Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; New York Prevention of Significant Deterioration of Air Quality and Nonattainment New Source Review, 43892-43897 [2010-18365]
Download as PDF
43892
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 143 / Tuesday, July 27, 2010 / Proposed Rules
which no changes are proposed in the
Part 98 amendment proposal.
II. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
The statutory and executive order
reviews do not apply to this notice
because this notice does not propose
any regulatory changes. For a complete
discussion of the statutory and
executive order reviews as they apply to
the proposed amendments to 40 CFR
part 2, see the notice ‘‘Proposed
Confidentiality Determinations for Data
Required under the Mandatory
Greenhouse Gas Reporting Rule and
Proposed Amendment to Special Rules
Governing Certain Information Obtained
under the Clean Air Act’’ (75 FR 39094).
List of Subjects 40 CFR Part 2
Environmental protection,
Administrative practice and procedure,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Dated: July 20, 2010.
Lisa P. Jackson,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2010–18229 Filed 7–26–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R02–OAR–2010–0321, FRL–9180–5]
Approval and Promulgation of
Implementation Plans; New York
Prevention of Significant Deterioration
of Air Quality and Nonattainment New
Source Review
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve
revisions to the New York State
Implementation Plan (SIP) submitted by
the New York State Department of
Environmental Conservation on March
3, 2009. The proposed revisions would
create a new New York State Prevention
of Significant Deterioration of Air
Quality (PSD) regulations program and
modify the existing New York State
Nonattainment New Source Review
(NNSR) regulations in the SIP. These
proposed revisions also address changes
mandated by the revised Federal New
Source Review (NSR) regulations,
referred to as the ‘‘2002 NSR Reform
Rules.’’ EPA’s 2002 NSR Reform Rules,
proposed by New York State for
inclusion in the New York SIP with
some changes, include provisions for
jdjones on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:29 Jul 26, 2010
Jkt 220001
baseline emissions calculations, an
actual-to-projected-actual methodology
for calculating emissions changes,
options for plantwide applicability
limits, and recordkeeping and reporting
requirements. If EPA finalizes approval
of New York’s regulations, New York
will implement its own PSD and NNSR
State regulations. EPA notes that, in this
proposal, no action is being taken on
certain items of New York’s revisions
that relate to the Prevention of
Significant Deterioration and Title V
Greenhouse Gas Tailoring Rule
(‘‘Tailoring Rule’’).
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before August 26, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID number EPA–
R02–OAR–2010–0321, by one of the
following methods:
• https://www.regulations.gov: Follow
the on-line instructions for submitting
comments.
• E-mail: Werner.Raymond@epa.gov.
• Fax: 212–637–3901.
• Mail: Raymond Werner, Chief, Air
Programs Branch, Environmental
Protection Agency, Region 2 Office, 290
Broadway, 25th Floor, New York, New
York 10007–1866.
• Hand Delivery: Raymond Werner,
Chief, Air Programs Branch,
Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 2 Office, 290 Broadway, 25th
Floor, New York, New York 10007–
1866. Such deliveries are only accepted
during the Regional Office’s normal
hours of operation. The Regional
Office’s official hours of business are
Monday through Friday, 8:30 a.m. to
4:30 p.m. excluding Federal holidays.
Instructions: Direct your comments to
Docket ID No. EPA–R02–OAR–2010–
0321. EPA’s policy is that all comments
received will be included in the public
docket without change and may be
made available online at https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided, unless
the comment includes information
claimed to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise
protected through https://
www.regulations.gov or e-mail. The
https://www.regulations.gov Web site is
an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which
means EPA will not know your identity
or contact information unless you
provide it in the body of your comment.
If you send an e-mail comment directly
to EPA without going through https://
www.regulations.gov your e-mail
address will be automatically captured
and included as part of the comment
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
that is placed in the public docket and
made available on the Internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, EPA
recommends that you include your
name and other contact information in
the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA
cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact
you for clarification, EPA may not be
able to consider your comment.
Electronic files should avoid the use of
special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or
viruses. For additional information
about EPA’s public docket visit the EPA
Docket Center homepage at https://
www.epa.gov/epahome/dockets.htm.
Docket: All documents in the docket
are listed in the https://
www.regulations.gov index. Although
listed in the index, some information is
not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other
material, such as copyrighted material,
will be publicly available only in hard
copy. Publicly available docket
materials are available either
electronically in https://
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at
the Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 2 Office, Air Programs Branch,
290 Broadway, 25th Floor, New York,
New York 10007–1866. EPA requests, if
at all possible, that you contact the
individual listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to view
the hard copy of the docket. You may
view the hard copy of the docket
Monday through Friday, 8 a.m. to 4
p.m., excluding Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Frank Jon, Air Programs Branch,
Environmental Protection Agency, 290
Broadway, 25th Floor, New York, New
York 10007–1866, (212) 637–4085;
e-mail address: jon.frank@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document, references
to ‘‘EPA,’’ ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our,’’ are
intended to mean the Environmental
Protection Agency. The supplementary
information is arranged as follows:
I. What is being addressed in this
document?
II. What is the background for this action?
III. What is EPA’s analysis of New York’s
NSR rule revisions?
IV. What action is EPA proposing to take?
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. What is being addressed in this
document?
On March 3, 2009, the State of New
York, through the New York State
Department of Environmental
Conservation (NYSDEC), submitted to
EPA Region 2 revisions to the New York
E:\FR\FM\27JYP1.SGM
27JYP1
jdjones on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 143 / Tuesday, July 27, 2010 / Proposed Rules
State Implementation Plan (SIP). The
submittal consists of revisions to three
regulations that are already part of the
New York SIP. The affected regulations
are: 6 New York Code of Rules and
Regulations (NYCRR) Part 231, New
Source Review for New and Modified
Facilities; 6 NYCRR Part 200, General
Provisions; and 6 NYCRR Part 201,
Permits and Certificates. The revisions
were made to create a new New York
State PSD regulation program and to
update the existing New York State
nonattainment regulations consistent
with changes to the Federal NSR
regulations published on December 31,
2002 (67 FR 80186). In today’s action,
EPA is proposing to approve those
revisions with the caveat that EPA is not
proposing action at this time on (1) the
PSD permitting threshold provisions to
the extent that those provisions require
permits for sources of greenhouse gas
(GHG) emissions that equal or exceed
the 100/250 tons per year (tpy) GHG
levels but are less than the thresholds
identified in EPA’s final Tailoring Rule
at 75 FR 31514, 31606 (June 3, 2010);
and (2) the PSD significance level
provisions of New York’s rule to the
extent that those provisions treat as
significant GHG emissions increases
that are less than the thresholds
identified in the final Tailoring Rule. Id.
In accordance with the final Tailoring
Rule, New York is expected to submit a
letter to EPA addressing these issues
shortly. Id. After receiving New York’s
letter, EPA will take action with respect
to these additional items. Today’s
proposed approval with respect to GHG
emissions above the Tailoring Rule
thresholds is premised on our
understanding that the New York State
PSD regulations provide authority to
regulate GHG emissions within EPA’s
meaning of the term ‘‘subject to
regulation.’’ See 75 FR 31582. This
understanding is based upon EPA’s
review of New York’s definition of
‘‘Regulated NSR Contaminant,’’ which
includes any contaminant that is
‘‘subject to regulation’’ under the Clean
Air Act. 6 NYCRR § 231–4.1(43). New
York is also expected to address its
authority to regulate GHG emissions in
its letter. In the event that New York
articulates the view that it does not have
authority to regulate greenhouse gases,
EPA will revisit this issue before taking
final action.
II. What is the background for this
action?
On December 31, 2002, EPA
published final rule changes to 40 Code
of Federal Regulations (CFR) parts 51
and 52, regarding the Clean Air Act’s
PSD and Nonattainment New Source
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:29 Jul 26, 2010
Jkt 220001
Review (NNSR) programs. 67 FR 80186.
Available at https://www.epa.gov/nsr/fr/
20021231_80186.pdf. On November 7,
2003, EPA published a final action on
the reconsideration of the December 31,
2002 final rule changes. 68 FR 63021. In
that November 7th final action, EPA
added the definition of ‘‘replacement
unit,’’ and clarified an issue regarding
plantwide applicability limitations
(PALs). On June 13, 2007, EPA revised
the rules to remove provisions for
pollution control projects and clean
units. 72 FR 32526. EPA further revised
the rules on December 21, 2007, to
clarify when facilities must keep records
and report emissions when a
‘‘reasonable possibility’’ test shows that
projected emissions increases could
equal or exceed 50% of the Clean Air
Act’s NSR significant levels for a
regulated NSR pollutant. 72 FR 72607.
