Takes of Marine Mammals Incidental to Specified Activities; Taking Marine Mammals Incidental to Operation and Maintenance of a Liquefied Natural Gas Facility off Massachusetts, 41440-41449 [2010-17434]
Download as PDF
41440
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 136 / Friday, July 16, 2010 / Notices
dealing with matters the disclosure of
which would be likely to frustrate
significantly implementation of an
agency action as described in 5 U.S.C.
552b(c)(9)(B) shall be exempt from the
provisions relating to public meetings
found in 5 U.S.C. app. 2 §§ 10(a)1 and
10(a)(3). The remaining portions of the
meeting will be open to the public. For
more information, call Yvette Springer
at (202) 482–2813.
(Final EIS) on the Neptune LNG
Deepwater Port License Application is
available for viewing at https://
www.regulations.gov by entering the
search words ‘‘Neptune LNG.’’
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Candace Nachman, Office of Protected
Resources, NMFS, (301) 713 2289, ext
156.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Dated: July 13, 2010.
Yvette Springer,
Committee Liaison Officer.
Background
Sections 101(a)(5)(A) and (D) of the
MMPA (16 U.S.C. 1361 et seq.) direct
the Secretary of Commerce to allow,
upon request, the incidental, but not
intentional, taking of small numbers of
marine mammals by U.S. citizens who
engage in a specified activity (other than
commercial fishing) within a specified
geographical region if certain findings
are made and either regulations are
issued or, if the taking is limited to
harassment, a notice of a proposed
authorization is provided to the public
for review.
Authorization for incidental takings
shall be granted if NMFS finds that the
taking will have a negligible impact on
the species or stock(s), will not have an
unmitigable adverse impact on the
availability of the species or stock(s) for
subsistence uses (where relevant), and if
the permissible methods of taking and
requirements pertaining to the
mitigation, monitoring and reporting of
such takings are set forth. NMFS has
defined ‘‘negligible impact’’ in 50 CFR
216.103 as ’’...an impact resulting from
the specified activity that cannot be
reasonably expected to, and is not
reasonably likely to, adversely affect the
species or stock through effects on
annual rates of recruitment or survival.’’
Section 101(a)(5)(D) of the MMPA
established an expedited process by
which citizens of the U.S. can apply for
an authorization to incidentally take
small numbers of marine mammals by
harassment. Section 101(a)(5)(D)
establishes a 45 day time limit for
NMFS review of an application
followed by a 30 day public notice and
comment period on any proposed
authorizations for the incidental
harassment of marine mammals. Within
45 days of the close of the comment
period, NMFS must either issue or deny
the authorization.
Except with respect to certain
activities not pertinent here, the MMPA
defines ‘‘harassment’’ as:
[FR Doc. 2010–17398 Filed 7–15–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–JT–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
RIN 0648–XW09
Takes of Marine Mammals Incidental to
Specified Activities; Taking Marine
Mammals Incidental to Operation and
Maintenance of a Liquefied Natural
Gas Facility off Massachusetts
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice; issuance of an
incidental harassment authorization.
SUMMARY: In accordance with the
Marine Mammal Protection Act
(MMPA) regulations, notification is
hereby given that NMFS has issued an
Incidental Harassment Authorization
(IHA) to Neptune LNG LLC (Neptune) to
take marine mammals, by harassment,
incidental to port commissioning and
operations, including maintenance and
repair activities, at its Neptune
Deepwater Port.
DATES: Effective July 12, 2010, through
July 11, 2011.
ADDRESSES: A copy of the authorization
and application may be obtained by
writing to Michael Payne, Chief,
Permits, Conservation and Education
Division, Office of Protected Resources,
National Marine Fisheries Service, 1315
East West Highway, Silver Spring, MD
20910, telephoning the contact listed
below (see FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT), or visiting the internet at:
https://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/permits/
incidental.htm. Documents cited in this
notice may also be viewed, by
appointment, during regular business
hours, at the aforementioned address.
The Maritime Administration
(MARAD) and U.S. Coast Guard (USCG)
Final Environmental Impact Statement
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:00 Jul 15, 2010
Jkt 220001
any act of pursuit, torment, or annoyance
which (i) has the potential to injure a marine
mammal or marine mammal stock in the wild
[‘‘Level A harassment’’]; or (ii) has the
potential to disturb a marine mammal or
marine mammal stock in the wild by causing
disruption of behavioral patterns, including,
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
but not limited to, migration, breathing,
nursing, breeding, feeding, or sheltering
[‘‘Level B harassment’’].
Summary of Request
NMFS received an application on
December 14, 2009, from Neptune for
the taking, by harassment, of marine
mammals incidental to port
commissioning and operations,
including maintenance and repair
activities, at its Neptune Deepwater Port
(Port) facility in Massachusetts Bay.
NMFS reviewed Neptune’s application
and identified a number of issues
requiring further clarification. After
addressing comments from NMFS,
Neptune modified its application and
submitted a revised application on
March 11, 2010.
NMFS issued a 1–year IHA to
Neptune in June 2008 for the
construction of the Port (73 FR 33400,
June 12, 2008), which expired on June
30, 2009. NMFS issued a second 1–year
IHA to Neptune for the completion of
construction and beginning of Port
operations on June 26, 2009 (74 FR
31926, July 6, 2009). This IHA expired
on June 30, 2010.
During the period of this third IHA,
Neptune intends to commission its
second shuttle and regasification vessel
(SRV) and conduct limited port
operations. There is also a chance that
some maintenance and repairs may
need to be conducted on the Port
facility. The Neptune Port is located
approximately 22 mi (35 km) northeast
of Boston, Massachusetts, in Federal
waters approximately 260 ft (79 m) in
depth. The purpose of the Port is the
importation of liquefied natural gas
(LNG) into the New England region.
Take of marine mammals may occur
during port operations from thruster use
during maneuvering of the SRVs while
docking and undocking, occasional
weathervaning (turning of a vessel at
anchor from one direction to another
under the influence of wind or currents)
at the Port, and during thruster use of
dynamic positioning (DP) maintenance
vessels should a major repair be
necessary. Neptune has requested an
authorization to take 12 marine mammal
species by Level B harassment. They
are: North Atlantic right whale;
humpback whale; fin whale; sei whale;
minke whale; long-finned pilot whale;
Atlantic white-sided dolphin; harbor
porpoise; common dolphin; Risso’s
dolphin; bottlenose dolphin; and harbor
seal. In the 2009 IHA, NMFS also
authorized take of killer whales and
gray seals. NMFS has determined that it
would be appropriate to authorize take,
by Level B harassment only, of these
E:\FR\FM\16JYN1.SGM
16JYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 136 / Friday, July 16, 2010 / Notices
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
two species as well for port operations
and maintenance.
Description of the Specified Activity
On March 23, 2007, Neptune received
a license to own, construct, and operate
a deepwater port from MARAD. The
Port, which is located in Massachusetts
Bay, consists of a submerged buoy
system to dock specifically designed
LNG carriers approximately 22 mi (35
km) northeast of Boston, Massachusetts,
in Federal waters approximately 260 ft
(79 m) in depth. The two buoys are
separated by a distance of
approximately 2.1 mi (3.4 km). The
locations of the Neptune Port and the
associated pipeline are shown in Figure
2–1 in Neptune’s application (see
ADDRESSES). During the time period of
this IHA, Neptune plans to commission
its second SRV and begin limited
operations of the Port.
Neptune will be capable of mooring
LNG SRVs with a capacity of
approximately 140,000 cubic meters
(m3). Up to two SRVs will temporarily
moor at the Port by means of a
submerged unloading buoy system. Two
separate buoys will allow natural gas to
be delivered in a continuous flow,
without interruption, by having a brief
overlap between arriving and departing
SRVs. The annual average throughput
capacity will be around 500 million
standard cubic feet per day (mmscfd)
with an initial throughput of 400
mmscfd, and a peak capacity of
approximately 750 mmscfd.
The SRVs will be equipped to store,
transport, and vaporize LNG and to
odorize, meter and send out natural gas
by means of two 16–in (40.6–cm)
flexible risers and one 24–in (61–cm)
subsea flowline. These risers and
flowline will lead to a 24–in (61–cm)
gas transmission pipeline connecting
the deepwater port to the existing 30–
in (76.2–cm) Algonquin HublineTM
(HublineTM) located approximately 9 mi
(14.5 km) west of the Neptune
deepwater port location. The Port will
have an expected operating life of
approximately 25 years. Figure 1–1 of
Neptune’s application shows an
isometric view of the Port (see
ADDRESSES). A detailed overview of Port
operations and maintenance and repair
activities, as well as the types of sounds
those activities produce, was provided
in the Notice of Proposed IHA (75 FR
24906, May 6, 2010). No changes have
been made to the proposed operations
or maintenance and repair activities.
Comments and Responses
A notice of receipt of Neptune’s
application and NMFS’ proposal to
issue an IHA to Neptune published in
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:00 Jul 15, 2010
Jkt 220001
the Federal Register on May 6, 2010 (75
FR 24906). During the 30–day public
comment period, NMFS did not receive
any comment letters. The Marine
Mammal Commission (MMC) submitted
comments after the close of the 30–day
comment period. Those comments and
responses are addressed here.
Comment 1: The MMC concurs with
the need for the monitoring and
mitigation measures proposed by NMFS
and the applicant and recommends that
NMFS include all of them in any IHA,
especially to mitigate the risk of ship
collisions with North Atlantic right
whales and other cetacean species.
Response: All measures proposed in
the Notice of Proposed IHA are included
in the IHA.
Comment 2: The MMC concurs with
the need to reinitiate section 7
consultation and recommends that
NMFS complete the consultation and
issue the IHA only if the resulting
Biological Opinion concludes that the
cumulative effects of the proposed
action, in combination with other
activities in the action area, are not
likely to jeopardize the continued
existence of the North Atlantic right,
humpback, fin, sperm, sei, or blue
whales.
Response: Section 7 consultation
under the Endangered Species Act
(ESA) was reinitiated in March 2010.
That consultation is now complete and
makes the following conclusion. After
reviewing the best available information
on the status of endangered and
threatened species under NMFS
jurisdiction, the environmental baseline
for the action area, the effects of the
action, and the cumulative effects in the
action area, it is NMFS’ biological
opinion that the operation of the
Neptune LNG deepwater port, including
required maintenance and repair work,
is likely to adversely affect, but is not
likely to jeopardize the continued
existence of the North Atlantic right,
humpback, fin, and sei whale.
NMFS’ January 2007 Biological
Opinion considered impacts from port
and pipeline construction and operation
on sperm and blue whales in addition
to the other cetacean species cited in the
MMC’s comment. The 2007 opinion
concluded that those activities were not
likely to adversely affect sperm and blue
whales. Because no additional effects to
these two species are anticipated from
the repair and maintenance activities
and no effects beyond those analyzed in
2007 for operations are likely, sperm
and blue whales were not further
analyzed in the 2010 Biological
Opinion.
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
41441
Description of Marine Mammals in the
Area of the Specified Activity
Massachusetts Bay (as well as the
entire Atlantic Ocean) hosts a diverse
assemblage of marine mammals,
including: North Atlantic right whale;
blue whale; fin whale; sei whale; minke
whale; humpback whale; killer whale;
long-finned pilot whale; sperm whale;
Atlantic white-beaked dolphin; Atlantic
white-sided dolphin; bottlenose
dolphin; common dolphin; harbor
porpoise; Risso’s dolphin; striped
dolphin; gray seal; harbor seal; harp
seal; and hooded seal. Table 3–1 in
Neptune’s application outlines the
marine mammal species that occur in
Massachusetts Bay and the likelihood of
occurrence of each species. Of the
species listed here, the North Atlantic
right, blue, fin, sei, humpback, and
sperm whales are all listed as
endangered under the ESA and as
depleted under the MMPA. The
northern coastal stock of bottlenose
dolphins is considered depleted under
the MMPA. Certain stocks or
populations of killer whales are listed as
endangered under the ESA or depleted
under the MMPA; however, none of
those stocks or populations occurs in
the proposed activity area.
Of these species, 14 are expected to
occur in the area of Neptune’s proposed
operations. These species include: the
North Atlantic right, humpback, fin, sei,
minke, killer, and long-finned pilot
whale; Atlantic white-sided, common,
Risso’s, and bottlenose dolphins; harbor
porpoise; and harbor and gray seals. The
Notice of Proposed IHA (75 FR 24906,
May 6, 2010) provided a description of
certain marine mammal species that are
considered rare in the project area.
Information on those species that may
be impacted by this activity is provided
in Neptune’s application and sections
3.2.3 and 3.2.5 in the MARAD/USCG
Final EIS on the Neptune LNG proposal
(see ADDRESSES). Please refer to those
documents for more information on
these species. In addition, general
information on these marine mammal
species can also be found in the NMFS
U.S. Atlantic and Gulf of Mexico Marine
Mammal Stock Report (Waring et al.,
2009), which is available at: https://
www.nefsc.noaa.gov/publications/tm/
tm213/. A brief summary on several
commonly sighted marine mammal
species distribution and abundance in
the vicinity of the action area was
provided in the Notice of Proposed IHA
(75 FR 24906, May 6, 2010).
E:\FR\FM\16JYN1.SGM
16JYN1
41442
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 136 / Friday, July 16, 2010 / Notices
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
Brief Background on Marine Mammal
Hearing
When considering the influence of
various kinds of sound on the marine
environment, it is necessary to
understand that different kinds of
marine life are sensitive to different
frequencies of sound. Based on available
behavioral data, audiograms derived
using auditory evoked potential
techniques, anatomical modeling, and
other data, Southall et al. (2007)
designate ‘‘functional hearing groups’’
for marine mammals and estimate the
lower and upper frequencies of
functional hearing of the groups. The
functional groups and the associated
frequencies are indicated below (though
animals are less sensitive to sounds at
the outer edge of their functional range
and most sensitive to sounds of
frequencies within a smaller range
somewhere in the middle of their
functional hearing range):
• Low-frequency cetaceans (13
species of mysticetes): functional
hearing is estimated to occur between
approximately 7 Hz and 22 kHz;
• Mid-frequency cetaceans (32
species of dolphins, six species of larger
toothed whales, and 19 species of
beaked and bottlenose whales):
functional hearing is estimated to occur
between approximately 150 Hz and 160
kHz;
• High-frequency cetaceans (eight
species of true porpoises, six species of
river dolphins, Kogia, the franciscana,
and four species of cephalorhynchids):
functional hearing is estimated to occur
between approximately 200 Hz and 180
kHz; and
• Pinnipeds in Water: functional
hearing is estimated to occur between
approximately 75 Hz and 75 kHz, with
the greatest sensitivity between
approximately 700 Hz and 20 kHz.
