Report to Congress on Abnormal Occurrences Fiscal Year 2009; Dissemination of Information, 41553-41556 [2010-17373]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 136 / Friday, July 16, 2010 / Notices
Michael P. McDonald,
Advisory Committee, Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2010–17408 Filed 7–15–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7536–01–P
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
[NRC–2010–0238]
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
Report to Congress on Abnormal
Occurrences Fiscal Year 2009;
Dissemination of Information
Section 208 of the Energy
Reorganization Act of 1974 (Pub. L. 93–
438) defines an abnormal occurrence
(AO) as an unscheduled incident or
event which the U.S. Nuclear
Regulatory Commission (NRC)
determines to be significant from the
standpoint of public health or safety.
The Federal Reports Elimination and
Sunset Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–68)
requires that AOs be reported to
Congress annually. During Fiscal Year
2009, nine events that occurred at
facilities licensed or otherwise regulated
by the NRC and/or Agreement States
were determined to be AOs. The report
describes three events at NRC-licensed
facilities. All three NRC-licensee events
were medical events, as defined in Title
10, Part 35, of the Code of Federal
Regulations (10 CFR part 35). The report
also describes six events at Agreement
State-licensed facilities. [Agreement
States are those States that have entered
into formal agreements with the NRC
pursuant to Section 274 of the Atomic
Energy Act (AEA) to regulate certain
quantities of AEA licensed material at
facilities located within their borders.]
Currently, there are 37 Agreement
States. The first two Agreement Statelicensee events involved radiation
exposure to an embryo/fetus. The other
four Agreement State-licensee events
were medical events, as defined in 10
CFR part 35, and occurred at medical
institutions. As required by Section 208,
the discussion for each event includes
the date and place, nature and probable
consequences, the cause or causes, and
the actions taken to prevent recurrence.
Each event is also being described in
NUREG–0090, Vol. 32, ‘‘Report to
Congress on Abnormal Occurrences:
Fiscal Year 2009.’’ This report is
available electronically at the NRC Web
site https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doccollections/nuregs/staff/.
18:00 Jul 15, 2010
Jkt 220001
There are three major categories of
events reported in this document: I. For
All Licensees, II. For Commercial
Nuclear Power Plant Licensees, and III.
Events at Facilities Other Than Nuclear
Power Plants and All Transportation
Events. The full report, available on the
NRC Web site, provides the specific
criteria for determining when an event
is an abnormal occurrence (AO) and
discusses ‘‘Other Events of Interest’’ that
do not meet the AO criteria but which
the Commission has determined should
be included in the report. The event
identification number begins with ‘‘AS’’
for Agreement State AO events and
‘‘NRC’’ for NRC AO events.
potential health effects to the embryo/
fetus.
Cause(s)—The cause of this event was
the close proximity of conception,
which resulted in a negative pregnancy
test, to the administration of iodine-131.
Actions Taken To Prevent Recurrence:
Licensee—The licensee is providing
additional instructions to its staff to
strongly emphasize to patients the risks
associated with being pregnant prior to
the administration of radioiodine
treatments.
State—The State conducted a followup inspection and did not take any
enforcement action regarding this event.
*
*
*
*
*
I. For All Licensees
Room: 315.
Program: This meeting will review
applications for Modern European
History II in Fellowships, submitted to
the Division of Research Programs at the
May 4, 2010 deadline.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
41553
AS09–02 Human Exposure to
Radiation at Loyola University Medical
Center in Maywood, Illinois
Date and Place—September 21, 2009,
Maywood, Illinois.
Nature and Probable Consequences—
Loyola University Medical Center (the
licensee) reported that the
administration of 925 MBq (25 mCi) of
iodine-131 resulted in a dose to an
embryo/fetus of 67 mSv (6.7 rem). Prior
to the administration of iodine-131, a
urinary pregnancy test was conducted
by the licensee on September 21, 2009,
and it yielded a negative result. On
September 29, 2009, the patient notified
the licensee that she took a home
pregnancy test and it was positive. The
patient’s pregnancy was confirmed by
an independent clinic that administered
a second pregnancy test.
The administration of iodine-131 was
given to the patient at 2 to 3 weeks
gestation (as determined by a consulting
physician), a time period at which the
thyroid had not developed. Shortly
thereafter, the pregnancy ended. The
licensee calculated a total whole body
dose of 67 mSv (6.7 rem) to the embryo/
fetus. There was no dose to the fetal
thyroid since the pregnancy had ended
before the thyroid had developed.
Cause(s)—The cause of this event was
the close proximity of conception,
which resulted in a negative pregnancy
test, to the administration of iodine-131.
Actions Taken To Prevent Recurrence:
Licensee—The licensee reviewed its
established patient selection criteria,
screening methods, and testing
protocols for any procedural changes. A
more sensitive pregnancy test for
women capable of bearing children will
now be conducted no more than a few
days prior to the dose administration.
State—After consulting an expert, the
State determined that the administration
occurred before the development of the
thyroid. The State also performed
independent calculations that verified
the estimate of the fetal dose by the
A. Human Exposure to Radiation From
Licensed Material
During this reporting period, two
events at Agreement State-licensed
facilities were significant enough to be
reported as abnormal occurrences
(AOs). Although both of these events
occurred at medical facilities, they both
involved unintended exposures to
individuals who were not the patient.
Therefore, these events belong under the
criteria I.A, ‘‘For All Licensees’’ category
as opposed to the criteria III.C, ‘‘For
Medical Licensees’’ category.
AS09–01 Human Exposure to
Radiation at Chester County Hospital in
West Chester, Pennsylvania
Date and Place—March 30, 2009,
West Chester, Pennsylvania.
