordable Care Act, or the Act), Public Law 111-148, enacted on March
23, 2010, expands access to health insurance through the establishment
of American Health Benefits Exchanges (``Exchanges''). Sections 1311(b)
and 1321 (b) of the Affordable Care Act provide that each State may
elect to establish an Exchange that would (consistent with definitions
relating to the individual and group markets and employer size
established in Section 1304 of the Act): (1) Facilitate the purchase of
qualified health plans (QHPs); (2) provide for the establishment of a
Small Business Health Options Program (``SHOP Exchange'') designed to
assist qualified employers in facilitating the enrollment of their
employees in QHPs offered in the SHOP Exchange; and (3) meet other
requirements specified in the Act. Additionally, section 1321(c)(1)
requires the Secretary to establish and operate an Exchange within
States that do not elect to establish an Exchange, or if the Secretary
determines, on or before January 1, 2013, that the State will not have
an Exchange operable by January 1, 2014 or has not taken the actions
necessary to meet required Exchange standards as defined by regulation
or to implement other requirements in Subtitles A and C of the
Affordable Care Act (relating to insurance market reforms). For
purposes of the remainder of this notice, the term ``Exchange'' will
refer to State-operated Exchanges and the Exchange operated by the
Federal government on behalf of States that do not elect to establish
an Exchange.
B. Requirements for Establishing and Operating Exchanges
Section 1311(d) of the Affordable Care Act specifies certain
requirements for Exchanges, and section 1311(e) specifies the
requirements for a plan to be certified by the Exchange as a QHP.
Additionally, Section 1321 of the Affordable Care Act discusses State
flexibility in the operation and enforcement of Exchanges and related
requirements. The Secretary will issue regulations setting standards
for meeting the requirements under Title I of the Act with respect to
the establishment and operations of the Exchanges. Each State electing
to establish and operate an Exchange must have in effect Federal
standards or a State law or regulation that implements the Federal
standards within the State. Also, section 1311(k) specifies that
Exchanges may not establish rules that conflict with or prevent the
application of regulations promulgated by the Secretary under Subtitle
D of the Affordable Care Act.
Section 1321(c) of the Act provides the authority for the Secretary
to establish and operate an Exchange on behalf of a State that does not
elect to establish an Exchange or that the Secretary determines will
not have an Exchange operable by January 1, 2014; or has not taken the
necessary actions to implement the requirements in 1321(a) or other
market reforms specified in Subtitles A and C of Title I of the
Affordable Care Act.
1. General Requirements for Exchanges
Section 1311(d)(1) requires that an Exchange must be a governmental
agency or nonprofit entity established by a State. Section 1311(d)(2)
requires Exchanges to make QHPs available to eligible individuals and
employers. Section 1311(d)(6) requires Exchanges to consult with
various stakeholders relevant to carrying out their responsibilities.
Section 1311(d)(4) identifies the minimum functions that an
Exchange must perform. These functions include, but are not limited to:
Implementing procedures for certification, recertification, and
decertification of QHPs; providing for the operation of a toll-free
telephone hotline to respond to requests for assistance; maintaining an
Internet website containing standardized comparative information on
QHPs; assigning ratings to each QHP offered through the Exchange on the
basis of relative quality and price, in accordance with criteria as
defined by the Secretary; utilizing a standardized format for
presenting health benefits options in the Exchange; consistent with
requirements in Section 1413 of the Act, informing individuals of
eligibility requirements for the Medicaid and CHIP programs or any
applicable State or local public program, and enrolling individuals in
those programs if the Exchange determines they are eligible through
screening of the application by the Exchange; establishing and making
available by electronic means a calculator to determine the actual cost
of coverage after application of any premium tax credit and cost-
sharing reduction; granting certifications to individuals relating to
hardship or other exemptions; and establishing a Navigator program
consistent with the requirements in Section 1311(i).
