FM TABLE OF ALLOTMENTS, GRANTS PASS, OREGON, 43897-43898 [2010-18265]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 143 / Tuesday, July 27, 2010 / Proposed Rules 1980. Because the proposed SIP revision will result in equivalent or greater emission reductions, the proposed SIP revision is consistent with the requirements of section 193 of the CAA. jdjones on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with PROPOSALS-1 IV. What action is EPA proposing to take? EPA is proposing to approve revisions to the New York SIP 6 NYCRR Part 200, 6 NYCRR Part 201 and 6 NYCRR Part 231 which became effective under NYS law on March 5, 2009, and was submitted by the State of New York to EPA on March 3, 2009. Specifically, EPA is proposing to approve subparts 200.1, 200.6, 200.7, and 220.9, as effective March 5, 2009, and subpart 201–2, as effective March 5, 2009, with the caveat that EPA is taking no action on the specific items identified in Section I of this proposal related to the Tailoring Rule thresholds. EPA will take action on these additional items after receiving New York’s letter, expected shortly. V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the CAA and applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA’s role is to approve State choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act. Accordingly, this action merely approves State law as meeting Federal requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by State law. For that reason, this action: • Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993); • Does not impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); • Is certified as not having a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.); • Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4); • Does not have Federalism implications as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999); • Is not an economically significant regulatory action based on health or VerDate Mar<15>2010 15:29 Jul 26, 2010 Jkt 220001 safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); • Is not a significant regulatory action subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001); • Is not subject to requirements of section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act; and • Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). In addition, this rule does not have Tribal implications as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000), because the SIP is not approved to apply in Indian country located in the State, and EPA notes that it will not impose substantial direct costs on Tribal governments or preempt Tribal law. List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide, Intergovernmental relations, Lead, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile organic compounds. Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. Dated: July 16, 2010. Judith A. Enck, Regional Administrator, Region 2. [FR Doc. 2010–18365 Filed 7–26–10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560–50–P FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION 47 CFR Part 73 [DA 10–1061; MB Docket No. 10–117; RM– 11601] FM TABLE OF ALLOTMENTS, GRANTS PASS, OREGON Federal Communications Commission ACTION: Proposed rule. AGENCY: This document sets forth a proposal to amend the FM Table of Allotments. The Commission requests comment on a petition filed by Three Rivers Broadcasting, LLC proposing the allotment of FM Channel 257A as the second commercial allotment at Grants Pass, Oregon. The channel can be allotted at Grants Pass in compliance SUMMARY: PO 00000 Frm 00033 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 43897 with the Commission’s minimum distance separation requirements with a site restriction of 8.7 km (5.4 miles) west of Grants Pass, at 42–25–25 North Latitude and 123–26–25 West Longitude. See Supplementary Information infra. The deadline for filing comments is August 26, 2010. Reply comments must be filed on or before September 10, 2010. DATES: Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street, SW, Washington, DC 20554. In addition to filing comments with the FCC interested parties should serve the petitioner, as follows: Casey McIntosh, Three Rivers Broadcasting, LLC, 2970 Ravenwood Drive, Grants Pass, Oregon 97527 ADDRESSES: FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Deborah A. Dupont, Media Bureau, (202) 418–2180. This is a synopsis of the Commission’s Notice of Proposed Rule Making, MB Docket No. 10–117, adopted June 10, 2010, and released June 14, 2010. The full text of this Commission decision is available for inspection and copying during normal business hours in the FCC Reference Information Center (Room CY–A257), 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. The complete text of this decision may also be purchased from the Commission’s copy contractor, Best Copy and Printing, Inc., 445 12th Street, SW, Room CY–B402, Washington, DC 20554, 800–378–3160 or via the company’s website, https:// www.bcpiweb.com. This document does not contain proposed information collection requirements subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104– 13. In addition, therefore, it does not contain any proposed information collection burden ‘‘for small business concerns with fewer than 25 employees,’’ pursuant to the Small Business Paperwork Relief Act of 2002, Public Law 107–198, see 44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(4). Provisions of the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 does not apply to this proceeding. Members of the public should note that from the time a Notice of Proposed Rule Making is issued until the matter is no longer subject to Commission consideration or court review, all ex parte contacts are prohibited in Commission proceedings, such as this one, which involve channel allotments. See 47 CFR 1.1204(b) for rules governing permissible ex parte contacts. