Hazardous Materials: Incorporation of Certain Cargo Tank Special Permits Into Regulations, 42364-42373 [2010-17712]
Download as PDF
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
42364
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 139 / Wednesday, July 21, 2010 / Proposed Rules
into two sections. The select agents and
toxins listed in § 73.3 (HHS select agents
and toxins) are those regulated only by
HHS under the authority of the
Bioterrorism Act. The select agents and
toxins listed in § 73.4 (Overlap select
agents and toxins) are those regulated by
HHS under the authority of the
Bioterrorism Act and regulated by
Secretary of Agriculture (USDA) under
the authority of the Agricultural
Bioterrorism Protection Act of 2002 (7
U.S.C. 8401).
To fulfill this statutory mandate,
CDC’s Division of Select Agents and
Toxins (DSAT) has initiated its biennial
review process which will include
consultation with subject matter experts
including the Intragovernmental Select
Agents and Toxins Technical Advisory
Committee (ISATTAC). The ISATTAC is
comprised of Federal government
employees from the CDC, the National
Institutes of Health (NIH), the Food and
Drug Administration (FDA), the USDA/
Animal and Plant Health Inspection
Service (APHIS), USDA/Agricultural
Research Service (ARS), USDA/Center
for Veterinary Biologics (CVB), the
Department of Homeland Security
(DHS), and the Department of Defense
(DOD).
The purpose of this advanced notice
of proposed rulemaking is to seek public
comment on (1) the appropriateness of
the current HHS list of select agents and
toxins, (2) whether there are other
agents or toxins that should be added to
the HHS list, (3) whether agents or
toxins currently on the HHS list should
be deleted from the list, (4) whether the
HHS select agent list should be tiered
based on the relative bioterrorism risk of
each agent or toxin, and (5) whether the
security requirements for agents in the
highest tier should be further stratified
based on type of use or other factors.
A recent report by the National
Research Council recommended that the
select agent list should be ordered based
on the potential of an agent to be used
as a biothreat, and a graded series of
security procedures should be applied
so that the greatest resources and
scrutiny go to securing agents that pose
a maximum risk (https://
www8.nationalacademies.org/
onpinews/
newsitem.aspx?RecordID=12774). As
noted above, we are also seeking public
comment on whether the HHS list
should be tiered based on the relative
bioterrorism risk of each agent or toxin
and whether the security requirements
for agents in the highest tier should be
further stratified based on type of use or
other factors. If a commenter believes
that the HHS list should be tiered and/
or stratified, we would also be
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:10 Jul 20, 2010
Jkt 220001
interested in what criteria should be
used to designate higher-risk agents, and
what, if any, changes we should make
in security requirements for what would
be determined to be higher-risk agents.
If implemented, tiering of the HHS
select agent list could allow for the
application of more stringent security
measures for those select agents or
toxins which pose a higher risk to
public health and safety if stolen or
misused. If implemented, stratification
of the HHS select agent list could allow
for varying levels of security
requirements for entities that possess
the highest tier agents, based on use of
the agent or other factors. If a
commenter believes that tiering and/or
stratification of the HHS select agent list
is advisable, we would be interested in
comments as to what criteria should be
used to designate which agents and
toxins pose a higher bioterrorism risk
and what criteria should be used for
stratifying the highest risk agents. For
example, the tiering and/or stratification
of the HHS select agent list might
consider the relative ease with which a
particular agent or toxin might be
disseminated or transmitted between
humans or throughout the environment;
the potential for high mortality rates; the
potential for a major public health
impact; whether misuse of an agent or
toxin might result in public panic or
other social or economic disruption; and
whether the agent or toxin requires
Federal, State and local officials to take
special action in planning for major
public health disasters (quarantine
needs, eradicated agent or toxin).
Additionally, we would also be
interested in what corresponding
changes should be made to the security
requirements found in 42 CFR 73.11 to
increase protection for higher tier agents
or toxins; whether those security
requirements should be stratified based
on the use of the agent or other factors;
and whether such changes should be
prescriptive (the imposition of specific
restraints, restrictions, or requirements)
or risk-based (security requirement
based on a security risk assessment), or
a combination of prescriptive and riskbased.
Following the conclusion of CDC
review, we will publish another notice
in the Federal Register either proposing
that the select agent and toxin list
remain the same, or that specific
biological agents or toxins be added to
or deleted from the list. If appropriate,
we will also propose any changes to the
Select Agent regulations (42 CFR Part
73) to implement a tiering and/or
stratification schema along with any
corresponding amendments to the
current security requirements in the
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Select Agent regulations that might be
required for higher-risk agents and
toxins.
This action has been determined to be
significant for the purposes of Executive
Order 12866 and, therefore, has been
reviewed by the Office of Management
and Budget.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 262a.
Dated: January 8, 2010.
Kathleen Sebelius,
Secretary.
Editorial Note: This document was
received in the Office of the Federal Register
on July 15, 2010.
[FR Doc. 2010–17728 Filed 7–20–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163–18–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials
Safety Administration
49 CFR Parts 171 and 173
[Docket No. PHMSA–2010–0017 (HM–245)]
RIN 2137–AE56
Hazardous Materials: Incorporation of
Certain Cargo Tank Special Permits
Into Regulations
Pipeline and Hazardous
Materials Safety Administration
(PHMSA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
The Pipeline and Hazardous
Materials Safety Administration is
proposing to amend the Hazardous
Materials Regulations to incorporate
provisions contained in certain widely
used or longstanding cargo tank special
permits that are granted to multiple
parties and have an established safety
record. Special permits allow a
company or individual to package or
ship a hazardous material in a manner
that varies from the regulations
provided an equivalent level of safety is
maintained. The proposed revisions are
intended to provide wider access to the
regulatory flexibility offered in the
special permits and eliminate the need
for numerous renewal requests, thereby,
facilitating commerce activity and
reducing paperwork burdens while
maintaining an appropriate level of
safety.
SUMMARY:
Comments must be received by
August 20, 2010. A 30 day comment
period is appropriate for this
rulemaking because it proposes to
incorporate long-standing, widely used
special permits into the HMR. These
DATES:
E:\FR\FM\21JYP1.SGM
21JYP1
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 139 / Wednesday, July 21, 2010 / Proposed Rules
special permits have well-established
safety records. Incorporation of these
special permits would reduce the
compliance burden and cost on both
industry and government by removing
the need to apply for special permits.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
by identification of the docket number
(PHMSA–2010–0017 (HM–245)) by any
of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
online instructions for submitting
comments.
• Fax: 1–202–493–2251.
• Mail: Docket Operations, U.S.
Department of Transportation, West
Building, Ground Floor, Room W12–
140, Routing Symbol M–30, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC
20590.
• Hand Delivery: To Docket
Operations, Room W12–140 on the
ground floor of the West Building, 1200
New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington,
DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays.
Instructions: All submissions must
include the agency name and docket
number for this notice at the beginning
of the comment. All comments received
will be posted without change to the
Federal Docket Management System
(FDMS), including any personal
information.
Docket: For access to the dockets to
read background documents or
comments received, go to https://
www.regulations.gov or DOT’s Docket
Operations Office (see ADDRESSES).
Privacy Act: Anyone is able to search
the electronic form of any written
communications and comments
received into any of our dockets by the
name of the individual submitting the
document (or signing the document, if
submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may
review DOT’s complete Privacy Act
Statement in the Federal Register
published on April 11, 2000 (Volume
65, Number 70; Pages 19477–78).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joan
McIntyre or Matthew Nickels, Office of
Hazardous Materials Standards, (202)
366–8553, Pipeline and Hazardous
Materials Safety Administration
(PHMSA), or John Van Steenburg, Office
of Enforcement and Compliance, (202)
366–5125, Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Administration (FMCSA), 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC
20590.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
II. Overview of Proposed Amendments
III. Summary Review of Amendments
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:10 Jul 20, 2010
Jkt 220001
IV. Regulatory Analyses and Notices
I. Background
The Pipeline and Hazardous Materials
Safety Administration (PHMSA) is
proposing to amend the Hazardous
Materials Regulations (HMR; 49 CFR
Parts 171–180) to incorporate certain
requirements based on existing special
permits issued by PHMSA under 49
CFR Part 107, Subpart B (§§ 107.101 to
107.127). A special permit sets forth
alternative requirements (variances) to
the requirements in the HMR by means
that achieve a safety level that at the
least corresponds to the safety level
required under the regulations and that
is consistent with the public interest.
Congress expressly authorized DOT to
issue these variances in the Hazardous
Materials Transportation Act of 1975.
The HMR generally are performance
oriented regulations, which provides the
regulated community with a certain
amount of flexibility in meeting safety
requirements. Even so, not every
transportation situation can be
anticipated and built into the
regulations. Innovation is a strength of
our economy and the hazardous
materials community is particularly
strong at developing new materials and
technologies and innovative ways of
moving materials. Special permits
enable the hazardous materials industry
to quickly, effectively and safely
integrate new products and technologies
into the production and transportation
stream. Thus, special permits provide a
mechanism for testing new
technologies, promoting increased
transportation efficiency and
productivity, and ensuring global
competitiveness.
A special permit must achieve at least
an equivalent level of safety to that
specified in the HMR. Implementation
of new technologies and operational
techniques can enhance safety because
the authorized operations or activities
achieve a greater level of safety than
currently required under the
regulations. Special permits also reduce
the volume and complexity of the HMR
by addressing unique or infrequent
transportation situations that would be
difficult to accommodate in regulations
intended for use by a wide range of
shippers and carriers. PHMSA conducts
ongoing reviews of special permits to
identify widely used and longstanding
special permits with an established
safety record for adoption into
regulations for broader applicability.
Converting these special permits into
regulations reduces paperwork burdens
and facilitates commerce while
maintaining an acceptable level of
safety. Additionally, adoption of special
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
42365
permits as rules of general applicability
provides wider access to the benefits
and regulatory flexibility of the
provisions granted in the special
permits. Factors that influence whether
a specific special permit is a candidate
for regulatory action include: the safety
record for hazardous materials
transported; transportation operations
conducted under a special permit; the
potential for broad application of a
special permit; suitability of provisions
in the special permit for incorporation
into the HMR; rulemaking activity in
related areas; and agency priorities.
Although PHMSA does not issue a
special permit to an industry
association, PHMSA may issue a special
permit to members of an industry
association when many of its members
have a common interest in obtaining
authority to perform a specific
transportation activity, there is no large
business entity to take the lead in
seeking such authority, and the
association has the resources to gather
the necessary information and perform
any necessary research. Special permits
issued to the members of associations
are potentially among the most suitable
types of special permit for later
adoption into the HMR. Such special
permits have broad applicability;
moreover, many of them have been in
effect for a number of years and have
demonstrated safety records.
The six special permits addressed in
this notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM), which authorize cargo tank
transportation operations not
specifically permitted under the HMR,
were initially issued to members of
industry associations or similar
organizations. They have wellestablished safety records and, thus, are
candidates for incorporation into the
HMR. Incorporating these special
permits into the HMR would eliminate
the need for over 10,000 current
grantees to reapply for the renewal of
six special permits every four years and
for PHMSA to process the renewal
applications.
Incorporation of these special permits
into the HMR also eliminates a
significant paperwork burden. Unless
otherwise excepted by this agency, a
copy of each special permit must be
maintained at each facility where a
packaging is manufactured under a
special permit, at each facility where a
package is offered or re-offered for
transportation under a special permit
carried on board each cargo vessel or
aircraft, and in some cases must be
carried aboard each transport vehicle
used to transport a hazardous material
under a special permit.
E:\FR\FM\21JYP1.SGM
21JYP1
42366
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 139 / Wednesday, July 21, 2010 / Proposed Rules
II. Overview of Proposed Amendments
In this NPRM, PHMSA is proposing to
revise the HMR by providing:
• Authorization to transport liquefied
petroleum gas (LPG) in non-DOT
specification cargo tank motor vehicles
known as moveable fuel storage tenders
that are used exclusively for agricultural
purposes.
• Authorization to transport Division
6.1 liquid soil pesticide fumigants in
DOT Specification MC 306 and DOT
406 cargo tank motor vehicles and DOT
57 portable tanks, used exclusively for
agricultural purposes.
• Authorization to transport certain
hazardous materials used for roadway
striping in non-DOT specification cargo
tanks.
• Authorization for private motor
carriers to transport LPG in consumer
storage containers with quantities
greater than 5 percent of the container’s
water capacity.
• Authorization to transport nurse
tanks securely mounted on field trucks.
• Authorization for nurse tanks with
missing or illegible ASME plates to
continue to be used in anhydrous
ammonia service under specified
conditions.
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
III. Summary Review of Amendments
A. Moveable Fuel Storage Tenders
Special permit SP 11209 authorizes
the transportation of LPG in non-DOT
specification cargo tank motor vehicles,
commonly known as moveable fuel
storage tenders, used exclusively for
agricultural purposes. Moveable fuel
storage tenders are used to supply LPG
fuel to farmers for crop drying, crop
irrigation, flame weeding, plant
defoliation prior to harvest, and other
agricultural operations.
The special permit has been in effect
since 1994 and has been utilized by
upwards of 3,400 grantees. A review of
the Hazardous Materials Incident Data
library did not reveal any incidents
related to this special permit over, at
least, the past ten years. Each vehicle
operated under this special permit
conforms to the ASME Code in effect at
the time of its manufacture. The design
and use of these vehicles is included in
the provisions of the National Fire
Protection Association pamphlet no. 58,
Storage and Handling of Liquefied
Petroleum Gases.
