Fisheries of the Exclusive Economic Zone Off Alaska; Skates Management in the Groundfish Fisheries of the Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands; Groundfish Annual Catch Limits for the Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands Management Area and Gulf of Alaska, 41424-41429 [2010-17436]
Download as PDF
41424
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 136 / Friday, July 16, 2010 / Proposed Rules
cprice-sewell on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
requests for additional information from
DOE, particularly regarding the WIPP
waste inventory and groundwater (karst)
issues.
EPA will now undertake a full
technical evaluation on the complete
2009 CRA in determining whether the
WIPP continues to comply with the
radiation protection standards for
disposal. EPA will also consider any
additional public comments and other
information relevant to WIPP’s
compliance. The Agency is most
interested in whether new or changed
information has been appropriately
incorporated into performance
assessment calculations for WIPP, and
whether the potential effects of changes
are properly characterized.
If EPA approves the application, it
will set the parameters for how WIPP
will be operated by DOE over the
following five years. The approved CRA
will then serve as the baseline for the
next recertification. As required by the
WIPP LWA, the Agency will make a
final recertification decision within six
months of issuing its completeness
determination.
June 29, 2010
Honorable Dr. Steven Chu, Secretary U.S.
Department of Energy, 1000 Independence
Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20585.
Dear Mr. Secretary: Pursuant to Section 8(f)
of the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP)
Land Withdrawal Act, as amended, and in
accordance with the WIPP Compliance
Criteria at 40 CFR 194.11, I hereby notify you
that the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA or ‘‘the Agency’’) has
determined that the U.S. Department of
Energy’s (DOE) 2009 Compliance
Recertification Application (CRA) for WIPP is
complete. This completeness determination
is an administrative determination required
under the WIPP Compliance Criteria, which
implement the Agency’s Final Radioactive
Waste Disposal Regulations at Subparts B
and C of 40 CFR Part 191. While the
completeness determination initiates the sixmonth evaluation period provided for in
Section 8(f)(2) of the Land Withdrawal Act,
it does not have any generally applicable
legal effect. Further, this determination does
not imply or indicate that DOE’s CRA
demonstrates compliance with the
Compliance Criteria and/or the Disposal
Regulations.
Section 8(f) of the amended Land
Withdrawal Act requires EPA to evaluate all
changes in conditions or activities at WIPP
every five years to determine if the facility
continues to comply with EPA’s disposal
regulations. This second recertification
process includes a review of all of the
changes made at the WIPP facility since the
initial 2004 CRA (and subsequent
recertification decision, issued in 2006) was
submitted by DOE.
Under the applicable regulations, EPA may
recertify the WIPP only after DOE has
submitted a ‘‘full’’ (or complete) application
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:16 Jul 15, 2010
Jkt 220001
(see 40 CFR 194.11). Upon receipt of the CRA
on March 24, 2009, EPA immediately began
its review to determine whether the
application was complete. Shortly thereafter,
the Agency began to identify areas of the
2009 CRA that required supplementary
information and analyses. In addition, EPA
received public comments and held public
meetings on the application that identified
areas where additional information was
needed for EPA’s review.
EPA identified completeness concerns in a
series of letters/e-mails from the Agency to
Dr. Dave Moody, Manager for DOE’s Carlsbad
Field Office, as well as his staff. This
correspondence is detailed below:
• May 21, 2009—EPA requested additional
information on the performance assessment
and chemical portions of the CRA–2009.
• July 16, 2009—EPA requested additional
information on waste inventory, performance
assessment calculations/code documentation,
human intrusion, and chemistry (including
karst comments raised by stakeholders).
• October 19, 2009—EPA requested
additional information on waste inventory,
chemistry, features/events/processes (FEPs),
and performance assessment paramaters/
codes.
• January 25, 2010 (addendum to 5/21/09
letter via e-mail)— EPA requested additional
information conceptual models and modeling
calculations.
• February 19, 2010—EPA requested
additional information on repository
chemistry issues.
DOE submitted the requested information
with a series of 11 letters, which were sent
on the following dates:
• August 24, 2009
• September 30, 2009
• November 25, 2009
• January 12, 2010
• February 22, 2010
• March 31, 2010
• April 12, 2010
• April 19, 2010
• May 26, 2010
• June 22, 2010
• June 28, 2010
All completeness-related correspondence
was placed in our public docket (EDOCKET
EPA–HQ–OAR–2009–0330) and on our
website (https://www.epa.gov/radiation/
wipp).
Based on the information provided by
DOE, we conclude that the 2009 CRA is
complete. Again, this is the initial,
administrative step that indicates DOE has
provided information relevant to each
applicable provision of the WIPP Compliance
Criteria and in sufficient detail for us to
proceed with a full technical evaluation of
the adequacy of the application. In
accordance with Section 8(f)(2) of the
amended Land Withdrawal Act, EPA will
make its final recertification decision within
six months of this letter.
To the extent possible, the Agency began
conducting a preliminary technical review of
the application upon its submittal by DOE,
and has provided the Department with
relevant technical comments on an ongoing
basis. EPA will continue to conduct its
technical review of the 2009 CRA as needed,
and will convey further requests for
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
additional information and analyses. The
Agency will issue its compliance
recertification decision, in accordance with
40 CFR Part 194 and Part 191, Subparts B and
C, after it has thoroughly evaluated the
complete CRA and considered relevant
public comments. The public comment
period on our completeness determination
will remain open for 30 days following the
publication of this letter in the Federal
Register.
Thank you for your cooperation during our
review process. Should your staff have any
questions regarding this request, they may
contact Tom Peake at (202) 343–9765 or by
e-mail at peake.tom@epa.gov.
Sincerely,
Michael P. Flynn,
Director, Office of Radiation and Indoor Air.
Dated: July 7, 2010.
Michael P. Flynn,
Director, Office of Radiation and Indoor Air.
[FR Doc. 2010–17141 Filed 7–15–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 679
[Docket No. 0912231441–91445–01]
RIN 0648–AY48
Fisheries of the Exclusive Economic
Zone Off Alaska; Skates Management
in the Groundfish Fisheries of the
Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands;
Groundfish Annual Catch Limits for
the Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands
Management Area and Gulf of Alaska
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Proposed rule; request for
comments.
SUMMARY: NMFS proposes regulations to
implement Amendments 95 and 96 to
the Fishery Management Plan (FMP) for
Groundfish of the Bering Sea and
Aleutian Islands Management Area
(BSAI) and Amendment 87 to the FMP
for Groundfish of the Gulf of Alaska
(GOA), (collectively referred to as ‘‘the
FMPs’’). If approved, Amendment 95
would move skates from the ‘‘other
species’’ category to the ‘‘target species’’
category in the FMP. Amendments 96
and 87 would revise the FMPs to meet
the National Standard 1 guidelines for
annual catch limits and accountability
measures. These amendments would
move all remaining species groups from
the ‘‘other species’’ category to the
‘‘target species’’ category, remove the
E:\FR\FM\16JYP1.SGM
16JYP1
cprice-sewell on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 136 / Friday, July 16, 2010 / Proposed Rules
‘‘other species’’ and ‘‘non-specified
species’’ categories from the FMPs,
establish an ‘‘ecosystem component’’
category, and describe the current
practices for groundfish fisheries
management in the FMPs, as required
by the guidelines. The proposed rule
would remove references to the ‘‘other
species’’ category for purposes of the
harvest specifications and would add
skate species to the reporting codes for
the BSAI groundfish fisheries. This
proposed action is intended to promote
the goals and objectives of the
Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act, the
FMPs, and other applicable laws.
DATES: Comments must be received by
August 30, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Send comments to Sue
Salveson, Assistant Regional
Administrator, Sustainable Fisheries
Division, Alaska Region, NMFS, Attn:
Ellen Sebastian. You may submit
comments, identified by RIN 0648–
AY48, by any one of the following
methods:
• Electronic Submissions: Submit all
electronic public comments via the
Federal eRulemaking Portal at https://
www.regulations.gov.
• Mail: P.O. Box 21668, Juneau, AK
99802.