As mentioned previously in this
document, 14 marine mammal species
(12 cetacean and two pinniped species)
are likely to occur in the Neptune Port
area. Of the 12 cetacean species likely
to occur in Neptune’s project area, five
are classified as low-frequency
cetaceans (i.e., North Atlantic right,
humpback, fin, minke, and sei whales),
six are classified as mid-frequency
cetaceans (i.e., killer and pilot whales
and bottlenose, common, Risso’s, and
Atlantic white-sided dolphins), and one
is classified as a high-frequency
cetacean (i.e., harbor porpoise) (Southall
et al., 2007).
Potential Effects of the Specified
Activity on Marine Mammals
Potential effects of Neptune’s
proposed port operations and
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:00 Jul 15, 2010
Jkt 220001
maintenance/repair activities would
most likely be acoustic in nature. LNG
port operations and maintenance/repair
activities introduce sound into the
marine environment. Potential acoustic
effects on marine mammals relate to
sound produced by thrusters during
maneuvering of the SRVs while docking
and undocking, occasional
weathervaning at the port, and during
thruster use of DP maintenance vessels
should a major repair be necessary. The
potential effects of sound from the
proposed activities associated with the
Neptune Port might include one or more
of the following: tolerance; masking of
natural sounds; behavioral disturbance;
non-auditory physical effects; and, at
least in theory, temporary or permanent
hearing impairment (Richardson et al.,
1995). However, for reasons discussed
in the Notice of Proposed IHA (75 FR
24906, May 6, 2010) and later in this
document, it is unlikely that there
would be any cases of temporary, or
especially permanent, hearing
impairment resulting from these
activities. As outlined in previous
NMFS documents, the effects of noise
on marine mammals are highly variable,
and can be categorized as follows (based
on Richardson et al., 1995):
(1) The noise may be too weak to be
heard at the location of the animal (i.e.,
lower than the prevailing ambient noise
level, the hearing threshold of the
animal at relevant frequencies, or both);
(2) The noise may be audible but not
strong enough to elicit any overt
behavioral response;
(3) The noise may elicit reactions of
variable conspicuousness and variable
relevance to the well being of the
marine mammal; these can range from
temporary alert responses to active
avoidance reactions such as vacating an
area at least until the noise event ceases
but potentially for longer periods of
time;
(4) Upon repeated exposure, a marine
mammal may exhibit diminishing
responsiveness (habituation), or
disturbance effects may persist; the
latter is most likely with sounds that are
highly variable in characteristics,
infrequent, and unpredictable in
occurrence, and associated with
situations that a marine mammal
perceives as a threat;
(5) Any anthropogenic noise that is
strong enough to be heard has the
potential to reduce (mask) the ability of
a marine mammal to hear natural
sounds at similar frequencies, including
calls from conspecifics, and underwater
environmental sounds such as surf
noise;
(6) If mammals remain in an area
because it is important for feeding,
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
breeding, or some other biologically
important purpose even though there is
chronic exposure to noise, it is possible
that there could be noise-induced
physiological stress; this might in turn
have negative effects on the well-being
or reproduction of the animals involved;
and
(7) Very strong sounds have the
potential to cause a temporary or
permanent reduction in hearing
sensitivity. In terrestrial mammals, and
presumably marine mammals, received
sound levels must far exceed the
animal’s hearing threshold for there to
be any temporary threshold shift (TTS)
in its hearing ability. For transient
sounds, the sound level necessary to
cause TTS is inversely related to the
duration of the sound. Received sound
levels must be even higher for there to
be risk of permanent hearing
impairment. In addition, intense
acoustic or explosive events may cause
trauma to tissues associated with organs
vital for hearing, sound production,
respiration and other functions. This
trauma may include minor to severe
hemorrhage.
The Notice of Proposed IHA (75 FR
24906, May 6, 2010) included a
discussion of the effects of
anthropogenic sound on mysticetes,
odontocetes, and pinnipeds, including
tolerance, masking, disturbance, and
hearing impairment and other
physiological effects. That discussion
did not take into consideration the
monitoring and mitigation measures
proposed by Neptune and NMFS. Based
on the discussion contained in the
proposed IHA notice, it is highly
unlikely that marine mammals could
receive sounds strong enough (and over
a sufficient duration) to cause
permanent threshold shift (or even TTS)
during port operations and
maintenance/repair activities. The
modeled broadband source level for 100
percent thruster use during port
operations is 180 dB re 1 μPa at 1 m
(rms). This does not reach the threshold
of 190 dB currently used for pinnipeds.
The threshold for cetaceans is 180 dB;
therefore, cetaceans would have to be
immediately adjacent to the vessel for
even the possibility of hearing
impairment to occur. Based on this and
mitigation measures included in the
IHA (described later in this document in
the ‘‘Mitigation’’ section), only Level B
behavioral harassment is anticipated
occur, and it is highly unlikely that any
type of hearing impairment would occur
as a result of Neptune’s activities.
Anticipated Effects on Habitat
The primary potential impacts to
marine mammals and other marine
E:\FR\FM\16JYN1.SGM
16JYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 136 / Friday, July 16, 2010 / Notices
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
species are associated with elevated
sound levels produced by the Port
operations and maintenance/repair
activities. However, other potential
impacts from physical disturbance are
also possible. Major repairs to the
Neptune port and pipeline may affect
marine mammal habitat in several ways:
cause disturbance of the seafloor;
increase turbidity slightly; and generate
additional underwater sound in the
area. These underwater sound levels
will cause some species to temporarily
disperse from or avoid repair areas, but
they are expected to return shortly after
the repair is completed. Operation of the
Port will result in long-term, continued
disturbance of the seafloor, regular
withdrawal of seawater, and generation
of underwater sound. The Notice of
Proposed IHA (75 FR 24906, May 6,
2010) contained a full discussion of the
potential impacts to marine mammal
habitat and prey species in the project
area.
NMFS determined that repair
activities would not create long-term
habitat changes, and marine mammals
displaced by the disturbance to the
seafloor are expected to return soon
after repair activities cease. Marine
mammals also could be indirectly
affected if benthic prey species were
displaced or destroyed by repair
activities. However, affected species are
expected to recover soon after the
completion of repairs and will represent
only a small portion of food available to
marine mammals in the area. In
conclusion, NMFS has determined that
Neptune’s port operations and
maintenance/repair activities are not
expected to have any habitat-related
effects that could cause significant or
long-term consequences for individual
marine mammals or on the food sources
that they utilize.
Mitigation
In order to issue an incidental take
authorization (ITA) under Sections
101(a)(5)(A) and (D) of the MMPA,
NMFS must, where applicable, set forth
the permissible methods of taking
pursuant to such activity, and other
means of effecting the least practicable
impact on such species or stock and its
habitat, paying particular attention to
rookeries, mating grounds, and areas of
similar significance, and on the
availability of such species or stock for
taking for certain subsistence uses
(where relevant).
Mitigation Measures in Neptune’s IHA
Application
Neptune submitted a ‘‘Marine
Mammal Detection, Monitoring, and
Response Plan for the Operations Phase’’
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:00 Jul 15, 2010
Jkt 220001
(the Plan) as part of its MMPA
application (Appendix D of the
application; see ADDRESSES). The
measures, which include safety zones
and vessel speed reductions, are fully
described in the Plan and summarized
here. Any maintenance and/or repairs
needed will be scheduled in advance
during the May 1 to November 30
seasonal window, whenever possible, so
that disturbance to North Atlantic right
whales will be largely avoided. If the
repair cannot be scheduled during this
time frame, additional mitigation
measures are required.
(1) Mitigation Measures for Major
Repairs (May 1 to November 30)
(A) During repairs, if a marine
mammal is detected within 0.5 mi (0.8
km) of the repair vessel, the vessel
superintendent or on-deck supervisor
will be notified immediately. The
vessel’s crew will be put on a
heightened state of alert. The marine
mammal will be monitored constantly
to determine if it is moving toward the
repair area.
(B) Repair vessels will cease any
movement in the area if a marine
mammal other than a right whale is
sighted within or approaching to a
distance of 100 yd (91 m) from the
operating repair vessel. Repair vessels
will cease any movement in the
construction area if a right whale is
sighted within or approaching to a
distance of 500 yd (457 m) from the
operating vessel. Vessels transiting the
repair area, such as pipe haul barge tugs,
will also be required to maintain these
separation distances.
(C) Repair vessels will cease all sound
emitting activities if a marine mammal
other than a right whale is sighted
within or approaching to a distance of
100 yd (91 m) or if a right whale is
sighted within or approaching to a
distance of 500 yd (457 m), from the
operating repair vessel. The backcalculated source level, based on the
most conservative cylindrical model of
acoustic energy spreading, is estimated
to be 139 dB re 1 μPa.
(D) Repair activities may resume after
the marine mammal is positively
reconfirmed outside the established
zones (either 500 yd (457 m) or 100 yd
(91 m), depending upon species).
(E) While under way, all repair
vessels will remain 500 yd (457 m) away
from right whales and 100 yd (91 m)
away from all other marine mammals to
the extent physically feasible given
navigational constraints.
(F) All repair vessels 300 gross tons or
greater will maintain a speed of 10 knots
(18.5 km/hr) or less. Vessels less than
300 gross tons carrying supplies or crew
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
41443
between the shore and the repair site
will contact the Mandatory Ship
Reporting System (MSRS), the USCG, or
the marine mammal observers (MMOs)
at the repair site before leaving shore for
reports of recent right whale sightings or
active Dynamic Management Areas
(DMAs) and, consistent with navigation
safety, restrict speeds to 10 knots (18.5
km/hr) or less within 5 mi (8 km) of any
recent sighting location and within any
existing DMA.
(G) Vessels transiting through the
Cape Cod Canal and Cape Cod Bay
(CCB) between January 1 and May 15
will reduce speeds to 10 knots (18.5 km/
hr) or less, follow the recommended
routes charted by NOAA to reduce
interactions between right whales and
shipping traffic, and avoid aggregations
of right whales in the eastern portion of
CCB.
(2) Additional Port and Pipeline Major
Repair Measures (December 1 to April
30)
If unplanned/emergency repair
activities cannot be conducted between
May 1 and November 30, Neptune is
required to implement the following
additional mitigation measures:
(A) If on-board MMOs do not have at
least 0.5–mi (0.8–km) visibility, they
shall call for a shutdown of repair
activities. If dive operations are in
progress, then they shall be halted and
brought on board until visibility is
adequate to see a 0.5–mi (0.8–km) range.
At the time of shutdown, the use of
thrusters must be minimized. If there
are potential safety problems due to the
shutdown, the captain will decide what
operations can safely be shut down and
will document such activities.
(B) Prior to leaving the dock to begin
transit, the barge will contact one of the
MMOs on watch to receive an update of
sightings within the visual observation
area. If the MMO has observed a North
Atlantic right whale within 30 minutes
of the transit start, the vessel will hold
for 30 minutes and again get a clearance
to leave from the MMOs on board.
MMOs will assess whale activity and
visual observation ability at the time of
the transit request to clear the barge for
release.
(C) A half-day training course will be
provided to designated crew members
assigned to the transit barges and other
support vessels. These designated crew
members will be required to keep watch
on the bridge and immediately notify
the navigator of any whale sightings. All
watch crew will sign into a bridge log
book upon start and end of watch.
Transit route, destination, sea
conditions, and any protected species
sightings/mitigation actions during
E:\FR\FM\16JYN1.SGM
16JYN1
41444
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 136 / Friday, July 16, 2010 / Notices
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
watch will be recorded in the log book.
Any whale sightings within 3,281 ft
(1,000 m) of the vessel will result in a
high alert and slow speed of 4 knots (7.4
km/hr) or less. A sighting within 2,461
ft (750 m) will result in idle speed and/
or ceasing all movement.
(D) The material barges and tugs used
for repair work shall transit from the
operations dock to the work sites during
daylight hours, when possible, provided
the safety of the vessels is not
compromised. Should transit at night be
required, the maximum speed of the tug
will be 5 knots (9.3 km/hr).
(E) Consistent with navigation safety,
all repair vessels must maintain a speed
of 10 knots (18.5 km/hr) or less during
daylight hours. All vessels will operate
at 5 knots or less at all times within 3.1
mi (5 km) of the repair area.
(3) Speed Restrictions in Seasonal
Management Areas (SMAs)
Repair vessels and SRVs will transit at
10 knots (18.5 km/hr) or less in the
following seasons and areas, which
either correspond to or are more
restrictive than the times and areas in
NMFS’ final rule (73 FR 60173, October
10, 2008) to implement speed
restrictions to reduce the likelihood and
severity of ship strikes of right whales:
• CCB SMA from January 1 through
May 15, which includes all waters in
CCB, extending to all shorelines of the
Bay, with a northern boundary of 42°
12’ N. latitude;
• Off Race Point SMA year round,
which is bounded by straight lines
connecting the following coordinates in
the order stated: 42° 30’ N. 69° 45’ W.;
thence to 42° 30’ N. 70° 30’ W.; thence
to 42° 12’ N. 70° 30’ W.; thence to 42°
12’ N. 70° 12’ W.; thence to 42° 04’
56.5’’ N. 70° 12’ W.; thence along mean
high water line and inshore limits of
COLREGS limit to a latitude of 41° 40’
N.; thence due east to 41° 41’ N. 69° 45’
W.; thence back to starting point; and
• Great South Channel (GSC) SMA
from April 1 through July 31, which is
bounded by straight lines connecting
the following coordinates in the order
stated:
42° 30’ N. 69° 45’ W.
41° 40’ N. 69° 45’ W.
41° 00’ N. 69° 05’ W.
