Accounting Guide for LSC Recipients (2010 Edition), 42786-42790 [2010-17737]
Download as PDF
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with NOTICES
42786
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 140 / Thursday, July 22, 2010 / Notices
with respect to Behr Dayton Thermal
Systems VOC Plume Superfund Site
(‘‘Behr Dayton’’).
Under the Settlement Agreement, EPA
will receive an allowed general
unsecured claim with respect to
response costs incurred by the EPA with
respect to Behr Dayton in the amount of
$26,000,000. The EPA will receive an
allowed general unsecured claim with
respect to civil penalties in the amount
of $5,000,000. Accordingly, the total
amount of the EPA’s allowed general
unsecured claim will be $31,000,000.
The allowed general unsecured claim
with respect to civil penalties, however,
shall be subordinated under the plan of
confirmation to other allowed general
unsecured claims.
Upon the effective date of the
settlement agreement, the United States
will also receive a cash payment of
$500,000, which will be applied to Behr
Dayton. In the event that certain funds
reserved for funding environmental
cleanup at sites owned by the
Liquidation Trust are not needed for
their intended purpose because such
owned property is transferred or sold to
a third party purchaser, the United
States would receive additional cash
payments in the maximum aggregate
amount of $1,500,000 million (which,
together with the $500,000 in cash that
the United States would receive on the
effective date of the settlement
agreement, would total $2,000,000),
which amount(s) will also be applied to
Behr Dayton.
The Department of Justice will
receive, for a period of thirty days from
the date of this publication, comments
relating to the Settlement Agreement.
Comments should be addressed to the
Assistant Attorney General,
Environment and Natural Resources
Division, and either e-mailed to
pubcomment-ees.enrd@usdoj.gov or
mailed to P.O. Box 7611, U.S.
Department of Justice, Washington, DC
20044–7611, and should refer to In re
Old Carco LLC, et al., D.J. Ref. 90–11–
3–09743. Commenters may request an
opportunity for a public meeting in the
affected area, in accordance with
Section 7003(d) of RCRA, 42 U.S.C.
6973(d).
The Settlement Agreement may be
examined at the Office of the United
States Attorney, 86 Chambers Street, 3rd
Floor, New York, New York 10007, and
at the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, Ariel Rios Building, 1200
Pennsylvania Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20460. During the
public comment period, the Settlement
Agreement may also be examined on the
following Department of Justice Web
site, https://www.usdoj.gov/enrd/
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:46 Jul 21, 2010
Jkt 220001
Consent_Decrees.html. Copies of the
Settlement Agreement may also be
obtained by mail from the Consent
Decree Library, P.O. Box 7611, U.S.
Department of Justice, Washington, DC
20044–7611 or by faxing or e-mailing a
request to Tonia Fleetwood
(tonia.fleetwood@usdoj.gov), fax no.
(202) 514–0097, phone confirmation
number (202) 514–1547. In requesting a
copy from the Consent Decree Library,
please enclose a check in the amount of
$5.00 (25 cents per page reproduction
cost) payable to the U.S. Treasury or, if
by e-mail or fax, please forward a check
in that amount to the Consent Decree
Library at the stated address.
references to other sources of
information; and (8) other changes to
clarify existing provisions. The
Accounting Guide for LSC Recipients
(2010 edition) can be located by
accessing LSC’s Web site at https://
www.lsc.gov/pdfs/accounting_guide_
for_lsc_recipients_2010_edition.pdf.
DATES: Effective Date: August 23, 2010.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Chuck Greenfield, Program Counsel,
Legal Services Corporation, 3333 K St.,
NW., Washington DC 20007;
greenfieldc@lsc.gov (e-mail), (212) 295–
1549 (phone) or (212) 337–6813 (fax).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Maureen Katz,
Assistant Section Chief, Environmental
Enforcement Section, Environment and
Natural Resources Division.
Background
[FR Doc. 2010–18065 Filed 7–21–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–15–P
LEGAL SERVICES CORPORATION
Accounting Guide for LSC Recipients
(2010 Edition)
Legal Services Corporation.
Notice.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Legal Services
Corporation (LSC) is revising the
Accounting Guide for LSC Recipients to
reflect changes that have occurred since
the last publication of the Accounting
Guide (the ‘‘Guide’’) in 1997. Notice was
published in the Federal Register on
February 2, 2010, requesting public
comments to proposed revisions to the
Guide. Following the receipt of
comments from the public, the LSC
Office of the Inspector General and
members of the LSC Board of Directors,
and making changes as deemed
appropriate in response to those
comments, the LSC Board of Directors
approved revisions to the Guide at a
meeting held on June 15, 2010.
The revisions incorporate: (1) New
internal control provisions for electronic
banking transactions and contracting;
(2) financial oversight concepts from the
Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002;
(3) references to the accounting
standards codification by the Financial
Standards Accounting Board (FASB)
released on July 1, 2009; (4) key
practices to enhance fraud prevention;
(5) provisions in other LSC regulations
and policies, including the LSC
Property Acquisition and Management
Manual and LSC Program Letters; (6)
revisions to accounting procedures and
internal controls to reflect current best
practices; (7) updated and new
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00109
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Under the Legal Services Corporation
Act, as amended, LSC ‘‘is authorized to
require such reports as it deems
necessary from any recipient, contractor
or person or entity receiving assistance’’
42 U.S.C. 2996g(a). LSC is also
‘‘authorized to prescribe the keeping of
records with respect to funds provided
by grant or contract and shall have
access to such records’’ 42 U.S.C.
2996g(b). Further, LSC ‘‘shall conduct or
require each recipient, contractor,
person or entity receiving financial
assistance * * * to provide for an
annual financial audit.’’ 42 U.S.C.
2996h(c)(1). In addition, ‘‘funds received
by any recipient from a source other
than the Corporation * * * shall be
accounted for and reported as receipts
and disbursements separate and district
from Federal funds’’ 42 U.S.C. 2996i(c).
Under authority of the Legal Services
Corporation Act, LSC published the
Accounting Guide for LSC Recipients.
The Guide sets forth LSC’s accounting,
financial management and reporting
guidelines. In general, LSC requires
recipients and subrecipients of its
funding to: (1) Manage LSC and nonLSC funds in a stewardship manner and
pursuant to the cost standards and
procedures of 45 CFR Part 1630; and
(2) record transactions in accounting
records and prepare annual financial
statements in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles (GAAP).
The current version of the Guide was
last updated in 1997.
In an effort to update the Guide to
reflect more current accounting and
financial oversight practices, as well as
to respond to grantee financial issues
mentioned in a Government
Accountability Office (GAO) report, and
as a result of the recommendations of
the LSC Fiscal Advisory Group, LSC
developed a number of revisions to the
Guide. The revisions are in the
following eight categories:
E:\FR\FM\22JYN1.SGM
22JYN1
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 140 / Thursday, July 22, 2010 / Notices
(1) New internal control provisions for
electronic banking transactions and
contracting. The current Guide does not
discuss in detail electronic banking.