Collectively, these four final actions are
referred to as the ‘‘2002 NSR Reform
Rules.’’ The 2002 NSR Reform Rules are
part of EPA’s implementation of parts C
and D of title I of the Clean Air Act
(CAA), 42 U.S.C. 7470–7515. Part C of
title I of the CAA, 42 U.S.C. 7470–7492,
is the PSD program, which applies in
areas that meet the National Ambient
Air Quality Standards (NAAQS)—
‘‘attainment’’ areas—as well as in areas for
which there is insufficient information to
determine whether the area meets the
NAAQS—‘‘unclassifiable’’ areas. Part D
of title I of the CAA, 42 U.S.C. 7501–
7515, is the NNSR program, which
applies in areas that are not in
attainment of the National Ambient Air
Quality Standards (NAAQS)—
‘‘nonattainment areas.’’ Collectively, the
PSD and NNSR programs are referred
to as the ‘‘New Source Review’’ or ‘‘NSR
programs’’. EPA regulations
implementing these programs are
contained in 40 CFR 51.165, 51.166,
52.21, 52.24, and part 51, Appendix S.
The CAA’s NSR programs are
preconstruction permitting programs
applicable to new and modified
stationary sources of air pollutants
regulated under the CAA.
The NSR programs include a
combination of air quality planning and
air pollution control technology
requirements. Briefly, section 109 of the
CAA, 42 U.S.C. 7409, requires EPA to
promulgate primary NAAQS to protect
public health and secondary NAAQS to
protect public welfare. Once EPA sets
those standards, States must develop,
adopt, and submit to EPA for approval,
a SIP that contains emissions limitations
and other control measures to attain and
maintain the NAAQS. Each SIP is
required to contain a preconstruction
review program for the construction and
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
43893
modification of any stationary source of
air pollution to: (1) Assure that the
NAAQS are achieved and maintained;
(2) protect areas of clean air; (3) protect
air quality related values (such as
visibility) in national parks and other
areas; (4) assure that appropriate
emissions controls are applied; (5)
maximize opportunities for economic
development consistent with the
preservation of clean air resources; and
(6) ensure that any decision to increase
air pollution is made only after full
public consideration of the
consequences of the decision.
The 2002 NSR Reform Rules made
changes to four areas of the NSR
programs. In summary, the 2002 Rules:
(1) Provide a new method for
determining baseline actual emissions;
(2) adopt an actual-to-projected-actual
methodology for determining whether a
major modification has occurred; (3)
allow major stationary sources to
comply with plant-wide applicability
limits (PALs) to avoid having a
significant emissions increase that
triggers the requirements of the major
NSR program; and (4) require new
recordkeeping and reporting. On
November 7, 2003, EPA published a
final action on its reconsideration of the
2002 NSR Reform Rules (68 FR 63021),
which added a definition for
‘‘replacement unit’’ and clarified an
issue regarding PALs. After the 2002
NSR Reform Rules were finalized and
effective (March 3, 2003), various
petitioners challenged numerous
aspects of the 2002 NSR Reform Rules,
along with portions of EPA’s 1980 NSR
Rules (45 FR 5276, August 7, 1980). On
June 24, 2005, the DC Circuit Court
issued a decision on the challenges to
the 2002 NSR Reform Rules. New York
v. United States, 413 F.3d 3 (DC Cir.
2005). In summary, the DC Circuit Court
vacated portions of the Rules pertaining
to clean units and pollution control
projects, remanded a portion of the
Rules regarding recordkeeping, e.g., 40
CFR 52.21(r)(6) and 40 CFR 51.166(r)(6),
and either upheld or did not comment
on the other provisions included as part
of the 2002 NSR Reform Rules. On June
13, 2007, EPA revised the Rules to
remove provisions for pollution control
projects and clean units. On December
21, 2007, EPA took final action
regarding the remanded portion on
recordkeeping by promulgating the
reasonable possibility in recordkeeping
rule. Today’s action is consistent with
the decision of the DC Circuit Court
because New York’s submittal does not
include any portions of the 2002 NSR
Reform Rules that were vacated as part
E:\FR\FM\27JYP1.SGM
27JYP1
43894
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 143 / Tuesday, July 27, 2010 / Proposed Rules
of the DC Circuit Court’s June 2005
decision.
The 2002 NSR Reform Rules require
that State agencies adopt and submit
revisions to their SIP permitting
programs implementing the minimum
program elements of the 2002 NSR
Reform Rules no later than January 2,
2006. (Consistent with changes to 40
CFR 51.166(a)(6)(i), State agencies are
now required to adopt and submit SIP
revisions within three years after new
amendments are published in the
Federal Register.) State agencies may
meet the requirements of 40 CFR part
51, and the 2002 NSR Reform Rules,
with different but equivalent
regulations. However, if a State decides
not to implement any of the new
applicability provisions, that State is
required to demonstrate that its existing
program is at least as stringent as the
Federal program. On March 3, 2009, the
State of New York submitted a SIP
revision for the purpose of revising the
State’s NSR permitting provisions.
These changes were made primarily to
adopt EPA’s 2002 NSR Reform Rules
with a few modifications. As discussed
in further detail below, EPA believes the
revisions contained in the New York
submittal are approvable for inclusion
into the New York SIP, with the caveat
that we are taking no action on the
specific items identified in Section I of
this proposal related to the Tailoring
Rule thresholds.
jdjones on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
III. What is EPA’s analysis of New
York’s NSR rule revisions?
New York currently has an approved
NNSR program for new and modified
sources. Today, EPA is proposing to
approve revisions to New York’s
existing NNSR program and a new PSD
program. These proposed revisions
became State effective on March 5,
2009, and were submitted to EPA on
March 3, 2009. Copies of the revised
rules, as well as the State’s Regulatory
Impact Statement (RIS), can be obtained
from the Docket, as discussed in the
‘‘Docket’’ section above. In general, the
New York State revisions to the rule are
similar to the Federal NSR Reform Rules
except for a few specific provisions. A
discussion of the specific changes to
New York’s rule, proposed for inclusion
in the SIP, that are different from the
EPA rules are as follows.
A. Definition for Baseline Period
Under the major NSR program, an
existing major facility may modify, or
even completely replace, or add,
emissions units without obtaining a
major NSR permit, so long as the
‘‘projected actual emissions’’ do not
increase by a significant amount over
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:29 Jul 26, 2010
Jkt 220001
the levels emitted during the ‘‘baseline
period’’ at the plant as a whole.
The revised New York regulations in
6 NYCRR Part 231 establish a uniform
period provision for electric utility
steam generating units (EUSGUs) and
non-EUSGUs. The revised Part 231
requires that all emissions sources select
a baseline period using the annual
average of any twenty-four (24)
consecutive month period within the
five (5) year period that precedes a
proposed change. Sources are not
allowed to go beyond this time period.
Under the Federal NSR rule, EUSGUs
must select a baseline period using any
24-consecutive month period within the
5-year period immediately preceding
the actual construction or another 24consecutive month period that is
demonstrated to be more representative.
For non-EUSGUs, they must take the
average of annual emissions of any 24consecutive months within the 10-year
period that precedes the proposed
change. By allowing a longer period for
selecting the 24-month average, sources
are more likely to find a period of time
with high emissions that will result in
an increase below significance levels.
Though EPA believes that the Federal
rule allowing a 10-year look-back for
defining the baseline period for nonEUSGUs retains the environmental
benefits of the NSR program,1 the
revised Part 231 definition of Baseline
Period is more restrictive than the
Federal definition for non-EUSGUs
because the Federal definition allows
only a 5-year look-back period.
B. Single Baseline for Facilities
Undergoing NSR Modifications
The revised Part 231 requires that
facilities select a single baseline period
for all regulated NSR pollutants when
calculating baseline actual emissions.
Under the Federal NSR rule, facilities
are allowed to choose a different
baseline period within the look-back
period for each NSR pollutant. This
allows sources to pick and choose the
baseline period, for each pollutant, most
likely to result in an increase below
significance levels. New York’s
approach would not allow for this
flexibility, and would increase the
likelihood of requiring NSR review for
more regulated NSR pollutants. So, this
State requirement is more stringent than
the Federal requirement.