42° 09’ N. 67° 08’ 24’’ W.
42° 30’ N. 67° 27’ W.
42° 30’ N. 69° 45’ W.
(4) Additional Mitigation Measures
(A) In approaching and departing
from the Neptune Port, SRVs shall use
the Boston Traffic Separation Scheme
(TSS) starting and ending at the
entrance to the GSC. Upon entering the
TSS, the SRV shall go into a ‘‘heightened
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:00 Jul 15, 2010
Jkt 220001
awareness’’ mode of operation, which is
outlined in detail in the Plan (see
Neptune’s application).
(B) In the event that a whale is
visually observed within 0.6 mi (1 km)
of the Port or a confirmed acoustic
detection is reported on either of the
two auto-detection buoys (ABs; more
information on the acoustic devices is
contained in the ‘‘Monitoring and
Reporting’’ section later in this
document) closest to the Port, departing
SRVs shall delay their departure from
the Port, unless extraordinary
circumstances, defined in the Plan,
require that the departure is not
delayed. The departure delay shall
continue until either the observed whale
has been visually (during daylight
hours) confirmed as more than 0.6 mi (1
km) from the Port or 30 minutes have
passed without another confirmed
detection either acoustically within the
acoustic detection range of the two ABs
closest to the Port or visually within 0.6
mi (1 km) from Neptune.
(C) SRVs that are approaching or
departing from the Port and are within
the Area to be Avoided (ATBA)
surrounding Neptune shall remain at
least 0.6 mi (1 km) away from any
visually detected right whales and at
least 100 yards (91 meters) away from
all other visually detected whales unless
extraordinary circumstances, as defined
in Section 1.2 of the Plan in Neptune’s
application, require that the vessel stay
its course. The ATBA is defined in 33
CFR 150.940. It is the largest area of the
Port marked on nautical charts and it is
enforceable by the USCG in accordance
with the 150.900 regulations. The Vessel
Master shall designate at least one
lookout to be exclusively and
continuously monitoring for the
presence of marine mammals at all
times while the SRV is approaching or
departing Neptune.
(D) Neptune will ensure that other
vessels providing support to Neptune
operations during regasification
activities that are approaching or
departing from the Port and are within
the ATBA shall be operated so as to
remain at least 0.6 mi (1 km) away from
any visually detected right whales and
at least 100 yd (91 m) from all other
visually detected whales.
Additional Mitigation Measures
Required by NMFS
In addition to the mitigation measures
in Neptune’s IHA application, NMFS
has included the following measures in
the IHA in order to ensure the least
practicable impact on the affected
species or stocks:
(1) Neptune must immediately
suspend any repair and maintenance or
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
operations activities if a dead or injured
marine mammal is found in the vicinity
of the project area, and the death or
injury of the animal could be
attributable to the LNG facility
activities. Neptune must contact NMFS
and the Northeast Stranding and
Disentanglement Program. Activities
will not resume until review and
approval has been given by NMFS.
(2) MMOs will direct a moving vessel
to slow to idle if a baleen whale is seen
less than 0.6 mi (1 km) from the vessel.
(3) Use of lights during repair or
maintenance activities shall be limited
to areas where work is actually
occurring, and all other lights must be
extinguished. Lights must be
downshielded to illuminate the deck
and shall not intentionally illuminate
surrounding waters, so as not to attract
whales or their prey to the area.
Mitigation Conclusions
NMFS has carefully evaluated the
applicant’s mitigation measures and
considered a range of other measures in
the context of ensuring that NMFS
prescribes the means of effecting the
least practicable impact on the affected
marine mammal species and stocks and
their habitat. Our evaluation of potential
measures included consideration of the
following factors in relation to one
another:
• The manner in which, and the
degree to which, the successful
implementation of the measure is
expected to minimize adverse impacts
to marine mammals;
• The proven or likely efficacy of the
specific measure to minimize adverse
impacts as planned; and
• The practicability of the measure
for applicant implementation.
Based on our evaluation of the
applicant’s measures, as well as other
measures considered by NMFS, NMFS
has determined that the required
mitigation measures provide the means
of effecting the least practicable impact
on marine mammal species or stocks
and their habitat, paying particular
attention to rookeries, mating grounds,
and areas of similar significance.
Monitoring and Reporting
In order to issue an ITA for an
activity, Section 101(a)(5)(D) of the
MMPA states that NMFS must, where
applicable, set forth ‘‘requirements
pertaining to the monitoring and
reporting of such taking’’. The MMPA
implementing regulations at 50 CFR
216.104 (a)(13) indicate that requests for
ITAs must include the suggested means
of accomplishing the necessary
monitoring and reporting that will result
in increased knowledge of the species
E:\FR\FM\16JYN1.SGM
16JYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 136 / Friday, July 16, 2010 / Notices
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
and of the level of taking or impacts on
populations of marine mammals that are
expected to be present in the proposed
action area.
Neptune proposed both visual and
acoustic monitoring programs in the
Plan contained in the IHA application.
Summaries of those plans, as well as the
proposed reporting, are contained next.
The monitoring and reporting programs
contained in the Plan are included in
the IHA.
Passive Acoustic Monitoring
Neptune LNG will deploy and
maintain a passive acoustic detection
network along a portion of the TSS and
in the vicinity of Neptune. This network
will consisting of autonomous recording
units (ARUs) and near-real-time ABs. To
develop, implement, collect, and
analyze the acoustic data obtained from
deployment of the ARUs and ABs, as
well as to prepare reports and maintain
the passive acoustic detection network,
Neptune LNG has engaged the Cornell
University Bioacoustic Research
Program (BRP) in Ithaca, New York, and
the Woods Hole Oceanographic
Institution (WHOI) in Woods Hole,
Massachusetts.
During June 2008, an array of 19
passive seafloor ARUs was deployed by
BRP for Neptune. The layout of the
array centered on the terminal site and
was used to monitor the noise
environment in Massachusetts Bay in
the vicinity of Neptune during
construction of the port and associated
pipeline lateral. The ARUs were not
designed to provide real-time or nearreal-time information about vocalizing
whales. Rather archival noise data
collected from the ARU array were used
for the purpose of understanding the
seasonal occurrences and overall
distributions of whales (primarily North
Atlantic right whales) within
approximately 10 nm (18.5 km) of the
Neptune Port. Neptune LNG will
maintain these ARUs in the same
configuration for a period of five years
during full operation of Neptune in
order to monitor the actual acoustic
output of port operations and to alert
NOAA to any unanticipated adverse
effects of port operations, such as large
scale abandonment by marine mammals
of the area. To further assist in
evaluations of the Neptune’s acoustic
output, source levels associated with DP
of SRVs at the buoys will be estimated
using empirical measurements collected
from the passive detection network.
In addition to the ARUs, Neptune
LNG has deployed 10 ABs within the
Separation Zone of the TSS for the
operational life of the Port. The purpose
of the AB array is to detect the presence
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:00 Jul 15, 2010
Jkt 220001
of vocalizing North Atlantic right
whales. Each AB has an average
detection range of 5 nm (9.3 km) of the
AB, although detection ranges will vary
based on ambient underwater
conditions. The AB system will be the
primary detection mechanism that alerts
the SRV Master to the occurrence of
right whales in the TSS and triggers
heightened SRV awareness. The
configurations of the ARU array and AB
network (see Figure 3 in the Plan in
Neptune’s application) were based upon
the configurations developed and
recommended by NOAA personnel.
Each AB deployed in the TSS will
continuously screen the low-frequency
acoustic environment (less than 1,000
Hz) for right whale contact calls
occurring within an approximately
5–nm (9.3–km) radius from each buoy
(the ABs’ detection range) and rank
detections on a scale from 1 to 10. Each
AB shall transmit all detection data for
detections of rank greater than or equal
to 6 via Iridium satellite link to the BRP
server website every 20 minutes. This
20–minute transmission schedule was
determined by consideration of a
combination of factors including the
tendency of right whale calls to occur in
clusters (leading to a sampling logic of
listening for other calls rather than
transmitting immediately upon
detection of a possible call) and the
amount of battery power required to
complete a satellite transmission.
Additional details on the protocol can
be found in Neptune’s application.
Additionally, Neptune shall provide
empirically measured source level data
for all sources of noise associated with
LNG port maintenance and repair
activities. Measurements should be
carefully coordinated with noiseproducing activities and should be
collected from the passive acoustic
monitoring network.
Visual Monitoring
During maintenance- and repairrelated activities, Neptune LNG shall
employ two qualified MMOs on each
vessel that has a DP system. All MMOs
must receive training and be approved
in advance by NOAA after a review of
their qualifications. Qualifications for
these MMOs shall include direct field
experience on a marine mammal
observation vessel and/or aerial surveys
in the Atlantic Ocean/Gulf of Mexico.
The MMOs (one primary and one
secondary) are responsible for visually
locating marine mammals at the ocean’s
surface and, to the extent possible,
identifying the species. The primary
MMO shall act as the identification
specialist, and the secondary MMO will
serve as data recorder and will assist
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
41445
with identification. Both MMOs shall
have responsibility for monitoring for
the presence of marine mammals.
The MMOs shall monitor the area
where maintenance and repair work is
conducted beginning at daybreak using
the naked eye, hand-held binoculars,
and/or power binoculars (e.g, Big Eyes).
The MMOs shall scan the ocean surface
by eye for a minimum of 40 minutes
every hour. All sightings must be
recorded on marine mammal field
sighting logs.
While an SRV is navigating within the
designated TSS, three people have
lookout duties on or near the bridge of
the ship including the SRV Master, the
Officer-of-the-Watch, and the Helmsman
on watch. In addition to standard watch
procedures, while the SRV is within the
ATBA and/or while actively engaging in
the use of thrusters an additional
lookout shall be designated to
exclusively and continuously monitor
for marine mammals. Once the SRV is
moored and regasification activities
have begun, the vessel is no longer
considered in ‘‘heightened awareness’’
status. However, when regasification
activities conclude and the SRV
prepares to depart from Neptune, the
Master shall once again ensure that the
responsibilities as defined in the Plan
are carried out. All sightings of marine
mammals by the designated lookout,
individuals posted to navigational
lookout duties, and/or any other crew
member while the SRV is within the
TSS, in transit to the ATBA, within the
ATBA, and/or when actively engaging
in the use of thrusters shall be
immediately reported to the Officer-ofthe-Watch who shall then alert the
Master.
Reporting Measures
Since the Neptune Port is within the
Mandatory Ship Reporting Area
(MSRA), all SRVs transiting to and from
Neptune shall report their activities to
the mandatory reporting section of the
USCG to remain apprised of North
Atlantic right whale movements within
the area. All vessels entering and exiting
the MSRA shall report their activities to
WHALESNORTH. Vessel operators shall
contact the USCG by standard
procedures promulgated through the
Notice to Mariner system.
For any repair work associated with
the pipeline lateral or other port
components, Neptune LNG shall notify
the appropriate NOAA personnel as
soon as practicable after it is determined
that repair work must be conducted.
During maintenance and repair of the
pipeline lateral or other port
components, weekly status reports must
be provided to NOAA. The weekly
E:\FR\FM\16JYN1.SGM
16JYN1
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
41446
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 136 / Friday, July 16, 2010 / Notices
report must include data collected for
each distinct marine mammal species
observed in the project area during the
period of the repair activity. The weekly
reports shall include the following:
• The location, time, and nature of
the pipeline lateral repair activities;
• Whether the DP system was
operated and, if so, the number of
thrusters used and the time and
duration of DP operation;
• Marine mammals observed in the
area (number, species, age group, and
initial behavior);
• The distance of observed marine
mammals from the repair activities;
• Observed marine mammal
behaviors during the sighting;
• Whether any mitigation measures
were implemented;
• Weather conditions (sea state, wind
speed, wind direction, ambient
temperature, precipitation, and percent
cloud cover, etc.);
• Condition of the marine mammal
observation (visibility and glare); and
• Details of passive acoustic
detections and any action taken in
response to those detections.
For minor repairs and maintenance
activities, the following protocols will
be followed:
• All vessel crew members will be
trained in marine mammal
identification and avoidance
procedures;
• Repair vessels will notify
designated NOAA personnel when and
where the repair/maintenance work is to
take place along with a tentative
schedule and description of the work;
• Vessel crews will record/document
any marine mammal sightings during
the work period; and
• At the conclusion of the repair/
maintenance work, a report will be
delivered to designated NOAA
personnel describing any marine
mammal sightings, the type of work
taking place when the sighting occurred,
and any avoidance actions taken during
the repair/maintenance work.
During all phases of project repair/
maintenance activities and operation,
sightings of any injured or dead marine
mammals will be reported immediately
to the USCG and NMFS, regardless of
whether the injury or death is caused by
project activities. Sightings of injured or
dead marine mammals not associated
with project activities can be reported to
the USCG on VHF Channel 16 or to
NMFS Stranding and Entanglement
Hotline. In addition, if the injury or
death was caused by a project vessel
(e.g., SRV, support vessel, or
construction vessel), USCG must be
notified immediately, and a full report
must be provided to NMFS, Northeast
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:00 Jul 15, 2010
Jkt 220001
Regional Office. The report must
include the following information: (1)
the time, date, and location (latitude/
longitude) of the incident; (2) the name
and type of vessel involved; (3) the
vessel’s speed during the incident; (4) a
description of the incident; (5) water
depth; (6) environmental conditions
(e.g., wind speed and direction, sea
state, cloud cover, and visibility); (7) the
species identification or description of
the animal; (8) the fate of the animal;
and (9) photographs or video footage of
the animal (if equipment is available).
An annual report on marine mammal
monitoring and mitigation will be
submitted to NMFS Office of Protected
Resources and NMFS Northeast
Regional Office within 90 days after the
expiration of the IHA. The weekly
reports and the annual report should
include data collected for each distinct
marine mammal species observed in the
project area in the Massachusetts Bay
during the period of LNG facility
operations and repair/maintenance
activities. Description of marine
mammal behavior, overall numbers of
individuals observed, frequency of
observation, and any behavioral changes
and the context of the changes relative
to operation and repair/maintenance
activities shall also be included in the
annual report. Additional information
that will be recorded during operations
and repair/maintenance activities and
contained in the reports include: date
and time of marine mammal detections
(visually or acoustically), weather
conditions, species identification,
approximate distance from the source,
activity of the vessel when a marine
mammal is sighted, and whether
thrusters were in use and, if so, how
many at the time of the sighting.
