Pre-Existing Condition Insurance Plan Program, 45014-45033 [2010-18691]
Download as PDF
45014
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 146 / Friday, July 30, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
45 CFR Part 152
[OCIIO–9995–IFC]
RIN 0991–AB71
Pre-Existing Condition Insurance Plan
Program
Office of Consumer Information
and Insurance Oversight, OCIIO,
Department of Health and Human
Services, HHS.
ACTION: Interim final rule with comment
period.
AGENCY:
Section 1101 of Title I of the
Patient Protection and Affordable Care
Act of 2010 (Affordable Care Act)
requires that the Secretary establish,
either directly or through contracts with
States or nonprofit private entities, a
temporary high risk health insurance
pool program to provide affordable
health insurance coverage to uninsured
individuals with pre-existing
conditions. This program will continue
until January 1, 2014, when Exchanges
established under sections 1311 and
1321 of the Affordable Care Act will be
available for individuals to obtain
health insurance coverage. This interim
final rule implements requirements in
section 1101 of the Affordable Care Act.
Key issues addressed in this interim
final rule include administration of the
program, eligibility and enrollment,
benefits, premiums, funding, and
appeals and oversight rules.
DATES: Effective date: This regulation is
effective on July 30, 2010.
Comment date: To be assured
consideration, comments must be
received at one of the addresses
provided below, no later than 5 p.m. on
September 28, 2010.
ADDRESSES: In commenting, please refer
to file code OCIIO–9995–IFC. Because of
staff and resource limitations, we cannot
accept comments by facsimile (FAX)
transmission.
You may submit comments in one of
four ways (please choose only one of the
ways listed)
1. Electronically. You may submit
electronic comments on this regulation
to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow
the instructions under the ‘‘More Search
Options’’ tab.
2. By regular mail. You may mail
written comments to the following
address only: Centers for Medicare &
Medicaid Services, Department of
Health and Human Services, Attention:
CMS–OCIIO–IFC, P.O. Box 8010,
Baltimore, MD 21244–8010.
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES2
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:44 Jul 29, 2010
Jkt 220001
Please allow sufficient time for mailed
comments to be received before the
close of the comment period.
3. By express or overnight mail. You
may send written comments to the
following address only: Centers for
Medicare & Medicaid Services,
Department of Health and Human
Services, Attention: OCIIO–9995–IFC,
Mail Stop C4–26–05, 7500 Security
Boulevard, Baltimore, MD 21244–1850.
4. By hand or courier. If you prefer,
you may deliver (by hand or courier)
your written comments before the close
of the comment period to either of the
following addresses:
a. For delivery in Washington, DC—
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
Services, Department of Health and
Human Services, Room 445–G, Hubert
H. Humphrey Building, 200
Independence Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC 20201
(Because access to the interior of the
Hubert H. Humphrey Building is not readily
available to persons without Federal
government identification, commenters are
encouraged to leave their comments in the
CMS drop slots located in the main lobby of
the building. A stamp-in clock is available for
persons wishing to retain a proof of filing by
stamping in and retaining an extra copy of
the comments being filed.)
b. For delivery in Baltimore, MD—
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
Services, Department of Health and
Human Services, 7500 Security
Boulevard, Baltimore, MD 21244–
1850.
If you intend to deliver your
comments to the Baltimore address,
please call telephone number (410) 786–
7195 in advance to schedule your
arrival with one of our staff members.
Comments mailed to the addresses
indicated as appropriate for hand or
courier delivery may be delayed and
received after the comment period.
Submission of comments on
paperwork requirements. You may
submit comments on this document’s
paperwork requirements by following
the instructions at the end of the
‘‘Collection of Information
Requirements’’ section in this document.
For information on viewing public
comments, see the beginning of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Ariel Novick, (301) 492–4290.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Inspection
of Public Comments: All comments
received before the close of the
comment period are available for
viewing by the public, including any
personally identifiable or confidential
business information that is included in
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
a comment. We post all comments
received before the close of the
comment period on the following Web
site as soon as possible after they have
been received: https://regulations.gov.
Follow the search instructions on that
Web site to view public comments.
Comments received timely will be
also available for public inspection as
they are received, generally beginning
approximately 3 weeks after publication
of a document, at the headquarters of
the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
Services, 7500 Security Boulevard,
Baltimore, Maryland 21244, Monday
through Friday of each week from 8:30
a.m. to 4 p.m. To schedule an
appointment to view public comments,
phone 1–800–743–3951.
I. Background
A. General
Historically, public policy has
addressed the challenges of people with
pre-existing conditions through either
high risk pools or insurance reform. In
general, high risk pools provide
coverage of last resort for people who,
because of their health, are denied
coverage by private insurers or are
unable to purchase coverage in the
individual market except at
substantially surcharged premiums due
to their health status, and are ineligible
for public coverage (such as Medicare or
Medicaid). Most States that permit
insurers to decline coverage for health
reasons have established high risk pools
as an alternative coverage option in
their individual market. These current
pools provide safety net coverage for
people who have difficulty obtaining
individual health insurance because of
their pre-existing conditions. First
established in 1976, 35 State high risk
pools currently provide coverage to
approximately 200,000 individuals, or
about one percent of the individual
market nationwide, and vary in terms of
the populations they cover and the
benefits they provide.
States and the Congress through the
Affordable Care Act have also elected to
use insurance reforms to address the
accessibility and availability of health
insurance coverage for high risk
populations. Seven States have adopted
guaranteed issue to ensure access to
coverage, and two States prohibit health
status from being a factor in setting
premiums.1 The Patient Protection and
Affordable Care Act of 2010, (the
Affordable Care Act or ‘‘the Act’’), Public
Law 111–148 applies a ban on preexisting condition exclusions and ‘‘rateups’’ based on health status starting in
1 Kaiser Family Foundation. State Health Facts.
https://www.statehealthfacts.org/.
E:\FR\FM\30JYR2.SGM
30JYR2
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 146 / Friday, July 30, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
2014 and prohibits the use of preexisting condition exclusions for
children starting in plan or policy years
that begin on or after September 23,
2010.2 This temporary Federal program
provides coverage to uninsured
Americans with pre-existing conditions
until the Affordable Care Act is fully
implemented in 2014.
B. Overview: Section 1101 of the Patient
Protection and Affordable Care Act
The Affordable Care Act, was enacted
on March 23, 2010. The Health Care and
Education Reconciliation Act (the
Reconciliation Act), Public Law 111–
152, was enacted on March 30, 2010.
Section 1101 of the Affordable Care Act
requires that the Secretary of the
Department of Health and Human
Services (HHS) establish, either directly
or through contracts with States or
nonprofit private entities, a temporary
high risk health insurance program to
provide access to coverage for
uninsured Americans with pre-existing
conditions. (Hereafter, we generally
refer to this program as the Pre-Existing
Condition Insurance Plan program, or
PCIP program, to avoid confusion with
the existing State high risk pool
programs, which will continue to
operate separately.)
The PCIP program is intended to
remain in place from the time of its
establishment until the Exchanges
established under sections 1311 or 1321
of the Act go into effect on January 1,
2014. This interim final regulation sets
policy only for this unique, temporary
Federal program with fixed Federal
funding. Presented below is a general
overview of the statutory requirements
for the new program. More detailed
descriptions of the specific
requirements are included below as part
of the discussion of the associated
regulatory provisions set forth in this
interim final rule.
II. Provisions of the Interim Final Rule
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES2
A. General Provisions (Subpart A,
§ 152.1 Through § 152.2)
Section 152.1 of this interim final rule
specifies the general statutory authority
for the ensuing regulations and the
scope of the program, consistent with
section 1101 of the Act. Section 152.2
provides definitions for terms that
appear throughout these regulations.
Generally, the definitions are selfexplanatory or taken directly from
2 These provisions do not apply to
‘‘grandfathered’’ plans. For a description of these
provisions, see the interim final regulations
implementing 2719A (regarding patient
protections), published in the Federal Register on
June 28, 2010 (75 FR 37188).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:44 Jul 29, 2010
Jkt 220001
section 1101 of the statute. The
definitions set forth in subpart A apply
to all of part 152 unless otherwise
indicated and are applicable only for
purposes of part 152.
The definition of ‘‘pre-existing
condition exclusion’’ warrants a brief
discussion. First, it is important to note
that this definition applies only for
purposes of the prohibition in section
1101(c)(2)(A) on a PCIP ‘‘impos[ing] any
preexisting condition exclusion’’ under
the coverage provided (an important
protection for a program designed to
offer coverage to those with a preexisting condition), and is separate from
the ‘‘guidelines’’ that determine preexisting condition status under section
1101(d)(2)(3) for purposes of eligibility
for enrollment in a PCIP. These latter
eligibility provisions are set forth in
subpart C of this rule, under section
152.14.
State laws vary with regard to the
definition of a pre-existing condition
exclusion. For purposes of defining a
pre-existing condition exclusion, we
adopted the definition of pre-existing
condition currently used in the group
market under the Health Insurance
Portability and Accountability Act of
1996 (HIPAA). We also took into
account section 1201 of the Affordable
Care Act, which prohibits denials of
coverage because of a pre-existing
condition. Thus, we specify that preexisting condition exclusion has the
same meaning as under 45 CFR 144.103.
That is, the term refers to a denial of
coverage, or limitation or exclusion of
benefits, based on the fact that the
individual denied coverage or benefits
had a health condition that was present
before the date of enrollment for the
coverage (or a denial of enrollment),
whether or not any medical advice,
diagnosis, care, or treatment was
recommended or received before that
date. This would include exclusions
stemming from a condition identified
via a pre-enrollment questionnaire or
physical examination, or the review of
medical records during the preenrollment period.
B. PCIP Program Administration
(Subpart B, § 152.6 and § 152.7)
As noted above, section 1101(b) of the
Affordable Care Act provides that HHS
may ‘‘carry out’’ the temporary high risk
health insurance pool program either
directly or through contracts with
eligible entities, which are States and
non-profit entities. Eligible entities must
submit a proposal to carry out a PCIP in
a time and manner, and containing such
information, that the Secretary requires.
Section 152.6 establishes the general
rules for administration through either a
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
45015
State or by HHS through a non-profit
private entity. Section 152.7 then
describes the proposal process and
specifies that in order to contract with
HHS, the eligible entity’s proposal must
demonstrate capability to perform all
functions necessary for the design and
operation of a PCIP, and that its
proposed PCIP is in full compliance
with all of the requirements of this part.
These standards establish minimum
requirements for PCIPs, and are
supplemented by other requirements
detailed in solicitation documents (such
as the descriptions of the outreach plan
and consumer information resources
that each PCIP will establish) and
incorporated into the final contracts
with HHS.
B. Eligibility and Enrollment (Subpart C,
§ 152.14 Through § 152.15)
Section 1101(d) of the Affordable Care
Act provides the basic eligibility criteria
for the PCIP program, which are set
forth under § 152.14. In addition,
consistent with the Secretary’s general
authority under section 1101(c)(2)(D) of
the Act to establish requirements for a
PCIP, we set forth enrollment and
disenrollment requirements in § 152.15.
Eligibility for the PCIP Program
(§ 152.14)
Under section 1101(d) of the
Affordable Care Act and subparagraphs
(1), (2) and (3) of § 152.14(a) of this
interim final rule, an individual is
eligible to enroll in a PCIP if he or she:
(1) Is a citizen or national of the United
States or is lawfully present in the
United States as determined in
accordance with section 1411 of the
Affordable Care Act; (2) has not been
covered under creditable coverage, as
defined in section 2701(c)(1) of the
Public Health Service Act as of the date
of enactment, during the 6-month
period prior to the date on which he or
she is applying for coverage through the
PCIP; and (3) has a pre-existing
condition, as determined in a manner
consistent with guidance issued by the
Secretary. We further provide in
§ 152.14(a)(4) that an individual must be
a resident of a State that falls within the
service area of a PCIP.
Eligibility Conditioned on Citizenship
and Immigration Status
Eligibility for the PCIP program is
limited to citizens or nationals of the
United States and individuals who are
lawfully present in the United States.
For the purpose of this regulation,
lawfully present has the meaning
presently used under the Children’s
Health Insurance Program, provided in
the State Health Official letter issued by
E:\FR\FM\30JYR2.SGM
30JYR2
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES2
45016
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 146 / Friday, July 30, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid
Services (CMS) on July 1, 2010. Section
1101(d)(1) directs the Secretary to make
a determination of citizenship and
immigration status in accordance with
section 1411 of the Act, which describes
procedures to be employed for
determining eligibility for the
Exchanges and provides for these
procedures also to be used in
determining eligibility for the PCIP
program. This section sets forth detailed
requirements governing the type of
information that applicants must
provide and specific verification
procedures that the Secretary of Health
and Human Services, Commissioner of
Social Security, and Secretary of
Homeland Security would be required
to follow to establish eligibility. Section
1411(c)(4) of the Affordable Care Act
further provides that the Secretary shall
conduct verifications and
determinations ‘‘through the use of an
on-line system or otherwise for the
electronic submission of, and response
to, the information submitted * * *
with respect to an applicant,’’ or by
‘‘such other method as is approved by
the Secretary’’ that determines ‘‘the
consistency of the information
submitted with the information
maintained in the records of the
Secretary of the Treasury, the Secretary
of Homeland Security, and the
Commissioner of Social Security’’.
Under this authority, § 152.15(a)(3)
specifies that a PCIP must verify that an
individual is a United States citizen or
national, or lawfully present in the
United States. A PCIP can verify an
individual’s citizenship or immigration
status through the Social Security
Administration or, if applicable, the
Department of Homeland Security. In
many cases, States may be able to
automate verification of citizenship and
immigration status by leveraging
existing data exchanges that are
currently in place for other programs,
such as Medicaid and the Children’s
Health Insurance Program. The
Department of Homeland Security’s U.S.
Citizenship and Immigration Services
(USCIS) Systematic Alien Verification
for Entitlements (SAVE) program
provides online system to verify an
individual’s immigration status. States
can access this system after entering
into the necessary Memorandum of
Understanding with USCIS. An
automated verification process will be
used in all States where HHS is
administering the PCIP program.
Some States are not able to have an
automated ‘‘on-line system’’ or
‘‘electronic’’ process in place when they
start accepting enrollments into their
PCIPs. Therefore, these regulations
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:44 Jul 29, 2010
Jkt 220001
provide, as an ‘‘alternative method’’
approved by the Secretary, that a PCIP
program may instead require the
individual to provide documentation
that establishes citizenship or
immigration status. Subject to HHS
approval, States using documentation
procedures may switch to an automated
system in the future. If a PCIP shares
such information with the Social
Security Administration or the
Department of Homeland Security,
consistent with the Privacy Act, the
regulation specifies that a PCIP must
include a disclosure that the
information provided on the enrollment
request may be shared with other
government agencies for purposes of
establishing eligibility. The type(s) of
documentation PCIPs may use is subject
to approval by HHS under the terms of
the contract.
Eligibility Based on a 6-Month Period
Without Insurance Coverage
Eligibility for the PCIP program is
limited to individuals with no
creditable coverage during the 6-month
period prior to the date on which they
apply for coverage through the PCIP.
Section 2701(c)(1) of the Public Health
Service Act on the date of enactment
and 45 CFR § 146.113(a)(1) define
creditable coverage as coverage of an
individual under a group health plan,
health insurance coverage as defined at
45 CFR 144.103, Medicare Part A or Part
B, Medicaid, the Children’s Health
Insurance Program, the TRICARE
program, a medical care program of the
Indian Health Service or of a tribal
organization, a State health benefits risk
pool (that is, existing State high risk
pool), the Federal Employee Health
Benefits program, a public health plan
(for example, coverage through the
Veterans Administration), or a health
benefit plan offered under section 5(e)
of the Peace Corps Act. Such creditable
coverage includes health coverage
provided to certain former employees,
retirees, spouses, former spouses, and
dependent children who are entitled to
temporary continuation of health
coverage at group rates under the
Consolidated Omnibus Reconciliation
Act of 1985 (COBRA). We specify under
§ 152.14(b)(3) that if an individual has
already satisfied the requirement for a 6month period without creditable
coverage in connection with qualifying
for a given PCIP under section 1101 of
the Act, the individual will be
considered to have satisfied this
eligibility requirement for purposes of a
PCIP in another State, if such individual
moves to a different State and wishes to
enroll in that State’s PCIP.
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
In light of the unique circumstances
presented by infants who are less than
six months old, the Department will
issue guidance on how the requirement
that the individual not have had
creditable coverage during the sixmonth period prior to the application
for the PCIP program applies to and can
be satisfied by such infants. Factors to
be considered in this guidance include
whether coverage in the hospital under
the mother’s plan at birth counts,
current practices regarding insurers’
coverage of newborns, and the antidumping rules that direct the Secretary
to prevent disenrollment of individuals
from existing insurance due to their
health status.
Eligibility Based on Having a PreExisting Condition
Under section 1101(d)(3), eligibility
for the PCIP program is conditioned on
individuals having a pre-existing
condition, as ‘‘determined in a manner
consistent with guidance issued by the
Secretary.’’ We specify at § 152.14(c)(1)
that a PCIP in a State, or the PCIP run
by a non-profit in States that are not
carrying out the PCIP program, may
determine that an individual has a preexisting condition, for purposes of PCIP
eligibility, based on satisfying any one
or more of the following criteria, subject
to HHS approval: (1) The individual
provides documented evidence that an
insurer has refused, or has provided
clear indication that it would refuse, to
issue individual coverage on grounds
related to the individual’s health; (2) the
individual provides documented
evidence that he or she has been offered
individual coverage but only with a
rider that excludes coverage of benefits
associated with a pre-existing condition;
(3) the individual provides documented
evidence that he or she has a medical or
health condition specified by the State
and approved by the Secretary; or
(4) other criteria as defined by the PCIP
and approved by HHS.
We believe that these criteria are fully
consistent with the intent of section
1101(d)(3) of the Act and address the
problems that individuals with preexisting conditions face when applying
for insurance coverage in the individual
market. That is, individuals with preexisting conditions are often unable to
obtain coverage for reasons that include
an outright denial and an exclusion of
coverage for the pre-existing condition.
This includes instances when an
individual applies for coverage and is
informed by the carrier’s representative
or Web site that they would be denied
for coverage by the carrier due to the
pre-existing condition. Providing States
and non-profit entities operating a PCIP
E:\FR\FM\30JYR2.SGM
30JYR2
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 146 / Friday, July 30, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES2
the option of using these manifestations
of having a pre-existing condition,
rather than relying on a list of medical
conditions, is consistent with the PCIP
program goal of covering people who
both have a pre-existing condition and
otherwise cannot access insurance. We
note that in some cases, individuals
with pre-existing conditions are unable
to obtain outright written coverage
denials, but instead are told that carriers
will not accept their applications. These
regulations will permit PCIPs to exercise
flexibility in determining exactly what
type of communication constitutes a
refusal to issue coverage.
Under § 152.14(c)(3), we specify that
a PCIP may determine that an
individual has a pre-existing condition
based on evidence of the existence or
history of certain medical or health
conditions, as approved by the
Secretary. This provision comports with
our intention to permit the continuing
use of eligibility standards that States
use in their existing high risk pools, and
permits a State that has guaranteed issue
and community rated premiums to use
an alternative test to showing a denial
of coverage.
Finally, we provide at § 152.14(c)(4)
that HHS may approve other criteria for
meeting the definition of pre-existing
condition under a given PCIP.
We anticipate that the first two
criteria will be used in all States where
individuals may be denied coverage or
offered coverage with exclusionary
riders. In the PCIP program serving
States that have elected not to play a
role in operating a PCIP program, only
the first two criteria will be used, except
with respect to individuals who are
guaranteed to be issued a policy. PCIPs
administered by States or non-profit
entities may choose to utilize the
additional criteria with HHS approval.
Eligibility for a PCIP Conditioned on
Residing in the Plan’s Service Area
Eligibility for a PCIP is limited to
individuals who reside in the service
area of the PCIP. At § 152.14(a)(4), we
provide that an individual must be a
resident of one of the 50 States or the
District of Columbia which constitutes
or is within the service area of the PCIP.
The statute explicitly acknowledges
the role of a State (defined in section
1304(d) of the Act as the 50 States and
the District of Columbia) with respect to
the administration of PCIP, with no
reference to ‘‘Territories’’ (see 1101(b)(2)
and (3), 1101(e)(3), 1101(g)(3)(A) and
(5)). Unlike section 1204(a) of the Health
Care and Education Reconciliation Act
of 2010, (which amended the Affordable
Care Act and clearly specified a role for
territories in the operation of
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:44 Jul 29, 2010
Jkt 220001
Exchanges), the Congress made no
similar reference to Territories in
connection with the PCIP program.
Enrollment and Disenrollment Process
(§ 152.15)
Under our authority in section
1101(c)(2)(D) of the Act to impose
‘‘appropriate’’ requirements that PCIPs
would be required to meet, § 152.15(a)
and (b) require PCIPs to establish a
process for enrolling and disenrolling
individuals that is approved by HHS.
Our intent is to permit the use of
established enrollment policies and
procedures in place under existing State
high risk pools, to the extent that they
are consistent with the statute.
