Mevinphos; Proposed Data Call-in Order for Pesticide Tolerance, 44181-44184 [2010-18541]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 144 / Wednesday, July 28, 2010 / Proposed Rules
• Are not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ subject to review by the Office
of Management and Budget under
Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993);
• Do not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Are certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Do not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Do not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Are not economically significant
regulatory actions based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Are not significant regulatory
actions subject to Executive Order
13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
• Are not subject to the requirements
of Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act;
and
• Do not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this rule does not have
tribal implications as specified by
Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249,
November 9, 2000), because the SIP is
not approved to apply in Indian country
located in the state, and EPA notes that
it will not impose substantial direct
costs on tribal governments or preempt
tribal law.
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations,
Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Volatile
organic compounds.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: July 15, 2010.
H. Curtis Spalding,
Regional Administrator, EPA New England.
[FR Doc. 2010–18553 Filed 7–27–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:46 Jul 27, 2010
Jkt 220001
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 180
[EPA–HQ–OPP–2010-0423; FRL–8835–7]
Mevinphos; Proposed Data Call-in
Order for Pesticide Tolerance
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed order.
AGENCY:
This document proposes to
require the submission of various data
required to support the continuation of
the tolerances for the pesticide
mevinphos. Pesticide tolerances are
established under the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA).
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before September 27, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by docket identification (ID)
number EPA–HQ–OPP–2010–0423, by
one of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
on-line instructions for submitting
comments.
• Mail: Office of Pesticide Programs
(OPP) Regulatory Public Docket (7502P),
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington,
DC 20460–0001.
• Delivery: OPP Regulatory Public
Docket (7502P), Environmental
Protection Agency, Rm. S–4400, One
Potomac Yard (South Bldg.), 2777 S.
Crystal Dr., Arlington, VA. Deliveries
are only accepted during the Docket
Facility’s normal hours of operation
(8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday through
Friday, excluding legal holidays).
Special arrangements should be made
for deliveries of boxed information. The
Docket Facility telephone number is
(703) 305–5805.
Instructions: Direct your comments to
docket ID number EPA–HQ–OPP–2010–
0423. EPA’s policy is that all comments
received will be included in the docket
without change and may be made
available on-line at https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided, unless
the comment includes information
claimed to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise
protected through regulations.gov or email. The regulations.gov website is an
‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which
means EPA will not know your identity
or contact information unless you
provide it in the body of your comment.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
44181
If you send an e-mail comment directly
to EPA without going through
regulations.gov, your e-mail address
will be automatically captured and
included as part of the comment that is
placed in the docket and made available
on the Internet. If you submit an
electronic comment, EPA recommends
that you include your name and other
contact information in the body of your
comment and with any disk or CD-ROM
you submit. If EPA cannot read your
comment due to technical difficulties
and cannot contact you for clarification,
EPA may not be able to consider your
comment. Electronic files should avoid
the use of special characters, any form
of encryption, and be free of any defects
or viruses.
Docket: All documents in the docket
are listed in the docket index available
at https://www.regulations.gov. Although
listed in the index, some information is
not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other
material, such as copyrighted material,
is not placed on the Internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy
form. Publicly available docket
materials are available either in the
electronic docket at https://
www.regulations.gov, or, if only
available in hard copy, at the OPP
Regulatory Public Docket in Rm. S–
4400, One Potomac Yard (South Bldg.),
2777 S. Crystal Dr., Arlington, VA. The
hours of operation of this Docket
Facility are from 8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, excluding legal
holidays. The Docket Facility telephone
number is (703) 305–5805.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: K.
Avivah Jakob, Pesticide Re-evaluation
Division, Office of Pesticide Programs,
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave, NW., Washington,
DC 20460–0001; telephone number:
(703) 305–1328; e-mail address:
jakob.kathryn@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
A. Does this Action Apply to Me?
You may be potentially affected by
this action if you are an agricultural
producer, food manufacturer, or
pesticide manufacturer. Potentially
affected entities may include, but are
not limited to:
• Crop production (NAICS code 111).
• Animal production (NAICS code
112).
• Food manufacturing (NAICS code
311).
• Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS
code 32532).
E:\FR\FM\28JYP1.SGM
28JYP1
44182
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 144 / Wednesday, July 28, 2010 / Proposed Rules
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS
This listing is not intended to be
exhaustive, but rather provides a guide
for readers regarding entities likely to be
affected by this action. Other types of
entities not listed in this unit could also
be affected. The North American
Industrial Classification System
(NAICS) codes have been provided to
assist you and others in determining
whether this action might apply to
certain entities. If you have any
questions regarding the applicability of
this action to a particular entity, consult
the person listed under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT.
B. What Should I Consider as I Prepare
My Comments for EPA?