General Conclusions Drawn from
Previous Monitoring Reports
Throughout the construction period,
Neptune submitted weekly reports on
marine mammal sightings in the area.
While it is difficult to draw biological
conclusions from these reports, NMFS
can make some general conclusions.
Data gathered by MMOs is generally
useful to indicate the presence or
absence of marine mammals (often to a
species level) within the safety zones
(and sometimes without) and to
document the implementation of
mitigation measures. Though it is by no
means conclusory, it is worth noting
that no instances of obvious behavioral
disturbance as a result of Neptune’s
activities were observed by the MMOs.
Of course, these observations only cover
the animals that were at the surface and
within the distance that the MMOs
could see. Based on the number of
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
sightings contained in the weekly
reports, it appears that NMFS’ estimated
take levels are accurate. As operation of
the Port has not yet commenced, there
are no reports describing the results of
the visual monitoring program for this
phase of the project. However, it is
anticipated that visual observations will
be able to continue as they were during
construction.
As described previously in this
document, Neptune was required to
maintain an acoustic array to monitor
calling North Atlantic right whales
(humpback and fin whale calls were
also able to be detected). Cornell BRP
analyzed the data and submitted a
report covering the initial construction
phase of the project, which occurred in
2008. While acoustic data can only be
collected if the animals are actively
calling, the report indicates that
humpback and fin whales were heard
calling on at least some of the ARUs on
all construction days, and right whale
calls were heard only 28 percent of the
time during active construction days.
The passive acoustic arrays will remain
deployed during the time frame of this
IHA in order to obtain information
during the operational phase of the Port
facility.
Estimated Take by Incidental
Harassment
Except with respect to certain
activities not pertinent here, the MMPA
defines ‘‘harassment’’ as: any act of
pursuit, torment, or annoyance which (i)
has the potential to injure a marine
mammal or marine mammal stock in the
wild [Level A harassment]; or (ii) has
the potential to disturb a marine
mammal or marine mammal stock in the
wild by causing disruption of behavioral
patterns, including, but not limited to,
migration, breathing, nursing, breeding,
feeding, or sheltering [Level B
harassment]. Only take by Level B
harassment is anticipated as a result of
Neptune’s operational and repair/
maintenance activities. Anticipated take
of marine mammals is associated with
thruster sound during maneuvering of
the SRVs while docking and undocking,
occasional weathervaning at the Port,
and during thruster use of DP
maintenance vessels should a major
repair be necessary. The regasification
process itself is an activity that does not
rise to the level of taking, as the
modeled source level for this activity is
110 dB (rms). Certain species may have
a behavioral reaction to the sound
emitted during the activities. Hearing
impairment is not anticipated.
Additionally, vessel strikes are not
anticipated, especially because of the
speed restriction measures that are
E:\FR\FM\16JYN1.SGM
16JYN1
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 136 / Friday, July 16, 2010 / Notices
proposed that were described earlier in
this document.
For continuous sounds, such as those
produced by Neptune’s proposed
activities, NMFS uses a received level of
120–dB (rms) to indicate the onset of
Level B harassment. The basis for
Neptune’s ‘‘take’’ estimate is the number
of marine mammals that potentially
could be exposed to sound levels in
excess of 120 dB. This has been
determined by applying the modeled
zone of influence (ZOI; e.g., the area
ensonified by the 120–dB contour) to
the seasonal use (density) of the area by
marine mammals and correcting for
seasonal duration of sound-generating
activities and estimated duration of
individual activities when the
maximum sound-generating activities
are intermittent to occasional. Nearly all
of the required information is readily
available in the MARAD/USCG Final
EIS, with the exception of marine
mammal density estimates for the
project area. In the case of data gaps, a
conservative approach was used to
ensure that the potential number of
takes is not underestimated.
The Notice of Proposed IHA (75 FR
24906, May 6, 2010) included an indepth discussion of the methodology
used by NMFS to estimate take by
harassment incidental to operation and
repair/maintenance activities at the
Neptune Port facility. A summary is
provided next.
Results of sound modeling tests
indicate that the 120–dB radius from
thruster use by the SRV is estimated to
be 1.6 nm (3 km), creating a maximum
ZOI of 8.5 nm2 (29 km2). This zone is
smaller than the one that was used to
estimate the level of take in the previous
IHA. However, the vessels used in the
2009 tests more closely resemble the
vessels that will be used by Neptune for
regasification by the SRV. Other vessels
would be required for use during
maintenance and repair activities at the
port facility. Sounds generated during
those activities would be similar or less
than those generated during original
construction of the facility. Therefore,
NMFS has used the 120–dB contour
estimated for construction in the
previous IHAs for repair and
maintenance activities. Depending on
water depth, the 120–dB contour during
repair and maintenance activities will
extend from the source (the Port) out to
3.9 km (2.1 nm) and cover an area of 52
km2 (15 nm2).
NMFS used the data on cetacean
distribution within Massachusetts Bay,
such as those published by the National
Centers for Coastal Ocean Science
(NCCOS, 2006), to determine potential
takes of marine mammals in the vicinity
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:00 Jul 15, 2010
Jkt 220001
of the project area. Sighting data for the
following species are contained in the
report: North Atlantic right, fin,
humpback, minke, pilot, and sei whales
and Atlantic white-sided dolphins. The
NCCOS study used cetacean sightings
from two sources: (1) the North Atlantic
Right Whale Consortium (NARWC)
sightings database held at the University
of Rhode Island (Kenney, 2001); and (2)
the Manomet Bird Observatory (MBO)
database, held at the NMFS Northeast
Fisheries Science Center (NEFSC). The
NCCOS study then combined these two
data sets by extracting cetacean sighting
records, updating database field names
to match the NARWC database, creating
geometry to represent survey tracklines
and applying a set of data selection
criteria designed to minimize
uncertainty and bias in the data used.
For a detailed description and
calculation of the cetacean abundance
data and sightings-per-unit-effort
(SPUE), refer to the NCCOS study
(NCCOS, 2006). SPUE for all four
seasons were analyzed, and the highest
value SPUE for the season with the
highest abundance of each species was
used to determine relative abundance.
Based on the data, the relative
abundance of North Atlantic right, fin,
humpback, minke, sei, and pilot whales
and Atlantic white-sided dolphins, as
calculated by SPUE in number of
animals per square kilometer, is 0.0082,
0.0097, 0.0265, 0.0059, 0.0084, 0.0407,
and 0.1314 n/km, respectively. Table 1
in this document outlines the density,
abundance, take estimates, and percent
of population for the 14 species for
which NMFS has authorized Level B
harassment.
In calculating the area density of these
species from these linear density data,
NMFS used 0.4 km (0.25 mi), which is
a quarter the distance of the radius for
visual monitoring, as a conservative
hypothetical strip width (W). Thus the
area density (D) of these species in the
project area can be obtained by the
following formula:
D = SPUE/2W.
Based on the calculation, the
estimated take numbers by Level B
harassment for the 1–year IHA period
during operation of the SRV for North
Atlantic right, fin, humpback, minke,
sei, and pilot whales and Atlantic
white-sided dolphins, within the 120–
dB ZOI of the LNG Port facility area of
approximately 8.5 nm2 (29 km2)
maximum ZOI, corrected for 50 percent
underwater, are 23, 27, 72, 16, 6, 110,
and 357, respectively. This estimate is
based on an estimated 50 SRV trips for
the period July 12, 2010, through July
11, 2011, that will produce sounds of
120 dB or greater.
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
41447
Based on the same calculation method
described above for Port operations (but
using the 120–dB ZOI of approximately
52 km2 (15 nm2), the estimated take
numbers by Level B harassment for
North Atlantic right, fin, humpback,
minke, sei, and pilot whales and
Atlantic white-sided dolphins for the 1–
year IHA period incidental to Port
maintenance and repair activities,
corrected for 50 percent underwater, are
11, 13, 36, 8, 11, 56, and 179,
respectively. These numbers are based
on 14 days of repair and maintenance
activities occurring between July 12,
2010, through July 11, 2011. It is
unlikely that this much repair and
maintenance work would be required
this soon after completion of the
construction phase of the facility.
The total estimated take of these
species as a result of both operations
and repair and maintenance activities of
the Neptune Port facility between July
12, 2010, through July 11, 2011, is: 33
North Atlantic right whales; 40 fin
whales; 108 humpback whales; 24
minke whales; 17 sei whales; 166 longfinned pilot whales; and 536 Atlantic
white-sided dolphins. These numbers
represent a maximum of 9.6, 1.8, 12.8,
0.7, 4.4, 0.5, and 0.8 percent of the
populations for these species or stocks
in the western North Atlantic,
respectively. It is likely that individual
animals will be ‘‘taken’’ by harassment
multiple times (because certain
individuals may occur in the area more
than once while other individuals of the
population or stock may not enter the
proposed project area). Additionally, the
highest value SPUE for the season with
the highest abundance of each species
was used to determine relative
abundance. Moreover, it is not expected
that Neptune will have 50 SRV transits
and LNG deliveries in the first year of
operations. Therefore, these percentages
are the upper boundary of the animal
population that could be affected. Thus,
the actual number of individual animals
being exposed or taken is expected to be
far less.
In addition, bottlenose dolphins,
common dolphins, Risso’s dolphins,
killer whales, harbor porpoises, harbor
seals, and gray seals could also be taken
by Level B harassment as a result of the
deepwater LNG port project. Because
these species are less likely to occur in
the area, and there are no density
estimates specific to this particular area,
NMFS based the take estimates on
typical group size. Therefore, NMFS
estimates (and has authorized) that up
to approximately 10 bottlenose
dolphins, 20 common dolphins, 20
Risso’s dolphins, 20 killer whales, 5
harbor porpoises, 15 harbor seals, and
E:\FR\FM\16JYN1.SGM
16JYN1
41448
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 136 / Friday, July 16, 2010 / Notices
15 gray seals could be exposed to
continuous noise at or above 120 dB re
1 μPa rms incidental to operations and
repair and maintenance activities during
the one year period of the IHA,
respectively.
Because Massachusetts Bay represents
only a small fraction of the western
North Atlantic basin where these
animals occur NMFS has determined
that only small numbers of the affected
marine mammal species or stocks would
be potentially affected by the Neptune
LNG deepwater project. The take
estimates presented in this section of
the document do not take into
consideration the mitigation and
monitoring measures required by the
IHA.
TABLE 1. DENSITY ESTIMATES, POPULATION ABUNDANCE ESTIMATES, TOTAL AUTHORIZED TAKE (WHEN COMBINE TAKES
FROM OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE/REPAIR ACTIVITIES), AND PERCENTAGE OF POPULATION THAT MAY BE TAKEN FOR
THE POTENTIAL AFFECTED SPECIES.
Density (n/km2)
Abundance1
Total Authorized Take
(operation & maintenance)
Percentage of Stock or
Population
North Atlantic right whale
0.0082
345
33
9.6
Fin whale
0.0097
2,269
40
1.8
Humpback whale
0.0265
847
108
12.8
Minke whale
0.0059
3,312
24
0.7
Sei whale
0.0084
386
17
4.4
Long-finned pilot whale
0.0407
31,139
166
0.5
Atlantic white-sided dolphin
0.1314
63,368
536
0.8
Bottlenose dolphin
NA
7,489
10
0.1
Common dolphin
NA
120,743
20
0.02
Risso’s dolphin
NA
20,479
20
0.1
Killer whale
NA
NA
20
NA
Harbor porpoise
NA
89,054
5
0.01
Harbor seal
NA
99,340
15
0.02
Gray seal
NA
125,541-169,064
15
0.01
Species
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
1
Abundance estimates taken from NMFS Atlantic and Gulf of Mexico SAR; NA=Not Available
NMFS has defined ‘‘negligible impact’’
in 50 CFR 216.103 as ’’...an impact
resulting from the specified activity that
cannot be reasonably expected to, and is
not reasonably likely to, adversely affect
the species or stock through effects on
annual rates of recruitment or survival.’’
In making a negligible impact
determination, NMFS considers a
variety of factors, including but not
limited to: (1) the number of anticipated
mortalities; (2) the number and nature of
anticipated injuries; (3) the number,
nature, intensity, and duration of Level
B harassment; and (4) the context in
which the takes occur.
No injuries or mortalities are
anticipated to occur as a result of
Neptune’s port operation and
maintenance and repair activities, and
none have been authorized by NMFS.
Additionally, animals in the area are not
anticipated to incur any hearing
impairment (i.e., TTS or PTS), as the
modeling results for the SRV indicate a
source level of 180 dB (rms).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:00 Jul 15, 2010
Jkt 220001
While some of the species occur in
the project area year-round, some
species only occur in the area during
certain seasons. Sei whales are only
anticipated in the area during the
spring. Therefore, if shipments and/or
maintenance/repair activities occur in
other seasons, the likelihood of sei
whales being affected is quite low.
Additionally, any repairs that can be
scheduled in advance will be scheduled
to avoid the peak time that North
Atlantic right whales occur in the area,
which usually is during the early spring.
North Atlantic right, humpback, and
minke whales are not expected in the
project area in the winter. During the
winter, a large portion of the North
Atlantic right whale population occurs
in the southeastern U.S. calving grounds
(i.e., South Carolina, Georgia, and
northern Florida). The fact that certain
activities will occur during times when
certain species are not commonly found
in the area will help reduce the amount
of Level B harassment for these species.
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Many animals perform vital functions,
such as feeding, resting, traveling, and
socializing, on a diel cycle (24–hr
cycle). Behavioral reactions to noise
exposure (such as disruption of critical
life functions, displacement, or
avoidance of important habitat) are
more likely to be significant if they last
more than one diel cycle or recur on
subsequent days (Southall et al., 2007).
Consequently, a behavioral response
lasting less than one day and not
recurring on subsequent days is not
considered particularly severe unless it
could directly affect reproduction or
survival (Southall et al., 2007).