PHMSA proposes to incorporate the
terms of special permit SP 11209 into
the HMR by amending § 173.5 to
authorize the transportation of LPG in
moveable fuel storage tenders used
exclusively for agricultural purposes
and operated by a private motor carrier.
(A ‘‘private motor carrier,’’ as defined in
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:10 Jul 20, 2010
Jkt 220001
interpretation letters issued by PHMSA,
is a carrier who transports the business’s
own products and does not provide
such transportation service to other
businesses). As proposed, a non-DOT
specification cargo tank motor vehicle
used as a moveable fuel storage tender
must: (1) Have a minimum design
pressure of 250 psig; (2) conform to the
requirements of the ASME Code in
effect at the time the cargo tank was
manufactured and marked accordingly;
(3) have a water capacity of 1,200
gallons or less; (4) conform to applicable
requirements in National Fire Protection
Association (NFPA) Pamphlet No. 58;
and (5) be mounted securely on a motor
vehicle. In addition, the cargo tank must
be filled as prescribed in § 173.315(b).
When filled, transportation of a
moveable fuel storage tender would be
limited to movements over local roads
between fields using the shortest
practical distance. In addition,
transportation of a moveable storage fuel
tender to an LPG distribution facility for
re-filling would be permitted only if it
contains no more than 5 percent of its
water capacity.
B. Liquid Soil Pesticide Fumigants
Special permit SP 13113 authorizes
the transportation of Division 6.1 liquid
soil pesticide fumigants in MC 306 and
DOT 406 cargo tank motor vehicles and
DOT 57 portable tanks used exclusively
for agricultural purposes.
Transportation of these materials is
limited to private motor carriage and
must be between a bulk loading facility
and farms (including between farms) not
exceeding 150 miles from one another.
Liquid soil pesticide fumigants are used
by farmers as an alternative to the
agricultural use of methyl bromide to
ensure the adequate protection of crops
from pesticide infestation, and
consequently, to preserve agricultural
productivity.
This special permit has been in effect
since 2002 and has been utilized by
hundreds of grantees. A review of the
Hazardous Materials Incident Data
library did not reveal any incidents
related to this special permit since the
date of its issuance. Prior to 2002, when
this material was classed as
Dichloropropenes, 6.1, UN2047, PG III,
it was routinely shipped, according to
49 CFR 173.242 in MC 306 and DOT 406
cargo tanks and DOT 57 portable tanks.
The same tanks have been widely used
to transport gasoline, a low flashpoint
PGII liquid. The pressure relief systems
and bottom discharge equipment on the
cargo tanks offer equivalent safety in
terms of containment and operation of
pressure relief systems. Also, stainless
steel DOT 57 portable tanks provide
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
comparable containment to metal, rigid
plastic, and composite Intermediate
Bulk Containers (IBCs), which are
authorized for transport of Division 6.1
liquid soil pesticide fumigants under
§ 173.202.
PHMSA proposes to incorporate the
terms of special permit SP 13113 into
the HMR by also amending § 173.5 to
authorize the transportation of Division
6.1 liquid soil pesticide fumigants in
MC 306 and DOT 406 cargo tank motor
vehicles and DOT 57 portable tanks by
a private motor carrier, exclusively for
agricultural purposes. As proposed, MC
306 and DOT 406 cargo tank motor
vehicles used for the transportation of
these fumigants must: (1) Meet
qualification and maintenance
requirements (including periodic testing
and inspection) in accordance with
Subpart E of Part 180; and (2) conform
to the pressure relief system
requirements specified in
§ 173.243(b)(1). In addition, MC 306
cargo tank motor vehicles must be
equipped with stop-valves capable of
being remotely closed by manual and
mechanical means; and DOT 406 cargo
tanks must conform to the bottom outlet
requirements specified in
§ 173.243(b)(2). Also as proposed, DOT
57 portable tanks used to transport
Division 6.1 liquid soil pesticide
fumigants must be constructed of
stainless steel. Finally, MC 306 and
DOT 406 cargo tank motor vehicles and
DOT 57 portable tanks used to transport
Division 6.1 liquid soil pesticide
fumigants must be used exclusively for
agricultural purposes, operated by a
private motor carrier; and limited to
transport between a bulk loading facility
and farms (including between farms) not
to exceed 150 miles from one another.
C. Non-DOT Specification Cargo Tanks
Used for Roadway Striping
Special permit SP 12284 authorizes
the transportation in commerce of
certain hazardous materials used for
roadway striping in non-DOT
specification cargo tanks. These nonDOT specification cargo tanks are used
for the low hazard job of applying
roadway striping to paved roads
throughout the United States.
The special permit has been in effect
since 1999 and has been utilized by over
100 grantees. A review of the Hazardous
Materials Incident Data library did not
reveal any incidents related to this
special permit since the date of its
issuance. Based on the safety record,
PHMSA is proposing to incorporate the
provisions of special permit SP 12284
into the HMR by adding a new
paragraph (c) to § 173.5a to authorize
the transportation of certain hazardous
E:\FR\FM\21JYP1.SGM
21JYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 139 / Wednesday, July 21, 2010 / Proposed Rules
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
materials used for roadway striping to
be transported in non-DOT specification
cargo tanks provided the conditions
specified in the new paragraph are met.
The new paragraph (c) would specify
conditions that include packaging
specifications, inspection and testing
requirements, requirements for
maintaining records, and operational
controls. Consistent with the special
permit, paragraph (c) also would
include marking requirements in
addition to applicable marking and
placarding requirements in subparts D
and F. The section title heading would
also be revised to reflect the addition of
non-DOT specification cargo tanks used
for roadway striping into this section.
Finally, § 173.242(b) would be revised
to include the authorization to use nonDOT specification cargo tanks used for
roadway striping.
D. LPG Storage Containers
Currently, in accordance with
§ 173.315(j)(4), LPG may not be
transported in consumer storage
containers that contain greater than 5
percent of the container’s water
capacity. Special permit SP 13341
authorizes the transportation by private
motor carrier of LPG in consumer
storage containers in quantities greater
than 5 percent of the container’s water
capacity. The storage containers are
designed for permanent installation on
consumer premises. The special permit
authorizes the transportation of a
storage container from the consumer
location to the container owner’s nearest
LPG plant.
The special permit has been in effect
since 2004 and has been utilized by
several thousand grantees. A review of
the Hazardous Materials Incident Data
library did not reveal any incidents
related to this special permit since the
date of its issuance. Prior to 1998,
consumer storage containers containing
greater than 5 percent water capacity
were routinely transported without any
known incidents. The prohibition of
transporting containers with more than
5 percent water capacity resulted from
concern of the potential for confusion
between ASME and DOT tanks, as
ASME tanks are not designed to be
lifted by the lugs with product inside.
This proposal requires lifting with
slings, not by the lugs. Also,
transporting a tank with some product
is sometimes preferable from a safety
standpoint than removing LPG from a
tank at a residence.
PHMSA proposes to incorporate the
terms of special permit SP 13341 into
the HMR by revising § 173.315(j) to
authorize the transportation of LPG in
consumer storage containers containing
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:10 Jul 20, 2010
Jkt 220001
greater than 5 percent of the container’s
water capacity. As proposed, the storage
container must have a water capacity
not exceeding 500 gallons and be ASME
‘‘U’’ stamped to indicate that it was
designed and constructed in accordance
with ASME Code requirements. In
addition, the container must be
inspected for leaks, corroded or abraded
areas, dents, weld distortions, or any
other conditions that could make the
container unsafe for transportation.
PHMSA also proposes to require that:
(1) Only one storage container may be
transported at one time on a motor
vehicle; (2) the storage container must
be lifted by slings, not lifting lugs; and
(3) the storage container must be loaded
and secured on the motor vehicle so that
the container is well-secured against
movement and completely within the
envelope of the vehicle. Finally,
PHMSA proposes to limit transportation
to one-way movement from the
consumer’s premises to the container
owner’s nearest facility.
E. Nurse Tanks
Nurse tanks are non-DOT
specification cargo tanks used to
transport and apply anhydrous
ammonia fertilizers. The HMR authorize
the use of nurse tanks operated by
private motor carriers exclusively for
agricultural purposes provided that the
nurse tank: (1) Has a minimum design
pressure of 250 psig and meets the
requirements of Section VIII of the
ASME code in effect at the time the
nurse tank was manufactured; (2) is
equipped with pressure relief valves; (3)
has a capacity of 3,000 gallons or less;
(4) is loaded to a filling density no
greater than 56 percent; and (5) is
securely mounted on a farm wagon.
Because they are non-DOT specification
containers, currently nurse tanks are not
subject to periodic inspection, testing,
or requalification requirements.
Nurse tanks mounted on field trucks.
Special permit SP 10950 authorizes the
use of a nurse tank securely mounted on
a field truck. Field trucks are
specifically designed and equipped to
improve safety and efficiency by being
more maneuverable and more stable
than a farm wagon when moving over
hilly terrain. These trucks are operated
in remote rural areas in eastern
Washington, Oregon, and northern
Idaho within a short distance of the
fertilizer distribution point. The special
permit has been in effect since 1993 and
has been utilized by over a hundred
grantees. A review of the Hazardous
Materials Incident Data library did not
reveal any incidents related to this
special permit since the date of its
issuance. Tanks operated under this
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
42367
special permit are subject to the
periodic testing requirements under
Subpart E of Part 180.
Based on the safety record, PHMSA is
proposing to incorporate the provisions
of SP 10950 into the HMR by adding a
new paragraph (m)(2) to § 173.315. As
proposed, nurse tanks mounted on field
trucks would be required to be
inspected and tested in accordance with
Subpart E of Part 180 as specified for
MC 331 cargo tanks. Operations would
be restricted to rural roads within 50
miles of the distribution site where the
nurse tank is loaded.
Nurse tanks with missing or illegible
ASME plates. As indicated above, nurse
tanks must be manufactured in
accordance with the applicable ASME
Code requirements in effect at the time
of manufacture. The ASME Code
requires tanks built to its specifications
to have an attached plate that lists the
manufacturer, maximum allowable
working pressure, minimum design
metal temperature, and the year of
manufacture. A number of nurse tanks
are missing the required ASME plates or
have illegible ASME plates. Special
permit SP 13554 permits the continued
use in anhydrous ammonia service of
nurse tanks with missing or illegible
ASME plates provided the tanks are
inspected and tested. Specifically, the
tanks must undergo an external visual
inspection and testing using the
procedures specified in § 180.407(d),
thickness tested using the procedures
specified in § 180.407(i), and pressure
tested using the procedures specified in
§ 180.407(g). The special permit also
establishes minimum head and shell
thickness, below which the nurse tank
must be removed from service.
The special permit has been in effect
since 2004 and has been utilized by
thousands of grantees. A review of the
Hazardous Materials Incident Data
library did not reveal any incidents
related to this special permit since the
date of its issuance. Although 49 CFR
173.315(m) requires that a nurse tank
‘‘meet the requirements of the edition of
Section VIII of the ASME Code in effect
at the time it was manufactured and is
marked accordingly,’’ if the plate is
missing or illegible the nurse tank can
not be used. Therefore, these additional
requirements that nurse tanks operating
under the special permit must follow
(i.e. the thickness testing, the pressure
testing, and the external visual
inspection), safely provides for the
continued use of these tanks.
In this NPRM, PHMSA is proposing to
incorporate the terms of special permit
SP 13554 into the HMR by adding a new
paragraph (m)(3) in § 173.315. As
proposed, existing nurse tanks with
E:\FR\FM\21JYP1.SGM
21JYP1
42368
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 139 / Wednesday, July 21, 2010 / Proposed Rules
missing or illegible ASME plates that
successfully pass the required
inspections and tests and are marked
with a unique identifier would be
authorized to remain in service.
Finally, in § 171.7, we are proposing
to revise the entries, American Society
of Mechanical Engineers (ASME),
National Board of Boiler and Pressure
Vessel Inspectors (NBIC) and the
National Fire Protection Association
(NFPA) to reflect the addition of the
incorporated by reference materials to
the applicable newly proposed
regulatory text.
IV. Rulemaking Analyses and Notices
A. Statutory/Legal Authority for This
Rulemaking
This NPRM is published under the
authority of 49 U.S.C. 5103(b) which
authorizes the Secretary to prescribe
regulations for the safe transportation,
including security, of hazardous
material in intrastate, interstate, and
foreign commerce. 49 U.S.C. 5117(a)
authorizes the Secretary of
Transportation to issue a special permit
from a regulation prescribed in 5103(b),
5104, 5110, or 5112 of the Federal
Hazardous Materials Transportation
Law to a person transporting, or causing
to be transported, hazardous material in
a way that achieves a safety level at least
equal to the safety level required under
the law, or consistent with the public
interest, if a required safety level does
not exist. If adopted as proposed, the
final rule would amend the regulations
incorporating provisions from certain
widely used and longstanding special
permits that have established a history
of safety and which may, therefore, be
converted into the regulations for
general use.
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
B. Executive Order 12866 and DOT
Regulatory Policies and Procedures
This proposed rule is not considered
a significant regulatory action under
section 3(f) and was not reviewed by the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB). The proposed rule is not
considered a significant rule under the
Regulatory Policies and Procedures
order issued by the Department of
Transportation [44 FR 11034].
