Special Regulations; Areas of the National Park System, 39168-39170 [2010-16600]
Download as PDF
39168
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 130 / Thursday, July 8, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with RULES
Lake Tahoe off of Glenbrook, NV. The
fireworks launch site will be located in
position 37°46′38.46″ N, 122°23′1.67″ W
(NAD 83). From 10:45 a.m. to 10:00
p.m., the temporary safety zone applies
to the navigable waters around the
fireworks site within a radius of 100
feet. From 10 p.m. until 10:15 p.m. on
July 16, 2010, the area to which the
temporary safety zone applies will
increase in size to encompass the
navigable waters around the fireworks
site within a radius of 1,000 feet. From
10:15 p.m. until 10:30 p.m., the safety
zone will only apply to the navigable
waters around the fireworks site within
a radius of 100 feet.
(b) Definitions. As used in this
section, ‘‘designated representative’’
means a Coast Guard Patrol
Commander, including a Coast Guard
coxswain, petty officer, or other officer
on a Coast Guard vessel or a Federal,
State, or local officer designated by or
assisting the Captain of the Port San
Francisco (COTP) in the enforcement of
the safety zone.
(c) Regulations.
(1) Under the general regulations in
§ 165.23 of this title, entry into,
transiting, or anchoring within this
safety zone is prohibited unless
authorized by the COTP or the COTP’s
designated representative.
(2) The safety zone is closed to all
vessel traffic, except as may be
permitted by the COTP or a designated
representative.
(3) Vessel operators desiring to enter
or operate within the safety zone must
contact the COTP or a designated
representative to obtain permission to
do so. Vessel operators given permission
to enter or operate in the safety zone
must comply with all directions given to
them by the COTP or the designated
representative. Persons and vessels may
request permission to enter the safety
zone on VHF–16 or through the 24-hour
Command Center at telephone 415–399–
3547.
(d) Effective period. This section is
effective from 10:45 a.m. on through
10:30 p.m. on July 16, 2010.
Dated: June 26, 2010.
P.M. Gugg,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port San Francisco.
[FR Doc. 2010–16584 Filed 7–7–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:22 Jul 07, 2010
Jkt 220001
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
National Park Service
36 CFR Part 7
RIN 1024–AD79
Special Regulations; Areas of the
National Park System
National Park Service.
Final Rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The National Park Service
(NPS) is removing the regulation that
closed the Harry S Truman Home to all
public use until June 1, 2010. The
closure was necessary because of
serious health and safety hazards to
visitors during the repair and restoration
work and the potential for damage to
irreplaceable artifacts. Closure could not
be avoided without compromising the
quality and cost of renovation of the
Truman Home. It was necessary to
become effective upon publication to
allow major repair and restoration
activities scheduled to proceed. The
projects have been completed and the
Truman Home has been reopened as
scheduled.
DATES: Effective Date: July 8, 2010.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Superintendent Larry Villalva, at Harry
S Truman National Historic Site.
Telephone 816–254–2720.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The projects to repair and restore the
Truman Home are part of the National
Park Service Centennial Initiative,
which was introduced in May 2007. The
initiative is a nine year plan to improve
facilities and services in the National
Park Service for the 100th anniversary
of the agency in 2016. One of the main
goals is stewardship of natural and
cultural resources in our National Parks,
including rehabilitation, restoration and
maintenance of treasured cultural
resources such as the Truman Home.
The home is a Victorian-style mansion
which was built in 1867 and became
part of the National Park System in
1983. It served as the residence of Harry
S Truman, 33rd President of the United
States from 1919 until his death in 1972.
During the closure, we completed four
projects: installation of a new HVAC
system, installation of a fire suppression
system, repair of structural deficiencies,
and rehabilitation of walls, ceilings and
historic wall covering materials. Before
these construction projects, we removed
and stored the historic furnishings to
protect them from accidental damage
from fine dust caused by construction
activities.
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
We removed historic wallpaper from
the dining room and upstairs bedroom
areas for cleaning, repairing, and
reinstallation by a paper conservator.
Plaster located in many areas
throughout the home failed as a result
of deterioration and exposure to
moisture which caused ceilings to
buckle, and walls to either bulge or
crack.
The existing HVAC system installed
in 1985 failed to maintain a stable
environment in the Truman Home. This
compromised the longevity of not only
the home’s infrastructure, but also the
thousands of artifacts on exhibit and in
storage within the home. We installed
three HVAC units to stabilize the
interior environment. Since the project
required removal of flooring on the
second floor and attic to install
ductwork, we used the opportunity for
access to the floor cavities to install a
fire suppression system.
