Tamarac National Wildlife Refuge and Wetland Management District, Minnesota, 39038-39039 [2010-16425]

Download as PDF 39038 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 129 / Wednesday, July 7, 2010 / Notices locations, and new visitor uses including hunting. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Fish and Wildlife Service Alternative C: High Involvement in Watershed Improvement [FWS–R3–R–2010–N118; 30136–1265–0000– S3] The third alternative, Alternative C, retains many of the concepts and objectives from alternative B, but increases the emphasis given to water resources both on-Refuge and in the watershed upstream of the wetland complex. Alternative C restores additional wetland and upland acres up-watershed of the Refuge, expands water resource monitoring and improvement activities throughout the east half of the Platte-Spunk watershed, targets a limited quantity of additional lands with critical water resource value adjacent to the existing Refuge boundary for acquisition, increases and directs private lands work to priority aquatic and riparian areas upstream of the Refuge, emphasizes fishing as a primary recreation opportunity, directs additional education and interpretation efforts to water resource topics, and highlights partnerships, outreach opportunities, and volunteerism that occur within, or directly affect the Refuge’s watershed. Public Meeting We will give the public an opportunity to provide input at a public meeting. You can obtain the schedule from the address or Web site listed in this notice (see ADDRESSES). You may also submit comments anytime during the comment period. Public Availability of Comments cprice-sewell on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with NOTICES Before including your address, phone number, e-mail address, or other personal identifying information in your comment, you should be aware that your entire comment—including your personal identifying information—may be made publicly available at anytime. While you can ask us in your comment to withhold your personal identifying information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be able to do so. Dated: June 18, 2010. Lynn M. Lewis, Acting Regional Director, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Fort Snelling, Minnesota. [FR Doc. 2010–16426 Filed 7–6–10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4310–55–P VerDate Mar<15>2010 15:28 Jul 06, 2010 Jkt 220001 Tamarac National Wildlife Refuge and Wetland Management District, Minnesota AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior. ACTION: Notice of Availability: draft comprehensive conservation plan and environmental assessment; request for comments. SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), announce the availability of a draft comprehensive conservation plan (CCP) and draft environmental assessment (EA) for Tamarac National Wildlife Refuge (NWR) and Tamarac Wetland Management District (WMD) for public review and comment. In this draft CCP/ EA we describe how we propose to manage the refuge and district for the next 15 years. DATES: To ensure consideration, we must receive your written comments by August 6, 2010. An open house style meeting will be held during the comment period to receive comments and provide information on the draft plan. Special mailings, newspaper articles, internet postings, and other media announcements will inform people of the meetings and opportunities for written comments. ADDRESSES: Comments or requests for more information can be sent by any of the following methods. You may also drop off comments in person at Tamarac NWR. 1. Agency Web site: View or download a copy of the document and comment at https://www.fws.gov/ midwest/planning/Tamarac/. 2. E-mail: r3planning@fws.gov. Include ‘‘Tamarac Draft CCP/EA’’ in the subject line of the message. 3. Fax: 218–847–2641. 4. Mail: Attention: Refuge Manager, Tamarac National Wildlife Refuge, 35704 County Road 26, Rochert, Minnesota 56578. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Barbara Boyle, 218–847–2641. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Introduction With this notice, we continue the CCP process for Tamarac NWR and WMD, which we began by publishing a notice of intent on (72 FR 27587–27588, May 16, 2007). For more about the initial process and the history of this refuge and district, see that notice. PO 00000 Frm 00064 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 The 42,738-acre Tamarac National Wildlife Refuge was established in 1938. The Refuge includes 2,180 Federallydesignated wilderness acres. The Tamarac Wetland Management District consists of 8,577 acres of wetland easements distributed throughout five counties. Background The CCP Process The National Wildlife Refuge System Administration Act of 1966, as amended by the National Wildlife Refuge System Improvement Act of 1997 (16 U.S.C. 668dd–668ee), requires us to develop a comprehensive conservation plan for each national wildlife refuge. The purpose in developing a CCP is to provide refuge managers with a 15-year strategy for achieving refuge purposes and contributing toward the mission of the National Wildlife Refuge System, consistent with sound principles of fish and wildlife management, conservation, legal mandates, and Service policies. In addition to outlining broad management direction on conserving wildlife and their habitats, plans identify wildlifedependent recreational opportunities available to the public, including opportunities for hunting, fishing, wildlife observation, wildlife photography, and environmental education and interpretation. CCP Alternatives and Our Preferred Alternative Priority Issues During the public scoping process, we, other stakeholders and partners, and the public identified several priority issues, which include habitat management, invasive species, and demand for additional recreation opportunities and visitor services. To address these issues, we developed and evaluated the following alternatives during the planning process. Tamarac National Wildlife Refuge Alternative 1: Management of Habitat in Context of Providing Migratory Bird Benefits and Complemented with Priority Public Use (Preferred Alternative) The preferred alternative for Tamarac NWR over the next 15 years directs management of habitats to focus on maintaining and using ecological processes that shaped these communities prior to European settlement and will allow for some emphasis of priority bird habitat. Wildlife-dependant recreation opportunities, biological surveys and monitoring activities, and native E:\FR\FM\07JYN1.SGM 07JYN1 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 129 / Wednesday, July 7, 2010 / Notices habitats would all increase under the preferred alternative. Alternative 