In this notice, PHMSA proposes to
amend the HMR by incorporating
alternatives this agency has permitted
under widely used and longstanding
special permits with established safety
records that we have determined meet
the safety criteria for inclusion in the
HMR. Incorporation of these special
permits into regulations of general
applicability will provide shippers and
carriers with additional flexibility to
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:10 Jul 20, 2010
Jkt 220001
comply with established safety
requirements, thereby reducing
transportation costs and increasing
productivity. In addition, the proposals
in this NPRM will reduce the paperwork
burden on industry and this agency
caused by continued renewals of special
permits. The provisions of this proposed
rule will promote the continued safe
transportation of hazardous materials
while reducing transportation costs for
the industry and administrative costs for
the agency.
C. Executive Order 13132
This proposed rule was analyzed in
accordance with the principles and
criteria contained in Executive Order
13132 (‘‘Federalism’’). This proposed
rule would preempt State, local and
Indian Tribe requirements but does not
propose any regulation that has
substantial direct effects on the States,
the relationship between the national
government and the States, or the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of governments. Therefore, the
consultation and funding requirements
of Executive Order 13132 do not apply.
Federal hazardous material
transportation law, 49 U.S.C. 5101–
5128, contains an express preemption
provision (49 U.S.C. 5125(b))
preempting State, local and Indian Tribe
requirements on certain covered
subjects. Covered subjects are:
(1) The designation, description, and
classification of hazardous materials;
(2) The packing, repacking, handling,
labeling marking, and placarding of
hazardous materials;
(3) The preparation, execution, and
use of shipping documents related to
hazardous materials and requirements
related to the number, contents, and
placement of those documents;
(4) The written notification,
recording, and reporting of the
unintentional release in transportation
of hazardous materials; or
(5) The design, manufacture,
fabrication, marking, maintenance,
reconditioning, repair, or testing of a
packaging or container represented,
marked, certified, or sold as qualified
for use in transporting hazardous
materials.
This proposed rule addresses covered
subject items 2, 3, and 5 and would
preempt any State, local, or Indian Tribe
requirements not meeting the
‘‘substantively the same’’ standard.
Federal hazardous materials
transportation law provides at 49 U.S.C.
5125(b)(2) that if PHMSA issues a
regulation concerning any of the
covered subjects, PHMSA must
determine and publish in the Federal
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Register the effective date of Federal
preemption. The effective date may not
be earlier than the 90th day following
the date of issuance of the final rule and
not later than two years after the date of
issuance. PHMSA proposes the effective
date of Federal preemption be 90 days
from publication of a final rule in this
matter in the Federal Register.
D. Executive Order 13175
This proposed rule was analyzed in
accordance with the principles and
criteria contained in Executive Order
13175 (‘‘Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments’’).
Because this proposed rule does not
have Tribal implications and does not
impose substantial direct compliance
costs on Indian Tribal governments, the
funding and consultation requirements
of Executive Order 13175 do not apply.
E. Regulatory Flexibility Act, Executive
Order 13272, and DOT Procedures and
Policies
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.) requires an agency to
review regulations to assess their impact
on small entities. An agency must
conduct a regulatory flexibility analysis
unless it determines and certifies that a
rule is not expected to have a significant
impact on a substantial number of small
entities. This proposed rule incorporates
into the HMR certain widely used
special permits. Incorporation of these
special permits into regulations of
general applicability will provide
shippers and carriers with additional
flexibility to comply with established
safety requirements, thereby reducing
transportation costs and increasing
productivity. Therefore, I certify this
rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities.
This proposed rule has been
developed in accordance with Executive
Order 13272 (‘‘Proper Consideration of
Small Entities in Agency Rulemaking’’)
and DOT’s procedures and policies to
promote compliance with the
Regulatory Flexibility Act to ensure that
potential impacts of draft rules on small
entities are properly considered.
F. Paperwork Reduction Act
This proposed rule does not impose
new information collection
requirements. PHMSA has an approved
information collection under OMB
Control Number 2137–0051,
‘‘Rulemaking, Special Permits, and
Preemption Requirements,’’ currently
being reviewed for renewal by OMB.
This NPRM may result in a decrease in
the annual burden and costs under OMB
Control Number 2137–0051 due to
E:\FR\FM\21JYP1.SGM
21JYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 139 / Wednesday, July 21, 2010 / Proposed Rules
proposed changes to incorporate
provisions contained in certain widely
used or longstanding special permits
that have an established safety record.
Under the Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995, no person is required to
respond to an information collection
unless it has been approved by OMB
and displays a valid OMB control
number. Section 1320.8(d), title 5, Code
of Federal Regulations requires that
PHMSA provide interested members of
the public and affected agencies an
opportunity to comment on information
and recordkeeping requests.
This notice identifies a revised
information collection request that
PHMSA will submit to OMB for
approval based on the requirements in
this proposed rule. PHMSA has
developed burden estimates to reflect
changes in this proposed rule. PHMSA
estimates that the information collection
and recordkeeping burden as proposed
in this rule would be decreased as
follows:
OMB Control No. 2137–0051
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
Decrease in Annual Number of
Respondents: 185.
Decrease in Annual Responses: 185.
Decrease in Annual Burden Hours:
185.
Decrease in Annual Burden Costs:
$7,400.
PHMSA specifically requests
comments on the information collection
and recordkeeping burdens associated
with developing, implementing, and
maintaining these requirements for
approval under this proposed rule.
Requests for a copy of this
information collection should be
directed to Deborah Boothe or T. Glenn
Foster, Office of Hazardous Materials
Standards (PHH–11), Pipeline and
Hazardous Materials Safety
Administration, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590–
0001, Telephone (202) 366–8553.
Address written comments to the
Dockets Unit as identified in the
ADDRESSES section of this rulemaking.
We must receive comments regarding
information collection burdens prior to
the close of the comment period
identified in the DATES section of this
rulemaking. In addition, you may
submit comments specifically related to
the information collection burden to the
PHMSA Desk Officer, Office of
Management and Budget, at fax number
(202) 395–6974.
G. Regulation Identifier Number (RIN)
A regulation identifier number (RIN)
is assigned to each regulatory action
listed in the Unified Agenda of Federal
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:10 Jul 20, 2010
Jkt 220001
Regulations. The Regulatory Information
Service Center publishes the Unified
Agenda in April and October of each
year. The RIN contained in the heading
of this document may be used to crossreference this action with the Unified
Agenda.
H. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995
This proposed rule does not impose
unfunded mandates under the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995. It does not result in costs of
$141.3 million or more to either State,
local or Tribal governments, in the
aggregate, or to the private sector, and
is the least burdensome alternative that
achieves the objective of the rule.
I. Environmental Assessment
The National Environmental Policy
Act of 1969 (NEPA), as amended (42
U.S.C. 4321–4347), requires Federal
agencies to consider the consequences
of major Federal actions and prepare a
detailed statement on actions that
significantly affect the quality of the
human environment.
The hazardous materials regulatory
system is a risk management system that
is prevention oriented and focused on
identifying a hazard and reducing the
probability and quantity of a hazardous
materials release. Hazardous materials
are categorized by hazard analysis and
experience into hazard classes and
packing groups. The regulations require
each shipper to classify a material in
accordance with these hazard classes
and packing groups; the process of
classifying a hazardous material is itself
a form of hazard analysis. Further, the
regulations require the shipper to
communicate the material’s hazards by
identifying the hazard class, packing
group, and proper shipping name on
shipping papers and with labels on
packages and placards on transport
vehicles. Thus, the shipping paper,
labels, and placards communicate the
most significant findings of the
shipper’s hazard analysis. Most
hazardous materials are assigned to one
of three packing groups based upon its
degree of hazard, from a high hazard
Packing Group I material to a low
hazard Packing Group III material. The
quality, damage resistance, and
performance standards for the
packagings authorized for the hazardous
materials in each packing group are
appropriate for the hazards of the
material transported.
Hazardous materials are transported
by aircraft, vessel, rail, and highway.
The potential for environmental damage
or contamination exists when packages
of hazardous materials are involved in
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
42369
transportation incidents. The need for
hazardous materials to support essential
services means transportation of highly
hazardous materials is unavoidable.
However, these shipments frequently
move through densely populated or
environmentally sensitive areas where
the consequences of an incident could
be loss of life, serious injury, or
significant environmental damage. The
ecosystems that could be affected by a
hazardous materials release during
transportation include atmospheric,
aquatic, terrestrial, and vegetal
resources (for example, wildlife
habitats). The adverse environmental
impacts associated with releases of most
hazardous materials are short-term
impacts that can be greatly reduced or
eliminated through prompt clean-up of
the incident scene. In this NPRM, we
are requesting comments on the
potential environmental impacts of the
proposals.
In this NPRM, PHMSA proposes to
incorporate the terms of six special
permits into the HMR. Several of the
proposals in this NPRM involve the
transportation of LPG. LPG is a Division
2.1 (flammable gas) material that poses
an explosive, fire, blast, or projection
hazard. If released, LPG may cause eye
or skin irritation and, if inhaled, it may
irritate the respiratory tract. Moderate
exposure may cause headache or
dizziness. Elevated exposure may cause
unconsciousness or respiratory arrest.
Further, by diluting the oxygen
concentration in air below the level
necessary to support life, LPG can act as
an asphyxiant. LPG is not known to
cause long-term ecological damage. The
proposals in this NPRM are intended to
ensure that LPG will be transported in
a variety of applications with no release
from its packaging and, thus, no adverse
safety or environmental impacts.
One of the proposals in this NPRM
involves Division 6.1 liquid soil
pesticide fumigants. Soil fumigation is a
chemical control strategy used
independently or in conjunction with
cultural and physical control methods
to reduce populations of soil organisms.
Soil fumigants can effectively control
soil-borne organisms, such as
nematodes, fungi, bacteria, insects,
weed seeds, and weeds. Different
fumigants have varying effects on the
control of these pests. Some are pest
specific, while others are broad
spectrum biocides that kill most soil
organisms. Soil fumigants are used in
agriculture, nurseries, ornamental
beddings, forest systems, and other
areas where soil-borne pests can harm
or devastate desirable plants. Because of
treatment costs, applicators use soil
fumigants primarily on high value
E:\FR\FM\21JYP1.SGM
21JYP1
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
42370
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 139 / Wednesday, July 21, 2010 / Proposed Rules
crops, such as vegetables, fruits, and
ornamentals. Control of soil-borne pests
increases plant aesthetics, plant quality
and vigor, crop yields, and ultimately
profitability. Soil fumigants are closely
regulated by the Environmental
Protection Agency to prevent adverse
health impacts to agricultural workers
or bystanders (people who live, work, or
otherwise spend time near fields that
are fumigated). The proposals in this
NPRM will help to ensure that liquid
soil pesticide fumigants are transported
without incident on or between farms
and the bulk loading facility.
Several proposals in this NPRM
address the transportation of anhydrous
ammonia. Anhydrous ammonia is a
poisonous by inhalation (PIH) material.
When anhydrous ammonia is released
into water, it floats on the surface,
rapidly dissolving into the water as
ammonium hydroxide while
simultaneously boiling into the
atmosphere as gaseous ammonia. High
concentrations of ammonia (greater than
1700 parts per million (ppm)) in the
atmosphere cause compulsive coughing
and death, while lower concentrations
(lower than 700 ppm) cause eye and
throat irritation. Ammonia is lighter
than air so that it dissipates in the
atmosphere, the rate of dissipation
depending on weather.
In an aquatic or wetland environment,
ammonium hydroxide would cause fish,
planktonic, and benthic organism
mortality in the vicinity of the release—
the size depending on the volume of
anhydrous ammonia released. The
chemical would also strip protective
oils from the feathers of shore birds,
causing drowning or infection. Such
die-offs could spur high nutrient levels
that could stimulate noxious blooms of
algae. Terrestrial vegetation would also
be either damaged or killed, depending
on atmospheric concentrations.
The cleanup effort from a release of
anhydrous ammonia would require the
removal of soil containing anhydrous
ammonia quickly to avoid
contamination of the water table.
Ammonia emissions would be released
during the cleanup effort as
contaminated soil is disturbed.
The proposals in this NPRM will
require certain nurse tanks used to
transport anhydrous ammonia to, from,
and between farm fields to be inspected
and tested periodically to identify
problems that would result in a leak or
release.
There are no significant
environmental impacts associated with
the proposals in this NPRM, although
PHMSA solicits comments on the
potential environmental impacts of the
proposals in this NPRM. The process
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:10 Jul 20, 2010
Jkt 220001
through which special permits are
issued requires the applicant to
demonstrate that the alternative
transportation method or packaging
proposed provides an equivalent level
of safety as that provided in the HMR.
Implicit in this process is that the
special permit must provide an
equivalent level of environmental
protection as that provided in the HMR.
Thus, incorporation of special permits
as regulations of generally applicability
maintains the existing environmental
protections built into the HMR. In
addition, the proposals applicable to
nurse tanks will enhance the integrity of
those tanks, thereby reducing the
possibility of an anhydrous ammonia
release.
