Information Collection; Submission for OMB Review, Comment Request, 39211-39212 [2010-16575]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 130 / Thursday, July 8, 2010 / Notices
by the Council in its 2010 Annual
Report to Congress.
III. Brief Descriptions of Priority Issues
1. Education and At-Risk Youth
The best way to keep young people
out of trouble is to keep them in school.
Without structure and supervision that
school provides, young people often
turn to delinquent or criminal behavior
during school hours and end up in the
juvenile justice system, with most not
completing high school. A number of
factors contribute to the failure of young
people to complete schooling including:
Chronic truancy, educational instability,
‘‘push out,’’ issues of access, co-occuring
factors, school connectedness, and the
absences of positive activities for
afterschool times.
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
2. Juvenile Reentry and Transitions to
Adulthood
Young people reentering the
community from juvenile residential
facilities often lack the support they
need to change the course of their lives
and avoid the destructive cycle of
recidivism. The multiple needs of these
young people (schooling, stable
housing, skills to obtain meaningful
employment, physical and mental
health problems, etc.) require
coordination of services, supervision,
and support at the local level to help
ensure each youth a successful
transition back home and to adulthood.
Youth aging out of foster care and youth
who are homeless have similar needs for
transitional support. A number of
Federal policies, practices, programs,
and legislation affect local and state
capacity to provide solid support
through transition.
3. Racial and Ethnic Disparities in the
Juvenile Justice and Related Systems
Disproportionate contact of minorities
(DMC) in juvenile justice has been a
challenge for policymakers for decades.
DMC is not an issue specific to the
justice system; it is connected with
inequities in other youth-serving
systems and requires exploration of the
relationship between child welfare,
education, and youth’s socioeconomic
status. The team seeks to identify
Federal legislation and practices that
both assist States and those that
function as barriers in reducing
disparities in juvenile justice, child
welfare, and education.
4. Tribal Youth and Juvenile Justice
Tribal youth face a host of
challenges—poverty, child abuse and
neglect, exposure to family violence,
substance abuse, the highest rate of
suicides among all youth, and a weak
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:09 Jul 07, 2010
Jkt 220001
educational system. Without
intervention and remediation these
issues can lead to additional negative
outcomes including delinquency.
Multiple Federal agencies have specific
responsibility for working with Indian
Country, notably, the Departments of
Agriculture, Justice, Health and Human
Services, Housing and Urban
Development, and Interior. The
overlapping mosaic of policies,
regulations, guidelines and programs
can challenge achievement of desired
results.
IV. Guiding Questions for Commenters
The Council’s issue teams have
identified a number of questions to
focus their examination, and the
Council is particularly interested in
receiving comments addressing some or
all of these questions. The first question
for three of the topic areas is listed by
topic as follows:
Education and At-Risk Youth: What is
the Federal role in preventing youth
from entering the juvenile justice system
and successfully graduating from high
school prepared for adulthood?
Juvenile Reentry and Transitions to
Adulthood: What is the Federal role in
helping ensure youth graduate and
successfully transition back home and
into adulthood (from juvenile facilities,
out of the foster care system, and in
returning home and to their
communities from runaway/thrown
away/homeless status)?
Racial and Ethnic Disparities in the
Juvenile Justice and Related Systems:
How do you view the Federal role with
regard to racial and ethnic disparities?
For these first three topic areas, all of
the questions below also apply:
a. What does the Federal government
do well? What needs to be changed?
b. Are there Federal practices,
policies, legislation, and/or regulations
that support or restrict the successful
education of youth; reentry and/or
transitions to adulthood; or addressing
of racial/ethnic disparities in the
juvenile justice and related systems?
What role does technical/training
support have in redressing restrictions?
c. Are there legislative challenges
affecting this issue that should be
brought to the attention of the Federal
agencies? What ought Federal agencies
do about them?
d. What results and/or consequences
might occur from the enacted
recommendations?
e. Is there anything else the Federal
government should be aware of
concerning this topic?
The Council’s Tribal Youth issue team
requests public comments addressing
the following questions:
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
39211
a. How do you view the Federal role
with regard to tribal youth and their
families?
b. What does the Federal government
do well for tribal youth? What needs to
be changed?
c. Describe what Federal practices,
policies, or regulations support or fail to
support Tribal youth and their families.
What comes to mind when you think of
barriers? Alternatively, areas of good
practice (to meeting the needs for
belonging, mastery, independence and
generosity)?
d. Are there legislative challenges
affecting issues related to Tribal youth
and juvenile justice that should be
brought to the attention of the Federal
agencies? What ought Federal agencies
do about them? Who are the key people
to help with this issue?
e. What results and/or consequences
might occur in Indian Country from
enacted recommendations? Are there
individuals, agencies or systems that
might not welcome the
recommendations or changes in policies
(Tribal Youth, Tribes, and Agencies)?
f. Is there anything else the Federal
government should be aware of
concerning tribal youth justice,
specifically in the areas of youth
prevention, intervention, detention and
reentry?