• Fax: (907) 586–7557.
• Hand delivery to the Federal
Building: 709 West 9th Street, Room
420A, Juneau, AK.
All comments received are a part of
the public record. No comments will be
posted to https://www.regulations.gov for
public viewing until after the comment
period has closed. Comments will
generally be posted without change. All
Personal Identifying Information (for
example, name, address) voluntarily
submitted by the commenter may be
publicly accessible. Do not submit
Confidential Business Information or
otherwise sensitive or protected
information.
NMFS will accept anonymous
comments (enter N/A in the required
fields, if you wish to remain
anonymous). You may submit
attachments to electronic comments in
Microsoft Word, Excel, WordPerfect, or
Adobe PDF file formats only.
Electronic copies of Amendments 95
and 96 to the FMP for Groundfish of the
BSAI, Amendment 87 to the FMP for
Groundfish of the GOA, the
Environmental Assessments (EAs), and
the Regulatory Impact Review (RIR)
prepared for this action are available
from the Alaska Region website at
https://www.alaskafisheries.noaa.gov/
regs/summary.htm.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:22 Jul 15, 2010
Jkt 220001
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Melanie Brown, 907–586–7228.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
groundfish fisheries in the exclusive
economiczone of the BSAI and GOA are
managed under the FMPs. The North
Pacific Fishery Management Council
(Council) prepared the FMPs under the
authority of the Magnuson-Stevens
Fishery Conservation and Management
Act (Magnuson-Stevens Act), 16 U.S.C.
1801 et seq. Regulations implementing
the FMPs appear at 50 CFR part 679.
General regulations governing U.S.
fisheries also appear at 50 CFR part 600.
The Council has submitted
Amendments 87, 95, and 96 for review
by the Secretary of Commerce
(Secretary), and a Notice of Availability
of the FMP amendments was published
in the Federal Register on July 2, 2010
(75 FR 38454), with comments on the
FMP amendments invited through
August 31, 2010.
Comments may address the FMP
amendments, the proposed rule, or both,
but must be received by 1700 hours,
A.D.T. on August 31, 2101, to be
considered in the approval/disapproval
decision on the FMP amendments. All
comments received by that time,
whether specifically directed to the
FMP amendments or to this proposed
rule, will be considered in the approval/
disapproval decision on the FMP
amendments.
Background
Amendment 95 was unanimously
adopted by the Council in October 2009.
If approved by the Secretary, this
amendment would move skates from the
‘‘other species’’ category to the ‘‘target
species’’ list in the BSAI FMP, allowing
the management of skates as a target
species complex or as individual skate
species. NMFS trawl survey and catch
information show that 15 skate species
occur in the BSAI. In the Bering Sea
subarea, the most abundant species is
the Alaska skate, while the most
abundant species in the Aleutian
Islands subarea is the whiteblotched
skate. Individual species of skate could
be listed under the skate complex in the
‘‘target species’’ list during the harvest
specifications process to allow for
management of these individual species.
Amendments 96 and 87 were
unanimously adopted by the Council in
April 2010. If approved by the
Secretary, these amendments would
revise the FMPs to meet the MagnusonStevens Act requirements to establish
annual catch limits (ACLs) and
accountability measures (AMs), and
conform to the National Standard 1
(NS1) guidelines (74 FR 3178, January
16, 2009). The Magnuson-Stevens
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
41425
Fishery Conservation and Management
Reauthorization Act of 2006 (MSRA),
which was signed into law on January
12, 2007, included new requirements
regarding ACLs and AMs, which
reinforce existing requirements to
prevent overfishing and rebuild
fisheries. NMFS revised the NS1
guidelines at 50 CFR 600.310 to
integrate these new requirements with
existing provisions related to
overfishing, rebuilding overfished
stocks, and achieving optimum yield.
Section 104(a)(10) of the MSRA,
codified as section 303(a)(15) of the
Magnuson-Stevens Act, requires FMPs
to establish mechanisms for specifying
ACLs, including AMs. The provision
states that FMPs shall ‘‘establish a
mechanism for specifying annual catch
limits in the plan (including a multiyear
plan), implementing regulations, or
annual specifications, at a level such
that overfishing does not occur in the
fishery, including measures to ensure
accountability.’’ ACLs and AMs are
required by fishing year 2011 in
fisheries where overfishing is not
occurring. None of the Alaska
groundfish fisheries have overfishing
occurring, and therefore the groundfish
ACLs and AMs must be implemented by
January 1, 2011.
Skate, shark, sculpin, and octopus
groups are currently managed as a
complex in the ‘‘other species’’ category
in the BSAI. In the GOA, shark, sculpin,
octopus, and squid groups are managed
as a complex in the ‘‘other species’’
category. Each year, the overfishing
limit (OFL), acceptable biological catch
(ABC), and total allowable catch (TAC)
are specified for the ‘‘other species’’
category as a whole in each management
area. National Standard 1 guidelines
require species managed in a stock
complex to have similar life histories,
but the current ‘‘other species’’ category
combines the management of short-lived
invertebrates (squids and octopuses)
with long-lived fish (sharks and skates).
If approved, Amendment 95 would
move BSAI skates from the ‘‘other
species’’ category to the ‘‘target species’’
category and require annual
specification of OFL, ABC, and TAC for
the skate group as a whole or for
individual skate species. Amendments
96 and 87 would remove the remaining
species groups from the ‘‘other species’’
category in each FMP and place these
groups in the ‘‘target species’’ category.
The ‘‘other species’’ category would be
completely removed from the FMPs.
Managing skates, sculpins, sharks,
octopuses, and squids as separate
groups or as individual species, each
with its own OFL, ABC, ACL, and TAC,
would enhance NMFS’ ability to control
E:\FR\FM\16JYP1.SGM
16JYP1
cprice-sewell on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
41426
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 136 / Friday, July 16, 2010 / Proposed Rules
the harvest of these species groups
based on the best available scientific
information, and would reduce the
potential for overfishing these groups.
The susceptibility of skates to fishing
pressure has been well documented in
the EA for Amendment 95 (see
ADDRESSES). While no target fishery
has been developed yet for groups
currently in the ‘‘other species’’ category,
without the proposed amendments, the
potential exists for the entire ‘‘other
species’’ TAC to be taken as the harvest
of a single group. Such a harvest could
represent an unsustainable level of
fishing mortality for that single group,
even though the harvest may not exceed
the aggregate OFL for all groups in the
‘‘other species’’ category. Amendment 63
to the FMP for Groundfish of the GOA
was a similar precautionary measure
that removed skates from the ‘‘other
species’’ category in response to a
rapidly developing directed fishery (69
FR 26313, May 12, 2004).
Implementation of these amendments
will promote the goal of ending and
preventing overfishing.
A retrospective analysis in the EA for
Amendments 96 and 87 of past shark
and octopus harvest compared to the
2010 ABCs and OFLs showed that
potential harvests of these species may
exceed ABCs and OFLs without NMFS
inseason management to control
incidental catch (see ADDRESSES). If
the TACs for these groups are
insufficient to support a directed
fishery, a vessel’s harvest of sharks and
octopuses would be limited to a
maximum retainable amount,
representing a percentage of the amount
of ‘‘target species’’ harvested by a vessel.
If closing directed fishing for sharks and
octopuses, together with applicable
limits on retention, is not sufficient to
prevent reaching the ABCs and OFLs for
these groups, NMFS inseason
management would use observed catch,
fish ticket, and vessel monitoring
system data to determine the most
effective actions to prevent overfishing,
while minimizing adverse impacts to
fishing communities, to the extent
practicable. Controlling incidental
harvests of BSAI and GOA octopuses
may require temporary closure of areas
of high octopus retention to Pacific cod
pot gear vessels. If necessary, BSAI and
GOA shark incidental harvest would
likely be constrained by temporarily
restricting harvesting locations for hookand-line sablefish and Pacific cod
fisheries and the trawl pollock fishery.