2: Pre-Settlement Ecological Processes Alternative 2: Pre-Settlement Ecological Processes Under Alternative 2, WMD actions will approximate ecological processes that promoted the native communities present prior to European settlement, emphasizing the use of natural hydrological and fire regimes. Vegetative communities and wildlife diversity will then be expected to resemble pre-settlement conditions. Actions on private lands, such as the use of prescribed fire and grazing, will be used if possible. The WMD will not grow as much as under Alternative 1 but landowner interaction will be similar. Refuge management actions will approximate ecological processes that promoted the native communities present prior to European settlement, emphasizing the use of natural hydrological and fire regimes. Environmental interpretation and education programs will emphasize the role of ecological processes in creating natural pre-European settlement habitats and cultural history. Alternative 3: Focused Management for Priority Migratory Birds The focus of this alternative will be management for U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Region 3) priority wetland and grassland birds. Environmental interpretation and education programs on and off the Refuge will focus on the importance of managing for Service priority wetland and forest birds and their habitats. Alternative 4: Current Management Direction of Conservation, Restoration, and Preservation (No Action) Current management is focused on providing a variety of upland and wetland habitats to benefit an array of migratory and resident species. Forest lands are harvested to maintain early and mid-successional stages. Wetlands are actively managed to benefit migratory birds, especially waterfowl. Visitor services include a variety of environmental education programs, an auto-tour route, annual open houses, foot trails, a visitor contact station, and observation platforms. Tamarac Wetland Management District cprice-sewell on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with NOTICES Alternative 1: Restoration and Management of Habitat by Facilitating Natural Ecological Processes but Also Providing for Migratory Bird Benefits (Preferred Alternative) This alternative will result in a more active and growing WMD. Wildlife resources of concern will be identified and targeted for protection and enhancement. Management of upland habitats will focus on maintaining and using ecological processes that shaped these communities prior to European settlement including fire and grazing. Growth of the WMD will include fee and easement acquisitions as funding is available. Priority will be given to core areas, corridors and critical sites. VerDate Mar<15>2010 15:28 Jul 06, 2010 Jkt 220001 Alternative 3: Current Management Direction (No Action) Current management is focused on providing habitats to benefit migratory birds, especially nesting waterfowl. Landowners are primarily responsible for maintaining habitat and controlling invasive plant species. No growth in easement land holdings has occurred since the mid-1990s. Emphasis will be on maintaining relationships with existing landowners and enforcement issues. New acquisitions and partnerships will continue on an opportunistic basis. Public Meeting We will give the public an opportunity to provide input at a public meeting. You can obtain the schedule from the address or web site listed in this notice (see ADDRESSES). You may also submit comments anytime during the comment period. Public Availability of Comments Before including your address, phone number, e-mail address, or other personal identifying information in your comment, you should be aware that your entire comment—including your personal identifying information—may be made publicly available at any time. While you can ask us in your comment to withhold your personal identifying information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be able to do so. Dated: June 18, 2010. Lynn M. Lewis, Acting Regional Director, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Fort Snelling, Minnesota. [FR Doc. 2010–16425 Filed 7–6–10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4310–55–P PO 00000 Frm 00065 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 39039 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR United States Geological Survey Notice of Availability of the Final Environmental Assessment for the Upper Midwest Environmental Sciences Center ARRA Funded Construction Projects AGENCY: United States Geological Survey, Interior. ACTION: Notice of Availability (NOA). SUMMARY: In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA), as amended, and the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976, as amended, the United States Geological Survey (USGS) has prepared a Final Environmental Assessment (EA) for the projects described in this NOA. By this notice, the USGS is announcing its availability. In addition, a Draft Environmental Assessment was published on December 23, 2009, for a 7-day public comment period and no comments were received. DATES: The USGS will not issue a final decision on the proposed projects, until after 30 days from the date this notice is published in the Federal Register. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Bill Hayman, Facility Mechanical Engineer at Upper Midwest Environmental Sciences Center, 2630 Fanta Reed Road, La Crosse, WI 54603; (608) 781–6253 (telephone); (608) 783– 6066 (fax); or bhayman@usgs.gov (e-mail). Copies of the Environmental Assessment for the proposed projects are available for public inspection during regular business hours at the USGS Upper Midwest Environmental Sciences Center (see address above). Before including your address and any other personal identifying information in your comment, please be aware that your entire comment, including your personal identifying information, may be made publicly available at any time. While you may ask us in your comment to withhold your personal identifying information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be able to do so. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background Information The objective of the Upper Midwest Environmental Sciences Center is to provide comprehensive research facilities to study the acute and chronic effects of chemicals on fish and nontarget life, physical, and biological controls, specific diseases, predation, and integrated controls. E:\FR\FM\07JYN1.SGM 07JYN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 129 (Wednesday, July 7, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 39038-39039]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-16425]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Fish and Wildlife Service