(Parts A and B), V, VIII (Division 1), and
IX of 1998 Edition of American Society
of Mechanical Engineers Boiler and
Pressure Vessel Code’’ is amended by
adding sections ‘‘173.5’’ and ‘‘173.5a’’ in
appropriate numerical order;
b. Under the entry, National Board of
Boiler and Pressure Vessel Inspectors,
the entry ‘‘National Board Inspection
Code, A Manual for Boiler and Pressure
Vessel Inspectors, NB–23, 1992 Edition’’
is amended by adding section ‘‘173.315’’
in appropriate alphabetical order; and
c. Under the entry, National Fire
Protection Association, the entry ‘‘NFPA
58—Liquefied Petroleum Gas Code,
2001 Edition’’ is amended by adding the
sections ‘‘173.5’’ and ‘‘173.315’’ in
appropriate alphabetical order.
J. Privacy Act
Anyone is able to search the
electronic form of all comments
received into any of our dockets by the
name of the individual submitting the
comment (or signing the comment, if
submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may
review DOT’s complete Privacy Act
Statement in the Federal Register
published on April 11, 2000 (Volume
65, Number 70, pages 19477–78), or at
https://www.regulations.gov.
PART 173—SHIPPERS—GENERAL
REQUIREMENTS FOR SHIPMENTS
AND PACKAGINGS
List of Subjects
*
49 CFR Part 171
Exports, Hazardous materials
transportation, Hazardous waste,
Imports, Incorporation by reference,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
49 CFR Part 173
Hazardous materials transportation,
Packaging and containers, Radioactive
materials, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Uranium.
In consideration of the foregoing, we
propose to amend 49 CFR Chapter I as
follows:
PART 171—GENERAL INFORMATION,
REGULATIONS, AND DEFINITIONS
1. The authority citation for part 171
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 5101–5128, 44701; 49
CFR 1.45 and 1.53; Pub. L. 101–410 section
4 (28 U.S.C. 2461 note); Pub. L. 104–134
section 31001.
§ 171.7
[Amended]
2. In § 171.7, in the paragraph (a)(3)
table, in the second column, ‘‘49 CFR
reference,’’ the following changes are
made:
a. Under the entry, American Society
of Mechanical Engineers, the entry
‘‘ ‘ASME Code’; ASME Code, Sections II
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
3. The authority citation for part 173
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 5101–5128, 44701; 49
CFR 1.45, 1.53.
4. In § 173.5, redesignate paragraphs
(d), (e), and (f) as paragraphs (f), (g) and
(h), respectively, and add new
paragraphs (d) and (e) to read as follows:
§ 173.5
Agricultural operations.
*
*
*
*
(d) Moveable fuel storage tenders. A
non-DOT specification cargo tank motor
vehicle may be used to transport
Liquefied petroleum gas, UN1075,
including Propane, UN1978, as
moveable fuel storage tender used
exclusively for agricultural purposes
when operated by a private carrier
under the following conditions:
(1) The cargo tank must have a
minimum design pressure of 250 psig.
(2) The cargo tank must meet the
requirements of the ASME Code in
effect at the time of its manufacture and
must be marked accordingly.
(3) The cargo tank must have a water
capacity of 1,200 gallons or less.
(4) The cargo tank must conform to
applicable requirements in National Fire
Protection Association (NFPA)
Pamphlet No. 58 (IBR, see § 171.7 of this
subchapter).
(5) The cargo tank must be securely
mounted on a motor vehicle.
(6) The cargo tank must be filled in
accordance with § 173.315(b) for
liquefied petroleum gas.
(7) The cargo tank must be painted
white, aluminum, or other light
reflecting color.
(8) Transportation of the filled
moveable fuel storage tender is limited
to movements over local roads between
fields using the shortest practical
distance.
E:\FR\FM\21JYP1.SGM
21JYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 139 / Wednesday, July 21, 2010 / Proposed Rules
(9) Transportation of the moveable
fuel storage tender between its point of
use and a liquefied petroleum gas
distribution facility is authorized only if
the cargo tank contains no more than 5
percent of its water capacity.
(e) Liquid soil pesticide fumigants.
MC 306 and DOT 406 cargo tank motor
vehicles and DOT 57 portable tanks may
be used to transport liquid soil pesticide
fumigants, Pesticides, liquid, toxic,
flammable, n.o.s., flash point not less
than 23 degrees C, 6.1, UN2903, PG II,
exclusively for agricultural operations
by a private motor carrier between a
bulk loading facility and a farm
(including between farms). However,
transportation is not to exceed 150 miles
between the loading facility and the
farm, and not more than five days are
permitted for intermediate stops for
temporary storage. Additionally,
transport is permitted only under the
following conditions:
(1) Cargo tanks. MC 306 and DOT 406
cargo tank motor vehicles must:
(i) Meet qualification and
maintenance requirements (including
periodic testing and inspection) in
accordance with Subpart E of Part 180
of this subchapter;
(ii) Conform to the pressure relief
system requirements specified in
§ 173.243(b)(1);
(iii) MC 306 cargo tanks must be
equipped with stop-valves capable of
being remotely closed by manual and
mechanical means; and
(iv) For DOT 406 cargo tanks, must
conform to the bottom outlet
requirements specified in
§ 173.243(b)(2).
(2) Portable tanks. DOT 57 portable
tanks must—
(i) Be constructed of stainless steel;
and
42371
(ii) Meet qualification and
maintenance requirements of Subpart G
of Part 180 of this subchapter.
*
*
*
*
*
5. In § 173.5a, revise the section
heading and add new paragraph (c) to
read as follows:
§ 173.5a Oilfield service vehicles,
mechanical displacement meter provers,
and roadway striping vehicles exceptions.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) Roadway striping. In addition to
conformance with all other applicable
requirements of this subchapter, nonDOT specification cargo tanks used for
roadway striping are authorized
provided all the following conditions in
this paragraph (c) are met.
(1) Authorized materials. Only the
hazardous materials listed in the table
below may be transported in roadway
striping vehicles. The cargo tank may
not be filled to be liquid full at less than
or equal to 130° F.
HAZARDOUS MATERIALS DESCRIPTION
Hazard
class/
division
Proper shipping name
Adhesives, containing a flammable liquid ..........................................................................................
Paint including paint, lacquer, enamel, stain, shellac solution, varnish, polish, liquid filler, and liquid lacquer base.
Paint related material including paint thinning drying, removing, or reducing compound .................
Flammable liquids, n.o.s. a .................................................................................................................
Gasoline .............................................................................................................................................
Acetone b ............................................................................................................................................
Dichloromethane b ..............................................................................................................................
Ethyl methyl ketone or Methyl ethyl ketone b .....................................................................................
Ethyl acetate b ....................................................................................................................................
Methanol b ..........................................................................................................................................
Organic peroxide type E, liquid (Dibenzoyl peroxide) c .....................................................................
Petroleum distillates, n.o.s. or Petroleum products, n.o.s. b ..............................................................
1,1,1-Trichloroethane b .......................................................................................................................
Toluene b ............................................................................................................................................
Xylenes b ............................................................................................................................................
Environmentally hazardous substance, liquid, n.o.s. c .......................................................................
Corrosive liquid, basic, organic, n.o.s. c .............................................................................................
Corrosive liquids, n.o.s. c ....................................................................................................................
Elevated temperature liquid, n.o.s., at or above 100 C and below its flash point (including molten
metals, molten salts, etc.).d
a Adhesive
Identification
number
Packing
group
3
3
UN1133
UN1263
II
II
3
3
3
3
6.1
3
3
3
5.2
3
6.1
3
3
9
8
8
9
UN1263
UN1993
UN1203
UN1090
UN1593
UN1193
UN1173
UN1230
UN3107
UN1268
UN2831
UN1294
UN1307
UN3082
UN3267
UN1760
UN3257
II
II
II
II
III
II
II
II
II
III
III
II
II, III
III
III
III
III
containing ethyl acetate.
b Solvent.
c Catalyst.
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
d Thermoplastic
material non-hazardous at room temperature.
(2) Cargo tank requirements. Each
non-DOT specification cargo tank used
for roadway striping must be securely
bolted to a motor vehicle and must—
(i) Be constructed and certified in
conformance with the ASME Code in
effect at the time of its manufacture;
(ii) Have a minimum design pressure
of 100 psig;
(iii) Have a maximum capacity of 500
gallons;
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:10 Jul 20, 2010
Jkt 220001
(iv) For solvents and organic
peroxides, the cargo tank may not
contain more than 50 gallons;
(v) Be given an external visual
inspection prior to each use to ensure
that it has not been damaged on the
previous trip;
(vi) Be retested and reinspected in
accordance with § 180.407(c) of this
subchapter as specified for an MC 331
cargo tank motor vehicle; and
(vii) Be securely mounted to a motor
vehicle in accordance with the
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
securement provisions prescribed in
§§ 393.100 through 393.106 of this title.
(3) Test records. The owner or
operator of the roadway striping vehicle
must maintain hydrostatic test records
in accordance with § 180.417(b) and
must make those records available to
any representative of the Department of
Transportation upon request.
(4) Marking. A non-DOT specification
cargo tank used for roadway striping
must be plainly marked on both sides
near the middle in letters at least two
E:\FR\FM\21JYP1.SGM
21JYP1
42372
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 139 / Wednesday, July 21, 2010 / Proposed Rules
inches in height on a contrasting
background ‘‘ROADWAY STRIPING’’.
(5) Operational controls. A non-DOT
specification cargo tank used for
roadway striping may not be
pressurized when the motor vehicle is
traveling to and from job sites.
Additionally, the distance traveled by a
non-DOT specification cargo tank used
for roadway striping may not exceed
750 miles.
*
*
*
*
*
6. In § 173.242, revise paragraph (b)
introductory text to read as follows:
§ 173.242 Bulk packagings for certain
medium hazard liquids and solids,
including solids with dual hazards.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) Cargo tanks: Specification MC 300,
MC 301, MC 302, MC 303, MC 304, MC
305, MC 306, MC 307, MC 310, MC 311,
MC 312, MC 330, MC 331, DOT 406,
DOT 407, and DOT 412 cargo tank
motor vehicles; and non-DOT
specification cargo tank motor vehicles
when in compliance with § 173.5a(c).
Cargo tanks used to transport Class 3,
Packing Group I or II, or Packing Group
III with a flash point of less than 38 °C
(100 °F); Class 6, Packing Group I or II;
and Class 8, Packing Group I or II
materials must conform to the following
special requirements:
*
*
*
*
*
7. In § 173.315, revise paragraphs (j)
and (m) to read as follows:
§ 173.315 Compressed gases in cargo
tanks and portable tanks.
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
*
*
*
*
*
(j) Consumer storage containers. (1)
Storage containers for liquefied
petroleum gas or propane charged to 5
percent of their capacity or less and
intended for permanent installation on
consumer premises may be shipped by
private motor carrier under the
following conditions:
(i) Each container must be constructed
in compliance with the requirements in
Section VIII of the ASME Code (IBR, see
§ 171.7 of this subchapter) and must be
marked to indicate compliance in the
manner specified by the respective
Code. Containers built in compliance
with earlier editions starting with 1943
are authorized.
(ii) Each container must be equipped
with safety devices in compliance with
the requirements for safety devices on
containers as specified in NFPA 58 (IBR,
see § 171.7 of this subchapter).
(iii) The containers must be braced or
otherwise secured on the vehicle to
prevent relative motion while in transit.
Valves or other fittings must be
adequately protected against damage
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:10 Jul 20, 2010
Jkt 220001
during transportation. (See § 177.834(a)
of this subchapter).
(2) Storage containers with a water
capacity not exceeding 500 gallons
charged with liquefied petroleum gas to
more than 5 percent of their capacity
and intended for permanent installation
on consumer premises may be
transported by private motor carrier
one-way only from the consumer’s
premises to the container owner’s
nearest facility under the following
conditions:
(i) Each container must be constructed
in compliance with the requirements in
Section VIII of the ASME Code and
must be marked to indicate compliance
in the manner specified by the
respective Code.
(ii) Maximum permitted filling
density may not exceed that specified in
paragraph (b) of this section.
(iii) Prior to loading on a motor
vehicle, the container must be inspected
by a trained and qualified person for
leaks, corroded or abraded areas, dents,
distortions, weld defects, or other
condition that may render the container
unsafe for transportation. A record of
the inspection must be legibly signed
and dated by the person performing the
inspection and retained by the container
owner for two years. The record of
inspection must include the date of
inspection, inspector’s contact
information, such as a telephone
number, the container’s serial number
and container size (water capacity),
estimated amount of hazardous
material, and the origin and destination
of shipment.
(iv) Only one storage container may
be transported on a motor vehicle.
(v) For loading on a motor vehicle, the
container must be lifted by slings.
Lifting lugs may not be used. The slings
must be rated to a weight sufficient to
accommodate the container and its
lading and shall comply with ASME
B30.9 on slings used for lifting
purposes, and must be visually
inspected prior to each use. A sling
showing evidence of tears, fraying, or
other signs of excessive wear may not be
used.
(vi) The storage container must be
secured on a motor vehicle so that the
container is completely within the
envelope of the vehicle and does not
extend beyond the vehicle frame.
(vii) The storage container must be
placed on the vehicle in a manner, such
as in a cradle, which ensures that no
weight is placed on the supporting legs
during transportation.
(viii) The storage container must be
secured against movement during
transportation. Bracing must conform
with the requirements of paragraph
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
(j)(1)(iii) of this section and § 177.834(a)
of this subchapter and with Section 6–
5.2 of the NFPA Pamphlet No. 58.
Straps or chains used as tie-downs must
be rated to exceed the maximum load to
be transported and conform to the
requirements in §§ 393.100 through
393.106 of this title.