Because BSAI and GOA octopus have
been sold, information is available to
estimate changes in potential revenue
from the proposed action. The estimated
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:22 Jul 15, 2010
Jkt 220001
revenue for BSAI and GOA octopus is
decreased $110,000 to $155,000 based
on the retrospective harvest and
inseason management methods.
Increased costs may occur if fishing
operations have to travel further to
reach alternative fishing grounds, or if
they must fish in areas with lower
catch-per-unit of effort (and thus incur
increased costs of fishing effort to catch
the same amount of fish). Decreased
revenues may occur if increased travel
or fishing time requirements makes it
impossible to catch the same amount of
fish in the time available. Decreased
revenues also may occur if shifts in
fishing activity make it harder to deliver
a quality product.
Proposed Regulatory Amendments
The Council recommended, and the
Secretary proposes, the following
regulatory revisions and additions to 50
CFR part 679 to implement
Amendments 87, 95, and 96.
The definitions for ‘‘groundfish’’,
‘‘license limitation groundfish’’, and
‘‘target species,’’ in § 679.2, would be
revised to remove reference to the ‘‘other
species’’ category. Removing the term
‘‘other species category’’ from these
definitions would reduce confusion
related to target species and the harvest
specifications, as Amendments 96 and
87 would remove the ‘‘other species’’
category from the FMPs for purposes of
the harvest specifications, and leave
only ‘‘target species’’ as a category for
which NMFS must establish harvest
specifications. The definition for ‘‘other
species’’ would be revised to allow the
continued management of BSAI and
GOA sharks, sculpins, and octopuses
and GOA squids as a group for purposes
of prohibited species catch under
§ 679.21 and maximum retainable
amounts specified in Tables 10 and 11
to part 679.
Section 679.20 would be revised by
removing the term ‘‘other species
category’’ in paragraphs related to
harvest limits, reserves, harvest
specifications, and fishery closures.
This revision would ensure the
regulations for harvest specifications
and ‘‘target species’’ management are
consistent with Amendments 96 and 87,
which would remove ‘‘other species’’
from the FMP for purposes of harvest
specifications and inseason
management.
Section 679.25 would be revised to
remove the ‘‘other species’’ category
from the paragraph related to reopening
an area to achieve TAC for a target
species. This revision would ensure the
regulations are consistent with
removing ‘‘other species’’ from the FMP
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
for purposes of target species
management.
Table 2a to part 679 would be revised
to add whiteblotched, Alaska, and
Aleutian skates, as well as the scientific
names for individual skate species.
Adding these individual skate species
and the scientific names would facilitate
the reporting of individual skate species
taken during groundfish harvest and
would provide more detailed
information regarding skate harvests for
stock assessments and fisheries
management. This revision would
ensure the regulations are consistent
with Amendment 95, providing the
species specific information to support
managing skates as a target species
group or as individual target species.
Classification
Pursuant to section 304 (b)(1)(A) of
the Magnuson-Stevens Act, the NMFS
Assistant Administrator has determined
that this proposed rule is consistent
with Amendments 87, 95, and 96, other
provisions of the Magnuson-Stevens Act
and other applicable laws, subject to
further consideration after public
comment.
This proposed rule has been
determined to be not significant for the
purposes of E. O. 12866.
The Chief Counsel for Regulation of
the Department of Commerce certified
to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the
Small Business Administration that this
proposed rule, if adopted, would not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
Factual Basis for Certification
Description and Estimate of the Number
of Small Entities to Which the Rule
Applies
For purposes of this analysis, a ‘‘small
entity’’ is any entity that catches, or
catches and processes, less than $4.0
million gross ex-vessel value (or first
wholesale gross product value) of
groundfish per year.
The proposed regulatory changes for
Amendments 96 and 87 do not impose,
increase, relax, or remove substantive
restrictions on any entity. This proposed
regulatory action is not the only
regulatory action that the agency will
take to implement these amendments,
and it does not give effect to these FMP
amendments in a manner that will
directly impact regulated entities.
Because no entities will be directly
regulated by the portion of the proposed
rule for Amendments 96 and 87, no
small entities will be directly regulated
by the proposed action for Amendments
96 and 87. Therefore, the proposed
action that implements Amendments 96
E:\FR\FM\16JYP1.SGM
16JYP1
cprice-sewell on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 136 / Friday, July 16, 2010 / Proposed Rules
and 87 does not directly apply to any
small entities.
The portion of the proposed rule to
implement Amendment 95 may directly
regulate small entities, although as
noted below, the impacts would not be
significant. The entities directly
regulated by this action, if adopted,
would be the Community Development
Quota (CDQ) and non-CDQ fishing
operations harvesting species in the
‘‘other species’’ complex in the BSAI,
using hook-and-line, pot, or trawl gear.
Vessels generally are harvesting skates
and the remaining species in the ‘‘other
species’’ category, incidentally to other
targeted fishing operations; (e.g., fishing
for Pacific cod); none of the species in
the ‘‘other species’’ category are
currently fished as a target. Because any
hook-and-line, pot, or trawl operation in
the BSAI may harvest the ‘‘other
species’’ complex, the universe of
potentially directly regulated operations
includes all BSAI hook-and-line, pot,
and trawl vessels.
In 2007, the universe of potentially
directly regulated vessels that caught (or
caught and processed) less than $4.0 M
gross ex-vessel value (or first wholesale
gross product value) of groundfish or
‘‘other species,’’ totaled 212 vessels in
the BSAI. This included 40 hook-andline vessels, 71 pot vessels, and 103
trawlers. The portion of the proposed
action to implement Amendment 95
potentially applies to all of these
entities.
For RFA purposes, the entity size
determination is based on operation
gross annual revenues from groundfish
fishing in and off Alaska. This likely
‘‘understates’’ the actual annual gross
revenues earned by many of these
operations, because income from nongroundfish commercial fishing activities
is not included, owing to an absence of
germane data. Moreover, data are not
available to fully take account of
affiliations between fishing operations
and associated processors, or other
associated fishing operations. For these
reasons, these counts likely overstate
the numbers of small entities potentially
directly regulated by the proposed
action. Average groundfish gross
revenues, in 2007, for these small
entities were estimated to be $670,000
for hook-and-line catcher vessels, $2.27
million for hook-and-line catcher
processors, $1,400,000 for pot catcher
vessels, and $1.91 million for trawl
catcher vessels (AFSC did not report
information for pot and trawl catcherprocessors).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:22 Jul 15, 2010
Jkt 220001
Estimate of Economic Impact on Small
Entities by Entity Size and Industry
The impacts of this action have been
evaluated in the accompanying RIR (See
ADDRESSES). The proposed regulatory
changes to accompany Amendments 96
and 87 do not impose, increase, relax,
or remove substantive restrictions on
any entity. Because this portion of the
proposed action does not directly
regulate any entities, this portion of the
proposed action would not have any
discernible impacts on small entities.
The proposed regulatory amendment
for Amendment 95 would change the
codes required for reporting skate
catches, and to this extent would further
restrict entity behavior. Vessel operators
would need to learn how to identify
three individual skate species and use
the proposed species code from Table 2a
to part 679 in their harvest reports.
However, all skate harvest must
currently be reported using a code from
Table 2a to part 679. Once the operator
learns how to identify the skate species
and becomes familiar with the proposed
codes, the expense of reporting skate
harvests would be similar to that
currently experienced. The RIR notes
that this portion of the proposed action
is expected to have de minimis costs.
Because the costs are expected to be so
small, the portion of the action to
implement Amendment 95 is not
expected to have a significant impact on
any directly regulated small entities.
Criteria Used to Evaluate Whether the
Rule Would Impose ‘‘Significant
Economic Impacts’’
The two criteria recommended to
determine the significance of the
economic impacts of the action are
disproportionality and profitability.
As noted above, there are no
economic impacts caused by the portion
of the proposed action that implements
Amendments 87 and 96. That portion of
the proposed action will not result in
disproportionate impacts nor impacts
on profitability of regulated entities, and
therefore will not impose significant
economic impacts.
