Special Local Regulation for Marine Events; Mattaponi River, Wakema, VA, 39161-39163 [2010-16587]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 130 / Thursday, July 8, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
adversely affected by the decision, and
we notify the person to appear at the
hearing or to present evidence
supporting his or her interest.
■ 8. In § 416.1436, revise the first and
second sentences of paragraph (a),
paragraphs (c) and (d), and the
introductory text of paragraph (e), and
add paragraphs (g) and (h), to read as
follows:
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with RULES
§ 416.1436 Time and place for a hearing
before an administrative law judge.
(a) General. We may set the time and
place for any hearing. We may change
the time and place, if it is necessary.
* * *
*
*
*
*
*
(c) Determining how appearances will
be made. In setting the time and place
of the hearing, we will consult with the
administrative law judge in order to
determine the status of case preparation
and to determine whether your
appearance or that of any other party
who is to appear at the hearing will be
made in person or by video
teleconferencing. The administrative
law judge will determine that the
appearance of a person be conducted by
video teleconferencing if video
teleconferencing technology is available
to conduct the appearance, use of video
teleconferencing to conduct the
appearance would be more efficient
than conducting the appearance in
person, and the administrative law
judge determines that there is no
circumstance in the particular case that
prevents the use of video
teleconferencing to conduct the
appearance. Section 416.1450 sets forth
procedures under which parties to the
hearing and witnesses appear and
present evidence at hearings.
(d) Objecting to the time or place of
the hearing. If you object to the time or
place of your hearing, you must notify
us at the earliest possible opportunity
before the time set for the hearing. You
must state the reason for your objection
and state the time and place you want
the hearing to be held. If at all possible,
the request should be in writing. We
will change the time or place of the
hearing if the administrative law judge
finds you have good cause, as
determined under paragraphs (e) and (f)
of this section. Section 416.1438
provides procedures we will follow
when you do not respond to a notice of
hearing.
(e) Good cause for changing the time
or place. If you have been scheduled to
appear for your hearing by video
teleconferencing and you notify us as
provided in paragraph (d) of this section
that you object to appearing in that way,
the administrative law judge will find
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:22 Jul 07, 2010
Jkt 220001
your wish not to appear by video
teleconferencing to be a good reason for
changing the time or place of your
scheduled hearing and we will
reschedule your hearing for a time and
place at which you may make your
appearance before the administrative
law judge in person. The administrative
law judge will also find good cause for
changing the time or place of your
scheduled hearing, and we will
reschedule your hearing, if your reason
is one of the following circumstances
and is supported by the evidence:
*
*
*
*
*
(g) Consultation procedures. Before
we exercise the authority to set the time
and place for an administrative law
judge’s hearings, we will consult with
the appropriate hearing office chief
administrative law judge to determine if
there are any reasons why we should
not set the time and place of the
administrative law judge’s hearings. If
the hearing office chief administrative
law judge does not state a reason that
we believe justifies the limited number
of hearings scheduled by the
administrative law judge, we will then
consult with the administrative law
judge before deciding whether to begin
to exercise our authority to set the time
and place for the administrative law
judge’s hearings. If the hearing office
chief administrative law judge states a
reason that we believe justifies the
limited number of hearings scheduled
by the administrative law judge, we will
not exercise our authority to set the time
and place for the administrative law
judge’s hearings. We will work with the
hearing office chief administrative law
judge to identify those circumstances
where we can assist the administrative
law judge and address any impediment
that may affect the scheduling of
hearings.
(h) Pilot program. The provisions of
the first and second sentences of
paragraph (a), the first sentence of
paragraph (c), and paragraph (g) of this
section are a pilot program. These
provisions will no longer be effective on
August 9, 2013, unless we terminate
them earlier or extend them beyond that
date by notice of a final rule in the
Federal Register.
■ 9. In § 416.1438, revise the first
sentence of paragraph (a) to read as
follows:
§ 416.1438 Notice of a hearing before an
administrative law judge.
