Basin Electric Power Cooperative: Deer Creek Station, 43915-43916 [2010-18294]
Download as PDF
43915
Notices
Federal Register
Vol. 75, No. 143
Tuesday, July 27, 2010
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains documents other than rules or
proposed rules that are applicable to the
public. Notices of hearings and investigations,
committee meetings, agency decisions and
rulings, delegations of authority, filing of
petitions and applications and agency
statements of organization and functions are
examples of documents appearing in this
section.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
National Agricultural Statistics Service
Notice of Intent To Request Revision
and Extension of a Currently Approved
Information Collection
National Agricultural Statistics
Service, USDA.
ACTION: Notice and request for
comments.
AGENCY:
In accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, this
notice announces the intention of the
National Agricultural Statistics Service
(NASS) to request revision and
extension of a currently approved
information collection, the Equine
Survey. Revision to burden hours may
be needed due to changes in the size of
the target population, sampling design,
and/or questionnaire length.
DATES: Comments on this notice must be
received by September 27, 2010 to be
assured of consideration.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by docket number 0535–0227,
by any of the following methods:
• E-mail: ombofficer@nass.usda.gov.
Include docket number above in the
subject line of the message.
• Fax: (202) 720–6396.
• Mail: Mail any paper, disk, or CD–
ROM submissions to: David Hancock,
NASS Clearance Officer, U.S.
Department of Agriculture, Room 5336
South Building, 1400 Independence
Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20250–
2024.
• Hand Delivery/Courier: Hand
deliver to: David Hancock, NASS
Clearance Officer, U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Room 5336 South Building,
1400 Independence Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC 20250–2024.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Joseph T. Reilly, Associate
Administrator, National Agricultural
Statistics Service, U.S. Department of
Agriculture, (202) 720–4333.
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:30 Jul 26, 2010
Jkt 220001
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Title: Equine Survey.
OMB Number: 0535–0227.
Expiration Date: 11/30/2010.
Type of Request: To revise and extend
a currently approved information
collection for a period of three years.
Abstract: To improve information
regarding the equine industry, several
State Departments of Agriculture are
expected to contract with the National
Agricultural Statistics Service to
conduct an Equine Survey in their State
within the next 3 years. Equine
activities offer unusually varied
opportunities for rural development. In
addition to providing the livelihood for
breeders, trainers, veterinarians, and
many others, the horse remains
important to recreation. The number of
operations, number of animals, and
economic information will quantify the
importance of the equine industry to
State economies. Income data provides
a view of the benefits that the industry
provides to the State economy and a
ranking of its relative importance within
both the agricultural sector and the
State’s total economic sector. The
expenditure information provides data
regarding the multiplier effect of money
from the equine industry, effects of
wage rates paid to both permanent and
part-time employees, and secondary
businesses supported by the industry.
Authority: These data will be
collected under authority of 7 U.S.C.
2204(a). Individually identifiable data
collected under this authority are
governed by Section 1770 of the Food
Security Act of 1985 as amended, 7
U.S.C. 2276, which requires USDA to
afford strict confidentiality to nonaggregated data provided by
respondents. This Notice is submitted in
accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–13)
and Office of Management and Budget
regulations at 5 CFR part 1320 (60 FR
44978, August 29, 1995). NASS also
complies with OMB Implementation
Guidance, ‘‘Implementation Guidance
for Title V of the E-Government Act,
Confidential Information Protection and
Statistical Efficiency Act of 2002
(CIPSEA),’’ Federal Register, Vol. 72,
No. 115, June 15, 2007, p. 33376.
Estimate of Burden: Public reporting
burden for this collection of information
is estimated to average 30 minutes per
response.
Respondents: Horse owners, breeders,
trainers, boarders.
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Estimated Number of Respondents:
40,000.
Estimated Total Annual Burden on
Respondents: 20,000 hours.
Copies of this information collection
and related instructions can be obtained
without charge from David Hancock,
NASS Clearance Officer, at (202) 690–
2388.
Comments: Comments are invited on:
(a) Whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
agency, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
(b) the accuracy of the agency’s estimate
of the burden of the proposed collection
of information including the validity of
the methodology and assumptions used;
(c) ways to enhance the quality, utility,
and clarity of the information to be
collected; and (d) ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information
on those who are to respond, through
the use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, technological or
other forms of information technology
collection methods.
All responses to this notice will
become a matter of public record and be
summarized in the request for OMB
approval.
Signed at Washington, DC, July 13, 2010.
Joseph T. Reilly,
Associate Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2010–18296 Filed 7–26–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–20–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Rural Utilities Service
Basin Electric Power Cooperative:
Deer Creek Station
Rural Utilities Service, USDA.
