Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Model 747-100, 747-100B, 747-100B SUD, 747-200B, 747-200C, 747-200F, 747-300, 747-400, 747SR, and 747SP Series Airplanes, 39818-39820 [2010-16435]
Download as PDF
39818
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 133 / Tuesday, July 13, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
Office—EAL, 1 Rond Point Maurice Bellonte,
31707 Blagnac Cedex, France; telephone +33
5 61 93 36 96; fax +33 5 61 93 45 80, e-mail
airworthiness.A330-A340@airbus.com;
Internet https://www.airbus.com.
(3) You may review copies of the service
information at the FAA, Transport Airplane
Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA, call
425–227–1221.
(4) You may also review copies of the
service information that is incorporated by
reference at the National Archives and
Records Administration (NARA). For
information on the availability of this
material at NARA, call 202–741–6030, or go
to: https://www.archives.gov/federal_register/
code_of_federal_regulations/
ibr_locations.html.
Issued in Renton, Washington on June 29,
2010.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2010–16550 Filed 7–12–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2010–0383; Directorate
Identifier 2009–NM–214–AD; Amendment
39–16362; AD 2010–14–17]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing
Company Model 747–100, 747–100B,
747–100B SUD, 747–200B, 747–200C,
747–200F, 747–300, 747–400, 747SR,
and 747SP Series Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
SUMMARY: We are adopting a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for certain
Model 747–100, 747–100B, 747–100B
SUD, 747–200B, 747–200C, 747–200F,
747–300, 747–400, 747SR, and 747SP
series airplanes. This AD requires
repetitive detailed inspections of certain
overwing intercostal webs, and related
investigative and corrective actions if
necessary. This AD results from reports
of cracks in overwing intercostal webs.
We are issuing this AD to detect and
correct such cracking, which could grow
and result in a severed intercostal. If an
intercostal is severed, cracks could
develop in the adjacent frame structure
and skin, resulting in a rapid loss of
cabin pressure.
DATES: This AD is effective August 17,
2010.
The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
of a certain publication listed in the AD
as of August 17, 2010.
ADDRESSES: For service information
identified in this AD, contact Boeing
Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data
& Services Management, P.O. Box 3707,
MC 2H–65, Seattle, Washington 98124–
2207; telephone 206–544–5000,
extension 1; fax 206–766–5680; e-mail
me.boecom@boeing.com; Internet
https://www.myboeingfleet.com.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the
Docket Management Facility between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD
docket contains this AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and
other information. The address for the
Docket Office (telephone 800–647–5527)
is the Document Management Facility,
U.S. Department of Transportation,
Docket Operations, M–30, West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ivan
Li, Aerospace Engineer, Airframe
Branch, ANM–120S, FAA, Seattle
Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), 1601
Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington
98057–3356; telephone (425) 917–6437;
fax (425) 917–6590.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
We issued a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to include an airworthiness
directive (AD) that would apply to
certain Model 747–100, 747–100B, 747–
100B SUD, 747–200B, 747–200C, 747–
200F, 747–300, 747–400, 747SR, and
747SP series airplanes. That NPRM was
published in the Federal Register on
April 21, 2010 (75 FR 20792). That
NPRM proposed to require repetitive
detailed inspections of certain overwing
intercostal webs, and related
investigative and corrective actions if
necessary.
Comments
We gave the public the opportunity to
participate in developing this AD. We
considered the comment received.
Boeing supports the NPRM.
Conclusion
We reviewed the relevant data,
considered the comment received, and
determined that air safety and the
public interest require adopting the AD
as proposed.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this AD affects 86
airplanes of U.S. registry. The following
table provides the estimated costs for
U.S. operators to comply with this AD.
TABLE—ESTIMATED COSTS
Work hours
Average labor
rate per hour
Parts
Cost per product
Number of
U.S.-registered
airplanes
Inspection ...
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with RULES
Action
4
$85
None ...........
$340 per inspection cycle
86
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. ‘‘Subtitle VII:
Aviation Programs,’’ describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in ‘‘Subtitle VII,
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:12 Jul 12, 2010
Jkt 220001
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701:
General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Fleet cost
$29,240 per inspection cycle.
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
Regulatory Findings
This AD will not have federalism
implications under Executive Order
13132. This AD will not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on
the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
E:\FR\FM\13JYR1.SGM
13JYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 133 / Tuesday, July 13, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify that this AD:
(1) Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866,
(2) Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979), and
(3) Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
You can find our regulatory
evaluation and the estimated costs of
compliance in the AD Docket.