Because the impact of reporting skates
under the portion of the proposed action
that implements Amendment 95 would
be a de minimis impact regardless of
entity size, the proposed action would
not place a substantial number of small
entities at a disadvantage, relative to
large entities. Any costs attributed to the
proposed action are expected to be de
minimis and thus would have a de
minimis impact on profits. Because the
impacts of the proposed action to
implement Amendment 95 are expected
to be de minimis in terms of
PO 00000
Frm 00039
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
41427
disproportionality and profitability, the
economic impacts would not be
significant.
Criteria Used to Evaluate Whether the
Rule Would Impose Impacts on ‘‘a
Substantial Number’’ of Small Entities
NMFS guidelines for economic review
of regulatory actions explain that the
term ‘‘substantial number’’ has no
specific statutory definition and the
criterion does not lend itself to objective
standards applicable across all
regulatory actions. Rather, a ‘‘substantial
number’’ depends upon the context of
the action, the problem to be addressed,
and the structure of the regulated
industry. The Small Business
Administration casts ‘‘substantial’’
within the context of ‘‘more than just a
few’’ or de minimis (‘‘too few to care
about’’) criteria (See page 28 of NMFS
Guidelines for Economic Review of
National Marine Fisheries Service
Regulatory Actions, available at https://
reefshark.nmfs.noaa.gov/f/pds/
publicsite/documents/procedures/01–
111–05.pdf).
As described above, the portion of the
proposed action that implements
Amendments 87 and 96 would not
directly regulate any small entities, and
therefore would not impose impacts on
a ‘‘substantial number’’ of small entities.
Although a substantial number of
small entities may be directly regulated
by the portion of the proposed action to
implement Amendment 95, the impacts
are estimated to be de minimis. Because
the impacts are de minimis, the
proposed action to implement
Amendment 95 would not impose
significant impacts on a substantial
number of directly regulated small
entities, and meets the certification
criteria under the RFA.
As a result, an initial regulatory
flexibility analysis is not required, and
none has been prepared.
List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 679
Alaska, Fisheries, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: July 12, 2010.
Samuel D. Rauch III,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for
Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
For reasons set out in the preamble,
50 CFR part 679 is proposed to be
amended as follows:
PART 679—FISHERIES OF THE
EXCLUSIVE ECONOMIC ZONE OFF
ALASKA
1. The authority citation for part 679
continues to read as follows:
E:\FR\FM\16JYP1.SGM
16JYP1
41428
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 136 / Friday, July 16, 2010 / Proposed Rules
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 773 et seq.; 1801 et
seq.; 3631 et seq.; Pub. L. 108–447.
2. In § 679.2, revise paragraph (2) of
the definition for ‘‘Groundfish’’, and the
definitions of ‘‘License limitation
groundfish’’, ‘‘Other species’’ and ‘‘Target
species’’ to read as follows:
§ 679.2
Definitions.
*
*
*
*
*
Groundfish means* * *
(2) Target species specified annually
pursuant to § 679.20(a)(2) (See also the
definitions for: License limitation
groundfish ; CDQ species ; and IR/IU
species of this section).
*
*
*
*
*
License limitation groundfish means
target species specified annually
pursuant to § 679.20(a)(2), except that
demersal shelf rockfish east of 140 W.
longitude, sablefish managed under the
IFQ program, and pollock allocated to
the Aleutian Islands directed pollock
fishery and harvested by vessels 60 feet
(18.3 m) LOA or less, are not considered
license limitation groundfish.
*
*
*
*
*
Other species is a category of target
species for the purpose of MRA and PSC
management that consists of groundfish
species in each management area. These
target species are managed as an other
species group and identified in Tables
10 and 11 to this part pursuant to
§ 679.20(e).
*
*
*
*
*
Target species are those species or
species groups for which a TAC is
specified pursuant to § 679.20(a)(2).
*
*
*
*
*
3. In § 679.20, revise paragraphs
(a)(1)(i) introductory text, (a)(2), (a)(3)
introductory text, (a)(3(i), (b)(1)(i), (b)(2)
introductory text, (c)(1)(iii), (c)(1)(iv),
(c)(3)(ii), (c)(3)(iii), (d)(1)(i),
(d)(1)(iii)(B), and (d)(2) to read as
follows:
cprice-sewell on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
§ 679.20
General limitations.
(a) * * *
(1) * * *
(i) BSAI and GOA. The OY for BSAI
and GOA target species is a range or
specific amount that can be harvested
consistently with this part, plus the
amounts of ‘‘nonspecified species’’ taken
incidentally to the harvest of target
species. The species categories are
defined in Table 1 of the specifications
as provided in paragraph (c) of this
section.
*
*
*
*
*
(2) TAC. NMFS, after consultation
with the Council, will specify and
apportion the annual TAC and reserves
for each calendar year among the GOA
and BSAI target species. TACs in the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:22 Jul 15, 2010
Jkt 220001
target species category may be split or
combined for purposes of establishing
new TACs with apportionments thereof
under paragraph (c) of this section. The
sum of the TACs so specified must be
within the OY range specified in
paragraph (a)(1) of this section.
(3) Annual TAC determination. The
annual determinations of TAC for each
target species and the reapportionment
of reserves may be adjusted, based upon
a review of the following:
(i) Biological condition of groundfish
stocks. Resource assessment documents
prepared annually for the Council that
provide information on historical catch
trend; updated estimates of the MSY of
the groundfish complex and its
component species groups; assessments
of the stock condition of each target
species; assessments of the multispecies
and ecosystem impacts of harvesting the
groundfish complex at current levels,
given the assessed condition of stocks,
including consideration of rebuilding
depressed stocks; and alternative
harvesting strategies and related effects
on the component species group.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(1) * * *
(i) Nonspecified reserve. Fifteen
percent of the BSAI TAC for each target
species, except pollock, the hook-andline and pot gear allocation for
sablefish, and the Amendment 80
species, which includes Pacific cod, is
automatically placed in the
nonspecified reserve before allocation to
any sector. The remaining 85 percent of
each TAC is apportioned to the initial
TAC for each target species that
contributed to the nonspecified reserve.
The nonspecified reserve is not
designated by species or species group.
Any amount of the nonspecified reserve
may be apportioned to target species
that contributed to the nonspecified
reserve, provided that such
apportionments are consistent with
paragraph (a)(3) of this section and do
not result in overfishing of a target
species.
*
*
*
*
*
(2) GOA. Initial reserves are
established for pollock, Pacific cod,
flatfish, squids, octopuses, sharks, and
sculpins, which are equal to 20 percent
of the TACs for these species or species
groups.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(1) * * *
(iii) GOA. The proposed
specifications will specify for up to two
fishing years the annual TAC for each
target species and apportionments
thereof, halibut prohibited species catch
PO 00000
Frm 00040
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
amounts, and seasonal allowances of
pollock and Pacific cod.
(iv) BSAI. The proposed specifications
will specify for up to two fishing years
the annual TAC for each target species
and apportionments thereof, PSQ
reserves and prohibited species catch
allowances, seasonal allowances of
pollock, Pacific cod, and Atka mackerel
TAC (including pollock, Pacific cod,
and Atka mackerel CDQ), and CDQ
reserve amounts.
*
*
*
*
*
(3) * * *
(ii) GOA. The final specifications will
specify for up to two fishing years the
annual TAC for each target species and
apportionments thereof, halibut
prohibited species catch amounts, and
seasonal allowances of pollock and
Pacific cod.
(iii) BSAI. The final specifications
will specify for up to two fishing years
the annual TAC for each target species
and apportionments thereof, PSQ
reserves and prohibited species catch
allowances, seasonal allowances of
pollock (including pollock, Pacific cod,
and Atka mackerel CDQ), and CDQ
reserve amounts.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) * * *
(1) * * *
(i) General. If the Regional
Administrator determines that any
allocation or apportionment of a target
species specified under paragraph (c) of
this section has been or will be reached,
the Regional Administrator may
establish a directed fishing allowance
for that species or species group.
*
*
*
*
*
(iii) * * *
(B) Retention of incidental species.