Nature and Probable Consequences—
Chester County Hospital (the licensee)
reported that a therapeutic dose of
2,001.7 MBq (54.1 mCi) of iodine-131
resulted in a dose to an embryo/fetus of
119 mSv (11.9 rem). On March 30, 2009,
the patient was given a pregnancy test
and it yielded a negative result. Based
on the negative pregnancy test, the
licensee administered the iodine-131 to
the patient.
On May 13, 2009, the patient
informed the authorized user that she
was pregnant. The administration of
iodine-131 was given to the patient
approximately 5 days post-conception, a
time period at which the thyroid had
not developed. The hospital discovered
the pregnancy at 9.5 weeks gestation, at
which time the thyroid had developed.
Due to residual iodine-131 in the
patient’s system, both a whole body and
an organ dose exposure occurred. The
hospital calculated a total whole body
dose to the embryo/fetus of 119 mSv
(11.9 rem) and a fetal thyroid dose of 9.7
mSv (0.97 rem). The hospital
recommended that the patient consult
with a genetic counselor for any
PO 00000
Frm 00124
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\16JYN1.SGM
16JYN1
41554
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 136 / Friday, July 16, 2010 / Notices
licensee. The State reviewed and
accepted the licensee’s formal report on
October 14, 2009.
*
*
*
*
*
II. Commercial Nuclear Power Plant
Licensees
During this reporting period, no
events at commercial nuclear power
plants in the United States were
significant enough to be reported as
AOs.
*
*
*
*
*
III. Events at Facilities Other Than
Nuclear Power Plants and All
Transportation Events
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
C. Medical Licensees
During this reporting period, three
events at NRC-licensed or regulated
facilities and four events at Agreement
State-licensed facilities were significant
enough to be reported as AOs.
AS09–03 Medical Event at St.
Vincent’s Medical Center Inc., in
Jacksonville, Florida
Date and Place—September 10–17,
2008, Jacksonville, Florida.
Nature and Probable Consequences—
St. Vincent’s Medical Center Inc., (the
licensee) reported that a medical event
occurred associated with a high doserate (HDR) mammosite treatment for
breast cancer containing 199.8 GBq (5.4
Ci) of iridium-192. A patient was
prescribed to receive 34 Gy (3,400 rad)
to the right breast but received 34 Gy
(3,400 rad) to the skin of the left breast.
On October 16, 2008, the patient
notified her physician of erytherma on
her left breast. During a records review,
the medical physicist determined that
an error in programming the catheter
length in the HDR device caused the
source to stop 10 cm short of the
intended tumor site in the right breast.
Due to this programming error, the dose
intended for the right breast was
delivered to the skin of the left breast.
The authorized user concluded that no
chronic health effect to the patient is
expected.
Cause(s)—The medical event was
caused by human error in failing to
verify that the correct catheter length
was entered into the treatment planning
system.
Actions Taken To Prevent Recurrence:
Licensee—The licensee committed to
taking several corrective actions as a
result of the medical event that include
(1) utilizing a catheter length worksheet
to determine and verify the mammosite
catheter length, (2) documenting the
mammosite catheter length by two
individuals—one physicist and either a
dosimetrist, physicist, or radiation
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:00 Jul 15, 2010
Jkt 220001
therapist—during simulation treatment
set-up, (3) providing procedures for the
medical physicist and authorized user
on documenting the catheter length on
the catheter worksheet during the
review of the treatment control unit and
treatment plan, and (4) conducting a
second measurement of the catheter
length to verify that the length agrees
with the data in the treatment control
unit.
State—The Florida Bureau of
Radiation Control conducted an
investigation and reviewed the
licensee’s corrective actions and found
the corrective actions to be adequate.
*
*
*
*
*
NRC09–01 Medical Event at Saint
Mary’s Medical Center in Huntington,
West Virginia
Date and Place—October 15, 2008,
Huntington, West Virginia.
Nature and Probable Consequences—
Saint Mary’s Medical Center (the
licensee) reported that a medical event
occurred associated with the
administration of a 5.55 GBq (150 mCi)
iodine-131 capsule for thyroid cancer. A
patient was prescribed to receive 10.12
Gy (1,012 rad) to the esophagus but
received 18 Gy (1,800 rad) to the
esophagus. The patient and the referring
physician were informed of this event.
During the administration, the patient
attempted to swallow the capsule, but it
became lodged in an obstruction in the
upper portion of the esophagus.
Licensee staff provided the patient with
soda and applesauce to help dissolve
the capsule, and after 2.5 hours the
capsule passed the obstruction. Since
the capsule was lodged in the patient’s
upper portion of the esophagus for
longer than expected, an estimated dose
of 18 Gy (1,800 rad) was received to a
small area of esophageal tissue. If the
capsule had not become lodged in the
upper portion of the patient’s
esophagus, the esophagus would have
received the intended dose of 10.12 Gy
(1,012 rad) instead of 18 Gy (1,800 rad).
The dose to the esophagus exceeded the
intended dose by 78 percent.
On October 22, 2008, the event was
discussed with the patient during a
follow-up visit with the prescribing
physician. The prescribing physician
indicated that potential health effects
from this administration could include
esophagitis and radiation fibrosis.
Cause(s)—The cause of the medical
event was human error in failing to
recognize that the esophageal
obstruction might interfere with the
patient’s ability to swallow the iodine131 capsule.
Actions Taken To Prevent Recurrence:
PO 00000
Frm 00125
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Licensee—The licensee modified its
procedure to include a pre-therapy
esophageal dilation for patients known
to have difficulty swallowing. In
addition, patients known to have this
difficulty may be administered liquid
iodine-131 for treatment.