1 EPA’s environmental impact analysis of the 10year look-back provision was provided at the time
of the 2002 NSR Reform rule in EPA’s
‘‘Supplemental Analysis of the Environmental
Impact of the 2002 Final NSR Improvement Rules’’
and is available at https://www.epa.gov/nsr/
actions.html#2002.
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
C. Plantwide Applicability Limits (PALs)
A PAL is a voluntary option that
provides a facility with the ability to
manage facility-wide emissions without
triggering major NSR review. If a facility
keeps the emissions below a plantwide
actual emissions cap (that is, an actual
PAL), then these regulations allow the
facility to avoid the major NSR
permitting process when the facility
makes alterations to the plant or
individual emissions units. In return for
this flexibility, the facility must monitor
and comply with more stringent
requirements for all of the emissions
units under the PAL.
The revised Part 231 allows facilities
to establish a PAL for an initial term not
to exceed 10 years. However, the rule
aligns the PAL term with the facility’s
title V permit so that they both expire
at the same time. This will allow the
PAL to be renewed with the title V
facility under the same administrative
and permit review process and will
result in PAL renewals earlier than
under the Federal rule.
The revised Part 231 also requires a
reduction in the PAL of up to 25% or
implementation of best available control
technology (BACT), whichever is less
stringent, by the end of the fifth year of
the initial PAL. The earlier PAL
renewals and PAL reduction programs
under New York’s revised Part 231 are
more stringent than the Federal rules.
D. The Facility Need Not Be Major for
the Specific Nonattainment Pollutant in
Order for the Specific Nonattainment
Significant Threshold To Apply
New York’s revised Part 231 does not
require that the facility be an existing
major source for the applicable
nonattainment pollutant before looking
at the specific nonattainment significant
threshold for applicability purposes. In
other words, a facility only needs to be
a major source for one nonattainment
pollutant, for example, ozone, for all
other nonattainment significant
thresholds to apply for applicability
purposes. The revised Part 231 for
nonattainment areas follows the same
applicability procedures as the PSD
rules, i.e., the facility only needs to be
an existing major stationary source for
an attainment pollutant and then all the
significant thresholds will apply for
applicability purposes. This is more
stringent than the Federal requirements
in nonattainment areas which indicate
that the existing facility must be a major
stationary source for that specific
nonattainment pollutant before the
applicable significant nonattainment
pollutant threshold is applied.
E:\FR\FM\27JYP1.SGM
27JYP1
jdjones on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 143 / Tuesday, July 27, 2010 / Proposed Rules
E. Reasonable Possibility in
Recordkeeping
Revised Part 231 expands upon the
requirements of EPA’s December 21,
2007 final Reasonable Possibility in
Recordkeeping rule by incorporating
recordkeeping and/or monitoring
requirements for all insignificant
modifications. For example, any
modification with a ‘‘project emission
potential’’ (a term equivalent to EPA’s
projected actual emissions increase)
which is less than 50% of the applicable
significant project threshold, or any
modification with a project emission
potential which, when emissions from
independent and unrelated factors such
as demand growth are added, is less
than 50% of the applicable significant
project threshold, must maintain for a
minimum of 5 years: (1) A description
of the modification; (2) An
identification of each new or modified
emission sources(s) including the
associated processes, and emission
units; (3) the calculation of the projected
emission potential for each modified
emission source(s) including supporting
documentation; and (4) the date the
modification commenced operation.
The revised Part 231 also extends the
pre-construction notification
requirement (must submit an
application to the NYSDEC) to any
facility that proposes a modification
with a project emission potential which
equals or exceeds 50% of the applicable
significant project threshold or proposes
a modification with a project emission
potential which is less than 50% of the
applicable significant project threshold,
but equals or exceeds 50% of the
applicable significant project threshold
when emissions from independent and
unrelated factors such as demand
growth are added.
For the post-change monitoring
requirements, the facilities must keep
records of their calculations of emission
increases from independent and
unrelated factors such as demand
growth, monitor post-modification
emissions, and submit annual reports to
verify the accuracy of their calculations.
Under the Federal NSR rule,
provisions for recordkeeping are
applicable to: (1) Modifications with a
projected actual emissions increase that
equals or exceeds 50% of the applicable
NSR significant threshold, and (2)
modifications with a projected actual
emissions increase that is less than 50%
of the applicable NSR significance
threshold but when emissions
attributable to independent and
unrelated factors such as demand
growth are added, equals or exceeds
50% of the applicable NSR significance
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:29 Jul 26, 2010
Jkt 220001
threshold. For (1) above, EPA requires
emission sources to comply with both
pre-change and post-change
recordkeeping and reporting
requirements. For (2) above, EPA
requires only pre-change recordkeeping
requirements.
Also, the final Federal Reasonable
Possibility Rule only requires EUSGUs
to notify the permitting authority, prior
to beginning actual construction, for any
modification with a project emission
potential which equals or exceeds 50%
of the applicable significant project
threshold. Therefore, the revised Part
231 is more restrictive than the Federal
requirements.
Except as described above, the State
Part 231 rules are substantively the
same as the existing PSD and
nonattainment Federal rules.
F. Prevention of Significant
Deterioration of Air Quality: 6 NYCRR
Part 231
The State rule does not incorporate
the portions of the Federal rules that
were vacated by the DC Circuit Court,
specifically, the clean unit provisions
and the pollution control projects
exclusion. Except for the items
described above in Sections A through
E, the revisions included in New York’s
PSD program are substantively the same
and, in some instances (as discussed
above), more stringent than the
corresponding Federal provisions.
As part of its review of the New York
SIP submittal, EPA performed a review
of the proposed revisions and has
determined that they are consistent with
the program requirements for the
preparation, adoption and submittal of
implementation plans for the Prevention
of Significant Deterioration of Air
Quality, set forth at 40 CFR 51.166,
including the 2002 NSR Reform Rules.
G. Review of New Sources in
Nonattainment Areas: 6 NYCRR Part
231
New York’s permitting requirements
for major sources in nonattainment
areas are set forth at 6 NYCRR Part 231.
The New York nonattainment NSR
program was originally approved into
the New York SIP on July 1, 1980 and
applies to the construction and
modification of any major stationary
source of air pollution in a
nonattainment area, as required by part
D of title I of the CAA. To receive
approval to construct, a source that is
subject to this regulation must show that
it will not cause a net increase in
pollution with more than 1:1 offset
ratio, will not create a delay in meeting
the NAAQS, and will install and use
control technology that achieves the
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
43895
LAER. The revisions to this regulation,
which EPA is proposing to approve into
the SIP, update the existing provisions
to be consistent with the current Federal
nonattainment rule in 40 CFR 51.165,
including the 2002 NSR Reform Rules.
These revisions address baseline actual
emissions, actual-to-projected-actual
applicability tests, and PALs.
The State rule does not incorporate
the portions of the Federal rules that
were vacated by the DC Circuit Court,
specifically, the clean unit provisions
and the pollution control projects
exclusion. Except for the items
described above in Sections A through
E, the revisions included in New York’s
nonattainment NSR program are
substantively the same as the 2002 NSR
Reform Rules. As part of its review of
the New York submittal, EPA performed
a review of the proposed revisions and
has determined that they are consistent
with the program requirements for the
preparation, adoption and submittal of
implementation plans for New Source
Review, set forth at 40 CFR 51.165,
including the 2002 NSR Reform Rules.
We note that New York State is
required to submit a SIP revision to EPA
as a result of the Implementation of the
New Source Review (NSR) Program for
Particulate Matter Less than 2.5
Micrometers (PM2.5) which was
published in the Federal Register on
May 16, 2008. 73 FR 28321. This rule
requires the States to adopt and submit
plan revisions to their attainment and
nonattainment NSR SIP that incorporate
a number of requirements pertaining to
PM2.5 within 3 years from the date EPA
publishes the changes in the Federal
Register. Consequently, New York State
has until May 16, 2011 to submit the
required PM2.5 changes to EPA.
H. Technical Error and Other Issues
There is a technical error in the
revised Part 231. New York must
address this technical error by adding
the underlined words ‘‘equal or’’ as
shown below. However, EPA is
proposing to approve this regulation
into the SIP with the interpretation
listed below for this particular
definition. Our interpretation, that the
language should read as ‘‘equal or
exceed,’’ is consistent with other
sections of Part 231 which do use the
term ‘‘equal or exceed’’ when dealing
with applicable significant project
threshold of a regulated NSR
contaminant and manifest New York’s
intention to apply the language in the
Federal rules.