Administration is issuing this AD to
detect and correct such cracking, which
could grow and result in a severed
intercostal. If an intercostal is severed,
cracks could develop in the adjacent
frame structure and skin, resulting in a
rapid loss of cabin pressure.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
(g) Before the accumulation of 8,000
total flight cycles, or within 1,500 flight
cycles after the effective date of this AD,
whichever occurs later: Do a detailed
inspection of the left-side and right-side
STAs 1160, 1180, 1200, and 1220
overwing intercostal webs, and do all
applicable related investigative and
corrective actions, in accordance with
the Accomplishment Instructions of
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747–
53A2750, dated August 27, 2009, except
as required by paragraph (i) of this AD.
Do all applicable related investigative
and corrective actions before further
flight. If no cracking is found during any
detailed inspection, repeat the
inspection thereafter at intervals not to
exceed 3,000 flight cycles.
(h) For any airplane with an overwing
intercostal web replaced in accordance
with Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747–
53A2750, dated August 27, 2009:
Within 6,000 flight cycles after the web
was replaced, do a detailed inspection
of the replacement overwing intercostal
web, and do all applicable related
investigative and corrective actions, in
accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of Boeing Alert Service
Bulletin 747–53A2750, dated August 27,
2009, except as required by paragraph
(i) of this AD. Do all applicable related
investigative and corrective actions
before further flight. If no cracking is
found during any detailed inspection,
repeat the inspection thereafter at
intervals not to exceed 3,000 flight
cycles.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as
follows:
■
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
the following new AD:
2010–14–17 The Boeing Company:
Amendment 39–16362. Docket No.
FAA–2010–0383; Directorate Identifier
2009–NM–214–AD.
■
Effective Date
(a) This airworthiness directive (AD)
is effective August 17, 2010.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with RULES
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to The Boeing
Company Model 747–100, 747–100B,
747–100B SUD, 747–200B, 747–200C,
747–200F, 747–300, 747–400, 747SR,
and 747SP series airplanes, certificated
in any category; as identified in Boeing
Alert Service Bulletin 747–53A2750,
dated August 27, 2009.
Subject
(d) Air Transport Association (ATA)
of America Code 53: Fuselage.
Unsafe Condition
(e) This AD results from reports of
cracks in overwing intercostal webs
between station (STA) 1160 and STA
1220. The Federal Aviation
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:12 Jul 12, 2010
Jkt 220001
Compliance
(f) You are responsible for having the
actions required by this AD performed
within the compliance times specified,
unless the actions have already been
done.
Repetitive Inspections of the Overwing
Intercostal Web
Exception to Service Bulletin
(i) If any cracking is found during any
inspection required by this AD, and
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747–
53A2750, dated August 27, 2009,
specifies contacting Boeing for
appropriate action: Before further flight,
repair the cracking using a method
approved in accordance with the
procedures provided in paragraph (j) of
this AD.
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
39819
Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
(j)(1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft
Certification Office (ACO), FAA, has the
authority to approve AMOCs for this
AD, if requested using the procedures
found in 14 CFR 39.19. Send
information to Attn: Ivan Li, Aerospace
Engineer, Airframe Branch, ANM–120S,
FAA, Seattle Aircraft Certification
Office (ACO), 1601 Lind Avenue, SW.,
Renton, Washington 98057–3356;
telephone (425) 917–6437; fax (425)
917–6590. Information may be e-mailed
to: 9-ANM-Seattle-ACO-AMOCRequests@faa.gov.
(2) To request a different method of
compliance or a different compliance
time for this AD, follow the procedures
in 14 CFR 39.19. Before using any
approved AMOC on any airplane to
which the AMOC applies, notify your
principal maintenance inspector (PMI)
or principal avionics inspector (PAI), as
appropriate, or lacking a principal
inspector, your local Flight Standards
District Office. The AMOC approval
letter must specifically reference this
AD.
(3) An AMOC that provides an
acceptable level of safety may be used
for any repair required by this AD if it
is approved by the Boeing Commercial
Airplanes Organization Designation
Authorization that has been authorized
by the Manager, Seattle ACO, to make
those findings. For a repair method to be
approved, the repair must meet the
certification basis of the airplane, and
the approval must specifically refer to
this AD.
Material Incorporated by Reference
(k) You must use Boeing Alert Service
Bulletin 747–53A2750, dated August 27,
2009, to do the actions required by this
AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
(1) The Director of the Federal
Register approved the incorporation by
reference of this service information
under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
(2) For service information identified
in this AD, contact Boeing Commercial
Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services
Management, P.O. Box 3707, MC 2H–65,
Seattle, Washington 98124–2207;
telephone 206–544–5000, extension 1;
fax 206–766–5680; e-mail
me.boecom@boeing.com; Internet
https://www.myboeingfleet.com.
