Safety Zone; DEEPWATER HORIZON Response Staging Area in the Vicinity of Shell Beach, Hopedale, LA, 43821-43823 [2010-18306]
Download as PDF
43821
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 143 / Tuesday, July 27, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
PART 742 [AMENDED]
August 24, 2010 to submit their
encryption registrations. * * *
3. The authority citations for part 742
continue to read as follows:
Dated: July 21, 2010.
Bernard Kritzer,
Director, Office of Exporter Services.
■
Authority: 50 U.S.C. app. 2401 et seq.; 50
U.S.C. 1701 et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 3201 et seq.;
42 U.S.C. 2139a; 22 U.S.C. 7201 et seq.; 22
U.S.C. 7210; Sec 1503, Pub. L. 108 11, 117
Stat. 559; E.O. 12058, 43 FR 20947, 3 CFR,
1978 Comp., p. 179; E.O. 12851, 58 FR 33181,
3 CFR, 1993 Comp., p. 608; E.O. 12938, 59
FR 59099, 3 CFR, 1994 Comp., p. 950; E.O.
13026, 61 FR 58767, 3 CFR, 1996 Comp., p.
228; E.O. 13222, 66 FR 44025, 3 CFR, 2001
Comp., p. 783; Presidential Determination
2003 23 of May 7, 2003, 68 FR 26459, May
16, 2003; Notice of August 13, 2009, 74 FR
41325 (August 14, 2009); Notice of November
6, 2009, 74 FR 58187 (November 10, 2009).
4. Section 742.15 is amended by
adding a sentence after the fourth
sentence in paragraph (b) to read as
follows:
■
§ 742.15
[FR Doc. 2010–18360 Filed 7–26–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–33–P
This safety zone will be enforced
from 5 p.m. on July 23, 2010, to 1 a.m.
on July 24, 2010.
DATES:
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
If
you have questions on this notice, call
or e-mail LTJG Ashley M. Wanzer,
Sector Seattle Waterways Management,
Coast Guard; telephone 206–217–6175,
SectorSeattleWWM@uscg.mil.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG–2010–0063]
Safety Zones; Annual Firework
Displays Within the Captain of the
Port, Puget Sound Area of
Responsibility
Coast Guard, DHS.
Correction of Notice of
Enforcement of Regulation.
AGENCY:
Encryption items.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * * For items self-classified
under paragraph (b)(1) of this section
from June 25, 2010 through August 24,
2010, and for requests for classification
under paragraph (b)(3) of this section
submitted from June 25, 2010 through
August 24, 2010, exporters have until
changes the date for the zone to July 23,
2010. During the enforcement periods,
entry into, transit through, mooring, or
anchoring within these zones is
prohibited unless authorized by the
Captain of the Port, Puget Sound or
Designated Representative.
ACTION:
On July 1, 2010, the Coast
Guard published a document in the
Federal Register, providing notice of
enforcement of a 300-yard safety zone in
Dyes Inlet for the Whaling Days event
on July 24, 2010. This correction
SUMMARY:
The Coast
Guard will enforce the safety zone listed
in 33 CFR 165.1332, Safety Zones;
annual firework displays within the
Captain of the Port, Puget Sound Area
of Responsibility. A previous notice of
enforcement, published on July 1, 2010
(75 FR 38021), incorrectly stated that
the zone would be enforced on July 24,
2010. This notice provides corrected
information.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
The following safety zone will be
enforced from 5 p.m. on July 23, 2010
through 1 a.m. on July 24, 2010:
Event Name
Location
Latitude
Longitude
Radius
Whaling Days ......................................
Dyes Inlet ...........................................
47° 38.65′ N
122° 41.35′ W
300
Dated: July 12, 2010.
S.W. Bornemann,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port, Puget Sound.
staging area. This safety zone is
necessary to protect personnel and
vessels at the response staging area at
Shell Beach in Hopedale, LA in
response to the DEEPWATER HORIZON
oil spill. Vessels must travel at a safe
speed and distance to maintain a no
wake zone in this area.