2. Requirements Relating to Plan Ratings and Internet Portals
Section 1311(c)(3) requires the Secretary to develop a rating
system that would rate QHPs offered through an Exchange on the basis of
the relative quality and price. Additionally, Section 1311(c)(4)
requires the Secretary to develop an enrollee satisfaction system that
would evaluate the level of satisfaction with QHPs that had more than
500 enrollees during the previous year that are offered through an
Exchange. The Act requires Exchanges to include quality and enrollee
satisfaction ratings in the information provided to individuals and
employers through their Internet portals.
Section 1311(c)(5) directs the Secretary to make a model template
available to Exchanges for an Internet portal that may be used to
direct eligible individuals and employers to QHPs; assist individuals
and employers in determining eligibility for participation in
Exchanges, premium tax credits, or cost-sharing reductions; and present
standardized information (including plan ratings) to assist consumers
in making health insurance choices. The Affordable Care Act also
directs the Secretary to continue operating, maintaining and updating
the Federal Internet portal developed under Section 1103(a) and to
assist States in developing and maintaining their own portals.
[[Page 45586]]
3. Requirements Relating to Navigator Programs
Section 1311(i) provides that an Exchange shall establish a
Navigator program under which it awards grants to eligible entities
that meet the law's criteria, including demonstrating to the Exchange
that they have existing relationships or could establish relationships
with employers and employees, consumers, or self-employed individuals
likely to be eligible to enroll in a qualified health plan. The duties
of entities that serve as Navigators under such a grant include:
Conducting public education activities to raise awareness of the
availability of QHPs; distributing fair and impartial information
concerning enrollment in QHPs and the availability of premium tax
credits and cost-sharing reductions; facilitating enrollment in QHPs;
providing referrals to any applicable office of health insurance
consumer assistance, health insurance ombudsman, or other State agency
to address enrollee complaints and questions about their health plans
and coverage determination; and providing information in a manner that
is culturally and linguistically appropriate to the needs of the
population being served by the Exchange. The Affordable Care Act
directs the Secretary, in collaboration with States, to develop
standards to ensure that information made available by Navigators is
fair, accurate and impartial.
4. Other Requirements Relating to Exchanges
Section 1311(c)(6) requires Exchanges to provide for an initial
open enrollment period (as determined by the Secretary no later than
July 1, 2012), annual open enrollment periods (as determined by the
Secretary), and special enrollment periods.
Section 1311(d)(5)(A) specifies that States must ensure that their
Exchanges are self-sustaining on or after January 1, 2015, including
allowing Exchanges to charge assessments or user fees to participating
health insurance issuers, or otherwise generate funding to support
their operations. Section 1311(d)(5)(B) prohibits wasteful use of funds
by Exchanges. Additionally, Section 1313 requires Exchanges to keep an
accurate accounting of all activities, receipts, and expenditures, and
annually submit to the Secretary a report concerning such accounting.
Section 1313(a) also specifies that the Secretary has certain
enforcement authority if an Exchange or a State has engaged in serious
misconduct related to compliance with Title I of the Act.
5. Establishment of Exchanges in the Territories
Section 1323 of the Affordable Care Act provides an opportunity for
U.S. Territories to elect to establish Exchanges and appropriates a
fixed amount of funds to reduce the cost of coverage provided through
an Exchange in the Territories. The Act stipulates that Territories'
elections related to establishing Exchanges must be consistent with
Section 1321, relating to standards for establishing and operating
Exchanges, and received not later than October 1, 2013.
II. Solicitation of Comments
Section 1321(a)(2) of the Affordable Care Act requires the
Secretary to consult with stakeholders to ensure balanced
representation among interested parties. HHS is inviting public comment
to aid in the development of standards for establishment and operation
of the Exchanges, to address other Exchange-related provisions in Title
I of the Affordable Care Act, and to inform for the awarding of grants
to the States to assist them in planning and developing Exchanges. The
Department is interested in comments from all interested parties. To
assist interested parties in responding, this request for comments
describes specific areas in which the Department is particularly
interested.