(3) You may review copies of the
service information at the FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601
Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington.
For information on the availability of
this material at the FAA, call 425–227–
1221.
(4) You may also review copies of the
service information that is incorporated
E:\FR\FM\13JYR1.SGM
13JYR1
39820
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 133 / Tuesday, July 13, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
by reference at the National Archives
and Records Administration (NARA).
For information on the availability of
this material at NARA, call 202–741–
6030, or go to: https://www.archives.gov/
federal_register/
code_of_federal_regulations/
ibr_locations.html.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on June 25,
2010.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2010–16435 Filed 7–12–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Highway Administration
23 CFR Part 772
[FHWA Docket No. FHWA–2008–0114]
RIN 2125–AF26
Procedures for Abatement of Highway
Traffic Noise and Construction Noise
AGENCY: Federal Highway
Administration (FHWA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
SUMMARY: This final rule amends the
Federal regulations on the Procedures
for Abatement of Highway Traffic Noise
and Construction Noise. The final rule
clarifies and adds definitions, the
applicability of this regulation, certain
analysis requirements, and the use of
Federal funds for noise abatement
measures.
Effective date: July 13, 2011.
Incorporation by reference: The
incorporation by reference of certain
publications listed in the regulations is
approved by the Director of the Federal
Register as of July 13, 2011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Mark Ferroni, Office of Natural and
Human Environment, (202) 366–3233,
or Mr. Robert Black, Office of the Chief
Counsel, (202) 366–1359, Federal
Highway Administration, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC
20590.
DATES:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with RULES
Electronic Access
This document and all comments
received by the DOT Docket Facility,
Room PL–401, may be viewed through
www.regulations.gov. Regulations.gov is
available 24 hours each day, 365 days
each year. Electronic submission and
retrieval help and guidelines are
available under the help section of this
Web site.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:12 Jul 12, 2010
Jkt 220001
An electronic copy of this document
may be downloaded by using a
computer, modem, and suitable
communications software from the
Government Printing Office’s Electronic
Bulletin Board Service at (202) 512–
1661. Internet users may also reach the
Office of the Federal Register’s home
page at: https://www.archives.gov and the
Government Printing Office’s Web page
at: https://www.access.gpo.gov/nara.
Background
The FHWA developed the noise
regulation as required by section 136 of
the Federal-Aid Highway Act of 1970
(codified at 23 U.S.C. 109(i)). The
regulation applies to highway
construction projects where a State
department of transportation has
requested Federal funding for
participation in the project. The FHWA
noise regulation, found at 23 CFR 772,
requires a highway agency to investigate
traffic noise impacts in areas adjacent to
federally funded highways for the
proposed construction of a highway on
a new location or the reconstruction of
an existing highway that either
significantly changes the horizontal or
vertical alignment or increases the
number of through-traffic lanes. If the
highway agency identifies impacts, it
must consider abatement. The highway
agency must incorporate all feasible and
reasonable noise abatement into the
project design.
The FHWA published the ‘‘Highway
Traffic Noise Analysis and Abatement
Policy and Guidance’’ (Policy and
Guidance), dated June 1995 (available at
https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/environment/
noise/polguide/polguid.pdf), which
provides guidance and policy on
highway traffic and construction noise
abatement procedures for Federal-aid
projects. While updating the 1995
Policy and Guidance, the FHWA
determined that certain changes to the
noise regulations were necessary.
As a result, the FHWA published a
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM)
on September 17, 2009 (74 FR 47762).
This final rule amends sections 772.1,
772.5 to 772.17, and Table 1—Noise
Abatement Criteria. Sections 772.3 and
772.19 are not amended by this final
rule, and Appendix A—National
Reference Energy Mean Emission Levels
as a Function of Speed, is removed by
this final rule. This final rule also
reorganizes various sections and parts of
sections throughout the NPRM to
institute a more logical order in the
regulation. This reorganization does not
change the meaning of the regulation
and is not substantive in nature.
In the preamble of the NPRM, the
FHWA specifically asked for comments
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
on the cost of abatement, third party
funding for abatement, and maintaining
a noise abatement inventory. The
FHWA appreciates the comments
received on this section. A summary of
the comments received and the FHWA’s
response to these comments can be
found in the discussion of comments
section.
The preamble of the NPRM requested
comments on a proposed timeline for
highway agencies to revise and have the
FHWA approve their noise policies.
Changes to this timeline have been
made based on the comments received.
