List of Approved Spent Fuel Storage Casks: NAC-MPC System, Revision 6, 42292-42295 [2010-17848]
Download as PDF
42292
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 139 / Wednesday, July 21, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
§ 2429.22 Additional time after service by
mail or commercial delivery.
making such recommendations
concerning the award as it considers
necessary, consistent with applicable
laws, rules, or regulations.
PART 2429—MISCELLANEOUS AND
GENERAL REQUIREMENTS
2. The authority citation for part 2429
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 7134; § 2429.18 also
issued under 28 U.S.C. 2122(a).
3. Section § 2429.5 is revised to read
as follows:
■
§ 2429.5 Matters not previously presented;
official notice.
The Authority will not consider any
evidence, factual assertions, arguments
(including affirmative defenses),
requested remedies, or challenges to an
awarded remedy that could have been,
but were not, presented in the
proceedings before the Regional
Director, Hearing Officer,
Administrative Law Judge, or arbitrator.
The Authority may, however, take
official notice of such matters as would
be proper.
4. Section 2429.21(a) is revised to read
as follows:
■
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES
§ 2429.21
papers.
Except as to the filing of an
application for review of a Regional
Director’s Decision and Order under
§ 2422.31 of this subchapter, and subject
to the rules set forth in § 2425.2 of this
subchapter, whenever a party has the
right or is required to do some act
pursuant to this subchapter within a
prescribed period after service of a
notice or other paper upon such party,
and the notice or paper is served on
such party by mail or commercial
delivery, 5 days shall be added to the
prescribed period: Provided, however,
that 5 days shall not be added in any
instance where an extension of time has
been granted.
Dated: July 14, 2010.
Carol Waller Pope,
Chairman.
[FR Doc. 2010–17648 Filed 7–20–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6727–01–P
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
10 CFR Part 72
RIN 3150–AI88
[NRC–2010–0183]
Computation of time for filing
(a) In computing any period of time
prescribed by or allowed by this
subchapter, except in agreement bar
situations described in § 2422.12(c), (d),
(e), and (f) of this subchapter, the day of
the act, event, or default from or after
which the designated period of time
begins to run shall not be included. The
last day of the period so computed is to
be included unless it is a Saturday,
Sunday, or a Federal legal holiday in
which event the period shall run until
the end of the next day which is neither
a Saturday, Sunday, or a Federal legal
holiday. Provided, however, in
agreement bar situations described in
§ 2422.12(c), (d), (e), and (f), if the 60th
day prior to the expiration date of an
agreement falls on a Saturday, Sunday,
or a Federal legal holiday, a petition, to
be timely, must be filed by the close of
business on the last official workday
preceding the 60th day. When the
period of time prescribed or allowed is
7 days or less, intermediate Saturdays,
Sundays, and Federal legal holidays
shall be excluded from the
computations.
*
*
*
*
*
5. Section 2429.22 is revised to read
as follows:
■
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:10 Jul 20, 2010
Jkt 220001
List of Approved Spent Fuel Storage
Casks: NAC–MPC System, Revision 6
Nuclear Regulatory
Commission.
ACTION: Direct final rule.
AGENCY:
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC) is amending its
spent fuel storage regulations by
revising the NAC International Inc.
(NAC) NAC–MPC System listing within
the ‘‘List of Approved Spent Fuel
Storage Casks’’ to include Amendment
No. 6 to Certificate of Compliance (CoC)
Number 1025. Amendment No. 6 to the
NAC–MPC System CoC will include the
following changes to the configuration
of the NAC–MPC storage system as
noted in Appendix B of the Technical
Specifications (TS): Incorporation of a
single closure lid with a welded closure
ring for redundant closure into the
Transportable Storage Canister (TSC)
design; modification of the TSC and
basket design to accommodate up to 68
La Crosse Boiling Water Reactor
(LACBWR) spent fuel assemblies (36
undamaged Exxon fuel assemblies and
up to 32 damaged fuel cans (in a
preferential loading pattern)) that may
contain undamaged Exxon fuel
assemblies and damaged Exxon and
Allis Chalmers fuel assemblies and/or
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
fuel debris; the addition of zirconium
alloy shroud compaction debris to be
stored with undamaged and damaged
fuel assemblies; minor design
modifications to the Vertical Concrete
Cask (VCC) incorporating design
features from the MAGNASTOR system
for improved operability of the system
while adhering to as low as is
reasonably achievable (ALARA)
principles; an increase in the concrete
pad compression strength from 4,000
psi to 6,000 psi; added justification for
the 6-ft soil depth as being conservative;
and other changes to incorporate minor
editorial corrections in CoC No. 1025
and Appendices A and B of the TS.
Also, the Definitions in TS 1.1 will be
revised to include modifications and
newly defined terms; the Limiting
Conditions for Operation and associated
Surveillance Requirements in TS 3.1
and 3.2 will be revised; and editorial
changes will be made to TS 5.2 and 5.4.
DATES: The final rule is effective
October 4, 2010, unless significant
adverse comments are received by
August 20, 2010. A significant adverse
comment is a comment where the
commenter explains why the rule would
be inappropriate, including challenges
to the rule’s underlying premise or
approach, or would be ineffective or
unacceptable without a change. If the
rule is withdrawn, timely notice will be
published in the Federal Register.
ADDRESSES: You can access publicly
available documents related to this
document using the following methods:
Federal e-Rulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov and search
for documents filed under Docket ID
NRC–2010–0183. Address questions
about NRC dockets to Carol Gallagher at
301–492–3668; e-mail
Carol.Gallagher@nrc.gov.
NRC’s Public Document Room (PDR):
The public may examine and have
copied for a fee publicly available
documents at the NRC’s PDR, Room O–
1F21, One White Flint North, 11555
Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland.
NRC’s Agencywide Documents Access
and Management System (ADAMS):
Publicly available documents created or
received at the NRC are available
electronically at the NRC’s Electronic
Reading Room at https://www.nrc.gov/
reading-rm/adams.html. From this page,
the public can gain entry into ADAMS,
which provides text and image files of
NRC’s public documents. If you do not
have access to ADAMS or if there are
problems in accessing the documents
located in ADAMS, contact the NRC’s
PDR reference staff at 1–899–397–4209,
301–415–4737, or by e-mail to
pdr.resource@nrc.gov. An electronic
E:\FR\FM\21JYR1.SGM
21JYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 139 / Wednesday, July 21, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES
copy of the proposed CoC, TS, and
preliminary safety evaluation report
(SER) can be found under ADAMS
Package Number ML100890517. The
ADAMS Accession Number for the NAC
application, dated January 16, 2009, is
ML090270151.