From ‘‘Definitions’’ under 6 NYCRR
Part 231–4.1(b)(31):
(31) NSR major modification. Any
modification of a major facility that would
E:\FR\FM\27JYP1.SGM
27JYP1
43896
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 143 / Tuesday, July 27, 2010 / Proposed Rules
equal or exceed the applicable significant
project threshold of a regulated NSR
contaminant in Table 3, Table 4, or Table 6
of Subpart 231–13 of this Part; and would
result in a significant net emissions increase
of that contaminant from the major facility.
(i) Any modification with a project
emission potential for VOC or NOX that
equals or exceeds the applicable significant
project threshold or any net emissions
increase at a major facility that is significant
for VOC or NOX shall be considered
significant for ozone.
jdjones on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
With respect to the creation of
Emission Reduction Credits (ERCs), the
revised 6 NYCRR Part 231 states that for
NOX, PM10 or VOC emissions, ERCs
must have physically occurred on or
after November 15, 1990 but need not be
contemporaneous. This November 15,
1990 date is much earlier than the
emission inventory base year that New
York State uses for planning purposes
which is the year 2002. EPA regulations
require a State to include ERCs created
in the years prior to the emission
inventory base year in the future year
attainment inventories. ERCs created
between November 15, 1990 and 2002
have been properly accounted for in the
future year (projection) attainment
inventories that are used to account for
the reasonable further progress
requirements. Therefore, EPA deems
that the ERC meets the specific
requirements from shutdowns and
curtailments contained in 40 CFR part
51, Appendix S, section IV.C.3.
With respect to the creation of ERCs
for PM2.5, 6 NYCRR Part 231 states that
the ERCs must have physically occurred
on or after April 5, 2005 but need not
be contemporaneous. The year for the
last New York State PM2.5 emission
inventory is 2002. The April 5, 2005
date is more stringent than the Federal
requirement of using the emission
inventory base year of 2002. Therefore,
EPA is proposing to approve the
provision with the April 5, 2005 date.
I. Revisions to 6 NYCRR Part 200,
‘‘General Provisions’’ and 6 NYCRR Part
201, ‘‘Permits and Certificates’’
New York also made administrative
changes to Parts 200 and 201 which
reflect implementation of the Part 231
provisions. The Part 200 amendments,
specifically Subdivision 200.1(bl) was
amended to clarify that for emergency
power generating stationary internal
combustion engines, the potential to
emit will be based on a maximum of 500
hours of operation per year per engine
unless a more restrictive limitation
exists in a permit or registration. A new
subdivision 200.1(cl) was added to
indicate that routine maintenance
determinations are made on a case-bycase basis, taking into account the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:29 Jul 26, 2010
Jkt 220001
nature and extent of the activity and its
frequency and cost. Section 200.9 was
amended to include all Federal
materials referenced in the proposed
amendments to Part 231. Section
200.10(a) was amended to reflect that
the NYSDEC is no longer delegated
responsibility for implementation of the
Federal Prevention of Significant
Deterioration (PSD) Program.
New York’s amendments to Part 201
revise the definition for ‘‘major
stationary source or major source or
major facility’’ at 6 NYCRR 201–
2.1(b)(21). The definition will now
encompass the term ‘‘major facility’’ and
incorporate major facility and
significant project thresholds for
facilities emitting particulate matter or
particles with an aerodynamic diameter
less than or equal to a nominal 2.5
micro-meters (PM2.5). EPA designated
the New York City metropolitan area as
nonattainment for the PM2.5 standard
(70 FR 944). NNSR review is now
required for new major facilities and
major modifications to existing facilities
that emit PM2.5 in significant amounts in
the PM2.5 nonattainment area.
Since the revisions to Parts 200 and
201, including the new or revised
definitions are consistent with Federal
guidance, EPA is proposing to approve
them into the New York SIP. It is
important to note that EPA is proposing
to approve only those revisions made to
Part 200, specifically subparts 200.1,
200.6, 200.7, and 200.9, as effective
March 5, 2009, consistent with what has
been previously approved into the
Federally enforceable New York SIP.
EPA is also proposing to approve those
revisions to Part 201, specifically
subpart 201–2, effective March 5, 2009,
as it applies to the implementation of
the Part 231 NSR permitting program.
EPA is not proposing action on the
revisions to section 200.10 since they
are references to Federal standards and
requirements and are therefore already
Federally enforceable standards and
requirements.
J. Clean Air Act (CAA) Section 110(l)
Section 110(l) of the CAA provides
that ‘‘the Administrator shall not
approve a revision of a plan if the
revision would interfere with any
applicable requirement concerning
attainment and reasonable further
progress * * * or any other applicable
requirement of this Act.’’
Approval of New York’s Revised Part
231 into the SIP would not violate CAA
section 110(l) with respect to either PSD
or nonattainment NSR.
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
1. PSD
With respect to PSD, EPA determines
that approval of New York’s regulations
will not ‘‘interfere with * * *
attainment or any other applicable
requirement’’ of the statute. New York
has never had a PSD SIP. As a result, the
regulations currently in place in New
York State are the Federal NSR Reform
regulations. New York’s proposed SIP
for PSD is no less stringent than the
Federal program, and is in fact more
stringent than the Federal program in a
number of ways as discussed above in
this proposal. Thus, approval of New
York’s PSD regulations into the SIP will
not interfere with any applicable
requirement of the CAA.
2. Nonattainment NSR (NNSR)
EPA likewise determines that
approval of New York’s proposed NNSR
SIP also would not interfere with
attainment, reasonable further progress
or any other applicable requirement of
the CAA. New York’s NNSR SIP
approval dates back to July 1, 1980, well
before the 1990 Clean Air Act
Amendments. Since then, there have
been many improvements in part D of
the CAA, and these have been
incorporated into New York’s revised
Part 231. Thus, approval of New York’s
new NNSR regulation into the SIP will
add provisions that will support
attainment or reasonable further
progress. For example, the current
NNSR SIP does not contain up-to-date
offset ratios for VOCs and NOX
inasmuch as it predates the ozone
transport region, and contains a
threshold of 50 tons/year throughout the
State for VOCs and NOX. New York’s
revised Part 231 addresses these
weaknesses. Furthermore, New York’s
reasonable further progress (RFP)
demonstration does not rely on this NSR
rule but on other regulations, such as
Reasonably Available Control
Technology (RACT).
K. Clean Air Act (CAA) Section 193
Section 193 of the CAA specifically
provides that ‘‘no control requirement in
effect, or required to be adopted by an
order, settlement agreement, or plan in
effect before November 15, 1990, in any
area which is a nonattainment area for
any air pollutant may be modified after
November 15, 1990, in any manner
unless the modification insures
equivalent or greater emissions
reductions of such air pollutant.’’
As discussed in the preceding section,
New York’s PSD and NNSR SIP
provisions are more stringent than the
applicable Federal regulations and the
existing NSR SIP approved on July 1,
E:\FR\FM\27JYP1.SGM
27JYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 143 / Tuesday, July 27, 2010 / Proposed Rules
1980. Because the proposed SIP revision
will result in equivalent or greater
emission reductions, the proposed SIP
revision is consistent with the
requirements of section 193 of the CAA.
jdjones on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
IV. What action is EPA proposing to
take?
EPA is proposing to approve revisions
to the New York SIP 6 NYCRR Part 200,
6 NYCRR Part 201 and 6 NYCRR Part
231 which became effective under NYS
law on March 5, 2009, and was
submitted by the State of New York to
EPA on March 3, 2009. Specifically,
EPA is proposing to approve subparts
200.1, 200.6, 200.7, and 220.9, as
effective March 5, 2009, and subpart
201–2, as effective March 5, 2009, with
the caveat that EPA is taking no action
on the specific items identified in
Section I of this proposal related to the
Tailoring Rule thresholds. EPA will take
action on these additional items after
receiving New York’s letter, expected
shortly.
V. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the Clean Air Act, the
Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the
provisions of the CAA and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k);
40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP
submissions, EPA’s role is to approve
State choices, provided that they meet
the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
Accordingly, this action merely
approves State law as meeting Federal
requirements and does not impose
additional requirements beyond those
imposed by State law. For that reason,
this action:
• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ subject to review by the Office
of Management and Budget under
Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993);
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:29 Jul 26, 2010
Jkt 220001
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of
section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act;
and
• Does not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this rule does not have
Tribal implications as specified by
Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249,
November 9, 2000), because the SIP is
not approved to apply in Indian country
located in the State, and EPA notes that
it will not impose substantial direct
costs on Tribal governments or preempt
Tribal law.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Intergovernmental relations, Lead,
Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate
matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile
organic compounds.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: July 16, 2010.
Judith A. Enck,
Regional Administrator, Region 2.
[FR Doc. 2010–18365 Filed 7–26–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
47 CFR Part 73
[DA 10–1061; MB Docket No. 10–117; RM–
11601]
FM TABLE OF ALLOTMENTS, GRANTS
PASS, OREGON
Federal Communications
Commission
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
This document sets forth a
proposal to amend the FM Table of
Allotments. The Commission requests
comment on a petition filed by Three
Rivers Broadcasting, LLC proposing the
allotment of FM Channel 257A as the
second commercial allotment at Grants
Pass, Oregon. The channel can be
allotted at Grants Pass in compliance
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
43897
with the Commission’s minimum
distance separation requirements with a
site restriction of 8.7 km (5.4 miles) west
of Grants Pass, at 42–25–25 North
Latitude and 123–26–25 West
Longitude. See Supplementary
Information infra.
The deadline for filing comments
is August 26, 2010. Reply comments
must be filed on or before September 10,
2010.
DATES:
Federal Communications
Commission, 445 12th Street, SW,
Washington, DC 20554. In addition to
filing comments with the FCC interested
parties should serve the petitioner, as
follows: Casey McIntosh, Three Rivers
Broadcasting, LLC, 2970 Ravenwood
Drive, Grants Pass, Oregon 97527
ADDRESSES:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Deborah A. Dupont, Media Bureau,
(202) 418–2180.
This is a
synopsis of the Commission’s Notice of
Proposed Rule Making, MB Docket No.
10–117, adopted June 10, 2010, and
released June 14, 2010. The full text of
this Commission decision is available
for inspection and copying during
normal business hours in the FCC
Reference Information Center (Room
CY–A257), 445 12th Street, S.W.,
Washington, D.C. 20554.
The complete text of this decision
may also be purchased from the
Commission’s copy contractor, Best
Copy and Printing, Inc., 445 12th Street,
SW, Room CY–B402, Washington, DC
20554, 800–378–3160 or via the
company’s website, https://
www.bcpiweb.com.
This document does not contain
proposed information collection
requirements subject to the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104–
13. In addition, therefore, it does not
contain any proposed information
collection burden ‘‘for small business
concerns with fewer than 25
employees,’’ pursuant to the Small
Business Paperwork Relief Act of 2002,
Public Law 107–198, see 44 U.S.C.
3506(c)(4).
Provisions of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act of 1980 does not apply
to this proceeding.
Members of the public should note
that from the time a Notice of Proposed
Rule Making is issued until the matter
is no longer subject to Commission
consideration or court review, all ex
parte contacts are prohibited in
Commission proceedings, such as this
one, which involve channel allotments.
See 47 CFR 1.1204(b) for rules
governing permissible ex parte contacts.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
E:\FR\FM\27JYP1.SGM
27JYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 143 (Tuesday, July 27, 2010)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 43892-43897]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-18365]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R02-OAR-2010-0321, FRL-9180-5]
Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; New York
Prevention of Significant Deterioration of Air Quality and
Nonattainment New Source Review
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to
approve revisions to the New York State Implementation Plan (SIP)
submitted by the New York State Department of Environmental
Conservation on March 3, 2009. The proposed revisions would create a
new New York State Prevention of Significant Deterioration of Air
Quality (PSD) regulations program and modify the existing New York
State Nonattainment New Source Review (NNSR) regulations in the SIP.
These proposed revisions also address changes mandated by the revised
Federal New Source Review (NSR) regulations, referred to as the ``2002
NSR Reform Rules.'' EPA's 2002 NSR Reform Rules, proposed by New York
State for inclusion in the New York SIP with some changes, include
provisions for baseline emissions calculations, an actual-to-projected-
actual methodology for calculating emissions changes, options for
plantwide applicability limits, and recordkeeping and reporting
requirements. If EPA finalizes approval of New York's regulations, New
York will implement its own PSD and NNSR State regulations. EPA notes
that, in this proposal, no action is being taken on certain items of
New York's revisions that relate to the Prevention of Significant
Deterioration and Title V Greenhouse Gas Tailoring Rule (``Tailoring
Rule'').
DATES: Comments must be received on or before August 26, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID number EPA-
R02-OAR-2010-0321, by one of the following methods:
https://www.regulations.gov: Follow the on-line
instructions for submitting comments.
E-mail: Werner.Raymond@epa.gov.
Fax: 212-637-3901.
Mail: Raymond Werner, Chief, Air Programs Branch,
Environmental Protection Agency, Region 2 Office, 290 Broadway, 25th
Floor, New York, New York 10007-1866.
Hand Delivery: Raymond Werner, Chief, Air Programs Branch,
Environmental Protection Agency, Region 2 Office, 290 Broadway, 25th
Floor, New York, New York 10007-1866. Such deliveries are only accepted
during the Regional Office's normal hours of operation. The Regional
Office's official hours of business are Monday through Friday, 8:30
a.m. to 4:30 p.m. excluding Federal holidays.
Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID No. EPA-R02-OAR-
2010-0321. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included
in the public docket without change and may be made available online at
https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information
provided, unless the comment includes information claimed to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise protected through https://www.regulations.gov or e-mail. The https://www.regulations.gov Web site
is an ``anonymous access'' system, which means EPA will not know your
identity or contact information unless you provide it in the body of
your comment. If you send an e-mail comment directly to EPA without
going through https://www.regulations.gov your e-mail address will be
automatically captured and included as part of the comment that is
placed in the public docket and made available on the Internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you include your name
and other contact information in the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA
may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid
the use of special characters, any form of encryption, and be free of
any defects or viruses. For additional information about EPA's public
docket visit the EPA Docket Center homepage at https://www.epa.gov/epahome/dockets.htm.
Docket: All documents in the docket are listed in the https://www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such
as copyrighted material, will be publicly available only in hard copy.
Publicly available docket materials are available either electronically
in https://www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at the Environmental
Protection Agency, Region 2 Office, Air Programs Branch, 290 Broadway,
25th Floor, New York, New York 10007-1866. EPA requests, if at all
possible, that you contact the individual listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to view the hard copy of the docket. You
may view the hard copy of the docket Monday through Friday, 8 a.m. to 4
p.m., excluding Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Frank Jon, Air Programs Branch,
Environmental Protection Agency, 290 Broadway, 25th Floor, New York,
New York 10007-1866, (212) 637-4085; e[dash]mail address:
jon.frank@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, references to
``EPA,'' ``we,'' ``us,'' or ``our,'' are intended to mean the
Environmental Protection Agency. The supplementary information is
arranged as follows:
I. What is being addressed in this document?
II. What is the background for this action?
III. What is EPA's analysis of New York's NSR rule revisions?
IV. What action is EPA proposing to take?
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. What is being addressed in this document?
On March 3, 2009, the State of New York, through the New York State
Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC), submitted to EPA
Region 2 revisions to the New York
[[Page 43893]]
State Implementation Plan (SIP). The submittal consists of revisions to
three regulations that are already part of the New York SIP. The
affected regulations are: 6 New York Code of Rules and Regulations
(NYCRR) Part 231, New Source Review for New and Modified Facilities; 6
NYCRR Part 200, General Provisions; and 6 NYCRR Part 201, Permits and
Certificates. The revisions were made to create a new New York State
PSD regulation program and to update the existing New York State
nonattainment regulations consistent with changes to the Federal NSR
regulations published on December 31, 2002 (67 FR 80186). In today's
action, EPA is proposing to approve those revisions with the caveat
that EPA is not proposing action at this time on (1) the PSD permitting
threshold provisions to the extent that those provisions require
permits for sources of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions that equal or
exceed the 100/250 tons per year (tpy) GHG levels but are less than the
thresholds identified in EPA's final Tailoring Rule at 75 FR 31514,
31606 (June 3, 2010); and (2) the PSD significance level provisions of
New York's rule to the extent that those provisions treat as
significant GHG emissions increases that are less than the thresholds
identified in the final Tailoring Rule. Id. In accordance with the
final Tailoring Rule, New York is expected to submit a letter to EPA
addressing these issues shortly. Id. After receiving New York's letter,
EPA will take action with respect to these additional items. Today's
proposed approval with respect to GHG emissions above the Tailoring
Rule thresholds is premised on our understanding that the New York
State PSD regulations provide authority to regulate GHG emissions
within EPA's meaning of the term ``subject to regulation.'' See 75 FR
31582. This understanding is based upon EPA's review of New York's
definition of ``Regulated NSR Contaminant,'' which includes any
contaminant that is ``subject to regulation'' under the Clean Air Act.