1. Submitting CBI. Do not submit this
information to EPA through
regulations.gov or e-mail. Clearly mark
the part or all of the information that
you claim to be CBI. For CBI
information in a disk or CD-ROM that
you mail to EPA, mark the outside of the
disk or CD-ROM as CBI and then
identify electronically within the disk or
CD-ROM the specific information that is
claimed as CBI. In addition to one
complete version of the comment that
includes information claimed as CBI, a
copy of the comment that does not
contain the information claimed as CBI
must be submitted for inclusion in the
public docket. Information so marked
will not be disclosed except in
accordance with procedures set forth in
40 CFR part 2.
2. Tips for preparing your comments.
When submitting comments, remember
to:
i. Identify the document by docket ID
number and other identifying
information (subject heading, Federal
Register date and page number).
ii. Follow directions. The Agency may
ask you to respond to specific questions
or organize comments by referencing a
Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) part
or section number.
iii. Explain why you agree or disagree;
suggest alternatives and substitute
language for your requested changes.
iv. Describe any assumptions and
provide any technical information and/
or data that you used.
v. If you estimate potential costs or
burdens, explain how you arrived at
your estimate in sufficient detail to
allow for it to be reproduced.
vi. Provide specific examples to
illustrate your concerns and suggest
alternatives.
vii. Explain your views as clearly as
possible, avoiding the use of profanity
or personal threats.
viii. Make sure to submit your
comments by the comment period
deadline identified.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:46 Jul 27, 2010
Jkt 220001
II. FFDCA Data Call-In Authority
In this document, EPA proposes to
issue an order requiring the submission
of various data to support the
continuation of the mevinphos
tolerances at 40 CFR 180.157. Under
section 408(f) of the Federal Food, Drug,
and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA), 21 U.S.C.
346a(f), EPA is authorized to require, by
order, submission of data ‘‘reasonably
required to support the continuation of
a tolerance’’ when such data cannot be
obtained under the Data Call-In
authority of section 3(c)(2)(B) of the
Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and
Rodenticide Act (FIFRA), 7 U.S.C.
136a(c)(2)(B), or section 4 of the Toxic
Substances Control Act (TSCA), 15
U.S.C. 2603. A section 408(f) Data CallIn order may only be issued following
notice and a comment period of not less
than 60 days.
A section 408(f) Data Call-In order
must contain the following elements:
1. A requirement that one or more
persons submit to EPA a notice
identifying the person(s) who commit to
submit the data required in the order.
2. A description of the required data
and the required reports connected to
such data.
3. An explanation of why the required
data could not be obtained under
section 3(c)(2)(B) of FIFRA or section 4
of TSCA.
4. The required submission date for
the notice identifying one or more
interested persons who commit to
submit the required data and the
required submission dates for all the
data and reports required in the order.
(21 U.S.C. 346a(f)(1)(C)).
EPA may by order modify or revoke
the affected tolerances if any one of the
following submissions is not made in a
timely manner:
• A notice identifying one or more
interested persons who commit to
submit the data.
• The data itself.
• The reports required under a
section 408(f) order are not submitted by
the date specified in the order. (21
U.S.C. 346a(f)(2)).
III. Regulatory Background for
Mevinphos
Mevinphos is a contact/systemic
insecticide-acaricide. It is not currently
registered under FIFRA and may not be
sold, distributed, or used in the United
States. Mevinphos’ FIFRA registration
was canceled in 1994. However, 15
FFDCA tolerances remain for residues of
mevinphos on the following
commodities: Broccoli, cabbage,
cauliflower, celery, cucumbers, grapes,
lettuce, melons, peas, peppers, spinach,
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
strawberries, summer squash, tomatoes,
and watermelon (40 CFR 180.157).
Since there are currently no domestic
registrations for mevinphos, these
tolerances are referred to as ‘‘import
tolerances.’’
Mevinphos is a member of a family of
pesticides known as the
organophosphates. EPA has concluded
mevinphos and other organophosphate
pesticides share a common mechanism
of toxicity. As with other
organophosphates, the principal toxic
effects induced by mevinphos are
related to its cholinesterase-inhibiting
activity. It produces the associated
clinical signs such as tremors, unsteady
gait, decreased activity, salivation,
disturbed balance in rats and rabbits,
and decreased cholinesterase activity
(plasma, brain) in rats and rabbits
following acute, subchronic, and
chronic oral exposure.