CoC No. 1025, the TS, the preliminary
SER, and the environmental assessment
are available for inspection at the NRC
PDR, Room O–1F21, One White Flint
North, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville,
MD. Single copies of these documents
may be obtained from Jayne M.
McCausland, Office of Federal and State
Materials and Environmental
Management Programs, U.S. Nuclear
Regulatory Commission, Washington,
DC 20555–0001, telephone (301) 415–
6219, e-mail
Jayne.McCausland@nrc.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jayne M. McCausland, Office of Federal
and State Materials and Environmental
Management Programs, U.S. Nuclear
Regulatory Commission, Washington,
DC 20555–0001, telephone (301) 415–
6219, e-mail
Jayne.McCausland@nrc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Section 218(a) of the Nuclear Waste
Policy Act of 1982, as amended
(NWPA), requires that ‘‘[t]he Secretary
[of the Department of Energy (DOE)]
shall establish a demonstration program,
in cooperation with the private sector,
for the dry storage of spent nuclear fuel
at civilian nuclear power reactor sites,
with the objective of establishing one or
more technologies that the [Nuclear
Regulatory] Commission may, by rule,
approve for use at the sites of civilian
nuclear power reactors without, to the
maximum extent practicable, the need
for additional site-specific approvals by
the Commission.’’ Section 133 of the
NWPA states, in part, that ‘‘[t]he
Commission shall, by rule, establish
procedures for the licensing of any
technology approved by the
Commission under Section 218(a) for
use at the site of any civilian nuclear
power reactor.’’
To implement this mandate, the NRC
approved dry storage of spent nuclear
fuel in NRC-approved casks under a
general license by publishing a final
rule in 10 CFR part 72, which added a
new Subpart K within 10 CFR part 72,
entitled ‘‘General License for Storage of
Spent Fuel at Power Reactor Sites’’ (55
FR 29181; July 18, 1990). This rule also
established a new subpart L within 10
CFR part 72, entitled ‘‘Approval of Spent
Fuel Storage Casks,’’ which contains
procedures and criteria for obtaining
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:10 Jul 20, 2010
Jkt 220001
NRC approval of spent fuel storage cask
designs. The NRC subsequently issued a
final rule on March 9, 2000 (65 FR
12444), that approved the NAC–MPC
cask design and added it to the list of
NRC-approved cask designs in 10 CFR
72.214 as CoC No. 1025.
Discussion
On January 16, 2009, and as
supplemented on February 11, April 1,
April 30, September 22, 2009, and
January 8, 2010, the certificate holder
(NAC) submitted an application to the
NRC that requested an amendment to
CoC No. 1025. NAC requested
modifications to the cask design that
included the following changes to the
configuration of the NAC–MPC storage
system as noted in Appendix B of the
TS: (1) Incorporation of a single closure
lid with a welded closure ring for
redundant closure into the TSC design;
(2) modification of the TSC and basket
design to accommodate up to 68
LACBWR spent fuel assemblies (36
undamaged Exxon fuel assemblies and
up to 32 damaged fuel cans (in a
preferential loading pattern)) that may
contain undamaged Exxon fuel
assemblies and damaged Exxon and
Allis Chalmers fuel assemblies and/or
fuel debris; (3) the addition of
zirconium alloy shroud compaction
debris to be stored with undamaged and
damaged fuel assemblies; (4) minor
design modifications to the VCC
incorporating design features from the
MAGNASTOR system for improved
operability of the system while adhering
to ALARA principles; (5) an increase in
the concrete pad compression strength
from 4,000 psi to 6,000 psi; (6) added
justification for the 6-ft soil depth as
being conservative; and (7) other
changes to incorporate minor editorial
corrections in CoC No. 1025 and
Appendices A and B of the TS. Also, the
Definitions in TS 1.1 will be revised to
include modifications and newly
defined terms; the Limiting Conditions
for Operation and associated
Surveillance Requirements in TS 3.1
and 3.2 will be revised; and editorial
changes will be made to TS 5.2 and 5.4.
As documented in the final SER, the
NRC staff performed a detailed safety
evaluation of the proposed CoC
amendment request and found that an
acceptable safety margin is maintained.
In addition, the NRC staff has
determined that there continues to be
reasonable assurance that public health
and safety and the environment will be
adequately protected.
This direct final rule revises the
NAC–MPC System listing in 10 CFR
72.214 by adding Amendment No. 6 to
CoC No. 1025. The amendment consists
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
42293
of the changes described above, as set
forth in the revised CoC and TS. The
particular TS which are changed are
identified in the SER.
The amended NAC–MPC System cask
design, when used under the conditions
specified in the CoC, the TS, and NRC
regulations, will meet the requirements
of part 72; thus, adequate protection of
public health and safety will continue to
be ensured. When this direct final rule
becomes effective, persons who hold a
general license under 10 CFR 72.210
may load spent nuclear fuel into NAC–
MPC System casks that meet the criteria
of Amendment No. 6 to CoC No. 1025
under 10 CFR 72.212.
Discussion of Amendments by Section
Section 72.214 List of Approved Spent
Fuel Storage Casks
Certificate No. 1025 is revised by
adding the effective date of Amendment
Number 6.
Procedural Background
This rule is limited to the changes
contained in Amendment 6 to CoC No.
1025 and does not include other aspects
of the NAC–MPC System. The NRC is
using the ‘‘direct final rule procedure’’ to
issue this amendment because it
represents a limited and routine change
to an existing CoC that is expected to be
noncontroversial. Adequate protection
of public health and safety and the
environment continues to be ensured.
The amendment to the rule will become
effective on October 4, 2010. However,
if the NRC receives significant adverse
comments on this direct final rule by
August 20, 2010, then the NRC will
publish a document that withdraws this
action and will subsequently address
the comments received in a final rule as
a response to the companion proposed
rule published elsewhere in this issue of
the Federal Register. Absent significant
modifications to the proposed revisions
requiring republication, the NRC will
not initiate a second comment period on
this action.