Electronic banking arrangements and
transactions are now common. Many
recipients of LSC funding conduct a
significant portion of their financial
transactions electronically. LSC itself
transmits funds electronically to all
recipients. The revisions add a new
section on electronic banking to the
Fundamental Criteria and include
sections on the authorization process for
electronic banking activities, the
authorization process for employees that
initiate and transmit electronic fund
transactions, review and approval
procedures for electronic banking
transactions, supporting documentation
for electronic banking transactions,
recording electronic banking
transactions in the general ledger, bank
reconciliations and safeguards. Section
3–5.15. New sections on electronic
transactions have also been added to the
Accounting Procedures and Internal
Control Checklist in Appendix VII.
Sections G2, G3, and M of Appendix
VII. In addition, a new section was
added in the Fundamental Criteria on
contracting and includes sections on
types of contracts, documenting,
competition and approvals. Section 3–
5.16.
(2) Financial oversight concepts from
the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002. While
only limited provisions of the Sarbanes
Oxley Act of 2002 are required of non
profit corporations, LSC has determined
that certain financial oversight concepts
found in Sarbanes Oxley are appropriate
for recipients of LSC funds. An example
is the current Accounting Guide
requirement that recipients of LSC
funds have a financial oversight
committee of their board of directors,
but not a separate audit committee. The
revisions require that recipients must
have a financial oversight committee(s)
that engages in all the activities of an
audit committee, including: Hiring the
auditor; setting the auditor’s
compensation; overseeing the auditor’s
activities; setting rules and processes for
complaints about accounting practices
and internal control practices; reviewing
the annual IRS Form 990 for
completeness, accuracy, and on-time
filing and providing assurances of
compliance to the full board; ensuring
the recipient’s operations are conducted
and managed in an ethical manner that
complies with all applicable laws,
regulations and policies; ensuring
effective management of the recipient’s
resources and risks; and ensuring
accountability of persons within the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:46 Jul 21, 2010
Jkt 220001
organization. Section 1–7. In addition,
the revisions consider it a best practice
for the board of directors to have an
audit committee separate from the
finance committee and for the board to
have at least one member who is a
financial expert or for the board to have
access to a financial expert. Section 1–
7.
(3) References to the accounting
standards codification by the Financial
Standards Accounting Board (FASB).
FASB released a new codification of its
accounting standards on July 1, 2009.
The standards, an authoritative listing of
generally accepted accounting
principles (GAAP), are referred to in
numerous sections of the Guide. All
references to the accounting standards
in the Accounting Guide have been
updated and new references have been
inserted to reflect new section numbers
in the FASB accounting standards
codification.
(4) Key practices to enhance fraud
prevention. While the current Guide
lists the elements of an adequate
accounting and financial reporting
system, including the use of specific
internal controls and risk assessment,
there is no separate section on fraud
prevention. The revisions add a fraud
prevention section that details key
practices to help prevent fraud. Section
3–6.
(5) Provisions in LSC regulations and
policies, including the LSC Property
Acquisition and Management Manual
and LSC Program Letters. The regulation
on attorneys’ fees (45 CFR Part 1642)
was eliminated in a final rule change
effective April 26, 2010, to reflect
changes contained in the Consolidated
Appropriations Act of 2010, Public Law
111–117. Accordingly, section 2–2.6
(Court-Awarded Attorney Fees) of the
Guide was modified. Further,
subsequent to the publication of the
Guide in 1997, LSC issued other
guidelines for recipients of LSC funds
that impact on the Guide. For example,
the LSC Property Acquisition and
Management Manual (PAMM), issued in
2001, requires recipients to capitalize
and depreciate all nonexpendable
property with a cost in excess of $5,000
and a useful life of more than one year.
However, the current Guide uses $1,000
as the capitalization and depreciation
threshold. The revisions to the Guide
change the threshold to $5,000 to be
consistent with the PAAM. Appendix
IV, Section 1. In addition, LSC has
issued Program Letters 08–2 (March 20,
2008), 08–3 (December 18, 2008) and
09–3 (December 17, 2009) that contain
guidance to recipients on compliance
and fiscal management issues. Those
Program Letters have been referenced in
PO 00000
Frm 00110
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
42787
the revisions to the Guide. Section 2–
3.1.
(6) Revisions to accounting
procedures and internal controls to
reflect current best practices. Appendix
VII of the current Guide contains a
checklist of accounting procedures and
internal controls. The revisions update
the checklist to reflect current best
practices.
(7) Updated and new references to
other sources of information. The Guide
contains numerous references to other
sources of information. The revisions
update and make new references where
appropriate.
(8) Other changes to clarify existing
provisions. The revisions clarify existing
sections to make the provisions easier to
understand.
Comments Received to Proposed
Revisions to Accounting Guide
Following the publication of notice of
proposed revisions to the Guide in the
Federal Register on February 2, 2010,
LSC received comments from the
public, the LSC Office of the Inspector
General, and from members of the LSC
Board of Directors. The following is a
summary of comments received and
LSC’s response to those comments.
Responsibilities of the Financial
Oversight Committee of Committees
(Section 1–7)
Section 1–7 sets forth the duties and
responsibilities of financial oversight
committees, including the finance and
audit committees. The Georgia Legal
Services Program raised a concern about
the prospect of being required to have
separate board finance and audit
committees. Response: The proposed
revisions do not require separate finance
and audit committees. Section 1–7
provides that ‘‘it generally is considered
a best practice for governing bodies to
have both a finance committee and a
separate audit committee.’’ However, the
proposed revisions do provide that
‘‘[t]he critical point is that all of the
finance and audit committee duties
* * * must be performed by a financial
oversight committee(s).’’
The Georgia Legal Services Program
also expressed concern over the use of
the term ‘‘financial statements’’ in one of
the specified roles of the finance
committee. The Georgia program
mentions that the review of full
financial statements monthly would be
time-consuming, burdensome for the
program, and potentially confusing.
Response: In response to this comment
we have revised this section to use the
term ‘‘management reports’’ rather than
‘‘financial statements’’ in role No. 2 of
the finance committee, with a reference
E:\FR\FM\22JYN1.SGM
22JYN1
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with NOTICES
42788
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 140 / Thursday, July 22, 2010 / Notices
to budgeted and actual expenses and
income, variances, and a statement of
cash on hand. We have added sample
management reports as Appendix IB
and a section entitled ‘‘Statement of
Cash on Hand’’ to section 3–5.9 of the
Fundamental Criteria (Management
Reports).
The final comment from the Georgia
Legal Services Program is that the
provision of financial reports on a
quarterly basis, rather than monthly as
set forth in the proposed revision, has
worked well for their program.