In September 2000, EPA issued an
Interim Tolerance Reassessment
Eligibility Decision (ITRED) for
mevinphos in connection with its
obligation under the Food Quality
Protection Act of 1996 (FQPA), to
evaluate whether all tolerances in
existence at the time of the passage of
FQPA met the revised safety standard
that the FQPA adopted for FFDCA
section 408. In the ITRED, EPA
concluded that the risks of mevinphos
when evaluated in isolation from other
organophosphates met the revised safety
standard in FFDCA section 408. This
conclusion was labeled ‘‘interim,’’
however, because EPA had not yet
completed a cumulative risk assessment
for the organophosphates. In July 2006,
EPA completed its cumulative risk
assessment for the organophosphate
pesticides finding that these tolerances
met the revised safety standard.
The ITRED called attention to several
data gaps for mevinphos including:
1. A developmental neurotoxicity
(DNT) study in rats (with expanded
protocol to extend the postnatal
treatment period and to measure
cholinesterase inhibition in offspring) as
was required for all organophosphate
pesticides.
2. Various studies evaluating
mevinphos residue levels on treated
crops. EPA noted that it would be taking
steps to require the submission of this
data. Subsequently, the manufacturer of
mevinphos submitted residue data for
grapes and frozen storage stability data
for broccoli, cucumbers, lettuce,
tomatoes, and strawberries. However,
the registrant has not submitted a DNT
study or residue data for the remaining
imported commodities.
Under section 3(g) of FIFRA and
implementing regulations, EPA has
E:\FR\FM\28JYP1.SGM
28JYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 144 / Wednesday, July 28, 2010 / Proposed Rules
established a review program for
pesticides registered under FIFRA. The
goal of that program is a periodic review
of pesticide registrations every 15 years
to ensure that the registrations satisfy
FIFRA standards and are based on
‘‘current scientific and other knowledge
regarding the pesticide.’’ (40 CFR
155.40(a)). EPA is in the preliminary
stages of the registration review process
for organophosphate pesticides.
Although mevinphos is not registered
under FIFRA, EPA will be re-examining
mevinphos with the other registered
organophosphates because of the
organophosphates shared mechanism of
toxicity.
In re-examining mevinphos, EPA has
identified several studies noted in the
ITRED as data gaps for which data have
not been submitted and one new
regulatory data requirement for which a
study is needed. These data are
necessary to support the continuation of
mevinphos tolerances and are listed
below.
IV. Data Requirements
A. Required Data and Reports
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS
Pursuant to FFDCA section 408(f),
EPA has determined that additional data
are reasonably required to support the
continuation of the tolerances for
mevinphos which are codified at 40
CFR 180.157. Accordingly, EPA
proposes to issue a final order requiring
the submission of the following data:
1. Comparative Cholinesterase Assay
(Test Guideline 870.6300). A protocol
and a final report are required.
Rationale. As an organophosphate
pesticide (OP), inhibition of
acetylcholinesterase (AChE) is the
critical effect for use in human health
risk assessment. Many OPs were subject
to a Data-Call-In for the developmental
neurotoxicity study (DNT). This DCI
also included the requirement for AChE
inhibition data to evaluate comparative
sensitivity in juvenile and adult rats.
These data are most often collected in
a study called the comparative
cholinesterase assay (CCA). Since that
time, CCA studies for more than 20 OPs
have been submitted to OPP. Although
for some OPs no difference in sensitivity
has been observed in juvenile and adult
animals, for many of the OPs, juveniles
have been shown to be more sensitive.
At this time, OPP has determined that
Guideline Requirement Number
860.1200
VerDate Mar<15>2010
a CCA is required for mevinphos to
evaluate the potential for increased
sensitivity in juvenile animals
compared with that of adult animals.
Given that the AChE data provided in
the CCAs have provided more sensitive
results than DNT studies for the OPs, a
DNT study for mevinphos is not
required at this time.
2. Immunotoxicity Study (Test
Guideline 870.7800). A final report and
protocol are required.
Rationale. This is a new data
requirement under 40 CFR part 158 as
a part of the data requirements for
registration of a pesticide (food and nonfood uses).
The Immunotoxicity Test Guideline
(Harmonized Guideline 870.7800)
prescribes functional immunotoxicity
testing and is designed to evaluate the
potential of a repeated chemical
exposure to produce adverse effects (i.e.,
suppression) on the immune system.
Immunosuppression is a deficit in the
ability of the immune system to respond
to a challenge of bacterial or viral
infections such as tuberculosis (TB),
severe acquired respiratory syndrome
(SARS), or neoplasia.
3. Directions for Use (Test Guideline
860.1200)
Rationale. The Agency needs use
directions, which appear on the Mexico
label(s).
4. Crop Field Trials (Test Guideline
860.1500) – (broccoli, cabbage,
cauliflower, celery, grapes, lettuce, peas,
peppers, spinach, strawberries, summer
squash, and tomatoes.)
Rationale. Field trials are required for
each commodity/commodity group
according to guidelines that take into
account where the crop is grown and
how much of the crop is grown. Field
trials are required for each type of
formulation because the formulation can
have significant effect on the magnitude
of the pesticide residue left on the crop.