Commenters should use the questions below to provide the Department
with relevant information for the development of regulations regarding
the Exchange-related provisions in Title I of the Affordable Care Act.
However, it is not necessary for commenters to address every question
below and commenters may also address additional issues under the
Exchange-related provisions in Title I of the Affordable Care Act.
Individuals, groups, and organizations interested in providing comments
may do so at their discretion by following the above mentioned
instructions.
Specific areas in which HHS is particularly interested include the
following:
A. State Exchange Planning and Establishment Grants
Section 1311(a) directs the Secretary to make planning and
establishment grant awards to States for activities related to
establishing an Exchange. For each fiscal year, the Secretary must
determine the total amount that will be made available to each State.
Grants awarded under this Section may be renewed if a State is making
sufficient progress toward establishing an Exchange, implementing other
insurance market reforms, and meeting other benchmarks. The Secretary
must make the initial grant awards under this Section no later than one
year after enactment, and no grants shall be awarded after January 1,
2015.
1. What factors are States likely to consider in determining
whether they will elect to offer an Exchange by January 1, 2014? To
what extent are States currently planning to develop their own
Exchanges by 2014 (e.g., become electing States) versus choosing to
opt-in to an Exchange operated by the Federal government for their
State? When will this decision be made? Can planning grants assist in
identifying and assessing relevant factors and making this decision?
2. To what extent have States already begun to plan for
establishment of Exchanges? What kinds of activities are currently
underway (e.g., legislative, regulatory, etc.)? What internal and/or
external entities are involved, or will likely be involved in this
planning process?
a. What kinds of governance structures, rules or processes have
States established or are they likely to establish related to operating
Exchanges (e.g., legal structure (such as placement in State agency or
nonprofit organization), governance structure, requirements relating to
governing board composition, etc.)?
b. To what extent have States begun developing business plans or
budgets relating to Exchange implementation?
3. What are some of the major factors that States are likely to
consider in determining how to structure their Exchanges (e.g.,
separate or combined individual Exchanges and SHOP Exchanges; regional
or interstate Exchanges; subsidiary Exchanges, State agency versus
nonprofit entity)? What are the pros and cons of these various options?
4. What kinds of factors are likely to affect States' resource
needs related to establishing Exchanges?
a. What is the estimated range of costs that States are likely to
incur during the upcoming year (e.g., calendar 2010 through calendar
2011) for each of the major categories of Exchange activities? Which of
these expenses are fixed costs, and which costs are variable?
b. To what extent do States have existing resources that could be
leveraged as a starting point for Exchange operations (e.g., existing
information technology (IT) systems, toll-free hotlines, Web sites,
business processes, etc.)?
[[Page 45587]]
c. For what kinds of activities are States likely to seek funding
using the Exchange establishment and planning grants?
5. What kinds of questions are States likely to receive during the
initial planning and start-up phase of establishing Exchanges? How can
HHS provide technical assistance, and in what forms, in helping States
to answer these questions?
B. Implementation Timeframes and Considerations
Section 1321(b) requires each State that elects to establish an
Exchange meeting the Secretary's requirements to have an Exchange
operational by January 1, 2014. Section 1321(c) directs the Secretary
to establish and operate an Exchange within each State that: (1) Does
not elect to establish an Exchange; or (2) the Secretary determines
will not have an Exchange operational by January 1, 2014, or has not
taken the actions the Secretary determines necessary to implement the
requirements in Section 1321(a) or the other insurance market reform
requirements in Subtitles A and C of Title I of the Act.