Notice of availability of record
of decision.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Rural Utilities Service,
hereinafter referred to as RUS and/or the
Agency, has issued a Record of Decision
(ROD) for the Environmental Impact
Statement (EIS) for the proposed Deer
Creek Station Energy Facility project
(Project) in Brookings and Deuel
Counties, South Dakota. The
Administrator of RUS has signed the
ROD, which is effective upon signing.
The EIS was prepared pursuant to the
National Environmental Policy Act of
1969 (NEPA) (U.S.C. 4231 et seq.) and
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\27JYN1.SGM
27JYN1
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with NOTICES
43916
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 143 / Tuesday, July 27, 2010 / Notices
in accordance with the Council on
Environmental Quality’s (CEQ)
regulations for implementing the
procedural provisions of NEPA (40 CFR
Parts 1500–1508), RUS’s NEPA
implementing regulations (7 CFR Part
1794), and the Western Area Power
Administration’s (Western) NEPA
implementing regulations (10 CFR Part
1021). Western was the lead federal
agency in preparation of the EIS as
defined at 40 CFR 1501.5; RUS was a
cooperating agency. The purpose of the
EIS was to evaluate the potential
environmental impacts of and
alternatives to Basin Electric Power
Cooperative’s (Basin Electric)
application for a RUS loan and a
Western interconnection agreement to
construct the proposed Project. The
proposed Project’s facility would
include a new natural gas-fired
combustion turbine set, a heat recovery
steam generator, and a steam turbine
generator set.
ADDRESSES: To obtain copies of the
ROD, or for further information, contact:
Ms. Lauren McGee, Environmental
Scientist, USDA, Rural Utilities Service,
1400 Independence Avenue, SW., Stop
1571, Room 2239–S, Washington, DC
20250–1571, telephone: (202) 720–1482,
fax: (202) 690–0649, or e-mail:
lauren.mcgee@wdc.usda.gov. A copy of
the ROD can be viewed online at:
https://www.usda.gov/rus/water/ees/
eis.htm.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Basin
Electric’s proposed Project is to
construct, own, operate, and maintain
the Deer Creek Station Energy Facility,
a 300 MW combined-cycle natural gas
generation facility, water pipeline,
transmission line, transmission
interconnection(s), and other associated
facilities in Brookings and Deuel
counties in eastern South Dakota. The
purpose for the proposed Project is to
serve increased load demand for electric
power in the eastern portion of Basin
Electric’s service area. In 2007, Basin
Electric prepared a forecast showing
load and capability surpluses/deficits
through the year 2021. The forecast
predicted that by 2014, there will be a
deficit of 800–900 MW for the eastern
portion of its service area. The proposed
Project’s addition of 300 MW of
generation will help meet Basin
Electric’s future energy requirements.
In accordance with NEPA, the CEQ
regulations for implementing the
procedural provisions of NEPA, and
applicable agency NEPA implementing
regulations, Western and RUS prepared
an EIS to assess the potential
environmental impacts associated with
the proposed Project. The decision
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:30 Jul 26, 2010
Jkt 220001
being documented in RUS’s ROD is that
the Agency agrees to consider, subject to
loan approval, funding the proposed
Project at the White Site 1 location.
More details regarding RUS’s regulatory
authority, rationale for the decision, and
compliance with applicable regulations
are included in the ROD. Because two
distinct federal actions are being
proposed, RUS and Western decided to
issue separate RODs.
On February 6, 2009, Western
published in the Federal Register a
Notice of Intent to prepare an EIS for the
proposed Project. On February 26, 2010,
RUS published its Notice of Availability
(NOA) of the Draft EIS for the proposed
Project in the Federal Register. The U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency
acknowledged receipt of the Draft EIS
on February 5, 2010, from Western. The
45-day comment period ended on
March 22, 2010. Because few comments
were received which did not result in
the substantial modification of the
alternatives or the environmental
analysis in the Draft EIS, Western and
RUS prepared an abbreviated Final EIS
to address the comments received. RUS
published its NOA of the Final EIS for
the proposed Project in the Federal
Register on June 11, 2010. The U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency
acknowledged receipt of the Final EIS
on May 28, 2010, from Western. The 30day waiting period ended on June 28,
2010. One comment was received; it
was addressed in RUS’s ROD.