NRC—NRC contracted a medical
consultant to review this event, its effect
on the patient, and the licensee’s
corrective actions taken to prevent
recurrence of similar events. The
medical consultant concluded that no
significant adverse health effect to the
patient is expected. The NRC concluded
an inspection on February 6, 2009, and
one non-cited violation was issued to
the licensee on February 10, 2009.
*
*
*
*
*
AS09–04 Medical Event at
Presbyterian Hospital of Dallas in
Dallas, Texas
Date and Place—December 2, 2008,
Dallas, Texas.
Nature and Probable Consequences—
Presbyterian Hospital of Dallas (the
licensee) reported that a medical event
occurred associated with its gamma
stereotactic radiosurgery unit (gamma
knife) containing 125.8 TBq (3,400 Ci) of
cobalt-60. A patient being treated for
trigeminal neuralgia was prescribed to
receive 80 Gy (8,000 rad) to the fifth
intracranial nerve but received 14.95 Gy
(1,495 rad) to the seventh intracranial
nerve. The patient and the referring
physician were informed of this event.
An error in entry of information into
the treatment planning system caused
the wrong nerve to receive treatment.
The error was identified by the
neurosurgeon 9 minutes into the 45minute treatment. The licensee
concluded that no significant adverse
health effect to the patient is expected.
Cause(s)—The medical event was
caused by the misidentification of the
anatomical target site listed on the
written directive.
Actions Taken To Prevent Recurrence:
Licensee—The licensee modified its
written procedure to include
verification of the target site, by the
neuroradiologist, for each treatment. In
addition, an updated written directive
will document the new procedure to
ensure that the correct treatment site is
targeted and treated in each procedure.
State—The State will conduct a
review of at least 20 percent of the past
treatment cases to ensure that this error
had not previously occurred.
*
*
*
*
*
E:\FR\FM\16JYN1.SGM
16JYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 136 / Friday, July 16, 2010 / Notices
AS09–05 Medical Event at Cancer Care
Northwest PET Center in Spokane,
Washington
Date and Place—April 14, 2009,
Spokane, Washington.
Nature and Probable Consequences—
Cancer Care Northwest PET Center (the
licensee) reported that a medical event
occurred associated with a HDR
brachytherapy treatment for prostate
cancer containing 185 GBq (5 Ci) of
iridium-192. During patient treatment,
the aluminum connector to needle 13
became detached from the plastic guide
tube and a dose of 12.5 Gy (1,250 rad)
was delivered to a small area of the
patient’s inner thigh (wrong treatment
site). The patient and the referring
physician were informed of this event.
The source wire for needle 13 hung
about 6 inches past the disconnected
guide tube, which resulted in the skin
dose. The licensee conducted several
follow-up examinations of the patient’s
inner thigh and noted that no skin
reddening or injury has occurred and
the patient is not experiencing any pain
in this area. Therefore, the licensee
concluded that no significant adverse
health effect to the patient is expected.
Cause(s)—The cause of the medical
event was the source wire, for needle
13, snagged on the seam between the
aluminum connector and the plastic
guide tube during retraction.
Actions Taken To Prevent Recurrence:
Licensee—The licensee committed to
taking several actions as a result of the
medical event that include (1) requiring
the staff to sign the patient quality
assurance list when they check the
applicators, transfer guide tubes, and
aluminum connectors; (2) inspecting the
guide tube catheters daily and
examining the aluminum connectors
prior to patient use; and (3) revising the
refresher training to include new
procedures for staff prior to patient
treatment.
State—The State conducted follow-up
inspection activities from April–May
2009, and reviewed the licensee’s
corrective actions. The State found the
licensee’s corrective actions adequate
and did not take any enforcement action
regarding this event.
*
*
*
*
*
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
AS09–06 Medical Event at The
Urology Center in Cincinnati, Ohio
Date and Place—May 11, 2009,
Cincinnati, Ohio.
Nature and Probable Consequences—
The Urology Center (the licensee)
reported that a medical event occurred
associated with a brachytherapy seed
implant procedure to treat prostate
cancer. The patient was prescribed to
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:00 Jul 15, 2010
Jkt 220001
receive a total dose of 144 Gy (14,400
rad) to the prostate using 64 iodine-125
seeds as permanent implants. Instead,
the patient received an approximate
dose of 76 Gy (7,600 rad) to the urethra
and bulb of the penis (unintended sites).
The patient and the referring physician
were informed of this event.
According to the licensee, an
interpretation of the ultrasound image of
the patient’s prostate resulted in 30 of
the 64 seeds delivered to the prostate
while the other 34 seeds were delivered
outside the prostate. Due to the patient’s
prostate being smaller than normal, the
prostate received 68 Gy (6,800 rad) of
the prescribed dose and the urethra and
bulb of the penis (unintended sites)
received approximately 76 Gy (7,600
rad). Prior to the seeds being implanted,
the urologist and radiation oncologist
should have consulted on the
ultrasound image of the patient’s
prostate to determine the correct seed
placement. The licensee concluded that
no significant adverse health effect on
the patient is expected. On May 19,
2009, the patient returned for a second
treatment to compensate for the original
underdosing to the prostate.
Cause(s)—The cause of the medical
event was the misinterpretation of the
correct size of the patient’s small
prostate gland by ultrasound.
Actions Taken To Prevent Recurrence:
Licensee—Corrective actions taken by
the licensee included instituting a new
policy requiring agreement by both the
urologist and radiation oncologist on
seed placement for all prostate glands
measuring 20 cubic centimeters or less.
On May 26, 2009, the licensee
submitted a written report of this event
to the Ohio Department of Health,
Bureau of Radiation Protection (ODH
BRP).
State—On June 12, 2009, ODH BRP
conducted an inspection of this event
and determined that the licensee had
followed the correct procedures for
administrations requiring a written
directive. ODH BRP reviewed the
licensee’s corrective actions for this
event and found the corrective actions
to be adequate.
