Airworthiness Directives; Eurocopter France (ECF) Model EC225LP Helicopters, 43801-43803 [2010-17757]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 143 / Tuesday, July 27, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2010–0721; Directorate
Identifier 2009–SW–56–AD; Amendment 39–
16370; AD 2010–15–04]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Eurocopter
France (ECF) Model EC225LP
Helicopters
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule; request for
comments.
AGENCY:
We are adopting a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for the
specified ECF Model EC225LP
helicopters. This AD results from a
mandatory continuing airworthiness
information (MCAI) AD issued by the
aviation authority of the European
Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), which
is the Technical Agent for the Member
States of the European Community. The
MCAI AD states there have been a ‘‘few’’
reports of cracks and failure of the main
rotor hub (MRH) cone restrainer support
lugs at their attachment points on the
reinforcement ring where the dome
fairing is secured. Also, cracks on the
dome fairing support have been
reported. Failure of the cone restrainer
support or the dome fairing support
attachment lugs may lead to loss of the
dome fairing, damage to the rotor
blades, and subsequent loss of control of
the helicopter.
DATES: This AD becomes effective on
August 11, 2010.
The incorporation by reference of
certain publications listed in the
regulations is approved by the Director
of the Federal Register as of August 11,
2010.
We must receive comments on this
AD by September 27, 2010.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by
any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting your
comments electronically.
• Fax: (202) 493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations,
M–30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations,
M–30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
jdjones on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:25 Jul 26, 2010
Jkt 220001
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590,
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
You may get the service information
identified in this AD from American
Eurocopter Corporation, 2701 Forum
Drive, Grand Prairie, TX 75053–4005,
telephone (800) 232–0323, fax (972)
641–3710, or at https://
www.eurocopter.com.
Examining the Docket: You may
examine the AD docket on the Internet
at https://www.regulations.gov or in
person at the Docket Operations office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
The AD docket contains this AD, the
economic evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The
street address for the Docket Operations
office (telephone (800) 647–5527) is
stated in the ADDRESSES section of this
AD. Comments will be available in the
AD docket shortly after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
DOT/FAA Southwest Region, Gary
Roach, ASW–111, Aviation Safety
Engineer, Rotorcraft Directorate,
Regulations and Guidance Group, 2601
Meacham Blvd., Fort Worth, Texas
76137, telephone (817) 222–5130, fax
(817) 222–5961.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
EASA, which is the Technical Agent
for the Member States of the European
Community, has issued EASA AD 2009–
0024, dated February 20, 2009, to
correct an unsafe condition for the
Eurocopter Model EC225LP helicopters.
The MCAI AD states there have been
a ‘‘few’’ reports of cracks and failure of
the MRH cone restrainer support lugs in
the area of their attachment points on
the reinforcement ring where the dome
fairing is secured. Also, cracks on the
dome fairing support have been
reported. Failure of the cone restrainer
support or the dome fairing support
attachment lugs may lead to loss of the
dome fairing, damage to the rotor
blades, and subsequent loss of control of
the helicopter or injury to persons on
the ground.
You may obtain further information
by examining the MCAI AD and any
related service information in the AD
docket.
Related Service Information
Eurocopter has issued one Emergency
Alert Service Bulletin (EASB) No.
05A003, Revision 2, dated February 3,
2009 (EASB No. 05A003) for two
different helicopters: the Model
EC225LP and the military Model
EC725AP, a non-FAA type certificated
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
43801
helicopter. Eurocopter has also issued
EASB No. 62–007, dated July 10, 2009
(SB 62–007), which corresponds to
MOD 0743718. EASB 05A003 specifies
checking the MRH in the area of the
cone restrainer support attachment lugs
and the dome fairing support
attachment lugs for a crack. If a crack is
found in one of the five lugs of the cone
restrainer support or the dome fairing
support, the EASB specifies complying
with SB 62–007 before further flight. SB
62–007 specifies modifying the MRH by
replacing the cone restrainer support
and the dome fairing support,
reidentifying those parts and balancing
the main rotor blades if they were
removed. The actions described in the
MCAI AD are intended to correct the
unsafe condition identified in the
service information.
FAA’s Evaluation and Unsafe Condition
Determination
This helicopter has been approved by
the aviation authority of France and is
approved for operation in the United
States. Pursuant to our bilateral
agreement with France, EASA, their
Technical Agent, has notified us of the
unsafe condition described in the MCAI
AD. We are issuing this AD because we
evaluated all information provided by
EASA and determined the unsafe
condition exists and is likely to exist or
develop on other helicopters of this
same type design.