Administrative Procedure Act
The temporary closure of the Truman
Home to visitors ended on June 1, 2010,
making it possible for the public to
again visit this historic property (36 CFR
7.94; 70 FR 51239). The regulation is no
longer necessary and should be
removed. Since accepting public
comment on this rule would be
unnecessary and contrary to the public
interest, we find under the
Administrative Procedure Act that it is
not necessary to publish a proposed
rule. For the same reasons, we find that
the rule can become effective
immediately under the criteria in the
Administrative Procedure Act.
Regulatory Planning and Review
(Executive Order 12866)
This document is not a significant
rule and the Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed this rule under
Executive Order 12866. We have made
the assessments required by E.O. 12866
and the results are given below.
(1) This rule will not have an effect of
$100 million or more on the economy.
It will not adversely affect in a material
way the economy, productivity,
competition, jobs, the environment,
public health or safety, or State, local,
or tribal governments or communities.
The area restricted through the
rulemaking was closed only during the
Truman Home repair, preservation and
protection construction activities
stabilizing the structure, replacing the
HVAC systems and adding a fire
suppression system, and is now safe for
access by the public.
(2) This rule will not create a serious
inconsistency or otherwise interfere
with an action taken or planned by
E:\FR\FM\08JYR1.SGM
08JYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 130 / Thursday, July 8, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
another agency. The closure was
confined to one building located within
a unit of the National Park System,
which is neither managed nor occupied
by any other agency.
(3) This rule does not alter the
budgetary effects of entitlements, grants,
user fees, or loan programs or the rights
or obligations of their recipients. The
rule was confined to the closure for
public safety and protection of the
historic resource, does not regulate any
financial programs or matters and is
being removed.
(4) This rule does not raise novel legal
or policy issues. Closure of a historic
structure for restoration is a normal
procedure for assuring public safety,
minimizing interruption of the
restoration process, and protection of
the building and contents while
construction is ongoing, and the needed
restoration has been accomplished.
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with RULES
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Department of the Interior
certifies that this document will not
have a significant economic effect on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.). The economic effects
of this rule are local in nature and
negligible in scope. The primary
purpose of this rule is to close the
Truman Home during preparation and
completion of necessary construction
activities. Removal of the restriction is
necessary in order to allow public
access once again.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act (SBREFA)
This rule is not a major rule under 5
U.S.C. 804(2), the Small Business
Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act.
This rule:
a. Does not have an annual effect on
the economy of $100 million or more.
This rule will allow the public to visit
the interior of the Truman Home during
the closure.
b. Will not cause a major increase in
costs or prices for consumers,
individual industries, federal, state, or
local government agencies, or
geographic regions. There were no costs
associated with the removal of this
section of the CFR.
c. Does not have significant adverse
effects on competition, employment,
investment, productivity, innovation, or
the ability of U.S.-based enterprises to
compete with foreign-based enterprises.
The primary purpose of the interim rule
was to implement a closure to allow
necessary construction activities to
proceed safely and efficiently in order to
carry out the protection and
preservation of the Truman Home
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:22 Jul 07, 2010
Jkt 220001
structure. This rule will not change the
ability of United States based
enterprises to compete in any way.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
This rule does not impose an
unfunded mandate on State, local, or
tribal governments or the private sector
of more than $100 million per year. The
rule does not have a significant or
unique effect on State, local or tribal
governments or the private sector. The
restrictions under this regulation do not
have a significant effect or impose an
unfunded mandate on any agency or on
the private sector. This rule applies only
to federal parkland administered by the
National Park Service at Truman Home,
and no costs will be incurred by any
non-federal parties.
Takings (Executive Order 12630)
Under the criteria in Executive Order
12630, this rule does not have
significant takings implications. This
rule does not apply to private property,
or cause a compensable taking, so there
are no takings implications.
Federalism (Executive Order 13132)
In accordance with Executive Order
13132, the rule does not have sufficient
federalism implications to warrant the
preparation of a Federalism Assessment.
This regulation will not have a
substantial direct effect on the states, or
on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government. The rule
addresses public access to the Truman
Home structure at Harry S Truman
National Monument. The affected land
is under the administrative jurisdiction
of the National Park Service.
Civil Justice Reform (Executive Order
12988)
This rule complies with the
requirements of Executive Order 12988.