[FR Doc. 2010–18267 Filed 7–23–10; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG–2010–0622]
Safety Zone; DEEPWATER HORIZON
Response Staging Area in the Vicinity
of Shell Beach, Hopedale, LA
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The New Orleans Captain of
the Port (COTP), under the authority of
the Ports and Waterways Safety Act, has
established a safety zone requiring no
wake on the Mississippi River Gulf
Outlet (MRGO) at Mile 42 extending the
entire width of the MRGO 500 yards
above and 500 yards below the response
jdjones on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:25 Jul 26, 2010
Jkt 220001
This rule is effective in the CFR
from July 27, 2010 until 11:59 p.m. on
September 24, 2010. This rule is
effective with actual notice for purposes
of enforcement beginning June 24, 2010
upon signature. This rule will remain in
effect until 11:59 p.m. on September 24,
2010.
DATES:
Documents indicated in this
preamble as being available in the
docket are part of docket USCG–2010–
0622 and are available online by going
to https://www.regulations.gov, inserting
USCG–2010–0622 in the ‘‘Keyword’’
box, and then clicking ‘‘Search.’’ They
are also available for inspection or
copying at the Docket Management
Facility (M–30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground
Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590,
ADDRESSES:
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this temporary
rule, call or e-mail Lieutenant
Commander (LCDR) Marty Daniels,
Sector New Orleans, Coast Guard;
telephone 504–565–5044, e-mail
William.M.Daniels@uscg.mil. If you
have questions on viewing the docket,
call Renee V. Wright, Program Manager,
Docket Operations, telephone 202–366–
9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulatory Information
The Coast Guard is issuing this
temporary final rule without prior
notice and opportunity to comment
pursuant to authority under section 4(a)
of the Administrative Procedure Act
(APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This provision
authorizes an agency to issue a rule
without prior notice and opportunity to
comment when the agency for good
cause finds that those procedures are
‘‘impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary
to the public interest.’’ Under 5 U.S.C.
553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that
good cause exists for not publishing a
E:\FR\FM\27JYR1.SGM
27JYR1
43822
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 143 / Tuesday, July 27, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
with respect to this rule. It would be
impracticable to issue an NPRM for this
rule, because a safety zone is needed
immediately to protect personnel and
vessels associate with response
operations at the staging area at Shell
Beach.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast
Guard finds that good cause exists for
making this rule effective less than 30
days after publication in the Federal
Register. Potential safety hazards
associated with response activities at
this location prohibits regularly issued
safety zones.
Basis and Purpose
This response staging area is in
support of the DEEPWATER HORIZON
oil spill clean-up effort. This safety zone
requires that vessels maintain the
slowest safe speed to maintain steerage.
This rule is needed to protect members
of the response effort by creating a no
wake zone in the vicinity of the staging
area. In addition, the rule is needed to
protect mariners transiting in or through
the area from the dangers associated
with navigating around equipment
deployed in support of the clean-up
efforts.
Discussion of Rule
The Coast Guard is establishing a
safety zone encompassing the coastal
areas affected by the DEEPWATER
HORIZON oil spill on the Mississippi
River Gulf Outlet (MRGO) at Mile 42 at
Shell Beach. The safety zone will
encompass the entire width of the
MRGO, 500 yards above and 500 yards
below the response staging area. In
accordance with the general regulation
in § 165.23 of this part, vessels must
transit at the slowest safe speed to allow
for steerage to comply with the no wake
zone located in (a)(1). Vessels must
exercise caution when transiting this
area to observe the no wake zone. The
Coast Guard will enforce this safety
zone from June 24 through September
24, 2010.
jdjones on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with RULES
Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after
considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on 13 of these statutes or
executive orders.
Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is an emergency regulatory
action under section 6(a)(3)(D) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, and requires
compliance with the ordinary review
procedure to the extent practicable. The
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:25 Jul 26, 2010
Jkt 220001
Office of Management and Budget has
not reviewed it under that Order.
This rule has been deemed an
emergency regulatory action after
consultation with the Eighth Coast
Guard District Legal Office, CG–0941
and CG–0943. Although this regulation
will restrict access to the area, the effect
of the rule will not be significant
because the safety zone will only be in
place for a limited specified time period
and is for a limited size and notice will
be provided to the maritime community
through Safety Broadcast Notice to
Mariners and Marine Safety Information
Bulletins. Additionally, persons or
vessels requiring deviations from this
rule may request permission from the
Captain of the Port New Orleans.