Residue trials also need to represent the
maximum application rate on the label
and have a geographic distribution
representative of the commodity/
commodity group. On June 1, 2000 (65
FR 35069) (FRL–6559–3), EPA
published in the Federal Register, a
Notice which provided detailed
guidance on applying current U.S. data
requirements for the establishment or
continuance of tolerances for pesticide
residues in or on imported foods. A
Directions for use
15:46 Jul 27, 2010
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00021
copy of that Notice is available in the
docket of this proposed order. That
Notice contains instructions for
determining number and location of
field trials.
5. Processing Study (tomatoes) (Test
Guideline 860.1520)
Rationale. Processing studies are
required to determine whether residues
in raw commodities may be expected to
degrade or concentrate during food
processing. If residues concentrate in a
processed commodity, a food or feed
additive tolerance must be established.
If residues do not concentrate in a
processed commodity, the tolerance for
the raw agricultural commodity applies
to all processed food or feed derived
from it.
B. Persons who Commit to Submit the
Required Data
After this 60–day comment period
closes, the Agency will respond to
comments, if appropriate, and may issue
a final order requiring the submission of
various data for mevinphos in the
Federal Register. If EPA issues such an
order, persons who are interested in the
continuation of the mevinphos
tolerances must notify the Agency by
completing and submitting the required
‘‘§408(f) Order Response’’ form
(available in the docket) within 90 days
after publication of the final order in the
Federal Register.
The ‘‘§408(f) Order Response Form’’
requires the identification of persons
who will submit the required data and
lists the options available to support the
required data:
i. Develop new data.
ii. Submit an Existing Study — submit
existing data not submitted previously to the
Agency by anyone,
iii. Upgrade a Study – submit or cite data
to upgrade a study classified by EPA as
partially acceptable and upgradable,
iv. Cite an Existing Study – cite an existing
study that EPA classified as acceptable or an
existing study that has been submitted but
not reviewed by the Agency.
C. Required Dates for Submission of
Data/Reports
The table below lists the time
allocated for both the completion and
submission of each study. The required
submission date is calculated from the
date of publication in the Federal
Register of the final order.
Timeframe for protocol submission
Study Title
Not required
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
44183
E:\FR\FM\28JYP1.SGM
Timeframe for data submission
12 months
28JYP1
44184
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 144 / Wednesday, July 28, 2010 / Proposed Rules
Guideline Requirement Number
Timeframe for protocol submission
Study Title
Timeframe for data submission
860.1500
Crop Field Trials (broccoli, cabbage,
cauliflower,
celery,
grapes, lettuce, peas, peppers,
spinach, strawberries, summer
squash, and tomatoes)
Not Required
24 months
860.1520
Processing studies (tomatoes)
Not Required
24 months
870.6300
Comparative
Assay
6 months
12 months
870.7800
Immunotoxicity Study
6 months
12 months
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS
D. Failure to Submit
If the Agency does not receive a
§408(f) Response Form identifying a
person who agrees to submit the
required data within 90 days after
publication of the final order, EPA will
proceed to revoke the mevinphos
tolerances at 40 CFR 180.157. Such
revocation order is subject to the
objection and hearing procedure in
FFDCA section 408(g)(2) but the only
material issue in such a procedure is
whether a submission required by the
order was made in a timely fashion.
Additional events that may be the
basis for modification or revocation of
mevinphos tolerances include, but are
not limited to the following:
1. No person submits on the required
schedule an acceptable proposal or final
protocol when such is required to be
submitted to the Agency for review.
2. No person submits on the required
schedule an adequate progress report on
a study as required by the order.
3. No person submits on the required
schedule acceptable data as required by
the final order.
4. No person submits supportable
certifications as to the conditions of
submitted data, where required by order
and where no other cited or submitted
study meets the data requirements the
study was intended to fulfill.
V. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
As required by statute, this proposal
to require submission of data in support
of tolerances is in the form of an order
and not a rule. (21 U.S.C. 346a(f)(1)(C)).
Under the Administrative Procedures
Act, orders are expressly excluded from
the definition of a rule. (5 U.S.C.
551(4)). Accordingly, the regulatory
assessment requirements imposed on
rulemaking do not, therefore, apply to
this action.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180
Environmental protection,
Administrative practice and procedure,
Agricultural commodities, Pesticides
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:46 Jul 27, 2010
Jkt 220001
Cholinesterase
and pests, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Dated: July 22, 2010.
Richard P. Keigwin, Jr.,
Director, Pesticide Re-evaluation Division,
Office of Pesticide Programs.