Operational activities are not
anticipated to occur at the Port on
consecutive days. Once Neptune is at
full operations, SRV shipments would
occur every 4–8 days, with thruster use
needed for a couple of hours. Therefore,
Neptune will not be creating increased
sound levels in the marine environment
for several days at a time.
E:\FR\FM\16JYN1.SGM
16JYN1
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 136 / Friday, July 16, 2010 / Notices
Of the 14 marine mammal species
likely to occur in the area, four are listed
as endangered under the ESA: North
Atlantic right, humpback, fin, and sei
whales. All of these species, as well as
the northern coastal stock of bottlenose
dolphin, are also considered depleted
under the MMPA. The affected
humpback and North Atlantic right
whale populations have been increasing
in recent years. However, there is
insufficient data to determine
population trends for the other depleted
species in the project area. There is
currently no designated critical habitat
or known reproductive areas for any of
these species in or near the project area.
However, there are several well known
North Atlantic right whale feeding
grounds in the CCB and GSC. As
mentioned previously, to the greatest
extent practicable, all maintenance/
repair work will be scheduled during
the May 1 to November 30 time frame
to avoid peak right whale feeding in
these areas, which occur close to the
Neptune Port. No mortality or injury is
expected to occur and due to the nature,
degree, and context of the Level B
harassment anticipated, the activity is
not expected to impact rates of
recruitment or survival.
The population estimates for the
species that may be taken by harassment
from the most recent U.S. Atlantic SAR
were provided earlier in this document
(see Table 1). From the most
conservative estimates of both marine
mammal densities in the project area
and the size of the 120–dB ZOI, the
maximum calculated number of
individual marine mammals for each
species that could potentially be
harassed annually is small relative to
the overall population sizes (12.8
percent for humpback whales and 9.6
percent for North Atlantic right whales
and no more than 4.4 percent of any
other species).
Based on the analysis contained
herein of the likely effects of the
specified activity on marine mammals
and their habitat, and taking into
consideration the implementation of the
mitigation and monitoring measures,
NMFS finds that operation, including
repair and maintenance activities, of the
Neptune Port will result in the
incidental take of small numbers of
marine mammals, by Level B
harassment only, and that the total
taking from Neptune’s activities will
have a negligible impact on the affected
species or stocks.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:00 Jul 15, 2010
Jkt 220001
Impact on Availability of Affected
Species or Stock for Taking for
Subsistence Uses
There are no relevant subsistence uses
of marine mammals implicated by this
action.
Endangered Species Act (ESA)
On January 12, 2007, NMFS
concluded consultation with MARAD
and USCG under section 7 of the ESA
on the proposed construction and
operation of the Neptune LNG facility
and issued a Biological Opinion. The
finding of that consultation was that the
construction and operation of the
Neptune LNG terminal may adversely
affect, but is not likely to jeopardize, the
continued existence of North Atlantic
right, humpback, and fin whales, and is
not likely to adversely affect sperm, sei,
or blue whales and Kemp’s ridley,
loggerhead, green, or leatherback sea
turtles.
On March 2, 2010, MARAD and
USCG sent a letter to NMFS requesting
reinitiation of the section 7
consultation. MARAD and USCG
determined that certain routine planned
operations and maintenance activities,
inspections, surveys, and unplanned
repair work on the Neptune Deepwater
Port pipelines and flowlines, as well as
any other Neptune Deepwater Port
component (including buoys, risers/
umbilicals, mooring systems, and subsea manifolds), may constitute a
modification not previously considered
in the 2007 Biological Opinion.
Construction of the Port facility has
been completed, and, therefore, is no
longer part of the proposed action.
Consultation with NMFS’ Northeast
Regional Office is now complete. The
2010 Biological Opinion contains the
following conclusion. After reviewing
the best available information on the
status of endangered and threatened
species under NMFS jurisdiction, the
environmental baseline for the action
area, the effects of the action, and the
cumulative effects in the action area, it
is NMFS’ biological opinion that the
operation of the Neptune LNG
deepwater port, including required
maintenance and repair work, is likely
to adversely affect, but is not likely to
jeopardize the continued existence of
the North Atlantic right, humpback, fin,
and sei whale.
National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA)
MARAD and the USCG released a
Final EIS/Environmental Impact Report
(EIR) for the proposed Neptune LNG
Deepwater Port (see ADDRESSES). A
notice of availability was published by
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
41449
MARAD on November 2, 2006 (71 FR
64606). The Final EIS/EIR provides
detailed information on the proposed
project facilities, construction methods,
and analysis of potential impacts on
marine mammals.
NMFS was a cooperating agency in
the preparation of the Draft and Final
EISs based on a Memorandum of
Understanding related to the Licensing
of Deepwater Ports entered into by the
U.S. Department of Commerce along
with 10 other government agencies. On
June 3, 2008, NMFS adopted the USCG
and MARAD FEIS and issued a separate
Record of Decision for issuance of
authorizations pursuant to sections
101(a)(5)(A) and (D) of the MMPA for
the construction and operation of the
Neptune LNG Port facility.
Authorization
As a result of these determinations,
NMFS has issued an IHA to Neptune for
the take of marine mammals incidental
to port commissioning and operations,
including repair and maintenance
activities at the Neptune Deepwater
Port, provided the previously
mentioned mitigation, monitoring, and
reporting requirements are incorporated.
Dated: July 12, 2010.
James H. Lecky,
Director, Office of Protected Resources,
National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2010–17434 Filed 7–15–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–S
COMMITTEE FOR PURCHASE FROM
PEOPLE WHO ARE BLIND OR
SEVERELY DISABLED
Procurement List Additions and
Deletion
AGENCY: Committee for Purchase From
People Who Are Blind or Severely
Disabled.
ACTION: Additions to and deletion from
the Procurement List.
SUMMARY: This action adds products and
services to the Procurement List that
will be furnished by nonprofit agencies
employing persons who are blind or
have other severe disabilities and
deletes a service from the Procurement
List previously furnished by such
agency.
DATES: Effective Date: 8/16/2010.
ADDRESSES: Committee for Purchase
From People Who Are Blind or Severely
Disabled, Jefferson Plaza 2, Suite 10800,
1421 Jefferson Davis Highway,
Arlington, Virginia 22202–3259.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Barry S. Lineback, Telephone: (703)
E:\FR\FM\16JYN1.SGM
16JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 136 (Friday, July 16, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 41440-41449]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-17434]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
RIN 0648-XW09
Takes of Marine Mammals Incidental to Specified Activities;
Taking Marine Mammals Incidental to Operation and Maintenance of a
Liquefied Natural Gas Facility off Massachusetts
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Notice; issuance of an incidental harassment authorization.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In accordance with the Marine Mammal Protection Act (MMPA)
regulations, notification is hereby given that NMFS has issued an
Incidental Harassment Authorization (IHA) to Neptune LNG LLC (Neptune)
to take marine mammals, by harassment, incidental to port commissioning
and operations, including maintenance and repair activities, at its
Neptune Deepwater Port.
DATES: Effective July 12, 2010, through July 11, 2011.
ADDRESSES: A copy of the authorization and application may be obtained
by writing to Michael Payne, Chief, Permits, Conservation and Education
Division, Office of Protected Resources, National Marine Fisheries
Service, 1315 East West Highway, Silver Spring, MD 20910, telephoning
the contact listed below (see FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT), or
visiting the internet at: https://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/permits/incidental.htm. Documents cited in this notice may also be viewed, by
appointment, during regular business hours, at the aforementioned
address.
The Maritime Administration (MARAD) and U.S. Coast Guard (USCG)
Final Environmental Impact Statement (Final EIS) on the Neptune LNG
Deepwater Port License Application is available for viewing at https://www.regulations.gov by entering the search words ``Neptune LNG.''
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Candace Nachman, Office of Protected
Resources, NMFS, (301) 713 2289, ext 156.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Sections 101(a)(5)(A) and (D) of the MMPA (16 U.S.C. 1361 et seq.)
direct the Secretary of Commerce to allow, upon request, the
incidental, but not intentional, taking of small numbers of marine
mammals by U.S. citizens who engage in a specified activity (other than
commercial fishing) within a specified geographical region if certain
findings are made and either regulations are issued or, if the taking
is limited to harassment, a notice of a proposed authorization is
provided to the public for review.
Authorization for incidental takings shall be granted if NMFS finds
that the taking will have a negligible impact on the species or
stock(s), will not have an unmitigable adverse impact on the
availability of the species or stock(s) for subsistence uses (where
relevant), and if the permissible methods of taking and requirements
pertaining to the mitigation, monitoring and reporting of such takings
are set forth. NMFS has defined ``negligible impact'' in 50 CFR 216.103
as ''...an impact resulting from the specified activity that cannot be
reasonably expected to, and is not reasonably likely to, adversely
affect the species or stock through effects on annual rates of
recruitment or survival.''
Section 101(a)(5)(D) of the MMPA established an expedited process
by which citizens of the U.S. can apply for an authorization to
incidentally take small numbers of marine mammals by harassment.
Section 101(a)(5)(D) establishes a 45 day time limit for NMFS review of
an application followed by a 30 day public notice and comment period on
any proposed authorizations for the incidental harassment of marine
mammals. Within 45 days of the close of the comment period, NMFS must
either issue or deny the authorization.
Except with respect to certain activities not pertinent here, the
MMPA defines ``harassment'' as:
any act of pursuit, torment, or annoyance which (i) has the
potential to injure a marine mammal or marine mammal stock in the
wild [``Level A harassment'']; or (ii) has the potential to disturb
a marine mammal or marine mammal stock in the wild by causing
disruption of behavioral patterns, including, but not limited to,
migration, breathing, nursing, breeding, feeding, or sheltering
[``Level B harassment''].
Summary of Request
NMFS received an application on December 14, 2009, from Neptune for
the taking, by harassment, of marine mammals incidental to port
commissioning and operations, including maintenance and repair
activities, at its Neptune Deepwater Port (Port) facility in
Massachusetts Bay. NMFS reviewed Neptune's application and identified a
number of issues requiring further clarification. After addressing
comments from NMFS, Neptune modified its application and submitted a
revised application on March 11, 2010.
NMFS issued a 1-year IHA to Neptune in June 2008 for the
construction of the Port (73 FR 33400, June 12, 2008), which expired on
June 30, 2009. NMFS issued a second 1-year IHA to Neptune for the
completion of construction and beginning of Port operations on June 26,
2009 (74 FR 31926, July 6, 2009). This IHA expired on June 30, 2010.
During the period of this third IHA, Neptune intends to commission
its second shuttle and regasification vessel (SRV) and conduct limited
port operations. There is also a chance that some maintenance and
repairs may need to be conducted on the Port facility. The Neptune Port
is located approximately 22 mi (35 km) northeast of Boston,
Massachusetts, in Federal waters approximately 260 ft (79 m) in depth.
The purpose of the Port is the importation of liquefied natural gas
(LNG) into the New England region. Take of marine mammals may occur
during port operations from thruster use during maneuvering of the SRVs
while docking and undocking, occasional weathervaning (turning of a
vessel at anchor from one direction to another under the influence of
wind or currents) at the Port, and during thruster use of dynamic
positioning (DP) maintenance vessels should a major repair be
necessary. Neptune has requested an authorization to take 12 marine
mammal species by Level B harassment. They are: North Atlantic right
whale; humpback whale; fin whale; sei whale; minke whale; long-finned
pilot whale; Atlantic white-sided dolphin; harbor porpoise; common
dolphin; Risso's dolphin; bottlenose dolphin; and harbor seal. In the
2009 IHA, NMFS also authorized take of killer whales and gray seals.
NMFS has determined that it would be appropriate to authorize take, by
Level B harassment only, of these
[[Page 41441]]
two species as well for port operations and maintenance.
Description of the Specified Activity
On March 23, 2007, Neptune received a license to own, construct,
and operate a deepwater port from MARAD. The Port, which is located in
Massachusetts Bay, consists of a submerged buoy system to dock
specifically designed LNG carriers approximately 22 mi (35 km)
northeast of Boston, Massachusetts, in Federal waters approximately 260
ft (79 m) in depth. The two buoys are separated by a distance of
approximately 2.1 mi (3.4 km). The locations of the Neptune Port and
the associated pipeline are shown in Figure 2-1 in Neptune's
application (see ADDRESSES). During the time period of this IHA,
Neptune plans to commission its second SRV and begin limited operations
of the Port.
Neptune will be capable of mooring LNG SRVs with a capacity of
approximately 140,000 cubic meters (m3). Up to two SRVs will
temporarily moor at the Port by means of a submerged unloading buoy
system. Two separate buoys will allow natural gas to be delivered in a
continuous flow, without interruption, by having a brief overlap
between arriving and departing SRVs. The annual average throughput
capacity will be around 500 million standard cubic feet per day
(mmscfd) with an initial throughput of 400 mmscfd, and a peak capacity
of approximately 750 mmscfd.
The SRVs will be equipped to store, transport, and vaporize LNG and
to odorize, meter and send out natural gas by means of two 16-in (40.6-
cm) flexible risers and one 24-in (61-cm) subsea flowline. These risers
and flowline will lead to a 24-in (61-cm) gas transmission pipeline
connecting the deepwater port to the existing 30-in (76.2-cm) Algonquin
Hubline\TM\ (Hubline\TM\) located approximately 9 mi (14.5 km) west of
the Neptune deepwater port location. The Port will have an expected
operating life of approximately 25 years. Figure 1-1 of Neptune's
application shows an isometric view of the Port (see ADDRESSES). A
detailed overview of Port operations and maintenance and repair
activities, as well as the types of sounds those activities produce,
was provided in the Notice of Proposed IHA (75 FR 24906, May 6, 2010).
No changes have been made to the proposed operations or maintenance and
repair activities.
Comments and Responses
A notice of receipt of Neptune's application and NMFS' proposal to
issue an IHA to Neptune published in the Federal Register on May 6,
2010 (75 FR 24906). During the 30-day public comment period, NMFS did
not receive any comment letters. The Marine Mammal Commission (MMC)
submitted comments after the close of the 30-day comment period. Those
comments and responses are addressed here.