Small Entities
better evaluate its effects on them and
participate in the rulemaking process.
Small businesses may send comments
on the actions of Federal employees
who enforce, or otherwise determine
compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
and the Regional Small Business
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
Ombudsman evaluates these actions
annually and rates each agency’s
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
employees of the Coast Guard, call 1–
888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247). The
Coast Guard will not retaliate against
small entities that question or complain
about this rule or any policy or action
of the Coast Guard.
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered
whether this rule would have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises
small businesses, not-for-profit
organizations that are independently
owned and operated and are not
dominant in their fields, and
governmental jurisdictions with
populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5
U.S.C. 605(b) that this will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
This rule will affect the following
entities, some of which may be small
entities: the owners or operators of
vessels, intending to transit the MRGO
at Mile 42 in the vicinity of the
DEEPWATER HORIZON oil spill
response staging area at Shell Beach and
where oil spill response activities are
taking place. This safety zone will not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities
for the following reasons: the safety
zone will only be in place for a limited
specified time period and is for a
limited size; notice will be provided to
the maritime community through Safety
Broadcast Notice to Mariners and
Marine Safety Information Bulletins;
and persons or vessels requiring
deviations from this rule may request
permission from the Captain of the Port
New Orleans. Finally, we note that
vessels can transit the area, but merely
must do so at reduced speeds.
Collection of Information
Assistance for Small Entities
Civil Justice Reform
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we offer to assist small entities in
understanding the rule so that they can
This rule meets applicable standards
in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to
minimize litigation, eliminate
ambiguity, and reduce burden.
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
This rule calls for no new collection
of information under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–
3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on State or local governments and
would either preempt State law or
impose a substantial direct cost of
compliance on them. We have analyzed
this rule under that Order and have
determined that it does not have
implications for federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this rule
will not result in such an expenditure,
we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not cause a taking of
private property or otherwise have
taking implications under Executive
Order 12630, Governmental Actions and
Interference with Constitutionally
Protected Property Rights.
E:\FR\FM\27JYR1.SGM
27JYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 143 / Tuesday, July 27, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13045, Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not
an economically significant rule and
does not create an environmental risk to
health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
jdjones on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with RULES
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under that order because
it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. The Administrator of the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs
has not designated it as a significant
energy action. Therefore, it does not
require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use
voluntary consensus standards in their
regulatory activities unless the agency
provides Congress, through the Office of
Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:25 Jul 26, 2010
Jkt 220001
43823
Management Directive 023–01 and
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
which guide the Coast Guard in
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have concluded this action is one of a
category of actions which do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. This rule is categorically
excluded, under figure 2–1, paragraph
(34)(g), of the Instruction. This rule
involves the establishment of a safety
zone.
Under figure 2–1, paragraph (34)(g), of
the Instruction, an environmental
analysis checklist and a categorical
exclusion determination are required for
this rule because it concerns a situation
of more than 1 week in duration. An
environmental analysis checklist and a
categorical exclusion determination will
be made available in the docket upon
publication in the Federal Register.
New Orleans. The COTP may be
contacted at telephone (504) 846–5923.
(3) All persons and vessels shall
comply with the instructions of the
Captain of the Port New Orleans and
designated personnel. Designated
personnel include commissioned,
warrant and petty officers of the U.S.
Coast Guard.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
RIN 1625–AA00
Harbors, Marine Safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and record-keeping
requirements, Security Measures,
Waterways.
■ For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
Safety Zone; He’eia Kea Small Boat
Harbor, Kaneohe Bay, Oahu, HI
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for Part 165
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195;
33 CFR 1.05–1(g), 6.06–1, 6.05–6 and 160.5;
Pub. L. 107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department
of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
2. Add § 165.T08–0622 to read as
follows:
■
§ 165.T08–0622 Safety Zone, DEEPWATER
HORIZON Response Staging Area in the
vicinity of Shell Beach, Hopedale, LA.
(a) Location: On the Mississippi River
Gulf Outlet (MRGO) at Mile 42 in the
vicinity of Shell Beach to extend the
entire width of the MRGO 500 yards
above and 500 yards below the response
staging area.
(b) Enforcement Period: This rule will
be enforced from June 24, 2010, until
11:59 p.m. on September 24, 2010.