A significant adverse comment is a
comment where the commenter
explains why the rule would be
inappropriate, including challenges to
the rule’s underlying premise or
approach, or would be ineffective or
unacceptable without a change. A
comment is adverse and significant if:
(1) The comment opposes the rule and
provides a reason sufficient to require a
substantive response in a notice-andcomment process. For example, a
substantive response is required when:
(a) The comment causes the NRC staff
to reevaluate (or reconsider) its position
or conduct additional analysis;
E:\FR\FM\21JYR1.SGM
21JYR1
42294
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 139 / Wednesday, July 21, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
(b) The comment raises an issue
serious enough to warrant a substantive
response to clarify or complete the
record; or
(c) The comment raises a relevant
issue that was not previously addressed
or considered by the NRC staff.
(2) The comment proposes a change
or an addition to the rule, and it is
apparent that the rule would be
ineffective or unacceptable without
incorporation of the change or addition.
(3) The comment causes the NRC staff
to make a change (other than editorial)
to the rule, CoC, or TS.
For detailed instructions on filing
comments, see the companion proposed
rule published elsewhere in this issue of
the Federal Register.
Voluntary Consensus Standards
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act of 1995 (Pub. L.
104–113) requires that Federal agencies
use technical standards that are
developed or adopted by voluntary
consensus standards bodies unless the
use of such a standard is inconsistent
with applicable law or otherwise
impractical. In this direct final rule, the
NRC will revise the NAC–MPC System
cask design listed in § 72.214 (List of
NRC-approved spent fuel storage cask
designs). This action does not constitute
the establishment of a standard that
contains generally applicable
requirements.
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES
Agreement State Compatibility
Under the ‘‘Policy Statement on
Adequacy and Compatibility of
Agreement State Programs’’ approved by
the Commission on June 30, 1997, and
published in the Federal Register on
September 3, 1997 (62 FR 46517), this
rule is classified as Compatibility
Category ‘‘NRC.’’ Compatibility is not
required for Category ‘‘NRC’’ regulations.
The NRC program elements in this
category are those that relate directly to
areas of regulation reserved to the NRC
by the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as
amended (AEA), or the provisions of
Title 10 of the Code of Federal
Regulations. Although an Agreement
State may not adopt program elements
reserved to NRC, it may wish to inform
its licensees of certain requirements via
a mechanism that is consistent with the
particular State’s administrative
procedure laws but does not confer
regulatory authority on the State.
Plain Language
The Presidential Memorandum,
‘‘Plain Language in Government
Writing,’’ published June 10, 1998 (63
FR 31883), directed that the
Government’s documents be in clear
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:10 Jul 20, 2010
Jkt 220001
and accessible language. The NRC
requests comments on this direct final
rule specifically with respect to the
clarity and effectiveness of the language
used. Comments should be sent to the
address listed under the heading
ADDRESSES, above.
Finding of No Significant
Environmental Impact: Availability
Under the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969, as amended, and the
NRC regulations in subpart A of 10 CFR
part 51, the NRC has determined that
this rule, if adopted, would not be a
major Federal action significantly
affecting the quality of the human
environment and, therefore, an
environmental impact statement is not
required. The NRC has prepared an
environmental assessment and, on the
basis of this environmental assessment,
has made a finding of no significant
impact. This rule will amend the CoC
for the NAC–MPC System cask design
within the list of approved spent fuel
storage casks that power reactor
licensees can use to store spent fuel at
reactor sites under a general license.
Amendment No. 6 to the NAC–MPC
System CoC will include the following
changes to the configuration of the
NAC–MPC storage system as noted in
Appendix B of the TS: (1) Incorporation
of a single closure lid with a welded
closure ring for redundant closure into
the TSC design; (2) modification of the
TSC and basket design to accommodate
up to 68 LACBWR spent fuel assemblies
(36 undamaged Exxon fuel assemblies
and up to 32 damaged fuel cans (in a
preferential loading pattern)) that may
contain undamaged Exxon fuel
assemblies and damaged Exxon and
Allis Chalmers fuel assemblies and/or
fuel debris; (3) the addition of
zirconium alloy shroud compaction
debris to be stored with undamaged and
damaged fuel assemblies; (4) minor
design modifications to the VCC
incorporating design features from the
MAGNASTOR system for improved
operability of the system while adhering
to ALARA principles; (5) an increase in
the concrete pad compression strength
from 4,000 psi to 6,000 psi; (6) added
justification for the 6-ft soil depth as
being conservative; and (7) other
changes to incorporate minor editorial
corrections in CoC No. 1025 and
Appendices A and B of the TS. Also, the
Definitions in TS 1.1 will be revised to
include modifications and newly
defined terms; the Limiting Conditions
for Operation and associated
Surveillance Requirements in TS 3.1
and 3.2 will be revised; and editorial
changes will be made to TS 5.2 and 5.4.
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
The environmental assessment and
finding of no significant impact on
which this determination is based are
available for inspection at the NRC
Public Document Room, Room O–1F21,
One White Flint North, 11555 Rockville
Pike, Rockville, MD. Single copies of the
environmental assessment and finding
of no significant impact are available
from Jayne M. McCausland, Office of
Federal and State Materials and
Environmental Management Programs,
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission,
Washington, DC 20555–0001, telephone
(301) 415–6219, e-mail
Jayne.McCausland@nrc.gov.
Paperwork Reduction Act Statement
This direct final rule does not contain
a new or amended information
collection requirement subject to the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). Existing
requirements were approved by the
Office of Management and Budget,
Approval Number 3150–0132.
Public Protection Notification
The NRC may not conduct or sponsor,
and a person is not required to respond
to, a request for information or an
information collection requirement
unless the requesting document
displays a currently valid OMB control
number.
Regulatory Analysis
On July 18, 1990 (55 FR 29181), the
NRC issued an amendment to 10 CFR
PART 72 to provide for the storage of
spent nuclear fuel under a general
license in cask designs approved by the
NRC. Any nuclear power reactor
licensee can use NRC-approved cask
designs to store spent nuclear fuel if it
notifies the NRC in advance, the spent
fuel is stored under the conditions
specified in the cask’s CoC, and the
conditions of the general license are
met. A list of NRC-approved cask
designs is contained in 10 CFR 72.214.