Response: While it is recognized that a
number of programs provide financial
reports to the finance committee and/or
the board on a quarterly basis, it is the
preferred practice to have these reports
produced and reviewed monthly
thereby providing the finance
committee with as up-to-date
information as possible on the financial
condition of the program. It should be
noted that this provision does not
require monthly meetings of the finance
committee, but that the reports be
reviewed monthly with the chief
financial officer, controller, and/or CPA.
This review may occur by email or in
some other manner.
In addition, there were comments
from several members of the LSC Board
of Directors that this section needs to
have more focus on the need for the
duties of audit committees to be
performed even if a recipient does not
have a separate audit committee and on
the need of having a financial expert on
the financial oversight committee(s) or
access to a financial expert. One board
member also mentioned that there were
too many ‘‘or’’ options in the language.
Response: In response to these
comments, a new paragraph has been
drafted which more clearly emphasizes
the critical points that all of the listed
duties of a finance and an audit
committee must be performed by a
financial oversight committee(s) and
that the financial oversight committee(s)
needs to have a financial expert or
access to a financial expert.
LSC Board members recommended an
expansion of the language in Section
1–7 under role No. 6 of the Audit
Committee. Response: Role No. 6 of the
Audit Committee in Section 1–7 was
expanded to more fully describe the
committee’s duties in ensuring
compliance with ethical requirements,
applicable laws, regulations and
policies, effective management of the
recipient’s resources and risks, and
accountability of persons within the
organization.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:46 Jul 21, 2010
Jkt 220001
Property (Section 2–2.4)
Section 2–2.4 sets forth certain
principles for the treatment of property,
including the requirement that
recipients capitalize and depreciate all
nonexpendable property with a cost in
excess of $5,000 and a useful life of
more than one year. A comment was
received from the LSC Office of the
Inspector General (OIG) suggesting that
it might be necessary to include
accounting for sensitive assets even
when those assets are valued at less
than $5,000, as the program may want
to track them for other reasons.
Response: A new sentence has been
added to Section 2–2.4 incorporating
this suggestion.
Court-Awarded Attorneys Fees (Section
2–2.6)
Section 2–2.6 discusses courtawarded attorneys’ fees. A comment
was received from the Chair of the
Standing Committee on Legal Aid and
Indigent Defendants of the American
Bar Association, suggesting that, given
the elimination of the restriction on the
claiming, collection and retention of
attorneys’ fees, it would be helpful if
there would be an explanation of what
attorneys’ fees are permitted. Response:
It is correctly noted that the restriction
on claiming, collection and retention of
attorneys’ fees (former 45 CFR 1642) has
been eliminated in a final rule change
effective April 26, 2010, to reflect
changes contained in the Consolidated
Appropriations Act of 2010, Public Law
111–117, and that there is no language
in the change to 2–2.6 stating in what
situations attorneys’ fees are permitted.
The question of when attorneys’ fees are
permitted to be collected from the
opposing party is generally a matter of
state and federal law, as interpreted by
the judge deciding the case. LSC does
not have a regulation that sets forth
when attorneys’ fees are available. It is
noted that the recipients of LSC funds
are subject to restrictions regarding
accepting fee-generating cases, as set
forth in 45 CFR 1609. No change to
2–2.6 was made in response to this
comment.
There was also a comment from the
Center on Law and Social Policy
recommending a reference in 2–2.6 to
the provision on accounting for
attorneys’ fees, now set forth in 45 CFR
1609.4. Response: In response to this
comment, 2.2–6 has been amended to
include this reference.
Grant and Contract Costs (Section
2–3.1)
Section 2–3.1 addresses grant and
contract costs. A comment received
PO 00000
Frm 00111
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
from the LSC OIG questioned whether
the Program Letter on Compliance
Guidance and Interim Guidance on
Attorneys’ Fees dated December 17,
2009, was superseded by an interim
final rule on attorneys’ fees issued by
the LSC on March 15, 2010. Response:
The purpose of the reference to Program
Letters in 2–3.1 is to let grantees know
that the letters themselves contain
additional cost allocation and financial
management information. The
Compliance Guidance and Interim
Guidance on Attorneys’ Fees issued on
December 17, 2009 as Program Letter
09–03 mostly discusses issues unrelated
to attorneys’ fees. The attorneys’ fees
discussion is limited to interim
guidance and by its terms applies only
until LSC Board action on the issue. The
interim guidance remains applicable
during the period until the Board acted.
After reviewing the Program Letter,
there appears to be nothing inconsistent
between the interim guidance and the
Board’s later action.
Internal Control/Fundamental Criteria
of an Accounting and Financial
Reporting System (Chapter 3)
The introduction to Chapter 3
discusses the responsibilities of a
recipient to maintain adequate
accounting records and internal control
procedures. An LSC OIG comment
recommended the addition of language
making clear that internal control is
specifically a management
responsibility. Response: The first
paragraph of Chapter 3 has been
modified to add that internal control is
‘‘managed and maintained by the
recipient’s board of directors and
management.’’
Fundamental Criteria (Section 3–5)
Section 3–5 contains the LSC
Fundamental Criteria, which is a listing
of the elements of an adequate
accounting and financial reporting
system. A comment from the LSC OIG
noted that the discussion on Enterprise
Risk Management seemed to be
misplaced and not fully developed.
Response: As a result of this comment,
we have revised section 3–5 to include
a fuller discussion of Enterprise Risk
Management in the background section.
An additional comment from the OIG
suggested that a section on contracting
should be included in the fundamental
criteria. Response: In response to this
comment a new section on contracting
has been added to the Fundamental
Criteria. See Section 3–5.16.
A further OIG comment stated that
while allocation is covered in Section
3–5.9(c) of the Fundamental Criteria,
there is no specific mention of
E:\FR\FM\22JYN1.SGM
22JYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 140 / Thursday, July 22, 2010 / Notices
documenting the methodology.
Response: New language has been
added to Section 3–5.9(c), under Criteria
for Allocations to require adequate
written documentation of the allocation
formula.
A follow-up comment from the OIG
recommended that the OIG be
specifically mentioned in the new
allocation formula language. Response:
The OIG has been added to Section 3–
5.9(c), under Criteria for Allocations.
An OIG comment recommended the
addition of ‘‘a sufficient level of fidelity
coverage’’ in Section 3–5.13 (Bonding.)
Response: In response to the comment
Section 3–5.13 has been changed to
make specific reference to the fidelity
coverage requirements of 45 CFR
1629.1(a).
An OIG comment suggested adding a
provision specifying that documents to
support competition should be retained
and kept with the contract files in
Section 3.5.16 (Contracting.) Response:
In response to this comment language
has been added to the competition
section, under criteria, to Section 3.5.16,
that incorporates the suggestion.
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with NOTICES
Fraud Prevention (Section 3–6)
Section 3–6 contains a list of key
practices that can help prevent fraud.
An LSC OIG comment suggested that
there should be an addition to No. 19 to
address protection against retaliation for
board members and volunteers who
report suspected fraud. Response: In
response to this comment the
recommended language has been added
to No. 19.