Differences Between This AD and the
MCAI AD
We do not specify dates because the
dates have already passed nor do we
specify the compliance time in days but
rather only in hours time-in-service
(TIS). We also use a different
compliance time. Also, we use inspect
rather than check when referring to an
action required by a mechanic as
opposed to a pilot.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this AD will affect
about 4 helicopters of U.S. registry. We
also estimate that it will take about 30
work-hours per helicopter to inspect
and modify the MRH. The average labor
rate is $85 per work-hour. Required
parts will cost about $18,981 per
helicopter. Based on these figures, we
estimate the cost of this AD on U.S.
operators will be $86,124, assuming a
crack is found in each MRH cone
restrainer support or dome fairing
support attachment lugs.
FAA’s Determination of the Effective
Date
An unsafe condition exists that
requires the immediate adoption of this
E:\FR\FM\27JYR1.SGM
27JYR1
43802
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 143 / Tuesday, July 27, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
AD. We find that the risk to the flying
public justifies waiving notice and
comment prior to adoption of this rule
because of the short compliance time of
15 hours TIS to conduct the inspection
for a crack in the attachment lugs.
Failure of these lugs could result in loss
of control of the helicopter. Therefore,
we have determined that notice and
opportunity for public comment before
issuing this AD are impracticable and
that good cause exists for making this
amendment effective in fewer than 30
days.
Comments Invited
This AD is a final rule that involves
requirements affecting flight safety, and
we did not precede it by notice and
opportunity for public comment.
However, we invite you to send us any
written data, views, or arguments
concerning this AD. Send your
comments to an address listed under the
ADDRESSES section of this AD. Include
‘‘Docket No. FAA–2010–0721;
Directorate Identifier 2009–SW–56–AD’’
at the beginning of your comments. We
specifically invite comments on the
overall regulatory, economic,
environmental, and energy aspects of
this AD. We will consider all comments
received by the closing date and may
amend this AD because of those
comments.
We will post all comments we
receive, without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov including any
personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact we receive
about this AD.
jdjones on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with RULES
Authority for This Rulemaking
15:25 Jul 26, 2010
Jkt 220001
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as
follows:
■
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
the following new Airworthiness
Directive (AD):
■
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. ‘‘Subtitle VII:
Aviation Programs,’’ describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in ‘‘Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701:
General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
product(s) identified in this rulemaking
action.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this AD will not
have federalism implications under
Executive Order 13132. This AD will
not have a substantial direct effect on
the States, on the relationship between
the national government and the States,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
Therefore, I certify this AD:
1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866;
2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
We prepared an economic evaluation
of the estimated costs to comply with
this AD and placed it in the AD docket.
2010–15–04 EUROCOPTER FRANCE:
Amendment 39–16370. Docket No.
FAA–2010–0721; Directorate Identifier
2009–SW–57–AD.
Effective Date
(a) This AD becomes effective on August
11, 2010.
Other Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to Model EC225LP
helicopters, except those that have been
modified with MOD 0743718, certificated in
any category.
Reason
(d) The mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI) AD states
there have been a ‘‘few’’ reports of cracks and
failure of the main rotor hub (MRH) cone
restrainer support lugs at their attachment
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
points on the reinforcement ring where the
dome fairing is secured. Also, cracks on the
dome fairing support have been reported.
Failure of the cone restrainer support or the
dome fairing support attachment lugs may
lead to loss of the dome fairing, damage to
the rotor blades, and subsequent loss of
control of the helicopter.
Actions and Compliance
(e) Required as indicated:
(1) Within 15 hours time-in-service (TIS),
unless already done, and thereafter at
intervals not to exceed 15 hours TIS, visually
inspect for a crack in the area of the
attachment points on the MRH reinforcement
ring of the lugs securing the cone restrainer
support and also of the lugs securing the
dome fairing support as depicted in Figures
1 and 2 of Eurocopter Emergency Alert
Service Bulletin No. 05A003, Revision 2,
dated February 3, 2009 (EASB No. 05A003)
and by following the Accomplishment
Instructions, paragraph 2.B.1, of EASB No.
05A003.
Note: The one EASB No. 05A003 applies
to two different model helicopters:
Eurocopter Model EC225LP helicopters that
are type-certificated in the United States and
Eurocopter Model EC725AP military
helicopters that are not type-certificated in
the United States.