[FWS-R3-R-2010-N118; 30136-1265-0000-S3]


Tamarac National Wildlife Refuge and Wetland Management District, 
Minnesota

AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of Availability: draft comprehensive conservation plan 
and environmental assessment; request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), announce the 
availability of a draft comprehensive conservation plan (CCP) and draft 
environmental assessment (EA) for Tamarac National Wildlife Refuge 
(NWR) and Tamarac Wetland Management District (WMD) for public review 
and comment. In this draft CCP/EA we describe how we propose to manage 
the refuge and district for the next 15 years.

DATES: To ensure consideration, we must receive your written comments 
by August 6, 2010. An open house style meeting will be held during the 
comment period to receive comments and provide information on the draft 
plan. Special mailings, newspaper articles, internet postings, and 
other media announcements will inform people of the meetings and 
opportunities for written comments.

ADDRESSES: Comments or requests for more information can be sent by any 
of the following methods. You may also drop off comments in person at 
Tamarac NWR.
    1. Agency Web site: View or download a copy of the document and 
comment at https://www.fws.gov/midwest/planning/Tamarac/.
    2. E-mail: r3planning@fws.gov. Include ``Tamarac Draft CCP/EA'' in 
the subject line of the message.
    3. Fax: 218-847-2641.
    4. Mail: Attention: Refuge Manager, Tamarac National Wildlife 
Refuge, 35704 County Road 26, Rochert, Minnesota 56578.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Barbara Boyle, 218-847-2641.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Introduction

    With this notice, we continue the CCP process for Tamarac NWR and 
WMD, which we began by publishing a notice of intent on (72 FR 27587-
27588, May 16, 2007). For more about the initial process and the 
history of this refuge and district, see that notice.
    The 42,738-acre Tamarac National Wildlife Refuge was established in 
1938. The Refuge includes 2,180 Federally-designated wilderness acres. 
The Tamarac Wetland Management District consists of 8,577 acres of 
wetland easements distributed throughout five counties.

Background

The CCP Process

    The National Wildlife Refuge System Administration Act of 1966, as 
amended by the National Wildlife Refuge System Improvement Act of 1997 
(16 U.S.C. 668dd-668ee), requires us to develop a comprehensive 
conservation plan for each national wildlife refuge. The purpose in 
developing a CCP is to provide refuge managers with a 15-year strategy 
for achieving refuge purposes and contributing toward the mission of 
the National Wildlife Refuge System, consistent with sound principles 
of fish and wildlife management, conservation, legal mandates, and 
Service policies. In addition to outlining broad management direction 
on conserving wildlife and their habitats, plans identify wildlife-
dependent recreational opportunities available to the public, including 
opportunities for hunting, fishing, wildlife observation, wildlife 
photography, and environmental education and interpretation.

