New Postal Product, 44819-44820 [2010-18575]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 145 / Thursday, July 29, 2010 / Notices
facts, and formulate proposed positions
and actions, as appropriate, for
deliberation by the Full Committee.
Members of the public desiring to
provide oral statements and/or written
comments should notify the Designated
Federal Official (DFO), Girija Shukla
(Telephone 301–415–6855 or E-mail
Girija.Shukla@nrc.gov) five days prior to
the meeting, if possible, so that
appropriate arrangements can be made.
Thirty-five hard copies of each
presentation or handout should be
provided to the DFO thirty minutes
before the meeting. In addition, one
electronic copy of each presentation
should be e-mailed to the DFO one day
before the meeting. If an electronic copy
cannot be provided within this
timeframe, presenters should provide
the DFO with a CD containing each
presentation at least thirty minutes
before the meeting. Electronic
recordings will be permitted only
during those portions of the meeting
that are open to the public. Detailed
procedures for the conduct of and
participation in ACRS meetings were
published in the Federal Register on
October 14, 2009, (74 FR 58268–58269).
Detailed meeting agendas and meeting
transcripts are available on the NRC
Web site at https://www.nrc.gov/readingrm/doc-collections/acrs. Information
regarding topics to be discussed,
changes to the agenda, whether the
meeting has been canceled or
rescheduled, and the time allotted to
present oral statements can be obtained
from the Web site cited above or by
contacting the identified DFO.
Moreover, in view of the possibility that
the schedule for ACRS meetings may be
adjusted by the Chairman as necessary
to facilitate the conduct of the meeting,
persons planning to attend should check
with these references if such
rescheduling would result in a major
inconvenience.
Dated: July 22, 2010.
Duncan White,
Acting Chief, Reactor Safety Branch B,
Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards.
[FR Doc. 2010–18655 Filed 7–28–10; 8:45 am]
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
Advisory Committee on Reactor
Safeguards (ACRS); Meeting of the
ACRS Subcommittee on Siting
The ACRS Subcommittee on Siting
will hold a meeting on August 19–20,
2010, Room T–2B1, 11545 Rockville
Pike, Rockville, Maryland.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
12:45 Jul 28, 2010
Jkt 220001
The entire meeting will be open to
public attendance.
The agenda for the subject meeting
shall be as follows:
Thursday, August 19, 2010 and Friday,
August 20, 2010—8:30 a.m. Until 5 p.m.
The Subcommittee will review the
MOX Fuel Fabrication Facility (ShawAreva MOX Services, LLC) proposed for
construction at Savannah River. The
Subcommittee will hear presentations
by and hold discussions with
representatives of the NRC staff, ShawAreva, LLC, and other interested
persons regarding this matter. The
Subcommittee will gather information,
analyze relevant issues and facts, and
formulate proposed positions and
actions, as appropriate, for deliberation
by the Full Committee.
Members of the public desiring to
provide oral statements and/or written
comments should notify the Designated
Federal Official (DFO), Neil Coleman
(Telephone 301–415–7656 or E-mail
Neil.Coleman@nrc.gov) five days prior
to the meeting, if possible, so that
appropriate arrangements can be made.
Thirty-five hard copies of each
presentation or handout should be
provided to the DFO thirty minutes
before the meeting. In addition, one
electronic copy of each presentation
should be emailed to the DFO one day
before the meeting. If an electronic copy
cannot be provided within this
timeframe, presenters should provide
the DFO with a CD containing each
presentation at least thirty minutes
before the meeting. Electronic
recordings will be permitted only
during those portions of the meeting
that are open to the public. Detailed
procedures for the conduct of and
participation in ACRS meetings were
published in the Federal Register on
October 14, 2009, (74 FR 58268–58269).
Detailed meeting agendas and meeting
transcripts are available on the NRC
Web site at https://www.nrc.gov/readingrm/doc-collections/acrs. Information
regarding topics to be discussed,
changes to the agenda, whether the
meeting has been canceled or
rescheduled, and the time allotted to
present oral statements can be obtained
from the Web site cited above or by
contacting the identified DFO.
Moreover, in view of the possibility that
the schedule for ACRS meetings may be
adjusted by the Chairman as necessary
to facilitate the conduct of the meeting,
persons planning to attend should check
with these references if such
rescheduling would result in a major
inconvenience.
PO 00000
Frm 00064
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
44819
Dated: July 22, 2010.