Comment 1: The MMC concurs with the need for the monitoring and
mitigation measures proposed by NMFS and the applicant and recommends
that NMFS include all of them in any IHA, especially to mitigate the
risk of ship collisions with North Atlantic right whales and other
cetacean species.
Response: All measures proposed in the Notice of Proposed IHA are
included in the IHA.
Comment 2: The MMC concurs with the need to reinitiate section 7
consultation and recommends that NMFS complete the consultation and
issue the IHA only if the resulting Biological Opinion concludes that
the cumulative effects of the proposed action, in combination with
other activities in the action area, are not likely to jeopardize the
continued existence of the North Atlantic right, humpback, fin, sperm,
sei, or blue whales.
Response: Section 7 consultation under the Endangered Species Act
(ESA) was reinitiated in March 2010. That consultation is now complete
and makes the following conclusion. After reviewing the best available
information on the status of endangered and threatened species under
NMFS jurisdiction, the environmental baseline for the action area, the
effects of the action, and the cumulative effects in the action area,
it is NMFS' biological opinion that the operation of the Neptune LNG
deepwater port, including required maintenance and repair work, is
likely to adversely affect, but is not likely to jeopardize the
continued existence of the North Atlantic right, humpback, fin, and sei
whale.
NMFS' January 2007 Biological Opinion considered impacts from port
and pipeline construction and operation on sperm and blue whales in
addition to the other cetacean species cited in the MMC's comment. The
2007 opinion concluded that those activities were not likely to
adversely affect sperm and blue whales. Because no additional effects
to these two species are anticipated from the repair and maintenance
activities and no effects beyond those analyzed in 2007 for operations
are likely, sperm and blue whales were not further analyzed in the 2010
Biological Opinion.
Description of Marine Mammals in the Area of the Specified Activity
Massachusetts Bay (as well as the entire Atlantic Ocean) hosts a
diverse assemblage of marine mammals, including: North Atlantic right
whale; blue whale; fin whale; sei whale; minke whale; humpback whale;
killer whale; long-finned pilot whale; sperm whale; Atlantic white-
beaked dolphin; Atlantic white-sided dolphin; bottlenose dolphin;
common dolphin; harbor porpoise; Risso's dolphin; striped dolphin; gray
seal; harbor seal; harp seal; and hooded seal. Table 3-1 in Neptune's
application outlines the marine mammal species that occur in
Massachusetts Bay and the likelihood of occurrence of each species. Of
the species listed here, the North Atlantic right, blue, fin, sei,
humpback, and sperm whales are all listed as endangered under the ESA
and as depleted under the MMPA. The northern coastal stock of
bottlenose dolphins is considered depleted under the MMPA. Certain
stocks or populations of killer whales are listed as endangered under
the ESA or depleted under the MMPA; however, none of those stocks or
populations occurs in the proposed activity area.
Of these species, 14 are expected to occur in the area of Neptune's
proposed operations. These species include: the North Atlantic right,
humpback, fin, sei, minke, killer, and long-finned pilot whale;
Atlantic white-sided, common, Risso's, and bottlenose dolphins; harbor
porpoise; and harbor and gray seals. The Notice of Proposed IHA (75 FR
24906, May 6, 2010) provided a description of certain marine mammal
species that are considered rare in the project area.
Information on those species that may be impacted by this activity
is provided in Neptune's application and sections 3.2.3 and 3.2.5 in
the MARAD/USCG Final EIS on the Neptune LNG proposal (see ADDRESSES).
Please refer to those documents for more information on these species.
In addition, general information on these marine mammal species can
also be found in the NMFS U.S. Atlantic and Gulf of Mexico Marine
Mammal Stock Report (Waring et al., 2009), which is available at:
https://www.nefsc.noaa.gov/publications/tm/tm213/. A brief summary on
several commonly sighted marine mammal species distribution and
abundance in the vicinity of the action area was provided in the Notice
of Proposed IHA (75 FR 24906, May 6, 2010).
[[Page 41442]]
Brief Background on Marine Mammal Hearing
When considering the influence of various kinds of sound on the
marine environment, it is necessary to understand that different kinds
of marine life are sensitive to different frequencies of sound. Based
on available behavioral data, audiograms derived using auditory evoked
potential techniques, anatomical modeling, and other data, Southall et
al. (2007) designate ``functional hearing groups'' for marine mammals
and estimate the lower and upper frequencies of functional hearing of
the groups. The functional groups and the associated frequencies are
indicated below (though animals are less sensitive to sounds at the
outer edge of their functional range and most sensitive to sounds of
frequencies within a smaller range somewhere in the middle of their
functional hearing range):
Low-frequency cetaceans (13 species of mysticetes):
functional hearing is estimated to occur between approximately 7 Hz and
22 kHz;
Mid-frequency cetaceans (32 species of dolphins, six
species of larger toothed whales, and 19 species of beaked and
bottlenose whales): functional hearing is estimated to occur between
approximately 150 Hz and 160 kHz;
High-frequency cetaceans (eight species of true porpoises,
six species of river dolphins, Kogia, the franciscana, and four species
of cephalorhynchids): functional hearing is estimated to occur between
approximately 200 Hz and 180 kHz; and
Pinnipeds in Water: functional hearing is estimated to
occur between approximately 75 Hz and 75 kHz, with the greatest
sensitivity between approximately 700 Hz and 20 kHz.
As mentioned previously in this document, 14 marine mammal species
(12 cetacean and two pinniped species) are likely to occur in the
Neptune Port area. Of the 12 cetacean species likely to occur in
Neptune's project area, five are classified as low-frequency cetaceans
(i.e., North Atlantic right, humpback, fin, minke, and sei whales), six
are classified as mid-frequency cetaceans (i.e., killer and pilot
whales and bottlenose, common, Risso's, and Atlantic white-sided
dolphins), and one is classified as a high-frequency cetacean (i.e.,
harbor porpoise) (Southall et al., 2007).
Potential Effects of the Specified Activity on Marine Mammals
Potential effects of Neptune's proposed port operations and
maintenance/repair activities would most likely be acoustic in nature.
LNG port operations and maintenance/repair activities introduce sound
into the marine environment. Potential acoustic effects on marine
mammals relate to sound produced by thrusters during maneuvering of the
SRVs while docking and undocking, occasional weathervaning at the port,
and during thruster use of DP maintenance vessels should a major repair
be necessary. The potential effects of sound from the proposed
activities associated with the Neptune Port might include one or more
of the following: tolerance; masking of natural sounds; behavioral
disturbance; non-auditory physical effects; and, at least in theory,
temporary or permanent hearing impairment (Richardson et al., 1995).
However, for reasons discussed in the Notice of Proposed IHA (75 FR
24906, May 6, 2010) and later in this document, it is unlikely that
there would be any cases of temporary, or especially permanent, hearing
impairment resulting from these activities. As outlined in previous
NMFS documents, the effects of noise on marine mammals are highly
variable, and can be categorized as follows (based on Richardson et
al., 1995):
(1) The noise may be too weak to be heard at the location of the
animal (i.e., lower than the prevailing ambient noise level, the
hearing threshold of the animal at relevant frequencies, or both);
(2) The noise may be audible but not strong enough to elicit any
overt behavioral response;
(3) The noise may elicit reactions of variable conspicuousness and
variable relevance to the well being of the marine mammal; these can
range from temporary alert responses to active avoidance reactions such
as vacating an area at least until the noise event ceases but
potentially for longer periods of time;
(4) Upon repeated exposure, a marine mammal may exhibit diminishing
responsiveness (habituation), or disturbance effects may persist; the
latter is most likely with sounds that are highly variable in
characteristics, infrequent, and unpredictable in occurrence, and
associated with situations that a marine mammal perceives as a threat;
(5) Any anthropogenic noise that is strong enough to be heard has
the potential to reduce (mask) the ability of a marine mammal to hear
natural sounds at similar frequencies, including calls from
conspecifics, and underwater environmental sounds such as surf noise;
(6) If mammals remain in an area because it is important for
feeding, breeding, or some other biologically important purpose even
though there is chronic exposure to noise, it is possible that there
could be noise-induced physiological stress; this might in turn have
negative effects on the well-being or reproduction of the animals
involved; and
(7) Very strong sounds have the potential to cause a temporary or
permanent reduction in hearing sensitivity. In terrestrial mammals, and
presumably marine mammals, received sound levels must far exceed the
animal's hearing threshold for there to be any temporary threshold
shift (TTS) in its hearing ability. For transient sounds, the sound
level necessary to cause TTS is inversely related to the duration of
the sound. Received sound levels must be even higher for there to be
risk of permanent hearing impairment. In addition, intense acoustic or
explosive events may cause trauma to tissues associated with organs
vital for hearing, sound production, respiration and other functions.
This trauma may include minor to severe hemorrhage.
The Notice of Proposed IHA (75 FR 24906, May 6, 2010) included a
discussion of the effects of anthropogenic sound on mysticetes,
odontocetes, and pinnipeds, including tolerance, masking, disturbance,
and hearing impairment and other physiological effects. That discussion
did not take into consideration the monitoring and mitigation measures
proposed by Neptune and NMFS. Based on the discussion contained in the
proposed IHA notice, it is highly unlikely that marine mammals could
receive sounds strong enough (and over a sufficient duration) to cause
permanent threshold shift (or even TTS) during port operations and
maintenance/repair activities. The modeled broadband source level for
100 percent thruster use during port operations is 180 dB re 1 microPa
at 1 m (rms). This does not reach the threshold of 190 dB currently
used for pinnipeds. The threshold for cetaceans is 180 dB; therefore,
cetaceans would have to be immediately adjacent to the vessel for even
the possibility of hearing impairment to occur. Based on this and
mitigation measures included in the IHA (described later in this
document in the ``Mitigation'' section), only Level B behavioral
harassment is anticipated occur, and it is highly unlikely that any
type of hearing impairment would occur as a result of Neptune's
activities.
Anticipated Effects on Habitat
The primary potential impacts to marine mammals and other marine
[[Page 41443]]
species are associated with elevated sound levels produced by the Port
operations and maintenance/repair activities. However, other potential
impacts from physical disturbance are also possible. Major repairs to
the Neptune port and pipeline may affect marine mammal habitat in
several ways: cause disturbance of the seafloor; increase turbidity
slightly; and generate additional underwater sound in the area. These
underwater sound levels will cause some species to temporarily disperse
from or avoid repair areas, but they are expected to return shortly
after the repair is completed. Operation of the Port will result in
long-term, continued disturbance of the seafloor, regular withdrawal of
seawater, and generation of underwater sound. The Notice of Proposed
IHA (75 FR 24906, May 6, 2010) contained a full discussion of the
potential impacts to marine mammal habitat and prey species in the
project area.
NMFS determined that repair activities would not create long-term
habitat changes, and marine mammals displaced by the disturbance to the
seafloor are expected to return soon after repair activities cease.
Marine mammals also could be indirectly affected if benthic prey
species were displaced or destroyed by repair activities. However,
affected species are expected to recover soon after the completion of
repairs and will represent only a small portion of food available to
marine mammals in the area. In conclusion, NMFS has determined that
Neptune's port operations and maintenance/repair activities are not
expected to have any habitat-related effects that could cause
significant or long-term consequences for individual marine mammals or
on the food sources that they utilize.
Mitigation
In order to issue an incidental take authorization (ITA) under
Sections 101(a)(5)(A) and (D) of the MMPA, NMFS must, where applicable,
set forth the permissible methods of taking pursuant to such activity,
and other means of effecting the least practicable impact on such
species or stock and its habitat, paying particular attention to
rookeries, mating grounds, and areas of similar significance, and on
the availability of such species or stock for taking for certain
subsistence uses (where relevant).
Mitigation Measures in Neptune's IHA Application
Neptune submitted a ``Marine Mammal Detection, Monitoring, and
Response Plan for the Operations Phase'' (the Plan) as part of its MMPA
application (Appendix D of the application; see ADDRESSES). The
measures, which include safety zones and vessel speed reductions, are
fully described in the Plan and summarized here. Any maintenance and/or
repairs needed will be scheduled in advance during the May 1 to
November 30 seasonal window, whenever possible, so that disturbance to
North Atlantic right whales will be largely avoided. If the repair
cannot be scheduled during this time frame, additional mitigation
measures are required.
(1) Mitigation Measures for Major Repairs (May 1 to November 30)
(A) During repairs, if a marine mammal is detected within 0.5 mi
(0.8 km) of the repair vessel, the vessel superintendent or on-deck
supervisor will be notified immediately. The vessel's crew will be put
on a heightened state of alert. The marine mammal will be monitored
constantly to determine if it is moving toward the repair area.
(B) Repair vessels will cease any movement in the area if a marine
mammal other than a right whale is sighted within or approaching to a
distance of 100 yd (91 m) from the operating repair vessel. Repair
vessels will cease any movement in the construction area if a right
whale is sighted within or approaching to a distance of 500 yd (457 m)
from the operating vessel. Vessels transiting the repair area, such as
pipe haul barge tugs, will also be required to maintain these
separation distances.
(C) Repair vessels will cease all sound emitting activities if a
marine mammal other than a right whale is sighted within or approaching
to a distance of 100 yd (91 m) or if a right whale is sighted within or
approaching to a distance of 500 yd (457 m), from the operating repair
vessel. The back-calculated source level, based on the most
conservative cylindrical model of acoustic energy spreading, is
estimated to be 139 dB re 1 microPa.
(D) Repair activities may resume after the marine mammal is
positively reconfirmed outside the established zones (either 500 yd
(457 m) or 100 yd (91 m), depending upon species).
(E) While under way, all repair vessels will remain 500 yd (457 m)
away from right whales and 100 yd (91 m) away from all other marine
mammals to the extent physically feasible given navigational
constraints.
(F) All repair vessels 300 gross tons or greater will maintain a
speed of 10 knots (18.5 km/hr) or less. Vessels less than 300 gross
tons carrying supplies or crew between the shore and the repair site
will contact the Mandatory Ship Reporting System (MSRS), the USCG, or
the marine mammal observers (MMOs) at the repair site before leaving
shore for reports of recent right whale sightings or active Dynamic
Management Areas (DMAs) and, consistent with navigation safety,
restrict speeds to 10 knots (18.5 km/hr) or less within 5 mi (8 km) of
any recent sighting location and within any existing DMA.