After considering various ways to
meet these future needs, Basin Electric
identified construction of the proposed
Project as its best course of action. This
EIS considered 16 alternatives to meet
the future energy requirements of the
eastern portion of its service area and
five alternative site locations. These
alternatives were evaluated in terms of
cost-effectiveness, technical feasibility,
and environmental factors (e.g., soils,
topography and geology, water
resources, air quality, biological
resources, the acoustic environment,
recreation, cultural and historic
resources, visual resources,
transportation, farmland, land use,
human health and safety, the
socioeconomic environment,
environmental justice, and cumulative
effects).
The EIS analyzes in detail the No
Action Alternative and the Action
Alternative (construction of the Deer
Creek Station Energy Facility) at two
separate locations: White Site 1
(Brookings County, T111N R48W,
Section 25 NE Quarter) and White Site
2 (Brookings County, T111N R48W,
Section 2 NW Quarter). The No Action
Alternative would expose Basin Electric
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
and its member cooperatives to higher
prices by purchasing power on the
volatile open electric market. The
Action Alternative at White Site 1
would be located approximately 0.5miles from the existing White
Substation, would be further away from
occupied residences, and has more
suitable site conditions than White Site
2. The Action Alternative at White Site
2 would require the construction of a
new substation for interconnection to
the grid, would be closer to occupied
residences, and has site conditions that
are less suitable for the type of
development being proposed. The
resources or environmental factors that
could be affected by the proposed
Project were evaluated in detail in the
EIS. These issues are summarized in
Table ES–1: ‘‘Summary of Potential
Impacts of Deer Creek Station,’’ of the
EIS.
Based on an evaluation of the
information and impact analyses
presented in the EIS, including the
evaluation of all alternatives, and in
consideration of the Agency’s NEPA
implementing regulations,
Environmental Policies and Procedures,
as amended (7 CFR Part 1794), RUS
finds that the evaluation of reasonable
alternatives is consistent with NEPA.
The Agency has selected the Action
Alternative at White Site 1 as its
preferred alternative. Because the
proposed Project may involve action in
floodplains or wetlands, this Notice also
serves as a final notice of action in
floodplains and wetlands (in accordance
to Executive Orders 11988 and 11990).
This Notice concludes RUS’s
compliance with NEPA and the
Agency’s ‘‘Environmental Policies and
Procedures.’’
Dated: July 15, 2010.
Jonathan Adelstein,
Administrator, Rural Utilities Service.
[FR Doc. 2010–18294 Filed 7–26–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
BROADCASTING BOARD OF
GOVERNORS
Sunshine Act Meeting
Friday, July 30, 2010, 12
Noon–1 p.m.
PLACE: Cohen Building, Room 3321, 330
Independence Ave., SW., Washington,
DC 20237.
CLOSED MEETING: The members of the
Broadcasting Board of Governors (BBG)
will meet in closed session to review
and discuss a number of issues relating
to U.S. Government-funded nonmilitary international broadcasting.
DATE AND TIME:
E:\FR\FM\27JYN1.SGM
27JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 143 (Tuesday, July 27, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 43915-43916]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-18294]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Rural Utilities Service
Basin Electric Power Cooperative: Deer Creek Station
AGENCY: Rural Utilities Service, USDA.
ACTION: Notice of availability of record of decision.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Rural Utilities Service, hereinafter referred to as RUS
and/or the Agency, has issued a Record of Decision (ROD) for the
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the proposed Deer Creek
Station Energy Facility project (Project) in Brookings and Deuel
Counties, South Dakota. The Administrator of RUS has signed the ROD,
which is effective upon signing. The EIS was prepared pursuant to the
National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (U.S.C. 4231 et seq.)
and
[[Page 43916]]
in accordance with the Council on Environmental Quality's (CEQ)
regulations for implementing the procedural provisions of NEPA (40 CFR
Parts 1500-1508), RUS's NEPA implementing regulations (7 CFR Part
1794), and the Western Area Power Administration's (Western) NEPA
implementing regulations (10 CFR Part 1021). Western was the lead
federal agency in preparation of the EIS as defined at 40 CFR 1501.5;
RUS was a cooperating agency. The purpose of the EIS was to evaluate
the potential environmental impacts of and alternatives to Basin
Electric Power Cooperative's (Basin Electric) application for a RUS
loan and a Western interconnection agreement to construct the proposed
Project. The proposed Project's facility would include a new natural
gas-fired combustion turbine set, a heat recovery steam generator, and
a steam turbine generator set.