*
*
*
*
*
NRC09–02 Medical Event at Gamma
Knife Center of the Pacific in Honolulu,
Hawaii
Date and Place—July 2, 2009,
Honolulu, Hawaii.
Nature and Probable Consequences—
Gamma Knife Center of the Pacific (the
licensee) reported that a medical event
occurred associated with its gamma
stereotactic radiosurgery unit (gamma
knife) containing 104.86 TBq (2,834 Ci)
of cobalt-60. A patient being treated for
PO 00000
Frm 00126
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
41555
multiple brain metastatic sites was
prescribed to receive 24 Gy (2,400 rad)
to seven discrete brain sites using an 8
mm collimator. However, an 18 mm
collimator was used to treat two of the
discrete brain sites, resulting in a dose
of 24 Gy (2,400 rad) to additional brain
tissue. The patient and the referring
physician were informed of this event.
The patient received treatment to the
first and second discrete brain sites and
after receiving treatment to the second
discrete site, it was discovered that an
18 mm collimator was used to deliver
treatment instead of the prescribed 8
mm collimator. The larger collimator
caused the volume of each of the two
discrete sites to increase by 2.45 cubic
meters, resulting in a dose of 24 Gy
(2,400 rad) to additional brain tissue.
After the 18 mm collimator was
discovered, it was replaced with the 8
mm collimator and the patient received
treatment to the five remaining discrete
sites as prescribed. The licensee
concluded that no significant adverse
health effect to the patient is expected.
Cause(s)—The cause of the medical
event was human error in failing to
check the collimator size prior to patient
treatment.
Actions Taken To Prevent Recurrence:
Licensee—Corrective actions taken by
the licensee included (1) sending a
notice to all authorized users,
neurosurgeons, and medical physicists
reiterating that they should each
independently check the collimator size
prior to patient treatment and (2)
revising procedures to have a second
independent verification of all treatment
parameters, including the collimator
size, by a treatment team member.
NRC—NRC conducted an onsite
inspection and hired a medical
consultant to review the event. The
conclusions from the onsite inspection
and medical consultant’s review are
ongoing.
*
*
*
*
*
NRC09–03 Medical Event at the
Veterans Affairs San Diego Health Care
System in San Diego, California
Date and Place—September 21, 2009,
San Diego, California.
Nature and Probable Consequences—
The Department of Veterans Affairs (the
licensee), National Health Physics
Program (NHPP) reported that a medical
event occurred at the Veterans Affairs
(VA) San Diego Health Care System
associated with a therapeutic dosage of
iodine-131 for the treatment of
metastatic thyroid cancer. A patient was
prescribed to receive 6.9 GBq (187 mCi)
of iodine-131 to the metastatic sites
around the body but received 6.1 GBq
(166 mCi) to the stomach (wrong
E:\FR\FM\16JYN1.SGM
16JYN1
41556
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 136 / Friday, July 16, 2010 / Notices
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
treatment site). The patient and the
referring physician were informed of
this event.
On September 21, 2009, a dosage of
6.9 GBq (187 mCi) of iodine-131 was
administered to the patient through an
existing feeding tube. Daily radiation
measurements indicated small decreases
in radiation readings that were
consistent with the physical decay of
iodine-131, but not consistent with the
biological elimination of iodine-131. On
September 25, 2009, the feeding tube
was replaced and a subsequent
investigation revealed that the majority
of the dosage, 6.1 GBq (166 mCi), was
administered to the wrong orifice of the
feeding tube. As a result, the dosage
remained in the balloon of the feeding
tube and irradiated the patient’s
stomach, resulting in an approximate
dose of 16 Gy to 19 Gy (1,600 rad to
1,900 rad) to the stomach.
Cause(s)—Three root causes were
identified for this medical event: (1)
Inadequate training of staff, (2)
inadequate procedures, and (3) an
inadequate procedure on the
verification that administrations
involving feeding tubes were being
administered in accordance with a
written directive.
Actions Taken To Prevent Recurrence:
Licensee—Corrective actions taken by
the licensee included (1) immediate
suspension of any further gastric tube
administrations until the direct cause of
the medical event was identified, (2)
suspension of one individual’s
participation in administrations
requiring a written directive, (3)
informal training of the nuclear
medicine technologists by the Radiation
Safety Officer, and (4) development of
draft written policies and procedures on
the administration of iodine-131
through a gastric tube.
NRC—The NRC Region III Office
conducted a reactive inspection on
November 3, 2009, and also contracted
a medical consultant to review this
event. Based on the results of the
inspection, five apparent violations of
NRC’s regulations were identified.
Enforcement action is pending and the
medical consultant’s review is on-going.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 12th day
of July 2010.
For the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission.
Annette L. Vietti-Cook,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2010–17373 Filed 7–15–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:00 Jul 15, 2010
Jkt 220001
PEACE CORPS
Proposed Collection Renewal;
Correction
ACTION: 60-day notice and request for
comments; correction.
SUMMARY: The Peace Corps published a
document in the Federal Register of
June 28, 2010, [FR Doc. 2010–15584,
pages 36721–36722], concerning a
proposal to renew three currently
approved collections of information: 1.
World Wise Schools Conference Online
Registration Form (OMB Control No.
0420–0514); Speakers Match: Online
Request for a Speaker Form (OMB
Control No. 0420–0539); and
Correspondence Match Educator Online
Enrollment Form: Educator Sign Up
Form (OMB Control No. 0420–0540).
The document contained an incorrect
OMB Control Number for the World
Wise Schools Conference—Online
Registration Form. The correct
information should read: 1. Title: World
Wise Schools Conference—Online
Registration Form (OMB Control
Number: 0420–0541). The remaining
two information collections are correct
as listed. The dates for comments has
been extended because of the correction
made to the notice.