Section 152.15(a)(2) of this interim
final rule specifies that a PCIP must
allow an individual to remain enrolled
unless the individual is disenrolled
under specified circumstances (for
example, the individual moves out of
the service area or obtains other
creditable coverage) or the PCIP
program is terminated. Our intent is to
promote continuity of coverage for
individuals who enroll in a PCIP until
they are able to obtain coverage through
the Exchange, under which
participating insurers cannot exclude
individuals with pre-existing
conditions. We understand, however,
that to the extent individuals can obtain
other coverage, for example, by
becoming entitled to Medicare or
enrolling in employer-based health
insurance, such coverage would obviate
the need for coverage provided by the
PCIP. Leveraging the availability of such
coverage, by exiting the PCIP, enables
other qualified individuals to enroll.
A PCIP is required to establish,
consistent with § 152.15(b) of this
interim final rule, a disenrollment
process that is approved by HHS. As
noted above, we seek to support States’
ability to participate in this program by
allowing them to adopt policies and
procedures in use under existing high
risk pool programs. We understand that
current practice in State high risk pools
is that an individual who does not pay
his or her premiums on a timely basis
may be disenrolled. We provide in
§ 152.15(b)(2) that, under these
circumstances, the enrollee will receive
sufficient notice and reasonable grace
period for payment prior to any
disenrollment taking effect not to
exceed 61 days (the longest period
currently provided for by States). The
consequence of failing to pay premiums
and any subsequent disenrollment is
that an individual loses access to
coverage and may not be able to reenroll for 6 months. Thus, we believe
that it is the PCIP’s responsibility to
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
45017
inform its enrollees prior to making a
disenrollment effective. There are other
circumstances in which involuntary
disenrollment is appropriate and thus
we establish at § 152.15(b)(3) that a PCIP
must disenroll an individual in cases of
death, where an individual obtains
creditable coverage or no longer resides
in the PCIP’s service area, and other
exceptional circumstances as
established by HHS. We envision that
such circumstances would include cases
of fraud or intentional
misrepresentation of material fact, and it
is our intent to work with PCIPs to
develop policies in these areas via subregulatory guidance. As we explain
under our discussion of eligibility, an
individual who is disenrolled because
he or she no longer resides in the
service area of a PCIP does not have to
satisfy another 6-month continuous
period without creditable coverage
before applying to enroll in a PCIP in
the new State of residence.
Section 152.15(c) requires that a PCIP
establish rules governing effective dates
of enrollments and disenrollments. In
particular, a PCIP program must specify
the deadline for receiving an enrollment
application that would take effect on the
first of the following month. In general,
an individual who submits a complete
enrollment request by an eligible
individual by the 15th day of a month
could access coverage by the 1st day of
the following month. Exceptions to this
policy will be subject to approval by
HHS.
Finally, given the capped
appropriation for this program, we
recognize that PCIPs need sufficient
programmatic flexibility to manage their
costs and enrollment, to help ensure
that the PCIP program’s funding
allocation is sufficient to cover claims
and other program costs for the entire
duration of the program. Thus, we
establish authority under § 152.15(d) for
a PCIP program to employ strategies to
manage enrollment over the course of
the program that may include
enrollment capacity limits, phased-in
(delayed) enrollment, premium and
benefit adjustments that indirectly affect
enrollment, and other measures, as
defined by the PCIP and approved by
HHS.
Benefits—(Subpart D, Sections 152.19
Through 152.22)
Covered Benefits (§ 152.19)
Required Benefits (§ 152.19(a))
The required benefit list in § 152.19(a)
builds off of the essential health benefits
under the new section 2707 of the
Public Health Service Act, as enacted in
the Affordable Care Act, for which
E:\FR\FM\30JYR2.SGM
30JYR2
45018
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 146 / Friday, July 30, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
guidance has yet to be issued. The list
is consistent with the most commonly
covered services offered in existing
State high risk pools, according to a
survey conducted by the National
Association of State Comprehensive
Health Insurance Plans (NASCHIP) in
2009. Its benefits are also parallel to the
benefits offered by the Federal
Employees Health Benefits Plan
(FEHBP).
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES2
Excluded Services (§ 152.19(b))
Section 152.19(b) sets forth a list of
services that shall not be covered by any
PCIP. While the specific benefits to be
included and excluded by any PCIP are
generally subject to HHS approval and
review through the PCIP contracting
process, this excluded services list
addresses several areas where providing
coverage is unequivocally prohibited.
This list of excluded services parallels
that of FEHBP.
The subject of Federal funding of
abortion services with respect to the
Affordable Care Act was addressed in
the Executive Order issued by the
President on March 24, 2010: The
enactment of the Affordable Care Act
left in place current restrictions that
prohibit the use of Federal funds for
abortion services, except in cases of rape
or incest, or where the life of the woman
would be endangered. Exec. Order No.
13,535, 75 FR 15,599 (Mar. 24, 2010).
These restrictions currently apply to
certain Federal programs that are similar
to the PCIP program. The PCIP program
is Federally-created, funded, and
administered (whether directly or
through contract); it is a temporary
Federal insurance program in which the
risk is borne by the Federal government
up to a fixed appropriation. As such, the
services covered by the PCIP program
shall not include abortion services
except in the case of rape or incest, or
where the life of the woman would be
endangered.
Pre-Existing Conditions Exclusions
(§ 152.20)
Section 1101(c)(2)(A) of the Act
requires that a PCIP established under
this section not impose any pre-existing
condition exclusions with respect to
covered services. The Health Insurance
Portability and Accountability Act of
1996 (HIPAA) includes limitations for
pre-existing conditions in the group
market. This protection was expanded
under section 1201 of the Affordable
Care Act, which prohibits any preexisting condition exclusions from
being imposed by group health plans or
group and individual health insurance
coverage beginning January 1, 2014. The
interim final rules issued pursuant to
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:44 Jul 29, 2010
Jkt 220001
section 2704 of the Public Health
Service Act (as amended by the
Affordable Care Act) under § 147 adopt,
with minor modifications, the definition
of pre-existing condition currently used
under HIPAA.
Similarly, our rule prohibits PCIPs
from applying any pre-existing
condition exclusion to covered services,
and consistent with the regulations
implementing section 1201 of the Act,
defines a pre-existing condition
exclusion as a limitation or exclusion of
benefits based on the fact that the
condition was present before the date of
enrollment in coverage (or a denial of
enrollment), whether or not any medical
advice, diagnosis, care, or treatment was
recommended or received before that
date.
Pursuant to the authority provided to
the Secretary under section
1101(c)(2)(D), this interim final rule also
prohibits PCIPs from imposing any type
of coverage waiting period upon eligible
individuals. For purposes of this rule, a
waiting period is defined as the period
immediately following the effective date
of enrollment in which some or all
benefits in the coverage are not
provided. Accordingly, once an
individual is enrolled in a PCIP
consistent with the rules set forth in
subpart C, full coverage must be
provided to the individual starting with
the effective date of enrollment.
Premiums and Cost-Sharing (§ 152.21)
Standard Rate
Section 1101(c)(2)(C)(iii) of the Act
requires that premium rates charged for
coverage under the high risk pool
program be established at ‘‘a standard
rate for a standard population’’. The
National Association of Insurance
Commissioners (NAIC) Model Health
Plan for Uninsurable Individuals Act
suggests that high risk pool plans
‘‘determine a standard risk rate by
considering the premium rates charged
by other insurers offering health
insurance coverage to individuals.’’
Furthermore, section 2245(g)(2) of the
Public Health Service Act (PHSA),
which governs the existing Federal high
risk pool grant program, defines the
‘‘standard risk rate’’ for the high risk
pools to mean a rate that: (1) Is
determined under the State high risk
pool by considering the premium rates
charged by other health insurers offering
health insurance coverage to individuals
in the insurance market served; (2) is
established using reasonable actuarial
techniques; and (3) reflects anticipated
claims experience and expenses for the
coverage involved.
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
In keeping with the methodology
suggested by the NAIC Model Act and
the Federal grant program, § 152.21 of
this interim final rule generally
interprets the phrase ‘‘standard rate for
a standard population’’ to refer to the
premium rates offered in the individual
market in a given State. While existing
State high risk pools’ premiums vary
between 105–250 percent of the
standard rate of the individual market,
the Act requires that premiums in the
PCIP program be at the standard rate,
rather than a higher proportion of that
rate. Therefore, this rule provides that a
PCIP established under this section
must not offer enrollees premiums at a
rate that exceeds 100 percent of the
standard individual market rate in the
PCIP service area.
This interim final rule does not
mandate a specific formula for
calculating the standard rate. Instead,
we specify that a PCIP may calculate the
standard rate using reasonable actuarial
techniques, as approved by the
Secretary, that reflect anticipated
experience and expenses. This
requirement should accommodate
reasonable variations in the methods
that PCIPs may use to calculate a
standard risk rate.
We also recognize that individual
market rates in each State can vary as a
consequence of individual State
insurance laws. For example, some
States require that insurers issue all
applicants a policy or offer coverage at
a community rate. In such situations,
the standard individual rate may be
considerably higher than in a State that
permits insurers to reject applicants or
set premiums on the basis of health
status or other factors. To account for
these variations, § 152.21(a) of these
rules provides that, subject to approval
by HHS, a PCIP may use other methods
of determining the standard rate in the
State. The exact methodology must be
submitted and approved through the
proposal process as specified in § 152.8
of this part.
Premium Variation
Section 1101(c)(2)(C)(ii) of the Act
specifies that premium rates in a PCIP
can vary on the basis of age by a factor
not greater than 4 to 1. Section
2701(a)(3) of the PHSA as amended by
the Affordable Care Act requires HHS,
in consultation with NAIC, to define
permissible age bands for rating
purposes in the individual and group
markets. However, the rating bands
established under section 2701 will not
be effective until January 1, 2014, and
no such requirement exists for the PCIP
program. Given these factors, this rule
does not establish standard age bands
E:\FR\FM\30JYR2.SGM
30JYR2
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 146 / Friday, July 30, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
152.22(b) makes clear that, in the case
of emergency room services, such
services must be covered out of network
and out of area if (1) the enrollee had
a reasonable concern that failure to
obtain immediate treatment could
present a serious risk to his or her life
or health; and (2) the services were
required to assess whether a condition
requiring immediate treatment exists, or
to provide such immediate treatment
where warranted. We believe these
requirements are in keeping with
generally accepted standards with
respect to the provision of emergency
services in plans with network limits,
such as those in place in the Medicare
Advantage program under title XVIII of
the Social Security Act and the
commercial health insurance market.
Limits on Enrollee Costs
Section 1101(c)(2)(B) of the Act sets
limits on enrollee costs in the PCIP
program. Specifically, the issuer’s share
of the total allowed costs of benefits
provided under such coverage cannot be
less than 65 percent of such costs,
subject to actuarial review and approval
by the Secretary. Section 152.21(b)(1) of
this rule provides that coverage under a
plan offered by a PCIP must at a
minimum meet this 65 percent
threshold.
Section 1101(c)(2)(B)(ii) of the Act
requires that coverage provided by
PCIPs not have an out-of-pocket limit
greater than the applicable amount
described in section 223(c)(2) of the
Internal Revenue Code, which sets the
out-of-pocket limit for high deductible
health plans associated with a tax
favored health savings accounts. (This
amount is $5,950 for 2010.) Under
§ 152.2, we define out-of-pocket costs as
the sum of the annual deductible and
the other annual out-of-pocket expenses,
other than for premiums, required to be
paid under the plan. Section
152.21(b)(2) also notes that, consistent
with IRS rules, the out-of-pocket limit
may be applied only for in-network
providers, consistent with the terms of
PCIP plan benefit package.
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES2
for the PCIP program beyond the
statutory requirements. Thus,
§ 152.21(a)(2) of this rule simply follows
the statutory requirement of section
1101(c)(2)(C)(ii) of the Act and provides
that premiums charged in the PCIP can
vary by age on a factor of not greater
than 4 to 1. Specific age band rating will
be established through the PCIP
contracting process.
Section 1101(c)(2)(C)(i) of the Act
requires that premiums in the PCIP
program may vary only as provided
under section 2701 of the PHSA, other
than what is allowed in section 1101.
Section 2701 permits premiums rates to
vary in the individual and group
markets by a finite number of factors.
Gender rating, for example, is
prohibited in the PCIP program.
E. Oversight (Subpart E, Sections 152.26
Through 152.28)
Access to Services (§ 152.22)
As noted above, section 1101(c)(2)(D)
of the Act provides that coverage offered
via a PCIP must meet any other
requirements determined appropriate by
the Secretary of HHS. Section 152.22
provides that the PCIP may specify the
network of providers from whom
enrollees may obtain services, provided
that the PCIP demonstrates to HHS that
it has a sufficient number and range of
providers to ensure that all covered
services are reasonably available and
accessible under such coverage. Section
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:44 Jul 29, 2010
Jkt 220001
Appeals Procedures (§ 152.26)
Section 1101(f)(1) of the Act requires
the establishment of an appeals process
to enable individuals to appeal
determinations under the PCIP program.
We are interpreting this provision to
apply both to determinations with
respect to benefit coverage
determinations and determinations with
respect to an individual’s eligibility for
the program, including whether an
individual is a citizen or national of the
United States, or lawfully present in the
United States.
Rather than establishing detailed,
proscriptive requirements with respect
to appeals procedures, § 152.26 of this
interim final rule establishes minimum
requirements that all PCIPS must meet.
Section 152.26(b) specifies that a PCIP
must provide for a timely
redetermination of an eligibility or
coverage determination; coverage
determinations include both whether an
item or service is covered and the
amount paid by the PCIP. For coverage
determinations, § 152.26(b)(3) further
specifies that an enrollee has the right
to a timely second-level appeal, or
‘‘reconsideration,’’ by an independent
entity.
The requirement for independent
review of a plan’s coverage
redetermination ensures that the entity
providing the reconsideration would
have no stake of any kind in the
outcome, and was not involved in the
initial or reconsidered determination
being reviewed. This requirement could
be satisfied under a variety of
arrangements, including (1) An existing
appeal mechanism provided for under
State law; (2) in the case of a Stateadministered PCIP, a review process
created by the State; or (3) an
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
45019
independent contractor, such as the
independent review entities with which
HHS contracts to review coverage
determinations under the Medicare
program.
These requirements are intended to
permit States to use existing appeals or
review mechanisms provided for under
State law, and to permit other non-profit
entities to utilize their existing internal
appeals mechanisms. The actual appeals
mechanisms will be subject to the
Secretary’s approval as part of the
contracting process. Given both the
temporary nature of the program and the
statutory implementation timeframe for
the new program, we believe that using
these existing mechanisms is necessary
and appropriate.
Fraud, Waste, and Abuse (§ 152.27)
Section 1101(f)(2) of the Affordable
Care Act requires the Secretary to
establish procedures to protect against
fraud, waste, and abuse. To that end,
§ 152.27(a) of this interim final rule
requires the PCIP to develop,
implement, and execute operating
procedures to prevent, detect, recover
payments (when applicable or
allowable), and promptly report to HHS
incidences of waste, fraud, and abuse.
These procedures are required to
include identifying situations in which
enrollees, potential enrollees, or their
family members had access to employerbased coverage, and may have been
discouraged from enrolling in that
coverage. Should HHS become aware of
instances involving fraud, waste, or
abuse within the PCIP’s operation, HHS
will take appropriate action within the
terms of the contract, or as otherwise
provided by law. As stated in
§ 152.27(b), the PCIP shall cooperate
with Federal law enforcement and
oversight authorities in cases involving
waste, fraud and abuse, and shall report
cases in which an individual may have
been discouraged from enrolling in
other coverage to appropriate
authorities. For example, if the coverage
was an employer group health plan
subject to ERISA, which prohibits
discrimination based on health status,
the matter should be reported to the
Department of Labor for investigation
and possible enforcement action.
Preventing Insurer Dumping (§ 152.28)
There is an incentive for employers
and issuers to single out high risk and
thus high-cost individuals and offer
incentives for them to disenroll from
their coverage and obtain coverage in
PCIPs which offer such individuals
guaranteed access to coverage without
pre-existing condition exclusion at a
standard premium, if they are uninsured
E:\FR\FM\30JYR2.SGM
30JYR2
45020
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 146 / Friday, July 30, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
for covered services incurred by
enrollees. Administrative expenses, the
costs of operating the program, make up
the second major expense category.
Section 152.32(a) of this interim final
rule thus provides that all funds
awarded under this program must be
used exclusively to pay the allowable
claims and administrative costs of a
PCIP established under this section.
Such costs include those incurred in the
development and operation of the PCIP
program, to the extent that those costs
are in excess of the amounts or
premiums collected from individuals
enrolled in the program. PCIP program
funds are not available for any other
uses, such as to pay expenses or defray
premiums of existing State high risk
pools.
Although the Act does not specify the
amount that a PCIP can spend on
administrative expenses, § 152.32(b) of
this rule permits PCIPs to spend no
more than 10 percent of its total allotted
funds towards administrative expenses.
The 10 percent limitation is similar to
what is imposed under the Children’s
Health Insurance Program (CHIP).
Typical examples of the types of
administrative costs and expenses that
we expect to be incurred by PCIPs
include: Start-up and program
implementation activities, the
production and distribution of
information and outreach materials,
eligibility determination and enrollment
processing, claims processing, costs
associated with prevention and
detection of fraud, waste and abuse, and
other ancillary services such as
operation of a customer service call
center, account maintenance, and
appeals. We note that, given the start-up
costs for the new PCIPs established
under this program, and the need for
expeditious implementation, this 10
percent cap applies to the total
allotment for the duration of the
program, as opposed to spending in a
given year.
F. Funding (Subpart F, Sections 152.32
Through 152.35)
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES2
for at least six months. Congress
recognized this potential issue and
directed the Secretary under section
1101(e)(2) of the Act to establish criteria
for determining whether health
insurance issuers and employmentbased health plans have discouraged
individuals from remaining enrolled in
prior coverage based on the health
status of those individuals, and specifies
certain criteria that shall be included in
those established by the Secretary.
Section 152.28 of this interim final rule
thus sets forth these criteria, and
requires that PCIPs establish procedures
to identify and report to HHS instances
where health insurance issuers or group
health plans are discouraging high-risk
individuals from remaining enrolled in
their current coverage, in instances
where such individuals subsequently
are eligible to enroll in the PCIP.
Consistent with section 1101(e)(2) of
the Affordable Care Act, section
152.28(c) of the interim final rule
provides that if, in applying the criteria
in section 152.28(b), it is determined
that a dumping under section 152.28(a)
has occurred, the Secretary may bill the
issuer or group health plan for any
medical expenses incurred by the PCIP
for such enrollees. In these situations,
the interim final rule also makes clear
that the issuer or group health plan will
be referred to appropriate Federal and
State authorities for other enforcement
action that may be warranted depending
on the facts and circumstances. Finally,
section 152.28(d) specifies that nothing
in the subsection may be construed as
constituting exclusive remedies for
violations of the section or preventing
States from applying or enforcing this
section or other provisions of law with
respect to health insurance issuers,
consistent with section 1101(c)(3) of the
Affordable Care Act. Additional
guidance will be issued to prevent
‘‘dumping’’ from public programs like
Medicaid and the Children’s Health
Insurance Program.
Initial Allocation of Funds (§ 152.33)
Section 1101(g) of the Act does not
specify exactly how HHS should
allocate funds for the purpose of this
program. At the outset of the program,
as specified under section 152.33, the
Secretary has established initial
allotment ceilings for PCIPs in each
State using a methodology consistent
with the funding allocation
methodology used in CHIP, as set forth
under 42 CFR Part 457, subpart F,
Payment to States. (Note that, subject to
these allocation ceilings, the estimated
funding amounts available under the
PCIP program contracts are established
through the contracting process based
Use of Funds (§ 152.32)
Section 1101(g) of the Affordable Care
Act appropriates $5,000,000,000 to pay
the claims and administrative costs of
the PCIP program established under this
section that are in excess of the amount
of premiums collected from enrollees.
Traditionally, in State high risk pools,
as well as other insurance programs, the
funds collected from enrollees as
premiums and other funding streams are
expended across two chief areas. The
majority of funds collected as premiums
are expended to pay the health expenses
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:44 Jul 29, 2010
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
on the projected number of PCIP
enrollees and their projected claims
costs. Actual payments to PCIPs will be
based on their reported cost statements
during the life of the contract.)
Thus, the initial ceilings on PCIP
funding allocations are based on a
blended formula based on the State
population, number of uninsured
individuals under 65, and geographic
health care costs. Under this formula,
one half of the available funds are
allocated based on the number of the
nonelderly population in each State,
compared to the total U.S. nonelderly
population. This gives more populous
States more funding and does not
penalize those States that employ
mechanisms to reduce the number of
uninsured persons in their States.
The health care cost index that HHS
will use to adjust the funding
allocations will be based on the wages
of employees in the health services
industry, and is consistent with what
we have used under the Children’s
Health Insurance Program. These wage
data were developed by the Bureau of
Labor Statistics of the Department of
Labor through its Quarterly Census of
Employment and Wages. This will
include a weighted average of the wages
in the health services industry
represented by ambulatory health care
services, hospitals, and nursing and
residential care facilities. As in the CHIP
formula, 15 percent of the cost factor is
held constant, while 85 percent reflects
how each State’s average wage compares
to the U.S. average. In order to insure
that the geographic variation and cost
adjustments accurately reflect statistics
on population and the number of
uninsured, the same year of data will be
used to calculate population, number of
uninsured, geographic health care costs,
and cost adjustments.