Additionally, the Affordable Care Act includes several statutory
deadlines for the Secretary related to establishment of Exchanges,
including:
Issuing regulations and/or guidance relating to
requirements for Exchanges, requirements for QHPs, and risk adjustment
as soon as practicable;
Awarding State planning grants no later than one year
after enactment (March 23, 2011);
Determining the dates of the initial open enrollment
period by July 1, 2012;
No later than January 1, 2013, determining States'
readiness to have Exchanges operational and implement required
insurance market reforms by January 1, 2014;
No later than July 1, 2013, issuing regulations for health
choice compacts and the CO-OP program, and awarding CO-OP program
grants; and
Having in place additional insurance market reforms and
providing cost-sharing reductions beginning on January 1, 2014.
In order to carry out the Federal implementation activities to
ensure Exchanges are fully operational on January 1, 2014, the
Department is seeking comments from stakeholders relating to
implementation timeframes.
1. What are the key implementation tasks that need to be
accomplished to meet Exchange formation deadlines and what is the
timing for such tasks? What kinds of business functions will need to be
operational before January 1, 2014, and how soon will they need to be
operational?
2. What kinds of guidance or information would be helpful to
States, plans, employers, consumers, and other groups or sectors as
they begin the planning process?
3. What potential criteria could be considered in determining
whether an electing State is making sufficient progress in establishing
an Exchange and implementing the insurance market reforms in Subtitles
A and C of Title I of the Affordable Care Act? What are important
milestones for States to show they are making steady and sufficient
progress to implement reforms by the statutory deadlines?
4. What other terms or provisions require additional clarification
to facilitate implementation and compliance? What specific
clarifications would be helpful?
C. State Exchange Operations
Section 1311(b) requires an Exchange to be established in each
State not later than January 1, 2014 that: Facilitates the purchase of
QHPs; provides for the establishment of a SHOP Exchange that assists
small employers in facilitating the enrollment of their employees in
QHPs offered in the small group market in the State; and meets
additional requirements for Exchanges outlined in Section 1311(d). The
Act requires the Secretary to publish regulations relating to the
requirements for operating State Exchanges as soon as practicable, and
provides various types of flexibility for States.
A number of additional programs established by the Act are closely
related to the establishment of health insurance Exchanges, such as the
Navigator program in Section 1311(i) and other consumer assistance
programs. In addition, the insurance reforms, consumer protection
provisions, and premium rating requirements will apply to plans both
inside and outside the Exchanges.
1. What are some of the major considerations for States in planning
for and establishing Exchanges?
2. For which aspects of Exchange operations or Exchange standards
would uniformity be preferable? For which aspects of Exchange
operations or Exchange standards is State flexibility likely to be
particularly important?
3. What kinds of systems are States likely to need to enable
important Exchange operational functions (e.g., eligibility
determination, plan qualification, data reporting, payment flows,
etc.), to ensure adequate accounting and tracking of spending, provide
transparency to Exchange functions, and facilitate financial audits?
What are the relative costs and considerations associated with building
Exchange operational, financial, and/or IT systems off of existing
systems, versus building new stand-alone Exchange IT systems?
4. What are the tradeoffs for States to utilize a Federal IT
solution for operating their Exchanges, as compared to building their
own unique systems to conform to the current State environment? For
what kinds of functions would it make more sense for States to build
their own systems, or modify existing systems?
5. What are the considerations for States as they develop web
portals for the Exchanges?
6. What factors should Exchanges consider in reviewing
justifications for premium increases from insurers seeking
certification as QHPs? How will States leverage/coordinate the work
funded by the rate review grants to inform the decisions about which
plans will be certified by QHPs?
7. To what extent are Territories likely to elect to establish
their own Exchanges? What specific issues apply to establishing
Exchanges in the Territories?
8. What specific planning steps should the Exchanges undertake to
ensure that they are accessible and available to individuals from
diverse cultural origins and those with low literacy, disabilities, and
limited English proficiency?
9. What factors should the Secretary consider in determining what
constitutes as wasteful spending (as outlined in Section 1311
(d)(5)(B))?