6 NYCRR Sec. 231-4.1(43). New York is also expected to address its
authority to regulate GHG emissions in its letter. In the event that
New York articulates the view that it does not have authority to
regulate greenhouse gases, EPA will revisit this issue before taking
final action.
II. What is the background for this action?
On December 31, 2002, EPA published final rule changes to 40 Code
of Federal Regulations (CFR) parts 51 and 52, regarding the Clean Air
Act's PSD and Nonattainment New Source Review (NNSR) programs. 67 FR
80186. Available at https://www.epa.gov/nsr/fr/20021231_80186.pdf. On
November 7, 2003, EPA published a final action on the reconsideration
of the December 31, 2002 final rule changes. 68 FR 63021. In that
November 7th final action, EPA added the definition of ``replacement
unit,'' and clarified an issue regarding plantwide applicability
limitations (PALs). On June 13, 2007, EPA revised the rules to remove
provisions for pollution control projects and clean units. 72 FR 32526.
EPA further revised the rules on December 21, 2007, to clarify when
facilities must keep records and report emissions when a ``reasonable
possibility'' test shows that projected emissions increases could equal
or exceed 50% of the Clean Air Act's NSR significant levels for a
regulated NSR pollutant. 72 FR 72607. Collectively, these four final
actions are referred to as the ``2002 NSR Reform Rules.'' The 2002 NSR
Reform Rules are part of EPA's implementation of parts C and D of title
I of the Clean Air Act (CAA), 42 U.S.C. 7470-7515. Part C of title I of
the CAA, 42 U.S.C. 7470-7492, is the PSD program, which applies in
areas that meet the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS)--
``attainment'' areas--as well as in areas for which there is
insufficient information to determine whether the area meets the
NAAQS--``unclassifiable'' areas. Part D of title I of the CAA, 42
U.S.C. 7501-7515, is the NNSR program, which applies in areas that are
not in attainment of the National Ambient Air Quality Standards
(NAAQS)--``nonattainment areas.'' Collectively, the PSD and NNSR
programs are referred to as the ``New Source Review'' or ``NSR
programs''. EPA regulations implementing these programs are contained
in 40 CFR 51.165, 51.166, 52.21, 52.24, and part 51, Appendix S. The
CAA's NSR programs are preconstruction permitting programs applicable
to new and modified stationary sources of air pollutants regulated
under the CAA.
The NSR programs include a combination of air quality planning and
air pollution control technology requirements. Briefly, section 109 of
the CAA, 42 U.S.C. 7409, requires EPA to promulgate primary NAAQS to
protect public health and secondary NAAQS to protect public welfare.
Once EPA sets those standards, States must develop, adopt, and submit
to EPA for approval, a SIP that contains emissions limitations and
other control measures to attain and maintain the NAAQS. Each SIP is
required to contain a preconstruction review program for the
construction and modification of any stationary source of air pollution
to: (1) Assure that the NAAQS are achieved and maintained; (2) protect
areas of clean air; (3) protect air quality related values (such as
visibility) in national parks and other areas; (4) assure that
appropriate emissions controls are applied; (5) maximize opportunities
for economic development consistent with the preservation of clean air
resources; and (6) ensure that any decision to increase air pollution
is made only after full public consideration of the consequences of the
decision.
The 2002 NSR Reform Rules made changes to four areas of the NSR
programs. In summary, the 2002 Rules: (1) Provide a new method for
determining baseline actual emissions; (2) adopt an actual-to-
projected-actual methodology for determining whether a major
modification has occurred; (3) allow major stationary sources to comply
with plant-wide applicability limits (PALs) to avoid having a
significant emissions increase that triggers the requirements of the
major NSR program; and (4) require new recordkeeping and reporting. On
November 7, 2003, EPA published a final action on its reconsideration
of the 2002 NSR Reform Rules (68 FR 63021), which added a definition
for ``replacement unit'' and clarified an issue regarding PALs. After
the 2002 NSR Reform Rules were finalized and effective (March 3, 2003),
various petitioners challenged numerous aspects of the 2002 NSR Reform
Rules, along with portions of EPA's 1980 NSR Rules (45 FR 5276, August
7, 1980). On June 24, 2005, the DC Circuit Court issued a decision on
the challenges to the 2002 NSR Reform Rules. New York v. United States,
413 F.3d 3 (DC Cir. 2005). In summary, the DC Circuit Court vacated
portions of the Rules pertaining to clean units and pollution control
projects, remanded a portion of the Rules regarding recordkeeping,
e.g., 40 CFR 52.21(r)(6) and 40 CFR 51.166(r)(6), and either upheld or
did not comment on the other provisions included as part of the 2002
NSR Reform Rules. On June 13, 2007, EPA revised the Rules to remove
provisions for pollution control projects and clean units. On December
21, 2007, EPA took final action regarding the remanded portion on
recordkeeping by promulgating the reasonable possibility in
recordkeeping rule. Today's action is consistent with the decision of
the DC Circuit Court because New York's submittal does not include any
portions of the 2002 NSR Reform Rules that were vacated as part
[[Page 43894]]
of the DC Circuit Court's June 2005 decision.
The 2002 NSR Reform Rules require that State agencies adopt and
submit revisions to their SIP permitting programs implementing the
minimum program elements of the 2002 NSR Reform Rules no later than
January 2, 2006. (Consistent with changes to 40 CFR 51.166(a)(6)(i),
State agencies are now required to adopt and submit SIP revisions
within three years after new amendments are published in the Federal
Register.) State agencies may meet the requirements of 40 CFR part 51,
and the 2002 NSR Reform Rules, with different but equivalent
regulations. However, if a State decides not to implement any of the
new applicability provisions, that State is required to demonstrate
that its existing program is at least as stringent as the Federal
program. On March 3, 2009, the State of New York submitted a SIP
revision for the purpose of revising the State's NSR permitting
provisions. These changes were made primarily to adopt EPA's 2002 NSR
Reform Rules with a few modifications. As discussed in further detail
below, EPA believes the revisions contained in the New York submittal
are approvable for inclusion into the New York SIP, with the caveat
that we are taking no action on the specific items identified in
Section I of this proposal related to the Tailoring Rule thresholds.
III. What is EPA's analysis of New York's NSR rule revisions?
New York currently has an approved NNSR program for new and
modified sources. Today, EPA is proposing to approve revisions to New
York's existing NNSR program and a new PSD program. These proposed
revisions became State effective on March 5, 2009, and were submitted
to EPA on March 3, 2009. Copies of the revised rules, as well as the
State's Regulatory Impact Statement (RIS), can be obtained from the
Docket, as discussed in the ``Docket'' section above. In general, the
New York State revisions to the rule are similar to the Federal NSR
Reform Rules except for a few specific provisions. A discussion of the
specific changes to New York's rule, proposed for inclusion in the SIP,
that are different from the EPA rules are as follows.
A. Definition for Baseline Period
Under the major NSR program, an existing major facility may modify,
or even completely replace, or add, emissions units without obtaining a
major NSR permit, so long as the ``projected actual emissions'' do not
increase by a significant amount over the levels emitted during the
``baseline period'' at the plant as a whole.
The revised New York regulations in 6 NYCRR Part 231 establish a
uniform period provision for electric utility steam generating units
(EUSGUs) and non-EUSGUs. The revised Part 231 requires that all
emissions sources select a baseline period using the annual average of
any twenty-four (24) consecutive month period within the five (5) year
period that precedes a proposed change. Sources are not allowed to go
beyond this time period.