An LSC OIG comment recommended
that board members should be reminded
that applicable federal and state laws
also apply to them. Response: In
response to this comment new No. 22
has been added incorporating this
language.
A comment from the LSC OIG noted
that item No. 23 was the only key
practice that did not start with a verb.
Response: New No. 24 has been changed
to start with ‘‘involve.’’
A comment made by an LSC Board
member recommended that more
specific guidance be given to recipients
in the event fraud is discovered.
Response: In response to this comment
language has been added to provide
more specific instructions to grantees in
the event fraud is discovered. See
Section 3–6, No. 26. This same language
is found in LSC Grant Assurance No. 15
for 2010 grants, which is signed by both
the recipient’s board chair and
executive director.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:46 Jul 21, 2010
Jkt 220001
Illustrative Financial Statements and
Notes to the Financial Statements
(Appendix IA)
Appendix IA.1 provides a description
of illustrative financial statements. A
comment from the LSC OIG suggests
that the OIG be listed in the first
paragraph so that the OIG, as well as
LSC, would be able ‘‘to make
comparison with budgeted amounts as
well as accumulate regional or national
data for the legal services network.’’
Response: The suggested language has
been added to the first paragraph in
Appendix IA.1.
Description of Accounting Records—
Retention Times for Nonprofit Records
(Appendix II)
Appendix II contains a section on the
retention times for nonprofit records. A
comment from a nominee to the LSC
Board suggested that we add a provision
recognizing that state law may provide
a longer retention period for certain
types of records. Response: In response
to this comment we have added a new
sentence recognizing the possibility that
state law may require a longer retention
period for particular types of records.
A comment was also received from
the LSC OIG recommending that all
financial and financial related
information be retained for at least five
years, given the fact that questioned
costs under 45 CFR 1630 can go back
five years. Response: In response to this
comment we have changed the retention
period for the mentioned financial and
financial related information to seven
years, to make this section consistent
with 45 CFR 1630 and the Grant
Assurances.
Accounting for Property (Appendix IV)
Appendix IV sets forth procedures for
accounting for property, including the
capitalization and depreciation of
property and equipment. We received
comments from JAA & Associates,
Hawaii, that the proposed revisions to
the illustrations of journal entries for
capitalization and depreciation are
confusing, incomplete or inaccurate.
JAA & Associates also suggested
changing the title of Illustration 1.1
under Capitalization from ‘‘To record
equipment purchased with cash’’ to ‘‘To
record equipment purchased with cash
or credit.’’ Response: We are also
concerned that the proposed revisions
in the illustrations in the capitalization
and depreciation sections may be
confusing. Further, the flow of journal
entries can vary somewhat depending
on the accounting system used by each
LSC grantee. It was determined that
while the recommended changes make
PO 00000
Frm 00112
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
42789
sense if journal entries are made in a
certain way, there are other valid ways
to make entries and the proposed
changes could cause confusion. Thus,
we have reverted to the 1997 language
for the illustrations, which is more
easily understandable.
Other Regulatory Financial
Requirements (Appendix VI)
Appendix VI contains provisions on
other regulatory financial requirements,
including tax reporting. An LSC OIG
comment recommended that the
language be altered to reflect that form
990 is required to be filed and the
failure to file for three consecutive years
will automatically result in the loss of
a non profit’s tax exempt status.
Response: In response to this comment
the language has been changed in
Appendix VI.1 to specifically mention
the mandatory requirement of filing the
990 form and the automatic loss of taxexempt status for the failure to file a 990
for three consecutive years.
Accounting Procedures and Internal
Control Checklist (Appendix VII)
Appendix VII provides a checklist for
a grantee’s internal controls. An LSC
OIG comment suggests requiring
employees and officers handling assets
to be ‘‘sufficiently bonded’’ under
Appendix VII A (General.), No. 6.
Response: In response to this comment
Appendix VII A, No. 6 has been
changed to add a reference to the
bonding requirements found in 45 CFR
1629.
A comment from the LSC OIG
questioned whether it was intended in
Appendix VII A (General) to have a
monthly reporting requirement of a cash
flow statement to the finance committee
of a recipient’s board of directors.
Response: Monthly reporting to the
finance committee was intended and is
consistent with the section 1–7
discussion about role No. 2 of the
finance committee. We have changed
the second sentence in No. 18 to add
‘‘statement of cash on hand,’’ which is
also mentioned in sections 1–7, 3–
5.9(b), and Appendix IB.
We also received a comment from a
nominee to the LSC Board that
Appendix VII B (Personnel and Payroll)
should mention that it is a best practice
to include both a nondiscrimination
policy and a signed statement from
every employee that they understand
their roles in terms of
nondiscrimination. Response: In
response to this comment a new No. 14
has been added to Appendix VII B
incorporating this comment.
An LSC OIG comment suggested that
Appendix VII D (Procurement) contain
E:\FR\FM\22JYN1.SGM
22JYN1
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with NOTICES
42790
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 140 / Thursday, July 22, 2010 / Notices
a requirement that each procurement
action, above a reasonable level, be fully
documented by maintaining the bids
received and the approvals given. This
would include written justification for
sole source purchases above a certain
level. Response: In response to this
comment a new No. 12 has been added
to Appendix D, incorporating the
suggestion.
Another LSC OIG comment
questioned what ‘‘properly executed’’
means in Appendix VII E (Legal
Consultants/Contract Services.)
Response: In response to this comment
we have changed No. 2. in Legal
Consultants/Contract Services from ‘‘Are
contracts written so that the services to
be rendered are clearly defined and
properly executed?’’ to the following
three sentences: ‘‘Are contracts written
so that the services to be rendered are
clearly defined?’’; ‘‘Are contracts
properly signed by authorized persons?’’
and ‘‘Have all contract terms and
modifications been complied with?’’
An LSC OIG comment suggested
adding to Appendix VII G1 No. 7 that
the check should be marked as void or
defaced in a manner that would prevent
future use of the check. Response: In
response to this comment Appendix VII
G1 No. 7 has been changed to include
the recommended language.
An LSC OIG comment pointed out
that there was no reference in Appendix
VII H (Controls Over Cash Receipts) to
cash received from an individual while
in the office, as opposed to receiving
money through the mail. Response: In
response to this comment, we have
added new Nos. 8–12 in Appendix VII
H, to include the questions addressing
cash received from an individual while
in the office.
The LSC OIG also commented that
No. 15 should provide that the client is
entitled to a receipt for cash provided
and that if a receipt is not provided that
the client should see a supervisor.
Response: In response to this comment
Appendix VII H No. 15 was changed to
include the recommended language.
A comment received from the Legal
Aid and Defender Association, Detroit,
Michigan, questions the segregation of
duties guidelines found in Appendix
VII, Section J (Segregation of Duties).
There is a fear that if duties were
assigned to staff outside the accounting
department, this staff person may have
access to confidential information.