(2) If a crack is found in the area of any
of the lugs of the cone restrainer support or
the dome fairing support, as depicted in
Figures 1 and 2 of EASB No. 05A003, before
further flight, modify the MRH by replacing
both the cone restrainer support and the
dome fairing support assembly by following
the Accomplishment Instructions, paragraphs
2.B.1. and 2.B.2., reidentify the cone
restrainer support and dome fairing assembly
by following paragraph 2.D., and if removed,
track and balance the main rotor blades by
following paragraph 3.B.3. of Eurocopter
Service Bulletin No. 62–007, Revision 1,
dated July 10, 2009.
(f) Replacing and reidentifying both the
cone restrainer support and the dome fairing
support assembly in accordance with
paragraph (e)(2) of this AD constitutes
terminating action for the requirements of
this AD.
Differences Between this AD and the MCAI
AD
(g) We do not specify dates because the
dates are already passed nor do we specify
the time in days but rather only in hours TIS.
We also use a different initial compliance
time. Also, we use inspect rather than check
when referring to an action required by a
mechanic as opposed to a pilot.
Other Information
(h) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs): The Manager, Safety Management
Group, ATTN: DOT/FAA Southwest Region,
Gary Roach, ASW–111, Aviation Safety
Engineer, Rotorcraft Directorate, Regulations
and Guidance Group, 2601 Meacham Blvd.,
Fort Worth, Texas 76137, telephone (817)
222–5130, fax (817) 222–5961, has the
authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if
requested, using the procedures found in 14
CFR 39.19.
E:\FR\FM\27JYR1.SGM
27JYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 143 / Tuesday, July 27, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
(i) A special flight permit may be issued to
ferry the helicopter to a location where the
modification can be done, provided the dome
fairing and its attachment screws are
removed. When allowing flight with the
dome fairing removed, the special flight
permit must contain information that alerts
the flight crew that when flying without the
dome fairing, the lateral vibrations of the
helicopter significantly increase at speeds of
70 to 120 knots. These lateral vibrations do
not affect flight safety.
Related Information
(j) European Aviation Safety Agency
(EASA) Airworthiness Directive No. 2009–
0024, dated February 20, 2009, contains
related information.
Joint Aircraft System/Component (JASC)
Code
Material Incorporated by Reference
(l) You must use the specified portions of
Eurocopter Emergency Alert Service Bulletin
No. 05A003, Revision 2, dated February 3,
2009, and Eurocopter Service Bulletin No.
62–007, Revision 1, dated July 10, 2009, to
do the actions required.
(1) The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference of
this service information under 5 U.S.C.
552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
(2) For service information identified in
this AD, contact American Eurocopter
Corporation, 2701 Forum Drive, Grand
Prairie, TX 75053–4005, telephone (800)
232–0323, fax (972) 641–3710, or at https://
www.eurocopter.com.
(3) You may review copies at the FAA,
Office of the Regional Counsel, Southwest
Region, 2601 Meacham Blvd., Fort Worth,
Texas, 76137; or at the National Archives and
Records Administration (NARA). For
information on the availability of this
material at NARA, call (202) 741–6030, or go
to: https://www.archives.gov/federal-register/
cfr/ibr-locations.html.
[FR Doc. 2010–17757 Filed 7–26–10; 8:45 am]
jdjones on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with RULES
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:25 Jul 26, 2010
Jkt 220001
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2010–0173; Directorate
Identifier 2009–NM–076–AD; Amendment
39–16374; AD 2010–15–08]
RIN 2120–AA64
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The FAA is superseding an
existing airworthiness directive (AD),
which applies to all Model 737–100,
–200, –200C, –300, –400, and –500
series airplanes. That AD currently
requires repetitive inspections to find
cracks, fractures, or corrosion of each
carriage spindle of the left and right
outboard mid-flaps, and corrective
action if necessary. That AD also
currently requires repetitive gap checks
of the inboard and outboard carriage of
the outboard mid-flaps to detect
fractured carriage spindles, and
corrective actions if necessary. This new
AD requires any new or serviceable
carriage spindle installed per the
requirements of the existing AD to meet
minimum allowable diameter
measurements taken at three locations.
This AD also requires new repetitive
inspections, measurements, and
overhaul of the carriage spindles, and
applicable corrective actions. In
addition, this AD requires replacing any
carriage spindle when it has reached its
maximum life limit. This AD results
from reports of fractures that resulted
from stress corrosion and pitting along
the length of the spindle and spindle
diameter, and additional reports of
corrosion on the outboard flap carriage
spindles. We are issuing this AD to
detect and correct cracked, corroded, or
fractured carriage spindles, and to
prevent severe flap asymmetry, which
could result in reduced control or loss
of controllability of the airplane.