Duncan White,
Acting Chief, Reactor Safety Branch B,
Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards.
[FR Doc. 2010–18654 Filed 7–28–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
POSTAL REGULATORY COMMISSION
[Docket Nos. MC2010–32 and CP2010–77;
Order No. 497]
New Postal Product
Postal Regulatory Commission.
Notice.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Commission is noticing a
recently-filed Postal Service filing to
add Priority Mail Contract 27 to the
competitive product list. The Postal
Service has also filed a related contract.
This notice addresses procedural steps
associated with the filing.
DATES: Comments are due: July 30,
2010.
SUMMARY:
Submit comments
electronically via the Commission’s
Filing Online system at https://
www.prc.gov. Commenters who cannot
submit their views electronically should
contact the person identified in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section
by telephone for advice on alternatives
to electronic filing.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Stephen L. Sharfman, General Counsel,
stephen.sharfman@prc.gov or 202–789–
6820.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
ADDRESSES:
Table of Contents
I. Introduction
II. Notice of Filing
III. Ordering Paragraphs
I. Introduction
Pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 39
CFR 3020.30 et seq., the Postal Service
filed a formal request and associated
supporting information to add Priority
Mail Contract 27 to the competitive
product list.1 The Postal Service asserts
that Priority Mail Contract 27 is a
competitive product ‘‘not of general
applicability’’ within the meaning of 39
U.S.C. 3632(b)(3). Id. at 1. The Postal
Service states that prices and
classification underlying this contract
are supported by Governors’ Decision
No. 09–6 in Docket No. MC2009–25. Id.
1 Request of the United States Postal Service to
Add Priority Mail Contract 27 to Competitive
Product List and Notice of Filing (Under Seal) of
Contract and Supporting Data, July 21, 2010
(Request).
E:\FR\FM\29JYN1.SGM
29JYN1
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
44820
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 145 / Thursday, July 29, 2010 / Notices
The Request has been assigned Docket
No. MC2010–32.
The Postal Service
contemporaneously filed a contract
related to the proposed new product
pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3632(b)(3) and 39
CFR 3015.5. The contract has been
assigned Docket No. CP2010–77.
Request. In support of its Request, the
Postal Service filed six attachments as
follows:
• Attachment A—a redacted copy of
the Governor’s Decision No. 09–6,
originally filed in Docket No. MC2009–
25, authorizing certain Priority Mail
contracts;
• Attachment B—a redacted copy of
the contract;
• Attachment C—a proposed change
in the Mail Classification Schedule
competitive product list;
• Attachment D—a Statement of
Supporting Justification as required by
39 CFR 3020.32;
• Attachment E—a certification of
compliance with 39 U.S.C. 3633(a); and
• Attachment F—an application for
non-public treatment of materials to
maintain redacted portions of the
contract and supporting document
under seal.
In the Statement of Supporting
Justification, Brian G. Denneny, Acting
Manager, Sales and Communications,
asserts that the service to be provided
under the contract will cover its
attributable costs, make a positive
contribution to institutional costs, and
increase contribution toward the
requisite 5.5 percent of the Postal
Service’s total institutional costs. Id.,
Attachment D. Thus, Mr. Denneny
contends there will be no issue of
subsidization of competitive products
by market dominant products as a result
of this contract. Id.
Related contract. A redacted version
of the specific Priority Mail Contract 27
is included with the Request. The
contract will become effective on the
day that the Commission provides all
necessary regulatory approvals. It is
terminable upon 30 days notice by a
party, but could continue for 3 years.
The Postal Service represents that the
contract is consistent with 39 U.S.C.
3633(a). See id., Attachment D. The
Postal Service will provide the shipper
with Priority Mail packaging for eligible
Priority Mail items mailed by the
shipper.
The Postal Service filed much of the
supporting materials, including the
specific Priority Mail Contract 27, under
seal. It maintains that the contract and
related financial information, including
the customer’s name and the
accompanying analyses that provide
prices, terms, conditions, cost data, and
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:42 Jul 28, 2010
Jkt 220001
financial projections should remain
under seal. See Attachment F. It also
requests that the Commission order that
the duration of such treatment of all
customer-identifying information be
extended indefinitely, instead of ending
after 10 years. Id. at 7.
II. Notice of Filings
The Commission establishes Docket
Nos. MC2010–32 and CP2010–77 for
consideration of the Request pertaining
to the proposed Priority Mail Contract
27 product and the related contract,
respectively. In keeping with practice,
these dockets are addressed on a
consolidated basis for purposes of this
order; however, future filings should be
made in the specific docket in which
issues being addressed pertain.