(G) Vessels transiting through the Cape Cod Canal and Cape Cod Bay
(CCB) between January 1 and May 15 will reduce speeds to 10 knots (18.5
km/hr) or less, follow the recommended routes charted by NOAA to reduce
interactions between right whales and shipping traffic, and avoid
aggregations of right whales in the eastern portion of CCB.
(2) Additional Port and Pipeline Major Repair Measures (December 1 to
April 30)
If unplanned/emergency repair activities cannot be conducted
between May 1 and November 30, Neptune is required to implement the
following additional mitigation measures:
(A) If on-board MMOs do not have at least 0.5-mi (0.8-km)
visibility, they shall call for a shutdown of repair activities. If
dive operations are in progress, then they shall be halted and brought
on board until visibility is adequate to see a 0.5-mi (0.8-km) range.
At the time of shutdown, the use of thrusters must be minimized. If
there are potential safety problems due to the shutdown, the captain
will decide what operations can safely be shut down and will document
such activities.
(B) Prior to leaving the dock to begin transit, the barge will
contact one of the MMOs on watch to receive an update of sightings
within the visual observation area. If the MMO has observed a North
Atlantic right whale within 30 minutes of the transit start, the vessel
will hold for 30 minutes and again get a clearance to leave from the
MMOs on board. MMOs will assess whale activity and visual observation
ability at the time of the transit request to clear the barge for
release.
(C) A half-day training course will be provided to designated crew
members assigned to the transit barges and other support vessels. These
designated crew members will be required to keep watch on the bridge
and immediately notify the navigator of any whale sightings. All watch
crew will sign into a bridge log book upon start and end of watch.
Transit route, destination, sea conditions, and any protected species
sightings/mitigation actions during
[[Page 41444]]
watch will be recorded in the log book. Any whale sightings within
3,281 ft (1,000 m) of the vessel will result in a high alert and slow
speed of 4 knots (7.4 km/hr) or less. A sighting within 2,461 ft (750
m) will result in idle speed and/or ceasing all movement.
(D) The material barges and tugs used for repair work shall transit
from the operations dock to the work sites during daylight hours, when
possible, provided the safety of the vessels is not compromised. Should
transit at night be required, the maximum speed of the tug will be 5
knots (9.3 km/hr).
(E) Consistent with navigation safety, all repair vessels must
maintain a speed of 10 knots (18.5 km/hr) or less during daylight
hours. All vessels will operate at 5 knots or less at all times within
3.1 mi (5 km) of the repair area.
(3) Speed Restrictions in Seasonal Management Areas (SMAs)
Repair vessels and SRVs will transit at 10 knots (18.5 km/hr) or
less in the following seasons and areas, which either correspond to or
are more restrictive than the times and areas in NMFS' final rule (73
FR 60173, October 10, 2008) to implement speed restrictions to reduce
the likelihood and severity of ship strikes of right whales:
CCB SMA from January 1 through May 15, which includes all
waters in CCB, extending to all shorelines of the Bay, with a northern
boundary of 42[deg] 12' N. latitude;
Off Race Point SMA year round, which is bounded by
straight lines connecting the following coordinates in the order
stated: 42[deg] 30' N. 69[deg] 45' W.; thence to 42[deg] 30' N. 70[deg]
30' W.; thence to 42[deg] 12' N. 70[deg] 30' W.; thence to 42[deg] 12'
N. 70[deg] 12' W.; thence to 42[deg] 04' 56.5'' N. 70[deg] 12' W.;
thence along mean high water line and inshore limits of COLREGS limit
to a latitude of 41[deg] 40' N.; thence due east to 41[deg] 41' N.
69[deg] 45' W.; thence back to starting point; and
Great South Channel (GSC) SMA from April 1 through July
31, which is bounded by straight lines connecting the following
coordinates in the order stated:
42[deg] 30' N. 69[deg] 45' W.
41[deg] 40' N. 69[deg] 45' W.
41[deg] 00' N. 69[deg] 05' W.
42[deg] 09' N. 67[deg] 08' 24'' W.
42[deg] 30' N. 67[deg] 27' W.
42[deg] 30' N. 69[deg] 45' W.
(4) Additional Mitigation Measures
(A) In approaching and departing from the Neptune Port, SRVs shall
use the Boston Traffic Separation Scheme (TSS) starting and ending at
the entrance to the GSC. Upon entering the TSS, the SRV shall go into a
``heightened awareness'' mode of operation, which is outlined in detail
in the Plan (see Neptune's application).
(B) In the event that a whale is visually observed within 0.6 mi (1
km) of the Port or a confirmed acoustic detection is reported on either
of the two auto-detection buoys (ABs; more information on the acoustic
devices is contained in the ``Monitoring and Reporting'' section later
in this document) closest to the Port, departing SRVs shall delay their
departure from the Port, unless extraordinary circumstances, defined in
the Plan, require that the departure is not delayed. The departure
delay shall continue until either the observed whale has been visually
(during daylight hours) confirmed as more than 0.6 mi (1 km) from the
Port or 30 minutes have passed without another confirmed detection
either acoustically within the acoustic detection range of the two ABs
closest to the Port or visually within 0.6 mi (1 km) from Neptune.
(C) SRVs that are approaching or departing from the Port and are
within the Area to be Avoided (ATBA) surrounding Neptune shall remain
at least 0.6 mi (1 km) away from any visually detected right whales and
at least 100 yards (91 meters) away from all other visually detected
whales unless extraordinary circumstances, as defined in Section 1.2 of
the Plan in Neptune's application, require that the vessel stay its
course. The ATBA is defined in 33 CFR 150.940. It is the largest area
of the Port marked on nautical charts and it is enforceable by the USCG
in accordance with the 150.900 regulations. The Vessel Master shall
designate at least one lookout to be exclusively and continuously
monitoring for the presence of marine mammals at all times while the
SRV is approaching or departing Neptune.
(D) Neptune will ensure that other vessels providing support to
Neptune operations during regasification activities that are
approaching or departing from the Port and are within the ATBA shall be
operated so as to remain at least 0.6 mi (1 km) away from any visually
detected right whales and at least 100 yd (91 m) from all other
visually detected whales.
Additional Mitigation Measures Required by NMFS
In addition to the mitigation measures in Neptune's IHA
application, NMFS has included the following measures in the IHA in
order to ensure the least practicable impact on the affected species or
stocks:
(1) Neptune must immediately suspend any repair and maintenance or
operations activities if a dead or injured marine mammal is found in
the vicinity of the project area, and the death or injury of the animal
could be attributable to the LNG facility activities. Neptune must
contact NMFS and the Northeast Stranding and Disentanglement Program.
Activities will not resume until review and approval has been given by
NMFS.
(2) MMOs will direct a moving vessel to slow to idle if a baleen
whale is seen less than 0.6 mi (1 km) from the vessel.
(3) Use of lights during repair or maintenance activities shall be
limited to areas where work is actually occurring, and all other lights
must be extinguished. Lights must be downshielded to illuminate the
deck and shall not intentionally illuminate surrounding waters, so as
not to attract whales or their prey to the area.
Mitigation Conclusions
NMFS has carefully evaluated the applicant's mitigation measures
and considered a range of other measures in the context of ensuring
that NMFS prescribes the means of effecting the least practicable
impact on the affected marine mammal species and stocks and their
habitat. Our evaluation of potential measures included consideration of
the following factors in relation to one another:
The manner in which, and the degree to which, the
successful implementation of the measure is expected to minimize
adverse impacts to marine mammals;
The proven or likely efficacy of the specific measure to
minimize adverse impacts as planned; and
The practicability of the measure for applicant
implementation.
Based on our evaluation of the applicant's measures, as well as
other measures considered by NMFS, NMFS has determined that the
required mitigation measures provide the means of effecting the least
practicable impact on marine mammal species or stocks and their
habitat, paying particular attention to rookeries, mating grounds, and
areas of similar significance.
Monitoring and Reporting
In order to issue an ITA for an activity, Section 101(a)(5)(D) of
the MMPA states that NMFS must, where applicable, set forth
``requirements pertaining to the monitoring and reporting of such
taking''. The MMPA implementing regulations at 50 CFR 216.104 (a)(13)
indicate that requests for ITAs must include the suggested means of
accomplishing the necessary monitoring and reporting that will result
in increased knowledge of the species
[[Page 41445]]
and of the level of taking or impacts on populations of marine mammals
that are expected to be present in the proposed action area.
Neptune proposed both visual and acoustic monitoring programs in
the Plan contained in the IHA application. Summaries of those plans, as
well as the proposed reporting, are contained next. The monitoring and
reporting programs contained in the Plan are included in the IHA.
Passive Acoustic Monitoring
Neptune LNG will deploy and maintain a passive acoustic detection
network along a portion of the TSS and in the vicinity of Neptune. This
network will consisting of autonomous recording units (ARUs) and near-
real-time ABs. To develop, implement, collect, and analyze the acoustic
data obtained from deployment of the ARUs and ABs, as well as to
prepare reports and maintain the passive acoustic detection network,
Neptune LNG has engaged the Cornell University Bioacoustic Research
Program (BRP) in Ithaca, New York, and the Woods Hole Oceanographic
Institution (WHOI) in Woods Hole, Massachusetts.
During June 2008, an array of 19 passive seafloor ARUs was deployed
by BRP for Neptune. The layout of the array centered on the terminal
site and was used to monitor the noise environment in Massachusetts Bay
in the vicinity of Neptune during construction of the port and
associated pipeline lateral. The ARUs were not designed to provide
real-time or near-real-time information about vocalizing whales. Rather
archival noise data collected from the ARU array were used for the
purpose of understanding the seasonal occurrences and overall
distributions of whales (primarily North Atlantic right whales) within
approximately 10 nm (18.5 km) of the Neptune Port. Neptune LNG will
maintain these ARUs in the same configuration for a period of five
years during full operation of Neptune in order to monitor the actual
acoustic output of port operations and to alert NOAA to any
unanticipated adverse effects of port operations, such as large scale
abandonment by marine mammals of the area. To further assist in
evaluations of the Neptune's acoustic output, source levels associated
with DP of SRVs at the buoys will be estimated using empirical
measurements collected from the passive detection network.
In addition to the ARUs, Neptune LNG has deployed 10 ABs within the
Separation Zone of the TSS for the operational life of the Port. The
purpose of the AB array is to detect the presence of vocalizing North
Atlantic right whales. Each AB has an average detection range of 5 nm
(9.3 km) of the AB, although detection ranges will vary based on
ambient underwater conditions. The AB system will be the primary
detection mechanism that alerts the SRV Master to the occurrence of
right whales in the TSS and triggers heightened SRV awareness. The
configurations of the ARU array and AB network (see Figure 3 in the
Plan in Neptune's application) were based upon the configurations
developed and recommended by NOAA personnel.
Each AB deployed in the TSS will continuously screen the low-
frequency acoustic environment (less than 1,000 Hz) for right whale
contact calls occurring within an approximately
5-nm (9.3-km) radius from each buoy (the ABs' detection range) and
rank detections on a scale from 1 to 10. Each AB shall transmit all
detection data for detections of rank greater than or equal to 6 via
Iridium satellite link to the BRP server website every 20 minutes. This
20-minute transmission schedule was determined by consideration of a
combination of factors including the tendency of right whale calls to
occur in clusters (leading to a sampling logic of listening for other
calls rather than transmitting immediately upon detection of a possible
call) and the amount of battery power required to complete a satellite
transmission. Additional details on the protocol can be found in
Neptune's application.
Additionally, Neptune shall provide empirically measured source
level data for all sources of noise associated with LNG port
maintenance and repair activities. Measurements should be carefully
coordinated with noise-producing activities and should be collected
from the passive acoustic monitoring network.
Visual Monitoring
During maintenance- and repair-related activities, Neptune LNG
shall employ two qualified MMOs on each vessel that has a DP system.
All MMOs must receive training and be approved in advance by NOAA after
a review of their qualifications. Qualifications for these MMOs shall
include direct field experience on a marine mammal observation vessel
and/or aerial surveys in the Atlantic Ocean/Gulf of Mexico. The MMOs
(one primary and one secondary) are responsible for visually locating
marine mammals at the ocean's surface and, to the extent possible,
identifying the species. The primary MMO shall act as the
identification specialist, and the secondary MMO will serve as data
recorder and will assist with identification. Both MMOs shall have
responsibility for monitoring for the presence of marine mammals.
The MMOs shall monitor the area where maintenance and repair work
is conducted beginning at daybreak using the naked eye, hand-held
binoculars, and/or power binoculars (e.g, Big Eyes). The MMOs shall
scan the ocean surface by eye for a minimum of 40 minutes every hour.
All sightings must be recorded on marine mammal field sighting logs.
While an SRV is navigating within the designated TSS, three people
have lookout duties on or near the bridge of the ship including the SRV
Master, the Officer-of-the-Watch, and the Helmsman on watch. In
addition to standard watch procedures, while the SRV is within the ATBA
and/or while actively engaging in the use of thrusters an additional
lookout shall be designated to exclusively and continuously monitor for
marine mammals. Once the SRV is moored and regasification activities
have begun, the vessel is no longer considered in ``heightened
awareness'' status. However, when regasification activities conclude
and the SRV prepares to depart from Neptune, the Master shall once
again ensure that the responsibilities as defined in the Plan are
carried out. All sightings of marine mammals by the designated lookout,
individuals posted to navigational lookout duties, and/or any other
crew member while the SRV is within the TSS, in transit to the ATBA,
within the ATBA, and/or when actively engaging in the use of thrusters
shall be immediately reported to the Officer-of-the-Watch who shall
then alert the Master.
Reporting Measures
Since the Neptune Port is within the Mandatory Ship Reporting Area
(MSRA), all SRVs transiting to and from Neptune shall report their
activities to the mandatory reporting section of the USCG to remain
apprised of North Atlantic right whale movements within the area. All
vessels entering and exiting the MSRA shall report their activities to
WHALESNORTH. Vessel operators shall contact the USCG by standard
procedures promulgated through the Notice to Mariner system.