CCP Alternatives and Our Preferred Alternative

Priority Issues

    During the public scoping process, we, other stakeholders and 
partners, and the public identified several priority issues, which 
include habitat management, invasive species, and demand for additional 
recreation opportunities and visitor services. To address these issues, 
we developed and evaluated the following alternatives during the 
planning process.

Tamarac National Wildlife Refuge

Alternative 1: Management of Habitat in Context of Providing Migratory 
Bird Benefits and Complemented with Priority Public Use (Preferred 
Alternative)
    The preferred alternative for Tamarac NWR over the next 15 years 
directs management of habitats to focus on maintaining and using 
ecological processes that shaped these communities prior to European 
settlement and will allow for some emphasis of priority bird habitat. 
Wildlife-dependant recreation opportunities, biological surveys and 
monitoring activities, and native

[[Page 39039]]

habitats would all increase under the preferred alternative.
Alternative 2: Pre-Settlement Ecological Processes
    Refuge management actions will approximate ecological processes 
that promoted the native communities present prior to European 
settlement, emphasizing the use of natural hydrological and fire 
regimes. Environmental interpretation and education programs will 
emphasize the role of ecological processes in creating natural pre-
European settlement habitats and cultural history.
Alternative 3: Focused Management for Priority Migratory Birds
    The focus of this alternative will be management for U.S. Fish and 
Wildlife Service (Region 3) priority wetland and grassland birds. 
Environmental interpretation and education programs on and off the 
Refuge will focus on the importance of managing for Service priority 
wetland and forest birds and their habitats.
Alternative 4: Current Management Direction of Conservation, 
Restoration, and Preservation (No Action)
    Current management is focused on providing a variety of upland and 
wetland habitats to benefit an array of migratory and resident species. 
Forest lands are harvested to maintain early and mid-successional 
stages. Wetlands are actively managed to benefit migratory birds, 
especially waterfowl. Visitor services include a variety of 
environmental education programs, an auto-tour route, annual open 
houses, foot trails, a visitor contact station, and observation 
platforms.

Tamarac Wetland Management District

Alternative 1: Restoration and Management of Habitat by Facilitating 
Natural Ecological Processes but Also Providing for Migratory Bird 
Benefits (Preferred Alternative)
    This alternative will result in a more active and growing WMD. 
Wildlife resources of concern will be identified and targeted for 
protection and enhancement. Management of upland habitats will focus on 
maintaining and using ecological processes that shaped these 
communities prior to European settlement including fire and grazing. 
Growth of the WMD will include fee and easement acquisitions as funding 
is available. Priority will be given to core areas, corridors and 
critical sites.
Alternative 2: Pre-Settlement Ecological Processes
    Under Alternative 2, WMD actions will approximate ecological 
processes that promoted the native communities present prior to 
European settlement, emphasizing the use of natural hydrological and 
fire regimes. Vegetative communities and wildlife diversity will then 
be expected to resemble pre-settlement conditions. Actions on private 
lands, such as the use of prescribed fire and grazing, will be used if 
possible. The WMD will not grow as much as under Alternative 1 but 
landowner interaction will be similar.
Alternative 3: Current Management Direction (No Action)
    Current management is focused on providing habitats to benefit 
migratory birds, especially nesting waterfowl. Landowners are primarily 
responsible for maintaining habitat and controlling invasive plant 
species. No growth in easement land holdings has occurred since the 
mid-1990s. Emphasis will be on maintaining relationships with existing 
landowners and enforcement issues. New acquisitions and partnerships 
will continue on an opportunistic basis.

Public Meeting

    We will give the public an opportunity to provide input at a public 
meeting. You can obtain the schedule from the address or web site 
listed in this notice (see addresses). You may also submit comments 
anytime during the comment period.

Public Availability of Comments

    Before including your address, phone number, e-mail address, or 
other personal identifying information in your comment, you should be 
aware that your entire comment--including your personal identifying 
information--may be made publicly available at any time. While you can 
ask us in your comment to withhold your personal identifying 
information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be 
able to do so.

    Dated: June 18, 2010.
Lynn M. Lewis,
Acting Regional Director, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Fort 
Snelling, Minnesota.
[FR Doc. 2010-16425 Filed 7-6-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.