Under the Federal NSR rule, EUSGUs must select a baseline period
using any 24-consecutive month period within the 5-year period
immediately preceding the actual construction or another 24-consecutive
month period that is demonstrated to be more representative. For non-
EUSGUs, they must take the average of annual emissions of any 24-
consecutive months within the 10-year period that precedes the proposed
change. By allowing a longer period for selecting the 24-month average,
sources are more likely to find a period of time with high emissions
that will result in an increase below significance levels. Though EPA
believes that the Federal rule allowing a 10-year look-back for
defining the baseline period for non-EUSGUs retains the environmental
benefits of the NSR program,\1\ the revised Part 231 definition of
Baseline Period is more restrictive than the Federal definition for
non-EUSGUs because the Federal definition allows only a 5-year look-
back period.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ EPA's environmental impact analysis of the 10-year look-back
provision was provided at the time of the 2002 NSR Reform rule in
EPA's ``Supplemental Analysis of the Environmental Impact of the
2002 Final NSR Improvement Rules'' and is available at https://www.epa.gov/nsr/actions.html#2002.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Single Baseline for Facilities Undergoing NSR Modifications
The revised Part 231 requires that facilities select a single
baseline period for all regulated NSR pollutants when calculating
baseline actual emissions.
Under the Federal NSR rule, facilities are allowed to choose a
different baseline period within the look-back period for each NSR
pollutant. This allows sources to pick and choose the baseline period,
for each pollutant, most likely to result in an increase below
significance levels. New York's approach would not allow for this
flexibility, and would increase the likelihood of requiring NSR review
for more regulated NSR pollutants. So, this State requirement is more
stringent than the Federal requirement.
C. Plantwide Applicability Limits (PALs)
A PAL is a voluntary option that provides a facility with the
ability to manage facility-wide emissions without triggering major NSR
review. If a facility keeps the emissions below a plantwide actual
emissions cap (that is, an actual PAL), then these regulations allow
the facility to avoid the major NSR permitting process when the
facility makes alterations to the plant or individual emissions units.
In return for this flexibility, the facility must monitor and comply
with more stringent requirements for all of the emissions units under
the PAL.
The revised Part 231 allows facilities to establish a PAL for an
initial term not to exceed 10 years. However, the rule aligns the PAL
term with the facility's title V permit so that they both expire at the
same time. This will allow the PAL to be renewed with the title V
facility under the same administrative and permit review process and
will result in PAL renewals earlier than under the Federal rule.
The revised Part 231 also requires a reduction in the PAL of up to
25% or implementation of best available control technology (BACT),
whichever is less stringent, by the end of the fifth year of the
initial PAL. The earlier PAL renewals and PAL reduction programs under
New York's revised Part 231 are more stringent than the Federal rules.
D. The Facility Need Not Be Major for the Specific Nonattainment
Pollutant in Order for the Specific Nonattainment Significant Threshold
To Apply
New York's revised Part 231 does not require that the facility be
an existing major source for the applicable nonattainment pollutant
before looking at the specific nonattainment significant threshold for
applicability purposes. In other words, a facility only needs to be a
major source for one nonattainment pollutant, for example, ozone, for
all other nonattainment significant thresholds to apply for
applicability purposes. The revised Part 231 for nonattainment areas
follows the same applicability procedures as the PSD rules, i.e., the
facility only needs to be an existing major stationary source for an
attainment pollutant and then all the significant thresholds will apply
for applicability purposes. This is more stringent than the Federal
requirements in nonattainment areas which indicate that the existing
facility must be a major stationary source for that specific
nonattainment pollutant before the applicable significant nonattainment
pollutant threshold is applied.
[[Page 43895]]
E. Reasonable Possibility in Recordkeeping
Revised Part 231 expands upon the requirements of EPA's December
21, 2007 final Reasonable Possibility in Recordkeeping rule by
incorporating recordkeeping and/or monitoring requirements for all
insignificant modifications. For example, any modification with a
``project emission potential'' (a term equivalent to EPA's projected
actual emissions increase) which is less than 50% of the applicable
significant project threshold, or any modification with a project
emission potential which, when emissions from independent and unrelated
factors such as demand growth are added, is less than 50% of the
applicable significant project threshold, must maintain for a minimum
of 5 years: (1) A description of the modification; (2) An
identification of each new or modified emission sources(s) including
the associated processes, and emission units; (3) the calculation of
the projected emission potential for each modified emission source(s)
including supporting documentation; and (4) the date the modification
commenced operation.
The revised Part 231 also extends the pre-construction notification
requirement (must submit an application to the NYSDEC) to any facility
that proposes a modification with a project emission potential which
equals or exceeds 50% of the applicable significant project threshold
or proposes a modification with a project emission potential which is
less than 50% of the applicable significant project threshold, but
equals or exceeds 50% of the applicable significant project threshold
when emissions from independent and unrelated factors such as demand
growth are added.
For the post-change monitoring requirements, the facilities must
keep records of their calculations of emission increases from
independent and unrelated factors such as demand growth, monitor post-
modification emissions, and submit annual reports to verify the
accuracy of their calculations.
Under the Federal NSR rule, provisions for recordkeeping are
applicable to: (1) Modifications with a projected actual emissions
increase that equals or exceeds 50% of the applicable NSR significant
threshold, and (2) modifications with a projected actual emissions
increase that is less than 50% of the applicable NSR significance
threshold but when emissions attributable to independent and unrelated
factors such as demand growth are added, equals or exceeds 50% of the
applicable NSR significance threshold. For (1) above, EPA requires
emission sources to comply with both pre-change and post-change
recordkeeping and reporting requirements. For (2) above, EPA requires
only pre-change recordkeeping requirements.
Also, the final Federal Reasonable Possibility Rule only requires
EUSGUs to notify the permitting authority, prior to beginning actual
construction, for any modification with a project emission potential
which equals or exceeds 50% of the applicable significant project
threshold. Therefore, the revised Part 231 is more restrictive than the
Federal requirements.
Except as described above, the State Part 231 rules are
substantively the same as the existing PSD and nonattainment Federal
rules.
F. Prevention of Significant Deterioration of Air Quality: 6 NYCRR Part
231
The State rule does not incorporate the portions of the Federal
rules that were vacated by the DC Circuit Court, specifically, the
clean unit provisions and the pollution control projects exclusion.
Except for the items described above in Sections A through E, the
revisions included in New York's PSD program are substantively the same
and, in some instances (as discussed above), more stringent than the
corresponding Federal provisions.
As part of its review of the New York SIP submittal, EPA performed
a review of the proposed revisions and has determined that they are
consistent with the program requirements for the preparation, adoption
and submittal of implementation plans for the Prevention of Significant
Deterioration of Air Quality, set forth at 40 CFR 51.166, including the
2002 NSR Reform Rules.
G. Review of New Sources in Nonattainment Areas: 6 NYCRR Part 231
New York's permitting requirements for major sources in
nonattainment areas are set forth at 6 NYCRR Part 231. The New York
nonattainment NSR program was originally approved into the New York SIP
on July 1, 1980 and applies to the construction and modification of any
major stationary source of air pollution in a nonattainment area, as
required by part D of title I of the CAA. To receive approval to
construct, a source that is subject to this regulation must show that
it will not cause a net increase in pollution with more than 1:1 offset
ratio, will not create a delay in meeting the NAAQS, and will install
and use control technology that achieves the LAER. The revisions to
this regulation, which EPA is proposing to approve into the SIP, update
the existing provisions to be consistent with the current Federal
nonattainment rule in 40 CFR 51.165, including the 2002 NSR Reform
Rules. These revisions address baseline actual emissions, actual-to-
projected-actual applicability tests, and PALs.
The State rule does not incorporate the portions of the Federal
rules that were vacated by the DC Circuit Court, specifically, the
clean unit provisions and the pollution control projects exclusion.
Except for the items described above in Sections A through E, the
revisions included in New York's nonattainment NSR program are
substantively the same as the 2002 NSR Reform Rules. As part of its
review of the New York submittal, EPA performed a review of the
proposed revisions and has determined that they are consistent with the
program requirements for the preparation, adoption and submittal of
implementation plans for New Source Review, set forth at 40 CFR 51.165,
including the 2002 NSR Reform Rules.
We note that New York State is required to submit a SIP revision to
EPA as a result of the Implementation of the New Source Review (NSR)
Program for Particulate Matter Less than 2.5 Micrometers
(PM2.5) which was published in the Federal Register on May
16, 2008. 73 FR 28321. This rule requires the States to adopt and
submit plan revisions to their attainment and nonattainment NSR SIP
that incorporate a number of requirements pertaining to
PM2.5 within 3 years from the date EPA publishes the changes
in the Federal Register. Consequently, New York State has until May 16,
2011 to submit the required PM2.5 changes to EPA.