Response: Appendix VII J contains
guidelines for the management of a
recipient’s financial systems. The
objective of Section J is to provide the
maximum safeguards possible under the
circumstances. Accounting duties
should be segregated to ensure that no
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:46 Jul 21, 2010
Jkt 220001
individual simultaneously has both the
physical control and the record keeping
responsibility for any asset, including,
but not limited to, cash, client deposits,
supplies and property. Duties must be
segregated so that no individual can
initiate, execute, and record a
transaction without a second
independent individual being involved
in the process. In response to this
comment and to clarify the inquiry, we
have changed the question to: ‘‘Are
checks, after being signed, controlled
and mailed out by an individual who
does not have any other payables
duties?’’
An LSC OIG comment suggested that
Appendix VII K (Petty Cash Controls) be
changed to add procedures regarding
access to and physical control over the
petty cash box during and after work
hours. Response: In response to this
comment a new No. 14 has been added
to Appendix VII K to include language
regarding access to and physical control
over the petty cash box during and after
work hours.
libraries and library programs and the
development of future Presidential
libraries. NARA will use the
Committee’s recommendations in its
implementation of strategies for the
efficient operation of the Presidential
libraries.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
NARA’s Committee Management Officer
is Mary Ann Hadyka. She can be
reached at 301–837–1782.
Dated: July 13, 2010.
Victor M. Fortuno,
President, Legal Services Corporation.
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC) is considering
changes to the Emergency Plan,
pursuant to 10 CFR 50.54, ‘‘Conditions
of licenses,’’ paragraph (q), for Facility
Operating License No. NPF–62, issued
to Exelon Generation Company, LLC
(the licensee), for operation of the
Clinton Power Station, located in
Clinton, Illinois. In accordance with 10
CFR 51.21, the NRC prepared an
environmental assessment documenting
its finding. The NRC concluded that the
proposed action will have no significant
environmental impact.
[FR Doc. 2010–17737 Filed 7–21–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7050–01–P
NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS
ADMINISTRATION
Advisory Committee on Presidential
Library-Foundation Partnerships.
National Archives and Records
Administration.
ACTION: Renewal of Advisory Committee
on Presidential Library-Foundation
Partnerships.
AGENCY:
This notice is published in
accordance with the provisions of
section 9(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92–463,
5 U.S.C., App.) and advises of the
renewal of the National Archives and
Records Administration’s (NARA)
Advisory Committee on Presidential
Library-Foundation Partnerships. In
accordance with Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) Circular A–135,
OMB approved the inclusion of the
Advisory Committee on Presidential
Library-Foundation Partnerships in
NARA’s ceiling of discretionary
advisory committees.
NARA has determined that the
renewal of the Advisory Committee is in
the public interest due to the expertise
and valuable advice the Committee
members provide on issues affecting the
functioning of existing Presidential
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00113
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Dated: July 16, 2010.
David S. Ferriero,
Archivist of the United States.
[FR Doc. 2010–17997 Filed 7–21–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7515–01–P
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
[Docket No. 50–461; NRC–2010–0252]
Exelon Generation Company, LLC;
Clinton Power Station; Environmental
Assessment and Finding of No
Significant Impact
Environmental Assessment
Identification of the Proposed Action
The proposed action is NRC approval
of a licensee’s request to revise the
staffing requirements for the Exelon
Nuclear Radiological Emergency Plan
Annex for Clinton Station, Table B–1,
‘‘Minimum Staffing Requirements for
the On-Shift Clinton Station Emergency
Response Organization (ERO),’’ to allow
an increase in the Non-Licensed
Operator (NLO) staffing from two to
four, allow in-plant protective actions to
be performed by personnel assigned
other functions, and replace a
Mechanical Maintenance person with a
NLO. The regulation at 10 CFR 50.54(q)
states that, ‘‘The nuclear power reactor
licensee may make changes to these
plans without Commission approval
only if the changes do not decrease the
effectiveness of the plans.’’ The licensee
concluded that the proposed action
constituted a decrease in the plan’s
E:\FR\FM\22JYN1.SGM
22JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 140 (Thursday, July 22, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 42786-42790]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-17737]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
LEGAL SERVICES CORPORATION
Accounting Guide for LSC Recipients (2010 Edition)
AGENCY: Legal Services Corporation.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Legal Services Corporation (LSC) is revising the
Accounting Guide for LSC Recipients to reflect changes that have
occurred since the last publication of the Accounting Guide (the
``Guide'') in 1997. Notice was published in the Federal Register on
February 2, 2010, requesting public comments to proposed revisions to
the Guide. Following the receipt of comments from the public, the LSC
Office of the Inspector General and members of the LSC Board of
Directors, and making changes as deemed appropriate in response to
those comments, the LSC Board of Directors approved revisions to the
Guide at a meeting held on June 15, 2010.
The revisions incorporate: (1) New internal control provisions for
electronic banking transactions and contracting; (2) financial
oversight concepts from the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002; (3) references
to the accounting standards codification by the Financial Standards
Accounting Board (FASB) released on July 1, 2009; (4) key practices to
enhance fraud prevention; (5) provisions in other LSC regulations and
policies, including the LSC Property Acquisition and Management Manual
and LSC Program Letters; (6) revisions to accounting procedures and
internal controls to reflect current best practices; (7) updated and
new references to other sources of information; and (8) other changes
to clarify existing provisions. The Accounting Guide for LSC Recipients
(2010 edition) can be located by accessing LSC's Web site at https://www.lsc.gov/pdfs/accounting_guide_for_lsc_recipients_2010_edition.pdf.
DATES: Effective Date: August 23, 2010.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Chuck Greenfield, Program Counsel,
Legal Services Corporation, 3333 K St., NW., Washington DC 20007;
greenfieldc@lsc.gov (e-mail), (212) 295-1549 (phone) or (212) 337-6813
(fax).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Under the Legal Services Corporation Act, as amended, LSC ``is
authorized to require such reports as it deems necessary from any
recipient, contractor or person or entity receiving assistance'' 42
U.S.C. 2996g(a). LSC is also ``authorized to prescribe the keeping of
records with respect to funds provided by grant or contract and shall
have access to such records'' 42 U.S.C. 2996g(b). Further, LSC ``shall
conduct or require each recipient, contractor, person or entity
receiving financial assistance * * * to provide for an annual financial
audit.'' 42 U.S.C. 2996h(c)(1). In addition, ``funds received by any
recipient from a source other than the Corporation * * * shall be
accounted for and reported as receipts and disbursements separate and
district from Federal funds'' 42 U.S.C. 2996i(c).
Under authority of the Legal Services Corporation Act, LSC
published the Accounting Guide for LSC Recipients. The Guide sets forth
LSC's accounting, financial management and reporting guidelines. In
general, LSC requires recipients and subrecipients of its funding to:
(1) Manage LSC and non-LSC funds in a stewardship manner and pursuant
to the cost standards and procedures of 45 CFR Part 1630; and (2)
record transactions in accounting records and prepare annual financial
statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles
(GAAP). The current version of the Guide was last updated in 1997.