Except as described in § 679.20(e)(3)(iii),
if directed fishing for a target species or
species group is prohibited, a vessel
may not retain that incidental species in
an amount that exceeds the maximum
retainable amount, as calculated under
paragraphs (e) and (f) of this section, at
any time during a fishing trip.
*
*
*
*
*
(2) Groundfish as prohibited species
closure. When the Regional
Administrator determines that the TAC
of any target species specified under
paragraph (c) of this section, or the
share of any TAC assigned to any type
of gear, has been or will be achieved
prior to the end of a year, NMFS will
publish notification in the Federal
Register requiring that target species be
treated in the same manner as a
prohibited species, as described under
§ 679.21(b), for the remainder of the
year.
*
*
*
*
*
E:\FR\FM\16JYP1.SGM
16JYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 136 / Friday, July 16, 2010 / Proposed Rules
4. In § 679.25, revise paragraph
(a)(2)(iii)(D) to read as follows:
§ 679.25
TABLE 2A TO PART 679 - SPECIES
CODES: FMP GROUNDFISH—Continued
Inseason adjustments.
(a) * * *
(2) * * *
(iii) * * *
(D) Reopening of a management area
or season to achieve the TAC or gear
share of a TAC for any of the target
species.
*
*
*
*
*
5. Revise Table 2a to part 679 to read
as follows:
41429
TABLE 2A TO PART 679 - SPECIES
CODES: FMP GROUNDFISH—Continued
Species Description
Species Description
Darkblotched (S. crameri)
159
SHARKS
Dusky (S. variabilis)
172
Greenstriped (S. elongatus)
135
Other (if salmon, spiny dogfish or
Pacific sleeper shark - use specific
species code)
689
Harlequin (S. variegatus)
176
Pacific sleeper
692
Northern (S. polyspinis)
136
Salmon
690
Pacific Ocean Perch (S. alutus)
TABLE 2A TO PART 679 - SPECIES
CODES: FMP GROUNDFISH
Code
141
Spiny dogfish
691
Code
Pygmy (S. wilsoni)
179
SKATES
Species Description
Code
Quillback (S. maliger)
147
Whiteblotched (Bathyraja maculata)
705
Atka mackerel (greenling)
193
Redbanded (S. babcocki)
153
Aleutian (B. aleutica)
704
Redstripe (S. proriger)
158
Alaska (B. parmifera)
703
Rosethorn (S. helvomaculatus)
150
Big (Raja binoculata)
702
Rougheye (S. aleutianus)
151
Longnose (R. rhina)
701
Sharpchin (S. zacentrus)
166
Shortbelly (S. jordani)
181
Other (if Whiteblotched, Aleutian,
Alaska, Big, or Longnose - use specific species code listed above)
700
Shortraker (S. borealis)
152
Silvergray (S. brevispinis)
157
Splitnose (S. diploproa)
182
Stripetail (S. saxicola)
183
Flatfish, miscellaneous (flatfish species without separate codes)
120
FLOUNDER
Alaska plaice
133
Arrowtooth and/or Kamchatka
121
Starry
129
Octopus, North Pacific
SOLE
870
Pacific cod
Butter
126
Dover
124
English
128
143
Flathead
122
110
Pollock
270
ROCKFISH
Aurora (Sebastes aurora)
185
Thornyhead (all Sebastolobus species)
Black (BSAI) (S. melanops)
142
Tiger (S. nigrocinctus)
148
Petrale
131
Blackgill (S. melanostomus)
177
Vermilion (S. miniatus)
184
Rex
125
Blue (BSAI) (S. mystinus)
167
Widow (S. entomelas)
156
Rock
123
Bocaccio (S. paucispinis)
137
Yelloweye (S. ruberrimus)
145
Sand
132
Canary (S. pinniger)
146
Yellowmouth (S. reedi)
175
Yellowfin
127
Chilipepper (S. goodei)
178
Yellowtail (S. flavidus)
155
Squid, majestic
875
China (S. nebulosus)
149
Sablefish (blackcod)
710
Turbot, Greenland
134
Copper (S. caurinus)
138
Sculpins
160
[FR Doc. 2010–17436 Filed 7–15–10; 8:45 am]
cprice-sewell on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
BILLING CODE 3510–22–S
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:22 Jul 15, 2010
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00041
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 9990
E:\FR\FM\16JYP1.SGM
16JYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 136 (Friday, July 16, 2010)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 41424-41429]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-17436]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
50 CFR Part 679
[Docket No. 0912231441-91445-01]
RIN 0648-AY48
Fisheries of the Exclusive Economic Zone Off Alaska; Skates
Management in the Groundfish Fisheries of the Bering Sea and Aleutian
Islands; Groundfish Annual Catch Limits for the Bering Sea and Aleutian
Islands Management Area and Gulf of Alaska
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Proposed rule; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: NMFS proposes regulations to implement Amendments 95 and 96
to the Fishery Management Plan (FMP) for Groundfish of the Bering Sea
and Aleutian Islands Management Area (BSAI) and Amendment 87 to the FMP
for Groundfish of the Gulf of Alaska (GOA), (collectively referred to
as ``the FMPs''). If approved, Amendment 95 would move skates from the
``other species'' category to the ``target species'' category in the
FMP. Amendments 96 and 87 would revise the FMPs to meet the National
Standard 1 guidelines for annual catch limits and accountability
measures. These amendments would move all remaining species groups from
the ``other species'' category to the ``target species'' category,
remove the
[[Page 41425]]
``other species'' and ``non-specified species'' categories from the
FMPs, establish an ``ecosystem component'' category, and describe the
current practices for groundfish fisheries management in the FMPs, as
required by the guidelines. The proposed rule would remove references
to the ``other species'' category for purposes of the harvest
specifications and would add skate species to the reporting codes for
the BSAI groundfish fisheries. This proposed action is intended to
promote the goals and objectives of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act, the FMPs, and other applicable laws.
DATES: Comments must be received by August 30, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Send comments to Sue Salveson, Assistant Regional
Administrator, Sustainable Fisheries Division, Alaska Region, NMFS,
Attn: Ellen Sebastian. You may submit comments, identified by RIN 0648-
AY48, by any one of the following methods:
Electronic Submissions: Submit all electronic public
comments via the Federal eRulemaking Portal at https://www.regulations.gov.
Mail: P.O. Box 21668, Juneau, AK 99802.
Fax: (907) 586-7557.
Hand delivery to the Federal Building: 709 West 9th
Street, Room 420A, Juneau, AK.
All comments received are a part of the public record. No comments
will be posted to https://www.regulations.gov for public viewing until
after the comment period has closed. Comments will generally be posted
without change. All Personal Identifying Information (for example,
name, address) voluntarily submitted by the commenter may be publicly
accessible. Do not submit Confidential Business Information or
otherwise sensitive or protected information.
NMFS will accept anonymous comments (enter N/A in the required
fields, if you wish to remain anonymous). You may submit attachments to
electronic comments in Microsoft Word, Excel, WordPerfect, or Adobe PDF
file formats only.
Electronic copies of Amendments 95 and 96 to the FMP for Groundfish
of the BSAI, Amendment 87 to the FMP for Groundfish of the GOA, the
Environmental Assessments (EAs), and the Regulatory Impact Review (RIR)
prepared for this action are available from the Alaska Region website
at https://www.alaskafisheries.noaa.gov/regs/summary.htm.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Melanie Brown, 907-586-7228.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The groundfish fisheries in the exclusive
economiczone of the BSAI and GOA are managed under the FMPs. The North
Pacific Fishery Management Council (Council) prepared the FMPs under
the authority of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and
Management Act (Magnuson-Stevens Act), 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
Regulations implementing the FMPs appear at 50 CFR part 679. General
regulations governing U.S. fisheries also appear at 50 CFR part 600.
The Council has submitted Amendments 87, 95, and 96 for review by
the Secretary of Commerce (Secretary), and a Notice of Availability of
the FMP amendments was published in the Federal Register on July 2,
2010 (75 FR 38454), with comments on the FMP amendments invited through
August 31, 2010.