DATES: This AD becomes effective
August 31, 2010.
The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
of certain publications listed in the AD
as of August 31, 2010.
On December 4, 2003 (68 FR 67027,
December 1, 2003), the Director of the
Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference of a certain
other publication listed in the AD.
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4700
For service information
identified in this AD, contact Boeing
Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data
& Services Management, P. O. Box 3707,
MC 2H–65, Seattle, Washington 98124–
2207; telephone 206–544–5000,
extension 1; fax 206–766–5680; e-mail
me.boecom@boeing.com; Internet
https://www.myboeingfleet.com.
ADDRESSES:
Examining the AD Docket
Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing
Company Model 737–100, –200, –200C,
–300, –400, and –500 Series Airplanes
SUMMARY:
(k) The JASC Code is 6220: Main Rotor
Head.
Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on July 13,
2010.
Mark R. Schilling,
Acting Manager, Rotorcraft Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
43803
Sfmt 4700
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the
Docket Management Facility between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD
docket contains this AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and
other information. The address for the
Docket Office (telephone 800–647–5527)
is the Document Management Facility,
U.S. Department of Transportation,
Docket Operations, M–30, West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Nancy Marsh, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe Branch, ANM–120S, FAA,
Seattle Aircraft Certification Office,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington 98057–3356; telephone
(425) 917–6440; fax (425) 917–6590.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
The FAA issued a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to include an AD that
supersedes AD 2003–24–08,
Amendment 39–13377 (68 FR 67027,
December 1, 2003). The existing AD
applies to all Model 737–100, –200,
–200C, –300, –400, and –500 series
airplanes. That NPRM was published in
the Federal Register on March 1, 2010
(75 FR 9137). That NPRM proposed to
continue to require repetitive gap
checks of the inboard and outboard
carriage of the outboard mid-flaps to
detect fractured carriage spindles, and
corrective actions if necessary, and
continue to require repetitive
inspections to find cracks, factures, or
corrosion of each carriage spindle of the
left and right outboard mid-flaps. That
NPRM also proposed to require any new
or serviceable carriage spindle installed
per the requirements of the existing AD
to meet minimum allowable diameter
measurements taken at three locations.
That NPRM proposed to require new
repetitive inspections, measurements,
and overhaul of the carriage spindles,
and applicable corrective actions. In
addition, that NPRM also proposed to
require replacing any carriage spindle
E:\FR\FM\27JYR1.SGM
27JYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 143 (Tuesday, July 27, 2010)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 43801-43803]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-17757]
[[Page 43801]]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2010-0721; Directorate Identifier 2009-SW-56-AD;
Amendment 39-16370; AD 2010-15-04]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Eurocopter France (ECF) Model EC225LP
Helicopters
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the
specified ECF Model EC225LP helicopters. This AD results from a
mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) AD issued by the
aviation authority of the European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), which
is the Technical Agent for the Member States of the European Community.
The MCAI AD states there have been a ``few'' reports of cracks and
failure of the main rotor hub (MRH) cone restrainer support lugs at
their attachment points on the reinforcement ring where the dome
fairing is secured. Also, cracks on the dome fairing support have been
reported. Failure of the cone restrainer support or the dome fairing
support attachment lugs may lead to loss of the dome fairing, damage to
the rotor blades, and subsequent loss of control of the helicopter.
DATES: This AD becomes effective on August 11, 2010.
The incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in
the regulations is approved by the Director of the Federal Register as
of August 11, 2010.
We must receive comments on this AD by September 27, 2010.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting your
comments electronically.
Fax: (202) 493-2251.
Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
You may get the service information identified in this AD from
American Eurocopter Corporation, 2701 Forum Drive, Grand Prairie, TX
75053-4005, telephone (800) 232-0323, fax (972) 641-3710, or at https://www.eurocopter.com.