In an effort to update the Guide to reflect more current accounting
and financial oversight practices, as well as to respond to grantee
financial issues mentioned in a Government Accountability Office (GAO)
report, and as a result of the recommendations of the LSC Fiscal
Advisory Group, LSC developed a number of revisions to the Guide. The
revisions are in the following eight categories:
[[Page 42787]]
(1) New internal control provisions for electronic banking
transactions and contracting. The current Guide does not discuss in
detail electronic banking. Electronic banking arrangements and
transactions are now common. Many recipients of LSC funding conduct a
significant portion of their financial transactions electronically. LSC
itself transmits funds electronically to all recipients. The revisions
add a new section on electronic banking to the Fundamental Criteria and
include sections on the authorization process for electronic banking
activities, the authorization process for employees that initiate and
transmit electronic fund transactions, review and approval procedures
for electronic banking transactions, supporting documentation for
electronic banking transactions, recording electronic banking
transactions in the general ledger, bank reconciliations and
safeguards. Section 3-5.15. New sections on electronic transactions
have also been added to the Accounting Procedures and Internal Control
Checklist in Appendix VII. Sections G2, G3, and M of Appendix VII. In
addition, a new section was added in the Fundamental Criteria on
contracting and includes sections on types of contracts, documenting,
competition and approvals. Section 3-5.16.
(2) Financial oversight concepts from the Sarbanes Oxley Act of
2002. While only limited provisions of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002
are required of non profit corporations, LSC has determined that
certain financial oversight concepts found in Sarbanes Oxley are
appropriate for recipients of LSC funds. An example is the current
Accounting Guide requirement that recipients of LSC funds have a
financial oversight committee of their board of directors, but not a
separate audit committee. The revisions require that recipients must
have a financial oversight committee(s) that engages in all the
activities of an audit committee, including: Hiring the auditor;
setting the auditor's compensation; overseeing the auditor's
activities; setting rules and processes for complaints about accounting
practices and internal control practices; reviewing the annual IRS Form
990 for completeness, accuracy, and on-time filing and providing
assurances of compliance to the full board; ensuring the recipient's
operations are conducted and managed in an ethical manner that complies
with all applicable laws, regulations and policies; ensuring effective
management of the recipient's resources and risks; and ensuring
accountability of persons within the organization. Section 1-7. In
addition, the revisions consider it a best practice for the board of
directors to have an audit committee separate from the finance
committee and for the board to have at least one member who is a
financial expert or for the board to have access to a financial expert.
Section 1-7.
(3) References to the accounting standards codification by the
Financial Standards Accounting Board (FASB). FASB released a new
codification of its accounting standards on July 1, 2009. The
standards, an authoritative listing of generally accepted accounting
principles (GAAP), are referred to in numerous sections of the Guide.
All references to the accounting standards in the Accounting Guide have
been updated and new references have been inserted to reflect new
section numbers in the FASB accounting standards codification.
(4) Key practices to enhance fraud prevention. While the current
Guide lists the elements of an adequate accounting and financial
reporting system, including the use of specific internal controls and
risk assessment, there is no separate section on fraud prevention. The
revisions add a fraud prevention section that details key practices to
help prevent fraud. Section 3-6.
(5) Provisions in LSC regulations and policies, including the LSC
Property Acquisition and Management Manual and LSC Program Letters. The
regulation on attorneys' fees (45 CFR Part 1642) was eliminated in a
final rule change effective April 26, 2010, to reflect changes
contained in the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2010, Public Law
111-117. Accordingly, section 2-2.6 (Court-Awarded Attorney Fees) of
the Guide was modified. Further, subsequent to the publication of the
Guide in 1997, LSC issued other guidelines for recipients of LSC funds
that impact on the Guide. For example, the LSC Property Acquisition and
Management Manual (PAMM), issued in 2001, requires recipients to
capitalize and depreciate all nonexpendable property with a cost in
excess of $5,000 and a useful life of more than one year. However, the
current Guide uses $1,000 as the capitalization and depreciation
threshold. The revisions to the Guide change the threshold to $5,000 to
be consistent with the PAAM. Appendix IV, Section 1. In addition, LSC
has issued Program Letters 08-2 (March 20, 2008), 08-3 (December 18,
2008) and 09-3 (December 17, 2009) that contain guidance to recipients
on compliance and fiscal management issues. Those Program Letters have
been referenced in the revisions to the Guide. Section 2-3.1.
(6) Revisions to accounting procedures and internal controls to
reflect current best practices. Appendix VII of the current Guide
contains a checklist of accounting procedures and internal controls.
The revisions update the checklist to reflect current best practices.
(7) Updated and new references to other sources of information. The
Guide contains numerous references to other sources of information. The
revisions update and make new references where appropriate.
(8) Other changes to clarify existing provisions. The revisions
clarify existing sections to make the provisions easier to understand.
Comments Received to Proposed Revisions to Accounting Guide
Following the publication of notice of proposed revisions to the
Guide in the Federal Register on February 2, 2010, LSC received
comments from the public, the LSC Office of the Inspector General, and
from members of the LSC Board of Directors. The following is a summary
of comments received and LSC's response to those comments.
Responsibilities of the Financial Oversight Committee of Committees
(Section 1-7)
Section 1-7 sets forth the duties and responsibilities of financial
oversight committees, including the finance and audit committees. The
Georgia Legal Services Program raised a concern about the prospect of
being required to have separate board finance and audit committees.
Response: The proposed revisions do not require separate finance and
audit committees. Section 1-7 provides that ``it generally is
considered a best practice for governing bodies to have both a finance
committee and a separate audit committee.'' However, the proposed
revisions do provide that ``[t]he critical point is that all of the
finance and audit committee duties * * * must be performed by a
financial oversight committee(s).''
The Georgia Legal Services Program also expressed concern over the
use of the term ``financial statements'' in one of the specified roles
of the finance committee. The Georgia program mentions that the review
of full financial statements monthly would be time-consuming,
burdensome for the program, and potentially confusing. Response: In
response to this comment we have revised this section to use the term
``management reports'' rather than ``financial statements'' in role No.
2 of the finance committee, with a reference
[[Page 42788]]
to budgeted and actual expenses and income, variances, and a statement
of cash on hand. We have added sample management reports as Appendix IB
and a section entitled ``Statement of Cash on Hand'' to section 3-5.9
of the Fundamental Criteria (Management Reports).
The final comment from the Georgia Legal Services Program is that
the provision of financial reports on a quarterly basis, rather than
monthly as set forth in the proposed revision, has worked well for
their program. Response: While it is recognized that a number of
programs provide financial reports to the finance committee and/or the
board on a quarterly basis, it is the preferred practice to have these
reports produced and reviewed monthly thereby providing the finance
committee with as up-to-date information as possible on the financial
condition of the program. It should be noted that this provision does
not require monthly meetings of the finance committee, but that the
reports be reviewed monthly with the chief financial officer,
controller, and/or CPA. This review may occur by email or in some other
manner.