(ix) Tow trailers used to transport
storage containers in accordance with
this paragraph (j)(2) must provide rear
end protection that conforms to
requirements in § 393.86 of this title.
(3) Storage containers of less than
1,042 pounds water capacity (125
gallons) may be shipped when charged
with liquefied petroleum gas in
compliance with DOT filling density.
*
*
*
*
*
(m) General. (1) A cargo tank that is
commonly known as a nurse tank and
considered an implement of husbandry
transporting anhydrous ammonia and
operated by a private motor carrier
exclusively for agricultural purposes is
excepted from the specification
requirements of Part 178 of this
subchapter if it:
(i) Has a minimum design pressure of
250 psig, meets the requirements of the
edition of Section VIII of the ASME
Code in effect at the time it was
manufactured, and is marked with a
valid ASME plate.
(ii) Is equipped with pressure relief
valves meeting the requirements of CGA
Standard S–1.2 (IBR, see § 171.7 of this
subchapter);
(iii) Is painted white or aluminum;
(iv) Has capacity of 3,000 gallons or
less;
(v) Is loaded to a filling density no
greater than 56 percent;
(vi) Is securely mounted on a farm
wagon or meets paragraph (m)(3) of this
section; and
(vii) Is in conformance with the
requirements of Part 172 of this
subchapter except that shipping papers
are not required; and it need not be
marked or placarded on one end if that
end contains valves, fittings, regulators
or gauges when those appurtenances
prevent the markings and placard from
being properly placed and visible.
(2) Nurse tanks with missing or
illegible ASME plates. Nurse tanks with
missing or illegible ASME plates may
continue to be operated provided they
conform to the following requirements:
(i) Each nurse tank must undergo an
external visual inspection and testing in
accordance with § 180.407(d) of this
subchapter.
(ii) Each nurse tank must be thickness
tested in accordance with § 180.407(i) of
this subchapter. A nurse tank with a
capacity of less than 1,500 gallons must
E:\FR\FM\21JYP1.SGM
21JYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 139 / Wednesday, July 21, 2010 / Proposed Rules
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
have a minimum head thickness of
0.203 inch and a minimum shell
thickness of 0.239 inch. A nurse tank
with a capacity of 1,500 gallons or more
must have a minimum thickness of
0.250 inch. Any nurse tank with a
thickness test reading of less than that
specified in this paragraph at any point
must be removed from hazardous
materials service.
(iii) Each nurse tank must be pressure
tested in accordance with § 180.407(g)
of this subchapter. The minimum test
pressure is 375 psig. Pneumatic testing
is not authorized.
(iv) Each nurse tank must be
inspected and tested by a person
meeting the requirements of
§ 180.409(d) of this subchapter.
Furthermore, each nurse tank must have
the tests performed at least once every
five years after the completion of the
initial tests.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:10 Jul 20, 2010
Jkt 220001
(v) After each nurse tank has
successfully passed the visual,
thickness, and pressure tests, welded
repairs on the tank are prohibited.
(vi) After the nurse tank has
successfully passed the visual,
thickness, and pressure tests, it must be
marked in accordance with § 180.415(b),
and permanently marked near the test
and inspection markings with a unique
owner’s identification number in letters
and numbers at least 1⁄2 inch in height
and width.
(vii) Each nurse tank owner must
maintain a copy of the test inspection
report prepared by the inspector. The
test report must contain the results of
the test and meet the requirements in
§ 180.417(b) and be made available to a
DOT representative upon request.
(3) Field truck mounted tanks. A nonDOT specification cargo tank (nurse
tank) securely mounted on a field truck
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 9990
42373
is authorized under the following
conditions:
(i) Is in conformance with all the
requirements of paragraph (m)(1) of this
section, except that the requirement in
paragraph (m)(1)(vi) does not apply;
(ii) Is inspected and tested in
accordance with Subpart E of Part 180
of this subchapter as specified for an
MC 331 cargo tank; and
(iii) Is restricted to rural roads in areas
within 50 miles of the fertilizer
distribution point where the nurse tank
is loaded.
*
*
*
*
*
Issued in Washington, DC on July 14, 2010,
under authority delegated in 49 CFR part 1.
Magdy El-Sibaie,
Associate Administrator for Hazardous
Materials Safety, Pipeline and Hazardous
Materials Safety Administration.
[FR Doc. 2010–17712 Filed 7–20–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–60–P
E:\FR\FM\21JYP1.SGM
21JYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 139 (Wednesday, July 21, 2010)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 42364-42373]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-17712]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration
49 CFR Parts 171 and 173
[Docket No. PHMSA-2010-0017 (HM-245)]
RIN 2137-AE56
Hazardous Materials: Incorporation of Certain Cargo Tank Special
Permits Into Regulations
AGENCY: Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA),
DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration is
proposing to amend the Hazardous Materials Regulations to incorporate
provisions contained in certain widely used or longstanding cargo tank
special permits that are granted to multiple parties and have an
established safety record. Special permits allow a company or
individual to package or ship a hazardous material in a manner that
varies from the regulations provided an equivalent level of safety is
maintained. The proposed revisions are intended to provide wider access
to the regulatory flexibility offered in the special permits and
eliminate the need for numerous renewal requests, thereby, facilitating
commerce activity and reducing paperwork burdens while maintaining an
appropriate level of safety.
DATES: Comments must be received by August 20, 2010. A 30 day comment
period is appropriate for this rulemaking because it proposes to
incorporate long-standing, widely used special permits into the HMR.
These
[[Page 42365]]
special permits have well-established safety records. Incorporation of
these special permits would reduce the compliance burden and cost on
both industry and government by removing the need to apply for special
permits.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments by identification of the docket
number (PHMSA-2010-0017 (HM-245)) by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for submitting
comments.
Fax: 1-202-493-2251.
Mail: Docket Operations, U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building, Ground Floor, Room W12-140, Routing
Symbol M-30, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
Hand Delivery: To Docket Operations, Room W12-140 on the
ground floor of the West Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
Instructions: All submissions must include the agency name and
docket number for this notice at the beginning of the comment. All
comments received will be posted without change to the Federal Docket
Management System (FDMS), including any personal information.
Docket: For access to the dockets to read background documents or
comments received, go to https://www.regulations.gov or DOT's Docket
Operations Office (see ADDRESSES).
Privacy Act: Anyone is able to search the electronic form of any
written communications and comments received into any of our dockets by
the name of the individual submitting the document (or signing the
document, if submitted on behalf of an association, business, labor
union, etc.). You may review DOT's complete Privacy Act Statement in
the Federal Register published on April 11, 2000 (Volume 65, Number 70;
Pages 19477-78).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joan McIntyre or Matthew Nickels,
Office of Hazardous Materials Standards, (202) 366-8553, Pipeline and
Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA), or John Van
Steenburg, Office of Enforcement and Compliance, (202) 366-5125,
Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA), 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
II. Overview of Proposed Amendments
III. Summary Review of Amendments
IV. Regulatory Analyses and Notices
I. Background
The Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA)
is proposing to amend the Hazardous Materials Regulations (HMR; 49 CFR
Parts 171-180) to incorporate certain requirements based on existing
special permits issued by PHMSA under 49 CFR Part 107, Subpart B
(Sec. Sec. 107.101 to 107.127). A special permit sets forth
alternative requirements (variances) to the requirements in the HMR by
means that achieve a safety level that at the least corresponds to the
safety level required under the regulations and that is consistent with
the public interest. Congress expressly authorized DOT to issue these
variances in the Hazardous Materials Transportation Act of 1975.
The HMR generally are performance oriented regulations, which
provides the regulated community with a certain amount of flexibility
in meeting safety requirements. Even so, not every transportation
situation can be anticipated and built into the regulations. Innovation
is a strength of our economy and the hazardous materials community is
particularly strong at developing new materials and technologies and
innovative ways of moving materials. Special permits enable the
hazardous materials industry to quickly, effectively and safely
integrate new products and technologies into the production and
transportation stream. Thus, special permits provide a mechanism for
testing new technologies, promoting increased transportation efficiency
and productivity, and ensuring global competitiveness.
A special permit must achieve at least an equivalent level of
safety to that specified in the HMR. Implementation of new technologies
and operational techniques can enhance safety because the authorized
operations or activities achieve a greater level of safety than
currently required under the regulations. Special permits also reduce
the volume and complexity of the HMR by addressing unique or infrequent
transportation situations that would be difficult to accommodate in
regulations intended for use by a wide range of shippers and carriers.
PHMSA conducts ongoing reviews of special permits to identify widely
used and longstanding special permits with an established safety record
for adoption into regulations for broader applicability. Converting
these special permits into regulations reduces paperwork burdens and
facilitates commerce while maintaining an acceptable level of safety.
Additionally, adoption of special permits as rules of general
applicability provides wider access to the benefits and regulatory
flexibility of the provisions granted in the special permits. Factors
that influence whether a specific special permit is a candidate for
regulatory action include: the safety record for hazardous materials
transported; transportation operations conducted under a special
permit; the potential for broad application of a special permit;
suitability of provisions in the special permit for incorporation into
the HMR; rulemaking activity in related areas; and agency priorities.
Although PHMSA does not issue a special permit to an industry
association, PHMSA may issue a special permit to members of an industry
association when many of its members have a common interest in
obtaining authority to perform a specific transportation activity,
there is no large business entity to take the lead in seeking such
authority, and the association has the resources to gather the
necessary information and perform any necessary research. Special
permits issued to the members of associations are potentially among the
most suitable types of special permit for later adoption into the HMR.
Such special permits have broad applicability; moreover, many of them
have been in effect for a number of years and have demonstrated safety
records.
The six special permits addressed in this notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM), which authorize cargo tank transportation operations
not specifically permitted under the HMR, were initially issued to
members of industry associations or similar organizations. They have
well-established safety records and, thus, are candidates for
incorporation into the HMR. Incorporating these special permits into
the HMR would eliminate the need for over 10,000 current grantees to
reapply for the renewal of six special permits every four years and for
PHMSA to process the renewal applications.
Incorporation of these special permits into the HMR also eliminates
a significant paperwork burden. Unless otherwise excepted by this
agency, a copy of each special permit must be maintained at each
facility where a packaging is manufactured under a special permit, at
each facility where a package is offered or re-offered for
transportation under a special permit carried on board each cargo
vessel or aircraft, and in some cases must be carried aboard each
transport vehicle used to transport a hazardous material under a
special permit.
[[Page 42366]]
II. Overview of Proposed Amendments
In this NPRM, PHMSA is proposing to revise the HMR by providing:
Authorization to transport liquefied petroleum gas (LPG)
in non-DOT specification cargo tank motor vehicles known as moveable
fuel storage tenders that are used exclusively for agricultural
purposes.
Authorization to transport Division 6.1 liquid soil
pesticide fumigants in DOT Specification MC 306 and DOT 406 cargo tank
motor vehicles and DOT 57 portable tanks, used exclusively for
agricultural purposes.
Authorization to transport certain hazardous materials
used for roadway striping in non-DOT specification cargo tanks.
Authorization for private motor carriers to transport LPG
in consumer storage containers with quantities greater than 5 percent
of the container's water capacity.
Authorization to transport nurse tanks securely mounted on
field trucks.
Authorization for nurse tanks with missing or illegible
ASME plates to continue to be used in anhydrous ammonia service under
specified conditions.
III. Summary Review of Amendments
A. Moveable Fuel Storage Tenders
Special permit SP 11209 authorizes the transportation of LPG in
non-DOT specification cargo tank motor vehicles, commonly known as
moveable fuel storage tenders, used exclusively for agricultural
purposes. Moveable fuel storage tenders are used to supply LPG fuel to
farmers for crop drying, crop irrigation, flame weeding, plant
defoliation prior to harvest, and other agricultural operations.
The special permit has been in effect since 1994 and has been
utilized by upwards of 3,400 grantees. A review of the Hazardous
Materials Incident Data library did not reveal any incidents related to
this special permit over, at least, the past ten years. Each vehicle
operated under this special permit conforms to the ASME Code in effect
at the time of its manufacture. The design and use of these vehicles is
included in the provisions of the National Fire Protection Association
pamphlet no. 58, Storage and Handling of Liquefied Petroleum Gases.
PHMSA proposes to incorporate the terms of special permit SP 11209
into the HMR by amending Sec. 173.5 to authorize the transportation of
LPG in moveable fuel storage tenders used exclusively for agricultural
purposes and operated by a private motor carrier. (A ``private motor
carrier,'' as defined in interpretation letters issued by PHMSA, is a
carrier who transports the business's own products and does not provide
such transportation service to other businesses). As proposed, a non-
DOT specification cargo tank motor vehicle used as a moveable fuel
storage tender must: (1) Have a minimum design pressure of 250 psig;
(2) conform to the requirements of the ASME Code in effect at the time
the cargo tank was manufactured and marked accordingly; (3) have a
water capacity of 1,200 gallons or less; (4) conform to applicable
requirements in National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) Pamphlet
No. 58; and (5) be mounted securely on a motor vehicle. In addition,
the cargo tank must be filled as prescribed in Sec. 173.315(b). When
filled, transportation of a moveable fuel storage tender would be
limited to movements over local roads between fields using the shortest
practical distance. In addition, transportation of a moveable storage
fuel tender to an LPG distribution facility for re-filling would be
permitted only if it contains no more than 5 percent of its water
capacity.