Robin Delany-Shabazz,
Designated Federal Official, Coordinating
Council on Juvenile Justice and Delinquency
Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2010–16696 Filed 7–7–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–18–P
CORPORATION FOR NATIONAL AND
COMMUNITY SERVICE
Information Collection; Submission for
OMB Review, Comment Request
AGENCY: Corporation for National and
Community Service.
ACTION: Notice.
SUMMARY: The Corporation for National
and Community Service (hereinafter the
‘‘Corporation’’), has submitted a public
information collection request (ICR)
entitled the Peer Reviewer Application
Instructions to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for
review and approval in accordance with
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995,
Public Law 104–13, (44 U.S.C. Chapter
35). Copies of this ICR, with applicable
supporting documentation, may be
obtained by calling the Corporation for
National and Community Service, James
Willie at (202) 606–6845. Individuals
who use a telecommunications device
for the deaf (TTY–TDD) may call (202)
E:\FR\FM\08JYN1.SGM
08JYN1
39212
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 130 / Thursday, July 8, 2010 / Notices
606–3472 between 8:30 a.m. and 5 p.m.
eastern time, Monday through Friday.
ADDRESSES: Comments may be
submitted, identified by the title of the
information collection activity, to the
Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs, Attn: Ms. Sharon Mar, OMB
Desk Officer for the Corporation for
National and Community Service, by
any of the following two methods
within 30 days from the date of
publication in this Federal Register.
(1) By fax to: (202) 395–6974,
Attention: Ms. Sharon Mar, OMB Desk
Officer for the Corporation for National
and Community Service; and
(2) Electronically by e-mail to:
smar@omb.eop.gov.
The OMB
is particularly interested in comments
which:
• Evaluate whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the Corporation, including
whether the information will have
practical utility;
• Evaluate the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
• Propose ways to enhance the
quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and
• Propose ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information
on those who are to respond, including
through the use of appropriate
automated, electronic, mechanical, or
other technological collection
techniques or other forms of information
technology, e.g., permitting electronic
submissions of responses.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
Comments
A 60-day public comment Notice was
published in the Federal Register on
April 28, 2010. This comment period
ended June 29, 2010. No public
comments were received from this
Notice.
Description: The Corporation seeks to
renew the current information
collection. Minor revisions are proposed
to clarify eGrants instructions and
reflect adjustments to the Corporation
for National and Community Service
eGrants system.
The information collection will
otherwise be used in the same manner
as the existing application. The
Corporation also seeks to continue using
the current application until the revised
application is approved by OMB. The
current application is due to expire on
October 31, 2010.
Type of Review: Renewal.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:09 Jul 07, 2010
Jkt 220001
Agency: Corporation for National and
Community Service.
Title: Peer Reviewer Application
Instructions.
OMB Number: 3045–0090.
Agency Number: None.
Affected Public: Individuals who are
interested in serving as peer reviewers
and peer review panel facilitators for the
Corporation.
Total Respondents: 2,500 responses
annually.
Frequency: One time to complete.
Average Time per Response: Averages
40 minutes.
Estimated Total Burden Hours: 1,666
hours.
Total Burden Cost (capital/startup):
None.
Total Burden Cost (operating/
maintenance): None.
Dated: June 30, 2010.
Vielka Garibaldi,
Director, Office of Grants Policy and
Operations.
[FR Doc. 2010–16575 Filed 7–7–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6050–$$–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Office of the Secretary
Establishment of Department of
Defense Federal Advisory Committee;
Independent Panel Review of Judge
Advocate Requirements of the
Department of the Navy
Department of Defense (DoD).
Establishment of Federal
advisory committee.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: Under the provisions of
section 506 of Public Law 111–84, the
Federal Advisory Committee Act of
1972, (5 U.S.C. Appendix, as amended),
the Government in the Sunshine Act of
1976 (5 U.S.C. 552b, as amended), and
41 CFR 102–3.50, the Department of
Defense gives notice that it is
establishing the charter for the
Independent Panel Review of Judge
Advocate Requirements of the
Department of the Navy (hereafter
referred to as the Panel).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jim
Freeman, Deputy Committee
Management Officer for the Department
of Defense, 703–601–6128.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Panel
is a non-discretionary Federal advisory
committee established to review the
judge advocate requirement of the
Department of the Navy. The Panel
shall:
a. Carry out a study of the policies
and management and organizational
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
practices of the U.S. Navy and the U.S.