In addition, there were comments from several members of the LSC
Board of Directors that this section needs to have more focus on the
need for the duties of audit committees to be performed even if a
recipient does not have a separate audit committee and on the need of
having a financial expert on the financial oversight committee(s) or
access to a financial expert. One board member also mentioned that
there were too many ``or'' options in the language. Response: In
response to these comments, a new paragraph has been drafted which more
clearly emphasizes the critical points that all of the listed duties of
a finance and an audit committee must be performed by a financial
oversight committee(s) and that the financial oversight committee(s)
needs to have a financial expert or access to a financial expert.
LSC Board members recommended an expansion of the language in
Section 1-7 under role No. 6 of the Audit Committee. Response: Role No.
6 of the Audit Committee in Section 1-7 was expanded to more fully
describe the committee's duties in ensuring compliance with ethical
requirements, applicable laws, regulations and policies, effective
management of the recipient's resources and risks, and accountability
of persons within the organization.
Property (Section 2-2.4)
Section 2-2.4 sets forth certain principles for the treatment of
property, including the requirement that recipients capitalize and
depreciate all nonexpendable property with a cost in excess of $5,000
and a useful life of more than one year. A comment was received from
the LSC Office of the Inspector General (OIG) suggesting that it might
be necessary to include accounting for sensitive assets even when those
assets are valued at less than $5,000, as the program may want to track
them for other reasons. Response: A new sentence has been added to
Section 2-2.4 incorporating this suggestion.
Court-Awarded Attorneys Fees (Section 2-2.6)
Section 2-2.6 discusses court-awarded attorneys' fees. A comment
was received from the Chair of the Standing Committee on Legal Aid and
Indigent Defendants of the American Bar Association, suggesting that,
given the elimination of the restriction on the claiming, collection
and retention of attorneys' fees, it would be helpful if there would be
an explanation of what attorneys' fees are permitted. Response: It is
correctly noted that the restriction on claiming, collection and
retention of attorneys' fees (former 45 CFR 1642) has been eliminated
in a final rule change effective April 26, 2010, to reflect changes
contained in the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2010, Public Law
111-117, and that there is no language in the change to 2-2.6 stating
in what situations attorneys' fees are permitted. The question of when
attorneys' fees are permitted to be collected from the opposing party
is generally a matter of state and federal law, as interpreted by the
judge deciding the case. LSC does not have a regulation that sets forth
when attorneys' fees are available. It is noted that the recipients of
LSC funds are subject to restrictions regarding accepting fee-
generating cases, as set forth in 45 CFR 1609. No change to 2-2.6 was
made in response to this comment.
There was also a comment from the Center on Law and Social Policy
recommending a reference in 2-2.6 to the provision on accounting for
attorneys' fees, now set forth in 45 CFR 1609.4. Response: In response
to this comment, 2.2-6 has been amended to include this reference.
Grant and Contract Costs (Section 2-3.1)
Section 2-3.1 addresses grant and contract costs. A comment
received from the LSC OIG questioned whether the Program Letter on
Compliance Guidance and Interim Guidance on Attorneys' Fees dated
December 17, 2009, was superseded by an interim final rule on
attorneys' fees issued by the LSC on March 15, 2010. Response: The
purpose of the reference to Program Letters in 2-3.1 is to let grantees
know that the letters themselves contain additional cost allocation and
financial management information. The Compliance Guidance and Interim
Guidance on Attorneys' Fees issued on December 17, 2009 as Program
Letter 09-03 mostly discusses issues unrelated to attorneys' fees. The
attorneys' fees discussion is limited to interim guidance and by its
terms applies only until LSC Board action on the issue. The interim
guidance remains applicable during the period until the Board acted.
After reviewing the Program Letter, there appears to be nothing
inconsistent between the interim guidance and the Board's later action.
Internal Control/Fundamental Criteria of an Accounting and Financial
Reporting System (Chapter 3)
The introduction to Chapter 3 discusses the responsibilities of a
recipient to maintain adequate accounting records and internal control
procedures. An LSC OIG comment recommended the addition of language
making clear that internal control is specifically a management
responsibility. Response: The first paragraph of Chapter 3 has been
modified to add that internal control is ``managed and maintained by
the recipient's board of directors and management.''
Fundamental Criteria (Section 3-5)
Section 3-5 contains the LSC Fundamental Criteria, which is a
listing of the elements of an adequate accounting and financial
reporting system. A comment from the LSC OIG noted that the discussion
on Enterprise Risk Management seemed to be misplaced and not fully
developed. Response: As a result of this comment, we have revised
section 3-5 to include a fuller discussion of Enterprise Risk
Management in the background section.
An additional comment from the OIG suggested that a section on
contracting should be included in the fundamental criteria. Response:
In response to this comment a new section on contracting has been added
to the Fundamental Criteria. See Section 3-5.16.
A further OIG comment stated that while allocation is covered in
Section 3-5.9(c) of the Fundamental Criteria, there is no specific
mention of
[[Page 42789]]
documenting the methodology. Response: New language has been added to
Section 3-5.9(c), under Criteria for Allocations to require adequate
written documentation of the allocation formula.
A follow-up comment from the OIG recommended that the OIG be
specifically mentioned in the new allocation formula language.
Response: The OIG has been added to Section 3-5.9(c), under Criteria
for Allocations.
An OIG comment recommended the addition of ``a sufficient level of
fidelity coverage'' in Section 3-5.13 (Bonding.) Response: In response
to the comment Section 3-5.13 has been changed to make specific
reference to the fidelity coverage requirements of 45 CFR 1629.1(a).
An OIG comment suggested adding a provision specifying that
documents to support competition should be retained and kept with the
contract files in Section 3.5.16 (Contracting.) Response: In response
to this comment language has been added to the competition section,
under criteria, to Section 3.5.16, that incorporates the suggestion.
Fraud Prevention (Section 3-6)
Section 3-6 contains a list of key practices that can help prevent
fraud. An LSC OIG comment suggested that there should be an addition to
No. 19 to address protection against retaliation for board members and
volunteers who report suspected fraud. Response: In response to this
comment the recommended language has been added to No. 19.
An LSC OIG comment recommended that board members should be
reminded that applicable federal and state laws also apply to them.
Response: In response to this comment new No. 22 has been added
incorporating this language.
A comment from the LSC OIG noted that item No. 23 was the only key
practice that did not start with a verb. Response: New No. 24 has been
changed to start with ``involve.''
A comment made by an LSC Board member recommended that more
specific guidance be given to recipients in the event fraud is
discovered. Response: In response to this comment language has been
added to provide more specific instructions to grantees in the event
fraud is discovered. See Section 3-6, No. 26. This same language is
found in LSC Grant Assurance No. 15 for 2010 grants, which is signed by
both the recipient's board chair and executive director.