D. Qualified Health Plans (QHPs)
Section 1311(d)(2)(A) requires Exchanges to make QHPs available to
qualified individuals and employers, and Section 1311(d)(4)(A) requires
Exchanges to implement procedures for the certification,
recertification, and decertification of health plans as QHPs,
consistent with criteria developed by the Secretary under section
1311(c). This certification criteria include, at a minimum: Meeting
marketing requirements; ensuring a sufficient choice of providers and
providing information on the availability of providers; including
essential community providers within health insurance plan networks;
receiving appropriate accreditation; implementing a quality improvement
strategy; utilizing a uniform enrollment form and a standard format to
present health benefit plan options; and providing quality information
to enrollees and prospective enrollees.
[[Page 45588]]
1. What are some of the major considerations involved in certifying
QHPs under the Exchanges, and how do those considerations differ in the
context of individual and SHOP State Exchanges, subsidiary Exchanges,
regional or interstate Exchanges, or an Exchange operated by the
Federal government on behalf of States that do not elect to establish
an Exchange?
2. What factors should be considered in developing the Section
1311(c) certification criteria? To what extent do States currently have
similar requirements or standards for plans in the individual and group
markets?
a. What issues need to be considered in establishing appropriate
standards for ensuring a sufficient choice of providers and providing
information on the availability of providers?
b. What issues need to be considered in establishing appropriate
minimum standards for marketing of QHPs and enforcement of those
standards? What are appropriate Federal and State roles in marketing
oversight?
3. What factors are needed to facilitate participation of a
sufficient mix of QHPs in the Exchanges to meet the needs of consumers?
a. What timeframes and key milestones will be most important in
assessing plans' participation in Exchanges?
b. What kinds of factors are likely to encourage or discourage
competition among plans in the Exchanges based on price, quality,
value, and other factors?
4. What health plan standards and bidding processes would help to
facilitate getting the best value for consumers and taxpayers?
5. What factors are important in establishing minimum requirements
for the actuarial value/level of coverage?
6. What factors, bidding requirements, and review/selection
practices are likely to facilitate the participation of multiple plans
in Exchanges? To what extent should the Exchanges accept all plans that
meet minimum standards or select and negotiate with plans?
7. What are some important considerations related to establishing
the program to offer loans or grants to foster the promotion of
qualified nonprofit health plans under CO-OP plans? How prevalent are
these organizations today? What is the likely demand for these loans
and grants? What kinds of guidance are they likely to need from HHS and
what legislative or regulatory changes are they likely to need from
States?
8. Are there any special factors that are important for
consideration in establishing standards for the participation of multi-
State plans in Exchanges?
9. To what extent are States considering setting up State Basic
Health Plans under Section 1331 of the Act?
E. Quality
The Affordable Care Act requires the Secretary to develop a health
plan rating system on the basis of quality and prices that would be
used by the Exchanges and to establish quality improvement criteria
that health plans must meet in order to be qualified plans for
Exchanges.
1. What factors are most important for consideration in
establishing standards for a plan rating system?
a. How best can Exchanges help consumers understand the quality and
cost implications of their plan choices?
b. Are the measures and standards that are being used to establish
ratings for health plans in the Medicare Advantage program appropriate
for rating QHPs in the Exchanges? Are there other State Medicaid or
commercial models that could be considered?
c. How much flexibility is desirable with respect to establishing
State-specific thresholds or quality requirements above the minimum
Federal thresholds or quality requirements?
2. What are some minimum standards or other factors that could be
considered with respect to establishing quality measurement and
improvement thresholds or quality requirements that should be met by
QHPs? What other strategies, including payment structures, could be
used by plans to improve the practices of plan providers?
F. An Exchange for Non-Electing States
Section 1321(c) requires that in the case of States that do not
elect to establish Exchanges, or that the Secretary determines will not
have Exchanges operational by January 1, 2014 or have not taken the
necessary actions to implement the requirements in Section 1321(a) or
other insurance market reforms specified in Subtitles A and C of Title
I of the Act, the Secretary shall establish (directly or through
agreement with a not-for-profit entity) and operate an Exchange within
the State.