Comments may address the FMP amendments, the proposed rule, or
both, but must be received by 1700 hours, A.D.T. on August 31, 2101, to
be considered in the approval/disapproval decision on the FMP
amendments. All comments received by that time, whether specifically
directed to the FMP amendments or to this proposed rule, will be
considered in the approval/disapproval decision on the FMP amendments.
Background
Amendment 95 was unanimously adopted by the Council in October
2009. If approved by the Secretary, this amendment would move skates
from the ``other species'' category to the ``target species'' list in
the BSAI FMP, allowing the management of skates as a target species
complex or as individual skate species. NMFS trawl survey and catch
information show that 15 skate species occur in the BSAI. In the Bering
Sea subarea, the most abundant species is the Alaska skate, while the
most abundant species in the Aleutian Islands subarea is the
whiteblotched skate. Individual species of skate could be listed under
the skate complex in the ``target species'' list during the harvest
specifications process to allow for management of these individual
species.
Amendments 96 and 87 were unanimously adopted by the Council in
April 2010. If approved by the Secretary, these amendments would revise
the FMPs to meet the Magnuson-Stevens Act requirements to establish
annual catch limits (ACLs) and accountability measures (AMs), and
conform to the National Standard 1 (NS1) guidelines (74 FR 3178,
January 16, 2009). The Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and
Management Reauthorization Act of 2006 (MSRA), which was signed into
law on January 12, 2007, included new requirements regarding ACLs and
AMs, which reinforce existing requirements to prevent overfishing and
rebuild fisheries. NMFS revised the NS1 guidelines at 50 CFR 600.310 to
integrate these new requirements with existing provisions related to
overfishing, rebuilding overfished stocks, and achieving optimum yield.
Section 104(a)(10) of the MSRA, codified as section 303(a)(15) of the
Magnuson-Stevens Act, requires FMPs to establish mechanisms for
specifying ACLs, including AMs. The provision states that FMPs shall
``establish a mechanism for specifying annual catch limits in the plan
(including a multiyear plan), implementing regulations, or annual
specifications, at a level such that overfishing does not occur in the
fishery, including measures to ensure accountability.'' ACLs and AMs
are required by fishing year 2011 in fisheries where overfishing is not
occurring. None of the Alaska groundfish fisheries have overfishing
occurring, and therefore the groundfish ACLs and AMs must be
implemented by January 1, 2011.
Skate, shark, sculpin, and octopus groups are currently managed as
a complex in the ``other species'' category in the BSAI. In the GOA,
shark, sculpin, octopus, and squid groups are managed as a complex in
the ``other species'' category. Each year, the overfishing limit (OFL),
acceptable biological catch (ABC), and total allowable catch (TAC) are
specified for the ``other species'' category as a whole in each
management area. National Standard 1 guidelines require species managed
in a stock complex to have similar life histories, but the current
``other species'' category combines the management of short-lived
invertebrates (squids and octopuses) with long-lived fish (sharks and
skates).
If approved, Amendment 95 would move BSAI skates from the ``other
species'' category to the ``target species'' category and require
annual specification of OFL, ABC, and TAC for the skate group as a
whole or for individual skate species. Amendments 96 and 87 would
remove the remaining species groups from the ``other species'' category
in each FMP and place these groups in the ``target species'' category.
The ``other species'' category would be completely removed from the
FMPs. Managing skates, sculpins, sharks, octopuses, and squids as
separate groups or as individual species, each with its own OFL, ABC,
ACL, and TAC, would enhance NMFS' ability to control
[[Page 41426]]
the harvest of these species groups based on the best available
scientific information, and would reduce the potential for overfishing
these groups. The susceptibility of skates to fishing pressure has been
well documented in the EA for Amendment 95 (see ADDRESSES). While no
target fishery has been developed yet for groups currently in the
``other species'' category, without the proposed amendments, the
potential exists for the entire ``other species'' TAC to be taken as
the harvest of a single group. Such a harvest could represent an
unsustainable level of fishing mortality for that single group, even
though the harvest may not exceed the aggregate OFL for all groups in
the ``other species'' category. Amendment 63 to the FMP for Groundfish
of the GOA was a similar precautionary measure that removed skates from
the ``other species'' category in response to a rapidly developing
directed fishery (69 FR 26313, May 12, 2004). Implementation of these
amendments will promote the goal of ending and preventing overfishing.
A retrospective analysis in the EA for Amendments 96 and 87 of past
shark and octopus harvest compared to the 2010 ABCs and OFLs showed
that potential harvests of these species may exceed ABCs and OFLs
without NMFS inseason management to control incidental catch (see
ADDRESSES). If the TACs for these groups are insufficient to support a
directed fishery, a vessel's harvest of sharks and octopuses would be
limited to a maximum retainable amount, representing a percentage of
the amount of ``target species'' harvested by a vessel. If closing
directed fishing for sharks and octopuses, together with applicable
limits on retention, is not sufficient to prevent reaching the ABCs and
OFLs for these groups, NMFS inseason management would use observed
catch, fish ticket, and vessel monitoring system data to determine the
most effective actions to prevent overfishing, while minimizing adverse
impacts to fishing communities, to the extent practicable. Controlling
incidental harvests of BSAI and GOA octopuses may require temporary
closure of areas of high octopus retention to Pacific cod pot gear
vessels. If necessary, BSAI and GOA shark incidental harvest would
likely be constrained by temporarily restricting harvesting locations
for hook-and-line sablefish and Pacific cod fisheries and the trawl
pollock fishery. Because BSAI and GOA octopus have been sold,
information is available to estimate changes in potential revenue from
the proposed action. The estimated revenue for BSAI and GOA octopus is
decreased $110,000 to $155,000 based on the retrospective harvest and
inseason management methods. Increased costs may occur if fishing
operations have to travel further to reach alternative fishing grounds,
or if they must fish in areas with lower catch-per-unit of effort (and
thus incur increased costs of fishing effort to catch the same amount
of fish). Decreased revenues may occur if increased travel or fishing
time requirements makes it impossible to catch the same amount of fish
in the time available. Decreased revenues also may occur if shifts in
fishing activity make it harder to deliver a quality product.
Proposed Regulatory Amendments
The Council recommended, and the Secretary proposes, the following
regulatory revisions and additions to 50 CFR part 679 to implement
Amendments 87, 95, and 96.
The definitions for ``groundfish'', ``license limitation
groundfish'', and ``target species,'' in Sec. 679.2, would be revised
to remove reference to the ``other species'' category. Removing the
term ``other species category'' from these definitions would reduce
confusion related to target species and the harvest specifications, as
Amendments 96 and 87 would remove the ``other species'' category from
the FMPs for purposes of the harvest specifications, and leave only
``target species'' as a category for which NMFS must establish harvest
specifications. The definition for ``other species'' would be revised
to allow the continued management of BSAI and GOA sharks, sculpins, and
octopuses and GOA squids as a group for purposes of prohibited species
catch under Sec. 679.21 and maximum retainable amounts specified in
Tables 10 and 11 to part 679.
Section 679.20 would be revised by removing the term ``other
species category'' in paragraphs related to harvest limits, reserves,
harvest specifications, and fishery closures. This revision would
ensure the regulations for harvest specifications and ``target
species'' management are consistent with Amendments 96 and 87, which
would remove ``other species'' from the FMP for purposes of harvest
specifications and inseason management.
Section 679.25 would be revised to remove the ``other species''
category from the paragraph related to reopening an area to achieve TAC
for a target species. This revision would ensure the regulations are
consistent with removing ``other species'' from the FMP for purposes of
target species management.
Table 2a to part 679 would be revised to add whiteblotched, Alaska,
and Aleutian skates, as well as the scientific names for individual
skate species. Adding these individual skate species and the scientific
names would facilitate the reporting of individual skate species taken
during groundfish harvest and would provide more detailed information
regarding skate harvests for stock assessments and fisheries
management. This revision would ensure the regulations are consistent
with Amendment 95, providing the species specific information to
support managing skates as a target species group or as individual
target species.