On March 9, 2000 (65 FR 12444), the
NRC issued an amendment to part 72
that approved the NAC–MPC System
cask design by adding it to the list of
NRC-approved cask designs in 10 CFR
72.214. On January 16, 2009, and as
supplemented on February 11, April 1,
April 30, September 22, 2009, and
January 8, 2010, the certificate holder
(NAC) submitted an application to the
NRC that requested an amendment to
CoC No. 1025. Specifically, the
amendment will include the following
changes to the configuration of the
NAC–MPC storage system as noted in
Appendix B of the TS: (1) Incorporation
of a single closure lid with a welded
closure ring for redundant closure into
E:\FR\FM\21JYR1.SGM
21JYR1
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 139 / Wednesday, July 21, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
the TSC design; (2) modification of the
TSC and basket design to accommodate
up to 68 LACBWR spent fuel assemblies
(36 undamaged Exxon fuel assemblies
and up to 32 damaged fuel cans (in a
preferential loading pattern)) that may
contain undamaged Exxon fuel
assemblies and damaged Exxon and
Allis Chalmers fuel assemblies and/or
fuel debris; (3) the addition of
zirconium alloy shroud compaction
debris to be stored with undamaged and
damaged fuel assemblies; (4) minor
design modifications to the VCC
incorporating design features from the
MAGNASTOR system for improved
operability of the system while adhering
to ALARA principles; (5) an increase in
the concrete pad compression strength
from 4000 psi to 6000 psi; (6) added
justification for the 6-ft soil depth as
being conservative; and (7) other
changes to incorporate minor editorial
corrections in CoC No. 1025 and
Appendices A and B of the TS. Also, the
Definitions in TS 1.1 will be revised to
include modifications and newly
defined terms; the Limiting Conditions
for Operation and associated
Surveillance Requirements in TS 3.1
and 3.2 will be revised; and editorial
changes will be made to TS 5.2 and 5.4.
The alternative to this action is to
withhold approval of Amendment No. 6
and to require any Part 72 general
licensee, seeking to load spent nuclear
fuel into NAC–MPC System casks under
the changes described in Amendment
No. 6, to request an exemption from the
requirements of 10 CFR 72.212 and
72.214. Under this alternative, each
interested Part 72 licensee would have
to prepare, and the NRC would have to
review, a separate exemption request,
thereby increasing the administrative
burden upon the NRC and the costs to
each licensee.
Approval of the direct final rule is
consistent with previous NRC actions.
Further, as documented in the SER and
the environmental assessment, the
direct final rule will have no adverse
effect on public health and safety. This
direct final rule has no significant
identifiable impact or benefit on other
Government agencies. Based on this
regulatory analysis, the NRC concludes
that the requirements of the direct final
rule are commensurate with the NRC’s
responsibilities for public health and
safety and the common defense and
security. No other available alternative
is believed to be as satisfactory, and
thus, this action is recommended.
Regulatory Flexibility Certification
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
of 1980 (5 U.S.C. 605(b)), the NRC
certifies that this rule will not, if issued,
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:10 Jul 20, 2010
Jkt 220001
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
This direct final rule affects only
nuclear power plant licensees and NAC.
These entities do not fall within the
scope of the definition of ‘‘small
entities’’ set forth in the Regulatory
Flexibility Act or the size standards
established by the NRC (10 CFR 2.810).
Backfit Analysis
The NRC has determined that the
backfit rule (10 CFR 72.62) does not
apply to this direct final rule because
this amendment does not involve any
provisions that would impose backfits
as defined in 10 CFR chapter I.
Therefore, a backfit analysis is not
required.
Congressional Review Act
Under the Congressional Review Act
of 1996, the NRC has determined that
this action is not a major rule and has
verified this determination with the
Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs, Office of Management and
Budget.
List of Subjects in 10 CFR Part 72
Administrative practice and
procedure, Hazardous Waste, Nuclear
materials, Occupational safety and
health, Radiation protection, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements,
Security measures, Spent nuclear fuel,
Whistle blowing.
For the reasons set out in the
preamble and under the authority of the
Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended;
the Energy Reorganization Act of 1974,
as amended; the Nuclear Waste Policy
Act of 1982, as amended; and 5 U.S.C.
552 and 553; the NRC is adopting the
following amendments to 10 CFR part
72.
■
PART 72—LICENSING
REQUIREMENTS FOR THE
INDEPENDENT STORAGE OF SPENT
NUCLEAR FUEL, HIGH-LEVEL
RADIOACTIVE WASTE, AND
REACTOR-RELATED GREATER THAN
CLASS C WASTE
1. The authority citation for Part 72
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: Secs. 51, 53, 57, 62, 63, 65, 69,
81, 161, 182, 183, 184, 186, 187, 189, 68 Stat.
929, 930, 932, 933, 934, 935, 948, 953, 954,
955, as amended, sec. 234, 83 Stat. 444, as
amended (42 U.S.C. 2071, 2073, 2077, 2092,
2093, 2095, 2099, 2111, 2201, 2232, 2233,
2234, 2236, 2237, 2238, 2282); sec. 274, Pub.
L. 86–373, 73 Stat. 688, as amended (42
U.S.C. 2021); sec. 201, as amended, 202, 206,
88 Stat. 1242, as amended, 1244, 1246 (42
U.S.C. 5841, 5842, 5846); Pub. L. 95–601, sec.
10, 92 Stat. 2951 as amended by Pub. L. 102–
486, sec. 7902, 106 Stat. 3123 (42 U.S.C.
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 9990
42295
5851); sec. 102, Pub. L. 91–190, 83 Stat. 853
(42 U.S.C. 4332); secs. 131, 132, 133, 135,
137, 141, Pub. L. 97–425, 96 Stat. 2229, 2230,
2232, 2241, sec. 148, Pub. L. 100–203, 101
Stat. 1330–235 (42 U.S.C. 10151, 10152,
10153, 10155, 10157, 10161, 10168); sec.