B. Liquid Soil Pesticide Fumigants
Special permit SP 13113 authorizes the transportation of Division
6.1 liquid soil pesticide fumigants in MC 306 and DOT 406 cargo tank
motor vehicles and DOT 57 portable tanks used exclusively for
agricultural purposes. Transportation of these materials is limited to
private motor carriage and must be between a bulk loading facility and
farms (including between farms) not exceeding 150 miles from one
another. Liquid soil pesticide fumigants are used by farmers as an
alternative to the agricultural use of methyl bromide to ensure the
adequate protection of crops from pesticide infestation, and
consequently, to preserve agricultural productivity.
This special permit has been in effect since 2002 and has been
utilized by hundreds of grantees. A review of the Hazardous Materials
Incident Data library did not reveal any incidents related to this
special permit since the date of its issuance. Prior to 2002, when this
material was classed as Dichloropropenes, 6.1, UN2047, PG III, it was
routinely shipped, according to 49 CFR 173.242 in MC 306 and DOT 406
cargo tanks and DOT 57 portable tanks. The same tanks have been widely
used to transport gasoline, a low flashpoint PGII liquid. The pressure
relief systems and bottom discharge equipment on the cargo tanks offer
equivalent safety in terms of containment and operation of pressure
relief systems. Also, stainless steel DOT 57 portable tanks provide
comparable containment to metal, rigid plastic, and composite
Intermediate Bulk Containers (IBCs), which are authorized for transport
of Division 6.1 liquid soil pesticide fumigants under Sec. 173.202.
PHMSA proposes to incorporate the terms of special permit SP 13113
into the HMR by also amending Sec. 173.5 to authorize the
transportation of Division 6.1 liquid soil pesticide fumigants in MC
306 and DOT 406 cargo tank motor vehicles and DOT 57 portable tanks by
a private motor carrier, exclusively for agricultural purposes. As
proposed, MC 306 and DOT 406 cargo tank motor vehicles used for the
transportation of these fumigants must: (1) Meet qualification and
maintenance requirements (including periodic testing and inspection) in
accordance with Subpart E of Part 180; and (2) conform to the pressure
relief system requirements specified in Sec. 173.243(b)(1). In
addition, MC 306 cargo tank motor vehicles must be equipped with stop-
valves capable of being remotely closed by manual and mechanical means;
and DOT 406 cargo tanks must conform to the bottom outlet requirements
specified in Sec. 173.243(b)(2). Also as proposed, DOT 57 portable
tanks used to transport Division 6.1 liquid soil pesticide fumigants
must be constructed of stainless steel. Finally, MC 306 and DOT 406
cargo tank motor vehicles and DOT 57 portable tanks used to transport
Division 6.1 liquid soil pesticide fumigants must be used exclusively
for agricultural purposes, operated by a private motor carrier; and
limited to transport between a bulk loading facility and farms
(including between farms) not to exceed 150 miles from one another.
C. Non-DOT Specification Cargo Tanks Used for Roadway Striping
Special permit SP 12284 authorizes the transportation in commerce
of certain hazardous materials used for roadway striping in non-DOT
specification cargo tanks. These non-DOT specification cargo tanks are
used for the low hazard job of applying roadway striping to paved roads
throughout the United States.
The special permit has been in effect since 1999 and has been
utilized by over 100 grantees. A review of the Hazardous Materials
Incident Data library did not reveal any incidents related to this
special permit since the date of its issuance. Based on the safety
record, PHMSA is proposing to incorporate the provisions of special
permit SP 12284 into the HMR by adding a new paragraph (c) to Sec.
173.5a to authorize the transportation of certain hazardous
[[Page 42367]]
materials used for roadway striping to be transported in non-DOT
specification cargo tanks provided the conditions specified in the new
paragraph are met. The new paragraph (c) would specify conditions that
include packaging specifications, inspection and testing requirements,
requirements for maintaining records, and operational controls.
Consistent with the special permit, paragraph (c) also would include
marking requirements in addition to applicable marking and placarding
requirements in subparts D and F. The section title heading would also
be revised to reflect the addition of non-DOT specification cargo tanks
used for roadway striping into this section. Finally, Sec. 173.242(b)
would be revised to include the authorization to use non-DOT
specification cargo tanks used for roadway striping.
D. LPG Storage Containers
Currently, in accordance with Sec. 173.315(j)(4), LPG may not be
transported in consumer storage containers that contain greater than 5
percent of the container's water capacity. Special permit SP 13341
authorizes the transportation by private motor carrier of LPG in
consumer storage containers in quantities greater than 5 percent of the
container's water capacity. The storage containers are designed for
permanent installation on consumer premises. The special permit
authorizes the transportation of a storage container from the consumer
location to the container owner's nearest LPG plant.
The special permit has been in effect since 2004 and has been
utilized by several thousand grantees. A review of the Hazardous
Materials Incident Data library did not reveal any incidents related to
this special permit since the date of its issuance. Prior to 1998,
consumer storage containers containing greater than 5 percent water
capacity were routinely transported without any known incidents. The
prohibition of transporting containers with more than 5 percent water
capacity resulted from concern of the potential for confusion between
ASME and DOT tanks, as ASME tanks are not designed to be lifted by the
lugs with product inside. This proposal requires lifting with slings,
not by the lugs. Also, transporting a tank with some product is
sometimes preferable from a safety standpoint than removing LPG from a
tank at a residence.
PHMSA proposes to incorporate the terms of special permit SP 13341
into the HMR by revising Sec. 173.315(j) to authorize the
transportation of LPG in consumer storage containers containing greater
than 5 percent of the container's water capacity. As proposed, the
storage container must have a water capacity not exceeding 500 gallons
and be ASME ``U'' stamped to indicate that it was designed and
constructed in accordance with ASME Code requirements. In addition, the
container must be inspected for leaks, corroded or abraded areas,
dents, weld distortions, or any other conditions that could make the
container unsafe for transportation. PHMSA also proposes to require
that: (1) Only one storage container may be transported at one time on
a motor vehicle; (2) the storage container must be lifted by slings,
not lifting lugs; and (3) the storage container must be loaded and
secured on the motor vehicle so that the container is well-secured
against movement and completely within the envelope of the vehicle.
Finally, PHMSA proposes to limit transportation to one-way movement
from the consumer's premises to the container owner's nearest facility.
E. Nurse Tanks
Nurse tanks are non-DOT specification cargo tanks used to transport
and apply anhydrous ammonia fertilizers. The HMR authorize the use of
nurse tanks operated by private motor carriers exclusively for
agricultural purposes provided that the nurse tank: (1) Has a minimum
design pressure of 250 psig and meets the requirements of Section VIII
of the ASME code in effect at the time the nurse tank was manufactured;
(2) is equipped with pressure relief valves; (3) has a capacity of
3,000 gallons or less; (4) is loaded to a filling density no greater
than 56 percent; and (5) is securely mounted on a farm wagon. Because
they are non-DOT specification containers, currently nurse tanks are
not subject to periodic inspection, testing, or requalification
requirements.
Nurse tanks mounted on field trucks. Special permit SP 10950
authorizes the use of a nurse tank securely mounted on a field truck.
Field trucks are specifically designed and equipped to improve safety
and efficiency by being more maneuverable and more stable than a farm
wagon when moving over hilly terrain. These trucks are operated in
remote rural areas in eastern Washington, Oregon, and northern Idaho
within a short distance of the fertilizer distribution point. The
special permit has been in effect since 1993 and has been utilized by
over a hundred grantees. A review of the Hazardous Materials Incident
Data library did not reveal any incidents related to this special
permit since the date of its issuance. Tanks operated under this
special permit are subject to the periodic testing requirements under
Subpart E of Part 180.
Based on the safety record, PHMSA is proposing to incorporate the
provisions of SP 10950 into the HMR by adding a new paragraph (m)(2) to
Sec. 173.315. As proposed, nurse tanks mounted on field trucks would
be required to be inspected and tested in accordance with Subpart E of
Part 180 as specified for MC 331 cargo tanks. Operations would be
restricted to rural roads within 50 miles of the distribution site
where the nurse tank is loaded.
Nurse tanks with missing or illegible ASME plates. As indicated
above, nurse tanks must be manufactured in accordance with the
applicable ASME Code requirements in effect at the time of manufacture.
The ASME Code requires tanks built to its specifications to have an
attached plate that lists the manufacturer, maximum allowable working
pressure, minimum design metal temperature, and the year of
manufacture. A number of nurse tanks are missing the required ASME
plates or have illegible ASME plates. Special permit SP 13554 permits
the continued use in anhydrous ammonia service of nurse tanks with
missing or illegible ASME plates provided the tanks are inspected and
tested. Specifically, the tanks must undergo an external visual
inspection and testing using the procedures specified in Sec.
180.407(d), thickness tested using the procedures specified in Sec.
180.407(i), and pressure tested using the procedures specified in Sec.
180.407(g). The special permit also establishes minimum head and shell
thickness, below which the nurse tank must be removed from service.
The special permit has been in effect since 2004 and has been
utilized by thousands of grantees. A review of the Hazardous Materials
Incident Data library did not reveal any incidents related to this
special permit since the date of its issuance. Although 49 CFR
173.315(m) requires that a nurse tank ``meet the requirements of the
edition of Section VIII of the ASME Code in effect at the time it was
manufactured and is marked accordingly,'' if the plate is missing or
illegible the nurse tank can not be used. Therefore, these additional
requirements that nurse tanks operating under the special permit must
follow (i.e. the thickness testing, the pressure testing, and the
external visual inspection), safely provides for the continued use of
these tanks.
In this NPRM, PHMSA is proposing to incorporate the terms of
special permit SP 13554 into the HMR by adding a new paragraph (m)(3)
in Sec. 173.315. As proposed, existing nurse tanks with
[[Page 42368]]
missing or illegible ASME plates that successfully pass the required
inspections and tests and are marked with a unique identifier would be
authorized to remain in service.
Finally, in Sec. 171.7, we are proposing to revise the entries,
American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME), National Board of
Boiler and Pressure Vessel Inspectors (NBIC) and the National Fire
Protection Association (NFPA) to reflect the addition of the
incorporated by reference materials to the applicable newly proposed
regulatory text.
IV. Rulemaking Analyses and Notices
A. Statutory/Legal Authority for This Rulemaking
This NPRM is published under the authority of 49 U.S.C. 5103(b)
which authorizes the Secretary to prescribe regulations for the safe
transportation, including security, of hazardous material in
intrastate, interstate, and foreign commerce. 49 U.S.C. 5117(a)
authorizes the Secretary of Transportation to issue a special permit
from a regulation prescribed in 5103(b), 5104, 5110, or 5112 of the
Federal Hazardous Materials Transportation Law to a person
transporting, or causing to be transported, hazardous material in a way
that achieves a safety level at least equal to the safety level
required under the law, or consistent with the public interest, if a
required safety level does not exist. If adopted as proposed, the final
rule would amend the regulations incorporating provisions from certain
widely used and longstanding special permits that have established a
history of safety and which may, therefore, be converted into the
regulations for general use.
B. Executive Order 12866 and DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
This proposed rule is not considered a significant regulatory
action under section 3(f) and was not reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB). The proposed rule is not considered a
significant rule under the Regulatory Policies and Procedures order
issued by the Department of Transportation [44 FR 11034].
In this notice, PHMSA proposes to amend the HMR by incorporating
alternatives this agency has permitted under widely used and
longstanding special permits with established safety records that we
have determined meet the safety criteria for inclusion in the HMR.
Incorporation of these special permits into regulations of general
applicability will provide shippers and carriers with additional
flexibility to comply with established safety requirements, thereby
reducing transportation costs and increasing productivity. In addition,
the proposals in this NPRM will reduce the paperwork burden on industry
and this agency caused by continued renewals of special permits. The
provisions of this proposed rule will promote the continued safe
transportation of hazardous materials while reducing transportation
costs for the industry and administrative costs for the agency.
C. Executive Order 13132
This proposed rule was analyzed in accordance with the principles
and criteria contained in Executive Order 13132 (``Federalism''). This
proposed rule would preempt State, local and Indian Tribe requirements
but does not propose any regulation that has substantial direct effects
on the States, the relationship between the national government and the
States, or the distribution of power and responsibilities among the
various levels of governments. Therefore, the consultation and funding
requirements of Executive Order 13132 do not apply. Federal hazardous
material transportation law, 49 U.S.C. 5101-5128, contains an express
preemption provision (49 U.S.C. 5125(b)) preempting State, local and
Indian Tribe requirements on certain covered subjects. Covered subjects
are:
(1) The designation, description, and classification of hazardous
materials;
(2) The packing, repacking, handling, labeling marking, and
placarding of hazardous materials;
(3) The preparation, execution, and use of shipping documents
related to hazardous materials and requirements related to the number,
contents, and placement of those documents;
(4) The written notification, recording, and reporting of the
unintentional release in transportation of hazardous materials; or
(5) The design, manufacture, fabrication, marking, maintenance,
reconditioning, repair, or testing of a packaging or container
represented, marked, certified, or sold as qualified for use in
transporting hazardous materials.
This proposed rule addresses covered subject items 2, 3, and 5 and
would preempt any State, local, or Indian Tribe requirements not
meeting the ``substantively the same'' standard. Federal hazardous
materials transportation law provides at 49 U.S.C. 5125(b)(2) that if
PHMSA issues a regulation concerning any of the covered subjects, PHMSA
must determine and publish in the Federal Register the effective date
of Federal preemption. The effective date may not be earlier than the
90th day following the date of issuance of the final rule and not later
than two years after the date of issuance. PHMSA proposes the effective
date of Federal preemption be 90 days from publication of a final rule
in this matter in the Federal Register.