Classification
Pursuant to section 304 (b)(1)(A) of the Magnuson-Stevens Act, the
NMFS Assistant Administrator has determined that this proposed rule is
consistent with Amendments 87, 95, and 96, other provisions of the
Magnuson-Stevens Act and other applicable laws, subject to further
consideration after public comment.
This proposed rule has been determined to be not significant for
the purposes of E. O. 12866.
The Chief Counsel for Regulation of the Department of Commerce
certified to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business
Administration that this proposed rule, if adopted, would not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
Factual Basis for Certification
Description and Estimate of the Number of Small Entities to Which the
Rule Applies
For purposes of this analysis, a ``small entity'' is any entity
that catches, or catches and processes, less than $4.0 million gross
ex-vessel value (or first wholesale gross product value) of groundfish
per year.
The proposed regulatory changes for Amendments 96 and 87 do not
impose, increase, relax, or remove substantive restrictions on any
entity. This proposed regulatory action is not the only regulatory
action that the agency will take to implement these amendments, and it
does not give effect to these FMP amendments in a manner that will
directly impact regulated entities. Because no entities will be
directly regulated by the portion of the proposed rule for Amendments
96 and 87, no small entities will be directly regulated by the proposed
action for Amendments 96 and 87. Therefore, the proposed action that
implements Amendments 96
[[Page 41427]]
and 87 does not directly apply to any small entities.
The portion of the proposed rule to implement Amendment 95 may
directly regulate small entities, although as noted below, the impacts
would not be significant. The entities directly regulated by this
action, if adopted, would be the Community Development Quota (CDQ) and
non-CDQ fishing operations harvesting species in the ``other species''
complex in the BSAI, using hook-and-line, pot, or trawl gear. Vessels
generally are harvesting skates and the remaining species in the
``other species'' category, incidentally to other targeted fishing
operations; (e.g., fishing for Pacific cod); none of the species in the
``other species'' category are currently fished as a target. Because
any hook-and-line, pot, or trawl operation in the BSAI may harvest the
``other species'' complex, the universe of potentially directly
regulated operations includes all BSAI hook-and-line, pot, and trawl
vessels.
In 2007, the universe of potentially directly regulated vessels
that caught (or caught and processed) less than $4.0 M gross ex-vessel
value (or first wholesale gross product value) of groundfish or ``other
species,'' totaled 212 vessels in the BSAI. This included 40 hook-and-
line vessels, 71 pot vessels, and 103 trawlers. The portion of the
proposed action to implement Amendment 95 potentially applies to all of
these entities.
For RFA purposes, the entity size determination is based on
operation gross annual revenues from groundfish fishing in and off
Alaska. This likely ``understates'' the actual annual gross revenues
earned by many of these operations, because income from non-groundfish
commercial fishing activities is not included, owing to an absence of
germane data. Moreover, data are not available to fully take account of
affiliations between fishing operations and associated processors, or
other associated fishing operations. For these reasons, these counts
likely overstate the numbers of small entities potentially directly
regulated by the proposed action. Average groundfish gross revenues, in
2007, for these small entities were estimated to be $670,000 for hook-
and-line catcher vessels, $2.27 million for hook-and-line catcher
processors, $1,400,000 for pot catcher vessels, and $1.91 million for
trawl catcher vessels (AFSC did not report information for pot and
trawl catcher-processors).
Estimate of Economic Impact on Small Entities by Entity Size and
Industry
The impacts of this action have been evaluated in the accompanying
RIR (See ADDRESSES). The proposed regulatory changes to accompany
Amendments 96 and 87 do not impose, increase, relax, or remove
substantive restrictions on any entity. Because this portion of the
proposed action does not directly regulate any entities, this portion
of the proposed action would not have any discernible impacts on small
entities.
The proposed regulatory amendment for Amendment 95 would change the
codes required for reporting skate catches, and to this extent would
further restrict entity behavior. Vessel operators would need to learn
how to identify three individual skate species and use the proposed
species code from Table 2a to part 679 in their harvest reports.
However, all skate harvest must currently be reported using a code from
Table 2a to part 679. Once the operator learns how to identify the
skate species and becomes familiar with the proposed codes, the expense
of reporting skate harvests would be similar to that currently
experienced. The RIR notes that this portion of the proposed action is
expected to have de minimis costs. Because the costs are expected to be
so small, the portion of the action to implement Amendment 95 is not
expected to have a significant impact on any directly regulated small
entities.
Criteria Used to Evaluate Whether the Rule Would Impose ``Significant
Economic Impacts''
The two criteria recommended to determine the significance of the
economic impacts of the action are disproportionality and
profitability.
As noted above, there are no economic impacts caused by the portion
of the proposed action that implements Amendments 87 and 96. That
portion of the proposed action will not result in disproportionate
impacts nor impacts on profitability of regulated entities, and
therefore will not impose significant economic impacts.
Because the impact of reporting skates under the portion of the
proposed action that implements Amendment 95 would be a de minimis
impact regardless of entity size, the proposed action would not place a
substantial number of small entities at a disadvantage, relative to
large entities. Any costs attributed to the proposed action are
expected to be de minimis and thus would have a de minimis impact on
profits. Because the impacts of the proposed action to implement
Amendment 95 are expected to be de minimis in terms of
disproportionality and profitability, the economic impacts would not be
significant.
Criteria Used to Evaluate Whether the Rule Would Impose Impacts on ``a
Substantial Number'' of Small Entities
NMFS guidelines for economic review of regulatory actions explain
that the term ``substantial number'' has no specific statutory
definition and the criterion does not lend itself to objective
standards applicable across all regulatory actions. Rather, a
``substantial number'' depends upon the context of the action, the
problem to be addressed, and the structure of the regulated industry.
The Small Business Administration casts ``substantial'' within the
context of ``more than just a few'' or de minimis (``too few to care
about'') criteria (See page 28 of NMFS Guidelines for Economic Review
of National Marine Fisheries Service Regulatory Actions, available at
https://reefshark.nmfs.noaa.gov/f/pds/publicsite/documents/procedures/01-111-05.pdf).
As described above, the portion of the proposed action that
implements Amendments 87 and 96 would not directly regulate any small
entities, and therefore would not impose impacts on a ``substantial
number'' of small entities.
Although a substantial number of small entities may be directly
regulated by the portion of the proposed action to implement Amendment
95, the impacts are estimated to be de minimis. Because the impacts are
de minimis, the proposed action to implement Amendment 95 would not
impose significant impacts on a substantial number of directly
regulated small entities, and meets the certification criteria under
the RFA.
As a result, an initial regulatory flexibility analysis is not
required, and none has been prepared.
List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 679
Alaska, Fisheries, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: July 12, 2010.
Samuel D. Rauch III,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
For reasons set out in the preamble, 50 CFR part 679 is proposed to
be amended as follows:
PART 679--FISHERIES OF THE EXCLUSIVE ECONOMIC ZONE OFF ALASKA
1. The authority citation for part 679 continues to read as
follows:
[[Page 41428]]
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 773 et seq.; 1801 et seq.; 3631 et seq.;
Pub. L. 108-447.
2. In Sec. 679.2, revise paragraph (2) of the definition for
``Groundfish'', and the definitions of ``License limitation
groundfish'', ``Other species'' and ``Target species'' to read as
follows:
Sec. 679.2 Definitions.
* * * * *
Groundfish means* * *
(2) Target species specified annually pursuant to Sec.
679.20(a)(2) (See also the definitions for: License limitation
groundfish ; CDQ species ; and IR/IU species of this section).
* * * * *
License limitation groundfish means target species specified
annually pursuant to Sec. 679.20(a)(2), except that demersal shelf
rockfish east of 140 W. longitude, sablefish managed under the IFQ
program, and pollock allocated to the Aleutian Islands directed pollock
fishery and harvested by vessels 60 feet (18.3 m) LOA or less, are not
considered license limitation groundfish.
* * * * *
Other species is a category of target species for the purpose of
MRA and PSC management that consists of groundfish species in each
management area. These target species are managed as an other species
group and identified in Tables 10 and 11 to this part pursuant to Sec.
679.20(e).
* * * * *
Target species are those species or species groups for which a TAC
is specified pursuant to Sec. 679.20(a)(2).