(c) Regulations:
(1) In accordance with the general
regulation in § 165.23 of this part,
vessels must transit at the slowest safe
speed to allow for steerage to comply
with no wake zone located in (a).
(2) Persons or vessels requiring
deviations from this rule must request
permission from the Captain of the Port
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Dated: June 24, 2010.
E. M. Stanton,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander,
Sector New Orleans.
[FR Doc. 2010–18306 Filed 7–26–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG–2010–0458]
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary Final Rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard is
establishing a temporary safety zone in
He’eia Kea Small Boat Harbor located in
Kaneohe Bay, Oahu, Hawaii. The safety
zone is necessary to protect watercraft
and the general public from hazards
associated with five vessels moored for
approximately 3-weeks off the boat
harbor’s main pier. Vessels desiring to
transit through the zone can request
permission by contacting the Captain of
the Port Honolulu.
DATES: This rule is effective in the CFR
on July 27, 2010 through 7:00 p.m. on
August 13, 2010. This rule is effective
with actual notice for purposes of
enforcement on 5 a.m. on July 16, 2010.
This rule will remain in effect through
7 p.m. on August 13, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Documents indicated in this
preamble as being available in the
docket are part of docket USCG–2010–
0458 and are available online by going
to https://www.regulations.gov/, inserting
USCG–2010–0458 in the ‘‘Keyword’’
box, and then clicking ‘‘Search.’’ They
are also available for inspection or
copying at the Docket Management
Facility (M–30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground
Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590,
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\27JYR1.SGM
27JYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 143 (Tuesday, July 27, 2010)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 43821-43823]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-18306]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG-2010-0622]
Safety Zone; DEEPWATER HORIZON Response Staging Area in the
Vicinity of Shell Beach, Hopedale, LA
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Temporary final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The New Orleans Captain of the Port (COTP), under the
authority of the Ports and Waterways Safety Act, has established a
safety zone requiring no wake on the Mississippi River Gulf Outlet
(MRGO) at Mile 42 extending the entire width of the MRGO 500 yards
above and 500 yards below the response staging area. This safety zone
is necessary to protect personnel and vessels at the response staging
area at Shell Beach in Hopedale, LA in response to the DEEPWATER
HORIZON oil spill. Vessels must travel at a safe speed and distance to
maintain a no wake zone in this area.
DATES: This rule is effective in the CFR from July 27, 2010 until 11:59
p.m. on September 24, 2010. This rule is effective with actual notice
for purposes of enforcement beginning June 24, 2010 upon signature.
This rule will remain in effect until 11:59 p.m. on September 24, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Documents indicated in this preamble as being available in
the docket are part of docket USCG-2010-0622 and are available online
by going to https://www.regulations.gov, inserting USCG-2010-0622 in the
``Keyword'' box, and then clicking ``Search.'' They are also available
for inspection or copying at the Docket Management Facility (M-30),
U.S. Department of Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this
temporary rule, call or e-mail Lieutenant Commander (LCDR) Marty
Daniels, Sector New Orleans, Coast Guard; telephone 504-565-5044, e-
mail William.M.Daniels@uscg.mil. If you have questions on viewing the
docket, call Renee V. Wright, Program Manager, Docket Operations,
telephone 202-366-9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulatory Information
The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary final rule without prior
notice and opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under section
4(a) of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This
provision authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice and
opportunity to comment when the agency for good cause finds that those
procedures are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest.'' Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good
cause exists for not publishing a
[[Page 43822]]
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) with respect to this rule. It
would be impracticable to issue an NPRM for this rule, because a safety
zone is needed immediately to protect personnel and vessels associate
with response operations at the staging area at Shell Beach.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good cause
exists for making this rule effective less than 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register. Potential safety hazards
associated with response activities at this location prohibits
regularly issued safety zones.
Basis and Purpose
This response staging area is in support of the DEEPWATER HORIZON
oil spill clean-up effort. This safety zone requires that vessels
maintain the slowest safe speed to maintain steerage. This rule is
needed to protect members of the response effort by creating a no wake
zone in the vicinity of the staging area. In addition, the rule is
needed to protect mariners transiting in or through the area from the
dangers associated with navigating around equipment deployed in support
of the clean-up efforts.