Reallocation of Funds (§ 152.34)
As noted above, over time, spending
under the PCIP program will be
determined based on the actual
enrollment and cost experience of the
PCIPs across the country. Thus, we
recognize that there may be a need to
reallocate funds if actual experience
indicates that, in a given State, not all
of funds available under the allocation
formula will be used. Section 152.34
accounts for this possibility by giving
HHS explicit authority to reallocate
funds among States if HHS determines
that the PCIP in a given State will not
make use of the total estimated funding
originally allotted to that State. HHS
will be receiving monthly reports on the
program costs of each PCIP and will
consult closely with PCIPs in evaluating
these reports and making any decisions
E:\FR\FM\30JYR2.SGM
30JYR2
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 146 / Friday, July 30, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
with respect to the need for
reallocations.
Insufficient Funds (§ 152.35)
Section 1101(g)(2) of the Affordable
Care Act states that if HHS estimates for
any fiscal year that the aggregate
amounts available for the payment of
the expenses of the high risk pool will
be less than the actual amount of such
expenses, HHS shall make such
adjustments as are necessary to
eliminate this deficit. Further, section
1101(g)(4) of this Act states that HHS
has the authority to stop taking
applications for participation in the
program to comply with the funding
limitations. Accordingly, § 152.35(c) of
this rule provides that the PCIP, subject
to HHS approval, may adjust premiums,
alter required benefits, limit PCIP
applications or take other measures to
eliminate a projected deficit.
Particularly in view of the capped
appropriation for the PCIP program,
HHS is committed to working very
closely with the PCIPs to monitor PCIP
enrollment and claims experience. To
that end, the PCIP contracts include
detailed reporting responsibilities with
respect to PCIP enrollment and
spending, as well as spelling out PCIP
responsibilities for the development of
mitigation strategies and recommended
adjustments should the amounts
available under a contract be less than
the projected expenses. Lastly,
§ 152.35(d) ensures that, if the Secretary
estimates that aggregate amounts
available for PCIP expenses will be less
than the actual amount of expenses,
HHS reserves the right to make such
adjustments as are necessary to
eliminate such deficit, consistent with
the terms of the PCIP contract.
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES2
G. Relationship to Existing Laws and
Programs (Subpart G, § 152.39 Through
§ 152.40)
Relationship to Other Federal Health
Insurance Regulation
We note that subtitles A and C of Title
I of the Affordable Care Act contain new
requirements that apply to group health
plans and issuers of health insurance in
the individual health insurance market
which are governed by title XXVII of the
PHSA. Some of these provisions address
the same areas as the above provisions
in section 1101 governing the PCIP
program (e.g., premium amounts,
beneficiary out-of-pocket expenses, and
pre-existing conditions). These
insurance reforms do not apply to the
PCIP established under section 1101 of
the Affordable Care Act and
implemented in this interim final rule
since the high risk pools do not meet the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:44 Jul 29, 2010
Jkt 220001
definition of a group health plan or a
health insurance issuer pursuant to
sections 2791(a)(1) and 2791(b)(2) of the
PHS Act.
Maintenance of Effort (§ 152.39)
Section 1101(b)(3) of the new law
imposes a maintenance of effort
requirement, which specifies that in
order for a State to enter into a contract
to administer a PCIP, a State must agree
not to reduce the annual amount it
expended on the operation of an
existing State high risk pool in the year
preceding the year in which a PCIP
contract begins. We believe that the
clear intent of this provision is to
prohibit the shifting of costs of existing
State high risk pools to the Federal
government. The maintenance of effort
requirement both ensures that the fixed
$5 billion in funding is used to meet the
PCIP program goals and also reinforces
the limitation of eligibility to
individuals who are uninsured, as
opposed to those already insured
through a State high risk pool. At the
same time, we recognize that States now
use different sources of funds to support
the operation of existing high risk pools.
For example, many States rely upon
assessments on the health insurance
industry or health insurance providers
to support their high risk pools, and
States also commonly allow insurers to
reduce premium tax payments by all or
a percentage of such assessment.
Given the various funding models that
are now in place in different States, we
believe it is appropriate to permit States
some latitude in terms of ways in which
they can satisfy this requirement subject
to Secretarial approval. Accordingly,
section 152.39(a) specifies that in order
for a State to enter into a contract with
the Secretary it must comply with the
maintenance of effort requirement set
forth in section 1101(b)(3) of the
Affordable Care Act in a manner
approved by the Secretary. We
anticipate that permissible methods of
meeting this requirement would
include, but are not limited to,
maintaining either the total amount or
the total per capita amount of State
funding for the operation of an existing
high risk pool (given that a State would
be maintaining its effort per enrollee,
and cannot control disenrollment),
maintaining the same formula for
providing funding for a State high risk
pool, or establishing an altered formula
that the Secretary determines will not
reduce the total funds expended on the
existing high risk pool. (Note that
options such as the per capita approach
would need to be evaluated in terms of
other policies in effect in a State that
could negatively influence enrollment
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
45021
in an existing State high risk pool.)
Again, all such approaches are subject
to the approval of the Secretary.
Section 152.39(b) specifies that in
situations where a State enters into a
contract with HHS under this part, HHS
shall take appropriate action, such as
terminating the PCIP contract, against
any State that fails to maintain funding
levels for existing State high risk pools.
Relation to State Laws (§ 152.40)
Section 152.40 of this interim final
rule reflects the provision in section
1101(g)(5) that specifies State standards
that might otherwise apply to the
coverage offered under a PCIP program
are pre-empted, with the exception of
laws relating to licensing or solvency.
This language tracks similar language
that applies to State regulation of health
plans offering Medicare Advantage
plans under Medicare Part C or drug
coverage under Medicare Part D under
title XVIII of the Social Security Act,
and we would expect to interpret the
language for purposes of the PCIP
program in a manner similar to the way
HHS has applied it under those
programs.
H. Transition to Exchanges (Subpart H,
§ 152.44 Through § 152.45)
End of PCIP Coverage (§ 152.44)
Section of 152.44 of this interim final
rule specifies that, consistent with
section 1101(g)(3)(A) of the Affordable
Care Act, enrollee coverage under the
PCIP program will end effective January
1, 2014, because affordable coverage
will be available under the Exchanges
and insurance plans will no longer be
permitted to exclude coverage for preexisting conditions. Note that PCIP
program contracts will remain in effect
to provide for appropriate contractual
close out periods, but coverage of claims
under the PCIP program will extend
only to the costs of covered services
provided up through December 31,
2013.
Transition to the Exchanges (§ 145.45)
As provided by section 1101(g)(3)(B)
of the Affordable Care Act, HHS will
develop procedures to transition PCIP
enrollees to the Exchanges (exchanges)
that are established under sections 1311
or 1321 of the Act, in order to ensure
there are no lapses in coverage for
individuals enrolled in the PCIP
program. Since these exchanges are still
in the developmental stages, we believe
it would be premature to specify
transition procedures in this interim
final rule. Thus, section 152.45 simply
establishes that HHS will develop such
transition procedures, and we encourage
E:\FR\FM\30JYR2.SGM
30JYR2
45022
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 146 / Friday, July 30, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
comments on the best ways to carry out
the transition.
III. Response to Comments
Because of the large number of public
comments we normally receive on
Federal Register documents, we are not
able to acknowledge or respond to them
individually. We will consider all
comments we receive by the date and
time specified in the DATES section of
this preamble, and, when we proceed
with a subsequent document, we will
respond to the comments in the
preamble to that document.
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES2
IV. Waiver of Proposed Rulemaking
We ordinarily publish a notice of
proposed rulemaking (NPRM) in the
Federal Register and invite public
comment on the proposed rule before
publishing a final rule that responds to
comments and sets forth final
regulations that generally take effect
sixty days later. This procedure can be
waived, however, if an agency finds
good cause that a notice-and-comment
procedure is impracticable,
unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest and incorporates a statement of
the finding and its reasons in the rule
issued.
The Affordable Care Act was enacted
on March 23, 2010, and requires that a
temporary high risk pool program be in
place ‘‘not later than 90 days’’ after
enactment. The publication of proposed
regulations in an NPRM could not
govern implementation of the high risk
pool program, as they would constitute
mere proposals with no force of law.
The normal sixty-day public comment
period provided for in the case of
regulations proposed in an NPRM
would by itself consume two-thirds of
the time the statute provides for
implementation. Under these
circumstances, it would be
impracticable and contrary to the public
interest to delay putting regulations into
effect that are necessary to implement
the program until the rules have been
subjected to prior notice and comment
procedures.
Therefore, we find good cause to
waive the notice of proposed
rulemaking and to issue this final rule
on an interim basis. We are providing a
60-day public comment period. Also,
because these regulations need to be in
effect in order to undertake full
implementation of the program, we also
find good cause for waiving the normal
delay in effective date that would apply,
and these regulations are effective on
July 30, 2010.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:44 Jul 29, 2010
Jkt 220001
V. Collection of Information
Requirements
Under the Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995, we are required to provide 60day notice in the Federal Register and
solicit public comment before a
collection of information requirement is
submitted to the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) for review and
approval. In order to fairly evaluate
whether an information collection
should be approved by OMB, section
3506(c)(2)(A) of the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 requires that we
solicit comment on the following issues:
• The need for the information
collection and its usefulness in carrying
out the proper functions of our agency.
• The accuracy of our estimate of the
information collection burden.
• The quality, utility, and clarity of
the information to be collected.
• Recommendations to minimize the
information collection burden on the
affected public, including automated
collection techniques.
We are soliciting public comment on
each of these issues for the following
sections of this document that contain
information collection requirements
(ICRs):
A. ICRs Regarding Proposal Process
(§ 152.7)
Section 152.7 states that a proposal
from a State or from a nonprofit private
entity shall demonstrate that the eligible
entity has the capacity and technical
capability to perform all functions
necessary for the design and operation
of a Pre-Existing Condition Insurance
Plan (PCIP), and that its proposed PCIP
is in full compliance with all of the
requirements of this part. Specifically,
the proposal shall demonstrate that the
proposed PCIP satisfies at least the
conditions listed at § 152.7(a)(1) through
(9).
If there are States that do not submit
acceptable proposals as described in
§ 152.7, HHS will solicit proposals from
nonprofit entities to contract with HHS
to operate a PCIP in those States.
Nonprofits may submit proposals to
contract directly with HHS to operate a
PCIP program.
The burden associated with this
requirement is the time and effort
necessary for a State or nonprofit entity
to develop and submit a proposal to
operate a PCIP, which is a one-time
information collection burden. We
estimate that it would take a State or
nonprofit entity 684 hours to compile
the necessary information to comply
with this requirement. While this onetime requirement is subject to the PRA,
the associated burden is approved under
OMB control number 0938–1085.
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
B. ICRs Regarding Eligibility (§ 152.14)
Section 152.14 discusses eligibility to
enroll in a PCIP program. An individual
who enrolls in a PCIP must meet both
the requirements listed at § 152.14(a)(1),
demonstrating they are a citizen or
national of the United States or lawfully
present in the United States and
§ 152.14(a)(3), providing evidence that
they have a pre-existing condition as
established under paragraph (c) of this
section. The burden associated with this
requirement includes the process of
obtaining such information and
forwarding the information to the
appropriate party at the PCIP. We
estimate this information could be
submitted either electronically or hard
copy in accordance with directions
furnished by the PCIP and approved by
HHS. We estimate that it will take
approximately 30 minutes per applicant
to obtain, review and submit the above
proof(s) of eligibility. Although the
Department has not estimated program
participation, for the purpose of this
calculation, we assume that within the
first six months of the program
approximately 100,000 potential
enrollees will submit eligibility
information to the PCIP program. The
estimated one-time burden associated
with this requirement is 50,000 hours.
As the program progresses beyond 2010,
we assume that we will receive fewer
inquiries based on the experience with
existing State high risk pool programs.
In 2011 and beyond, we assume that
approximately 50,000 potential
enrollees will submit eligibility
information to the PCIP program. The
estimated annual burden associated
with this requirement is 25,000 hours.
C. ICRs Regarding Enrollment and
Disenrollment Process (§ 152.15)
Section 152.15(a) and (b) require a
PCIP to develop and implement
enrollment and disenrollment
processes, respectively. The burden
associated with these requirements is
the time and effort necessary for a PCIP
program to establish enrollment and
disenrollment procedures. The burden
associated with the establishment of
enrollment and disenrollment
procedures is a one-time burden that
was included in the 684 burden hour
estimate in our earlier discussion of
§ 152.7. While these requirements are
subject to the PRA, the associated
burden is approved under OMB control
number 0938–1085.
In regards to ongoing reporting under
the PCIP contract, any State or entity
selected to administer the PCIP program
may later decide it is in the best interest
of their State to propose amendments to
E:\FR\FM\30JYR2.SGM
30JYR2
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 146 / Friday, July 30, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
the previously agreed upon contract. We
estimate that, while uncommon, such
instances may occur and permissible
proposed changes would be allowed.
When considering all aspects of the
contract, which would include the
enrollment and disenrollment process,
access to services, and the appeals
process, we estimate that it will take
approximately 24 hours per contractor
to submit a revised proposal and
implement any approved amendments.
The estimated annual burden associated
with this requirement is 1,224 hours at
a cost of $28,152.
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES2
D. ICRs Regarding Access to Services
(§ 152.22)
Section § 152.22(a) states that a PCIP
may specify the networks of providers
from whom enrollees may obtain plan
services. The PCIP must demonstrate to
HHS that it has a sufficient number and
range of providers to ensure that all
covered services are reasonably
available and accessible to its enrollees.
The burden associated with this
requirement is the time and effort
necessary for a PCIP to demonstrate to
HHS that it has a sufficient number and
range of providers to ensure that all
covered services are reasonably
available and accessible to its enrollees.
The burden associated with these
requirements is included in the 684
burden hour estimate for compiling the
necessary information to comply with
this requirement as stated in our earlier
discussion of § 152.7.
In regards to ongoing reporting under
the PCIP contract, any State or entity
selected to administer the PCIP program
may later decide it is in the best interest
of their state to propose amendments to
the previously agreed upon contract. We
estimate that while uncommon, such
instances may occur, and permissible
proposed changes would be allowed.
When considering all aspects of the
contract, which would include access to
covered services, we estimate that it will
take approximately 24 hours per
contractor to submit a revised proposal
and implement any approved
amendments. The estimated annual
burden associated with this requirement
is 1,224 hours at a cost of $28,152.
E. ICRs Regarding Appeals Procedures
(§ 152.26)
Section 152.26(a) requires a PCIP to
establish and maintain procedures for
individuals to appeal eligibility and
coverage determinations. Section
152.26(b) lists the minimum
requirements for appeals procedures.
The burden associated with this
requirement is the time and effort
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:44 Jul 29, 2010
Jkt 220001
necessary for a PCIP to develop and
maintain appeals procedures. The
burden associated with these
requirements is included in the 684
burden hour estimate for compiling the
necessary information to comply with
this requirement as stated in our earlier
discussion of § 152.7. The
aforementioned information collection
requirements and associated burden are
currently approved under OMB control
number 0938–1085.
In regards to ongoing reporting under
the PCIP contract, any state or entity
selected to administer the PCIP program
may later decide it is in the best interest
of their state to propose amendments to
the previously agreed upon contract. We
estimate that while uncommon, such
instances may occur, and permissible
proposed changes would be allowed.
When considering all aspects of the
contract, which would include the
appeals process, we estimate that it will
take approximately 24 hours per
contractor to submit a revised proposal
and implement any approved
amendments. The estimated annual
burden associated with this requirement
is 1,224 hours at a cost of $28,152.
F. ICRs Regarding Fraud, Waste, and
Abuse (§ 152.27)
As stated in § 152.27(a), a PCIP shall
develop, implement, and execute
operating procedures to prevent, detect,
recover (when applicable or allowable),
and promptly report to HHS incidences
of waste, fraud and abuse. Additionally,
§ 152.27(b) states that a PCIP program
shall cooperate with Federal law
enforcement authorities in cases
involving waste, fraud, and abuse. The
burden associated with the requirement
contained in § 152.27 is the time and
effort necessary to submit the required
information on an ongoing basis. We
estimate that it will take PCIPs 4 hours
each month, per State, to report all
required information to HHS and/or
Federal law enforcement authorities
which would include any identified
instances of waste, fraud, and abuse.
The estimated annual burden associated
with this requirement is 2,448 hours at
a cost of $56,304.
G. ICRs Regarding Preventing Insurer
Dumping (§ 152.28)
Section 152.28(b) requires a PCIP to
establish procedures to identify and
report to HHS instances in which health
insurance issuers or group health plans
are discouraging high-risk individuals
from remaining enrolled in their current
coverage and in instances in which such
individuals subsequently are eligible to
enroll in the qualified high risk pool.
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
45023
The required procedures shall include
methods to identify circumstances
described in § 152.28(b)(1) through (4).
The burden associated with this
requirement is the time and effort
necessary for a PCIP to establish
procedures for identifying insurer
dumping and for reporting dumping
practices to HHS. We estimate that it
will take PCIPs 8 hours each month, per
State, to develop and report information
to HHS of any health insurance issuer
or group health plan they have
identified as discouraging an individual
from remaining enrolled in coverage
offered by such issuer or health plan
based on the individual’s health status.
The estimated annual burden associated
with this requirement is 4,896 hours at
a cost of $110,160.
H. ICRs Regarding Use of Funds
(§ 152.32)
Section 152.32 states that all funds
awarded through the contracts
established under this program must be
used exclusively to pay allowable
claims and administrative costs
incurred in the development and
operation of the PCIP that are in excess
of the amounts of premiums collected
from individuals enrolled in the
program. The burden associated with
this requirement is the time and effort
necessary for a State to collect allowable
cost information, review and submit
such information to HHS for payment.
We estimate that it will take each PCIPs
16 hours each month, per State to
comply with this requirement. The
estimated annual burden associated
with this requirement is 9,792 hours at
a cost of $323,136.
I. ICRs Regarding Maintenance of Effort
(§ 152.39)
Section 152.39(a) requires a State that
enters into a contract with HHS under
this part to demonstrate, subject to
approval by HHS, that it will continue
to provide funding of any existing high
risk pools in the State at a level that is
not reduced from the amount provided
for in the year prior to the year in which
the contract is entered. The burden
associated with this requirement is the
time and effort necessary for a State to
demonstrate maintenance of effort to
HHS. The burden associated with this
one-time requirement is included in the
684 burden hour estimate for compiling
the necessary information to comply
with the proposal requirement as stated
in our earlier discussion of § 152.7.
While this requirement is subject to the
PRA, the associated burden is approved
under OMB control number 0938–1085.
E:\FR\FM\30JYR2.SGM
30JYR2
45024
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 146 / Friday, July 30, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
TABLE 1—ANNUAL REPORTING AND RECORDKEEPING BURDEN
OMB
Control
No.
Regulation
Section(s)
§ 152.7,
§ 152.15,
§ 152.22,
§ 152.26,
§ 152.39 ......
§ 152.15,
§ 152.22,
§ 152.26 ......
§ 152.14 ..........
§ 152.27 ..........
§ 152.28 ..........
§ 152.32 ..........
Total ........
Hourly labor
cost
of reporting
($)
Total
labor cost
of reporting
($)
Total capital/
maintenance
costs
($)
Total cost
($)
34,884
**
1,421,268
0
1,421,268
24
.5
4
8
16
1,224
50,000
2,448
4,896
9,792
**
**
**
**
**
28,152
N/A
56,304
110,160
323,136
0
0
0
0
0
28,152
N/A
56,304
110,160
323,136
..................
103,244
....................
....................
......................
1,939,020
Respondents
Responses
Burden per
response
(hours)
0938–1085
51
51
684
0938–1100
0938–1095
0938–1100
0938–1100
0938–1100
51
100,000
51
51
51
51
100,000
612
612
612
..................
100,051
101,887
Total
annual
burden
(hours)
**Wage rates vary by level of staff involved in complying with information collection request (ICR). Wage rates are detailed in the Supporting
Statement Part A for this (ICR). Wage rates vary from $12 to $60 hourly salary. Supporting Statement Part A for this (ICR).
We will accept comments for both the
new information collection
requirements contained in this interim
final rule and the requirements
previously approved under 0938–1085
and 0938–1095, respectively, for 60
days from the date of display for this
interim final rule. At the conclusion of
the 60-day comment period, we will
publish an additional notice
announcing the submission of the
information collection request
associated with this final rule for OMB
approval. At that time, the public will
have an additional 30 days to submit
public comments to OMB for
consideration.
If you comment on these information
collection and recordkeeping
requirements, please do either of the
following:
1. Submit your comments
electronically as specified in the
ADDRESSES section of this proposed rule;
or
2. Submit your comments to the
Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs, Office of Management and
Budget,
Attention: CMS Desk Officer, [OCIIO–
9995–IFC]
Fax: (202) 395–6974; or
E-mail:
OIRA_submission@omb.eop.gov.