1704, 112 Stat. 2750 (44 U.S.C. 3504 note);
sec. 651(e), Pub. L. 109–58, 119 Stat. 806–10
(42 U.S.C. 2014, 2021, 2021b, 2111).
Section 72.44(g) also issued under secs.
142(b) and 148(c), (d), Pub. L. 100–203, 101
Stat. 1330–232, 1330–236 (42 U.S.C.
10162(b), 10168(c),(d)). Section 72.46 also
issued under sec. 189, 68 Stat. 955 (42 U.S.C.
2239); sec. 134, Pub. L. 97–425, 96 Stat. 2230
(42 U.S.C. 10154). Section 72.96(d) also
issued under sec. 145(g), Pub. L. 100–203,
101 Stat. 1330–235 (42 U.S.C. 10165(g)).
Subpart J also issued under secs. 2(2), 2(15),
2(19), 117(a), 141(h), Pub. L. 97–425, 96 Stat.
2202, 2203, 2204, 2222, 2244 (42 U.S.C.
10101, 10137(a), 10161(h)). Subparts K and L
are also issued under sec. 133, 98 Stat. 2230
(42 U.S.C. 10153) and sec. 218(a), 96 Stat.
2252 (42 U.S.C. 10198).
2. In § 72.214, Certificate of
Compliance 1025 is revised to read as
follows:
■
§ 72.214 List of approved spent fuel
storage casks.
*
*
*
*
*
Certificate Number: 1025.
Initial Certificate Effective Date: April
10, 2000.
Amendment Number 1 Effective Date:
November 13, 2001.
Amendment Number 2 Effective Date:
May 29, 2002.
Amendment Number 3 Effective Date:
October 1, 2003.
Amendment Number 4 Effective Date:
October 27, 2004.
Amendment Number 5 Effective Date:
July 24, 2007.
Amendment Number 6 Effective Date:
October 4, 2010.
SAR Submitted by: NAC
International, Inc.
SAR Title: Final Safety Analysis
Report for the NAC Multi-Purpose
Canister System (NAC–MPC System).
Docket Number: 72–1025.
Certificate Expiration Date: April 10,
2020.
Model Number: NAC–MPC.
*
*
*
*
*
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 6th day
of July, 2010.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
R.W. Borchardt,
Executive Director for Operations.
[FR Doc. 2010–17848 Filed 7–20–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
E:\FR\FM\21JYR1.SGM
21JYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 139 (Wednesday, July 21, 2010)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 42292-42295]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-17848]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
10 CFR Part 72
RIN 3150-AI88
[NRC-2010-0183]
List of Approved Spent Fuel Storage Casks: NAC-MPC System,
Revision 6
AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
ACTION: Direct final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is amending its
spent fuel storage regulations by revising the NAC International Inc.
(NAC) NAC-MPC System listing within the ``List of Approved Spent Fuel
Storage Casks'' to include Amendment No. 6 to Certificate of Compliance
(CoC) Number 1025. Amendment No. 6 to the NAC-MPC System CoC will
include the following changes to the configuration of the NAC-MPC
storage system as noted in Appendix B of the Technical Specifications
(TS): Incorporation of a single closure lid with a welded closure ring
for redundant closure into the Transportable Storage Canister (TSC)
design; modification of the TSC and basket design to accommodate up to
68 La Crosse Boiling Water Reactor (LACBWR) spent fuel assemblies (36
undamaged Exxon fuel assemblies and up to 32 damaged fuel cans (in a
preferential loading pattern)) that may contain undamaged Exxon fuel
assemblies and damaged Exxon and Allis Chalmers fuel assemblies and/or
fuel debris; the addition of zirconium alloy shroud compaction debris
to be stored with undamaged and damaged fuel assemblies; minor design
modifications to the Vertical Concrete Cask (VCC) incorporating design
features from the MAGNASTOR system for improved operability of the
system while adhering to as low as is reasonably achievable (ALARA)
principles; an increase in the concrete pad compression strength from
4,000 psi to 6,000 psi; added justification for the 6-ft soil depth as
being conservative; and other changes to incorporate minor editorial
corrections in CoC No. 1025 and Appendices A and B of the TS. Also, the
Definitions in TS 1.1 will be revised to include modifications and
newly defined terms; the Limiting Conditions for Operation and
associated Surveillance Requirements in TS 3.1 and 3.2 will be revised;
and editorial changes will be made to TS 5.2 and 5.4.
DATES: The final rule is effective October 4, 2010, unless significant
adverse comments are received by August 20, 2010. A significant adverse
comment is a comment where the commenter explains why the rule would be
inappropriate, including challenges to the rule's underlying premise or
approach, or would be ineffective or unacceptable without a change. If
the rule is withdrawn, timely notice will be published in the Federal
Register.
ADDRESSES: You can access publicly available documents related to this
document using the following methods:
Federal e-Rulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov and
search for documents filed under Docket ID NRC-2010-0183. Address
questions about NRC dockets to Carol Gallagher at 301-492-3668; e-mail
Carol.Gallagher@nrc.gov.
NRC's Public Document Room (PDR): The public may examine and have
copied for a fee publicly available documents at the NRC's PDR, Room O-
1F21, One White Flint North, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland.
NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS):
Publicly available documents created or received at the NRC are
available electronically at the NRC's Electronic Reading Room at https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. From this page, the public can gain
entry into ADAMS, which provides text and image files of NRC's public
documents. If you do not have access to ADAMS or if there are problems
in accessing the documents located in ADAMS, contact the NRC's PDR
reference staff at 1-899-397-4209, 301-415-4737, or by e-mail to
pdr.resource@nrc.gov. An electronic
[[Page 42293]]
copy of the proposed CoC, TS, and preliminary safety evaluation report
(SER) can be found under ADAMS Package Number ML100890517. The ADAMS
Accession Number for the NAC application, dated January 16, 2009, is
ML090270151.