1. How can the Federal government best work to implement an
Exchange in States that do not elect to establish or are unable to
establish their own Exchanges?
2. Are there considerations for an Exchange operated by the Federal
government on behalf of States that do not elect to establish an
Exchange that would be different from the State-run Exchanges?
G. Enrollment and Eligibility
Section 1411 of the Affordable Care Act requires the Secretary to
establish a program for determining whether an individual meets certain
eligibility requirements for Exchange participation, premium tax
credits and cost-sharing reductions, and individual responsibility
exemptions. Additionally, Sections 1412, 1413 and 2201 contain
additional requirements to assist Exchanges by making advance
determinations regarding income eligibility and cost-sharing
reductions; providing for residents of each State to apply for
enrollment in, receive a determination of eligibility for participation
in, and continue participation in applicable State health subsidy
programs; and simplifying and coordinating enrollment in the Exchanges,
Medicaid and the Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP).
1. What are the advantages and issues associated with various
options for setting the duration of the open enrollment period for
Exchanges for the first year and subsequent years? What factors are
important for developing criteria for special enrollment periods?
2. What are some of the key considerations associated with
conducting online enrollment?
3. How can eligibility and enrollment be effectively coordinated
between Medicaid, CHIP, and Exchanges? How could eligibility systems be
designed or adapted to accomplish this? What steps can be taken to ease
consumer navigation between the programs and ease administrative
burden? What are the key considerations related to States using
Exchange or Medicaid/CHIP application information to determine
eligibility for all three programs?
4. What kinds of data linkages do State Medicaid and CHIP agencies
currently have with other Federal and State agencies and data sources?
How can the implementation of Exchanges help to streamline these
processes for States, and how can these linkages be leveraged to
support Exchange operations?
5. How do States or other stakeholders envision facilitating the
requirements of Section 1411 related to verification with Federal
agencies of eligibility for enrollment through an Exchange?
6. What are the verification and data sharing functions that States
are capable of performing to facilitate the determination of Exchange
eligibility and enrollment?
7. What considerations should be taken into account in establishing
[[Page 45589]]
procedures for payment of the cost-sharing reductions to health plans?
H. Outreach
Section 1311(i) provides that Exchanges shall establish grant
programs for Navigators, to conduct public education activities,
distribute enrollment information, facilitate enrollment, and provide
referrals for grievances, complaints, or questions.
1. What kinds of consumer enrollment, outreach, and educational
activities are States and other entities likely to conduct relating to
Exchanges, insurance market reforms, premium tax credits and cost-
sharing reductions, available plan choices, etc., and what Federal
resources or technical assistance are likely to be beneficial?
2. What resources are needed for Navigator programs? To what extent
do States currently have programs in place that can be adapted to serve
as patient Navigators?
3. What kinds of outreach strategies are likely to be most
successful in enrolling individuals who are eligible for tax credits
and cost-sharing reductions to purchase coverage through an Exchange,
and retaining these individuals? How can these outreach efforts be
coordinated with efforts for other public programs?
I. Rating Areas
Section 2701(a)(2) of the Public Health Service Act, as added by
Section 1201 of the Affordable Care Act requires each State to
establish one or more rating areas within the State for purposes of
applying the requirements of Title I of the Affordable Care Act
(including the Exchange provisions), subject to review by the
Secretary.
1. To what extent do States currently utilize established premium
rating areas? What are the typical geographical boundaries of these
premium rating areas (e.g., Statewide, regional, county, etc.)? What
are the pros and cons associated with interstate, statewide, and sub-
State premium rating areas? What insurance markets are typically
required to utilize these premium rating areas?
2. To the extent that States utilize premium rating areas, how are
they established? What kinds of criteria do States and other entities
typically consider when determining the adequacy of premium rating
areas? What other criteria could be considered?