D. Executive Order 13175
This proposed rule was analyzed in accordance with the principles
and criteria contained in Executive Order 13175 (``Consultation and
Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments''). Because this proposed
rule does not have Tribal implications and does not impose substantial
direct compliance costs on Indian Tribal governments, the funding and
consultation requirements of Executive Order 13175 do not apply.
E. Regulatory Flexibility Act, Executive Order 13272, and DOT
Procedures and Policies
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) requires an
agency to review regulations to assess their impact on small entities.
An agency must conduct a regulatory flexibility analysis unless it
determines and certifies that a rule is not expected to have a
significant impact on a substantial number of small entities. This
proposed rule incorporates into the HMR certain widely used special
permits. Incorporation of these special permits into regulations of
general applicability will provide shippers and carriers with
additional flexibility to comply with established safety requirements,
thereby reducing transportation costs and increasing productivity.
Therefore, I certify this rule will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities.
This proposed rule has been developed in accordance with Executive
Order 13272 (``Proper Consideration of Small Entities in Agency
Rulemaking'') and DOT's procedures and policies to promote compliance
with the Regulatory Flexibility Act to ensure that potential impacts of
draft rules on small entities are properly considered.
F. Paperwork Reduction Act
This proposed rule does not impose new information collection
requirements. PHMSA has an approved information collection under OMB
Control Number 2137-0051, ``Rulemaking, Special Permits, and Preemption
Requirements,'' currently being reviewed for renewal by OMB. This NPRM
may result in a decrease in the annual burden and costs under OMB
Control Number 2137-0051 due to
[[Page 42369]]
proposed changes to incorporate provisions contained in certain widely
used or longstanding special permits that have an established safety
record.
Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, no person is required to
respond to an information collection unless it has been approved by OMB
and displays a valid OMB control number. Section 1320.8(d), title 5,
Code of Federal Regulations requires that PHMSA provide interested
members of the public and affected agencies an opportunity to comment
on information and recordkeeping requests.
This notice identifies a revised information collection request
that PHMSA will submit to OMB for approval based on the requirements in
this proposed rule. PHMSA has developed burden estimates to reflect
changes in this proposed rule. PHMSA estimates that the information
collection and recordkeeping burden as proposed in this rule would be
decreased as follows:
OMB Control No. 2137-0051
Decrease in Annual Number of Respondents: 185.
Decrease in Annual Responses: 185.
Decrease in Annual Burden Hours: 185.
Decrease in Annual Burden Costs: $7,400.
PHMSA specifically requests comments on the information collection
and recordkeeping burdens associated with developing, implementing, and
maintaining these requirements for approval under this proposed rule.
Requests for a copy of this information collection should be
directed to Deborah Boothe or T. Glenn Foster, Office of Hazardous
Materials Standards (PHH-11), Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety
Administration, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001,
Telephone (202) 366-8553.
Address written comments to the Dockets Unit as identified in the
ADDRESSES section of this rulemaking. We must receive comments
regarding information collection burdens prior to the close of the
comment period identified in the DATES section of this rulemaking. In
addition, you may submit comments specifically related to the
information collection burden to the PHMSA Desk Officer, Office of
Management and Budget, at fax number (202) 395-6974.
G. Regulation Identifier Number (RIN)
A regulation identifier number (RIN) is assigned to each regulatory
action listed in the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulations. The
Regulatory Information Service Center publishes the Unified Agenda in
April and October of each year. The RIN contained in the heading of
this document may be used to cross-reference this action with the
Unified Agenda.
H. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
This proposed rule does not impose unfunded mandates under the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995. It does not result in costs of
$141.3 million or more to either State, local or Tribal governments, in
the aggregate, or to the private sector, and is the least burdensome
alternative that achieves the objective of the rule.
I. Environmental Assessment
The National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA), as amended
(42 U.S.C. 4321-4347), requires Federal agencies to consider the
consequences of major Federal actions and prepare a detailed statement
on actions that significantly affect the quality of the human
environment.
The hazardous materials regulatory system is a risk management
system that is prevention oriented and focused on identifying a hazard
and reducing the probability and quantity of a hazardous materials
release. Hazardous materials are categorized by hazard analysis and
experience into hazard classes and packing groups. The regulations
require each shipper to classify a material in accordance with these
hazard classes and packing groups; the process of classifying a
hazardous material is itself a form of hazard analysis. Further, the
regulations require the shipper to communicate the material's hazards
by identifying the hazard class, packing group, and proper shipping
name on shipping papers and with labels on packages and placards on
transport vehicles. Thus, the shipping paper, labels, and placards
communicate the most significant findings of the shipper's hazard
analysis. Most hazardous materials are assigned to one of three packing
groups based upon its degree of hazard, from a high hazard Packing
Group I material to a low hazard Packing Group III material. The
quality, damage resistance, and performance standards for the
packagings authorized for the hazardous materials in each packing group
are appropriate for the hazards of the material transported.
Hazardous materials are transported by aircraft, vessel, rail, and
highway. The potential for environmental damage or contamination exists
when packages of hazardous materials are involved in transportation
incidents. The need for hazardous materials to support essential
services means transportation of highly hazardous materials is
unavoidable. However, these shipments frequently move through densely
populated or environmentally sensitive areas where the consequences of
an incident could be loss of life, serious injury, or significant
environmental damage. The ecosystems that could be affected by a
hazardous materials release during transportation include atmospheric,
aquatic, terrestrial, and vegetal resources (for example, wildlife
habitats). The adverse environmental impacts associated with releases
of most hazardous materials are short-term impacts that can be greatly
reduced or eliminated through prompt clean-up of the incident scene. In
this NPRM, we are requesting comments on the potential environmental
impacts of the proposals.
In this NPRM, PHMSA proposes to incorporate the terms of six
special permits into the HMR. Several of the proposals in this NPRM
involve the transportation of LPG. LPG is a Division 2.1 (flammable
gas) material that poses an explosive, fire, blast, or projection
hazard. If released, LPG may cause eye or skin irritation and, if
inhaled, it may irritate the respiratory tract. Moderate exposure may
cause headache or dizziness. Elevated exposure may cause
unconsciousness or respiratory arrest. Further, by diluting the oxygen
concentration in air below the level necessary to support life, LPG can
act as an asphyxiant. LPG is not known to cause long-term ecological
damage. The proposals in this NPRM are intended to ensure that LPG will
be transported in a variety of applications with no release from its
packaging and, thus, no adverse safety or environmental impacts.
One of the proposals in this NPRM involves Division 6.1 liquid soil
pesticide fumigants. Soil fumigation is a chemical control strategy
used independently or in conjunction with cultural and physical control
methods to reduce populations of soil organisms. Soil fumigants can
effectively control soil-borne organisms, such as nematodes, fungi,
bacteria, insects, weed seeds, and weeds. Different fumigants have
varying effects on the control of these pests. Some are pest specific,
while others are broad spectrum biocides that kill most soil organisms.
Soil fumigants are used in agriculture, nurseries, ornamental beddings,
forest systems, and other areas where soil-borne pests can harm or
devastate desirable plants. Because of treatment costs, applicators use
soil fumigants primarily on high value
[[Page 42370]]
crops, such as vegetables, fruits, and ornamentals. Control of soil-
borne pests increases plant aesthetics, plant quality and vigor, crop
yields, and ultimately profitability. Soil fumigants are closely
regulated by the Environmental Protection Agency to prevent adverse
health impacts to agricultural workers or bystanders (people who live,
work, or otherwise spend time near fields that are fumigated). The
proposals in this NPRM will help to ensure that liquid soil pesticide
fumigants are transported without incident on or between farms and the
bulk loading facility.
Several proposals in this NPRM address the transportation of
anhydrous ammonia. Anhydrous ammonia is a poisonous by inhalation (PIH)
material. When anhydrous ammonia is released into water, it floats on
the surface, rapidly dissolving into the water as ammonium hydroxide
while simultaneously boiling into the atmosphere as gaseous ammonia.
High concentrations of ammonia (greater than 1700 parts per million
(ppm)) in the atmosphere cause compulsive coughing and death, while
lower concentrations (lower than 700 ppm) cause eye and throat
irritation. Ammonia is lighter than air so that it dissipates in the
atmosphere, the rate of dissipation depending on weather.
In an aquatic or wetland environment, ammonium hydroxide would
cause fish, planktonic, and benthic organism mortality in the vicinity
of the release--the size depending on the volume of anhydrous ammonia
released. The chemical would also strip protective oils from the
feathers of shore birds, causing drowning or infection. Such die-offs
could spur high nutrient levels that could stimulate noxious blooms of
algae. Terrestrial vegetation would also be either damaged or killed,
depending on atmospheric concentrations.
The cleanup effort from a release of anhydrous ammonia would
require the removal of soil containing anhydrous ammonia quickly to
avoid contamination of the water table. Ammonia emissions would be
released during the cleanup effort as contaminated soil is disturbed.
The proposals in this NPRM will require certain nurse tanks used to
transport anhydrous ammonia to, from, and between farm fields to be
inspected and tested periodically to identify problems that would
result in a leak or release.
There are no significant environmental impacts associated with the
proposals in this NPRM, although PHMSA solicits comments on the
potential environmental impacts of the proposals in this NPRM. The
process through which special permits are issued requires the applicant
to demonstrate that the alternative transportation method or packaging
proposed provides an equivalent level of safety as that provided in the
HMR. Implicit in this process is that the special permit must provide
an equivalent level of environmental protection as that provided in the
HMR. Thus, incorporation of special permits as regulations of generally
applicability maintains the existing environmental protections built
into the HMR. In addition, the proposals applicable to nurse tanks will
enhance the integrity of those tanks, thereby reducing the possibility
of an anhydrous ammonia release.
J. Privacy Act
Anyone is able to search the electronic form of all comments
received into any of our dockets by the name of the individual
submitting the comment (or signing the comment, if submitted on behalf
of an association, business, labor union, etc.). You may review DOT's
complete Privacy Act Statement in the Federal Register published on
April 11, 2000 (Volume 65, Number 70, pages 19477-78), or at https://www.regulations.gov.
List of Subjects
49 CFR Part 171
Exports, Hazardous materials transportation, Hazardous waste,
Imports, Incorporation by reference, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
49 CFR Part 173
Hazardous materials transportation, Packaging and containers,
Radioactive materials, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements,
Uranium.
In consideration of the foregoing, we propose to amend 49 CFR
Chapter I as follows:
PART 171--GENERAL INFORMATION, REGULATIONS, AND DEFINITIONS
1. The authority citation for part 171 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 5101-5128, 44701; 49 CFR 1.45 and 1.53;
Pub. L. 101-410 section 4 (28 U.S.C. 2461 note); Pub. L. 104-134
section 31001.
Sec. 171.7 [Amended]
2. In Sec. 171.7, in the paragraph (a)(3) table, in the second
column, ``49 CFR reference,'' the following changes are made:
a. Under the entry, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, the
entry `` `ASME Code'; ASME Code, Sections II (Parts A and B), V, VIII
(Division 1), and IX of 1998 Edition of American Society of Mechanical
Engineers Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code'' is amended by adding
sections ``173.5'' and ``173.5a'' in appropriate numerical order;
b. Under the entry, National Board of Boiler and Pressure Vessel
Inspectors, the entry ``National Board Inspection Code, A Manual for
Boiler and Pressure Vessel Inspectors, NB-23, 1992 Edition'' is amended
by adding section ``173.315'' in appropriate alphabetical order; and
c. Under the entry, National Fire Protection Association, the entry
``NFPA 58--Liquefied Petroleum Gas Code, 2001 Edition'' is amended by
adding the sections ``173.5'' and ``173.315'' in appropriate
alphabetical order.
PART 173--SHIPPERS--GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR SHIPMENTS AND
PACKAGINGS
3. The authority citation for part 173 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 5101-5128, 44701; 49 CFR 1.45, 1.53.
4. In Sec. 173.5, redesignate paragraphs (d), (e), and (f) as
paragraphs (f), (g) and (h), respectively, and add new paragraphs (d)
and (e) to read as follows:
Sec. 173.5 Agricultural operations.
* * * * *
(d) Moveable fuel storage tenders. A non-DOT specification cargo
tank motor vehicle may be used to transport Liquefied petroleum gas,
UN1075, including Propane, UN1978, as moveable fuel storage tender used
exclusively for agricultural purposes when operated by a private
carrier under the following conditions:
(1) The cargo tank must have a minimum design pressure of 250 psig.
(2) The cargo tank must meet the requirements of the ASME Code in
effect at the time of its manufacture and must be marked accordingly.
(3) The cargo tank must have a water capacity of 1,200 gallons or
less.
(4) The cargo tank must conform to applicable requirements in
National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) Pamphlet No. 58 (IBR, see
Sec. 171.7 of this subchapter).
(5) The cargo tank must be securely mounted on a motor vehicle.
(6) The cargo tank must be filled in accordance with Sec.
173.315(b) for liquefied petroleum gas.
(7) The cargo tank must be painted white, aluminum, or other light
reflecting color.
(8) Transportation of the filled moveable fuel storage tender is
limited to movements over local roads between fields using the shortest
practical distance.