(a) Issuing the notice. After we set the
time and place of the hearing, we will
mail notice of the hearing to you at your
last known address, or give the notice to
you by personal service, unless you
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
39161
have indicated in writing that you do
not wish to receive this notice. * * *
*
*
*
*
*
■ 10. In § 416.1450, revise the third
sentence of paragraph (b) to read as
follows:
§ 416.1450 Presenting evidence at a
hearing before an administrative law judge.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * * Even if all of the parties
waive their right to appear at a hearing,
we may notify them of a time and a
place for an oral hearing, if the
administrative law judge believes that a
personal appearance and testimony by
you or any other party is necessary to
decide the case.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2010–16549 Filed 7–7–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4191–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 100
[Docket No. USCG–2010–0295]
RIN 1625–AA08
Special Local Regulation for Marine
Events; Mattaponi River, Wakema, VA
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard will
establish special local regulations
during the Mattaponi Madness Drag
Boat Event, a series of power boat races
to be held on the waters of the
Mattaponi River, near Wakema,
Virginia. These special local regulations
are necessary to provide for the safety of
life on navigable waters during the
events. This action is intended to
restrict vessel traffic during the power
boat races on the Mattaponi River
immediately adjacent to the Rainbow
Acres Campground, located in King and
Queen County, near Wakema, Virginia.
DATES: This rule is effective from 9 a.m.
on August 28, 2010 until 7 p.m. on
August 29, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Comments and material
received from the public, as well as
documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, are part
of docket USCG–2010–0295 and are
available online by going to https://
www.regulations.gov, inserting USCG–
2010–0295 in the ‘‘Keyword’’ box, and
then clicking ‘‘Search.’’ This material is
also available for inspection or copying
at the Docket Management Facility (M–
E:\FR\FM\08JYR1.SGM
08JYR1
39162
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 130 / Thursday, July 8, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
30), U.S. Department of Transportation,
West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this temporary
rule, call or email LT Tiffany Duffy,
Chief Waterways Management Division,
Sector Hampton Roads, Coast Guard;
telephone (757)668–5580, e-mail
Tiffany.A.Duffy@uscg.mil. If you have
questions on viewing or submitting
material to the docket, call Renee V.
Wright, Program Manager, Docket
Operations, telephone 202–366–9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulatory Information
On May 11, 2010, we published a
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
entitled Special Local Regulation for
Marine Events; Mattaponi River,
Wakema, VA in the Federal Register (75
FR 90). We received no comments on
the proposed rule. No public meeting
was requested, and none was held.
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with RULES
Basis and Purpose
The Mattaponi Volunteer Rescue
Squad will be sponsoring a series of
power boat racing events titled the
‘‘Mattaponi Madness Drag Boat Event.’’
This section will be effective on the
following dates: August 28, 2010
through August 29, 2010. The Coast
Guard anticipates that this section will
only be enforced between 9 a.m. to 7
p.m. on August 28, 2010. If the event is
postponed due to inclement weather,
then this section will be enforced on
August 29, 2010 between 9 a.m. and 7
p.m. The races will be held on the
Mattaponi River immediately adjacent
to the Rainbow Acres Campground,
King and Queen County, Virginia. The
power boat races will consist of
approximately 45 vessels conducting
high speed straight line runs along the
river and parallel to the shoreline. A
fleet of spectator vessels is expected to
gather near the event site to view the
competition. Due to the high speed of 45
vessels, the regulation is necessary to
provide for the safety of participants,
spectators and other transiting vessels
by temporarily restricting vessel traffic
in the event area during the power boat
races.
Discussion of Comments and Changes
The Coast Guard received no
comments in response to the NPRM. No
public meeting was requested and none
was held.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:22 Jul 07, 2010
Jkt 220001
Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after
considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on 13 of these statutes or
executive orders.
Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant
regulatory action under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs
and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that
Order. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under that
Order. Although this regulation will
prevent traffic from transiting a portion
of the Mattaponi River during the
events, the effect of this regulation will
not be significant due to the limited
duration that the regulation will be in
effect and the advance notification that
will be made to the maritime
community via marine information
broadcast so mariners can adjust their
plans accordingly. Additionally, the
regulated area has been designed to
impose the least impact on general
navigation yet provide the level of safety
deemed necessary. Vessel traffic will be
able to transit the regulated area
between heats and when the Coast
Guard Patrol Commander deems it is
safe to do so.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered
whether this rule would have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises
small businesses, not-for-profit
organizations that are independently
owned and operated and are not
dominant in their fields, and
governmental jurisdictions with
populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5
U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities:
owners or operators of vessels intending
to transit this section of the Mattaponi
River from 9 a.m. to 7 p.m. on August
28, 2010 or on August 29, 2010. This
rule would not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities for the
following reasons: (i) Although the
regulated area will apply to a threequarter mile segment of the Mattaponi
River, traffic may be allowed to pass
through the regulated area with the
permission of the Coast Guard Patrol
Commander between races; (ii) in the
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
case where the Patrol Commander
authorizes passage through the
regulated area during the event, vessels
shall proceed at the minimum speed
necessary to maintain a safe course that
minimizes wake near the race course;
(iii) before the enforcement period, we
will issue maritime advisories so
mariners can adjust their plans
accordingly.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
in the NPRM we offered to assist small
entities in understanding the rule so
that they could better evaluate its effects
on them and participate in the
rulemaking process.
Small businesses may send comments
on the actions of Federal employees
who enforce, or otherwise determine
compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
and the Regional Small Business
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
Ombudsman evaluates these actions
annually and rates each agency’s
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
employees of the Coast Guard, call 1–
888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247). The
Coast Guard will not retaliate against
small entities that question or complain
about this rule or any policy or action
of the Coast Guard.
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection
of information under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–
3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on State or local governments and
would either preempt State law or
impose a substantial direct cost of
compliance on them. We have analyzed
this rule under that Order and have
determined that it does not have
implications for federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this rule
will not result in such an expenditure,
E:\FR\FM\08JYR1.SGM
08JYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 130 / Thursday, July 8, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not cause a taking of
private property or otherwise have
taking implications under Executive
Order 12630, Governmental Actions and
Interference with Constitutionally
Protected Property Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards
in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to
minimize litigation, eliminate
ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13045, Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not
an economically significant rule and
does not create an environmental risk to
health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under that order because
it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. The Administrator of the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs
has not designated it as a significant
energy action. Therefore, it does not
require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with RULES
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use
voluntary consensus standards in their
regulatory activities unless the agency
provides Congress, through the Office of
Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:22 Jul 07, 2010
Jkt 220001
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023–01 and
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
which guide the Coast Guard in
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA)(42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have concluded this action is one of a
category of actions which do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. This rule is categorically
excluded, under figure 2–1, paragraph
(34)(h), of the Instruction. This rule
involves implementation of regulations
within 33 CFR Part 100 that apply to
organized marine events on the
navigable waters of the United States
that may have potential for negative
impact on the safety or other interest of
waterway users and shore side activities
in the event area. The category of water
activities includes but is not limited to
sail boat regattas, boat parades, power
boat racing, swimming events, crew
racing, and sail board racing. An
environmental analysis checklist and a
categorical exclusion determination will
be available in the docket where
indicated under ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 100
Marine safety, Navigation (water),
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Waterways.
■ For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 100 as follows:
PART 100—SAFETY OF LIFE ON
NAVIGABLE WATERS
1. The authority citation for part 100
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1233
2. Add temporary § 100.35T05–0295
to read as follows:
■
39163
immediately adjacent to Rainbow Acres
Campground, King and Queen County,
Virginia. The regulated area includes a
section of the Mattaponi River
approximately three-quarter mile long
and bounded in width by each
shoreline, bounded to the east by a line
that runs parallel along longitude
076°52′43″ W, near the mouth of
Mitchell Hill Creek, and bounded to the
west by a line that runs parallel along
longitude 076°53′41″ W just north of
Wakema, Virginia. All coordinates
reference Datum NAD 1983.
(b) Definitions. (1) Coast Guard Patrol
Commander means a commissioned,
warrant or petty officer of the Coast
Guard who has been designated by the
Commander, Coast Guard Sector
Hampton Roads.
(2) Official Patrol means any vessel
assigned or approved by Commander,
Coast Guard Sector Hampton Roads
with a commissioned, warrant or petty
officer on board and displaying a Coast
Guard ensign.