Interested persons may submit
comments on whether the Postal
Service’s filings in the captioned
dockets are consistent with the policies
of 39 U.S.C. 3632, 3633, or 3642 and 39
CFR part 3015 and 39 CFR 3020, subpart
B. Comments are due no later than July
30, 2010. The public portions of these
filings can be accessed via the
Commission’s Web site (https://
www.prc.gov).
The Commission appoints Paul L.
Harrington to serve as Public
Representative in these dockets.
III. Ordering Paragraphs
It is ordered:
1. The Commission establishes Docket
Nos. MC2010–32 and CP2010–77 for
consideration of the matter raised in
each docket.
2. Pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 505, Paul L.
Harrington is appointed to serve as
officer of the Commission (Public
Representative) to represent the
interests of the general public in these
proceedings.
3. Comments by interested persons in
these proceedings are due no later than
July 30, 2010.
4. The Secretary shall arrange for
publication of this order in the Federal
Register.
By the Commission.
Shoshana M. Grove,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010–18575 Filed 7–28–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710–FW–S
THE PRESIDIO TRUST
Proposed Use Limit of Battery
Caulfield Road and Request for
Comments
The Presidio Trust.
Notice.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
PO 00000
Frm 00065
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
The Presidio Trust (Trust) is
considering two approaches to limit
vehicular use of a portion of Battery
Caulfield Road in the Presidio of San
Francisco (Presidio): (1) Limitation of
vehicular use during weekday peak AM
and PM hours, 7 to 9 a.m. and 5 to 7
p.m., as well as on weekends
(Alternative 1); or (2) limitation of
vehicular use at all times (Alternative
2). The proposed limitation on vehicular
use is intended to reduce the amount of
cut-through traffic to maintain public
health and safety, to protect
environmental values, to protect natural
resources, and to avoid conflict among
visitor uses. By restricting the use of
Battery Caulfield Road, the Trust also
intends to reduce the amount of traffic
through the 14th and 15th Avenue gates.
Under both Alternative 1 and
Alternative 2, designated vehicles (e.g.,
emergency vehicles, PresidiGo shuttles
and designated Presidio residents and
tenants) will continue to have
unrestricted access to Battery Caulfield
Road, and access by pedestrians and
bicyclists will remain unrestricted. The
Trust invites comments on both of these
proposed limits of public use.
Located in the Public Health Service
Hospital (PHSH) District at the southern
end of the Presidio, Battery Caulfield
Road is not a major thoroughfare within
the Presidio, but rather it is a narrow
roadway connecting the upper and
lower plateaus of the PHSH District
(District). Battery Caulfield Road was
built by the Army in 1984 to facilitate
internal circulation, not to
accommodate through-traffic. The road
passes through sensitive wildlife areas
and native plant communities, and
recreational use of the area has
increased with the expansion of the
Presidio’s trails and bikeways. Of the
total daily traffic through the 15th
Avenue gate, an estimated 350–550 cars
use Battery Caulfield Road as a cutthrough route, i.e., travel from an origin
outside the Presidio to a destination
outside the Presidio.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under 36
CFR 1001.5, the Board of Directors of
the Trust (Board) may impose public
use limits or close all or a portion of the
area administered by the Trust to all
public use or to a specific use or
activity, given a determination that such
action is necessary to maintain public
health and safety, to protect
environmental or scenic values, to
protect natural or cultural resources, or
to avoid conflict among visitor use
activities. In its April 2007 Record of
Decision for the development of the
District, the Board identified its intent
to restrict use of Battery Caulfield
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\29JYN1.SGM
29JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 145 (Thursday, July 29, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 44819-44820]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-18575]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
POSTAL REGULATORY COMMISSION
[Docket Nos. MC2010-32 and CP2010-77; Order No. 497]
New Postal Product
AGENCY: Postal Regulatory Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Commission is noticing a recently-filed Postal Service
filing to add Priority Mail Contract 27 to the competitive product
list. The Postal Service has also filed a related contract. This notice
addresses procedural steps associated with the filing.