Illustrative Financial Statements and Notes to the Financial Statements
(Appendix IA)
Appendix IA.1 provides a description of illustrative financial
statements. A comment from the LSC OIG suggests that the OIG be listed
in the first paragraph so that the OIG, as well as LSC, would be able
``to make comparison with budgeted amounts as well as accumulate
regional or national data for the legal services network.'' Response:
The suggested language has been added to the first paragraph in
Appendix IA.1.
Description of Accounting Records--Retention Times for Nonprofit
Records (Appendix II)
Appendix II contains a section on the retention times for nonprofit
records. A comment from a nominee to the LSC Board suggested that we
add a provision recognizing that state law may provide a longer
retention period for certain types of records. Response: In response to
this comment we have added a new sentence recognizing the possibility
that state law may require a longer retention period for particular
types of records.
A comment was also received from the LSC OIG recommending that all
financial and financial related information be retained for at least
five years, given the fact that questioned costs under 45 CFR 1630 can
go back five years. Response: In response to this comment we have
changed the retention period for the mentioned financial and financial
related information to seven years, to make this section consistent
with 45 CFR 1630 and the Grant Assurances.
Accounting for Property (Appendix IV)
Appendix IV sets forth procedures for accounting for property,
including the capitalization and depreciation of property and
equipment. We received comments from JAA & Associates, Hawaii, that the
proposed revisions to the illustrations of journal entries for
capitalization and depreciation are confusing, incomplete or
inaccurate. JAA & Associates also suggested changing the title of
Illustration 1.1 under Capitalization from ``To record equipment
purchased with cash'' to ``To record equipment purchased with cash or
credit.'' Response: We are also concerned that the proposed revisions
in the illustrations in the capitalization and depreciation sections
may be confusing. Further, the flow of journal entries can vary
somewhat depending on the accounting system used by each LSC grantee.
It was determined that while the recommended changes make sense if
journal entries are made in a certain way, there are other valid ways
to make entries and the proposed changes could cause confusion. Thus,
we have reverted to the 1997 language for the illustrations, which is
more easily understandable.
Other Regulatory Financial Requirements (Appendix VI)
Appendix VI contains provisions on other regulatory financial
requirements, including tax reporting. An LSC OIG comment recommended
that the language be altered to reflect that form 990 is required to be
filed and the failure to file for three consecutive years will
automatically result in the loss of a non profit's tax exempt status.
Response: In response to this comment the language has been changed in
Appendix VI.1 to specifically mention the mandatory requirement of
filing the 990 form and the automatic loss of tax-exempt status for the
failure to file a 990 for three consecutive years.
Accounting Procedures and Internal Control Checklist (Appendix VII)
Appendix VII provides a checklist for a grantee's internal
controls. An LSC OIG comment suggests requiring employees and officers
handling assets to be ``sufficiently bonded'' under Appendix VII A
(General.), No. 6. Response: In response to this comment Appendix VII
A, No. 6 has been changed to add a reference to the bonding
requirements found in 45 CFR 1629.
A comment from the LSC OIG questioned whether it was intended in
Appendix VII A (General) to have a monthly reporting requirement of a
cash flow statement to the finance committee of a recipient's board of
directors. Response: Monthly reporting to the finance committee was
intended and is consistent with the section 1-7 discussion about role
No. 2 of the finance committee. We have changed the second sentence in
No. 18 to add ``statement of cash on hand,'' which is also mentioned in
sections 1-7, 3-5.9(b), and Appendix IB.
We also received a comment from a nominee to the LSC Board that
Appendix VII B (Personnel and Payroll) should mention that it is a best
practice to include both a nondiscrimination policy and a signed
statement from every employee that they understand their roles in terms
of nondiscrimination. Response: In response to this comment a new No.
14 has been added to Appendix VII B incorporating this comment.
An LSC OIG comment suggested that Appendix VII D (Procurement)
contain
[[Page 42790]]
a requirement that each procurement action, above a reasonable level,
be fully documented by maintaining the bids received and the approvals
given. This would include written justification for sole source
purchases above a certain level. Response: In response to this comment
a new No. 12 has been added to Appendix D, incorporating the
suggestion.
Another LSC OIG comment questioned what ``properly executed'' means
in Appendix VII E (Legal Consultants/Contract Services.) Response: In
response to this comment we have changed No. 2. in Legal Consultants/
Contract Services from ``Are contracts written so that the services to
be rendered are clearly defined and properly executed?'' to the
following three sentences: ``Are contracts written so that the services
to be rendered are clearly defined?''; ``Are contracts properly signed
by authorized persons?'' and ``Have all contract terms and
modifications been complied with?''
An LSC OIG comment suggested adding to Appendix VII G1 No. 7 that
the check should be marked as void or defaced in a manner that would
prevent future use of the check. Response: In response to this comment
Appendix VII G1 No. 7 has been changed to include the recommended
language.
An LSC OIG comment pointed out that there was no reference in
Appendix VII H (Controls Over Cash Receipts) to cash received from an
individual while in the office, as opposed to receiving money through
the mail. Response: In response to this comment, we have added new Nos.
8-12 in Appendix VII H, to include the questions addressing cash
received from an individual while in the office.
The LSC OIG also commented that No. 15 should provide that the
client is entitled to a receipt for cash provided and that if a receipt
is not provided that the client should see a supervisor. Response: In
response to this comment Appendix VII H No. 15 was changed to include
the recommended language.
A comment received from the Legal Aid and Defender Association,
Detroit, Michigan, questions the segregation of duties guidelines found
in Appendix VII, Section J (Segregation of Duties). There is a fear
that if duties were assigned to staff outside the accounting
department, this staff person may have access to confidential
information. Response: Appendix VII J contains guidelines for the
management of a recipient's financial systems. The objective of Section
J is to provide the maximum safeguards possible under the
circumstances. Accounting duties should be segregated to ensure that no
individual simultaneously has both the physical control and the record
keeping responsibility for any asset, including, but not limited to,
cash, client deposits, supplies and property. Duties must be segregated
so that no individual can initiate, execute, and record a transaction
without a second independent individual being involved in the process.
In response to this comment and to clarify the inquiry, we have changed
the question to: ``Are checks, after being signed, controlled and
mailed out by an individual who does not have any other payables
duties?''
An LSC OIG comment suggested that Appendix VII K (Petty Cash
Controls) be changed to add procedures regarding access to and physical
control over the petty cash box during and after work hours. Response:
In response to this comment a new No. 14 has been added to Appendix VII
K to include language regarding access to and physical control over the
petty cash box during and after work hours.
Dated: July 13, 2010.
Victor M. Fortuno,
President, Legal Services Corporation.
[FR Doc. 2010-17737 Filed 7-21-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7050-01-P