DATES: Comments must be submitted on
or before September 14, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Comments should be
addressed to Marjorie Anctil, Director of
World Wise Schools, Peace Corps, 1111
20th Street, NW., Washington, DC
20526. Marjorie Anctil can be contacted
by telephone at 202–692–1461 or e-mail
at manctil@peacecorps.gov. E-mail
comments must be made in text and not
in attachments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Marjorie Anctil, at Peace Corps address
above.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Proposal
to renew the following currently
approved collections of information:
1. Title: World Wise Schools
Conference—Online Registration Form.
OMB Control Number: 0420–0541.
Respondents: Educators and
employees of governmental and
nongovernmental organizations
interested in promoting global
education in the classroom.
Estimated annual number of
respondents: 300.
Estimated average time to respond: 10
minutes.
Frequency of response: Annually.
Estimated total annual burden hours:
50 hours.
General description of collection: The
information collected is used to
PO 00000
Frm 00127
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 9990
officially register attendees to the
annual World Wise Schools Conference.
The information is used as a record of
attendance.
2. Title: Speakers Match: Online
Request for a Speaker Form.
OMB Control Number: 0420–0539.
Type of Review: Regular—extension,
without change, currently approved
collection.
Respondents: Educators interested in
promoting global education in the
classroom.
Estimated annual number of
responses: 300.
Estimated average time to respond: 10
minutes.
Frequency of response: Annually.
Estimated annual burden hours: 50
hours.
General description of collection: The
information collected is used to make
suitable matches between the educators
and returned Peace Corps Volunteers for
the Speakers Match program.
3. Title: Correspondence Match
Educator Online Enrollment Form:
Educator Sign Up Form.
OMB Control Number: 0420–0540.
Respondents: Educators interested in
promoting global education in the
classroom.
Estimated annual number of
responses: 10,000.
Estimated average time to respond: 10
minutes.
Frequency of response: Annually.
Estimated annual burden hours: 1667
hours.
General description of collection: The
information collected is used to make
suitable matches between the educators
and currently serving Peace Corps
Volunteers.
Request for Comment: Peace Corps
invites comments on whether the
proposed collections of information are
necessary for proper performance of the
functions of the Peace Corps and the
Paul D. Coverdell World Wise Schools,
including whether the information will
have practical use; the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information,
including the validity of the information
to be collected; and, ways to minimize
the burden of the collection of
information on those who are to
respond, including through the use of
automated collection techniques, when
appropriate, and other forms of
information technology.
This notice is issued in Washington, DC on
July 9, 2010.
Earl W. Yates,
Associate Director for Management.
[FR Doc. 2010–17370 Filed 7–15–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6051–01–P
E:\FR\FM\16JYN1.SGM
16JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 136 (Friday, July 16, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 41553-41556]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-17373]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
[NRC-2010-0238]
Report to Congress on Abnormal Occurrences Fiscal Year 2009;
Dissemination of Information
Section 208 of the Energy Reorganization Act of 1974 (Pub. L. 93-
438) defines an abnormal occurrence (AO) as an unscheduled incident or
event which the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) determines to
be significant from the standpoint of public health or safety. The
Federal Reports Elimination and Sunset Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-68)
requires that AOs be reported to Congress annually. During Fiscal Year
2009, nine events that occurred at facilities licensed or otherwise
regulated by the NRC and/or Agreement States were determined to be AOs.
The report describes three events at NRC-licensed facilities. All three
NRC-licensee events were medical events, as defined in Title 10, Part
35, of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR part 35). The report
also describes six events at Agreement State-licensed facilities.
[Agreement States are those States that have entered into formal
agreements with the NRC pursuant to Section 274 of the Atomic Energy
Act (AEA) to regulate certain quantities of AEA licensed material at
facilities located within their borders.] Currently, there are 37
Agreement States. The first two Agreement State-licensee events
involved radiation exposure to an embryo/fetus. The other four
Agreement State-licensee events were medical events, as defined in 10
CFR part 35, and occurred at medical institutions. As required by
Section 208, the discussion for each event includes the date and place,
nature and probable consequences, the cause or causes, and the actions
taken to prevent recurrence. Each event is also being described in
NUREG-0090, Vol. 32, ``Report to Congress on Abnormal Occurrences:
Fiscal Year 2009.'' This report is available electronically at the NRC
Web site https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/nuregs/staff/.
There are three major categories of events reported in this
document: I. For All Licensees, II. For Commercial Nuclear Power Plant
Licensees, and III. Events at Facilities Other Than Nuclear Power
Plants and All Transportation Events. The full report, available on the
NRC Web site, provides the specific criteria for determining when an
event is an abnormal occurrence (AO) and discusses ``Other Events of
Interest'' that do not meet the AO criteria but which the Commission
has determined should be included in the report. The event
identification number begins with ``AS'' for Agreement State AO events
and ``NRC'' for NRC AO events.
I. For All Licensees
A. Human Exposure to Radiation From Licensed Material
During this reporting period, two events at Agreement State-
licensed facilities were significant enough to be reported as abnormal
occurrences (AOs). Although both of these events occurred at medical
facilities, they both involved unintended exposures to individuals who
were not the patient. Therefore, these events belong under the criteria
I.A, ``For All Licensees'' category as opposed to the criteria III.C,
``For Medical Licensees'' category.
AS09-01 Human Exposure to Radiation at Chester County Hospital in West
Chester, Pennsylvania
Date and Place--March 30, 2009, West Chester, Pennsylvania.
Nature and Probable Consequences--Chester County Hospital (the
licensee) reported that a therapeutic dose of 2,001.7 MBq (54.1 mCi) of
iodine-131 resulted in a dose to an embryo/fetus of 119 mSv (11.9 rem).