DATES: Comments are due: July 30, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments electronically via the Commission's Filing
Online system at https://www.prc.gov. Commenters who cannot submit their
views electronically should contact the person identified in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section by telephone for advice on
alternatives to electronic filing.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Stephen L. Sharfman, General Counsel,
stephen.sharfman@prc.gov or 202-789-6820.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. Introduction
II. Notice of Filing
III. Ordering Paragraphs
I. Introduction
Pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 39 CFR 3020.30 et seq., the Postal
Service filed a formal request and associated supporting information to
add Priority Mail Contract 27 to the competitive product list.\1\ The
Postal Service asserts that Priority Mail Contract 27 is a competitive
product ``not of general applicability'' within the meaning of 39
U.S.C. 3632(b)(3). Id. at 1. The Postal Service states that prices and
classification underlying this contract are supported by Governors'
Decision No. 09-6 in Docket No. MC2009-25. Id.
[[Page 44820]]
The Request has been assigned Docket No. MC2010-32.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Request of the United States Postal Service to Add Priority
Mail Contract 27 to Competitive Product List and Notice of Filing
(Under Seal) of Contract and Supporting Data, July 21, 2010
(Request).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Postal Service contemporaneously filed a contract related to
the proposed new product pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3632(b)(3) and 39 CFR
3015.5. The contract has been assigned Docket No. CP2010-77.
Request. In support of its Request, the Postal Service filed six
attachments as follows:
Attachment A--a redacted copy of the Governor's Decision
No. 09-6, originally filed in Docket No. MC2009-25, authorizing certain
Priority Mail contracts;
Attachment B--a redacted copy of the contract;
Attachment C--a proposed change in the Mail Classification
Schedule competitive product list;
Attachment D--a Statement of Supporting Justification as
required by 39 CFR 3020.32;
Attachment E--a certification of compliance with 39 U.S.C.
3633(a); and
Attachment F--an application for non-public treatment of
materials to maintain redacted portions of the contract and supporting
document under seal.
In the Statement of Supporting Justification, Brian G. Denneny,
Acting Manager, Sales and Communications, asserts that the service to
be provided under the contract will cover its attributable costs, make
a positive contribution to institutional costs, and increase
contribution toward the requisite 5.5 percent of the Postal Service's
total institutional costs. Id., Attachment D. Thus, Mr. Denneny
contends there will be no issue of subsidization of competitive
products by market dominant products as a result of this contract. Id.
Related contract. A redacted version of the specific Priority Mail
Contract 27 is included with the Request. The contract will become
effective on the day that the Commission provides all necessary
regulatory approvals. It is terminable upon 30 days notice by a party,
but could continue for 3 years. The Postal Service represents that the
contract is consistent with 39 U.S.C. 3633(a). See id., Attachment D.
The Postal Service will provide the shipper with Priority Mail
packaging for eligible Priority Mail items mailed by the shipper.
The Postal Service filed much of the supporting materials,
including the specific Priority Mail Contract 27, under seal. It
maintains that the contract and related financial information,
including the customer's name and the accompanying analyses that
provide prices, terms, conditions, cost data, and financial projections
should remain under seal. See Attachment F. It also requests that the
Commission order that the duration of such treatment of all customer-
identifying information be extended indefinitely, instead of ending
after 10 years. Id. at 7.
II. Notice of Filings
The Commission establishes Docket Nos. MC2010-32 and CP2010-77 for
consideration of the Request pertaining to the proposed Priority Mail
Contract 27 product and the related contract, respectively. In keeping
with practice, these dockets are addressed on a consolidated basis for
purposes of this order; however, future filings should be made in the
specific docket in which issues being addressed pertain.
Interested persons may submit comments on whether the Postal
Service's filings in the captioned dockets are consistent with the
policies of 39 U.S.C. 3632, 3633, or 3642 and 39 CFR part 3015 and 39
CFR 3020, subpart B. Comments are due no later than July 30, 2010. The
public portions of these filings can be accessed via the Commission's
Web site (https://www.prc.gov).
The Commission appoints Paul L. Harrington to serve as Public
Representative in these dockets.
III. Ordering Paragraphs
It is ordered:
1. The Commission establishes Docket Nos. MC2010-32 and CP2010-77
for consideration of the matter raised in each docket.
2. Pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 505, Paul L. Harrington is appointed to
serve as officer of the Commission (Public Representative) to represent
the interests of the general public in these proceedings.
3. Comments by interested persons in these proceedings are due no
later than July 30, 2010.
4. The Secretary shall arrange for publication of this order in the
Federal Register.
By the Commission.
Shoshana M. Grove,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-18575 Filed 7-28-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-FW-S