Therefore, highway agencies will need
to submit their revised noise policy,
meeting the requirements of this final
rule, to FHWA for approval within 6
months from the publication date of this
final rule. The FHWA will review the
highway agency’s revised noise policy
for conformance to the final rule and
uniform and consistent application
nationwide. The highway agency will
provide FHWA a review schedule for
approval of their revised noise policy
that does not exceed 3 months from the
highway agency’s first submission of the
revised noise policy to the FHWA. Each
review of the document by FHWA
should have a duration of at least 14
days for the initial and subsequent
reviews. The highway agency’s main
point of contact for this review will be
the FHWA Division Office in their State.
Each highway agency’s revised noise
document will be concurrently
reviewed by three FHWA offices to
ensure uniform and consistent
application of this final rule nationwide
(one from the respective Division Office,
one from the Resource Center, and one
from Headquarters). Failure to submit a
revised noise policy in accordance with
the final rule could result in a delay in
FHWA’s approval of Federal-aid
highway projects that require a noise
analysis. The highway agency would be
required to implement the new standard
no later than 12 months from the date
this final rule was published in the
Federal Register.
Grandfathering to the pre-final rule of
23 CFR 772 should be considered for
Federal-aid highway projects for which
the Categorical Exclusion, Finding of No
Significant Impact, or Record of
Decision has been signed by the
effective date of this final rule. The State
highway agency should coordinate with
their FHWA Division Office to
determine which projects, if any, should
be completed under the previous 23
CFR 772 and highway agency’s
previously approved noise policy.
The FHWA has updated the Policy
and Guidance document to reflect what
is presented in this final rule. Highway
E:\FR\FM\13JYR1.SGM
13JYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 133 (Tuesday, July 13, 2010)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 39818-39820]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-16435]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2010-0383; Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-214-AD;
Amendment 39-16362; AD 2010-14-17]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Model 747-100, 747-
100B, 747-100B SUD, 747-200B, 747-200C, 747-200F, 747-300, 747-400,
747SR, and 747SP Series Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain
Model 747-100, 747-100B, 747-100B SUD, 747-200B, 747-200C, 747-200F,
747-300, 747-400, 747SR, and 747SP series airplanes. This AD requires
repetitive detailed inspections of certain overwing intercostal webs,
and related investigative and corrective actions if necessary. This AD
results from reports of cracks in overwing intercostal webs. We are
issuing this AD to detect and correct such cracking, which could grow
and result in a severed intercostal. If an intercostal is severed,
cracks could develop in the adjacent frame structure and skin,
resulting in a rapid loss of cabin pressure.
DATES: This AD is effective August 17, 2010.
The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of a certain publication listed in the AD as of August 17,
2010.
ADDRESSES: For service information identified in this AD, contact
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services Management,
P.O. Box 3707, MC 2H-65, Seattle, Washington 98124-2207; telephone 206-
544-5000, extension 1; fax 206-766-5680; e-mail me.boecom@boeing.com;
Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Management Facility
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this AD, the regulatory evaluation,
any comments received, and other information. The address for the
Docket Office (telephone 800-647-5527) is the Document Management
Facility, U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30,
West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ivan Li, Aerospace Engineer, Airframe
Branch, ANM-120S, FAA, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office (ACO),
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98057-3356; telephone (425)
917-6437; fax (425) 917-6590.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to include an airworthiness directive (AD) that would apply to
certain Model 747-100, 747-100B, 747-100B SUD, 747-200B, 747-200C, 747-
200F, 747-300, 747-400, 747SR, and 747SP series airplanes. That NPRM
was published in the Federal Register on April 21, 2010 (75 FR 20792).
That NPRM proposed to require repetitive detailed inspections of
certain overwing intercostal webs, and related investigative and
corrective actions if necessary.
Comments
We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this AD. We considered the comment received. Boeing supports the NPRM.
Conclusion
We reviewed the relevant data, considered the comment received, and
determined that air safety and the public interest require adopting the
AD as proposed.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this AD affects 86 airplanes of U.S. registry. The
following table provides the estimated costs for U.S. operators to
comply with this AD.
Table--Estimated Costs
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number of U.S.-
Action Work hours Average labor Parts Cost per product registered Fleet cost
rate per hour airplanes
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inspection........................... 4 $85 None..................... $340 per inspection 86 $29,240 per inspection cycle.
cycle.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
This AD will not have federalism implications under Executive Order
13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct effect on the States,
on the relationship between the national government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and
[[Page 39819]]
responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
(1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
(2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979), and
(3) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
You can find our regulatory evaluation and the estimated costs of
compliance in the AD Docket.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
0
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new AD:
2010-14-17 The Boeing Company: Amendment 39-16362. Docket No. FAA-
2010-0383; Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-214-AD.