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES2
VI. Regulatory Impact Analysis
A. Summary and Need for Regulatory
Action
Section 1101 of Title I of the Patient
Protection and Affordable Care Act of
2010 (Affordable Care Act), Public Law
111–148, requires that the Secretary
establish, either directly or through
contracts with States or nonprofit
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:44 Jul 29, 2010
Jkt 220001
private entities, a temporary high risk
health insurance pool program to
provide affordable health insurance
coverage to uninsured individuals with
pre-existing conditions. (We generally
refer to this program as the Pre-Existing
Condition Insurance Plan program, or
PCIP program, to avoid confusion with
the existing State high risk pool
programs, which will continue to
operate separately.) This program will
continue until January 1, 2014, when
Exchanges established under sections
1311 and 1321 of the Affordable Care
Act will be available for individuals to
obtain health insurance coverage
without regard to their pre-existing
condition. This interim final rule sets
forth the initial regulations with respect
to this new program, and is needed for
its implementation. The rule addresses
key issues regarding administration of
the program, eligibility and enrollment,
benefits, premiums, funding, appeals
rules, and enforcement provisions
related to anti-dumping and fraud waste
and abuse.
Executive Order 12866 explicitly
requires agencies to take account of
‘‘distributive impacts’’ and ‘‘equity.’’
Offering health coverage to uninsured
Americans with pre-existing conditions
at an affordable premium is needed to
provide the opportunity for coverage to
individuals that cannot otherwise obtain
insurance in the market. It is a
temporary program to provide a
transition to the Affordable Care Act
policies that take effect in 2014 that ban
the use of pre-existing conditions in
determining access, benefit and
premiums. The $5 billion in Federal
funding appropriated for this program
will yield a meaningful increase in
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
equity, and is a benefit of this interim
final regulation.
B. Executive Order 12866
Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR
51735), a ‘‘significant’’ regulatory action
is subject to review by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB).
Section 3(f) of the Executive Order
defines a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
as an action that is likely to result in a
rule (1) having an annual effect on the
economy of $100 million or more in any
one year, or adversely and materially
affecting a sector of the economy,
productivity, competition, jobs, the
environment, public health or safety, or
State, local or tribal governments or
communities (also referred to as
‘‘economically significant’’); (2) creating
a serious inconsistency or otherwise
interfering with an action taken or
planned by another agency; (3)
materially altering the budgetary
impacts of entitlement grants, user fees,
or loan programs or the rights and
obligations of recipients thereof; or (4)
raising novel legal or policy issues
arising out of legal mandates, the
President’s priorities, or the principles
set forth in the Executive Order. OMB
has determined that this regulation is
economically significant within the
meaning of section 3(f)(1) of the
Executive Order, because it is likely to
have an annual effect on the economy
of $100 million in any one year.
Accordingly, OMB has reviewed this
rule pursuant to the Executive Order.
The Department provides an
assessment of the potential costs,
benefits, and transfers associated with
these interim final regulations,
summarized in the following table.
E:\FR\FM\30JYR2.SGM
30JYR2
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 146 / Friday, July 30, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
45025
TABLE 1.1—ACCOUNTING TABLE
Benefits
Qualitative: The Pre-existing Condition Insurance Plan will provide uninsured Americans with preexisting conditions that have been denied coverage or otherwise excluded from purchasing insurance coverage with an opportunity to obtain coverage. Providing this insurance option will
increase access to health care and reduce financial strain for participants. It is also likely to improve health outcomes and worker productivity.
Individuals who are especially vulnerable as a result of existing health problems and financial status may receive the greatest benefit from
this program.
Costs .............................................................................................
$1,939,020 annually for reporting and recordkeeping.
Qualitative: To the extent PCIP increases access to health care services, increased health care utilization and costs will result due to increased
uptake. Administrative costs include: the cost of contractors to apply, the time cost for individuals to apply, and the contractors’ costs of complying with program rules (e.g., conducting appeals, preventing fraud).
Transfers .......................................................................................
$5,000,000,000 for the period from July 1, 2010 to December 31, 2013.
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES2
Qualitative: The $5 billion in Federal funds is a transfer from the Secretary to contractors to aid in administering the program.
a. Estimated Number of Affected
Entities
This rule provides guidance for the
States and nonprofit private entities that
contract with HHS to establish PCIPs to
provide affordable health insurance
coverage to uninsured individuals with
pre-existing conditions within each
State. The States or nonprofit private
entities that voluntarily participate in
the PCIP program will be directly
affected by this regulation as well as the
terms of their contracts.
There are 35 State-based high risk
pool programs today.3 First created in
the 1970s, States adopted these
programs to address insurance market
failures for people with pre-existing
conditions. The number of such existing
State programs grew with the enactment
of a Federal law, the Health Insurance
Portability and Accountability Act of
1996 (HIPAA), that requires States to
provide either guaranteed issue policies
in the individual market to a certain set
of people who have been continuously
covered or access to an acceptable
alternative mechanism, such as a high
risk pool. In addition, beginning in
2002, Federal grants provided seed
money and a limited amount of loss
subsidies for such programs. Ongoing
financial support for State-based high
risk pools varies, but is generally
provided through assessments on
issuers, enrollee premiums, State
general revenue, and, recently, Federal
grants. Each program also has different
eligibility rules, benefits, premiums,
and/or cost controls (e.g., pre-existing
condition waiting lists, disease
management). As of the end of 2008,
there were approximately 200,000
enrollees in the 35 State high risk pools.
The Government Accountability Office
3 U.S. Government Accountability Office, Health
Insurance: Enrollment, Benefits, Funding, and
Other Characteristics of State High Risk Health
Insurance Pools (2009), https://www.gao.gov/
new.items/d09730r.pdf.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:44 Jul 29, 2010
Jkt 220001
(GAO) estimated that there were
approximately 4 million uninsured
people with health problems in States
with high risk pools.4
The Affordable Care Act establishes a
program that is similar in some respects
to these programs, but has notable
differences in terms of eligibility
criteria, benefits, and premiums. These
differences make it difficult to
extrapolate potential enrollment in the
PCIP program from the experience of
existing State high risk pools.
First, none of the existing pools limit
eligibility to people who have been
uninsured for a minimum of six months
whereas this is a pre-requisite for
enrollment in the PCIP program. In
general, the uninsured have different
health problems, economic statuses, and
demands for health care and health
insurance than the insured population.5
Second, while the State programs and
Federal program cover roughly the same
benefit categories, the PCIP program
bars both benefit carve-outs and waiting
periods for pre-existing conditions,
which 30 State programs employ.6 In
addition, PCIP limits annual out-ofpocket spending to $5,950 nationwide,
whereas two State programs have no
specified annual limits and six States
have limits that exceed $5,950 within
each State’s most popular high risk pool
4 U.S. Government Accountability Office, Health
Insurance: Enrollment, Benefits, Funding, and
Other Characteristics of State High Risk Health
Insurance Pools (2009), https://www.gao.gov/
new.items/d09730r.pdf. This estimate was based on
the number of individuals with at least one chronic
condition, from the 2006 Medical Expenditure
Panel Survey (MEPS), applied to the Current
Population Survey estimates of the population in
States with high risk pools.
5 ‘‘The Uninsured: A Primer,’’ Kaiser Commission
on Medicaid and the Uninsured (2006), https://
www.kff.org/uninsured/upload/7451.pdf.
6 Tanya Schwartz, ‘‘State High Risk Pools: An
Overview,’’ Kaiser Commission on Medicaid and
the Uninsured. (2010), https://www.kff.org/
uninsured/8041.cfm.
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
plan.7 These distinctions in benefits
affect both the cost of health insurance
per capita as well as the mix of
enrollees. For example, a person with
cancer may decide it is not worth the
premiums to sign up for a State high
risk pool that will not cover her
chemotherapy in the first year of
enrollment due to a waiting period.
Immediate coverage of pre-existing
conditions should increase demand in
the new program relative to the existing
pools, and may also lead to a somewhat
less favorable mix of health risks,
because people with problems requiring
substantial medical care will receive
more benefit from the new program than
the existing pools.
Third, all State high risk pools set
their premiums at a higher percent of
the standard rate in the individual
market than the PCIP program. In the
existing pools, premiums average 140
percent of standard rate, and range from
105 percent to 250 percent of the
standard rate or higher.8 The PCIP
program’s premiums are set at 100
percent of standard rate. PCIP’s lower
premium is expected to increase the
number of people who will want to
purchase coverage. One study estimated
that lowering all State high risk pool
premiums to 125 percent of the standard
rate would increase enrollment by onethird.9 The lower premium may lead to
a more favorable health mix of
enrollees, because the higher premiums
in existing pools make the pools less
7 U.S. Government Accountability Office, Health
Insurance: Enrollment, Benefits, Funding, and
Other Characteristics of State High Risk Health
Insurance Pools (2009), https://www.gao.gov/
new.items/d09730r.pdf.
8 National Association of State Comprehensive
Health Insurance Plans. Comprehensive Health
Insurance for High-Risk Individuals: A State-byState Analysis, 2009/2010.
9 Austin Frakt, Steve Pizer, and Martin Wrobel,
‘‘Insuring the Uninsurable: The Growth in High-Risk
Pools,’’ Abt Associates, HSRE Working Paper (2002),
https://www.abtassociates.com/reports/HSRE-W12highrisk.pdf.
E:\FR\FM\30JYR2.SGM
30JYR2
45026
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 146 / Friday, July 30, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES2
attractive to individuals with fewer
health problems. Lower premiums may
also attract individuals who are in poor
health, but are unable to afford the
premiums in the existing pools.
Fourth, fifteen States and the District
of Columbia lack a high risk pool
program today. These States do not have
a high risk pool for a variety of reasons.
Some States, such as New York,
Massachusetts, and Vermont, have
enacted insurance reforms that require
plans to accept people with pre-existing
conditions into the individual insurance
market (through guaranteed issue and
rating rules) instead of segregating them
into high risk pools. Others, like
Arizona and Nevada, do not have
extensive insurance reforms. There is no
common profile to States that lack high
risk pools today.
Lastly, there is no clear correlation
between high risk pool enrollment and
need. One measure of need is the
number and rate of uninsured residents.
A State that provides protections for its
residents with high risk or low income
should have a relatively low number
and rate of uninsured residents, and
vice versa. As such, among States that
offer such pools, there should be a
relatively constant relationship between
a State’s number of uninsured and its
enrollees in high risk pools. However,
experience suggests otherwise. The
difference between the highest and
lowest ratio of a State’s uninsured
population to its high risk pool
enrollees is 27 to one. This is
substantially larger than the disparity in
the ratio of uninsured to Medicaid
enrollees in a State, which is six to
one.10 A report that examined current
State high risk pools, estimated a
participation rate of 0.05 to 0.33 percent
of the State population in those
programs.11 For these reasons, the
Department concludes that the
experience in existing high risk pools is
not a good basis for estimating PCIP
enrollment.
Several reports have estimated the
likely number of enrollees in the PCIP
program by using survey data and
applying a participation rate to the
approximate number of people eligible
for the PCIP program. One analysis was
conducted by the Center for Studying
Health System Change.12 Using the
Medical Expenditure Panel Survey
10 Data from State Health Facts.org, Kaiser Family
Foundation.
11 ‘‘State High Risk Pools: An Overview.’’ State
Health Access Data Assistance Center (2008).
12 Mark Merlis, ‘‘Health Coverage for the HighRisk Uninsured: Policy Options for Design of the
Temporary High-Risk Pool,’’ National Institute for
Health Care Reform, Center for Studying Health
System Change (2010).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:44 Jul 29, 2010
Jkt 220001
(MEPS), the analysis identified
individuals who were uninsured and
had at least one chronic condition
deemed ‘‘high cost,’’ meaning spending
exceeds 1.5 times of the average cost of
the condition. This methodology
generated 5.6 to 7 million people who
could potentially qualify for the
program. Assuming that the annual
Federal cost per person is $6,000 to
$7,000 and the $5 billion in Federal
funding is capped in each year over the
three and a half year period (roughly
$1.3 to $1.4 billion per year), the
analysis estimated that 200,000 people
per year through 2013 could be covered.
Second, the Centers for Medicare and
Medicaid Services’ Office of the Actuary
(OAct) estimated participation based on
demand, without assuming that Federal
funding would be limited to $1.3 to $1.4
billion in each year. It estimated that
participation in the program in 2010
would be 375,000, assuming the
program would be fully implemented
within the year. Given this enrollment
rate, it projected that the $5 billion in
Federal funding would not last through
2013.
Third, the Congressional Budget
Office (CBO) conducted two analyses. In
a December 2008 report, CBO estimated
the cost and coverage of a national high
risk pool program. This program would
require that all States establish high risk
pool programs, with full Federal
subsidies for enrollees. Its premiums
would be higher than PCIP—150 versus
100 percent of the standard rate—but its
enrollment would be broader—
significantly, it would not require that
applicants have been uninsured for the
previous six months. CBO estimated
that 175,000 uninsured would gain
coverage in this program, and the
Federal cost would be $5.4 billion over
five years (with offsetting receipts from
changes in employer coverage).13
In addition, in June, 2010, CBO
provided information on PCIP in
response to a request from Congress.14
Its methodology was not explained in its
letter, but it calculated that 200,000
people could be enrolled in the program
for the 2010–2013 period given the fixed
$5 billion appropriation. If the Federal
funding cap were lifted, CBO estimated
that enrollment would be 400,000 in
2011 rising to about 600,000 or 700,000
in 2013. CBO underscored the
uncertainty of the estimates due to the
potential variation in eligibility rules,
benefits, and premiums. Since this
13 Congressional Budget Office. Health Care
Budget Options Volume I. December 2008.
14 Congressional Budget Office Director Douglas
W. Elmendorf, letter to Senator Michael B. Enzi,
June 21, 2010.
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
interim final rule preserves variation
and flexibility in program parameters
across States, CBO’s observations
continue to be relevant and there may
be a wide range of potential enrollees.
CBO would probably continue to
estimate a wide range of potential
enrollees taking this interim final rule
into account.
For purpose of this analysis, the
Department has not produced its own
estimates of the number of individuals
likely to enroll in the PCIP program but
believes that it will fall in the range of
the other estimates, from 200,000 to
400,000. The lower bound of this range
is consistent with the numbers
estimated by the Center for Studying
Health System Change and by CBO in
June 2010. The upper bound of this
range is approximately the enrollment
estimate from the Office of the Actuary
and CBO when they assume that PCIPs
do not immediately impose enrollment
constraints to extend the limited Federal
funding. We expect that efficient
program implementation, effective cost
control, targeted benefit design, and
enrollment patterns that are different
than projected will mitigate the need for
enrollment constraints, and Federal
funding will be sufficient to meet
program demand. Even assuming the
lower estimate of enrollment of 200,000,
the PCIP program could double the
number of Americans with pre-existing
conditions insured through high risk
pool programs.
c. Benefits
A key premise for the establishment
of the Pre-Existing Condition Insurance
Plan is that those who are unable to
purchase health insurance in the private
sector due to medical underwriting and
are not eligible for public insurance
programs are potentially disadvantaged
through both poor health and loss of
income. We expect that the PCIP
program will help such individuals by
providing access to affordable health
insurance coverage.
This interim final regulation could
generate significant benefits to
consumers. These benefits could take
the form of reductions in mortality and
morbidity, reductions in medical
expenditure risk, increases in worker
productivity, and decreases in the crosssubsidy in premiums to offset
uncompensated care, sometimes
referred to as the ‘‘hidden tax.’’ Each of
these effects is described below.
A first type of benefit is reductions in
mortality and morbidity. While the
empirical literature leaves many
questions unresolved, a growing body of
evidence convincingly demonstrates
that health can be improved by
E:\FR\FM\30JYR2.SGM
30JYR2
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 146 / Friday, July 30, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES2
spending more on at-risk individuals
and by expanding health insurance
coverage. For example, Almond et al.15
find that newborns classified just below
a medical threshold for ‘‘very low
birthweight’’ have lower mortality rates
than newborns classified as just above
the threshold, despite an association
between low birth weight and higher
mortality in general, because they tend
to receive timely and appropriate
medical care. In a study of severe
automobile accidents, Doyle 16 found
that uninsured individuals receive less
care and have a substantially higher
mortality rate. Currie and Gruber 17
found that increased eligibility for
Medicaid coverage expanded utilization
of care for otherwise uninsured
children, leading to a sizeable and
significant reduction in child mortality.
A study of Medicare by Card et al.18
found that individuals just old enough
to qualify for coverage have lower
mortality rates—despite similar illness
severity—than do those just too young
for eligibility. Finally, a report by the
Institute of Medicine (IOM) 19 found
mortality risks for uninsured
individuals that were 25 percent higher
than those of observably similar insured
individuals. In addition to the prospect
that expanded insurance coverage will
result in reductions in mortality, it will
almost certainly significantly reduce
morbidity, as demonstrated in extensive
reviews of the literature by Hadley and
the IOM.20
This interim final regulation will
expand access to currently uninsured
individuals with pre-existing
conditions. These newly insured
populations will likely achieve both
mortality and morbidity reductions from
the regulation greater than those found
15 Douglas Almond et al., ‘‘Estimating Marginal
Returns to Medical Care: Evidence from At-Risk
Newborns,’’ The Quarterly Journal of Economics
125, No. 2 (2010): 591–634, https://www.mit.edu/
~jjdoyle/vlbw.pdf.
16 Joseph J. Doyle, ‘‘Health Insurance, Treatment
and Outcomes: Using Auto Accidents as Health
Shocks.’’ The Review of Economics and Statistics
87, No. 2 (2005): 256–270, https://www.mitpress
journals.org/doi/abs/10.1162/0034653053970348.
17 Janet Currie and J. Gruber, ‘‘Health Insurance
Eligibility, Utilization of Medical Care, and Child
Health,’’ The Quarterly Journal of Economics 111,
No. 2 (1996): 431–466, https://www.jstor.org/stable/
2946684?cookieSet=1.
18 David Card, C. Dobkin, and N. Maestas, ‘‘Does
Medicare Save Lives?’’ The Quarterly Journal of
Economics 124, No. 2 (2009): 597–636, https://
www.mitpressjournals.org/doi/abs/10.1162/qjec.
2009.124.2.597.
19 Institute of Medicine, ‘‘Care Without Coverage:
Too Little, Too Late,’’ (2002), https://books.nap.edu/
openbook.php?record_id=10367&page=R1.
20 Institute of Medicine, op. cit. J. Hadley, ‘‘Sicker
and Poorer: The Consequences of Being Uninsured,’’
Medical Care Research and Review 60 (No. 2): 3S–
75S, (2003).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:44 Jul 29, 2010
Jkt 220001
in the studies, since these populations
are, on average, in worse health than the
population at large and thus likely to
benefit even more from insurance
coverage than uninsured individuals in
general.
A second type of benefit from the
cumulative effects of this interim final
regulation is a reduction in financial
burden faced by the uninsured on
account of onerous medical costs.
Various studies have documented two
related phenomena: (1) Averted
healthcare utilization among the
uninsured due to cost and (2) financial
strain due to medical expenditures
among the uninsured. Recent data show
that 24 percent of the uninsured went
without needed health care due to cost
compared to 4 percent of those with
private or employer-based insurance.21
Given the population targeted by the
PCIP program—uninsured people with
pre-existing conditions—individuals
currently without insurance may not be
able to simply forgo needed care,
leading to substantial financial strain.
Approximately half of the more than
500,000 personal bankruptcies in the
U.S. in 2007 were in part due to very
high medical expenses.22 In a
Commonwealth Fund report 23 on
medical debt, 60 percent of those having
no insurance reported having
difficulties paying medical care costs. In
the past 12 months, they had incurred
medical bills they either could not pay,
were forced to make significant changes
in their life styles in order to meet their
obligations, had been contacted by a bill
collection agency, or were forced to pay
medical bills over an extended period.
Exclusions from health insurance
coverage based on preexisting
conditions expose the uninsured to the
aforementioned financial risks.
The Pre-Existing Condition Insurance
Plan is designed to reduce the
uncertainty and hardship associated
with these financial risks by limiting the
extent to which individuals must bear
the entire cost of medical care by
themselves. One study found that
people who are uninsured for a full year
pay for over a third of their care (35
percent) out-of-pocket, while
individuals who are insured for a full or
partial year paid just under 20 percent
21 Kaiser Family Foundation, ‘‘The Uninsured A
Primer,’’ (2009), https://www.kff.org/uninsured/
upload/7451-05.pdf.
22 David Himmelstein et al., ‘‘Medical Bankruptcy
in the United States, 2007: Results of a National
Study,’’ The American Journal of Medicine (2009),
https://www.pnhp.org/new_bankruptcy_study/
Bankruptcy-2009.pdf.
23 Collins et al., ‘‘The Affordability Crisis In U.S.
Health Care: Findings From The Commonwealth
Fund Biennial Health Insurance Survey,’’ (2004): 17.