Specifically, this rule:
(a) Meets the criteria of section 3(a)
requiring that all regulations be
reviewed to eliminate errors and
ambiguity and be written to minimize
litigation; and
(b) Meets the criteria of section 3(b)(2)
requiring that all regulations be written
in clear language and contain clear legal
standards
National Environmental Policy Act
The Handbook for NPS Director’s
Order 12 contains a listing of
Categorical Exclusions. Section 3.4 D(2)
of the Director’s Order 12 Handbook
provides that ‘‘minor changes in
programs and regulations pertaining to
visitor activities’’ may be categorically
excluded under NEPA. The revision
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
39169
will have no effect on use, adjacent land
ownerships or land uses, or adjacent
owners or occupants. Visitor access has
already resumed, and the only effect of
this rule is to remove an obsolete
regulation. Completion of the
environmental screening form shows
that the adoption of this regulation to
remove the closure of the Truman house
would result in no measurable adverse
environmental effects.
We have also determined that the rule
does not involve any of the
extraordinary circumstances listed in 43
CFR 46.215 that would require further
analysis under the National
Environmental Policy Act. As such, a
categorical exclusion is the appropriate
form of NEPA compliance for this
regulatory action.
Government-to-Government
Relationship With Tribes
Under the criteria in Executive Order
13175, we have evaluated this rule and
determined that it has no potential
effects on federally recognized Indian
tribes. This interim rule is temporary, is
limited to the closure of the Truman
house, does not affect any other area of
the park, and does not involve items or
interests of federally recognized Indian
tribes.
Information Quality Act
In developing this rule we did not
conduct or use a study, experiment, or
survey requiring peer review under the
Information Quality Act (Pub. L. 106–
554).
Effects on the Energy Supply (E.O.
13211)
This rule is not a significant energy
action under the definition in Executive
Order 13211. A Statement of Energy
Effects is not required.
Drafting Information
The following persons participated in
the writing of this regulation: Larry
Villalva, Superintendent, Harry S
Truman National Historic Site, Carol
Dage, Curator, Harry S Truman National
Historic Site, James Loach, Associate
Regional Director, Midwest Regional
Office, Omaha, Nebraska; and Philip A.
Selleck, Chief, Regulations and Special
Park Uses, Washington, DC.
List of Subjects in 36 CFR Part 7
District of Columbia, National Parks,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
For the reasons stated in the preamble,
the National Park Service amends 36
CFR part 7 as follows:
■
E:\FR\FM\08JYR1.SGM
08JYR1
39170
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 130 / Thursday, July 8, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
1. The authority for part 7 continues
to read as follows:
■
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1, 3, 9a, 462(k); Sec.
7.96 also issued under D.C. Code 10–137
(2001) and D.C. Code 50–2201 (2001).
§ 7.94
■
[Removed and reserved]
2. Remove and reserve § 7.94.
Dated: June 29, 2010.
Will Shafroth,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Fish and
Wildlife and Parks.
[FR Doc. 2010–16600 Filed 7–7–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4312–BA–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 648
[Docket No. 0907211158–0265–02]
RIN 0648–AY04
Fisheries of the Northeastern United
States; Recreational Management
Measures for the Summer Flounder,
Scup, and Black Sea Bass Fisheries;
Fishing Year 2010
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Final rule.
SUMMARY: NMFS implements
recreational management measures for
the 2010 summer flounder, scup, and
black sea bass fisheries. These actions
are necessary to comply with
regulations implementing the Summer
Flounder, Scup, and Black Sea Bass
Fishery Management Plan (FMP) and to
ensure compliance with the MagnusonStevens Fishery Conservation and
Management Act (Magnuson-Stevens
Act). The intent of these measures is to
prevent overfishing of the summer
flounder, scup, and black sea bass
resources.
Effective August 9, 2010.
Copies of supporting
documents used by the Summer
Flounder, Scup, and Black Sea Bass
Monitoring Committees and of the
Environmental Assessment, Regulatory
Impact Review, and Initial Regulatory
Flexibility Analysis (EA/RIR/IRFA) and
EA/RIR/IRFA Addendum are available
from Daniel Furlong, Executive Director,
Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management
DATES:
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with RULES
ADDRESSES:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:22 Jul 07, 2010
Jkt 220001
Council, Room 2115, Federal Building,
800 N. State Street, Suite 201, Dover, DE
19901. The EA/RIR/IRFA is also
accessible via the Internet at https://
www.nero.noaa.gov. The Final
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (FRFA)
consists of the IRFA, public comments
and responses contained in this final
rule, and the summary of impacts and
alternatives contained in this final rule.