[FR Doc. 2010–18541 Filed 7–27–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–S
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 180
[EPA–HQ–OPP–2010–0490; FRL–8834–1]
Aluminum tris(O-ethylphosphonate),
Butylate, Chlorethoxyfos, Clethodim,
et al.; Proposed Tolerance Actions
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
In accordance with current
Agency practice to describe more clearly
the measurement and scope or coverage
of the tolerances, EPA is proposing
minor revisions to tolerance expressions
for a number of pesticide active
ingredients, including the insecticides
chlorethoxyfos, clofentezine,
cyromazine, etofenprox, fenbutatinoxide, fosthiazate, propetamphos, and
tebufenozide; the fungicides aluminum
tris(O-ethylphosphonate) and fenarimol;
the herbicides butylate, clethodim,
clomazone, fenoxaprop-ethyl,
flumetsulam, flumiclorac pentyl,
fluridone, fomesafen, glufosinate
ammonium, lactofen, propyzamide,
quinclorac, and pyridate; and the
fungicide/bactericide oxytetracycline.
Also, EPA is proposing to revoke the
tolerances for aluminum tris(Oethylphosphonate) on pineapple fodder
and forage because they are not
considered to be significant livestock
feed items, and revise specific tolerance
nomenclatures for aluminum tris(Oethylphosphonate), clethodim,
flumetsulam, and fluridone. In addition,
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
EPA will be removing several expired
tolerances for aluminum tris(Oethylphosphonate), etofenprox,
propyzamide, and tebufenozide.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before September 27, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by docket identification (ID)
number EPA–HQ–OPP–2010–0490, by
one of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the oNline instructions for submitting
comments.
• Mail: Office of Pesticide Programs
(OPP) Regulatory Public Docket (7502P),
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington,
DC 20460–0001.
• Delivery: OPP Regulatory Public
Docket (7502P), Environmental
Protection Agency, Rm. S–4400, One
Potomac Yard (South Bldg.), 2777 S.
Crystal Dr., Arlington, VA. Deliveries
are only accepted during the Docket
Facility’s normal hours of operation
(8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday through
Friday, excluding legal holidays).
Special arrangements should be made
for deliveries of boxed information. The
Docket Facility telephone number is
(703) 305–5805.
Instructions: Direct your comments to
docket ID number EPA–HQ–OPP–2010–
0490. EPA’s policy is that all comments
received will be included in the docket
without change and may be made
available oN-line at https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided, unless
the comment includes information
claimed to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise
protected through regulations.gov or email. The regulations.gov website is an
‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which
means EPA will not know your identity
or contact information unless you
provide it in the body of your comment.
If you send an e-mail comment directly
E:\FR\FM\28JYP1.SGM
28JYP1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 144 (Wednesday, July 28, 2010)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 44181-44184]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-18541]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 180
[EPA-HQ-OPP-2010-0423; FRL-8835-7]
Mevinphos; Proposed Data Call-in Order for Pesticide Tolerance
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed order.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document proposes to require the submission of various
data required to support the continuation of the tolerances for the
pesticide mevinphos. Pesticide tolerances are established under the
Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA).
DATES: Comments must be received on or before September 27, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by docket identification
(ID) number EPA-HQ-OPP-2010-0423, by one of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the on-line instructions for submitting comments.
Mail: Office of Pesticide Programs (OPP) Regulatory Public
Docket (7502P), Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania
Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001.
Delivery: OPP Regulatory Public Docket (7502P),
Environmental Protection Agency, Rm. S-4400, One Potomac Yard (South
Bldg.), 2777 S. Crystal Dr., Arlington, VA. Deliveries are only
accepted during the Docket Facility's normal hours of operation (8:30
a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays).
Special arrangements should be made for deliveries of boxed
information. The Docket Facility telephone number is (703) 305-5805.
Instructions: Direct your comments to docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-
2010-0423. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included
in the docket without change and may be made available on-line at
https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information
provided, unless the comment includes information claimed to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise protected through regulations.gov or e-
mail. The regulations.gov website is an ``anonymous access'' system,
which means EPA will not know your identity or contact information
unless you provide it in the body of your comment. If you send an e-
mail comment directly to EPA without going through regulations.gov,
your e-mail address will be automatically captured and included as part
of the comment that is placed in the docket and made available on the
Internet. If you submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you
include your name and other contact information in the body of your
comment and with any disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your
comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you for
clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic
files should avoid the use of special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or viruses.