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
45027
of their care out-of-pocket.24 Moreover,
because the PCIP program is targeted to
individuals who are likely to have
extensive medical needs, it is likely to
have especially large economic benefits
in terms of reducing financial risk. For
example, uninsured individuals with
two chronic conditions spent $908 out
of pocket annually compared to $304
annually among the uninsured with no
chronic conditions and $259 annually
among the privately insured with no
chronic conditions.25 This program and
the interim final regulation that
implements it will help insurance
companies more effectively protect
patients from the financial hardship of
illness, including bankruptcy and
reduced funds for non-medical
purposes.
A third type of benefit from the PCIP
program and this interim final
regulation is improved workplace
productivity. This interim final
regulation will benefit employers and
workers by increasing workplace
productivity and reducing absenteeism,
low productivity at work due to
preventable illness, and ‘‘job-lock.’’ A
June 2009 report by the Council of
Economic Advisers found that increased
access to health insurance coverage
improves labor market outcomes by
improving worker health.26 The health
benefits of offering health insurance to
uninsured people with pre-existing
conditions will help to reduce
disability, low productivity at work due
to preventable illness, and absenteeism
in the work place, thereby increasing
workplace productivity and labor
supply. Economic theory suggests that
these benefits would likely be shared by
workers, employers, and consumers.
Fourth, the PCIP will reduce cost
shifting of uncompensated care to the
privately insured, which contributes to
higher premiums. The program will
help expand the number of individuals
who are insured and reduce the
likelihood that individuals who have
insurance do not bankrupt themselves
by paying medical bills. Both effects
will help reduce the amount of
uncompensated care that imposes a
‘‘hidden tax’’ on consumers of health
care since the costs of this care are
24 Jack Hadley and John Holohan, ‘‘The Cost of
Care for the Uninsured,’’ The Kaiser Commission on
Medicaid and the Uninsured (2004), https://
www.kff.org/uninsured/upload/The-Cost-of-Carefor-the-Uninsured-What-Do-We-Spend-Who-Paysand-What-Would-Full-Coverage-Add-to-MedicalSpending.pdf.
25 Hwang et al, ‘‘Out of Pocket Medical Spending
for Care of Chronic Conditions,’’ Health Affairs
(2001), https://www.partnershipforsolutions.org/
DMS/files/Out-of-pocket2002.pdf.
26 Council of Economic Advisers. ‘‘The Economic
Case for Health Reform.’’ (2009).
E:\FR\FM\30JYR2.SGM
30JYR2
45028
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 146 / Friday, July 30, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES2
shifted to those who are able to pay for
services in the form of higher prices.
In their analysis of the interim final
regulations implementing patient
protections, the Departments of Labor,
the Treasury, and Health and Human
Services estimated an order of
magnitude for the compensatory
reduction in cost-shifting of
uncompensated care associated with the
expansion of coverage of those interim
final regulations.27 The analysis
assumed that induced utilization due to
expanded coverage would be relatively
low since the uninsured populations
affected by these interim final
regulations tend to have worse health,
greater needs for health care, and less
ability to reduce utilization when they
are uninsured. Second, on the basis of
the economics literature on the
subject,28 the Departments estimated
that two-thirds of the previously
uncovered costs would have been
uncompensated care, 25 percent of
which would have been paid for by
private sources. Assuming that
reductions in privately-financed
uncompensated care lower insurance
premiums charged to consumers, the
Departments estimated the patient
protections’ regulations’ increased
insurance coverage could result in
reductions in insurance premiums of up
to $1 billion in 2013.29
Assuming an enrollment range of
200,000 to 400,000 in the PCIP program,
the effect on uncompensated care could
be over twice to four times as high as
prior estimates associated with the
patient protections. This increased
impact is due to the fact that the
primary effect on coverage of the patient
protections interim final regulations was
the ban on pre-existing condition
exclusions for children. Those rules
27 Federal Register June 28, 2010: https://
frwebgate1.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/
TEXTgate.cgi?WAISdocID=3HyQcj/5/1/
0&WAISaction=retrieve.
28 Jack Hadley et al, ‘‘Covering the Uninsured in
2008: Current Costs, Sources of Payment, and
Incremental Costs,’’ Health Affairs 27, No. 5 (2008):
399–415.
29 The Departments first estimated the proportion
of the population in group and individual markets
using the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (2008).
Next, information from 75 FR 34538 (June 17, 2010)
was used to estimate the proportion of employer
and individual plans that maintain or lose
grandfather status by 2013. Projections of national
health expenditures from the National Health
Expenditure Accounts to 2013 were distributed
among these groups, and premium impacts as
discussed in this regulatory impact analysis were
applied. Potential premium reductions secondary to
reductions in the cost-shifting of uncompensated
care were then calculated using the information
from the economic literature as presented in this
discussion. The Departments note that to the extent
that not all of the reductions in uncompensated care
costs are passed onto insured populations, these
estimates may be an overestimate.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:44 Jul 29, 2010
Jkt 220001
estimated that 90,000 children would
gain coverage. Given the differing
scopes of these two interim final
regulations, it is likely that more
uninsured will be helped by PCIP than
the patient protections policies and
interim final regulations. Moreover,
savings per person will likely be higher
for the PCIP population compared to
children with pre-existing conditions.
This is because most enrollees in PCIP
are likely to be adults, whose average
cost of health care is higher than that of
children.
In addition, we believe that PCIP will
help local and State governments. Since
much of the uncompensated health care
is provided through State and locally
funded public health facilities, by
enabling a portion of those who would
seek care at a public facility to enroll in
the high risk pool, the program could
help reduce the drain on scarce State
and local resources. We welcome public
comment on this analysis.
d. Costs and Transfers
Under section 1101 of the Affordable
Care Act, HHS is authorized to disperse
$5 billion for the purpose of funding the
PCIP program, including administrative
costs and contracts with States and nonprofit third party administrators. This
Federal funding is used to offset the cost
of providing health care to enrollees that
exceeds the premium revenue.
According to independent studies, the
Federal share of total costs could be
roughly 35 to 40 percent of total
spending.30
There will also be administrative
costs associated with the PCIP program.
This takes the form of the cost to
contractors to apply, the time cost for
individuals to apply, and the
contractors’ costs of complying with
program rules (for example, conducting
appeals, preventing fraud). The
Department estimates that the annual
administrative cost would be $1.9
million. Note that any State
administrative costs incurred that are
allowable under this program may be
paid for by Federal and premium funds.
e. Conclusion
Under section 1101 of the Affordable
Care Act, the Department is authorized
to spend $5 billion via States and third
party administrators for the purpose of
funding the PCIP program. The transfer
of this amount of funds will have a
significant, positive financial impact on
individuals who enroll in the program,
30 Mark Merlis, ‘‘Health Coverage for the HighRisk Uninsured: Policy Options for Design of the
Temporary High-Risk Pool,’’ National Institute for
Health Care Reform, Center for Studying Health
System Change (2010).
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
States, and health care providers. We
anticipate that individuals who are
currently uninsured will benefit from
having lower out-of-pocket costs for
health care, less financial strain, and
improved access to health services. We
also anticipate that insured individuals
will benefit indirectly through paying
lower premiums because of a reduced
burden on the plans to subsidize
uncompensated care. In addition, we
believe that establishing the PCIP
program will reduce the burden on local
and State governments to pay health
care providers for uncompensated care.
The direct costs of this regulation is
a transfer of $5 billion from the Federal
government to the PCIPs that will be
established in each State.
Administrative costs are expected to be
$1.9 million per year. In accordance
with the provisions of Executive Order
12866, this regulation was reviewed by
the Office of Management and Budget.
VII. Other Sections
Regulatory Alternatives
Under the Executive Order, we must
consider alternatives to issuing
regulations and alternative regulatory
approaches. Section 1101 establishes
broad requirements regarding
contracting, eligibility, benefits,
payments, insurer dumping, and the
control of fraud, waste, and abuse.
We considered implementing the
PCIP through some form of guidance to
States and other interested parties.
However, we believe that it is in the best
interest of States, contractors, enrollees,
and other interested parties to establish
this program through the rulemaking
process. As discussed in detail above,
there are several areas where the statute
clearly anticipates that the Secretary
will exercise discretion in implementing
the program, most notably the definition
of a pre-existing condition for purpose
of establishing eligibility. We also need
to issue regulations to establish the legal
framework for the contracting
mechanism that sets the specific terms
for the State-administered pools and for
the organizations that will operate the
pools in the States that do not contract
with HHS. Establishing these rules
through rulemaking ensures that the
public has ample opportunity to
understand and comment on these rules
and establishes clear authority to
enforce them.
The Department considered
regulatory alternatives for program
design, and often referred to the design
features in existing State high risk pool
and the Children’s Health Insurance
Program (CHIP) given their similarities
to the PCIP goals and features. We
E:\FR\FM\30JYR2.SGM
30JYR2
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 146 / Friday, July 30, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
explored setting uniform rules for
eligibility for all PCIPs but rejected this
approach since it did not take into
account the existing markets and
programs in each State.
Given the fixed Federal funding for
the PCIP program, these regulatory
alternatives will not affect Federal
outlays. They are also unlikely to have
measurable national health spending
implications since the Federal funding
constraint is accompanied by a fixed
standard for private premiums—100
percent of a standard rate for benefits
that cover at least 65 percent of the cost
of coverage.
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES2
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The RFA requires agencies that issue
a regulation to analyze options for
regulatory relief of small businesses if a
rule has a significant impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The Act generally defines a ‘‘small
entity’’ as (1) A proprietary firm meeting
the size standards of the Small Business
Administration (SBA), (2) a nonprofit
organization that is not dominant in its
field, or (3) a small government
jurisdiction with a population of less
than 50,000. States and individuals are
not included in the definition of ‘‘small
entity.’’ These regulations apply to the
States, both those that contract with
HHS to establish PCIPs and those States
in which HHS contracts with another
entity to establish the program, no small
entities will be affected. Therefore, the
Secretary certifies that the regulations
will not have significant impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
Section 202 of the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA)
requires that agencies assess anticipated
costs and benefits before issuing any
rule whose mandates would require
spending in any one year $100 million
in 1995 dollars, updated annually for
inflation. In 2010, that threshold is
approximately $135 million.
UMRA does not address the total cost
of a rule. Rather, it focuses on certain
categories of cost, mainly those ‘‘Federal
mandate’’ costs resulting from: (1)
Imposing enforceable duties on State,
local, or tribal governments, or on the
private sector; or (2) increasing the
stringency of conditions in, or
decreasing the funding of, State, local,
or tribal governments under entitlement
programs.
Under the Affordable Care Act, States
may choose to participate in the PCIPs
and receive Federal funding for
administering and paying benefits. If
they do not choose to participate, the
Federal government will establish a
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:44 Jul 29, 2010
Jkt 220001
45029
PCIPs in the State. Thus, the law and
these regulations do not impose an
unfunded mandate on States.
Individuals will have to pay a
premium and incur out-of-pocket
expenses to join the PCIPs that either a
State or the Federal government
establishes. However, individuals are
free to join based on their evaluation of
the costs and benefits of belonging to
the program. There is no automatic
enrollment and no requirement to join
a PCIP. Thus, the law, and these
regulations do not impose an unfunded
mandate on the private sector.
Subpart B—PCIP Program Administration
Federalism
Executive Order 13132 establishes
certain requirements that an agency
must meet when it promulgates a
proposed rule (and subsequent final
rule) that imposes substantial direct
requirement costs on State and local
governments, preempts State law, or
otherwise has Federalism implications.
This rule does not impose any direct
costs on State or local governments.
Consistent with section 1101(g)(5) of the
Act, § 152.40 of this interim final rule
specifies that State standards that might
otherwise apply to the coverage offered
under a PCIP are preempted, with the
exception of laws relating to licensing or
solvency. This language tracks similar
language that applies to State regulation
of health plans offering Medicare
Advantage plans under Medicare Part C
or drug coverage under Medicare Part D
under title XVIII of the Social Security
Act, and we would expect to interpret
the language for purposes of the high
risk pool program in a manner similar
to the way HHS has applied it under
those programs. We do not anticipate
that this regulation will have significant
implications, particularly since only
individuals who are not now insured,
and thus not directly subject to existing
State insurance laws, may enroll in the
program.
Subpart E—Oversight
List of Subjects in 45 CFR Part 152
Administrative practice and
procedure, Health care, Health
insurance, Penalties, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
■ For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, the Department of Health and
Human Services amends 45 CFR subtitle
A, subchapter B, by adding a new part
152 to read as follows:
PART 152—PRE-EXISTING CONDITION
INSURANCE PLAN PROGRAM
Subpart A—General Provisions
Sec.
152.1 Statutory basis.
152.2 Definitions.
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
152.6
152.7
Program administration.
PCIP proposal process.
Subpart C—Eligibility and Enrollment
152.14 Eligibility.
152.15 Enrollment and disenrollment
process.
Subpart D—Benefits
152.19 Covered benefits.
152.20 Prohibitions on pre-existing
condition exclusions and waiting
periods.
152.21 Premiums and cost-sharing.
152.22 Access to services.
152.26
152.27
152.28
Appeals procedures.
Fraud, waste, and abuse.
Preventing insurer dumping.
Subpart F—Funding
152.32
152.33
152.34
152.35
Use of funds.
Initial allocation of funds.
Reallocation of funds.
Insufficient funds.
Subpart G—Relationship to Existing Laws
and Programs
152.39
152.40
Maintenance of effort.
Relation to State laws.
Subpart H—Transition to Exchanges
152.44
152.45
End of PCIP program coverage.
Transition to the exchanges.
Authority: Sec. 1101 of the Patient
Protection and Affordable Care Act (Pub. L.
111–148).
Subpart A—General Provisions
§ 152.1
Statutory basis.
(a) Basis. This part establishes
provisions needed to implement section
1101 of the Patient Protection and
Affordable Care Act of 2010 (Affordable
Care Act), which requires the Secretary
of the Department of Health and Human
Services to establish a temporary high
risk health insurance pool program to
provide health insurance coverage for
individuals described in § 152.14 of this
part.
(b) Scope. This part establishes
standards and sets forth the
requirements, limitations, and
procedures for the temporary high risk
health insurance pool program,
hereafter referred to as the ‘‘Pre-Existing
Condition Insurance Plan’’ (PCIP)
program.
§ 152.2
Definitions.
For purposes of this part the following
definitions apply:
Creditable coverage means coverage
of an individual as defined in section
2701(c)(1) of the Public Health Service
Act as of March 23, 2010 and 45 CFR
146.113(a)(1).
E:\FR\FM\30JYR2.SGM
30JYR2
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES2
45030
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 146 / Friday, July 30, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
Enrollee means an individual
receiving coverage from a PCIP
established under this section.
Lawfully present means
(1) A qualified alien as defined in
section 431 of the Personal
Responsibility and Work Opportunity
Act (PRWORA) (8 U.S.C. 1641);
(2) An alien in nonimmigrant status
who has not violated the terms of the
status under which he or she was
admitted or to which he or she has
changed after admission;
(3) An alien who has been paroled
into the United States pursuant to
section 212(d)(5) of the Immigration and
Nationality Act (INA) (8 U.S.C.
1182(d)(5)) for less than 1 year, except
for an alien paroled for prosecution, for
deferred inspection or pending removal
proceedings;
(4) An alien who belongs to one of the
following classes:
(i) Aliens currently in temporary
resident status pursuant to section 210
or 245A of the INA (8 U.S.C. 1160 or
1255a, respectively);
(ii) Aliens currently under Temporary
Protected Status (TPS) pursuant to
section 244 of the INA (8 U.S.C. 1254a),
and pending applicants for TPS who
have been granted employment
authorization;
(iii) Aliens who have been granted
employment authorization under 8 CFR
274a.12(c)(9), (10), (16), (18), (20), (22),
or (24);
(iv) Family Unity beneficiaries
pursuant to section 301 of Public Law
101–649 as amended;
(v) Aliens currently under Deferred
Enforced Departure (DED) pursuant to a
decision made by the President;
(vi) Aliens currently in deferred
action status;
(vii) Aliens whose visa petitions have
been approved and who have a pending
application for adjustment of status;
(5) A pending applicant for asylum
under section 208(a) of the INA (8
U.S.C. 1158) or for withholding of
removal under section 241(b)(3) of the
INA (8 U.S.C. 1231) or under the
Convention Against Torture who has
been granted employment authorization,
and such an applicant under the age of
14 who has had an application pending
for at least 180 days;
(6) An alien who has been granted
withholding of removal under the
Convention Against Torture; or
(7) A child who has a pending
application for Special Immigrant
Juvenile status as described in section
101(a)(27)(J) of the INA (8 U.S.C.
1101(a)(27)(J)).
Out-of-pocket costs means the sum of
the annual deductible and the other
annual out-of-pocket expenses, other
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:44 Jul 29, 2010
Jkt 220001
than for premiums, required to be paid
under the program.
Pre-Existing condition exclusion has
the meaning given such term in 45 CFR
144.103.
Pre-Existing Condition Insurance Plan
(PCIP) means the temporary high risk
health insurance pool plan (sometimes
referred to as a ‘‘qualified high risk
pool’’) that provides coverage in a State,
or combination of States, in accordance
with the requirements of section 1101 of
the Affordable Care Act and this part.
The term ‘‘PCIP program’’ is generally
used to describe the national program
the Secretary is charged with carrying
out, under which States or non-profit
entities operate individual PCIPs.
Resident means an individual who
has been legally domiciled in a State.
Service Area refers to the geographic
area encompassing an entire State or
States in which PCIP furnishes benefits.
State refers each of the 50 States and
the District of Columbia.
Subpart B—PCIP Program
Administration
§ 152.6
Program administration.
(a) General rule. Section 1101(b)(1) of
the Affordable Care Act requires that
HHS carry out the Pre-Existing
Condition Insurance Plan program
directly or through contracts with
eligible entities, which are States or
nonprofit private entities.
(b) Administration by State. A State
(or its designated non-profit private
entity) may submit a proposal to enter
into a contract with HHS to establish
and administer a PCIP in accordance
with section 1101 of the Affordable Care
Act and this part.
(1) At the Secretary’s discretion, a
State may designate a nonprofit entity or
entities to contract with HHS to
administer a PCIP.
(2) As part of its administrative
approach, a State or designated entity
may subcontract with either a for-profit
or nonprofit entity.
(c) Administration by HHS. If a State
or its designated entity notifies HHS
that it will not establish or continue to
administer a PCIP, or does not submit
an acceptable or timely proposal to do
so, HHS will contract with a nonprofit
private entity or entities to administer a
PCIP in that State.
(d) Transition in administration. The
Secretary may consider a request from a
State to transition from administration
by HHS to administration by a State or
from administration by a State to
administration by HHS. Such transitions
shall be approved only if the Secretary
determines that the transition is in the
best interests of the PCIP enrollees and
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
potential PCIP enrollees in that state,
consistent with § 152.7(b) of this part.
§ 152.7
PCIP proposal process.
(a) General. A proposal from a State
or nonprofit private entity to contract
with HHS shall demonstrate that the
eligible entity has the capacity and
technical capability to perform all
functions necessary for the design and
operation of a PCIP, and that its
proposed PCIP is in full compliance
with all of the requirements of this part.
(b) Special rules for transitions in
administration. (1) Transitions from
HHS administration of a PCIP to State
administration must take effect on
January 1 of a given year.
(2) A State’s proposal to administer a
PCIP must meet all the requirements of
this section.
(3) Transitions from State
administration to HHS administration
must comply with the termination
procedures of the PCIP contract in effect
with the State or its designated entity.
(4) The Secretary may establish other
requirements needed to ensure a
seamless transition of coverage for all
existing enrollees.
Subpart C—Eligibility and Enrollment
§ 152.14
Eligibility.
(a) General rule. An individual is
eligible to enroll in a PCIP if he or she:
(1) Is a citizen or national of the
United States or lawfully present in the
United States;
(2) Subject to paragraph (b) of this
section, has not been covered under
creditable coverage for a continuous 6month period of time prior to the date
on which such individual is applying
for PCIP;
(3) Has a pre-existing condition as
established under paragraph (c) of this
section; and
(4) Is a resident of one of the 50 States
or the District of Columbia which
constitutes or is within the service area
of the PCIP. A PCIP may not establish
any standards with regard to the
duration of residency in the PCIP
service area.
(b) Satisfaction of 6-month creditable
coverage requirement when an enrollee
leaves the PCIP service area. An
individual who becomes ineligible for a
PCIP on the basis of no longer residing
in the PCIP’s service area as described
in paragraph (a)(4) of this section is
deemed to have satisfied the
requirement in paragraph (a)(2) of this
section for purposes of applying to
enroll in a PCIP in the new service area.
(c) Pre-existing condition requirement.
For purposes of establishing a process
for determining eligibility, and subject
E:\FR\FM\30JYR2.SGM
30JYR2
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 146 / Friday, July 30, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
to HHS approval, a PCIP may elect to
apply any one or more of the following
criteria in determining whether an
individual has a pre-existing condition
for purposes of this section:
(1) Refusal of coverage. Documented
evidence that an insurer has refused, or
a clear indication that the insurer would
refuse, to issue coverage to an
individual on grounds related to the
individual’s health.
(2) Exclusion of coverage.