ADDRESSES: To obtain copies of the ROD, or for further information,
contact: Ms. Lauren McGee, Environmental Scientist, USDA, Rural
Utilities Service, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW., Stop 1571, Room 2239-
S, Washington, DC 20250-1571, telephone: (202) 720-1482, fax: (202)
690-0649, or e-mail: lauren.mcgee@wdc.usda.gov. A copy of the ROD can
be viewed online at: https://www.usda.gov/rus/water/ees/eis.htm.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Basin Electric's proposed Project is to
construct, own, operate, and maintain the Deer Creek Station Energy
Facility, a 300 MW combined-cycle natural gas generation facility,
water pipeline, transmission line, transmission interconnection(s), and
other associated facilities in Brookings and Deuel counties in eastern
South Dakota. The purpose for the proposed Project is to serve
increased load demand for electric power in the eastern portion of
Basin Electric's service area. In 2007, Basin Electric prepared a
forecast showing load and capability surpluses/deficits through the
year 2021. The forecast predicted that by 2014, there will be a deficit
of 800-900 MW for the eastern portion of its service area. The proposed
Project's addition of 300 MW of generation will help meet Basin
Electric's future energy requirements.
In accordance with NEPA, the CEQ regulations for implementing the
procedural provisions of NEPA, and applicable agency NEPA implementing
regulations, Western and RUS prepared an EIS to assess the potential
environmental impacts associated with the proposed Project. The
decision being documented in RUS's ROD is that the Agency agrees to
consider, subject to loan approval, funding the proposed Project at the
White Site 1 location. More details regarding RUS's regulatory
authority, rationale for the decision, and compliance with applicable
regulations are included in the ROD. Because two distinct federal
actions are being proposed, RUS and Western decided to issue separate
RODs.
On February 6, 2009, Western published in the Federal Register a
Notice of Intent to prepare an EIS for the proposed Project. On
February 26, 2010, RUS published its Notice of Availability (NOA) of
the Draft EIS for the proposed Project in the Federal Register. The
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency acknowledged receipt of the Draft
EIS on February 5, 2010, from Western. The 45-day comment period ended
on March 22, 2010. Because few comments were received which did not
result in the substantial modification of the alternatives or the
environmental analysis in the Draft EIS, Western and RUS prepared an
abbreviated Final EIS to address the comments received. RUS published
its NOA of the Final EIS for the proposed Project in the Federal
Register on June 11, 2010. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
acknowledged receipt of the Final EIS on May 28, 2010, from Western.
The 30-day waiting period ended on June 28, 2010. One comment was
received; it was addressed in RUS's ROD.
After considering various ways to meet these future needs, Basin
Electric identified construction of the proposed Project as its best
course of action. This EIS considered 16 alternatives to meet the
future energy requirements of the eastern portion of its service area
and five alternative site locations. These alternatives were evaluated
in terms of cost-effectiveness, technical feasibility, and
environmental factors (e.g., soils, topography and geology, water
resources, air quality, biological resources, the acoustic environment,
recreation, cultural and historic resources, visual resources,
transportation, farmland, land use, human health and safety, the
socioeconomic environment, environmental justice, and cumulative
effects).
The EIS analyzes in detail the No Action Alternative and the Action
Alternative (construction of the Deer Creek Station Energy Facility) at
two separate locations: White Site 1 (Brookings County, T111N R48W,
Section 25 NE Quarter) and White Site 2 (Brookings County, T111N R48W,
Section 2 NW Quarter). The No Action Alternative would expose Basin
Electric and its member cooperatives to higher prices by purchasing
power on the volatile open electric market. The Action Alternative at
White Site 1 would be located approximately 0.5-miles from the existing
White Substation, would be further away from occupied residences, and
has more suitable site conditions than White Site 2. The Action
Alternative at White Site 2 would require the construction of a new
substation for interconnection to the grid, would be closer to occupied
residences, and has site conditions that are less suitable for the type
of development being proposed. The resources or environmental factors
that could be affected by the proposed Project were evaluated in detail
in the EIS. These issues are summarized in Table ES-1: ``Summary of
Potential Impacts of Deer Creek Station,'' of the EIS.
Based on an evaluation of the information and impact analyses
presented in the EIS, including the evaluation of all alternatives, and
in consideration of the Agency's NEPA implementing regulations,
Environmental Policies and Procedures, as amended (7 CFR Part 1794),
RUS finds that the evaluation of reasonable alternatives is consistent
with NEPA. The Agency has selected the Action Alternative at White Site
1 as its preferred alternative. Because the proposed Project may
involve action in floodplains or wetlands, this Notice also serves as a
final notice of action in floodplains and wetlands (in accordance to
Executive Orders 11988 and 11990). This Notice concludes RUS's
compliance with NEPA and the Agency's ``Environmental Policies and
Procedures.''
Dated: July 15, 2010.
Jonathan Adelstein,
Administrator, Rural Utilities Service.
[FR Doc. 2010-18294 Filed 7-26-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P