Docket: All documents in the docket are listed in the docket index
available at https://www.regulations.gov. Although listed in the index,
some information is not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other
material, such as copyrighted material, is not placed on the Internet
and will be publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly
available docket materials are available either in the electronic
docket at https://www.regulations.gov, or, if only available in hard
copy, at the OPP Regulatory Public Docket in Rm. S-4400, One Potomac
Yard (South Bldg.), 2777 S. Crystal Dr., Arlington, VA. The hours of
operation of this Docket Facility are from 8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday
through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The Docket Facility telephone
number is (703) 305-5805.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: K. Avivah Jakob, Pesticide Re-
evaluation Division, Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental
Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave, NW., Washington, DC 20460-
0001; telephone number: (703) 305-1328; e-mail address:
jakob.kathryn@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
A. Does this Action Apply to Me?
You may be potentially affected by this action if you are an
agricultural producer, food manufacturer, or pesticide manufacturer.
Potentially affected entities may include, but are not limited to:
Crop production (NAICS code 111).
Animal production (NAICS code 112).
Food manufacturing (NAICS code 311).
Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS code 32532).
[[Page 44182]]
This listing is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides
a guide for readers regarding entities likely to be affected by this
action. Other types of entities not listed in this unit could also be
affected. The North American Industrial Classification System (NAICS)
codes have been provided to assist you and others in determining
whether this action might apply to certain entities. If you have any
questions regarding the applicability of this action to a particular
entity, consult the person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT.
B. What Should I Consider as I Prepare My Comments for EPA?
1. Submitting CBI. Do not submit this information to EPA through
regulations.gov or e-mail. Clearly mark the part or all of the
information that you claim to be CBI. For CBI information in a disk or
CD-ROM that you mail to EPA, mark the outside of the disk or CD-ROM as
CBI and then identify electronically within the disk or CD-ROM the
specific information that is claimed as CBI. In addition to one
complete version of the comment that includes information claimed as
CBI, a copy of the comment that does not contain the information
claimed as CBI must be submitted for inclusion in the public docket.
Information so marked will not be disclosed except in accordance with
procedures set forth in 40 CFR part 2.
2. Tips for preparing your comments. When submitting comments,
remember to:
i. Identify the document by docket ID number and other identifying
information (subject heading, Federal Register date and page number).
ii. Follow directions. The Agency may ask you to respond to
specific questions or organize comments by referencing a Code of
Federal Regulations (CFR) part or section number.
iii. Explain why you agree or disagree; suggest alternatives and
substitute language for your requested changes.
iv. Describe any assumptions and provide any technical information
and/or data that you used.
v. If you estimate potential costs or burdens, explain how you
arrived at your estimate in sufficient detail to allow for it to be
reproduced.
vi. Provide specific examples to illustrate your concerns and
suggest alternatives.
vii. Explain your views as clearly as possible, avoiding the use of
profanity or personal threats.
viii. Make sure to submit your comments by the comment period
deadline identified.
II. FFDCA Data Call-In Authority
In this document, EPA proposes to issue an order requiring the
submission of various data to support the continuation of the mevinphos
tolerances at 40 CFR 180.157. Under section 408(f) of the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA), 21 U.S.C. 346a(f), EPA is authorized to
require, by order, submission of data ``reasonably required to support
the continuation of a tolerance'' when such data cannot be obtained
under the Data Call-In authority of section 3(c)(2)(B) of the Federal
Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA), 7 U.S.C.
136a(c)(2)(B), or section 4 of the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA),
15 U.S.C. 2603. A section 408(f) Data Call-In order may only be issued
following notice and a comment period of not less than 60 days.
A section 408(f) Data Call-In order must contain the following
elements:
1. A requirement that one or more persons submit to EPA a notice
identifying the person(s) who commit to submit the data required in the
order.
2. A description of the required data and the required reports
connected to such data.
3. An explanation of why the required data could not be obtained
under section 3(c)(2)(B) of FIFRA or section 4 of TSCA.
4. The required submission date for the notice identifying one or
more interested persons who commit to submit the required data and the
required submission dates for all the data and reports required in the
order. (21 U.S.C. 346a(f)(1)(C)).
EPA may by order modify or revoke the affected tolerances if any
one of the following submissions is not made in a timely manner:
A notice identifying one or more interested persons who
commit to submit the data.
The data itself.
The reports required under a section 408(f) order are not
submitted by the date specified in the order. (21 U.S.C. 346a(f)(2)).
III. Regulatory Background for Mevinphos
Mevinphos is a contact/systemic insecticide-acaricide. It is not
currently registered under FIFRA and may not be sold, distributed, or
used in the United States. Mevinphos' FIFRA registration was canceled
in 1994. However, 15 FFDCA tolerances remain for residues of mevinphos
on the following commodities: Broccoli, cabbage, cauliflower, celery,
cucumbers, grapes, lettuce, melons, peas, peppers, spinach,
strawberries, summer squash, tomatoes, and watermelon (40 CFR 180.157).
Since there are currently no domestic registrations for mevinphos,
these tolerances are referred to as ``import tolerances.''