* * * * *
3. In Sec. 679.20, revise paragraphs (a)(1)(i) introductory text,
(a)(2), (a)(3) introductory text, (a)(3(i), (b)(1)(i), (b)(2)
introductory text, (c)(1)(iii), (c)(1)(iv), (c)(3)(ii), (c)(3)(iii),
(d)(1)(i), (d)(1)(iii)(B), and (d)(2) to read as follows:
Sec. 679.20 General limitations.
(a) * * *
(1) * * *
(i) BSAI and GOA. The OY for BSAI and GOA target species is a range
or specific amount that can be harvested consistently with this part,
plus the amounts of ``nonspecified species'' taken incidentally to the
harvest of target species. The species categories are defined in Table
1 of the specifications as provided in paragraph (c) of this section.
* * * * *
(2) TAC. NMFS, after consultation with the Council, will specify
and apportion the annual TAC and reserves for each calendar year among
the GOA and BSAI target species. TACs in the target species category
may be split or combined for purposes of establishing new TACs with
apportionments thereof under paragraph (c) of this section. The sum of
the TACs so specified must be within the OY range specified in
paragraph (a)(1) of this section.
(3) Annual TAC determination. The annual determinations of TAC for
each target species and the reapportionment of reserves may be
adjusted, based upon a review of the following:
(i) Biological condition of groundfish stocks. Resource assessment
documents prepared annually for the Council that provide information on
historical catch trend; updated estimates of the MSY of the groundfish
complex and its component species groups; assessments of the stock
condition of each target species; assessments of the multispecies and
ecosystem impacts of harvesting the groundfish complex at current
levels, given the assessed condition of stocks, including consideration
of rebuilding depressed stocks; and alternative harvesting strategies
and related effects on the component species group.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(1) * * *
(i) Nonspecified reserve. Fifteen percent of the BSAI TAC for each
target species, except pollock, the hook-and-line and pot gear
allocation for sablefish, and the Amendment 80 species, which includes
Pacific cod, is automatically placed in the nonspecified reserve before
allocation to any sector. The remaining 85 percent of each TAC is
apportioned to the initial TAC for each target species that contributed
to the nonspecified reserve. The nonspecified reserve is not designated
by species or species group. Any amount of the nonspecified reserve may
be apportioned to target species that contributed to the nonspecified
reserve, provided that such apportionments are consistent with
paragraph (a)(3) of this section and do not result in overfishing of a
target species.
* * * * *
(2) GOA. Initial reserves are established for pollock, Pacific cod,
flatfish, squids, octopuses, sharks, and sculpins, which are equal to
20 percent of the TACs for these species or species groups.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(1) * * *
(iii) GOA. The proposed specifications will specify for up to two
fishing years the annual TAC for each target species and apportionments
thereof, halibut prohibited species catch amounts, and seasonal
allowances of pollock and Pacific cod.
(iv) BSAI. The proposed specifications will specify for up to two
fishing years the annual TAC for each target species and apportionments
thereof, PSQ reserves and prohibited species catch allowances, seasonal
allowances of pollock, Pacific cod, and Atka mackerel TAC (including
pollock, Pacific cod, and Atka mackerel CDQ), and CDQ reserve amounts.
* * * * *
(3) * * *
(ii) GOA. The final specifications will specify for up to two
fishing years the annual TAC for each target species and apportionments
thereof, halibut prohibited species catch amounts, and seasonal
allowances of pollock and Pacific cod.
(iii) BSAI. The final specifications will specify for up to two
fishing years the annual TAC for each target species and apportionments
thereof, PSQ reserves and prohibited species catch allowances, seasonal
allowances of pollock (including pollock, Pacific cod, and Atka
mackerel CDQ), and CDQ reserve amounts.
* * * * *
(d) * * *
(1) * * *
(i) General. If the Regional Administrator determines that any
allocation or apportionment of a target species specified under
paragraph (c) of this section has been or will be reached, the Regional
Administrator may establish a directed fishing allowance for that
species or species group.
* * * * *
(iii) * * *
(B) Retention of incidental species. Except as described in Sec.
679.20(e)(3)(iii), if directed fishing for a target species or species
group is prohibited, a vessel may not retain that incidental species in
an amount that exceeds the maximum retainable amount, as calculated
under paragraphs (e) and (f) of this section, at any time during a
fishing trip.
* * * * *
(2) Groundfish as prohibited species closure. When the Regional
Administrator determines that the TAC of any target species specified
under paragraph (c) of this section, or the share of any TAC assigned
to any type of gear, has been or will be achieved prior to the end of a
year, NMFS will publish notification in the Federal Register requiring
that target species be treated in the same manner as a prohibited
species, as described under Sec. 679.21(b), for the remainder of the
year.
* * * * *
[[Page 41429]]
4. In Sec. 679.25, revise paragraph (a)(2)(iii)(D) to read as
follows:
Sec. 679.25 Inseason adjustments.
(a) * * *
(2) * * *
(iii) * * *
(D) Reopening of a management area or season to achieve the TAC or
gear share of a TAC for any of the target species.
* * * * *
5. Revise Table 2a to part 679 to read as follows:
Table 2a To Part 679 - Species Codes: FMP Groundfish
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Species Description Code
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Atka mackerel (greenling) 193
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flatfish, miscellaneous (flatfish species without separate 120
codes)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
FLOUNDER ........
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Alaska plaice 133
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Arrowtooth and/or Kamchatka 121
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Starry 129
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Octopus, North Pacific 870
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pacific cod 110
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pollock 270
------------------------------------------------------------------------
ROCKFISH ........
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Aurora (Sebastes aurora) 185
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Black (BSAI) (S. melanops) 142
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Blackgill (S. melanostomus) 177
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Blue (BSAI) (S. mystinus) 167
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bocaccio (S. paucispinis) 137
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Canary (S. pinniger) 146
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Chilipepper (S. goodei) 178
------------------------------------------------------------------------
China (S. nebulosus) 149
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Copper (S. caurinus) 138
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Darkblotched (S. crameri) 159
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dusky (S. variabilis) 172
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Greenstriped (S. elongatus) 135
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Harlequin (S. variegatus) 176
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northern (S. polyspinis) 136
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pacific Ocean Perch (S. alutus) 141
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pygmy (S. wilsoni) 179
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Quillback (S. maliger) 147
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Redbanded (S. babcocki) 153
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Redstripe (S. proriger) 158
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rosethorn (S. helvomaculatus) 150
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rougheye (S. aleutianus) 151
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sharpchin (S. zacentrus) 166
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Shortbelly (S. jordani) 181
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Shortraker (S. borealis) 152
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Silvergray (S. brevispinis) 157
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Splitnose (S. diploproa) 182
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Stripetail (S. saxicola) 183
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Thornyhead (all Sebastolobus species) 143
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tiger (S. nigrocinctus) 148
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Vermilion (S. miniatus) 184
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Widow (S. entomelas) 156
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yelloweye (S. ruberrimus) 145
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yellowmouth (S. reedi) 175
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yellowtail (S. flavidus) 155
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sablefish (blackcod) 710
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sculpins 160
------------------------------------------------------------------------
SHARKS ........
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Other (if salmon, spiny dogfish or Pacific sleeper shark - 689
use specific species code)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pacific sleeper 692
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Salmon 690
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Spiny dogfish 691
------------------------------------------------------------------------
SKATES ........
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Whiteblotched (Bathyraja maculata) 705
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Aleutian (B. aleutica) 704
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Alaska (B. parmifera) 703
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Big (Raja binoculata) 702
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Longnose (R. rhina) 701
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Other (if Whiteblotched, Aleutian, Alaska, Big, or Longnose - 700
use specific species code listed above)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
SOLE ........
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Butter 126
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dover 124
------------------------------------------------------------------------
English 128
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flathead 122
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Petrale 131
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rex 125
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rock 123
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sand 132
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yellowfin 127
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Squid, majestic 875
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Turbot, Greenland 134
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[FR Doc. 2010-17436 Filed 7-15-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-S