CoC No. 1025, the TS, the preliminary SER, and the environmental
assessment are available for inspection at the NRC PDR, Room O-1F21,
One White Flint North, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, MD. Single
copies of these documents may be obtained from Jayne M. McCausland,
Office of Federal and State Materials and Environmental Management
Programs, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-
0001, telephone (301) 415-6219, e-mail Jayne.McCausland@nrc.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jayne M. McCausland, Office of Federal
and State Materials and Environmental Management Programs, U.S. Nuclear
Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001, telephone (301) 415-
6219, e-mail Jayne.McCausland@nrc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Section 218(a) of the Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982, as amended
(NWPA), requires that ``[t]he Secretary [of the Department of Energy
(DOE)] shall establish a demonstration program, in cooperation with the
private sector, for the dry storage of spent nuclear fuel at civilian
nuclear power reactor sites, with the objective of establishing one or
more technologies that the [Nuclear Regulatory] Commission may, by
rule, approve for use at the sites of civilian nuclear power reactors
without, to the maximum extent practicable, the need for additional
site-specific approvals by the Commission.'' Section 133 of the NWPA
states, in part, that ``[t]he Commission shall, by rule, establish
procedures for the licensing of any technology approved by the
Commission under Section 218(a) for use at the site of any civilian
nuclear power reactor.''
To implement this mandate, the NRC approved dry storage of spent
nuclear fuel in NRC-approved casks under a general license by
publishing a final rule in 10 CFR part 72, which added a new Subpart K
within 10 CFR part 72, entitled ``General License for Storage of Spent
Fuel at Power Reactor Sites'' (55 FR 29181; July 18, 1990). This rule
also established a new subpart L within 10 CFR part 72, entitled
``Approval of Spent Fuel Storage Casks,'' which contains procedures and
criteria for obtaining NRC approval of spent fuel storage cask designs.
The NRC subsequently issued a final rule on March 9, 2000 (65 FR
12444), that approved the NAC-MPC cask design and added it to the list
of NRC-approved cask designs in 10 CFR 72.214 as CoC No. 1025.
Discussion
On January 16, 2009, and as supplemented on February 11, April 1,
April 30, September 22, 2009, and January 8, 2010, the certificate
holder (NAC) submitted an application to the NRC that requested an
amendment to CoC No. 1025. NAC requested modifications to the cask
design that included the following changes to the configuration of the
NAC-MPC storage system as noted in Appendix B of the TS: (1)
Incorporation of a single closure lid with a welded closure ring for
redundant closure into the TSC design; (2) modification of the TSC and
basket design to accommodate up to 68 LACBWR spent fuel assemblies (36
undamaged Exxon fuel assemblies and up to 32 damaged fuel cans (in a
preferential loading pattern)) that may contain undamaged Exxon fuel
assemblies and damaged Exxon and Allis Chalmers fuel assemblies and/or
fuel debris; (3) the addition of zirconium alloy shroud compaction
debris to be stored with undamaged and damaged fuel assemblies; (4)
minor design modifications to the VCC incorporating design features
from the MAGNASTOR system for improved operability of the system while
adhering to ALARA principles; (5) an increase in the concrete pad
compression strength from 4,000 psi to 6,000 psi; (6) added
justification for the 6-ft soil depth as being conservative; and (7)
other changes to incorporate minor editorial corrections in CoC No.
1025 and Appendices A and B of the TS. Also, the Definitions in TS 1.1
will be revised to include modifications and newly defined terms; the
Limiting Conditions for Operation and associated Surveillance
Requirements in TS 3.1 and 3.2 will be revised; and editorial changes
will be made to TS 5.2 and 5.4.
As documented in the final SER, the NRC staff performed a detailed
safety evaluation of the proposed CoC amendment request and found that
an acceptable safety margin is maintained. In addition, the NRC staff
has determined that there continues to be reasonable assurance that
public health and safety and the environment will be adequately
protected.
This direct final rule revises the NAC-MPC System listing in 10 CFR
72.214 by adding Amendment No. 6 to CoC No. 1025. The amendment
consists of the changes described above, as set forth in the revised
CoC and TS. The particular TS which are changed are identified in the
SER.
The amended NAC-MPC System cask design, when used under the
conditions specified in the CoC, the TS, and NRC regulations, will meet
the requirements of part 72; thus, adequate protection of public health
and safety will continue to be ensured. When this direct final rule
becomes effective, persons who hold a general license under 10 CFR
72.210 may load spent nuclear fuel into NAC-MPC System casks that meet
the criteria of Amendment No. 6 to CoC No. 1025 under 10 CFR 72.212.
Discussion of Amendments by Section
Section 72.214 List of Approved Spent Fuel Storage Casks
Certificate No. 1025 is revised by adding the effective date of
Amendment Number 6.
Procedural Background
This rule is limited to the changes contained in Amendment 6 to CoC
No. 1025 and does not include other aspects of the NAC-MPC System. The
NRC is using the ``direct final rule procedure'' to issue this
amendment because it represents a limited and routine change to an
existing CoC that is expected to be noncontroversial. Adequate
protection of public health and safety and the environment continues to
be ensured. The amendment to the rule will become effective on October
4, 2010. However, if the NRC receives significant adverse comments on
this direct final rule by August 20, 2010, then the NRC will publish a
document that withdraws this action and will subsequently address the
comments received in a final rule as a response to the companion
proposed rule published elsewhere in this issue of the Federal
Register. Absent significant modifications to the proposed revisions
requiring republication, the NRC will not initiate a second comment
period on this action.
A significant adverse comment is a comment where the commenter
explains why the rule would be inappropriate, including challenges to
the rule's underlying premise or approach, or would be ineffective or
unacceptable without a change. A comment is adverse and significant if:
(1) The comment opposes the rule and provides a reason sufficient
to require a substantive response in a notice-and-comment process. For
example, a substantive response is required when:
(a) The comment causes the NRC staff to reevaluate (or reconsider)
its position or conduct additional analysis;
[[Page 42294]]
(b) The comment raises an issue serious enough to warrant a
substantive response to clarify or complete the record; or
(c) The comment raises a relevant issue that was not previously
addressed or considered by the NRC staff.
(2) The comment proposes a change or an addition to the rule, and
it is apparent that the rule would be ineffective or unacceptable
without incorporation of the change or addition.
(3) The comment causes the NRC staff to make a change (other than
editorial) to the rule, CoC, or TS.
For detailed instructions on filing comments, see the companion
proposed rule published elsewhere in this issue of the Federal
Register.
Voluntary Consensus Standards
The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (Pub.