Examining the Docket: You may examine the AD docket on the Internet
at https://www.regulations.gov or in person at the Docket Operations
office between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this AD, the economic evaluation, any
comments received, and other information. The street address for the
Docket Operations office (telephone (800) 647-5527) is stated in the
ADDRESSES section of this AD. Comments will be available in the AD
docket shortly after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: DOT/FAA Southwest Region, Gary Roach,
ASW-111, Aviation Safety Engineer, Rotorcraft Directorate, Regulations
and Guidance Group, 2601 Meacham Blvd., Fort Worth, Texas 76137,
telephone (817) 222-5130, fax (817) 222-5961.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
EASA, which is the Technical Agent for the Member States of the
European Community, has issued EASA AD 2009-0024, dated February 20,
2009, to correct an unsafe condition for the Eurocopter Model EC225LP
helicopters.
The MCAI AD states there have been a ``few'' reports of cracks and
failure of the MRH cone restrainer support lugs in the area of their
attachment points on the reinforcement ring where the dome fairing is
secured. Also, cracks on the dome fairing support have been reported.
Failure of the cone restrainer support or the dome fairing support
attachment lugs may lead to loss of the dome fairing, damage to the
rotor blades, and subsequent loss of control of the helicopter or
injury to persons on the ground.
You may obtain further information by examining the MCAI AD and any
related service information in the AD docket.
Related Service Information
Eurocopter has issued one Emergency Alert Service Bulletin (EASB)
No. 05A003, Revision 2, dated February 3, 2009 (EASB No. 05A003) for
two different helicopters: the Model EC225LP and the military Model
EC725AP, a non-FAA type certificated helicopter. Eurocopter has also
issued EASB No. 62-007, dated July 10, 2009 (SB 62-007), which
corresponds to MOD 0743718. EASB 05A003 specifies checking the MRH in
the area of the cone restrainer support attachment lugs and the dome
fairing support attachment lugs for a crack. If a crack is found in one
of the five lugs of the cone restrainer support or the dome fairing
support, the EASB specifies complying with SB 62-007 before further
flight. SB 62-007 specifies modifying the MRH by replacing the cone
restrainer support and the dome fairing support, reidentifying those
parts and balancing the main rotor blades if they were removed. The
actions described in the MCAI AD are intended to correct the unsafe
condition identified in the service information.
FAA's Evaluation and Unsafe Condition Determination
This helicopter has been approved by the aviation authority of
France and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant to
our bilateral agreement with France, EASA, their Technical Agent, has
notified us of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI AD. We are
issuing this AD because we evaluated all information provided by EASA
and determined the unsafe condition exists and is likely to exist or
develop on other helicopters of this same type design.
Differences Between This AD and the MCAI AD
We do not specify dates because the dates have already passed nor
do we specify the compliance time in days but rather only in hours
time-in-service (TIS). We also use a different compliance time. Also,
we use inspect rather than check when referring to an action required
by a mechanic as opposed to a pilot.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this AD will affect about 4 helicopters of U.S.
registry. We also estimate that it will take about 30 work-hours per
helicopter to inspect and modify the MRH. The average labor rate is $85
per work-hour. Required parts will cost about $18,981 per helicopter.
Based on these figures, we estimate the cost of this AD on U.S.
operators will be $86,124, assuming a crack is found in each MRH cone
restrainer support or dome fairing support attachment lugs.
FAA's Determination of the Effective Date
An unsafe condition exists that requires the immediate adoption of
this
[[Page 43802]]
AD. We find that the risk to the flying public justifies waiving notice
and comment prior to adoption of this rule because of the short
compliance time of 15 hours TIS to conduct the inspection for a crack
in the attachment lugs. Failure of these lugs could result in loss of
control of the helicopter. Therefore, we have determined that notice
and opportunity for public comment before issuing this AD are
impracticable and that good cause exists for making this amendment
effective in fewer than 30 days.
Comments Invited
This AD is a final rule that involves requirements affecting flight
safety, and we did not precede it by notice and opportunity for public
comment. However, we invite you to send us any written data, views, or
arguments concerning this AD. Send your comments to an address listed
under the ADDRESSES section of this AD. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2010-
0721; Directorate Identifier 2009-SW-56-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this AD. We will
consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend this
AD because of those comments.
We will post all comments we receive, without change, to https://www.regulations.gov including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this AD.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on product(s) identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this AD will not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government.
Therefore, I certify this AD:
1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
We prepared an economic evaluation of the estimated costs to comply
with this AD and placed it in the AD docket.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
0
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new Airworthiness
Directive (AD):
2010-15-04 EUROCOPTER FRANCE: Amendment 39-16370. Docket No. FAA-
2010-0721; Directorate Identifier 2009-SW-57-AD.
Effective Date
(a) This AD becomes effective on August 11, 2010.