[[Page 42371]]
(9) Transportation of the moveable fuel storage tender between its
point of use and a liquefied petroleum gas distribution facility is
authorized only if the cargo tank contains no more than 5 percent of
its water capacity.
(e) Liquid soil pesticide fumigants. MC 306 and DOT 406 cargo tank
motor vehicles and DOT 57 portable tanks may be used to transport
liquid soil pesticide fumigants, Pesticides, liquid, toxic, flammable,
n.o.s., flash point not less than 23 degrees C, 6.1, UN2903, PG II,
exclusively for agricultural operations by a private motor carrier
between a bulk loading facility and a farm (including between farms).
However, transportation is not to exceed 150 miles between the loading
facility and the farm, and not more than five days are permitted for
intermediate stops for temporary storage. Additionally, transport is
permitted only under the following conditions:
(1) Cargo tanks. MC 306 and DOT 406 cargo tank motor vehicles must:
(i) Meet qualification and maintenance requirements (including
periodic testing and inspection) in accordance with Subpart E of Part
180 of this subchapter;
(ii) Conform to the pressure relief system requirements specified
in Sec. 173.243(b)(1);
(iii) MC 306 cargo tanks must be equipped with stop-valves capable
of being remotely closed by manual and mechanical means; and
(iv) For DOT 406 cargo tanks, must conform to the bottom outlet
requirements specified in Sec. 173.243(b)(2).
(2) Portable tanks. DOT 57 portable tanks must--
(i) Be constructed of stainless steel; and
(ii) Meet qualification and maintenance requirements of Subpart G
of Part 180 of this subchapter.
* * * * *
5. In Sec. 173.5a, revise the section heading and add new
paragraph (c) to read as follows:
Sec. 173.5a Oilfield service vehicles, mechanical displacement meter
provers, and roadway striping vehicles exceptions.
* * * * *
(c) Roadway striping. In addition to conformance with all other
applicable requirements of this subchapter, non-DOT specification cargo
tanks used for roadway striping are authorized provided all the
following conditions in this paragraph (c) are met.
(1) Authorized materials. Only the hazardous materials listed in
the table below may be transported in roadway striping vehicles. The
cargo tank may not be filled to be liquid full at less than or equal to
130[deg] F.
Hazardous Materials Description
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hazard class/
Proper shipping name division Identification number Packing group
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Adhesives, containing a flammable liquid 3 UN1133 II
Paint including paint, lacquer, enamel, 3 UN1263 II
stain, shellac solution, varnish,
polish, liquid filler, and liquid
lacquer base.
Paint related material including paint 3 UN1263 II
thinning drying, removing, or reducing
compound.
Flammable liquids, n.o.s. \a\........... 3 UN1993 II
Gasoline................................ 3 UN1203 II
Acetone \b\............................. 3 UN1090 II
Dichloromethane \b\..................... 6.1 UN1593 III
Ethyl methyl ketone or Methyl ethyl 3 UN1193 II
ketone \b\.
Ethyl acetate \b\....................... 3 UN1173 II
Methanol \b\............................ 3 UN1230 II
Organic peroxide type E, liquid 5.2 UN3107 II
(Dibenzoyl peroxide) \c\.
Petroleum distillates, n.o.s. or 3 UN1268 III
Petroleum products, n.o.s. \b\.
1,1,1-Trichloroethane \b\............... 6.1 UN2831 III
Toluene \b\............................. 3 UN1294 II
Xylenes \b\............................. 3 UN1307 II, III
Environmentally hazardous substance, 9 UN3082 III
liquid, n.o.s. \c\.
Corrosive liquid, basic, organic, n.o.s. 8 UN3267 III
\c\.
Corrosive liquids, n.o.s. \c\........... 8 UN1760 III
Elevated temperature liquid, n.o.s., at 9 UN3257 III
or above 100 C and below its flash
point (including molten metals, molten
salts, etc.).\d\
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\a\ Adhesive containing ethyl acetate.
\b\ Solvent.
\c\ Catalyst.
\d\ Thermoplastic material non-hazardous at room temperature.
(2) Cargo tank requirements. Each non-DOT specification cargo tank
used for roadway striping must be securely bolted to a motor vehicle
and must--
(i) Be constructed and certified in conformance with the ASME Code
in effect at the time of its manufacture;
(ii) Have a minimum design pressure of 100 psig;
(iii) Have a maximum capacity of 500 gallons;
(iv) For solvents and organic peroxides, the cargo tank may not
contain more than 50 gallons;
(v) Be given an external visual inspection prior to each use to
ensure that it has not been damaged on the previous trip;
(vi) Be retested and reinspected in accordance with Sec.
180.407(c) of this subchapter as specified for an MC 331 cargo tank
motor vehicle; and
(vii) Be securely mounted to a motor vehicle in accordance with the
securement provisions prescribed in Sec. Sec. 393.100 through 393.106
of this title.
(3) Test records. The owner or operator of the roadway striping
vehicle must maintain hydrostatic test records in accordance with Sec.
180.417(b) and must make those records available to any representative
of the Department of Transportation upon request.
(4) Marking. A non-DOT specification cargo tank used for roadway
striping must be plainly marked on both sides near the middle in
letters at least two
[[Page 42372]]
inches in height on a contrasting background ``ROADWAY STRIPING''.
(5) Operational controls. A non-DOT specification cargo tank used
for roadway striping may not be pressurized when the motor vehicle is
traveling to and from job sites. Additionally, the distance traveled by
a non-DOT specification cargo tank used for roadway striping may not
exceed 750 miles.
* * * * *
6. In Sec. 173.242, revise paragraph (b) introductory text to read
as follows:
Sec. 173.242 Bulk packagings for certain medium hazard liquids and
solids, including solids with dual hazards.
* * * * *
(b) Cargo tanks: Specification MC 300, MC 301, MC 302, MC 303, MC
304, MC 305, MC 306, MC 307, MC 310, MC 311, MC 312, MC 330, MC 331,
DOT 406, DOT 407, and DOT 412 cargo tank motor vehicles; and non-DOT
specification cargo tank motor vehicles when in compliance with Sec.
173.5a(c). Cargo tanks used to transport Class 3, Packing Group I or
II, or Packing Group III with a flash point of less than 38 [deg]C (100
[deg]F); Class 6, Packing Group I or II; and Class 8, Packing Group I
or II materials must conform to the following special requirements:
* * * * *
7. In Sec. 173.315, revise paragraphs (j) and (m) to read as
follows:
Sec. 173.315 Compressed gases in cargo tanks and portable tanks.
* * * * *
(j) Consumer storage containers. (1) Storage containers for
liquefied petroleum gas or propane charged to 5 percent of their
capacity or less and intended for permanent installation on consumer
premises may be shipped by private motor carrier under the following
conditions:
(i) Each container must be constructed in compliance with the
requirements in Section VIII of the ASME Code (IBR, see Sec. 171.7 of
this subchapter) and must be marked to indicate compliance in the
manner specified by the respective Code. Containers built in compliance
with earlier editions starting with 1943 are authorized.
(ii) Each container must be equipped with safety devices in
compliance with the requirements for safety devices on containers as
specified in NFPA 58 (IBR, see Sec. 171.7 of this subchapter).
(iii) The containers must be braced or otherwise secured on the
vehicle to prevent relative motion while in transit. Valves or other
fittings must be adequately protected against damage during
transportation. (See Sec. 177.834(a) of this subchapter).
(2) Storage containers with a water capacity not exceeding 500
gallons charged with liquefied petroleum gas to more than 5 percent of
their capacity and intended for permanent installation on consumer
premises may be transported by private motor carrier one-way only from
the consumer's premises to the container owner's nearest facility under
the following conditions:
(i) Each container must be constructed in compliance with the
requirements in Section VIII of the ASME Code and must be marked to
indicate compliance in the manner specified by the respective Code.
(ii) Maximum permitted filling density may not exceed that
specified in paragraph (b) of this section.
(iii) Prior to loading on a motor vehicle, the container must be
inspected by a trained and qualified person for leaks, corroded or
abraded areas, dents, distortions, weld defects, or other condition
that may render the container unsafe for transportation. A record of
the inspection must be legibly signed and dated by the person
performing the inspection and retained by the container owner for two
years. The record of inspection must include the date of inspection,
inspector's contact information, such as a telephone number, the
container's serial number and container size (water capacity),
estimated amount of hazardous material, and the origin and destination
of shipment.
(iv) Only one storage container may be transported on a motor
vehicle.
(v) For loading on a motor vehicle, the container must be lifted by
slings. Lifting lugs may not be used. The slings must be rated to a
weight sufficient to accommodate the container and its lading and shall
comply with ASME B30.9 on slings used for lifting purposes, and must be
visually inspected prior to each use. A sling showing evidence of
tears, fraying, or other signs of excessive wear may not be used.
(vi) The storage container must be secured on a motor vehicle so
that the container is completely within the envelope of the vehicle and
does not extend beyond the vehicle frame.
(vii) The storage container must be placed on the vehicle in a
manner, such as in a cradle, which ensures that no weight is placed on
the supporting legs during transportation.
(viii) The storage container must be secured against movement
during transportation. Bracing must conform with the requirements of
paragraph (j)(1)(iii) of this section and Sec. 177.834(a) of this
subchapter and with Section 6-5.2 of the NFPA Pamphlet No. 58. Straps
or chains used as tie-downs must be rated to exceed the maximum load to
be transported and conform to the requirements in Sec. Sec. 393.100
through 393.106 of this title.
(ix) Tow trailers used to transport storage containers in
accordance with this paragraph (j)(2) must provide rear end protection
that conforms to requirements in Sec. 393.86 of this title.
(3) Storage containers of less than 1,042 pounds water capacity
(125 gallons) may be shipped when charged with liquefied petroleum gas
in compliance with DOT filling density.
* * * * *
(m) General. (1) A cargo tank that is commonly known as a nurse
tank and considered an implement of husbandry transporting anhydrous
ammonia and operated by a private motor carrier exclusively for
agricultural purposes is excepted from the specification requirements
of Part 178 of this subchapter if it:
(i) Has a minimum design pressure of 250 psig, meets the
requirements of the edition of Section VIII of the ASME Code in effect
at the time it was manufactured, and is marked with a valid ASME plate.
(ii) Is equipped with pressure relief valves meeting the
requirements of CGA Standard S-1.2 (IBR, see Sec. 171.7 of this
subchapter);
(iii) Is painted white or aluminum;
(iv) Has capacity of 3,000 gallons or less;
(v) Is loaded to a filling density no greater than 56 percent;
(vi) Is securely mounted on a farm wagon or meets paragraph (m)(3)
of this section; and
(vii) Is in conformance with the requirements of Part 172 of this
subchapter except that shipping papers are not required; and it need
not be marked or placarded on one end if that end contains valves,
fittings, regulators or gauges when those appurtenances prevent the
markings and placard from being properly placed and visible.
(2) Nurse tanks with missing or illegible ASME plates. Nurse tanks
with missing or illegible ASME plates may continue to be operated
provided they conform to the following requirements:
(i) Each nurse tank must undergo an external visual inspection and
testing in accordance with Sec. 180.407(d) of this subchapter.
(ii) Each nurse tank must be thickness tested in accordance with
Sec. 180.407(i) of this subchapter. A nurse tank with a capacity of
less than 1,500 gallons must
[[Page 42373]]
have a minimum head thickness of 0.203 inch and a minimum shell
thickness of 0.239 inch. A nurse tank with a capacity of 1,500 gallons
or more must have a minimum thickness of 0.250 inch. Any nurse tank
with a thickness test reading of less than that specified in this
paragraph at any point must be removed from hazardous materials
service.
(iii) Each nurse tank must be pressure tested in accordance with
Sec. 180.407(g) of this subchapter. The minimum test pressure is 375
psig. Pneumatic testing is not authorized.
(iv) Each nurse tank must be inspected and tested by a person
meeting the requirements of Sec. 180.409(d) of this subchapter.
Furthermore, each nurse tank must have the tests performed at least
once every five years after the completion of the initial tests.
(v) After each nurse tank has successfully passed the visual,
thickness, and pressure tests, welded repairs on the tank are
prohibited.
(vi) After the nurse tank has successfully passed the visual,
thickness, and pressure tests, it must be marked in accordance with
Sec. 180.415(b), and permanently marked near the test and inspection
markings with a unique owner's identification number in letters and
numbers at least \1/2\ inch in height and width.
(vii) Each nurse tank owner must maintain a copy of the test
inspection report prepared by the inspector. The test report must
contain the results of the test and meet the requirements in Sec.
180.417(b) and be made available to a DOT representative upon request.
(3) Field truck mounted tanks. A non-DOT specification cargo tank
(nurse tank) securely mounted on a field truck is authorized under the
following conditions:
(i) Is in conformance with all the requirements of paragraph (m)(1)
of this section, except that the requirement in paragraph (m)(1)(vi)
does not apply;
(ii) Is inspected and tested in accordance with Subpart E of Part
180 of this subchapter as specified for an MC 331 cargo tank; and
(iii) Is restricted to rural roads in areas within 50 miles of the
fertilizer distribution point where the nurse tank is loaded.
* * * * *
Issued in Washington, DC on July 14, 2010, under authority
delegated in 49 CFR part 1.
Magdy El-Sibaie,
Associate Administrator for Hazardous Materials Safety, Pipeline and
Hazardous Materials Safety Administration.
[FR Doc. 2010-17712 Filed 7-20-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-60-P