L. 104-113) requires that Federal agencies use technical standards that
are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus standards bodies unless
the use of such a standard is inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. In this direct final rule, the NRC will revise
the NAC-MPC System cask design listed in Sec. 72.214 (List of NRC-
approved spent fuel storage cask designs). This action does not
constitute the establishment of a standard that contains generally
applicable requirements.
Agreement State Compatibility
Under the ``Policy Statement on Adequacy and Compatibility of
Agreement State Programs'' approved by the Commission on June 30, 1997,
and published in the Federal Register on September 3, 1997 (62 FR
46517), this rule is classified as Compatibility Category ``NRC.''
Compatibility is not required for Category ``NRC'' regulations. The NRC
program elements in this category are those that relate directly to
areas of regulation reserved to the NRC by the Atomic Energy Act of
1954, as amended (AEA), or the provisions of Title 10 of the Code of
Federal Regulations. Although an Agreement State may not adopt program
elements reserved to NRC, it may wish to inform its licensees of
certain requirements via a mechanism that is consistent with the
particular State's administrative procedure laws but does not confer
regulatory authority on the State.
Plain Language
The Presidential Memorandum, ``Plain Language in Government
Writing,'' published June 10, 1998 (63 FR 31883), directed that the
Government's documents be in clear and accessible language. The NRC
requests comments on this direct final rule specifically with respect
to the clarity and effectiveness of the language used. Comments should
be sent to the address listed under the heading ADDRESSES, above.
Finding of No Significant Environmental Impact: Availability
Under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, as amended,
and the NRC regulations in subpart A of 10 CFR part 51, the NRC has
determined that this rule, if adopted, would not be a major Federal
action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment
and, therefore, an environmental impact statement is not required. The
NRC has prepared an environmental assessment and, on the basis of this
environmental assessment, has made a finding of no significant impact.
This rule will amend the CoC for the NAC-MPC System cask design within
the list of approved spent fuel storage casks that power reactor
licensees can use to store spent fuel at reactor sites under a general
license. Amendment No. 6 to the NAC-MPC System CoC will include the
following changes to the configuration of the NAC-MPC storage system as
noted in Appendix B of the TS: (1) Incorporation of a single closure
lid with a welded closure ring for redundant closure into the TSC
design; (2) modification of the TSC and basket design to accommodate up
to 68 LACBWR spent fuel assemblies (36 undamaged Exxon fuel assemblies
and up to 32 damaged fuel cans (in a preferential loading pattern))
that may contain undamaged Exxon fuel assemblies and damaged Exxon and
Allis Chalmers fuel assemblies and/or fuel debris; (3) the addition of
zirconium alloy shroud compaction debris to be stored with undamaged
and damaged fuel assemblies; (4) minor design modifications to the VCC
incorporating design features from the MAGNASTOR system for improved
operability of the system while adhering to ALARA principles; (5) an
increase in the concrete pad compression strength from 4,000 psi to
6,000 psi; (6) added justification for the 6-ft soil depth as being
conservative; and (7) other changes to incorporate minor editorial
corrections in CoC No. 1025 and Appendices A and B of the TS. Also, the
Definitions in TS 1.1 will be revised to include modifications and
newly defined terms; the Limiting Conditions for Operation and
associated Surveillance Requirements in TS 3.1 and 3.2 will be revised;
and editorial changes will be made to TS 5.2 and 5.4.
The environmental assessment and finding of no significant impact
on which this determination is based are available for inspection at
the NRC Public Document Room, Room O-1F21, One White Flint North, 11555
Rockville Pike, Rockville, MD. Single copies of the environmental
assessment and finding of no significant impact are available from
Jayne M. McCausland, Office of Federal and State Materials and
Environmental Management Programs, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission,
Washington, DC 20555-0001, telephone (301) 415-6219, e-mail
Jayne.McCausland@nrc.gov.
Paperwork Reduction Act Statement
This direct final rule does not contain a new or amended
information collection requirement subject to the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). Existing requirements were
approved by the Office of Management and Budget, Approval Number 3150-
0132.
Public Protection Notification
The NRC may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, a request for information or an information collection
requirement unless the requesting document displays a currently valid
OMB control number.
Regulatory Analysis
On July 18, 1990 (55 FR 29181), the NRC issued an amendment to 10
CFR PART 72 to provide for the storage of spent nuclear fuel under a
general license in cask designs approved by the NRC. Any nuclear power
reactor licensee can use NRC-approved cask designs to store spent
nuclear fuel if it notifies the NRC in advance, the spent fuel is
stored under the conditions specified in the cask's CoC, and the
conditions of the general license are met. A list of NRC-approved cask
designs is contained in 10 CFR 72.214. On March 9, 2000 (65 FR 12444),
the NRC issued an amendment to part 72 that approved the NAC-MPC System
cask design by adding it to the list of NRC-approved cask designs in 10
CFR 72.214. On January 16, 2009, and as supplemented on February 11,
April 1, April 30, September 22, 2009, and January 8, 2010, the
certificate holder (NAC) submitted an application to the NRC that
requested an amendment to CoC No. 1025. Specifically, the amendment
will include the following changes to the configuration of the NAC-MPC
storage system as noted in Appendix B of the TS: (1) Incorporation of a
single closure lid with a welded closure ring for redundant closure
into
[[Page 42295]]
the TSC design; (2) modification of the TSC and basket design to
accommodate up to 68 LACBWR spent fuel assemblies (36 undamaged Exxon
fuel assemblies and up to 32 damaged fuel cans (in a preferential
loading pattern)) that may contain undamaged Exxon fuel assemblies and
damaged Exxon and Allis Chalmers fuel assemblies and/or fuel debris;
(3) the addition of zirconium alloy shroud compaction debris to be
stored with undamaged and damaged fuel assemblies; (4) minor design
modifications to the VCC incorporating design features from the
MAGNASTOR system for improved operability of the system while adhering
to ALARA principles; (5) an increase in the concrete pad compression
strength from 4000 psi to 6000 psi; (6) added justification for the 6-
ft soil depth as being conservative; and (7) other changes to
incorporate minor editorial corrections in CoC No. 1025 and Appendices
A and B of the TS. Also, the Definitions in TS 1.1 will be revised to
include modifications and newly defined terms; the Limiting Conditions
for Operation and associated Surveillance Requirements in TS 3.1 and
3.2 will be revised; and editorial changes will be made to TS 5.2 and
5.4.