Documented evidence that such
individual has been offered coverage but
only with a rider that excludes coverage
of benefits associated with an
individuals’ identified pre-existing
condition.
(3) Medical or health condition.
Documented evidence of the existence
or history of certain medical or health
condition, as approved or specified by
the Secretary.
(4) Other. Other criteria, as defined by
a PCIP and approved by HHS.
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES2
§ 152.15 Enrollment and disenrollment
process.
(a) Enrollment process. (1) A PCIP
must establish a process for verifying
eligibility and enrolling an individual
that is approved by HHS.
(2) A PCIP must allow an individual
to remain enrolled in the PCIP unless:
(i) The individual is disenrolled
under paragraph (b) of this section;
(ii) The individual obtains other
creditable coverage;
(iii) The PCIP program terminates, or
is terminated; or
(iv) As specified by the PCIP program
and approved by HHS.
(3) A PCIP must verify that an
individual is a United States citizen or
national or lawfully present in the
United States by:
(i) Verifying the individual’s
citizenship, nationality, or lawful
presence with the Commissioner of
Security or Secretary of Homeland
Security as applicable; or
(ii) By requiring the individual to
provide documentation which
establishes the individual’s citizenship,
nationality, or lawful presence.
(iii) The PCIP must provide an
individual who is applying to enroll in
the PCIP with a disclosure specifying if
the information will be shared with the
Department of Health and Human
Services, Social Security
Administration, and if necessary,
Department of Homeland Security for
purposes of establishing eligibility.
(b) Disenrollment process. (1) A PCIP
must establish a disenrollment process
that is approved by HHS.
(2) A PCIP may disenroll an
individual if the monthly premium is
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:44 Jul 29, 2010
Jkt 220001
not paid on a timely basis, following
notice and a reasonable grace period,
not to exceed 61 days from when
payment is due, as defined by the PCIP
and approved by HHS.
(3) A PCIP must disenroll an
individual in any of the following
circumstances:
(i) The individual no longer resides in
the PCIP service area.
(ii) The individual obtains other
creditable coverage.
(iii) Death of the individual.
(iv) Other exceptional circumstances
established by HHS.
(c) Effective dates. A PCIP must
establish rules governing the effective
date of enrollment and disenrollment
that are approved by HHS. A complete
enrollment request submitted by an
eligible individual by the 15th day of a
month, where the individual is
determined to be eligible for enrollment,
must take effect by the 1st day of the
following month, except in exceptional
circumstances that are subject to HHS
approval.
(d) Funding limitation. A PCIP may
stop taking applications for enrollment
to comply with funding limitations
established by the HHS under section
1101(g) of Public Law 111–148 and
§ 152.35 of this part. Accordingly, a
PCIP may employ strategies to manage
enrollment over the course of the
program that may include enrollment
capacity limits, phased-in (delayed)
enrollment, and other measures, as
defined by the PCIP and approved by
HHS, including measures specified
under § 152.35(b).
Subpart D—Benefits
§ 152.19
Covered benefits.
(a) Required benefits. Each benefit
plan offered by a PCIP shall cover at
least the following categories and the
items and services:
(1) Hospital inpatient services
(2) Hospital outpatient services
(3) Mental health and substance abuse
services
(4) Professional services for the
diagnosis or treatment of injury, illness,
or condition
(5) Non-custodial skilled nursing
services
(6) Home health services
(7) Durable medical equipment and
supplies
(8) Diagnostic x-rays and laboratory
tests
(9) Physical therapy services
(occupational therapy, physical therapy,
speech therapy)
(10) Hospice
(11) Emergency services, consistent
with § 152.22(b), and ambulance
services
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
45031
(12) Prescription drugs
(13) Preventive care
(14) Maternity care
(b) Excluded services. Benefit plans
offered by a PCIP shall not cover the
following services:
(1) Cosmetic surgery or other
treatment for cosmetic purposes except
to restore bodily function or correct
deformity resulting from disease.
(2) Custodial care except for hospice
care associated with the palliation of
terminal illness.
(3) In vitro fertilization, artificial
insemination or any other artificial
means used to cause pregnancy.
(4) Abortion services except when the
life of the woman would be endangered
or when the pregnancy is the result of
an act of rape or incest.
(5) Experimental care except as part of
an FDA-approved clinical trial.
§ 152.20 Prohibitions on pre-existing
condition exclusions and waiting periods.
(a) Pre-existing condition exclusions.
A PCIP must provide all enrollees with
health coverage that does not impose
any pre-existing condition exclusions
(as defined in § 152.2) with respect to
such coverage.
(b) Waiting periods. A PCIP may not
impose a waiting period with respect to
the coverage of services after the
effective date of enrollment.
§ 152.21
Premiums and cost-sharing.
(a) Limitation on enrollee premiums.
(1) The premiums charged under the
PCIP may not exceed 100 percent of the
premium for the applicable standard
risk rate that would apply to the
coverage offered in the State or States.
The PCIP shall determine a standard
risk rate by considering the premium
rates charged for similar benefits and
cost-sharing by other insurers offering
health insurance coverage to individuals
in the applicable State or States. The
standard risk rate shall be established
using reasonable actuarial techniques,
that are approved by the Secretary, and
that reflect anticipated experience and
expenses. A PCIP may not use other
methods of determining the standard
rate, except with the approval of the
Secretary.
(2) Premiums charged to enrollees in
the PCIP may vary on the basis of age
by a factor not greater than 4 to 1.
(b) Limitation on enrollee costs. (1)
The PCIP’s average share of the total
allowed costs of the PCIP benefits must
be at least 65 percent of such costs.
(2) The out-of-pocket limit of coverage
for cost-sharing for covered services
under the PCIP may not be greater than
the applicable amount described in
section 223(c)(2) of the Internal Revenue
E:\FR\FM\30JYR2.SGM
30JYR2
45032
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 146 / Friday, July 30, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
code of 1986 for the year involved. If the
plan uses a network of providers, this
limit may be applied only for innetwork providers, consistent with the
terms of PCIP benefit package.
§ 152.22
Access to services.
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES2
(a) General rule. A PCIP may specify
the networks of providers from whom
enrollees may obtain plan services. The
PCIP must demonstrate to HHS that it
has a sufficient number and range of
providers to ensure that all covered
services are reasonably available and
accessible to its enrollees.
(b) Emergency services. In the case of
emergency services, such services must
be covered out of network if:
(1) The enrollee had a reasonable
concern that failure to obtain immediate
treatment could present a serious risk to
his or her life or health; and
(2) The services were required to
assess whether a condition requiring
immediate treatment exists, or to
provide such immediate treatment
where warranted.
(or their family members) are employed,
and may have, or have had, access to
other coverage such as group health
coverage, but were discouraged from
enrolling.
(b) Cooperation. The PCIP shall
cooperate with Federal law enforcement
and oversight authorities in cases
involving waste, fraud and abuse, and
shall report to appropriate authorities
situations in which enrollment in other
coverage may have been discouraged.
§ 152.28
Preventing insurer dumping.
(a) General rule. If it is determined
based on the procedures and criteria set
forth in paragraph (b) of this section that
a health insurance issuer or group
health plan has discouraged an
individual from remaining enrolled in
coverage offered by such issuer or
health plan based on the individual’s
health status, if the individual
subsequently enrolls in a PCIP under
this part, the issuer or health plan will
be responsible for any medical expenses
incurred by the PCIP with respect to the
individual.
(b) Procedures and criteria for a
Subpart E—Oversight
determination of dumping. A PCIP shall
§ 152.26 Appeals procedures.
establish procedures to identify and
(a) General. A PCIP shall establish and report to HHS instances in which health
maintain procedures for individuals to
insurance issuers or employer-based
appeal eligibility and coverage
group health plans are discouraging
determinations.
high-risk individuals from remaining
(b) Minimum requirements. The
enrolled in their current coverage in
appeals procedure must, at a minimum, instances in which such individuals
provide:
subsequently are eligible to enroll in the
(1) A potential enrollee with the right qualified high risk pool. Such
to a timely redetermination by the PCIP
procedures shall include methods to
or its designee of a determination
identify the following circumstances,
regarding PCIP eligibility, including a
either through the PCIP enrollment
determination of whether the individual application form or other vehicles:
is a citizen or national of the United
(1) Situations where an enrollee or
States, or is lawfully present in the
potential enrollee had prior coverage
United States.
obtained through a group health plan or
(2) An enrollee with the right to a
issuer, and the individual was provided
timely redetermination by the PCIP or
financial consideration or other rewards
its designee of a determination
for disenrolling from their coverage, or
regarding the coverage of a service or
disincentives for remaining enrolled.
(2) Situations where enrollees or
the amount paid by the PCIP for a
potential enrollees had prior coverage
service.
obtained directly from an issuer or a
(3) An enrollee with the right to a
group health plan and either of the
timely reconsideration of a
following occurred:
redetermination made under paragraph
(i) The premium for the prior coverage
(b)(2) of this section by an entity
was increased to an amount that
independent of the PCIP.
exceeded the premium required by the
§ 152.27 Fraud, waste, and abuse.
PCIP (adjusted based on the age factors
(a) Procedures. The PCIP shall
applied to the prior coverage), and this
develop, implement, and execute
increase was not otherwise explained;
(ii) The health plan, issuer or
operating procedures to prevent, detect,
employer otherwise provided money or
recover (when applicable or allowable),
other financial consideration to
and promptly report to HHS incidences
disenroll from coverage, or disincentive
of waste, fraud, and abuse, and to
appropriate law enforcement authorities to remain enrolled in such coverage.
Such considerations include payment of
instances of fraud. Such procedures
the PCIP premium for an enrollee or
shall include identifying situations in
potential enrollee.
which enrollees or potential enrollees
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:44 Jul 29, 2010
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
(c) Remedies. If the Secretary
determines, based on the criteria in
paragraph (b) of this section, that the
rule in paragraph (a) of this section
applies, an issuer or a group health plan
will be billed for the medical expenses
incurred by the PCIP. The issuer or
group health plan also will be referred
to appropriate Federal and State
authorities for other enforcement
actions that may be warranted based on
the behavior at issue.
(d) Other. Nothing in this section may
be construed as constituting exclusive
remedies for violations of this section or
as preventing States from applying or
enforcing this section or other
provisions of law with respect to health
insurance issuers.
Subpart F—Funding
§ 152.32
Use of funds.
(a) Limitation on use of funding. All
funds awarded through the contracts
established under this program must be
used exclusively to pay allowable
claims and administrative costs
incurred in the development and
operation of the PCIP that are in excess
of the amounts of premiums collected
from individuals enrolled in the
program.
(b) Limitation on administrative
expenses. No more than 10 percent of
available funds shall be used for
administrative expenses over the life of
the contract with the PCIP, absent
approval from HHS.
§ 152.33
Initial allocation of funds.
HHS will establish an initial ceiling
for the amount of the $5 billion in
Federal funds allocated for PCIPs in
each State using a methodology
consistent with that used to established
allocations under the Children’s Health
Insurance Program, as set forth under 42
CFR Part 457, Subpart F, Payment to
States.
§ 152.34
Reallocation of funds.
If HHS determines, based on actual
and projected enrollment and claims
experience, that the PCIP in a given
State will not make use of the total
estimated funding allocated to that
State, HHS may reallocate unused funds
to other States, as needed.
§ 152.35
Insufficient funds.
(a) Adjustments by a PCIP to
eliminate a deficit. In the event that a
PCIP determines, based on actual and
projected enrollment and claims data,
that its allocated funds are insufficient
to cover projected PCIP expenses, the
PCIP shall report such insufficiency to
HHS, and identify and implement
E:\FR\FM\30JYR2.SGM
30JYR2
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 146 / Friday, July 30, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
45033
Subpart G—Relationship to Existing
Laws and Programs
§ 152.39
Maintenance of effort.
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES2
(a) General. A State that enters into a
contract with HHS under this part must
demonstrate, subject to approval by
HHS, that it will continue to provide
funding of any existing high risk pool in
the State at a level that is not reduced
from the amount provided for in the
year prior to the year in which the
contract is entered.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:44 Jul 29, 2010
Jkt 220001
(b) Failure to maintain efforts. In
situations where a State enters into a
contract with HHS under this part, HHS
shall take appropriate action, such as
terminating the PCIP contract, against
any State that fails to maintain funding
levels for existing State high risk pools
as required, and approved by HHS,
under paragraph (a) of this section.
§ 152.45
§ 152.40
necessary adjustments to eliminate such
deficit, subject to HHS approval.
(b) Adjustment by the Secretary. If the
Secretary estimates that aggregate
amounts available for PCIP expenses
will be less than the actual amount of
expenses, HHS reserves the right to
make such adjustments as are necessary
to eliminate such deficit.
Dated: July 26, 2010.
Jay Angoff,
Director, Office of Consumer Information and
Insurance Oversight.
Dated: July 26, 2010.
Kathleen Sebelius,
Secretary, Department of Health and Human
Services.
Relation to State laws.
The standards established under this
section shall supersede any State law or
regulation, other than State licensing
laws or State laws relating to plan
solvency, with respect to PCIPs which
are established in accordance with this
section.
Subpart H—Transition to Exchanges
Transition to the exchanges.
Prior to termination of the PCIP
program, HHS will develop procedures
to transition PCIP enrollees to the
Exchanges, established under sections
1311 or 1321 of the Affordable Care Act,
to ensure that there are no lapses in
health coverage for those individuals.
[FR Doc. 2010–18691 Filed 7–29–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4150–03–P
§ 152.44
End of PCIP program coverage.
Effective January 1, 2014, coverage
under the PCIP program (45 CFR part
152) will end.
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 9990
E:\FR\FM\30JYR2.SGM
30JYR2
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 146 (Friday, July 30, 2010)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 45014-45033]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-18691]
[[Page 45013]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Part II
Department of Health and Human Services
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
45 CFR Part 152
Pre-Existing Condition Insurance Plan Program; Interim Final Rule
Federal Register / Vol. 75 , No. 146 / Friday, July 30, 2010 / Rules
and Regulations
[[Page 45014]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
45 CFR Part 152
[OCIIO-9995-IFC]
RIN 0991-AB71
Pre-Existing Condition Insurance Plan Program
AGENCY: Office of Consumer Information and Insurance Oversight, OCIIO,
Department of Health and Human Services, HHS.
ACTION: Interim final rule with comment period.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Section 1101 of Title I of the Patient Protection and
Affordable Care Act of 2010 (Affordable Care Act) requires that the
Secretary establish, either directly or through contracts with States
or nonprofit private entities, a temporary high risk health insurance
pool program to provide affordable health insurance coverage to
uninsured individuals with pre-existing conditions. This program will
continue until January 1, 2014, when Exchanges established under
sections 1311 and 1321 of the Affordable Care Act will be available for
individuals to obtain health insurance coverage. This interim final
rule implements requirements in section 1101 of the Affordable Care
Act. Key issues addressed in this interim final rule include
administration of the program, eligibility and enrollment, benefits,
premiums, funding, and appeals and oversight rules.
DATES: Effective date: This regulation is effective on July 30, 2010.
Comment date: To be assured consideration, comments must be
received at one of the addresses provided below, no later than 5 p.m.
on September 28, 2010.
ADDRESSES: In commenting, please refer to file code OCIIO-9995-IFC.
Because of staff and resource limitations, we cannot accept comments by
facsimile (FAX) transmission.
You may submit comments in one of four ways (please choose only one
of the ways listed)
1. Electronically. You may submit electronic comments on this
regulation to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions under
the ``More Search Options'' tab.
2. By regular mail. You may mail written comments to the following
address only: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Department of
Health and Human Services, Attention: CMS-OCIIO-IFC, P.O. Box 8010,
Baltimore, MD 21244-8010.
Please allow sufficient time for mailed comments to be received
before the close of the comment period.
3. By express or overnight mail. You may send written comments to
the following address only: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services,
Department of Health and Human Services, Attention: OCIIO-9995-IFC,
Mail Stop C4-26-05, 7500 Security Boulevard, Baltimore, MD 21244-1850.
4. By hand or courier. If you prefer, you may deliver (by hand or
courier) your written comments before the close of the comment period
to either of the following addresses:
a. For delivery in Washington, DC--
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Department of Health and
Human Services, Room 445-G, Hubert H. Humphrey Building, 200
Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20201
(Because access to the interior of the Hubert H. Humphrey
Building is not readily available to persons without Federal
government identification, commenters are encouraged to leave their
comments in the CMS drop slots located in the main lobby of the
building. A stamp-in clock is available for persons wishing to
retain a proof of filing by stamping in and retaining an extra copy
of the comments being filed.)
b. For delivery in Baltimore, MD--
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Department of Health and
Human Services, 7500 Security Boulevard, Baltimore, MD 21244-1850.
If you intend to deliver your comments to the Baltimore address,
please call telephone number (410) 786-7195 in advance to schedule your
arrival with one of our staff members.
Comments mailed to the addresses indicated as appropriate for hand
or courier delivery may be delayed and received after the comment
period.
Submission of comments on paperwork requirements. You may submit
comments on this document's paperwork requirements by following the
instructions at the end of the ``Collection of Information
Requirements'' section in this document.
For information on viewing public comments, see the beginning of
the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ariel Novick, (301) 492-4290.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Inspection of Public Comments: All comments
received before the close of the comment period are available for
viewing by the public, including any personally identifiable or
confidential business information that is included in a comment. We
post all comments received before the close of the comment period on
the following Web site as soon as possible after they have been
received: https://regulations.gov. Follow the search instructions on
that Web site to view public comments.
Comments received timely will be also available for public
inspection as they are received, generally beginning approximately 3
weeks after publication of a document, at the headquarters of the
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, 7500 Security Boulevard,
Baltimore, Maryland 21244, Monday through Friday of each week from 8:30
a.m. to 4 p.m. To schedule an appointment to view public comments,
phone 1-800-743-3951.
I. Background
A. General
Historically, public policy has addressed the challenges of people
with pre-existing conditions through either high risk pools or
insurance reform. In general, high risk pools provide coverage of last
resort for people who, because of their health, are denied coverage by
private insurers or are unable to purchase coverage in the individual
market except at substantially surcharged premiums due to their health
status, and are ineligible for public coverage (such as Medicare or
Medicaid). Most States that permit insurers to decline coverage for
health reasons have established high risk pools as an alternative
coverage option in their individual market. These current pools provide
safety net coverage for people who have difficulty obtaining individual
health insurance because of their pre-existing conditions. First
established in 1976, 35 State high risk pools currently provide
coverage to approximately 200,000 individuals, or about one percent of
the individual market nationwide, and vary in terms of the populations
they cover and the benefits they provide.
States and the Congress through the Affordable Care Act have also
elected to use insurance reforms to address the accessibility and
availability of health insurance coverage for high risk populations.
Seven States have adopted guaranteed issue to ensure access to
coverage, and two States prohibit health status from being a factor in
setting premiums.\1\ The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of
2010, (the Affordable Care Act or ``the Act''), Public Law 111-148
applies a ban on pre-existing condition exclusions and ``rate-ups''
based on health status starting in
[[Page 45015]]
2014 and prohibits the use of pre-existing condition exclusions for
children starting in plan or policy years that begin on or after
September 23, 2010.\2\ This temporary Federal program provides coverage
to uninsured Americans with pre-existing conditions until the
Affordable Care Act is fully implemented in 2014.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Kaiser Family Foundation. State Health Facts. https://www.statehealthfacts.org/.
\2\ These provisions do not apply to ``grandfathered'' plans.
For a description of these provisions, see the interim final
regulations implementing 2719A (regarding patient protections),
published in the Federal Register on June 28, 2010 (75 FR 37188).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Overview: Section 1101 of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care
Act
The Affordable Care Act, was enacted on March 23, 2010. The Health
Care and Education Reconciliation Act (the Reconciliation Act), Public
Law 111-152, was enacted on March 30, 2010. Section 1101 of the
Affordable Care Act requires that the Secretary of the Department of
Health and Human Services (HHS) establish, either directly or through
contracts with States or nonprofit private entities, a temporary high
risk health insurance program to provide access to coverage for
uninsured Americans with pre-existing conditions. (Hereafter, we
generally refer to this program as the Pre-Existing Condition Insurance
Plan program, or PCIP program, to avoid confusion with the existing
State high risk pool programs, which will continue to operate
separately.)
The PCIP program is intended to remain in place from the time of
its establishment until the Exchanges established under sections 1311
or 1321 of the Act go into effect on January 1, 2014. This interim
final regulation sets policy only for this unique, temporary Federal
program with fixed Federal funding. Presented below is a general
overview of the statutory requirements for the new program. More
detailed descriptions of the specific requirements are included below
as part of the discussion of the associated regulatory provisions set
forth in this interim final rule.
II. Provisions of the Interim Final Rule
A. General Provisions (Subpart A, Sec. 152.1 Through Sec. 152.2)
Section 152.1 of this interim final rule specifies the general
statutory authority for the ensuing regulations and the scope of the
program, consistent with section 1101 of the Act. Section 152.2
provides definitions for terms that appear throughout these
regulations. Generally, the definitions are self-explanatory or taken
directly from section 1101 of the statute. The definitions set forth in
subpart A apply to all of part 152 unless otherwise indicated and are
applicable only for purposes of part 152.