Copies of the small entity compliance
guide and EA/RIR/IRFA document and
addendum are available from Patricia A.
Kurkul, Regional Administrator,
Northeast Region, NMFS, 55 Great
Republic Drive, Gloucester, MA 01930–
2276.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Michael Ruccio, Fishery Policy Analyst,
(978) 281–9104.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
management measures (minimum fish
sizes, possession limits, and fishing
seasons) intended to keep annual
recreational landings from exceeding
the specified harvest limits.
Background
PART 7—SPECIAL REGULATIONS,
AREAS OF THE NATIONAL PARK
SYSTEM
Summer Flounder Management
Measures
The Commission notified the NMFS
Northeast Regional Administrator by
letter dated April 6, 2010, that the 2010
summer flounder recreational fishery
management programs (i.e., minimum
fish size, possession limit, and fishing
seasons) implemented by the states from
Massachusetts to North Carolina have
been reviewed by the Commission’s
Technical Committee and approved by
the Commission’s Summer Flounder
Management Board (SF Board). The
correspondence indicates that the
Commission-approved management
programs are projected to restrict 2010
recreational summer flounder coastwide
landings consistent with the statespecific requirements established by the
Technical Committee and SF Board
through the Commission process.
Based on the recommendation of the
Commission, the NMFS Northeast
Regional Administrator finds that the
recreational summer flounder fishing
measures proposed to be implemented
by the individual states for 2010 are the
conservation equivalent of the season,
minimum size, and possession limit
prescribed in §§ 648.102, 648.103, and
648.105(a), respectively. According to
§ 648.107(a)(1), vessels subject to the
recreational fishing measures of this
part and landing summer flounder in a
state with an approved conservation
equivalency program shall not be
subject to Federal measures, and shall
instead be subject to the recreational
fishing measures implemented by the
state in which they land. Section
648.107(a) has been amended to
recognize state-implemented measures
as conservation equivalent of the
coastwide recreational management
measures for 2010. For clarity, the 2010
The summer flounder, scup, and
black sea bass fisheries are managed
cooperatively by the Atlantic States
Marine Fisheries Commission
(Commission) and the Mid-Atlantic
Fishery Management Council (Council),
in consultation with the New England
and South Atlantic Fishery Management
Councils. The FMP and its
implementing regulations, which are
found at 50 CFR part 648, subparts A
(general provisions), G (summer
flounder), H (scup), and I (black sea
bass), describe the process for specifying
annual recreational management
measures that apply in the Exclusive
Economic Zone (EEZ). The state from
North Carolina to Maine manage these
fisheries within 3 nautical miles of their
coasts, under the Commission’s plan for
summer flounder, scup, and black sea
bass. The Federal regulations govern
fishing activity in the EEZ, as well as
vessels possessing a Federal fisheries
permit, regardless of where they fish.
The 2010 coastwide recreational
harvest limits, after deduction of
research set-aside (RSA), are 8,586,440
lb (3,896 mt) for summer flounder;
3,011,074 lb (1,366 mt) for scup; and
1,830,390 lb (830 mt) for black sea bass.
The final 2010 quota specifications,
inclusive of the recreational harvest
limits, were previously implemented by
NMFS effective January 1, 2010 (74 FR
67978; December 22, 2009), for summer
flounder and scup, and effective
February 2, 2010, for black sea bass (75
FR 6586).
The proposed rule to implement
annual Federal recreational measures
for the 2010 summer flounder, scup,
and black sea bass fisheries was
published on April 27, 2010 (75 FR
22087), along with proposed
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
2010 Recreational Management
Measures
Additional discussion on the
development of the recreational
management measures appeared in the
preamble of the proposed rule and is not
repeated here. All minimum fish sizes
discussed below are total length
measurements of the fish, i.e., the
straight-line distance from the tip of the
snout to the end of the tail while the fish
is lying on its side. For black sea bass,
total length measurement does not
include the caudal fin tendril. All
possession limits discussed below are
per person.
E:\FR\FM\08JYR1.SGM
08JYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 130 (Thursday, July 8, 2010)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 39168-39170]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-16600]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
National Park Service
36 CFR Part 7
RIN 1024-AD79
Special Regulations; Areas of the National Park System
AGENCY: National Park Service.