The alternative to this action is to withhold approval of Amendment
No. 6 and to require any Part 72 general licensee, seeking to load
spent nuclear fuel into NAC-MPC System casks under the changes
described in Amendment No. 6, to request an exemption from the
requirements of 10 CFR 72.212 and 72.214. Under this alternative, each
interested Part 72 licensee would have to prepare, and the NRC would
have to review, a separate exemption request, thereby increasing the
administrative burden upon the NRC and the costs to each licensee.
Approval of the direct final rule is consistent with previous NRC
actions. Further, as documented in the SER and the environmental
assessment, the direct final rule will have no adverse effect on public
health and safety. This direct final rule has no significant
identifiable impact or benefit on other Government agencies. Based on
this regulatory analysis, the NRC concludes that the requirements of
the direct final rule are commensurate with the NRC's responsibilities
for public health and safety and the common defense and security. No
other available alternative is believed to be as satisfactory, and
thus, this action is recommended.
Regulatory Flexibility Certification
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (5 U.S.C. 605(b)), the
NRC certifies that this rule will not, if issued, have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. This direct
final rule affects only nuclear power plant licensees and NAC. These
entities do not fall within the scope of the definition of ``small
entities'' set forth in the Regulatory Flexibility Act or the size
standards established by the NRC (10 CFR 2.810).
Backfit Analysis
The NRC has determined that the backfit rule (10 CFR 72.62) does
not apply to this direct final rule because this amendment does not
involve any provisions that would impose backfits as defined in 10 CFR
chapter I. Therefore, a backfit analysis is not required.
Congressional Review Act
Under the Congressional Review Act of 1996, the NRC has determined
that this action is not a major rule and has verified this
determination with the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs,
Office of Management and Budget.
List of Subjects in 10 CFR Part 72
Administrative practice and procedure, Hazardous Waste, Nuclear
materials, Occupational safety and health, Radiation protection,
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Spent
nuclear fuel, Whistle blowing.
0
For the reasons set out in the preamble and under the authority of the
Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended; the Energy Reorganization Act of
1974, as amended; the Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982, as amended; and
5 U.S.C. 552 and 553; the NRC is adopting the following amendments to
10 CFR part 72.
PART 72--LICENSING REQUIREMENTS FOR THE INDEPENDENT STORAGE OF
SPENT NUCLEAR FUEL, HIGH-LEVEL RADIOACTIVE WASTE, AND REACTOR-
RELATED GREATER THAN CLASS C WASTE
0
1. The authority citation for Part 72 continues to read as follows:
Authority: Secs. 51, 53, 57, 62, 63, 65, 69, 81, 161, 182, 183,
184, 186, 187, 189, 68 Stat. 929, 930, 932, 933, 934, 935, 948, 953,
954, 955, as amended, sec. 234, 83 Stat. 444, as amended (42 U.S.C.
2071, 2073, 2077, 2092, 2093, 2095, 2099, 2111, 2201, 2232, 2233,
2234, 2236, 2237, 2238, 2282); sec. 274, Pub. L. 86-373, 73 Stat.
688, as amended (42 U.S.C. 2021); sec. 201, as amended, 202, 206, 88
Stat. 1242, as amended, 1244, 1246 (42 U.S.C. 5841, 5842, 5846);
Pub. L. 95-601, sec. 10, 92 Stat. 2951 as amended by Pub. L. 102-
486, sec. 7902, 106 Stat. 3123 (42 U.S.C. 5851); sec. 102, Pub. L.
91-190, 83 Stat. 853 (42 U.S.C. 4332); secs. 131, 132, 133, 135,
137, 141, Pub. L. 97-425, 96 Stat. 2229, 2230, 2232, 2241, sec. 148,
Pub. L. 100-203, 101 Stat. 1330-235 (42 U.S.C. 10151, 10152, 10153,
10155, 10157, 10161, 10168); sec. 1704, 112 Stat. 2750 (44 U.S.C.
3504 note); sec. 651(e), Pub. L. 109-58, 119 Stat. 806-10 (42 U.S.C.
2014, 2021, 2021b, 2111).
Section 72.44(g) also issued under secs. 142(b) and 148(c), (d),
Pub. L. 100-203, 101 Stat. 1330-232, 1330-236 (42 U.S.C. 10162(b),
10168(c),(d)). Section 72.46 also issued under sec. 189, 68 Stat.
955 (42 U.S.C. 2239); sec. 134, Pub. L. 97-425, 96 Stat. 2230 (42
U.S.C. 10154). Section 72.96(d) also issued under sec. 145(g), Pub.
L. 100-203, 101 Stat. 1330-235 (42 U.S.C. 10165(g)). Subpart J also
issued under secs. 2(2), 2(15), 2(19), 117(a), 141(h), Pub. L. 97-
425, 96 Stat. 2202, 2203, 2204, 2222, 2244 (42 U.S.C. 10101,
10137(a), 10161(h)). Subparts K and L are also issued under sec.
133, 98 Stat. 2230 (42 U.S.C. 10153) and sec. 218(a), 96 Stat. 2252
(42 U.S.C. 10198).
0
2. In Sec. 72.214, Certificate of Compliance 1025 is revised to read
as follows:
Sec. 72.214 List of approved spent fuel storage casks.
* * * * *
Certificate Number: 1025.
Initial Certificate Effective Date: April 10, 2000.
Amendment Number 1 Effective Date: November 13, 2001.
Amendment Number 2 Effective Date: May 29, 2002.
Amendment Number 3 Effective Date: October 1, 2003.
Amendment Number 4 Effective Date: October 27, 2004.
Amendment Number 5 Effective Date: July 24, 2007.
Amendment Number 6 Effective Date: October 4, 2010.
SAR Submitted by: NAC International, Inc.
SAR Title: Final Safety Analysis Report for the NAC Multi-Purpose
Canister System (NAC-MPC System).
Docket Number: 72-1025.
Certificate Expiration Date: April 10, 2020.
Model Number: NAC-MPC.
* * * * *
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 6th day of July, 2010.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
R.W. Borchardt,
Executive Director for Operations.
[FR Doc. 2010-17848 Filed 7-20-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P