On March 30, 2009, the patient was given a pregnancy test and it
yielded a negative result. Based on the negative pregnancy test, the
licensee administered the iodine-131 to the patient.
On May 13, 2009, the patient informed the authorized user that she
was pregnant. The administration of iodine-131 was given to the patient
approximately 5 days post-conception, a time period at which the
thyroid had not developed. The hospital discovered the pregnancy at 9.5
weeks gestation, at which time the thyroid had developed. Due to
residual iodine-131 in the patient's system, both a whole body and an
organ dose exposure occurred. The hospital calculated a total whole
body dose to the embryo/fetus of 119 mSv (11.9 rem) and a fetal thyroid
dose of 9.7 mSv (0.97 rem). The hospital recommended that the patient
consult with a genetic counselor for any potential health effects to
the embryo/fetus.
Cause(s)--The cause of this event was the close proximity of
conception, which resulted in a negative pregnancy test, to the
administration of iodine-131.
Actions Taken To Prevent Recurrence:
Licensee--The licensee is providing additional instructions to its
staff to strongly emphasize to patients the risks associated with being
pregnant prior to the administration of radioiodine treatments.
State--The State conducted a follow-up inspection and did not take
any enforcement action regarding this event.
* * * * *
AS09-02 Human Exposure to Radiation at Loyola University Medical Center
in Maywood, Illinois
Date and Place--September 21, 2009, Maywood, Illinois.
Nature and Probable Consequences--Loyola University Medical Center
(the licensee) reported that the administration of 925 MBq (25 mCi) of
iodine-131 resulted in a dose to an embryo/fetus of 67 mSv (6.7 rem).
Prior to the administration of iodine-131, a urinary pregnancy test was
conducted by the licensee on September 21, 2009, and it yielded a
negative result. On September 29, 2009, the patient notified the
licensee that she took a home pregnancy test and it was positive. The
patient's pregnancy was confirmed by an independent clinic that
administered a second pregnancy test.
The administration of iodine-131 was given to the patient at 2 to 3
weeks gestation (as determined by a consulting physician), a time
period at which the thyroid had not developed. Shortly thereafter, the
pregnancy ended. The licensee calculated a total whole body dose of 67
mSv (6.7 rem) to the embryo/fetus. There was no dose to the fetal
thyroid since the pregnancy had ended before the thyroid had developed.
Cause(s)--The cause of this event was the close proximity of
conception, which resulted in a negative pregnancy test, to the
administration of iodine-131.
Actions Taken To Prevent Recurrence:
Licensee--The licensee reviewed its established patient selection
criteria, screening methods, and testing protocols for any procedural
changes. A more sensitive pregnancy test for women capable of bearing
children will now be conducted no more than a few days prior to the
dose administration.
State--After consulting an expert, the State determined that the
administration occurred before the development of the thyroid. The
State also performed independent calculations that verified the
estimate of the fetal dose by the
[[Page 41554]]
licensee. The State reviewed and accepted the licensee's formal report
on October 14, 2009.
* * * * *
II. Commercial Nuclear Power Plant Licensees
During this reporting period, no events at commercial nuclear power
plants in the United States were significant enough to be reported as
AOs.
* * * * *
III. Events at Facilities Other Than Nuclear Power Plants and All
Transportation Events
C. Medical Licensees
During this reporting period, three events at NRC-licensed or
regulated facilities and four events at Agreement State-licensed
facilities were significant enough to be reported as AOs.
AS09-03 Medical Event at St. Vincent's Medical Center Inc., in
Jacksonville, Florida
Date and Place--September 10-17, 2008, Jacksonville, Florida.
Nature and Probable Consequences--St. Vincent's Medical Center
Inc., (the licensee) reported that a medical event occurred associated
with a high dose-rate (HDR) mammosite treatment for breast cancer
containing 199.8 GBq (5.4 Ci) of iridium-192. A patient was prescribed
to receive 34 Gy (3,400 rad) to the right breast but received 34 Gy
(3,400 rad) to the skin of the left breast.
On October 16, 2008, the patient notified her physician of
erytherma on her left breast. During a records review, the medical
physicist determined that an error in programming the catheter length
in the HDR device caused the source to stop 10 cm short of the intended
tumor site in the right breast. Due to this programming error, the dose
intended for the right breast was delivered to the skin of the left
breast. The authorized user concluded that no chronic health effect to
the patient is expected.
Cause(s)--The medical event was caused by human error in failing to
verify that the correct catheter length was entered into the treatment
planning system.
Actions Taken To Prevent Recurrence:
Licensee--The licensee committed to taking several corrective
actions as a result of the medical event that include (1) utilizing a
catheter length worksheet to determine and verify the mammosite
catheter length, (2) documenting the mammosite catheter length by two
individuals--one physicist and either a dosimetrist, physicist, or
radiation therapist--during simulation treatment set-up, (3) providing
procedures for the medical physicist and authorized user on documenting
the catheter length on the catheter worksheet during the review of the
treatment control unit and treatment plan, and (4) conducting a second
measurement of the catheter length to verify that the length agrees
with the data in the treatment control unit.
State--The Florida Bureau of Radiation Control conducted an
investigation and reviewed the licensee's corrective actions and found
the corrective actions to be adequate.
* * * * *
NRC09-01 Medical Event at Saint Mary's Medical Center in Huntington,
West Virginia
Date and Place--October 15, 2008, Huntington, West Virginia.
Nature and Probable Consequences--Saint Mary's Medical Center (the
licensee) reported that a medical event occurred associated with the
administration of a 5.55 GBq (150 mCi) iodine-131 capsule for thyroid
cancer. A patient was prescribed to receive 10.12 Gy (1,012 rad) to the
esophagus but received 18 Gy (1,800 rad) to the esophagus. The patient
and the referring physician were informed of this event.