Discussion of Rule
The Coast Guard is establishing a safety zone encompassing the
coastal areas affected by the DEEPWATER HORIZON oil spill on the
Mississippi River Gulf Outlet (MRGO) at Mile 42 at Shell Beach. The
safety zone will encompass the entire width of the MRGO, 500 yards
above and 500 yards below the response staging area. In accordance with
the general regulation in Sec. 165.23 of this part, vessels must
transit at the slowest safe speed to allow for steerage to comply with
the no wake zone located in (a)(1). Vessels must exercise caution when
transiting this area to observe the no wake zone. The Coast Guard will
enforce this safety zone from June 24 through September 24, 2010.
Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on 13 of these statutes or executive orders.
Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is an emergency regulatory action under section
6(a)(3)(D) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review,
and requires compliance with the ordinary review procedure to the
extent practicable. The Office of Management and Budget has not
reviewed it under that Order.
This rule has been deemed an emergency regulatory action after
consultation with the Eighth Coast Guard District Legal Office, CG-0941
and CG-0943. Although this regulation will restrict access to the area,
the effect of the rule will not be significant because the safety zone
will only be in place for a limited specified time period and is for a
limited size and notice will be provided to the maritime community
through Safety Broadcast Notice to Mariners and Marine Safety
Information Bulletins. Additionally, persons or vessels requiring
deviations from this rule may request permission from the Captain of
the Port New Orleans.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered whether this rule would have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small entities''
comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are
independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields,
and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this will not
have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities. This rule will affect the following entities, some of which
may be small entities: the owners or operators of vessels, intending to
transit the MRGO at Mile 42 in the vicinity of the DEEPWATER HORIZON
oil spill response staging area at Shell Beach and where oil spill
response activities are taking place. This safety zone will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities
for the following reasons: the safety zone will only be in place for a
limited specified time period and is for a limited size; notice will be
provided to the maritime community through Safety Broadcast Notice to
Mariners and Marine Safety Information Bulletins; and persons or
vessels requiring deviations from this rule may request permission from
the Captain of the Port New Orleans. Finally, we note that vessels can
transit the area, but merely must do so at reduced speeds.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we offer to assist small
entities in understanding the rule so that they can better evaluate its
effects on them and participate in the rulemaking process.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this rule under
that Order and have determined that it does not have implications for
federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not cause a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
[[Page 43823]]
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not an economically significant rule and does not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have concluded
this action is one of a category of actions which do not individually
or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment.
This rule is categorically excluded, under figure 2-1, paragraph
(34)(g), of the Instruction. This rule involves the establishment of a
safety zone.
Under figure 2-1, paragraph (34)(g), of the Instruction, an
environmental analysis checklist and a categorical exclusion
determination are required for this rule because it concerns a
situation of more than 1 week in duration. An environmental analysis
checklist and a categorical exclusion determination will be made
available in the docket upon publication in the Federal Register.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine Safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and record-
keeping requirements, Security Measures, Waterways.
0
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for Part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701, 3306,
3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1(g), 6.06-1, 6.05-6 and
160.5; Pub. L. 107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland
Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
0
2. Add Sec. 165.T08-0622 to read as follows:
Sec. 165.T08-0622 Safety Zone, DEEPWATER HORIZON Response Staging
Area in the vicinity of Shell Beach, Hopedale, LA.
(a) Location: On the Mississippi River Gulf Outlet (MRGO) at Mile
42 in the vicinity of Shell Beach to extend the entire width of the
MRGO 500 yards above and 500 yards below the response staging area.
(b) Enforcement Period: This rule will be enforced from June 24,
2010, until 11:59 p.m. on September 24, 2010.
(c) Regulations:
(1) In accordance with the general regulation in Sec. 165.23 of
this part, vessels must transit at the slowest safe speed to allow for
steerage to comply with no wake zone located in (a).
(2) Persons or vessels requiring deviations from this rule must
request permission from the Captain of the Port New Orleans. The COTP
may be contacted at telephone (504) 846-5923.
(3) All persons and vessels shall comply with the instructions of
the Captain of the Port New Orleans and designated personnel.
Designated personnel include commissioned, warrant and petty officers
of the U.S. Coast Guard.
Dated: June 24, 2010.
E. M. Stanton,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, Sector New Orleans.
[FR Doc. 2010-18306 Filed 7-26-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P