J. Consumer Experience
1. What kinds of design features can help consumers obtain coverage
through the Exchange? What information are consumers likely to find
useful from Exchanges in making plan selections? Which kinds of
enrollment venues are likely to be most helpful in facilitating
individual enrollment in Exchanges and QHPs?
2. What kinds of information are likely to be most useful to
consumers as they determine whether to enroll in an Exchange and which
plans to select (within or outside of an Exchange)? What are some best
practices in conveying information to consumers relating to health
insurance, plan comparisons, and eligibility for premium tax credits,
or eligibility for other public health insurance programs (e.g.,
Medicaid)? What types of efforts could be taken to reach individuals
from diverse cultural origins and those with low literacy,
disabilities, and limited English proficiency?
3. What are best practices in implementing consumer protections
standards?
4. Given that consumer complaints can be an important source of
information in identifying compliance issues, what are the pros and
cons of various options for collecting and reporting Exchange-related
complaints (e.g., collecting complaints at the Federal level, versus at
the State or Exchange level)?
K. Employer Participation
Section 1311(b)(1)(B) provides for the establishment of Small
Business Health Options Programs, referred to as SHOP Exchanges, which
are designed to assist qualified employers in the State who are small
employers in facilitating the enrollment of their employees in QHPs
offered in the small group market in the State. Section 1304(b)
provides that for plan years beginning before January 1, 2016, States
have the option to define ``small employers'' as those with (1) 100 or
fewer employees, or (2) 50 or fewer employees. Section 1312(f)(2)(B)
specifies that beginning in 2017, States may elect to include issuers
of health insurance coverage in the large group market to offer QHPs
through the Exchange, and for large employers to purchase coverage
through the Exchange.
In addition, employers that do not offer affordable coverage to
their employees will also interact with the Exchanges including where
their employees purchase coverage through the Exchange.
1. What Exchange design features are likely to be most important
for employer participation, including the participation of large
employers in the future? What are some relevant best practices?
2. What factors are important for consideration in determining the
employer size limit (e.g., 50 versus 100) for participation in a given
State's Exchange?
3. What considerations are important in facilitating coordination
between employers and Exchanges? What key issues will require
collaboration?
4. What other issues are there of interest to employers with
respect to their participation in Exchanges?
L. Risk Adjustment, Reinsurance, and Risk Corridors
Sections 1341, 1342, and 1343 of the Act provide for the
establishment of transitional reinsurance programs, risk corridors, and
risk adjustment systems for the individual and small group markets
within States.
1. To what extent do States and other entities currently risk-
adjust payments for health insurance coverage in order to counter
adverse selection? In what markets (e.g., Medicaid, CHIP, government
employee plans, etc.) are these risk adjustment activities currently
performed? To the extent that risk adjustment is or has been used, what
methods have been utilized, and what are the pros and cons of such
methods?
2. To what extent do States currently collect demographic and other
information, such as health status, claims history, or medical
conditions under treatment on enrollees in the individual and small
group markets that could be used for risk adjustment? What kinds of
resources and authorities would States need in order to collect
information for risk adjustment of plans offered inside and outside of
the Exchanges?
3. What issues are States likely to consider in carrying out risk
adjustment for health plans inside and outside of the Exchanges? What
kinds of technical assistance might be useful to States and QHPs?
4. What are some of the major administrative options for carrying
out risk adjustment? What kinds of entities could potentially conduct
risk adjustment or collect and distribute funds for risk adjustment?
What are some of the options relating to the timing of payments, and
what are the pros and cons of these options?
5. To what extent do States currently offer reinsurance in the
health insurance arena (e.g., Medicaid, State employee plans, etc.) or
in other arenas? How is that reinsurance typically structured in terms
of contributions, coverage levels, and eligibility? How much is
typically taken in and paid out? Is the reinsurance fund capped in any
way?