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: E:\FR\FM\27JYP1.SGM 27JYP1 43898 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 143 / Tuesday, July 27, 2010 / Proposed Rules For information regarding proper filing procedures for comments, see 47 CFR 1.415 and 1.420. List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73 Radio, Radio broadcasting. For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Federal Communications Commission proposes to amend 47 CFR part 73 as follows: PART 73—RADIO BROADCAST SERVICES 1. The authority citation for Part 73 continues to read as follows: Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154, 303, 334, 336. § 73.202 [Amended] 2. Section 73.202(b), the Table of FM Allotments under Oregon, is amended by adding Grants Pass, Channel 257A. Federal Communications Commission. John A. Karousos, Assistant Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau. [FR Doc. 2010–18265 Filed 7–27–10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6712–01–S DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration 49 CFR Parts 105, 107, and 171 [Docket No. PHMSA–2009–0410 (HM–233B)] RIN 2137–AE57 Hazardous Materials Transportation: Revisions of Special Permits Procedures Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA), DOT. ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM). AGENCY: PHMSA is proposing to revise its procedures for applying for a special permit to require an applicant to provide sufficient information about its operations to enable the agency to evaluate the applicant’s fitness and the safety impact of operations that would be authorized in the special permit. In addition, PHMSA is providing an online application option. DATES: Submit comments by August 26, 2010. ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by the docket number (PHMSA–2009–0410) by any of the following methods: jdjones on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with PROPOSALS-1 SUMMARY: VerDate Mar<15>2010 18:21 Jul 26, 2010 Jkt 220001 • Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. • Fax: 1–202–493–2251. • Mail: Docket Operations, U.S. Department of Transportation, West Building, Ground Floor, Room W12– 140, Routing Symbol M–30, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590. • Hand Delivery: To Docket Operations, Room W12–140 on the ground floor of the West Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. Instructions: All submissions must include the agency name and docket number for this notice at the beginning of the comment. All comments received will be posted without change to the Federal Docket Management System (FDMS), including any personal information. • Docket: For access to the dockets to read background documents or comments received, go to https:// www.regulations.gov or DOT’s Docket Operations Office (see ADDRESSES). • Privacy Act: Anyone is able to search the electronic form of any written communications and comments received into any of our dockets by the name of the individual submitting the document (or signing the document, if submitted on behalf of an association, business, labor union, etc.). You may review DOT’s complete Privacy Act Statement in the Federal Register published on April 11, 2000 (Volume 65, Number 70; Pages 19477–78). FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Steven Andrews or Mr. T. Glenn Foster, Office of Hazardous Materials Standards, PHMSA, at (202) 366–8553 or Mr. Don Burger, Office of Hazardous Materials Special Permits and Approvals, PHMSA, at (202) 366–4511. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. Background The Federal hazardous material transportation law (Federal hazmat law), 49 U.S.C. 5101 et seq., directs the Secretary of Transportation to prescribe regulations for the safe transportation of hazardous material in commerce. (49 U.S.C. 5103) Federal hazmat law authorizes the Secretary to issue variances—termed special permits— from the Hazardous Materials Regulations (HMR; 49 CFR parts 171– 180) only if a special permit provides for a safety level at least equal to the safety level required under Federal hazmat law/regulations or consistent PO 00000 Frm 00034 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 with the public interest and Federal hazmat law, if a required safety level does not exist. Section 5117(a) authorizes the Secretary of Transportation to issue a special permit from a regulation prescribed in §§ 5103(b), 5104, 5110, or 5112 of the Federal Hazardous Materials Transportation Law to a person transporting, or causing to be transported, hazardous material in a way that achieves a safety level at least equal to the safety level required under the law, or consistent with the public interest, if a required safety level does not exist. The Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA) is the administration within the Department of Transportation (DOT) primarily responsible for implementing the Federal hazmat law and issuing special permits. The HMR generally are performanceoriented regulations that provide the regulated community with a certain amount of flexibility in meeting safety requirements. Even so, not every transportation situation can be anticipated and built into the regulations. Innovation is a strength of our economy and the hazardous materials community is particularly strong at developing new materials and technologies and innovative ways of moving materials. Special permits enable the hazardous materials industry to quickly, effectively, and safely integrate new products and technologies into the production and transportation stream. Thus, special permits provide a mechanism for testing new technologies, promoting increased transportation efficiency and productivity, and ensuring global competitiveness. A special permit must achieve at least an equivalent level of safety to that specified in the HMR, or be consistent with the public interest and Federal hazmat law, if a required safety level does not exist. Implementation of new technologies and operational techniques can enhance safety because the authorized operations or activities often provide a greater level of safety than required under the regulations. And each applicant granted a special permit undergoes a safety fitness evaluation further assuring the safety of transportation under the special permit. Special permits also reduce the volume and complexity of the HMR by addressing unique or infrequent transportation situations that would be difficult to accommodate in regulations intended for use by a wide range of shippers and carriers. The procedures governing the application, issuance, modification, and termination of special permits are found E:\FR\FM\27JYP1.SGM 27JYP1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 143 (Tuesday, July 27, 2010)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 43897-43898]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-18265]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 73