ACTION: Final Rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The National Park Service (NPS) is removing the regulation
that closed the Harry S Truman Home to all public use until June 1,
2010. The closure was necessary because of serious health and safety
hazards to visitors during the repair and restoration work and the
potential for damage to irreplaceable artifacts. Closure could not be
avoided without compromising the quality and cost of renovation of the
Truman Home. It was necessary to become effective upon publication to
allow major repair and restoration activities scheduled to proceed. The
projects have been completed and the Truman Home has been reopened as
scheduled.
DATES: Effective Date: July 8, 2010.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Superintendent Larry Villalva, at
Harry S Truman National Historic Site. Telephone 816-254-2720.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The projects to repair and restore the Truman Home are part of the
National Park Service Centennial Initiative, which was introduced in
May 2007. The initiative is a nine year plan to improve facilities and
services in the National Park Service for the 100th anniversary of the
agency in 2016. One of the main goals is stewardship of natural and
cultural resources in our National Parks, including rehabilitation,
restoration and maintenance of treasured cultural resources such as the
Truman Home. The home is a Victorian-style mansion which was built in
1867 and became part of the National Park System in 1983. It served as
the residence of Harry S Truman, 33rd President of the United States
from 1919 until his death in 1972.
During the closure, we completed four projects: installation of a
new HVAC system, installation of a fire suppression system, repair of
structural deficiencies, and rehabilitation of walls, ceilings and
historic wall covering materials. Before these construction projects,
we removed and stored the historic furnishings to protect them from
accidental damage from fine dust caused by construction activities.
We removed historic wallpaper from the dining room and upstairs
bedroom areas for cleaning, repairing, and reinstallation by a paper
conservator. Plaster located in many areas throughout the home failed
as a result of deterioration and exposure to moisture which caused
ceilings to buckle, and walls to either bulge or crack.
The existing HVAC system installed in 1985 failed to maintain a
stable environment in the Truman Home. This compromised the longevity
of not only the home's infrastructure, but also the thousands of
artifacts on exhibit and in storage within the home. We installed three
HVAC units to stabilize the interior environment. Since the project
required removal of flooring on the second floor and attic to install
ductwork, we used the opportunity for access to the floor cavities to
install a fire suppression system.
Administrative Procedure Act
The temporary closure of the Truman Home to visitors ended on June
1, 2010, making it possible for the public to again visit this historic
property (36 CFR 7.94; 70 FR 51239). The regulation is no longer
necessary and should be removed. Since accepting public comment on this
rule would be unnecessary and contrary to the public interest, we find
under the Administrative Procedure Act that it is not necessary to
publish a proposed rule. For the same reasons, we find that the rule
can become effective immediately under the criteria in the
Administrative Procedure Act.
Regulatory Planning and Review (Executive Order 12866)
This document is not a significant rule and the Office of
Management and Budget has not reviewed this rule under Executive Order
12866. We have made the assessments required by E.O. 12866 and the
results are given below.
(1) This rule will not have an effect of $100 million or more on
the economy. It will not adversely affect in a material way the
economy, productivity, competition, jobs, the environment, public
health or safety, or State, local, or tribal governments or
communities. The area restricted through the rulemaking was closed only
during the Truman Home repair, preservation and protection construction
activities stabilizing the structure, replacing the HVAC systems and
adding a fire suppression system, and is now safe for access by the
public.
(2) This rule will not create a serious inconsistency or otherwise
interfere with an action taken or planned by
[[Page 39169]]
another agency. The closure was confined to one building located within
a unit of the National Park System, which is neither managed nor
occupied by any other agency.
(3) This rule does not alter the budgetary effects of entitlements,
grants, user fees, or loan programs or the rights or obligations of
their recipients. The rule was confined to the closure for public
safety and protection of the historic resource, does not regulate any
financial programs or matters and is being removed.
(4) This rule does not raise novel legal or policy issues. Closure
of a historic structure for restoration is a normal procedure for
assuring public safety, minimizing interruption of the restoration
process, and protection of the building and contents while construction
is ongoing, and the needed restoration has been accomplished.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Department of the Interior certifies that this document will
not have a significant economic effect on a substantial number of small
entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.).
The economic effects of this rule are local in nature and negligible in
scope. The primary purpose of this rule is to close the Truman Home
during preparation and completion of necessary construction activities.