Marine Corps with respect to the
responsibilities, assignment, and career
development of judge advocates for
purposes of determining the number of
judge advocates required to fulfill the
legal mission of the Department of the
Navy.
b. In carrying out the study, the Panel
shall review the following:
i. The emergent operational law
requirements of the U.S. Navy and the
U.S. Marine Corps, including
requirements for judge advocates on
joint task forces, in support of rule of
law objectives in Iraq and Afghanistan,
and in operational units;
ii. New requirements to support the
Office of Military Commissions and to
support the disability evaluation system
for members of the U.S. Armed Forces;
iii. The judge advocate requirements
of the Department of the Navy for the
military justice mission, including
assignment policies, training and
education, increasing complexity of
court-martial litigation, and the
performance of the U.S. Navy and U.S.
Marine Corps in providing legally
sufficient post-trial processing of cases
in general courts-martial and special
courts-martial.
iv. The role of the Judge Advocate
General of the Navy, as the senior
uniformed legal officer of the
Department of the Navy, to determine
whether additional authority for the
Judge Advocate General over manpower
policies and assignments of judge
advocates in the U.S. Navy and U.S.
Marine Corps is warranted;
v. Directives issued by the U.S. Navy
and the U.S. Marine Corps pertaining to
jointly-shared missions requiring legal
support;
vi. Career patterns for U.S. Marine
Corps judge advocates in order to
identify and validate assignments to
non-legal billets required for
professional development and
promotion; and
In addition, the Panel will review,
evaluate and assess such other matters
and materials as the Panel considers
appropriate for purposes of the study.
In carrying out its study the Panel
may review, and incorporate as
appropriate, the findings of applicable
on-going and completed studies in
future manpower requirements,
including the two-part study by CNA
Analysis and Solutions® entitled, ‘‘An
Analysis of Navy JAG Corps Future
Manpower Requirements’’.
The Panel, no later than 120 days after
its first meeting, shall submit a report of
its study. The report, as a minimum,
shall include the following:
E:\FR\FM\08JYN1.SGM
08JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 130 (Thursday, July 8, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 39211-39212]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-16575]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
CORPORATION FOR NATIONAL AND COMMUNITY SERVICE
Information Collection; Submission for OMB Review, Comment
Request
AGENCY: Corporation for National and Community Service.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Corporation for National and Community Service
(hereinafter the ``Corporation''), has submitted a public information
collection request (ICR) entitled the Peer Reviewer Application
Instructions to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review
and approval in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995,
Public Law 104-13, (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35). Copies of this ICR, with
applicable supporting documentation, may be obtained by calling the
Corporation for National and Community Service, James Willie at (202)
606-6845. Individuals who use a telecommunications device for the deaf
(TTY-TDD) may call (202)
[[Page 39212]]
606-3472 between 8:30 a.m. and 5 p.m. eastern time, Monday through
Friday.
ADDRESSES: Comments may be submitted, identified by the title of the
information collection activity, to the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs, Attn: Ms. Sharon Mar, OMB Desk Officer for the
Corporation for National and Community Service, by any of the following
two methods within 30 days from the date of publication in this Federal
Register.
(1) By fax to: (202) 395-6974, Attention: Ms. Sharon Mar, OMB Desk
Officer for the Corporation for National and Community Service; and
(2) Electronically by e-mail to: smar@omb.eop.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The OMB is particularly interested in
comments which:
Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is
necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the
Corporation, including whether the information will have practical
utility;
Evaluate the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the
burden of the proposed collection of information, including the
validity of the methodology and assumptions used;
Propose ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity
of the information to be collected; and
Propose ways to minimize the burden of the collection of
information on those who are to respond, including through the use of
appropriate automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological
collection techniques or other forms of information technology, e.g.,
permitting electronic submissions of responses.
Comments
A 60-day public comment Notice was published in the Federal
Register on April 28, 2010. This comment period ended June 29, 2010. No
public comments were received from this Notice.
Description: The Corporation seeks to renew the current information
collection. Minor revisions are proposed to clarify eGrants
instructions and reflect adjustments to the Corporation for National
and Community Service eGrants system.
The information collection will otherwise be used in the same
manner as the existing application. The Corporation also seeks to
continue using the current application until the revised application is
approved by OMB. The current application is due to expire on October
31, 2010.
Type of Review: Renewal.
Agency: Corporation for National and Community Service.
Title: Peer Reviewer Application Instructions.
OMB Number: 3045-0090.
Agency Number: None.
Affected Public: Individuals who are interested in serving as peer
reviewers and peer review panel facilitators for the Corporation.
Total Respondents: 2,500 responses annually.
Frequency: One time to complete.
Average Time per Response: Averages 40 minutes.
Estimated Total Burden Hours: 1,666 hours.
Total Burden Cost (capital/startup): None.
Total Burden Cost (operating/maintenance): None.
Dated: June 30, 2010.
Vielka Garibaldi,
Director, Office of Grants Policy and Operations.
[FR Doc. 2010-16575 Filed 7-7-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6050-$$-P