[DA 10-1061; MB Docket No. 10-117; RM-11601]


FM TABLE OF ALLOTMENTS, GRANTS PASS, OREGON

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document sets forth a proposal to amend the FM Table of 
Allotments. The Commission requests comment on a petition filed by 
Three Rivers Broadcasting, LLC proposing the allotment of FM Channel 
257A as the second commercial allotment at Grants Pass, Oregon. The 
channel can be allotted at Grants Pass in compliance with the 
Commission's minimum distance separation requirements with a site 
restriction of 8.7 km (5.4 miles) west of Grants Pass, at 42-25-25 
North Latitude and 123-26-25 West Longitude. See Supplementary 
Information infra.

DATES: The deadline for filing comments is August 26, 2010. Reply 
comments must be filed on or before September 10, 2010.

ADDRESSES: Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street, SW, 
Washington, DC 20554. In addition to filing comments with the FCC 
interested parties should serve the petitioner, as follows: Casey 
McIntosh, Three Rivers Broadcasting, LLC, 2970 Ravenwood Drive, Grants 
Pass, Oregon 97527

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Deborah A. Dupont, Media Bureau, (202) 
418-2180.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a synopsis of the Commission's 
Notice of Proposed Rule Making, MB Docket No. 10-117, adopted June 10, 
2010, and released June 14, 2010. The full text of this Commission 
decision is available for inspection and copying during normal business 
hours in the FCC Reference Information Center (Room CY-A257), 445 12th 
Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554.
    The complete text of this decision may also be purchased from the 
Commission's copy contractor, Best Copy and Printing, Inc., 445 12th 
Street, SW, Room CY-B402, Washington, DC 20554, 800-378-3160 or via the 
company's website, https://www.bcpiweb.com.
    This document does not contain proposed information collection 
requirements subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 
104-13. In addition, therefore, it does not contain any proposed 
information collection burden ``for small business concerns with fewer 
than 25 employees,'' pursuant to the Small Business Paperwork Relief 
Act of 2002, Public Law 107-198, see 44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(4).
    Provisions of the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 does not apply 
to this proceeding.
    Members of the public should note that from the time a Notice of 
Proposed Rule Making is issued until the matter is no longer subject to 
Commission consideration or court review, all ex parte contacts are 
prohibited in Commission proceedings, such as this one, which involve 
channel allotments. See 47 CFR 1.1204(b) for rules governing 
permissible ex parte contacts.

[[Page 43898]]

    For information regarding proper filing procedures for comments, 
see 47 CFR 1.415 and 1.420.

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73

    Radio, Radio broadcasting.
    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Federal 
Communications Commission proposes to amend 47 CFR part 73 as follows:

PART 73--RADIO BROADCAST SERVICES

    1. The authority citation for Part 73 continues to read as follows:
    Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154, 303, 334, 336.



Sec.  73.202  [lsqb]Amended[rsqb]

    2. Section 73.202(b), the Table of FM Allotments under Oregon, is 
amended by adding Grants Pass, Channel 257A.


Federal Communications Commission.
John A. Karousos,
Assistant Chief,
Audio Division,
Media Bureau.

[FR Doc. 2010-18265 Filed 7-27-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-S
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.