Mevinphos is a member of a family of pesticides known as the
organophosphates. EPA has concluded mevinphos and other organophosphate
pesticides share a common mechanism of toxicity. As with other
organophosphates, the principal toxic effects induced by mevinphos are
related to its cholinesterase-inhibiting activity. It produces the
associated clinical signs such as tremors, unsteady gait, decreased
activity, salivation, disturbed balance in rats and rabbits, and
decreased cholinesterase activity (plasma, brain) in rats and rabbits
following acute, subchronic, and chronic oral exposure.
In September 2000, EPA issued an Interim Tolerance Reassessment
Eligibility Decision (ITRED) for mevinphos in connection with its
obligation under the Food Quality Protection Act of 1996 (FQPA), to
evaluate whether all tolerances in existence at the time of the passage
of FQPA met the revised safety standard that the FQPA adopted for FFDCA
section 408. In the ITRED, EPA concluded that the risks of mevinphos
when evaluated in isolation from other organophosphates met the revised
safety standard in FFDCA section 408. This conclusion was labeled
``interim,'' however, because EPA had not yet completed a cumulative
risk assessment for the organophosphates. In July 2006, EPA completed
its cumulative risk assessment for the organophosphate pesticides
finding that these tolerances met the revised safety standard.
The ITRED called attention to several data gaps for mevinphos
including:
1. A developmental neurotoxicity (DNT) study in rats (with expanded
protocol to extend the postnatal treatment period and to measure
cholinesterase inhibition in offspring) as was required for all
organophosphate pesticides.
2. Various studies evaluating mevinphos residue levels on treated
crops. EPA noted that it would be taking steps to require the
submission of this data. Subsequently, the manufacturer of mevinphos
submitted residue data for grapes and frozen storage stability data for
broccoli, cucumbers, lettuce, tomatoes, and strawberries. However, the
registrant has not submitted a DNT study or residue data for the
remaining imported commodities.
Under section 3(g) of FIFRA and implementing regulations, EPA has
[[Page 44183]]
established a review program for pesticides registered under FIFRA. The
goal of that program is a periodic review of pesticide registrations
every 15 years to ensure that the registrations satisfy FIFRA standards
and are based on ``current scientific and other knowledge regarding the
pesticide.'' (40 CFR 155.40(a)). EPA is in the preliminary stages of
the registration review process for organophosphate pesticides.
Although mevinphos is not registered under FIFRA, EPA will be re-
examining mevinphos with the other registered organophosphates because
of the organophosphates shared mechanism of toxicity.
In re-examining mevinphos, EPA has identified several studies noted
in the ITRED as data gaps for which data have not been submitted and
one new regulatory data requirement for which a study is needed. These
data are necessary to support the continuation of mevinphos tolerances
and are listed below.
IV. Data Requirements
A. Required Data and Reports
Pursuant to FFDCA section 408(f), EPA has determined that
additional data are reasonably required to support the continuation of
the tolerances for mevinphos which are codified at 40 CFR 180.157.
Accordingly, EPA proposes to issue a final order requiring the
submission of the following data:
1. Comparative Cholinesterase Assay (Test Guideline 870.6300). A
protocol and a final report are required.
Rationale. As an organophosphate pesticide (OP), inhibition of
acetylcholinesterase (AChE) is the critical effect for use in human
health risk assessment. Many OPs were subject to a Data-Call-In for the
developmental neurotoxicity study (DNT). This DCI also included the
requirement for AChE inhibition data to evaluate comparative
sensitivity in juvenile and adult rats. These data are most often
collected in a study called the comparative cholinesterase assay (CCA).
Since that time, CCA studies for more than 20 OPs have been submitted
to OPP. Although for some OPs no difference in sensitivity has been
observed in juvenile and adult animals, for many of the OPs, juveniles
have been shown to be more sensitive. At this time, OPP has determined
that a CCA is required for mevinphos to evaluate the potential for
increased sensitivity in juvenile animals compared with that of adult
animals. Given that the AChE data provided in the CCAs have provided
more sensitive results than DNT studies for the OPs, a DNT study for
mevinphos is not required at this time.
2. Immunotoxicity Study (Test Guideline 870.7800). A final report
and protocol are required.
Rationale. This is a new data requirement under 40 CFR part 158 as
a part of the data requirements for registration of a pesticide (food
and non-food uses).
The Immunotoxicity Test Guideline (Harmonized Guideline 870.7800)
prescribes functional immunotoxicity testing and is designed to
evaluate the potential of a repeated chemical exposure to produce
adverse effects (i.e., suppression) on the immune system.
Immunosuppression is a deficit in the ability of the immune system to
respond to a challenge of bacterial or viral infections such as
tuberculosis (TB), severe acquired respiratory syndrome (SARS), or
neoplasia.