The definition of ``pre-existing condition exclusion'' warrants a
brief discussion. First, it is important to note that this definition
applies only for purposes of the prohibition in section 1101(c)(2)(A)
on a PCIP ``impos[ing] any preexisting condition exclusion'' under the
coverage provided (an important protection for a program designed to
offer coverage to those with a pre-existing condition), and is separate
from the ``guidelines'' that determine pre-existing condition status
under section 1101(d)(2)(3) for purposes of eligibility for enrollment
in a PCIP. These latter eligibility provisions are set forth in subpart
C of this rule, under section 152.14.
State laws vary with regard to the definition of a pre-existing
condition exclusion. For purposes of defining a pre-existing condition
exclusion, we adopted the definition of pre-existing condition
currently used in the group market under the Health Insurance
Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA). We also took into
account section 1201 of the Affordable Care Act, which prohibits
denials of coverage because of a pre-existing condition. Thus, we
specify that pre-existing condition exclusion has the same meaning as
under 45 CFR 144.103. That is, the term refers to a denial of coverage,
or limitation or exclusion of benefits, based on the fact that the
individual denied coverage or benefits had a health condition that was
present before the date of enrollment for the coverage (or a denial of
enrollment), whether or not any medical advice, diagnosis, care, or
treatment was recommended or received before that date. This would
include exclusions stemming from a condition identified via a pre-
enrollment questionnaire or physical examination, or the review of
medical records during the pre-enrollment period.
B. PCIP Program Administration (Subpart B, Sec. 152.6 and Sec. 152.7)
As noted above, section 1101(b) of the Affordable Care Act provides
that HHS may ``carry out'' the temporary high risk health insurance
pool program either directly or through contracts with eligible
entities, which are States and non-profit entities. Eligible entities
must submit a proposal to carry out a PCIP in a time and manner, and
containing such information, that the Secretary requires. Section 152.6
establishes the general rules for administration through either a State
or by HHS through a non-profit private entity. Section 152.7 then
describes the proposal process and specifies that in order to contract
with HHS, the eligible entity's proposal must demonstrate capability to
perform all functions necessary for the design and operation of a PCIP,
and that its proposed PCIP is in full compliance with all of the
requirements of this part.
These standards establish minimum requirements for PCIPs, and are
supplemented by other requirements detailed in solicitation documents
(such as the descriptions of the outreach plan and consumer information
resources that each PCIP will establish) and incorporated into the
final contracts with HHS.
B. Eligibility and Enrollment (Subpart C, Sec. 152.14 Through Sec.
152.15)
Section 1101(d) of the Affordable Care Act provides the basic
eligibility criteria for the PCIP program, which are set forth under
Sec. 152.14. In addition, consistent with the Secretary's general
authority under section 1101(c)(2)(D) of the Act to establish
requirements for a PCIP, we set forth enrollment and disenrollment
requirements in Sec. 152.15.
Eligibility for the PCIP Program (Sec. 152.14)
Under section 1101(d) of the Affordable Care Act and subparagraphs
(1), (2) and (3) of Sec. 152.14(a) of this interim final rule, an
individual is eligible to enroll in a PCIP if he or she: (1) Is a
citizen or national of the United States or is lawfully present in the
United States as determined in accordance with section 1411 of the
Affordable Care Act; (2) has not been covered under creditable
coverage, as defined in section 2701(c)(1) of the Public Health Service
Act as of the date of enactment, during the 6-month period prior to the
date on which he or she is applying for coverage through the PCIP; and
(3) has a pre-existing condition, as determined in a manner consistent
with guidance issued by the Secretary. We further provide in Sec.
152.14(a)(4) that an individual must be a resident of a State that
falls within the service area of a PCIP.
Eligibility Conditioned on Citizenship and Immigration Status
Eligibility for the PCIP program is limited to citizens or
nationals of the United States and individuals who are lawfully present
in the United States. For the purpose of this regulation, lawfully
present has the meaning presently used under the Children's Health
Insurance Program, provided in the State Health Official letter issued
by
[[Page 45016]]
the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) on July 1, 2010.
Section 1101(d)(1) directs the Secretary to make a determination of
citizenship and immigration status in accordance with section 1411 of
the Act, which describes procedures to be employed for determining
eligibility for the Exchanges and provides for these procedures also to
be used in determining eligibility for the PCIP program. This section
sets forth detailed requirements governing the type of information that
applicants must provide and specific verification procedures that the
Secretary of Health and Human Services, Commissioner of Social
Security, and Secretary of Homeland Security would be required to
follow to establish eligibility. Section 1411(c)(4) of the Affordable
Care Act further provides that the Secretary shall conduct
verifications and determinations ``through the use of an on-line system
or otherwise for the electronic submission of, and response to, the
information submitted * * * with respect to an applicant,'' or by
``such other method as is approved by the Secretary'' that determines
``the consistency of the information submitted with the information
maintained in the records of the Secretary of the Treasury, the
Secretary of Homeland Security, and the Commissioner of Social
Security''.
Under this authority, Sec. 152.15(a)(3) specifies that a PCIP must
verify that an individual is a United States citizen or national, or
lawfully present in the United States. A PCIP can verify an
individual's citizenship or immigration status through the Social
Security Administration or, if applicable, the Department of Homeland
Security. In many cases, States may be able to automate verification of
citizenship and immigration status by leveraging existing data
exchanges that are currently in place for other programs, such as
Medicaid and the Children's Health Insurance Program. The Department of
Homeland Security's U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS)
Systematic Alien Verification for Entitlements (SAVE) program provides
online system to verify an individual's immigration status. States can
access this system after entering into the necessary Memorandum of
Understanding with USCIS. An automated verification process will be
used in all States where HHS is administering the PCIP program.
Some States are not able to have an automated ``on-line system'' or
``electronic'' process in place when they start accepting enrollments
into their PCIPs. Therefore, these regulations provide, as an
``alternative method'' approved by the Secretary, that a PCIP program
may instead require the individual to provide documentation that
establishes citizenship or immigration status. Subject to HHS approval,
States using documentation procedures may switch to an automated system
in the future. If a PCIP shares such information with the Social
Security Administration or the Department of Homeland Security,
consistent with the Privacy Act, the regulation specifies that a PCIP
must include a disclosure that the information provided on the
enrollment request may be shared with other government agencies for
purposes of establishing eligibility. The type(s) of documentation
PCIPs may use is subject to approval by HHS under the terms of the
contract.
Eligibility Based on a 6-Month Period Without Insurance Coverage
Eligibility for the PCIP program is limited to individuals with no
creditable coverage during the 6-month period prior to the date on
which they apply for coverage through the PCIP. Section 2701(c)(1) of
the Public Health Service Act on the date of enactment and 45 CFR Sec.
146.113(a)(1) define creditable coverage as coverage of an individual
under a group health plan, health insurance coverage as defined at 45
CFR 144.103, Medicare Part A or Part B, Medicaid, the Children's Health
Insurance Program, the TRICARE program, a medical care program of the
Indian Health Service or of a tribal organization, a State health
benefits risk pool (that is, existing State high risk pool), the
Federal Employee Health Benefits program, a public health plan (for
example, coverage through the Veterans Administration), or a health
benefit plan offered under section 5(e) of the Peace Corps Act. Such
creditable coverage includes health coverage provided to certain former
employees, retirees, spouses, former spouses, and dependent children
who are entitled to temporary continuation of health coverage at group
rates under the Consolidated Omnibus Reconciliation Act of 1985
(COBRA). We specify under Sec. 152.14(b)(3) that if an individual has
already satisfied the requirement for a 6-month period without
creditable coverage in connection with qualifying for a given PCIP
under section 1101 of the Act, the individual will be considered to
have satisfied this eligibility requirement for purposes of a PCIP in
another State, if such individual moves to a different State and wishes
to enroll in that State's PCIP.
In light of the unique circumstances presented by infants who are
less than six months old, the Department will issue guidance on how the
requirement that the individual not have had creditable coverage during
the six-month period prior to the application for the PCIP program
applies to and can be satisfied by such infants. Factors to be
considered in this guidance include whether coverage in the hospital
under the mother's plan at birth counts, current practices regarding
insurers' coverage of newborns, and the anti-dumping rules that direct
the Secretary to prevent disenrollment of individuals from existing
insurance due to their health status.
Eligibility Based on Having a Pre-Existing Condition
Under section 1101(d)(3), eligibility for the PCIP program is
conditioned on individuals having a pre-existing condition, as
``determined in a manner consistent with guidance issued by the
Secretary.'' We specify at Sec. 152.14(c)(1) that a PCIP in a State,
or the PCIP run by a non-profit in States that are not carrying out the
PCIP program, may determine that an individual has a pre-existing
condition, for purposes of PCIP eligibility, based on satisfying any
one or more of the following criteria, subject to HHS approval: (1) The
individual provides documented evidence that an insurer has refused, or
has provided clear indication that it would refuse, to issue individual
coverage on grounds related to the individual's health; (2) the
individual provides documented evidence that he or she has been offered
individual coverage but only with a rider that excludes coverage of
benefits associated with a pre-existing condition; (3) the individual
provides documented evidence that he or she has a medical or health
condition specified by the State and approved by the Secretary; or (4)
other criteria as defined by the PCIP and approved by HHS.
We believe that these criteria are fully consistent with the intent
of section 1101(d)(3) of the Act and address the problems that
individuals with pre-existing conditions face when applying for
insurance coverage in the individual market. That is, individuals with
pre-existing conditions are often unable to obtain coverage for reasons
that include an outright denial and an exclusion of coverage for the
pre-existing condition. This includes instances when an individual
applies for coverage and is informed by the carrier's representative or
Web site that they would be denied for coverage by the carrier due to
the pre-existing condition. Providing States and non-profit entities
operating a PCIP
[[Page 45017]]
the option of using these manifestations of having a pre-existing
condition, rather than relying on a list of medical conditions, is
consistent with the PCIP program goal of covering people who both have
a pre-existing condition and otherwise cannot access insurance. We note
that in some cases, individuals with pre-existing conditions are unable
to obtain outright written coverage denials, but instead are told that
carriers will not accept their applications. These regulations will
permit PCIPs to exercise flexibility in determining exactly what type
of communication constitutes a refusal to issue coverage.
Under Sec. 152.14(c)(3), we specify that a PCIP may determine that
an individual has a pre-existing condition based on evidence of the
existence or history of certain medical or health conditions, as
approved by the Secretary. This provision comports with our intention
to permit the continuing use of eligibility standards that States use
in their existing high risk pools, and permits a State that has
guaranteed issue and community rated premiums to use an alternative
test to showing a denial of coverage.
Finally, we provide at Sec. 152.14(c)(4) that HHS may approve
other criteria for meeting the definition of pre-existing condition
under a given PCIP.
We anticipate that the first two criteria will be used in all
States where individuals may be denied coverage or offered coverage
with exclusionary riders. In the PCIP program serving States that have
elected not to play a role in operating a PCIP program, only the first
two criteria will be used, except with respect to individuals who are
guaranteed to be issued a policy. PCIPs administered by States or non-
profit entities may choose to utilize the additional criteria with HHS
approval.
Eligibility for a PCIP Conditioned on Residing in the Plan's Service
Area
Eligibility for a PCIP is limited to individuals who reside in the
service area of the PCIP. At Sec. 152.14(a)(4), we provide that an
individual must be a resident of one of the 50 States or the District
of Columbia which constitutes or is within the service area of the
PCIP.
The statute explicitly acknowledges the role of a State (defined in
section 1304(d) of the Act as the 50 States and the District of
Columbia) with respect to the administration of PCIP, with no reference
to ``Territories'' (see 1101(b)(2) and (3), 1101(e)(3), 1101(g)(3)(A)
and (5)). Unlike section 1204(a) of the Health Care and Education
Reconciliation Act of 2010, (which amended the Affordable Care Act and
clearly specified a role for territories in the operation of
Exchanges), the Congress made no similar reference to Territories in
connection with the PCIP program.
Enrollment and Disenrollment Process (Sec. 152.15)
Under our authority in section 1101(c)(2)(D) of the Act to impose
``appropriate'' requirements that PCIPs would be required to meet,
Sec. 152.15(a) and (b) require PCIPs to establish a process for
enrolling and disenrolling individuals that is approved by HHS. Our
intent is to permit the use of established enrollment policies and
procedures in place under existing State high risk pools, to the extent
that they are consistent with the statute.
Section 152.15(a)(2) of this interim final rule specifies that a
PCIP must allow an individual to remain enrolled unless the individual
is disenrolled under specified circumstances (for example, the
individual moves out of the service area or obtains other creditable
coverage) or the PCIP program is terminated. Our intent is to promote
continuity of coverage for individuals who enroll in a PCIP until they
are able to obtain coverage through the Exchange, under which
participating insurers cannot exclude individuals with pre-existing
conditions. We understand, however, that to the extent individuals can
obtain other coverage, for example, by becoming entitled to Medicare or
enrolling in employer-based health insurance, such coverage would
obviate the need for coverage provided by the PCIP. Leveraging the
availability of such coverage, by exiting the PCIP, enables other
qualified individuals to enroll.
A PCIP is required to establish, consistent with Sec. 152.15(b) of
this interim final rule, a disenrollment process that is approved by
HHS. As noted above, we seek to support States' ability to participate
in this program by allowing them to adopt policies and procedures in
use under existing high risk pool programs. We understand that current
practice in State high risk pools is that an individual who does not
pay his or her premiums on a timely basis may be disenrolled. We
provide in Sec. 152.15(b)(2) that, under these circumstances, the
enrollee will receive sufficient notice and reasonable grace period for
payment prior to any disenrollment taking effect not to exceed 61 days
(the longest period currently provided for by States). The consequence
of failing to pay premiums and any subsequent disenrollment is that an
individual loses access to coverage and may not be able to re-enroll
for 6 months. Thus, we believe that it is the PCIP's responsibility to
inform its enrollees prior to making a disenrollment effective. There
are other circumstances in which involuntary disenrollment is
appropriate and thus we establish at Sec. 152.15(b)(3) that a PCIP
must disenroll an individual in cases of death, where an individual
obtains creditable coverage or no longer resides in the PCIP's service
area, and other exceptional circumstances as established by HHS. We
envision that such circumstances would include cases of fraud or
intentional misrepresentation of material fact, and it is our intent to
work with PCIPs to develop policies in these areas via sub-regulatory
guidance. As we explain under our discussion of eligibility, an
individual who is disenrolled because he or she no longer resides in
the service area of a PCIP does not have to satisfy another 6-month
continuous period without creditable coverage before applying to enroll
in a PCIP in the new State of residence.
Section 152.15(c) requires that a PCIP establish rules governing
effective dates of enrollments and disenrollments. In particular, a
PCIP program must specify the deadline for receiving an enrollment
application that would take effect on the first of the following month.
In general, an individual who submits a complete enrollment request by
an eligible individual by the 15th day of a month could access coverage
by the 1st day of the following month. Exceptions to this policy will
be subject to approval by HHS.
Finally, given the capped appropriation for this program, we
recognize that PCIPs need sufficient programmatic flexibility to manage
their costs and enrollment, to help ensure that the PCIP program's
funding allocation is sufficient to cover claims and other program
costs for the entire duration of the program. Thus, we establish
authority under Sec. 152.15(d) for a PCIP program to employ strategies
to manage enrollment over the course of the program that may include
enrollment capacity limits, phased-in (delayed) enrollment, premium and
benefit adjustments that indirectly affect enrollment, and other
measures, as defined by the PCIP and approved by HHS.
Benefits--(Subpart D, Sections 152.19 Through 152.22)
Covered Benefits (Sec. 152.19)
Required Benefits (Sec. 152.19(a))
The required benefit list in Sec. 152.19(a) builds off of the
essential health benefits under the new section 2707 of the Public
Health Service Act, as enacted in the Affordable Care Act, for which
[[Page 45018]]
guidance has yet to be issued. The list is consistent with the most
commonly covered services offered in existing State high risk pools,
according to a survey conducted by the National Association of State
Comprehensive Health Insurance Plans (NASCHIP) in 2009. Its benefits
are also parallel to the benefits offered by the Federal Employees
Health Benefits Plan (FEHBP).
Excluded Services (Sec. 152.19(b))
Section 152.19(b) sets forth a list of services that shall not be
covered by any PCIP. While the specific benefits to be included and
excluded by any PCIP are generally subject to HHS approval and review
through the PCIP contracting process, this excluded services list
addresses several areas where providing coverage is unequivocally
prohibited. This list of excluded services parallels that of FEHBP.
The subject of Federal funding of abortion services with respect to
the Affordable Care Act was addressed in the Executive Order issued by
the President on March 24, 2010: The enactment of the Affordable Care
Act left in place current restrictions that prohibit the use of Federal
funds for abortion services, except in cases of rape or incest, or
where the life of the woman would be endangered. Exec. Order No.
13,535, 75 FR 15,599 (Mar. 24, 2010). These restrictions currently
apply to certain Federal programs that are similar to the PCIP program.
The PCIP program is Federally-created, funded, and administered
(whether directly or through contract); it is a temporary Federal
insurance program in which the risk is borne by the Federal government
up to a fixed appropriation. As such, the services covered by the PCIP
program shall not include abortion services except in the case of rape
or incest, or where the life of the woman would be endangered.
Pre-Existing Conditions Exclusions (Sec. 152.20)
Section 1101(c)(2)(A) of the Act requires that a PCIP established
under this section not impose any pre-existing condition exclusions
with respect to covered services. The Health Insurance Portability and
Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA) includes limitations for pre-
existing conditions in the group market. This protection was expanded
under section 1201 of the Affordable Care Act, which prohibits any pre-
existing condition exclusions from being imposed by group health plans
or group and individual health insurance coverage beginning January 1,
2014. The interim final rules issued pursuant to section 2704 of the
Public Health Service Act (as amended by the Affordable Care Act) under
Sec. 147 adopt, with minor modifications, the definition of pre-
existing condition currently used under HIPAA.
Similarly, our rule prohibits PCIPs from applying any pre-existing
condition exclusion to covered services, and consistent with the
regulations implementing section 1201 of the Act, defines a pre-
existing condition exclusion as a limitation or exclusion of benefits
based on the fact that the condition was present before the date of
enrollment in coverage (or a denial of enrollment), whether or not any
medical advice, diagnosis, care, or treatment was recommended or
received before that date.
Pursuant to the authority provided to the Secretary under section
1101(c)(2)(D), this interim final rule also prohibits PCIPs from
imposing any type of coverage waiting period upon eligible individuals.
For purposes of this rule, a waiting period is defined as the period
immediately following the effective date of enrollment in which some or
all benefits in the coverage are not provided. Accordingly, once an
individual is enrolled in a PCIP consistent with the rules set forth in
subpart C, full coverage must be provided to the individual starting
with the effective date of enrollment.
Premiums and Cost-Sharing (Sec. 152.21)
Standard Rate
Section 1101(c)(2)(C)(iii) of the Act requires that premium rates
charged for coverage under the high risk pool program be established at
``a standard rate for a standard population''. The National Association
of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC) Model Health Plan for Uninsurable
Individuals Act suggests that high risk pool plans ``determine a
standard risk rate by considering the premium rates charged by other
insurers offering health insurance coverage to individuals.''
Furthermore, section 2245(g)(2) of the Public Health Service Act
(PHSA), which governs the existing Federal high risk pool grant
program, defines the ``standard risk rate'' for the high risk pools to
mean a rate that: (1) Is determined under the State high risk pool by
considering the premium rates charged by other health insurers offering
health insurance coverage to individuals in the insurance market
served; (2) is established using reasonable actuarial techniques; and
(3) reflects anticipated claims experience and expenses for the
coverage involved.
In keeping with the methodology suggested by the NAIC Model Act and
the Federal grant program, Sec. 152.21 of this interim final rule
generally interprets the phrase ``standard rate for a standard
population'' to refer to the premium rates offered in the individual
market in a given State. While existing State high risk pools' premiums
vary between 105-250 percent of the standard rate of the individual
market, the Act requires that premiums in the PCIP program be at the
standard rate, rather than a higher proportion of that rate. Therefore,
this rule provides that a PCIP established under this section must not
offer enrollees premiums at a rate that exceeds 100 percent of the
standard individual market rate in the PCIP service area.
This interim final rule does not mandate a specific formula for
calculating the standard rate. Instead, we specify that a PCIP may
calculate the standard rate using reasonable actuarial techniques, as
approved by the Secretary, that reflect anticipated experience and
expenses. This requirement should accommodate reasonable variations in
the methods that PCIPs may use to calculate a standard risk rate.
We also recognize that individual market rates in each State can
vary as a consequence of individual State insurance laws. For example,
some States require that insurers issue all applicants a policy or
offer coverage at a community rate. In such situations, the standard
individual rate may be considerably higher than in a State that permits
insurers to reject applicants or set premiums on the basis of health
status or other factors. To account for these variations, Sec.
152.21(a) of these rules provides that, subject to approval by HHS, a
PCIP may use other methods of determining the standard rate in the
State. The exact methodology must be submitted and approved through the
proposal process as specified in Sec. 152.8 of this part.