(c) Special Local Regulations. (1)
Except for persons or vessels authorized
by the Coast Guard Patrol Commander,
no person or vessel may enter or remain
in the regulated area.
(2) The operator of any vessel in the
regulated area shall:
(i) Stop the vessel immediately when
directed to do so by an Official Patrol.
(ii) Proceed as directed by any official
patrol.
(d) Enforcement Period. This
regulation will be enforced from 9 a.m.
to 7 p.m. on August 28, 2010. In the case
of inclement weather, this regulation
will be enforced from 9 a.m. to 7 p.m.
on August 29, 2010.
Dated: June 21, 2010.
M.S. Ogle,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port Hampton Roads.
[FR Doc. 2010–16587 Filed 7–7–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG–2010–0472]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone; Illinois River, Mile 119.7
to 120.3
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary final rule.
AGENCY:
§ 100.35T05–0295 Mattaponi River,
Wakema, Virginia.
ACTION:
(a) Regulated Area. The regulated area
includes all waters of Mattaponi River
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is
establishing a temporary safety zone for
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\08JYR1.SGM
08JYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 130 (Thursday, July 8, 2010)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 39161-39163]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-16587]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 100
[Docket No. USCG-2010-0295]
RIN 1625-AA08
Special Local Regulation for Marine Events; Mattaponi River,
Wakema, VA
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Temporary final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard will establish special local regulations
during the Mattaponi Madness Drag Boat Event, a series of power boat
races to be held on the waters of the Mattaponi River, near Wakema,
Virginia. These special local regulations are necessary to provide for
the safety of life on navigable waters during the events. This action
is intended to restrict vessel traffic during the power boat races on
the Mattaponi River immediately adjacent to the Rainbow Acres
Campground, located in King and Queen County, near Wakema, Virginia.
DATES: This rule is effective from 9 a.m. on August 28, 2010 until 7
p.m. on August 29, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Comments and material received from the public, as well as
documents mentioned in this preamble as being available in the docket,
are part of docket USCG-2010-0295 and are available online by going to
https://www.regulations.gov, inserting USCG-2010-0295 in the ``Keyword''
box, and then clicking ``Search.'' This material is also available for
inspection or copying at the Docket Management Facility (M-
[[Page 39162]]
30), U.S. Department of Transportation, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590,
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this
temporary rule, call or email LT Tiffany Duffy, Chief Waterways
Management Division, Sector Hampton Roads, Coast Guard; telephone
(757)668-5580, e-mail Tiffany.A.Duffy@uscg.mil. If you have questions
on viewing or submitting material to the docket, call Renee V. Wright,
Program Manager, Docket Operations, telephone 202-366-9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulatory Information
On May 11, 2010, we published a notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM) entitled Special Local Regulation for Marine Events; Mattaponi
River, Wakema, VA in the Federal Register (75 FR 90). We received no
comments on the proposed rule. No public meeting was requested, and
none was held.
Basis and Purpose
The Mattaponi Volunteer Rescue Squad will be sponsoring a series of
power boat racing events titled the ``Mattaponi Madness Drag Boat
Event.'' This section will be effective on the following dates: August
28, 2010 through August 29, 2010. The Coast Guard anticipates that this
section will only be enforced between 9 a.m. to 7 p.m. on August 28,
2010. If the event is postponed due to inclement weather, then this
section will be enforced on August 29, 2010 between 9 a.m. and 7 p.m.
The races will be held on the Mattaponi River immediately adjacent to
the Rainbow Acres Campground, King and Queen County, Virginia. The
power boat races will consist of approximately 45 vessels conducting
high speed straight line runs along the river and parallel to the
shoreline. A fleet of spectator vessels is expected to gather near the
event site to view the competition. Due to the high speed of 45
vessels, the regulation is necessary to provide for the safety of
participants, spectators and other transiting vessels by temporarily
restricting vessel traffic in the event area during the power boat
races.
Discussion of Comments and Changes
The Coast Guard received no comments in response to the NPRM. No
public meeting was requested and none was held.
Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on 13 of these statutes or executive orders.
Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant regulatory action under section 3(f)
of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs and benefits under section
6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and Budget has not
reviewed it under that Order. Although this regulation will prevent
traffic from transiting a portion of the Mattaponi River during the
events, the effect of this regulation will not be significant due to
the limited duration that the regulation will be in effect and the
advance notification that will be made to the maritime community via
marine information broadcast so mariners can adjust their plans
accordingly. Additionally, the regulated area has been designed to
impose the least impact on general navigation yet provide the level of
safety deemed necessary. Vessel traffic will be able to transit the
regulated area between heats and when the Coast Guard Patrol Commander
deems it is safe to do so.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered whether this rule would have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small entities''
comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are
independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields,
and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities: owners or operators of vessels intending to transit this
section of the Mattaponi River from 9 a.m. to 7 p.m. on August 28, 2010
or on August 29, 2010. This rule would not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities for the following
reasons: (i) Although the regulated area will apply to a three-quarter
mile segment of the Mattaponi River, traffic may be allowed to pass
through the regulated area with the permission of the Coast Guard
Patrol Commander between races; (ii) in the case where the Patrol
Commander authorizes passage through the regulated area during the
event, vessels shall proceed at the minimum speed necessary to maintain
a safe course that minimizes wake near the race course; (iii) before
the enforcement period, we will issue maritime advisories so mariners
can adjust their plans accordingly.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), in the NPRM we offered to
assist small entities in understanding the rule so that they could
better evaluate its effects on them and participate in the rulemaking
process.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this rule under
that Order and have determined that it does not have implications for
federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in
such an expenditure,
[[Page 39163]]
we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not cause a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not an economically significant rule and does not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA)(42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have concluded
this action is one of a category of actions which do not individually
or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment.
This rule is categorically excluded, under figure 2-1, paragraph
(34)(h), of the Instruction. This rule involves implementation of
regulations within 33 CFR Part 100 that apply to organized marine
events on the navigable waters of the United States that may have
potential for negative impact on the safety or other interest of
waterway users and shore side activities in the event area. The
category of water activities includes but is not limited to sail boat
regattas, boat parades, power boat racing, swimming events, crew
racing, and sail board racing. An environmental analysis checklist and
a categorical exclusion determination will be available in the docket
where indicated under ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 100
Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Waterways.
0
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 100 as follows:
PART 100--SAFETY OF LIFE ON NAVIGABLE WATERS
0
1. The authority citation for part 100 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1233
0
2. Add temporary Sec. 100.35T05-0295 to read as follows:
Sec. 100.35T05-0295 Mattaponi River, Wakema, Virginia.
(a) Regulated Area. The regulated area includes all waters of
Mattaponi River immediately adjacent to Rainbow Acres Campground, King
and Queen County, Virginia. The regulated area includes a section of
the Mattaponi River approximately three-quarter mile long and bounded
in width by each shoreline, bounded to the east by a line that runs
parallel along longitude 076[deg]52[min]43[sec] W, near the mouth of
Mitchell Hill Creek, and bounded to the west by a line that runs
parallel along longitude 076[deg]53[min]41[sec] W just north of Wakema,
Virginia. All coordinates reference Datum NAD 1983.
(b) Definitions. (1) Coast Guard Patrol Commander means a
commissioned, warrant or petty officer of the Coast Guard who has been
designated by the Commander, Coast Guard Sector Hampton Roads.
(2) Official Patrol means any vessel assigned or approved by
Commander, Coast Guard Sector Hampton Roads with a commissioned,
warrant or petty officer on board and displaying a Coast Guard ensign.
(c) Special Local Regulations. (1) Except for persons or vessels
authorized by the Coast Guard Patrol Commander, no person or vessel may
enter or remain in the regulated area.
(2) The operator of any vessel in the regulated area shall:
(i) Stop the vessel immediately when directed to do so by an
Official Patrol.
(ii) Proceed as directed by any official patrol.
(d) Enforcement Period. This regulation will be enforced from 9
a.m. to 7 p.m. on August 28, 2010. In the case of inclement weather,
this regulation will be enforced from 9 a.m. to 7 p.m. on August 29,
2010.
Dated: June 21, 2010.
M.S. Ogle,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Hampton Roads.
[FR Doc. 2010-16587 Filed 7-7-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P