During the administration, the patient attempted to swallow the
capsule, but it became lodged in an obstruction in the upper portion of
the esophagus. Licensee staff provided the patient with soda and
applesauce to help dissolve the capsule, and after 2.5 hours the
capsule passed the obstruction. Since the capsule was lodged in the
patient's upper portion of the esophagus for longer than expected, an
estimated dose of 18 Gy (1,800 rad) was received to a small area of
esophageal tissue. If the capsule had not become lodged in the upper
portion of the patient's esophagus, the esophagus would have received
the intended dose of 10.12 Gy (1,012 rad) instead of 18 Gy (1,800 rad).
The dose to the esophagus exceeded the intended dose by 78 percent.
On October 22, 2008, the event was discussed with the patient
during a follow-up visit with the prescribing physician. The
prescribing physician indicated that potential health effects from this
administration could include esophagitis and radiation fibrosis.
Cause(s)--The cause of the medical event was human error in failing
to recognize that the esophageal obstruction might interfere with the
patient's ability to swallow the iodine-131 capsule.
Actions Taken To Prevent Recurrence:
Licensee--The licensee modified its procedure to include a pre-
therapy esophageal dilation for patients known to have difficulty
swallowing. In addition, patients known to have this difficulty may be
administered liquid iodine-131 for treatment.
NRC--NRC contracted a medical consultant to review this event, its
effect on the patient, and the licensee's corrective actions taken to
prevent recurrence of similar events. The medical consultant concluded
that no significant adverse health effect to the patient is expected.
The NRC concluded an inspection on February 6, 2009, and one non-cited
violation was issued to the licensee on February 10, 2009.
* * * * *
AS09-04 Medical Event at Presbyterian Hospital of Dallas in Dallas,
Texas
Date and Place--December 2, 2008, Dallas, Texas.
Nature and Probable Consequences--Presbyterian Hospital of Dallas
(the licensee) reported that a medical event occurred associated with
its gamma stereotactic radiosurgery unit (gamma knife) containing 125.8
TBq (3,400 Ci) of cobalt-60. A patient being treated for trigeminal
neuralgia was prescribed to receive 80 Gy (8,000 rad) to the fifth
intracranial nerve but received 14.95 Gy (1,495 rad) to the seventh
intracranial nerve. The patient and the referring physician were
informed of this event.
An error in entry of information into the treatment planning system
caused the wrong nerve to receive treatment. The error was identified
by the neurosurgeon 9 minutes into the 45-minute treatment. The
licensee concluded that no significant adverse health effect to the
patient is expected.
Cause(s)--The medical event was caused by the misidentification of
the anatomical target site listed on the written directive.
Actions Taken To Prevent Recurrence:
Licensee--The licensee modified its written procedure to include
verification of the target site, by the neuroradiologist, for each
treatment. In addition, an updated written directive will document the
new procedure to ensure that the correct treatment site is targeted and
treated in each procedure.
State--The State will conduct a review of at least 20 percent of
the past treatment cases to ensure that this error had not previously
occurred.
* * * * *
[[Page 41555]]
AS09-05 Medical Event at Cancer Care Northwest PET Center in Spokane,
Washington
Date and Place--April 14, 2009, Spokane, Washington.
Nature and Probable Consequences--Cancer Care Northwest PET Center
(the licensee) reported that a medical event occurred associated with a
HDR brachytherapy treatment for prostate cancer containing 185 GBq (5
Ci) of iridium-192. During patient treatment, the aluminum connector to
needle 13 became detached from the plastic guide tube and a dose of
12.5 Gy (1,250 rad) was delivered to a small area of the patient's
inner thigh (wrong treatment site). The patient and the referring
physician were informed of this event.
The source wire for needle 13 hung about 6 inches past the
disconnected guide tube, which resulted in the skin dose. The licensee
conducted several follow-up examinations of the patient's inner thigh
and noted that no skin reddening or injury has occurred and the patient
is not experiencing any pain in this area. Therefore, the licensee
concluded that no significant adverse health effect to the patient is
expected.
Cause(s)--The cause of the medical event was the source wire, for
needle 13, snagged on the seam between the aluminum connector and the
plastic guide tube during retraction.
Actions Taken To Prevent Recurrence:
Licensee--The licensee committed to taking several actions as a
result of the medical event that include (1) requiring the staff to
sign the patient quality assurance list when they check the
applicators, transfer guide tubes, and aluminum connectors; (2)
inspecting the guide tube catheters daily and examining the aluminum
connectors prior to patient use; and (3) revising the refresher
training to include new procedures for staff prior to patient
treatment.
State--The State conducted follow-up inspection activities from
April-May 2009, and reviewed the licensee's corrective actions. The
State found the licensee's corrective actions adequate and did not take
any enforcement action regarding this event.
* * * * *
AS09-06 Medical Event at The Urology Center in Cincinnati, Ohio
Date and Place--May 11, 2009, Cincinnati, Ohio.
Nature and Probable Consequences--The Urology Center (the licensee)
reported that a medical event occurred associated with a brachytherapy
seed implant procedure to treat prostate cancer. The patient was
prescribed to receive a total dose of 144 Gy (14,400 rad) to the
prostate using 64 iodine-125 seeds as permanent implants. Instead, the
patient received an approximate dose of 76 Gy (7,600 rad) to the
urethra and bulb of the penis (unintended sites). The patient and the
referring physician were informed of this event.