Premium Variation
Section 1101(c)(2)(C)(ii) of the Act specifies that premium rates
in a PCIP can vary on the basis of age by a factor not greater than 4
to 1. Section 2701(a)(3) of the PHSA as amended by the Affordable Care
Act requires HHS, in consultation with NAIC, to define permissible age
bands for rating purposes in the individual and group markets. However,
the rating bands established under section 2701 will not be effective
until January 1, 2014, and no such requirement exists for the PCIP
program. Given these factors, this rule does not establish standard age
bands
[[Page 45019]]
for the PCIP program beyond the statutory requirements. Thus, Sec.
152.21(a)(2) of this rule simply follows the statutory requirement of
section 1101(c)(2)(C)(ii) of the Act and provides that premiums charged
in the PCIP can vary by age on a factor of not greater than 4 to 1.
Specific age band rating will be established through the PCIP
contracting process.
Section 1101(c)(2)(C)(i) of the Act requires that premiums in the
PCIP program may vary only as provided under section 2701 of the PHSA,
other than what is allowed in section 1101. Section 2701 permits
premiums rates to vary in the individual and group markets by a finite
number of factors. Gender rating, for example, is prohibited in the
PCIP program.
Limits on Enrollee Costs
Section 1101(c)(2)(B) of the Act sets limits on enrollee costs in
the PCIP program. Specifically, the issuer's share of the total allowed
costs of benefits provided under such coverage cannot be less than 65
percent of such costs, subject to actuarial review and approval by the
Secretary. Section 152.21(b)(1) of this rule provides that coverage
under a plan offered by a PCIP must at a minimum meet this 65 percent
threshold.
Section 1101(c)(2)(B)(ii) of the Act requires that coverage
provided by PCIPs not have an out-of-pocket limit greater than the
applicable amount described in section 223(c)(2) of the Internal
Revenue Code, which sets the out-of-pocket limit for high deductible
health plans associated with a tax favored health savings accounts.
(This amount is $5,950 for 2010.) Under Sec. 152.2, we define out-of-
pocket costs as the sum of the annual deductible and the other annual
out-of-pocket expenses, other than for premiums, required to be paid
under the plan. Section 152.21(b)(2) also notes that, consistent with
IRS rules, the out-of-pocket limit may be applied only for in-network
providers, consistent with the terms of PCIP plan benefit package.
Access to Services (Sec. 152.22)
As noted above, section 1101(c)(2)(D) of the Act provides that
coverage offered via a PCIP must meet any other requirements determined
appropriate by the Secretary of HHS. Section 152.22 provides that the
PCIP may specify the network of providers from whom enrollees may
obtain services, provided that the PCIP demonstrates to HHS that it has
a sufficient number and range of providers to ensure that all covered
services are reasonably available and accessible under such coverage.
Section 152.22(b) makes clear that, in the case of emergency room
services, such services must be covered out of network and out of area
if (1) the enrollee had a reasonable concern that failure to obtain
immediate treatment could present a serious risk to his or her life or
health; and (2) the services were required to assess whether a
condition requiring immediate treatment exists, or to provide such
immediate treatment where warranted. We believe these requirements are
in keeping with generally accepted standards with respect to the
provision of emergency services in plans with network limits, such as
those in place in the Medicare Advantage program under title XVIII of
the Social Security Act and the commercial health insurance market.
E. Oversight (Subpart E, Sections 152.26 Through 152.28)
Appeals Procedures (Sec. 152.26)
Section 1101(f)(1) of the Act requires the establishment of an
appeals process to enable individuals to appeal determinations under
the PCIP program. We are interpreting this provision to apply both to
determinations with respect to benefit coverage determinations and
determinations with respect to an individual's eligibility for the
program, including whether an individual is a citizen or national of
the United States, or lawfully present in the United States.
Rather than establishing detailed, proscriptive requirements with
respect to appeals procedures, Sec. 152.26 of this interim final rule
establishes minimum requirements that all PCIPS must meet. Section
152.26(b) specifies that a PCIP must provide for a timely
redetermination of an eligibility or coverage determination; coverage
determinations include both whether an item or service is covered and
the amount paid by the PCIP. For coverage determinations, Sec.
152.26(b)(3) further specifies that an enrollee has the right to a
timely second-level appeal, or ``reconsideration,'' by an independent
entity.
The requirement for independent review of a plan's coverage
redetermination ensures that the entity providing the reconsideration
would have no stake of any kind in the outcome, and was not involved in
the initial or reconsidered determination being reviewed. This
requirement could be satisfied under a variety of arrangements,
including (1) An existing appeal mechanism provided for under State
law; (2) in the case of a State-administered PCIP, a review process
created by the State; or (3) an independent contractor, such as the
independent review entities with which HHS contracts to review coverage
determinations under the Medicare program.
These requirements are intended to permit States to use existing
appeals or review mechanisms provided for under State law, and to
permit other non-profit entities to utilize their existing internal
appeals mechanisms. The actual appeals mechanisms will be subject to
the Secretary's approval as part of the contracting process. Given both
the temporary nature of the program and the statutory implementation
timeframe for the new program, we believe that using these existing
mechanisms is necessary and appropriate.
Fraud, Waste, and Abuse (Sec. 152.27)
Section 1101(f)(2) of the Affordable Care Act requires the
Secretary to establish procedures to protect against fraud, waste, and
abuse. To that end, Sec. 152.27(a) of this interim final rule requires
the PCIP to develop, implement, and execute operating procedures to
prevent, detect, recover payments (when applicable or allowable), and
promptly report to HHS incidences of waste, fraud, and abuse. These
procedures are required to include identifying situations in which
enrollees, potential enrollees, or their family members had access to
employer-based coverage, and may have been discouraged from enrolling
in that coverage. Should HHS become aware of instances involving fraud,
waste, or abuse within the PCIP's operation, HHS will take appropriate
action within the terms of the contract, or as otherwise provided by
law. As stated in Sec. 152.27(b), the PCIP shall cooperate with
Federal law enforcement and oversight authorities in cases involving
waste, fraud and abuse, and shall report cases in which an individual
may have been discouraged from enrolling in other coverage to
appropriate authorities. For example, if the coverage was an employer
group health plan subject to ERISA, which prohibits discrimination
based on health status, the matter should be reported to the Department
of Labor for investigation and possible enforcement action.
Preventing Insurer Dumping (Sec. 152.28)
There is an incentive for employers and issuers to single out high
risk and thus high-cost individuals and offer incentives for them to
disenroll from their coverage and obtain coverage in PCIPs which offer
such individuals guaranteed access to coverage without pre-existing
condition exclusion at a standard premium, if they are uninsured
[[Page 45020]]
for at least six months. Congress recognized this potential issue and
directed the Secretary under section 1101(e)(2) of the Act to establish
criteria for determining whether health insurance issuers and
employment-based health plans have discouraged individuals from
remaining enrolled in prior coverage based on the health status of
those individuals, and specifies certain criteria that shall be
included in those established by the Secretary. Section 152.28 of this
interim final rule thus sets forth these criteria, and requires that
PCIPs establish procedures to identify and report to HHS instances
where health insurance issuers or group health plans are discouraging
high-risk individuals from remaining enrolled in their current
coverage, in instances where such individuals subsequently are eligible
to enroll in the PCIP.
Consistent with section 1101(e)(2) of the Affordable Care Act,
section 152.28(c) of the interim final rule provides that if, in
applying the criteria in section 152.28(b), it is determined that a
dumping under section 152.28(a) has occurred, the Secretary may bill
the issuer or group health plan for any medical expenses incurred by
the PCIP for such enrollees. In these situations, the interim final
rule also makes clear that the issuer or group health plan will be
referred to appropriate Federal and State authorities for other
enforcement action that may be warranted depending on the facts and
circumstances. Finally, section 152.28(d) specifies that nothing in the
subsection may be construed as constituting exclusive remedies for
violations of the section or preventing States from applying or
enforcing this section or other provisions of law with respect to
health insurance issuers, consistent with section 1101(c)(3) of the
Affordable Care Act. Additional guidance will be issued to prevent
``dumping'' from public programs like Medicaid and the Children's
Health Insurance Program.
F. Funding (Subpart F, Sections 152.32 Through 152.35)
Use of Funds (Sec. 152.32)
Section 1101(g) of the Affordable Care Act appropriates
$5,000,000,000 to pay the claims and administrative costs of the PCIP
program established under this section that are in excess of the amount
of premiums collected from enrollees. Traditionally, in State high risk
pools, as well as other insurance programs, the funds collected from
enrollees as premiums and other funding streams are expended across two
chief areas. The majority of funds collected as premiums are expended
to pay the health expenses for covered services incurred by enrollees.
Administrative expenses, the costs of operating the program, make up
the second major expense category. Section 152.32(a) of this interim
final rule thus provides that all funds awarded under this program must
be used exclusively to pay the allowable claims and administrative
costs of a PCIP established under this section. Such costs include
those incurred in the development and operation of the PCIP program, to
the extent that those costs are in excess of the amounts or premiums
collected from individuals enrolled in the program. PCIP program funds
are not available for any other uses, such as to pay expenses or defray
premiums of existing State high risk pools.
Although the Act does not specify the amount that a PCIP can spend
on administrative expenses, Sec. 152.32(b) of this rule permits PCIPs
to spend no more than 10 percent of its total allotted funds towards
administrative expenses. The 10 percent limitation is similar to what
is imposed under the Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP).
Typical examples of the types of administrative costs and expenses that
we expect to be incurred by PCIPs include: Start-up and program
implementation activities, the production and distribution of
information and outreach materials, eligibility determination and
enrollment processing, claims processing, costs associated with
prevention and detection of fraud, waste and abuse, and other ancillary
services such as operation of a customer service call center, account
maintenance, and appeals. We note that, given the start-up costs for
the new PCIPs established under this program, and the need for
expeditious implementation, this 10 percent cap applies to the total
allotment for the duration of the program, as opposed to spending in a
given year.
Initial Allocation of Funds (Sec. 152.33)
Section 1101(g) of the Act does not specify exactly how HHS should
allocate funds for the purpose of this program. At the outset of the
program, as specified under section 152.33, the Secretary has
established initial allotment ceilings for PCIPs in each State using a
methodology consistent with the funding allocation methodology used in
CHIP, as set forth under 42 CFR Part 457, subpart F, Payment to States.
(Note that, subject to these allocation ceilings, the estimated funding
amounts available under the PCIP program contracts are established
through the contracting process based on the projected number of PCIP
enrollees and their projected claims costs. Actual payments to PCIPs
will be based on their reported cost statements during the life of the
contract.)
Thus, the initial ceilings on PCIP funding allocations are based on
a blended formula based on the State population, number of uninsured
individuals under 65, and geographic health care costs. Under this
formula, one half of the available funds are allocated based on the
number of the nonelderly population in each State, compared to the
total U.S. nonelderly population. This gives more populous States more
funding and does not penalize those States that employ mechanisms to
reduce the number of uninsured persons in their States.
The health care cost index that HHS will use to adjust the funding
allocations will be based on the wages of employees in the health
services industry, and is consistent with what we have used under the
Children's Health Insurance Program. These wage data were developed by
the Bureau of Labor Statistics of the Department of Labor through its
Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages. This will include a weighted
average of the wages in the health services industry represented by
ambulatory health care services, hospitals, and nursing and residential
care facilities. As in the CHIP formula, 15 percent of the cost factor
is held constant, while 85 percent reflects how each State's average
wage compares to the U.S. average. In order to insure that the
geographic variation and cost adjustments accurately reflect statistics
on population and the number of uninsured, the same year of data will
be used to calculate population, number of uninsured, geographic health
care costs, and cost adjustments.
Reallocation of Funds (Sec. 152.34)
As noted above, over time, spending under the PCIP program will be
determined based on the actual enrollment and cost experience of the
PCIPs across the country. Thus, we recognize that there may be a need
to reallocate funds if actual experience indicates that, in a given
State, not all of funds available under the allocation formula will be
used. Section 152.34 accounts for this possibility by giving HHS
explicit authority to reallocate funds among States if HHS determines
that the PCIP in a given State will not make use of the total estimated
funding originally allotted to that State. HHS will be receiving
monthly reports on the program costs of each PCIP and will consult
closely with PCIPs in evaluating these reports and making any decisions
[[Page 45021]]
with respect to the need for reallocations.
Insufficient Funds (Sec. 152.35)
Section 1101(g)(2) of the Affordable Care Act states that if HHS
estimates for any fiscal year that the aggregate amounts available for
the payment of the expenses of the high risk pool will be less than the
actual amount of such expenses, HHS shall make such adjustments as are
necessary to eliminate this deficit. Further, section 1101(g)(4) of
this Act states that HHS has the authority to stop taking applications
for participation in the program to comply with the funding
limitations. Accordingly, Sec. 152.35(c) of this rule provides that
the PCIP, subject to HHS approval, may adjust premiums, alter required
benefits, limit PCIP applications or take other measures to eliminate a
projected deficit. Particularly in view of the capped appropriation for
the PCIP program, HHS is committed to working very closely with the
PCIPs to monitor PCIP enrollment and claims experience. To that end,
the PCIP contracts include detailed reporting responsibilities with
respect to PCIP enrollment and spending, as well as spelling out PCIP
responsibilities for the development of mitigation strategies and
recommended adjustments should the amounts available under a contract
be less than the projected expenses. Lastly, Sec. 152.35(d) ensures
that, if the Secretary estimates that aggregate amounts available for
PCIP expenses will be less than the actual amount of expenses, HHS
reserves the right to make such adjustments as are necessary to
eliminate such deficit, consistent with the terms of the PCIP contract.
G. Relationship to Existing Laws and Programs (Subpart G, Sec. 152.39
Through Sec. 152.40)
Relationship to Other Federal Health Insurance Regulation
We note that subtitles A and C of Title I of the Affordable Care
Act contain new requirements that apply to group health plans and
issuers of health insurance in the individual health insurance market
which are governed by title XXVII of the PHSA. Some of these provisions
address the same areas as the above provisions in section 1101
governing the PCIP program (e.g., premium amounts, beneficiary out-of-
pocket expenses, and pre-existing conditions). These insurance reforms
do not apply to the PCIP established under section 1101 of the
Affordable Care Act and implemented in this interim final rule since
the high risk pools do not meet the definition of a group health plan
or a health insurance issuer pursuant to sections 2791(a)(1) and
2791(b)(2) of the PHS Act.
Maintenance of Effort (Sec. 152.39)
Section 1101(b)(3) of the new law imposes a maintenance of effort
requirement, which specifies that in order for a State to enter into a
contract to administer a PCIP, a State must agree not to reduce the
annual amount it expended on the operation of an existing State high
risk pool in the year preceding the year in which a PCIP contract
begins. We believe that the clear intent of this provision is to
prohibit the shifting of costs of existing State high risk pools to the
Federal government. The maintenance of effort requirement both ensures
that the fixed $5 billion in funding is used to meet the PCIP program
goals and also reinforces the limitation of eligibility to individuals
who are uninsured, as opposed to those already insured through a State
high risk pool. At the same time, we recognize that States now use
different sources of funds to support the operation of existing high
risk pools. For example, many States rely upon assessments on the
health insurance industry or health insurance providers to support
their high risk pools, and States also commonly allow insurers to
reduce premium tax payments by all or a percentage of such assessment.
Given the various funding models that are now in place in different
States, we believe it is appropriate to permit States some latitude in
terms of ways in which they can satisfy this requirement subject to
Secretarial approval. Accordingly, section 152.39(a) specifies that in
order for a State to enter into a contract with the Secretary it must
comply with the maintenance of effort requirement set forth in section
1101(b)(3) of the Affordable Care Act in a manner approved by the
Secretary. We anticipate that permissible methods of meeting this
requirement would include, but are not limited to, maintaining either
the total amount or the total per capita amount of State funding for
the operation of an existing high risk pool (given that a State would
be maintaining its effort per enrollee, and cannot control
disenrollment), maintaining the same formula for providing funding for
a State high risk pool, or establishing an altered formula that the
Secretary determines will not reduce the total funds expended on the
existing high risk pool. (Note that options such as the per capita
approach would need to be evaluated in terms of other policies in
effect in a State that could negatively influence enrollment in an
existing State high risk pool.) Again, all such approaches are subject
to the approval of the Secretary.
Section 152.39(b) specifies that in situations where a State enters
into a contract with HHS under this part, HHS shall take appropriate
action, such as terminating the PCIP contract, against any State that
fails to maintain funding levels for existing State high risk pools.
Relation to State Laws (Sec. 152.40)
Section 152.40 of this interim final rule reflects the provision in
section 1101(g)(5) that specifies State standards that might otherwise
apply to the coverage offered under a PCIP program are pre-empted, with
the exception of laws relating to licensing or solvency. This language
tracks similar language that applies to State regulation of health
plans offering Medicare Advantage plans under Medicare Part C or drug
coverage under Medicare Part D under title XVIII of the Social Security
Act, and we would expect to interpret the language for purposes of the
PCIP program in a manner similar to the way HHS has applied it under
those programs.
H. Transition to Exchanges (Subpart H, Sec. 152.44 Through Sec.
152.45)
End of PCIP Coverage (Sec. 152.44)
Section of 152.44 of this interim final rule specifies that,
consistent with section 1101(g)(3)(A) of the Affordable Care Act,
enrollee coverage under the PCIP program will end effective January 1,
2014, because affordable coverage will be available under the Exchanges
and insurance plans will no longer be permitted to exclude coverage for
pre-existing conditions. Note that PCIP program contracts will remain
in effect to provide for appropriate contractual close out periods, but
coverage of claims under the PCIP program will extend only to the costs
of covered services provided up through December 31, 2013.
Transition to the Exchanges (Sec. 145.45)
As provided by section 1101(g)(3)(B) of the Affordable Care Act,
HHS will develop procedures to transition PCIP enrollees to the
Exchanges (exchanges) that are established under sections 1311 or 1321
of the Act, in order to ensure there are no lapses in coverage for
individuals enrolled in the PCIP program. Since these exchanges are
still in the developmental stages, we believe it would be premature to
specify transition procedures in this interim final rule. Thus, section
152.45 simply establishes that HHS will develop such transition
procedures, and we encourage
[[Page 45022]]
comments on the best ways to carry out the transition.
III. Response to Comments
Because of the large number of public comments we normally receive
on Federal Register documents, we are not able to acknowledge or
respond to them individually. We will consider all comments we receive
by the date and time specified in the DATES section of this preamble,
and, when we proceed with a subsequent document, we will respond to the
comments in the preamble to that document.
IV. Waiver of Proposed Rulemaking
We ordinarily publish a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) in the
Federal Register and invite public comment on the proposed rule before
publishing a final rule that responds to comments and sets forth final
regulations that generally take effect sixty days later. This procedure
can be waived, however, if an agency finds good cause that a notice-
and-comment procedure is impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the
public interest and incorporates a statement of the finding and its
reasons in the rule issued.
The Affordable Care Act was enacted on March 23, 2010, and requires
that a temporary high risk pool program be in place ``not later than 90
days'' after enactment. The publication of proposed regulations in an
NPRM could not govern implementation of the high risk pool program, as
they would constitute mere proposals with no force of law. The normal
sixty-day public comment period provided for in the case of regulations
proposed in an NPRM would by itself consume two-thirds of the time the
statute provides for implementation. Under these circumstances, it
would be impracticable and contrary to the public interest to delay
putting regulations into effect that are necessary to implement the
program until the rules have been subjected to prior notice and comment
procedures.
Therefore, we find good cause to waive the notice of proposed
rulemaking and to issue this final rule on an interim basis. We are
providing a 60-day public comment period. Also, because these
regulations need to be in effect in order to undertake full
implementation of the program, we also find good cause for waiving the
normal delay in effective date that would apply, and these regulations
are effective on July 30, 2010.
V. Collection of Information Requirements
Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, we are required to
provide 60-day notice in the Federal Register and solicit public
comment before a collection of information requirement is submitted to
the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and approval. In
order to fairly evaluate whether an information collection should be
approved by OMB, section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995 requires that we solicit comment on the following issues:
The need for the information collection and its usefulness
in carrying out the proper functions of our agency.
The accuracy of our estimate of the information collection
burden.
The quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be
collected.
Recommendations to minimize the information collection
burden on the affected public, including automated collection
techniques.
We are soliciting public comment on each of these issues for the
following sections of this document that contain information collection
requirements (ICRs):
A. ICRs Regarding Proposal Process (Sec. 152.7)
Section 152.7 states that a proposal from a State or from a
nonprofit private entity shall demonstrate that the eligible entity has
the capacity and technical capability to perform all functions
necessary for the design and operation of a Pre-Existing Condition
Insurance Plan (PCIP), and that its proposed PCIP is in full compliance
with all of the requirements of this part. Specifically, the proposal
shall demonstrate that the proposed PCIP satisfies at least the
conditions listed at Sec. 152.7(a)(1) through (9).
If there are States that do not submit acceptable proposals as
described in Sec. 152.7, HHS will solicit proposals from nonprofit
entities to contract with HHS to operate a PCIP in those States.
Nonprofits may submit proposals to contract directly with HHS to
operate a PCIP program.
The burden associated with this requirement is the time and effort
necessary for a State or nonprofit entity to develop and submit a
proposal to operate a PCIP, which is a one-time i