Removal of the restriction is necessary in order to allow public access
once again.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act (SBREFA)
This rule is not a major rule under 5 U.S.C. 804(2), the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act. This rule:
a. Does not have an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or
more. This rule will allow the public to visit the interior of the
Truman Home during the closure.
b. Will not cause a major increase in costs or prices for
consumers, individual industries, federal, state, or local government
agencies, or geographic regions. There were no costs associated with
the removal of this section of the CFR.
c. Does not have significant adverse effects on competition,
employment, investment, productivity, innovation, or the ability of
U.S.-based enterprises to compete with foreign-based enterprises. The
primary purpose of the interim rule was to implement a closure to allow
necessary construction activities to proceed safely and efficiently in
order to carry out the protection and preservation of the Truman Home
structure. This rule will not change the ability of United States based
enterprises to compete in any way.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
This rule does not impose an unfunded mandate on State, local, or
tribal governments or the private sector of more than $100 million per
year. The rule does not have a significant or unique effect on State,
local or tribal governments or the private sector. The restrictions
under this regulation do not have a significant effect or impose an
unfunded mandate on any agency or on the private sector. This rule
applies only to federal parkland administered by the National Park
Service at Truman Home, and no costs will be incurred by any non-
federal parties.
Takings (Executive Order 12630)
Under the criteria in Executive Order 12630, this rule does not
have significant takings implications. This rule does not apply to
private property, or cause a compensable taking, so there are no
takings implications.
Federalism (Executive Order 13132)
In accordance with Executive Order 13132, the rule does not have
sufficient federalism implications to warrant the preparation of a
Federalism Assessment. This regulation will not have a substantial
direct effect on the states, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government. The rule
addresses public access to the Truman Home structure at Harry S Truman
National Monument. The affected land is under the administrative
jurisdiction of the National Park Service.
Civil Justice Reform (Executive Order 12988)
This rule complies with the requirements of Executive Order 12988.
Specifically, this rule:
(a) Meets the criteria of section 3(a) requiring that all
regulations be reviewed to eliminate errors and ambiguity and be
written to minimize litigation; and
(b) Meets the criteria of section 3(b)(2) requiring that all
regulations be written in clear language and contain clear legal
standards
National Environmental Policy Act
The Handbook for NPS Director's Order 12 contains a listing of
Categorical Exclusions. Section 3.4 D(2) of the Director's Order 12
Handbook provides that ``minor changes in programs and regulations
pertaining to visitor activities'' may be categorically excluded under
NEPA. The revision will have no effect on use, adjacent land ownerships
or land uses, or adjacent owners or occupants. Visitor access has
already resumed, and the only effect of this rule is to remove an
obsolete regulation. Completion of the environmental screening form
shows that the adoption of this regulation to remove the closure of the
Truman house would result in no measurable adverse environmental
effects.
We have also determined that the rule does not involve any of the
extraordinary circumstances listed in 43 CFR 46.215 that would require
further analysis under the National Environmental Policy Act. As such,
a categorical exclusion is the appropriate form of NEPA compliance for
this regulatory action.
Government-to-Government Relationship With Tribes
Under the criteria in Executive Order 13175, we have evaluated this
rule and determined that it has no potential effects on federally
recognized Indian tribes. This interim rule is temporary, is limited to
the closure of the Truman house, does not affect any other area of the
park, and does not involve items or interests of federally recognized
Indian tribes.
Information Quality Act
In developing this rule we did not conduct or use a study,
experiment, or survey requiring peer review under the Information
Quality Act (Pub. L. 106-554).
Effects on the Energy Supply (E.O. 13211)
This rule is not a significant energy action under the definition
in Executive Order 13211. A Statement of Energy Effects is not
required.
Drafting Information
The following persons participated in the writing of this
regulation: Larry Villalva, Superintendent, Harry S Truman National
Historic Site, Carol Dage, Curator, Harry S Truman National Historic
Site, James Loach, Associate Regional Director, Midwest Regional
Office, Omaha, Nebraska; and Philip A. Selleck, Chief, Regulations and
Special Park Uses, Washington, DC.
List of Subjects in 36 CFR Part 7
District of Columbia, National Parks, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
0
For the reasons stated in the preamble, the National Park Service
amends 36 CFR part 7 as follows:
[[Page 39170]]
PART 7--SPECIAL REGULATIONS, AREAS OF THE NATIONAL PARK SYSTEM
0
1. The authority for part 7 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1, 3, 9a, 462(k); Sec. 7.96 also issued
under D.C. Code 10-137 (2001) and D.C. Code 50-2201 (2001).
Sec. 7.94 [Removed and reserved]
0
2. Remove and reserve Sec. 7.94.
Dated: June 29, 2010.
Will Shafroth,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Fish and Wildlife and Parks.
[FR Doc. 2010-16600 Filed 7-7-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4312-BA-P