According to the licensee, an interpretation of the ultrasound
image of the patient's prostate resulted in 30 of the 64 seeds
delivered to the prostate while the other 34 seeds were delivered
outside the prostate. Due to the patient's prostate being smaller than
normal, the prostate received 68 Gy (6,800 rad) of the prescribed dose
and the urethra and bulb of the penis (unintended sites) received
approximately 76 Gy (7,600 rad). Prior to the seeds being implanted,
the urologist and radiation oncologist should have consulted on the
ultrasound image of the patient's prostate to determine the correct
seed placement. The licensee concluded that no significant adverse
health effect on the patient is expected. On May 19, 2009, the patient
returned for a second treatment to compensate for the original
underdosing to the prostate.
Cause(s)--The cause of the medical event was the misinterpretation
of the correct size of the patient's small prostate gland by
ultrasound.
Actions Taken To Prevent Recurrence:
Licensee--Corrective actions taken by the licensee included
instituting a new policy requiring agreement by both the urologist and
radiation oncologist on seed placement for all prostate glands
measuring 20 cubic centimeters or less. On May 26, 2009, the licensee
submitted a written report of this event to the Ohio Department of
Health, Bureau of Radiation Protection (ODH BRP).
State--On June 12, 2009, ODH BRP conducted an inspection of this
event and determined that the licensee had followed the correct
procedures for administrations requiring a written directive. ODH BRP
reviewed the licensee's corrective actions for this event and found the
corrective actions to be adequate.
* * * * *
NRC09-02 Medical Event at Gamma Knife Center of the Pacific in
Honolulu, Hawaii
Date and Place--July 2, 2009, Honolulu, Hawaii.
Nature and Probable Consequences--Gamma Knife Center of the Pacific
(the licensee) reported that a medical event occurred associated with
its gamma stereotactic radiosurgery unit (gamma knife) containing
104.86 TBq (2,834 Ci) of cobalt-60. A patient being treated for
multiple brain metastatic sites was prescribed to receive 24 Gy (2,400
rad) to seven discrete brain sites using an 8 mm collimator. However,
an 18 mm collimator was used to treat two of the discrete brain sites,
resulting in a dose of 24 Gy (2,400 rad) to additional brain tissue.
The patient and the referring physician were informed of this event.
The patient received treatment to the first and second discrete
brain sites and after receiving treatment to the second discrete site,
it was discovered that an 18 mm collimator was used to deliver
treatment instead of the prescribed 8 mm collimator. The larger
collimator caused the volume of each of the two discrete sites to
increase by 2.45 cubic meters, resulting in a dose of 24 Gy (2,400 rad)
to additional brain tissue. After the 18 mm collimator was discovered,
it was replaced with the 8 mm collimator and the patient received
treatment to the five remaining discrete sites as prescribed. The
licensee concluded that no significant adverse health effect to the
patient is expected.
Cause(s)--The cause of the medical event was human error in failing
to check the collimator size prior to patient treatment.
Actions Taken To Prevent Recurrence:
Licensee--Corrective actions taken by the licensee included (1)
sending a notice to all authorized users, neurosurgeons, and medical
physicists reiterating that they should each independently check the
collimator size prior to patient treatment and (2) revising procedures
to have a second independent verification of all treatment parameters,
including the collimator size, by a treatment team member.
NRC--NRC conducted an onsite inspection and hired a medical
consultant to review the event. The conclusions from the onsite
inspection and medical consultant's review are ongoing.
* * * * *
NRC09-03 Medical Event at the Veterans Affairs San Diego Health Care
System in San Diego, California
Date and Place--September 21, 2009, San Diego, California.
Nature and Probable Consequences--The Department of Veterans
Affairs (the licensee), National Health Physics Program (NHPP) reported
that a medical event occurred at the Veterans Affairs (VA) San Diego
Health Care System associated with a therapeutic dosage of iodine-131
for the treatment of metastatic thyroid cancer. A patient was
prescribed to receive 6.9 GBq (187 mCi) of iodine-131 to the metastatic
sites around the body but received 6.1 GBq (166 mCi) to the stomach
(wrong
[[Page 41556]]
treatment site). The patient and the referring physician were informed
of this event.
On September 21, 2009, a dosage of 6.9 GBq (187 mCi) of iodine-131
was administered to the patient through an existing feeding tube. Daily
radiation measurements indicated small decreases in radiation readings
that were consistent with the physical decay of iodine-131, but not
consistent with the biological elimination of iodine-131. On September
25, 2009, the feeding tube was replaced and a subsequent investigation
revealed that the majority of the dosage, 6.1 GBq (166 mCi), was
administered to the wrong orifice of the feeding tube. As a result, the
dosage remained in the balloon of the feeding tube and irradiated the
patient's stomach, resulting in an approximate dose of 16 Gy to 19 Gy
(1,600 rad to 1,900 rad) to the stomach.
Cause(s)--Three root causes were identified for this medical event:
(1) Inadequate training of staff, (2) inadequate procedures, and (3) an
inadequate procedure on the verification that administrations involving
feeding tubes were being administered in accordance with a written
directive.
Actions Taken To Prevent Recurrence:
Licensee--Corrective actions taken by the licensee included (1)
immediate suspension of any further gastric tube administrations until
the direct cause of the medical event was identified, (2) suspension of
one individual's participation in administrations requiring a written
directive, (3) informal training of the nuclear medicine technologists
by the Radiation Safety Officer, and (4) development of draft written
policies and procedures on the administration of iodine-131 through a
gastric tube.
NRC--The NRC Region III Office conducted a reactive inspection on
November 3, 2009, and also contracted a medical consultant to review
this event. Based on the results of the inspection, five apparent
violations of NRC's regulations were identified. Enforcement action is
pending and the medical consultant's review is on-going.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 12th day of July 2010.
For the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Annette L. Vietti-Cook,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2010-17373 Filed 7-15-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P