For any repair work associated with the pipeline lateral or other
port components, Neptune LNG shall notify the appropriate NOAA
personnel as soon as practicable after it is determined that repair
work must be conducted. During maintenance and repair of the pipeline
lateral or other port components, weekly status reports must be
provided to NOAA. The weekly
[[Page 41446]]
report must include data collected for each distinct marine mammal
species observed in the project area during the period of the repair
activity. The weekly reports shall include the following:
The location, time, and nature of the pipeline lateral
repair activities;
Whether the DP system was operated and, if so, the number
of thrusters used and the time and duration of DP operation;
Marine mammals observed in the area (number, species, age
group, and initial behavior);
The distance of observed marine mammals from the repair
activities;
Observed marine mammal behaviors during the sighting;
Whether any mitigation measures were implemented;
Weather conditions (sea state, wind speed, wind direction,
ambient temperature, precipitation, and percent cloud cover, etc.);
Condition of the marine mammal observation (visibility and
glare); and
Details of passive acoustic detections and any action
taken in response to those detections.
For minor repairs and maintenance activities, the following
protocols will be followed:
All vessel crew members will be trained in marine mammal
identification and avoidance procedures;
Repair vessels will notify designated NOAA personnel when
and where the repair/maintenance work is to take place along with a
tentative schedule and description of the work;
Vessel crews will record/document any marine mammal
sightings during the work period; and
At the conclusion of the repair/maintenance work, a report
will be delivered to designated NOAA personnel describing any marine
mammal sightings, the type of work taking place when the sighting
occurred, and any avoidance actions taken during the repair/maintenance
work.
During all phases of project repair/maintenance activities and
operation, sightings of any injured or dead marine mammals will be
reported immediately to the USCG and NMFS, regardless of whether the
injury or death is caused by project activities. Sightings of injured
or dead marine mammals not associated with project activities can be
reported to the USCG on VHF Channel 16 or to NMFS Stranding and
Entanglement Hotline. In addition, if the injury or death was caused by
a project vessel (e.g., SRV, support vessel, or construction vessel),
USCG must be notified immediately, and a full report must be provided
to NMFS, Northeast Regional Office. The report must include the
following information: (1) the time, date, and location (latitude/
longitude) of the incident; (2) the name and type of vessel involved;
(3) the vessel's speed during the incident; (4) a description of the
incident; (5) water depth; (6) environmental conditions (e.g., wind
speed and direction, sea state, cloud cover, and visibility); (7) the
species identification or description of the animal; (8) the fate of
the animal; and (9) photographs or video footage of the animal (if
equipment is available).
An annual report on marine mammal monitoring and mitigation will be
submitted to NMFS Office of Protected Resources and NMFS Northeast
Regional Office within 90 days after the expiration of the IHA. The
weekly reports and the annual report should include data collected for
each distinct marine mammal species observed in the project area in the
Massachusetts Bay during the period of LNG facility operations and
repair/maintenance activities. Description of marine mammal behavior,
overall numbers of individuals observed, frequency of observation, and
any behavioral changes and the context of the changes relative to
operation and repair/maintenance activities shall also be included in
the annual report. Additional information that will be recorded during
operations and repair/maintenance activities and contained in the
reports include: date and time of marine mammal detections (visually or
acoustically), weather conditions, species identification, approximate
distance from the source, activity of the vessel when a marine mammal
is sighted, and whether thrusters were in use and, if so, how many at
the time of the sighting.
General Conclusions Drawn from Previous Monitoring Reports
Throughout the construction period, Neptune submitted weekly
reports on marine mammal sightings in the area. While it is difficult
to draw biological conclusions from these reports, NMFS can make some
general conclusions. Data gathered by MMOs is generally useful to
indicate the presence or absence of marine mammals (often to a species
level) within the safety zones (and sometimes without) and to document
the implementation of mitigation measures. Though it is by no means
conclusory, it is worth noting that no instances of obvious behavioral
disturbance as a result of Neptune's activities were observed by the
MMOs. Of course, these observations only cover the animals that were at
the surface and within the distance that the MMOs could see. Based on
the number of sightings contained in the weekly reports, it appears
that NMFS' estimated take levels are accurate. As operation of the Port
has not yet commenced, there are no reports describing the results of
the visual monitoring program for this phase of the project. However,
it is anticipated that visual observations will be able to continue as
they were during construction.
As described previously in this document, Neptune was required to
maintain an acoustic array to monitor calling North Atlantic right
whales (humpback and fin whale calls were also able to be detected).
Cornell BRP analyzed the data and submitted a report covering the
initial construction phase of the project, which occurred in 2008.
While acoustic data can only be collected if the animals are actively
calling, the report indicates that humpback and fin whales were heard
calling on at least some of the ARUs on all construction days, and
right whale calls were heard only 28 percent of the time during active
construction days. The passive acoustic arrays will remain deployed
during the time frame of this IHA in order to obtain information during
the operational phase of the Port facility.
Estimated Take by Incidental Harassment
Except with respect to certain activities not pertinent here, the
MMPA defines ``harassment'' as: any act of pursuit, torment, or
annoyance which (i) has the potential to injure a marine mammal or
marine mammal stock in the wild [Level A harassment]; or (ii) has the
potential to disturb a marine mammal or marine mammal stock in the wild
by causing disruption of behavioral patterns, including, but not
limited to, migration, breathing, nursing, breeding, feeding, or
sheltering [Level B harassment]. Only take by Level B harassment is
anticipated as a result of Neptune's operational and repair/maintenance
activities. Anticipated take of marine mammals is associated with
thruster sound during maneuvering of the SRVs while docking and
undocking, occasional weathervaning at the Port, and during thruster
use of DP maintenance vessels should a major repair be necessary. The
regasification process itself is an activity that does not rise to the
level of taking, as the modeled source level for this activity is 110
dB (rms). Certain species may have a behavioral reaction to the sound
emitted during the activities. Hearing impairment is not anticipated.
Additionally, vessel strikes are not anticipated, especially because of
the speed restriction measures that are
[[Page 41447]]
proposed that were described earlier in this document.
For continuous sounds, such as those produced by Neptune's proposed
activities, NMFS uses a received level of 120-dB (rms) to indicate the
onset of Level B harassment. The basis for Neptune's ``take'' estimate
is the number of marine mammals that potentially could be exposed to
sound levels in excess of 120 dB. This has been determined by applying
the modeled zone of influence (ZOI; e.g., the area ensonified by the
120-dB contour) to the seasonal use (density) of the area by marine
mammals and correcting for seasonal duration of sound-generating
activities and estimated duration of individual activities when the
maximum sound-generating activities are intermittent to occasional.
Nearly all of the required information is readily available in the
MARAD/USCG Final EIS, with the exception of marine mammal density
estimates for the project area. In the case of data gaps, a
conservative approach was used to ensure that the potential number of
takes is not underestimated.
The Notice of Proposed IHA (75 FR 24906, May 6, 2010) included an
in-depth discussion of the methodology used by NMFS to estimate take by
harassment incidental to operation and repair/maintenance activities at
the Neptune Port facility. A summary is provided next.
Results of sound modeling tests indicate that the 120-dB radius
from thruster use by the SRV is estimated to be 1.6 nm (3 km), creating
a maximum ZOI of 8.5 nm\2\ (29 km\2\). This zone is smaller than the
one that was used to estimate the level of take in the previous IHA.
However, the vessels used in the 2009 tests more closely resemble the
vessels that will be used by Neptune for regasification by the SRV.
Other vessels would be required for use during maintenance and repair
activities at the port facility. Sounds generated during those
activities would be similar or less than those generated during
original construction of the facility. Therefore, NMFS has used the
120-dB contour estimated for construction in the previous IHAs for
repair and maintenance activities. Depending on water depth, the 120-dB
contour during repair and maintenance activities will extend from the
source (the Port) out to 3.9 km (2.1 nm) and cover an area of 52 km\2\
(15 nm\2\).
NMFS used the data on cetacean distribution within Massachusetts
Bay, such as those published by the National Centers for Coastal Ocean
Science (NCCOS, 2006), to determine potential takes of marine mammals
in the vicinity of the project area. Sighting data for the following
species are contained in the report: North Atlantic right, fin,
humpback, minke, pilot, and sei whales and Atlantic white-sided
dolphins. The NCCOS study used cetacean sightings from two sources: (1)
the North Atlantic Right Whale Consortium (NARWC) sightings database
held at the University of Rhode Island (Kenney, 2001); and (2) the
Manomet Bird Observatory (MBO) database, held at the NMFS Northeast
Fisheries Science Center (NEFSC). The NCCOS study then combined these
two data sets by extracting cetacean sighting records, updating
database field names to match the NARWC database, creating geometry to
represent survey tracklines and applying a set of data selection
criteria designed to minimize uncertainty and bias in the data used.
For a detailed description and calculation of the cetacean
abundance data and sightings-per-unit-effort (SPUE), refer to the NCCOS
study (NCCOS, 2006). SPUE for all four seasons were analyzed, and the
highest value SPUE for the season with the highest abundance of each
species was used to determine relative abundance. Based on the data,
the relative abundance of North Atlantic right, fin, humpback, minke,
sei, and pilot whales and Atlantic white-sided dolphins, as calculated
by SPUE in number of animals per square kilometer, is 0.0082, 0.0097,
0.0265, 0.0059, 0.0084, 0.0407, and 0.1314 n/km, respectively. Table 1
in this document outlines the density, abundance, take estimates, and
percent of population for the 14 species for which NMFS has authorized
Level B harassment.
In calculating the area density of these species from these linear
density data, NMFS used 0.4 km (0.25 mi), which is a quarter the
distance of the radius for visual monitoring, as a conservative
hypothetical strip width (W). Thus the area density (D) of these
species in the project area can be obtained by the following formula:
D = SPUE/2W.
Based on the calculation, the estimated take numbers by Level B
harassment for the 1-year IHA period during operation of the SRV for
North Atlantic right, fin, humpback, minke, sei, and pilot whales and
Atlantic white-sided dolphins, within the 120-dB ZOI of the LNG Port
facility area of approximately 8.5 nm\2\ (29 km\2\) maximum ZOI,
corrected for 50 percent underwater, are 23, 27, 72, 16, 6, 110, and
357, respectively. This estimate is based on an estimated 50 SRV trips
for the period July 12, 2010, through July 11, 2011, that will produce
sounds of 120 dB or greater.
Based on the same calculation method described above for Port
operations (but using the 120-dB ZOI of approximately 52 km\2\ (15
nm\2\), the estimated take numbers by Level B harassment for North
Atlantic right, fin, humpback, minke, sei, and pilot whales and
Atlantic white-sided dolphins for the 1-year IHA period incidental to
Port maintenance and repair activities, corrected for 50 percent
underwater, are 11, 13, 36, 8, 11, 56, and 179, respectively. These
numbers are based on 14 days of repair and maintenance activities
occurring between July 12, 2010, through July 11, 2011. It is unlikely
that this much repair and maintenance work would be required this soon
after completion of the construction phase of the facility.
The total estimated take of these species as a result of both
operations and repair and maintenance activities of the Neptune Port
facility between July 12, 2010, through July 11, 2011, is: 33 North
Atlantic right whales; 40 fin whales; 108 humpback whales; 24 minke
whales; 17 sei whales; 166 long-finned pilot whales; and 536 Atlantic
white-sided dolphins. These numbers represent a maximum of 9.6, 1.8,
12.8, 0.7, 4.4, 0.5, and 0.8 percent of the populations for these
species or stocks in the western North Atlantic, respectively. It is
likely that individual animals will be ``taken'' by harassment multiple
times (because certain individuals may occur in the area more than once
while other individuals of the population or stock may not enter the
proposed project area). Additionally, the highest value SPUE for the
season with the highest abundance of each species was used to determine
relative abundance. Moreover, it is not expected that Neptune will have
50 SRV transits and LNG deliveries in the first year of operations.
Therefore, these percentages are the upper boundary of the animal
population that could be affected. Thus, the actual number of
individual animals being exposed or taken is expected to be far less.
In addition, bottlenose dolphins, common dolphins, Risso's
dolphins, killer whales, harbor porpoises, harbor seals, and gray seals
could also be taken by Level B harassment as a result of the deepwater
LNG port project. Because these species are less likely to occur in the
area, and there are no density estimates specific to this particular
area, NMFS based the take estimates on typical group size. Therefore,
NMFS estimates (and has authorized) that up to approximately 10
bottlenose dolphins, 20 common dolphins, 20 Risso's dolphins, 20 killer
whales, 5 harbor porpoises, 15 harbor seals, and
[[Page 41448]]
15 gray seals could be exposed to continuous noise at or above 120 dB
re 1 microPa rms incidental to operations and repair and maintenance
activities during the one year period of the IHA, respectively.
Because Massachusetts Bay represents only a small fraction of the
western North Atlantic basin where these animals occur NMFS has
determined that only small numbers of the affected marine mammal
species or stocks would be potentially affected by the Neptune LNG
deepwater project. The take estimates presented in this section of the
document do not take into consideration the mitigation and monitoring
measures required by the IHA.
Table 1. Density estimates, population abundance estimates, total authorized take (when combine takes from operation and maintenance/repair activities),
and percentage of population that may be taken for the potential affected species.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Authorized Take
Species Density (n/km\2\) Abundance\1\ (operation & Percentage of Stock or
maintenance) Population
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
North Atlantic right whale 0.0082 345 33 9.6
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fin whale 0.0097 2,269 40 1.8
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Humpback whale 0.0265 847 108 12.8
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Minke whale 0.0059 3,312 24 0.7
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sei whale 0.0084 386 17 4.4
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Long-finned pilot whale 0.0407 31,139 166 0.5
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Atlantic white-sided dolphin 0.1314 63,368 536 0.8
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bottlenose dolphin NA 7,489 10 0.1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Common dolphin NA 120,743 20 0.02
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Risso's dolphin NA 20,479 20 0.1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Killer whale NA NA 20 NA
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Harbor porpoise NA 89,054 5 0.01
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Harbor seal NA 99,340 15 0.02
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gray seal NA 125,541-169,064 15 0.01
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Abundance estimates taken from NMFS Atlantic and Gulf of Mexico SAR; NA=Not Available
NMFS has defined ``negligible impact'' in 50 CFR 21