H. Technical Error and Other Issues
There is a technical error in the revised Part 231. New York must
address this technical error by adding the underlined words ``equal
or'' as shown below. However, EPA is proposing to approve this
regulation into the SIP with the interpretation listed below for this
particular definition. Our interpretation, that the language should
read as ``equal or exceed,'' is consistent with other sections of Part
231 which do use the term ``equal or exceed'' when dealing with
applicable significant project threshold of a regulated NSR contaminant
and manifest New York's intention to apply the language in the Federal
rules.
From ``Definitions'' under 6 NYCRR Part 231-4.1(b)(31):
(31) NSR major modification. Any modification of a major
facility that would
[[Page 43896]]
equal or exceed the applicable significant project threshold of a
regulated NSR contaminant in Table 3, Table 4, or Table 6 of Subpart
231-13 of this Part; and would result in a significant net emissions
increase of that contaminant from the major facility.
(i) Any modification with a project emission potential for VOC
or NOX that equals or exceeds the applicable significant
project threshold or any net emissions increase at a major facility
that is significant for VOC or NOX shall be considered
significant for ozone.
With respect to the creation of Emission Reduction Credits (ERCs),
the revised 6 NYCRR Part 231 states that for NOX,
PM10 or VOC emissions, ERCs must have physically occurred on
or after November 15, 1990 but need not be contemporaneous. This
November 15, 1990 date is much earlier than the emission inventory base
year that New York State uses for planning purposes which is the year
2002. EPA regulations require a State to include ERCs created in the
years prior to the emission inventory base year in the future year
attainment inventories. ERCs created between November 15, 1990 and 2002
have been properly accounted for in the future year (projection)
attainment inventories that are used to account for the reasonable
further progress requirements. Therefore, EPA deems that the ERC meets
the specific requirements from shutdowns and curtailments contained in
40 CFR part 51, Appendix S, section IV.C.3.
With respect to the creation of ERCs for PM2.5, 6 NYCRR
Part 231 states that the ERCs must have physically occurred on or after
April 5, 2005 but need not be contemporaneous. The year for the last
New York State PM2.5 emission inventory is 2002. The April
5, 2005 date is more stringent than the Federal requirement of using
the emission inventory base year of 2002. Therefore, EPA is proposing
to approve the provision with the April 5, 2005 date.
I. Revisions to 6 NYCRR Part 200, ``General Provisions'' and 6 NYCRR
Part 201, ``Permits and Certificates''
New York also made administrative changes to Parts 200 and 201
which reflect implementation of the Part 231 provisions. The Part 200
amendments, specifically Subdivision 200.1(bl) was amended to clarify
that for emergency power generating stationary internal combustion
engines, the potential to emit will be based on a maximum of 500 hours
of operation per year per engine unless a more restrictive limitation
exists in a permit or registration. A new subdivision 200.1(cl) was
added to indicate that routine maintenance determinations are made on a
case-by-case basis, taking into account the nature and extent of the
activity and its frequency and cost. Section 200.9 was amended to
include all Federal materials referenced in the proposed amendments to
Part 231. Section 200.10(a) was amended to reflect that the NYSDEC is
no longer delegated responsibility for implementation of the Federal
Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) Program.
New York's amendments to Part 201 revise the definition for ``major
stationary source or major source or major facility'' at 6 NYCRR 201-
2.1(b)(21). The definition will now encompass the term ``major
facility'' and incorporate major facility and significant project
thresholds for facilities emitting particulate matter or particles with
an aerodynamic diameter less than or equal to a nominal 2.5 micro-
meters (PM2.5). EPA designated the New York City
metropolitan area as nonattainment for the PM2.5 standard
(70 FR 944). NNSR review is now required for new major facilities and
major modifications to existing facilities that emit PM2.5
in significant amounts in the PM2.5 nonattainment area.
Since the revisions to Parts 200 and 201, including the new or
revised definitions are consistent with Federal guidance, EPA is
proposing to approve them into the New York SIP. It is important to
note that EPA is proposing to approve only those revisions made to Part
200, specifically subparts 200.1, 200.6, 200.7, and 200.9, as effective
March 5, 2009, consistent with what has been previously approved into
the Federally enforceable New York SIP. EPA is also proposing to
approve those revisions to Part 201, specifically subpart 201-2,
effective March 5, 2009, as it applies to the implementation of the
Part 231 NSR permitting program. EPA is not proposing action on the
revisions to section 200.10 since they are references to Federal
standards and requirements and are therefore already Federally
enforceable standards and requirements.
J. Clean Air Act (CAA) Section 110(l)
Section 110(l) of the CAA provides that ``the Administrator shall
not approve a revision of a plan if the revision would interfere with
any applicable requirement concerning attainment and reasonable further
progress * * * or any other applicable requirement of this Act.''
Approval of New York's Revised Part 231 into the SIP would not
violate CAA section 110(l) with respect to either PSD or nonattainment
NSR.
1. PSD
With respect to PSD, EPA determines that approval of New York's
regulations will not ``interfere with * * * attainment or any other
applicable requirement'' of the statute. New York has never had a PSD
SIP. As a result, the regulations currently in place in New York State
are the Federal NSR Reform regulations. New York's proposed SIP for PSD
is no less stringent than the Federal program, and is in fact more
stringent than the Federal program in a number of ways as discussed
above in this proposal. Thus, approval of New York's PSD regulations
into the SIP will not interfere with any applicable requirement of the
CAA.
2. Nonattainment NSR (NNSR)
EPA likewise determines that approval of New York's proposed NNSR
SIP also would not interfere with attainment, reasonable further
progress or any other applicable requirement of the CAA. New York's
NNSR SIP approval dates back to July 1, 1980, well before the 1990
Clean Air Act Amendments. Since then, there have been many improvements
in part D of the CAA, and these have been incorporated into New York's
revised Part 231. Thus, approval of New York's new NNSR regulation into
the SIP will add provisions that will support attainment or reasonable
further progress. For example, the current NNSR SIP does not contain
up-to-date offset ratios for VOCs and NOX inasmuch as it
predates the ozone transport region, and contains a threshold of 50
tons/year throughout the State for VOCs and NOX. New York's
revised Part 231 addresses these weaknesses. Furthermore, New York's
reasonable further progress (RFP) demonstration does not rely on this
NSR rule but on other regulations, such as Reasonably Available Control
Technology (RACT).
K. Clean Air Act (CAA) Section 193
Section 193 of the CAA specifically provides that ``no control
requirement in effect, or required to be adopted by an order,
settlement agreement, or plan in effect before November 15, 1990, in
any area which is a nonattainment area for any air pollutant may be
modified after November 15, 1990, in any manner unless the modification
insures equivalent or greater emissions reductions of such air
pollutant.''
As discussed in the preceding section, New York's PSD and NNSR SIP
provisions are more stringent than the applicable Federal regulations
and the existing NSR SIP approved on July 1,
[[Page 43897]]
1980. Because the proposed SIP revision will result in equivalent or
greater emission reductions, the proposed SIP revision is consistent
with the requirements of section 193 of the CAA.
IV. What action is EPA proposing to take?
EPA is proposing to approve revisions to the New York SIP 6 NYCRR
Part 200, 6 NYCRR Part 201 and 6 NYCRR Part 231 which became effective
under NYS law on March 5, 2009, and was submitted by the State of New
York to EPA on March 3, 2009. Specifically, EPA is proposing to approve
subparts 200.1, 200.6, 200.7, and 220.9, as effective March 5, 2009,
and subpart 201-2, as effective March 5, 2009, with the caveat that EPA
is taking no action on the specific items identified in Section I of
this proposal related to the Tailoring Rule thresholds. EPA will take
action on these additional items after receiving New York's letter,
expected shortly.
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the CAA and
applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve State
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
Accordingly, this action merely approves State law as meeting Federal
requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those
imposed by State law. For that reason, this action:
Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993);
Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
Is not subject to requirements of section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the Clean Air Act; and
Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this rule does not have Tribal implications as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000),
because the SIP is not approved to apply in Indian country located in
the State, and EPA notes that it will not impose substantial direct
costs on Tribal governments or preempt Tribal law.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Intergovernmental relations, Lead, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate
matter, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur oxides,
Volatile organic compounds.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: July 16, 2010.
Judith A. Enck,
Regional Administrator, Region 2.
[FR Doc. 2010-18365 Filed 7-26-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P