3. Directions for Use (Test Guideline 860.1200)
Rationale. The Agency needs use directions, which appear on the
Mexico label(s).
4. Crop Field Trials (Test Guideline 860.1500) - (broccoli,
cabbage, cauliflower, celery, grapes, lettuce, peas, peppers, spinach,
strawberries, summer squash, and tomatoes.)
Rationale. Field trials are required for each commodity/commodity
group according to guidelines that take into account where the crop is
grown and how much of the crop is grown. Field trials are required for
each type of formulation because the formulation can have significant
effect on the magnitude of the pesticide residue left on the crop.
Residue trials also need to represent the maximum application rate on
the label and have a geographic distribution representative of the
commodity/commodity group. On June 1, 2000 (65 FR 35069) (FRL-6559-3),
EPA published in the Federal Register, a Notice which provided detailed
guidance on applying current U.S. data requirements for the
establishment or continuance of tolerances for pesticide residues in or
on imported foods. A copy of that Notice is available in the docket of
this proposed order. That Notice contains instructions for determining
number and location of field trials.
5. Processing Study (tomatoes) (Test Guideline 860.1520)
Rationale. Processing studies are required to determine whether
residues in raw commodities may be expected to degrade or concentrate
during food processing. If residues concentrate in a processed
commodity, a food or feed additive tolerance must be established. If
residues do not concentrate in a processed commodity, the tolerance for
the raw agricultural commodity applies to all processed food or feed
derived from it.
B. Persons who Commit to Submit the Required Data
After this 60-day comment period closes, the Agency will respond to
comments, if appropriate, and may issue a final order requiring the
submission of various data for mevinphos in the Federal Register. If
EPA issues such an order, persons who are interested in the
continuation of the mevinphos tolerances must notify the Agency by
completing and submitting the required ``Sec. 408(f) Order Response''
form (available in the docket) within 90 days after publication of the
final order in the Federal Register.
The ``Sec. 408(f) Order Response Form'' requires the identification
of persons who will submit the required data and lists the options
available to support the required data:
i. Develop new data.
ii. Submit an Existing Study -- submit existing data not
submitted previously to the Agency by anyone,
iii. Upgrade a Study - submit or cite data to upgrade a study
classified by EPA as partially acceptable and upgradable,
iv. Cite an Existing Study - cite an existing study that EPA
classified as acceptable or an existing study that has been
submitted but not reviewed by the Agency.
C. Required Dates for Submission of Data/Reports
The table below lists the time allocated for both the completion
and submission of each study. The required submission date is
calculated from the date of publication in the Federal Register of the
final order.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Timeframe for protocol Timeframe for data
Guideline Requirement Number Study Title submission submission
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
860.1200 Directions for use Not required 12 months
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 44184]]
860.1500 Crop Field Trials Not Required 24 months
(broccoli, cabbage,
cauliflower, celery,
grapes, lettuce, peas,
peppers, spinach,
strawberries, summer
squash, and tomatoes)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
860.1520 Processing studies Not Required 24 months
(tomatoes)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
870.6300 Comparative 6 months 12 months
Cholinesterase Assay
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
870.7800 Immunotoxicity Study 6 months 12 months
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
D. Failure to Submit
If the Agency does not receive a Sec. 408(f) Response Form
identifying a person who agrees to submit the required data within 90
days after publication of the final order, EPA will proceed to revoke
the mevinphos tolerances at 40 CFR 180.157. Such revocation order is
subject to the objection and hearing procedure in FFDCA section
408(g)(2) but the only material issue in such a procedure is whether a
submission required by the order was made in a timely fashion.
Additional events that may be the basis for modification or
revocation of mevinphos tolerances include, but are not limited to the
following:
1. No person submits on the required schedule an acceptable
proposal or final protocol when such is required to be submitted to the
Agency for review.
2. No person submits on the required schedule an adequate progress
report on a study as required by the order.
3. No person submits on the required schedule acceptable data as
required by the final order.
4. No person submits supportable certifications as to the
conditions of submitted data, where required by order and where no
other cited or submitted study meets the data requirements the study
was intended to fulfill.
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
As required by statute, this proposal to require submission of data
in support of tolerances is in the form of an order and not a rule. (21
U.S.C. 346a(f)(1)(C)). Under the Administrative Procedures Act, orders
are expressly excluded from the definition of a rule. (5 U.S.C.
551(4)). Accordingly, the regulatory assessment requirements imposed on
rulemaking do not, therefore, apply to this action.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180
Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure,
Agricultural commodities, Pesticides and pests, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: July 22, 2010.
Richard P. Keigwin, Jr.,
Director, Pesticide Re-evaluation Division, Office of Pesticide
Programs.
[FR Doc. 2010-18541 Filed 7-27-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-S