Other Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to Model EC225LP helicopters, except those
that have been modified with MOD 0743718, certificated in any
category.
Reason
(d) The mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) AD
states there have been a ``few'' reports of cracks and failure of
the main rotor hub (MRH) cone restrainer support lugs at their
attachment points on the reinforcement ring where the dome fairing
is secured. Also, cracks on the dome fairing support have been
reported. Failure of the cone restrainer support or the dome fairing
support attachment lugs may lead to loss of the dome fairing, damage
to the rotor blades, and subsequent loss of control of the
helicopter.
Actions and Compliance
(e) Required as indicated:
(1) Within 15 hours time-in-service (TIS), unless already done,
and thereafter at intervals not to exceed 15 hours TIS, visually
inspect for a crack in the area of the attachment points on the MRH
reinforcement ring of the lugs securing the cone restrainer support
and also of the lugs securing the dome fairing support as depicted
in Figures 1 and 2 of Eurocopter Emergency Alert Service Bulletin
No. 05A003, Revision 2, dated February 3, 2009 (EASB No. 05A003) and
by following the Accomplishment Instructions, paragraph 2.B.1, of
EASB No. 05A003.
Note: The one EASB No. 05A003 applies to two different model
helicopters: Eurocopter Model EC225LP helicopters that are type-
certificated in the United States and Eurocopter Model EC725AP
military helicopters that are not type-certificated in the United
States.
(2) If a crack is found in the area of any of the lugs of the
cone restrainer support or the dome fairing support, as depicted in
Figures 1 and 2 of EASB No. 05A003, before further flight, modify
the MRH by replacing both the cone restrainer support and the dome
fairing support assembly by following the Accomplishment
Instructions, paragraphs 2.B.1. and 2.B.2., reidentify the cone
restrainer support and dome fairing assembly by following paragraph
2.D., and if removed, track and balance the main rotor blades by
following paragraph 3.B.3. of Eurocopter Service Bulletin No. 62-
007, Revision 1, dated July 10, 2009.
(f) Replacing and reidentifying both the cone restrainer support
and the dome fairing support assembly in accordance with paragraph
(e)(2) of this AD constitutes terminating action for the
requirements of this AD.
Differences Between this AD and the MCAI AD
(g) We do not specify dates because the dates are already passed
nor do we specify the time in days but rather only in hours TIS. We
also use a different initial compliance time. Also, we use inspect
rather than check when referring to an action required by a mechanic
as opposed to a pilot.
Other Information
(h) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
Safety Management Group, ATTN: DOT/FAA Southwest Region, Gary Roach,
ASW-111, Aviation Safety Engineer, Rotorcraft Directorate,
Regulations and Guidance Group, 2601 Meacham Blvd., Fort Worth,
Texas 76137, telephone (817) 222-5130, fax (817) 222-5961, has the
authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested, using the
procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
[[Page 43803]]
(i) A special flight permit may be issued to ferry the
helicopter to a location where the modification can be done,
provided the dome fairing and its attachment screws are removed.
When allowing flight with the dome fairing removed, the special
flight permit must contain information that alerts the flight crew
that when flying without the dome fairing, the lateral vibrations of
the helicopter significantly increase at speeds of 70 to 120 knots.
These lateral vibrations do not affect flight safety.
Related Information
(j) European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) Airworthiness
Directive No. 2009-0024, dated February 20, 2009, contains related
information.
Joint Aircraft System/Component (JASC) Code
(k) The JASC Code is 6220: Main Rotor Head.
Material Incorporated by Reference
(l) You must use the specified portions of Eurocopter Emergency
Alert Service Bulletin No. 05A003, Revision 2, dated February 3,
2009, and Eurocopter Service Bulletin No. 62-007, Revision 1, dated
July 10, 2009, to do the actions required.
(1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference of this service information under 5
U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
(2) For service information identified in this AD, contact
American Eurocopter Corporation, 2701 Forum Drive, Grand Prairie, TX
75053-4005, telephone (800) 232-0323, fax (972) 641-3710, or at
https://www.eurocopter.com.
(3) You may review copies at the FAA, Office of the Regional
Counsel, Southwest Region, 2601 Meacham Blvd., Fort Worth, Texas,
76137; or at the National Archives and Records Administration
(NARA). For information on the availability of this material at
NARA, call (202) 741-6030, or go to: https://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.
Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on July 13, 2010.
Mark R. Schilling,
Acting Manager, Rotorcraft Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2010-17757 Filed 7-26-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P