Effective Date
(a) This airworthiness directive (AD) is effective August 17, 2010.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to The Boeing Company Model 747-100, 747-100B,
747-100B SUD, 747-200B, 747-200C, 747-200F, 747-300, 747-400, 747SR,
and 747SP series airplanes, certificated in any category; as identified
in Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-53A2750, dated August 27, 2009.
Subject
(d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 53: Fuselage.
Unsafe Condition
(e) This AD results from reports of cracks in overwing intercostal
webs between station (STA) 1160 and STA 1220. The Federal Aviation
Administration is issuing this AD to detect and correct such cracking,
which could grow and result in a severed intercostal. If an intercostal
is severed, cracks could develop in the adjacent frame structure and
skin, resulting in a rapid loss of cabin pressure.
Compliance
(f) You are responsible for having the actions required by this AD
performed within the compliance times specified, unless the actions
have already been done.
Repetitive Inspections of the Overwing Intercostal Web
(g) Before the accumulation of 8,000 total flight cycles, or within
1,500 flight cycles after the effective date of this AD, whichever
occurs later: Do a detailed inspection of the left-side and right-side
STAs 1160, 1180, 1200, and 1220 overwing intercostal webs, and do all
applicable related investigative and corrective actions, in accordance
with the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin
747-53A2750, dated August 27, 2009, except as required by paragraph (i)
of this AD. Do all applicable related investigative and corrective
actions before further flight. If no cracking is found during any
detailed inspection, repeat the inspection thereafter at intervals not
to exceed 3,000 flight cycles.
(h) For any airplane with an overwing intercostal web replaced in
accordance with Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-53A2750, dated August
27, 2009: Within 6,000 flight cycles after the web was replaced, do a
detailed inspection of the replacement overwing intercostal web, and do
all applicable related investigative and corrective actions, in
accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert Service
Bulletin 747-53A2750, dated August 27, 2009, except as required by
paragraph (i) of this AD. Do all applicable related investigative and
corrective actions before further flight. If no cracking is found
during any detailed inspection, repeat the inspection thereafter at
intervals not to exceed 3,000 flight cycles.
Exception to Service Bulletin
(i) If any cracking is found during any inspection required by this
AD, and Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-53A2750, dated August 27,
2009, specifies contacting Boeing for appropriate action: Before
further flight, repair the cracking using a method approved in
accordance with the procedures provided in paragraph (j) of this AD.
Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)
(j)(1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office (ACO),
FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using
the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. Send information to Attn: Ivan
Li, Aerospace Engineer, Airframe Branch, ANM-120S, FAA, Seattle
Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington 98057-3356; telephone (425) 917-6437; fax (425) 917-6590.
Information may be e-mailed to: 9-ANM-Seattle-ACO-AMOC-Requests@faa.gov.
(2) To request a different method of compliance or a different
compliance time for this AD, follow the procedures in 14 CFR 39.19.
Before using any approved AMOC on any airplane to which the AMOC
applies, notify your principal maintenance inspector (PMI) or principal
avionics inspector (PAI), as appropriate, or lacking a principal
inspector, your local Flight Standards District Office. The AMOC
approval letter must specifically reference this AD.
(3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable level of safety may be used
for any repair required by this AD if it is approved by the Boeing
Commercial Airplanes Organization Designation Authorization that has
been authorized by the Manager, Seattle ACO, to make those findings.
For a repair method to be approved, the repair must meet the
certification basis of the airplane, and the approval must specifically
refer to this AD.
Material Incorporated by Reference
(k) You must use Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-53A2750, dated
August 27, 2009, to do the actions required by this AD, unless the AD
specifies otherwise.
(1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation
by reference of this service information under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1
CFR part 51.
(2) For service information identified in this AD, contact Boeing
Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services Management, P.O. Box
3707, MC 2H-65, Seattle, Washington 98124-2207; telephone 206-544-5000,
extension 1; fax 206-766-5680; e-mail me.boecom@boeing.com; Internet
https://www.myboeingfleet.com.
(3) You may review copies of the service information at the FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington. For information on the availability of this material at the
FAA, call 425-227-1221.
(4) You may also review copies of the service information that is
incorporated
[[Page 39820]]
by reference at the National Archives and Records Administration
(NARA). For information on the availability of this material at NARA,
call 202-741-6030, or go to: https://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on June 25, 2010.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2010-16435 Filed 7-12-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P