[[Page 45590]]
6. What kinds of non-profit entities currently exist in the
marketplace that could potentially fulfill the role of an ``applicable
reinsurance entity'' as defined in the Act?
7. What methods are typically used to determine which individuals
are deemed high-risk or high cost for the purposes of reinsurance?
8. What challenges are States likely to face in implementing the
temporary reinsurance program?
9. How do other programs (e.g., Medicaid) use risk corridors to
share profits and losses with health plans or other entities? How are
the corridors defined and monitored under these programs? What
mechanisms are used to collect and disburse payments?
10. Are there non-Federal instances in which reinsurance and/or
risk corridors and/or risk adjustment were used together? What kinds of
special considerations are important when implementing multiple risk
selection mitigation strategies at once?
M. Comments Regarding Economic Analysis, Paperwork Reduction Act, and
Regulatory Flexibility Act
Executive Order 12866 requires an assessment of the anticipated
costs and benefits of a significant rulemaking action and the
alternatives considered, using the guidance provided by the Office of
Management and Budget. These costs and benefits are not limited to the
Federal government, but pertain to the affected public as a whole.
Under Executive Order 12866, a determination must be made whether
implementation of the Exchange-related provisions in Title I of the
Affordable Care Act will be economically significant. A rule that has
an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or more is considered
economically significant.
In addition, the Regulatory Flexibility Act may require the
preparation of an analysis of the economic impact on small entities of
proposed rules and regulatory alternatives. An analysis under the
Regulatory Flexibility Act must generally include, among other things,
an estimate of the number of small entities subject to the regulations
(for this purpose, plans, employers, and in some contexts small
governmental entities), the expense of the reporting, recordkeeping,
and other compliance requirements (including the expense of using
professional expertise), and a description of any significant
regulatory alternatives considered that would accomplish the stated
objectives of the statute and minimize the impact on small entities.
The Paperwork Reduction Act requires an estimate of how many
``respondents'' will be required to comply with any ``collection of
information'' requirements contained in regulations and how much time
and cost will be incurred as a result. A collection of information
includes recordkeeping, reporting to governmental agencies, and third-
party disclosures.
Furthermore, Section 202 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995 (UMRA) requires that agencies assess anticipated costs and
benefits and take certain other actions before issuing a final rule
that includes any Federal mandate that may result in expenditure in any
one year by State, local, or tribal governments, in the aggregate, or
by the private sector, of $135 million.
The Department is requesting comments that may contribute to the
analyses that will be performed under these requirements, both
generally and with respect to the following specific areas:
1. What policies, procedures, or practices of plans, employers and
States may be impacted by the Exchange-related provisions in Title I of
the Affordable Care Act?
a. What direct or indirect costs and benefits would result?
b. Which stakeholders will be affected by such benefits and costs?
c. Are these impacts likely to vary by insurance market, plan type,
or geographic area?
2. Are there unique effects for small entities subject to the
Exchange-related provisions in Title I of the Affordable Care Act?
3. Are there unique benefits and costs affecting consumers? How
will these consumer benefits be affected by States' Exchange design and
flexibilities and the magnitude and substance of provisions mandated by
the Act? Please discuss tangible and intangible benefits.
4. Are there paperwork burdens related to the Exchange-related
provisions in Title I of the Affordable Care Act, and, if so, what
estimated hours and costs are associated with those additional burdens?
N. Comments Regarding Exchange Operations
The Exchange-related provisions in Title I of the Affordable Care
Act may affect/will involve various stakeholders. HHS wants to ensure
receipt of all comments pertaining to the operations of the Exchanges.
1. What other considerations related to the operations of Exchanges
should be addressed? If your questions related to the operations of
Exchanges have not been asked, or you would like to add additional
comments, you may do so here.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 27th day of July 2010.
Jay Angoff,
Director, Office of Consumer Information and Insurance Oversight,
Department of Health and Human Services.
[FR Doc. 2010-18924 Filed 7-29-10; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 4150-65-P